HomeMy WebLinkAboutLSA Associates - 2nd Amendment to agreement dated 10.12.21 - 06.21.23DocuSign Envelope ID: CEOOEE63-D531-458E-BO71-3032D9571E5C
SECOND AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT (Amendment) made and entered into
effective the 21 st of June 2023, between the City of Fresno, a California municipal
corporation (City), and LSA Associates, a California corporation (Consultant).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City and the Consultant entered into an agreement on October 12,
2021 (Agreement), to provide professional environmental planning and consulting
services for the Vehicle Miles Traveled Mitigation Program (Project); and
WHEREAS, City and Consultant entered into First Amendment, dated
December 28, 2022; and
WHEREAS, City and Consultant desire to increase the scope of work by requiring
additional services beyond those services referred in the Project, increasing Consultant's
total compensation by $151,595 and to extend the contract term to December 31, 2024;
and
WHEREAS, with entry into this Amendment, the Consultant agrees it has no claim,
demand, or dispute against the City.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree that the aforesaid Agreement be amended
as follows:
The recitals to this Amendment are incorporated and made a part of this
Amendment.
2. The Consultant's sole compensation for satisfactory performance of all
services required or rendered pursuant to this Amendment shall be a total fee of $151,595
for a total contract value of $450,225.11.
3. The term of the Agreement shall be extended to December 31, 2024.
4. In the event of any conflict between the body of this Amendment and any
Exhibit or Attachment hereto, the terms and conditions of the body of this Amendment
shall control and take precedence over the terms and conditions expressed within the
Exhibitor Attachment. Furthermore, any terms or conditions contained within any Exhibit
or Attachment hereto which purport to modify the allocation of risk between the Parties,
provided for within the body of this Amendment, shall be null and void.
5. Except as otherwise provided herein, the Agreement entered into by the
City and the Consultant on October 12, 2021, and amended on December 28, 2022,
remain in full force and effect.
[Signatures follow on the next page.]
DocuSign Envelope ID: CEOOEE63-D531-458E-8071-3032D9571E5C
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement at Fresno,
California, on the day and year first above written.
CITY OF FRESNO, LSA Associates,
iQkNp municipal corporation I r;pr3r i
7/12/2023 't6'S 7/6/2023
' erinAer K. Clark, Tony Petros "
Director, Planning & Development Name.
Title: CEO
APPROVED AS TO FORM: (if corporation or LLC., Board Chair,
ANDREW JANZ Pres. or Vice Pres.)
Ci alb Rgy
7/7/2023 By.
randon M. Collet Date Name:
Supervising Deputy City Attorney
Title:
ATTEST: (If corporation or LLC., CFO, Treasurer,
TODD STERMER, CMC Secretary or Assistant Secretary)
City Clerk
REVIEWED BY:
D"C S-tlnrtl by.
By:
aC
Deputy a on ennett, Project Administrator
Addresses:
CITY:
City of Fresno
Attention: Nadia Salinas
Project Manger
2600 Fresno St
Fresno, CA 93721
Phone: (559) 621-8150
Email: Nadia.Salinas@fresno.gov
Attachment:
1. Exhibit A — Scope of Services
CONSULTANT:
LSA Associates, Inc.
