Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - City Council - 82-094 - 1982-03-02. • Ed Bielicki RESOLUTION NO. 82-94 RESOLUTION INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE REORGANIZATION OF THE CITY OF FRESNO, THE KINGS RIVER CONSERVATION DISTRICT AND THE MID VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, IN- VOLVING UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND DESIGNATED AS THE PROPOSED OLIVE -CEDAR NO. 2 DISTRICT REORGANIZATION, SETTING THE TIME, DATE AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS THERETO, AND GIVING NOTICE THEREOF WHEREAS, proceedings for a proposed reorganization were commenced by the City of Fresno pursuant to its Resolution No. 81-465 adopted on November 17, 1981, and; WHEREAS, the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission on the 27th day of January 27, 1982, met at the noticed time and place to consider all matters relevant to the proposed reorgan- ization and heard all persons interested therein, and adopted at the time and in the form and manner prescribed by law its Resolution No. RO-81-68, "Making Determination and Approving the Proposed Olive -Cedar No. 2 District Reorganization", a copy of which is attached hereto and identified as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, the Fresno County Assessor's roll will be used for the purpose of levying any assessments or taxes on the subject property; and WHEREAS, the subject territory proposed to be annexed to the City of Fresno shall be exempt from taxation for the payment of principal or interest, or any other amounts which shall become due on account of any outstanding bonded indebtedness incurred by the City prior to the effective date of such annexation; upon completion of the reorganization proceedings for this proposal the subject territory will be included in Municipal Bond Area "D" and will not be taxed for any existing bonded indebtedness or contractual obligation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the Council of the City of Fresno, as follows: 1. Proceedings are hereby initiated for the proposed Olive -Cedar No. 2 District Reorganization as described in Exhibit "B" and graphically de- picted in Exhibit "C" wherein the City of Fresno, Page 1 of 3 m � - 94 • the Mid Valley Fire Protection District and the Kings River Conservation District are all subject to a change of organization. 2. All of the subject territory affected is within the County of Fresno. 3. For the purpose of the proposed reorganization, the subject territory is found to be uninhabited. 4. The reasons for this proposed reorganization are as follows: a. The subject territory is within the City of Fresno's Sphere of Influence. b. The project was initiated by a pro- perty owner who expressed a desire to annex to the City of Fresno and the annexation enhances the Council's policy to unify the metropolitan area. The project area includes four proper- ties owned by the State of California. C. It is advantageous for the territory within the Olive -Cedar No. 2 District Reorganiza- tion to be a part of the City of Fresno. 6. April 6, 1982 at the hour of 3:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber, City Hall, 2326 Fresno Street, Fresno, California, which date is not less than fifteen days nor more than sixty days after the date of adoption of this resolution be, and is hereby, established as the time, date and place of hearing on the proposed reorganization. At this time and place any interested person de- siring to protest said reorganization shall do so by written communication filed with the Clerk of the City of Fresno not later than than the hour set for hearing. Written protests shall be signed and submitted after the adoption of this resolution and shall contain the date of signature. Page 2 of 3 A written protest by a landowner shall contain a description sufficient to identify the land owned by him. 7. The Clerk of the City of Fresno shall give notice of such hearing once in a newspaper of general circulation at least fifteen days prior to the date specified herein for hearing. 8. The Clerk shall further cause a copy of this resolution to be posted on or near the door of the meeting place of the Council, said posting to be commenced at least fifteen days prior to the date specified herein for hearing and continue to the time of said hearing. 