HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - City Council - 82-056 - 1982-02-09• 0 Ed Bielicki
RESOLUTION NO. 82-56
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FRESNO APPLYING TO THE FRESNO LOCAL AGENCY
FORMATION COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE
PROPOSED TYLER-WINERY NO. 4 DISTRICT
REORGANIZATION, INCLUDING THE DETACHMENT
OF CERTAIN TERRITORY CONSISTING OF 2.80
ACRES FROM THE MID VALLEY FIRE PROTECT-
ION DISTRICT AND THE KINGS RIVER CONSERVA-
TION DISTRICT, AND ANNEXATION OF SAID TER-
RITORY TO THE CITY OF FRESNO.
WHEREAS, this proposal is made pursuant to the District
Reorganization Act of 1965 contained in Division 1 of Title
6 (commencing with Section 56000) of the California Govern-
ment Code; and
WHEREAS, the nature of the proposed change is a reorgan-
ization consisting of the detachment of certain territory
consisting of 2.80 acres and hereinafter called the "subject
territory" from the Mid Valley Fire Protection District
and the Kings River Conservation District, and annexation of
the same territory to the City of Fresno; and
WHEREAS, no other counties, cities, or districts are
affected; and
WHEREAS, the proposed reorganization is uninhabited,
is described in Exhibit "A" and graphically depicted in
Exhibit "B"; and
WHEREAS, the Master Service Delivery Plan, adopted by
the Council on November 13, 1979, prepared in accordance
with Government Code Section 35102, provides information
for the City of Fresno's plans and policies for the pro-
vision of services in the metropolitan area; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 80-172, the Council
has approved the implementation of the Master Service Delivery
Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Master Service Delivery Plan specifies City
plans and policies for the provisions of services to the sub-
ject territory; and
Page 1 of 3
9L - SGr
WHEREAS, review and analysis of Environmental Assess-
ment No. 3174, relating to the Master Service Delivery
Plan has resulted in the filing of a Negative Declaration
by the Director of Planning and Inspection; and
WHEREAS, no new districts are proposed to be formed
by this reorganization; and
WHEREAS, the Fresno County Assessor's roll will be
used for the purpose of levying any assessments or taxes on
the subject territory; and
WHEREAS, the subject territory proposed to be annexed
to the City of Fresno will be exempted from taxation for
payment of principal or interest, or any other amounts which
shall become due on account of any outstanding bonded indebt-
edness incurred by the City prior to the effective date of
such annexation, and upon completion of this reorganization
proposal, the subject territory will be included in Municipal
Bonded Area "D" and will not be taxed for any existing bonded
indebtedness or contractual obligations; and
WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposal are stated as
follows:
1. Annexation of the subject territory to the
City of Fresno will result in improved land
use planning. All private development con-
trols of the City will apply, following re-
organization.
2. The subject territory is within the City of
Fresno's Sphere of Influence.
3. Property owners within the project area have
consented to annexation in return for the
provision of water service from the City of
Fresno.
4. It is advantageous for the subject territory to
be a part of the City.
Page 2 of 3
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the
City of Fresno hereby requests that proceedings be taken by
the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission for the herein
proposed Tyler -Winery No. 4 District Reorganization,
including the detachment of the subject territory, consist-
ing of 2.80 acres from the Mid Valley Fire Protection
District and the Kings River Conservation District, and
annexation of the same territory to the City of Fresno; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Council of the City of
Fresno finds Environmental Assessment No. 3174 is the con-
trolling environmental document for this annexation pro-
posal, such environmental assessment has been completed
in compliance with the California Environmental Quality
Act and the State Guidelines, and the Council has reviewed
and considered the information contained in such environ-
mental assessment prior to the approval of the initiation
of this annexation proposal and finds there is no poss-
ibility such proposal may have a significant effect on
the environment.
CLERK'S CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF FRESNO ) ss.
CITY OF FRESNO )
I, JACQUELINE L. RYLE, City Clerk of the City of Fresno,
certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the
Council of the City of Fresno, California, at a regular
meeting held on the 9th day of _February. 1982
JACQUELINE L. RYLE
City Clerk
B R CE I�
Depti#g_ ,'
A►TROVO AS TO RV
Page 3 of 3
TYLER-WINERY NO. 4
DISTRICT REORGANIZATION
Area to be Detached from the Mid Valley Fire Protection District, the Kings
River Conservation District and Annexed to the City of Fresno.
