HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - City Council - 82-091 - 1982-02-23• • Ed Bielicki
RESOLUTION NO.82-91
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF FRESNO, CALIFORNIA, IN THE MATTER OF
THE WOODWARD-CEDAR NO. 3 DISTRICT REOR-
GANIZATION ORDERING A REORGANIZATION OF THE
CITY OF FRESNO, THE MID VALLEY FIRE
DROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE KINGS RIVER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Fresno, pursuant
to its Resolution of Application No. 81-329 adopted on
August 25, 1981, requested the Fresno Local Agency For-
mation Commission to take appropriate proceedings for the
annexation of the subject territory to the City of Fresno;
and
WHEREAS, the proposed reorganization known as Woodward -
Cedar No. 3 District Reorganization is described in
Exhibit "A" and graphically depicted in Exhibit "B"; and
WHEREAS, with notice given according to law, LAFCO met
on November 25, 1981 to hear interested persons, consider the
Proposed reorganization, and adopted Resolution RO-81-56
"Making Determination and Approving Proposed Woodward -Cedar
No. 3, District Reorganization" of the City of Fresno, the
Mid Valley Fire Protection District and the Kings River
Conservation District; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. RO-81-56 authorized the Council
to conduct the proceedings for the reorganization in the
manner provided by law; and
WHEREAS, on January 19, 1982, the Council initiated
proceedings for said proposed reorganization by adopting Re-
solution No. 82-28 "Resolution initiating proceedings for
the reorganization of the City of Fresno, the Mid Valley Fire
Protection District and the Kings River Conservation District"
and setting a hearing on the proposed reorganization for
February 23, 1982 at 3:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber,
City Hall, 2326 Fresno Street, Fresno, California, 93721;
and
WHEREAS, the Council gave the required notice of the time
and place for hearing objections to the proposed reorganiza-
tion; and
`,�>'E � Page 1 of 3
WHEREAS, the Council conducted a hearing, at which
time they heard all persons who wished to object to the
proposed reorganization; and
WHEREAS, protests or objections in writing to the
proposed reorganization, delivered to the Clerk of the City
of Fresno before the hour set for hearing, were considered
and are on file in the office of the Clerk of the City of
Fresno, County of Fresno, State of California; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing and prior to consideration
of protests, LAFCO's resolution making determination and
approval was presented and summarized to the Council; and
WHEREAS, the Council considered all factors required
by law for a proposed reorganization; and
WHEREAS, the Council determined that the territory
to be reorganized is uninhabited and that written protests
filed and not withdrawn represented less than fifty per-
cent (50%) of the assessed value of land therein; and
WHEREAS, the Fresno County Assessor's roll will be
used for the purpose of levying any assessments or taxes
on the subject territory; and
WHEREAS, the subject territory proposed to be annexed
to the City of Fresno will be exempt from taxation for the
payment of principal or interest, or any other amounts which
shall become due on account of any outstanding bonded indebt-
edness incurred by the City prior to the effective date of
such annexation, and upon completion of this reorganization
proposal, the subject territory will be included in Municipal
Bond Area "D" and will not be taxed for any existing bonded
indebtedness or contractual obligations; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Fresno Municipal Code Section 2-
208, the subject territory is allocated to Council District No, 5.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
City of Fresno as follows:
1. The Council hereby orders that the territory
Page 2 of 3
referred to as Woodward -Cedar No. 3 District
Reorganization and described in Exhibits "A"
and "B", attached hereto, be annexed to the
City of Fresno and the same territory be
detached from the Kings River Conservation
District and the Mid Valley Fire Protection
District of Fresno County.
2. The proposed reorganization is in the best
interest of the territory of Woodward -Cedar No. 3
District Reorganization and lands have not been
improperly omitted from or included within
this reorganization.
3. The reasons for this proposed reorganization are:
a. The subject territory is within the City of
Fresno's Sphere of Influence.
b. The annexation is being initiated by the City
of Fresno in accordance with the Council's
policy to unify the metropolitan area.
