The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolution - City Council - 82-490 - 1982-10-26Ji J • • RESOLUTION NO. 82-490 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRESNO APPLYING TO THE FRESNO LOCAL AGJ~NCY FORMATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSED. TOWER ... ·BACKER NO. 4 DISTRICT REORGANIZATION, INCLUDING THE DETACHMENT OF CERTAIN TERRITORY CONSISTING OF 8 .. 90 ACRES FROM THE MID V1\LLEY FIRE PROTECT- ION DISTRICT AND THE KINGS RIVER CONSERVA- TION DISTRICT, AND ANNEXATION OF SAID TER- RITORY TO THE CIT'Y OF FRESNO. WHEREAS, this proposal is made pursuant to the District Reorganization Act of 1965 contained in Division 1 of Title 6 (commencing with Se~ction 56000) of the California Govern- ment Code; and Ed Bielicki WHEREAS, the nature of the proposed change is a reorgan- ization consisting of the detachment of certain territory consisting of B.90 acres and hereinafter called the nsubject territoryn from the Mid Valley Fire Protection District and the Kings River Conservation District, and annexation of the same te:r:ri tory to the City of Fresno 1: and WHEREAS, no other counties, cities, or districts are affected; and WHEREAS, the proposed reorganization is uninhabited, is described in Exhibit 11 A" and graphically depicted in Exhibit "B"; and WHEREAS, the Master SeJCvice Delivery Plan, adopted by the Council on November 13, 1979, prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 35102, provides information for the City of Fresno's plans and policies for the pro- vision of services in the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 80-172, the Council has approved the implementation of the Master Service Delivery Plan; and WHEREAS, the Master Service Delivery Plan specifies City plans and policies for the provision of services to the 0 ub- j ect te:rri tory; and :Page 1 of 3 , I ' • • WHERE.A.S, review and analysis of Environmenta.l Asse~3s- ment No. 31741 relating to the Master ServicE~ Delivery Plan has resulted in the filing of a Negative Declaration by the Director of the Dev:elopment Department; and WHEREAS, no new districts are proposed to be formed by this reorganization; and WHEREAS, the Fresno County Assessor's roll will be used for the purpose of levying any assessments or taxes on the subject territory; and WHEREAS, the subject territory proposed to be annexed to the City of Fresno will be exempted from taxation for payment of principal or int(3rest, or any other amounts which shall become due on account of any outstanding bonded indebt,.., edness incurred by the City prior to the effective date of such annexation, and upon completion of thi~; reorganization proposal, the subject terri t:o:ry will. be included in Municipal Bond Area 11 D0 and will not be taxed for a:ny existing bonded indebtedness or contractual obligations; and WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposal are stated as follows: 1. Annexation of the subject territory to the City of Fresno will result in improved land use planning. All private development con- tr()ls of the City will apply, following re- organization. 2. The subject territory is within the City of Fresno's Sphere of Influence .. 3. This annexation is beincr initiated as a result of a condition imposed by LAFCO, that an unincorporated corridor County island be annexed to the City of Fresno. 4. It is advantageous for the subject territory to be a part of the City~ Page 2 of 3 • • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Co1.1ncil of the City of Fresno hereby requests that proceedings be taken by the Fresnc> Local Agency Formation Commission for the herei11 proposed 'I'ower-Backer No. 4 District Reorganization, including the detachment of the subject territory, consist- ing of 8 . 9 O acres from the Mid Valley E1ire Protection District and the Kings River Conservation District, and annexation of the same territory to the City of Fresno; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Fresno finds Environmental Assessment No,. 3174 is the con- trolling environmental document for this annexation pro- posal, such environmental assessment has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the State Guidelines, and the Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in such e11viron-- men tal assessment prior to the approval oft.he initiation of this annexation proposal and finds there is no poss•- ibility such proposal may have a significant effect on the environment. CLERK 1 S CERTIFICATION STATE OF Cl\,LIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF FRESNO ) ss .. CITY OF FRESNO ) I, J'ACQUELINE L. RYLE, City Clerk of the City of Fresno, certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Council of the City of Fresno, California, at a regular meeting held on the 26th day of 0ctober~982 • JACQUELINE L. RYLE City Clerk -~-------" ' =' ' ( . . ·.J ·"J ., ·' ~.