Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
T-5493 - Conditions of Approval - 3/9/2006
"Y°' Zvi, REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION �����■ AGENDA ITEM NO. VIII-D COMMISSION MEETING 8/31/05 August 31, 2005 r. APPROVED BY FROM: STAFF, Planning Division` V ` 1 Planning and Development Department DEPARTMENT oiREcroa SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF REZONE APPLICATION NO. R-05-17, VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5493/UGM, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION NO. C-05-81 AND ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. R-05-17/T-5493/C-05-81 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, Rezone Application No. R-05-17, filed by Quad Knopf, on behalf of Lemley Land Sales Inc. and Centex Homes,, proposes to reclassifyapproximately 56 acres of.property located on the east side of North Bryan Avenue, between West Shaw and West Gettysburg Avenues from the R-R (Fresno County-Rural Residentiao zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) and R-2/UGM (Low Density Multiple Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone districts. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM proposes to subdivide the subject property into a 74-lot single family planned development and a 169-lot single family residential subdivision. Conditional Use Permit ,Application No. C-05-81 proposes to allow the northerly 1.0-acre portion of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM to be developed as a gated, private street planned unit development with reduced lot , sizes, reduced setbacks and increased, lot coverage. The applications would bring the subject property into conformance with the West Area Community Plan and the 2025 Fresno General Plan, which designate the property for medium and medium high density residential planned land uses. This map is supported by staff and the West Area Community Plan Citizens Advisory Committee. PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT Request to rezone the project site from the R-R (Fresno County-Rural Residential) zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/ Urban Growth Management)and R-2/UGM (Low Density Multiple Family ResidentiabUrban Growth Management)zone districts, which would facilitate a 243-lot single family residential subdivision to be developed at an overall density of 4.3 dwelling units per acre APPLICANT Centex Homes and L:emley Land Sales, Inc. (Engineer: Quad Knopf) LOCATION East side of North Bryan Avenue, between West Shaw and West Gettysburg.Avenues (Council District 2, Councilmember Calhoun) F SITE SIZE ; 56 acres LAND USE Existing - Vacant Proposed Single Family Residential ZONING Existing - R-R (Fresno County-Rural Residentiao Proposed - R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) and R-2/UGM (Low Density Multiple Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Rezone Application No.R-05-17 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM Conditional Use Permit.Application No. C-05-81 P August 31, 2005 Page 2 PLAN DESIGNATION The proposed R-1/UGM and R-2/UGM zone districts and the 243-lot AND CONSISTENCY single family residential subdivision are consistent with the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the West Area Community Plan designation of the site for medium and medium high density residential land use (4.99 to 10.37 L . units per acre) 4 ENVIRONMENTAL Finding of Conformity to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master. FINDING .Environmental Impact Report (MSIR No. 10130) dated Januar 27, 2005 PLAN COMMITTEE The West Area Community Plan Citizens Advisory Committee will RECOMMENDATION be reviewing the project at their meeting on September 12" 2005 STAFF Recommend approval of rezone application and approve the Jvesting RECOMMENDATION tentative tract map and conditional use permit applications subject to compliance with the,Conditions of Approval for T-5493/UGM and C-05- 81 dated August 31;,2005 BORDERING PROPERTY INFORMATION ax Planned Land Use Existing Zoning Existing Land Use I North Office Commercial R-R Vacant Fresno County-Rural Residential Medium and Medium High R-R South Density Residential Fresno County-Rural Residential Agricultural Medium and Medium High R-R East Density'Residential Agricultural . Fresno County-Rural Residential Open Space-Ponding Basin IR-R Rural Residential and Single Low and Medium Fresno County-Rural Residential West Family Residential�pproved Density Residential with Tract 5452 R-11UGM(upon annexation) ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING The initial study prepared for Environmental Assessment No. R-05-171--5493/C-05-81 considered potential environmental impacts associated with the subject rezone, vesting tentative tract map and conditional use permit request. The study indicates that the project, if approved, would conform to the medium and medium high density residential planned land use designations and land use policies of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and is within the scope of Master Environmental Impact Report No. 10130. Therefore, staff has issued a finding that the project proposal is in conformance to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (HEIR No. 10130) dated July 28, 2005, which incorporates a MEIR Mitigation Monitoring Checklist. This environmental ,finding was properly published with no comments received to date. i REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Rezone Application No. R-05-17.. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81 August 31, 2005 Page 3 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The applicant, Quad Knopf, on behalf of Lemley Land Sales Inc. and Centex Homes, has filed Rezone Application No. R-05-17, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM and Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81 for 56 acres of property located on the east side of North. Bryan Avenue, between West Shaw and West Gettysburg Avenues. Rezone Application No. R-05-17 proposes to reclassify the subject site from the R-R {Fresno County-Rural Residential] zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone district for the northerly 10 acres of the project site and to the R-2/UGM (Low Density Multiple Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone district for the southerly 46 acres of the project site. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM proposes to subdivide the subject property into a 74-lot single family planned development and a 169-lot single family residential subdivision. Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81 proposes to allow the northerly 10-acre portion of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM to be developed as a gated, private street planned unit development with reduced lot sizes, reduced setbacks and increased lot M. coverage. The project site is designated for medium and medium high density residential use by the 2025 Fresno General Plan and West Area Community Plan. According to the "Planned Land Use and Zone District Consistency Matrix" (Table 2) adopted with the 2025 Fresno General Plan (and applied within all community plans), the medium density residential land use designation for the southerly 46 acres of the project site allows for 4.99 to 10.37 dwelling units per acre. However, Fresno Municipal Code Section 12-403-B-2-b-1 allows development of a project site not less than the minimum density of the next lower land use designation, which is medium-low density residential (2.19 to 4.98 dwelling units per acre). The proposed density for this portion of the site is 3.6 dwelling units per acre. The medium high density residential land use designation allows for 10.38 to 18.15 dwelling units per acre on the northerly 10- acre portion of the project site. That portion.of the site will be developed with 7.4 dwelling units per acre is which meets the density requirements. The overall density for the project is approximately 4.3 dwelling units per acre. Therefore, Vesting Tentative Map No. 5493/UGM is consistent with the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the West Area Community Plan. Surrounding land uses are characterized by rural residential and single family residences (approved with Tract 5352) to the west, while property to the north, south and east are developed with vacant and agricultural type uses. (' West Area Community Plan Citizens Advisory Committee The West Area Community Plan Citizens Advisory Committee will review the project at its meeting on August 29, 2005 and their comments will be presented to the Planning Commission at the hearing on August 31, 2005. Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81 Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81 was filed in conjunction with Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM to allow the northerly 10-acre portion of the subdivision to be developed as a planned unit development with one outlot for open space/trail purposes and one outlot for access, increased lot coverage to 50%, reduced front yards of 10 feet, rear yards of 4 feet (except along the easterly boundary which must have a minimum of 10 feet) and 4 foot side yards, including street side yards on corner lots of 8 feet. There will be one main access point to North Bryan Avenue and a secondary exit-only gate to North Bryan Avenue. REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Rezone Application No. R-05-17 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81, August 31, 2005 Page 4 Circulation Element Plan Policies and Major Street System Traffic Capacity According to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Circulation Map, North Bryan Avenue is defined as a collector street. The', Public Works Department Traffic Division has reviewed the proposed development and has determined that the streets relating to the site will be able to carry the quantity and kind of traffic generated subject toseveral improvements. These improvements include dedicating required right-of- way and constructing street paving within the limits of the tract map; installing curb, gutter, sidewalk; construction of an underground street lighting system; and relinquishment of access rights to North Bryan Avenue for all residential lots adjacent to this`street frontage. These street improvements are outlined in more detail in the Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM Conditions of Approval dated August 31 2005. i When the City of Fresno Master'Environmental Impact Report (MEIR) No. 10130 was certified by the City Council for the 2025 FresnoGeneral Plan, a determination was made to require project-specific traffic assessments for projects which would generate 100 or more vehicle trips during weekday peak hours. . Given the number of lots in this project, a special traffic study, dated May 27; 2005, was prepared by Peters Engineering Group. The study concluded that the intersections of Shaw and Bryan Avenues, Shaw and Hayes Avenues and Shaw and Parkway Avenues will continue to function at an acceptable level of service through the year 2025 with construction of the project. Eventual buildout of the surrounding ,area and construction of required 'street improvements to city standards of new developments will ensure that this intersection maintains an. acceptable level of service.1 The Department of Public Works has reviewed the traffic study and recommended the following requirements of the development based upon information in the traffic study, which are included in the, tentative tract map.conditions of approval: The project shall:pay its fair share, 2.5%, towards the cost of improvements to the intersection at Shaw and Parkway Avenues. This fee shall be in the amount of $6,500 and is not eligible for fee credit or reimbursement and is due at the time of building permit. • The project shall;pay its Traffic Signal Mitigation Impact fee as detailed in the fee section of these conditions. i • Dedicate and construct two 17' center section travel lanes along Shaw Avenue with 250' le' turn lanes at all major`intersections from Bryan Avenue to Parkway Avenue. An additional 6' of paving shall be required adjacent to