HomeMy WebLinkAboutNorth Central Fire Protection DistrictCity of
Cm\I/
rc O�F
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
August 29, 2006
FROM:
SUBJECT:
RANDY R. BRUEGMAN, Fire Chief
Fire Department
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9; J5am F
COUNCIL MEETING 08-29-06
APPROVED BY
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
DIRECTOR
CITY MANAGER
REGIONALIZATION EFFORTS BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT
A. APPROVE SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR FIRE PROTECTION AND EMERGENCY
SERVICES WITH THE NORTH CENTRAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE
DISTRICT'S ELECTORATE IN NOVEMBER 2006
B. DISCUSSION/COUNCIL DIRECTION REGARDING CITY/FRESNO COUNTY FIRE
PROTECTION DISTRICT SERVICE TO THE COUNTY ISLANDS WITHIN THE
SPHERE OF INFLUENCE
KEY RESULT AREA: 0209001000
Public Safety
RECOMMENDATION
Presented to City Co u ciI
Date siill 06
Disposition � _
1. Approve service agreement for fire protection and emergency services with the North Central Fire
Protection District and authorize execution of documents subject to approval by the District's electorate
in November 2006.
2. Update on discussions/receive Council direction regarding City/Fresno County Fire Protection District
service to the county islands within the sphere of influence.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In the Public Safety 2025 Plan, which was presented to Council in May 2004, the regionalization of services
was one of the primary strategic initiatives. Since that time the department has worked diligently on the
development of a relationship with North Central Fire Protection District (NCFPD) that has culminated in the
passage of a transition agreement and a proposal for a long-term service agreement between NCFPD and the
City of Fresno. The long-term service agreement is included in this packet and is labeled Item A. Staff is
recommending Council approve the service agreement for fire protection and emergency services with NCFPD
and authorize execution of documents subject to the approval of NCFPD's electorate in November 2006.
Item B is an update/Council direction item regarding the discussions that have been occurring with the Fresno
County Fire Protection District (FCFPD).
)ItSUBJECT TO MAYOR'S VETO
Report to the City Council
Request Council Approval of Contract with the North Central Fire Protection District
for the Provision of Fire Services
August 29, 2006
Page 2
KEY OBJECTIVE BALANCE
The proposed NCFPD contract provides gains in all three key objectives of Customer Satisfaction, Employee
Satisfaction, and Financial Management. Customer Satisfaction will be enhanced by providing better
coordinated response between the NCFPD and the City. Regionalization of services will provide a more
effective and timely response to the residents living in these areas for both city and district residents.
Employee satisfaction will be enhanced by the increase of a consolidated safety response into this area. The
current system is fragmented and provides the opportunity for redundant level of service and
miscommunication with multiple units responding from various fire agencies. The benefits from a financial
standpoint will be the shared use of public facilities, and the coordinated response will ensure the money being
spent for fire protection and first -responder EMS services in the area will result in the most effective service
delivery for the residents of both agencies.
The proposed NCFPD service agreement presents the best solution for enhancing both employee and
customer satisfaction by providing superior regional fire and emergency service delivery to the area in a
financially prudent manner.
BACKGROUND
Proposed Service Agreement
In January 2005, staff began to meet with NCFPD in regard to the regionalization of services. On
November 29, 2005, a transition agreement was passed by Council that addressed concerns LAFCO had
raised, which allowed for the continuation of City annexations. At that time Council was informed that staff was
working toward a long-term service agreement for the merging of services. Through numerous meetings with
NCFPD's board of directors and residents of the areas served by NCFPD, a service agreement was drafted for
fire protection services. The proposed service agreement (Attachment A) will incorporate NCFPD service into
the City Fire/EMS Center, will reduce a redundant level of service, and will expedite the department's ability to
respond faster to emergencies. The proposed service agreement will incorporate all personnel into one
operational system, allow the utilization of one set of standard operating procedures, utilization of a common
command control, maximization of radio frequencies, and improved interoperability. The proposed service
agreement will reallocate personnel to Kerman, Biola, and Kearney Park, which will afford a higher level of
protection throughout the region, placing more firefighters in stations that are further away from support units
(Attachment B). The support to move on the service agreement with the City has been almost universal. The
City of Kerman passed a resolution in support of this effort (see Attachment C). During discussions at several
public meetings, numerous business owners, the BIA, and residents have provided testimonials in support of
this proposal. On August 2 the Board approved the service agreement contingent upon voter approval in
November. Highlights of the service agreement are as follows:
• The service agreement has a base term of thirty (30) years.
City will provide enhanced fire suppression services, building and construction plan review, fire
investigation, fire prevention inspection and enforcement services, conduct fire prevention education
programs, and emergency management planning services.
0 The NCFPD will pay for these services using tax revenue payments from the County of Fresno.
Report to the City Council
Request Council Approval of Contract with the North Central Fire Protection District
for the Provision of Fire Services
August 29, 2006
Page 3
• The annual fee is subject to adjustments by approval of both parties to reflect any requested increases
in service levels or shifting of tax base resulting from annexation of NCFPD service area. If no service
level adjustments are made, the annual fee shall be adjusted for the lesser of the change in consumer
price index or percentage of district tax revenue growth.
• The base annual fee paid by NCFPD under the current staffing configuration will pay for 41 of the
current NCFPD employees to be transitioned to the Fire Department and become City employees. One
NCFPD firefighter will transition to the City to fill one firefighter vacancy currently existing within the
department. The transition is anticipated to increase the Fire Department PAR as follows: 8
firefighters, 18 firefighter specialists, 10 fire captains, 3 battalion chiefs, 1 deputy chief, 1 principal
account clerk, and 1 senior administrative clerk.
• Two dispatchers will transfer to the Police Department and one finance support person will retire. Fire
Chief Downs may transfer to the City as a fire deputy chief. When Chief Lonnie Downs retires in
approximately 14 months, the Fire Department will return to three deputy chiefs as is the case today.
The City will have use of NCFPD facilities and equipment
Update/Council Direction regarding Service to the County Islands within the Sphere of Influence
As Council is aware, there are several county islands within the city of Fresno, which are surrounded by City
fire stations. City stations are often the closest stations to many areas within the islands or to the county areas
inside the sphere of influence.
With the implementation of the Fig Garden agreement, it became imperative that these county islands be
addressed. On September 15, 2005, a letter was sent to then FCFPD Chief Ted Mendoza suggesting the City
take over full service to those areas for the fire taxes generated in those areas. Subsequently, several letters
have been exchanged between the department and FCFPD. At this point in time, the issue is yet to be
resolved.
Over the course of the last 12 months, this has become even more problematic with the adoption of the
agreement that opened City Station 15 and closed County Station 88, causing all previous agreements with the
County to become null and void. Therefore, there are no agreements for response to the majority of County
islands and as such, the County must adhere to the statewide mutual -aid plan. Mutual aid, as defined by the
state, is designed to augment the jurisdiction's resources when an emergency occurs that is of such size that
the jurisdiction has been overwhelmed or all its resources are committed at another incident. Mutual aid is not
designed for first response, and this is why jurisdictions develop automatic -aid agreements or service
agreements to address these issues. What has been occurring in the past is that the Fresno Fire Department
is routinely being dispatched to respond into an area without an agreement. This is the reason why a transition
of service agreement was proposed over a year ago, which is similar to the agreement for the Sunnyside area
(Station 15). The calls would go directly to the City's dispatch system, eliminating a significant time delay and
improve response to the residents in those areas. The department proposed to do so for the fire taxes
generated within the county islands.
The system that exists today is fragmented at best, causing delays in dispatch processing time and places the
department in a difficult situation as its resources are not obligated to respond to those areas and may assume
some degree of liability without an existing agreement. This has an impact on the department's response and
deployment patterns as requests are often made for a single-engine response when multiple engines should
Report to the City Council
Request Council Approval of Contract with the North Central Fire Protection District
for the Provision of Fire Services
August 29, 2006
Page 4
be dispatched initially. This places City firefighters at risk and does not provide the highest level of service to
the residents of the county islands and/or the city. This approach to serving these areas is clearly outside the
City/FCFPD negotiated agreement for use of resources and is subsidizing the County service into those areas.
This is why the department proposed a transition of tax money for full service to these areas as the Fresno Fire
Department is the logical provider since this department has the most stations located to serve those residents.
FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed NCFPD service agreement fee was designed to provide for full cost recovery. Subsequent year
fees will be subject to adjustments by approval of both parties to reflect any changes in service levels. If no
service level adjustments are made, the annual fee shall be adjusted for the lesser of the change in the
consumer price index or percentage of district tax revenue growth. The service agreement also provides for
renegotiation with not less than 12 months notice should any major labor contract change significantly impact
cost recovery for providing the contracted services.
The proposed budget is cost neutral for the City. The cost of wages and benefits, including pension costs, has
been factored into the proposed budget. A fiscal analysis on the proposal was conducted by Finance (see
Attachment D). A final budget will be prepared at the time the contract is executed.
