Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - City Council - 82-027 - 1982-01-19• • RESOLUTION NO. 81-27 RESOLUTION INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE REORGANIZATION OF THE CITY OF FRESNO, THE KINGS RIVER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, FRESNO COUNTY WATERWORKS DISTRICT NO. 24 AND THE MID VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, IN­VOLVING UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND DESIGNATED AS THE PROPOSED TULARE-FOWLER NO. 2 DISTRICT REORGAN­IZATION, SETTING THE TIME, DATE AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS THERETO, AND GIVING NOTICE THEREOF Ed Bielicki WHEREAS, proceedings for a proposed reorganization were commenced by the City of Fresno pursuant to its Resolution No. 81-372, adopted on September 22, 1981; and WHEREAS, the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission on the 25th day of November, 1981, met at the noticed time and place to consider all matters relevant to the proposed reorganization and heard all persons interested therein, and adopted at the time and in the form and manner prescribed by law its Resolution No. RO-81-51, "Making Determination and Approving the Proposed Tulare-Fowler No. 2 District Reorganization", a copy of which is attached hereto and identified as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, the Fresno County Assessor's roll will be used for the purpose of levying any assessments or taxes on the subject property; and WHEREAS, the subject territory proposed to be annexed to the City of Fresno shall be exempt from taxation for the payment of principal or interest, or any other amounts which shall become due on account of any outstanding bonded indebtedness incurred by the City prior to the effective date of such annexation; upon completion of the reorganization proceedings for this proposal the subject territory will be included in Municipal Bond Area "D" and will not be taxed for any existing bonded indebtedness or contractual obligation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the Council of the City of Fresno, as follows: l.Proceedings are hereby initiated for the proposed Tulare-Fowler No. 2 District Reorganization as described in Exhibit "B" and graphically de­ picted in Exhibit "C" wherein the City of Fresno, Page l of 4