The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2022-01-10 PRAC Agenda PacketMonday, January 10, 2022 5:30 PM City of Fresno 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 www.fresno.gov In Person and/or Electronic Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Chair – Kimberly McCoy Vice Chair – Jon Dohlin Commissioner - Maiyer Vang Commissioner – Dr. Francine Oputa Commissioner – Scott Miller Commissioner – Mona Nyandoro Cummings Commissioner – Harman Singh Commissioner – Jose Leon Barraza Commissioner – Sarah Parkes Meeting Agenda - Final Regular Meeting January 10, 2022Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Meeting Agenda - Final PUBLIC ADVISORY: THE FRESNO CITY COUNCIL WELCOMES YOU TO CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, LOCATED IN CITY HALL, 2ND FLOOR, 2600 FRESNO STREET, FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93721. You can also participate in the meeting on our City’s website click on the URL https://fresno.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx and click on the “In progress” link under “video” for the corresponding meeting. The Council meeting can also be viewed live at 9:00 A.M. on Comcast Channel 96 and AT&T Channel 99. The City Council Chambers are open for public participation. However, members of the public are encouraged to participate electronically because of reduced capacity of seating in the Chambers to allow for social distancing, and masks will be required for the vaccinated and unvaccinated. PUBLIC COMMENT: The following options are available for members of the public who want to address the Commission: 1. eComment at https://fresno.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx. a) eComments is a tool for citizens to use to make comments on agenda items. It will be open during the Commission meeting and closed at the end of the meeting and will be a part of the official record. The User Agreement and Procedures document for eComment can be accessed by the URL https://www.fresno.gov/cityclerk/ b) eComments will be a maximum of 450 words. OR 2. You are invited to a Zoom webinar. When: January 10, 2022, 5:30PM Pacific Time (US and Canada) Topic: January 10, 2022 Regular Meeting a) Register in advance for this webinar: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_v7mtgS9hRFWJ58iMZfI94A After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar. b) If you do not wish for your name to appear on the screen, then use the drop down menu and click on “rename” to rename yourself. Page 2 City of Fresno January 10, 2022Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Meeting Agenda - Final c) If you wish to address the Commission during the public comment portion of the agenda, click on the icon labeled “Participants” at the bottom center of your PC or Mac screen. At the bottom of the window on the right side of the screen, click the icon labeled “RaiseHand”. Your digital hand will now be raised. d) Those addressing the Commission must state their name for the record. e) To facilitate electronic access, no person shall speak until recognized by the Presiding Officer. OR 3. Email: to clerk@fresno.gov a) Residents may also email comments to be read during the meeting. Please include the agenda date and item number you wish to speak on in the subject line of your email. b) Emails will be a maximum of 450 words. c) All comments received will be distributed to the Commission prior and during the meeting and will be a part of the official record. All participants will be on mute until they are called upon at which point they will be unmuted. To prevent participants from having their video on, we will remove the option to show their video. The City of Fresno’s goal is to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, If you need additional accommodations such as interpreters, sign language signers, or the services of a translator, please contact the office of the City Clerk at (559) 6217650 or clerk@fresno.gov. To ensure availability, you are advised to make your request at least three business days prior to the meeting. The City of Fresno thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreading COVID19 virus. Page 3 City of