The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2021-12-06 PRAC Agenda PacketMonday, December 6, 2021 5:30 PM City of Fresno 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 www.fresno.gov In Person and/or Electronic Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Chair – Kimberly McCoy Vice Chair – Jon Dohlin Commissioner - Maiyer Vang Commissioner – Dr. Francine Oputa Commissioner – Scott Miller Commissioner – Mona Nyandoro Cummings Commissioner – Harman Singh Commissioner – Jose Leon Barraza Commissioner – Sarah Parkes Meeting Agenda - Final Regular Meeting December 6, 2021Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Meeting Agenda - Final PUBLIC ADVISORY: THE FRESNO CITY COUNCIL WELCOMES YOU TO CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, LOCATED IN CITY HALL, 2ND FLOOR, 2600 FRESNO STREET, FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93721. You can also participate in the meeting on our City’s website click on the URL https://fresno.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx and click on the “In progress” link under “video” for the corresponding meeting. The Council meeting can also be viewed live at 9:00 A.M. on Comcast Channel 96 and AT&T Channel 99. The City Council Chambers are open for public participation. However, members of the public are encouraged to participate electronically because of reduced capacity of seating in the Chambers to allow for social distancing, and masks will be required for the vaccinated and unvaccinated. PUBLIC COMMENT: The following options are available for members of the public who want to address City Council: 1. eComment at https://fresno.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx. a) eComments is a tool for citizens to use to make comments on agenda items. It will be open during the Council meeting and closed at the end of the meeting and will be a part of the official record. The User Agreement and Procedures document for eComment can be accessed by the URL https://www.fresno.gov/cityclerk/ b) eComments will be a maximum of 450 words. OR 2. You are invited to a Zoom webinar. When: December 6, 2021 9:00 AM Pacific Time (US and Canada) Topic: December 6, 2021 Regular Meeting a) Register in advance for this webinar: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_6V8mO0CpSwKB2Zb3tt3c0w After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar. b) If you do not wish for your name to appear on the screen, then use the drop down menu and click on “rename” to rename yourself. Page 2 City of Fresno December 6, 2021Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Meeting Agenda - Final c) If you wish to address Council during the public comment portion of the agenda, click on the icon labeled “Participants” at the bottom center of your PC or Mac screen. At the bottom of the window on the right side of the screen, click the icon labeled “RaiseHand”. Your digital hand will now be raised. d) Those addressing Council must state their name for the record. e) To facilitate electronic access, no person shall speak until recognized by the Presiding Officer. OR 3. Email: to clerk@fresno.gov a) Residents may also email comments to be read during the meeting. Please include the agenda date and item number you wish to speak on in the subject line of your email. b) Emails will be a maximum of 450 words. c) All comments received will be distributed to Council prior and during the meeting and will be a part of the official record. All participants will be on mute until they are called upon at which point they will be unmuted. To prevent participants from having their video on, we will remove the option to show their video. The City of Fresno’s goal is to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, If you need additional accommodations such as interpreters, sign language signers, or the services of a translator, please contact the office of the City Clerk at (559) 6217650 or clerk@fresno.gov. To ensure availability, you are advised to make your request at least three business days prior to the meeting. The City of Fresno thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreading COVID19 virus. Page 3 City of Fresno December 6, 2021Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Meeting Agenda - Final 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Approve Agenda 5. Approval of Minutes Approval of Minutes for November 1, 2021 and November 15, 2021 Regular Meeting. ID 21-1000 6. Discussion: Subcommittee Reports: Cultural Arts Plan: Highest Needs Neighborhoods Parks Master Plan: 7. Members Reports and Comments 8. City Administration and PARCS Staff Reports and Comments 9. Unscheduled Communication Members of the public may address the Commission regarding items that are not listed on the agenda and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission. Each person will have up to three (3) minutes to present. 