· · .. , . . . , ' ~ . ,· . ~ I ~ ,'. ,. Page 3 of 3 \\ APPIOVID Al ,on.• 01ff Aff0Mrlr1 SOPTICI: .. • TOWER-BACKER NO. 4 DISTRICT REORGANIZATION • Area to be Detached from the Mid Valley Fire Protection District, the Kings Ri.ver Conservation District and Annexed to tha City of Fresno. Consisting of Lots 1 to 12, Inclusive, portion of Lot 22, Lots 23 to 46, Inclu- sive, all of Anooshvan Park, lying in Section 13, 14/20, M.D.B .. &M. BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarte:r of Secti(.m 13, Township 14 South, Range 20 East, Mount Diablci Base and Meridian a:s said Section is .shown on the United States Government Townsh:tp Plats, being also,, a point on the existing City Limits of the City of Fresno; thence Southerly, alobg the West line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 13, btdng also, along the existing City Limits of said City, to the intersection with the Westerly produc- tion of the South line of Lot 12 of Anooshvan Park, as said lot is shown on the Map thereof, filed in the Office of the County Recorder August 21, 1953 and re"";' corded in Volume 16 of Plats at page 55, Fresno County Records, thence Easterly,·· along the Westerly production of the South line of said Lot 12, a11d along, the South line of said Lot 12, and along the Easterly production of the South line 0£ said Lot 12~ being also, along the existing City Limits of sa.id City, to the in-. tersection with a line which is parallel with and 30 ... 00 feet Northeast of the Northeast lines of Lots 21 to 18, Inclusive, ot said Anooshvan Pc!rk; thence Southeasterly, along a line which is parallel v.tith and 30.00 feet Northeast: of the Northeast lines of said Lots 21 to 18, Inclusive, being also,,along the exist-- ing City Limits of said City, to the intersection with a line whieh is parallel - with and 30.00 feet North of the North lines of Lots 17 and 16, of Anooshvan, Park; thence Easterly, along a line which is parallel with and 30 • .00 feet North 1;,f the North lines of said Lots 17 and 16, being also> along the existing City Limits of said City, to the intersecti_on with the Southerly production of the East line of Lot 46 of said Anooshvan Park; thence Northerly, along the Southerly productipn of the East line of said Lot 46, a distance of 130 .. 00 f6}et, being also, along tl\J;! existing City Limits of said City, to the Northeast corner of said Lot 46; then,:/~-· Westerly, along the North line o:E said Lot 46:i a distance of 70.00 feet, being · also, along the existing City Limits of said City, to the Northwest corner of said Lot 46; thence Northwesterly, along the Northeasterly lines of Lots 45 ai.1,d. • 44 of said Ano,;)shvan Park, a distance of 92. 99 feet, being also along the e:i,tist·'"" ing City Limits of said City, to the intersection with the East lines of Lots 44 to 34, Inclusive, of said Anooshvan Park; thence Northet:ly, along the East liues1 of said Lots 44 to 34, Inclusive and along the Northerly production of the East line of said Lot 34, a distance of 825.28 feet, being al.so, along the e:xisting City Limits of said C:lty; to the intersection with the South: line of the Nord1- west Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 13; thence Westerly, along; the South line of the Northwest Q.uarter of the Northeast Quarter of; said Sectio.r:J: 13, being also, along the existing City Limits of said City, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. File No. 2224 Drawing No. 6-A-1254 Contains 8.90 Acres GBM/pt 9/29/82 Exhibit nAn: • AVE. E. PITT AVE.,. us ..._ _____ , '-----~;;...._---,, E. ~vMAtJ AVE. INES t.t:m:> 40-fr, 44, INa~/lf ~ -----------1 e . 0/()f<CH AV£. Exhib. "B 11 ............. AR&A -rt> ee, oerACJ-1e0 Ff?o!A -TJ.le Mio VAl/..cY n~e PR(JTt;C77o,./ 0!57l?ICT, T/./E 1(111/~ ~'IEK C()/Jst:RV)fT!a~ Ol5TRlaT MIO AJJAle/EO 7l> 71/E OTY OF fl(Ez/Jo . 7?':>We?. -51..Ckef< NO . 4 O/'oTRK:r I?~ /?.Al/(:),J (1)~t-517o OF c.trrs I -ro /2. ,:1}JCJ..,()stVf:.., ~ OF l6T .22., ltff'3J ~IC> 4<, ;I/K,L,V51VE I OF NKXJ~t/AAI FMK., lYING "f£CT: l?J, ~. T COUNCIJ_ 0 STRICT 0 . -~ AS PER COUNCIL DISTR IC T MAP DATED i -2 2 Bl! FILE No. ANNEX No. ACRES= COUNCIL DIST lCT No . -=G'---_ • Proposed Tower Backer No.4 istrict Reor anization Approximate Sc le E NORlH It/II£ l IIIUl(:4t ., [ IITIIM. i . _ ....... I I [. AM[AICAH #If ----•-•V •1:--• i I i i .. ... .. .. ·--- -· ·~-· _., ..... r I • i I • I .. □-1!!!1•------ □---~ ..... □-----· □------..... D □----•·---- □--,~---. -"-- - ~ ~ = ~ ·-· ,.... ... ·-•• !' -~•! •'!!_ I a., • ...,....._ . ---, ....... ~ . --• .. --,. , ...... <>-... ................ ,. ..... . ........... .,, .. ·--... .,.._... .............. ,.-... . .._.. ·-----..... -------....,. __ loc-- Roosevelt Con1n1u11/ty Plan . . •