The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolution - City Council - 82-484 - 1982-10-12• • RESOLUTION NO. 82-484 RESOLUTION OF 1THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRESNO APPLYING TO THE FRESNO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION IN Tl-IE MATTER 01'' THE PROPOSED BELMONT..-.MANILA NO. 2 DISTRICT REORGANIZATION., INCLUDING THE DETACHMENT OF CERTA..IN TERRITORY CONSISTING OF 60+ . . - ACRES FROM THE MID VALLEY FIRE PROTECT- ION DISTRICT AND THE KINGS RIVER CONSERVA- TION DISTRICT, Al\J'D ANNEXATION OF SAID TER- RITORY TO THE CITY OF FRESNO. WHEREAS, this proposal is made pursuant to the District Reorganization. Act of 1965 contained in Division l of Title 6 {commencing with Section 56000} of the California Govern- ment Code; and Ed Bielicki WHEREAS, the nature of the proposed change is a reo:rgan·- ization cotu;isting of the detachment of certain territory consisting of 60± acres and hereinafter called the 0 subject terri toryn fr·om the Mid Valley Fire Protection District and the Kings River Conservation District., and annexation o:E the same territory to the City of Fresno; and WHEREAS, no other counties, cities, or districts are affected; and WHEREAS, the proposed reorganization is uninhabited, is described in Exhibit nA" and graphically depicted in Exhibit "B"; and WHEREAS, the Master Service Delivery Plan, adopted by the Council on November 13, 1979, prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 35102, pr·ovides information for the City of Fresno's plans and policies for the pro- vision of services in the metropolitan area.; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No-80 ... ·1'72, the Council has approved the implementation of the Master Service Delivery Plan; and WHERJ:~AS, the Master Service Delivery Plan specifies City plans and policies for the provision of services to the sub- ject territory; and Page 1 of 3 • WHEREAS, review and analysis of Environmental Assess- ment No. 3174, relating to the Master Service Delivery J?lan has resulted in the filing of a Negative Declaration by the Director of the Development Detpartment; and WHEREAS, no new districts atre p,roposed to be formed by this reorganization; and WHEREAS, the Fresno County Assessor•s roll will be used for the purpose of levying any assessments or taxes on the subject territory; and WHEREAS, the subject territory proposed to be annexed to the City of Fresno will be exempted from taxation for payment of principal or interest, or any other amounts which shall become due on account of any outs.tanding bonded indebt- edness incurred by the City prior to the E~ffective date of such annexation, and upon completion of this reorganization proposal, the subject territory will be included in Municipal Bond i .. rea "D 0 and will not be taxed for any existing bonded indebtedness or contract1.1al obligations; and WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposal are stated as follows: l. Annexation of the subject territory to the City of Fresno will result in improved land use planning .. All private development con- trols of the City will apply, following re- organization. 2. The subject territory is within the City of Fresno's Sphere of Influence .. 3. The City of Fresno has initiated this proposal to comply with a LAFCO condition of approvcil applied to the proposed Tulare-Sunnyside No. 2 District Reorganization wherein recordation of said Tulare-Sunnyside No. 2 District Reorgani- zation would be held in abeyance pending receipt of a City of Fresno application for annexation of the subject territory. It is advantageous for the subject territory to be a part of the City. Page 2 of 3 1. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Fresno hereby requests that proceedings be taken by the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission for the herein proposed Belmont-Manila No. 2 District Reorganization, including the detachment of the subject terrii::ory, consist- ing of 60± acres from the Mid Valley Fire Protection District and the Kings River Conservation District, and annexation of tAe same territory to the City of Fresno; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Fresno finds Environmental Assessment No. 3174 is the con- trolling environmental document for this annexation pro- posal, such environmental assessment has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the State