The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolution - City Council - 82-529 - 1982-11-16• Ed Bielicki RESOLUTION NO .. 82-529 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRESNO APPLYING '110 THE FRESNO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE '.PROPOSED ILLINOIS-DE WITT NO.. 4 DISTRICT REORGANIZATION, INCLUDING THE DETACHMENT OF CERTAIN TERRIJI'ORY CONSISTING O:F1 6 "'4 7 ACRES FROM THE MID VALLEY FIRE PROTECT- ION DISTRICT AND THE KINGS RIVER CONSERVA- TION DISTRICT, AND ANNEXATION OF SAID TER- RITORY TO THE CITY OF FRESNO. WHEREAS, this proposal is made pursuant to the District Reorganization. Act of 1965 contained in Division 1 of Title 6 (commencing with Section 56000} of the California Govern- ment Code; and WHEREAS, the nature of the proposed change is a reorgan- ization consisting of the detachment of certain territory consisting of 6.47 acres and hereinafter called the nsubject terri toryt• from the Mid Valley Fire ProtectiOrll District and the Kings River Conse1::-vation District, and annexation of the same territory to the City of Fresno; and WHEREAS, no otheJ:-counties, cities I or districts are affected; and WHEREAS, the proposed reorganization is uninhabited, is described in E.xhibit nA" and graphically depicted in Exhibit nBni and WHEREAS, the Master Service Delivery Plan, adopted by the Council on November 13, 1979, prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 35102, prcvides information for the City of Fresno's plans and policies for the pro- vision of services in. the metropolitan area; and WHEREASr pursuant to Resolution No. 80-172, the Council has approved the implementation of the Master Service Delivery Plan; and WHEREAS, the Mast:.er Service Deli very Plan specifies City plans and policies for the provision of services to the sub- ject territory;, and Page 1 of 3 • • WHEREAS I review and analysis of Environmental Assess·- ment No .. 3174" relating to the Master Service Delivery Plan has resulted in the filing of a Negative Declaration by the Director of the Development Department; and WHEREAS, no new districts are proposed to be formed by this reorganization; and WHEl'.RE.1\S, the Fresno County Assessor• s roll will be u~ed for the purpose of levying any assessments or taxes on the subject territory; and WHEREAS, the subject territory proposed to be annexed to the City of Fresno will be exempted from taxation for payment of principal or interest, or any other amounts which shall become due on account of any outstanding bonded indebt- edness incurred by the City prior to the effective date of such annexation, and upon completion of this reorganization proposal, the subject territory will be included in Municipal Bond Area "D 0 and will not be taxed for any existing bonded indebtedness or contractual obligcLtions; and WHEREAS, the reasons for this propos.al are stated as follows: 1.. Annexation of the subject territory to the City of Fresno will result in improved land. use planning. All private development con- trols of the City will apply, following :re- organization. 2. The subject territory is within the City of Fresnois Sphere of Influence. 3. The owner of sixteen of the twenty parc1;;ls within the project area has requested a~:1nex- ation to the City. 4. It is advantageous for the subject terr:i/tory to be a part of the City. Page 2 of 3 • • NOW,r THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Fresno hereby requests that proceedings be taken by the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission for the herein proposed Illinois-De Witt No. 4 District Reorganization, including the detachment of the subjecrt territory, consist- ing of 6 .. 47 acres from the Mid Valley Fire Protection District and the Kings River Conservation District, and annexation of the same territory to the City of B'resnor and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Fresno finds Environmental Assessment No.. 317 iJ is the con- trolling environmental document for this annexation pro- posal, such environmental assessment has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the State Guidelines, and the Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in such environ- mental assessment prior to the approval of the initiation of this annexation proposal and finds there is no poss- ibility such proposal may have a significant effect on the environment. CLERK'S CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF FRESNO ) ss .. CITY OF FRE!SNO ) I, certify Council meeting JACQUELINE L. RYLE, City Clerk of the City of Fresno., that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the of the City of Fresno, California 1 at a regular held on the 16th day of November 1982 -' JACQUELINE L. RYLE City Clerk ......... d---•--•-.,=-•~ -•-•••~~••·• "(1 .. !