RRB/RC/mc 082406
Attachments for Item A:
Attachment A: Service Agreement for Fire Protection and Emergency Services
Attachment B: Map: Regionalization of Services Proposal
Attachment B: Resolution—City of Kerman Re: North Central Fire Protection District Contract
Attachment C: Memo—Renena Smith Re: Fiscal Analysis on the North Central Fire Protection District Merger Proposal
Attachments for Item B:
Attachment A: Memo—Mayor Autry and Council, dated August 24, 2006, including:
Fresno City Map
Correspondence Exchanged between Fresno City and Fresno County Fire Protection District
August 30, 2006pp Council Adoption: 08/29/06
f� F C E � V;. t D Mayor Approval:
TO: MAYOR ALAN AUTRY Mayor veto:
FROM: REBECCA E. KLISCH,�c q -� AM 11: 22 Override Request:
City Clerk CITY CLERK, FRES40 C;,
SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL OF COUNCIL ACTION FOR APPROVAL OR VETO
At the Council meeting of 08/29/06, Council took legislative action entitled Appv svc agrmnt
w/North Central Fire Protection District for fire protection/emergency services, Item
No. 9:15 a.m. F-1, by the following vote:
Ayes Boyajian, Calhoun, Dages, Perea, Sterling, Westerlund, Duncan
Noes None
Absent None
Abstain None
Please indicate either your formal approval or veto by completing the following sections and
executing and dating your action. Please file the completed memo with the Clerk's office on
or before September 11, 2006. In computing the ten day period required bCharter, the first
day has been excluded and the tenth day has been included unless the 10� day is a
Saturday. Sunday, or holiday, in which case it has also been excluded. Failure to file this
memo with the Clerk's office within the required time limit shall constitute approval of the
ordinance, resolution or action, and it shall take effect without the Mayor's signed approval.
Thank you.
A PROVED:
VE for the following reasons: (Written objections are required by Charter; attach
additional sheets if necessary.)
Ayes
Noes
Absent
Abstain
Date: - q lu I ou
Date:
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR FIRE PROTECTION
AND EMERGENCY SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made this 908' day of , 2006, by and between the
CITY OF FRESNO, a charter city and municipal corporation hereinafter referred to as
"CITY," and the NORTH CENTRAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, a California fire
protection district, organized and operated pursuant to the Fire Protection District Law of
1987, Health and Safety Code, Sections 13800, et seq., hereinafter referred to as
"DISTRICT," the promises and agreements of each being in consideration of the promises
and agreements of the other.
RECITALS
(1) DISTRICT currently is the primary provider of fire protection service and
receives general purpose ad valorem property tax and other revenues from within its
territorial limits, such tax revenue being based on application of the combined "parent zone"
and applicable "ZONE 1" rates to the taxable value of the real property within such territory.
(2) DISTRICT'S current territorial limits include certain unincorporated territory in
DISTRICT'S service area which are surrounded by incorporated areas of the CITY.
(3) Current and future expansion of CITY'S incorporated territory will include the
detachment of territory from DISTRICT'S service area and the transfer of such territory to
CITY, and will result in the loss of significant ad valorem property tax revenues for the
District, the impact of which is presently partially mitigated by the "TRANSITION
AGREEMENT" which the parties have executed, dated as of November 29, 2005.
(4) The parties have negotiated this "Service Agreement for Fire Protection and
Emergency Services" (the "Agreement") in light of the foregoing facts and in order to
enhance the fire protection services, equipment and staffing available for the residents of
the DISTRICT.
(5) By this Agreement, the parties intend to provide for the continued
independence of the District's Board of Directors and the services provided by the CITY, as
described in this Agreement, shall be subject to the direction of the Board of Directors of the
District.
(6) The parties wish to provide a clear means of administration and dispute
resolution for purposes of this Agreement.
The parties agree as follows:
Term. The term of this Agreement is thirty (30) years, beginning of the 18` day of
July 2007 and ending on the 301h day of June 2037, subject to the provisions of
Paragraph 8.
2. Scope of Services:
A. The CITY agrees to provide fire protection and emergency services to the
DISTRICT consistent with the services provided within the CITY. In providing
these services the CITY shall:
1) Provide primary response fire protection and emergency services
throughout the DISTRICT in a manner consistent with this
Agreement and within the staffing and response guidelines
established in the service level criteria set forth in Appendix A,
including the use of the CITY'S vehicles, equipment, apparatus, and
sufficient personnel to operate the vehicles, equipment, and
apparatus. These services shall be provided subject to the
condition that reasonably sufficient vehicles, equipment, apparatus,
and personnel shall remain within the CITY to assure adequate fire
protection and emergency services to the CITY. Under this
condition, if the demands of the DISTRICT exceed the services
which the CITY can provide, the CITY agrees to the use of third
party mutual aid agreements may be necessary to supplement the
CITY'S vehicles, equipment, apparatus, and personnel.
2) Use due diligence to maintain continuous (twenty-four [24] hours per
day, seven [7] days per week) and uninterrupted fire protection and
emergency services which shall at least be consistent with the
standards set forth in the service level criteria in Appendix A. Under
no circumstances is the CITY liable to the DISTRICT for an
interruption or failure of service caused by acts of God, unavoidable
accident, or other circumstances beyond the control of the CITY
through no fault of its own.
3) The services described in paragraph 1) of this section shall include
the following activities:
(i) Review building and construction plans for compliance
with applicable fire codes and ordinances of the DISTRICT.
(ii) Investigate fires within the DISTRICT.
(iii) Review and propose fire codes and ordinances for
adoption by the DISTRICT, subject to the provisions of Paragraph 20.
(iv) Perform inspections in the DISTRICT in accordance with
the Department's service level objectives.
2
(v) Enforce applicable fire codes, ordinances, regulations,
and statutes for the District. The DISTRICT hereby delegates to the
CITY authority to issue citations for such purposes.
(vi) Conduct a fire prevention and education program within
the DISTRICT.
(vii) Maintain, for the DISTICT, adequate fire service records
of activities as may be required by the Insurance Services Office and
the California State Fire Marshal, and financial records, as may be
required by the DISTRICT Board of Directors.
(viii) Participate in mutual aid agreements and instant aid with
fire protection providers who are contiguous with DISTRICT, as
approved by both the CITY and the DISTRICT as
necessary/appropriate.
(ix) Take all reasonable steps to maintain all of its apparatus,
equipment, and its entire system in a good state of repair and shall at
all times conduct its operations under this Agreement in a safe and
professional manner.
(x) Participate in the DISTIRCT'S emergency management
planning through the Fire Chief or designee.
(xi) Prepare reports for and take action for those matters
shown on Appendix "D" and such other matters as reasonably
requested by the DISTRICT Board from time to time, except for those
matters assigned to the District's Business Manager, as set forth on
Appendix "F".
(xii) Designate an individual to act as the DISTRICT "Fire
Chief', subject to DISTRICT approval as the point of contact for
residents of the DISTRICT and for DISTRICT Board Members.
(xiii) Insure that the DISTRICT Fire Chief attend all special
and regular meetings of the DISTRICT Board of Directors, and
represents the Board at all other City, County and Regional meetings of
Fire Chiefs.
(xiv) Insure DISTRICT compliance with its contractual
obligations by managing the contracts listed in Appendix "E", provided
legal and financial obligations remain with District. CITY expressly
does not assume these contracts or any of them.
3
B. The CITY agrees to provide the DISTRICT with monthly call summary and
other reports for the fire protection services and emergency services provided.
C. The CITY shall keep the DISTRICT informed of all new developments, issues,
or concerns affecting the operations of the CITY that impact CITY's
performance of this Agreement. CITY shall endeavor to notify the DISTRICT
in advance of any public announcement concerning such CITY operations.
The DISTRICT shall endeavor to notify the CITY of any developments or
issues concerning the Agreement in advance of any public announcement on
the subject.
D. The City shall cooperate with the District's Business Manager in all assigned
duties, as set forth on Appendix "F".
3. Compensation. The DISTRICT agrees to pay the CITY a base annual fee in two
annual installments on December 31't and April 30th of each year, beginning on
December 31, 2007, subject to the receipt of the DISTRICT tax revenue
payments from the County of Fresno, as shown on Appendix B, subject to the
following adjustments:
A. The adjustments are:
1) The base annual fee may be adjusted by approval of the parties
to meet decreased service level demands resulting from annexation of
DISTRICT service area.
2) The base annual fee may be adjusted by approval of the parties
to meet increased service level demands.
3) The base annual fee shall be adjusted for the change in All
Urban Consumers California CPI for the previous year or the % of DISTRICT
tax revenue growth whichever is less.
4) In the event that a portion of the territory of DISTRICT is
annexed to CITY, such territory shall be excluded from this Agreement upon
detachment, and at the next installment payment as defined in this paragraph
3, the base annual fee shall be permanently reduced by the amount of tax
revenue (including the ad valorum tax and the Zone 1 voter approved tax)
generated from the annexed area from/after the date of detachment. The
amount of the reduction shall be the amount received by the DISTRICT in the
tax year immediately preceding the annexation. The DISTRICT shall remit to
the CITY any post -detachment tax revenues received by it within 30 days
thereof.
12
B. None of the provisions of this Agreement shall be construed to create in
the DISTRICT either party any right, interest, or ownership in any real or personal
property of the CITY other used for the performance of this Agreement.
C. If during the term of this Agreement the revenue streams of the
DISTRICT and/or the CITY are limited for reasons beyond their respective control
and if, as a result the CITY is unable to provide the level of service described in
Section 2 above, and/or if DISTRICT is unable to pay CITY for the established
levels of service, either party may terminate the Agreement by notice as
described in Section 8 (iv) and request best efforts renegotiation and/or service
transition.
D. This agreement is subject to any applicable constitutional and charter
taxing or debt limitations and is contingent upon the annual appropriation of
funds. Upon failure to appropriate the funds necessary for this Agreement, notice
as described in Section 8 shall be given and both parties will immediately
negotiate a service transition and/or enter best efforts renegotiation, subject to
Transition Agreement reviver as provided hereunder.
4. Financial Review. Each year, the chief financial officers or designees of both
agencies will review the costs associated with providing fire protection and
emergency services to protect against cost shifting between agencies. The
financial officers will produce a report to the elected officials that describes the
outcome of the financial review, by not later than May 30th.
5. Legal Advice. Each party will be represented by and bear costs of its respective
counsel.
6. Transition:
A. Employees: Employees of the DISTRICT who are currently employed
by the DISTRICT shall have the option of transferring employment to CITY
effective July 1, 2007, as described in Appendix C.