Guidelines, and the Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in such environ-~ mental assessment prior to the approval of the initiation of this annexation proposal and finds there is no poss- ibility such proposal may have a significant effect on the environment. CLERKrs CERTIFICATION S~ATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF FRESNO } ss. CITY OF FRESNO ) l, JACQUELINE L. RYLE, City Clerk Of the City of Fresno, certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Council of the City of Fresno, California, at a regular meeting held on the 12th day of October, l 982 • JACQUELINE L .. RYLE City Clerk l?age 3 of 3 • • BELMONT-MANILA NO"' 2. DISTRICT REORGANIZATION Area to be Detached from the Mid-Valley ]lire Protection District, the ~ngs River Conservation District, and Annexed to the City of Fresno. Consisting .of the following - All of Fancher Creek Ranchos No.,, 1; Lots 74 to 85 Inclusive, of Fane.her Creek Ranchos No. 2, together with outlot nun of Fancher Creek Ranchos No .. 2; portion of Section 4, 14/21, M.D.B.&M. BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of Lot 74 of Fancher Creek Ranchos No. 2:, as· said lot is shown on the Map thereof, filed in the Office of the County Recorder July 16, 1957 and recorded in Volume 19 of Plats at page 25, Fresno County Records,, being also, a point on the existing City Limits o:f the City of Frt~sna; thence Easterly, along the North line of said Lot 74~ and along the Easterly production of the North line of said Lot 74, and along the North lines of Lots 68 to 63, Inclusive, of Fancher Creek Ranchos No. 1, as said lots are shown on the. Map · thereof, filed in the Office of the County Recorder July 10, 1957 and recorded in Volume 19 of Flats at pages 23 and 24,. Fresno County Records, being also~ along a line which is parallel with and 90. 00 feet South of the Nc<tth line of Section 4, 1.rownship 14 South, Range 21 East:, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, as said Section is shown on the United States Government Tovmship Plats" being also a.long the existing Clty Limits of the City of Fresno, to the intersection with the East line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 4; thence South 00°02 1 41° West, being also,' along the existing City Li.nu.ts of said City, a distance of 262 ... 85 feet; thence Souther~ty, along a tangent curve, concave to the West, and ha:ving a radius of 716.20 feet, through an interior angle of 02°45toO'n, being also, along the existing City Limits of said City, an arc distance of 34 .. 38 feet; thence South 02°47r41n West, along a tangent to the previously de.scribed curve.; being also, along the existing City Limits of said City, a distance of 424.99 · feet; thence· Southerly, along a tangent curve, concave to the East, and having a radius of 1432.-40 feet, through an interior angle of 08°40'00'*, being ,also,. along the existing City Limits of said City, an arc distance of 216. 67 f,eet; thence South 05°52 1 19" East, along a tangent to the previo'l,l.sly described curve, being also, along the existing City Limits of said City, a distance of 458.40 feet; thence Southerly, along a tangent curve, concave to the West, and having a radius of 1462.40 feet, through an interior angle of ll0 50 1 0on> being also" along the existing City Limits of said City:. an arc distance of 302 .. 03 fa~et; thenc•e South 05°57t 41n West, along a tangent to the previously described curve, being also:i along the existing City Limits of said City:. a distance of 238.13 feet; thence Southerly, along a tangent curve, concave to the Eastl, and having a radi.us of 1402.40 feet, through an interior angle of 05°55'00u:, being also, along the existing City Limits of said City, an arc distance of 144:.sz feet; thence South 00°02'41" West, along a tangent to the previously described curve1 being also, along the ex:i.!sting City Limits -01£ said City, a dist~nce of 442 .. 67 feet, to its intersection with the center line of Fancher Greek; thence South-· · westerly :1, Westerly, Northwesterly, Northerly, Northwesterly, Westerly, South- westerly, and Southerly, along the various courses of the center line of said Fancher Creek, be.:i.ng also, along the existing City Limits of sa.id City, to the intet·s~ction with a line which is parallel with and 174. 20 feet South of :the East-West center line of said Section 4; thence Westerly,. along a line wh:i.ch iss, parallel with .and 174.20 feet South of the East~West center line of said Section 4,, being also, along the eidsting City Limits of said City, a distance of 325. 00 feet; thence North, along the West line of the Southeast Quartet' of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 4, beJLng also,. along the existing City Limits of said City, a distance of 629.91 feet; thence South 57°45toon East,. being also, along the existing City Limits ,of said City, a distance of 100.00 feet; thence l-Torth 57°45'00n East, being also, along the existing City Limits of said City; a dis- tance of 30.4'6 feet; thence South 57"45'00'' East, being also, along the ezisting City Limits of said City, a distance of 25.00 feet; thence Northeasterly$ and Northerly, along a line which is parallel with and 30 .. 00 feet Westerly from the most Westerly lines of Lots 28., 27, 26, 25 and 24, of said Fancher Creek Ranchos No. 1, and along a line which is 30-00 feet Westerly of the Northerly portion of the most Westerly line of said Lot 24, being also, along the existing City Limits of said City, to the intersection with the Southeas'terly production of the South- erly line of Lot 85 of said Fancher Creek Ranchos No .. 2; tpence North 72°32'001r West, along the Southeasterly production of the Southerly line of said Lot 8.5, and along the Southerly lines of Lots 85, 84 and 83, of said Fancher Cx;eek Ranchos No. Z, being also, along the Southerly line of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company's easement, being also, along the existing City Limits of said City)' to l of 2 EJ{HIBIT "A 0 ., !J~'st ~- • • the Southwesterly corneJ: of said Lot 83; thence North 17°35 *50° East, accordi11g to a deed of record, filed in Book 6209 at page 450 of Official Records of Fr,~sno County, being also, North 17°29 1 34" East:., along the Westerly lines of Lots 83 and 82 of sa:i.d Fancher Creek Ranchos No. 2., being also, along the ex:i.sting City Limits of said City., a distance~ of 315.50 feet~ to the m:rrthwest corner of,, said Lot 82; thence North 00 9 15'25" East, according to said deed of record, b€dng also, North 00°19'30" East., along the West boundary line of said Fancher Creek Ranchos No~ 2., being also., along the existing City Li1nits of said City, a distance of 690.00 feet:, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. File No. 2220 Drawing No. 6-A-1250 Contains 60± Acres 7 /27/82 TWB/pt 2 of 2 s· .r;, !!.,.s-tae>,, a.s:-~, S S? ~ -N"'~tflt1. ~ /41, Ott>' . . . · .. . · ... • •: ••••• • •• • •• • •• 6), ••• . ·. ·:-:: •~':., .............. ·. \j }• 0 '\: ·:-:.:·:-:·:-:·:':-➔-Nl.1 -.◄ ..... --=~1111 -\• ~ ..... ) I. .-~ >' •• . . . V' -:•:• v ·.·9. ~ -~ . . ·-:-..... .... . . . . . . . . . -:-:-:-:-:-...... . . . . . . . . . . . •••• 0 •••••• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ::::::::· . ::••··· . . . . ... .::--::••. .. . . . .. . ·. '.•:::. ..... •.-: ..... . . .. . AE-5 ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -----~ .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :-:-:-:-· . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •:•:•:•:• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... :::::::: . .. . ~~-u•• • • • • • • • • .... .... . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . -..j __ .. ..,.-t:5..•.······ .... .... . . . . • • C, • . . . . . . . .. . ... ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . .... . . ..... . . .... ... . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . .:: /-,c. ~ ·"'~.s-o ,o.t.o• OUT LOT '8' 0 UGM R·6024 /.,." ,f. • .,,_, . .:,-~ .rs-' /.,.,.. ~' Jf/' "!,. "'" - D . . AReA rt? .BE..0ETACH£.P rRt?M rNc ,,,f/'/p ... P:,L.kG';"' /;,:ee ~orecr/a"'V .0/S;?f</C?; TA"£" /fl#(';S ~Yc:R Ct:JA"S,a;,eYAT/t:71'1/ .z;)/s~/C~ .,,4/YP /A'#e;.,r-&p TO ??W:0.r;,,-~r/'""RES#O. ~d~~ /~ ....>,Y'cfTI,,,+? 3~L/Wt:JA/r-~.,,V/L A ./Y~ 2 ...D/srR/Cr RcoA?GA/V/Z .. 4 r-/c>h" ~~..r~ CR~ .,,a,~,ya,s-":(;Le,~?# TD~ ~Pr.u>r '~~• o,.c-r...4#~~ c~G~ ~.c::v-~ 2,; ,,tC,,j'/,.,Yt;, /A" .5£cp~.,,y 4. /~ .-ZI'. ,,,#. .z?...8. t£ /4: DISTRICT NO. ALLOCATED TO COUNCI DISTRICT MAP DATED I -2 2 -82 .:...AS PER COUNCIL FILE No. ANNEX ACRES= 0 . 60 - COUNCIL DISTRICT No . _5=---- DR . SY: DATE ~ SCALE,~ 6--!25'2 EXHIBIT "B" I. .. .. ... ._ __ I. .. .. .. .. -.. • -- , -.. __ --------...,. __ >oc -- ROPOSEL> BELMOtT -MA ILA ON .2 DISTRICT REORGANIZATIO Ap p roximate cale Roosevelt Community Plan • -