Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutT-5781 - Conditions of Approval - 10/9/2006 f City of Planning and Development Department 2600 Fresno Street • Third Floor Nick P.Yovino Fresno, California 93721-3604 Director (559) 621-8277 FAX (559)488-1020 July 8, 2004 Please reply to: Mike Sanchez Sunnyside Ranch Estates, LLC (559)621-8040 299 East Lester Avenue Fresno, California 93720 Dear Sir: SUBJECT: FINAL ACTION BY THE FRESNO Cl COUNCIL AND FRESNO CITY PLANNING COMMISSION REGARDING PLAN AMEN MENT APPLICATION NO.A-03-22,REZONE APPLICATION NOS.R-03-69 AND R-03- 4 AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAPS NOS. T-5258 AND T-5295 FOR PROP RTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SOUTH CLOVIS AVENUE BETWEEN E UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD AND THE EAST CHURCH AVENUE ALIGNMENT The Fresno City Council conducted a duly noticed publi hearing on June 29, 2004, to consider Plan Amendment Application No.A-03-22,Rezone Application os.R-03-69 and R-03-84. These applications relate to the proposed development of two single family s bdivisions as requested by Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. T-5258 and T-5295 for 103 acres of pro rty located on the west side of South Clovis Avenue between the Union Pacific Railroad and the East hurch Avenue alignment. Following a full and complete hearing,the Council adopted Resolution No.200 228 and Ordinance Nos.2004-65 and 2004- 66, relating to the above applications as follows: 1. ADOPTED Resolution No. 2004-228 (encl sed)that amends the 2025 Fresno General Plan and Roosevelt Community Plan for a 2 -acre porton of the subject property from the office commercial (12 acres) and neigh orhood commercial (10 acres) land use designations to the medium density reside tial land use designation. 2. ADOPTED Ordinance Bill No. 2004-65 (enlosed)that rezones a 70-acre portion of the subject property from the AE-5 (Exclusi a Five Acre Agricultural) and AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre AgriculturaUUrban Gro h Management)zone districts to the R-1/cz (Single Family ResidentiaUconditional z hg) and R-1/UGM/cz (Single Family ResidentiaUUrban Growth Management/co ditional zoning) zone districts. 3. ADOPTED Ordinance Bill No. 2004-66 (enc osed)that rezones a 26-acre portion of the subject property from the AE-5 (Exclus' a Five Acre Agricultural) and AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre AgriculturaUUrban Gr wth Management) zone districts to R-1/cz (Single Family Residential/conditional z ing) and R-1/UGM/cz (Single Family ResidentiaUUrban Growth Management/con itional zoning)zone districts. Please be advised that the Ordinance Bills shall become a;plication ctive and in full force at 12:01 a.m., thirty- one days after its passage. The Fresno City Planning Commission previously conducta duly noticed public hearing on June 16, 2004, to consider Plan Amendment No. A-03-22, Rezone Nos. R-03-69 and R-03-84 and Vesting Tentative Tract Maps Nos. T-5258 and T-5295. he Planning Commission recommended approval to the City Council regarding Plan Amendment No.R 03-22(Commission Resolution No. 12033) r Sunnyside Ranch Estates, LLC Plan Amendment No.A-03-22 Rezone Application Nos. R-03-69, R-03-84 Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. T-5258, T-5295 Page 2 July 8, 2004 Rezone Application No.R-03-69(Commission Resolutio No. 12034),and Rezone Application No.R-03- 84 (Commission Resolution No. 12036). The Plannin Commission also approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. T-5258 (Commission Resolution No. 1 035)and T-5295 (Commission Resolution No. 12037). No council action is required on the vesting to tative tract maps since no appeal was filed. Please record this information for your future use. Yo will receive no further notice regarding these applications. If you have any questions relating to this atter, please feel free to contact me. . Sincerely, PLANNING DIVISION Mike Sanchez, Planner III 1 KAMaster Files-20031—PLAN AMENDMENTS A-03-22,R-03-89,84,T-5295, -5258(Ailanjian)—MS\Final Action Lettermpd Enclosures: Resolution No. 2004-228 Ordinance Bill No. 2004-65 I Ordinance Bill No. 2004-66 i c: Fresno County Assessor Ingels-Braun and Associates McMillin Homes I i i i RESOLUTION Nd. 2004-228 i i A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF HE CITY OF FRESNO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE 2025 FRESNO GENE L PLAN AND THE ROOSEVELT COMMUNITY PLAN (PLAN AMENDMEN APPLICATION NO. A-03-22) WHEREAS, on November 19, 2002, by Resolution No. 2002-379, the City Council adopted the 2025 Fresno General Plan which correspondingly I pdated the 1992 Roosevelt Community Plan and by Resolution No. 2002-378 certified Master Envir nmental Impact Report Nc. 10130 which evaluated the potentially significant adverse environmtal impacts of urban development within the City of Fresno's designated urban boundary line and a ended sphere of influence; and, WHEREAS, Sunnyside Ranch filed an application to amend the land use designation of the aforementioned plans from the office commercial planned land use designation (12.0 acres)and the i neighborhood Commercial planned land use (10.0 acre )to the medium density residential planned land use designation for approximately 26 acres of pro rty located on the northwest and southwest corners of South Clovis and East Church Avenues; and WHEREAS, the environmental assessment con ucted for the proposed plan amendment resulted in the filing of a mitigated negative declaration; nd, WHEREAS, on June 16, 2004, the Fresno City anning Commission held a public hearing to consider Plan Amendment Application No. A-03-22 and ssociated mitigated negative declaration for Environmental Assessment No. A-03-22/R-03-69/R-03 /T-5258[T-5295; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission took actio , as evidenced in Planning Commission Resolution No. 12033, to recommend approval of the mi gated negative declaration for Environmental Assessment No. A-03 !?2/-1-03-69/R-03-8 /T-5258[T-5295 dated May 12, 2004; and, WHEREAS, the Fresno City Plann-ng Commissio also took action, as evidenced in Planning Commission Resolution No. 12033, to recommend appro I of Plan Amendment Application No. A-03-22, which would amend the planned hand use d signation for the subject site from the office commercial designation(12.0 acres)and neighborhood mmercial (10 acres)to the medium density residential designation; and, T Resolution No. 2oo4-22a Plan Amendment Application No. A-03-22 Page 2 WHEREAS, on June 22, 2004, the Fresno Citi Council held a public hearing to consider Plan i Amendment Application No. A-03-22 and received bo h oral testimony and written information presented at the hearing regarding Plan Amendment pplication No. A-03-22. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by th� Council of the City of Fresno, based upon the testimony and information presented at the hearing a upon review and consideration of the environmental documentation provided, as follows: i 1. The Council finds that there is no substantial evidence in the record that Plan Amendment Application No. A-03-22 mai have a significant effect on the environment and hereby adopts the mitigated negativ declaration dated May 12, 2004. 2. The Council finds the adoption of the prised plan amendment as recommended by the Planning Commission is in the best i terest of the City of Fresno. 3. The Council of the City of Fresno hereby adopts Plan Amendment Application No. A-03-22 amending the land use desi nation of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and Roosevelt Community Plan from the offi commercial planned land use designation (12 acres)and Neighborhood commercial planned land use designation (10 acres)to i the medium density residential planned Ind use designation as depicted on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein y reference. i i I i Y CLERK'S CERT FICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF FRESNO ) CITY OF FRESNO ) I, REBECCA E. KLISCH, City Clerk of the City of Fresno, certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the Council of the City of Fresno, California, at a regular meeting held on the 29Th day of Jun. , 2004. AYES: Boyajian, Calhoun, Dages, Duncan, Perea, Sterling, Castillo NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None REBECCA E. KLISCH City Clerk By: APPROVED AS TO FORM HILDA CANTO MONTOY City Attorney By: _A -� Ian Amendment Application No. A-03-22 Deputy Y fled by Sunnyside Ranch arcel Nos. 481-040-02, 07, 11 KACommoMMaster Files-20031-PLAN AMENDMENTSV1-03-22, 3-69,84,T-5295,T-5258(Ailanjian)- MS1A-03-22-CCResolution.wpd EXHI IT A r.. OIIrK OYfl1[ , • cat 7 Y 1 A• ow[ rr■ I(, nQ[70e .K• AE 20 )GM AE-5 C� ' E. CALIFORNIA W-Arr JT r AE-5 � I or, s ucM AE-s E. CHURCH AE-9UGM / AE-5 `f ■ I AE754JGM* �� A LE EN PROJECT BOUNDARY i PLAN AMENDMENT NO.A-03-022 REZONE APPLICATION NO.R43-054 . / / From AES and AE-SNGM from OfAce Neiflhborhood Comm. to R•1 and R-11UGM / �;to Med.Den Resid. VICINITY nAP PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO.A-03-022 N DEPARTMENT From Of11ce and Neighborhood Comm.to Med.DerMy ROW. A.P.N.: 481-040-02.07 11 REZONE APPLICATION NO.R-03-084 e From AE-S and AE-5IUGM to R•1 and R-1/UGM ZONE MAP:2555.2655 West of Clovis Ave.btwn California and Church Ayes. NOT 0 SCALE BY/DATE: —[-S,/ 1-22-04 Recording Requested by. City Clerk,Fresno, Califomia No Fee-Govt. Code 6103 Return to City Clerk,Fresno Space above this ine reserved for Fresno County Recorder's Office ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL F THE CITY OF FRESNO PROPOSED AND INITIA ED BY MOVED BY Dages -S ECO 4DED BY Duncan BILL NO. B-55 ORDINANCE NO. _ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FRE NO,CALIFORNIA,AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONE MAP OF THE CITY OF CRESNO HERETOFORE ADOPTED BY ARTICLES 1 TO 4.5 INCLUSIVE, CHAPTER 12, OF THE FRESNO MUNICIPAL CODE, BEING THE ZON114G ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FRESNO WHEREAS, Rezone Application No. R-03-69 has been filed with the City of Fresno to rezone property as described hereinbelow; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Article , Chapter 12, of the Fresno Municipal Code, the Planning Commission of the City of Fresno held a public hearing on the 16th day of June, 2004, to consider Rezone Application No. R-03-069 and related nvironmental Assessment No. A-03-22/ R-03-69/R-03-84/T-5258/T-5295, during which the Commission recommended to the Council of the City of Fresno approval of the subject environmental assessment and rezone application amending the City's Zoning Ordinance on real property described here nbelow from the AE-5 (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural) and AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricu uraUUrban Growth Management) zone district to the R-1 (Single Family Residential)and R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management)zone district; and, a9 to 102 6;14 Ordinance Amending Official Zone Map Rezone Application No. R-03-69 Page 2 WHEREAS, on June 16, 2004, the Fresno City Planning Commission through Resolution No. 12034 recommended approval of Rezone Applicati n No. R-03-69 as described above; and, WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Fresno, or, the 22nd day of June, 2004, received the recommendation of the Planning Commission and concurs therewith. NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRESNO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Based upon the testimony and information presented at the hearing and upon review and consideration of the environmental docume tation provided, the adoption of the proposed rezoning is in the best interest of the City of Fresno. TIre Council finds in accordance with its own independent judgment that with the recommended mitigation measures for Environmental Assessment No. A-03-22/R-03-69/R-03-84/T-5258/T-5295 dated MaV 12, 2004, there is no substantial evidence in the record that the rezoning may have a significant effect on the environment and the mitigated negative declaration prepared for this project is hereby approved. SECTION 2. The Council finds the requested R-1 and R-1/UGM zone districts are consistent with the proposed medium low density residential and medium density residential land use designations of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the Roosevelt Community Plan as specified in Section 12-403-B of the Fresno Municipal Code. SECTION 3. The Council finds that the zone district of the real property described hereinbelow, located in the City of Fresno and shown on the Official Zone Map of the City of Fresno, is reclassified from the AE-5(Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural)and AE 5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural/Urban Growth Management)zone districts to the R-1 (Single Family Residential)and R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone districts: From AE-5 and AE-5 to R-1 and R-1/UGM: All that portion of the North half of the Northeast quarter of Section 17, Township 14 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, according to the Official Plat thereof, lying North and East of Fancher Creek. Ordinance Amending Official Zone Map Rezone Application No. R-03-69 Page 3 Excepting therefrom the North 30 feet of said Section conveyed to Pacific Improvement Company, a corporation, by deed recorded in Book 65 page 76 of Deeds. Also excepting therefrom that portion co eyed to the Southern Pacific Railroad Company, a corporation, by deed recorded June 27, 1889 in Book 97 Page 237 of Deeds. Also excepting therefrom; the South 620 eet. Together with, That portion of the East half of the Northe 3st quarter of Section 17,Township 14 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo BasE and Meridian,according to the Official Plat thereof, lying North and West of Fanter Creek. Together with, All that portion of the South three-fourths c f the East half of Section 17,Township 14 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, according to the Official Plat thereof,lying Southeasterly of Fancher Creek and Washington Canal, as said creek and canal now exist. Excepting therefrom the South 2319 feet hereof. Also excepting therefrom that portion desc 'bed as: Beginning at the East quarter corner of said Section 17; thence South along the East boundary of the said Southeast quarter of Section 17, a dista ce of 357 feet; thence North 89038' West,a distance of 36.94 feet;thence No h 01°06'30"East,a distance of 357.07 feet; thence Easterly along the North boundary of said Southeast quarter, a distance of 30 feet to the point of beginning,as conveyed to the County of Fresno by deed recorded June 30, 1970 in Book 5798 Page 147 as Document No. 44439, Official Records. Also excepting therefrom; the East 640 feat and the South 340 feet of the East 980 feet. SECTION 4. The development of the property described in Section 3 shall be conditioned upon the following conditions of zoning which is recur ed and on file in the Fresno County Recorder's Office: 1. The lots backing on to the Fancher Creek trail, where it is parallel and adjacent to South Dewitt Ave, and the lots backing on to the railroad tracks (California Avenue alignment)will be widened to an 80-foot lot width and limited to single-story construction. 2. Where the wall is required along the,west and north boundaries of the project site it will be seven feet in height and constructed with the first Ordinance Amending Official Zone Map Rezone Application No. R-03-69 Page 4 phase of the project. 3. The realigned Fancher Creek canal will not be concrete lined except at the curves where necessary to prevent erosion. 4. The Outlot "B" area of Tentative Tract Map No. 5258 located on the west and north side of the realigned Fa cher Creek canal will not be landscaped. 5. The wall along the project's north boundary(California Avenue alignment) to be set back one foot from the pr perty line and landscaping (appropriate climbing vine) and irrigation systen i installed to provide screening of the wall, subject to the granting of acc4 iss to construct and maintain the landscaping by the railroad compa iy which owns the railroad track right-of- way. 6. The number of lots within the interi r of the project may be increased to account for the number of lots reduced along the north and west sides of the project. 7. Install self-closing and latching gates on the pedestrian openings in the subdivision boundary wall that allow access to the Fancher Creek trail from the west ends of the subdivision'scul-de-sac streets. SECTION 5. This ordinance shall become elle tive and in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the thirty-first day after its passage. CLERK'S CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF FRESNO ) CITY OF FRESNO ) I, REBECCA E. KLISCH, City Clerk of the C ity of Fresno, certify that the foregoing ordinance was adopted by the Council of the City of I-resno, California, at a regular meeting held on the doth day of �,,,e , 2004, by the following vote: AYES: Boyajian, Calhoun, Dages, D ncan, Perea, Sterling, Castillo NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None RE13ECCA E. KLISCH Ci Clerk By. APPROVED AS TO FORM: HILDA CANTU MO OY City Attorngy r 1 \ By putt Re2one Application No. R-03-069 File by Sunnyside Ranch Ass ssors Parcel Nos. 481-040-02, 07, 11 KAMaster Files-2003\—PLAN AMENDMENTS\A-03-22,R-03-69,84,T-52)5,T-5258(Ailanjian)—MS\R-03-69-CC OrdBiil.wpd i Recording Requested by: City Clerk, Fresno, California No Fee-Govt. Code 6103 Return to City Cleric,Fresno Space above this fine reserved for Fresno County Recorder's Office ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRESNO PROPOSED AND INITIA D BY MOVED BY Dages SECO 4DED BY Duncan BILL NO. B—56 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FRE NO,CALIFORNIA,AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONE MAP OF THE CITY OF =RESNO HERETOFORE ADOPTED BY ARTICLES 1 TO 4.5 INCLUSIVE, CHAPTER 12, OF THE FRESNO MUNICIPAL CODE, BEING THE ZON114G ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FRESNO WHEREAS, Rezone Application No. R-03-84 has been filed with the City of Fresno to rezone property as described hereinbelow; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Article 41, Chapter 12, of the Fresno Municipal Code, the Planning Commission of the City of Fresno held a pLiblic hearing on the 16th day of June, 2004, to consider Rezone Application No. R-03-084 and related Environmental Assessment No. A-03-22/ R-03-69/R-03-84/T-5258/T-5295, during which the Commission recommended to the Council of the City of Fresno approval of the subject environmental assessment and rezone application amending the City's Zoning Ordinance on real property described here nbelow from the AE-5 (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural) and AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricu turallUrban Growth Management) zone districts to the R-1 (Single Family Residential) and R-1/UGM (Single Family ResidentiaUUrban Growth Management) zone districts; and, , ,,,d -a9-o4 lewd 6 q- 64 qla&w 7—F0— o-4 Ordinance Amending Officia, one Map Rezone Application No. R-03-84 Page 2 WHEREAS, on June 16, 2004, the Fresno City Planning Commission through Resolution No. 12036 recommended approval of Rezone Application No. R-03-84 as described above; and WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Fresno, on the 22nd day of June, 2004, received the recommendation of the Planning Commission and concurs therewith. NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRESNO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Based upon the testimony and information presented at the hearing and upon review and consideration of the environmental documentation provided, the adoption of the proposed rezoning is in the best interest of the City of Fresno. The Council finds in accordance with its own independent judgment that with the recommended mitigation measures for Environmental Assessment No. A-03-22/R-03-69/R-03-84/T-5258fT-5295, dated May 12, 2004, there is no substantial evidence in the record that the rezoning may have a significant effect on the environment and the mitigated negative declaration prepared for this project is hereby approved. SECTION 2. 'The Council finds the requested R-1 and R-1/UGM zone districts are consistent with the proposed medium-low density residential and medium density residential land use designations of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the Roosevelt Community Plan as specified in Section 12-403-B of the Fresno Municipal Code. SECTION 3. The Council finds that the zone district of the real property described hereinbelow, located in the City of Fresno and shown on the Official Zone Map of the City of Fresno, is reclassified from the AE-5(Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural) and AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre AgriculturaWrban Growth Management)zone districts to the R-1 (Single Family Residential)and R-1/UGM (Single Family ResidentiallUrban Growth Management)zone districts: Ordinance Amending Official Lone Map Rezone Application No. R-03-84 Page 3 From AE-5 and AE-5 to R-1 and R-1/UGM: PARCEL 1: All that portion of the North half of the Northeast quarter of Section 17, Township 14 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, according to the Official Plat thereof, lying North and East of Fancher Creek. Excepting therefrom the North 30 feet of said Section conveyed to Pacific Improvement Company, a corporation, by deed recorded in Book 65 page 76 of Deeds. Also excepting therefrom that portion conveyed to the Southern Pacific Railroad Company, a corporation, by deed recorded June 27, 1889 in Book 97 Page 237 of Deeds. Also excepting therefrom that portion conveyed to the Southern Pacific Railroad Company, a corporation, by deed recorded June 27, 1889 in Book 97 Page 237 of Deeds. PARCEL 2: That portion of the East half of the Northeast quarter of Section 17, Township 14 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian,according to the Official Plat thereof, lying North and West of Fancher Creek. Excepting therefrom all oil, gas, hydrocarbon substances and mineral in, under and which may be produced from said lands, and one-quarter of all of the royalties, payments, rights and benefits reserved to the lessor in any oil, gas or mineral lease of said land, and the right to enter upon said real property and to explore and prospect for and store and remove said oil, gas, hydrocarbons and minerals therefrom, and the right to construct and maintain on said land such roads, pipe lines, telephone lines, tanks, buildings and other appurtenances as may be reasonably necessary or incidental to such operations, and to exercise such other rights,including the right of ingress and egress,as may be reasonably necessary or incidental thereto, as reserved in the deed from Milton G. Cooper& Son, Inc., a corporation, recorded March 22, 1945 in Book 2237 Page 469 as Document No. 11685, Official Records. All that portion of the South three-fourths of the East half of Section 17,Township 14 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, according to the Official Platthereof,lying Southeasterly of Fancher Creekand Washington Canal, as said creek and canal now exist. Excepting therefrom the South 2319 feet thereof. Ordinance Amending Officiai zone Map Rezone Application No. R-03-84 Page 4 Also excepting therefrom that portion described as: Beginning at the East quarter comer of said Section 17; thence South along the East boundary of the said Southeast quarter of Section 17, a distance of 357 feet; thence North 89038' West, a distance of 36.94 feet; thence North 010 06' 30" East, a distance of 357.07 feet;thence Easterly along the North boundary of said Southeast quarter, a distance of 30 feet to the point of beginning, as conveyed to the County of Fresno by deed recorded June 30, 1970 in Book 5798 Page 147 as Document No. 44439, Official Records. SECTION 4. The development of the property described in Section 3 shall be conditioned upon the following conditions of zoning which is recorded and on file in the Fresno County Recorder's Office: 1. The lots backing on to the Fancher Creek trail, where it is parallel and adjacent to South Dewitt Ave, and the lots backing on to the railroad tracks (California Avenue alignment) will be widened to an 80-foot lot width and limited to single-story construction. 2. Where the wall is required along the west and north boundaries of the project site it will be seven feet in height and constructed with the first phase of the project. 3. The realigned Fancher Creek canal will.not be concrete lined except at the curves where necessary to prevent erosion. 4. The Outlot"B" area of Tentative Tract Map No. 5258 located on the west and north side of the realigned Fancher Creek canal will not be landscaped. 5. The wall along the project's north boundary(Califomia Avenue alignment) to be set back one foot from the property line and landscaping (appropriate climbing vine) and irrigation system installed to provide screening of the wall, subject to the granting of access to construct and maintain the landscaping by the railroad company which owns the railroad track right-of- way. 6. The number of lots within the interior of the project may be increased to account for the number of lots reduced along the north and west sides of the project. 7. Install self-closing and latching gates on the pedestrian openings in the subdivision boundary wall that allow access to the Fancher Creek trail from the west ends of the subdivision's cul-de-sac streets. Ordinance Amending Officiai 4one Map Rezone Application No. R-03-84 Page 5 SECTION 5. This ordinance shall become effective and in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the thirty-first day after its passage. 111 111 111 CLERK'S CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF FRESNO ) CITY OF FRESNO ) I, REBECCA E. KLISCH, City Clerk of the City of Fresno, certify that the foregoing ordinance was adopted by the Council of the City of Fresno, California, at a regular meeting held on the Z9th day of Jima , 2004, by the following vote: AYES: Boyajian, Calhoun, Dages, Duncan, Perea, Sterling, Castillo NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None REBECCA E. KLISCH City Clerk By APPROVED AS TO FORM: HILDA CANTO M NTOY City tfo ey By Dep Rezone Application No. R-03-84 Filed by Sunnyside Ranch Assessors Parcel Nos. 481-040-02, 07, 11 KAMaster Files-2001—PLAN AMENDMENTSW-03-22,R-03-89.84,T-5295,T-5258(Ailanjian)—MSR-03-84-CC OrdBill.wpd w�.�"� (wel�-loY gun..oma an naa]ar roar�u� OiLG'ON 1'Tr'�l1 iKY��Yqf�VITww •�� � < �� ovuuvb•avri a•r•vivnv�•v3"AID 1II01PI YOMAIalms nUT&M noun Gi+ON NITTIM�FI�o�P•+•4•+d b e• � !� �6 Y S3.LMIOOSSV$NnVM8-S-G N1 O m Z W 'a �rlm ■ a 00 �r 0 m CQ OgOpR gig o � Ig a 9�tl� P. �a O • ; :B all ill �R4Qg4Ey^y V W F v 'A 0 - 1� 'n x V/ \!.I LU E.H DC m 0 61 R1,111 1111AN 11 !X91111P. lila �tl� gs¢adi b¢ 5��3eB _ 11011 IN LU Q Q F2 4E # `� 34 aP F2P E i aR Tt-mml jigs °�_� g`��45 ;a� �$6d��e��b� H. ¢•gj k�a���pp���g���� "� � � '� a IM R fg�F yEpop9Q]4 •R 4bpia9���atl�i■�4$A dy F�Ri��(py O�Fb3y�iye���g� $ __—__ .� •� W T� I� ® � I H e < g@¢ 4f .v�bl�8.vviHb•.eRQERl!>la��Fk AlFl. H�Ei� � ■ x IS 5 tl4vCentlHtldAAnAa6-®altlHe2cR[Elea•tlb•m:,t �all 31 RlM � cel m, _ 000rc�a� awu m ncm tiw nu av�iu�iu GGGi'ON 1' L Iw YNIq�X!VI"M1A o 9§9�&�� n• tmvOOCR== 93.LVIDOS'W$?NfYVIUE -S'130NI �iON NITIN�Y/ 8 ,oi voneeM ♦f - 5 ME ..a.. .� �.. ..� �.. ._ .. � oll y Go gg �014 I c p 3 �P _ II WNand sino�o kII r+lnos - - _sRR — _ _ on UJ �[y� � I S II II n < � II � IIp � m 7`\ � �Y - �i `E �-g��•'� �� � 'l$'�iT I�. WEr' II n R � - _� a �II II � +97 / /� �• n",k 9 ry i / �\ Lp r t II a, 41 �`y –�.,Mi - FW MMM S 3..f e _ I - - X10 - - - -a •II! - - - - - - Ill ce g it c I d I c J \� I.xl mi - moo-is lwl ooaSR tl�'�G1Y •�95 e�i2 na..wwn my .la tar+na lu�.l. OGCC'ql 1?IYL I.ceY�.raET J^nTrw� n' fit'$.. ...n .......... vi0 �410ViltaaYr.allo4 NITTwi�ll YSRLV100SSV$Nf VU8S GONI i • .d 2QAg pC b a 3 Eoe p.E.a.,a Ss 8 � I �® c z aO m o 'aCQ 4 OD W f�Q pxbQa �3i� k ���Q � • R�/N— 1 - . s 05 _ — ---- ---- — -------- --- �mpO.k SIAO70 H.009 r R W� r °� n 3 m I' W �tg y mes ^� `sga IB a ''10 4�:5' -+� ire LL.Y C'� 9 s J m Q �_ I $ g I. I ` I I lull,•-- � - � a � m v yti p ', '� i ' �. � � • �I IIn y 8 e ? N, ' ti i I10 % oS' -_-.-_ le ��--� .. . � I I 1I jq ' - IY- / 1 a K_ Y kl � I ■■ e --. III. R —Al V4M.. . rei nn 1 : a 9 6 $ ➢ 5 8 _vf�n P3 a i T 4 Ilal l . i � �_ :s _��S —� ..iow,o�i s '� �"n �' B�° c 'I i UI'i�i i '•� �� A N� � ! <n 1 I 11 I rR Il { � � �I I I ^� •I IR I b — I � =� :�A ' qa II 111 a� •d - +'f � • . e m I 1 CCC ' o _ I l III iiddV +gyp I i 1 I I I $6E I I �a r� Y 1 a mm o�• V bg NIP 049 IV EwI (n �8 $ _ Z� goib L E r r� IV o nr b ' DW t ' 12 atR Z, m x = b Lr <� <, TO w9 15 W� 21 1-4 gli ��5.0� t�• k'~J � C + rrr ','IIICOR#0 a _�R a� ��u8 �• a a 8 �a�<a• �-g ba�� za� qb Mat-, 0 .a< ■ F �R p�8dyQi�fj s Rd`x=�jj� yg3n` yFgs€ a €L�<_<�§<€<eaa5< >t '<=-dF€ � i�< a" aF F0ROP. 0 -,h§ b§ a;<G s y 0 < s $ 8x� Na p > a�s pa ¢8 e� < A O a w < � sF .R 3Rnp �y - Gh yr�G ��jw � �a � I., p 00 Mg�gI _bb8� yar;Y R •y `b��bk' �`� ��8 1 '8� gi � Vo g"C�j' il8a�� �rq < a8u9$< �ilipa�;b� peg ab AN �`° aF O ma � ` 4 �b = >kk. IQ b 3g ��$ � R �8RbBG b � �� a $�s Y119 =F . IR Is8.gas db1171 � m� a RibY b Rid$ b R3bY Ig to 4 1.. IV gggA 9-1 1-7 e eEN € ¢ �� alp g� ��A4 1184 X16, P, Pi N , "" 011 0 ww'' I 10 0 W.04 aG4a O00412 19 0015 ��r(� E � q jil lil oil I m Q Lb e � OU�p g E N O00 .a w 04 s �-g■ Qg<: Qga:R Qga:Q pga`F[' Qg�'F[' Qga�p� ■6@ B x�� ~ r, to ;a r'� ylr �6 GaBR k'�� Yl��� Yl��� Y�i� I��i I�si� 6 E � � � i� 11 •< E p m dd � gl° b =mss S }s5 d� Fe5 ad a dF� F F.� �� di Rv � � b�$ $ �° 7g ba b -� g4 f sa $ € b w � a: 9 a X1 xs� g 9 9 $ Oji acid �z ��� �� N 1 .R' Wl 10;5 14, 1 b t ' i fig! m t qo'b bb �� e9a b� 2(1N2 xd 51 / 010 HI(105 seNaroae=0 s swe (G.esw x)) Cauce ■Ac mm M ,uux 3•xww s I19�Lxc ■.w.wm M Us.LVL ,00nnw x] mcLw •.mnnw s I �r -----�- R R\ R \ \• a � / �1 1 I. SIIRr 1 l N OF alb ,R � I U ml iryv:ui xl�<,w'isc[ 'R�amw w .—manic i ixrm xx- I.uvsx ■.a.vrm Feccai■Zcscm� N6-N2 b'Mb'M2NN I W HIn05 00 o mmm� °a e FF W, t�tK4 .saWA�stWWrt. F p + _ 1 „Yon'"t-.-:8§+=:7n NSA 0100 OR " yo gym FI • � �rl�m� 00 P4 kq.. U, mq ~ Ia A■a w FEF0 00 0Z 0 44 Z Up • F � m$m ki' " s rtg7- i 8A - - Rai;ii ty�A.^^^ A- ( Cp µ� k, p7VIR Cpl Ufa y': �_atxtW of a�._'aa„saa� R ��tlxnrR H Li ►rm Rl z --- W �pV w ��h�3ee - M5h7h�557�J�77�T.'��7�Rs5 PAbpm m - — ------ Q 4;-- ----------- C..w� (L1 74-1 F12 .d.lOZ1f10 lu .d.lOZ1f10 W Q 114 2/!N.7AV 91A 07'7 H1 /!O 5_ 39N21139 dO SIS 16c 3.%%o S __----- _ --AIR ' ct o eM o ' 4 _ n b ! ti 3a, 3nmoi !v m mw_ r 1 � PW n r tsa- 1 Q Rw T n � ,�.� g' • '�b�� a �� 0.1 �a��'\ t�`���m %'� `aQ'i�,� � �o°. sz % , sw 3 U a rsrsl%uI i azi%pca 0 M 4 js � t Yt $ACVmm(� t(1 $ lotw SIN `\ Ti ` �. g M T, lan m �� tf T scu: 9 o ik r� m,sz � „ds �� \ ��e:sb•�,�;r � oc,oc, u< g c+ oa'al In $$szmsamx �a� r 1. a.....�Ll1'roM -n ¢• R x1r os 'S I", Ik `°���> 9 ,p " °o oti am, �r.sL an ro ,OAmI � $%zsNMaox � �� n � � dya sr;' � �-��'"`•�v �n vw�v�• rLLno6 R� �- � � � -zcvA( '(uru o �, tQ;Dsr � �a �j �R�--��-.w'[[r� 3 x�•m_-�cx Z ` a g ',�N � g ��� ,'14�( ,� •nsu i K. � �.sz'sz r.ri rw•.°our 0, N D.IZ� e7ff F F y .LLvu zzvu , u 8 roml 10 $M„LGmOpI! mmi $%.LamOA M M '� sz ' O '�( ._q ' �pa61 mmI - %sada IQ �� u Isaa iaygz� .sz�u .at( awl o , IS1emmI & m r07 �•' z t 3.*ZA u o %.xmms .o C W R _W Al A JSaLm N w :L $rt.AIR.aA.a wyfl` 'i A4am II aaau X.10•11110� -- � DLsvn Lxx&m x Q µµ{{rQr %szr�A LLJ .0.10'1110 µ+,r a �{S R W W `zaFass" . N pSS i5 _ uzn �zLccl "s S 2rN;L^V"Im23 FLLf105 •n'fIQ %al'""N R W W m .1. ".L VMVM3NNIW. m '= N ���0000�00�0000�880B�B0��DD0�B09��� r 1 • '� •4` , ���09889��00B0�BBaBB��B00��B0�90B90090� 8 �����00���BB�8B0�B0000�BB8��8800�000�00880 0�00��0000��� �OGBGGGG90��06GGB88�B80�B0������ DD�D�G�8000600080080��G�8GG6GG�00���00�0���0�000�0060�0�06�0�6���90BOB8 W - A 3 ce 10 ON y p11ooi k • M 3.14. p 1011 r a 6 BAR !� 00. 34 11 p p 1410 Is E-♦ a8 A, H at . . @ � Ia oY. �x I'k tag 14 ZA e k OR K fill a0 N 0 � 1 Z ° s � u O u� 9 u n � g Alp a co F at 04 !i COF p' � 0 XCUMEn N N W co co IL �(1PIb NO a �o � o za Cl) w agQ C, a ¢ woZZ LL F O 0. � Nv�v�¢FW ' �i W O J Cli F- LU N F(qS Z O? t 0 Q W zZ=Q �y� _� u o 0 ti C7 Fn~. �t0 'fO�d.Y °.J 632 Q w W>3 cn Z a �awwa �g a �HQza iC yl w Q g ��F Oa V LL Z o F" LL O §Z_ O ¢O¢ F w awo V LL j OZO } z F O rL 0Uvvias w ° ¢ o zL Uwe 3g LL o ¢mZ =� O N ¢ ZaW z J u� O4' w Oa w� a =� q'ac�p? �' rn ppo F-m= w caX F- w w w 0 yp, yyg aN ND OS8O Z� LL G J WQ Q y ° w JLn 0 Cl) 4�v °U Z> (l)0Z)za Za } C7J 3� 3S oG3 c �~ ¢om w �3 w wa Z w a > � a �oc :0:) u)8x o f3 ¢ �V a 04rL'UZ o 5r�v cC � azw a �o ai wmo WHOANOO 3SV31d 2025 FRESNO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PROPOSED LAND USES A DRIVE sovrFi �zj JOAMIN VALLEY RAIuiOAD a . E. ATCASON AVBd1E ii ii is m - - . _ E. CALIFORNIA AVE. F_66ARY AVE. V1 -r x r. ■ - f r f r r E. PITT AVBUE lu ' ii - f - -- r /I SCALE ® r-500 - ' - t r ■ • r / r r .y r '- � r - r ------------ - - r - f - w I E. CHURCH AVE. _ AST CHURCH AVENUE (FUTU �fp r i / / PROPOSED 9U5DIV1810N INFORMATION: OVCRALL*ROSS AREA! W".M A49M Mph PIVAM Br RI:SIDCNTIAL LOTS, I N G E LS - BRAUN 60,WIDC MIN 6,000 SO.IlT. OTT/T7.�K AG.eR(NA"LPAJ & ASSOCIATES ReSXISTINAI LOT S Oil C N): $10 AL N� EXISTIN* LOT WEST Or CANAL CANAL AND OIVN Sr AGC CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING CANAL AND OMNSI'ACC NORTH GHUF+.GH 1.41 AG.NW 875 NEST ASHLAN A%ENUE.SL47E 102 CANAL AND Ol'4N SPA4:0 SOUTH oil GHURGH I.Z AG.Wr CLOYM CAI&Vff"ON12 0 (552)221 - 0427 IDA 6ADrIL2. Ooovm c-I-AI 2025 Fr(ESNO GENERAL FLAN AMENDMENT GOUJMBIA DRIVE 50lliH I Ll AN JOA UIN VALLEY RAILROAD. P- 11 E- ATCA419M \„ MEDIUM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ��. (NO CHANGE) CALIFORNIA AVE. I-6EARY AVE. MEDIUM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (NO CHANGE) 1 i, / Z i SCALE ® r-500 i O i MEDIUM DENSITY (NSIDENTIAL O CHANGE) U ' _ -- --- -- - - --- AST CHURCH AVENUE (RITURE) E. CHURCH AVE. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDNTIAL ' (NO CHANGE) PROPOSED GHA46E5 TO THE 2025 GENERAL PLAN rwme or. INGELS - BRAUN ® OFFICE COMMERCIAL PLAN DESIGNATION (12.0 ACRES) & ASSOCIATES CHANGE M MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL CIVIL ENGINEERING AMU LAND SURVEYINGNEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL PLAN DESIGNATION (9.9 ACRES) ass VEST ASHLAN AVE7VUE, SU--- --- ® CHANGE M MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL CANE, CA FOMIA 237812 (369) 421 - 0427 1 vr.MIS IDA GA RLE. ODO!'7!X-rA REPORT T... IME CITY COUNCIL —� AGENDA ITEM NO. COUNCIL MEETING une 22, 2004 APPROVEunt -� FROM: NICK P. YOVINO, Director DEPARTMENT DIRECTO -'- Planning and Development Department CITYMANAGER BY: DARRELL UNRUH, Planning Manager Planning and Development Department 0 SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. A-03-22, REZONE APPLICATION NO. R-03-69 AND REZONE APPLICATION NO. R-03-84 AND ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. A-03-22/ R-03-69/R-03-84/T-5258/T-5295 Prea�d m c.y tNuual o� SeJ z2)a� ----- . RECOMMENDATION Dispositionaz It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions: "- 1. APPROVE the finding of Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No. A-03-22/ R-03-69/R-03-84/T-5258/T-5295 dated May 12, 2004. 2. APPROVE Plan Amendment Application No.A-03-22 which proposes to amend the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the Roosevelt Community Plan from the office commercial land use designation (12 acres) and neighborhood commercial (10 acres)to the medium density residential land use designation. APPROVE of Rezone Application No. R-03=69 which proposes to rezone a 70-acre portion of the subject property from the AE-5 (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural) and AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural/Urban Growth Management)zone districts to the R-1(Sing/e FamilyResidentiao and R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management)zone districts. 4. APPROVE of Rezone Application No. R-03-84 which proposes to rezone a 26-acre portion of the subject property from the AE-5 (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural) and AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural/Urban Growth Management) zone districts to R-1(Single Family Residential) and R-1/UGM (Single Family ResidentiaUUrban Growth Management)zone districts. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Plan Amendment Application No.A-03-22 and Rezone Application Nos. R-03-69 and R-03-84,filed by Sunnyside Ranch, pertain to approximately 103 acres of property located'on the west side of South Clovis Avenue between the Union Pacific Railroad and a point 350 feet south of the East Church Avenue alignment. Plan Amendment Application No.A-03-22 proposes an amendmentofthe 2025 Fresno General Plan and the Roosevelt Community Plan to change the planned land use of a 22-acre portion of the project site from the office commercial planned land use designation (12 acres) and the neighborhood commercial planned land use designation (10 acres)to the medium density residential land use designation. Rezone Application No. R-03-69 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. T-5258 propose to rezone an approximately 70-acre portion of the subject site from the AE-5(Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural)and AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural/Urban Growth Management)zone districts to the R-1(Single Family Residential) and R-1/UGM(Single FamilyResidentiaUUrban Growth Management)zone districts and develop a 255-lot single family residential subdivision. Rezone Application No. R-03-84 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295 ropose to rezone an approximately 26-acre portion of the subject site from the AE-5 (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural)and AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural/Urban Growth Management)zone districts to the R-1 (Single Family Residential) and R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone 1 , REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Plan Amendment Application No. A-03-22 Rezone Application Nos. R-03-69/R-03-84 June 22, 2004 r..,. Page 2 districts and develop as a 98-lot single family residential subdivision. Approval of Rezone Applications . No. R-03-69 and No. R-03-84 will allow development of the subject property consistent with the medium and medium-low density residential planned land uses of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the Roosevelt Community Plan. The Planning Commission approved the tentative tract maps with no appeals being received. Therefore, the Planning Commission actions on the tract map applications are final. PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT A 984ot single-family residential subdivision on 24±acres of property with an overall density of 4.1 dwelling units per acre as proposed by Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295 and a 255-lot single family residential subdivision on 70±acres at a density of 3.6 dwelling units per acre as proposed by Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295 APPLICANT Sunnyside Ranch (Engineer: Ingels-Braun) LOCATION West side of South Clovis Avenue between the Union Pacific Railroad (California Avenue alignment) and 350 feet south of the East Church Avenue alignment (Council District 5, Councilmember Dages) SITE SIZE 96 net acres LAND USE Existing - Agricultural, Rural Residential and Horse Stables Proposed - Single Family Residential ZONING Existing AE-5(Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural) and AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre AgriculturaYUrban Growth Management) Proposed - R-1 (Single Family Residential)and R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) PLAN DESIGNATION The proposed R-1 and R-1/UGM zone districts and 98-lot and 255-lot AND CONSISTENCY single family residential subdivisions are consistent with the medium- low density residential (2.19 to 4.98 dwelling units per acre) and proposed medium density residential(4.99 to 10.37 dwelling units per acre)planned land uses per Section 12-403 of the Fresno Municipal Code. ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING Mitigated Negative Declaration issued on May 12, 2004 PLAN COMMITTEE The Roosevelt Community.Plan Advisory Committee reviewed RECOMMENDATION the item at its meeting of March 8, 2004, and recommended approval of the proposed project with conditions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the plan amendment application, the rezone applications, and the environmental assessment PLANNING COMMISSION On June 16, 2004, the Fresno City Planning Commission voted 4 RECOMMENDATION to 0 to recommend approval of the plan amendment application, the rezone application, and related environmental assessment. i i REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Plan Amendment Application No. A-03-22 Rezone Application Nos. R-03-69/R-03-84 ine 22, 2004 .-,age 3 BORDERING PROPERTY INFORMATION Planned Land Use Existing Zoning Existing Use North Low Density Residential R-1-AH(County) Large Lot Single Family Single Family Residential-Horses Subdivision South Medium-Low Density AE-51UGM . Proposed Single Family Residential Exclusive Five Acre Agriculture/Urban Subdivision Growth Management Medium Density Residential (R-11UGM.pending) East Medium-Low Density AE-201UGM Agriculture and Rural Residential Exclusive Twenty Acre Agriculture/ Residential Urban Growth Management AE-51UGM Exclusive Five Acre Agriculture/Urban Growth Management Community Commercial C-2/UGM Community Shopping Center/Urban Growth Management West Low Density Residential R-P/BA-15 Single Family Residential Residential and Professional Office/Boulevard Area Treatment,15 Feet ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING The initial study prepared for Environmental Assessment No.A-03-22/R-03-69/R-03-84/T-5258/t-5295 considered potential environmental impacts associated with the subject plan.amendment, rezone, and tentative tract map requests. The study indicates that the project, if approved, would not conform to the land use designation and land use policies of the 2025.Fresno General Plan, and it is not within the scope of Master Environmental Impact Report No. 10130. Therefore, staff has issued a finding of.a mitigated negative declaration which incorporates mitigation measures from MEIR No. 10130 as well as project, specific mitigation measures. The mitigated negative declaration was issued on May 12, 2004. This environmental finding was properly noticed with no comments filed within the 20-day review and comment period. BACKGROUND/ ANALYSIS The applicant, Ingels-Braun on behalf of Sunnyside Ranch, has filed Plan Amendment Application No.A-03-22, Rezone Application No. R-03-69 and related Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5258, and Rezone Application No. R-03-84 and related`Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.T-5295 for.96 net acres of property located on the west side of South Clovis Avenue between the Union Pacific Railroad Tracks(-California Avenue alignment)and a point 350 feet south of the East Church Avenue. Plan Amendment Application.No.. A-03-22 proposes to amend the land use plan designations of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the Roosevelt Community Plan from office commercial(12 acres)and neighborhood commercial(10 acres)to medium density residential planned land use (22 acres). Rezone Application No. R-03-84 and related Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295/UGM propose `o rezone a 26t-acre area portion of the project site from the AE-5 (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural) and 1E-5/UGM(Exclusive Five Acre AgriculturaUUrban Growth Management)zone districts to the R-1 (Single Family Residential)and R-1/UGM(Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management)zone districts and authorize development of a 98-lot single family residential subdivision. Rezone Application No. R-03-69 and associated REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Plan Amendment Application No.A-03-22 Rezone Application Nos. R-03-69/R-03-84 June 22, 2004 Page 4 Tentative Tract Map No. 5258 propose to rezone a 70t-acre area portion of the project site from the AE-5 (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural)and AE-5/UGM(Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural/Urban Growth Management) zone districts to the R-1(Single Family Residential) and R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management)zone districts and authorize development of a 255-lot single family residential subdivision. An approximately 54-acre area portion of the project site is designated for medium-low density residential uses. With approval of the proposed plan amendment application the remaining approximately 42-acre area portion of the project site will be designated for medium density residential uses. This 96-acre area calculation of the total project area is reflective of net acreage excluding areas dedicated for major street purposes and canal or trail areas. The residential density of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5258 is 3.6 dwelling units per acre, while the density of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295 is 4.1 dwelling units per acre. The average density for the entire project site will be 3.8 dwelling units per acre, which is permitted within the medium-low and medium density residential land use plan designations provided the average density is not less 2.18 units per acre. It is also noted that the portion of the subject property which is located to the north of the East Church Avenue alignment is within the non-UGM area. However, the portion of the subject property which is located south of East Church Avenue is within the designated UGM area. Both rezone applications cover portions of the project site that are within the UGM and non-UGM areas. Surrounding land uses are characterized by low density single family residential development to the north and west. To the east, there is rural residential with some agriculture being practice along with a ponding basin. It should be noted that there is residential development activity-further to the east which will ultimately be directed west to Clovis Avenue. To the south,there is evidence of past agriculture activity. However,a tentative tract map (T-5137) has been recently approved to allow development of the property to the immediate south with single family residences. Vehicular access to the project site will be primarily from South Clovis Avenue and East Church Avenue, which are designated as arterial and collector streets, respectively. In addition, the connection of South Minnewawa Avenue(a designated collector street)at the southwest corner of the site will provide additional access to a major street. The vehicle traffic generated by the development of this residential project can be accommodated by the planned circulation system with street improvements completed by the project as required by development standards and Master Environmental Impact Report No.. 101.30 mitigation measures. Sewer and water infrastructure availability and service demands have been verified by the Department of Public Utilities with existing facilities in both South Clovis Avenue and. East Church Avenues that both subdivision can connect to for service. Committee Recommendation The Roosevelt Community Plan Advisory Committee reviewed the plan amendment and rezone applications, and vesting tentative tract maps only at its meeting March 8, 2004. The committee took action to recommend approval of the applications with condition that the applicant incorporate efforts to physically prohibit vehicular access to the proposed multi-purpose trail and that final trail plans be brought back before the Committee for review. Fresno City Planning Commission On June 16, 2004, the Fresno City Planning Commission reviewed the proposed project and took action to unanimously recommend approval of the plan amendment and rezone applications. The Planning Commission also unanimously approved the vesting tentative tract map applications. The Planning Commission did impose additional conditions of approval to the vesting tentative tract maps based on the testimony presented at the REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Plan.Amendment Application No.A-03-22 Rezone Application Nos..R-03-69/R-03-84 ine 22, 2004 Page 5 meeting. These new requirements include the reduction of two lots in the northwest portion of the project site; no pedestrian bridge crossing over the Fancher Creek canal; construct the proposed multi-purpose trail with natural trail surfaces;the applicant and city staff are to work with the Fresno irrigation District to allow the Fancher Creek canal realignment to be constructed with earthen rather than concrete lining; and that the cul-de-sac streets with pedestrian access to the trail shall have wrought iron safety gates. The project applicant has agreed to these conditions. No appeals have been received regarding the tentative tract maps; therefore, the Planning Commission actions on the tentative tract map applications are final. Land Use Plans and Policies Objective C-9 of the 2025 Fresno General Plan encourages the city to "[p]lan for the diversity and quality of residential housing,at locations necessary to provide for adequate and affordable housing opportunities. Housing patterns should support balanced urban growth and should make efficient use of resources and public facilities." Policy-2-e of the 2025 Fresno General Plan calls for the application of standards and design strategies to accommodate expanded and appropriately intensified residential development within the eastern quadrant of the community that ensure existing neighborhoods are respected and enhanced. These two policies encourage the development of land which has remained in agricultural use or has been underdeveloped, while being located within the city's adopted urban area boundary and planned for urbanization. The project site is somewhat unique, with established large estate sized lots and homes developed to the north and west, the Fancher Creek canal traversing the property, and its past use as a ranch with equestrian stables that have become a notable part of .'he surrounding Sunnyside neighborhood. The development of the proposed single family residential subdivision All provide an appropriate transition from the single family homes with large size lots to the north and west. The pian amendment is proposing to eliminate approximately 12 acres of office commercial plan ned land use and 10 acres of neighborhood commercial planned land use and replace It with medium density residential planned land-use. The reduction of office and neighborhood commercial land uses is not expected to impact the a' in terms of having conveniently located and immediately accessibleservices for the future residents of this area. There several existing commercial shopping centers located one mile from the proposed site at Kings Canyon Road and Clovis Avenue. Moreover;there is a planried=community shopping center designated for the northeast corner of Clovis and Church Avenues directly to the east of the subject site. The proposed residential use is a less intensive land use and which will generally have a reduced demand upon public Infrastructure and services particularlywith the proposed residential densities of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.5258 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295, which are a relatively moderate 3.6 dwelling units per acre and 4.1 dwelling units per.acre, respectively. A historic property survey by J & R Environmental Services was conducted for the subject property. The.report dated May.6, 2004,.concluded that the structures on the site did not meet the.CEQA definition of an "historical resource." Circulation Element Plan Policies and.Major Street.System Traffic Capacity The 2025 Fresno General Plan designates South Clovis Avenue as an arterial street and designates East Church Avenue as a collector street. The developer will be required to dedicate and construct improvements in accordance with the adopted plans. These improvements include the construction of curb,gutter,sidewalk,and paving within the limits of the tract; construction of an underground street lighting system;and relinquishment of iccess rights to South Clovis, South Minnewawa, South Sundance, and East Church Avenues for all residential lots adjacent to the major street frontages. These street improvements are outlined in more detail in the Vesting REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Plan Amendment Application No.A-03-22 Rezone Application Nos. R-03-69/R-03-84 June 22, 2004 i Page 6 Tentative Tract Map No. 5258 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295 Conditions of Approval dated May 21, 2004, As required by the mitigation measures established by the certification of MEIR No. 10130,a traffic assessment, dated March 30, 2004, was prepared by Peters Engineering Group to evaluate the number of vehicle trips projected to be generated by the proposed project. Utilizing the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual,Sixth Edition,and associated computer software together with the Council of Fresno County Governments (COG) computerized traffic model, this analysis predicts the number of vehicle trips that will be generated from the proposed project and surrounding planned land uses, and the direction in which these trips will travel. Development of 381 single family residential dwelling units can be expected to generate .an average of approximately 3,646 vehicle trips per day(VTD). Of these vehicle trips it is projected that 285 will occur during the morning (7 to 9 a.m.)peak hour travel period and 385 will occur during the evening (4 to 6 p.m.)period hour travel period. A modest proportion of these projected trips are expected to access the planned 180 Freeway and Clovis•Avenue interchange and the Freeway 99 and Jensen Avenue interchange during the morning and evening peak periods. The eastern extension of Freeway 180 from Chestnut Avenue to the expressway transition at Temperance Avenue is expected to occur as provided by the Measure C Transportation Sales Tax Expenditure Plan by the year 2006. This extension includes the Clovis Avenue interchange which is expected to be designed with adequate capacity to accommodate a 20-year population and employment growth period. The project traffic study has indicated that the Church/Minnewawa intersection should be constructed and with necessary improvements to accommodate traffic control signalization. In addition,the Clovis/Church intersection should contain single left-turn lanes on Clovis Avenue with a single 300-foot left-turn pocket length extending from Church Avenue. The project's fair share for improvements to the Clovis/Church intersection has been determined to be 3.7 percent, while the fair share cost for the Clovis and Jensen intersection.is 1.6 percent. The applicant has agreed to pay these fees as a part of the mitigation measures in response to project generated traffic Impacts. This will include portions of the project site not located within the Urban Growth Management Area where the payment of major street and traffic signal fees and/or the.construction of.improvements would not otherwise be required. Much of the immediately surrounding area has been developed and the planned.major street .and intersection improvements have been completed as required by adopted plans, policies, and development standards. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans,), District 6, Office of Intergovernmental Relations has stated that the proposed plan amendment is not expected to create significant impacts to the State Highway System in a letter dated February 3, 2004. They have, however expressed concern regarding development that accommodates population growth within the Fresno Metropolitan Area, because any growth increases the demand upon the state highway systems. An appropriate, reasonable and legally permissible method of addressing capacity deficiencies has been presented to Caltrans for consideration. This method utilizes the master storm water drainage facility planning and fee program established by the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control Agency as a model. Using this model, Caltrans is responsible for providing a master facilities plan, development fee schedule, and assurances of compliance with constitutional and statutory requirements(Mitigation Fee Act-AB 1600)which apply to the City of Fresno. Should Caltrans develop a master facilities plan and development impact fee program consistent with this model, it will be applied to any final tract map or other applicable development entitlement for this project. REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Plan Amendment Application No. A-03-22 Rezone Application Nos. R-03-69/R-03-84 -une 22, 2004 Page 7 It is also noted that the City of Fresno's staff has. met with Caltrans representatives to review citywide impacts on State facilities; the CEQA process; and the legal requirements for determining the nexus (demonstration of the direct relationship between the project and the potential impact)and the proportionality(fair share contribution towards mitigating the impact)required by State law. The City of:Fresno again transmitted a written explanation of the above concerns, dated March 31, 2003, to Caltrans District 6 Office of Transportation Planning which identified potential mechanisms to establish impactfees such.as a memorandum of understanding or joint.powers agreement. A previous letter from the Caltrans District 6 office has indicated that the City of Fresno's request to be indemnified with respect to legal challenges protesting the imposition of a state facility fee exaction could not be granted. Subsequent correspondence received from Caltrans staff has not clarified the District's.position with respect to pursuing the city's suggested cooperative mechanisms but has continued to reiterate a conclusion that it is the sole responsibility of the City of Fresno as the lead agency to apply exactions through the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) process. Although Caltrans representatives have not endorsed a state transportation facilities impact agreement, a partnership in planning grant was obtained by the Council of Fresno County Governments through which the City of Fresno and Caltrans are participating, along with other local jurisdictions, to complete a freeway deficiency study. This study will detail the traffic impacts anticipated to occur to freeway facilities within the greater Fresno- Madera-Clovis Metropolitan Area. This study will focus upon facilities identified to be most impacted by the projected increases in traffic; identification of the sources of the vehicle traffic within the greater metropolitan area; and the improvements necessary to provide adequate vehicular capacity. Findings from this study may allow proportionate traffic impact fees to be legally implemented by the cities of Fresno and Clovis as well as the County of Fresno upon adoption by the respective jurisdictions. Streets and Access Points Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.T=5258 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.T-5295 propose to have vehicular access from South Clovis Avenue, South Sundance Avenue, South Minnewawa Avenue, and East Church Avenue. The Public Works Department,Transportation Planning Section, has reviewed the plan amendment, rezone, and tentative tract map applications. They have also reviewed the traffic assessment, dated March 30, 2004, prepared by Peters Engineering Group. Based upon its evaluation,the Public Works staff has determined that the.streets adjacent to and near the subject site will be able to accommodate the quantity and kind of traffic generated, subject to the dedication and improvement of adjacent portions of Clovis, Church; Minnewawa, and Sundance Avenues to their ultimate planned width. Landscaping/Walls Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. T-5258 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. T-5295 will be required to install a 15-foot deep landscaped setback and buffer along South Clovis and East Church Avenues and 20-foot deep landscaped setback and buffer along South.Minnewawa Avenue. In addition, the applicant will be required to install a solid wall to a height, as specified by the Acoustical Analysis dated March 2, 2004, along the rear of the required landscape setback, which will mitigate the adverse effect of noise.generated by vehicles traveling on the adjacent major streets and railroad. The west and south boundaries of the project will have solid masonry walls at a minimum of six feet. Lots that side or back onto the interior streets will also have solid masonry walls of six feet. The project site currently contains several dozen majestic palm trees. The project conditions encourage the implementation of diligent efforts to relocate the palm trees and incorporate them as part of the landscape feature along South Sundance Avenue, which is a local street designed to serve as the primary entry-way for the proposed residential development. REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Plan Amendment Application No.A-03-22 Rezone Application Nos. R-03-89/R-03-84 June 22, 2004 Page 8 Open Space The developer will be required to provide at least five percent of the total project area for public or private common open space per Roosevelt Community Plan Policy No. 1-17.1. Alternatively, an equivalent amount of area may be provided in conjunction with approved public or quasi-public open space within one-quarter mile of this development. The required multi-purpose trail to be .constructed along the realigned Fancher Canal within the proposed subdivision will provide a concrete or asphalt pavement surface for pedestrians/bicyclists and a crushed rock trail for equestrians.The project applicant will be required to deed to the City of Fresno 30 feet along the new Fancher Creek realignment for the future development of a multi-purpose trail on the east side of the realigned canal. In addition, the applicant will deed necessary property for the canal realignment to the Fresno Irrigation District. There are two other"outlots"that will be developed as open space which will be located on the west side of the new Fancher Creek canal. This required trail construction will apply toward the above-noted five percent open space requirement for this project as will Outlots B and C. CONCLUSION The appropriateness of the proposed project has been examined with respect to its consistency with goals and policies of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the Roosevelt Community Plan; its compatibility with surrounding existing or proposed uses; and, its avoidance or mitigation of potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. These factors have been evaluated as described above and by the accompanying environmental ` assessment. Upon consideration of this evaluation, it can be concluded that the proposed Plan Amendment Application No. A-03-22 and Rezone Application No. R-03-69 and R-03-84 are appropriate for the project site. K:1Common%laster Files-20M--PLAN AMENDMENMA-03-22,R-03-69,84,T-5295,T-5258(Ailanjian)—M%RCC-A-03-22.wpd Attachments: .Exhibit A.(Vicinity Map) Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5258 dated June 8,2004 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295 dated June 8, 2004 Letter From Fresno Irrigation.District dated April 8, 2004 Letters from Caltrans dated May 25, 2004, and March 16, 2004 Draft cross-section of canal/trail alignment Environmental Assessment No.A-03-22/R-03-69/R-03-84/T-5258/T-5295(finding of a Mitigated Negative Declaration), issued on May 12, 2004 Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 12033, 12034 and 12036 Resolution for Plan Amendment Application No. A-03-22 Ordinance Bill for Rezone Application No. R-03-69 Ordinance Bill for Rezone Application No. R-03-84 PROPOSED CONDITIONS RELATING TO PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. A-03-22 AND REZONE APPLICATIONS NO R-03-69 AND NO. R-03-84 PRESENTED AT THE CITY COUNCIL'S JUNE 29, 2004, PUBLIC HEARING 1. The lots backing on to the Fancher Creek trail, where it is parallel and adjacent to South Dewitt Ave, and the lots backing on to the railroad tracks (California Avenue alignment)will be widened to an 80-foot lot width and limited to single-story construction. 2. Where the wall is required along the west and north boundaries of the project site it will be seven feet in height and constructed with the first phase of the project. 3. The realigned Fancher Creek canal will not be concrete lined except at the curves where necessary to prevent erosion. 4. The Outlot "B" area of Tentative Tract Map No. 5258 located on the west and north side of the realigned Fancher Creek canal will not be landscaped. 5. The wall along the project's north boundary (California Avenue alignment) to be set back one foot from the property line and landscaping (appropriate climbing vine) and irrigation system installed to provide screening of Ahe wall, subject to the granting of access to construct and maintain the landscaping by the railroad company which owns the railroad track right-of-way. 6. The number of lots within the interior of the project may be increased to account for the number of lots reduced along the north and west sides of the project. 7. Install self-closing and latching gates on the pedestrian openings in the subdivision boundary wall that allow access to the Fancher Creek trail from the west ends of the subdivision's cul-de-sac streets. K:\Master Files-2003\—PLAN AMENDMENTS-03-22,R-03-88,84,T75295,T-5258.(Ailanjian)—MS\PROPOSED CONDITIONS RELATING TOPLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO.wpd REPORT TO .. E PLANNING COMMISSION AGr-,JDA ITEM NO. VIII—A COMMISSION MEETING 6/16/04 June 16, 2004 APPROVED BY FROM: STAFF, Planning Division Planning and Development epDEPARTMENT DIRECTORartment N/L`K I /Np SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. A-03-22, REZONE APPLICATION NO. R-03-69 AND RELATED VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5258, AND REZONE APPLICATION NO. R-03-84 AND ASSOCIATED VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5295 AND ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. A-03-22/R-03-69/R-03-84/T-5258/T-5295 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Plan Amendment Application No. A-03-22, Rezone Application No. R-03-69 and related Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5258, and Rezone Application No. R-03-84 and related Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295, filed by Ingels-Braun on behalf of Sunnyside Ranch, pertain to approximately 109 acres of property located on the west side of South Clovis Avenue between the Union Pacific Railroad (California Avenue alignment) and a point 350 feet south of the East Church Avenue alignment. Plan Amendment Application No. A-03-22 proposes an amendment of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the Roosevelt Community Plan for a 22-acre portion of the project site from the office commercial planned land use designation(12 acres)and the neighborhood commercial planned land use designation (10 acres)to the medium density residential land use designation. Rezone Application No. R-03-84 and related Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295/UGM propose to rezone an approximately 26-acre portion from the AE-5 (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural)and AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural/Urban Growth Management)zone districts to the R-1 (Single Family Residential)and R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone district and develop as a 98-lot single family residential subdivision. Rezone Application No. R-03-69 and associated Tentative Tract Map No. 5258 propose to rezone an approximately 70-acre portion from the AE-5 (Exclusive Five Acre Agr' ulturan and AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural/Urban Growth Management)zone districts to the R-1(Single Family Residential) and R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone districts and develop as a 255-lot single family residential subdivision. PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT A 98-lot single-family residential subdivision on 24t acres of property with an overall density of 4.1 dwelling units per acre as proposed by Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295 and a 255-lot single family residential subdivision on 70t acres at a density of 3.6 dwelling units per acre as proposed by Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295. APPLICANT Sunnyside Ranch (Engineer: Ingels-Braun) LOCATION West side of South Clovis Avenue between the Union Pacific Railroad (California Avenue alignment)and 350 feet south of the East Church Avenue alignment (Council District 5, Councilmember Dages) SITE SIZE 96 net acres LAND USE Existing -Agricultural, Rural Residential and Horse Stables Proposed - Single Family Residential REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Plan Amendment Application No.A-03-22 Rezone Application Nos. R-03-69 and R-03-84 Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos.T-5258 and T-5295 June 16, 2004 Page 2 ZONING Existing - AE-5 (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural)and AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre AgriculturaYUrban Growth Management) Proposed - R-1 (Single Family Residential)and R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) PLAN DESIGNATION The proposed R-1 and R-1/UGM zone districts and 98-lot and 255-lot AND CONSISTENCY single family residential subdivisions are consistent with the medium- low density residential (2.19 to 4.98 dwelling units per acre) and proposed medium density residential(4.99 to 10.37 dwelling units per acre)planned land uses per Section 12-403 of the Fresno Municipal Code. ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING Mitigated Negative Declaration issued on May 12, 2004 PLAN.COMMITTEE The Roosevelt Committee reviewed the item at its meeting of RECOMMENDATION March 8, 2004, and recommended approval of the proposed project with conditions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval of plan amendment and rezone applications and approve vesting tentative tract map subject to compliance with the Conditions of Approval for T-5258/T-5295 dated May 21, 2004. BORDERING PROPERTY INFORMATION Planned Land Use Existing Zoning Existing Use North Low Density.Residential R-1-AH(County) Large Lot Single Family Single Family Residential-Horses Subdivision South Medium Low Density Residential. AE-5/UGM Proposed Single Family Exclusive Five Acre Agriculture/ Subdivision Urban Growth Management Medium Density Residential (R-1/UGM pending) East Medium Low Density Residential AE-20/UGM Agriculture and Rural Exclusive Twenty Acre Agriculture/ Residential Urban Growth Management AE-51UGM Exclusive Fives Acre Agriculture/ Urban Growth Management Community Commercial C-2/UGM Community Shopping Center/Urban Growth Management West Low Density Residential R-1-AH(County) Single Family Residential Si le Family Residential-Horses REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Plan Amendment Application No.A-03-22 Rezone Application Nos. R-03-69 and R-03-84 Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos.T-5258 and T-5295 June 16,2004 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING The initial study prepared for Environmental Assessment No. A-03-22/R-03-69/R-03-84/T-5258/t-5295 considered potential environmental impacts associated with the subject plan amendment, rezone and tentative tract map requests. The study indicates that the project,if approved, would not conform to the land use designation and land use policies of the 2025 Fresno General Plan, and it is not within the scope of Master Environmental Impact Report No. 10130. Therefore, staff has issued a finding of a mitigated negative declaration which incorporates mitigation measures from MEIR No. 10130 as well as project speck mitigation measures. The mitigated negative declaration was issued on May 12, 2004. This environmental finding was properly noticed with no comments filed within the 20-day review and comment period. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The applicant, Ingels-Braun on behalf of Sunnyside Ranch,has filed Plan Amendment Application No.A-03-22, Rezone Application No. R-03-69 and related Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5258, and Rezone Application No. R-03-84 and related Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. T-5295 for 96 net acres of property located on the west side of South Clovis Avenue between the Union Pacific Railroad Tracks(California Avenue alignment)and a point 350 feet south of the East Church Avenue. Plan Amendment Application No. A-03-22 proposes to amend the land use plan designations of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the Roosevelt Community Plan from office commercial (12 acres) and neighborhood commercial (10 acres)to medium density residential planned land use(22 acres). Rezone Application No. R-03-84 and related Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295/UGM propose to rezone a 26t acre area portion of the project site from the AE-5(Exclusive Five Acre Agriculturao and AE-5/UGM(Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural/Urban Growth Management)zone districts to the R-1 (Single Family Residentiao and R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone district and authorize development of a 98-lot single family residential subdivision. Rezone Application No. R-03-69 and associated Tentative Tract Map No. 5258 propose to rezone a 70t acre area portion of the project site from the AE-5 (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural) and AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultura//Urban Growth Management) zone districts to the R-1(Single Family Residential) and R-1/UGM (Single Family ResidentiaUUrban Growth Management) zone districts and authorize development of a 255-lot single family residential subdivision. An approximately 54-acre area portion of the project site is designated for medium-low density residential uses. With approval of the proposed plan amendment application the remaining approximately 42-acre area portion of the project site will be designated for medium density residential uses. This 96-acre area calculation of the total project area is reflective of net acreage excluding areas dedicated for major street purposes and canal or trail areas. The residential density of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5258 is 3.6 dwelling units per acre,while the density of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295 is 4.1 dwelling units per acre. The average density for the entire project site will be 3.8 dwelling units per acre,which is permitted within the medium-low and medium density residential land use plan designations provided the average density is not less 2.18 units per acre. It is also noted that the portion of the subject property which is located to the north of the East Church Avenue alignment is within the non-UGM area. However, the portion of the subject property which is located south of East Church Avenue is within the designated UGM area. Both rezone applications cover portions of the project site that are within the UGM and non-UGM areas. REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Plan Amendment Application No.A-03-22 Rezone Application Nos. R-03-89 and R-03-84 Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos.T-5258 and T-5295 June 18, 2004 Page 4 Surrounding land uses are characterized by low density single family residential development to the north and west. To the east, there is rural residential with some agriculture being practice along with a ponding basin. It should be noted that there is residential development activity further to the east which will ultimately be directed west to Clovis Avenue. To the south, there is evidence of past agriculture activity. However, a tentative tract map (T-5137) has been recently approved to allow development of the property to the immediate south with single family residences. Vehicular access to the project site will be primarily from South Clovis Avenue and East Church Avenue,which are designated as arterial and collector streets, respectively. In addition, the connection of South Minnewawa Avenue (a designated collector street) at the southwest comer of the site will provide additional access to a major street. The vehicle traffic generated by the development of this residential project can be accommodated by the planned circulation system with street improvements completed bythe project as required by development standards and Master Environmental Impact Report No. 10130 mitigation measures. Sewer and water infrastructure availability and service demands have been verified by the Department of Public Utilities with existing facilities in both South Clovis Avenue and East Church Avenues that both subdivision can connect to for service. Roosevelt Community Plan Advisory Committee The Roosevelt Community Plan Advisory Committee reviewed the plan amendment and rezone applications, and vesting tentative tract maps only at its meeting March 8, 2004. The committee took action to recommend approval of the applications with condition that the applicant incorporate efforts to physically prohibit vehicular access to the proposed multi-purpose trail and that final trail plans be brought back before the Committee for review. Land Use Plans and Policies Objective .0-9 of the 2025 Fresno General Plan encourages the city to "[p]lan for the diversity and quality of residential housing, at locations necessary to provide for adequate and affordable housing opportunities. Housing patterns should support balanced urban growth and should make efficient use of resources and public facilities." Policy-2-e of the 2025 Fresno General Plan calls for the application of standards and design strategies to accommodate expanded and appropriately intensified residential development within the eastem quadrant of the community that ensure existing neighborhoods are respected and enhanced. These two policies encourage the development of land which has remained in agricultural use or has been underdeveloped,while being located.within the city's adopted ueban area boundary and planned for urbanization. The project site is somewhat unique, with established large estate. sized lots and homes developed to the north and west, the . Fancher Creek canal traversing the property, and its past use as a ranch with equestrian stables that have become a notable part of the surrounding Sunnyside neighborhood. The development of the proposed single family residential subdivision will provide an appropriate transition from the single family homes with large size lots to,the north and west. The plan amendment is proposing to eliminate approximately12 acres of office commercial planned land use and 10 acres of neighborhood commercial planned land use and replace it with medium density residential planned land use. The reduction of office and neighborhood commercial land uses is not expected to impact the area in terms of having conveniently located and immediately accessible services for the future residents of this area. There several existing commercial shopping centers located one mile from the proposed site at Kings Canyon Road and Clovis Avenue. Moreover, there is a planned community shopping center designated for the northeast corner of Clovis and Church Avenues directly to the east of the subject site. The proposed REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Plan Amendment Application No.A-03-22 Rezone Application Nos. R-03-69 and R-03-84 Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos.T-5258 and T-5295 June 16, 2004 Page 5 residential use is a less intensive land use and which will generally have a reduced demand upon public infrastructure and services particularly with the proposed residential densities of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5258 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.5295,which are a relatively moderate 3.6 dwelling units per acre and 4.1 dwelling units per acre, respectively. A historic property survey by J&R Environmental Services was conducted for the subject property. The report dated May 6, 2004, concluded that the structures on the site did not meet the CEQA definition of a "historical resource." Circulation Element Plan Policies and Major Street System Traffic Capacity The 2025 Fresno General Plan designates South Clovis Avenue as an arterial street and designates East Church Avenue as a collector street. The developer will be required to dedicate and construct improvements in accordance with the adopted plans. These improvements include the construction of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and paving within the limits of the tract; construction of an underground street lighting system; and relinquishment of access rights to South Clovis,South Minnewawa,South Sundance,and East Church Avenues for all residential lots adjacent to the major street frontages. These street improvements are outlined in more detail in the Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5258 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295 Conditions of Approval dated May 21, 2004. As required by the mitigation measures established by the certification of MEIR No. 10130,a traffic assessment, dated March 30, 2004, was prepared by Peters Engineering Group to evaluate the number of vehicle trips projected to be generated by the proposed project. Utilizing the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual,Sixth Edition,and associated computer software togetherwith the Council of Fresno County Govemments (COG) computerized traffic model, this analysis predicts the number of vehicle trips that will be generated from the proposed project and surrounding planned land uses,and the direction in which these trips will travel. Development of 381 single family residential dwelling units can be expected to generate an average of approximately 3,646 vehicle trips per day(VTD). Of these vehicle trips it is projected that 285 will occur during the moming(7 to 9 a.m.)peak hour travel period and 385 will occur during the evening(4 to 6 p.m.)period hour travel period. A modest proportion of these projected trips are expected to access the planned 180 Freeway and Clovis Avenue interchange and the Freeway 99 and Jensen Avenue interchange during the morning and evening peak periods. The eastern extension of Freeway 180 from Chestnut Avenue to the expressway transition at Temperance Avenue is expected to occur as provided by the Measure C Transportation Sales Tax Expenditure Plan by the year 2006. This extension includes the Clovis Avenue interchange which is expected to be designed with adequate capacity to accommodate a 20-year population and employment growth period. The project traffic study has indicated that the Church/Minnewawa intersection should be constructed and with necessary improvements to accommodate traffic control signalization. In addition,the Clovis/Church intersection should contain single left-turn lanes on Clovis Avenue with a single 300-foot left-turn pocket length extending from Church Avenue. The project's fair share for improvements to the Clovis/Church intersection has been determined to be 3.7 percent,while the fair share cost for the Clovis and Jensen intersection is 1.6 percent. The applicant has agreed to pay these fees as a part of the mitigation measures in response to project generated traffic impacts. This will include portions of the project site not located within the Urban Growth Management Area where the payment of major street and traffic signal fees and/or the construction of improvements would not otherwise be required. Much of the immediately surrounding area has been developed and the planned major street and intersection improvements have been completed as required by adopted plans, policies, and development standards. REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Plan,Amendment Application No.A-03-22 Rezone Application Nos. R-03-69 and R-03-84 Vesting Tentative Tract Map.Nos.T-5258 and T-5295 June 16, 2004 Page 6 The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), District 6, Office of Intergovernmental Relations has stated that the proposed plan amendment isnot expected to create significant impacts to the State Highway System in a letter dated February 3;2004. They have,however expressed concern regarding development that accommodates population growth within the Fresno Metropolitan Area, because any growth increases the demand upon the state highway systems. An appropriate, reasonable and legally permissible method of addressing capacity deficiencies has .been presented to Caltrans for consideration. This method utilizes the master storm water drainage facility planning and fee program established by the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control Agency as a model. Using this model, Caltrans is responsible for providing a master facilities plan, development fee schedule and assurances of compliance with constitutional and statutory requirements(Mitigation Fee Act-AB 1600)which apply to the City of Fresno, Should Caltrans develop a master facilities plan and development impact fee program consistent with this model, it will be applied to any final tract map or other applicable development entitlement for this project. It is also noted that the City of Fresno's staff has met with Caltrans representatives to review citywide impacts on State facilities; the CEQA process; and the legal requirements for determining the nexus(demonstration of the direct relationship between the project and the potential impact) and the proportionality (fair share contribution towards mitigating the impact)required by State law. The City of Fresno again transmitted a written explanation of the above concerns, dated March 31, 2003, to Caltrans District 6 Office of Transportation Planning which identified potential mechanisms to establish impact fees, such as a memorandum of understanding or joint powers agreement. A previous letter from the Caltrans District 6 office has indicated that the City of Fresno's request to be indemnified with.resPect to Legal challenges protesting the imposition of a state facility fee exaction could.not be granted. Subsequent.correspondence received from Caltrans staff has not clarified the District's position with respect to pursuing the city's suggested cooperative mechanisms but has continued to reiterate a conclusion that it is the sole responsibility of,the City of Fresno as the lead agency to apply exactions through the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)process. Although Caltrans representatives have not endorsed a state transportation facilities impact agreement,.a partnership in planning grant was obtained by the Council of Fresno County Governments through which the City of Fresno and Caltrans are participating,.along with other local. jurisdictions, to complete a freeway deficiency study. This study will detail the traffic impacts anticipated to occurto freeway facilities within the greater Fresno-Madera-Clovis Metropolitan Area. This study will.focus upon facilities identified to be.most impacted by the projected increases in traffic;identification of the sources of the vehicle traffic within the greater metropolitan area;and the improvements necessary to provide adequate vehicular capacity. Findings from this study may allow proportionate traffic impact fees to be legally implemented by the cities of Fresno and Clovis as well as the County of Fresno upon adoption by the respective jurisdictions. Streets.and Access Points Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.T-5258 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.T-5295 propose to have vehicular access from South Clovis Avenue, South Sundance Avenue, South Minnewawa Avenue, and East Church Avenue. The Public Works Department, Transportation Planning Section, has reviewed the plan amendment, rezone,and tentative tract map applications. They have also reviewed the traffic assessment,dated March 30, 2004,prepared by Peters Engineering Group. Based upon its evaluation,the Public Works staff has determined that the streets adjacent to and near the subject site will be able to accommodate the quantity and kind of traffic generated, subject to the dedication and improvement of adjacent portions of Clovis, Church, Minnewawa, and Sundance Avenues to their ultimate planned width. REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Plan Amendment Application No.A-03-22 Rezone Application Nos. R-03-69 and R-03-84 Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos.T-5258 and T-5295 June 16, 2004 Page 7 Landscaping/Walls Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.T-5258 and Vesting Tentative Tract.Map No.T-5295 will be required to install a 15-foot deep landscaped setback and buffer along South Clovis and East Church Avenues and 20-foot deep landscaped setback and buffer along South Minnewawa Avenue. In addition, the applicant will be required to install a solid wall to a height,as specified by the Acoustical Analysis dated March 2,2004,along the rear of the required landscape setback, which will mitigate the adverse effect of noise generated by vehicles traveling on the adjacent major streets. The project site currently contains several dozen majestic palm trees. The project conditions encourage the implementation of diligent efforts to relocate the palm trees and incorporate them as part of the landscape feature along South Sundance Avenue, which is a local street designed to serve as the primary entry-way for the proposed residential development. Open Space The developer will be required to provide at least five percent of the total project area for public or private common open space per Roosevelt Community Plan Policy No. 1-17.1. Alternatively, an equivalent amount of area may be provided in conjunction with approved public or quasi-public open space within one-quarter mile of this development. The required multi-purpose trail to be constructed along the realigned Fancher Canal within the proposed subdivision will provide a concrete or asphalt pavement surface for pedestrians/bicyclists and a crushed rock trail for equestrians. The project applicant will be required to deed to the City of Fresno 30 feet along the new Fancher Creek realignment for the future development of a multi-purpose trail on the east side of the realigned canal. In addition, the applicant will deed necessary property for the canal realignment to the Fresno Irrigation District. There are two other"outlots"that will be developed as open space which will be located on the west side of the new Fancher Creek canal. This required trail construction will apply toward the above-noted five percent open space requirement for this project as will Outlots B and C. Lot Dimensions The R-1 zone district requires minimum lot sizes of 6,000 square feet for lots in the subdivision. All of the lots in the subdivision exceed the minimum lot size requirement. In addition, all lots meet or exceed the minimum lot width (60 feet) and depth(100 feet)as required by the R-1 zone district. The subdivision map, based on the required findings for approval and subject to the recommended conditions of approval, and the standards and policies of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and Roosevelt Community Plan complies with applicable zoning and subdivision requirements. Therefore, staff recommends approval. Tentative Tract Map Findings The Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66400 et. seq.) requires that a proposed subdivision not be approved unless the map, together with its design and improvements, is found to be consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan (Finding No. 1 below). REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Plan Amendment Application No.A-03-22 Rezone Application Nos. R-03-69 and R-03-84 Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos.T-5258 and T-5295 June 16, 2004 Page 8 State law further provides that proposed subdivision maps for T-5258 and T-5295 be denied if any one of the Finding Nos. 2-5 below is made in the negative. In addition, State law requires that a subdivision be found to provide for future passive and natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision development(Finding No. 6 below). 1. Proposed subdivision maps T-5258 and T-5295, together with design and improvements, are consistent with.the City's 2025 General Plan and Roosevelt Community Plan.designation of the site for medium-low density residential and medium density residential land uses,as amended by Plan Amendment Application No.A-03-22,and subject to Section 12-403-B of.the Fresno Municipal Code, the project design meets the density and zoning ordinance criteria for development in this plan designation. 2. This site is physically suitable for the proposed type and density of development, because conditions of approval will ensure adequate access and drainage on and off the site. 3. Proposed subdivision maps T-5258 and T-5295 design and improvements are not likely to cause substantial and considerable damage to the natural environment, including fish, wildlife or their habitat, because of the urbanized nature of the area in which the site is located. 4. Proposed subdivision maps T-5258 and T-5295 design and improvements are not likely to cause serious public health and safety problems,because the conditions of approval have shown and will ensure that the subdivision maps conform with city health and safety standards. 5. Proposed subdivision maps T-5258 and T-5295 design will not conflict with public easements within or through the site, because conditions of approval will ensure noninterference with.any existing or proposed public easements. 6. The design of subdivision maps T-5258 and T-5295 provide,to the extent feasible,for future passive and natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivisions,because of the appropriate use and placement of landscaping plant materials and because of the orientation of the proposed lots. The subdivision maps for T-5258 and T-5295, subject to the recommended conditions of approval, comply with the design and property development standards of the Zoning Ordinance and local Subdivision Ordinance. Based upon the plans and information submitted by the applicant and the recommended conditions of project approval, staff has determined that these findings can be made. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Development shall take place in accordance with Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5258 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295 dated June 8,2004,and the Conditions of Approval for T-5258 and T-5295 dated April 21, 2004. Action by the Planning Commission regarding the plan amendment and rezone applications will be a recommendation to the City Council. Planning Commission action on the proposed tentative tract maps,unless appealed to the Council, are final. REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Plan Amendment Application No.A-03-22 Rezone Application Nos. R-03-69 and R-03-84 Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos.T-5258 and T-5295 June 16, 2004 Page 9 CONCLUSION/ RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission take the following actions: 1. RECOMMEND APPROVAL to the City Council of a finding of Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No. A-03-22/R-03-69/R-03-84/T-5258/T-5295 dated May 12, 2004. 2. RECOMMEND APPROVAL to the City Council of Plan Amendment Application No. A-03-22 which proposes to amend the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the Roosevelt Community Plan from the office commercial land use designation (12 acres) and neighborhood commercial land use designation to the medium density residential land use designation, as depicted on the attached Exhibit A(vicinity map). 3. RECOMMEND APPROVAL to the City Council of Rezone Application No.R-03-69 requests a rezone from AE-5 (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural)and AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre AgriculturaUUrban Growth Management)to R-1(Single Family Residential)and R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management)for 70 net acres. 4. RECOMMEND APPROVAL to the City Council of Rezone Application No.R-03-84 requests a rezone from AE-5 (Exclusive Five Acre Agriculturan and AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural/Urban Growth Management)to R-1(Single Family Residential)and R-1/UGM (Single Family ResidendaUUrban Growth Management)for 26 net acres. 5. APPROVE Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5258 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295 subject to compliance with the Conditions of Approval dated May 21, 2004. KACommonWaster Files-2001—PLAN AMENDMENTSIA-03-22,R-03-09,84,T-5295,T-5258(Ailanjian) —MSW-03-22-R-03-89-T-5258-R-03-84-T-5295 RPC Revision.wpd Attachments: Exhibit A(Vicinity Map) Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5258 dated June 8, 2004 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295 dated June 8, 2004 Conditions of Approval for T-5258 and T-5295 dated May 21,2004, including letters from Parks Department (03-17-04 and 03-22-04), Fire Department (1-23-04) and Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (4-29-04 and 4-24-04) Letter From Fresno Irrigation District dated April 8, 2004 Letters from Caltrans dated May 25, 2004, and March 16, 2004 Draft cross-section of canal/trail alignment Environmental Assessment No.A-03-22/R-03-69/R-03-84/T-5258/T-5295(finding of a Mitigated Negative Declaration), issued on May 12, 2004 I * � ■ f w I n n w � ■ w w w p t M r MIR[ wNr • AE 20 JGM K RpB011 ' LJ AE-5 . E CALIFORNIA �� ■ AE-5 ui N C fAM • s-uoM _ I r AE- g�.Q0 5 AE-5 E CHURCH r AE-51UGM AE-5 "` • r • w � ■ w ■ LEGEND PROJECT BOUNDARY PLAN AMENDMENT NO.A-03-022 REZONE APPLICATIONO.R-03-0154jj dDy�yt�boyhood COMM. From E-5 and AE-&UGM to MeDensity to R-1 and R-t/UGM VICINITY MAP PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO.A-03-022 N DEPARTMENT From Office and Neighborhood Comm.to Med.Density Resid, A.P.N.: 481-040-02.07.11 REZONE APPLICATION NO.R-03-084w E From AES and AE-5/UGM to R-1 and R-1 AJGM ZONE MAP:255 •2655 West of Clovis Ave.btwn California and Church Aves, NOT TO SCALE BY/DATE: J.S./ 1-22-04 • L , WMEW l KIN 1111,9111 `E I El- IN 1:JOB-As µ/y rrr���y■■■ ��� t�� all 7 ,_ SEE SHEET 7 05 .100 ' I,y IY IM M6 r7 } I I 1I EQ y M9 Y! ■ 1� 1, ,I I ii a'r i © 4 'a Na , i � I 1 _ 1 — M q * ILL I / % iy �• � _ _Jam/ ` � 7W } ! O} '� In e6 1 IOS , k/4 1 L-• i B m 0. 4 } 206 n+ k p 2CP 1 I - / �L r� >00 �� r a•. �L gas r I � I I �� ,► 20 it 242 . 20 row w 19 I %' +', //�' • ` �� `, ,• • N + , p st t ts• t t , ,d t0 ta'( 1p -, lo •• J • P P t AVOkK lo, , - .ds t,• rt,• t,• d• ,r d• ,A tP •t 0 .•• I ,• tp t,• I I 1 VESTING TENTATIVE b JBDIVISION MAP t TRACT, NOt.--52�95 �y(RY CLUB ESTATES-nU gIN1!1'6 Illse 4 .1 I . (I 11 1 ds e . ss �� so as as w r aia Z4 mi 1 SION 17.104 L 5� ►Ater:om ttR4t►An+eo , s ♦'�wLROAD � Zu off a ( t t r_—. °1Ramt e a \ t t ` ! v �,• , -i ROOT zcww A--20 CL 9 ,r ® r•co .•._. ., .r I drawn,by it e >e y date 3 Q6 9 1 IUVaae i j I i 0 012 revised rr Ol 3 BSSETs job no. TOA CAGWUL 01104en+n0 oa.o+e VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP TRACT NO, 5295 RE � N 0. � gr N d•:2rm retaas 1 "AL 008CERMAL L ZONED An-20 A W� j Ar ME Z z 12 01 4 2W "a in 9 ow fW W all 2 C2 I � � 14 or of 00WASICIAL 2K*4!D C-2 1 23 241 25 1 2611 7711 129 k I K OR or X or M 0 JK "Far of v w -or w 34 imm a K scuum 721 71 701 691 681 67 11 ar .=wow IRV6 32 -4 it a is �r 60 & 111 6_2 641 651 Am-5 Aof or I or JL / / 3° { Ar n of 35 or 57 5611 50'A 5411 0 7r Pr 7r PC MUM W W of 79 w COWAIROWL 37 1 ZONED C-2 49 50'A 521 53 al I PO 48 is 39 42 43 45 44 47 46 GWL WL------ W. if 9.1 i—96 95 4 93 9"2 (& 74 79 80 w a 9 75 78 -in W eiX or 31 90 0. 76 -7n7 82 83 ai 96 87 SCA&Z r-100' — — --- ---- W to drawn by +� 1 { �s �9 j a� a �e i a9 i �P e\9)dffmc 00 di I dote f II O 24110050011 Z ravloed ---—---- HENT NO. -M:j, Lp T_Ap i i II 'I I to lb" 41 %1 !> es 3 or 3 anSETB job no. L VESTINI TI MAL DUCRPTM. ►Aloca w A L TMT rani 07 M MDmI MALT IF M MfNOM/OT CUWM v IMM A.7oMW 14 MWft WW st GR MOMR MMM MAR 00 IOLpNI 10 M O7OAL PLAT TO@L+,LA0 M"NN w O room amN ORAOIC AQQIIOY M NOM 10 RUT O am 10C11OM cow=TO PAM MPMOUOOIT COWAIIT,A COAPOIAUK K OM ep01M N BWL a PAM 7@ Cr OMmL Aa ONVUO Immmu INAT PNTMNI COWA M A M sarpow NOW L MAMAAMID m/AM7.A aNP =K M Ir OM WOMM APE 17, 0 M 1 MOR M►AMI!n Or OUOL ►AMm N l INAT POWI M O M MCT MAV O M MOMTRNT MUM=O OCIIOI 17, L IOM/14 NM1M,MUI!Zt WT,MCUNT MOLD MOI NOMNOINL ACDNRMIM A M OlOK AAT MN77,LTMN MNIN AIO MpI Ot IAMOtA L COL OON•IND MIONNI ALL 01.W IIT0110GI34"Rd1 NNOAN®An MIOIALI 7. Lis I<ALL O M NO7 =W.m um Am X4110 Iwm m TO 71t L OR ANOUL LEM or JIM Nwr 10 011N1 I LD Mol PNMM NO 10 MOR�AO/Q7R�FM AND L 1AOMQM NOR TO�IIW�RINIC'f AD MAN7A�IO INO NIDI AM OOAOL►![ IL 0[N[wIOIMOL7 NOQl7N7~q NmOITK TO NIDI WgkA=ML AND TO tt. DOM■MA O�111 Ma1A010 NE IM(f O7 WAMCO MO INOi, ti N wr AE MUMOMIILT MI�AMr OM N0001TK TORR N IMIYm N M NDN RIOM MLT"L aura t ALONO M DM=7►AOMLNMCMTlATMMDCT0OmK ►MM L ALL MAY PNIIIOI O M MM 71M M-MAM 07 M CAN OW Q N.CM a 17 TOMN�N MAMLA if MWMW IMA OA=MO MmNI ARRMA O M OIOAL RAT N WA LMM fOMM.MLy O FNIOOI �MNIR OM1 AMD MMMg1O1 PJIIAL N OAO FJiNI ANO CAMK NOM COL M vxzn 0 TMNONNI M O017M 1110 NUT 71x0. AL10 OIa►TCIO 1Ie101IDY TIA7►ally/OL7ONIm via=AT IK 1L MCq NIOWUST v a Dt OAo viwMMRAT�T OMaw�Aa im TT7OswMNi w iM7 rMer 1Mo+t(11aNMI MM7M Inst A NMTAIQ Of 111,64 Fen TIOIDE 1L MOTI Nq'1C[AfT,A NMTAMIe O 17.00 rsT;TOAZ IIAM ALON M MORM OOUOMT.O/tA0 RI71eNf 9VwM7; A NRAMS O NI FM IO M PONT OI wooer^N ONIKNO 10 11[OL111MTY or FFONO Or .. O®!IWUUMN AOR 70.1070 N OONI�'MO Ma N7 AO DOmom ML N47O,0,MOAL NLO0a0 17, IL ' NL 1. Nl I 1 1 ¢ 1 1 a 1 a 1. M PROPOSED FANCHER CR SUI wr wNe 1wI PRIM Pw1 REI on, Ltm � r1a P11NM MM s MGIC r r M MMN tNN I'm =� v EXISTINGA C CCANAL �- OI A VAL u , 107 JOf 05 04 03 10 01 00 M 91197 N 95 7mis 91 /1 p I t0f — — a {!! t09 oz fa n /f n of w 70 1 74 75 7FT f q 111 fl !0 S9 5/ S7 5f � s<S3 52 St 50 19 4f 47 as ItY — � 113 4f 4z 4a u 45 4/ w 114 sa 115 31 ao Ep 2f r 1f n- 24 23 IS 21 zD 1/ fe er 117 7 f f 10 11 15 u n is 79 eo 1t/ — — 119 f s 4 1E 14 17 a 13 120 E 1 119 �0 ss1 121 in t IE4 217 Elf 1s _ 1:f Elf 134 � U a1 w Els IS z/Ig 2 nA au all rn 10 taa 34 ss as 1117 2211 221 142141 t 35 in ; ., 9 ne D ' S e f � 14a 441 4e 47 21212121 1 E s 6 7 a _ — — 5E 151 49 142 Ips 7 B C 6 K Is 10/ 1� 1/a 184 I q 22 24195 1%1211Z 24 30 151 23 188 S In 192 1N 72 71 70 69 66 67 32 fff 200 I" — 33 1ST 201 9 61 63 6< 66 66 Ipo 34 Iff IN In 90 If? tl 159 /1" � 0B 07 06 06 S4 n tNf4lda iu 1/1 IV WS 111 I to 204 910 � 49 00 9 02 S3 q1 17f 178 I in 18a 1a205 WO !39 9 41 172 175 179 1M 1n mf 44 42 40 173 174 IV Ifl EOf 47 46 46 97 96 95 94 9a 97 91 74 79 � 4 + 114 251 roe us 14E Esf 7S 7e a1 1533 15a 247 148 241 2a 76 77 e2 63 ae of e7 e9 90 PREPAM Br. _ INGEL.S - BRAUN wAA ® r-400 & ASSOCIATES CIVIL E/fucc/ltlf A/0 Luo SMITING 875 VEST ASHLAN AVENUE, SUITE 102 CLOVIS, CALIFORNIA 93612 (559) 291 - 0427 5Y. ESPINOZA -06/01 04 IBA CA FILM: O5O4SEXO4 C:\sofc\03043EX04.dwg 06/01/2004 11:45:06 AM PDT a FRESNO CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12036 The Fresno City Planning Commission, at its regular meeting on June 16, 2004, adopted the following resolution relating to Rezone Application No. R-03-84. WHEREAS, Rezone Application No. R-03-84 has been filed with the City of Fresno to rezone the property as described below: REQUESTED ZONING: R-1 (Single Family Residential)and R-1/UGM(Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) EXISTING ZONING: AE-5 (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural) and AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural/Urban Growth Management) APPLICANT: Sunnyside Ranch LOCATION: The west side of South Clovis Avenue between the Union Pacific Railroad and a point 350 feet south of the East Church Avenue alignment APN: 481-040-2, 7, 11 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: From AE-5 and AE-5lUGM to R-1 and R-11UGM: PARCEL 1: All that portion of the North half of the Northeast quarter of Section 17,Township 14 South, Range 21.East,.Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, according to the Official Plat thereof, lying North and East of Fancher Creek. Excepting therefrom. the North 30 feet of said Section conveyed to Pacific Improvement Company,a corporation, by deed recorded in Book.65 page 76 of Deeds. Also excepting therefrom that portion conveyed to the Southern Pacific Railroad Company, a corporation,by deed recorded June 27, 1889 in Book 97 Page 237 of Deeds. Also excepting therefrom that portion conveyed to the Southern Pacific Railroad Company, a corporation,,by deed recorded June 27, 1889 in Book 97 Page 237 of Deeds. PARCEL 2: . That portion of the East half of the Northeast quarter of Section 17,Township 14 South,Range 21 East,Mount Diablo Base and Meridian,according to the Official Plat thereof, lying North and West of Fancher Creek. Planning Commission Resolutwo No. 12036 Rezone Application No. R-03-84 Page 2 June 16, 2004 Excepting therefrom all oil, gas, hydrocarbon substances and mineral in, under and which may be produced.from said lands, and one-quarter of all of the royalties, payments, rights and benefits reserved to the lessor in any oil, gas or mineral lease of said land, and the right to enter upon said real property and to explore and prospect for and store and remove said oil, gas, hydrocarbons and minerals therefrom, and the right to construct and maintain on said land such roads, pipe lines, telephone lines, tanks, buildings and other appurtenances as may be reasonably necessary or incidental to such operations, and to exercise such other rights,including the right of ingress and egress,as may be reasonably necessary or incidental thereto, as,reserved in the deed from Milton G. Cooper &Son, Inc., a corporation, recorded March 22, 1945 in Book 2237 Page 469 as Document No. 11685, Official Records. All that portion of the South three-fourths of the East half of Section 17,Township 14 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, according to the Official .Plat thereof, lying Southeasterly of Fancher Creek and Washington Canal, as said creek and canal now exist. Excepting therefrom the South 2319 feet thereof. Also excepting therefrom that portion described as: Beginning at the East ' quarter comer of said Section 17; thence South along the East boundary of the said Southeast quarter of Section 17,a distance of 357 feet;thence North 89038' West, a distance of 36.94 feet; thence .North 010 06' 30" East, a distance of 357,07 feet;thence Easterly along the North boundary of said Southeast quarter, a distance of 30 feet to the point of beginning, as conveyed to.the County of Fresno by deed recorded June 30, 1970 in Book 5798 Page 147.as Document No 44439, Official Records. WHEREAS, the above-named applicant is requesting a zoning change on the above property in order to allow for a proposed single-family residential subdivision; and, WHEREAS, the Fresno City Planning Commission on June 16, 2004, reviewed the subject rezone application in accordance with the policies of the Roosevelt Community Plan and the 2025 Fresno General Plan; and, WHEREAS, during the June 16, 2004 hearing, the Commission received a staff report and related information, environmental documents and considered testimony regarding the requested zoning change. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Fresno City Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that there is no substantial evidence in the record to indicate that Rezone Application No. R-03-69 may have a significant effect on the environment as identified by the Mitigated Negative Declaration dated May 12, 2004, prepared for Environmental Assessment No. A-03-22/R-03-6.9/R-03-84/T-5258/T-5295. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Fresno City Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council that the requested R-1 and R-1/UGM zone.district be approved. ` Planning Commission Resolute... No. 12036 Rezone Application No. R-03-84 Page 3 June 16, 2004 The foregoing Resolution was adopted by the Fresno City.Planning Commission upon a motion by Commissioner Brown seconded by Commissioner.Vang. VOTING: Ayes - Brown, Vang, Kissler, Brand Noes - None Not Voting - None Absent - DiBuduo, White DATED: June 16, 2004 NICKP YOVINO, Secretary Fresn ity Planning Commission Resolution No. 12036 Rezone Application No. R-03-84 Filed by Sunnyside Ranch Action: Recommend Approval KACommon\Master Files-2003\—PLAN AMENDMENTSIA-03-22,R-03-89,84,T-5295,T-5258(Allarglan)—MS1R-03-84PC Reso 12038.wpd FRESNO CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12037 The Fresno City Planning Commission at its regular meeting on June 16, 2004, adopted the following resolution pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act of the Government Code of the State of California and the Municipal Code of the City of Fresno. WHEREAS,a Vesting Tentative Map of Tract No. 5295 was filed with the City of Fresno and proposes a 98-lot single-family residential subdivision on 24 net acres of land located on the west side of South Clovis Avenue between the Union Pacific Railroad and a point 350 south of the East Church Avenue alignment; and, WHEREAS, the Fresno City Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on June 16, 2004, to review the proposed subdivision and considered the staff report and invited testimony with respect to the proposed subdivision; and, WHEREAS,the Planning and Development Department staff recommended approval of the proposed project subject to all conditions of approval contained in the staff report dated June 16, 2004; and, WHEREAS, the Fresno City Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that there is no substantial evidence in the record to indicate that Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295 may have a significant effect on the environment as identified by the Mitigated Negative Declaration issued on May 12, 2004, prepared for Environmental Assessment No. A-03-22/R-03-69/R-03-84/T-5258/T-5295. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the Fresno City Planning Commission finds that approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295 subject to Section 12-403-B of the Fresno Municipal Code, is consistent with the adopted 2025 Fresno General Plan and the Roosevelt Community Plan, as amended by Plan Amendment Application No.A-03-22,and the findings required pursuant to Section 66410 et. seq. of the Government Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Fresno City Planning Commission hereby approves Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295 subject to the Planning and Development Department Conditions of Approval dated May 12, 2004 and subject to the following additions to the Conditions of Approval pursuant to the Planning Commission action of June 16, 2004: 110. The developer/owner shall reduce the number of lots by two in the northwest portion of Tract No. 5258. 111. There shall be no pedestrian bridge crossing the realigned Fancher Creek canal. 112. The proposed multi-purpose trail shall incorporate natural trail features and avoid permanent concrete or asphalt type surfaces. 