HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - City Council - 82-160 - 1982-04-06/40 ...
f.-
/
to
o.
•..
, :..
...•. .. .. .
• • • • . . .
. . . . .
•,•••• ••• .
-•
v`
'e
I 64g •.,• •••.•
•.
•.
..•• • • • • • •
....••
•r
•
•.•.
••
• '1V 6N.
U�tlE'
.. LOT Z3
E. U,ctZ-
•..
••••
• •••• �..
...
W. UIvE
PW
• • • • • • • • • •
to
E. uNC w.�
��,,
. ,`•'
�, („ENE
.. ....
5 UNE LOT 23 ; : •: ::::
... ....
....
urr •ZZ
....
..........
,
35
LE675AID
0
0
3l0
• • •
.•.
• • • • • • • • : • • •••-: • • • • • • • • ••• :ic • • e • • r
E XtTTlti/E C.1TY L /M [T5
3'7
AI=PRO%?ED -LAFCO
DATE
MAR'VIN L• PANTER
Executive Officer
AREA -0 5F- Vff7A CJ4E,D PROM 7WE/) MIC VAUZ Y Fl)ee PRU -4f C77otil
D/•57RIC7, Tf-/I k/nlC�5 ?elVCR C4nV 56R 1,'A"T10AJ 0I579/C7,
At,10 ArtW fX4 D TO Tot: C[7 Y OF FR1!51-/0.
ADDED ADf7K555 5 `/5 rZW
;r
r'OK7101V5 OF L?75 /7, /$, 22 AND -23 , h'AR VEY
f�g/£rW 5 , L ;SING Ih/ 57" 3 FC5 jao tit . D. L5. 14 m .
Ilwy SE•J //a/d2
FILE No. .2/600
ANNEX No.
ACRES = L.
COUNCIL DISTRICT No. fy
,ALLOCATED TO CO:JNCIL O,'STRICTW, C.'72- AS PER COUNCIL
OR.": .d1�M __
DATE, , f& ,", 6-A- 1/q0
*.�
SOLUTION NO. R01.
,7
g
NG OF wE
! S
ROPVSLID I tl.L� 1-V. L5'P ELEVZN.1.,�7 +{ "" V.Yti`<2 .: .�. ,t'Ttrlt'. ,tLi3 � ?�3 sS , i
S!}4 LOCREORGANIZATION
MMI ION
wnwM' M41 �^! A •!l.rewq iYM! Y!f M wp..AR gl+ira MYM1MlR
4
5 ;
of. Fresnoto annex terrltor�" genera l Y � C?Cat�d west cif Cedar :�.�n�xe .
6
between Lewis and Clay.Avenues to the City of Fresno and detach
7
from the Xid-�Valley Firs: Protection Dist. ctand'Kings Rarer.
conservation Distric �� ��� ����� �� �'re� no- �
WHEREAS,. an app, IiCatiOn for said proposal was accepted for
filing the Xe It . Ye office of this Local". envy �''�✓=ation
Cogs ssion and.
:.theExecutive
WEEPEAS I said application was set for tirti�.h �.�Fi�� by�
officer on the 2?th days Of January, 962, at the hour; Cif 10€ :_
14
of said clay, and,
WHEREAS, tii�t� e f the hearing of said application was duly
16
given by mai l I posting, and newspaper p].blicat ' an '' as required by
17
law; and
18
WHMEAS, the Exec t ,ve C?fficer reviewed said application and
19
prepared a: report, including his recomen ations thereon, said
20
ag lid cat .C)X� and report rt' having ae n ]presented to anc considered. y
2
this Commi s s i on - and
22
WHEREAS, this cots Y&ssion considered all relevant factors and
heard all interested parties wishing to speak ollsaid ap_plicatin - ;
4
and
WHEREAS, the CC3=issacan has rear .eyed and c<)nsidered the
6
information in the Negatjve : claration as provided In the Executive
27
Officer's Report duly prepared and filed by the City -of Fresno.
28
I�TOW l T REFORE, B IT �t.ES�JL�� that t�3e l�cc3,al. Agenc Forma-t a
9
Commission of thy'. county' cf .Fresno does HEREBY R1�4 ��l
30
AND OPMER as fal. ows .
�yUy"� +pi+�s,r.,tci3
rl
3
I
E CAN 1 FAL A'dE
A
N.1 fOMl.lrrn. • �•--_- _
Ip}'i/� �/ AY1Nall lll�a li 1�.�
Irp .r1. rr .111111. r'Ar. lllawF q�f•
O I.l SMla OI/ (u.c. W IrM yll. i..•
F. K&M CANNON ND
i ruil tli ws
K�
w.lr
V�
Nu... real •
Qrrur I.w //rrl l
■.rMMMrI.
lr-�1
W®Y
i
Y(.i Mr
�Mri. 1 HIAi
`'
N M / .I.IN11/M i
I �p�gy
fgS6�'i+�1S��
CJ iY1tM/YrY
Maul i111..Y
I i.11 tOb1Y
I titi
Ir III/MI... MYr
1 Ira/.I.r w••.
r ..i1. y.iri
., Y.Ib1 YrPr
/li( 1I.i .y1W
C j glrNilM
ar a\r/r1r.11 KIMII (I rll.
i M.N err rlM MSNif
I..M Y�11.1.I YII
1./rl.l
�r r-,f l.�iyb1 Y'v1n. M.�s.yl
Some Iu .1frr
S MI/rW
Roosevelt
Cololiriunity Plan
f AMIL "CAN Avt I=