10. Workshops Workshop - Cost of operations and maintenance of existing City of Fresno Parks and improvements. (WRT, PARCS) ID 21-971 Workshop - Process for how the Parks, Recreation and Arts Commission can prioritize parks for allocation recommendations to City Council related to General Fund and Measure P budgets. (WRT, PARCS) ID 21-972 11. Discussion Items Page 4 City of Fresno December 6, 2021Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Meeting Agenda - Final 12. Hearings: Hearing - To receive public input on allocations related to Measure P and the annual PARCS Department Budget and Capital Improvement Plans. (PARCS) ID 21-963 13. Adjournment Page 5 City of Fresno City of Fresno Staff Report 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 www.fresno.gov File #:ID 21-1000 Agenda Date:12/6/2021 Agenda #: REPORT TO THE PARKS, RECREATION, AND ARTS COMMISSION SUBJECT Approval of Minutes for November 1, 2021 and November 15, 2021 Regular Meeting. ATTACHEMENT City of Fresno Printed on 2/5/2024Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ Monday, November 1, 2021 5:30 PM City of Fresno 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 www.fresno.gov In person and/or electronic Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Chair – Kimberly McCoy Vice Chair – Jon Dohlin Commissioner – Maiyer Vang Commissioner – Dr. Francine Oputa Commissioner – Scott Miller Commissioner – Mona Nyandoro Cummings Commissioner – Harman Singh Commissioner – Jose Leon Barraza Commissioner – Sarah Parkes Meeting Minutes - Draft Regular Meeting November 1, 2021Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Meeting Minutes - Draft 1. Call to Order Vice Chair Dohlin called the meeting to order at 5:33 P.M. 2. Roll Call Chair McCoy was absent during roll call and joined the meeting at 5:37 P.M. Chair Kimberly McCoy, Vice Chair Jon Dohlin, Commissioner Maiyer Vang, Commissioner Francine Oputa, Commissioner Scott Miller, Commissioner Mona Cummings, Commissioner Harman Singh, Commissioner Jose Barraza, and Commissioner Sarah Parkes Present 9 - 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Approve Agenda Interim City Clerk Parra announced the following changes to the agenda: The minutes for October 18, 2021 and October 25, 2021 were continued to November 15, 2021. On motion of Commissioner Vang, seconded by Commissioner Cummings,the above Action was approved. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye:Chair McCoy, Vice Chair Dohlin, Commissioner Vang, Commissioner Oputa, Commissioner Miller, Commissioner Cummings, Commissioner Singh, Commissioner Barraza and Commissioner Parkes 9 - 5. Approval of Minutes 5-A.ID 21-801 Approval of Minutes for October 18, 2021 and October 25, 2021 Regular Commission meeting The above minutes were continued to November 15, 2021 6. Discussion: Subcommittee Reports: Commissioner Vang stated the Request for Proposal (RPF) will be sent out on Friday, November 2, 2021. City of Fresno ***Subject to Mayoral Veto Page 2 November 1, 2021Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Meeting Minutes - Draft 7. Members Report and Comments Commission Barraza asked staff for an update on the action City Council took on the recommendation made on the Measure P agenda item. Chair McCoy announced the item was continued to the November 4, 2021 regular meeting. Commissioner Oputa addressed her concerns with the survey and the lack of community input that was provided. Commissioner Parkes encouraged the Commission to attend the meeting in person at City Hall. Chair McCoy asked the Commissioners to hold their questions during workshops until staff presentation is finished. Commissioner Cummings spoke regarding addressing questions from members of the public during pubic comment regarding Roeding Park. 8. City Administration and PARCS Staff Reports and Comments Program Administrator Ramirez announced interpreters are available at today's meeting, and the Measure P council item was continued to November 4, 2021. 9. Unscheduled Communication Upon call, the follow member of the public addressed the Commission: Glenna Gammel. 