113. The developer and the City shall meet with the Fresno.Irrigation District to design an earthened canal and not a lined canal for the proposed realigned Fancher Creek canal. 114. The three cul-de-sac streets which abut the proposed realigned Fancher.Creek canal shall have wrought iron safety gates installed in a manner that would serve as a safety device. The foregoing Resolution was adopted by the Fresno City Planning Commission upon a motion by Commissioner Brown, seconded by Commissioner Vang. Planning Commission Resolution No. 12037 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295 Page 2 June 16, 2004 VOTING: Ayes - Brown, Vang, Kissler, Brand Noes - None Not Voting - None Absent - DiBuduo DATED: June 16, 2004 NICK P. YOVINO, Secretary Fresno City Planning Commission Resolution No. 12035 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5258 Filed by Sunnyside Ranch Action: Approve KAMaster Files-2003\-PLAN AMENDMENTS\A-03-22,R-03-89,84,T-5295,T-5258(Ailanlian)-MS\T-5295-PC Reso 12037.wpd CITY OF FRESNO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL May 21, 2004(Revised June 16, 2004) VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NOS. 5258 and 5295 West side of South Clovis Avenue, between the San Joaquin Valley Railroad and a point 350 feet South of the East Church Avenue Alignment All tentative maps are subject to the applicable provisions of the State Subdivision Map Act, Fresno Municipal Code, City policies, and City of Fresno Standard Specifications. The following specific conditions are applicable to this vesting tentative map. NOTICE TO PROJECT APPLICANT In accordance with the provisions of Government Code §66020(d)(1), the Imposition of fees, dedications, reservations or exactions for this project are subject to protest by the project applicant at the time of approval or conditional approval of the development or within 90 days after the date of the imposition of the fees,dedications,reservations or exactions imposed on the development project. GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. Upon conditional approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5258 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295 entitled "Exhibit A,"dated June 8, 2004, the subdivider may prepare a Final Map in accordance with the approved tentative map. 2. Submit grading plans and a soils report to the City of Fresno Planning and Development Department for verification prior to Final Map approval (Reference: Sections 12-1022 and 12-1023 of the Fresno Municipal Code). Grading plans shall indicate the location of any required walls and indicate the proposed width of required landscape easements or strips. Approval of the grading plan is required prior to Final Map approval. 3. At the time of Final Map submittal, the subdivider shall submit engineered construction plans to the City of Fresno Public Works, Public Utilities, and Planning and Development Departments for grading, public sanitary sewer system,public water system,street lighting system, public streets, and storm drainage, including other technical reports and engineered plans as necessary to construct the required public improvements and work and applicable processing fees. Engineered construction plans shall be approved by the City prior to the approval of the Final Map. If, at the time of Final Map approval, such plans have not been approved, the subdivider shall provide performance security in an amount established by the City to guarantee the completion of plans. 4. Public utilities easements, as necessary, shall be shown on the Final Map and dedicated to the City of Fresno. Public utility easements beyond the limits of the Final Map, but CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Nos. 5258 and 5295 Page 2 May 21, 2004 required as a condition of development,shall be acquired at the subdivider's cost and shall be dedicated by separate instrument at the time of Final Map approval. The relocation of existing utilities necessitated by the required public improvements shall be paid for by the subdivider. The subdivider is responsible to contact the appropriate utility company for information. 5. Comply with the conditions, policies and standards set forth in the City of Fresno, Municipal Code,Article 10, Chapter 12, 'Subdivision of Real Property"; Resolution No.68-187,"City Policy with Respect to Subdivisions"; and City of Fresno Standard Specifications, 2002 Edition, and any amendments thereto. 6. The developer/owner shall pay applicable fees for,but not limited to, plan checks for street improvements and other grading and construction;street trees,street signs,water service, sewering,and inspections in accordance with the City of Fresno Master Fee Schedule(City Resolution Nos.79-606 and No.80-420)and any amendments, modifications,or additions thereto;and in accordance with the requirements of State law as related to vesting tentative maps. 7. The subdivider shall furnish to the City acceptable security to guarantee the construction of the off-site street improvements in accordance with all applicable provisions of the Fresno Municipal Code and the State Subdivision Map Act. The subdivider shall complete all the public improvements prior to the approval of the Final Map by the City. If, at the time of Final Map approval, any public improvements have not been completed and accepted in accordance with the standards of.the City, the subdivider may elect to enter into an agreement with the City to thereafter guarantee the completion of the improvements. 8.. As a condition of Final Map approval, the subdivider shall furnish to the City a subdivision guarantee listing all parties having any right,title or interest and the nature of their interest per State law. 9. Relinquish access rights to South.Clovis Avenue, East Church Avenue, South Minnewawa Avenue and South Sundance Avenue from all residential lots which abut these streets. Ref. Section 12-1011-f-3.of the Fresno. Municipal Code. LANDSCAPING AND WALLS 10. Provide a 15-foot landscape easement(and irrigation system)along South Clovis and East Church Avenue and a 10-foot landscape easement (and irrigation system) along South Sundance Avenue in accordance with adopted plan policies. The easement will include appropriate pedestrian paths per Public Works standards. 10.a. Pursuant to the 1990 Master Multi-Purpose Trails Manual Policy Nos. 3.2.2, 3.2.3, and 4.3.1, pursuant to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Exhibit 9 and.Policies E-15-a, E-15-b, E- 15-d, E-15-e, E-15-k, E-15-x,'.within the limits of the tract, the developer/owner shall construct appropriate improvements or provide appropriate security for the improvement. of the entire 30-foot wide multi-purpose trail to be constructed along the east side of the newly aligned Fancher Creek Canal along the west boundary of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. T-5258. 11. Provide a 20-foot landscape easement (and irrigation system) along South Minnewawa Avenue in accordance with the Boulevard Area Treatment overly zone district. The landscape easement(and irrigation system)will be located along the side or rear property CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Nos. 5258 and 5295 Page 3 . May 21,2004 lines of lots which side-onto or back-onto South Minnewawa Avenue. Ref. Section 12- 10114-3, Fresno Municipal Code. When the grading plan establishes a top of slope beyond the required landscape easement noted and the construction of the required wall is to be established coincident with the top of slope then the required minimum easement width shall be expanded to include the full landscaped area up to the wall location. 12. Maintenance of the required 10, 15 and 20 foot landscape easements along South Sundance, South Clovis, East Church, and South Minnewawa Avenues may be the responsibility of the City's Community Facilities District No. 2. Contact the Public Works Department,Engineering Services Division staff for information regarding the City's District. The property owners shall petition the City for annexation to the City's District prior to final map approval_ 12.a. The applicant shall make a reasonable effort to relocate the existing palm trees along South Sundance Avenue as a landscape feature. 13. If the developer/subdivider elects to petition for annexation into the City's Community Facilities District No. 2, he/she shall be required to provide the City of Fresno, Department of Public Works, with a petition consisting of the following items: • A letter(petition)from the landowner or the owner's representative requesting the Final Tract be placed into the District. The name,address, phone number and fax number of the developer/landowner must be included in the letter. See attached letter form. • A District Tentative Plan for the entire tentative map, signed by the landowner/ developer,showing landscaping locations and total areas by type to be added to the District. The plan will also show locations, areas by type, and quantities of any other features to be added to the District. • Complete plans for the current final tract map showing all features to be added to the District. 14. Should the City Council not approve the annexation of such landscape areas into Community Facilities District No. 2, then the property owner/developer shall create a homeowners.association for the maintenance of the landscape areas. The proposed Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CCBR's) and the proposed instruments for the homeowner's association shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department for review two (2) weeks prior to final map approval. Said documents shall be recorded with the final map or alternatively submit recorded documents or documents for recording prior to final acceptance of subdivision improvements. Said documents shall include assignment of responsibility to the owner's association for landscaping and other provisions as stated in the Development Department Guidelines for preparation of CCBR's dated January 11, 1985. 15. Improvement plans for all required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department for review prior to Final Map approval. 16. Construct a 7 to 10.5400t high solid masonry wall along the all lots which back onto or side onto South Clovis,East Church and along the northerly boundary of Vesting Tentative Tract CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Nos. 5258 and 5295 Page 4 May 21, 2004 Map No. T-5258. Wall heights may vary in accordance with noise study prepared by Brown-Buntin and Associates dated March 2, 2004, (solid wall to meet the requirements of Section 12-306-H, Fresno Municipal Code). Construction plans for required walls showing architectural appearance and location of all walls shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department for review prior to Final Map approval. A six-foot masonry wall shall be constructed all remaining lots which back onto or side onto the south boundary of T-5258 and T-5295,the west boundary of T-5258,and all lots which back onto South Sundance and East Church Avenue. BUILDING SETBACKS 17. Building.setbacks shall be in accordance with the.R-1 zone district and the provisions of Fresno Municipal Code Section 12-207.5-E-1-c.standards as shown on Exhibit "A" of Tentative Tract No. 5258/UGM and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. T-5295 dated June 8, 2004 for those lots abutting Clovis, Church, and Minnewawa Avenues(Ref. Section 12- 240.5-E of the Fresno Municipal Code). 18. Building setback lines shall be as shown on Exhibit "A" dated June 8, 2004. A 10-foot building setback is required on the southerly side of Key Lots 243, 244,.249, 250, 255,256 of Vesting Tentative Tract map No. 5258 and Key Lots 69, 81, 101, and 102 of Vesting tentative tract Map No. 5295 to help minimize the impact to neighboring lots in accordance with Fresno Municipal Code Section 12-1011. INFORMATION 19. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295 is subject.to .Council approval of related Plan Amendment Application No. A-03-22 and Rezone Application No. R-03-84. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5258 is subject to Council.approval of Rezone Application No. R- 03-69. 20. Prior to the issuance of building permits for the subdivision, school construction fees shall be paid to the Sanger Unified or the Fresno Unified School District in accordance with the school district's adopted schedule of fees. 21. Contact the United States Postal Service, Fresno Office, for the location and type of mailboxes to be installed in this subdivision. 22. Pursuant to Section 66456.1 of the Subdivision Map Act, which states "The right of the subdivider to file multiple Final Maps shall not limit the authority of the local agency to impose reasonable conditions relating to the filing of multiple Final Maps,"any multiple final maps filed by the subdivider on this tract shall fully and independently conform to all provisions of Fresno Municipal Code Chapter 12,Article 10, Subdivision of Real Property. 23. The developer/owner shall obtain any and all permits required for the removal or demolition of any existing building or structure located within the subdivision boundaries. The developer/owner shall also obtain any and all permits required for the proper abandonment/closure of any existing water well, septic tank/leach field or cesspool, and irrigation pipeline on the subject property. All such permits shall be obtained prior to commencement of tract grading work, in accordance with Chapter 13 of the Fresno Municipal Code. ■ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Nos. 5258 and 5295 Page 5 May 21, 2004 24. If archaeological and/or animal fossil material is encountered during project surveying, grading, excavating, or construction,work shall stop immediately. If there are suspected human remains, the Fresno County Coroner shall be immediately contacted (business hours: 559-268-0109; after hours the contact. phone number is 559488-3111 for the Fresno County Sheriffs Department). If remains or other archaeological material is possibly Native American in origin,the Native American Heritage Commission (phone number 916-653-4082) shall be immediately contacted, and the California Archaeological Inventory/Southem San Joaquin Valley Information Center(phone number 805-644-2289) shall be contacted to obtain a referral list of recognized archaeologists. An archaeological assessment shall be conducted for the project, the site shall be formally recorded, and recommendations made to the City as to any further site investigation or site avoidance/preservation measures. If animal fossils are uncovered, the Museum of Paleontology at U.C. Berkeley shall be contacted to obtain a referral list of recognized paleontologists. An assessment shall be conducted by a paleontologist; if the paleontologist determines the material to be significant, a recommendation shall be made to the City as to any further site investigation or preservation measures. 25. Apportionment of Special Assessment: If,as part of this subdivision,a division will be made of any lot or parcel of land upon which.there is an unpaid special assessment levied under any State or local.law, including a division into condominium interest as defined in Section 783 of the Civil Code, the developer/owner shall file a written application with the City of Fresno Director of Public Works, requesting apportionment of the unpaid portion of the assessment or pay off such assessment in full. If the subdivider elects to apportion the assessment, the application shall contain the following information: a. A full description of each assessed lot, parcel or interest to.be divided and of how such lot, parcel or interest will be.divided; b. A request that the Engineer apportion the amount remaining unpaid on the assessment in accordance with applicable law; and C. Written consent of the owner(s)of each such.lot, parcel, or interest to the requested apportionment. The application shall be filed prior to the approval of the Final Map(s) by the City and shall be accompanied by a fee in an amount specified in the Master Fee Resolution for each separate lot, parcel,.or interest into which the original assessed lot, parcel or interest is to be divided. The fee shall be in an amount sufficient to pay all costs of the City and the Engineer of Work responsible for determining .the initial assessment in making the requested apportionment. 26. The subdivider shall comply with Regulation VIII of the San Joaquin Valley Air Quality Pollution Control District for the control of particulate matter and fugitive dust during construction of this project. A letter dated January 30, 2004 from the Air District outlines other suggested measures to reduce air emissions from this project. 27. Solid waste disposal for the subdivision shall be provided by the City of Fresno. The CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Nos. 5258 and 5295 Page 6 May 21, 2004 method of collection to be utilized in this tract shall be subject to approval of the Solid Waste Manager. PARK SERVICE 28. The developer/owner shall comply with the requirements in the attached memorandums from the Parks Division dated March 17, 2004, for Vesting Tentative Tract No. 5258 and March 22, 2004 for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295. 28.a. Furthermore, the applicant shall deed to the City of Fresno Outlot."A" as depicted on Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.5258 dated March 12,2004 forthe purposes of developing a future multi-purpose trail. 28.b. The project applicant shall also deed to the City of Fresno Outlots "B" and "C for future open space use or location of a water well site as depicted on Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5258 dated June 8, 2004. FIRE SERVICE 29. Fire service will be provided by County of Fresno Fire Station No.88. The project is subject to UGM Fire service fees for Fire Station 15. Provide residential fire hydrants and fire flows per Public Works Standards with two.sources of water. 30. Access is acceptable as shown. There shall be at least two points of access to the subdivision during construction. Comply with the memorandum dated January 23, 2004 from the Fire Department for the entire project site. STREETS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY 31. The subdivider shall furnish to the city acceptable security to guarantee the construction of the off-site street improvements in accordance with all applicable provisions of the Fresno Municipal Code and the State Subdivision Map Act. 32. The subdivider shall make provisions for disabled persons in accordance with the Department of Public Works.standards and as.required by State law. Handicap access ramps are required to be constructed in sidewalks at all corners within the limits of the tract. Where street furniture is located within the sidewalk area(fire hydrants, streetlights, etc.), a minimum of 48 inches of unobstructed path shall be maintained to satisfy the American Disabilities Act requirements. If necessary, dedicate a pedestrian easement to accommodate for the 4-foot minimum unobstructed path requirement. 33. All of the required street improvements shall be constructed and/or installed in accordance with the City of Fresno Standard.Specifications (2002 Edition). 34. The subdivider shall install all existing .and proposed utility systems underground in accordance with Fresno Municipal Code Section 12-1011(H). 35. The subdivider shall construct an underground street lighting system per Public Works Standards E-1 and E-2 within the limits of the tract. Spacing and design shall conform to Public Works Standards for local streets. Height, type, spacing, etc., of standards and luminaires shall be in accordance with Resolutions Nos. 68-187, 78-522, 81-219 and 88-229 or any modification thereto approved by the City Traffic Engineer prior to Final Map CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Nos. 5258 and 5295 Page 7 May 21, 2004 approval. Upon completion of the work by the subdivider and acceptance of the work by the City, the street lighting system shall be dedicated to the City. Submit engineered construction plans to the Public Works Department for approval. 36. All dead-end streets created by this subdivision shall be properly barricaded in accordance with City.standards (Public Works Standard P-44)within seven (7) days from the time the streets are surfaced or as directed by the Engineer. 37. The developer shall comply with Rule 8060 of the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District for the control of fugitive dust requirements from paved and unpaved roads. 38. Handicap access ramps are required at all corners within the limits of this tract. Identify corner cut dedications on all interior streets. 39. All required signing and striping shall be done and paid for by the developer/owner. The signing and striping plans shall be done per the current Caltrans standards and shall be submitted along with the street construction plans for this tentative map to the Public Works Department. Frontage Improvement Reauirements: Major Streets: South Clovis Avenue: Arterial 40. Construct concrete sidewalk to Public Works Standard P-5. The sidewalk pattern shall be constructed to a 10-foot residential Pattern. 41. Construct an underground street lighting system to Public Works Standard E-1 within the limits of this subdivision. Spacing and design shall conform to Public Works Standard E-7 for Arterial streets. 42. Construct twenty(20)fet of permanent.paving within the limits of Vesting tentative Tract Map Nos. T-5258 and T-5295. 43. Construct an eighty(80)foot bus.bay at the comer of Clovis and Church and Clovis and California. Concrete curb, gutter, and 10' monolithic sidewalk shall be constructed per Public Works Standard Drawing P-73. 44. Relinquish direct vehicular access rights to South Clovis Avenue from all lots within the limits of Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. T-5258 and T-5295. East Church Avenue: Collector 45. Dedicate 47 to 55 feet of property, from center line, both sides, for public street purposes within the limits of this subdivision to comply with the Church Avenue Official Plan Line and the current City of Fresno Collector Standards. 46. Construct concrete curb,gutter and sidewalk to Public Works Standard P-5. Construct the sidewalk to a 10-foot residential pattem (both sides). 47. Construct 20 feet of permanent paving (measured from face of curb) within the limits of Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. T-5258 and T-5295. L CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Nos. 5258 and 5295 Page 8 May 21,2004 48. Construct an underground street lighting system to Public Works Standard E-1 within the limits of Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos. T-5258 and T-5295. Spacing and design shall conform to Public Works Standard E-8 for Collector streets. 49, Construct an eighty (80) foot bus bay at the northwest corner of Clovis and Church. Concrete curb, gutter, and 10' monolithic sidewalk shall be constructed per Public Works Standard Drawing P-73. 50. Relinquish direct vehicular access rights to East Church Avenue from all lots within the limits of Vesting Tentative Tract Map Nos.T-5258 and T-5295. 51. Construct a concrete raised median 3 feet wide by 350 feet long in the center of Church from the West boundary of lot 258 to the east boundary of lot 253 of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. T-5358. South Minnewawa Avenue: Collector 52. Dedicate 35 feet of property,from center line,(both sides)for public street purposes within the limits of this subdivision to meet the City of Fresno's Collector Standards. 53. Construct concrete curb,gutter and sidewalk to Public Works Standard P-5. Construct the sidewalk to a 10 foot residential.pattern. (Both sides) 54. Construct 20 feet of permanent paving (both sides)within the limits of Vesting Tentative Tact Map No. 5358. 55. Construct an eighty(80)foot bus bay at the southwest comer of.Minnewawa and Church Avenues with curb and gutter with a 10-foot monolithic sidewalk to be constructed to Public Works Standard Drawing P-73. 56. Construct an underground street lighting system to.Public Works Standard E-1,within the limits of this development. Spacing and design shall conform to Public Works Standard E-8 for collector streets. 57. Design with a minimum 500 feet and 600 feet center line curve radii, respectively from Church Avenue based on a 40 MPH speed design. 58. Relinguish direct vehicular access rights to South Minnewawa Avenue from all lots within this subdivision. Local Streets: Dewitt Avenue 59. Dedicate 20 feet of property,from center line,for.public street purposes as shown by Outlot "D"of Vesting Tentative Tract map No.5258 within the limits of this subdivision to meet the current City of Fresno's Local Street Standards. Developer shall install"No Stopping"signs along the east side of Dewitt Avenue 60. Construct concrete curb,gutter and sidewalk to Public Works Standard P-5. Construct the sidewalk to a 10-foot residential pattern. 61. Construct an underground street lighting system to Public Works Standard E-2, within the CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Nos. 5258 and 5295 Page 9 May 21, 2004 limits of this development. Spacing and design shall conform to Public Works Standard E-9 for local streets. 62. Construct 20 feet of.permanent paving within the limits of Vesting Tentative Tact Map No. 5358. Interior Streets: 63. Design and construct all curb,gutter,sidewalk(both sides),permanent paving,cul-de-sacs, and underground street lighting systems on all interior local streets to Public Works Standards. Sidewalk patterns shall comply with Public Works Standards for fifty(50),fifty- four(54) and sixty(60)foot streets. Any dead end streets created by this subdivision shall be properly barricaded in accordance with the Public Works Standard P-44. Specific Conditions Reguirements: 64. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. T-5258 is proposing a 258-lot single family residential subdivision while Vesting Tentative Trat Map No. T-5295 is proposing a 123-lot single family subdivision. This project will generate 285 a.m./385 p.m.peak hour trips,therefore, a Traffic Impact Study(TIS)is required to comply with the mitigation measure requirements of the 2025 General Plan circulation element. A project trip generation and trip trace study shall be prepared and submitted to Traffic Planning prior to a TIS "scope" meeting being set. A traffic,impact study has been submitted.by the developer and reviewed by city staff. 65. The traffic index for South Sundance Avenue shall be 6.0. 66. The first order of work shall include a minimum of two points of vehicular access for any phase of this development. 67. Inigation/Canal Requirements:The developer shall enter into an agreement with the Fresno Irrigation District providing for piping the canal(s) and submit an executed copy ofthe agreement or commitment letter from FID to the Planning and Development Department. AA.piping shall be located outside the proposed right-of-way. Any piping across city streets shall be rubber gasketed reinforced concrete pipe(RGRCP)constructed perpendicular to the street. Submit engineered plans to Public Works Department, Engineering Division for review and approval. 68. Relinguish direct vehicular access rights to the trail from the East Lorena, East Florence, and East Pitt Avenue cul-de-sacs. 69. The terminus of the following streets in Tract No. 5258 are unacceptable: a. West Lorena Avenue adjacent to Lot 240 b. East Florence Avenue adjacent to Lot 234. C. South Rogers Lane adjacent to Lot 232. d. East Pitt Avenue adjacent to Lot 210. e. South Walling Avenue adjacent to Lot 210. 70. The terminus of the following streets in Tract No. 5295 are unacceptable: a. East Lorena Avenue adjacent to Lot 13. B. South walling Avenue adjacent to Lot 16. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Nos. 5258 and 5295 Page 10 May 21, 2004 C. South Rogers Avenue adjacent to Lot 24. D. East tower Avenue adjacent to Lot 68. The developer shall re-design in order to control the potential street right-of-way to those streets proposed by Tract Map Nos. T-5258 and T-5295.. UGM Requirements: 71. This Map is in UGM major street zone D-1/E-2; therefore pay all applicable UGM Fees. South Clovis Avenue: Arterial 72. Signalize the intersection of Clovis and:California complete with actuation, signal pre- emption and left tum phasing. 73. Dedicate and construct a raised concrete median island from the northerly limits to Church Avenue, where missing. 74. The developer shall contact the Southern Pacific Railroad to coordinate at-grade railroad crossing improvements. East Church Avenue: Collector 75. Construct two (2) seventeen (17)foot center section travel lanes along the East Church Avenue frontage within the westerly limits.of Tract No. 5295 east to.the intersection of Clovis and Church Avenues and construct two.(2)seventeen(17)foot center section travel lanes along the East Church Avenue frontage from the east boundary of Lot 208, west to a point approximately 1/4 mile west of Minnewawa (up to the existing UGM section to the west). 76. Complete the signalization of Church and Clovis by installing any necessary equipment to fully actuate the signal. 77. Design and construct a.major street Bridge,at the intersection of Church Avenue and the Washington Colony Canal. South Minnewawa Avenue: Collector 78. Dedicate and construct two 17' center section travel lanes within the limits of this subdivision. 79. Install three(3) signal poles with 150-watt safety lights to Public Works standards at the intersection of South Minnewawa and east Church Avenue. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE The nearest existing sewer main is a 54-inch.sewer main located in East Church Avenue. The following conditions are required to provide sanitary sewer service to the tract. 80. Extension of a 15-inch sewer main and a 12-inch sewer main in South Clovis Avenue from East Church Avenue north across the project frontage. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Nos. 5258 and 5295 Page 11 May 21, 2004 81. Sanitary sewer mains shall be extended within the proposed tract to provide sewer service to each lot created. 82. Separate sewer house branches shall be provided for each lot created. 83. Public sewer facilities shall be constructed in accordance with the Department of Public Works standards, specifications and policies. 84. Engineered improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted for Department of Public Utilities review and approvals for proposed additions to the sanitary sewer system. 85. A Preliminary sewer design layout shall be submitted for review and subject to Department of Public Utilities review and approvals prior to submitting engineered improvement plans for City approvals. WATER SERVICE There are existing 16-inch water mains located in South Clovis and East Church Avenues. The following conditions are required to provide water service to the tract. Water mains shall be installed before street improvements and paving. 86. Construct a 14-inch transmission grid water main(including installation of City fire hydrants) in East Califomia Avenue from South Clovis Avenue to East Church Avenue. 87. Construct a water supply well(s)on a site(s) dedicated to the City of Fresno. The well(s) shall be capable of.producing a minimum total. demand of 1000 gallons per minute, sufficient to serve peak water demand for the project. Well sites shall be of a size and at a location acceptable to the Water Systems Manager. 88. Water well construction shall include wellhead treatment facilities, if required. 89. Water mains (including installation of City fire hydrants) shall be extended within the proposed tract to provide water service to each lot created. 90. Separate water services with meter boxes shall be provided to each lot created. 91. Installation of public fire hydrant(s) is required in accordance with city.standards. 92. Two independent sources of water, meeting Federal and State Drinking Water Act Standards, are required to serve the tract including any subsequent phases thereof. The two-source requirement may be accomplished through any combination of water main extensions, construction of supply wells, or other acceptable sources of water supply approved by the Water Systems Manager. 93. All public water facilities shall be constructed in accordance with City of Fresno Department of Public Works standards, specifications, and policies. 94. Engineered improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer are required for proposed additions to the city water system. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Nos. 5258 and 5295 Page 12 May 21,2004 Public Utilities Department, Solid Waste Division 95. The owners, lessees or other tenants of the residential dwellings must, on service days before 6:00 a.m., place their solid waste containers at the edge of the curb approximately four (4) feet apart and not blocking any vehicle accesses in accordance with the City of Fresno's Solid Waste Management.Division Standards. 96. There shall be no parking allowed in the street,in any cul-de-sac,on the solid waste service day. This applies to any lot that is in whole or part of a cul-de-sac. 97. The following lots shall be clear of all vehicles before 6:00 a.m. on the solid waste service day: Lots 11, 12,13, 14,and 15 on East Street. Lots 131, 132, 133, 134, 215, 216,and 240 on East Lorena Avenue. Lots 141, 142, 143 and 144 on East Florence Avenue. .Lots 231, 232, and 233 on South Rogers Avenue. Lots 151, 152, and 153 on East Pitt Avenue Lots 178, 179, 180, 181, and 182 on South Playa Avenue. Lots 183, 184, 185, 186, and 187 on South Playa Avenue. Lots 206, 207,208, 209, and 210 on South Walling Avenue. Lots 254, 255, 256, and 257 on South Rabe Avenue. Lots 242, 243, 244, and 245 on South Perry Avenue. Lots 100, 101, 102 and 103 on.South Walling Avenue. Lots 114, 115, 116, 117 and.118 on East.Edna Avenue. 98. Developer shall provide through streets on South Walling, South Rogers, East Pitt, east Truman, east Belgravia, and East Tower. All streets must connect to another street to provide a path for Solid Waste trucks. if these streets do not connect, then a truck tum around must be provided. Turnaround must provide for a truck with a 44-foot turning radius. 99. Lots 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, and 252 on South DeWitt will be required to move their containers to the north edge of the property line of lots 247 and 252, along East Church Avenue to be serviced. Alternatively, A temporary turnaround will have to be provided at the end of South Dewitt so that Solid Waste trucks can turnaround. Turnaround must provide for a truck with a 44-foot tuming radius. This condition will require a covenant. Fresno Irrigation Di§trict FID's Washington Colony No. 15, Central No. 23 and Fancher Creek No. 6 canals traverse the proposed project area. 100. Fresno Irrigation District (FID) requests that the applicant grant an exclusive canal easement to FID and concrete line, encase in box culvert or other approved means to protect canal integrity, the above mentioned canals across the proposed development in accordance with FID standards,and that the applicant enter into an agreement with FID for that purpose. The applicant will need to meet with FID to determine canal alignment and required canal dimensions. CONDITIONS OF APPROVE Vesting Tentative Tract Nos. 5258 and 5295 Page 13 May 21, 2004 101. FID requests that its easement be shown on the map with proper recording information, and that FID be made a party to signing all plans which affect its easement and canal/pipeline facility and also be made a party to signing all plans which affect its easement and canal/pipeline facility and also be made a party to signing the final map. 102. FID will reserve further comment on the subject proposal until the regular agency process for site plan review, tract map, or parcel map review is completed. Design standards for the realigned Fancher Creek Canal shall be determined by the Fresno Irrigation District. 103. The project applicant shall deed Outlot"E"of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5258 dated March 12, 2004 to the Fresno Irrigation District for the.purpose of canal realignment of Fancher Creek. Right-of-Way Acquisition 104. The developer will be responsible for the acquisition of any necessary right-of-way to construct any of the required improvements. Rights-of--way acquisition shall include any rights-of-way necessary for proper drainage, signing, pole relocation, and shoulder grading. In general, this will require right-of-way to be provided approximately 10 feet outside the travel lane. The exact requirement must be determined at the project design stage based on the existing conditions and detailed design information. In the event an acquisition of any easement or right-of-way is necessitated by the subject development, said acquisition will be accomplished prior to Final Map approval. The developer/owner should contact the Real Estate Section of the Public Works Department to receive procedural guidance in such acquisitions. Should such acquisition not be accomplished by the subdivider prior to Final Map approval, the subdivider must request and grant to the City the full authority to attempt acquisition either through negotiation .or through its power of eminent domain. The subdivider shall furnish to the City Public Works Department,Engineering Division/Real Estate Section,an appraisal report or a request for an estimated appraisal amount(to be determined by the City of Fresno Real Estate Section) prior to preparation of a Subdivision Agreement. The subdivider shall submit adequate security in the form of a cash deposit to guarantee payment of all costs associated with the acquisition, including staff time, attomey's fees, appraisal fees, court costs, and all related expenditures and costs necessary to effect the acquisition of such easements or rights-of-way. FLOOD CONTROL AND DRAINAGE 105. The subdivider shall be required to pay any applicable storm drainage fees to comply with Fresno Municipal Code Chapter 13, Article 13. 