Consisting of Portions of Lots 3 and 4, in Block 7 of Belmont Gardens, Lying in
Section 36, T.13S., R.21E., M.D.B.6M.
BEGINNING at the intersection of the North line of Lot 4, in Block 7 of Belmont
Gardens, according to the Map thereof, filed in the Office of the County Recorder
June 4, 1936, and recorded in Volume 11 of Plats at page 39, Fresno County Records,
with the East line of the West Half of said Lot 4 in Block 7, being also, a point
on the existing City Limits of the City of Fresno; thence Easterly, along the North
line of said Lot 4, in Block 7, and along the North line of Lot 3, in Block 7 of
said Belmont Gardens, and along the Easterly production of the North line of said
Lot 3 in Block 7, being also, along the existing City Limits of said City, to the
intersection with a line which is parallel with and 30.00 feet East of the East
line of said Lot 3, in Block 7; thence Southerly, along a line which is parallel
with and 30.00 feet East of the East line of said Lot 3, in Block 7, to the inter-
section with a line which is parallel with and 30.00 feet North of the North line
of Lot 2, in Block 6 of said Belmont Gardens, being also, a point on the existing
City Limits of said City; thence Westerly along a line which is parallel with and
30.00 feet North of the North line of said Lot 2 in Block 6, being also, along
the existing City Limits of said City, to the intersection with a line which is
parallel with and 75.00 feet East of the East line of said Lot 4, in Block 7;
thence Northerly, along a line which is parallel with and 75.00 feet East of the
East line of said Lot 4, in Block 7, a distance of 165.00 feet, to the intersection
with a line which is parallel with and 135.00 feet North of the South line of said
Lot 3, in Block 7; thence Westerly, along a line which is parallel with and 135.00
feet North of the South line of said Lots 3 and 4, in Block 7, to the intersection
with the East line of the West half of said Lot 4, in Block 7; thence Northerly,
along the East line of the West half of said Lot 4, in Block 7, to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
File No. 2166
Drawing No. 6-A-1196
Contains 2.80 Acres
11/6/81
MW/pt
EXHIBIT "A"
L.�
E. OLIVE AVE.
------------------------------,
1
I
W 1
I
Q I
I �
Q
/ 1 V z�
M. LIUF- L0T-1 r� / /A1 7 i-N. LIME LOT?j - - - -
P f OF BECr•
..........
.................... :: I
:::::::::::::::::::::::I:::::::::::::::::::::..................::::::::::::
:::.................
..::::::::::::::::...
....
F. kIRIF,
W %z k0T `1
.......I
rc. /..11jE' I
: ,�.OT 4 �
�..11tilE
or 3
f
::1
3
I
LINE::::::.
5, L i ME %,OT4 l I
75
LOT 3
....•. ........
l!, I.I NE k0T I
N. A.IUE LOT 2 '
'L)EG,EAlD
Im�X/STIAIC� C/T`% �IM/t5
tMeE TO CAE IDETACHET) F-ROM THE m/p VRIE5_1
El FIRE PROTECTIOIJ p16TPtCT, THE f5lA1C7j ffl(/ER
CC)V6,ET{I/FITIDAI j>15TRlCT AND f3A 1L1E>-'--D TO
THE CITY OF FTCf5tlC).
FILE No. 2166
-rVk 6R - W/NEW NO-¢15T�RICT fREORGAU I zA77DA1ANNEX No.
C0A1515TI,UCT OF PORT/OA/5 OF kOr5 3 PAIP -1, ACRES -
/it/ B,LOCH 7 OF 5E4MON7- 6-F)RDEAl5,
,LVlAla l/t/ 5Ei/ CTID,3/, T. /35., R 2/ E. M.L2B � M COUNCIL DISTRICT No. ¢ —
ALLOCATED TO COUNCIL D STRICT N0. _ . ` _. AS PER COUNCIL DR. BY:
—mW-.
DISTRICT MAP DATED I-zz-81 DATE Al— l9BI_ 6_A_ _IIgG_
SCALE; -
EXHIBIT "B"
go
--Jyj 104
p
;IRA,
501
0
. Loco mI