the 250' left turn lanes. r Dedication shall be sufficient to accommodate additional paving and any other grading or transitions as necessary based on�a 45 MPH design speed. • Dedicate and construct two 17' center section travel lanes along Gettysburg Avenue with 250'.left turn lanes at all major intersections from the easterly limits of the tract to Polk Avenue.11 An additional 6' of paving shall be required adjacent to the 250' left turn lanes. Dedication shall be sufficient to accommodate additional paving and any other grading or transitions as necessary based on a 45 MPH design speed. The Public Works Department staff has concluded that this project does.not have significant adverse impacts upon the city's transportation system and that its nonsignificant impacts are mitigable through the city's standard Urban Growth Management (UGM,) process and project requirements forithis development as well as other development.in the area. In concert with the other developments that are l REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Rezone Application No. R-05-17 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.5493/UGM Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81; August 31, 2005 Page 5 approved pursuant to the `2025. Fresno'.General Plan, the developer will be required to install improvements and to pay fees toward development of the major street system as outlined in the Public Facilities Element of the general plan and will be required to provide for the installation of traffic control measures (e.g., signals, stop lights, etc.) installed per UGM policies and ongoing traffic studies. Interior Streets, Required Sidewalks and Multi-purpose Trail The developer will be required to design and construct all street-related improvements as shown on ` Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM Exhibit A, dated June 1, 2005, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM Exhibit A-1, dated August 17, 2005. All streets in the southerly portion of the subdivisionwill be developed with interior local streets having a right-of-way width of 50 or 54 feet as permitted with Public Works Standards. Installation of sidewalks will be required on both sides of the streets throughout this portion of the subdivision. The streets in the planned development portion of the will have a minimum width of 38 feet. The Multi-Purpose Trails Plan Map (Exhibit 9) in the 2025 General Plan. depicts a bicycle/pedestrian/equestrian trail as well as a bicycle/pedestrian trail on the Project site. The tentative tract map conditions of approval require that these trails be built along the northerly, westerly and easterly boundaries of the site. ti Public Facilities .. The Public Utilities Department has determined that there .is an adequate source of water available to serve the project with the implementation of UGM service delivery requirements.and environmental impact mitigation measures. Implementation of the 2025 Fresno General Plan policies, mitigation measures of Master Environmental Impact Report No. 10130, the Water Resources Management Plan, and the mitigation measures identified by the project environmental assessmentrnitial study will provide an adequate, reliable and sustainable water supply for the project's urban domestic and public safety consumptive purposes. These measures include the construction of one or more water supply well sites, including wellhead treatment facilities, which will be dedicated to the City of Fresno. The Public Utilities Department has determined that adequate sanitary sewer service is available to serve the project, subject to the mitigation measures imposed with the environmental assessment. Several major facility improvement projects have been implemented at the City of Fresno's Regional Wastewater Treatment and. Reclamation Facility in order to accommodate the projected rates of population and employment growth up to a projected`population holding capacity of 590,000 people. These improvements have been completed to provide an expanded wastewater treatment and reclamation capacity of 80 million gallons per day (MGD) which is sufficient to accommodate continued planned urban development including the proposed project. E ° The City of Fresno Fire Department has submitted comments that the proposed project is located within three miles of permanent and temporary fire station number 18: There is a conditional use permit application that has been approved for the construction of ,a temporary fire station at the southeast _corner of North Grantland and West Bullard Avenues, within the boundaries of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 5247/UGM. If any buildings are constructed at the project site for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM prior to the construction and operation of this temporary fire station, they must meet UGM service requirements for fire service. Some options for service include constructing homes on every other lot or installing fire sprinklers in the homes; the complete list requirements are outlined in the Fresno Municipal Code in the Urban Growth Management section. REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Rezone Application No. R-05-17 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81 August 31, 2005 Page 6 Landscaping/Walls . Given that the proposed subdivision abuts two collector streets, and in accordance with the West Area Community Plan Policy No: W-3-b, the developer will be required to install 15 feet of landscaping along North Bryan and West Gettysburg Avenues, with the exception of those areas where a multi,purpose trail is located. In addition, the applicant will be required to install a solid wall at the rear of the required landscape setback as required by the Fresno Municipal Code. i Lot Dimensions The R-1 zone district requires minimum lot sizes of 6,000'square feet for lots in the subdivision. Lots in the southerly portion of the subdivision will meet or exceed the minimum lot size requirement as well as the lot width (60 feet) and depth (100 feet) requirements. The northerly portion of the site, hich is proposed to be zoned R-2/UGM does not have a minimum lot area requirement for each lot within a planned development. subdivision. However, the zone,district does stipulate a population density requirement which specifies that there be not more than one dwelling unit for every 2,700 square feet of site area. The building setbacks on each lot have been modified to allow for minimum front yards of 10 feet, rear yards of 4 feet (except along the easterly boundary which must have a minimum of '0 feet) :and 4 foot side yards,)including street side yards on corner lots of 8 feet. State Department of Transportation Caltrans A copy of the traffic analysis prepared for the project by Petery Engineering Group was.forwarded to California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), District 6, Office of Intergovernmental Relations. The Caltrans staff has submitted the attached comments dated June .23, 2005, indicating tiat the proposed project will impact the state highway systema °The letter from Caltrans contends that the developers of the proposed project should pay $18,565 to mitigate those impacts. Staff considered. Caltrans letter in preparing the initial study and determined that this project does not create any impacts, including cumulative impacts, that were not identified in, MEIR No. 10130. City staff notes that potential cumulative traffic impacts of full buildout of the 2025 Fresno General.Plan were analyzed in ME(R No. 10130. I Although the City has i.met its legal obligations for addressing impacts to the state highway syst m for purposes of CEQA, the City has not ruled out working with Caltrans to obtain fees for the state highway system for projects such as this one. At this time, the City does not have a legally permissible means for collecting fees for such-a purpose.. A legally permissible means for collecting 'impact fees under the Mitigation Fee Act (California Government Code §§ 60000, et seq.), among other things, would require a capital improvement plan, a nexus/rough proportionality study that demonstrated a property owner/developer's proportionate share of costs to those capital improvements, and an accounting system for using.funds collected: Along with other cities and Fresno County, the City of ;Fresno has partnered with the Fresno County Council of Governments and Caltrans on a regional study of state highway facility capacity and measures needed to preserve and improve capacity of those facilities. A Partnership in Planning grant has been obtained to complete a regional freeway_deficiency study for the greater Fresno-Clovis- Madera Metropolitan area. .This study focuses on facilities. projected to be most impacted by projected - increases in traffic, identification of the sources and jpatterns of vehicle traffic within the greater metropolitan area and the improvements that would be necessary to provide adequate vehicular } REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Rezone Application No. R-05-17 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.5493/UGM Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81 ; August 31, 2005 Page 7 , capacity. Findings from this study may allow proportionate traffic impact fees to be implemented by cities and counties in the study area, upon adoption by the respective jurisdictions. In addition to a proportionate share study, a mechanism would be needed for the City to collect traffic impact fees and either hold those funds or deliver them to a separate agency for improvements to facilities the City does not control or maintain. The City has offered to cooperate with Caltrans in developing such a mechanism, including using the model used by the.City for collecting fees for FMFCD and/or entering into a Joint Powers Authority or an MOU. Staff representatives of the City of Fresno and Caltrans continue to conference in order to identify a mutually agreeable strategy to implement a fair and equitable traffic impact fee for state highway facilities:" Tentative Tract Map Findings The Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66400 et. seq.) requires that a proposed subdivision not be approved unless the map, together with its design and improvements, is found to be consistent with the Genera( Plan and any applicable specific plan (Finding No. l below). State law further provides that the proposed subdivision map be denied if any one of the Finding Nos. 2- 5 below is made in the negative. In addition, State law requires that a subdivision be found to provide for future passive and natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision development (Finding ...No. 6 below). 1. The proposed subdivision map, together with its design and improvements, is consistent with the City's 2025 General Plan (there .is not an applicable specific .plan), because the West Area Community Plan designates the site for medium and medium high density residential land uses and the project design meets the density and zoning ordinance criteria for development in this plan designation. 2. This site is physically suitable for the proposed type and density of development, because conditions of approval will ensure adequate access and drainage on and off the site. 3. The proposed subdivision design and improvement is not likely to cause substantial and considerable damage to the natural environment, including fish, wildlife or their habitat, because of the urbanized nature of the area in which the site is located. 4. The proposed subdivision design and improvements are not likely to cause serious public health and safety problems because the conditions of approval have shown and will ensure that the subdivision conforms with City health and safety standards. 5. The proposed subdivision design will not conflict with public easements within or through the site because conditions of approval will assure noninterference with any existing or proposed public easements. 6. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive and natural heating' or cooling opportunities in the subdivision because of the appropriate use and placement of landscaping plant materials and because of the orientation of the proposed lots. REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Rezone Application No. R-05-17 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81 August 31, 2005 Page 8 The subdivision map, subject to the recommended conditions of approval, complies with the design and property development standards of the Zoning Ordinance and local Subdivision Ordinance. Based upon the plan,s and information submitted by the applicant and the recommended conditions of project approval, staff has determined that these findings Can be made. Conditional Use Permit Findings _ Based upon analysis)of the conditional use permit application and subject to the applicant's co pliance with all of the conditions of approval noted below, staff concludes that the following required fini lings of Section 12-405-A-2 of the Fresno Municipal Code (FMC) can be made. FINDINGS PER FRESNO MUNICIPAL-CODE SECTION 12-405-A-2: a. All applicable provisions of this Code are compliedWith. and the site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use, and accommodate all yards, spaces, walls and fences, parking, loading, recycling areas, landscaping, and other required features,and, FindJng a The subject site is approximately 56 acres (gross) in size and has an .adequate mount of space, if developed in accordance with the projects site plan, to meet all applicable requirements of the Code and as established in the Special Permit Conditions of Approval h ' dated August 31, 2005, including yards, spaces, walls and fences, parking, Landscaping and. r other required features. ::rrtni a7..,,s. t n 1.+z ;•r{.> _.,..y+i...,, r%,-':r,:, •. „, '^`t 2,yVm,.; °, - ...;CS 5>" t:;s» {..,,,.�N'.w;.'[', ^K ..g:'_ .e*a�'e,.; t"C� 'Sifi: rr:Toumzi;r'3vuy b. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type to carry the quantity and kind of traffic generated by the proposed use;and, Finding bStaff from)the Transportation Planning section of the Public Works Department has estimated that the proposed development will generateapproximately1,182 daily vehicle trips which can be accommodated by the adjacent streets. The proposed project will construct the required improvements necessary for the traffic generated by the project. c. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious/to property or improvements in the area in which the property is located The third finding shall not apply to uses which are subject to the provision of Section 12-306-N-30 of this Code. Finding c ': The staff of the Planning and Development,Department has determined that the propk sed use will not be detrimental to the public welfare)or be injurious to property or improvements in the area in which the property is located ` if developed in accordance with the various w conditions/requirements established through the related tentative tract map application review process as well as the conditional use permit review process. Action by the Planning Commission regarding the rezone application will be a recommendation to the City. Council. Planning Commission action on the proposed vesting tentative trach map and conditional use permit application, unless appealed to the Council, islfinal: I • l REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Rezone Application,No. R-05-17 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81 August 31, 2005 Page 9 CONCLUSION/ RECOMMENDATION The appropriateness of the proposed project has been examined with respect to its consistency with goals and policies of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the West Area Community Plan; its compatibility with surrounding existing or proposed uses; and its avoidance or mitigation of potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. These factors have been evaluated as described above and by the accompanying environmental assessment. Upon consideration of this evaluation, it can be concluded that Rezone Application No. R-05-17, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM and Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81 are appropriate for the project site. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission: 1. RECOMMEND APPROVAL to the City Council of the environmental finding of Environmental Assessment No. R-05-17/T-5493/C-05-81 dated July 28, 2005 that the project proposal conforms to the provisions of the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MSIR No. 10130). 2. RECOMMEND APPROVAL to the City Council of Rezone Application No. R-05-17 which proposes to reclassify the subject site from the R-R (Fresno County-Rural Residential) zone district to the R- 1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone district for the northerly 10 acres of the project site and to the R-2/UGM (Low Density Multiple Family Residential/Urban Growth Management)zone district for the southerly 46 acres of the project site. 3. APPROVE Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM subject to compliance with the Conditions of Approval dated August 31, 2005. 4. APPROVE Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81 subject to compliance with the Conditions of Approval dated August 31, 2005. Attachments: Vicinity Map Aerial Photograph of the site Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM dated August 17, 2005 Conditional Use Permit No. C-05-81 Exhibits A and B, dated June 1,2005 Conditions of Approval for T-5493/UGM dated August 31, 2005, including letters from Public Works Department-Traffic (8/29/05), Public Works Department- Street Trees (7%5/05), Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (7/27/05), San Joaquin .Valley Air Pollution Control District (6/21/05) and Central Unified School District (717/05) _.Conditions of Approval for T-5493/UGM dated August 31, 2005 Letter from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) dated June 23, 2005 Environmental Assessment No. R-05-17/T-5493/C-05-81, Finding of Conformity to 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR No. 10130) dated January 27, 2005 ���St--rrt� L'`�¢I.. n.} ,�.�?� T S k at M xc ^Jr orr „r ...,; aFy^rr "Y«�p � .P+u _.r• rt�_ g^i�aT. ''2`r F `r a7,t 1S1y ,�7 c ..++r c - x'r a .k1�1 n •n;•N% +..5t Yautt� ii `" i�;i5.. Y+ si.r` A'`ri. ��".�+ M r � sN5'5�14*r it - ��.i.. ap,,5. `� r 4 x..tt� Ry. K` {r,,,,4 ¢ i t"+ •� S�`tr r d .r`yG, �,' a-� 5}....:r.f,+` ,c. Xlill kr i1W. U 'k t Gv xtta >tww 3�� �x$;;C' �`�^r.,.:�-+ '��.�. �'#�a~k."r.�.�r��'`r�,xttaa����,'�-*+r�.r.�+,. 'E"w *` `� �u .. �x s�t� ;�"��r��..�n�E .,.'vn„w!i� �4 �t��`'':�'; i€�vS• ,'3„ .,.�L�'.:3,� .:' �.",: v �. .'S' �1,�,�V�+, .n.tal+r �. t» 7.ts�x',�,*�2: t=..i`i�yat r �="`t�Y ��r*& S s „^ �*r,,{{ f � 'xi`.)•',.3''"�'M '� ,,�� 1.vtt �.t�'N�ne ���°'vY``bV �'�y"��`be.� x�ZS.,�.,er_b`''9`}}rM�`� �i✓t r't„+. ...^t' S ems+`c� ,gP t,,:}•,��;�3,E } ">t""i �wr �''�^�. • ..........•.......r•.r:..•....•..•......r..r••....••ru..•mu..•........•.... ur•.r•oe•• •. r..r•or..r. I RIALTO Snuthpm Pacific Railroad j • 1 i F r I .. .. X11 LEGEND J P Subject Property a ��� .�"� U.G.M.Area 4 VICINITMAP PLANNING & DEVEL©PT `� .VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5493 " ' . DEPARTMENT A.P.N.: 311-060-25.72 (portions) REZONE APPLICATION NO. R-05-017 {R From AE-5(County)to R-MGM,R-2/UGM CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. C-05-081 ZONE MAP. 144 BY/DATE: J.S!. ! 6-2-05 Northeast corner, Bryan Av. and Southern Pacific RR NOT To scALE I I �aB�dTr.x.W 1 �- 1 J � I G�•,t� I�l t xi-JIC�.. 6� 4.....Yom.__ � � y:fr.i C � ti- +�]r b�� 'f`v*' I.y i y_f <.F '�•�.�..��-.r i+LtsJ� - 1 +�' �F �qq r ��;7^ " 4�ir► 'tq�;, 1.! dT �3.✓'i'��',P' i ~ �, P.µs`.„r 3 � ; :... rn u'».5 A tx u�%r€•� d'L'i•,.,i i:,`) 1 -,'J9t� '� � r r' � e F ��,hj�tt125- I� t +J:M' ��b!i. 1 rj a�C•' � r{ -I� ,`�`{ i�_�d'r'F<a a a '4..,.�k� �� ht�� r j!`^:•Mr� -j 3K.:i.�-d �. p' 7;y t 2*-iw Tiia e j.i h .r 2i''Jr i j�te1 ti- a {,c,,51 wY'f uy t Y t r t�;;v arrt� a��+,�u��t�F`�� r ' f a�� i � ^r— R'"''�•a'3 I i;ta.?.�r'-.'.w a Y P rr Zk� �. � ..�..y v .t ty � �• � L . �'! '•a� ^.. , ''t-' �� � ,r � 7y }z1• 1 Vi.�� �p ',}��F � 9t � �A,3 `gat '} 5 i �[" .+ a±r:rs v ".. .�y' �rt�'��r ^gn e+. m .,,r I r f t r h "quo r h � raotJ*$ , ,r- �"'��z f[ {.t It �I } ( t. K 3 i t+ � s ` axi� viY�r� �^-'[fit„'i�glr�p� •'qS=yk 7z{...z ,�.W ���-. � s,r e a �- t .r lrr t.i � .( 3� S �'�' +': "R•� #'i T�� r � � a� r .F.Ii�T^�Hif Yet t1 { � r.. t4.v� i fF 7xN"x.l_ ' X +1 +a r _ rr 4. }d .. �R f.{ >• Y+SS;�' f 4� yY c t y4fd � e 'y�.a�rf t�s yi�� G.t°�,� " }�ytr �,., = a f� �. k tar � � >• P !"� a 'dpi° xvas$.Js ,. t` a ` 4. ' r h � � �'f�.?yf,� C 8.♦ � §a�-ed YtjFi �}f v''h .� d�' t '�� {Jipp it T Sita i$r J y r"r t-s wit ^ H[,. b �r � lyry�rC S-�•rt J g<�fi�' r����r![�r`� t r r.Z 1 �4 � J,PI. +� ee`O t" #3 k � t �[{ i r 1 t t�, ;'J �x SFi�..r,r i R � � #•. :iv r r; v� y Y}•t� f:f � 1.tt ,S per � � $ fkF a#3' t T J.tt 'jt t �'a. ✓ 4�.1,� C . I�r� ty:tt� 1� -1's.,'�dk?✓� .yl'1` t'l-�rl_yTr'� a[41r•�Lrr�-�i'��'i' x�J'✓4a' W�t.rq"0�'� �`,i�t�����. rWy, r ttr ipr :�� tk rix w.5 '4�'} '�` "t�'�„_' 1i^� {1t,. �t'+e" �� `'�'` 'qY�y)�•[ w.t �Yti�1�� � of,' ZLi as TeLR, M WRI �^ a � t� ,¢ T� 1 f i xt ]j 1111 � P J[ 1 � �j 9't`p F�7 F.L '7•'T,�4-1 �..t {,, ,��v_. T+1..• �r''� i ss J�Ilh: z ' is s W a gig RB�QF�pp« • ® R ..1 ■P A °!" �L-'..�-3RN3AY92F{� � / �1— I I A y�€ ' � � B ( I �i✓�■. �- � ■. ■ .. � t• tj r■SCF 1 1!W ,` ���'. \111 !° 9 I!1`11Y■� y 1 =i!� Hsu $ �� ! 1 . ■ ► ► • ■ • . a I . I "elk A_ t IlL,fi„ I � d €$ le I E$ 9{ . 1 " �.. ■ ° ■ ► /•� '!I Y�i ■ / 3 � #8 II • t! �Y ' •! I! sfl Ifl t! t! °$ �! to Afl `91 a .I I e�° E �r'w g mi Y � � �� i ° � $�i� ; � `/rl—A__•_=v--,—�''--a`wty-�'trws�_ r--:-�,a'n�� R• I �I ° $ Qpp ea p aQp$ y� $QE @ ° s t �s . ► . ■ . ■ . ■ . . $yl i ✓•1 Y ( 4A_ ! 9 ! ■f�1 �SA •t R!j.- �P '} t� RI ■R ■� •I R, RQ Jal.' 7 7 Rf .411 1p Ir ill, I J �Gq fill! a fi ,r �4 W W Q. Q t 0 z W 1 Lt r- g I' W T fid, ca 0 m1�^',�!IIS ,�'-11 1 - • •. W �1— r� 11 �'tII I1 ee 4v �- 'm 'O Lu W . � w _ 3W Z V d C ►g n YY �� a #0ag. aH _ ............9�nw,v.'A.. " file r Av 101 ED 10 a IL, ., — s I� C e ♦ I �B r 9 CL 11 e38 1 •8—IPi >� €L.:. - .. 1 L I L JL..JC JL JI 1 .�J Id cu _ s I_e rr] — 1ri--ir-- I a —� — 1f--� Y .I sell 11 lI �I y _L ... L J I C 18 1t. r— 1— s l— • � L llr— 1 z 1_a oI I y �L..JL,.JL JL L ,.�I .IA s r— L__j ._,r_�r lr—. r-11 70 I. x It --, 8 i S tll A Y1 S NJ q til A '___j 0 I I p z It L I a 1.' s o r a r y s - --rr— JL jL JU J — — ——I x I a Ik y I IN N I P d l L —1 � V,LO'T f10 •�� Ey $ F 91 s 41 w 41 w 41 a 41�w 41 wit R 41 �I S ' ! ' --------- ——————— ------ F1 I --- —.--- .1 as 1 '.�� .��; _d '� J • • p d 96 ! i ®Qe ' I CdJ ILIll �I, at IM D!3Wl!JVd3O 1N3WdOl3A3a ONS3yd dO A.LI3 AS a3AOHddV'aMO . . I. 31V 'JI•J3 fr• I UVO �. g _ 1 � g 4 1 s m i. { n ILI 11' Eg JA'k 4 OL FIT •�� � � /.� E � ,r,7- _�7 �'r Jul� � - — Q° Q� " t CITY OF FRESNO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF.APPROVAL AUGUST 31,2005 _VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT. MAP N0. 5493/UGM .EAST SIDE OF NORTH BRYAN AVENUE,BETWEEN WEST SHAW AND WEST GETTYSBURG AVENUES. All tentative maps are subject to the applicable provisions of the State Subdivision Map Act, Fresno Municipal Code, City policies, and City of Fresno Standard Specifications. The following specific conditions are applicable to this vesting tentative map. The Urban Growth Management (UGM) Service Delivery Plan requirements are included in the following conditions of approval and are designated by the caption "Urban Growth.Management Requirements. NOTICE TO PROJECT APPLICANT In accordance with the provisions of Government Code §66020(d)(1), the imposition of fees, dedications,reservations or exactions for this project are subject to protest by the project applicant at the time of approval or conditional approval. of the development or within 90 days after the date of the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations or exactions I imposed on the development project. GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. Upon conditional approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM entitled "Exhibit A," dated June 1, 2005, and "Exhibit A-1" dated August 17, 2005, the subdivider may prepare a Final Map in accordance with the approved tentative map, and related Rezone Application No. R-05-17 and Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81. 