/ C i ,9 1 f«p,q_~-U4-ft? {~~.,l:--t; 0 I D~t°'7 I -r-~--, ' ; ,' I .• .~·,/ ,-.,,. .. ✓ ·'ORNEY'S OFFICE Page 3 of 3 \, • oy<J?~::.::: Deputy • ILLINOIS-DE WITT NO. 4 DISTRICT REORGANIZATION • Area to be Detached from th~ Mid Valley Fire Protection. District.4' the Kings River Conservation District¥ and Annexed to the City of Fresno. Consisting of Rancho Dorado No. 4; Parcel Map No .. 3494; and a portion of Lot 30 of Easterby Rancho; lying in Section 5, 14/21,· M.D.B.&M. BEGINNING at the intersection of a line which is parallel with and 183.00 feet West of the East line of Lot 30 of Easterby Rancho, as said lot is shown on the Map thereof, filed in the Office of the County Recorder June 24, 1880 and reC()rded in Vol1;:une 2 of Plats at page 6, Fresno County Records, with the North line of Parcel Map No .. 5120, as shown on the Map thereof, filed in the Off:ice of the Coun.ty Recorder, December. 1980, and record,.=d in Book 35 of Parcel Maps at page 84, Fresno County Records, being also, a point on the existing City Limits of the City of Fresno; thence Easterly, along the North line of said Parcel Map No. 5120, being also, along the North line of the South Half of said Lot 30, being also, along the existing City Limits of said City, to the Northeast corner of the South Half of said Lot 30; thence Northerly, along the East line of said Lot 30, being also, along the existing City Limits of said City, to the Northeast corner of said Lot 30; thence Westerly, along the North line of said Lot 30, being also, along the North line of Rancho Dorado No~ 4, as shown on the Map thereof, filed in the Office of the County Recorder December 15, 1978 and recorded in Volume 33 of Plats at page 18, Fresno County Reco.rds, to the Northwest corner of said Rancho Dorado No. 4; thence Southerly, along the West line of said Rancho Dorado No .. 4, to the Southwest corner of said Rancho Dorado No~ 4; thence Easterly, along the South line of said Rancho Dorado No. 4,, to a point which is 183.00 feet West of the East line of said Lot 30; thence Southerly, along a line which is parallel with and 183.00 feet West of the East line of said Lot 30, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. File No. 2230 Drawing No. 6-A-1260 Contains 6.47 Acres 10/21/82 TWB/pt I ; ..... • A/W C'7R. ~A/YC/,/0 .-Z)o,e,4.c,e:, /Y..9.,;1 #E C t7~ L o r 3 '/Y L/.;ve Lo£.~ A/ ~/#e ~;4...v~...vo .LJa~ A,,,t:::t? """-,:Z ~ ~ 7 R ~~~3 t-7'! ~i i !'"'7:-~ i~i ---I ~-,.s-;.L': M CK £".IV .z / £ : : : : :/.~ D . . -- ~l -rJ~· /s-/' ~A . I 1, /~ 9 I p. r~9 .................. J· J .. _.;;-I .... /..T:,. .. . ........ ' ....................... ··········---· ..... ········· ................................................. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ♦• • • • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . --............... . C I J ~ r /V .ttf /N4' OP .,R,4/. # .$7 ,Zt, -- 0 I .50 ..4Re~ ro.se...DerACN£-D r~O,,,.,,, ?"H~ ~/.P-~.L~PY ~.4 PRO recr/C/Y ,,Z:>/.s r/w?/C 0 rH4" /r/A/q.S ,...P/¥4~ CO# ..s~,,,,,,,.,, T/~/Y Z) / .s TR/ c r; A#P ...4'##$.X-e.o ro r/7'4"' C/ ry or r-.,..p4s.....v4?'. _4 .P.0$,P _,47' -0.,0A;J 4"..S-.J'" S Y..S" T.4' ,4-? FILE No . 22_:.r;a hL1No1s --7.Jc f'l'lrr ./f/5! 4 ..D/STR/CT ~eORGA/'V/.ZAr./O.N ~A/CHt:J 2:JoA;>A,00 #~-¢. _,; ~~c,e~A?,,,-,.,,D #IZ 3~.9~ ,' .,,,,,.,,y~ A P0,12 r. O,c' L 4 r 3 0 Or CAS ""7!rAB.J-./294.,yc....vo 'Ly/#'tr ,,,,,,,.,, -52:-c r. -6; .,..,~~ ~"'7. 9. Ii-,,#: ANNEX No . ACRES= 6.42: COU NCIL DISTRI CT No . ~---"-- AL L OCATED TO COUNC IL DISTRICT NO . .£: AS PER CO UNCIL o · BY : J JY--e - DIST RI CT MAP DATED 1 -2 2 -8 .:! 0 T E :Oe;r./:J'S2, 6-A-'2,-a SC A L E :/ ''=LP~ L~ 0 EXHlBIT "B 11 i I £ COITAA IN£ I !I!!!! !!!I!! i . ---I I AM(fllCAH /IN[ •. ~.f!S. ...... I I ; i ... .. • I ~ i ... P POSED ILLI OIS DISTRICT l I .. .. .r.:: =..i. ... (,::;:, ' ,I. ~ ' • DE WITT o. 4 REORGANIZATION (Approximate Scale) ·---- .... ,,.,. .~ .. ~ i I I .. ... _.,. .. .. -..J · •A~ CMftONIIIP- l!!!J • ...... □-□-•□-----· •.. , .......... ·-. -.. -- -1: . ... --... ... ........... , ............. ·--..... -""~----, .......... <>-... .....,,.tMff ..... ·--. -----ff#,......,.,_... " ........... . -----------......... ..,... __ >oc-- Roa evelt Canimuni y 1, II