Attention: Tony Petros
CEO
3210 El Camino Real, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92602
Phone: (949) 553-0666
Email: Tony.Petros@lsa.net
DocuSign Envelope ID: CEOOEE63-D531-458E-6071-3032D9571E5C
UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT
TO ACTION WITHOUT A MEETING
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
a California Corporation
The undersigned, being all of the members of the Board of Directors (the "Board") of LSA
Associates, Inc., a California corporation (the "Corpomdon ") who would be entitled to notice of a
special meeting of the Board for the purpose of taking the actions and adopting the resolutions set
forth below, do hereby waive such notice, take the following actions, adopt the following
resolutions by unanimous written consent to action without a meeting pursuant to Section 307 of
the Corporations Code of the State of California, and direct that this consent be filed with the
minutes of the Corporation:
SIGNING AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the Board condoled the passing of Mike Trotta (Chief Executive Officer) on
December 4, 2022;
WHEREAS, the Board is authorized, pursuant to the Bylaws of the Corporation, to elect
or appoint officers, assistant officers and agents of the Corporation and to expressly delegate to
said officers or agents such duties and authority as the Board shall deem necessary and as the needs
of the Corporation may require including, without limitation, specific signatory rights on behalf of
the Corporation;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Bylaws of the Corporation, the Board previously elected the
following officers and agents of the Corporation effective December 9, 2022:
Anthony Petros
Chief Executive Officer
Amy Fischer
President and Chief Operating Officer
Justin Cary
Chief Financial Officer
Theresa Wallace
Secretary;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Bylaws the Board previously granted to the foregoing officers
of the Corporation certain rights and powers of signatory, including the right to make, execute,
sign, acknowledge, file and deliver contracts for the performance of professional services provided
by the Corporation; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Bylaws the Board desires to grant to certain of the foregoing
officers of the Corporation and Ms. Michele Douglas, Mr. Blake Selna. and Mr. Ambarish
Mukherjee, as agents of the Corporation, certain rights and powers of signatory, including the right
US.354956382.02
DocuSign Envelope ID: CEOOEE63-D531-458E-BO71-3032D9571E5C
to make, execute, sign, acknowledge, file and deliver documents of finance and credit of the
Corporation.
AUTHORIZING RESOLUTIONS
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, Anthony Petros, Amy Fischer, Justin Cary and
Theresa Wallace or any one of them acting alone, are authorized to sign on behalf of the
Corporation contracts for the performance of professional services provided by this Corporation.
The signature of any one of said officers upon any such contracts shall be binding upon this
Corporation; provided, however, that any contract involving professional services valued at more
than $250,000 shall also be signed by the Chief Executive Officer (Anthony Petros) or the
President (Amy Fischer) or the Chief Financial Officer (Justin Cary) in addition to one other
authorized signer. No other persons are authorized to sign contracts for the performance of
professional services.
RESOLVED, Justin Cary, Ms. Michele Douglas, Mr. Blake 5elna, Mr. Ambarish
Mukherj ee, and Theresa Wallace or any one of them acting alone, are authorized to sign on behalf
of the Corporation documents of finance and credit of this Corporation. The signature of any of
said officers or agents upon any such document shall be binding upon this Corporation; provided,
however, that any secured or unsecured debt or obligation valued at more than $250,000 shall also
be signed by the Chief Executive Officer (Anthony Petros) or the President (Amy Fischer) or the
Chief Financial Officer (Justin Cary) in addition to one other authorized signer. No other persons
are authorized to sign documents of finance and credit of this Corporation.
RESOLVED, Anthony Petros, Amy Fischer, Ms. Michele Douglas, Blake Selna, and Mr-
Ambarish Mukherjee, or any one of them acting alone, are authorized to sign on behalf of the
Corporation documents of payment (e.g., checks) of this Corporation of $250,000 or less to any
approved payee of the Corporation; provided, however, that any document of payment to any
payee of the Corporation of greater than $250,000 shall also be signed by the Chief Executive
Officer or the Chief Operating Officer in addition to one other authorized signer. No other persons
are authorized to sign documents of payment of this Corporation.
RESOLVED, that all acts and deeds heretofore done or action taken by the Chief Executive
Officer, President, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer or Secretary of the
Corporation for and on behalf of the Corporation, in entering into, executing, acknowledging or
attesting to any arrangements, agreements, instruments or documents which carry out the terms
and intentions of any of the foregoing resolutions are hereby in all respects ratified, approved and
confirmed; and it is further
RESOLVED, that this Unanimous Written Consent may be signed in any number of
counterparts, each of which (including any facsimile or "PDF" copies) shall be an original, with
the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument, and that
such counterparts (including any facsimile or `'PDF" copies) shall together constitute but one and
the same instrument; and
US.354956382.02
DocuSign Envelope ID: CEOOEE63-D531-458E-BO71-3032D9571 E5C
RESOLVED, that the fully executed copy of this Unanimous Written Consent shall be
delivered to the Secretary of the Corporation for inclusion in the minutes of the proceedings of the
Board.