2. Submit grading plans and a soils report to the City of Fresno Planning and Development Department for verification prior to.Final Map approval (Reference: Sections 12-1022 and 12-1023 of the Fresno Municipal Code). Grading plans shall indicate the location of any required walls and indicate the proposed width of required landscape easements or strips. Approval of the grading plan is required prior to Final Map approval. 3. At the time of Final Map submittal, the subdivider shall submit engineered construction plans to the City of Fresno Public Works, Public Utilities, and Planning and Development Departments for grading, public sanitary sewer system, public water system, street lighting system, public streets, and storm drainage, including other technical reports and engineered plans as necessary to construct the.required public improvements and work and applicable processing fees. 4. Engineered construction plans shall.be approved by the City prior to the approval of the Final Map. If, at the time of Final Map approval, such plans have not been approved, the subdivider shall provide performance security in an amount established by the City to guarantee the completion of plans. { Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM August 31, 2005 Page 2 i 5. Public utilities easements, as necessary, shall be shown on the Final Map and dedicated to the City of Fresno. .Public utility easements beyond the limits of the Final Map, but required as a condition of development, shall be acquired at the subdivider's cost and shall be dedicated by separate instrument at the time of Final Map approval. The relocation of lexisting utilities necessitated by the required public improvements shall be paid for by the subdivider. The subdivider is responsible to contact the appropriate utility company for information. 6. Comply with the conditions, policies and standards set forth in the City of Fresno, Municipal Code, Article 10, Chapter 12, "Subdivision of Real Property;" Resolution No. 68-187, "City Policy with Respect to Subdivisions;" and City of Fresno Standard Specifications, 2002 Edition, and any amendments thereto. 7. The developer/owner shall pay applicable fees for, but not limited to, plan checks for street improvements and other grading and construction; street trees, street signs, water and sewer service, and inspections in accordance with the City of Fresno Master Fee Schedule (City Resolution No. 79-606 and No. 80-420) and any amendments, modifications,or additions thereto; and in accordance with the requirements of State law as related to vesting tentative.maps. 8. The subdivider shall furnish to the City acceptable security to guarantee the construction of the off-site street improvements in accordance-with all applicable provisions of the Fresno Municipal Code (FMC) and the State Subdivision Map Act. The subdivider shall complete all the public improvements prior to the approval of the Final Map by the City. If, at the time of Final Map approval, any public improvements have not been completed and accepted in accordance with the standards of,the City, the subdivider may elect to enter into an !agreement with the City to thereafter guarantee the completion of the improvements 9. As a condition of Final Map approval, the subdivider shall furnish to the City a subdivision guarantee listing all parties having any right, title or interest and the nature of their interest per State law, Landscaping and Wall's 10. Pursuant to West Area Community Plan Policy No. W-3-c, the developer/owner shall provide a 15-foot landscape easement (and irrigation system) along the ,west property lines of lots which back-onto or side-onto North Bryan. Avenue and the south property lines of lots which back-onto or side-onto West Gettysburg Avenue. 11. Construct a 6400t,high solid masonry wall (at finished grade of proposed site) pursuant to Fresno Municipal Code Section 12-1011(f)(3) for all lots which side-onto or back-onto North Bryan and West Gettysburg Avenues. Construction plans for required walls showing architectural appearance and location of all walls shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department for review prior:to Final Map approval. 12. Construct a 6-foot high solid masonry wall (at finished grade of proposed site) pursuant to Fresno Municipal Code Section 12-10.11(f)(3) at the rear of Lots 82-89, inclusive. There shall also be a 10 foot landscape easement on the north side of said lots. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM August 31, 2005 Page 3 13. In accordance with Fresno Municipal Code Section 12-306-H.2.a(1), the maximum fence height allowed is 3 feet within that triangular area where the rear and street side property . lines meet for Lot 123. This area shall be measured 20 feet along the south and west property lines and the third leg shall connect those two lines. 14. ,When the grading _plan "establishes a top of slope beyond. the required landscape easement noted and the construction of the required wall is to be established coincident - with the top of slope then the required minimum easement width.shall be expanded to include the full landscaped area up to the wall location. 15. The long term"maintenance of the following items is the ultimate responsibility.of the owner/developer: If approved by Council, the following features may be maintained by a Community Facilities District: a.. Maintenance of all landscaping and irrigation systems as approved by the Public Works Department within the street easements (including medians) and the 15 foot wide landscape easements along the property lines .that side or back-onto North Bryan and West Gettysburg Avenue. b. Maintenance of all landscaping and irrigation systems as approved by the Public Works Department within Outlots B, C, D and E. c. Maintenance of sidewalks and street furniture as approved by the Public Works Departmentwithin the street ...easements and landscape easements along the property lines that border North Bryan and West Gettysburg Avenues: d, Maintenance of all interior pavement,. curbs and gutters, sidewalks, medians, and street furniture for all public local streets within the boundary of the tentative map. e. Maintenance and operating costs of all street lights as approved.by the Public .Works Department within the boundary of the map: f. Maintenance of all street.trees as approved by the Public Works Department within the boundary of the tentative map. If the developer/subdivider elects to petition for. annexation into the.City's Community Facilities District, he/she shall be required to provide the City of Fresno, Department of Public Works, with copies of signed acknowledgments from each purchaser of a lot within the subdivision, attesting to the purchasers understanding that the lot will have an annual maintenance assessment and that he/she is aware of the estimated amount of the assessment. 17. Should the City Council not approve the annexation of any or all of the maintenance items listed in condition No..13, above, then the property owner/developer shall create a homeowner's association for the maintenance of these items and proposed private streets, utilities, and walls/gates. The proposed Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and the proposed instruments for the homeowners association shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department for review two weeks prior to final map approval. Said documents shall be recorded with the final map or alternatively submit recorded documents or documents for recording prior to finale i. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative.Tract Map No. 5493/UGM August 31, 2005 . Page 4 acceptance of subdivision improvements. Said documents shall include assignment of responsibility to the homeowners association for landscaping and other provisions as stated in the Planning and Development Department Guidelines for preparation of CC&Rs dated January 11, 1985. 18. Proceedings�to lace the final ma into a CFD may not commence until the territory has 9 P P Y rY been annexed into the City of Fresno. 19. Construction !plans for all features to be maintained by a CFD for a final map shall be included in the final map submission to the Planning and Development Department for review prior to Final Map approval. This shall include a street tree location and street tree species (by street) map. Landscaping plans shall contain the actual tree and plant counts by species and include the areas (square feet) of turf, shrubs, trees and sidewalks or other paved areas within all landscaped areas. Multi-purpose Trail 20. Exhibit 9 of the 2025 Fresno General Plan,."Multi=Purpose Trails Plan Map", depicts a bicycle/pedestrian/equestrian trail and a bicycle/pedestrian trail on the project site. The developer/owner shall .construct this trail as required, by the Public Works and `Development and Planning Departments. �1 Q 21. Maintainer width for the trail along the north side of the subject site-a" 9_ tesrmof-the FN FQQ P basis-a 4along North. Bryan Avenue, , The trail width may be configured through a combination of street right-of-way and landscape or j planting and_ publictilities easements: Refer to Public Works memorandum dated August 29,2005. YrvAk cL e IV* to W �• Building Setbacks 22: Building setbacks shall be in accordance with the R-1 zone district for Lots 75-243 as shown on Exhibit "A-1° of Vesting Tentative Map Tract No. 5493/UGM dated August 17, 2005, and the provisions of Section 12-211,5-E of :the Fresno Municipal Code, unless otherwise noted in these conditions. 23. Building setbacks fog Lots 1-74 as shown on Exhibit "A-1" of Vesting Tentative Map Tract No. 5493/UGM dated August 17, 2005, have been modified subject to the approval of the related Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81. 24. Proposed lot 124 on Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM dated August 17, 2005, is considered a key lot. Provide a 10-foot side yard along the north property line of this lot. tion ;ting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM is subject to Council approval of related ,ine Application No R-05-17. r Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM August 31, 2005 Page 5 26: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM is subject to Planning Commission approval of related Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81. 27. The proposed tentative tract map shall be annexed to the City of Fresno concurrent with, or prior to, final tract map approval, pursuant to all required fees and policies of the Fresno County Local Agency Formation Commission and the City of Fresno, including any cost incurred to the city of Fresno caused by the detachment of the property from the North Central Fire District. 28. Prior to the issuance ,of building permits for the subdivision, school construction fees shall be paid to the Central Unified School District in accordance with the school district's adopted schedule of fees. 29. Contact the United States Postai Service for the.location and type of mailboxes to be installed in this subdivision. i 30. Pursuant to Section 66456.1 of the Subdivision Map Act, which states "The right of the subdivider to file multiple Final Maps shall not limit the authority of the local agency to impose reasonable conditions relating to the filing of multiple Final Maps," any multiple final maps filed by the subdivider on this tract shall fully and independently conform to all provisions of Fresno Municipal Code Chapter 12, Article 10, Subdivision of Real Property. 31. The developer/owner shall obtain any and all permits required for the removal or : demolition of any existing building or structure located within the subdivision boundaries. The developer/owner shall also obtain any and all permits required for the proper abandonment/closure of any existing water well, septic tank/leach field or cesspool, and irrigation pipeline on the subject property. All such permits shall be obtained prior to : : commencement of tract grading work, in accordance with Chapter 13 of the Fresno Municipal Code. 32. If archaeological and/or animal fossil material is encountered during project surveying, grading, excavating, or construction, work shall stop immediately. 