9. The Clerk shall further cause notice to be mailed to each person who owns land within the subject territory and to all other affected cities or dis- tricts, and any other person who has a written re- quest for special notice. Such mailings shall be by first class mail, postage prepaid, at least fifteen days prior to the day specified herein for hearing. 10. The Clerk is hereby instructed to forward a copy of this resolution to the Executive Officer of the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission. CLERK'S CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF FRESNO ) ss. CITY OF FRESNO ) I, JACQUELINE L. RYLE, City Clerk of the City of Fresno, certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Council of the City of Fresno, California, at a regular meeting held on the 2nd day of March, 1982 APPROVED AS TO FOW CITY ATTORNEY'S OFF By j Deputy JACQUELINE L. RYLE City Clerk D page 3 of 3 • SOLUTION NO. RO-81-68 CITY OF FREM 1 MAKTNG DETERMINATION AND APPROV2'#8 -'-' PM 3'44SOLUTION OF THE PROPOSED "OLIVE -CEDAR #21' PLANft)AH©'jHSfEC(IQN� NO LOCCOMMISS ON 2 REORGANIZATION z ------------------- J 4 WHEREAS, preliminary proceedings were initiated by the City 5 of Fresno to annex territory located generally east of Cedar Avenue 6 and south of Rowell Avenue to the City of Fresno and detach from 7 the Mid -Valley Fire Protection District and Kings River Conservatior 8 District in the County of Fresno; and 9 WHEREAS, an application for said proposal was accepted for 10 filing by the Executive Officer of this Local Agency Formation 111 Commission; and 12 WHEREAS, said application was set for hearing by the Executive 13 Officer on the 27th day of January, 1?83, at the hour of 10:00 a.m. 14 of said day; and 15 WHEREAS, notice of the hearing of said application was duly 16 given by mail, posting, and newspaper publication as required by 17 law; and 18 WHEREAS, the Executive Officer reviewed said application and' 19 prepared a report, including his recommendations thereon, said 20 application and report having been presented to and considered by 21 this Commission; and 22 WHEREAS, this Commission considered all relevant factors and 23 heard all interested parties wishing to speak on said application; 24 and 25 WHEREAS, the Commission has reviewed and considered the 26 information in the Negative Declaration as provided in the Executive 27 Officer's Report duly prepared and filed by the City of Fresno. 28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Local Agency Formation 29 Commission of the County of Fresno does HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, 30 AND ORDER as follows: 31 S� C OUMTY Os sw(SNO .�cswo. c.�rowr,i, Eirhl'hdf 'q" • 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 ; proposal is approved. Any resolution of the Section 7a Said ency ordering this reorganization shall provide that conducting 9 such reorganization shall not be subject to any terms and conditions. Sects �• Said territory is found to be uninhabited and is assigned the following distinctive short form designation: 7 ,,Olive -Cedar #2"• Secs 3• The City of Fresno is designated as the conducting 8 directed to 9 agency, and the governing body of said agency is hereby 0 initiate reorganization proceedings in compliance with this 11 resolution. Sects Further proceedings shall be initiated by the 12 adoption 13 conducting agency not later than 35 days after the date of adop of the Commission resolution and shall be conducted and completed 14 resolution of pursuant to required law. Proceedings and any 15 royal. 16 approval shall comply with the Commission's resolution of approval. 17 section The Executive Officer is hereby authorized and 18 directed to mail certified copies of this resolution as provided 19 in Section 56272 of the Government Code• b the following vote. 20 ADOPTED this 27th day of January, 1982, Y 21 AYES: Wilder, Tucci, Howard, Levy, Johnson 22 NOES: None 23 ABSENT: None 24 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) 25 COUNTY OF FRESNO ) MARVIN L. PANTER, Executive officero oftreshe Local Agency c 26 I that the foreg 9 n was Formation Commission Local Agency Formation Commission, 27 adopted by held on the 27th day California, at a regular meeting 28 1982. �^ 29 MARVIN L. PANTER, Executive Officer 30 31 32 .