C. It is advantageous for the territory with-
in Woodward -Cedar No. 3 District Reorgan-
ization to be a part of the City of Fresno.
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED by the Council of the City of
Fresno that the Woodward -Cedar No. 3 District Reorganization
be and is hereby allocated to Council District No. 5.
CLERK'S CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF FRESNO ) ss.
CITY OF FRESNO )
I, JACQUELINE L. RYLE, City Clerk of the City of Fresno,
certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Council
of the City of Fresno, California, at a regular meeting held on
the 23rd day of February 1982 .
JACQUELINE L. RYLE
City Clerk
g�_
Dag
i
i
APPROMYmir Page 3 of 3
CXTT •T IWAIWOOMM
iv
1• •
WOODWARD-CEDAR NO. 3
DISTRICT REORGANIZATION
Area to be Detached from the Mid Valley Fire Protection District, the Kings
River Conservation District, and Annexed to the City of Fresno.
Consisting of N' of Lots 1 and 2 of Dwight Park; and A of Lot 19 of Gordondale,
lying in Sections 11 and 12, 14/20, M.D.B.&M.
Beginning at a point on the South line of Section 12, Township 14 South, Range
20 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, as said Section is shown on the United
States Government Township Plats, which is 320.00 feet East of the Southwest
corner of said Section 12, being also, a point on the existing City Limits of
the City of Fresno; thence Easterly, along the South line of said Section 12,
being also, along the existing City Limits of said City, to the intersection
with the Southerly production of the West line of the East Half of Lot 19 of
Gordondale, as said lot is shown on the Map thereof, filed in the Office of the
County Recorder April 29, 1919 and recorded in Volume 8 of Plats at page 45,
Fresno County Records; thence Northerly, along the Southerly production of the
West line of the East Half of said Lot 19, and along the West line of the East
Half of said Lot 19 and along the Northerly production of the West line of the
East Half of said Lot 19, being also, along the existing City Limits of said
City, to the intersection with the South line of the Northwest Quarter of the
Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of said Section 12; thence Westerly,
along the South line of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the
Southwest Quarter of said Section 12, and along the South line of the Northeast
Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 11, of said
Township and Range, and along the North lines of Lots 1 and 2 of Dwight Park, as
said lots are shown on the Map thereof, filed in the Office of the County Recorder
September 6, 1912 and recorded in Volume 8 of Record of Surveys at page 14, Fresno
County Records, being also, along the existing City Limits of said City, to the
Northeast corner of Lot 3 of said Dwight Park; thence Southerly, along the East
line of said Lot 3, being also, along the West line of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map
No. 5013, as shown on the Map thereof, filed in the Office of the County Recorder
and recorded in Book 33 of Parcel Maps, at page 7, Fresno County Records, to the
Southwest corner of said Parcel 1; thence Easterly, along the South lines of
Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4, of said Parcel Map No. 5013, and along the South line of
the North Half of Lot 1 of said Dwight Park, and along the Easterly production
of the South line of the North Half of said Lot 1, to the intersection with the
West line of said Section 12; thence Southerly, along the West line of said
Section 12, to the Southwest corner of said Section 12; thence Easterly, along
the South line of said Section 12, a distance of 320.00 feet, to the Point of
Beginning.
File No. 2152
Drawing No. 6-A-1182
Contains 7.13 Acres
TWB/pt
8/3/81
Exhibit "A"
o 0
..... ..4s`96"
:::::I.... eel.. ..�......:....
..�....::�
.2 9 6-
::'SGi✓c��J//?!7:::::::::
........z.._..i
-3
SyY c -,v.
V
-L EGENl�—
LAX/ST/NG CITY �4E0 Exhibit "B"
' " ' /%.PEA TG B .DETACi1Ep F.pOit1 Ti.'E
TECT/O�Y �iST�P/L-Tr Ti,�� �iYGS �irE? COH �p✓,s O ��Sr�P/G�
f��1'O AiYiYEXEO TG Tif�E �'/TY OF ESiYp,
�� �170.QES_S' _i YSTE.iYy
FILE No. � I �
�/DODrY.4.pp- G-EpAR �Y�3 gNNEX No.