106. The subdivider shall be required to comply with the specific requirements imposed by the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District(FMFCD)forthe subdivision or any amendments or modifications to those requirements which may be granted by the FMFCD Board of Directors, pursuant to Section 13-1307 of the Fresno Municipal Code. These requirements are identified in the District's letter to the Planning and Development Department dated April 24, 2004 and April 29, 2004. 107. Any temporary ponding basins constructed or enlarged to provide service to the subdivision o CONDITIONS OF APPROV. Vesting Tentative Tract Nos. 5258 and 5295 Page 14 May 21, 2004 shall be fenced in accordance with City standards within seven(7)days from the time the basin becomes operational or as directed by the City Engineer. Temporary ponding basins will be created through a covenant between the City and the Developer prior to final map approval.. Maintenance of the temporary ponding basin shall be by the Developer until permanent service for the entire subdivision is provided. DEVELOPMENT FEES AND CHARGES 108. This project is subject to the following development fees and charges: MISCELLANEOUS 109. The applicant shall comply with the mitigation measures regarding the Clovis and Church Avenue intersection and the Clovis and Jensen Intersection and fair share cost assessment as outlined by the Public Works-Traffic Division letter dated May 27, 2004. 110. The developer/owner shall reduce the number of lots by two in the northwest portion of Tract No. 5258. 111. There shall be no pedestrian bridge crossing the realigned Fancher Creek canal. 112. The proposed multi-purpose .trail shall incorporate natural trail features and avoid permanent concrete or asphalt type surfaces. 113. The developer and the City shall meet with the Fresno Irrigation District to design an earthened canal and.not a lined canal.for the proposed realigned Fancher Creek canal. 114. The three cul-de-sac streets which abut the proposed realigned Fancher Creek canal shall have wrought iron safety gates installed in a manner that would serve as a safety device. PARKS DEPARTMENT FEE/RATE a. Street Tree Landscape Plan Review fee $56..00 b. Street Tree Installation fee $129.00/tree City installed tree c. Street Tree Inspection fee $30.00/tree Developer installed tree d. Maintenance District Plan Review fee $176.00 e. Maintenance District Inspection fee $305.00 f. Reinspection Fee $29/Hour FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FEE/ RATE g. Metropolitan Flood Control District Fee + Contact FMFCD for new fees. Rates increased as of March 1, 2003 s CONDITIONS OF APPROVA. . Vesting Tentative Tract Nos. 5258 and 5295 Page 15 May 21, 2004 SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES FEE RATE h. Lateral Sewer Charge $0.10/sq. ft. (to 100' depth) i. Oversize Charge $0.05/sq. ft. (to 100' depth) j. Trunk Sewer Charge n/a Service Area: k. Wastewater Facilities Charge $2,119/living unit I. House Branch Sewer Charge n/a m. Millbrook Overlay Sewer n/a WATER CONNECTION CHARGES FEE RATE n. Service Connection Charge Fee based on service(s)and meter(s) sizes specified by owner; fee for service(s) and Meter(s) established by the Master Fee Schedule. o. Frontage Charge $6.50/lineal foot p. Transmission Grid Main Charge $560/gross acre q. Transmission Grid Main Bond Debt Service Charge $243/gross acre r. UGM Water Supply Fee $507/living unit Service Area: 501-S s. Well Head Treatment Fee $207/living unit Service Area: 501 t. Recharge Fee $61/living unit Service Area: 501 u. 1994 Bond Debt Service $244/living unit Service Area: 501 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE v. Northeast Fresno Policing Area n/a URBAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT FEE RATE/CHARGE` w. UGM Fire Station Capital Fee $605/living unit Service Area: .15 x. UGM Park Fee $1.650/gross acre Service Area: 2 s • CONDITIONS OF APPROVA Vesting Tentative Tract Nos. 5158 and 5295 Page 16 May 21,2004 y. Major Street Charge $2180/adj. acre Service Area: D-1/E-2 z. Major Street Bridge Charge $210/adj. acre Service Area: D-1/E-2 aa. Traffic Signal Charge $860/adj. acre bb. UGM Grade Separation Fee n/a cc. Trunk Sewer Charge n/a Service Area: dd. "Street Acquisition/Construction Charge $40,011.00(APN 481-040-11) KAMaster Files-20031-PLAN AMENDMENTSW-03-22,R-03-69,84,T-5295,T-5258(Ailan)ian)—MS1T-5258-7-5295-COA.wpd i CONDITIONS OF APPROVA, Vesting Tentative Tract Nos. 5258 and 5295 Page 15 May 21,2004 n. Service Connection Charge Fee based on service(s)and meter(s)sizes specified by owner;fee for service(s) and Meter(s) established by the Master Fee Schedule. o. Frontage Charge $6.50/lineal foot p. Transmission Grid Main Charge $560/gross acre q. Transmission Grid Main Bond Debt Service Charge $243/gross acre r. UGM Water Supply Fee $507/living unit Service Area: 501-S s. Well Head Treatment Fee $207/living unit Service Area: 501 t. Recharge Fee $61/living unit Service Area: 501 u. 1994 Bond Debt Service $244/living unit Service Area: 501 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE v. Northeast Fresno Policing Area n/a URBAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT FEE RATE/CHARGE• w. UGM Fire Station Capital Fee $605/living unit Service Area: 15 x. UGM Park Fee $1650/gross acre Service Area: 2 y. Major Street Charge $2180/adj. acre Service Area: D-1/E-2 z. Major Street Bridge Charge $210/adj. acre Service Area: D-1/E-2 aa. Traffic Signal Charge $860/adj. acre bb. UGM Grade Separation Fee n/a cc. Trunk Sewer Charge n/a Service Area: dd. *Street Acquisition/Construction Charge $40,011.00 (APN 481-040-11) PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO: Mike Sanchez, Planner III Development Department FROM: HILARY KIMBER,Parks Supervisor 11(621-2924) DATE: March 17,2004 Subject: Tentative Subdivision Map T-5258(Located on the West Side of South Clovis Avenue between East Church and East California Avenues) The Parks Department has reviewed the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map drawn by Ingels-Braun& Associates,Civil Engineering and Land Surveying prepared for Sunnyside Ranch Estates, dated 11/03/03. Parks offers the following comments regarding the street tree, and buffer/parkway strip conditions . . . 1. STREET TREE REQUIREMENTS A. Street trees shall be planted at the rate of one tree for each 60' of street frontage,or one tree per lot, whichever is greater. The subdivider is required to provide street trees on all public street frontages and the dedication of applicable planting and buffer landscaping easements. The subdivider is required to provide automatic drip irrigation for all street trees. B. The street tree species are designated for the following rights of way: S.Clovis Ave. Platanus acerifolia `Columbia' (Columbia Sycamore) S. `B'Ave. Fraxinus `Autumn Purple' (Ash Autumn Purple) S. WallingAve. Koelreuteria paniculata(Golden Raintree) S.Rogers Ave. Ginkgo biloba Autumn Gold'or 'Fairmont'(Maidenhair Tree) S. Perry Ave Nyssa sylvatica(Black Tupelo). S.Rabe Ave. Pistacia chinensis(Chinese Pistache) S.Dewitt Ave. Alnus cordata(Italian Alder) S.Minnewawa Ave. Cinnamomum camphora(Camphor) E. Erin Ave. Cercis canadensis `Oklahoma' (Eastern Redbud) E Christine Ave. Fraxinus`Autumn Purple' (Ash Autumn Purple) E Atchison Ave. Ginkgo biloba `Autumn Gold'or`Fairmont' (Maidenhair Tree) E. Geary Ave. Celtis australis(European Hackberry) E.Lorena Ave. Sapium sebiferum(Chinese Tallow) E.Florence Ave. Pistacia chinensis(Chinese Pistache) E. Pitt Ave. Quercus virginiana(Southern Live Oak) E. Truman Ave. Nyssa sylvatica(Black Tupelo) E.Belgravia Ave. Celtis australis(European Hackberry) E. Tower Ave. Sophora japonica(Japanese Pagoda Tree) E.Church Ave. Quercus lobata(Valley Oak) C. Street tree requirements: a. Street tree inspection fees shall be collected for each 60'of public,or one tree per lot, whichever is greater. b. Trees shall be planted in accordance with "Specifications for Developer Street Tree Planting." The developer shall contact Parks to determine tree species required on each street. c. Landscape plans shall indicate street tree planting locations and species. Landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks,Recreation and Community Services Department. A street tree planting permit shall be required for all residential street tree planting. d. Performance and payment securities,paid with final map, will be released when all landscaping installed on public and/or city controlled property is in conformance with Parks Division's planting specifications and meets the specifications of the city. e. Upon acceptance of the required work, warranty security shall be furnished to or retained by the city for guaranty and warranty of the work for a period of ninety days following acceptance. 2. BUFFER LANDSCAPING & MAINTENACE REQUIREMENTS A. The developer is required to provide landscaping and long term provision of maintenance for the landscape easements and rights of way on East Church, South Clovis Avenues and `B' Street,the landscape strip and right-of-way on E.Church,E. California, S. Clovis S. Minnewawa Avenues and`B' Street. B. Buffer Maintenance Through Annexation to the Community Facilities District. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Parks Division for review and approval prior to Council approval of the final map. Plans shall be numbered to conform to and included in the Public Work's Department's street construction plan set for the final map. These fees are applicable when the subdivider elects to maintain the buffer landscaping by annexing into the city's Community Facilities District. 1. Landscaping shall comply with Landscape Buffer Development Standards approved by the City Council on October 2, 1990. Landscape and irrigation plans shall comply with Sections 12-306-N -23 &24 and 14-121 of the Fresno Municipal Code regarding Water Efficient Landscaping and Buffer landscaping. 2. Should the proposed landscape buffers and/or parkway strips be located next to an existing buffer and/or parkways strip,the planting concept shall simulate the adjacent landscape design to present a more uniform appearance on the street. Variances in the landscape concept will be acceptable,but the design of the new landscape buffer and/or parkway strip shall strive to mimic the existing as much as possible. 3. Landscape plans shall indicate grades and show fencing or wall details. All fencing shall be placed outside the landscape easement. Maximum slopes shall not exceed 4:1 with l'of level ground between the slope and the back of the sidewalk and/or face of fence. Erosion control measures shall be implemented on all slopes of4:1,including the use of synthetic.erosion control netting in combination with ground cover species approved by the Parks Division. 4. The water meter(s)serving the buffer landscaping shall be sized for the anticipated service flows. 5. No private flags,signs or identification of any kind shall be permitted in the right of way, within the City-controlled easement or on the fence or wall facing the street. 6. Landscaping in the right of way and landscape setback adjacent to waterwell sites shall be the responsibility of the City of Fresno Water Division and may not be included in the CFD. C. As an alternative to the CFD2,the subdivider may form a Home Owners Association for the long term provision of maintenance of the landscape buffers and rights-of-way. Parks,Recreation and Community Services,xpaAment March 17,2004 T-5258 Page 3 3. UGM REQUIREMENTS The project is in UGM Zone#2. Please assure that all Parks UGM fees are collected as allowed by FMC. The nearest regional park to the site is Roedinp Park. The fiearest neighborhood park is located at Sunnyside and Butler. An additional neighborhood park is proposed at S. Peach and E.Church Avenues. This project is consisted with the Parks Master Plan. 4. FEES As a reminder,please verify that the following administrative/plan check fees are collected: 1. Collect the street tree landscape review fee of$56.00(Acct#34599 Fund#10101 Org#17050) 2. Collect of the 15-gallon Street Tree Inspection fee for tree plantings by private party at the rate in effect in the Master Fee Schedule at the time payment is due(current rate is$30.00 per tree Acct#34859,Fund#24001,Org #179900). 3. Collect the CFD Plan Review fee of$176.00(FY2002 rates)(Acct#34599 Fund#10101 Org#17050) 4. Collect the CFD Field Inspection fee of$305.00 FY2002 rates)(Acct.(Acct#34599 Fund#10101 Orb#17050) Should the project be phased,separate plan check and inspection fees shall be collected for each phase. A re-inspection fee of$29.00/hour shall be charged when the landscape(and all associated work, including irrigation)fails to pass inspection and requires a re-inspection by city staff. M�Ze Sinchez-T-5295.doc Parks,Recreation and Community Services Department Manch 22.20X4 T-5295 Page 2 PARKS,RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO: Mike Sanchez,Planner M Development Department FROM: HILARY KIMBER,Parks Supervisor H(621-2924) DATE: March 22,2004 Subject: Tentative Subdivision Map T-5295(Located on the West Side of South Clovis Avenue between East Church and California Avenues) The Parks Department has reviewed the Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map drawn by Ingels-Braun& Associates,Civil Engineering and Land Surveying prepared for Sunnyside Ranch Estates,dated 11/03/03. Parks offers the following comments regarding the street tree,and buffer/parkway strip conditions . .. 1. STREET TREE REQUIREMENTS A. Street trees shall be planted at the rate of one.tree for each 60'of street frontage,or one tree per lot, whichever is greater. The subdivider is required to provide street trees on all public street frontages and the dedication of applicable planting and buffer landscaping casements. The subdivider is required to provide automatic drip irrigation for all street trees. B. Tree planting shall be within a Planting and Public Utility casement. Tree species to be planted on those streets are as follows: S.Clovis Ave. Platanus acerijolia'Columbia'(Columbia Sycamore) S. 'B'Ave. Fraxinus 'Autumn Purple' (Ash Autumn Purple) S.WallingAve. Koelreuteria paniculata(Golden Raintree) S.Rogers Ave. Ginkgo biloba'Autumn Gold'or'Fairmont'(Maidenhair Tree) E.Lorena Ave. Sapium sebijerum(Chinese Tallow) E.Florence Ave. Pistacia chinensis(Chinese Pistache) E.Pitt Ave. Quercus virginiana(Southern Live Oak) E.Truman Ave. Nyssa sylvatica(Black Tupelo) E.Belgravia Ave. Celtis australis(European Hackberry) E.Tower Ave. Sophora japonica(Japanese Pagoda Tree) E.Church Ave. Quercus lobata(Valley Oak) E. 'A'Ave. Brachychiton populneum(Bottle Tree) E.California Ave. Pistacia chinensis(Chinese Pistache) C. Street Tree Requirements: For those lots having internal street tree frontage available for street tree planting,the developer shall plant one tree for each 60'of street frontage,or one tree per lot having street frontage,whichever is greater. a. Street tree inspection fees shall be collected for each 60'of public or one tree per lot whichever is greater. b. Trees shall be planted in accordance with"Specifications for Developer Street Tree Planting.@ The developer shall contact Parks to determine tree species required on each street. Mike Fanchez-T-5295.doc Page 2 Parka,Recreation and Community Services Deportment Match 22, 2004 c. Landscape plans shall indicate street tree planting locations and species. Landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks,Recreation and Community Services Department. A street tree planting permit shall be required for all residential street tree planting. d. Performance and payment securities,paid with final map,will be released when all landscaping installed on public and/or city controlled property is in conformance with Parks Division's planting specifications and meets the specifications of the city. e. Upon acceptance of the required work,warranty security shall be furnished to or retained by the city for guaranty and warranty of the work for a period of ninety days following acceptance. 2.BUFFER LANDSCAPING&MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS A The landscaper is required to provide landscaping and long term provision of maintenance for the landscape easements and rights of way on East Church,East California and South Clovis Avenues. B, Buffer Landscaping Through Annexation to the Community Facilities District. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Parks Division for review and approval prior to Council approval of the final map. Plans shall be numbered to conform to and be included in the Public Works Department's street construction plan set for the final map. These fees are only applicable when the subdivider elects to maintain the buffer landscaping by annexing into the city's Community Facilities District. 1 .Landscaping shall comply with Landscape Buffer Development Standards approved by the City Council on October 2, 1990. Landscape and irrigation plans shall comply with Sections 12-306-N-23 & 24 and 14-121 of the Fresno Municipal Code regarding Water Efficient Landscaping and Buffer landscaping passed by Council on September 20, 1994. 2. Should the proposed landscape buffers and/or parkway strips be located next to an existing buffer and/or parkways strip,the planting concept shall simulate the adjacent landscape design to present a more uniform appearance on the street. Variances in the landscape concept will be acceptable,but the design of the new landscape buffer and/or parkway strip shall strive to mimic the existing as much as possible. 3. Landscape plans shall indicate grades and show fencing or wall details. All fencing shall be placed outside the landscape easement. Maximum slopes shall not exceed 4:1 with F of level ground between the slope and the back of the sidewalk and/or face of fence. Erosion control measures shall be implemented on all slopes of 4:1, including the use of synthetic erosion control netting in combination with ground cover species approved by the Parks Division. 4. The water meter(&)serving the buffer landscaping shall be sized for the anticipated service flows. S. No private flags,signs or identification of any kind shall be permitted in the right of way,within the City-controlled easement or on the fence or wall facing the street. 6. Landscaping in the right of way and landscape setback adjacent to waterwell sites shall be the responsibility of the City of Fresno Water Division and may not be included in the CFD. C. As an alternative to the CFD2,the subdivider may form a Homeowners Association for the long-term provision of maintenance of the landscape buffers and rights-of-ways. Mlke;•.anchez-T-5265.doc Page 3 a Paries.Recreation and Community Services Department Much 22, 2004 T-5295 Page � IY 3. UGM REQUIREMENTS F. The project is in UGM Zone#2. Please assure that all Parks UGM fees are collected as allowed by FMC. The nearest regional park to the site is Roeding Park. The nearest neighborhood park is located at South Sunnyside and East Butler Avenues. An additional neighborhood park is proposed at South Peach and East Church Avenues.. This project is consisted with the Parks Master Plan. 4. FEES As a reminder,please verify that the following administrative/plan check fees are collected: 1. Collect the street tree landscape review fee of$56.00(Acct#34599 Fund#10101 Org#17050) 2.Collect the fee for the 15-gallon Street Tree Inspection fee for tree plantings by private party at the rate in effect in the Master Fee Schedule at the time payment is due(current rate is$30.00 per tree Acct #34859,Fund#24001,Org#179900). 3. Collect the CFD Plan Review fee of$176.00(FY2002 rates)(Acct#34599 Fund#10101 Org#17050) 4. Collect the CFD Field Inspection fee of 5305.00 FY2002 rates)(Acct#34599 Fund#10101 Org#17050) FRESNO FIRE DEPARTMENT FPB-42 FIRE HYDRANT AND ACCESS REQUIREMENTS APPLICATION NO. DATE 1 LOCATION £, �gl,'`wn.c I�I%QNrrrtn� Zea, �y REVIEWEDBY (// T HYDRANTS I 9eyeloper must install on-site hydrant(s). See plan for location(s). Provide fire hydrant flow of JA 1500 GPM [ ]2500 GPM 8"water main minimum. 2. Public street hydrant(s) must be installed. Coordinate street hydrant locations with Public Works. 3. Fire hydrants shall be tested and approved, and all surface access roads shall be installed and made / serviceable prior to and during the time of construction. The 4-1/2"outlet shall face the access lane. ACCESS GENERAL: 4. ❑ Two means of ingress/egress must be provided. This access must be maintained during all phases of development. 5. All construction work on this project is subject to interruption if the road system becomes impassable for fire apparatus due to rain or other obstacles. " 6. All openings in the perimeter of a building shall be accessible from within 150 feet of a public street or private driveway. 7. ❑ Loading zones shall not be located in required fire lanes. 8. ❑ Where buildings or portions thereof are more than 35 feet in height, an aerial truck setup area shall be located adjacent to at least one side of such buildings. Aerial truck setup areas shall be minimum width of 30 feet wide for not less than 60 feet when part of through fire lanes 9. ❑ Aerial truck setup areas, as described in No. 8 above,shall be provided adjacent to at least two sides of buildings more than 35 feet in height that exceed 150 feet in length or width. 10. ❑ All private streets and driveways that are provided for common access, and are required for Fire Department access,shall be constructed to a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet. For drives separated by a median, 15 foot minimum lanes are required. 11. ❑ Streets highlighted on plan shall be identified as fire lanes as provided in the California Vehicle Code, Section 22500.1. Designate highlighted curbs as fire lanes(red curb with "Fire Lane" in 3"white letters every 50 feet or approved signs every 50 feet). 12. ❑ Provide sign(s)(17"X 22"minimum)at all public entrance drives to the property,which state,'Warning- Vehicles stopped, parked,or left standing in fire lanes will be immediately removed at owner's expense- 22658 California Vehicle Code-Fresno Police Department 498-1414." 13. ❑ Turns in private drives and intersecting drives shall have a minimum 34 foot centerline turning radius. 14. ❑ Turns in private drives for aerial truck access, required in No. 5 above, shall have a minimum 44 foot centerline turn radius. File No.210.45 FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS PUBLIC AGENCY DEVELOPER c. Mr. Gil Haro, Planning Manager SUNNYSIDE RANCH ESTATES Planning & Development Department 299 E. LESTER AVE. City of Fresno FRESNO, CA 93720 2600 Fresno Street - Fresno, CA 93721 MAP NO. 5258 PRELIMINARY FEE(S) (See below) DRAINAGE AREA S) " BH BG " DRAINAGE AREA BH $114,861.00 DATE $ — 671 DRAINAGE AREA BG $222,216.00 TOTAL FEE $337,077.00 The proposed development will generate storm runoff which produces potentially significant environmental impacts and which must be properly discharged and mitigated pursuant to the Z California Environmental Quality Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. The O District in cooperation with the City and County has developed and adopted the Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan. Compliance with and implementation of this Master Plan by this development project will satisfy the drainage related CEQA/NEPA impact of the project mitigation requirements. The proposed development shall pay drainage fees pursuant to the Drainage Fee Ordinance prior to approval of the final map at the rates in effect at the time of such approval. The fee indicated above is based on the tentative map. Contact the FMFCD project engineer prior to approval of the final map for the fee. Considerations which may affect the fee obligation(s) or the timing or form of fee payment: a) Fees related to undeveloped or phased portions of the project may be deferrable. b) Fees may be calculated based on the actual percentage of runoff if different than that typical for the zone district under which the development is being undertaken and if permanent provisions are made to assure that the site remains in that configuration. c) Master Plan storm drainage facilities may be constructed,or required to be constructed in lieu of paying fees. d) The actual cost incurred in constructing Master Plan drainage system facilities is credited against the drainage fee obligation. s�se 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO.CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 2 of 4 e) When the actual costs incurred in constructing Master Plan facilities exceeds the drainage fee obligation, reimbursement will be made for the excess costs from future fees collected by the District from other development. Approval of this development shall be conditioned upon compliance with these Distrito Requirements. 1. a. Drainage from the site shall be directed to X b. Grading and drainage patterns shall be as identified on Exhibit No. 1 // 2 C. The grading and drainage patterns shown on the site plan conform to the adopted Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan. 2. The proposed development shall construct and/or dedicate Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan facilities located within the development or necessitated by any off-site improvements required by the approving agency: X . Developer shall construct facilities as shown on Exhibit No. 1 as"Master Plan Facilities to be constructed by Developer". None required. 3. The following final improvement plans shall be submitted to the District for review prior to final development approval: X Grading Plan X Storm Drain Plan X Final Map X Street Plan X Water& Sewer Plan Other 4. Availability of drainage facilities: a. Permanent drainage service is available provided the developer can verify to the satisfaction of the City of Fresno that runoff can be safely conveyed to the Master Plan inlet(s). b. The construction of facilities required by Paragraph No.2 hereof will provide permanent drainage service. C. Permanent drainage service will not be available. The District recommends temporary facilities until permanent service is available. Temporary service is available through X d. See Exhibit No. 2. 5. The proposed development: X Appears to be located within a _500 year X 100 year flood prone area as designated on the latest Flood Insurance Rate Maps available to the District, necessitating appropriate floodplain management action. See attached Floodplain Policy. Does not appear to be located within a flood prone area. 5251 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 3 of 4 6. The Federal Clean Water Act and the State General Permits for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Industrial Activities (State General Permits) require developers of construction projects disturbing five or more acres, and discharges associated with industrial activity not otherwise exempt from National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) permitting, to implement controls to reduce pollutants,prohibit the discharge of waters other than storm water to the municipal storm drain system, and meet water quality standards. These requirements apply both to pollutants generated during construction, and to those which may be generated by operations at the development after construction. a. State General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activities, approved August 1999, (modified December 2002.) A State General Construction Permit is required for all clearing, grading, and disturbances to the ground that result.in soil disturbance of at least one acre (or less than one acre if part of a larger common plan of development or sale). Permittees are required to: submit a Notice of Intent to be covered and must pay a permit fee to the State Water Resources Control Z Board (State Board), develop and implement a storm water pollution prevention plan, eliminate non-storm water discharges, conduct routine site inspections, train employees O in permit compliance, and complete an annual certification of compliance. N. b. State General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities, April, 1997 (available at the District Office.) A State General Industrial Permit is required for specific typeg-of industries described in the NPDES regulations or by C* Standard Industrial Classification(SIC)code. The following categories of industries are generally required to secure an industrial permit: manufacturing; trucking; recycling; and waste and hazardous waste management. Specific exemptions exist for manufacturing activities which occur entirely indoors. Permittees are required to: submit a Notice of Intent to be covered and must pay a permit fee to the State Water Resources Control Board, develop and implement a storm water pollution prevention plan,eliminate non-storm water discharges, conduct routine site inspections, train employees in permit compliance, sample storm water runoff and test it for pollutant indicators, and annually submit a report to the State Board. 5259 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 4 of 4 C. The proposed development is encouraged to select and implement storm water quality controls recommended in the Fresno-Clovis Storm Water Quality Management Construction and Post-Construction Guidelines (available at the District Office)to meet the requirements of the State General Permits, eliminate the potential for non- storm water to enter the municipal storm drain system, and where possible minimize contact with materials which may contaminate storm water runoff. 7. A requirement of the District may be appealed by filing a written notice of appeal with the Secretary of the District within ten days of the date of this Notice of Requirements. 8. The District reserves the right to modify, reduce or add to these requirements, or revise fees, as necessary to accommodate changes made in the proposed development by the developer or requirements made by other agencies. 9. X See Exhibit No. 2 for additional comments, recommendations and requirements. Gerald E. Lakernan, Project Engineer: Neda Shakeri District Engineer, Assistant General Manager C: INGELS-BRAUN&ASSOCIATES 875 W. ASHLAN, STE. 102 CLOVIS, CA 93612 5256 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS SCHEMATIC, DISTANCES ARE APPROXIMATE. CALIFORNIA AVE. , �i somm pcmP-P. I --------------- ' it ATCHISON f ST. \ ' ,. �:' ; i s Q a, GEARY ST. SC&E 1'=600 21 15, I - - — — — — — — — ———— — .1$�. I 54. N ► PITT ST. x.: �` 24' Ram 25'�' 30, UNE Icy; 1(LB_H BASIN "BH" CANAL e.f "BGElieUJ " I. y �r k riy �, ► �wct 1 Z .y'.54 I ' Ct HURCH ALIGNMENT AE:�' ALIGN M N - '' � *��{�;�'Y,•c'a �,�"���,�y,�I'w; �`—� I, I• IG �� LEGEND MASTER PLAN FACILITIES TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY ""` """ 25' k 40' PERMANENT STORM DEVELOPER OF TRACT 5258 DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO BE ACQUIRED BY THE DEVELOPER MASTER PLAN FACILITIES TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY , DEVELOPER OF TRACT 5295 30 TEMPORARY STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO BE ACQUIRED BY MASTER PLAN FACILITIES TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY THE DEVELOPER DEVELOPER OF TRACT 5135 MASTER PLAN FACILITIES TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY �� EXISTING 15' PERMANENT —-- STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT THE DISTRICT ®-- FUTURE MASTER PLAN FACILITIES DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE –––––– INLET BOUNDARY — DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY TRACT 5258 WIN EXHIBIT NO. 1 DRAINAGE AREAS: 'BG" do ■BH" FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Nerr 01200+ J:\E"CINEERING\MJTDUD\DWGS\DEXHMl\TRA.CTS\.525E.D'ML jr­ OTHER REQUIREMENTS EXHIBIT NO. 2 The cost of construction of Master Plan facilities,excluding dedication of storm drainage easements, is eligible for credit against the drainage fee of the drainage area served by the facilities. A Development Agreement shall be executed with the District to effect such credit. Reimbursement provisions, in accordance with the Drainage Fee Ordinance, will be included to the extent that Developer's Master Plan costs for an individual drainage area exceed the fee of said area. Should the facilities cost for such individual area total less than the fee of said area,the difference shall be paid upon demand to the City or District. This project is broken into different drainage areas. Comments on these areas are as follows: Drainage Area"BH": The developer of Tracts 5258 and 5135 has been required to construct the storm drainage facilities, as shown on the attached sketch. Upon completion of those facilities,permanent service will be available. The District recommends temporary facilities until permanent service is available to proposed development. It is recommended that the developers work together to combine the projects to insure permanent drainage service to each development. Drainage Area"BG": The developer shall construct the facilities as shown on Exhibit No. 1. Permanent drainage service will not be available. The District recommends temporary facilities until permanent service is available. The proposed subdivision layout will shift Fancher Creek westerly. However, the drainage area boundaries shall remain the same as the Master Plan drainage area boundaries(see attached exhibit). Any extensions of the District's basin relief line due to relocation of Fancher Creek shall be at the developer's expense. Storm drain facilities shown on Exhibit No.l are tentative only, and may be subject to change pending Master Plan finalization for these drainage areas. The Developer shall dedicate a minimum fifteen-foot(15`)wide storm drain easement as a condition of the final map. No encroachments into the easement will be permitted including, but not limited to, foundations, roof overhangs, swimming pools, and trees. The District will obtain the necessary easements,east of Clovis Avenue,as shown on Exhibit No. 1. Major storm flows from Tracts 5258 and 5295 have historically flowed southerly to Church Avenue. The developers will be responsible for accommodating the passage of this major storm flow. Development No. Tract 5258 cngr\perm i6exhibi0tractsl5258(ns) FLOOD PLAIN POLICY Primary Flood Plains , Because of the relatively high velocities and volumes of flood flow associated with primary flood plains, and because the primary flood plain is responsible for passing the greatest percentage&the flood event,development located in such flood plains is subject to substantial risk,both to itself and to others as a result of the potential for blockage and diversion of flood waters. In view of these factors, the following policy statement is proposed: Policy 1) All proposed development activity shall be the subject of a detailed hydrological flood hazard investigation to determine the relationship of the proposed development to the secondary flood plain and the primary flood plain; and,further,to identify the estimated high water elevation of the 100- year flood event. 2) All development and/or permanent improvement activity which, if located within the primary. floodway, may unduly impede, retard, or change the direction of flow of water either,by itself,or by the catching or collecting of other debris or is placed where the flow of water would carry such obstruction downstream to the damage or detriment of either life or property, should not be permitted. Secondary Flood Plains Because development within secondary flood plains is subject to inundation,but without the threat of increased velocities of flood waters,and because the excessive development of the secondary flood plain can result in increased water surface elevations through displacement of flood waters, the following policy statement is suggested: Policy 1) Development in secondary flood plains is generally acceptable when a detailed hydrological flood hazard investigation report had been prepared indicating that the area proposed for development is located within a secondary as opposed to a primary flood plain. 2) The development must be properly flood proofed below the estimated high water elevation of the 100-year flood event. 