HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - City Council - 82-117 - 1982-03-16• • Ed Bielicki
RESOLUTION NO. 82-117
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FRESNO APPLYING TO THE FRESNO LOCAL AGENCY
FORMATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE
PROPOSED FLORENCE-MAPLE NO. 1 DISTRICT
REORGANIZATION, INCLUDING THE DETACHMENT
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY CONSISTING OF 56.47
ACRES FROM THE MID VALLEY FIRE PROTECT-
ION DISTRICT AND THE KINGS RIVER CONSERVA-
TION DISTRICT, AND ANNEXATION OF SAID TER-
RITORY TO THE CITY OF FRESNO.
WHEREAS, this proposal is made pursuant to the District
Reorganization Act of 1965 contained in Division 1 of Title
6 (commencing with Section 56000) of the California Govern-
ment Code; and
WHEREAS, the nature of the proposed change is a reorgan-
ization consisting of the detachment of certain territory
consisting of 56.47 acres and hereinafter called the "subject
territory" from the Mid Valley Fire Protection District
and the Kings River Conservation District, and annexation of
the same territory to the City of Fresno; and
WHEREAS, no other counties, cities, or districts are
affected; and
WHEREAS, the proposed reorganization is uninhabited,
is described in Exhibit "A" and graphically depicted in
Exhibit "B"; and
WHEREAS, the Master Service Delivery Plan, adopted by
the Council on November 13, 1979, prepared in accordance
with Government Code Section 35102, provides information
for the City of Fresno's plans and policies for the pro-
vision of services in the metropolitan area; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 80-172, the Council
has approved the implementation of the Master Service Delivery
Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Master Service Delivery Plan specifies City
Plans and policies for the provision of services to the sub-
ject territory; and
Page 1 of 3
/Y�
117
WHEREAS, review and analysis of Environmental Assess-
ment No. 3174, relating to the Master Service Delivery
Plan has resulted in the filing of a Negative Declaration
by the Director of Planning and Inspection; and
WHEREAS, no new districts are proposed to be formed
by this reorganization; and
WHEREAS, the Fresno County Assessor's roll will be
used for the purpose of levying any assessments or taxes on
the subject territory; and
WHEREAS, the subject territory proposed to be annexed
to the City of Fresno will be exempted from taxation for
payment of principal or interest, or any other amounts which
shall become due on account of any outstanding bonded indebt-
edness incurred by the City prior to the effective date of
such annexation, and upon completion of this reorganization
proposal, the subject territory will be included in Municipal
Bonded Area "D" and will not be taxed for any existing bonded
indebtedness or contractual obligations; and
WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposal are stated as
follows:
1. Annexation of the subject territory to the
City of Fresno will result in improved land
use planning. All private development con-
trols of the City will apply, following re-
organization.
2. The subject territory is within the City of
Fresno's Sphere of Influence.
3. The annexation is being initiated as a result
of a request by one of the property owners
within the project area.
4. It is advantageous for the subject territory to
be a part of the City.
Page 2 of 3
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the
City of Fresno hereby requests that proceedings be taken by
the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission for the herein
proposed Florence -Maple No. 1 District Reorganization,
including the detachment of the subject territory, consist-
ing of 56.47 acres from the Mid Valley Fire Protection
District and the Kings River Conservation District, and
annexation of the same territory to the City of Fresno; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Council of the City of
Fresno finds Environmental Assessment No. 3174 is the con-
trolling environmental document for this annexation pro-
posal, such environmental assessment has been completed
in compliance with the California Environmental Quality
Act and the State Guidelines, and the Council has reviewed
and considered the information contained in such environ-
mental assessment prior to the approval of the initiation
of this annexation proposal and finds there is no poss-
ibility such proposal may have a significant effect on
the environment.
CLERK'S CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF FRESNO ) ss.
CITY OF FRESNO )
I, JACQUELINE L. RYLE, City Clerk of the City of Fresno,
certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the
Council of the City of Fresno, California, at a regular
meeting held on the 16 th _ day of March, 1982
JACQUELINE L. RYLE
City Clerk
B�.' J
Deput
4 PPROVED AS TO /O
^TY A'f!'OWW'•
Page 3 of 3
dy
FLORENCE-MAPLE NO. 1
DISTRICT REORGANIZATION
Area to be Detached from the Mid -Valley Fire Protection District, the Kings
River Conservation District, and Annexed to the City of Fresno.
Consisting of lots 3, 4 and a portion of lot 5 of RICHLAND TRACT, lying in
Section 13, 14/20, M. D. B. 6 M.
BEGINNING at the intersection of the Southerly production of the West line
of lot 5 of RICHLAND TRACT, as said lot is shown on the Map thereof, filed
in the Office of the County Recorder March 9, 1889 and recorded in Volume 4
of Plats at page 28, Fresno County Records, with the North line of the South-
east Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 14 South, Range
20 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, as said Section is shown on the
United States Government Township Plats, being also, a point on the existing
City Limits of the City of Fresno; thence Easterly, along the North line of
the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13, being
also, along the existing City Limits of said City, to the Northeast corner
of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13; thence
continuing Easterly, along the South line of the Northwest Quarter of the
Northeast Quarter of said Section 13, to the intersection with the Northerly
production of the East line of Annooshvan Park, as shown on the Map thereof,
filed in the Office of the County Recorder August 31, 1953 and recorded in
Volume 16 of Plats at page 55, Fresno County Records, being also, a point on
the existing City Limits; thence continuing Easterly, along the South line of
the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 13, being also,
along a line which is parallel with and 20.00 feet North of the North of Lots
13 and 14 of said RICHLAND TRACT, being also, along the existing City Limits
of said City, to the intersection with the Southerly production of the West
line of Lot 2 of said RICHLAND TRACT; thence Northerly, along the Southerly
production of the West line of said Lot 2, and along the West line of said
Lot 2, and along the Northerly production of the West line of said Lot 2,
being also, along the existing City Limits of said City, to the intersection
with the South line of Section 12, of said Township and Range; thence Westerl}
along the South line of said Section 12, being also, along the existing City
Limits of said City, to the South Quarter corner of said Section 12, being
also, the North Quarter corner of said Section 13; thence Southerly, along
the East line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13, to the intersection
with a line which is parallel with and 228.00 feet South of the North line of
said Lot 5; thence Westerly, along a line which is parallel with and 228.00
feet South of the North line of said Lot 5, to the intersection which the West
line of said Lot 5; thence Southerly, along the West line of said Lot 5, and
along the Southerly production of the West line, to the point of beginning.
File No. 2137
Drawing No. 6-A-1167
Contains 56.47 acres
TWB/lg June 15, 1981
Exhibit "A"
/-0
Exhibit
71,
7XaW
FILE No. 2137
ANNEX No.
ZC17ZF ACRES= 5A-5 47
1.3,
4/-
COUNCIL DISTRICT No.
ALLOCATED To COUNCIL DISTRICT NO. 5- AS PER COUNCIL DR.8Y.
DISTRICT MAP DATED DATE:c/
6-A- 116
.4
IALE� -Z
■
0 0 I'tt
M
0
1100
\\� m
0 (D
1.
Z N
Ib 0
0
>
-
0