Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - City Council - 79-427 - 1979-10-02xy 7. Ruth Poufter Ask Ed B9lici +�r RESOLUTION No. 7 - 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRESNO, CALIFORNIA IN THE MATTER OF THE TULARE-PEACH 240.1-A DISTRICT REORGANIZA TION ORDERING A REORGANIZATION TO THE CITY OF FRESNO AND THE MID VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Fresno, pursuant to Resolution No. 79--39, applying for and requesting the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission to take appropriate proceedings for the annexation of land more particularly described below to the City of Fresno and the detachment of the same territory from the Mid Valley Protection District; and WHEREAS, such reorganization proposal was assigned the short term form designation of "Tulare -Peach No.l-A"; and WHEREAS, the Fresno Local Agency Formation, Commission, on the 25th day of April, at a duly noticed public hearangr considered all matters relevant to the proposed reorganization and heard all persons interested, and adopted Resolution No. RO--79-7 "Making Determination and Approving proposed Tulare - Peach No.l--A Reorganization"t all at the time and in the form and manner as proscribed by law; and WHEREAS, said Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission Resolution No. R.O-79-7 authorized the Council to conduct the proceedings fox the re- organization in the manner provided by law, which includes a waiver of the restriction in Government Cade Section 35002.3 pertaining to the creation of un- incorporated islands-; and WHEREAS, the Council pursuant to Resolution No. 79-338 initiated pro- ceedings for said proposed reorganization and set a. hearing on the proposed reorganization for the 2nd day of October, at 2.00 p.m,, in the Council Chamber, City Hall, 2326 Fresno Street, Fresno, California 93721;'arid i WHEREAS, the Council finds that the required, notice of the passage of said resolution initiating proceedings for the proposed reorganization and of the time and place for hearing protests or objections to said reorganl - : tion has been published, pasted, and mailed in the time, form, and manner re- quired, -,by law; and WHEREAS, said hearing duly held by the Council at said time and palace for the hearing of all objections to said proposed reorganization; and WHEREAS, protests or objections in writing to said, reorganization delivered to the Clerk of the City of Fresno up to the hour set for hearing .x Page l of 3 fr ,, thereof were considered and said protests or objections in writing are on file and of record in the Office of the Clerk of the City of Fresno, County of Fresno, State of California, and all persons who desired; to be heard were heard; and AREAS at said hearing and prior to consideration of protests, Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission's resolution making determination was presented and summarized to this Council, and WHEREAS, the Council considered all factors required by law for a i proposed reorganization and considered all: testimony, protests and all evidence presented with respect thereto; and WHEREAS, the Council determines the proposed reorganization constitutes uninhabited territory as defined by law and written protests filed and not withdrawn represented less than fifty percent (50%) of the assessed value of land therein: and l WHEREAS, pursuant to Fresno Municipal Code Section 2-208 the subject territory is allocated to the Roosevelt Council District "No. .°` NOW, THEREFORE, the Council of the City- of Fresno resolves and orders 1. The territory within those boundaries described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein and more particularly depicted upon the map marked Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein, is hereby annexed to the City of Fresno and the same territory is hereby detached from the Mid Valley Fire Protection District of Fresno County. 2. It will be to the best interest of said territory to annex the same or detach the same, as the case may be, and that lands have not been improperly omitted from or included: within said proposed annexation and detachment. 