1) Except and to the extent otherwise provided herein, all DISTRICT
employees who transfer to CITY employment shall be governed by the
terms and conditions of the Charter of the CITY, the Fresno Municipal
Code, the Administrative Order manual, the Salary Resolution and other
rules and regulations of the CITY.
2) Employees of the DISTRICT who elect to transfer to CITY
employment shall be placed into a job classification and bargaining unit
commensurate with their DISTRICT duties and at the rate of pay as
shown on Appendix "C." Non -safety DISTRICT employees shall be
required to complete a CITY job application specifying their relevant
knowledge, skills and abilities. All transferring DISTRICT employees
5
must meet CITY minimum qualifications and eligibility criteria to be
eligible for promotion to higher classes or ranks. All DISTRICT
employees who transfer to CITY employment shall be fingerprinted prior
to employment and subject to Department of Justice clearance prior to
commencement of employment.
3) Except and to the extent otherwise expressly provided herein, the
DISTRICT will be and remain responsible for all vested welfare,
retirement and pension obligations (including pension obligation bonds, if
any) and liabilities, existing on transition date, including the obligation to
pay off the "severance bank" for those employees shown on Appendix
"C" and to satisfy any remaining "longevity pay" obligations for those
employees shown on Appendix "C."
4) DISTRICT will transfer DISTRICT leave balances remaining at time of
separation to CITY for all employees who transfer employment to CITY
as outlined in this Section 6 and Appendix C.
(a) Sick Leave - all DISTRICT employees shall carry over their current
balance of sick leave hours (maximum of 2160 hours) which shall be
their starting CITY balance at the time of transition to the CITY,
provided that as to sworn management employees (Battalion Chiefs
and DISTRICT Fire Chief) the DISTRICT shall pay to the CITY the
value of those transferred sick leave hours above 240 hours multiplied
by forty percent (40%) of the employee's existing hourly rate of pay at
the time of retirement from the CITY;
(b) Vacation Leave - all DISTRICT employees shall carry over their
current balance of vacation hours (maximum of 216 hours) which shall
be their starting CITY balance at the time of transition to the CITY;
(i) Transitioning employees shall accrue applicable CITY
vacation or annual leave hours based on their combined total
years of service to the DISTRICT and the CITY in accordance
with the respective Memorandums of Understanding.
(c) Holiday Leave - all sworn DISTRICT employees shall be paid by the
DISTRICT for any holiday leave balance prior to transfer of employment
to the CITY.
5) DISTRICT employees who transfer employment to the CITY shall be
entitled to all applicable benefits to which CITY employees are entitled
including under CITY reciprocity agreement(s) and Memorandums of
Understanding with each respective bargaining unit. DISTRICT and
DISTRICT employees shall provide all certifications, documentation and
information reasonably required by the CITY for transfer of employment
to the CITY, including without limitation a HIPAA certificate of creditable
coverage.
6) Employees of the DISTRICT who have not completed or satisfied the
terms of their probation, as of the date of the transfer, shall be required to
satisfactorily complete their probation as CITY employees in accordance
with CITY standards.
(i) DISTRICT dispatchers who transfer to CITY employment shall
be required to successfully complete a background investigation
and a probationary period with the Police Department.
Dispatchers who do not successfully complete the background
investigation or their probation shall be offered CITY employment
in one available CITY position for which they meet the minimum
qualifications with similar rate of pay.
7) Any DISTRICT employee who has suffered a work related injury or
illness prior to the date of transition shall be entitled to receive medical
and/or other workers' compensation benefits required by law from and
through the DISTRICT before and after the date of transition. Any work
related injury or illness occurring after the transition date shall be
administered through the CITY's workers' compensation program.
8) The DISTRICT shall transfer the personnel files of all transitioning
employees to CITY at the time of transition.
9) All safety DISTRICT employees shall be covered by the existing
Memorandums of Understanding between the CITY and the International
Association of Firefighters (Basic Unit and Management Unit) as outlined
in Appendix "C," in addition to the following terms and conditions:
(i) Salaries — DISTRICT employees will begin at the "A" step of
the salary range for each respective rank;
(ii) Seniority On the Job — DISTRICT employees will be placed at
the bottom of the current seniority list in the same order they held
with DISTRCT at time of transfer of employment to CITY;
(iii) Seniority In Rank — DISTRICT employees will be placed at
the bottom of the current seniority list in each rank, in the order
that will reflect their seniority in rank with the DISTRICT as of the
time of transfer of employment to the CITY;
(iv) Assignments — DISTRICT employees may remain in their
respective DISTRICT stations until the next occurring station
draw.
(v) Movement Through Steps — For the first 5 years after
transition, DISTRICT employees shall move from the "A" step of
the salary range for each respective rank to the "B" step upon 1
year of paid status at the "A" step. Movement to each higher
step of the salary range for each respective rank shall also be
upon completion of one year of paid status at the lower step.
B. Facilities and Equipment. Fire protection and emergency services
facilities and equipment owned by the DISTRICT shall be available for the use by
the CITY at no cost to the CITY (except for stations 45 and 47) during the term of
this Agreement. DISTRICT shall retain ownership of all facilities and equipment
owned by DISTRICT on July 1, 2007. Should DISTRICT decide to divest itself of
facilities, fire equipment or apparatus, CITY shall have right -of -first -refusal to
purchase said equipment apparatus or facilities at its fair market value The
parties shall conduct an initial inventory such facilities and equipment variously
identifying assets including general condition, operational status and
interface/interoperability issues and costs. Any required modifications/fitting out
(including without limitation as to Mobile Data Terminals) not otherwise provided
for in this Agreement shall be accomplished only as agreed to by parties in
writing.
C. Reserves. DISTRICT will maintain sufficient funds in reserve to replace
fire apparatus and vehicles based upon the DISTRICT replacement schedule.
D. Apparatus Maintenance. Generally, CITY will maintain DISTRICT
owned apparatus and equipment regularly used by the CITY hereunder. CITY will
pay for parts and labor for apparatus maintenance up to twenty thousand dollars
($20,000) per year, and DISTRICT will be billed for all apparatus maintenance
costs that exceed this amount. The initial $20,000 threshold shall be adjusted
annually by the index described in paragraph 3.A. (3) of this Agreement. Labor
will be billed at an hourly rate based upon the wage and benefits of a Fire
Equipment Mechanic II. IF DISTRICT transitions ownership of equipment and
apparatus to CITY, DISTRICT and CITY will establish an equitable formula for
adjusting maintenance costs. Operating costs for fuel and tires shall be borne by
the DISTRICT for District Apparatus.
E. Facilities and Utilities. The cost of utilities (electric, gas, water, sewer,
trash and telecom) for DISTRICT facilities will be the responsibility of the
DISTRICT, provided that:
1.1
1) The CITY shall provide routine/emergency maintenance for the
DISTRICT'S facilities necessary to keep such in a state of good repair;
and
2) DISTRICT will pay for such routine facility maintenance not exceeding
thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) per year; maintenance costs exceeding
said amount must be prior approved by the DISTRICT except in
emergency situations imperiling life or property. The initial $30,000
threshold shall be adjusted annually by the index described in paragraph
3.A. (3) of this Agreement.
F. Small tools and equipment. The DISTRICT will budget and fund
twenty-eight thousand dollars ($28,000) per year for replacement or addition of
small tools and equipment. Anything above that amount will be borne by the
CITY. The initial $28,000 threshold shall be adjusted annually by the index
described in paragraph 3.A. (3) of this Agreement.
G. Turnout Equipment. DISTRICT shall budget and fund fifty thousand
dollars ($50,000) in year 1 of this Agreement for a second set of turnout
gear/equipment for each transitioning DISTRICT firefighting position. DISTRICT
shall budget and fund Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000) In each subsequent
year of this Agreement for replacement of turnout gear and equipment. The
initial $20,000 threshold shall be adjusted annually by the index described in
paragraph 3.A. (3) of this Agreement.
H. Emergency Communications. CITY will provide DISTRICT with
dispatch services.
I. Insurance. Each party shall be responsible for providing insurance
policies or self-insurance programs to fund liabilities on the facilities and
equipment it owns. Evidence of Insurance, Certificates of Insurance or other
similar documentation shall not be required of either party under this Agreement.
J. Facility/Apparatus Identity. The facilities and apparatus of the
DISTRICT shall be numbered, identified and marked in the manner mutually
agreed upon by the parties.
K. Prorations. The foregoing dollar amounts shall be prorated in the first
year of this agreement, except for the cost of turnout equipment in Section 6.G.
7. Hold Harmless.
A. The CITY shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend DISTRICT and each of
its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from any and all loss,
liability, fines, penalties, forfeitures, costs and damages (whether in contract, tort
or strict liability, including but not limited to personal injury, death at any time and
property damage) incurred by DISTRICT, CITY or any other person, and from any
and all claims, demands and actions in law or equity (including attorney's fees
and litigation expenses), arising or alleged to arise directly or indirectly from the
negligent or intentional acts or omissions of CITY or any of its officers, officials,
employees, agents or volunteers in the performance of this Agreement.
B. DISTRICT shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY and each of its
officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from any and all loss, liability,
fines, penalties, forfeitures, costs and damages (whether in contract, tort or strict
liability, including but not limited to personal injury, death at any time and property
damage) incurred by the CITY, DISTRICT or any other person, and from any and
all claims, demands and actions in law or equity (including attorney's fees and
litigation expenses), arising or alleged to arise directly or indirectly from the
negligent or intentional acts or omissions of DISTRICT or any of its officers,
officials employees, agents or volunteers in the performance of this Agreement.
C. In the event of concurrent negligence on the part of CITY or any of its officers,
officials, employees, agents or volunteers, and DISTRICT or any of its officers,
officials, employees, agents or volunteers, the liability for any and all such claims,
demands and actions in law or equity for such losses, fines, penalties, forfeitures,
costs and damages shall be apportioned under the State of California's theory of
comparative negligence as presently established or as may be modified hereafter.