Fresno January 10, 2022Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Meeting Agenda - Final 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Approve Agenda 5. Approval of Minutes Approval of Minutes for December 20, 2021ID 22-88 6. Discussion: Subcommittee Reports: 1. Cultural Arts Plan: 2. Highest Needs Neighborhoods 3. Parks Master Plan: 7. Members Reports and Comments 8. City Administration and PARCS Staff Reports and Comments 9. Unscheduled Communication Members of the public may address the Commission regarding items that are not listed on the agenda and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission. Each person will have up to three (3) minutes to present. 10. Workshops 11. Discussion Items 12. Hearings: Hearing - To receive public input on allocations related to Measure P and the annual PARCS Department Budget and Capital Improvement Plans. (PARCS) ID 22-89 Sponsors:Parks, After School and Recreation and Community Services Department Actions pertaining to: HEARING - Adoption of the Parks, Recreation and Art Commission’s park prioritization strategy that will inform the ID 22-90 Page 4 City of Fresno January 10, 2022Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Meeting Agenda - Final FY23 budget recommendations to City Council for (WRT/PARCS): 1.Existing Parks Prioritization 2.New Park Prioritization 3.Park Amenities Prioritization 13. Adjournment Page 5 City of Fresno City of Fresno Staff Report 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 www.fresno.gov File #:ID 22-88 Agenda Date:1/10/2022 Agenda #: REPORT TO THE PARKS, RECREATION, AND ARTS COMMISSION SUBJECT Approval of Minutes for December 20, 2021 Attachment: Draft Minutes for December 20, 2021 City of Fresno Printed on 2/5/2024Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Monday, December 20, 2021 5:30 PM City of Fresno 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 www.fresno.gov In Person and/or Electronic Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Chair – Kimberly McCoy Vice Chair – Jon Dohlin Commissioner – Maiyer Vang Commissioner – Dr. Francine Oputa Commissioner – Scott Miller Commissioner – Mona Nyandoro Cummings Commissioner – Harman Singh Commissioner – Jose Leon Barraza Commissioner – Sarah Parkes Meeting Minutes - Draft Regular Meeting December 20, 2021Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Meeting Minutes - Draft 1. Call to Order Vice Chair Dohlin called the meeting to order at 5:34 P.M. 2. Roll Call Commissioner Cummings was absent during roll call and joined the meeting at 5:35 P.M. Vice Chair Jon Dohlin, Commissioner Maiyer Vang, Commissioner Francine Oputa, Commissioner Scott Miller, Commissioner Mona Cummings, Commissioner Jose Barraza, and Commissioner Sarah Parkes Present 7 - Chair Kimberly McCoy, and Commissioner Harman SinghAbsent2 - 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Approve Agenda On motion of Commissioner Oputa, seconded by Commissioner Vang,the above Action was approved. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye:Vice Chair Dohlin, Commissioner Vang, Commissioner Oputa, Commissioner Miller, Commissioner Cummings, Commissioner Barraza and Commissioner Parkes 7 - Absent:Chair McCoy and Commissioner Singh2 - 5. Approval of Minutes ID 22-29 Approval of Minutes for the December 6, 2021 Regular Meeting. On motion of Commissioner Vang, seconded by Commissioner Parkes, that the above Action Item be approved. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye:Vice Chair Dohlin, Commissioner Vang, Commissioner Oputa, Commissioner Miller, Commissioner Cummings, Commissioner Barraza and Commissioner Parkes 7 - Absent:Chair McCoy and Commissioner Singh2 - 6. Discussion: Subcommittee Reports: City of Fresno ***Subject to Mayoral Veto Page 2 December 20, 2021Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Meeting Minutes - Draft 1. Cultural Arts Plan: 2. Highest Needs Neighborhoods 3. Parks Master Plan: Commissioner Vang stated the deadline for the Request for Proposal for the Consultant for the Cultural Arts Plan has been extended to February 7, 2022. There were no other updates. 