3. The reasons for this proposed reorganization are as ibl.lows: a.. The subject territory is within the City of Fresno's Sphere of Influence,' - b. Several property owners within the area have expressed: a desire to annex to the City. c. The consolidation of the subject area into one detachment - annexation project is beneficial to the affected governmental processes and the resultant City and, District boundaries. d. That the proposed reorganization requires the annexation of certain territory to the City of Fresno and the detachment of the same territory from. the Mid. Valley Fire Protection District. Page 2 of 3 4. The conditions imposed by the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission for the subject territory have been met:, such conditions being: a. Inclusion of Southern Pacific Railroad right--of-way adjacent to the North, and APN 462-26--37T, and submission of a revised map and legal, approved by the County Assessor's office, to the Local Agency Formation commission b. Amendment of City Service Plan to provide for fire service by the Mid Valley Fire Protection District, as per City/District Fire District Agreement. 5. WritUen protests filed and not withdrawn represented less than fifty percent (50%) of the assessed value of land therein. 6. The Clerk of the City of Fresno shall immediately cause to be trans- mitted to the Executive Officer of the Fresno Local Agency Formation Com— mission a certified copy of this resolution. Upon the filing of the appropriate documents by the said Executive officer in the manner prescribed by law, the reorganization shall be completed, IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Council of the City of Fresno, that the subject territory designated as the Tulare -leach No. 3-A District R.eorg vaization, described in said Exhibit "A." and depicted on said Exhibit. "B" , be and is hereby allocated to the Roosevelt Council District No.-5. CLERKI S CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO ) ss, CITY OF FRESNO I, JACQUELINE L. RYLE, City Clerk of the City of Fresno, certify that the foregoing resolution was adapted by the Council of the City of Fresno, California, at a regular meeting held on theme day of 1979. JACQUELINE L. RYLE City Clerk By Day GAKfBL: ak 9/ls/79 rv. Page 3 of 3 AMAWL OLUTION NO. RO-�79-7 t 1 MAKING DETERMINATION AND APPROVING) RESOLUTION OF THE PROPOSED "TULARE-PEACH #l-A" FRESNO LOCAL AGBN 'X 2 REORGANIZATION ) FORMATION COMMISSION 3 4 WHEREAS, preliminary liminary P a.proceedings have been initiated by the 5 City of Fresno to annex certain territory to the City of Fresno 6 and detach from Mid Talley Fire Protection District in the County 7 of Fresno and g WHEREAS, an application for said proposal has been accepted for g filingby the Executive Officer of the Local. Agency Formation ,I 10 Commission pursuant to Title 5, Division 11 Part 2 of the 11 Government Code; and 12 WHEREAS, said application was set 'or hearing by the Executive 13 Officer on the 25th day of April 1979., at the hour of 3:20 P.M. 14 and continued to May 91 1979; and 15 WHEREAS, notice of -the hearing of said application was duly 1g given by mail, posting, and newspaper publication as required by 17 law; and 1$ WHEREAS, the Executive Officer has reviewed said application 19' and prepared'a report, including his recommendations thereon, said 20 application and report having been presented to and considered by 21 this Commission; and 22 WHEREAS, this Commission has considered all relevant ;actors 23 and heard all interested parties wishing to speak on said 24 application; and 25 WHEREAS., -the Commission did make the f indinc; that the app li- 25 cation of the restriction in Government Code. Section 35002.3 prohibits creation of unincorporated islands would be 27 which 28 detrimental to the orderly development of the community and that 29 the area included is so located that it car.�not reasonably be 30 annexed to another city or incorporated as a new city; and 3l WHEREAS a negative declaration of environmental impact had 32 been prepared and properly noticed by the City of Fresno and said, f COUNTY Of ''FRFSNO FRLSNO, CALIFORNIA i I; f i k ws rwr"u+;e'" .n «'' v.