[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]
US.354956382.02
DocuSign Envelope ID: CEOOEE63-D531-45SE-BO71-3032D9571E5C
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Unanimous Written
Consent of the Board of Directors in Lieu of Special Meeting as of December 9, 2022.
BOARD:
ate, �--���---
Anthony Petr s
Dart Airola
Blake Sea r
17 +
J.T. Stgphens
Ken Howe
Ambarigh'Mukher ee
US.354956382.02
EXHIBIT A
LSA
June 6, 2023
Sophia Pagoulatos
Planning Manager
Planning and Development Department
City of Fresno
2600 Fresno Street, Room 3065
Fresno, CA 93721
Subject: Proposal to Prepare an Environmental Impact Report for the Vehicle Miles Traveled
Mitigation Program
Dear Ms. Pagoulatos:
CARLSBAD
CLOVIS
IRVINE
LOS ANGELES
PALM SPRINGS
POINT RICHMOND
RIVERSIDE
ROSEVILLE
SAN LUIS OBISPO
LSA is pleased to submit this proposed scope, schedule, and budget to prepare an Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) for the City of Fresno (City) to assess the potential environmental impacts
associated with implementing the Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Mitigation Program (herein referred
to as the "proposed Project.")
The preparation of the materials and templates will be staffed by Ashley Davis, Principal, who will
oversee the project, and Kyle Simpson, Principal, who will manage the project and prepare the text
updates. Amy Fischer, President, will also review and provide input on project deliverables.
SCOPE OF WORK
LSA will use utilize the City's General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) to program
an EIR for the VMT Mitigation Program. The following provides a description of the tasks that LSA
will complete.
TASK 1: PROJECT KICKOFF, DATA COLLECTION, AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Following issuance of the authorization to proceed, LSA will begin compiling background information
and coordinating with the City to hold a kickoff meeting, as described below.
1.1: Project Initiation
To initiate work on the EIR, LSA will meet with City staff to discuss expectations regarding the tasks
to be undertaken as part of the environmental documentation effort. During this meeting, LSA will:
• Lead a discussion regarding overall project administration, communications, invoicing
procedures, and general protocols.
• Confirm the proposed scope of work and expectations for use of any previously prepared
technical materials or other background materials that may be available.
• Discuss the significance criteria for each topic to be addressed in the EIR.
• Gather relevant information and data if there is information LSA has not yet received.
2565 Alluvial Avenue, Suite 172, Clovis, California 93611 559.490.1210 www.Isa.net
LSA is a business name of LSA Associates, Inc
LSA
• Discuss the City's desired schedule for the review process. Items to discuss include project
planning, coordination, and schedule, including establishing target dates for issuance of the
Notice of Preparation (NOP), the Scoping Meeting, and release of the Draft EIR.
Following the Kickoff Meeting, LSA will provide a summary memorandum to the City.
Deliverable:
• Kick-off Meeting Summary Memorandum (Adobe Portable Document Format [PDFj)
TASK 2: NOTICE OF PREPARATION AND SCOPING MEETING
2.1: Notice of Preparation
LSA will prepare a draft NOP and Notice of Completion (NOC) in accordance with the requirements
of CEQA. Project information will include all available details of the proposed Project. Following
review of the NOP and NOC by City staff, LSA will prepare a final NOP for distribution by City staff.
LSA will be responsible for submitting the NOP and NOC to the State Clearinghouse. City staff will be
responsible for all local notices, including newspaper and, Planning Commission and City Council
noticing.
2.2: Scoping Meeting
LSA will participate in a public EIR scoping meeting. LSA will develop materials, including handouts
that may include an overview of the objectives of CEQA, the EIR process and schedule, and the
topics to be addressed in the EIR. It is assumed that LSA will make a short presentation at the
scoping meeting that outlines the proposed Project's environmental review requirements and
process. LSA will provide to the City a written summary outlining the key issues and topics related to
the environmental review. The City will be responsible for meeting logistics, such as location, time,
day, and refreshments (if any).
Following the 30-day comment period on the NOP, LSA will review all comments, recommend any
needed changes to the proposed scope of work, and ensure that all submitted concerns are
adequately covered by the EIR.
2.3: Scope of Work Refinement
It may be necessary to refine the work program in accordance with comments received on the NOP.