D. This section shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement.
8. Termination. This Agreement shall be effective beginning July 1, 2007, and shall
remain in full force and effect until the earlier of (i) termination by mutual written
agreement of the parties, (ii) termination by a non -breaching party for the
nonperformance of the other not cured following thirty (30) days written notice
thereof (iii) June 30, 2037 or (iv) on nine (9) months written notice by either party,
if given pursuant to paragraph 3.C.. In the event of termination, the "Transition
Agreement" between the parties, dated as of November 29, 2005, shall again
become effective retroactive to date one year prior to the date of termination.
Master Agreement. This agreement shall serve as the "Master Agreement" for
fire protection and emergency services and transition of annexed/detached
DISTRICT service area. Upon signing the parties agree that, as to the subject
matter hereof this Agreement shall control any inconsistent portions of all other
Agreements if any between the parties, and shall specifically supersede and
suspend obligations under the "Transition Agreement" between the CITY and the
DISTRICT, dated as of November 29, 2005. The DISTRICT and CITY will explore
other opportunities for entering into additional mutually beneficial agreements
during the effective life of this Agreement and as long as neither party is in
default, CITY and DISTRICT and each of them covenant that they will not directly
or indirectly oppose annexations to CITY.
10
10. Renewal. Each party agrees to give not less than twelve (12) months notice to
the other prior to the expiration of this Agreement of intention to renegotiate the
Agreement.
A. If a party has notified the other of its intent to renegotiate this Agreement, the
parties agree that prior to the termination of this Agreement, they will negotiate in
good faith concerning the possible renewal of this Agreement or the making of a
new Agreement.
B. If a party has notified the other of its intent to renew or renegotiate this Agreement
and renewal or successful renegotiation has not been completed before the end
of this contract period, this Agreement shall be automatically extended for 90 days
to allow continuing negotiations, upon terms and conditions then in effect. This
Agreement may be extended further by mutual agreement for additional
increments up to 90 days each.
11. Discrimination. The parties agree not to discriminate on the basis of race,
religion, color, sex, marital status, familial status, national origin, age, mental or
physical disability, sexual orientation, or source of income in the performance of
this Agreement.
12. Waiver of Breach. A waiver of any breach of any provision of this Agreement by
either party shall not operate as a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same
of any other provision of this Agreement.
13. Applicable Laws. At all times during the term of this Agreement, the CITY and the
DISTRICT shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules, and
regulations of the United States of America, the State of California, including all
agencies and subdivisions thereof.
14. Dispute Resolution. The parties desire, if possible, to resolve disputes,
controversies, and claims ("Disputes") arising out of this Agreement without
litigation. To that end at the written request of a party, each party shall appoint a
knowledgeable, responsible management representative to meet and negotiate in
good faith to resolve any Dispute arising under this Agreement. The parties
intend that these negotiations be conducted by non -lawyer, business
representatives. The discussions shall be left to the discretion of the
representatives.
A. If the negotiations do not resolve the Dispute within sixty (60) days of the initial
written request, the Dispute may be submitted to non-binding mediation with a
mediator chosen by mutual agreement of the parties.
B. Each party shall bear its own cost of these dispute resolution procedures. The
parties shall equally share the fees of the mediation and the mediator.
11
15. Notice. All notices, reports, or demands required to be given in writing under this
Agreement shall be deemed to be given when delivered personally to the person
designated below, or his successor, or when five (5) days have elapsed after it is
deposited in the United States mail in a sealed envelope, with registered or
certified mail postage prepaid, or on the next addressed business day if sent by
express mail or overnight air courier to the party to which the notice is being
given, as follows:
For CITY
Fire Chief
450 "M" Street
Fresno, CA 93721
Copy To:
City Manager — City of Fresno
2600 Fresno Street, Room 2064
Fresno, CA 93721-3601
For DISTRICT
15850 W. Kearney Blvd.
Kerman, CA 93630
Such addresses may be changed by either party upon written notice to the other
party given as provided in this section.
16. Captions. The paragraph captions and headings in this Agreement are for
convenience and reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the
meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.
17. Precedence of Documents. In the event of any conflict between the body of this
Agreement and any exhibit or attachment hereto, the terms and conditions of the
body of this Agreement shall control and take precedence over the terms and
conditions expressed within the exhibit or attachment. Furthermore, any terms or
conditions contained within any exhibit or attachment hereto which purport to
modify the allocation of risk between the parties, provided for within the body of
this Agreement, shall be null and void.
18. Third Party Beneficiaries/Independent Capacity. This Agreement shall not be
assigned and shall not be construed or deemed to be an agreement for the
benefit of any third party or parties, and no third party or parties shall have any
right of action hereunder for any cause whatsoever. The parties are acting in an
independent capacity in pursuit of this Agreement.
19. Attorney's Fees. If either party is required to commence any proceeding or legal
action to enforce or interpret any term, covenant or condition of this Agreement,
the prevailing party in such proceeding or action shall be entitled to recover from
the other party its reasonable attorney's fees and legal expenses in addition to
any other relief to which such party may be entitled.
12
20. Advisory Committee. Following the execution of this Agreement, the parties
agree to create a committee to review applicable DISTRICT service area codes
and fees and present recommendation back to the North Central Fire Protection
Board.
13
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement in the County of
Fresno, State of California.
CITY OF FRESNO
By: tErpsno City Manager
NORTH CENTRAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
By: d Z' .
Pre ident, Board of Directors
Approved as to legal form:
A rney f DISTRI
ATTEST:
Rebecca E. Klisch
City Clerk
By:
epu
Approved as to Form:
Fresno City Attorney
By:
Deputy
Appendix A: Service Level Criteria
Appendix B: Financials.
Appendix C: Employee Transition.
Appendix D: District Master Calendar
Appendix E: List of District Contracts
Appendix F: NCFPD Business Manager Job Description
14
►r1„:1►1a]/ Irl
SERVICE LEVEL CRITERIA
Station Location
NCFD Station 41 — Kerman
NCFD Station 43 — Biola
NCFD Station 44 — Kearney Park
NCFD Station 45 — Shields/Grantland
NCFD Station 47 — Bullard/West
Minimum Staffin Per Shi
2 — Firefighters
1 — Firefighter Specialist
1 —Captain
1 — Battalion Chief
1 — Firefighter
1 — Firefighter Specialist
1 — Captain
1 — Firefighter
1 — Firefighter Specialist
1 — Captain
District Board discretion for
future use
District Board discretion for
future use
• The City shall follow existing District `cover” protocols to insure the
availability of vehicles, equipment, apparatus and personnel throughout
the District.
• The City shall respond to Priority #1 and Priority #2 medical aid
emergency calls outside of city limits.
• The City shall respond with the closest available engine to an incident.
• The City use due diligence to maintain continuous (twenty-four [24]
hours per day, seven [7] days per week) and uninterrupted fire protection
and emergency services.
15
1_1,»01151/3:3
PROFORMA FINANCIALS
Period of Servic ervice Contract Fee
7/1/2007 through 6/30/2008
$4,354,825"
Note: First year transition costs that are not reflected in the numbers include
MDT costs.
This fee is an estimate and includes a projection of benefits costs for
FY2008. FY 2008 benefit costs for workers compensation, health insurance
and retirement benefit rates are anticipated to be available in February 2007.
July 1, 2007 Battalion Chief salaries were estimated and may be subject to
adjustment pending finalization of contract negotiations. Actual benefit rates
may cause the contract fee to increase or decrease. The fee will be reduced
by $156,549 if the North Central Fire Protection District Fire Chief remains an
employee of the District. The fee will be prorated and reduced based on a
cost of $13,046 per month if the Fire Chief becomes a City employee and
works less than 12 months in any calendar year due to retirement or any other
cause.