+•.. rra'r.,,;f,. iT"�y.+;[ i .tr.yl �. 5�,: �awrd ..Y v. t 'fi t. F*` Y'R ^r. i^''` :.r t '"' r..< as:r{ +.5 t.`�+'''L,,,,, �.u�•�T':,: 5.'�Ptiy� e..r ';':« r , ra ..> -^f b:_ "7r' ": =. `'• "�`,'':HwC _ r'J" 'n`i.?,^y".L� '"'i w ir:+ r .t � `7��µ .,Y ass. ;. � ., . ^.:^�, R ;x y r .. .: i � ^^.�•.x _ s ..` > ,� a+o .T:+s••tvaY:a t Y^" r .•. Est ..'r, ,,.,w•ylwic'� .a `w: . +s+.,• ' a •f w 1' negative declaration was considered by the Commissions NOW, THEREFORE r BE IT.RESOLVED that the Vocal Agency Formation Commission of the County of Fresno does HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE 4 AND ORDER as follows Section 1. This Commission certifies it has reviewed and. 6 considered the negative declaration. The Commission has also found t 7 that the proposed inclusion will have no environmental impact beyond that addressed in the information submitted in the eaviron-- 9 mental finding for the proposal. 10 Section 2. Said proposal is approved subject to the terms and 11 conditions hereinafter specified.. 12 Section 3. Any resolution of the conducting agency ordering 13 this reorganization shall provide that such reorganization shall. be 14 subject to the following terms and conditions 13 1. inclusion. of Southern: Pacific Railroad right of way 16 adjacent to the north, and APN 4E2-25-37T r and submission of 17 ;revised map and Legal r approved by the County .Assessor's office, .181 to the Local Agency Formation Commission, 19 2. Amendment of the City Service Fiazl to provide for fire 20 service by the Mid --Valley Fire Protection District, as per city` 21 district fire district agreement, it 22 section 4. Wave the restriction in Government Code Sect on 23 35002.3'pertaining to the creation of unincorporated. islands 24 Section 5. The boundaries of the territory proposed to be R 25 reorganized, as set forth in attached E hibit A and as amended by 26 condition., are approved. Said territory is found to be uninhabited{ 27 and is assigned the following dis-tinetive short form designation, 28 Tulare -Peach 01--A, 29 F Section fa . The City of Fresno is designated as the conducting 30 agency and the governing body of said agency is hereby directed. to 31 initiate reorganization proceedings in compliance with this 32 resolution. ,COUNTY Of FRESNO FR,ESNO, CALIFORNIA a� ., . ;�- k �".4- .c':. ay 6. .p-Eti: -k '+, G`M"f•-'v.•.t. .+.f: ,Y �p+M1n;:. ,*'. sr.A: J - `i `'f.rsr ;!'a1.0` -. fti: i;'+`4�z,. ��`n��, r. $,, :. +S ..i.tk. h.1L tS,7. t„i i1{R .YD'¢ *#♦iTsni ".:.%r rR. . r:nM1+ #J",s ... y.",' , s 7 8 9 10 11 12 14' { 15 lb 17 19 20 i 21 rw.'�'4�-�4��naw•��� � r�°��""'�C.`'a+i'rgr N... 'kw+°*'�=ti;.u,} .:c m , .. �i.k.�..,'-%.-+.i�ia.,.»..e:>*?w"=�}r'`,YX�i`•!aS NOW s Section 7. Further proceedings shall be initiated, conducted, and completed pursuant to required law. Proceedings and any resolution of approval shall comply with the,Commission resolution of approval.. Section 8. The Executive officer is hereby authorized and directed to mail certified copies of this resolution as provided in Section 56272 of the Government Code. ADOPTED this 9th day of May 1975 by the following vote. - AYES; Donaldson, Valdez, Howard t Johnson,, AU�r,igh.t NOES Nome ABSENT: None STATE of CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF FRES NO I, MARVIN L. PANTER Executive officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Fresno County Local Agency Formation Commission, California, at a regular meeting held on the 9th day of May 1979, MARVIN L. PALTER, Executive officer COU14TY or PIR"cto -RESNO, GAUVO NIA r ey � �...�. .•.... _, ..c' -., � ',t°r.+,,, x �...o... ., t .fr .f Ms:i.. . f„r -i3 :;' . �- ..Ss:'"',+v+ y.m:y. n4' • a'a.> .y z i«s . ,x..:es an.'s�`� r,.�,K ,� '. ar,1 -rP j,,., s'$:!"i...i "ti,'^' .r: rt sb :.,..+ . �."�'^ , rx�.x;. rl:. E s k�;;SCt°q�"�±xs'N w #�s''i,,,nc,� a}F ,� , ,.... ._. , '�fn 3 �. ..�. r w.±.«. i',«.. • .r a :.r , t;z �. ✓' ; -. i«. ,,X(,w4.; +°�'. "� _,fi`��'� .� �, x +�. _ n°5x`+�:+ ., -. - ;- 't�-s,. Wit'.' 