��.o. c•u oea�• i OLIVE -CEDAR NO. 2 DISTRICT REORGANIZATION Area to be Detached from the Mid Valley, Fire Pvotection District, the Kings River.Conservation District, and Annexed to'the City of Fresno. Consisting of Lots 4, 5 and portions of Lots 7, 8 and 9, in Block 88; Lot 3 and the West Half of Lot 2 in Block 89, all of Sierra Vista Addition No. 5, lying in Section 36, 13/20, M.D.B.6M. Beginning at the intersection of the Westerly production of the North line of Lot 6 in Block 88 of Sierra Vista Addition No. 5, as said lot is shown on the Map thereof, filed in the Office of the County Recorder February 27, 1923 and recorded in Volume 9 of Plats at page 89, Fresno County Records, with the West line of Section 36, Township 13 South, Range 20 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, as said Section is shown on the United States Government Township Plats, being also, a point on the existing City Limits of the City of Fresno; thence Easterly, along the Westerly production of the North line of said Lot 6, and along the North line of said Lot 6, being also, along the existing City Limits of said City, to the Northeast corner of said Lot 6; thence Southerly, along the East line of said Lot 6, being also, along the existing City Limits of said City, to the intersection with a line which is parallel with and 15.00 feet South of the North line of the South Half of Lot 7, in said Block 88; thence Easterly, along a line which is parallel with and 15.00 feet South of the North line..of the South Half of said Lot 7, and along a line which is paral- lel with and 164.92 feet South of the North line of Lot 8, in said Block 88, being also, along the existing City Limits of said City, to the intersection with the East line of said Lot 8; thence Southerly, along the East line of said Lot 8, being also, along the existing City Limits of said City, and along the Southerly production of the East line of said Lot 8, to a point which is 30.00 feet South of the Southeast corner of said Lot 8; thence Westerly, along a line which is parallel with and 30.00 feet South of the South line of said Lot 8, being also, along the existing City Limits of said City, to the intersection with the Northerly production of the East line of Lot 4, in Block 89, of said Sierra Vista Addition No. 5; thence Southerly, along the Northerly production of the East line of said Lot 4, and along the East line of said Lot 4, being also, along the existing City Limits of said City to the Southeast corner of said Lot 4, being also, the Northwest corner of Lot 8, in said Block 89; thence Easterly, along the North lines of Lots 8 and 9, in said Block 89, being also, along the existing City Limits of said City, to the intersection with the East line of the West Half of Lot 2, in said Block 89; thence Northerly, along the East line of the West Half of said Lot.2, and along the Northerly production of the East line of the West Half of said Lot 2, to a point which is 30.00 feet North of the North line of said Lot 2; thence Easterly, along a line which is parallel with and 30.00 feet North of the North line of said Lot 2, to the intersection with the Southerly production of the East line of Lot 9, in said Block 88; thence Northerly, along the Southerly production of the East line of said Lot 9, in said Block 88, and along the East line of said Lot 9, to a point which is 145.00 feet South of the Northeast corner of said Lot 9, in said Block 88; thence Westerly, along a line which is parallel with and 145.00 feet South of the North line of said Lot 9, to the intersection with the West line of said Lot 9; thence Northerly, along the West line of said Lot 9, to the Northwest corner of said Lot 9, being also, the Southeast corner of Lot 3, in said Block 88; thence Westerly, along the South line of said Lot 3, in said Block 88, to the Southwest corner of said Lot 3; thence Northerly, along the West line of said Lot 3, in said Block 88, and along the Northerly production of the West line of said Lot 3, to the intersection with the North line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 36; thence Westerly, along the North line of the South- west Quarter of said Section 36, to the West Quarter corner of said Section 36; thence Southerly, along the West line of said Section 36, to the Point of Beginning. Fi .e No. 2145 APPROVED-LAFCO�.� ,7_ 8� Drawing No. 6-A-1175 Contains 4.84 Acres DATE TWB/pt 10/23/81 MARVIN L PANTER Executive Officer �Khibrf 'b" 0 0 ................. . ........ ............ .... ........ Jr- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 777 I I / APPROVCC) -LAFCO Ex,sTivG City /Y PEA DATE TO 3-, L PANTElt Executive officer XfV15Ea 1/716z FILE No. moors ¢sue ANNEX No. -3 ACRES ALLOCATED To COUNCI-1;�, COUNCIL DISTRICT No. -5- DISTRICT MAP DATED L D;STRicl NO. AS PER COUNCIL DATEt SCALE:Z"=_6-A-/ /7,57 M S -C-A S TTI u AVF Pik F 00 m 0 m z 0 K LOCM AM I