10. Workshops 11. Discussion Item 11-A.ID 21-814 DISCUSSION - Parks Identification of Projects and Priorities Process (WRT) The above item was introduced to the Commission by Consultant Gibbs, WRT and Director Miller, PARCs Department. City of Fresno ***Subject to Mayoral Veto Page 3 November 1, 2021Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Meeting Minutes - Draft Commissioner Parkes requested the maps be enlarged and provided to the Commissioners for a better view. Consultant Gibbs responded. DISCUSSED 12. Hearings 12-A.ID 21-800 Actions pertaining to the Highest Needs Definition (WRT) 1.HEARING - Presentation of the Proposed Highest Needs Definition 2.ACTION - Recommendation to City Council to Adopt the Proposed Highest Needs Definition The above item was introduced to the Commission by Consultant Gibbs, and Associate Bejarano, WRT. Upon call, the following member of the public addressed the Commission: Sylvesta Hall. Commissioner Vang ask that the survey be open to the community to obtain more public participation without having to attend the meetings. Commissioner Barraza motioned to select the highest needs percentile from 51 to 100 top 50%. Commissioner Singh seconded the motion. Motioned FAILED Commissioner Oputa motioned to accept WRTs recommendation and that the commission vote separately on the equity factor and highest needs. Commissioner Parkes seconded the motion. Motioned FAILED Vice Chair Dohlin motioned to accept WRT proposal as presented and take the top 25% of the highest needs neighborhoods as the cut off. Commissioner Cummings seconded the motion. Motion PASSED, 5-4, Commissioner Barraza, Commissioner Singh, Commissioner Oputa, Commissioner Vang voted no. 13. Adjournment The Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission adjourned at 7:59 P.M. City of Fresno ***Subject to Mayoral Veto Page 4 November 1, 2021Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Meeting Minutes - Draft City of Fresno ***Subject to Mayoral Veto Page 5 Monday, November 15, 2021 5:30 PM City of Fresno 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 www.fresno.gov In person and/or electronic Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Chair – Kimberly McCoy Vice Chair – Jon Dohlin Commissioner – Maiyer Vang Commissioner – Dr. Francine Oputa Commissioner – Scott Miller Commissioner – Mona Nyandoro Cummings Commissioner – Harman Singh Commissioner – Jose Leon Barraza Commissioner – Sarah Parkes Meeting Minutes - Draft Regular Meeting November 15, 2021Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Meeting Minutes - Draft 1. Call to Order Chair McCoy called the meeting to order at 5:33 P.M. 2. Roll Call Commissioner Miller, Commissioner Vang and Vice Chair Dohlin were absent during roll call and joined the meeting at 5:39 P.M. Chair Kimberly McCoy, Vice Chair Jon Dohlin, Commissioner Maiyer Vang, Commissioner Francine Oputa, Commissioner Scott Miller, Commissioner Harman Singh, Commissioner Jose Barraza, and Commissioner Sarah Parkes Present 8 - Commissioner Mona CummingsAbsent1 - 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Approve Agenda City Clerk Stermer announced translators were available, Commissioner Cummings was not going to be in attendance, and the minutes for November 1, 2021 were continued to December 6, 2021 regular meeting. On motion of Commissioner Oputa, seconded by Commissioner Parkes,the above Action was approved. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye:Chair McCoy, Commissioner Oputa, Commissioner Singh, Commissioner Barraza and Commissioner Parkes 5 - Absent:Vice Chair Dohlin, Commissioner Vang, Commissioner Miller and Commissioner Cummings 4 - 5. Approval of Minutes 5-A ID 21-864 Approval of Minutes for October 18, 2021 and October 25, 2021 On motion of Commissioner Parkes, seconded by Vice Chair Dohlin, that the above Action Item be approved. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye:Chair McCoy, Vice Chair Dohlin, Commissioner Oputa, Commissioner Singh, Commissioner Barraza and Commissioner Parkes 6 - City of Fresno ***Subject to Mayoral Veto Page 2 November 15, 2021Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Meeting Minutes - Draft Absent:Commissioner Vang, Commissioner Miller and Commissioner Cummings 3 - 6. Discussion: Subcommittee Reports: a. Cultural Arts Plan: b. Highest Needs Neighborhoods: c. Parks Master Plan: Commissioner Parkes announced the meeting for the Cultural Art Plan was scheduled for November 15, 2021 was cancelled, but the committee did receive an update by Lilia Chavez and the Request for Proposal (RFP) went out and all the Commissioners have received a copy. Chair McCoy stated there was nothing to report out on the Highest Needs Neighborhood. Vice Chair Dohlin stated there was nothing to report out on the Parks Master Plan. 7. Members Reports and Comments Commissioner Barraza expressed his concerns regarding the representation of the Parks, Recreations, and Arts Commission at the previous Council Meeting, on November 4, 2021. Commissioner Oputa recommended an item be placed on the next agenda to discuss the Commission's ability to respond to members of the community's questions during public comment. Deputy City Attorney Costa responded. Vice Chair Dohlin congratulated Director Aguirre on his new promotion as Director of the PARCs Department and thanked Director Miller for all her work with the Commission. Commissioner Parkes thanked the city staff for the clean up work on the Luis Eaton Trail. Chair McCoy spoke regarding her attendance at the last Council meeting City of Fresno ***Subject to Mayoral Veto Page 3 November 15, 2021Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Meeting Minutes - Draft regarding the recommendation the Commissioners made on the agenda item regarding "Actions Related to Improving Operations and Maintenance in Parks and Trails." Additionally, Chair McCoy requested the Commissioners send all requests for documents to Chair McCoy, she will then forward to the City Attorney's Office for distribution to the Commission. 8. City Administration and PARCS Staff Reports and Comments Assistant City Manager Kanne introduced and congratulated Director Aguirre and Assistant Director Ramirez on their recent promotion in the PARCs Department. Director Aguirre and Assistant Director Ramirez thanked the Commissioner's and stated they look forward to working with the committee. 9. Unscheduled Communication Members of the public may address the Commission regarding items that are not listed on the agenda and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Commission. Each person will have up to three (3) minutes to present. Upon call, the following member of the public addressed the Commission: Stacy Harrison. 10. Workshops 10-A ID 21-860 WORKSHOP - Overview of the City Annual Budget Process, PARCS Budget Process, and the PRAC’s Role (Budget and PARCS) The above workshop was introduced to the Commission by Budget Manager Fierro, Budget Department, Business Manager Boualamsy, and Assistant Director Ramirez, PARCs Department PRESENTED 10-B ID 21-858 WORKSHOP - Overview of the Public Input Process and the PRAC’s Role (PARCS and WRT) The above workshop was introduced to the Commission by Consultant Gibbs, and Consultant Hakimipour, WRT. PRESENTED City of Fresno ***Subject to Mayoral Veto Page 4 November 15, 2021Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission Meeting Minutes - Draft 10-C ID 21-861 WORKSHOP - Overview of the City Master Fee Schedule, Annual Review Process, and PRAC’s Role in Amendments to the PARCS Master Fee Schedule (PARCS) The above workshop was introduced to the Commission by Business Manager Boualamsy, PARCs Department. PRESENTED 11. Adjournment The Parks, Recreation, and Arts Commission adjourned the meeting at 7:08 P.M. City of Fresno ***Subject to Mayoral Veto Page 5 City of Fresno Staff Report 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 www.fresno.gov File #:ID 21-971 Agenda Date:12/6/2021 Agenda #: REPORT TO THE PARKS, RECREATION, AND ARTS COMMISSION SUBJECT Workshop - Cost of operations and maintenance of existing City of Fresno Parks and improvements. (WRT, PARCS) Attachment City of Fresno Printed on 2/5/2024Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION FRESNO PARK MAINTENANCE COSTS Existing and Future Parks Parks,Recreation &Arts Commission December 6,2021 Estimated $38 million per year Measure P *Extra .75%for Planning Total Cost of Ownership Methodology Financial Overview What is the value of parks? •Parks are Assets/Infrastructure Financial Overview •Existing Asset Value = $300 Million (not including land) •Existing City Maintenance Budget = $10 Million Annually (Combined PARCS & PW) •Existing Park Acreage = 1,100 Acres •Direct Maintenance Cost Per Acre = $2,500 (compare with Northern California average* of $7,000 -$10,000) •Lifecycle Replacement (10 yr.) Cost = $123M-$173M Financial Overview $7,700,000 –$11,000,000 ($7K -$10K per acre X 1,100 Acres)$ System -Wide Annual Maintenance Cost Per Acre $2,750,000 ($2.5K per