7. Members Reports and Comments Commissioners wished everyone a happy holiday. Commissioner Vang announced the Hmong New Year will be held at the Fresno Fair Ground on December 29, 2021. Commissioner Barraza spoke regarding the action taken by City Council for the approval of the top 33% for the Highest Needs Neighborhood and he asked if this impact can be reviewed by the WRT consultant. He requested an item be placed on the next agenda regarding the implementation of top 33% percentile method in defining Highest Need Neighborhoods. Commissioner Parks spoke regarding the resident survey and suggested a workshop and discussion item to better understand the survey design. 8. City Administration and PARCS Staff Reports and Comments Assistant City Manager Kanne notified the Commissioners the Ted C Wills Community center is open for shelter. Assistant Director Ramirez stated the City Council adopted the definition of the Highest Needs Neighborhood and that the Measure P website is now up and running. 9. Unscheduled Communication Members of the public may address the Commission regarding items that are not listed on the agenda and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission. Each person will have up to three (3) minutes to present. City of Fresno ***Subject to Mayoral Veto Page 3 December 20, 2021Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Meeting Minutes - Draft Upon call, there was no unscheduled communication. 10. Workshops ID 22-27 Workshop - Review Proposed Changes to the PARCS Department Master Fee Schedule. (PARCS) The above workshop was presented to the Commission by Director Aguirre and Business Manager Boualamsy, PARCs Department. Commissioner Vang asked the City Attorney's Office to clarify if the Ordinance will allow for Measure P dollars to cover the personnel cost for the facilities. 11. Discussion Items 12. Hearings: ID 22-28 Hearing - Adopt the Calendar Year 2022 Parks Recreation and Arts Commission Meeting Calendar. (PARCS) The above hearing was introduced to the Commission by Assistant Director Ramirez, PARCs Department. Upon call, there was no public comment. Commissioner Vang motioned to meet only once in the months of July and August: July 19, 2022 and August 1, 2022. After discussion, Commissioner Vang withdrew her motion. Commissioner Oputa motioned to amend the month of November and requested the Commission meet the first and third week of the month: November 7, 2022 and November 21, 2022. Commissioner Cummings seconded the motion. Motion PASSED 6-1, Commissioner Barraza voted no, Commissioner Singh and Chair McCoy absent. APPROVED AS AMENDED On motion of Commissioner Oputa, seconded by Commissioner Cummings, that the 2022 Calendar Item be approved as amended with City of Fresno ***Subject to Mayoral Veto Page 4 December 20, 2021Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Meeting Minutes - Draft the option to cancel or add any meeting in the future. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye:Vice Chair Dohlin, Commissioner Vang, Commissioner Oputa, Commissioner Miller, Commissioner Cummings, Commissioner Barraza and Commissioner Parkes 7 - Absent:Chair McCoy and Commissioner Singh2 - ID 22-26 Hearing - To receive public input on allocations related to Measure P and the annual PARCS Department Budget and Capital Improvement Plans. (PARCS) Upon call, the following members of the public addressed the Commission: Sarah Harris and Gregory Ireland. 13. Adjournment The Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission adjourned at 6:34 P.M. City of Fresno ***Subject to Mayoral Veto Page 5 City of Fresno Staff Report 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 www.fresno.gov File #:ID 22-89 Agenda Date:1/10/2022 Agenda #: REPORT TO THE PARKS, RECREATION, AND ARTS COMMISSION SUBJECT Hearing - To receive public input on allocations related to Measure P and the annual PARCS Department Budget and Capital Improvement Plans. (PARCS) Attachment: City of Fresno Printed on 2/5/2024Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Fresno Measure P Proposal: Youth Civic Service Clubs In June, 2021, the Civic Education Center (CEC) took 120 Fresno youth in three groups to Camp Fresno, thanks to Mayor Dyer and the Fresno Parks and Recreation Department. They