33. if there are suspected human remains, the Fresno County Coroner shall be immediately contacted (business hours: (559) 268-0109; after hours the contact phone number is (559) 488-3111 for the Fresno County Sheriff's Department). If remains or other archaeological material is possibly Native American .in origin, the Native American Heritage Commission (phone number (916) 653-4082) shall be immediately contacted, and the California Archaeological Inventory/Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center (phone number (805) 644-2289) .shall be contacted to.obtain a referral list of recognized archaeologists. 34. An archaeological assessment.shall be conducted for the project, the site shall be formally recorded, and recommendations made to the City as to any further. site investigation or site avoidance/preservation measures. 35. If animal fossils are . uncovered, the Museum of Paleontology at the University, of California, . Berkeley shall be contacted. to obtain a referral list of recognized paleontologists. An . assessment shall be conducted by a paleontologist; if the Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM August 31, 2005 Page 6 f L paleontologist determines the material to be significant, a recommendation shall be made to the City as to any further site investigation or preservation measures. 36. Apportionment of Special Assessment: If, as part of this subdivision, a division will bei made of any lot or parcel of land upon which .there is an unpaid special assessmentw levied under I any State or local law, including a division into condominium interest as defined in Section 783 of the. Civil Code, the developer/owner shall file a written application with the City of Fresno Director of Public Works, requesting apportionment of the unpaid portion of the assessment or pay off such assessment in full. l If the subdivider elects to apportion the assessment, the application shall contain the following info mations a. A full description of each assessed lot, parcel or interest to be divided and of how such lot,'parcel or interest will be divided; b. A request that the Engineer apportion the amount remaining' unpaid on the assessment in accordance with applicable law; and c. Written consent of the owner(s) of each such lot, parcel, or interest to the requested apportionment. i d.. The application shall be filed prior to the approval of the Final Map(s) by the City and shall be accompanied by a fee in an amount specified in the Master Fee Resolution for each separate lot, parcel, or interest into which the original assessed lot, parcel or interest is to be divided. The fee shall be in an amount sufficient to. pay all costs of the City and the Engineer of Work responsible for determining the initial assessment in making the requested apportionment. 37. The subdivider shall comply with Regulation VIII of the San Joaquin Valley Air Quality Pollution Control District for,the control of particulate matter and fugitive dust during construction of this project. 38. Solid waste disposal for the subdivision shall be provided by the City of Fresno. The method of collection to be utilized in this tract shall be subject to approval of the Solid Waste Manager(see below-noted conditions). PARK SERVICE 39. Comply with the attached memo from the Public Works Department dated July 5, 2005 for street tree requirements. Urban Growth Management Requirements 40. The subdivider shall be required to pay the appropriate UGM Park Capital Fee at the . time of Final Map approval. Fee payment may be deferred until time of building permit issuance in accordance with the requirements of Section 12-4.509-C-3 of the FMC. FIRE SERVICE 41.. This project is within three miles from temporary and permanent Fire Station No. 18. Any construction of buildings prior to the completion of the temporary City of Fresno fire Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.5493/UGM August 31, 2005 Page 7 station located near the intersection of North Grantland and West Bullard Avenues must meet the Urban Growth Management requirements for fire service. 42. Provide residential hydrants and fire flows per Public WorksStandards with two sources of water. Urban Growth Management Requirements 43. The subdivider shall be required to pay the appropriate Fire Station Capital Fee at the time of final map approval, for Fire Station No. 18. - Fee payment may be deferred until time of building permit issuance in accordance with the requirements of Section 12- 4.509-C-3 of the FMC. SOLID WASTE SERVICE 44. The owners, lessees or other tenants of the residential dwellings on service day, before EJ 6:00 a.m., shall place their solid waste containers at the edge of the curb approximately I. four feet apart and shall not block any vehicle accesses in accordance with the City of Fresno's Solid Waste Management Division Standards. 45. Per Section 9-404 of the FMC, Solid Waste Disposal,Regulations, no solid waste container or residential rubbish shall be allowed to remain at the curb line after 8:OO p.m. on the collection day. 46. . Property owners will receive three containers to be used as follows: one gray container for solid waste, one green container for green waste, and one blue container for recyclable material. 47. Project phasing: All streets shall connect to one another or a temporary turnaround shall be provided. The turnaround shall be large enough to accommodate a solid waste truck that is 35' long and has a turning radius of 44 feet. Turnaround shall be kept clear of vehicles by 6:00 a.m. on the solid waste service day. 48. Turning Template: Developer shall provide a turning template for the gated section of this subdivision. Corners show a 40-foot turning radius and solid waste requires a 44 foot turning radius. - 49. Solid Waste requires access to gates by 6:00 a.m. 50. The frontage for lots 12, 22, 37 and 53 may need to be increased to allow adequate space for the correct placement of the solid waste containers. The containers are approximately 3-feet wide and need to be space 4 feet apart, which requires 17 feet. STREETS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY 51. The subdivider shall furnish to the City acceptable security to guarantee the construction of the off-site street improvements in accordance with all applicable provisions of the FMC and the State Subdivision Map Act. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM August 31, 2005 Page 8 52. The subdivider shall make provisions for disabled persons in accordance with the Department of Public Works standards and as required by State law. Handicap access ramps are required to be constructed in sidewalks at all corners within the limits of thg tract. Where street furniture is located within the sidewalk area (fire hydrants, streetlights, etc.), a minimum of 48 inches of unobstructed path shall be maintained td satisfy the American Disabilities Act requirements If necessary, dedicate a pedestrian easement to accommodate for the 4-foot minimum unobstructed path requirement. 53. All of the required street improvements shall be constructed and/or installed in accordance with the City of Fresno Standard Specifications (2002 Edition). They following shall be submitted as a single package to the Public Works Department for review and approval: a. Signing and striping plans (per current California Department of Transportation standards); b. Street Construction Plans; and, c. Landscape and irrigation plans (median island and street trees within all parkways). 54. The subdivider shall underground all existing off'-site overhead utilities and proposed utility systems in accordance with FMC Sections 12-1011,8-801, and Resolution No. 78- 522, 88-229. 55. The subdivider shall construct an underground street lighting system per Public Works Standards within the limits of the tract. Spacing and design shall conform to Public Works Standards for collector (North Bryan and West Gettysburg Avenues) and local streets. Height, type, spacing, etc., of standards and luminaries shall be in accordance with Resolution No. 68-187, 78-522, 81-219, and 88-229 or any modification thereto approved by the City Traffic Engineer prior to Final Map approval. Upon completion of the work by the subdivider and acceptance of the work by the City, the street lighting system shall be dedicated to the City. Submit engineered construction plans to the Public Works Department for approval. .56. All dead-end streets created by this subdivision shall be properly barricaded in accordance with City standards within seven days from the time the streets are surfaced or as directed by the Engineer. 57. The developer shall comply with Rule 8060 of the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District for the control of fugitive dust requirements from paved! and unpaved roads. Frontage Improvement Requirements: Major Streets: Bryan Avenue: Collector 58. Dedicate 47-55' of property, from section line, for public street purposes within the limits of this subdivision to meet the current City of Fresno Collector.Standards. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM August 31, 2005 Page 9 59. Construct concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk to Public Works Standard P-5. The sidewalk pattern shall be constructed to a 10-foot residential pattern. 60.. Construct an. 80' bus bay, curb and gutter at the northeast corner. of Bryan and Gettysburg Avenues to Public Works Standard P-73, complete with a 10' monolithic sidewalk. 61. Construct twenty (20) feet of permanent paving (measured from face of curb) within the limits of this subdivision:' 62: Construct an underground street lighting system to Public Works Standard E-1 within the limits of this subdivision. Spacing and design shall conform to Public Works Standard E- 8 for Collector Streets. 63. Relinquish direct vehicular access rights to North Bryan Avenue from all lots within this subdivision.. A 64. 12' Bike - Pedestrian Path/Trail: Revise map to provide aJ'26' (minimum) easement for Bike and.Pedestrian purposes within the limits of this subdivision (from Gettysburg to the 4' northerly limits of this subdivision).' (Additional right of way may be required for drainage and grading purposes.) Construct a Bike and Pedestrian trail/path, .complete with signing, striping and landscaping, per.the 2025 Fresno. General. Plan, Multi-Purpose Trails Plan Map and .Public Works Standards and Exhibit "B". Identify route on the map and provide a cross sectionrp for to the planning commission hearing. Trail construction shall be per Public Works Standard P-59 and P-60. Submit engineered construction plans to Public Works. Submit signing and striping plan to Traffic- Engineering for approval. Submit grading, landscape and irrigation plans to Engineering Services. (A.mid-block crossing is not approved. Construct trail to cross at Bryan and Gettysburg.) Gettysburg Avenue: Collector 65. Dedicate 47-55' of property, from section line, for public street purposes within the limits of this subdivision to meet the current City of Fresno Collector Standards. 66. Construct concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk to Public Works Standard P-5. The sidewalk pattern shall be constructed to a 10-foot residential pattern. 67. Construct twenty (20) feet of permanent paving (measured from face of curb) within the n. limits of this subdivision. ` 68. Construct an underground street lighting system to Public Works-Standard E-1 within the limits of this subdivision. Spacing and design shall conform to Public Works Standard E- 8 for Collector Streets. 69. Relinquish direct vehicular access rights to West Gettysburg Avenue from all lots within. this subdivision. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM. August 31, 2005 Page 10 Shaw Avenue: Arterial (six lanes) 70. Dedicate 67'-74.5' ofproperty, from center line,:,for Public street purposes within the: limits of this subdivision to meet the City of Fresno's arterial standards. Interior Streets: 71. Design and construct all curb, gutter, sidewalk, (both sides), permanent paving, cul-de- sacs, and underground street lighting systems on all interior local streets to Public Works Standards. Sidewalk patterns shall comply with Public Works API Standards for fifty (50) foot and fifty-four(54) foot streets. 