'Y. . - +,'�. - z ; .t�«�t...T+^f `��y a'.'� �S a:.. mar' sv?w'rS,�r„ -�'-= ,s 't:.'z" '�+'^r.,�`rf�'�✓y�',R.x. t �.,s . ` PEACH NO. 1..A APPROV t TUL-� ~ LAF ' o DISTRICT REORGANIZATION AREA TO BE DETACHED FROM THE MID VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND ANNEXED To THE CITY A.� � R� OF FRESNO i� � ,% 41. Executive officer Consisting of Portions of Lots 8 and 25 lying in Section 5, T1.4S, R21E, M.'3.B.&M. BEGINNING at the intersection of the 'West line 4f Section 5, Township 14 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Fuse and Meridian, as said Section is shown on the United States Township Plats, with the Westerly production of the North line of Lot 25 of Easterby Rancho, as said lot is shown on the Map thereof, filed in the. Office of the County Recorder June 24, 1880 and recorded in volume 2 of Plats at page 61 Fresno County Records, being also, a ;point on the existing City Limits of the City of Fresno; thence Easterly, along he Westerly production of the North line of said Lot 25 , and along the North line of said Lot 25, being also r along the existing City Limits of said City, to a point which is 1.5,.39 feet East of the :Northwest corner of said Lot 25, thence South 011120!39" West, being also,+ along the existing City Limits of the City of Fresno, a distance of 107 feet, itore or less, to a point which is 1194.50 feet North of the South line of said Lot 25 thence South 8903814311 West, being also, along said existing City Limits, parallel with and 1194.50 feet North of the South- line of said Lot 25, a distance of 1.2.89 feet to the intersection with. the West line of said Lot 25; thence South 00,05 Y 17" East along the West line of said Lot 25, being also, along the said existing City Limits, a distance of 105.00 .feet to a point which. is 1089„50 feet North of the South line of said Lot 25; thence North 89038143" East, being also, along said existing City 'Limits., parallel with and 1089.50 feet North of South line of said Lot 25, a. distance of 10.43 feet; thence South 0102013911 West, being also, ., along the said existing City Limits, a distance of 18.49 feet; thence South 00*0511711 East, being also, along said existing City Limits, parallel with and 10.00 feet East of the West line of said Lot 25 a distance of 91.52 feet to a point vihi.ch is 979..50 feet North of the South Line of said Lot 25; thence South 89*3814311 West., being also, along said existing City Limits., parallel, with and 979.50 feet North of South line of said Lot 25, a distance of 10.00 feet to the intersection with the west line of - said Lot 25; thence South 00,005 11711 East .along the West line of said Lot 25, being' i also,, along said existing City Limits, a distance of 10.00 feet to a point which is l 969,50 feet North of the South line of said Lot 25; thence Forth 89038"431' East, 1 being ng also, 'along said existing City Limits,, parallel with and 969.50 feet North of i the: South Line of said Lot 25, a distance of 10.00 feet; thence South 00n05117" East, .being also, along said existing City Limits, parallel with and 1.0_00 feet East of the West line of said Lot 25, a distance of 63.00 feet to a point which is 906.50 feet North of the South line of said. Lot 25; thence South 89°38143" West, being also, along said existing City Limits,, parallel with and 906.50 feet North of South line of said Lot 25, a distance of 10.00 + £eet to the intersection with the West line of � said Lot 25; thence South 000051 I7" East- along the West line of said. Lot 25, being also, along said existing City Limits., a distance of 21.75 feet to a point which is 884.75 feet North of the South line of said Lot 25; thence North 8903814311 East, being also, along said existing City Limits, parallel with and. 384.75 feet North of the South line of said Lot 2 , a distance of 10.00 feet; thence South 00,0511711 East, being also, along; said existing City Limits, parallel with and 10.00 feet 'East of the west line of said. Lot 25, a distance of 210.00feet to a paint which is 674-75 feet North of the South line of said Lot 25; thence South 8913814311 West., being