acre X 1,100 Acres) Northern California Standard Spending Range City of Fresno Spending Components of Park Maintenance Lines of Service (example) Lines of Service (example) Urban Forestry Maintenance Lines of Service Citizen Inquiries Contract Management Education and Outreach Irrigation Systems Storm Clean-Up Traffic Safety Management Trail Clearing Tree Inspections and Protection Tree Inventory Management Tree Planting Tree Pruning and Maintenance Tree Removal Volunteer Management Athletic Maintenance Lines of Service Drainage Systems Hard Surface Maintenance (includes Parking lots, plazas and sidewalks) Horticulture Maintenance Infield Maintenance Irrigation Systems Lighting Security/Area Misc Mowing Outdoor Court Maintenance Playground Maintenance (Note: All Playgrounds are Level One) Restrooms in Parks Shade/Shelters Sign Maintenance Site Amenity/Structure Maintenance Storm Cleanup (Wind, Snow, Emergency Events) Tools & Equipment Tree Maintenance Turf Maintenance Vandalism/ Graffiti Removal/Transient Clean Up Waste Management Maintenance Standards (task and frequency) Maintenance Mode/Level 1 (Mode/Level 1) applies to parks or sites that require the greatest level of maintenance standard in the system. •Destination Location Parks, Signature Parks, Regional Parks Maintenance Mode/Level 2 (Mode/Level 2) applies to parks or sites that require a moderate level of effort and maintenance standards in the system. •Neighborhood and Community parks **Maintenance Mode/Level 3 (Mode/Level 3) applies to parks or sites that require a nominal level of effort and maintenance standards in the system. •Natural Areas, Open Space, Basins ** Fresno was managing most park acreage at a level 3 Maintenance Standards (example) Task Frequency Playgrounds and equipment - (All types) - Level 1 Maintenance Goal: To adhere to and exceed National Playground Safety Standards Inspect and document; 1x/month Major Annual Inspection 1x/year Repair Immediately Clean and pickup trash 7x/week Remove vandalism As needed Inspect water fountains, where applicable 7x/week Mow areas around the playground 1x/week Inspect playground parking lot, picnic tables and visitor benches 1x/week Rake sand, woodchips, gravel, fiber mulch 1x/week Seal rubberized, poured in place 1x/year Remove/Replace Fiber Mulch 1x/3-5 years Replace 1x/15 years Inspect for Pests/Bees/etc 1x/2 weeks Staffing Guidelines •Best practice ratio of staff per signature park acres maintained at a best practice for parks maintained at a Level 1 standard is 1 FTE for every 8 -12 acres •Best practice ratio of staff per general park acres maintained at a best practice for parks maintained at a Level 2 standard is 1 FTE for every 15 -20 acres •Best practice ratio of staff per natural area park acres maintained at a best practice for parks maintained at a Level 3 standard is 1 FTE for every 50 -100 acres Staffing Guidelines •Neighborhood Parks:250-300 annual labor hours per acre maintained at a level 2 standard. •Community Parks:200-250 annual labor hours per acre maintained at a level 2 standard. •Regional Parks: 200-300 annual labor hours per acre maintained at a level 1 standard. •Athletic Fields: 1 FTE for every 4-6 athletic fields maintained at a level 2 standard. City of Fresno Staff Report 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 www.fresno.gov File #:ID 21-972 Agenda Date:12/6/2021 Agenda #: REPORT TO THE PARKS, RECREATION AND ARTS COMMISSION SUBJECT Workshop - Process for how the Parks, Recreation and Arts Commission can prioritize parks for allocation recommendations to City Council related to General Fund and Measure P budgets. (WRT, PARCS) Attachment City of Fresno Printed on 2/5/2024Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Parks, Recreation & Arts Commission December 6, 2021 Process for Prioritizing Park Improvements FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Agenda 1. Measure P 2. Existing Park Prioritization •Fresno Parks Master Plan •Pipeline Projects •Emerging Community Priorities 3. New Park Prioritization •Fresno Parks Master Plan •Pipeline Projects •Emerging Community Priorities MEASURE P FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION What is Measure P? •Fresno Clean and Safe Neighborhood Parks Transactions and Use Tax (Article 15 of the Municipal Code) •Implements voter-approved Measure P •Establishes 3/8-cent sales tax to be used for: (1)Improving and Maintaining Clean and Safe Neighborhood Parks; (2)New Neighborhood Parks; Senior and Youth recreation Facilities (3)Youth