Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - City Council - 82-117 - 1982-03-16• • Ed Bielicki RESOLUTION NO. 82-117 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRESNO APPLYING TO THE FRESNO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSED FLORENCE-MAPLE NO. 1 DISTRICT REORGANIZATION, INCLUDING THE DETACHMENT OF CERTAIN TERRITORY CONSISTING OF 56.47 ACRES FROM THE MID VALLEY FIRE PROTECT- ION DISTRICT AND THE KINGS RIVER CONSERVA- TION DISTRICT, AND ANNEXATION OF SAID TER- RITORY TO THE CITY OF FRESNO. WHEREAS, this proposal is made pursuant to the District Reorganization Act of 1965 contained in Division 1 of Title 6 (commencing with Section 56000) of the California Govern- ment Code; and WHEREAS, the nature of the proposed change is a reorgan- ization consisting of the detachment of certain territory consisting of 56.47 acres and hereinafter called the "subject territory" from the Mid Valley Fire Protection District and the Kings River Conservation District, and annexation of the same territory to the City of Fresno; and WHEREAS, no other counties, cities, or districts are affected; and WHEREAS, the proposed reorganization is uninhabited, is described in Exhibit "A" and graphically depicted in Exhibit "B"; and WHEREAS, the Master Service Delivery Plan, adopted by the Council on November 13, 1979, prepared in accordance with Government Code Section 35102, provides information for the City of Fresno's plans and policies for the pro- vision of services in the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 80-172, the Council has approved the implementation of the Master Service Delivery Plan; and WHEREAS, the Master Service Delivery Plan specifies City Plans and policies for the provision of services to the sub- ject territory; and Page 1 of 3 /Y� 117 WHEREAS, review and analysis of Environmental Assess- ment No. 3174, relating to the Master Service Delivery Plan has resulted in the filing of a Negative Declaration by the Director of Planning and Inspection; and WHEREAS, no new districts are proposed to be formed by this reorganization; and WHEREAS, the Fresno County Assessor's roll will be used for the purpose of levying any assessments or taxes on the subject territory; and WHEREAS, the subject territory proposed to be annexed to the City of Fresno will be exempted from taxation for payment of principal or interest, or any other amounts which shall become due on account of any outstanding bonded indebt- edness incurred by the City prior to the effective date of such annexation, and upon completion of this reorganization proposal, the subject territory will be included in Municipal Bonded Area "D" and will not be taxed for any existing bonded indebtedness or contractual obligations; and WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposal are stated as follows: 1. Annexation of the subject territory to the City of Fresno will result in improved land use planning. All private development con- trols of the City will apply, following re- organization. 2. The subject territory is within the City of Fresno's Sphere of Influence. 3. The annexation is being initiated as a result of a request by one of the property owners within the project area. 4. It is advantageous for the subject territory to be a part of the City. Page 2 of 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the City of Fresno hereby requests that proceedings be taken by the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission for the herein proposed Florence -Maple No. 1 District Reorganization, including the detachment of the subject territory, consist- ing of 56.47 acres from the Mid Valley Fire Protection District and the Kings River Conservation District, and annexation of the same territory to the City of Fresno; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Council of the City of Fresno finds Environmental Assessment No. 3174 is the con- trolling environmental document for this annexation pro- posal, such environmental assessment has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the State Guidelines, and the Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in such environ- mental assessment prior to the approval of the initiation of this annexation proposal and finds there is no poss- ibility such proposal may have a significant effect on the environment. CLERK'S CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF FRESNO ) ss. CITY OF FRESNO ) I, JACQUELINE L. RYLE, City Clerk of the City of Fresno, certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Council of the City of Fresno, California, at a regular meeting held on the 16 th _ day of March, 1982 JACQUELINE L. RYLE City Clerk B�.' J Deput 4 PPROVED AS TO /O ^TY A'f!'OWW'• Page 3 of 3 dy FLORENCE-MAPLE NO. 1 DISTRICT REORGANIZATION Area to be Detached from the Mid -Valley Fire Protection District, the Kings River Conservation District, and Annexed to the City of Fresno. Consisting of lots 3, 4 and a portion of lot 5 of RICHLAND TRACT, lying in Section 13, 14/20, M. D. B. 6 M. BEGINNING at the intersection of the Southerly production of the West line of lot 5 of RICHLAND TRACT, as said lot is shown on the Map thereof, filed in the Office of the County Recorder March 9, 1889 and recorded in Volume 4 of Plats at page 28, Fresno County Records, with the North line of the South- east Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 14 South, Range 20 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, as said Section is shown on the United States Government Township Plats, being also, a point on the existing City Limits of the City of Fresno; thence Easterly, along the North line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13, being also, along the existing City Limits of said City, to the Northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13; thence continuing Easterly, along the South line of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 13, to the intersection with the Northerly production of the East line of Annooshvan Park, as shown on the Map thereof, filed in the Office of the County Recorder August 31, 1953 and recorded in Volume 16 of Plats at page 55, Fresno County Records, being also, a point on the existing City Limits; thence continuing Easterly, along the South line of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 13, being also, along a line which is parallel with and 20.00 feet North of the North of Lots 13 and 14 of said RICHLAND TRACT, being also, along the existing City Limits of said City, to the intersection with the Southerly production of the West line of Lot 2 of said RICHLAND TRACT; thence Northerly, along the Southerly production of the West line of said Lot 2, and along the West line of said Lot 2, and along the Northerly production of the West line of said Lot 2, being also, along the existing City Limits of said City, to the intersection with the South line of Section 12, of said Township and Range; thence Westerl} along the South line of said Section 12, being also, along the existing City Limits of said City, to the South Quarter corner of said Section 12, being also, the North Quarter corner of said Section 13; thence Southerly, along the East line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 13, to the intersection with a line which is parallel with and 228.00 feet South of the North line of said Lot 5; thence Westerly, along a line which is parallel with and 228.00 feet South of the North line of said Lot 5, to the intersection which the West line of said Lot 5; thence Southerly, along the West line of said Lot 5, and along the Southerly production of the West line, to the point of beginning. File No. 2137 Drawing No. 6-A-1167 Contains 56.47 acres TWB/lg June 15, 1981 Exhibit "A" /-0 Exhibit 71, 7XaW FILE No. 2137 ANNEX No. ZC17ZF ACRES= 5A-5 47 1.3, 4/- COUNCIL DISTRICT No. ALLOCATED To COUNCIL DISTRICT NO. 5- AS PER COUNCIL DR.8Y. DISTRICT MAP DATED DATE:c/ 6-A- 116 .4 IALE� -Z ■ 0 0 I'tt M 0 1100 \\� m 0 (D 1. Z N Ib 0 0 > - 0