Upon receipt and review of all of the comments on the NOP, and taking into consideration
comments heard at the scoping meeting, LSA will work with City staff to refine the scope of work
and budget, if necessary, to address any environmental issues that are not yet adequately addressed
in this work program.
Deliverables:
a Draft NOP (MS Word format and PDF)
■ Final NOP (MS Word format and PDF)
• Draft NOC (MS Word format)
• Scoping Meeting Minutes Memorandum
State Clearinghouse submittal
• Scoping Meeting PowerPoint Presentation (PowerPoint format)
6/7/23 2
LSA
TASK 3: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ALTERNATIVES
LSA will work closely with City staff to develop a Project Description for the EIR, as described below.
3.1: Project Description
LSA will prepare a Project Description that details the purpose, phasing, and physical elements of
the proposed Project. The Project Description will include a map showing the locations of project
components, as described by the VMT Mitigation Program and a general description of the
proposed Project's technical and environmental characteristics. LSA will work closely with the City to
ensure that the Project Description provides a level of detail appropriate to describe the proposed
Project. As part of the Project Description, LSA will work with the City to prepare a list of project
objectives consistent with the City's goals for the proposed Project.
The Project Description will also include a statement briefly describing the intended uses of the EIR,
including a list of agencies expected to use the EIR, a list of permits and other approvals required to
implement the proposed Project, and a list of related environmental review and consultation steps
required by federal, State, or local laws, regulations, and policies. LSA will submit a draft of the
Project Description to the City for review and acceptance before the LSA Team begins conducting
any impact analyses.
Deliverables:
• Draft Project Description (MS Word format and PDF)
■ Final Project Description (MS Word format and PDF)
TASK 4: ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Consistent with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, LSA will conduct an analysis of the proposed
Project's potential environmental impacts in the following resources topic areas:
• Aesthetics
• Agriculture and Forestry Resources
• Air Quality
■ Biological Resources
■ Cultural Resources
■ Energy
■ Geology and Soils
■ GHG Emissions
• Hazards and Hazardous Materials
■ Hydrology and Water Quality
• Land Use and Planning
• Mineral Resources
• Noise
• Population and Housing
• Public Services
• Recreation
• Transportation
• Tribal Cultural Resources
• Utilities and Service Systems
• Wildfire
Analysis included in the General Plan PEIR will be incorporated into the sections of applicable
resource topic areas. The setting section for each topic will describe the current conditions, which
form the baseline for the analysis. Each impact analysis will evaluate the potential environmental
effects resulting from implementation proposed Project, and feasible mitigation measures will be
identified as necessary.
Each topical section will also include a discussion of cumulative impacts. The analysis of cumulative
effects will address the potential impacts associated with the proposed Project in conjunction with
6/7/23
LSA
other projects that are under construction, approved, or reasonably foreseeable. The preferred
methodology for conducting the cumulative impacts analysis will be developed and agreed upon
during the early stages of the EIR preparation. The EIR will cover the topics listed above, and the
following key topic areas will include detailed technical analysis.
Alternatives Development
The LSA Team will identify and evaluate up to three alternatives to the proposed Project, one of
which will be the CEQA-required No Project Alternative. LSA will work with City staff to develop the
project alternatives that would reduce potential environmental impacts.
According to the CEQA Guidelines, alternatives can be evaluated in less detail than the proposed
Project, and the discussion for each issue topic will be of sufficient detail to evaluate the benefits
and drawbacks of each alternative, and to provide some qualitative conclusions regarding the
alternatives. A summary table will be included in this section that identifies the level of significance
of each environmental topic for each alternative as compared to implementation of the proposed
Project. Based on this analysis, the Environmentally Superior Alternative will be identified (as
required by CEQA).
Deliverable:
• Administrative Draft EIR (MS Word format and PDF)
TASK 5: SCREENCHECK DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Following receipt of one set of consolidated and reconciled comments from the City on the
Administrative Draft EIR, LSA will amend the Administrative Draft EIR and prepare a Screencheck
Draft EIR to be reviewed by City staff. One digital version (MS Word format and PDF) of the
Screencheck Draft will be provided. A PDF compare version in underline and strikeout will also be
provided for review by the City to verify that all requested changes have been made and all
appendix materials, references, and final graphics are acceptable. LSA will also provide one printed
copy of the Screencheck Draft EIR to the City to review.