and Senior Recreation Programs;After-School Programs; Job Training for Youth and Veterans (4)Expanded Access to Arts and Culture (5)Safe Walking and Biking Trails;Street Beautification and Litter Removal;San Joaquin River Parkway FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Estimated $38 million per year What is Measure P? EXISTING PARK PRIORITIZATION FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Park Prioritization Process Now: Defining an evaluation framework to ground our recommendations for which parks should be prioritized for improvements FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Park Prioritization Process Next Up: Ensuring that set-aside for highest-need neighborhoods is met, and defining what specific improvements should be made at priority parks FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Existing Park Prioritization Framework Example Fresno Parks Master Plan (2017)Pipeline Projects (2021) Emerging Priorities (2021) Number Park Park Condition Score Park Without Neighborhood Amenity Score Community Priority Score Flagship Park Score Adjacent to Access Gap Score Pipeline Projects Score Parks in Need Score Overall Score 1 Riverbottom Poor 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 3 2 Stallion Fair Yes 1 1 3 Koligian Good Yes 1 1 4 Figarden Loop Good Yes 1 1 5 Emerald Fair Yes 1 Yes 1 2 6 Safety Fair Yes 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 3 7 Orchid Fair Yes 1 Yes 1 2 8 Highway City Fair Yes 1 1 9 El Capitan Dog Park (AH1)Fair Yes 1 Yes 1 2 10 Logan Fair Yes 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 4 11 Oso de Oro (D)Good Yes 1 1 12 Holman Fair 0 13 Pinedale Fair 0 14 Spano Fair Yes 1 1 15 Audubon/LLMD Fair Yes 1 1 16 Woodward Regional Good Yes 1 1 17 Keith Tice Good 0 18 Todd Beamer Good 0 19 Selma Layne Fair 0 21 Belcher Fair Yes 1 Yes 1 2 22 Rotary East Fair Yes 1 Yes 1 2 26 El Dorado Poor 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 4 27 Vinland Poor 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 4 28 Large Fair Yes 1 Yes 1 2 29 Rotary West (B/E)Poor 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 3 FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Fresno Park System Source: Fresno Parks Master Plan, 2018 Definition:This map includes City of Fresno PARCS Department parks, including regional and neighborhood parks. Existing Park 1 Riverbottom 2 Stallion 3 Koligian 4 Figarden Loop 5 Emerald 6 Safety 7 Orchid 8 Highway City 9 El Capitan Dog Park (AH1) 10 Logan 11 Oso de Oro (D) 12 Holman 13 Pinedale 14 Spano 15 Audubon/LLMD 16 Woodward Regional 17 Keith Tice 18 Todd Beamer 19 Selma Layne 20 Kaiser 21 Belcher 22 Rotary East 23 Barstow & Del Mar (F) 24 Robinson 25 First & Bullard (O) 26 El Dorado 27 Vinland 28 Large 29 Rotary West (B/E) 30 Cary 31 University 32 Granny's 33 Einstein 34 Manchester (BB) 35 Radio 36 Lafayette 37 Quigley 38 Lions/Skate 39 Inspiration 40 Jaswant Singh Khalra (formerly Victoria West) 41 Basin XX 42 Roeding Regional 43 San Pablo Family 44 Ted C. Wills 45 Romain 46 Martin Ray Reilly 47 Carozza (G) 48 Reedy (Discovery Ctr.) 49 Melody 50 Al Radka 51 Trolley Creek (Y) 52 Willow/Balch 53 Sunnyside 54 Pilibos 55 Mosqueda 56 Ninth & Tulare 57 First & Nevada 58 Holmes 59 Dickey Playground 63 Chandler 64 Sunset 65 Neilsen 66 Pride 67 Kearny 68 Frank H. Ball 69 California/Tupman 70 Maxie L. Parks Community Center & Gym 71 Bigby-Villa 72 Hinton 73 Regional Sports Park 74 Mary Ella Brown 75 Almy 76 Airways Pool Complex 77 Huntington & Maple 78 Cultural Arts District 79 McKinley & Maple FRESNO PARK SYSTEM 60Hernandez (Alfonso) Youth Center 61Eaton Plaza 62Fink-White FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Park Condition Parks in Poor Condition 1 Riverbottom 26 El Dorado 27 Vinland 29 Rotary West (B/E) 30 Cary 32 Granny's 33 Einstein 34 Manchester (BB) 37 Quigley 41 Basin XX 43 San Pablo Family 45 Romain 47 Carozza (G) 56 Ninth & Tulare 57 First & Nevada Source:Fresno Parks Master Plan, 2018 59 Dickey Playground 62 Fink-White 64 Sunset 66 Pride 67 Kearny 68 Frank H. Ball 72 Hinton 74 Mary Ella Brown 76 Airways Pool Complex 77 Huntington & Maple 79 McKinley & Maple FRESNO PARK CONDITIONS Definition: A site with a good rating is free of major problems and may have some repairable mechanical/equipment issues, a park site with a fair rating indicates some mechanical/equipment defects that require major repair and/or replacement, and a park site with a poor rating has major defects and requires significant lifecycle