guided students to appreciate nature and to practice leadership skills and civic values. Groups considered how their city could be improved to serve the needs of youth. Their proposals include creating jobs for youth and providing youth programs at community centers with leadership development, youth dialogues, and civic service projects. CEC proposes developing Civic Service Clubs at 3 Fresno City Community Centers for local secondary students. We will collaborate with City and Community Center staff on site selection and how to organize these teen clubs. Meetings will include fun leadership activities, civil dialogue on current issues, and implementing community service projects. Expert facilitators will teach democratic principles and civic values and guide the development of shared agreements. At each of the 3 Community Centers, two students will be elected as Co-leaders with a salary of $1,000 each semester (a total of 6 teen jobs). They will work with staff to invite youth voice and cooperation at club meetings and service projects. As clubs research issues and plan service projects, CEC staff will bring in qualified experts and community-based organizations to share information and resources. For example, if the club wants to paint a mural with a positive message, we will hire an artist who can guide that process. The 6 Co-leaders will be invited to the annual Youth Summit at Wonder Valley. Clubs will present their projects at the Fresno Youth Showcase in May. This is a great opportunity for youth to engage in representative democracy. Community service and civic engagement projects empower youth to become responsible citizens who serve their community. They learn to take responsibility for their lives and to contribute to something greater than themselves. Fresno Unified School District is now giving high school students the opportunity to earn the State Seal of Civic Engagement at graduation, if they have participated in a civic service project. Request: CEC requests a grant of $200,000 from Measure P funds, to plan and implement the pilot Civic Service Clubs. We will meet with City Parks and Recreation staff to select the 3 Community Centers. We suggest Mary Ella Brown, Ted C. Wills and Mosqueda Centers. Hopefully, each Community Center will start a Community Service Club. Goals: 1. Create a safe community space for youth 2. Facilitate civil dialogue and deliberation on topics they choose 3. Support youth service and civic engagement projects 4. Develop youth leaders who apply civic values and plan projects 5. Showcase positive contributions of youth The Fresno Civic Learning Partnership was created in 2016 to train teachers to guide students to learn American civic values and ideals, identify a community problem, research to understand causes and potential solutions, and implement a civic service project. The Civic Education Center became a non-profit corporation in Fresno in 2018. Contact: Dr. Stephen Morris, CEO of CEC, stephen@civicedcenter.org www.civicedcenter.org Holiday Soccer Clinic Summary 12/18/2021 Holiday Soccer Camp is our annual free soccer camp that took place this year on Sunday 12/19/21 from 10:00 am to 12:30 pm. 65 youth soccer players registered for a 2-session camp (31 in session 1 and 34 in session 2). We had 2 licensed coaches, a physical therapist and 3 assistant youth coaches running the camp. The camp also featured our “Health Matters” all-you-can-eat snack bar, designed by a registered dietician. In addition to soccer training and a healthy snack bar, each child received a Santa hat for the scrimmages and jingle bells to create a festive and joyous atmosphere. Data from registration Most of our attendees had some experience playing youth soccer, both in recreational leagues and competitive leagues although the vast majority have only played recreational soccer. During online registration, 15% of respondents said they cannot afford to put their child in any soccer programs. 