Deliverable:
• Screencheck Draft EIR (MS Word format and PDF)
6/7/23
LSA
TASK 6: PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Following receipt of one set of consolidated and reconciled comments from the City on the
Screencheck Draft EIR, LSA will prepare a Public Review Draft EIR. LSA assumes that comments on
the Screencheck Draft EIR will be limited mostly to clarifications, spelling, and other editorial
comments, and no major changes to the substantive details of the proposed Project or analysis
would occur during this task.
LSA will prepare a draft Notice of Availability (NOA). Project information will include all available
details of the proposed Project. Following review of the NOA by City staff, LSA will prepare a final
NOA for distribution by City staff. LSA will be responsible for submitting the Draft EIR and NOA to
the State Clearinghouse. City staff will be responsible for all local notices, including newspaper
submission and noticing for Planning Commission and City Council.
Deliverables:
• Public Review Draft EIR (MS Word format and PDF, 20 printed copies; technical appendices to be
included on CD or flash drive attached to each printed copy)
• State Clearinghouse submittal including NOC (PDF)
• Draft Notice of Availability (NOA) (MS Word format and PDF)
• Final NOA (MS Word format and PDF)
TASK 7: FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND
REPORTING PROGRAM
Following the CEClA-required public review period of the Public Review Draft EIR, LSA will prepare
the Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), as described below.
7.1: Final Environmental Impact Report
7.1.1: Administrative Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
Following the completion of the 45-day public review period of the Public Review Draft EIR, the LSA
Team will formulate responses to written comments from the public and public agencies on the
Public Draft EIR. The Administrative Draft Final EIR will include: (1) a list of persons, organizations,
and public agencies commenting on the Draft EIR; (2) copies of written comments received; (3)
responses to environmental comments raised in the review process; and (4) any necessary text,
table, or figure changes as an Errata to the Draft EIR. LSA will discuss the best approach to the
responses document with the City following the close of the comment period.
Our budget estimate shows the level of professional effort assumed for this task, considering the
potential interest that the public might have in the Public Review Draft EIR. Should an unexpectedly
large volume of comments be submitted (e.g., an organized letter -writing campaign by project
opponents or a substantial package of comments by a law firm representing labor union interests),
an adjustment in the budget (and/or use of contingency funds) to cover work beyond the assumed
level would be needed. LSA will submit one digital version (in MS Word format and PDF) of the
Administrative Draft Final EIR for City review.
7.1.2: Screencheck Draft Final Environmental Impact Report
6/7/23
LSA
After review by City staff and transmittal of suggested revisions, LSA will amend the Administrative
Final EIR and prepare a screencheck version for final review by City staff. One digital version (MS
Word format and PDF) of the Screencheck Draft will be provided. A PDF compare version in
underline and strikeout will also be provided for review by the City to verify that all requested
changes have been made. LSA will also provide one printed copy of each Screencheck Draft Final EIR
to the City to review.
7.1.3: Final Environmental Impact Report
After review by City staff and transmittal of suggested revisions, LSA will amend the Screencheck
Draft Final EIR and prepare a final version. LSA will produce up to 20 bound copies. Digital versions
will also be prepared in PDF and will be distributed to the City for website posting. It is assumed that
the City will be responsible for distribution of the Final EIR to the public and commenting agencies a
minimum of 10 days prior to the final public hearing on the EIR. LSA will also provide any additional
reference materials in PDF and update the Administrative Record as needed.
7.2: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
LSA will a prepare an MMRP, which will identify responsibility for implementing and monitoring
each mitigation measure, along with monitoring triggers and reporting frequency, subject to
approval by City staff.