replacement and/or redesign. Parks in poor condition are included in the Measure P parks prioritization criteria. Data was collected from an on-site park assessment. FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Parks Without Neighborhood Amenity Parks Without Neighborhood Amenity 1 Riverbottom 5 Emerald 6 Safety 9 El Capitan Dog Park (AH1) 14 Spano 31 University 32 Granny's 41 Basin XX 48 Reedy (Discovery Ctr.) 56 Ninth & Tulare 57 First & Nevada 59 Dickey Playground 66 Pride 79 McKinley & Maple Source: Fresno Parks Master Plan, 2018 Definition:This map identifies parks that contain valuable “neighborhood amenities,” and those that do not. Geographic areas of need were determined by mapping access to existing park amenities. Park amenities (e.g. playgrounds, shaded picnic areas, etc.) were given a buffer for access radius depending on the typical catchment area for the amenity, ranging from 1 to 5 miles. Analysis was based on park assessments and community feedback.PARKS WITHOUT NEIGHBORHOOD AMENITY FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Community Priority Community Priority Parks 10 Logan 21 Belcher Park 26 El Dorado 27 Vinland 28 Large 29 Rotary West (B/E) 30 Cary 33 Einstein 35 Radio 36 Lafayette 37 Quigley 42 Roeding Regional 45 Romain 48 Reedy (Discovery Ctr.) 49 Melody Source : Fresno Parks Master Plan, 2018 Definition:The community identified priority parks for improvement, shown here with the needs gradient map underlay to illustrate the relationship between areas of Fresno that lack park amenities and specific parks that need improvement . 55 Mosqueda 56 Ninth & Tulare 58 Holmes 61 Eaton Plaza 62 Fink-White 67 Kearny Park 68 Frank H. Ball 72 Hinton 74 Mary Ella Brown PRIORITY PARKS FOR IMPROVEMENT FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Flagship Parks Flagship Parks 6 Safety 7 Orchid 10 Logan 11 Oso de Oro (D) 15 Audubon/LLMD 21 Belcher 22 Rotary East 29 Rotary West (B/E) 30 Cary 31 University 36 Lafayette 37 Quigley 38 Lions/Skate Park Source : Fresno Parks Master Plan, 2018 Definition :In order to provide a more even geographic distribution of park improvements, flagship parks are priority parks distributed across the city by council districts. Flagship parks are recommended to be prioritized for ongoing upgrades and fully funded maintenance including lifecycle replacement. FLAGSHIP PARKS BY COUNCIL DISTRICT 39 Inspiration 45 Romain 52 Willow/Balch 53 Sunnyside 55 Mosqueda 62 Fink-White 64 Sunset 68 Frank H. Ball FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Access Gaps Source:Fresno Parks Master Plan, 2018 Definition: Parks that are adjacent to an access gap greater than ½ mile with over 5,000 people per square mile Park Adjacent to an Access Gap 2 Stallion 3 Koligian 4 Figarden Loop Park 5 Emerald Park 6 Safety Park 8 Highway City 9 El Capitan Dog Park (AH1) 10 Logan 26 El Dorado 27 Vinland 28 Large 33 Einstein 36 Lafayette 37 Quigley 38 Lions/Skate Park 41 Basin XX 42 Roeding Regional 43 San Pablo Family 44 Ted C. Wills 56 Ninth & Tulare 58 Holmes 77 Huntington & Maple PARKS ADJACENT TO ACCESS GAPS FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Pipeline Projects Existing Parks with Pipeline Projects 1 Riverbottom Park 7 Orchid 10 Logan 16 Woodward Regional 22 Rotary East 26 El Dorado 27 Vinland 32 Granny's 33 Einstein 37 Quigley 40 Jaswant Singh Khalra Park (formerly Victoria West) 42 Roeding Regional 44 Ted C. Wills 50 Al Radka Park 54 Pilibos 70 Maxie L. Parks Community Center & Gym Definition: This map identifies existing parks that have current FY22 Measure P funded projects Source:Fresno Measure P Implementation EXISTING PARKS WITH PIPELINE PROJECTS FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Survey question: Name three parks that you feel are in most need of upgrades. Emerging Priorities SCREEN CAPTURE OF ONLINE SURVEY FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Park Prioritization with Equal Weighting, and Before Emerging Priorities are Available Park Park Condition Park Without Neighborhood Amenity Community Priority Flagship Park Adjacent to Access Gap Pipeline Projects Emerging Priority Quigley Poor Yes Yes Yes Yes ? Logan Fair Yes Yes Yes Yes ? El Dorado Poor Yes Yes Yes ? Vinland Poor Yes Yes Yes ? Einstein Poor Yes Yes Yes ? Ninth & Tulare Poor Yes Yes Yes ? Provided as a baseline for consideration. Overall Score 5 4 4 4 4 4 FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION PARK PRIORITIZATION WEIGHTING After reviewing each park prioritization criteria, how should each one be weighted? (A) higher than, (B) equal to, (C) or less than average? Exercise to be completed at the next meeting. 