also, along said existing City Limits, parallel with and 674.75 feet North of the South line of said Lot 25 , a distance of 10.00 feet to the intersection with the West line of said Lot 25 thence South 00005117" East along the West line of said Lot 25, being also, along the said existing City Limits, a distance of 161.75 , feet to a. point which is 513.00 feet North of the South line of said Lot 25; thence North 89 a 38 r 43» East, being also, along said existing City Limits, parallel with and 51300 feet North of the South line of said Lot 25, a distance of 10 00 feet; thence South 00*05117" East, along a line which is parallel with and 10.00 feet East of the West line of said Lot 25, being also t along the existing City Limits of said City p to a point which is 100.00 feet North of the South line of said Lot 25, fence South 1 *18122" East, being also, along the existing City Limits of said city, to the inter- section with the South line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 5; thence Easte:rl along the South line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section. 5, to the intersection with. the Southerly production of the East line of said Lot 25; thence Northerly r along the Southerly production of the East line of said List 25, and along the East line of "RXHIBIT A", Page. of 2 +.. r a+..•t _. a 'y.. ♦ M. e d :v: -±a {,1'';J.a„ ,•�:+ .sr''F-n'++P•;;;�..•.atl•;.�", toT.+ _,j>.�,,,��5•Lx"-t'#:$�:�a�. , �,'�}, ' �"'" + e1 .m "ti..'sy"-ar:. S "' i vMr;� r 'ye:+ . i, h,• �„ • .�1.s.a. said Lot 25 if -anal alonmkidLe Northerly production of th st line of said Lot 25, a _ across the former So ` Pacific Railroad right -of to the intersection with the Easterly production of the South line of Lot 15 of Easterly Retreats, as said lot is shown on the Map thereof, filed in the office of the Lour;ty Recorder July 1938, and recorded in Volume 11 of Plats at page , 68, Fresno County Records; thence Westerly, along the Easterly production of the South line of said Lot 15, and, along the South lines of Lots 15 , 14, 13, 12 and 11 of said Easterly Retreats, and along the Westerly production of the South line of ,said Lot 11, to the intersection with the West line of said Section 57 thence Southerlyt along the. West line of said Section 5, a distance of 40 feet,, more or less, to the: Point of Beginning, File No. 1962 (Revised) Acres = 19.89 Drawing No. 6-A-992 6/18/79 'Z'WIB/P "EXHIBIT A" ...._.�. 6- Executive Officwr y Page 2of2 Ar:P�+l:'t i. nY.'aSn,i iy.. ,"h ref :u ".N-'.a:! iVi ,y,• 2.+r.1. -/' `� .yew •� =K' w..'h± .�� iS;�''i°"A Y,..J<y.,,.�_.. ��d.� r-'L`? x t4•.i..'�.-•'";'': y�«K.T''•,'�,! as '+o. ;Tarr h-''r-..;: ':f 'k'.4;.it.+..t k 4� sue.. . w y `'` .%:'. M rfi '?` " ,,,..'k ,.r'r rt'qi ..N •: �, i•v 4z'r- t/ u .� .� IL i -A I�•HIWO '.r• .�. !!12_ l r' h ... . 8E.�x [ihE OF t9T-ZS• ..R: • S. P ,2. Q .G✓: s''::::::. � �s' .. �=-�.lf• ; � Ufif• 3r 2s ..�•At . %L 1.� .l. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •u ' r ~ //9IF: SQ " rt- of 5-tll"c 4f0rn � 6 , s 4 , .......................:::::::..:.v C •.•, �: ::N. G.�`.fB`.p.�"`E: :96.P. CAN. Of. ..............................:........:.. �J `J •;•:► 8'¢-�~� .- e04:757 /!OF.SL/NE r25 r�J :io..io.....:..:.: w .......... . • .:SBJ ?,�8' 3. ytr-6iic: T� rr of :siiOYl Or-15' : Q �,. 26 ............: H .ft. /B¢....Ir ..... .... �......� :.::: :::::......... A P P P ED-LArC❑ :::::::::DA zl. ,i: :......................... Exec u 4*0'fficer :•.•. l: :. �.:: - ;r ;5- •LINE:OF. 'CGZIS. E:R.:. i : : -T'UL-,A �.�. ice. — .,i,��— !�� •--_!' _ s'y5. LEGEND r-•:•, r C/7 f iREA X/S T/N G QR�a, To BE DErAcHEo IRoM /riE MAD VALLEY ,DISTRICT A"D A v,,vE-xoo To THE C17Y' OF A=co ADO QE S5 vL4 RE - PE-QCH Alo' . iA /5TR/CT 25 ORGAN/ Z A7-/ ON "fEXHIBIT B" t-RE'SNO 6%i�/79 T 5 Y5 Tt /''1 �Grt�/SE FILE N ° ---- - ANNEX No ACRES = OF EASTcRBY • RAIVCNO - 1.9 -- �. -f9.8S DR. BY. � AIAS DATE: .TAN._ 197s SCALE:- .,= zMO 6-A-_--P,9 • , ;.�V� .'s..•-.rrw^i a: •�,�'V_'�'i�2���,,�yy����w ♦ t}br:.. �:ivaS'I�'`'r`�•,kJt•�;►: �'�jyR�rl'Jrr��ri`.'.+.'- _ ..•ti.r.v .a...4%.?.:i=._ .4.i';. •�`�+5�.��}:�'_ �rt��: