Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - City Council - 82-426 - 1982-09-14e a Reorganization and described. in Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto, be annexed to the City of Fresno, and the same territory be detached from the Kings River Conservation District and the: Mid Vallev Fine Protection Districtof Fresno County, 2. This reorganization is in the best interest of the territory ;of White -Garden No. 4 District Reorgan- izationt and lands have not been improperly omitted. from or included within this reorganization. 3. The reasons for this -reorganization are: a. The subject territory is within the City of Fresno Sphere of Influence. b. The project has been initiated in accordance with the Council policy to unify the metro- politan area, and includes parcels that are subject to a contract wherein the owners I agreed to consent to annexation to the City of Fresno in exchange for the Citys agreement to extend municipal water services to the properties. C. It is advantageous for the territory within the White -Garden No. 4 District Reorgan- ization to be a : part of the City of �`resn.o. 4. The conditions imposed by LAFCOf namely that the City of Fresno shall gubmit ,an annexation proposal for the island created to the west of 'the subject proposal will be complied. with. City staff has — begun preliminary proceedings for the annexation of said unincorporated island area and is designated White -Chestnut No, 4.District Reorganization. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED by ` the Council of the City of Fresno that the White -Garden No. 4 District Reorganization be and is hereby allocated to Council District No. 5. Page 3 of 4 M .f. SOLUTION NO. RO--82-,23 t-s is 1 MAKING DETERMINATION AND APPROVING) RESOLUTION OF THE PROPOSED"W-iITE-GARDEN. _#4'' ) FRESNO 'LOGAL AGENCY 2 REORGANIZATION } FORMATION CO.MMIS81ON ----------------- Q WHEREAS, preliminary proceedings were .initiated by the City of Fresno to annex territory generally located northeast of 5 Belmont and Chestnut Avenues to the City of Fresno and detach, from 7 the Mid -Valley Fire Protection District and ;Kings River Conser- 8 vation District in the County 'o,f ;Fresno, and 9 WHEREAS, an application for said proposal was accepted for 10 filing by the Executive Officer of this Local Agency Formation 11 commission; and l WHEREAS, said application was. sat for hearing, ' by the Executive 13 officer ` on the loth day of May, 1982, at the hour, of l": 30 p,,mr of 14 said day; and 15 y+iREAS, notice of the hearing of said application, was duly; 16 given by mail, posting", and newspaper publication as required by 17 laws and 18 WHEREAS,, the Executive Officer, reviewed said application and 19 prepared a report, including his recommendati.ons thereon,. ' said 20 application and report having been presented to, and considered by 21 this Com-niasion ; and 22 WHEREAS, this Commission considered. all .relevant factors and. 23 heard a3.1 interested parties wishing to' spea.I on said application,- 24 and 25 WHEREAS, the Commission :has reviewers and considered the 26 information in the Negative Declaration as provided in the Executive 27 officer's Report duly prepared .and filed. by' the City of Fresno. 28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Local Agency Formation 29 Commission of the County of Fresno does HERESY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, 3p AND ORDER as follows: 31 Section 1 Said proposal is approved 'subject to the term 32 and conditions hereinafter specified. Any ;resolution' of the COUNTY Wr FRESNO RRESNO, CAL.IFORNIA Ekhibit R l conducting agency ordering this reorganization shall provide that 2 such reorganiaatian shall be stibj ect to the following terms and 3 conditions; =4 1. The Ciity of Fresno shall submit an annexation'prc+posal 5 for the island created to the west of the subject proposal: 6 Section 2. Said territory is found to `be uninhabited' and is assigned the' following distinctive short form designation: Wh te-GardenTr 9 Section 3. The City of Fresno is desigzated as the conducting I0 agency, and the governing body of said agency. is hereby directed 11 to initiate reorganization proceedings in compliance with this 12 .resolution. 13 Section 4; Further proceedings shall be in.it:ated,,by the la conducting agency not later-than5 days after the date; of adoption v of the- Commission resolution and shall be conducted and completed 16 Pursuant to required law. Proceedings and any resolution of - 17� approval shall combly with' the rove Commission's ese .ut an of a g P_ 18 _Section 5. The Executive- Officer is hereby- authorized and 19 directed to mail certified- copies_of this° resolution as provided 20 in Section 56272 of the Government Code. 21 r.DOPTED this 26th dayr ,of May 1982, oy the fo11owing Voto 22 AYES : Wilder, Satterberg' evy, J*obnson 23 NOES: None 24 I; ABSENT: Howard 25 STATE- OF CALIFORNIA) 26 COUNTY OF FRESNO } 27 I, NlARVIN L PA1VTE Executive of of the Local Agency Formation Commission certifyy'that the foregoing resolution was 2$ adopted by the Fresno County Local; Agency' Formation Commisson,' 29 California, at a regular meeting he d on the 26th day of �iay, 1982. 30 a� 31 P!IARtIIN L . PAINTER, Executive 'Officer 32 :OUKTY OI` PRCS/rp Rif' MO. CAtifOgNiA. �' ��Y 0 ill, 1,,,_,1 .1 Wl�itc - c;�c+l�II t•I(). isLri(A Mi mom 1 uol_q aiiizatiofI E AVE t!�! iiai Liar — M.KaN-EY a l a �� l 4 IF VA, E Bt(MM4T AVE IL .1 l�I ( IMaYa we )\ \AJ J A a cwc•M E JENSEN wE ( •YYlllw ( IYa : I E. NORTN AVE I �l OEM S� !,w/", % •,'1'. �'• GS CANYON RD j OWN rl • f't I , .. _ I ^ .. _ --- 1 ( Cal *up.. Yra �,- Nnr+^•wiCi11 u _ r ly (j �........ a , _ I i � r r •.. f h url , 7�;. C•t �' (C; aiali�wia7ii� r2.��� .. �. ��ifi. ,�R�, ... �-' � �• . to • l.r•,l ' . �• ~ • I.IaCar ava I ) �•((( E CENIRAL AVE ;Yy4 `' rr • E AMERICAN AVE �!^ r� �W% + "�•• t• 1� • In 1 a wwe �.•a. I.Ir YA YM Y. rc.r•r.s ••■IMNMU F• 11•Yr I Doff. far,. N IFI '. fY M / Rwr'Y A M wM rw. M• Nl1 4•r�•t•, r•••iLf Y•,.fV) IN FUV ■ I f11 r F Y1K'. W."Y M AN ..On Q rY/� ra l••••.r Y./110w1•p Worn NaL IN INlrO 4lr /FKaN YW i•(•.rN ,/+ r 5Q 1' Roosevelt C01111111111ity �1a11