1. Park Condition 2. Park Without Neighborhood Amenity 3. Community Priority Park 4. Flagship Park 5. Park Adjacent to Access Gap 6. Park with Pipeline Project 7. Emerging Priority Park NEW PARK PRIORITIZATION FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION New Park Prioritization Framework Example 2017 Parks Master Plan Pipeline Projects (2021) Emerging Priorities (2021) Number Park Community Priority for New Parks Score Priority Area Score Pipeline Projects Score Community Priority for New Parks Score Overall Score 81 Fresno Barrios Yes 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 ?3 82 South Tower-Broadway and Elizabeth Yes 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 ?3 83 Van Ness Triangle Park Yes 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 ?3 84 The Link Yes 1 Yes 1 Yes 1 ?3 85 Citywide Senior Center Yes 1 Yes 1 ?2 86 Bulldog & Sixth Yes 1 Yes 1 ?2 87 Milburn/Dakota Yes 1 Yes 1 ?2 FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Parks Master Plan Community Priority Areas for New Parks Definition: This map summarizes feedback from a Stakeholder Workshop regarding priority areas for new parks, and includes an underlay of Fresno’s Existing Neighborhoods, BRT Corridors, and Development Areas. Source: Fresno Parks Master Plan, 2018 STAKEHOLDER FEEDBACK ON PRIORITY AREAS Park 81 Fresno Barrios 82 South Tower-Broadway and Elizabeth 83 Van Ness Triangle Park 84 The Link 87 Milburn/Dakota FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION PMP Community Priority for New Parks Definition: This map summarizes feedback from a series of Council District Community Workshops regarding priority areas for new parks, and includes an underlay of Fresno’s Existing Neighborhoods, BRT Corridors, and Development Areas. Source: Fresno Parks Master Plan, 2018 COUNCIL DISTRICT FEEDBACK ON PRIORITY AREAS Park 81 Fresno Barrios 82 South Tower-Broadway and Elizabeth 83 Van Ness Triangle Park 84 The Link 87 Milburn/Dakota FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Priority Areas Definition:This map overlays needs assessment and suitability analysis data producing information to create a needs gradient map that identifies geographic areas of Fresno that range from being adequately served by parks (depicted in green), to being park poor areas, not adequately served by parks (depicted in red). Red areas that are extremely underserved by parks are priority zones for new parks. Source: Fresno Parks Master Plan, 2018 NEEDS GRADIENT MAP Park 81 Fresno Barrios 82 South Tower-Broadway and Elizabeth 83 Van Ness Triangle Park 84 The Link 85 Citywide Senior Center 86 Bulldog & Sixth FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Pipeline Projects Park 81 Fresno Barrios 82 South Tower-Broadway and Elizabeth 83 Van Ness Triangle Park 84 The Link 85 Citywide Senior Center 86 Bulldog & Sixth 87 Milburn/Dakota NEW PARKS WITH PIPELINE PROJECTS Definition: This map identifies new park projects that have been funded by Measure P in FY22 Source:Fresno Measure P Implementation FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Community Emerging Priority for New Parks Survey question: Are there any specific areas in town that you feel are not well served by parks? Name the nearest major cross streets. Screenshot of Survey or Website SCREEN CAPTURE OF ONLINE SURVEY FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION NEW PARK PRIORITIZATION WEIGHTING After reviewing each park prioritization criteria, how should each one be weighted? (A) higher than, (B) equal to, (C) or less than average? Exercise to be completed at the next meeting. 1. Priority Areas for New Parks 2. Suitability Area 3. Pipeline Projects 4. Emerging Priority Areas FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Measure P Implementation Process FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Community Engagement Process FRESNO MEASURE P IMPLEMENTATION Discussion City of Fresno Staff Report 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 www.fresno.gov File #:ID 21-963 Agenda Date:12/6/2021 Agenda #: REPORT TO THE PARKS, RECREATION, AND ARTS COMMISSION SUBJECT Hearing - To receive public input on allocations related to Measure P and the annual PARCS Department Budget and Capital Improvement Plans. (PARCS) Attachment: City of Fresno Printed on 2/5/2024Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™