60% said they had limited finances for low cost soccer opportunities. And the other 25% of respondents said they have no financial limitations to enrolling their child in a soccer program. During the online registration, 78% of respondents who registered their child for the clinic reside in the city of Fresno with the most common zip codes being 93710, 93711, 93726 and 93727. How does this compare to previous holiday camps? For safety reasons, we cancelled all camps in 2020 due to the pandemic. In 2019, 50% of families who attended the camp said they can afford to put their child in recreational leagues. 25% said their child can’t play soccer without some financial assistance. And the other 25% of respondents said they have no financial limitations to enrolling their child in a soccer program. During the online registration, 37% of respondents who registered their child for the clinic reside in the city of Fresno (primarily in the 93722 area). The other children reside in Clovis, Sanger, Caruthers, Auberry, Kingsburg and Madera. City of Fresno Staff Report 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 www.fresno.gov File #:ID 22-90 Agenda Date:1/10/2022 Agenda #: REPORT TO THE PARKS, RECREATION, AND ARTS COMMISSION SUBJECT Actions pertaining to: HEARING - Adoption of the Parks, Recreation and Art Commission’s park prioritization strategy that will inform the FY23 budget recommendations to City Council for (WRT/PARCS): 1.Existing Parks Prioritization 2.New Park Prioritization 3.Park Amenities Prioritization Attachment: City of Fresno Printed on 2/5/2024Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ J 1n1z j l 'I ! f'\ " • [:" q, l • '·-· '0 /--\ �-: ,:,"anuary 10, 2022CJT)' o;�-FREsno cirpa:ik�1 /lRecreation, and Arts Commission Information Packet ITEM($) File ID 22-90 Hearing -Adoption of the Parks, Recreation and Art Commission's park prioritization strategy that will inform the FY23 budget recommendations to City Council for (WRT/PARCS): 1.Existing Parks Prioritization 2.New Park Prioritization 3.Park Amenities Prioritization Contents of Supplement (2): -Park Prioritization Criteria Poll Questions -Fresno Measure P Implementation – PowerPoint Presentation Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Meeting January 10, 2022 Park Prioritization Criteria Poll Questions Page 1 of 1 1. After reviewing each park prioritization criteria, how should Park Condition be weighted? a. Higher than, b. Equal to, c. Or less than average. 2. After reviewing each park prioritization criteria, how should Parks Without Neighborhood Amenity be weighted? d. Higher than, e. Equal to, f. Or less than average. 3. After reviewing each park prioritization criteria, how should Community Priority Parks be weighted? g. Higher than, h. Equal to, i. Or less than average. 4. After reviewing each park prioritization criteria, how should Flagship Parks be weighted? j. Higher than, k. Equal to, l. Or less than average. 5. After reviewing each park prioritization criteria, how should Parks Adjacent to an Access Gap be weighted? m. Higher than, n. Equal to, o. Or less than average. 6. After reviewing each park prioritization criteria, how should Parks with a Pipeline Project be weighted? p. Higher than, q. Equal to, r. Or less than average. 7. After reviewing each park prioritization criteria, how should Emerging Priority Parks be weighted? s. Higher than, t. Equal to, u. Or less than average. FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Parks, Recreation & Arts Commission January 10th, 2022 Process for Prioritizing Park Improvements FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Agenda 1. Measure P 2. Existing Park Prioritization •Fresno Parks Master Plan •Pipeline Projects •Emerging Community Priorities 3. New Park Prioritization •Fresno Parks Master Plan •Pipeline Projects •Emerging Community Priorities 4. Park Amenity Priorities MEASURE P FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION What is Measure P? •Fresno Clean and Safe Neighborhood Parks Transactions and Use Tax (Article 15 of the Municipal Code) •Implements voter-approved Measure P •Establishes 3/8-cent sales tax to be used for: (1)Improving and Maintaining Clean and Safe Neighborhood Parks ; (2)New Neighborhood Parks ; Senior and Youth recreation Facilities (3)Youth and Senior Recreation Programs;After-School Programs; Job Training for Youth and Veterans (4)Expanded Access to Arts and Culture (5)Safe