72. Any temporary dead-end streets created by this subdivision shall be properly barricaded in accordance with the.Public Works Standard P-44. Specific Mitigation Requirements: 73 Relinquish direct vehicular access rights to: a. the north property line of lot 244 b. the south property line of lot 75 C. the east property line of lot 221 d. the west property line of lot 220 74. The first order of work shall include a minimum of two points of vehicular access to the major streets for any phase of this development. 75. Irrigation /Canal Requirements: The developer shall enter into an agreement with the Fresno Irrigation District providing for piping the canal(s) and submit an executed copy of the agreement or commitment letter from FID to the .Planning. and Development Department. All piping shall be located outside of the proposed street right of way. Any piping across city streets shall be rubber gasketed reinforced concrete pipe (RGRCP) constructed perpendicular to the street. Submit engineered plans to Public Works Department, Engineering Division for review and approval. 76. Multi-Purpose Trail: The following comments are' in reference to the proposed trail locations shown on the revision submitted to Traffic Engineering on 8-26-P5. Outlot "B" does not meet Traffic Engineering's minimum requirements; therefore we will not support the trail at this location. Revise the note on the plans to read "OUTLOTS C, D AND E TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY. OF FRESNO FOR TRAIL AND OPEN STACE PURPOSES." 77. The following comments are in reference to the proposed trail locations shown on the - revision submitted to Traffic Engineering on 8-26-05. Outlot"F° does not meet Traffic Engineering's minimum requirements; therefore we will not support the trail at this location. Revise the note on the plans to read "OUTLOTS C, D AND E TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF FRESNO FOR TRAIL AND OPEN STACE . PURPOSES. 78. Gated Entry: Proposed entry does not meet Traffic's approval; see attached Exhibit(s) "C", "D" and "E". Provide a detail which includes gate widths, gate locations, call box i i Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM August 31, 2005 Page 1.1 locations, ADA path of travel and proposed radii. A minimum stacking of 75' from back of walk to gate is required. 79. Dedication shall be required south of Gettysburg on Bryan to accommodate additional paving and any other grading or transitions as necessary based on a 45 MPH design : speed. ..80. Provide 160-foot minimum offset at Alamos and Acacia Avenues. UGM Requirements: This Map is in UGM major street zone E-4; therefore payall applicable UGM fees. Bryan Avenue: Collector 81. Dedicate and construct (2) two 17' center section travel lanes, with 250'.left turn lanes at all major intersections; from Gettysburg Avenue to Shaw Avenue. An additional 6' of paving shall be required adjacent to the 250' left. turn lanes. Dedication shall be sufficient to accommodate additional paving and any other grading or transitions as necessary based on a 45 MPH design speed. 82. Install a signal pole with a 150-watt safety light to Public Works Standards at the northeast corner of Bryan and Gettysburg. Gettysburg Avenue: Collector 83. Dedicate and construct (2) two 17' center section travel lanes,with 250' left turn lanes at all major intersections, within the limits of this subdivision and east to Hayes Avenue. An `additional 6' of paving shall be required adjacent to the 250' left turn lanes. Dedication shall be sufficient to accommodate additional paving and any other grading or transitions as necessary based on a 45 MPH design speed. 84. For Assessor's Parcel Nos. 311-06049 and 78: Dedicate and construct full offsite improvements. Coordinate agreement to offset fees with the Fresno Metropolitan Flood :Control District. (Frontage improvements required beyond the limit of development: FMC Section 11-226(f)(6) and 2025 Fresno General Plan Policy Nos. E-1-c, E-1-j, E-1-n and E-3-e.) k, l Shaw Avenue: Arterial 85. Dedicate and construct (2) two 17' center section travel lanes and a raised concrete median island within the limits of this subdivision. Dedication shall. be sufficient to accommodate arterial standard and any other grading or transitions as necessary based on a 45 MPH design speed. 86. Install a signal pole with a 150-watt safety light to Public Works Standards at the f northeast corner of Shaw and Bryan Avenues. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM August 31, 2005 Page 12 Hayes Avenue: Collector 87. Design and construct a major street bridge at the intersection of Hayes Avenue and Herndon No. 39 Canal. The Public Works Department will apply this requirement to minimum of 4 other subdivisions with each subdivision being responsible for a fee nog greater than 1/5 of the cost of said bridge. The timing of the bridge construction shall! occur prior to close out of this subdivision or at such time that the City Engineer deems necessary, whichever is earlier. Mitioation Measures from Traffic Study 88.. The project shall pay its fair `share, 2.5%, towards the cost of improvements to the intersection at Shaw and Parkway Avenues. This fee shall be in the amount of $6,500 and is not eligible for fee credit or reimbursement.and is.due at the time of. building permit. 89. The project shall pay its Traffic Signal Mitigation Impact fee as detailed in the fee section of these conditions. 90. Dedicate and construct two 17' center section travel lanes along Shaw Avenue with 250' left turn lanes at all major intersections from Bryan Avenue to Parkway Avenue. An additional 6' of paving shall be required adjacent to the 250' left turn lanes. Dedication shall be sufficient to accommodate additional paving and any other grading or transitions as necessary based on a 45 MPH design speed. 91. Dedicate and construct two 17' center section travel lanes along Gettysburg Avenue with 250' left tum lanes at all major intersections from the easterly limits of the tract to Polk Avenue. An'additional 6' of paving shall be required adjacent to the 250' left turn lanes. Dedication shall be sufficient to accommodate additional paving and any other grading i or transitions as necessary based on a 45 MPH design speed. STREET NAMES Change the following street name to reflect its proper spelling: 92. Make the following changes to the street names: a. West Santa Ana Avenue to new name b. W. Acacia Ave. to West Acacia Avenue c. Biola Branch Southern Pacific Railroad to West Gettysburg Avenue d. North Emory Avenue to North Massera Avenue e. North Sandrini Avenue to North Brent Avenue f. N. Rosalia Ave. to North Rosalia Avenue g. Outlot A (interior streets) shall be given new names which are unique to the County of Fresno and mustnot have the suffix of Avenue, Road or Street SANITARY SEWER SERVICE 93. • The nearest sanitary sewer mains to serve the. proposed .project are a ,15-inch main located in West Shaw Avenue and an 8-inch main located in North Bryan Avenue at West Gettysburg Avenue Alignment. Sanitary sewer facilities will be available to provide service to the site subject to the following requirements. j Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493%UGM t August 31, 2005 Page 13 94. Construct an `8-inch sanitary' sewer main in North Bryan Avenue from West Shaw Avenue south across the proposed project frontage. 95. Construct an 8-inch sanitary sewer main in North.Bryan Avenue from West Gettysburg Avenue Alignment north across the proposed project frontage. 96. Sanitary sewer mains shall be extended within the proposed tract to provide sewer service to each lot created. 97. Separate sewer house branches shall.be provided for each lot created -t, 98. Abandon all existing on-site private sanitary sewer systems. 99. A Preliminary sewer design layout shall be prepared by the Developer's Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Utilities for review and conceptual approvals prior to submittal or acceptance of the developers final map and engineered plan & profile improvement drawing for.City review. 100. Public sewer facilities shall be constructed in accordance with Public Works Department standards, specifications, and policies. 101. Engineered improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer are required for proposed additions to the sanitary sewer system. Sanitary Sewer Fees 102. The following Sewer Connection Charges are due and shall be paid for the Project Lateral Sewer Charge • Oversize Sewer Charge Sewer Facility Charge (Residential Only) ` Trunk Sewer Fees: Grantland Avenue - WATER SERVICE 103. The nearest water main to serve the proposed project is a 14-inch water main located in South Hayes Avenue. Water facilities are available to provide service to the site subject to the following requirements. 104. Construct a 14-inch transmission grid water main (including installation of City fire hydrants) in North Hayes Avenue from West Santa Ana Avenue to West Shaw Avenue. 105. Construct a 14-inch transmission grid water main (including installation of City fire hydrants) in West Shaw Avenue from North.Hayes Avenue west to North Bryan Avenue. 106.'Construct a 14-inch transmission grid water main (including installation of City fire hydrants) in North Bryan.Avenue from West Shaw Avenue to West Gettysburg Avenue Alignment.: . Conditions of Approval ` Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM August 31, 2005 Page 14 107. Construct a 14-inch transmission grid main (including installation of City fire hydrants) in West Gettysburg Avenue Alignment from North Bryan Avenue to West Hayes Avenue. 108. Water mains (including installation of City fire hydrants) shall be extended within the proposed tract to provide water service to each lot created. 109. Separate water services with meter boxes shall be provided to each lot created. 110. Two independent sources of water, meeting Federal and State Drinking Water Act , Standards, are required to serve the tract including any subsequent phases thereof. The two-source requirement may be accomplished through any combination of water main extensions, construction of supply wells, or other acceptable sources of water supply approved by the Water Systems Manager. 111. Seal and abandon existing on-site well in compliance with State of California Well Standards,. Bulletin 74-90 or current revisions issued by California Department of Water Resources and City of Fresno standards. 112. Provide a water well site(s) of a size and at a location acceptable to the Water Systems Manager. The cost of acquiring the well site(s) and construction of the well(s) shall be funded from the UGM Water Supply Well Service Area Fund 201s. In the event there are insufficient funds available in the UGM Water Supply Well Service Area Fund 201s, , the developer will be required to construct the well(s) on a site(s) dedicated to the City of Fresno. The developer's cost of acquiring the well sites) and construction of the well(s) shall be reimbursed from the UGM Water Supply Well Service Area Fund 201s, in accordance with established UGM policies. The well(s) shall be capable of.producing a. minimum of 600 gallons per minute. 113. Water well construction shall include wellhead treatment facilities, if required. The developer's cost for constructing wellhead treatment facilities shall be reimbursed from UGM Wellhead Treatment Service Area Fund 201s, in accordance .with established UGM policies. 114. All public water`facilities shall be constructed in accordance ,with Public Works Department standards, specifications,'and policies. 115. Engineered improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer are required for proposed additions to the City Water System. Water Fees 116. The following Water Connection Charges and fees shall be paid for the project. Wet-ties, water service(s), and/or meter(s) installation(s) • Frontage Charge Transmission Grid Main Charge Urban Growth Management Requirements 117. The proposed subdivision is located within UGM Water Service Area No. 101 s. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM August 31, 2005 Pagel 5 FRESNO IRRIGATION DISTRICT (FID) 118.:FID's Sylvia No. 47 pipeline traverses the subject property. 119. FID requires the applicant grant an exclusive pipeline easement to FID and pipe the Silvia No. 47 canal across the proposed development in accordance with FID standards and that the applicant enter into an agreement with FID for that purpose. The developer will need to meet with FID to determine the pipeline alignment and required pipeline diameter. 120. FID estimates the minimum inside diameter of pipe required for the Sylvia canal to be 48 inch. A pipe of this size and the accompanying 40-foot easement limits the available space for the placement of building and permanent improvements .on commercial property and virtually precludes homeowners from installing permanent improvements' such as swimming pools, concrete floored sheds, large.trees, etc. It has been FID's experience that there are several maintenance issues with pipelines that traverse through backyards or commercial properties. Therefore, FID recommends aligning the proposed pipeline with.Shaw and Bryan Avenues as shown on the attached map. By aligning the pipeline next to street right-of-ways, FID only requires 20 feet of easement " instead of the 40 feet required through private property. 121 FID does not allow its easements to be in common use with public utility easements but. Will allow its easement to be in common use with landscape easements. FID recommends all block walls and fences be located outside of this easement. 122. FID will require a Common Use of Easements Agreement between FID and the City of Fresno for all landscape easements which overlap FID's easement. 123. FID requires the applicant submit a grading and drainage plan for FID approval .which shows that the proposed development will not endanger the structural integrity of the pipeline, or result in drainage patterns that will adversely affect FID or the applicant. 124. FID requires its.easement be shown on the map with.proper recording information and that FID be made a party to signing all plans which affect its easement and canal/pipeline facility and also be made party to signing the final map. 125. FID requests the applicant be exempted from any .condition that.would require the construction of public facilities or conveyance of deeds or easements within FID's canal easement to any other party without FID's written consent. 126. FID may have additional comments regarding the subject proposal and suggests the h applicant and/or applicant's engineer contact FID at their earliest convenience. 127. For informational purposes, a private canal known as the Wheaton No. 518 traverses the subject property. This is an active canal and will need to remain in service. FLOOD CONTROL AND DRAINAGE 128. The subdivider shall be required to comply with the specific requirements imposed by the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (FMFCD) for the subdivision or any . Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM August 31, 2005 Page 16 r amendments or modifications to those requirements which may be granted by the FMFCD Board of Directors, pursuant to Section 1{3-1307 of the Fresno Municipal Code) , These requirements are identified in the District's fetter to the Planning and Development Department dated July 27, 2005: 129. Any temporary ponding basins constructed or enlarged to provide service to the subdivision shall be fenced in accordance with ,City standards within seven days from the time the basin becomes operational or as directed by the City Engineer. Temporary ponding basins will be created through a covenant between the City and the Developer prior to Final Map approval. Maintenance of the temporary ponding basin shall be by the Developer until permanent service for the entire subdivision is provided. SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 130. The developer/owner shall comply with the requirements in the letter from the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District dated:June 21, 2005, for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM. CENTRAL UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT .131. School developer fees shall be paid on all new residential construction within the proposed. subdivision, in accordance with a resolution adopted by the Central Unified School District, pursuant to Government Code Section 65995 and Educational Code Section 17620. 132. Install a permanent school bus pull-out, per the attached design drawing, located along northbound Bryan Avenue, adjacent to lots 77 and 78. 133. Information regarding school attendance boundaries and student generation can be found in the letter dated July 7, 2005, from Central Unified School.District. RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION 134. The developer will be responsible for the acquisition of any necessary right-of-way to construct any of the required improvements. 135. Rights-of-way acquisition shall include any rights-of-way necessary for proper drainage, signing, pole relocation, and shoulder grading. In general, this will require right-of-way to be provided approximately 10 feet outside the travel lane. The exact requirement must be determined at the project design stage based on the existing conditions and detailed design information. - 136. In the event an acquisition of any easement or right-of-way is necessitated by.the subject development, said acquisition will be accomplished prior to Final Map approval. The developedowner should contact the Real Estate Section of the Public Works Department to receive procedural guidance in such acquisitions. 137: Should such acquisition not be accomplished by the subdivider prior to Final Map approval, the subdivider must request and grant to the City the full authority to attempt acquisition either through.negotiation or .through .its power of eminent domain. The Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM August 31, 2005 Page 17 subdivider shall furnish to the City Public Works Department, Engineering Division/ Real Estate Section, an appraisal report or a request for an estimated appraisal amount (to be determined by the City of Fresno Real Estate Section) prior to preparation of a Subdivision Agreement., 138. The subdivider shall submit adequate security in the form of a cash deposit to guarantee payment of all costs associated with the acquisition, including staff time, attorney's fees, appraisal fees, court costs, and all related expenditures and costs necessary to effect the acquisition of such easements or rights-of-way. - CALTRANS 139. Caltrans has reviewed the project and is requesting the payment of fees, in the amount of $18,565, to mitigate impacts to the Freeway 99 interchange with Shaw Avenue. Prior to issuance of building permits, the project shall pay a state highway facility traffic impact fee equivalent to the proportional amount of vehicle trips projected to be generated by the development of 244 single family residential lots. Alternatively, the fee amount may be paid as determined by the Fresno County Council of Governments Fresno/Madera "Freeway Deficiency Study(ies). Imposition of this.condition is dependent upon the City of Fresno and Caltrans having an executed agreement. for the City to collect and administer this State Highway Facilities Fee. "URBAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS (GENERAL) 140. The. developer of property located within the UGM boundaries shall comply with all sewer, water and street requirements and pay all applicable UGM fees imposed under the Urban Growth Management process (with appropriate credit given for the installation of required UGM improvements) in accordance with the requirements of State Law as related to vesting tentative tract maps. 141 The developer will be responsible for the relocation or reconstruction of any existing improvements or facilities necessary to construct any of the required UGM .improvements. DEVELOPMENT FEES AND CHARGES 5 142. This project is subject to the following fees and charges: PARKS DEPARTMENT FEE/ RATE a. Street Tree Landscape Plan Review fee $56.00 b. .. ,Street Tree.Installation fee $129.00/tree City installed tree C. Street Tree Inspection fee $30.00/tree Developer installed tree d. . Maintenance District Plan Review fee $176.00 e. Maintenance District Inspection fee $305.00 5 Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM August 31, 2005 Page 18 f. Reinspection Fee $29/Hour FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DIST. FEE/RATE g. Metropolitan Flood Control.District Fee " Contact FMFCD for new fees. Rates increased as of November 2004 SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES FEE RATE h. Lateral Sewer Charge* $0.10/sq, ft. (to 100` depth) is .Oversize Charge* $0.05/sq. ft. (to 1.00' depth) j. Trunk Sewer Charge♦ $419/living unit Service Area: Grantland k. Wastewater Facilities Charge. °.$2,119/living unit I. Copper Avenue Sewer Lift Station Charge* N/A m. Fowler Trunk Sewer Interim Fee Surety* N/A n. House Branch Sewer Charge♦ .N/A - o. Millbrook Overlay Sewer* N/A WATER CONNECTION CHARGES FEE RATE p. Service Connection Charge !Fee based on service(s) and meter(s) sizes specified by owner; fee for service(s) and Meter(s) established by the Master Fee Schedule. q. Frontage Charge* $6.50/lineal foot r. .Transmission Grid Main Charge* $643/gross acre (parcels 5 gross acres or more) s. Transmission Grid Main Bond Debt Service Charge $243/gross acre (parcels 5 gross acres or more) t. UGM Water Supply Feer Service Area: 201 s:, $407/living unit U. Well Head Treatment Fee♦ $0/living unit Service Area: 201 i i ` Conditions of Approval . Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM August 31, 2005 . Page 19 v. Recharge Feev $0/living unit Service Area: 201 i w. 1994 Bond Debt Services $0/living unit Service Area: 201 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FEE RATE x. Northeast Fresno Policing.Areas N/A y. Traffic Signal Charges $414.69/living unit URBAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT FEE RATE z. UGM Fire Station Capital Fees $807/gross acre Service Area: .17, aa. UGM Park Feed $1783/gross acre Service Area: 4 bb. Major Street Charges $3531/adj.acre Service Area: E-4 cc. Major Street Bridge Charge* $196/adj. acre Service Area: E-4 dd. UGM Grade Separation Fees N/A Service Area: E-4-A ee. UGM Trunk Sewer Charges N/A Service Area: Grantland ff. Street Acquisition/Construction Chargee N/A Notes: 4 Due at time of development Deferrable through Fee Deferral Covenant. ♦ Due at time of subdivision. City of DATE: August 29, 2005 TO: Shelby Chamberlain, Planner II{ Development Department, Planning Division THROUGH: Scott Mozier, P.E., Traffic Engineering Manager S _ Public Works Department, Engineering Division FROM: Louise Monroe,Traffic Planning Supervisor Public Works Department, Engineering Division SUBJECT: TT 5493/ G05-081, REVISION Public Works Conditions of Approval (Bryan: between Shaw and Gettysburg) The Public Works Department, Traffic Planning Section, has completed its review and the following requirements are to be placed on this tentative map.as a condition of approval by the Public Works Department. General Conditions: Provide curb ramps at all corners within the limits of this subdivision.. Underground all existing offsite overhead utilities with the limits of this map in accordance..with Fresno Municipal Code Section 12-1011 and Resolution No. 78=522/88-229. Submit the following plans, as applicable, in a single package, to the Planning and Development Department for review and approval: Street Construction, Signing, Striping, .Traffic Signal and Streetlig ht and Trail Lighting, Signing and Striping. Frontage Improvement Requirements: Major Streets: Gettysburg Avenue: Collector 1. Dedicate 47'-55' of property, from section line, for public street purposes within the limits of this subdivision to meet the current City of Fresno Collector Standards. 2. Construct concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk to Public Works Standard P-5. The sidewalk path rn shall be constructed to a 10' residential pattern. 