D/STir/CT /�EO PG 4iY/zAT/OiY
N'/z OF LOJr^ I� 2 0F1�iyiG YT P�q Q f� `y/ �oT/9 ACRE S =
OF GOiQIJOAcl%4G..G �Y/iyG /iY _.$SECT/OiY�T' //� /�
/9zo /171�til COUNCIL DISTRICT No. S
ALLOCATED TO COUNCIL DISTRICT NO. -6- AS PER COUNCIL DR. BY: _1y%�_
DISTRICT MAP DATED /-22-82 DATE:AvGJyBL 6_,4_ 1182
SCALE:L=Isa,
r1f '
L�
RESOLUTION NO. RO-81-56
1 MAKING DETERMINATION AND APPROVING) RESOLUTION OF THE
PROPOSED "WOODWARD-CEDAR R3" ) FRESNO LOCAL AGENCY
2 REORGANIZATION ) FORMATIONCOMMISSION
-
3
4 WHEREAS, preliminary proceedings were initiated by the City of
5 Fresno to annex territory generally located south of Woodward
6 Avenue on both sides of Cedar Avenue to the City of Fresno and
7 detach from the Mid -Valley Fire Protection District and Kings River
8 Conservation District in the County of Fresno; and
9 WHEREAS, an application for said proposal was accepted for
10 filing by the Executive Officer of this Local Agency Formation
11 Commission; and
12 WHEREAS, said application was set for hearing by the Executive
13 officer on the 25th day of November, 1981, at the hour of 2:30 p.m.
14 of said day; and
15 WHEREAS, notice of the hearing of said application was duly
16 given by mail, posting, and newspaper publication as required by
17 law; and
lg WHEREAS, the Executive Officer reviewed said application and
19 prepared a report, including his recommendations thereon, said
20 application and report having been presented to and considered by
21 this Commission; and
22 WHEREAS, this Commission considered all relev nt factors and
23 heard all interested parties wishing to speak on said application;
24 and
P-51 WHEREAS, the Commission has reviewed and considered the
26 information in the Negative Declaration as provided in the Executive
27 Officer's Report duly prepared and filed by the City of Fresno.
28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Local Agency Formation
29 Commission of the County of Fresno does HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE,
30 AND ORDER as follows:
0
1 Section 1. Said proposal is approved. Any resolution of the
2 conducting agency ordering this reorganization shall provide that
3 such reorganization shall not be subject to any terms and
4 conditions.
5 Section 2. Said territory is found to be uninhabited and is
6 assigned the following distinctive short form designation:
7 "Woodward -Cedar n3".
8 Section 3. The City of Fresno is designated as the conducting
9 agency, and the governing body of said agency is hereby directed to
10 initiate reorganization proceedings in compliance with this
11 resolution.
12 Section 9. Further proceedings shall be initiated by the
13 conducting agency not later than 35 days after the date of adoption
14 of the Commission resolution and shall be conducted and completed
15 pursuant to required law. Proceedings and any resolution of
16 approval shall comply with the Commission's resolution of approval.
17 Section 5. The Executive Officer is hereby authorized and
18 directed to mail certified copies of this resolution as provided in
19 Section 56272 of the Government Code.
20 ADOPTED this 25th day of November, 1981, by the following vote:
21 AYES: Wilder, Tucci, Howard, Levy, Johnson
22 NOES: None
23 ABSENT: None
24
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
25 COUNTY OF FRESNO )
26 I, MARVIN L. PANTER, Executive Officer of the Local Agency
Formation Commission certify that the foregoing resolution was
27 adopted by the Fresno County Local Agency Formation Commission,
California, at a regular meeting held on the 25th day of November,
28 1981.
29
30 MARVIN L. PANTER, Executive Officer
31
32
X
8
ji
TDBER�NCi we
001, MCI �mmooloo
*0
00