Walking and Biking Trails ;Street Beautification and Litter Removal;San Joaquin River Parkway FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Estimated $38 million per year What is Measure P? EXISTING PARK PRIORITIZATION FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Existing Park Prioritization Process Now: Defining an evaluation framework to ground our recommendations for which parks should be prioritized for improvements FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Existing Park Prioritization Process Next Up: Defining what specific improvements should be made at priority parks FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Fresno Park System Source: Fresno Parks Master Plan, 2018 Definition:This map includes City of Fresno PARCS Department parks, including regional and neighborhood parks. Existing Park 1 Riverbottom 2 Stallion 3 Koligian 4 Figarden Loop 5 Emerald 6 Safety 7 Orchid 8 Highway City 9 El Capitan Dog Park (AH1) 10 Logan 11 Oso de Oro (D) 12 Holman 13 Pinedale 14 Spano 15 Audubon/LLMD 16 Woodward Regional 17 Keith Tice 18 Todd Beamer 19 Selma Layne 20 Kaiser 21 Belcher 22 Rotary East 23 Barstow & Del Mar (F) 24 Robinson 25 First & Bullard (O) 26 El Dorado 27 Vinland 28 Large 29 Rotary West (B/E) 30 Cary 31 University 32 Granny's 33 Einstein 34 Manchester (BB) 35 Radio 36 Lafayette 37 Quigley 38 Lions/Skate 39 Inspiration 40 Jaswant Singh Khalra (formerly Victoria West) 41 Basin XX 42 Roeding Regional 43 San Pablo Family 44 Ted C. Wills 45 Romain 46 Martin Ray Reilly 47 Carozza (G) 48 Reedy (Discovery Ctr.) 49 Melody 50 Al Radka 51 Trolley Creek (Y) 52 Willow/Balch 53 Sunnyside 54 Pilibos 55 Mosqueda 56 Ninth & Tulare 57 First & Nevada 58 Holmes 59 Dickey Playground FRESNO PARK SYSTEM 60 Hernandez (Alfonso) Youth Center 61 Eaton Plaza 62 Fink-White 63 Chandler 64 Sunset 65 Neilsen 66 Kearny Park 67 Frank H. Ball 68 California/Tupman 69 Maxie L. Parks Community Center & Gym 70 Bigby-Villa 71 Hinton 72 Regional Sports Park 73 Mary Ella Brown 74 Almy Park 75 Airways PoolComplex 76 Huntington & Maple 77 Cultural Arts District 78 McKinley & Maple FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Park Condition Source:Fresno Parks Master Plan, 2018 FRESNO PARK CONDITIONS Definition: A site with a good rating is free of major problems and may have some repairable mechanical/equipment issues, a park site with a fair rating indicates some mechanical/equipment defects that require major repair and/or replacement, and a park site with a poor rating has major defects and requires significant lifecycle replacement and/or redesign. Parks in poor condition are included in the Measure P parks prioritization criteria. Data was collected from an on-site park assessment. Number Park 1 Riverbottom Park 26 El Dorado 27 Vinland 29 Rotary West (B/E) 30 Cary 32 Granny's 33 Einstein 34 Manchester (BB) 37 Quigley 41 Basin XX 43 San Pablo Family 45 Romain 47 Carozza (G) 56 Ninth & Tulare 57 First & Nevada 59 Dickey Playground Park 62 Fink-White 64 Sunset 66 Kearny Park 67 Frank H. Ball 71 Hinton 73 Mary Ella Brown 75 Airways Pool Complex 76 Huntington & Maple 78 McKinley & Maple FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Parks Without Neighborhood Amenity Source: Fresno Parks Master Plan, 2018 Definition:This map identifies parks that contain valuable “neighborhood amenities,” and those that do not. Geographic areas of need were determined by mapping access to existing park amenities. Park amenities (e.g. playgrounds, shaded picnic areas, etc.) were given a buffer for access radius depending on the typical catchment area for the amenity, ranging from 1 to 5 miles. Analysis was based on park assessments and community feedback.PARKS WITHOUT NEIGHBORHOOD AMENITY Number Park 1 Riverbottom Park 5 Emerald Park 6 Safety Park 9 El Capitan Dog Park (AH1) 14 Spano Park 31 University Park 32 Granny's 41 Basin XX 48 Reedy (Discovery Ctr.) 56 Ninth & Tulare 57 First & Nevada 59 Dickey Playground Park 78 McKinley & Maple FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Community Priority Parks Community Priority Parks 10 Logan 21 Belcher Park 26 El Dorado 27 Vinland 28 Large 29 Rotary West (B/E) 30 Cary 33 Einstein 35 Radio 36 Lafayette 37 Quigley 42 Roeding Regional 45 Romain 48 Reedy (Discovery Ctr.) 49 Melody Source: Fresno Parks Master Plan, 2018 Definition:The community identified priority parks for improvement, shown here with the needs gradient map underlay to illustrate the relationship between areas of Fresno that lack park amenities and specific parks that need improvement.PRIORITY PARKS FOR IMPROVEMENT 55 Mosqueda 56 Ninth & Tulare 58 Holmes 61 Eaton Plaza 62 Fink-White 66 Kearny Park 67 Frank H. Ball 71 Hinton 73 Mary Ella Brown FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Flagship Parks Flagship Parks 7 Orchid 10 Logan 11 Oso de Oro (D) 18 Todd Beamer Park 21 Belcher Park 22 Rotary East 27 Vinland 29 Rotary West (B/E) 30 Cary 33 Einstein 35 Radio 37 Quigley Source: Fresno Parks Master Plan, 2018 Definition:In order to provide a more even geographic distribution of park improvements, flagship parks are priority parks distributed across the city by council districts. Flagship parks are recommended to be prioritized for ongoing upgrades and fully funded maintenance including lifecycle replacement. FLAGSHIP PARKS BY COUNCIL DISTRICT 38 Lions/Skate Park 39 Inspiration Park 45 Romain 50 Al Radka Park 54 Pilibos 55 Mosqueda 62 Fink-White 67 Frank H. Ball 73 Mary Ella Brown 67 73 FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Access Gaps Source:Fresno Parks Master Plan, 2018 Definition: Parks that are adjacent to an access gap greater than ½ mile with over 5,000 people per square mile Park Adjacent to an Access Gap 2 Stallion 3 Koligian 4 Figarden Loop Park 5 Emerald Park 6 Safety Park 8 Highway City 9 El Capitan Dog Park (AH1) 10 Logan 26 El Dorado 27 Vinland 28 Large 33 Einstein 36 Lafayette 37 Quigley 38 Lions/Skate Park 41 Basin XX 42 Roeding Regional 43 San Pablo Family 44 Ted C. Wills 56 Ninth & Tulare 58 Holmes 76 Huntington & Maple PARKS ADJACENT TO ACCESS GAPS 76 FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Pipeline Projects Existing Parks with Pipeline Projects 1 Riverbottom Park 7 Orchid 10 Logan 16 Woodward Regional 22 Rotary East 26 El Dorado 27 Vinland 32 Granny's 33 Einstein 37 Quigley 40 Jaswant Singh Khalra Park (formerly Victoria West) 42 Roeding Regional 44 Ted C. Wills 50 Al Radka Park 54 Pilibos 69 Maxie L. Parks Community Center & Gym Definition: This map identifies existing parks that have current FY22 Measure P funded projects Source:Fresno Measure P Implementation EXISTING PARKS WITH PIPELINE PROJECTS 69 FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Survey question: Name three parks that you feel are in most need of upgrades. Emerging Priorities SCREEN CAPTURE OF ONLINE SURVEY FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Existing Park Prioritization Framework: Equal Weighting 49 Melody Fair Yes 1 1 50 Al Radka Park Good Yes 1 Yes 1 2 51 Trolley Creek (Y)Good 0 52 Willow/Balch Fair 0 53 Sunnyside Fair 0 54 Pilibos Fair Yes 1 Yes 1 2 55 Mosqueda Fair Yes 1 Yes 1 2 56 Ninth & Tulare Poor 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 4 Yes 57 First & Nevada Poor 1 Yes 1 2 Yes 58 Holmes Fair Yes 1 Yes 1 2 Yes 59 Dickey Playground Park Poor 1 Yes 1 2 Yes 60 Hernandez (Alfonso) Youth Center unknown 0 Yes 61 Eaton Plaza Fair Yes 1 1 Yes 62 Fink-White Poor 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 3 63 Chandler Fair 0 64 Sunset Poor 1 1 Yes 65 Neilsen Fair 0 Yes 66 Kearny Park Poor 1 Yes 1 2 Yes Fresno Parks Master Plan (2017) Pipeline Projects (2021) Emerging Priorities (2021-22) Number Park Park Condition Score Park Without Neighborh ood Amenity Score Community Priority Score Flagship Park Score Adjacent to Access Gap Score Pipeline Projects Score Parks in Need Score Overall Score Highest- Need Neighbor hood? FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Park Prioritization with Equal Weighting, and Before Emerging Priorities are Available Park Park Condition Park Without Neighborhood Amenity Community Priority Flagship Park Adjacent to Access Gap Pipeline Projects Emerging Priority Vinland Poor Yes Yes Yes Yes ? Einstein Poor Yes Yes Yes Yes ? Quigley Poor Yes Yes Yes Yes ? Logan Fair Yes Yes Yes Yes ? El Dorado Poor Yes Yes Yes ? Ninth & Tulare Poor Yes Yes Yes ? Provided as a baseline for consideration. Overall Score 5 5 5 4 4 4 Highest -Need Neighb orhood No No No No No Yes FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION PARK PRIORITIZATION WEIGHTING After reviewing each park prioritization criteria, how should each one be weighted? (A) higher than, (B) equal to, (C) or less than average? 