APPENDIX C
EMPLOYEE TRANSITION
17
NCFD
NCFD
Vacation
Sick
Fresno City
Fresno City
Leave
Leave
Fresno City Fire
Fire
Labor
Employee ID
NCFD Rank
Balance
Balance
Department
Department
Unit/MOU
1/1/06'
1/1/06'
Rank
Monthly Base
Applicable
Salary
196
Firefighter
120.00
486.00
Firefighter
Ste A - $ 4,556
Basic -Local 753
206
Firefi hter
120.00
240.00
Firefighter
Ste A - $ 4,556
Basic -Local 753
209
Firefighter
120.00
200.00
Firefighter
Ste A - $ 4,556
Basic -Local 753
216
Firefighter
40.00
48.00
Firefighter
Ste A - $ 4,556
Basic -Local 753
222
Firefighter
Firefighter
Ste A - $ 4,556
Basic -Local 753
220
Firefighter
Firefighter
Ste A - $ 4,556
Basic -Local 753
221
Firefighter
Firefighter
Ste A - $ 4,556
Basic -Local 753
219
Firefighter
Firefi hter
Ste A - $ 4,556
Basic -Local 753
218
Firefighter
Firefi hter
Ste A - $ 4,556
Basic -Local 753
207
Firefighter
120.00
264.00
Firefighter
Ste A - $ 4,556
Bask -Local 753
210
Firefighter
120.00
150.00
Firefighter
Ste A - $ 4,556
Basic -Local 753
157
Engineer
120.00
235.50
Firefighter
Step A - $ 5,114
Basic -Local 753
Specialist
203
Engineer
120.00
235.50
Firefighter
Step A - $ 5,114
Basic -mal 753
Specialist
202
Engineer
120.00
156.00
Firefighter
Step A - $5,114
Basic -Local 753
Specialist
185
Engineer
168.00
783.00
Firefighter
Step A - $5,114
Basic -Local 753
Specialist
190
Engineer
168.00
786.50
Firefighter
Step A - $5,114
Bast -Local 753
Specialist
195
Engineer
120.00
343.00
Firefighter
Step A - $5,114
Bas1c-Local 753
Specialist
200
Engineer
120.00
396.00
Firefighter
Step A - $5,114
Basic -Local 753
Specialist
166
Engineer
168.00
792.00
Firefighter
Step A - $5,114
Basic -Local 753
Specialist
129
Engineer
216.00
1,860.00
Firefighter
Step A - $5,114
Basic -Local 753
Specialist
189
Engineer
168.00
906.00
Firefighter
Step A - $5,114
Basic -Local 753
Specialist
182
Engineer
168.00
1,134.00
Firefighter
Step A - $5,114
Basic -Loral 753
Specialist
197
Engineer
120.00
390.00
Firefighter
Step A - $5,114
Basic -Local 753
Specialist
160
Engineer
216.00
1,632.00
Firefighter
Step A - $5,114
Basic -Local 753
Specialist
201
Engineer
120.00
300.00
Firefighter
Step A - $5,114
Basic-Local753
Specialist
184
Training
168.00
891.75
Fire Captain
Step A - $5,721
Basic -Local 753
Captain
151
Fire Prev
216.00
2,160.00
Fire Captain
Step A - $5,721
Basic -Local 753
Captain
111 see
Fire Captain
216.00
2,160.00
Fire Ca tain
Ste A - $5,721
1 Basic -Local 753
17
156
Fire Captain
216.00
1,747.00
Fire Captain
Ste
A - $5,721
Basic -Local 753
115 ••
Fire Captain
216.00
2,160.00
Fire Captain
Ste
A - $5,721
Basic -Local 753
154
Fire Captain
216.00
2,142.00
Fire Captain
Ste
A - $5,721
Basic -Local 753
188
Fre Captain
Fire Captain
Ste
A - $5,721
Basic -Local 753
176
Fire Captain
Fire Captain
Ste
A - $5,721
Bask -Local 753
116 oom
Fre Captain
216.00
2,160.00
Fire Captain
Ste
A - $5,721
Basic -Local 753
133 •
Fre Captain
216.00
2,160.00
Fire Captain
Ste
A - $5,721
Basic -Local 753
158
Fire Captain
216.00
1,625.50
1 Fire Captain
I Ste
A - $5,721
Basic -focal 753
150
Battalion Chief
216.00
2,160.00
Battalion Chief #
Ste
A - $7,414
Mgmt-Local 753
114 •••
Battalion Chief
216.00
2,160.00
Battalion Chief #
Ste
A - $7,414
Mgmt-Local 753
109000
Battalion Chief
216.00
2,121.00
Battalion Chief #
Ste
A - $7,414
Mgmt-Local 753
097 •••
Fire Chief
216.00
2,160.00
Deoutv Chief
$9,389
Mgmt-Local 753
`Accrued balances shown are hours as of 1/1/06 for informational purposes only. DISTRICT shall provide actual
balances current as of July 1, 2007 as to all transitioning employees.
# Estimated Step A pending MOU negotiations related to July 2007 and subsequent salary range.
18
APPENDIX C (Continued)
EMPLOYEE TRANSITION
'Accrued balances shown are hours as of 1/1/06 for purposes of presentation for negotiation
purposes only. Actual balances will be reflected in the final agreement.
•• — Employee holds "severance bank" balance. (All balances to be paid as wages by DISTRICT
on or before the separation date.)
• — Employee enjoys "longevity bank" benefits due to time in service of [ --- ] . (No payment by
DISTRICT to be made so long as the starting salary for City employment is 8% or more than the
base DISTRICT salary on the transition date.)
NOTE: City Job Title of Emergency Services Dispatcher I
City Monthly Base of A -Step $2,993
19
NCFD
NCFD
Vacation
Sick
Fresno City
Fresno
Leave
Leave
Fresno City Fire
Fire
City Labor
Employee
NCFD Rank
Balance
Balance
Department Rank
Department
UniUMOU
Name
1/1/06'
1/1/06'
Monthly Base
Applicable
Salary
Principal Account
Step D -
217
Account Clerk
12.00
42.00
Clerk
$3,333
FCEA
Administrative
Sr Administrative
Step E -
139
Tech
120.00
454.50
Clerk
$2,940
FCEA
See Note
141
Dispatcher
112.00
888.80
See Note Below
Below
FCEA
See Note
193
Dispatcher
70.00
274.00
See Note Below
Below
FCEA
'Accrued balances shown are hours as of 1/1/06 for purposes of presentation for negotiation
purposes only. Actual balances will be reflected in the final agreement.
•• — Employee holds "severance bank" balance. (All balances to be paid as wages by DISTRICT
on or before the separation date.)
• — Employee enjoys "longevity bank" benefits due to time in service of [ --- ] . (No payment by
DISTRICT to be made so long as the starting salary for City employment is 8% or more than the
base DISTRICT salary on the transition date.)
NOTE: City Job Title of Emergency Services Dispatcher I
City Monthly Base of A -Step $2,993
19
APPENDIX D
North Central Fire Protection District
MASTER CALENDAR
Monthly Business:
• Financial Reports.
• Budget Report.
• Apparatus/Equipment Report.
• Monthly Board Meeting (4th Wednesday — 7 p.m.).
January:
February:
• Distribute Form 700 to Board Members.
March:
• Weed abatement: Adopt Resolution to establish the existence of a public nuisance.
• Collect Annual Form 700 from Board Members and file with County Clerk and FPPC.
April:
• Public Hearing for Weed Abatement.
• Weed Abatement Contract for Services.
May:
June:
• Preliminary Budget Presentation.
• Appoint Auditor.
July:
• Adopt Resolution for Weed Abatement Tax Roll Assessment.
• Automatic Defibrillators maintenance contract renewal.
August:
• Adoption of Final Budget.
September:
October:
Prepare and file annual Financial Report with State Controller (110 days after close
of fiscal year).
November:
December:
• Reorganization of Board Offices.
. Election of Board Members.
20
APPENDIX E
CONTRACTS
Contract Name
Contract Date
• Lease Agreement between NCFPD and
• July 1, 2001
Madera Radio Dispatch, Inc.
• Lease Agreement between NCFPD and
• March 16, 2004
County of Fresno regarding use of space
for radio communications equipment.
• Tower Lease Contract between NCFPD
• March 10, 2004
and Unwired Broadband, Inc.
• Business Associate Agreement between
• January 28, 2004
NCFPD and Central Valley Commercial
Corporation.
• Paramedic Ambulance Services
• January 1, 2004
Agreement Between North Central Fire
Protection District and American
Ambulance.
• Defib Technical Service Agreement
• September 1, 2006
between NCFPD and Medtronic Physio -
Control.
• Semi -Annual Inspection and Service
• March 1, 2004
Agreement for Air Compressor between
NCFPD and Bauer Compressors Inc.
• PWT IT, 3COM Partner Express Service
• December 21, 2005
Agreement for Service of Switched
Infrastructure and Voice Systems.
• Agreement between NCFPD and the
• November 17, 2004
County of Fresno regarding Hazmat
Vehicle.
• Bio -waste Disposal Agreement between
• April 1, 2006
NCFPD and Community Medical Centers.
• All mutual and Instant Aid Agreements
•
21
APPENDIX F
North Central Fire Protection District
BUSINESS MANAGER
Job Description
(Effective July 1, 2007)
The Business Manager performs and/or supervises professional financial and accounting functions
necessary to maintain the financial and accounting records of the District. The Business Manager is
responsible to the District Board of Directors for advice relative to all financial management matters.
• Responsible for the posting and maintenance of the general ledger and budgetary
control accounts of the District.
• The Business Manager shall process deposits and transfers into the District's Funds held at the
County of Fresno. He/she shall monitor and report Fund account information to the Board of
Directors at the monthly meetings.
• Responsible for the formulation of a fiscal operating budget for the District. He/she shall prepare
monthly expenditure analysis of Fire District expenditure accounts and maintain expenditure
history for the District.
• The Business Manager shall manage all accounting and financial functions to ensure systems
provide complete, accurate, and timely information for all internal and external audiences.
• Responsible for closely monitoring, analyzing, and reporting information regarding District's
financial performance and recommend updates to financial procedures as needed to the Board of
Directors.
• The Business Manager shall meet with the District's Fire Chief designee as often as needed to
discuss board agenda items, budget issues, financial reports, expenditure analysis, and to monitor
compliance of contractual obligations.
• The Business Manager shall meet each year with the chief financial officer or designee from the
City of Fresno for the review of costs associated with providing fire protection and emergency
services to protect against cost shifting between agencies. The financial officers will produce a
report to the elected officials that describes the outcome of this review no later than May 30a' of
each year.
• Responsible for providing timely responses to requests for information to external auditor
assigned to audit the District's records
• Responsible for preparing and filing Financial Report with the State Controller within 110 days
after close of fiscal year
• Responsible for producing timely, accurate, and understandable financial reports for all Board
Meetings. He/she is responsible for reviewing all board packet information before it goes out to
the Board of Directors.
• The Business Manager shall attend all Board Meetings.
22
• Responsible for providing the custody, safekeeping, and handling of cash receipts.
• The Business Manager shall review the posting and processing of all accounts payable invoices.
• Responsible for monthly bank reconciliations.
• The Business Manager shall post billings and invoices for services rendered as received for the
District in a legible and accountable manner.
• The Business Manager shall keep records of expenditures, additions, and replacement of fixed
assets for normal maintenance upkeep of facilities, grounds, and equipment.
• Responsible for distribution, filing, and safekeeping of Form 700 (statement of economic
interests) for Board of Directors.
• Responsible for posting and monitoring all ambulance transport fee cash receipts and
reconciliation of Lockbox account. He/she shall report cash receipts received at the District to
American Ambulance to update patient accounts.
• Responsible for collection procedures regarding ambulance delinquent accounts and contacting
patients via collection letter in the attempt to make payment arrangements before assigning
accounts to the District's collection agency.
• The Business Manager shall monitor and report at the Board Meetings informational and financial
reports regarding annexations through LAFCO.
• The Business Manager shall prepare and process payroll, federal and state tax deposits, quarterly
payroll reporting, W2 and 1099 forms.
• The Business Manager shall monitor and maintain reserve balances required by contract with the
City of Fresno for fire apparatus and vehicle replacement, facility maintenance, small tools and
equipment, apparatus maintenance, and turnout.
NOTE
The above statements are intended to describe the general nature and level of work being performed
by the person assigned to this position. They are not intended to be an exhaustive list of
responsibilities and duties. All other District administrative, secretarial, and legal obligations and
tasks not included in this job description have been assumed by the City of Fresno pursuant to the
Service Agreement.
23
ITEM A
ATTACHMENT C
RESOLUTION NO. 06-39
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KERMAN IN SUPPORT FOR
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR FIRE PROTECTION AND EMERGENCY SEVICES BETWEEN
NORTH CENTRAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF FRESNO
WHEREAS, the North Central Fire Protection District's (hereby referred to as DISTRICT)
is considering entering into an agreement with the City of Fresno to enhance the fire protection
services, equipment and staffing available for the residents of the DISTRICT, and
WHEREAS, the parties herewith propose the tern of this Agreement to be 30 years,
q beginning the I` day of October, 2006, and ending on the 3& day of September, 2036, and
n WHEREAS, the parties have negotiated the agreement and are anticipating a long working
1 I I relationship.
14
15
16
17
18
19
21
22
23
25
26
27
28
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KERMAN:
I . lends their support to the North Central Fire Protection District in entering into this
agreement with the City of Fresno, because the contract presents the most cost effective
approach to fire protection services for the City of Kerman., and
2. that the Mayor is authorized to sign this Resolution and the City Clerk to Attest.
The foregoing Resolution was approved by the City Council of the City of Kerman
at a regular meeting held on the 17th day of May, 2006, and passed at said meeting by the following
vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Moore, Sidhu, Stockwell
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers Cromartie, Rodriguez
ABSTAIN: None
The foregoing Resolution is hereby approved.
MAYOR, CITY OF KERMAN
ATTEST:
_ .°
CITY CLPYK, CITY OF KERMAN
CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION CERTIFICATION
I, L. RENEE HOLDCROFT, do hereby certify as follows:
That I am the City Clerk of the City of Kerman and that the foregoing
document, being Resolution No. 06-39 , was passed at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Kerman held on the 17 t h day of
20o6 and I further certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of the
document so adopted.
S -2S -a
DATE
'S • '�°��
L. RENEE HOLDCROFT
City Clerk
City of
rn�= im:.,.
DATE: July 13, 2006
TO: ANDREW T. SOUZA, City Manager
JON RUIZ, Assistant City Manager
FROM: RENENA SMITH, Budget Manager
Department of Finance
ITEM A
ATTACHMENT D
SUBJECT: FISCAL ANALYSIS ON THE NORTH CENTRAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
MERGER PROPOSAL
Background
The Fire Department (Fire) requested that the Budget & Management Studies Division
(BMSD) review the fiscal information related to the North Central Fire Protection District
(District) merger. Fire provided the fiscal information and arranged a follow-up meeting
with our office to discuss the details of their analysis. The Fire Department did an
outstanding job of reporting and substantiating first year and subsequent year costs related
to the merger. BMSD subsequently reviewed and validated the information. Our review is
limited to the fiscal impacts of the merger and does not address the strategic or policy
issues related to the proposal.
Methodology
1. Information provided included:
o The draft status report from the Fire Chief to the Mayor and Council
o The draft contract with the District
o Detailed spreadsheets on employee costing, minimum shift
replacement, proposed options for staffing and schedule of levies
trend analysis
2. Review of assumptions to ensure that all costs have been considered
3. Validate calculations to ensure that math works
4. Validate revenue stream to the schedule of levies to assure that the District will
have tax revenue to cover the projected costs
5. Review the future personnel cost impacts
6. Identify areas of risk
Conclusion
The Fire Department did address all material cost components associated with personnel in
the spreadsheet and within the contract. There are some interdepartmental charges and
overhead costs that were not included however these costs are not deemed material.
The revenue increase trend in the schedule of levies is sufficient to support the increase in
costs through 6/30/2012 assuming the status quo. Annexations, changes in MOU policies or
Health & Welfare adjustments could have significant impacts on revenue and expenses and
need to be considered on a case by case basis.
The contract calls for, "adjustments in the base annual fee for the change in All Urban
Consumers California CPI (CPI) for the previous year or the percentage of District tax
revenue growth whichever is less." While the tax revenue trend appears to be sufficient to
support costs the CPI has been trending 1 -1.5% lower. This variance does put the City of
Fresno at risk for approximately $45,000 - $70,000 annually at the current MOU policies and
Health & Welfare rates. Any additional cost increases in either policy will be fully born by
the City under the existing terms.
Finally, the Fire Department's assessment and assumptions appear to be accurate and
conservative. Based on the current assumptions and options The City of Fresno will not
suffer fiscal hardship related this merger.
C: Bruce Rudd, Assistant City Manager
Randy R. Bruegman, Fire Chief
Cheryl Carlson, MAIII
Pedro Rivera, Budget Analyst
City of
FIRE DEPARTMENT
DATE: August 24, 2006
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR ALAN AUTRY
COUNCIL PRESIDENT JERRY DUNCAN
COUNCIL MEMBERS
THROUGH: ANDREW T. SOUZA, City Manager
JON RUIZ, Assistant City Manager
FROM: RANDY R. BRUEGMAN, Fire Chief RRB
SUBJECT: UPDATE ON THE REGIONALIZATION EFFORTS
ITEM B
ATTACHMENT A
Attached are the correspondences that have been exchanged between the Fresno County Fire
Protection District and the City of Fresno over the course of the last several months regarding
response into the county island areas.
In addition, two maps have been included. One map shows the county islands that are within the
sphere of influence, and the second map shows the area that the City is responsible for under the
existing Station 15 (Sunnyside) contract. These are the only areas that the City is responsible to
respond into from an automatic -aid standpoint. All other responses into county islands are only
after the county response and only under the request for mutual aid.
Attachments:
A1: Map: Fresno City Fire Department
A2: Letters Exchanged between City of Fresno and Fresno County Fire Protection District
ITEM B
ATTACHMENT Al
6 o gg
:-> o
N
LL
EST.
L 7
August 9, 2006
Stan Craig, Fire Chief
Fresno County Fire Protection District
210 S. Academy
Sanger, CA 93657
Dear Chief Craig:
ITEM B
ATTACHMENT A2
Randy R. Bruegman
Fire Chief
450 "M" Street
Fresno, California 93721-3083
(559) 621-4000 FAX (559) 498-4261
www.fresno.gov
In response to your letter dated July 25, 2006, you requested examples of incidents where
mutual aid was not used appropriately. I have eight specific examples, which I believe
represent a snapshot during a specific period of time and not necessarily an all inclusive list.
The dates range from June 7, 2006 through July 29, 2006.
The examples are:
1. June 7, 2006-4381 East International, Clovis: Fresno City Engine 17, along
with North Central engine 47, was dispatched with the first -alarm assignment.
Fresno County Engine 86 was dispatched 13 minutes later.
2. June 23, 2006—Marks and Clemenceau, Caruthers: Fresno City Engines 8
and 15 were dispatched on the initial alarm for a reported structure fire at
Temperance and Manning at approximately 2217 hours. Fresno County
Engine 87 was in available in quarters. At 2222 hours Fresno City Engine 15
was diverted from the Manning incident to the Caruthers incident.
3. June 28, 2006-1066 North Wintergreen: Fresno City Engine 15 was
dispatched to this location for a medical -aid call. Fresno County Engines 84
and 86 were available in quarters.
4. July 7, 2006—Muscat and Valentine: Fresno City Water Tender 3 was on the
initial dispatch. Fresno County Water Tender 83 was available.
5. July 11, 2006-8036 South Cherry: Fresno City Engine 7 and North Central
Engine 44 were specifically requested for mutual aid.
"To protect and put service above all else."
Stan Craig, Fire Chief
August 9, 2006
Page 2
6. July 29, 2006-5675 East Ashlan (Tarpey Village): Fresno City Engine 10
was dispatched to a medical aid when Clovis Engine 32 is approximately half
mile closer.
7. July 29, 2006--4181 North Dewitt (Tarpey Village): Fresno City Engine 10
was dispatched to this location while Clovis 32 is much closer.
8. July 29, 2006—Ashlan and Sunnyside: Fresno City Engine 10 was
dispatched to this location for a medical aid, along with Fresno County Engine
85. Clovis 34 is one mile closer to this location than the City's Engine 10.
In each incident City resources were utilized inappropriately. As you understand, mutual -aid
requests should not be included with the initial alarm, a mutual -aid assignment should not be
diverted to another call without the parent organizations approval, and automatic -aid requests
are by contract to include sending the closest appropriate resource. Incidents 6, 7, and 8 are
not in alignment with the current Automatic Aid Agreement.
I find it unfortunate that your Board has made the decision to not discuss the delivery of fire
protection services to its constituents until after the release of the report by the Fresno Area
Chamber of Commerce. As fire chiefs, we are swom to protect our citizens to the best of our
ability. This being the case, the District and the City of Fresno have entered into an
agreement for Automatic Aid Fire Protection Services signed November 20, 2003. As of the
opening of Fresno City Fire Station 15, the automatic aid agreement is effective as outlined in
Exhibit B, which the City of Fresno is honoring. Everything outside of Exhibit B will be a
mutual -aid response in accordance to the guidelines of the California Fire Service and
Rescue Emergency Mutual Aid System's Mutual Aid Plan:
"In the absence of an emergency that is beyond the ability of a local government
entity to control, mutual aid shall not be used to shift the costs of fire suppression
to another political entity."
While mutual aid was never meant to replace an agency's responsibility to provide for the
initial response, rest assured if the County is out of resources or an incident exceeds your
capacity to control, the City resources are at your disposal. As I have previously stated, I
believe the Fresno City Fire Department should be providing the fire services to county
islands within the City of Fresno as we have the immediate resources to mitigate
emergencies. To do so will require the negotiation of a separate agreement. The current
system of response will inevitably lead to a disastrous outcome. We can prevent this from
occurring.
I am aware that your tenure as the Fresno County unit chief is coming to closure very soon,
and I wish you all the best in your future endeavors. It is my hope you will find the time to
Stan Craig, Fire Chief
August 9, 2006
Page 3
discuss this very important issue with the incoming unit chief. As always, the City remains
willing to negotiate an automatic aid agreement with the District for those county islands
outside of the existing contract.
Lastly, it has also come to my attention of city fire apparatus self dispatching to county areas
without notification to the County's command center. I have directed the battalion chiefs to
educate the field captains on the importance of the Incident Command System, as well as
reporting to the proper command center. In some instances, the City engines are dispatched
to a fire thought to be within the city limits. Once at location, the fire is found to be in a county
jurisdiction. The City engine crew extinguishes the fire and sometimes fails to contact the
responsible jurisdiction's communications center. Again, we are educating the field captains
on the importance of notifying the proper authority having jurisdiction.
Again, all the best to you in the future.
Sincerely,
Randy rE31ruegman, Fire Chief
FRESNO COUNTY
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
July 25, 2006
Randy R. Bruegman, Fire Chief
Fresno Fire Department
450 "M" Street
Fresno, California 93721-3083
Dear Chief Bruegman:
I am in receipt of your letter dated July 11, 2006, and am frankly surprised. I was not aware that our
Emergency Command Center has requested City resources for incidents originating outside the area
covered by our agreement. In fact, I have been led to believe that the City has been self dispatching into
County response areas, in many cases without notification to our command center. It is not my intent to be
adversarial, however; in order for me to accurately analyze your concerns, and our role therein, I will need
specific examples cited.
I am in full agreement with your understanding of "Mutual Aid" and pride myself on a 33 year career
without intentionally abusing what I consider to be the most efficient system of cooperative fire protection
found anywhere. I can assure you that it is not the intent of the District, nor its leadership, to knowingly
violate the intent of mutual aid. If I determine that my command center is requesting mutual aid, in a manner
for which mutual aid was not intended, I will implement policy direction to correct this.
As for your previous letters to the District, it is the understanding of my Board of Directors that Mr. John
Baker, of Management Partners Incorporated, has been retained to analyze, among other subjects, the issue
of fire protection service delivery to those County islands which have been created by City annexations. I am
not currently authorized by my Board to enter into negotiations for the purpose of providing services to these
areas, however; it is my understanding that once the final report is issued by Management Partners, the
District Board will reconsider their position on this issue.
In closing, if your staff could send me information citing some specific examples of when we have
requested mutual aid from your department, which may represent an abuse of the intent of "Mutual Aid," it
would be most helpful in conducting my research. Additionally, as you are aware, my tenure here is limited,
and it is my understanding that my replacement will be on -board on August 7, 2006. 1 assure you that my
orientation with the next Chief will include discussion of this and other topics relative to the cooperative
relationship between Fresno Fire Department and the County Fire District.
STAN CRAIG
UNIT CHIEF
laf
cc: Board of Directors, Fresno County Fire Protection District
210 South Academy Avenue, Sanger, California 93657
Telephone (559) 485-7500 FAX (559) 875-8473
•
EST.
1877
July 11, 2006
Stan Craig, Fire Chief
Fresno County Fire Protection District
210 S. Academy
Sanger, CA. 93657-9306
Dear Chief Craig:
Randy R. Bruegman
Fire Chief
450 "M" Street
Fresno, California 93721-3083
(559) 621-4000 FAX (559) 498-4261
www.fresno.gov
The Fresno County Fire Protection District and City of Fresno Agreement for Automatic Aid
Fire Protection Services dated November 20, 2003 supersedes previously existing Fire
Protection agreements between the District and the City (4h paragraph under RECITALS).
The agreement provides for response to emergency incidents with the nearest available fire
unit regardless of which unit that may be as set forth within the boundaries in Exhibit B of the
agreement. With the opening of City of Fresno Fire Station 15 (Park Circle Drive and Clovis
Avenue), all other Automatic Aid agreements between the District and the City were rendered
null and void.
Exhibit B outlines the area covered by the agreement as that area bounded by Dakota
Avenue on the north, Temperance Avenue on the east, California Avenue on the south, and
First Street on the west. Mutual aid will govern any incident occurring outside the above
boundaries. (See enclosure. City will respond Automatic Aid to all areas shaded purple.)
As you are well aware, mutual aid was designed to augment a jurisdiction's resources when
an emergency was of such size that the jurisdiction was overwhelmed and could not mitigate
the situation on its own. Mutual aid is also available to a jurisdiction requiring a specific piece
of equipment, which it does not possess but is available through a neighboring jurisdiction.
Mutual aid is not designed to cover the daily events for another jurisdiction.
Unfortunately, the City of Fresno is being requested to provide mutual aid to the District, not
because the District is overwhelmed but because the City has a closer unit(s). This use of
City resources goes against the intent of mutual aid and the above-mentioned Automatic Aid
Agreement between the District and the City.
As always, the City will respond units into the District in order to mitigate an emergency when
the District is overwhelmed or requires a specific piece of equipment from the City. The City
'To protect and put service above all else."
Stan Craig, Fire Chief
July 11, 2006
Page 2
should not be requested to respond into the District to mitigate an emergency until the District
has committed units on scene or has exhausted its resources.
The City remains willing to negotiate an agreement for fire protection services, similar to the
November 2003 agreement, for all District pockets within the Fresno metropolitan area. This
Department has sent three letters to the District and received no response to the first two.
We request a response no later than July 31, 2006. Without a response, the Fresno Fire
Department will take this matter before the City Council for direction.
Sincerely,
Randy R. Bruegman, Fire Chief
11I_"IPI
Enclosure
c: Jon Ruiz, Assistant City Manager
Robert Coyle, Deputy City Attorney
April -13,2006
•
Stan Craig, Interim Fire Chief
Fresno County Fire Protection District
210 S. Academy
Sanger, CA 93657
Dear Chief Craig:
Randy R. Bruegman
Fire Chief
450 "M" Street
Fresno, California 93721-3083
(559) 621-4000 FAX (559) 498-4261
www.tresno.gov
In a letter dated September 15, 2005, 1 asked the Fresno County Fire Protection District to
enter into discussions regarding the county islands bounded by the city of Fresno. With the
transition of service within the Fig Garden Fire District, it only makes sense that the county
islands surrounded by the city of Fresno be serviced by the Fresno Fire Department as
several City fire stations are in the best position to provide service to these areas.
These six island areas are generally bounded by:
1. North of Alluvial, east of Fruit,south of the bluff line (Pinedale Water
District)
2. East of Palm, west of Maroa, north of Sierra, south of Warner (Pinedale
Water District)
3. South of Sierra, east of Maroa, north of Bullard, west of Blackstone
(Pinedale Water District)
4. South of Dakota, west of Van Ness, north of Garland, east of Southern
Pacific Railroad (City of Fresno Water)
5. East of Millbrook, west of Cedar, south of Behymer alignment, north of
Plymouth (City of Fresno Water)
6. South of California, east of Minnewawa, west of DeWitt (No water system)
7o protect and put service above all else."
Stan Craig, Interim Fire Chief
April 13, 2006
Page 2
As I stated in my letter of September 15, the current system of relying on automatic or mutual
aid is neither effective nor does it provide for a coordinated or consistent response to the
residents who live in these areas. Repeatedly there have been incidents that due to the use
of multiple dispatch centers and the lack of county resources based within the city limits have
resulted in uncoordinated and/or ineffective responses. On September 15, 2005, 1 proposed
that the City of Fresno provide service to the area outside of the city limits, which can be
reached within eight minutes with a first -alarm response. The first -alarm response would
include a minimum of three engines, two ladder trucks, and a battalion chief. The eight -
minute response for a first -alarm assignment would meet NFPA 1710, Standard for
Organization Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations,
and Special Operations to the Public by Career Departments. I have enclosed a map of the
eight -minute response area that I am proposing FFD provide service to.
The Fresno Fire Department (FFD) again proposes to provide all the fire protection services
to include "First and Greater Alarm Assignments" as defined by the FFD Standard Response
Plan, which would include response to all fire, medical aid, motor vehicle accidents, hazmat,
and technical rescue incidents within the areas of the district stated above and shown on the
map. The payment for such service would be for 100 percent of the general purpose Ad
Valorem property tax for real property within the area listed on the map. Revenue shall be
based on application of the combined "Parent Zone" and applicable "Service Zone" rates.
FFD will service the fire hydrants owned by the City of Fresno.
Although this has some economic impact to the district, I believe in the course of good
governance the utilization of resources in a most effective manner in the delivery of service to
the residents whether they are city or county is of the utmost importance. I believe the
proposal being presented to you does that for the county residents who live in and around the
city of Fresno, where FFD can place a first -alarm assignment within eight minutes, therefore,
offering them a higher level of service than is currently being afforded to them. Any proposal
developed will be presented to the Fresno County Fire Protection District Board and Fresno
City Council for approval.
