The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolution - City Council - 82-530 - 1982-11-16I • RESOLUTION NO. 82-530 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PRESNO APPLYING TO THE FRESNO LOCAL AGENCY FO.RMATION C01"1MISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE l?ROPOSED BELMONT-WINERY NO,. 4 DISTRICT REORGANTZATION, INCLUDING THE DETACHMENT OF CERTAIN TERRITORY CONSISTING OF 4.37 ACRES FROM THE MID VALLEY FIRE PROTECT- ION DISTRICT AND ~~HE KINGS RIVER CONSERVA- TION DISTRICT; AND ANNEXATION OF SAID TER- RITORY TO THE CITY OE 1 FRESNO. Ed Bielicki WHEREAS, this proposal is made pursuant to the District Reorganization Act of 1965 contained in Division 1 of Title 6 (commencing with Section 56000) of the California Govern- ment Code; and WHEREAS, the nature of the proposed change is a reorgan- ization consisting of the detachment of certain territory consisting of 4 .. 37 acres and hereinafter called the 0 subject territory" from the Mid Valley Fire Protection District and the Kings River Conservation District, and annexation of the same te:cri tory to the City of Fresno; and WHEREAS, no other counties, cities, or districts are affected; and WHEREAS$ the proposed reorganization is uninhabited, is described in Exhibit "A.11 and graphically depicted in Exhibit "B"; and WHEREAS., the Master Service Delivery Plan., adopted by the Council on November 13, 1979, prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 35102, provides information for the City of Fresno's plans and policies for the pro- vision of services in the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 80-172 1 the Council has approved the implementation of the Master Service Deli ver~r Plan; and WHEREAS, the Master Service Deli veiry Plan specifies City plans and policies for the provision of services to the sub- ject territory; and Page 1 of 3 • • WHEREAS, review and analysis of Environmental Assess- ment No., 3174, relating to the Master Service Delivery Plan has resulted in the filing of a Negative Declaration by the Director of the Development Departroenti and vIBEREAS, no new districts are proposed to be formed by this reorganization; and WHEREAS, the Ii'resr.io Coi.:mty Assessor• s roll will be used for the purpose of lev~·ing any assessments or taxes on the subject territory; and WHEREAS, the subject territory proposed to be annexed to the City of Fresno will be exempted from taxation for payment of principal or interest1 or any other amounts which shall become due on account of any outstanding bonded indebt- edness incurred by the City prior to the effective date of such annexation, and upon completion of this reorganization proposal, the subject territory will be included in Municipal Bond Area "D 0 and will not be ta:xed for any existing bonded indebtedness or contractual obligations; and WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposal are stated as follows: 1.. Annexation of the subject territory to the City of Fresno will result in improved land use planningo All private development con- trols of the City will apply, following re- organization. 28 The subject territory is within the City of Fresno's Sphere of Influence. 3 .. A property owner within the project area has requested annexation to the City. Eight of the remaining ten parcels are subject to a con- tract wherein property owners have agreed to con- sent to annexation to the City of Fresno in exchange for the City's agreement to extend municipcil water services to the properties. 4.. It is advantageous for the subject territory to be a part of the City. Page 2 of 3 • • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Fresno hereby requests that proceedings be taken by the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission for the herein proposed Belmont-Winery No. 4 District Rieorganization, including the detachment of the subject territory, consist- ing of 4.37 acres from the Mid Valley Fire Protection District and the Kings River Conservation District, and annexation of the same territory to the City of Fresno; and BE rr FURTHER RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Fresno finds Envix·onmental Assessment No. 3174 is the con- trolling environmental docun1ent for this annexation pro- posal, such environmental assessment has been ,~ompleted in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the State Guidelines, and the Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in such environ- mental assessment pr!or to the approval of. the initiation of this annexation proposal and finds there is no poss- ibility such proposal may.have a significant effect on the