Deliverables:
• Administrative Draft Final EIR (MS Word format and PDF)
• Screencheck Final EIR (MS Word format and PDF)
• Final EIR (MS Word format and PDF, 20 printed copies; appendices to be included on CD or flash
drive attached to each printed copy)
■ Administrative Draft MMRP (MS Word format and PDF)
• Screencheck Draft MMRP (MS Word format and PDF)
■ Final MMRP (MS Word format and PDF)
TASK 8: STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS AND FINDINGS OF FACT
In compliance with CEQA, and based on an existing City template, LSA will prepare a Statement of
Overriding Considerations (SOC) and Findings of Fact, as necessary. Due to specific City
requirements, this task assumes preparation of an Administrative Draft document, and any
refinements will be completed by City staff.
Deliverable:
• Administrative Draft CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations (MS Word
format)
TASK 9: PUBLIC HEARINGS
LSA will attend one Planning Commission hearing and one City Council hearing. Prior to each
hearing, LSA will work with City staff to prepare a PowerPoint presentation related to the CEQA
portion of the proposed Project. During each hearing, LSA will assist the City in addressing CEQA-
related questions or comments as they are received.
6/7/23
LSA
TASK 10: PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND MEETINGS
Ashley Davis and Kyle Simpson will undertake a variety of general project management tasks
throughout the process of preparing the EIR and presenting it to decision -makers. Ms. Davis will
provide input on scope, budget, and scheduling of the project and quality assurance for all work
products. She will review all in-house prepared text, tables, and graphics before these materials are
presented to the City as administrative review documents. She will be available for consultation on
CEQA procedural matters as well as application of the CEQA Guidelines to this project.
Mr. Simpson will be in charge of the day-to-day activities associated with the proposed Project.
Project management tasks include regular client contact; oversight of team members; schedule
coordination; contract negotiation and management; and development of products. As Project
Manager, Mr. Simpson will attend all meetings and maintain a project schedule. He will monitor the
project budget in light of progress in the project schedule and will communicate any potential
deviations with the City in a timely manner. He will also provide direction to all team members that
will ensure an internally consistent, coherent document.
Ms. Davis, Mr. Simpson, and LSA staff, as appropriate, will be available to meet with the project
team to gather information, review progress, discuss project alternatives, review preliminary
findings, discuss staff comments, and offer input into any discussions on project modifications. The
proposed cost estimate includes attendance by both Ms. Davis (virtually) and Mr. Simpson (in -
person) at the project start-up meeting and the NOP scoping meeting(s) as detailed under Task 1. In
addition, LSA has budgeted (under this task) for attendance at up to three in -person or
teleconference team meetings with the City, the agendas and issues to be determined. In addition,
this scope assumes bi-weekly check -in calls during heavy work periods in order to keep the City
updated on progress and to resolve any issues that may be identified during LSA's analysis.
SCHEDULE
The work schedule for preparation and completion of the EIR is included as Table 1. LSA expects that
this schedule could be adjusted to meet the environmental review objectives of the City, and
specific dates will be assigned to the schedule following authorization to proceed.
COST ESTIMATE
For completion of the proposed scope of services set forth in this scope of work, LSA has provided a
cost estimate that details tasks by assigned personnel (see Table 2, attached). The budget for
preparing the EIR is $137,795. In addition, LSA has also included an approximate 10 percent
contingency amount of $13,800, which would not be used without written authorization from the
City. The contingency budget would be used to address any unforeseen, out -of -scope items. The
estimated cost of the LSA team's labor and direct expenses, including the contingency, is $151,595.
6/7/23
LSA
Table 1: Estimated Schedule
Milestone
Authorization to Proceed
Responsible
Party
City
(Weeks)
Weeks
—
Project Start -Up Meeting
Project Applicant/
City/LSA
1
1
Draft Project Description'
LSA
1
2
Review of Draft Project Description
Project Applicant/
City
1
3
Prepare Draft NOP
LSA
1
4
Review Draft NOP
City
1
5
Prepare/Distribute Public Review NOP
LSA/City
1
6
30-Day Public Scoping Period
4
10
Public Scoping Meeting
LSA/City
-
-
Prepare Administrative Draft EIR
LSA
4
1 14
Review Administrative Draft Focused EIR
City
3
17
Prepare Screencheck Draft Focused EIR
LSA
2
19
Review Screencheck Draft Focused EIR
City
2
21
Prepare Public Review Draft Focused EIR
LSA
1
22
45-Day Public Comment Period
—
6
28
Prepare Administrative Draft Final EIR
LSA
2
30
Review Administrative Draft Final EIR
City
2
32
Prepare Screencheck Draft Final EIR and Draft MMRP
LSA
1
33
Review Screencheck Draft Final EIR and Draft MMRP
City
1
34
Prepare Public Review Final EIR and Final MMRP
LSA
1
35
EIR Certification Hearing(s)
City
>10 days
36
1 Assumes that all requested project information and materials received within 1 day of start-up meeting.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide this proposal and look forward to working with you on
this project. Please feel free to contact Kyle at (559) 490-1212 or kyle.simpson@lsa.net if you have
any questions and/or require additional information.