1. Park Condition 2. Park Without Neighborhood Amenity 3. Community Priority Park 4. Flagship Park 5. Park Adjacent to Access Gap 6. Park with Pipeline Project 7. Emerging Priority Park NEW PARK PRIORITIZATION FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION New Park Prioritization Process Now: Defining an evaluation framework to ground our recommendations for which areas should be prioritized for new parks FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION New Park Prioritization Process Next Up: Identifying specific future park sites FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION 2018 Parks Master Plan Needs Gradient Definition:This map overlays needs assessment and suitability analysis data producing information to create a needs gradient map that identifies geographic areas of Fresno that range from being adequately served by parks (depicted in green), to being park poor areas, not adequately served by parks (depicted in red). Red areas that are extremely underserved by parks are priority zones for new parks. Source: Fresno Parks Master Plan, 2018 NEEDS GRADIENT MAP FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION 2018 Parks Master Plan Community Priority Areas for New Parks Definition: This map summarizes feedback from a Stakeholder Workshop regarding priority areas for new parks, and includes an underlay of Fresno’s Existing Neighborhoods, BRT Corridors, and Development Areas. Source: Fresno Parks Master Plan, 2018 STAKEHOLDER FEEDBACK ON PRIORITY AREAS FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION 2018 Parks Master Plan Community Priority Areas for New Parks Definition: This map summarizes feedback from a series of Council District Community Workshops regarding priority areas for new parks, and includes an underlay of Fresno’s Existing Neighborhoods, BRT Corridors, and Development Areas. Source: Fresno Parks Master Plan, 2018 COUNCIL DISTRICT FEEDBACK ON PRIORITY AREAS FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Pipeline Projects Park 79 Fresno Barrios 80 South Tower-Broadway and Elizabeth 81 Van Ness Triangle Park 82 The Link 83 Citywide Senior Center 84 Bulldog & Sixth 85 Milburn/Dakota NEW PARKS WITH PIPELINE PROJECTS/COMMUNITY INITIATIVES Definition: This map identifies new park projects that have been funded by Measure P in FY22 Source:Fresno Measure P Implementation FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Other Initiatives •Butler-Willow Specific •Fulton Corridor Specific Plan •Highway City Neighborhood •North Avenue Industrial Triangle •Southwest Fresno Specific Plan •Sun Garden Acres Specific Plan •Tower District Specific Plan •Tower District Design Guidelines •Yosemite Specific Plan •MLK Park •Fresno SE Regional Park and Soccer Complex FRESNO SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARIES FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Community Emerging Priority for New Parks Survey question: Are there any specific areas in town that you feel are not well served by parks? Name the nearest major cross streets. Screenshot of Survey or Website SCREEN CAPTURE OF ONLINE SURVEY FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Priority Areas: Recommended Framework RECOMMENDED PRIORITY AREAS What Do You Think? COMMUNITY RECREATION PRIORITIES FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Bringing Citywide Recreation Needs into Our Park Prioritization Process FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Fresno Park Amenities 2018 Parks Master Plan Survey Results FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Identifying Amenity Needs Across Parks Picnic Area BBQ Playground Sport Court Paths Splash Pad Bench Picnic Table Entry Character FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Measure P Implementation Process FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Discussion