Sincerely,
tZ C,� 12. --.-
Randy R. Bruegman, Fire Chief
Enclosures: Map
Copy of September 15, 2005 Letter
c: Andrew Souza, City Manager
Jon Ruiz, Assistant City Manager
Bob Coyle, Deputy City Attorney
U
V.98
September 15, 2005
Ted Mendoza, Interim Fire Chief
Fresno County Fire Protection District
210 S. Academy
Sanger, CA 93657
Dear Chief Mendoza:
Randy R. Bruegman
Fire Chief
450 M Street
Fresno, California 93721-3083
(559) 6214000 FAX (559) 498-4261
www.fresno.gov
With the conclusion of the Fig Garden agreement, we would like to address the other
remaining six county island areas within the metropolitan area of Fresno, which are
currently protected by the Fresno County Fire Protection District (District).
Because these county islands are surrounded by the City of Fresno, City fire stations are
deployed in a manner to provide the best response times and an excellent level of fire
protection to all areas identified.
The six (6) island areas are generally bounded by:
1. North of Alluvial, east of Fruit, south of the bluff line (Pinedale
Water District)
2. East of Palm, west of Maroa, north of Sierra, south of Warner
(Pinedale Water District)
3. South of Sierra, east of Maroa, north of Bullard, west of Blackstone
(Pinedale Water District)
4. South of Dakota, west of Van Ness, north of Garland, east of
Southern Pacific Railroad (City of Fresno Water)
5. East of Millbrook, west of Cedar, south of Behymer alignment, north
of Plymouth (City of Fresno Water)
6. South of California, east of Minnewawa, west of DeWitt (No water
system)
'To protect and put service above aN else."
Ted Mendoza, Interim Fire Chief
September 15, 2005
Page 2
Additional areas for consideration:
1. Any islands that are developed during the term of the agreement.
2. Areas outside the city limits that the City will respond a first -alarm
assignment to in eight minutes.
As the city has grown, the ability for the District to provide service to these county island
areas has been significantly impacted. The current system, reliant on automatic or
mutual aid, is neither effective nor does it provide a consistent coordinated response to
the residents who live in these areas.
In addition, I would propose that the City of Fresno also provide service to the area
outside of the city limits that can be reached within eight minutes with the first -alarm
response. The eight -minute response for a first -alarm assignment would meet NFPA
1710, Standard for Organization Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations,
Emergency Medical Operations, and Special Operations to the Public by Career
Departments. The enclosed map shows the eight -minute response area that we would
propose providing service to.
The Fresno Fire Department (FFD) proposes to provide all fire protection services to
include "First and Greater Alarm Assignments' as defined by the FFD Standard
Response Plan. FFD would respond to all fire, medical aid, motor vehicle accidents,
hazmat, and technical rescue incidents within the District areas stated above. FFD's
response would be for 100 percent of the general purpose Ad Valorem property tax
revenue from real property within the areas listed above. Revenue shall be based on
application of the combined "Parent Zone' and applicable "Service Zone" rates. FFD will
service the fire hydrants owned by the City of Fresno.
I appreciate your consideration and look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
Randy Bruegman, FYre Chief
Enclosure — Map
c: Andrew T. Souza, City Manager
r.. s
f1 r�mE�ia `� It e. II el' " a i i lii
111l
pu �a�1 IA IIII
HOW
I 1 IIII 'N�
IrA ■ �fl pp a .1 HOW Fir
'�pim,IN
l I �� 5JJ5
II .VIII xn tl� �•' Ai li' m{IljiiAinWH
.l�p
pop
I�wlxa�r 1
�I��1ry1mm1111 RG �li`ii�l
IIIIII 'I. V5 I, II rlxnn �" III
al mlxl =3d-■i!'�Ler" �■
sf170 ff
m i I Nl In Iii° lonliili�'In
wTV
.Pi I I u alxnyA'! N x1711 I
°I � EuIL xnl I ��r�ll'F
N s Ci 'llll Ilea lyl ' ! w ii IT
1 'i r7jlirjlnlft"�i eil 11 lllg� y113m ��
w`eyt. b 1 1
P SII �' �i��'si115il uIIiI1'1'i1�3 st1 gap
mill u. ...nn� Ii9I1.l9IIIN
1 _
�sli '11�A1i 1'N''.'us 1 n�l{b III�1�� IW
N�,Nlal pa- INIINI Mlill 411m
bli
I� l''L'11mf�ill' I L9` Im'Li'�I ou�lrvlil Vii'I
11 �_I filq • IIII n', Imo`\`�I��.�.� ��
444
11
r 'li liuf11111 �� � \`11�ann"i`�
w hµ a �,.,�\\h`��.� � . ►�
•• .� I' � .ryes \\�`\�\\ �\
• W
STAT1 OF CAUFORNIA _ Gray Daub. Govemor
DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY GOVERNOR'S OFFICE
AND FIRE PROTECTION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
F. O. 5o 9"246 2800 WWadow.le Rd.
SACRAMENTO, CA 942442460 Sccr nlo. CA 95832
(9161 633-9424 1916) 262.1616
OES
UFAICD*
Lwamf dmad
November 16, 2000
Dear Chief:
In 1997, the Directors of the Governor's Office of Emergency Services and the
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection signed a joint letter clarifying the
responsibilities of the state and local government under the California Fire Services and
Rescue Emergency Mutual Aid System Operating Plan.
Although the provisions of that letter have not changed since then, various fire
chiefs throughout the state have requested the letter be reissued. This letter will
reaffirm the provisions contained in the attached letter of June 19, 1997.
Sincerely,
Andrea E. Tuttle, Director
Department of Forestry
and Fire Protection
ch
Attachment
Dallas Jones Director
Governor's Office of
Emergency Services
STATE OF CALIFORNIA PETE WILSON. Governor
DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
GOVERNOR'S OFFICE
AND FIRE PROTECTION
OF EMERGENCY SERVICES
P. O. Boa 941246 --rs
2800 Meodowview Rd,
SACRAMENTO. CA 91211-2160
Sacranenlo, CA 95832
(9161 653-9121
(9161 262-1816
O E S
'„[Al g,4'A
f 11. 1 I O I M 1 •y
® u ` June 19, 1997
Gerenat. ��d
Dear Chief:
The purpose of this letter is to clarify the Stale of California's Fire and Rescue mutual aid
practices and procedures. In recent discussions between the California Department of Forestry and Fire
Protection (CDF), Govemor's Office of Emergency Services (OES), and representatives from both the
California Fire Chiefs Association and the Fire Districts Association of California. it became clear that
some misunderstandings exist regarding the application of mutual aid.
'Mutual Aid' is utilized when an incident is likely to exceed, or has exceeded, the ability of a
responsible entity to control the event. The basic assumptions are that the local government entity has
taken ALL actions within its capabilities necessary to mitigate a potential or on-going disaster, and has
reasonably exhausted local resources before requesting outside assistance through the Califomia Fire
Service and Rescue Emergency Mutual Aid System.
These discussions underscored the fad that each department has a basic responsibility to
protect its jurisdiction from potential fire disasters by providing training, planning and equipment, and, as
necessary, to formulate agreements for acquiring those services and resources that are reasonably
necessary to protect that jurisdiction. Further, it was Gear that a real need exists for Chief Officer
training in all areas of mutual aid. OES provides information and training to fire agencies at the local
and operational area level, and is working with the State Fire Marshal to correct this deficiency through a
review and revision of both Level I and Level II state fire training program certified courses.
With these issues in mind, we have jointly developed the attached guidelines for your direction.
We encourage each of you to become familiar with the provisions of the documents available from either
your duly elected Area Fire and Rescue Area Coordinator, or the OES Fire and Rescue Branch in
Sacramento.
It is important to understand that these discussions on Mutual Aid do not preclude the
responsibility for entities to develop cost apportionment agreements when emergency incidents involve
more than a single jurisdiction. The unified command on a multi -jurisdictional emergency incident is
responsible for the apportionment of incident related costs.
We are committed to a cooperative effort to mitigate the effects of disasters in California by
supporting the spirit of the Master Mutual Aid Agreement and maintaining one of the most efficient
mutual aid systems in the Nation. We also want to thank the members of the California Fire Service, as
represented by the task force from the California Fire Chiefs Association/Fire Districts Association and
the Firescope Board of Directors, for their cooperation in responding to this issue.
Sincerely,
i a ilso erector
Department f Forestry and
Fire Protection
X, �,Mee��
Richard Andrews, Director
Governor's Office of Emergency
Services
June 19, 1997
Provisions of the California Fire Service and Rescue Emergency Mutual Aid System's
Mutual Aid Plan, that provide for assistance without reimbursement, may apply to state
resources prior to a declaration of "local emergency" (as defined in the California
Emergency Services Act), when a local government entity determines that a fire is likely
to exceed its ability to control. Applicability will be based on the following guidelines:
1. From the time of initial attack to the point of determination that an incident is
likely to exceed the ability of a local government entity to control, state resources
can be made available to local fire agencies through a variety of agreements
(e.g., automatic aid, wildland protection, mutual threat zone, etc.)
2. In the absence of an emergency that is beyond the ability of a local government
entity to control, mutual aid shall not be used to shift the costs of fire
suppression to another political entity.
3. Mutual aid fire suppression resources committed to an incident, under the
provisions of the California Fire Service and Rescue Emergency Mutual Aid
System's Mutual Aid Plan, should only be used during the period of the
emergency. The period of emergency constitutes the time during which mutual
aid resources are necessary to prevent imminent or perceived imminent threat to
life and property. As the emergency condition de-escalates, the mutual aid
resources should be released, based on a preplanned demobilization process.
4. Entities should make maximum use of locally available facilities, equipment and
. services.
5. Requests for firefighting resources, for response to an emergency that is beyond
the ability of a local government entity to control, are to be based on the "closest
resources" concept and initiated through proper mutual aid channels.
6. Federal fire suppression resources which may be the "closest resources" are not
part of the California Fire Service and Rescue Emergency Mutual Aid System.
Assistance provided by these resources will be on an assistance -by -hire
arrangement, unless obtained through other pre-existing agreements.
7. Local government agencies receiving mutual aid are responsible for providing
logistical support to the mutual aid personnel and equipment.