Sincerely,
LSA Associates, Inc.
Ashley Davis
Principal
Attachment:
• Table 2: Cost Estimate
6/7/23
Kyle Simpson
Principal/Project Manager
LSA
Table 2: Cost Estimate
LABOR COSTS
Hourly Rate:
Principal -in-
Charge
(Davis)
Project Manager
(Simpson)
Senior Planner
(Cunningham)
Environmental
Planner
(Granda
Bustamantel
GIS
Document
Management/
Graphics/
Production
LSA Total
$295
1 $210
1 $180
9 $120
1 $160
$135
Task 1. Project initiation
1.1 Project Initiation
21
21
21
1,250
Subtotal orTask1
21
21
01
21
01
0
1250
Task 2. Notice of Preparation and Seopfng Meeting
2.1 Notice of Preparation
11
21
1 61
12
1,705
2.2 Scoping Meeting1
4
4
1,615
2.3 Scooe of Work Refinement
2
4
1,430
Subtotal or Task 2
41
101
0j
10
0
21
S 4.750
Task 3. Project Description and Alternatives
3-1 Project Oescri Lion
12
61
1 101
A
3,590
Subtotal for Task 31
21
61
01
lal
01
4
3,590
Task 4. Administrative Draft EIR
4.1 Administrative Draft EIR
20
91
70
264
8 40
75 970
Subtotal or Task 41
201
911
701
2641
81 401
5 75,970
'Task S. Screencheck Draft EIR
5.1 Screencheck Draft EIR
1 41 201
281
81 141
11,910
Subtotal for Task S
1 4 201
01
281
81 141
$ 11,910
'Task 6. Public Review Draft EIR
6.1 Public Review Draft EIR
1 2
6
101
81 14$ 6,220
Subtotal for Task 61
21
61
01
101
81 141 $ 6,220
Task 7. final EIR/MMRP
7.1 Final EIR
6
16
30
4
$ 9,270
7.1.1 Admin Draft FEIR
4
14
30
$ 7,720
7.1.2 Screencheck Draft FEIR
2
12
20
$ 5,510
7.1.3 Public Review FEIR
2
8
10
$ 3,470
7.2 Miti ation Monitoring and Re2orting Program
2
4
6
2,150
Subtotalfor Task 7
8
20
0
36
0
4
S 11,420
Task S. Statement of orverridi nic Considerations and Flndin s of Fact
8.1 Statement of Overriding Considerations and Findings of Fact
41
41
241
6 5,710
Subtotal for Task 81
4
4
0
241
01
6 5,710
Task 9. Public Hearings
9.1 PublicHearin s
1 6
.91
1
1
1 3450
Subtotal or Task 91
fi
81
01
01
01,
0 3,450
Task 10. Project Mana ement and Meetings
10.1 Project Management and Meetings
1 121
261
1 19
000
Subtotal for Task 10
1 121
261
01
01 01
0
9,000
TOTALLABOR
1 641
1931
701
3841 241
84
$ 133,270
DIRECT COSTS
1- Travel. Deliveries, Communication 500
2. Maps; Plarts; Reports. Database Searches 825
3. Printing Allowance 40 copies, $80 per copy) 3 200
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $ 4 525
TOTAL
TOTAL LSA TEAM BUDGET WITHOUT CONTINGENCY 337 795
CONTINGENCY
Contingency (10 Percent) 13 800
TOTAL LSA TEAM BUDGET WITH CONTINGENCY (10 PERCENT) $ 151 595
LSA
This page intentionally left blank.
6/7/23 10