3) The development is accomplished is such a way as to prohibit the displacement of any and all flood waters from that portion of the flood plain to be developed. engAengrformOoodplaio policy-form File No.210.45 FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS PUBLIC AGENCY DEVELOPER s, Mr. Gil Haro, Planning Manager SUNNYSIDE RANCH ESTATES s Planning & Development Department 299 E. LESTER AVE. City of Fresno FRESNO, CA 93720 2600 Fresno Street - Fresno, CA 93721 MAP NO. 5295 PRELIMINARY FEE(S)(See below) DRAINAGE AREA(S) " BH BG DRAINAGE AREA " BH $31,318.00 DATE DRAINAGE AREA " BG $105,526.00 TOTAL FEE $136,844.00 The proposed development will generate storm runoff which produces potentially significant environmental impacts and which must be properly discharged and mitigated pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. The District in cooperation with the City and County has developed and adopted the Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan. Compliance with and implementation of this Master Plan by this development project will satisfy the drainage related CEQA/NEPA impact of the project mitigation requirements. The proposed development shall pay drainage fees pursuant to the Drainage Fee Ordinance prior to approval of the final map at the rates in effect at the time of such approval. The fee indicated above is based on the tentative map. Contact the FMFCD project engineer prior to approval of the final map for the fee. Considerations which may affect the fee obligation(s)or the timing or form of fee payment: a) Fees related to undeveloped or phased portions of the project may be deferrable. b) Fees may be calculated based on the actual percentage of runoff if different than that typical for the zone district under which the development is being undertaken and if permanent provisions are made to assure that the site remains in that configuration. c) Master Plan storm drainage facilities may be constructed, or required to be constructed in lieu of paying fees. d) The actual cost incurred in constructing Master Plan drainage system facilities is credited against the drainage fee obligation. 5-5 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 2 of 4 e) When the actual costs incurred in constructing Master Plan facilities exceeds the drainage fee obligation, reimbursement wall be made for the excess costs from i future fees collected by the District from other development. Approval of this development shall be conditioned upon compliance with these District Requirements. 1. a. Drainage from the site shall be directed to b. Grading and drainage patterns shall be as identified on Exhibit No. 1 // 2 X c. The grading and drainage patterns shown on the site plan conform to the adopted Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan. 2, The proposed development shall construct and/or dedicate Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan facilities located within the development or necessitated by any off-site improvements required by the approving agency: X.. Developer shall construct facilities as shown on Exhibit No. 1 as "Master Plan Facilities to be constructed by Developer". None required. 3. The following final improvement plans shall be submitted to the District for review prior to final development approval: X Grading Plan X Storm Drain Plan X Final Map X Street Plan X Water& Sewer Plan Other 4. Availability of drainage facilities: a. Permanent drainage service is available provided the developer can verify to the satisfaction of the City of Fresno that runoff can be safely conveyed to the Master Plan inlet(s). b. The construction of facilities required by Paragraph No. 2 hereof will provide permanent drainage service. C. Permanent drainage service will not be available. The District recommends temporary facilities until permanent service is available. Temporary service is available through X d. See Exhibit No. 2. 5. The proposed development: X Appears to be located within a _500 year X 100 year flood prone area as designated on the latest Flood Insurance Rate Maps available to the District, necessitating appropriate floodplain management action. See attached Floodplain Policy Does not appear to be located within a flood prone area. 5295 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 3 of 4 6. The Federal Clean Water Act and the State General Permits for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Industrial Activities (State General Permits)require developers of construction projects disturbing five or more acres, and discharges associated with industrial '; FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 4 of 4 C. The proposed development is encouraged to select and implement storm water quality controls recommended in the Fresno-Clovis Storm Water Quality Management � ... Construction and Post-Construction Guidelines (available at the District Office)to . meet the requirements of the State General Permits, eliminate the potential for non- storm water to enter the municipal storm drain system, and where possible minimize contact with materials which may contaminate storm water runoff. 7. A requirement of the District may be appealed by filing a written notice of appeal with the Secretary of the District within ten days of the date of this Notice of Requirements. 8. .The District reserves the right to modify, reduce or add to these requirements, or revise fees, as necessary to accommodate changes made in the proposed development by the developer or requirements made by other agencies. 9. X . See Exhibit No. 2 for additional comments,recommendations and requirements. L" / /.66 L J .cam erald E. L eman, Project Engineer: District Engineer, Assistant General Manager C: INGELS-BRAUN & ASSOCIATES 875 W. ASHLAN, STE. 102 CLOVIS, CA 93612 5295 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document FLOOD PLAIN POLICY Primary Flood Plains 4,. Because of the relatively high velocities and volumes of flood flow associated with primary flood plains, and because the primary flood plain is responsible for passing the greatest percentage&the flood event,development located in such flood plains is subject to substantial risk,both to itself and to others as a result of the potential for blockage and diversion of flood waters. In view of these factors, the following policy statement is proposed: Policy 1) All proposed development activity shall be the subject of a detailed hydrological flood hazard investigation to determine the relationship of the proposed development to the secondary flood plain and the primary flood plain; and, further, to identify the estimated high water elevation of the 100- year flood event. 2) All development and/or permanent improvement activity which, if located within the primary floodway, may unduly impede, retard, or change the direction of flow of water either,by itself,or by the catching or collecting of other debris or is placed where the flow of water would carry such obstruction downstream to the damage or detriment of either life or property, should not be permitted. Secondary Flood Plains Because development within secondary flood plains is subject to inundation,but without the threat of increased velocities of flood waters,and because the excessive development of the secondary flood plain can result in increased water surface elevations through displacement of flood waters, the following policy statement is suggested: Policy 1) Development in secondary flood plains is generally acceptable when a detailed hydrological flood hazard investigation report had been prepared indicating that the area proposed for development is located within a . secondary as opposed to a primary flood plain. 2) The development must be properly flood proofed below the estimated high water elevation of the 100-year flood event. 3) The development is accomplished is such a way as to prohibit the displacement of any and all flood waters from that portion of the flood plain to be developed. en&rkngrformV1oodplain policy-forth OTHER REQUIREMENTS EXHIBIT NO. 2 The cost of construction of Master Plan facilities,excluding dedication of storm drainage easements, rL. y.e is eligible for credit against the drainage fee of the drainage area served by the facilities. A 'Development Agreement shall be executed with the District to effect such credit. Reimbursement provisions, in accordance with the Drainage Fee Ordinance, will be included to the extent that Developer's Master Plan costs for an individual drainage area exceed the fee of said area. Should the facilities cost for such individual area total less than the fee of said area,the difference shall be paid upon demand to the City or District. This project is broken into different drainage areas. Comments on these areas are as follows: Drainage Area"BH": The developer of Tracts 5258 and 5135 has been required to construct the storm drainage facilities, as shown on the attached sketch. Upon completion of those facilities,permanent service will be available. The District recommends temporary facilities until permanent service is available to proposed development. It is recommended that the developers work together to combine the projects to insure permanent drainage service to each development. Drainage Area`BG": Permanent drainage service will not be available. The District recommends temporary facilities until permanent service is available. The proposed subdivision layout will shift Fancher Creek westerly. However,the area draining to Drainage Areas`BG"and `BH"shall remain the same as the Master Plan (see attached exhibit). Any extensions of the District's basin relief line due to relocation of Fancher Creek shall be at the developer's expense. Storm drain facilities shown on Exhibit No.] are tentative only, and may be subject to change pending Master Plan finalization for these drainage areas. The Developer shall dedicate a minimum fifteen-foot(15')wide storm drain easement as a condition of the final map. No encroachments into the easement will be permitted including,but not limited to, foundations,roof overhangs, swimming pools, and trees. The District will obtain the necessary easements,east of Clovis Avenue,as shown on Exhibit No. 1. Major storm flows from Tracts 5258 and 5295 have historically flowed southerly to Church Avenue. The developer will be responsible for accommodating the passage of this major storm flow. Development No. Tract 5295 engr\permitbahibiMtm s\5295(ns) NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS SCHEMATIC, DISTANCES ARE APPROXIMATE. CALIFORNIA AVE. , � m I ------------- LLJ �I ATCHISON f ST. a Lj NSI f a GEARY ST. =m m SCALE 1.=60o 23 15' ` I 18, 54• N II PITT ST. a s -�24':REllff �� E 23 KrERTE UNE 3. BASIN "BH" ZN I GNAL t, '� °K J 'I CHURCHAVE. NALLGNMEN .�. ---- • it /.� LEGEND �,.MASTER PLAN FACILITIES TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY 25' & 40' PERMANENT STORK DEVELOPER OF TRACT 5258 DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO BE ACQUIRED �„_,..•,�. MASTER PIAN FACILITIES TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY BY.THE DEVELOPER DEVELOPER OF TRACT 5295 30 TEMPORARY STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO BE ACQUIRED BY FASTER PLAN FACILITIES TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY THE DEVELOPER DEVELOPER OF TRACT 5135 MASTER PLAN FACILITIES TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY ® EXISTING APERMANENT --- STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT THE DISTRICT 0- FUTURE MASTER PLAN FACILITIES DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE ------ INLET BOUNDARY - DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY BAC1T 5295 WON EXHIBIT NO. 1 DRAINAGE AREAS: "BG' Ik "BH' FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NCrr 0Y294! J:\ENGNEERINO\AUTOCAD\D"GS\OEXI.SIT\TRACTS\5258.0"4 K.I. V (� FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT File 210.434 April 29, 2004 Mr. Michael Sanchez,Planner III City of Fresno Development Department, Planning Division 2600 Fresno St. Fresno, CA 93721-3604 Dear Mr. Sanchez, Rezone 2003-69 Drainage Areas "BH" and "BG" The proposed rezone and plan amendment lies within the District's Drainage Areas`BH"and`BG". The District's system will be able to accommodate the proposed rezone. Any extensions of the District's basin relief line due to relocation of Fancher Creek shall be at the developer's expense. Please contact us if you need further information at(559)456-3292. Sincerely, Neda Shakeri Engineer II NS/Irl wprocas\ns\1ctters\2004\rezone 2003-69-bh.bg-Itr i I 5469 E. OLIVE • FRESNO, CA 93727 • (559)456-3292 • FAX(559)456-3194 Sent By: FRESNO IRRIGATION DISTR' '; 559 233 8227; Apr-' `4 11 :50; Page 2 orrman or r. y PHONE(560)M7101 FAX(559)233-8n7 2207 SOM MAPLE AVENUE FRESNO.CALIFORNIA 91725.2218 You►Most Valuable Resource•ftur April 8, 2004 Mr.Dewe Stiglich City of Fresno r Development Department Planning Division 2600 Fresno Street, Room 3043 Fresno, CA 93721-3604 SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment and Entitlement Application Review of Plan Amendment Application No.A-03-22 and Rezone Application.No.R-03-84 Fill's Fancher Creek No.6, Washington Colony No. 15 and Central No. 23 Curial s Dear Mr. Stiglich, The Fresno irrigation District (FID) has listed..its*typical "general comments" and "specific comments" due to potentia) impacts of the canal(s). FID does not typically submit specific comments at this stage, but FID feels that this site is unique and may require a mat deal of planning. FID's comments and requirements could change based on the.final design of the project. At the terminus of Fancher Creek Canal it divides into the Central and Washington Colony, Canals. At the "Central-Washington Divide" there are numerous canal facilities such as autornated gate valves. telemetry, traveling trash screens, check structures, broad crested weir measuring stations, catwalk bridges, bypass pipeline and two (2) bridges used in maintenanccloperations. DCvelupn ent or this project may directly impact some or a11�of these facilities. FM staff had several preliminary meetings with the Developer's Engineer but there appears to be regs;ding FID's requirements which am detailed on.mages 2 and 3. MD's comments and requests are as follows: General Comments: 1. FID recommends that the Project be Presented to FID's Board of Directors for approval as soon as the Developer's Engineer and FID's Engincers agree on _the scope of the proposed project. I,&Agcnuiu31Qtyl Plw%Am and App.No.A-03-22 and Romne App.No.R-03-84 Sent By: FRESNO IRRIGATION DISTR' 1 559 233 8227; Apr-B- 11 :50; Page 3/8 Mr. Dave Stiglich April 8, 2004 Page 2 of 4 2. F[D's Fancher Creek No. 6, Washington Colony No. 15 and Central No. 23 canals traverse the subject properties, as shown on the enclosed map. 3. FID requests that the applicant concrete line, encase in box culvert or other approved means to protect canal integrity, the three (3) canals that traverse the proposed development in :accordance with FTD standards, and that the applicant enter into an agreement with FID for that purpose. The applicant will need to meet with FID to determine the canal allgm nent and dimensions. The applicant will also need to prepare plans for the canal relocation and any structures to be approved by FID. 4. If the proposed development encompasses any portion of FID's existing prescriptive - canal easements, FID requests that the applicant grant to FID a documentary easement for . the canal, that the easement be shown on the map, and that FM be made-a party to and sign the final map. FTD'si minimum casement requirements for the canals are highlighted on the "DISTRICT CANAL RIGHT OF WAY REQUIREMENTS" sheet enclosed for your reference: S. 'FID requests that the applicant be required to submit grading and drainage plans for FID approval that demonstrates the proposed.proj cut will dircct'surface runoff away from FID canals, pipelines and other facilities to prevent conditions that may adversely affect FII) or the project. $ppeeC&C Lomments- As stated on page 1, there are numerous canal facilities located at the "Central-Washington Divide". It is unclear if these facilities will be relocated as part of the proposed project. FIA is concerned with the increase in pedestrians and potential vandalism as the surrounding area urbanizes. The existing site meets today's needs for FID's Operations and Maintenance Practices in its current rural and remote Incatinn. Listed below are comments addressing potential impacts of the canal facilities as well as comments regarding the application: 1. Possible Relocation of "Central-Washington Divide" - If it is determined that .the "Central-Washington Divide" facility shall be relocated per.FTD's specifications, FID will require the applicant to hire an Engineering Firm with proven experience in designing similar canal facilities. 2. Protect and/or Upgrade Automation and Telemetry - As stated above, FID will require that the existing automation and telemetry systems be safeguarded, protected and possibly upgraded with urbanization of the area. rryam' 3. Traveling Trash Screen - A bridge is located several hundred .feet upstream of the "Central.Washington Divide". This bridge v!a&constructed in 1999 as well as a traveling 1 trash screen which c epusited the trash on top of the bridge. The traveling trash screen had numerous problems and was removed in late 2002. FID installed-the bridge and screen at thio Ideation due to the high loads of canal trash (large limbs, small trees, lawn p clippings, prunings, trash, etc.) A pipeline bypass (48-inch diameter RGRCP) was also constructed as part of the bridge project. �' File AgenciesCity\Plan Amend App.No.A-03.22 and RuAme App.Nu.R-03-84 Sent By; FRESNO IRRIGATION DISTRr^T; 559 233 8227; Apr-' 74 11 :51; Page 4/8 Mr. Dave Stigl,ich Apri l 8,2004 Page'3 of 4 With urbanization and the already high trash.load at this site, FID.will likely require a new traveling trash screen as part of the project. 4. Canal Lining -The reports states that "the new canal would need to be lined on the sides with an open-bottom design. This would still allow some percolation into the ground adjacent to the existing County parcels." :This katemeni is partially true. FID's Board Policy No. 100.2 requires canal lining if an open channel is relocated or realigned. The . policy alsostates that both the channel bottom as well as the side slopes shall be lined. 5. Sediment Accumulation & Easement Width Due to large accumulations of sediment in this section of FID's canal system, FID may require a larger than normal casement. FID. will need a large enough easement to dredge the canal,place and store the.material on the', canal bank and off-haul the material at a later time. FTD may also require some sort.of a+A sediment trap structure to help the sediments settle at a desired location. _ 6. Trail - it is FID's understanding that trail is masterplanned along the canals. As . �. discussed with the Developer's EngineerFID will not allow the trail to encroachloverlap FID's canal casement. 7. 1F11)has the following comments regarding the Hydrologic Study: a: The:study mentions Dry Creels, which FID assumes Is a nn ss��elling and meant to read Faneher Creek Canal. b. The study refers to a 45-mile canal system. FID's canal system consists of approximately 750 miles of open canals and pipelines..,FID is unsure where the 45- mile number came from.. c. The report also states FID's,Staff approximates a 10'/o conveyance loss across the. system with 5% lost to percolation and 5% lost to evaporation. FTD dues not have any documentation supporting either number and wishes to withdraw these approximations. d. Canal Lining-Read Item #4 above. e...,FID will be conveying 'recharge" water to FMFCD Basin BH located northeast of Church and CIovi.s Avenues once the mterhe is completed. It is FID's opinion that.•. there will be minimal impacts to the ground wager table.if the canal is concrete lined ' %since Basin 1311 will be receiving`now"recharge water. Pile AKrawiev►1C;ity1 rlau Aincud Aln).No. A-03.22 and Rcmnc App.No.R-03-04 rt By; FRESNO IRRIGATION DISTRICT; 559 233 8227; Apr-' �4 11 :51 ; Page r/8 Mr. Dave Stiglich -April 8,2004 Page 4 of 4 'Ibank you for submitting this item for our review. Pleme feel free to contact-me with any further questions or concerns at 233-7161 extension.31 S. Sincerely, FRESNO IMOATION DISTRICT Bi Stretc , P.E. Chief Engineer Cc: Neda Shaken of FMFCD and Larry Braun of Ingels&Braun En},ginecring BS:sa Enclosures I Vile Ageosiu3%Cityl Him Amend App.No.A-03-22 and R,;rvnu App.Nu.8-03-84 :Sint qy: FRESNO IRRIGATION DISTR?"-; 559 233 8227; Apr-8-" 11 .52; page 8!8 EXHIBIT "5is ROOM=" OlR MD I.p6 THAN 20'; o . Is z ',X 30 015 4.1X AT GRAD!OR CW SCMOM' rr1 eecfioil O �j AS RIMMLXRED maNOuwTt" Ir it AT DUCTION flit 9CCi10N yTAii MRD 'STANDARD .0 me NO L=THAN I r 1AAi. L NM 50 crs �A ;vel BTANOARD ALTERNATE �1 ADD 2 FW TO MMA11 WNT VAUrM TOO2 THE ALMM44T=SWrION CAN MOF IM LDm P ISTA1DL.M4 0VMAU ROW VA lY:TO A 400AT! TM!!"ALL" M T1!STANDARD GRAM 01hOD WARANCE WON AM 13 P DI LY WHEN DOTR= ORRATIO M AND MAMMIAMa ruNcnow DO NOT R=MM A MANDARD ROADWAY. DISTRICT ANAL RIGH] OF WAY RE UI( IREMENTS KEv. 7/1195 ERE5NO IRRIGATION D15TRIGT ENGINEERING HANDBOOK PAGE NO. 1o . Sent By: FRESNO IRRIGATION DISTRlf'T; 559 233 8227; Apr-'a -`' 11 :51 ; Page 7/8„ 2025 FRESNO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT UMA IL &M jmolk� VALL" LA MEDIUM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ti (NO CHANGE) AVE. • � !nor • MEDIuM LOW DENSITY M (HoSIDIDIAL N U) EDi pt 'frtA%%U,-X 50A ® r-500 ' u•��� U� DENSITY RESIDENT (NO IAL MANCE) _ ......... ST CIAIRGH AVENUE E. Gh�JRGH AVE. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (HO CHANCE) PROPOSeD C HAN ft TO THE 20. dCNIEKAL PLAN 1A�R INGELS- BRAUN ® OFfTCE COMMERCIAL PLAN DESI(lNATION (ti2.0 ACRES) & A SOGIATES CHANCE TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIA Cmt Ismusea uo I.un Soviva lNEI"ORHOOD COMMERCIAL PLAN DESIGNATION (9.9 ACRES) BES $70 T A0 LM Avom 0418%a ® CHANCE M MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL . Iaav)b11� oFt STATE OFC 11FOR_MA—B S1N SS WSPORT .'`N AND HOUSING AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWA.RZENEGQFR.Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1352 WEST OLIVE AVENUE P.O.BOX 12616 FRESNO,CA 93778-2616 PHONE (559)445-6666 FAX (559)488-4088 Flee your power! Be energy e TrY (559)488-4066 efficient! May 25, 2004 CED MAY 2004 213 1-IGR/CEQA DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 6-FRE-180-63.4+/- CITY OF FRESNO A-03-22, R-03-84, R-03-69, T-5258 & T-5295 SUNNYSIDE RANCH ESTATES Mr. Mick Sanchez City of Fresno Development Department 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 Dear Mr. Sanchez: Caltrans notes that the City has published a. public„notice (05/21/04) for'the "Notice of Public Hearing" for the above-named plan amendment, rezone and' .tract map for a' proposed 257-unit single-family residential development: Caltrans made continents on this project in two letters dated February 3, 2004 and March 16, 2004 (copies enclosed). It is our understanding that this project is scheduled to go before the Planning Commission on June 2, 2004. Please ensure that our letters are included in the staff report. Please note that our March 16, 2004.indicated that the Traffic Impact.Study (TIS) was incomplete. We requested that the applicant's traffic consultant submit a revised TIS to Caltrans that included the level of service analysis for the interchange and the intersection and fair share calculations for the project's impacts to the State Highway System. We have not received the revised study. Caltrans questions the City's ability to make an environmental finding on this project when the project's impacts have not been fully evaluated and the environmental record is incomplete. We request that this letter be made part of the permanent record for this project and that a ,copy of our letter be included in the staff. repots ;for both the City Council and the Planning Commission. This will provide the decision-making body and the general-'p'ublic with a complete and accurate environmental evaluation for the project. "Caltrans improves mobility across California" Mr. Mike Sanchez May 25, 2004 Page 2 If you have any questions, please call me at (559) 445-6666. Sincerely, O zao MOSES STITES Office of Transportation Planning District 6 Enclosures C: Mr. Nick Yovino, Director, City of Fresno Development Department Ms. Barbara Goodwin, Council of Fresno County Governments "Caltrans improves mobility across California" STATE OFC L IF02MA—BUSMSS.TRANSP= fIAND HOUSNG AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARzQMnGE&r,,..w. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1352 WEST OLIVE AVENUE P.O.BOX 12616 FRESNO,CA 93778-2616 PHONE (559)445-6666 FAX (559)488-4088 ��5262 � Flex your power! TTY (559)488-4066 Be energy a eient! o �FCF March 16, 2004 Amy f12004 0E Ir 2131-IGR/CEQA 6-FRE-180-63.4+/- R-03-69 & T-5258 SUNNYSIDE RANCH ESTATES Mr. Mike Sanchez City of Fresno Development Department 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 Dear Mr. Sanchez: We have completed our review of the rezone and tract map for the proposed 257-unit single-family residential development on the west side of South Clovis Avenue between East California and East Jensen Avenues. The City has also provided a draft Traffic Impact Study (TIS) for our review. Caltrans has the following comments: Some of the project-generated trips would impact the State Route (SR) 180 interchange at Clovis Avenue and the SR 99 interchange at Jensen Avenue. The draft TIS provides the project-related traffic that will impact these interchanges. However, the level of service analysis for the interchange and the intersection were not provided. The SR 99 interchange at Jensen Avenue will reach its capacity as the City approves more land use changes in the area and development continues. The signalized intersection at the northbound ramps will need improvement in the future, such as northbound off-ramp widening. It is concluded, based on the draft TIS, that this project would impact this . interchange. It is therefore recommended that the project contribute its fair share for improvements to the SR 99 interchange at Jensen Avenue. A project fair share and mitigation cost estimate should be calculated by the applicant's traffic consultant and submitted to this office for review. The new segment of SR 180 between Clovis and Temperance Avenues is scheduled for construction in 2004. The future SR 180 interchange at Clovis Avenue was designed to accommodate 2025 traffic volumes. This project, in and of itself, would have a minimal impact to this future interchange. However, the City should be aware that continued land use changes have the potential to create cumulatively significant impacts to both transportation and air quality. As these cumulative impacts were not addressed in the General Plan Update Master EIR, the City should consider a mechanism for evaluating "Caltrans improves mobility across California" Mr. David Stiglich February 3, 2004 Page 2 project-related impacts to transportation and air quality. ' Please have the applicant's traffic consultant submit a revised TIS to Caltrans that includes the level of service analysis for the interchange and the intersection and fair share calculations for the project's impacts to the State Highway System. The City should consider a transit alternative for this project. The project is of sufficient size to support transit, and early planning could make such an alternative feasible. Caltrans recommends that this project be routed to Fresno Area Express (FAX) staff for their review and comment. Please see Attachment Number 1 for other recommended transportation alternatives. We request that this letter be made part of the permanent record for this project and that a copy of our letter be included in the staff reports for both the City Council and the Planning Commission. This will provide the decision-making body and the general public with a complete and accurate environmental evaluation for the project. Please send a copy of the staff report(s) to Caltrans prior to any scheduled hearings for this item. If you have any questions, please call me at(559)445-6666. Sincerely, MOSES STITES Office of Transportation Planning District 6 Enclosure C: Mr. Jon Ruiz, Interim Assistant City Manager and Director of Public Works Ms. Barbara Goodwin,Executive Director, Council of Fresno County Governments "Caltrans improves mobility across California" ATTACHMENT NUMBER 1 CALTRANS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES Ongoing development throughout the City of Fresno, including this project, will make traffic operations significantly worse by adding considerably to delay and congestion. Transit alternatives can help reduce congestion and delay and reduce overall degradation of air quality and gridlocked intersections. The City of Fresno should focus on ways to eliminate trips in addition to enhancing capacity. Transportation alternatives the City should consider include standard highway solutions along with the following: 1. Park and ride facilities on site or within the proximity of this project. 2. A study of the general accommodation and provision of mass transit in this area to provide insight on ways of increasing transit usage. 3. Exploring the potential of commuter shuttles. The shuttle could be financed through an assessment district and provide a way for individuals to utilize a park-and-ride facility or commercial area parking lot and be shuttled to various commercial/office centers within the area. Commuters who need to go further could use City of Fresno transit if the City planned for convenient connections. This may help to reduce the Single Occupancy Vehicle(SOV) demand seeking to use the State Highway System. 4. Providing for continuity of non-motorized transportation. 5. Exploring the potential for employer-sponsored carpools/vanpools or monthly transit passes for employees as well as including as a condition of project approval a covered transit stop as mitigation for project-related impacts to the transportation/circulation system. 6. Exploring the potential for linking the purchase of a monthly transit pass with new residential development as partial mitigation for congestion and air quality impacts, and to ensure the long term viability of public transportation. STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS.MMSSPORTA', AND HOU5rNG AGENCY _ ARNOLD SCHW RZ NEGr u G.vemor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1352 WEST OLIVE AVENUE P.O.BOX 12616 FRESNO,CA 93778-2616 PHONE (559)445-6666 FAX (559)488-4088 Flea your power! TTY (559)488-4066 Be energy e�citnt! xvuCEIVED , February 3, 2004 7 2004 DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 2131-IGR/CEQA CIN OF FRESNO 6-FRE-180-63.4+/- A-03-22, R-03-84 & T-5295 SUNNYSIDE RANCH ESTATES Mr. David Stiglich ------- _-.._ City of Fresno Development Department 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93 721 Dear Mr. Stiglich: We have completed our review of the plan amendment, rezone and tract map for the proposed 121-unit single-family residential development on the west side of South Clovis Avenue between East California and East Jensen Avenues. The City has also provided a draft Traffic Impact Study(TIS) for our review. Caltrans has the following comments: Some of the project-generated trips would impact the State Route (SR) 180 interchange at Clovis Avenue and the SR 99 interchange at Jensen Avenue. The draft TIS provides the project-related traffic that will impact these interchanges. However, the level of service analysis for the interchange and the intersection were not provided. The SR 99 interchange at Jensen Avenue will reach its capacity as the City approves more land use changes in the area and development continues. The signalized intersection at the northbound ramps will need improvement in the future such as northbound off-ramp widening. It is concluded, based on the draft TIS, that this project would impact this . interchange. It is therefore recommended that the.project contribute its fair share for improvements to the SR 99 interchange at Jensen Avenue. A project fair share and mitigation cost estimate should be calculated and submitted to this office for review. The new segment of SR 180 between Clovis and Temperance Avenues is scheduled for construction in 2004. The future SR 180 interchange at Clovis Avenue was designed to accommodate 2025 traffic volumes. This project, in and of itself, would have a minimal impact to this future interchange. However, the City should be aware that continued land use changes have the potential to create cumulatively significant impacts to both transportation and air quality. As these cumulative impacts were not addressed in the General Plan Update Master EIR, the City should consider a mechanism for evaluating project-related impacts to transportation and air quality. "Caltrans improves mobility across California" Mr. David Stiglich February 3, 2004 Page 2 Please have the applicant's traffic consultant submit a revised TIS to Caltrans that includes the level of service analysis for the interchange and the intersection and fair share calculations for the project's impacts to the State Highway System. The City should consider a transit alternative for this project. The project is of sufficient size to support transit, and early planning could make such an alternative feasible. Caltrans recommends that this project be routed to Fresno Area Express (FAX) staff for their review and comment. Please see Attachment Number 1, for other recommended transportation alternatives. We request that this letter be made part of the permanent record for this project and that a copy of our letter be included in the staff reports for both the City Council and the Planning Commission. This will provide the decision-making body and the general public with a complete and accurate environmental evaluation for the project. Please send a copy of the staff report(s) to Caltrans prior to any scheduled hearings for this : item. If you have-any questions, please call me at(559) 445-6666. Sincerely, . . 4'Lse MOSES STITES Office of Transportation Planning District 6 Enclosure C: Ms. Barbara Goodwin, Council of Fresno County Governments "Callrans improves mobility across California" ATTACHMENT NUMBER 1 CALTRANS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATNES Ongoing development throughout the City of Fresno, including this project, will make traffic operations significantly worse by adding considerably to delay and congestion. Transit alternatives can help reduce congestion and delay and reduce overall degradation of air quality and gridlocked intersections. The City of Fresno should focus on ways to eliminate trips in addition to enhancing capacity. Transportation alternatives the City should consider include standard highway solutions along with the following: 1. Park and ride facilities on site or within the proximity of this project. 2. A study of the general accommodation and provision of mass transit in this area to provide insight on ways of increasing transit usage. 3. Exploring the potential of commuter shuttles. The shuttle could be financed through an assessment district and provide a way for individuals to utilize a park-and-ride facility or commercial area parking .lot and be shuttled to various commercial/office centers within'the area. Commuters who need to go further could use City of Fresno transit if the City planned for convenient connections. This may help to reduce the Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) demand seeking to use the State Highway System. 4. Providing for continuity of non-motorized transportation. 5. Exploring the potential for employer-sponsored carpools/vanpools or monthly transit passes for employees as well as including as a condition of project approval a covered transit stop as mitigation for project-related impacts to the transportation/circulation system. 6. Exploring the potential for linking the purchase of a monthly transit pass with new residential development as partial mitigation for congestion and air quality impacts, and to ensure the long term viability of public transportation. ' •—. ?�!, !�°N"J x: A xJi xlr rJir x JJ� xJr�� x J� g �? X x x � Jr'd J'2i x r X 9 X J!! xJ, xJ�? J,� J,r� .g O X+ i PROPOSED SITE OF FANCHER CREEK RELOCATION I SCALE: 1' 1. 1 . 20- 20' 30 MA1fR LEVEL IZ +z 1 �N NMS AC TM I 71 . 