environment. CLERK'S CERTIFICATION STATE OF C.ALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF FRESNO ) ss. CITY OF FRESNO ) I, certify Council meeting JACQUELINE L. RYLE, City c:Lerk of the City of Fresno, that the fo:tf;going resolution was adopted by the of the City of Fresno, California, at a regular held on the 16th .......... day of November, 1982 JACQUELINE L. RYLE City Clerk Page 3 of 3 IPIIOY•Mto,_.. ◄Jlff 1,,-.,.,o,n. -' I I • • BELMONT-WINERY NO. 4 DISTRICT REORGANIZATION Area to be Detached from the Mid Valley Fire Protection District, the Kings River Conservation District., and Annexation to the City of Fresno. Consisting of Lots 6, 7, 8 and portions of Lots 9 and 10 of Block 2, of Belmont Gardens, lying in Section 31, 13/21, M .. D.B.&M .. BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of the No·tthwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 14 South, Ra'.nge 21 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, as said Section is shown on the United States Government Township Plats, being also, a point on the existing City Limits of the City of F1:esno; thence Westerly, along the North line of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 6, being also the South line of the Southwest Quarter of Section 31, Township 13 South, Range ·21 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, as said Sec.tion is shown on the United States Government Township Plats, being also, along the existing City Limits of said City, to the intersection with a line which is parallel with and 30.00 feet East of the East Line of Lot 6, in Block 1 of Belmont Gardens:, as said lot is shown on the Map thereof, filed in •'the Office of the County Recorder June 4, 1936, and recorded in )3ook 11 of Plats at page 39,, Fresno County Records; thence Northerly,, along a line which is par- allel with and 30.00 feet East of the East line of said Lot 6,f in Block 1, b:=:ing also along the existing City Limits of said City, to the intersection with a line which is parallel with and 140. 00 feet South of the North li1).e of L()t 10, in Block 2, of said Belmont Gardens; thence Easterly, along a line which is parallel with and 140.00 feet South of the North line of said Lot 10, in Block 2, to the inter- section with the West line of the East Half of Lot 9, in Block 2, of said Belmont Gardens; thence Northerly, along the West line of the East Half of said Lot 9, in Block 2, to the intersection with the North 1:tne of said Lot 9, in Block 2; thence Easterly, along the North lines of Lots 9, 8, 7 and 6, in Block 2 of said Belmont Gardens, and along the Easterly production of the North line of said Lot 6, in Block 2, to the intersection with a lin1~ which is parallel with and 30 .. 00 feet East of the East line of said Lot 6, in Block 2; thence Southerly, along a line which is parallel with and 30.00 feet East of the East line of said Lot 6, in Block 2, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. File No. 2227 Drawing No. 6-A-125? Contains 4.37 Acres 10/7/82 MB/pt . . ~ . ' • ,,._..ol,--..--,,.,. ............ ;..,.,.c,a .... j,A•►•~~ ... .,._.,,,. ;1-·">'""''·t•'-i<t"•'" ·•·'sit·:•., •.. .,.,~.,.,<..·,,;.·'" • ,-.,,~--~-:; .... ~~~·,;;,,-,;, .;~ ....... ••·--,:··- -· .. • I _J ) ? I ;1/) ~L.l~U! ~. L-\ tu€. J j , _ £. WHJ Tc : ___ t,.o, t.,o, e, : ~ r ······· ···················t······················~···········~···· :~ : ct-:::::'.: I:::::::::::::::::: :I::'.:;'.:'.::::::::::. t: J:~.::::::::::. 1:::: 7 1• ........ -- 0 0 d t ......... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ;:::,.,/ 6 N.. I.. I Jf: , NW~ 1 t-.1 ~ ;,E:C.. h, 14 /Al -- Pf, OF hl ~ co~ . ¼f-, f?. t...aJ £, 7W v"'l 17E;C. ~t , J'7/..Zt \JJ ¼\, ~£C. b 1 14/Z I EXl?TIAJG-CITY /lREfJ AREA To 'P£ JJ£T/J,CI-IEV Ff?DM TH£ Mil? VltllE.f.f Fl~£ PffOTECTIOAl Pl~TRICT, TH£ l<!Ait:,5' /?ll/£1f COA/7£~VrlT/O/J Pl5Tl?!CT, 11/t/P flA/AlEXEP 7o TH£. CITY OF FKE5AID. 'B~LN\O T -Wlt-JE.R<r "10. ~ 1)/5TRICT REORG-Al\ll~fiTI M CD 51:,TI Gr DF 1.-0T~ b, 7, B A~D -PORT OF LOT:, C) f 10, IN t3L.OCK ~, OF 13EL MC>t\lT (;rARPE-tJ?, L <-r thlC; t hl 6ecT. -::> l I t"3 /ti, , M .-o. B 4 N\. ALLOCATED TO COUNCIL DISTRICT NO . ----AS PER COUNCIL DIS RIC T P D TED l · 82 FILE No. ANNEX No. ACRES= COUNCIL DISTRICT No. EXHIBIT "B" ' ......... i t, N'AW M I . I IAMUICAHIN! 3 .. .. - I "' "' .. PROPCSED BEIJQl['-WI!,ERY -.. .. (AH;>raximate Scale ) ~ I C), □-0• -□-------· ---........ , ... ..... _ □----.......... . -,. __ ... --- •·e 1-r-• ;~~ I J_ I C ....... -~~ ,. ·-· <>-... ....., .............. ........... ,_ ·--,., ........ ,. -...n.-... . ·-.............. -----------~--)o c -- Roa e It Camm,,nlty Plan •