4S 12• DRAFT PRE MM Ff ING SECTION A-A & As ociATE SCALE 1'-t0' CIVIL ENGINEERING AND LANG SURI E75 VEST A94-AN AVENUE; SUIT (3%) 291 - 0427 CAD FM Gow CITY OF FRESNO MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Initial Study is on file in the Planning and Environmental RECEIVED Development Department, City Hall Assessment Number: 1004 MAY 12 Ate 8' 58 2600 Fresno Street, Fresno, California 93721 A-03-22/R-03-69/R-03-84/T- 559 621-8277 5258/T-5295 CITY CLERK, FRESNO C. APPLICANT: Ingles-Braun . Assessor's 875 West Ashlan Avenue#102 Parcel Number: Clovis, California 93612 481-040-02,07, 11 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION: Ingels-Braun and Associates on behalf Filed with: of Sunnyside Ranch Estates have filed entitlements covering 109 gross acres for REBECCA E. KLISCH, City property generally located on the west side of Clovis Avenue between the Union Pacific Clerk Railroad tracks and 350 feet south of the East Church Avenue alignment. Plan 2nd Floor-City Hall Amendment Application No. A-03-22 proposes to amend the 2025 Fresno General 2600 Fresno Street Plan and Roosevelt Community Plan from office commercial land use(12 acres)and Fresno, California 93721-3603 neighborhood commercial land use (10 acres)to medium density residential planned land use(22 acres). Rezoning Application No. R-03-84 and related Tentative Tract Map No.5295 is requesting a rezone from AE-5(Exclusive Five Acre Agriculture)and AE-5/UGM(Exclusive Five Acre Agriculture/Urban Growth Management)to R-1(Single Family Residentiao and R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management)for 26 net acres to facilitate the development of a 123-lot single family subdivision. Rezone Application No.R-03-69 and associated Tentative Tract Map No. 5258 requests a rezone from AEZ(Exclusive Five Acre Agriculture)and AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agriculture/Urban Growth Management) to R-1(Single Family Residentiao and R-1/UGM(Single Family ResidentiaYUrban Growth Management)to facilitate the development of a 258-lot single family subdivision. The proposed project has been evaluated with respect to each item on the attached environmental checklist. This completed checklist reflects comments of any applicable responsible agencies and research and analysis conducted to examine the interrelationship between the proposed project and the physical environment. The information contained in the Environmental Assessment Application,the checklist,and any attachments to the checklist,combine to form a record indicating that an initial study has been completed in compliance with the State CEQA Guidelines and the California Environmental Quality Act. Any rating of"2"on the checklist indicates that a speck adverse environmental effect has been identified in a categorywhich is of sufficient magnitude to be of concern. Such an effect may be inherent in the nature and magnitude of the project or may be related to the design and characteristics of the individual project. Effects rated in this manner are not sufficient in themselves to require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and/or have been mitigated to the extent feasible. All new development activity and many non-physical projects contribute directly or indirectly toward a cumulative impact on the physical environment. The incremental effect contributed by this project toward such a cumulative effect is not considered substantial in itself. The proposed project is not expected to result in any significant adverse effects in terms of the factors considered on the environmental checklist, including any such factors for which minor effects have been identified. Cumulative effects of a significant nature are also not expected. The proposed project will not result in any adverse effects which fall within the "Mandatory Findings of Significance"contained in Section 15065 of the State CEQA Guidelines. The finding is therefore made that the proposed project will clearly not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. This Mitigated Negative Declaration will be deemed final and effective if no appeal is filed in the manner specified by Section 12-505 of the Fresno Municipal Code. INITIAL STUDY PREPARED BY: Mike Sanchez SUBMITTED BY: �� Q Planner III DATE: May 12, 2004 DARRELL UNRUH, Planning Manager PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) CHECKLIST POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS EA No. A-03-22/R-03-69/R-03-84IT-5258/T--5295 1_0 TOPOGRAPHIC, SOIL, GEOLOGIC 11.0 URBAN SERVICES CONSIDERATIONS 1 11.1 Availability of fire protection 1 1.1 Geologic hazards,unstable soil conditions 1 11.2 Lack of emergency vehicle access 1 1.2 Adverse change in topography or ground surface relief 1 11.3 Adequacy of design for crime prevention 1 1.3 Destruction of unique geologic or physical features 1 11.4 Overcrowding of school facilities 1 1.4 Increased water erosion 1 11.5 Availability of water mains of adequate size 1 11.6, Availability of sewer lines of adequate capacity g0 AIR DUALITY 1 11.7 Availability of storm water drainage facilities(on or off 2 2.1 Substantial indirect source of pollution site) 1 2.2 Direct on-site pollution generation 1 11.8 Availability of adequate park and recreation areas 1 2.3 Generation of objectionable odors 1 11.9 Unusually high solid waste generation 1 2.4 Generation of dust except during construction 1 2.5 Adverse local climatic changes 12.0 HAZARDS -' 1 12.1 Risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances 3.0 WATER 1 12.2 Site subject to flooding 1 3.1 Insufficient ground water available for long-term project 1 12.3 Adverse change in course of flow of flood waters use 1 12.4 Potential hazards from aircraft accidents 1 3.2 Use of large quantities of ground water 1 12.5 Potential hazards from landfill and/or toxic waste sites 1 3.3 Wasteful use of ground water 1 3.4 Pollution of surface or ground water supplies 13.0 AESTHETICS 1 3.5 R9duction in ground water recharge 1 13.1 Obstruction to public or scenic vista or view 1 13.2 Creation of aesthetically offensive conditions 4.0 PLANT LIFE 1 13.3 Removal of street trees or other valuable vegetation 1 4.1 Reduction of the numbers of any unique,rare or 1 13.4 Architectural incompatibility with surrounding area endangered species 1 4.2 Reduction in acreage of agricultural crop 14.0 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL 1 4.3 Premature or unnecessary conversion of prime 1 14.1 Removal of historic building,disruption of agricultural land archaeological site 1 14.2 Construction or activity incompatible with adjacent 5.0 ANIMAL LIFE historic site 1 5.1 Reduction in the numbers of any rare,unique or endangered species 15.0 ENERGY 1 5.2 Deterioration or displacement of valuable wildlife habitat 1 15.1 Use of substantial amounts of energy or fuel 1 152 Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources 1 8.0 HUMAN HEALTH of energy 1 15.3 Wasteful use of energy 7.0 NOISE 1 7.1 Increases in existing noise levels EXPLANATION OF RATINGS 1 7.2 Exposure to high noise levels "0" Insufficient Information 8.0 LIGHT AND GLARE Insufficient information is available to determine the potential 1 8.1 Production of glare which will adversely affect residential environmental effects which may result from the proposed areas project in this category. 1 8.2 Exposure of residences to high levels of glare --"1" No Significant Environmental Effect The proposed project will not have an adverse environmental PA LAND USE effect in this category, or any such effect is not substantially 1 9.1 Incompatibility with adopted plans and policies unusual or of undesirable magnitude- This rating is also 1 9.2 Acceleration of growth rate utilized in cases where the category is not applicable to the 1 9.3 Induces unplanned growth particular project under consideration. 1 9.4 Adverse change in existing or planned area "2" Moderate Environmental Effect characteristics The proposed project will have an adverse environmental effect in this category,which is of sufficient magnitude to be of 112.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION specific concern. However, this effect is not substantial 10.1 Generation of vehicle traffic sufficient to cause capacity enough in itself to require the preparation of an Environmental deficiencies on existing street system Impact Report,and is mitigable through project changes and 2 10.2 Cumulative increase in traffic on a major street for which conditions. capacity deficiencies are projected "3" Significant Adverse Environmental Effect 1 10.3 Specific traffic hazard to motorists,bicyclists,pedestrians The environmental effect identified in this category 1 10.4 Routing of non-residential traffic through residential area substantiates in itself or contributes towards a finding that the 1 10.5 Insufficient or poorly located parking proposed project has a potentially significant adverse effect on 1 10.6 Substantial increase in rail and/or air traffic the environment sufficient to require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report. `l`/ D. I I J I I I t + 4 •� ,.. eaNx so"r r w � � w � nw w . r • . w p r � rC ncreor ava r AE ZQA 'GM AE-5 S ■ E. CALIFORNIA ,c Way aT' r . •• w - f0 C-2AM • . I •5-U6M I r AE-5 AE-.5 ��•�� / E. CHURCH AE-5 AE-S/UGM f AE5/UGh1111 LEGEND ' PROJECT BOUNDARY PLAN AMENDMENT NO.A-03022 REZONE APPLICATION NO.R-03-W4No From Of6eee and Neighborf>ood Comm. From AE-5 and AE-SNGM to Med.Density Resid. to R-1 and R-1IUGM VICIEN IT'Y MAP PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO.A-03-022 N DEPARTMENT From Office and Neighborhood Comm.to Med.Density Reaid. A.P.N.:481-040-02.07.11 REZONE APPLICATION NO.R-03-084 e From AE-5 and AE-SAJGM to R-1 and R-1/UGM ZONE MAP:2555,2655 West of Clovis Ave.btwn California and Church AveS. NOT TO SCALE BY/DATE: J.S./ 1-22.04 r CITY OF FRESNO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - INITIAL STUDY Application No. A-03-22/R-03-69/R-03-84/T-5258/T-5295 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Plan Amendment Application No. A-03-22, Rezone Application Nos. R-03-69 and R-03-84, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5258/UGM and 5295, filed by Ingels-Braun and Associates on behalf of Sunnyside Ranch Estates, pertain to approximately 109 gross acres of property located on the west side of South Clovis Avenue between the Union Pacific Railroad Tracks (California alignment)to a point 350 feet south of the East Church Avenue aliment. Plan Amendment Application No. A-03-22 requests. amend the 2025 Fresno General Pla#,Ih Rogsevelt Community Plan from office commercia A0 use (12.acres)and neighborhood commercialff 1%d use (10 acres)to medium density residential planned land use(22 acres). Rezone Application No. R-03-84 and related Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295/UGM 0S% requesting a rezone from AE-5(Exclusive Five Acre Agriculture)and AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agrtculture/Urban Growth Management) to R-1 (Single Family Residentian and R-1/UGM (Single Family Residenti'�IM���jr an Growth Management).for 26 net acres to facilitate the development of a .1 23-lot single familylt�diweon. Rezone Application No. R-03-69 and associated Tentative Tract Map No. 5258 requests a rezone from AE-5 (Exclusive Five Acre Agriculture) and AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Flve Acre Agriculture/Urban Growth Management)to R-1(Single Family Residential)and R-1/UGM (Single Family Residendal/Urban Growth Management)to facilitate the development of a 258-lot single family subdivision on 70 net acres. Bordering Property Information Planned Land Use Existing Zoning Existing Use North Low Density Residential R-1-AH (County) Large Lot Single Single Family Residential Family Subdivision Horses South Medium Low Density Residential AE-51UGM Proposed Single (R-1/UGM pending) Family Subdivision Medium Density Residential Exclusive Five Acre Agriculture /Urban Growth Management East Medium Low Density Residential AE-20/UGM Agriculture and Rural Exclusive Twenty Acre Residential Agriculture/Urban Growth Management Community Commercial AE-5/UGM Exclusive Five Acre Agriculture /Urban Growth Management C-21UGM Community Shopping Center/Urban Growth Management INITIAL STUDY Environmental Assessment No. A-03-22/R-03-69rr-5258/R-03-84rr-5295 Page 2 May 12, 2004 West Office Commercial R-1-AH (County) Single Family Single Family Residential Residential Horses Staff has reviewed the above-referenced project proposal and consulted with affected agencies and interest groups. Approval of the project may contribute to the creation of certain moderate environmental effects or the project may be adversely impacted by existing conditions as addressed below. The project area is located within the southeastern portion of the City of Fresno's adopted Sphere of. Influence and Urban Boundary area, and is planned for office commercial land uses by the Roosevelt Community Plan, updated in 2002, and the 2025 Fresno General Plan, adopted in 2002. Environmental documents for previous plan actions include Final EIR No. 10130 (2025 Fresno General Plan). Additional environmental documents have been certified for major public facilities to accommodate population growth and urban development including Final EIR No. 10118 (Fresno/Clovis Regional Wastewater Treatment and Reclamation Facility Capacity Expansion)and Final EIR No. SCH 95022029 (Fresno Metropolitan Water Resource Management Plan). These environmental impact analyses and conclusions, together with supporting technical studies, address the impacts of population growth and the necessary public facility capacity expansion associated with the urban development that will accommodate this growth within the City of Fresno's 2025 General Plan Urban Area Boundary and Sphere of Influence. Certification or approval of. these environmental documents identified potentially significant adverse environmental impacts, appropriate mitigation measures, and findings of overriding considerations with respect to unavoidable significant impacts. The following impacts were identified by City Council Resolution.No. 2002-378 certifying Final EIR No. 10130 (2025 Fresno General Plan). 1. Transportation and Circulation 2. Air Quality 3. Preservation of Agricultural Land 4. Noise Resolution No.2002-378 also contains a statement of overriding considerations for the above unavoidable significant effects. The benefits of implementing the 2025 Fresno General Plan outweigh unavoidable significant effects. 1.0—TOPOGRAPHIC.SOIL. GEOLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS There are no geologic hazards or unstable soil conditions known to exist on the project site. The existing topography is relatively flat with no apparent unique or significant land forms such as vernal pools. Development of the property requires compliance with grading and drainage standards of the City of Fresno and Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District Standards. Grade differentials at property lines must be limited to one foot or less,or a cross-drainage covenant must be executed with affected adjoining property owners. Fancher Creek does traverse through the property and is expected to be re-routed along the Dewitt Avenue alignment as part of this project. 2.0—AIR QUALITY; 2.1—Substantial Indirect Source of Pollution As a result of ti ne Sar,Joaquin Valley's clirnate'and topography,the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin(SJVAB) INITIAL STUDY Environmental Assessment No. A-03.22/R-03-69/T-525a/R-03-84/T-5295 Page 3 May 12, 2004 is predisposed to poor air quality. High mountain ranges surrounding the Valley frequently create air layer inversions that prevent mixing of air masses. The large number of sunny days per year and high temperatures in the summer favor the formation of ozone. In the winter, inversions form that often trap particulate matter. With respect to the Fresno area, the SJVAB has been classified as follows: • Ozone. Recently reclassified from"serious nonattainment"to"severe nonattainment"by the U.S. E.P.A. Classified as"severe nonattainment" by the State. • PM 10. Classified as"serious nonattainment"at the federal level. Classified as"nonattainment"by the State. • CO. Recently reclassified from "nonattainment"to "attainment" by th U.S. E.P.A. NOV Unclassified/Attainment at the federal level. Classified "attainment"at the State level. • SO2 Unclassified at the federal level. Classified "attainment"at the State level. • Sulfates. (No federal standard.) Classified "attainment"at the State level. • Lead. (No federal standard.) Classified "attainment" at the State level. • H.S. (No federal standard.) Unclassified by the State. • Visibility. (No federal standard.) Unclassified by the State. In response to the SJVAB's nonattainment status for Ozone and PM,o the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) has adopted air quality attainment plans as required by State and federal regulations. Table VC-1 of MEIR No. 10130 lists the air quality attainment plans that have been adopted by the SJVAPCD. The SJVAB reclassification from "serious nonattainment" to "severe nonattainment" at the federal level requires the SJVAPCD to prepare a new attainment plan, due to the U.S. E.P.A. in mid-year of 2003, that demonstrates attainment by 2006. The new attainment plan will include more stringent permitting requirements and a greater level of control on stationary source emissions within the District. Failure to implement control measures may result in a loss of federal funding for highways and may require sanctions on stationary sources. As a result of the SJVAB's classification of "severe nonattainment" for ozone by the State, the valley is subject to the most stringent requirements in the California Clean Air Act. These include providing for a 5% per year reduction in nonattainment emissions,or including"every feasible measure"in the Air Quality Attainment Plan; establishing a permitting program that achieves a no-net-increase in stationary source emissions; developing strategies to reduce vehicle trips and miles traveled; increasing average vehicle ridership to 1.5 persons during commute hours;reducing population exposure to non-attainment pollutants by 25%; establishing best available retrofit control technology requirements for permitted sources; and developing indirect and area source programs. As:stated in the current Air Quality Attainment Plan,it is SJVA.PCD's strategy to implement multiple tactics or control measures. These measures are,in turn,implemented through the extensive collection of District rules, regulations and permitting reyuirements established by the SJVAPCD. INITIAL STUDY Environmental Assessment No. A-03-22/R-03-69rr-5258/R-03-84/T-5295 Page 4 May 12, 2004 The Air District has suggested that the URBEMIS 2002 computer model be used to project future air pollutant emissions that can be expected to be generated from vehicular traffic generated from the urban uses developed on the project site. The computer model evaluated the following emissions: ROG (Reactive Organic Gasses),NOX(Nitrogen Oxides),CO(Carbon Monoxide),PM10(Particulates)and SOX (Sulfur Oxides)which are summarized below. URBEMIS 2002 AIR QUALITY IMPACTS** All data in tons/year ROG NOX CO PM10 SOX Area Source Emissions 2.75 0.60 0.27 0.0 0.0 Operational Emissions 6.94 5.98 72.54 0.24 0.03 Totals 8.69 6.58 72.81 0.24 0.03 Level of Significance or 10 10 100 14.6 27.375 Requirements for Offset. =Based on 113 single family residential units The URBEMIS 2002 model projections indicate that the proposed project will not exceed the threshold limits for the emissions listed. This particular analysis included the prohibition of wood burning devices. The SJVAPCD has developed the San Joaquin.Valley 1991 California Clean Air Act Air Quality Attainment Plan(AQAP), which continues to project nonattainment for the above-noted pollutants in the future. This project will be subject to applicable Air District rules, regulations, and strategies. In addition, the construction phase of the project will be subject to the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District(SJVAPCD)Regulation VIII, Fugitive Dust Rules, related.to the control of dust and fine particulate matter. This rule mandates the implementation of dust control measures to reduce the potential for dust to the lowest possible level. The plan includes a number of strategies to improve air quality including a transportation control strategy and a vehicle inspection program. In addition, the District encourages innovations in measures to reduce air quality impacts such as energy efficient building materials and household appliances as well as site design features including landscaping, pedestrian and transit access features. The 2025 Fresno General Plan and the Roosevelt Community Plan major street design standards and bikeway plans provide for thorough distribution of alternative transportation improvements. These facilities assure convenient accessibility to neighborhood uses including schools, parks, and commercial centers using alternative nonvehicular means of transportation. Neighborhood parks are acquired and developed with urban growth management fees,frequently located in conjunction with an elementary school site that facilitate related academic, athletic, recreational, and other community activities that promote combined trip-making and encourage the use of nonvehicular modes of transportation. In addition, the City of Fresno continues to plan and implement the expansion of its fixed-route bus public transportation system in order to serve developing urban areas. Adopted standards and conditions of development require the provision of adequate bus stop facilities at appropriate major street locations to facilitate future public transportation services. The 2025 Fresno General Plan does call for proposed bus route along Clovis Avenue which will include Church Avenue as well. These proposed bus routes are expected to reduce potential vehicle miles travel!ed. INITIAL STUDY Environmental Assessment No..A-03-22/R-03-69/T-5258/R-03-84/T-5295 'Page 5 May 12, 2004 Mitigation Measures 1. The proposed project shall implement and incorporate,as applicable,the airquality related mitigation measures as noted in the attached Project Specific Monitoring Checklist dated May 12, 2004. 2. The proposed.project shall implement and incorporate,as applicable,the air quality related mitigation measures as identified in the attached Master Environmental Impact Report No. 10130-2025 Fresno General Plan Mitigation Monitoring Checklist dated May 12, 2004. 3.0—WATER; 3.1—Insufficient Groundwater Available for Long-Term Proiect Use The adverse groundwater conditions of limited supply and compromised quality have been well- documented by planning, environmental impact report, and technical studies over the past 20 years including the Master Environmental Impact Report No. 10130 for the 2025 Fresno General Plan, Final EIR No.10106, Final EIR No.10117, Final EIR No. SCH 95022029 (Fresno Metropolitan Water Resource Management Plan)et al. These conditions include water quality degradation due to DBCP, arsenic, iron, and manganese concentratiuns; low water well yields; limited aquifer storage capacity and recharge capacity; and, intensive urban or semi-urban development occurring upgradient from the Fresno Metropolitan Area. The proposed project places additional demand upon peak water use capacity which is one of the limitations of the groundwater supply aquifer underlying the eastern portion of the Roosevelt and McLane Community Plan areas. The proposed project must contribute to short-term and long-range water supply and distribution remediation projects in order to adequately address this deficiency. Inresponse to the need for a comprehensive long-range water supply and distribution strategy the Fresno Metropolitan Water Resource Management Plan has been adopted and the accompanying Final EIR(SCH #95022029)certified. The purpose of the management plan is to provide safe,adequate,and dependable water supplies. to meet the future .needs of the metropolitan area in an economical manner; protect groundwater quality from further degradation, and overdraft; and, provide a plan of reasonably implementable measures and facilities. In addition,the proposed project must contribute to the completion of the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District's master planned storm drainage facilities. Stormwater ponding basins provide significant opportunity to recharge groundwater with collected storm water run-off and surface water obtained from the Fresno Irrigation District and United States Bureau of Reclamation benefitting the project area. In accordance with the provisions of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and Master EIR No. 10130 mitigation measures, project specific water supply and distribution requirements must assure that an adequate source of water is available to serve the project with the implementation of the mitigation measures noted below and are required to be implemented by the attached mitigation monitoring checklist. In summary, these mitigation measures require participation in the development of a water supply and distribution system equal to the project's estimated water consumption. Implementation of the Fresno General Plan policies, the Water Resources Management Plan, and the applicable mitigation measures of approved environmental review documents will address the issues of providing an adequate, reliable, and sustainable water supply for the project's urban domestic and public safety consumptive purposes.Tentative Tract Map No.5258 is proposing a 258-lot single family residential subdivision while Tentative Tract Map No. 5295 is proposing a 123-lot single family residential subdivision. These entitlements will require new water well(s) site to adequately serve the proposed projects. The nearest water mains are located in Church Avenue(.16-inch.main)and South Clovis Avenue(16-inch main) INITIAL :STUDY Environmental Assessment No. A-03-221R-03-69iT-.52581R-03-84iT-5295 Nage 6 May 12, 2004 Mitigation Measures 1. The proposed project shall implement and incorporate, as applicable, the water related mitigation measures as noted in the attached Project Specific Monitoring Checklist dated May 12, 2004. 2. The proposed project shall implement and incorporate, as applicable, the water related mitigation measures as identified in the attached Master Environmental'lmpact Report No..10130-2025 Fresno General Plan Mitigation Monitoring Checklist dated May 12, 2004. 4.0—PLANT LIFE; and 5.0—ANIMAL LIFE There are no native plants or significant wildlife populations known to exist on the project site. The extensive landscaping proposed on the site will provide habitat for certain species of birds and small animals suited for an urban environment. ¢.0—HUMAN HEALTH Aside from temparary dust generation during construction,.the project is not expected to have any other impacts on human health. 7.0—NOISE The project site will be exposed to vehicle traffic noise due to its location adjacent to a planned arterial major street(South Clovis Avenue)and a planned collector street(East Church Avenue). Arterial streets are typically developed with four to six travel lanes (two or three in each direction) and a center median island with single or dual left turn lanes at intersections. Arterial streets have the capacity to accommodate average daily vehicle trips of 36,000 and collector streets can accommodate average vehicle daily trips of 24,000, although projected.daily traffic volumes for Clovis Avenue will exceed the current four-lane capacities. Church avenue.is expected to be operating at a level of service C in the year 2025. Implementation of applicable development policies and zone district standards provide for the substantial reduction of traffic generated noise. Where single-family residential lots are proposed to back onto major streets,a 15-30 foot landscaped area from the edge of the street pavement to a block wall barrier(not less than six feet in height)is required. Confirmation of compliance with the City's noise element standards for residential environments will be assured with the final project design and a noise calculation analysis. Typically the implementation of these design measures assure compliance with the City's noise element standards of 45 dBA Ldn, or less, interior noise and 60 dBA Ldn, or less, exterior noise exposure. An Acoustical Analysis was performed by Brown-Buntin Associates Inc. for the Sunnyside Ranch Project dated March 2, 2004. The mitigation measures recommended in the report will be incorporated into the project design of both subdivisions. Mitigation Measures: 1. The proposed project shall.implement and incorporate, as applicable, the noise related mitigation measures as noted in the attached Project Specific Monitoring Checklist dated May 12, 2004. 2. The proposed project shall implement and incorporate, as applicable, the noise related mitigation measures as identified in the attached Master Environmental Impact Report No. 10130-2025 Fresno General Plan Mitigation Monitoring Checklist oated May 12, 2004. INITIAL STUDY Environmental Assessment No. A-03-22/R-03-69/T-5258/R-03-84/T-5295 Page 7 May 12, 2004 9.0—LAND USE The 2025 Fresno General Plan and Roosevelt Community Plan currently designate the subject site for medium low density residential land use(54 acres), medium density residential land use(20 acres),*office commercial land use(12 acres)and neighborhood commercial land use(10 acres). The plan amendment application proposes the change of planned land use from the office commercial designation and neighborhood commercial land use designation to the medium density residential land use designation for 22 acres of the subject property. Rezone Application No. R-03-84 and related Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295/UGM is requesting a rezone from AE-5 (Exclusive Five Acre Agriculture)and AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agriculture/Urban Growth Management)to R-1 (Single Family Residential)and R- 1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) for 26 net acres to facilitate the development of a 123-lot single family subdivision. Rezone Application No. R-03-69 and associated Tentative Tract Map No. 5258 requests a rezone from AE-5 (Exclusive Five Acre Agriculture) and AE- 51UGM(Exclusive Five Acre Agriculture/Urban Growth Management)to R-1(Single FamilyResidentiao and R-1/UGM(Single FamilyResidential/Urban Growth Management)to facilitate the development of a 258-lot single family subdivision on 70 net acres. The portion of the project that rests below the East Church Avenue alignment is an urban growth management area, while the balance of the project to the north of Church Avenue is a non-UGM area. The subject site is presently occupied by the Sunnyside Ranch complex which house equestrian riding and stable and related agricultural buildings and equipment. A majority of the open farmland is currently being leased for row crop cultivation to local growers. The area to the immediate north and west are characterized by large estate size lots that were developed in the County. Some of these homes contain facilities for horses which had been common in this portion of the community. To the east, there is planned community commercial land use that will be surrounded by a storm water drainage basin and single.family residences which are currently under construction. In addition, a single family subdivision is planned for the area south of the subject property. The prospective loss of 10 acres of commercial land use and 12 acres of office commercial land use is not expected to have a severe impact on planned developments in the southeast portion of the community. This loss will be offset by the adjoining community commercial designation located on the northeast corner of Clovis and Church Avenues. Furthermore, the proposed text amendments to he commercial zone districts which would implement the planned commercial land uses will be amended to include the potential for residential mixed use development. The mixed use concept is one that is heavily supported by the plans and policies of the 2025 Fresno General Plan. The proposed land use is compatible with the applicable community and general plan goals, policies, and implementation measures intended to. provide for the efficient uses of natural resources and public facilities; the construction of adequate public improvements by the development which generates the demand for these facilities; and, the implementation of a functional land use pattern consistent with the population and economic growth projects of the Fresno General Plan. Based on the applicability of adopted development standards,plan policies/implementation measures,and applicable mitigation measures of the above-referenced environmental documents,and with consideration of the proposed land use relationship, and recommended neighborhood unifying design principles, it is concluded that the proposed plan amendment will further promote the achievement of the planned urban form and land use objectives of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the Roosevelt Community Plan. 10.0—TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION The development of the project site with the proposed 381 single-family residences, and the surrounding planned urban uses designated by the 2025 Fresno General Plan and Roosevelt Community Plan,will be required to complete the planned major street network in accordance with applicable development policies INITIAL STUDY Environmental Assessment No. A-03-22/R-03-69/T-5258/R-03-84/T-5295 Page 8 May 12, 2004 and standards. Both plans designate South Clovis Avenue as an arterial street and East Church as a collector street. Arterial streets are typically required to be developed with two travel lanes in each direction separated by a median island to control left-turn and crossing vehicular movements although scenic drives can be developed with only one lane of travel in each direction to allow extra space for extensive landscaping. The plans designate East Church Avenue as collector streets, which would typically be developed with two travel lanes in each direction, or one travel lane in each direction and a continuous center tum lane, and there is not a median island. All street standards provide for a widened pavement width at major street intersections to allow for exclusive left-tum and right-tum lanes as well as bus bays or turnouts. - The Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR) No. 10130 prepared for the 2025 Fresno General Plan (incorporated herein by reference)utilized macro-level traffic analysis techniques to examine the traffic flow level of service(LOS)for major street segments that would occur in the year 2025. This analysis utilized the unadjusted COG traffic model projected traffic volumes and the Florida Tables,which are an accepted national tabular standard of the Highway Capacity Manual(HCM)methodology. LOS is a characterization of a street's traffic flow operations that range from an LOS of A (reflecting a very low traffic volume with no travel delay)to an LOS of F(reflecting a very high traffic volume with substantial congestion and travel delay). The master environmental impact report(MEIR No. 10130) prepared for the adoption of the 2025 Fresno General Plan predicts that Clovis Avenue from California to Church currently operates at an acceptable Level of Service D and would maintain that same level of service in 2025 with mitigation to six lanes for Clovis Avenue. The planned Church Avenue four-lane collector street is expected to operate at a Level of Service C in 2025. The City of Fresno's adopted standard for an acceptable level of service is D. However, there are streets in the larger southeast area that will be functioning at a level of service which is below the accepted level. A substantial proportion of these street deficiencies are the result of land use decisions, development practices and public perceptions that have affected land use distribution throughout the region. These factors also include state planning mandates such .as the need to accommodate projected population growth consistent with State planning law including the housing element mandates (California Government Code Sections 65583 through 65895.5). These decisions include the practice of segregating residential, commercial and industrial land uses so that industrial and other employment intensive uses were located in the southern portion of the metropolitan area, while predominantly residential uses were located in the middle and northern sectors. Large employment intensive uses attract trips from throughout.the region and thus might facilitate the use of public transportation or other alternatives to the use of the private vehicle. However, It is apparent that a substantial portion of the predicted vehicle trips impacting the plan area's major street system would be generated from land uses that are not equitably contributing to the cost of constructing adequate street capacity or other transportation.systems. Widely dispersed semi-urban or rural residential developments occurring beyond the Fresno Metropolitan Area are poorly suited for alternative forms of public transportation and typically would not contribute to the construction of additional major street capacity. The traffic analysis prepared for the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the associated Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR) No. 10130 utilized the Fresno County Peak Hour Travel Model of the Council of Fresno County Council of Governments (COG) to project average daily vehicle trip (ADT) volumes on major streets. With development of the project site and. surrounding planned urban uses designated by the general plan through the year 2025, projected ADT volumes of 40,000± on Clovis Avenue and , 14,000± on Church Avenue and 56,000± on Jensen Avenue can be anticipated. With anticipated improvements completed by the development of planned land uses as required by city standards and policies, these streets are expected to ultimately function with a level of service (LOS) of D and C. As required by the mitigation measures established by the certification of MEIR 10130, a traffic assessment was prepared by Peters Engineering Group to evaluate the number of vehicle trips projected , INITIAL STUDY Environmental Assessment No. A-03-22/R-03-69/T-5258/R-03-84/T-5295 Page 9 May 12, 2004 to be generated by the proposed project. Utilizing the Institute of Traffic Engineers(ITE)Trip Generation Manual, Sixth Edition, and associated computer software together with the Council of Fresno County Govemments'(COG)computerized traffic model,this analysis predicts the number of vehicle trips that will be generated from the proposed project and surrounding planned land uses,, and the direction in which these trips will travel. Development of 381 single family residential dwelling units can be expected to generate an average of approximately 3,646 vehicle trips per day(VTD). Of these vehicle trips it is projected that 285 will occur during the morning(7 to 9 a.m.)peak hour travel period and 385 will occur during the evening (4 to 6 p.m.) period hour travel period. A modest proportion of these projected trips are expected to access the planned 180 Freeway and Clovis Avenue interchange and the Freeway 99 and Jensen Avenue interchange during the morning and evening peak periods. The eastern extension of Freeway 180 from Chestnut Avenue to the expressway transition at Temperance Avenue is expected to occur as provided by the Measure C Transportation Sales Tax Expenditure Plan by the year 2006. This extension includes the Clovis Avenue interchange which is expected to be designed with adequate capacity to accommodate a twenty-year population and employment growth period. The project traffic study further indicates that the Church/Minnewawa intersection should be constructed and set up to accommodate future signalization as a precautionary measure. In addition, the Clovis/Church intersection should contain dual lefts with the possibility of dual lefts on Church Avenue if the intersection is proved to fail.The project's fair share for improvements to the Clovis/Church intersection has been determined to be 3.7%,while the fair share cost for the Clovis and Jensen intersection is 1.6%. The applicant has agreed to pay these fees as part of their mitigation measures for traffic impacts. Most of the immediately surround ing.area has been developed and the planned major street and intersection improvements have been completed as required by adopted plans, policies and development standards. The project site is not located in the Urban Growth Management Area and will not be paying fees or constructing improvements in accordance with that program. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), District 6, Office of Intergovernmental Relations has stated that the proposed plan amendment is not expected to create significant impacts to the State Highway System in a letter dated February 3, 2004. They have expressed concern for growth in Fresno, because any growth increases the demand on the highway systems. Although the proposed project will marginally contribute to the peak capacity deficiencies of the freeway system, major freeway improvements are the responsibility-of Caltrans and any fee related assessments imposed by Caltrans must comply with applicable legal parameters. The City has not recommended that this state facility traffic impact fee be imposed as a condition of project approval, as it is not evident that Caltrans has accurately documented a project description and cost,a reliable estimate of funding sources, a justifiable nexus or connection between the project and the need for the state facility improvements, and the reasonable proportionality of the project's share of the improvement costs that are necessary to justify the imposition of a traffic impact fee for the improvement of State facilities. This conclusion is based upon Caltrans's submission of varying descriptions of the necessary freeway improvements, the imprecise estimate of costs and probable finding sources, and the lack of adequate information to comply with Fee Mitigation Act requirements (California Government Code§§ 66000 et sequentes) applicable to the City of Fresno. In the absence of this documentation it is not legally permissible for the City to impose the requested traffic impact fee. State highway facilities appear to have failed to meet 20-year capacity design criteria during a period of time when the area's pace of population growth decreased to a rate well below previous state projections. This highway facility "under-design" and consequently the capacity deficiencies, which may now be prematurely occurring, are at least partially the result of resource allocation decisions made by the State of California rather than land use decisions made by the City of Fresno. INITIAL STUDY Environmental Assessment No. A-03-22!R-03-691T-5258/R-03-841T-5295 Page 10 May 12, 2004 presented to Caltrans for consideration. This method utilizes the master storm water drainage facility planning and fee program established by the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control Agency as a model. Using this model, Caltrans is responsible for providing a master facilities plan, development fee schedule and assurances of compliance with constitutional and statutory requirements (Mitigation Fee Act- AB 1600) which. apply to the City of Fresno. Should Caltrans develop a master facilities plan and development impact fee program consistent with this model, it will be applied to any final tract map or other applicable development entitlement for this project. It is also noted that the City of Fresno's staff has met with Caltrans representatives to review citywide impacts on State facilities; the CEQA process; and the legal requirements for determining the nexus (demonstration of the direct relationship between the project and the potential impact) and the proportionality (fair share contribution towards mitigating the impact) required by State law. While the Caltrans representatives have previously assured the City that Caltrans legal staff would provide evidence of compliance with State statutes, no response has been received to date by the City of Fresno. However, in response to these discussions, a partnership in planning grant was obtained through which the City of Fresno and Caltrans will participate with other jurisdictions to complete a freeway deficiency st.qdy. This study will detail the traffic impacts anticipated to occur to freeway facilities within the greater Fresno-Madera-Clovis Metropolitan Area. This study will focus upon facilities identified to be most impacted by the projected increases in traffic; identification of the sources of the vehicle traffic within the greater metropolitan area; and the improvements necessary to provide adequate vehicular capacity. Findings from this study may allow proportionate traffic impact fees to be legally implemented by the cities of Fresno and Clovis as well as the County.of Fresno upon adoption by the respective jurisdictions. In order to alleviate the impact of this project upon the City of Fresno's street system and to provide for a smooth flow of traffic to and from the project, the property owner/developer will be required to dedicate a portion of the subject sites for street purposes in.accordance with adopted plans and policies such as the Major Street and Highway Plan, the Circulation Element of the General Plan, an Official Plan Line, a Director's Determination, or a local street public improvement standard as determined by the Director. In addition,the residents of the proposed project will contribute to the construction of state highway facilities and regionally significant streets through the Measure "C° local transportation sales tax program. These and other street plans are the product of careful planning that projects traffic capacity needs based on the densities and intensities of planned land uses anticipated at build-out of the planned area. These streets will provide adequate access to and recognize the traffic generating characteristics of individual properties and, at the same time, afford the community an adequate and efficient circulation system. Mitigation Measure 1. The proposed project shall implement and incorporate, as applicable, the traffic and circulation related mitigation measures as noted in the attached Project Specific Monitoring Checklist dated May 12, 2004. 2. The proposed project shall implement and incorporate, as applicable, the traffic and circulation related mitigation measures as identified in the attached Master Environmental Impact Report No. 10130-2025 Fresno General Plan Mitigation Monitoring Checklist dated May 12, 2004. 11.0—URBAN SERVICES 11.1—Availability of Fire Protection The project site is located within three miles of County Fire Station No. 88 and is subject to UGM fire service fees for Fire Station 15. The subdivider will be required to install residential hydrants throughout the proposed singie family res=idential tract. The applicant also must comply with the applicable service INITIAL STUDY Environmental Assessment No. A-03-22/R-03-69fT-5258/R-03-84/T-5295 Page 11 May 12, 2004 facilities and services appropriate for urban uses. Mitigation Measures 1. The proposed project shall implement and incorporate,as applicable,fire service related mitigation measures as noted in the attached Project Specific Monitoring Checklist dated May 12, 2004. 2. The proposed project shall implement and incorporate, as applicable, the fire service related mitigation measures as identified in the attached Master Environmental Impact Report No. 10130- 2025 Fresno General Plan Mitigation Monitoring Checklist dated May 12, 2004. 11.4—Overcrowding of School Facilities The project site is served by both the Fresno Unified School District and Sanger Unified School District and is presently within the attendance boundaries of Ayer Elementary School, Terronez Intermediate School and Sunnyside High School for Fresno Unified;and Lone Star Elementary School,Washington Academic Middle.School and Sanger High School for Sanger Unified. Because of the sustained growth occurring within bath district boundaries,the school district has advised of the following conditions. 1. Future adjustments of school attendance areas could occur such that students residing in the proposed project will attend an elementary school other than Ayer or Lone Star and that students may attend more than one elementary school during their elementary school years. 2. The district has adopted development fees in accordance with current state law. Development of the project site will be subject to the fees in place at the time fee certificates are obtained. In addition, the district has requested that the owner/subdivider provide the above information to all prospective purchasers of property within the proposed project. In addition,the project developer will have to request a district boundary change if all students are to attend one school district. The present district boundary is the Fancher Creek Canal which is proposed to be relocated along the Dewitt Avenue alignment. 11.6—Availability of Sewer Lines of Adequate Capacity The Public Utilities. Department has determined that there is sufficient capacity to serve the project. The nearest available sewer r.,ains are located in East Church Avenue. Adequate sanitary sewer service is available to serve the project, subject to the Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5258/UGM and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5295 Conditions of Approval dated May 21, 2004. /Mitigation Measures 1. The proposed project shall implement and incorporate,as applicable,the sewer related mitigation measures as noted in the attached Project Specific Monitoring Checklist dated May 12, 2004. 2. The proposed project shall implement and incorporate,as applicable,the sewer related mitigation measures as identified in the attached Master Environmental Impact Report No. 10130-2025 Fresno General Plait Mitigation Monitoring Checklist dated May 12, 2004. INITIAL STUDY Envirunmental Assessment No. A•03-22/R-03-69/T-5258/R-03-84(T-5295 Page 12 May 12, 2004 11.7—Availability of Storm Water Drainage Facilities On or Off Site In order to avoid or reduce the discharge of pollutants into the storm water sewer system, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency requires that a Notice of.lntent fora general National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit be filed for a variety of industrial uses and for any construction site of five or more acres of land. The property owner of this development site has been informed of that requirement and of his,and any business owner's,,responsibility to ensure that the Notice of Intent is filed in accordance with the regulations published in Volume 55, No. 222, of the Federal Register. Mitigation Measures 1. The proposed project shall implement and incorporate, as applicable, the storm water and flood control related mitigation measures as noted in the attached Project Specific Monitoring Checklist dated May 12, 2004. 2: The proposed project shall implement and incorporate, as applicable, the storm water and flood control related mitigation measures as identified in the attached Master Environmental Impact Report No. 10130-2025 Fresno General Plan Mitigation Monitoring Checklist dated May 12,2004. 13.0-AESTHETICS The subject site contains a series of majestic palm trees that provide for an exotic entrance to the exiting Sunnyside Ranch. It is strongly suggested that the project applicant incorporate these trees as part of their landscape theme or have the trees strategically relocated within the development to offer aesthetic value. 14.0—HISIORICAUARCHAEOLOGICAL There are no adjacent historical or archaeological sites. To ensure that any possible sites will be protected, the following conditions have been added to this special permit approval: 1. If archaeological and/or animal fossil material is encountered during project surveying, grading, excavating, or construction, work shall stop immediately. 2. If there are suspected human remains, the Fresno County Coroner shall be immediately contacted. If the remains or other archaeological material is possibly Native American in origin, the Native American Heritage Commission shall be immediately contacted, and the California Archaeological Inventory/Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center shall be contacted to obtain a referral list of recognized archaeologists. An archaeological assessment shall be conducted for the project, the site shall be formally recorded, and recommendations made to the City as to any further site investigation or site avoidance/preservation. 3. If animal fossils are uncovered, the Museum of Paleontology at U.C. Berkeley shall be contacted to obtain a referral list of recognized paleontologists. An assessment shall be conducted by a paleontologist and, K the paleontologist determines the material to be significant, it shall be preserved. The project applicant did prepare a historical survey report that concluded that there was no significant evidence in the record to suggest that the project site and its environs would warrant historical status. DETERMINATION ' . INITIAL STUDY Environmental Assessment No. A-03-22/R-03-69/T-5258/R-03-84/T-5295 Page 13 May 12, 2004 Based upon these previous actions and the applicability of adopted development standards,plan policies/ implementation measures, and applicable mitigation measures of the above-referenced environmental documents, it is concluded that the proposed land uses will not result in a significant indirect adverse environmental effect. On the basis of this initial evaluation, it is determined that the proposed project is consistent with all applicable city plans and policies and conforms to all applicable zoning standards and requirements. Pursuant to Section 15070 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, it is further determined that there is no substantial evidence in the record that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment. This is based upon the mitigation measures required as conditions of project approval which are referenced by this environmental assessment and are conditions upon which a mitigated negative declaration can be recommended. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. • r SACXAMaster Fi•.es-7.0031—PLAN AMENDMENTSW03-22,R-03-69,84,T-5295,5258-(AilanjianWSW-03-22-Initial Studympd LL N W X x X N _ e- U eo G O U, T O c a dV ` G O Q) cd � V Of c d Q :+ m cc , to m X X X c � - _ °= = oU a Q CO to O. O2. Q 0 y Ic ......, .*,p„ ... .., aa` S 2 2 . z QcnUOwLL L) 4) $y ci cm m c O 4ZT cc Ec C7 JW toC0 toL = ao 'dao O IL LL 3crn> 30c > 3 �c > c3aai 'c0 . wU) cc .: SUS O V a' I` � oc a' -- a Fog' a. PcL o0 Z C `o y `o d `o m WE E E W Z m � �� D Z _ � 0. a ac H mmo c o cm o N g Y 3: W O,N f0 o •• o ff �' J � _u o c� 1 J t o c ¢o ato L Q V , _ a to a _ to a _ w o a� W co c E °' c0 C c c0 0 dL to W _C � L Z 0 N OJ O �` ox0 tdNE F- 3opE vI- ' U) aaiE C W C O N d .0. � Q � p EQ ,n 0 C L. N W O C ,Or O - y V C y r O ti eco c c co " y 0 to '� N 'o N O N) > f`0 !0 N d > y •- J Z-C � m �+C W m Ly. R E y a R r G A g.m f` W $ y 0 c >O 8 N C -�U UE Va O OCLL. yNCL E to CM VC> O tNN op � dv Co cLnCDaZ I0 :5t40)c LL N d " oy Q1 N - c I O U) '- N Nf � OO W ' N 34) mMS E0 W N m o N m m o 4) E y coc2 0 .0 > y > ` c4) LLJ aa � o y �Q . E c ED am c yv ycc t 0 to� an Ci m � oLI a N ydo � N C cv z LZ U, Q 0c � � _ � � % cw 0) 0)iy U W 2 cow c 3'F c c d m � QOC aD 2 = m aL0 y m o Sa m5E E am v OW � -- - a) b ra c tea .. o. To �- _ � cC � O � _� oUS � c L, y eco -� e E c -0. m e N .0 m ~ c "W .2 C O y to m m y to V C m m to to 7 d O Y d y y V O ._ m 0 y c > % O -O0 LV a C C y c M V N N ~ U a a m c •H >. E a d u U �' m C •0 V t Ln cc o rn co $ 0 m 2 to 'o c E c -0 > E �` o r 0 N c - c c W L W O m N ' 7 0 a c mai E to m � $ rn� , coo 0. 0.2 to d c iow Ow N m c o CMQ �� v E � � E E.3 � c H � � c-M I m U to y L " � a5 EW � `� $ �a mLn CD E E Q' yd � g .2 yE f0c yy omLeo QC E !d O S to C y N C U O c 4) E lU N iocZ c ay �.c to w.17 aE � N € "� aErL' to > d �c O :Q)c c 0 c � t c� m c m tco m am io c c` 3 am t3ot z E E o E EO y m o w E � a3 � - EY u)i LO c .E � a.4) Q � Q a m X 0 2 0,, E m o o La Cl. m 3w or_ O O M M �d 0 H r- � > c m E w a) > �' �ritn -o E 4> o c mto V cW ;° � oQ > > a.0 0 ,0o0py > p �� d maCL V O W r C - O .0 E N C - E L a y y O Om0) � ctoo_Lac r cy o. ci yE c = 5 .0 i ad O m y io E � tao � m o W � � .E m d� ci coi I M .0 0 CL LLa5 z i LL 1t'� '' c a* 1 ��w' "�• r N s :. -4. to LL n n m n (M-- CS m m c c m e c c m c c O � p C) ocE � oc 'E � ocE � ocE _ LU m o. 0 .2 M m o. m o Cf) JLL Cad °'Cam ° Cad o am m O � � 3: IM ' m � acm 3asm + VLU> > �° f0cm � � � � aai � � � am � � � � aai O aPa mC) a ma aa m0 at- a ma zm .-. L � .0 LLE O V n W ZZ > s: o > c$ °1 ° ¢ E •- c Z H = � CCL m c C°. Q. ai Fu dZ LU m0. V c _ WQV 2 w aim a `ommm a '2E w — N " v>, m$ a) c 0 mwR 5c Vm -m �CV N�yrnvQ � m c m C > = c c ya � � 0 :VZ L ym Q 0 -0 E OOC _ p`mma+i N 0 -0 N m C1n m •C 'o Cm m 7 E m m N 81 y O lc C m� •O m- m N 'o m m0= m aR1 •0 Zm N m > c ' LvVm> rn0o � Ea ° X gNS ._.0 m 0N $V) m am o o ¢W • 0cmC2 e aOc EO Z LL + m 0m � - mcm cm 0a� aa) sm r - ° M cWmNm Em c LU E.-675 c a) 0 > Ln tm CD y m > gig > > 6 O N CN C Lr) yS EQN � ° ma.- ma) � ma � a) �cCQai CL m > tM Q CL .215 N_ .00 E �`5NALcn7 co OC e m�Hy c0 M 0 C4) N .0W 7CCmaJm -2-:2 C �m C14 c C ZmyC ul) H OLLI $ m � y ao a o0 MCD E c CL E � c e ogmm W CM C3 a wa � mZ mo0 7S ° ' U N O c 19 E m5 E os c m -� � ° H � m ac c �c o o m � 3cn 'cci ram, m c o Qc g' m5 N � E E 3 c�i P y 4) -0 m cmi E uyi da a� m c c O)�aS .0m � mm � � . �OQy m m m C CDm N NC .sc 'a L? > N4) f C N aj . 0 w > C � a N d C m00 NN N t L- 'c dI �m VCO C M N NN 0 - 0 dCo QONm > cCy o N ot _ r> ° amam c E E y` > = " mG m m $ mCC m W C E m oCD M k, .2 � c � m � m a �nia u o � m o � Z o :5 O) C L m C Y (9 m N a C E - C m C 0 C N` -y o c O o m Ea yE O c E •_ �i ca � m c c m m 5 � . mNEm � � vcN _ m ° EE Q > a m m O.VX > V V m m �° O N N w N 0 3 W 0 0 0 o m m o � m e 3 ' mgi T ¢ m v c 5�° ai � CL CL$ o a � m m T � �y y m Z m m .0 0 o 'C Q. U- m Mom Eao . (DZ UE � m °' v ,>--r ° mNaE ui CD _� E m m m a mm o co .6 mS E aT m 0 4)mo m E `b w 0 00 • It LL CD O r N W X N T 0 U x0.0 x x ai m O Q x x W Um O ALU e�coacic � c E O ca c a r Q y u a� two G o r O W 'C a C m C Wa 0. O U � a� � LLUj > � � . LU ?' ZZ rn rn rn ° $ N LU W c c c _ �Z = � c rn a� YJY 3 _j o o wL� ON IL a tm 4) 2 -6 E `p d aLU r cc W .� Z � � 0 e� " 9 Em m � � rtb� c ,� � « w Q W bc y m C a 1 V r C C W va Cy .g E V G c d N 10 20 O E p C W m c �cc 0 ° o W W Q 9 Z ° ° � g p m Q y W ° « M C to y y C y F N d 2 • W Esc m c a� t a> c J Qy Lm Wm ecoE m _ `o - Q � o = W C �� am ?� vi yy . 'C° W E � o c v �. w w a 0- F . -5 Q p _ mc v CW w cy �° y yQ ? �o a aWad .93° m o �p NW E m c V Ln R IM LO C C t eco V W E Cm W G M y 7 8 y m 7 C ^! y r p C Ncyl Q a o W m H d C C � m W = '� d �p d C W a Z O N W C C 7 E W d m W W u ? a y N 8 y _ fit m e am E W o m o 72 Z oU X t� LU meB gocma > Ez ° c0 me UVB UD N m rW. '� v t w 0) W � m 't rn '� g 4)i 2 °c w V ,, .y C C o C fyc0 _� Q V LL A C m CD e S _W �° W e-° d S 'aj _ W S m > c m a 3 � �i C E f� � � N "W�' a � 17 ei @ u C ° 7 Z ° °� c mami ° 0 � ~>>, c 0) m '0c mm O 7 c 8. 0 C @ � m a 0- > y � to m E •2 eco 0 o m > Q W o ee o m y cq� rr g'> arc m 0 E c y L a> m .0 fD c y E G� '_3 E m � � E ` C�� vyi y ° y tee`° � � � � F' C C .�'+ C C 'p C Q C W y c• e+� Ci •m C Z a E ` W rQ y W o c y a y V C W y = G d 'W E y d y C y E > r •� m L' E O >.� N ) O C O aT d 2 A y m WCD O N m O •` p� •� m C C _W W •C y d w 7 ` O X fo O d N d y O •� 11 W to C N A C m tko O a 2 ,0 7 C Q O ` c ` E � o y � E O C 72 c Oe Z C C A O W o C - o C W E N O y Z fo d Q c S c euo m y g v _ �� m E r qq�°�� m E o � C .2 ay c °' >. a oma �w cui cc c E m m ny > �o `� rn Z 2 ,5 -0 a�i m� E o mQ _>� �+>^ y caa 19a d H m a c c a r� •_ ° .� u C O 5 y c0 c �� L7 . LU Q� m M C3 4) o ' '76 .s > j U v°i u d Cm E ° y Y d U o W Qm c`S W >. > G O a_� 7 C Q W e W 'Ci ►d C g 20 V y y y +7 Y g� W f71 , L O - O O Q N R! 0 O m CC U MCL � 'm N d to 5 U r eya � B a � W Wim ? e�ia e.; Xy 0. U rdi 'eo eo a j V o eo a ci V w E j UL W X X " X X i X N V X X M Y' W •yI X ,• X X W } a Z m m O Q C ) c o d � c o d c c c C") J W c c m c = m c. c -m c m " 0 m E m E m m E m E E m m O o H c 0 r 2 r- r 06*C O r E 06 O r cm C r O m c m m � c m m m c m m c m m c m m O W a= c > a.Q c > a aB c > a c > a c > a a V > ma S m m 7 m m m Q m m m m m m m m m m c 00a0 0aa � 0 0a a00 a00 a00 v Zm U a W Z c g Z c _c c c c c r � gLLJ o o o w LA- 0 CL Wes _ aaU O Z •� �' ac m $� $ m c m H h v CL CD LD :3 .e C J o Ue � mU �VO OC EcvQ p $ c mca9m m WZ_2 s � g m E = .n o H �c mmH c >N d 5 m m of ~ p o. ami x c m ' m e o. E m c m 0. 0 W LL cc m "� m m c0 o 'o �= m c of cui o 2 Ln I E �. .03 o c c a-p 3 m m c Z p = N o _o,mL m o M m 5 m � 2 •• 0 0 m . AmUS to f/1 m ONS v E 0 w 2 w p ts m m m h m Q c c 8 CO W m o aEi m � O m a� > a c p UO � � = � ' c �o m a c o o ° � c c m c v Z kn N y � � cmenQLy � rn � UTc - mEv aio 5 m N g' 10 `- a c c w O mL 0. 0o �� m ' Q I W O j m m C W E H C p •C A m m W CSD io Qmc= �' > a c m m 0 n $ A Z m � mh0 > =90 `•-° mE � » c � � me E Q o O o h � � � m �iti Q E o m c m �p c ° � Q c of cc mE � vi Q y � c 0 c c� 0 > m ,T C7 10 m m � c m x c� c 2 ° o m c m � S � � � m A _� o � £ E � '3 a 0 m m O � � v c c d � c c r- 0 ' °� 3 9 � m vmi �� � � m � � d � �� � c m � m �� � cr 8- m m 1 o. m c E � c m v m� c E -)o m E N E m m m 0 c y H c � m �m Q '� a cvy c � $ c � doa? o � E .. � Y ea � 0 cc H and m 7 A c m Z'TO € Z y m Q H m m � -o E 0 aL as m c c � H m w - � O m rn g - �" - o - m fL/1 :� l0 cmm L != 1p U O L (Op ly >• L m L _d p O) V Z � 3 H lC0 m V O m w C Cl m -e Q a W W � 0 -6 U 7 � d � y L C 'o .1 ..- = O ` E � _�m C m L 7 . W U `c° U oim � 0 m U f0 ° U o � 0 U m 0 � 5 � � � � Qm VH 0 L lC0 w Ol j L lC0 L C m O. > H 2 O m m m o ~ cLi o ' � � �' aW ~ mcg, � 00 rn U � L a .� N y .y E cc ri m .; v Q cc In o a m � CL DE G � h ° cgm Gym Gmrnm Dcm GC �o ci F N le LL W X r N :5 - e0 ci m a D Q W } vm Q O m m c c c JW amm m = m = m - f0 � m fOEm corm eEo � — or E r r ` $r g'or r- or g' r O W c > a a3 a a� c > a c > co c > a d c> > mis Sa o m Via= MSo aao aoo r w i3 Z H = Co rn rn ° ° rn cc rgY -1 o O o o o W � a CL Ly J = O �o to H y = � (� c S m ZC E � L - 3 N �' m c� E -e Z W ,0 cLn ° � a y mm ° � . l cc a c m m c (7 Uh C = a c m C O L m CL m 'm o C c � � � 0 y > C v E0 O > c0 � Mc 'm EO � a a y Z-2 m c�o � E m 10 ° OU CD cv1O m J ,•- y Q1 rn moc eom c' m = W C L `° Z�p' c Ch- coo c c � .__ - m yLm Us = cL dQ c £ m m y E V m y t0 pr LL O a o 's Z O C LL eo V � 2 :E o �. E 9E £ C0 U) L � co o'in � c m 5 CL ac = � N m v, `o C co S O N = 'C Of v°i = m 7'g Q. m O V N O Z C N c �: �' � � � 2 m �' mc � o U c `off C mE .ym, mm :: cc a; y bio c �,� m yo � M 00 W o eo > 3 e m e t c O � y U D a I y 3 t6 7 ; U V U Cps m y m / N y C y m .m m Co Q. G7 m m �0 y WN c m . c c m c c �� a3 y m � a � � ECC c`o3yM � C ym m = m � m O o `O Sj - Cc eo m m of c = c Co cc q11q�r y � Y � j CTJ VL i iz � y t C y y 8 m > S = m = La M Z c a ti9 5 ) -o E m a O 0 a o 0 a ` m m cpmc� �s $ c0 riy mH eooL � o .. = = Eco C to C H C y C9 cL L ;Cc c � � y mmycc c . m $ co Cc c m m o !E m 9 � E c m c * m E �M m � � co �c � eo � � mC orc � m > CE mm � _ m m m a m y E c m o co E .. N r ° ` ; eo mL E m m m C ° C E m c4 > o C M S �i 3 rn C o � .0 eo 2 C m d N yoacic SC � 00 � a oo m = `mm .ffi >� aDeo 0 A o ego coy V m E 'c = C . V c eo y c M io CmEc iE � m mm � o cEC o vi E m m -e = yc 79 a FF y comms : `_ " 2 o2y� Wim = � _ � S � Eco2m m om o5c = WE -4 je�oa e`o0 m Z y 'c O C C o. O) C co '` y C W �L �� �a eo � t0 T U � � U c eo w > E .c .c c C mieo M U " c c U o ? - m m 9 m me U = o 0 E v, ?-L m E C r y �_ `-� E y L oiE m � m m mrm. _ L m y F- C L Q7 m O — L c FE 'z V ~ � y � — m � � H ~ U C ° ~ � m ~ � .y d y 0 O C — O _ C m ao .p 'C O O> y W v H C O N m Pj y m a O � v=im O aam GU X. G ym W tmir v a W EC7 W 0 `m E ' LL N W ! .` iiu: ��''r ` x X X cq l0 f h •�� y. i 'T � Q ..:, ;:+r:. .'�:' `�.rrd moi'..: .r•'�v'�.+ti;P;<� W Um M � � ° Em 0- m a' a' a' m a c Q N c Q N Q N O M Q1 V > m -& m mmm m 0- > w W I-- v _ Z Z po' c° o' 2 Ul o cm az° g Y 3 w o 0 o 0 o LU Li Oa a L LI w W C e�c mcicecc m m tm.om "� � 78 U Z '` 7 .�. m N y'd � h cc p� V E L L m Q W me `�° ° Smog' co ° CE _ — � o � 7. E p O C y a `aa C .O m ' Q c -0:3 Q C a o G OC 7 2 V O 0 •o .. c cc C V c " y m m Ct R V O .0 CL c � � � e0ayma 2m m �cm � mmm d � T J -� ep1a — m' cym 8 m �r wpL cc Q C _p t _O:2.,o V �. G ; y C C C O` Ol ~ O m c E �° -- % c m m CO c cQ Z i+ 7 p �p 7 M c m m _m W 3 my 'D E y � �° 0Z62EE o oS W LO m c9 m � v; ciwv, O > amm 1 L" m ;° � o $ c N N cnc c ea $ cn my y p C m o tm. c a% c �B78 o m Z O m m — ._ m o ? c m " m m m m m > ct 4i N .� t H � m c a �n ° � m m d E ca � � � a ct m5tycc aKdu > o o mCL CL N W cm'� 'E c me eo'a D om m mHm � ohH UO W Q a� car r c3L S , �,� � o c W u c m m' o Qm 2 _r � � � ecc m m ma ° M Z o �° � m m mt c m m E f3 ° moo m N ca = m m 'c c m E ; m e QCT 2 c c m ,C m h ° .2mm ° a-- �' �h m'eo m v ° ; cpmCjm —O m m O E m C m C O C « m C Q m l O m O m Do W U CL m p m—M E m 2 t h C4 0t0 ,55 -o EL (D Ua !E V •H j � m -0 c ts CU mm m . i oS am mZtmoo E y0- 16 0UC a. . m C c y _ htm tLD c m - $ m E � p-� vvm . iB oM U m CL CD S ' m •S A7C � Lo `0 cr p >_ m Lm8E m Mm mS � . mdQ my L_ cC °c ED M mO m m mC Emn m m L e � hmEE o m E " O— co0 , — , m ¢v E co 5' � CL m CLoc w � m ° W ° m e > m 2 ; E mc ° cc r c o m �� it mu ` m c F-c m m 7 .0- a c44 m C T x O m 0 N o M . F7 �f N m h S'i aLU �i 0 l9 0-0 m LL m U s U LL V O. LL O. LL LL N W X X S X . N r Q a R U X X d m X X R D Q X X x W c a c a a O 4 ev) W � � c ., o E c c c C n. � amF d � mE c ° mE CM o, E � oy Oz `oy mdo m � � 0 So co g, e- OW aha > 0. 0. mai > i i a cv > 0 00 � D ii80 airoo L L ' Z Q CD y H y T �LJ WZ O C O O O O O C —0 -0 C g Z rr 0. W W a `-° av o c o` c o � o co ..� c c c c � m _ N = � o , 2 a0 0. 0a0 c ao co a m Y W .5 oc c a' 2 > E > Eo Y D. v a c g' H ° � �°J rna a 3 a.0 .0 ww VO H O O u O 0 O m m caoO eao d m Y m y mLD 0 9) pL_ OL W a c � m U 5 - Q W O ° � `y`° oyr- 0 m $� coo wo Z $ c HA E ti m m C V y E V d Lc fA E i N W 5 13 m y y R °) O 0. C m _ 0 '— >2 m V 'o m d y T O S = e� .cM a. `�� 2 E ° y E c ? c v 0 cow a coo c ( c QW C mm H �.0E r0 5E �3y � f0mVm 2 °' O .0 cao CDU c - a � c � -0 0 m $f am > m ZC LL '.; c E m m S ° v m 2-� mea m m v eyo E E c c Q ••� y V 3 rJ' 2 -2 a 1J •� VI rJ'CD vi m y E .y .� N y ' CD t (D yaci ° 0 om 2 : u0 0.5 a� � � 0 co W a E cv 0 E m � g' a� = co'• 0 - UO sN evo � eco �0Lm - 2• Ho � ocCD 0 =coe"�o $ m -0 11 �' Q � d ma�i �a2im � � m � � o OE- cc �N0 C t W m _ v 0 7 m m y v y m U 8 � O .ECM eo U c v .� m � � v � c 20 c `m Z n� °; m $ � o - m ioa cEo O C m 0 m�o a0 = y - E co L y y m F- 0 3 � 2 c0 LE •G Un LD -0m mZ 'Q^ LD -0 m a O `3 C0 0 �� y — Q y V >O y 'y Q� GGGGa •m O C � ° m y C �.. m m — e0 ? .m C C E _— 0 co D p $.� w m y0 d y �o w m c m mL m 2 m co m coo 0 c > m = - rJf .. ; 0. N m� -0 m ° � � .: - E• �' m a � m � 2 - m 0 N -S .2 . coy io m ° m c H �' _v0 ' E =Q e`o ° - m .2 ? �° E � a m E a o C �"� :3 = = 2 � c5E Em � 1 � � c � mmm v m '•- c 0 2 .2 H Hy ° � o o $ m i°oo c � Q m m a y C C dd .0 t j w .m m O m N 5E ' M 0CD 0 E my He� Vm ma . 0 = L a o L y E L != m C U C Q0 Q •C aD in m 82 Z m a �,5 0 �o a0i = 2 �` ° m E � �IV 0 eyo 0 °mi5 � v c2 WdV mm � H C ' te0 eC Le= L E '6 .c > c nomH �R2 .Ldo mm C m y O E_ r- cn ld aE $ 2 0w0C.Dm y °a - 0 VS am ° aso o CL.a9m � = 0 j etLL X x :'�` X X �w;• i. <: 'r;,`, ��• is W � 4 Q U } m n n m Zm o a a M aw � � E r d m E ME o, E f0 E e`o O cn cn cn �n rn r O W c > c > c > c > a O V ao a ao �.0 v Id. W C N C 9) C N C �' w 7 O 7 O 7 O v H O W0 -0 ow n voo Or- Z N ^ n o m c c n o m c c n o m C c a o c c a Z Y i c' > Ec c' > Ecm 0 Fm E 0 ccc > Eia � wLL La J Z ac 47 Fdc d7 nc d7 pac CL O W m W V O W m W V O M m M V O W m MID tm .C. m C C eft fA U Z -r- 0 7 C m A b T m N O T9 ,12 c • �, M _ m c CL c c m _ � v n� c U m eo 2 0 .2 0 c0 crm � mcL) 0m _ m .- 4) M a U) L ; L X 'U N L m n e�10 t '� Cml y W G m 'cE oc m A Q cmmar L - H aQ Z LL. >` C W U .0 A $ aCi vOl > d ALO cD E � f0v a (m «I � E N — 0) % 80m Em r>-•�WCT mCmM 0C� �a�0 O `C 0 � c06 Z cCD 0 mm ..+ m > �mO N d 0 m m � m O a am C y CA W m > E jM 0 .0 DO O O Cm O W 04 10 —Q H mM 4) CL Mho-0F �, �5 E � ° uJ me� y � � °�jhn rpc� > W010 y_ m o10 my f0 '�' air n cco M/ O O M C h CO m n w O m y ` t •� Q U m O :D V W O O > ? O W 0 Q 3 m F0) m W _ - m > V O CD C U ` C y H r —>-d) � N — o = CD m m M d rp t 0 Mc R m V d L L m m m m n r pi U O to cr Az .m cm >-O0 U O C n j N ~ � ~ai0 N = eco Q eo `� m C N � � ae?p c � 2 eco n L _ ` LD C m C .0.y 7 C c� d Q O E m O m 203 m �_ 'D do— CD LO m N Q fA � m C C C W � m4 EEM _ mg Z 0 g � c t cm 0) m �, ai m icoia W m oc -0 C N (m c cv ct Qao .7 m M -- t eo y t`o m m C N d ?i OL Oy H W w c m m •O pj m eA LL ` m C ui tD U 'V e O LL X O • N W N r � R V m m X !0 Q X X X X , W >' a a a n 1= a U m O w D c c ' c c c "7 JW � C� � m � c c c CD _o _o CCS 3 � d E n' LL c a g a g CL c a tl m c a OW c > c > 20y > ° C >coEc a V (L ao a � = aci as =a m � m W ° CC Z Zo M 0 3 m Z U)'"' WW c r E "o 0 o m0 CL 0� g �C 3J am ° � E a ° � 3 c c a2 a > '� O O 0 E m_ o E m W W L L gam a a V 0 M CD M k: Im m C C N �+ LD m 1. C) - N C y c V! C W ° � 2 0 4 w m m m m ._> .- = - ° Z E '� CD t t y ° ° 52t..? 19Z ° CD m � N _ v 'o m --= ac Y c► L o r c y E 'o c i. ECD= m E Z mt H m o Q p � � off, v_, mm= E � m E � CD � 8 E �a U J cm 2 o at y CD C - t at ° -19c- Z'm Q' a m _ _ 0 m a. v LL r p m m C) o H L` O p m m Vj - O C C V la .r C y o CD p C U y - C) vi CD w � �� (D C am E __ Q m C� dim > w 4 c �y .1m Ln N 2 m c m t 0 � (D c �L o � m CL rn � _ ° m ) N � L' � � co m iia mym CD c ° � m3 ° W aC � y rr `py Q � y cz � � � E _o cc O cm H a_ N 2 - z= o 2'm E c U D s Lo H E o C > o m m � c ° ° °' ° in 'A ;9 1N c � myc � oE � m �� co �, J < .T' 0 0 C U) y 'o 2 m � Jj S E C CD V! C y d - C. C l0 C � � E ' ° ° ` m om o Ec 2 .0 yg' 2 � m vai m m o ; E v°, U � - 0 :° m � 'c E CD 9 H Q C p y V C N C L 'O C '- 7 V! G e� Z a= m n E m E a d � m E W mm3 0 � m aE m O` > o H V C r y Q E y� mo v y c � '� �' ° a=� e� _� ?p �a3 O 7 G1 CD 0 p > � � ° (UD m � CD y C m � _ CD C y $ m d C) q m m Cpm Q�� o � f"¢q � L a m > 7S ID L N pp ,� L .4 8y m � > E icmo (7 cc CL rn c M Gp co-=_w O O � E SM m = � � ' N C m ' � y O E my n m •4 m m c rn m o E am CL E o g w c o �i c > o m m � E m o y mSg 'ri, o v, Q m ° m c (p a m �o mL ._ p°� d ova - c d H m o S. �° m lL 9j � N N > O.� V > � ° H GNU mt _ pp � ` a ` C V G l9 O p d > 0 O m Q O) lc9 ' E V p H o D D t .CS =(D ~ � 7 Ll9 G � .y.•• �j, C N l0 C `.• t m N N O) , Z .r dl pf N C o C) d C1 d - O 7 m 'w O `-' m c o C C W m � � . C� � rnECM 03 e. c 5 � 3 � 4� m o = m m m °` m 3C V c '= �o m -C- m CL y � m � `" .oin ani E c y c d � �' rn - � m a Qm = c � c'Z Emcyom " c °> E ctdm mZ' � t2Eco � t - d � c Qm mU c ° Q a QGa c = m '� c � _co- O 1EmW NandC4E `° m0L—Lm "awE � � syy = ago -2 �(n � - c Yc, t + r O LL x s Yk r:`..f ; iJ" uy W Xf; V �j•�j�..._ J.' X ••.�.�Mri. X �. •s,�TF•• • .t 7•�•. W } a S S _ Z m m_ CD D m 0 0 J — eom c0 c0 cm c0 O d LL � E rnE rnE W E f0 E eEo c � 4 5 0 2o g' o q, pW c ° m c.m c - c � L 0 (� > ° a>i eco > eco y y y eco m d Z 'ao ac, ao ao ao 0) W FW- �� yc b € _Uc .+ W W t o m ° CL c g' c ° Q° Z N 2 c c m 0 o 0 q o � a.� � J CD O'D ( 0 0 0 d Z CL 0y ° Oce , y w � �W/ Q V C14 cc 0) LDL cc U Z •` N y W (Ep .r Q N p 7 W.m CC C m QW 0 m a �' 5 ` L ; § r- = cr m 0 ° o v C J c CEo -0 . Ed �op 0 m cLI Z.. =' 0opts= wE .5 y E U m C ' 0 2 C Q C m �...W O �i' '�- � N mom, aci aW m Q Q o E d �' Z LL p c � 0. muco 0 — 0.d s c orn c c m c W � iLmc`o E � ` y3 ° Hc � co � � moy `O Z NO O � $ > c 0H .0 c > co = .d :2 m a Co a N 0 w > C co O N ° m > U. 17, t � o € y � o a 0 °>�' ao c e m op W �i c � � L E az UJ C E 0 E o2 y Q y � N w y ) € � y4)LL m z 8 �iX�Xc0 Lo0 _� c� f0 N UD Z D c 'm 'C — a c c y � "' � 'C 'E R i. ) c m m� E 0 W N �° 0 � � CL 4) > t a O) m E E .y 0 3 f0 ° Q> 7 C •y cW € c o y m m �' Q fO tS 0 � E cm 0. r cod '4 '.W. � c `C S.t U pyp O. y m �0 cco °� d Q�Q m �+ U'y orn o'm c M Z a D L C N y E G ° y y Q d C y C r` O Q O p y � N W w � y 0 m L m'O .O• L W m j � �CD 0 C F _ U m m _ m W 5 O �p f� ? G7 C'> -0 C N a N L E U p= C y 2 ? y C C W . d O) m 9 e7 t0 p Q ao E E � � evo = m w U5 0 mM aw aEi opo a M CL E y o o c m > c � ,s w y �'c CL �. m cg v > E a o-0 D ° m y aE cs m m - c z N W LU C C CL =W .W _d•`O` L C .0 'c y W E .9 C C d > N S N > a � c c t � m m 0_ � 5t?��LD. � � � G7 7 H~ toy W 0 N Q t9 0 m CD Q U '7 P � y m C ° 0 V L a Q C CD O O m 0 y m t C •C .y.. t 'U ' a .J y a Z Q mU c Ua y E c ° = m � _ � .�'CD cow 'Qcc `p� ° 2 ? m dog m — N c '� Y Qo� — cco w m � eo as pp, m Z ' f0 •Y E C C CD :S SU C y _� f0 'yl C E U y m y N X p Ur C q 2-L o U 0 t1 7 m �.V-. y C U C U C C A w .� >`D � v � � c m y '_ts c 0�� - m m m m � m E ar am yV m E o m Nmm � .,2 Q aa � r cm A y LL r^ N y - r d O) y m O y d f0 LM7 y in O Y U- v 2 H E Y In c0i J U co w �—ID c r °y CL v zED CL m oE � >- Y Cl) C 'S � N d Y : Y a) a) .5 a) Y C a) da) 0 15 ° a agoa ° 06 EY�O 6 mo _ o o a� 3 0 6 d c 0 2 0 > o > > af� > — > > — a a2 cn a00 a ca r c c c c c V c E E c c �? rn cr cm cm Err CM 9r Err rr m �� w c9 .a) � co 'c ° 'c ° �.L 'c co c9 � 'c w •c co ca c p, o. > a C c 06 c p,._ .. c 0. 0..0 c 0. c 0. 0. > aa aU) d2 0 a0 > 0 a0oa a0 & 00 V 4) N C O r ' c c_ C_ t d 0. rn �_ 0 E 0 0 c o w v, 4) o �o `o �o '6 �o -& 0 p o "D 0. C cm 0 O 0 Q a) O N E b6a 05 � 'p' ° a 06 E06 Ea c d0 oC C E � 4) m0 dco � 0 CoM _ � � cna � cna 06 �sM H � ¢ E a `o ¢ `0 ¢ E ¢ E QE U , M _ Z Y O CM V C C C C y p C C H y Y L O a) a) a) a) m Y O U 0 a' -M a 06 no E a a� W o 0 0 0 0 0 cq > 0. MC >> >� c` o CL > > c oa o QU0 0 0 oao C7 m 0 y oa O a) Cl) E E 0. 0)0 d of °) E °) E E � °' E °) E E � W ~ o 4E)CD � � ,ycM rr cM c � � � ccro r- MMo vC CL 06 06 06 LL a0 a00 O W U Z ypc �i C c cyo t � c c) � �g. Z- 0p 5. ,� Z Z t5 > > > N L d = F- U � WW c � M 4) 0 3 � h ° no mdamn W C � C >, c a g t 0 0 m U) U) � N °p � cQ � 'o � �0 -0 4) M ENS o � EF- $ N (, M W N 7 f0 Ott 17 C 'p EE L C y C L C N 1_- W � � mr c � t5m o >, Edi � � m g � yO � OQIA IA c � ° c � °-M 0 c3 Mcc— y0 MJ n� ccoc0o -� wMco w � c Kaci c� — rte ° ECo � e z cm CL 0 _ o W y c r y oto 4) 0 [C m — y m o �' E d >,3 ((pp 6 0 = 0 q p) C a o M f0 C a a) 0 ° d o a �m y Z v, � � SUE yai 305 c .0 E >. O r � a) 7W C a a) a) S� N c 0 0 0 -0 >% V y �o y � c E y m < ca m ° 0 p c Eco " y m vv a0 E of m � a � > �� _ � � V � M arc �oy06 � M d > �? � a) dv0i ° mM e m ° yc nn ,n w �' yasdo CL—W w 0 cz 06 nom C m � � n cco � � o o0 m IA E a� � n M C � � y CL ° p2 c) yx � � cari E N ° E `= �? d O Cl)V) y cl p — a) 0 N `° c co o 0 w -. E N ca �o _c •06Ea o 0 � d0G Q o YM Mc o �o c � ° � � - L_y o co co 0 Q 06 o 2 �o cm-LM 0 E > co o v E '� c >• -2 E — = .5 C .O O o b d O C y y y a) p) p a) cp U c0 cy v ��? c ,a aE o `—° g c c>o o �o °g g F:= c°> > m C°' 0 rnr b G f/� _ y 0 a c4 U U d 0 > d N 3 a E a y a = .y y y � Q o am T = T = T T = T o Q o ` •1 , NK NQ NQ NQ M � r.: Tf- U aW 1 08 N N m N E O -E O O O a O to O t0 > M > > U- 0 c c m C N W _ N -_ m p C C p C p C N O O O Q) EC E U C E C W W 7 C W W C v V z caa CCL cam = > aoo aoo aoo ow o o E o > .0 c c 0 D W W N a w O w m QEQ � Qa N ao M Z Y C C C C 0 IX C 0 �g = m o 0 o A > LL > > > U- C99 m Dc ac , 0c ° co w o M ZW � � C �° maci �0aciaci mcim t/� 0 .0 o 0EE rEE �, rE WWF_- � Elm cc�oc�oo C � p2 u�. - ZQ o � aai0 m 0) X04)2 u. Q0 � E aoo a � o �. aoo OC9vz o H LU - 0 ZLL' Z N v 0 -0 UJti V W d C m. W e m V QNCo E `2' EE EO v, WO. T 0 D3 N 7 2 N 0. t0 v y 7S u- N C y � Q o 0 7 c O O a) tr) J E E� o mn. y mE � a Q o E O C E `p S. N C N t d •p W N 3 E O a � aCc ZO � � Eby Env � ' Q: m = 3 = ) t0 N EE4 Q L L Z m tom to o Ey W Mtn C -0 C p y C O cm _ '� oE 8 "' O O �1 pOa o ppcm (Yj 9Q W W N C m� VIZ N m t1� W y g N U Ci G _ .Cr G O` a) O .apl4) 4 •aW a E ` ¢ o y ? l Q V r- co ti O � w