3. Construct 20' of permanent paving (measured from face of curb) within the limits of this sub- division. 4. Construct an underground street lighting system to Public Works Standard E-1 within the limits of this subdivision. Spacing and design shall conform to Public Works Standard E-8'for Collector Streets. 5. Relinquish direct vehicular access rights to Gettysburg Avenue from all lots within this subdivision: Pagel of 4 C:1Louise\TRACT MAPSIT-5493 REVISION SHAW AND BRYAN.doc Bryan Avenue: Collector 1. Dedicate 47'-55' of property, from section line, for public street purposes within the limits of this subdivision to meet the current City of Fresno Collector Standards. 2. Construct concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk to Public Works Standard P-5. The sidewalk pattern S shall be constructed to a 10' residential pattern. 3. Construct an 80' bus bay curb and gutter at the northeast corner of Bryan and Gettysburg to Public Works Standard P-73;complete with a 10' monolithic sidewalk. 4. Construct 20' of permanent paving (measured from face of curb) within the limits of this sub- division. 5. Construct an underground street lighting system to Public Works Standard E-1 within the limits Of t this subdivision. Spacing and design shall conform to Public Works Standard E-8 for Collector Streets. 6. Relinquish direct vehicular access rights to Bryan Avenue from all lots within this subdivision. 7.. 12' Bike - Pedestrian Path/Trail: Revise map to provide a 26' (minimum) easement for Bike and l Pedestrian purposes.within the limits of this subdivision (from Gettysburg to the northerly limits of this subdivision). (Additional right of way may be required for drainage and grading purposes.) Construct a Bike and Pedestrian trail/path, complete with signing, striping and landscaping, per: the 2025 Fresno General Plan, Multi-Purpose Trails Plan Map and Public Works Standards and Exhibit "B". Identify route On the map and provide a cross section prior to the planning commission hearing. Trail construction shall be per Public Works Standard P-59 and P-60. Submit engineered construction plans to Public Works. Submit signing and striping plan to Traffic Engineering for approval. Submit grading, landscape and irrigation plans to Engineering Services. (A mid-block crossing is not approved. Construct trail to cross at Bryan and Gettysburg.) Shaw Avenue:Arterial (six lanes) 1. Dedicate 67'-74.5' of property,from center line, for public street purposes within the limits of this subdivision to meet the City of Fresno's Arterial Standards. Interior Streets: Design and construct all curb,.gutter, sidewalk, (both sides), permanent paving, cul-de-sacs, and underground street lighting systems on all interior local streets to Public Works Standards. Sidewalk patterns shall comply with Public Works API Standards for 50'. and 54' streets. Any temporary dead-end streets created by this subdivision shall be properly barricaded in accordance with the Pubic Works Standard P-44. Specific Mitigation Requirements: 1 This tract will generate 183 a.m. /246 p.m. peak hour trips, therefore, a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) is required to comply with the mitigation measure requirements of the 2025 General Plan circulation element. Comply with the mitigation measures set forth in the attached letter prepared by the Traffic Planning Manager, dated June 29, 2005. 2. Relinquish direct vehicular access rights.to a. the north property line of lot 243. b. the south property line of lot 75. C. the east property line of lot 223. d. the west property line of lot 222. Page 2of4 C:\Louise\TRACT MAPSM5493 REVISION SHAW AND BRYAN.doc 3. The first order of work shall include a minimum of two points of vehicular access to the major. streets for anv phase of this development. 4. Irrigation /Canal Requirements: The developer shall enter into an agreement with the Fresno Irrigation District providing for piping the canals) and submit an executed copy of the agree r Ment or commitment letter from FID to the Planning and Development Department. All piping shall=be located outside of the proposed street right of way. Any piping across city streets shall be rubber gasketed reinforced concrete pipe (RGRCP) constructed perpendicular to the street. Submit engineered plans to Pubic Works Department, Engineering Division for review and approval. 5. Private Ditch to be piped: Verify feasibility with the'Planning Department. Multi-Purpose Trail: The following comments are in reference to the proposed trail locati''ons ..shown on the revision submitted to Traffic Engineering on 8-26-05. Outlot "B" does not meet Traffic Engineering's minimum requirements;'therefore we will not support the trail at this location. Revise the note on the plans to read "OUTLOTS C, D AND E TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF FRESNO FOR TRAIL AND OPEN STACE PURPOSES." 6. Silva Ditch No. 47 to be piped. Verify feasibility with the Planning Department. The following comments are in reference to the proposed trail locations shown on the revision submitted to Traffic Engineering on 8-26-05. Outlot "F" does not meet Traffic Engineering's minimum requirements; therefore we will not support the trail at this location. Revise the note on the plans to read "OUTLOTS C, D AND E TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF FRESNO FOR TRAIL AND OPEN STACE PURPOSES." An additional dedication shall be required south of Gettysburg on Bryan to accommodate additional paving and any other grading or transitions as necessary based on a 45 MPH design speed. 7. Gated Entry: Proposed entry does not meet Traffic's approval; see attached Exhibit(s) "C", and "E". Provide a detail which includes gate widths, gate locations, call box locations, ADA path of travel and proposed radii. A minimum stacking of 75' from back of walk to gate is required. UGM Requirements: This Map is in UGM major street zone E-4; therefore pay all applicable UGM fees. Gettysburg Avenue: Collector 1. Dedicate and construct (2) 17' center section travel lanes with 250' left turn lanes, at all major intersections, within the limits of this development and continue east to Haves Avenue. An additional 6' of paving shall be required adjacent to the 250' left turn lanes. Dedication shall be sufficient to accommodate additional paving and any other grading or transitions, as necessary based on a 45 MPH design speed. . 2. A.P.N.(s) 311-060-49T'and 78T: Dedicate and construct full offsite improvements. Coordinate agreement to offset fees with the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District. (Frontage improvements required beyond the limit of development: F.M.C. Section 11-226(f)(6) and 2025 General Plan Policy numbers E-1-c, E-1-J, E-1-n and E-3-e. ) Bryan Avenue: Collector 1. Dedicate and construct (2) 17' center section travel lanes with 250' left turn lanes, at all.major intersections from Gettysburg to Shaw. An additional 6' of paving shall be required adjacent to the 250' left turn lanes. Dedication shall be sufficient to accommodate additional paving and any other grading or transitions as necessary based on a 45 MPH design speed. { .Page 3 of 4 j I C:\Louise\TRACT MAPSIT-5493 REVISION SHAW AND BRYAN.doc 777 7 Y7 7 `.-"_3-y ,: k 2. Install a signal pole with a 150-watt safety light to Public Works Standards at the northeast corner of Bryan and Gettysburg. . Shaw Avenue:Arterial .1. Dedicate and construct (2) 17' center.section travel lanes and a raised concrete median island within the limits of this subdivision . Details of said street shall be depicted on the approved tentative tract map. Dedication shall be sufficient to accommodate arterial standard and any other grading or transitions as necessary based on a 45 MPH design speed. 2.. .Install a signal pole with a 150-watt safety light to Public Works Standards at the northeast corner . of Shaw and Bryan Avenues: Haves Avenue:_Collector 1. Design and construct a Major Street Bridge at the intersection of Hayes Avenue and the Herndon No. 39 Canal. Public Works will apply this requirement to a minimum of 4 other subdivisions with each subdivision being responsible for a fee no greater than 1/5 of the cost of said bridge. The timing of the bridge construction shall.occurrp for to close out of this subdivision or at such time that the City Engineer deems necessary, whichever is earlier: Page 4of4 C:%Louise\TRACT MAPS%T-5493 REVISION SHAW AND BRYAN.doc IIJ 40 W .. as. w W wLviLLI7 co ----� , _ W v� AIGL V u1 co � i rl 2 O � 2 4 } �• i �d o.r. �- 74,lat D.P- I' 1 �. j 1 { .j •1 I i I • • .i i i I i i j - i I ! t ' '� i• i •1 ! � ; i I j ; i i 1 i i •I 1 I i t I. ! 1 ! ! 1 i I ► i ' 1 � I I f I !' r i ` �: � � r I - � i � i •I I I i ( I j l i is I f I i f i r {- I i f i i •; I � ; __ i j i - i � ° I C I I ! j I • � ' . • 'j- .1 i• I 1 ! � i i _ j i i i � � �I i- i I ! I i I - I • I I !- '�- f � i' I 1 � � f � -I'.�� 1 i j i ` I i' ' i- I i � � ! i ! ! � f• } i I i I I I ; i �- )` f I .1 i i t l l l I I I I � ! 1 I .. I' i ' i ( .j Ind � ' •I - i __• MIti4; i i i i � i __ . i � 1 I 1 1 I I ' •1- i ' ; ; 1 , �. i j I t i j ' i ' -� I 1 I � I I ! I t I I I i r i � - ! 'I .I ..► ( � j. -� �- ! I I I I,. i I. ( 1 I 1�,,,..f..._;,iii..�•il.•.�Ip.��'•^".'y I j -; ; I -i � i I' � i t � I i ! I 1 V-77-1 ,. I ; 1 1 I i .i- • _ , •f_•;�• ; j t r �� I I � ,'� I .1 ; . I ( 'I <i :1 t ; '•j U: LJU 1 ! I 1 filly 1 , I- 1 I t i ' 1 f I I I � 77•Gt'I"-'j't ; i ! j -I I � _ 1 i - � _ _ i -. I �• ;. _4 d/ - . . .I - ate• N al ®® y IME NIL= mmim® Nol i W� u ���. O re ire t — C/_"t rLr qj j /d' L/�O�l Y [JYYf,�itfOy6v� ,` .P/.0 �✓� � � 'l10/I err .✓ A veii I �i A alif 14 -P el t I 1 ! I. i j ) - { .zJ- qkj - - ---- I Aft _ t I r 1 I 1. — ;;:..i:.=:.f,._..�.w k—=r' ; I I , •I 1 i I ( �.: ). `...._)_;� ,1 i t p �fl a c l ! i C i i ; ' i !. ,.. i j t •a. LM :moo�C�iAIY-.-_ �" ; r:- ; 7 h�:r• ? ;'�,� �• " j. i' I •�=�'. i. _ � LJJ Fresno City of 1 f1 Ie � N®® z000 n City Hall 559-621-8800 Public Works Department 2600 Fresno Street,Rm.4064 David Healey,Interim Director Fresno,CA 93721-3623 www.fresno.pov June 29, 2005 i . Peters Engineering Group. f 55 Shaw Avenue, Suite 220 Clovis, CA. 93612 Attn: John Rowland - SUBJECT: TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY (TIS).ACCEPTANCE FOR THE PROPOSED T5493; LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF BRYAN AVENUE AND THE .GETTYSBURG ALIGNMENT This project proposes to construct 244 single family residential units. Based on the ITE Trip Generation manual it is estimated that this project will generate 2,364 trips weekday, 183 am and 247 pm peak h)ur trips. The City has the following comments to the traffic impact study: Discussion: Based on 2025 future conditions, Shaw,Avenue from Highwayd,99 to Grantland Avenue will be a six (6) lane arterial. Therefore, the Synchro report shall be revised to show three (3) through lane in each direction. Please provide an addendum to show an updated LOS based on the additional through lanes. As a mitigation measure, this project shall: 1. The City of Fresno has established a geometric layout and cost estimate for the improvements of the intersection of Shaw at Parkway Avenue. The cost is estimated to be $260;000. Basedon the equitable fair share percentage, the impact is 2.5%,„which results in the amount of$6,500 mitigation fee. This fee is not eligible for fee credit or reimburstment and is due at time of building permit: C 2. This project shall pay its Traffic Signal Mitigation Impact Fee at the time of building permit basid on the trip generation rate(s) as set forth in the latest edition of the ITE Generation Manual. Refer to the adopted Master Fee Schedule for fee rate. This fee shall be paid at time of building permit with the above mentioned mitigation measure(s). Assuming the site develops consistent with t"he proposed uses as depicted on Table 1, this project would pay: a. 244 single family residential units x$414.69= $ 101,184.00 3. Dedicate and construct (2) 17' center section travel lanes along Shaw Avenue with 250' left tur lanes at all major intersections from Bryan to Parkway Avenue. An additional 6' o!f paving shall .be required adjacent to the 250' left turn lanes. Dedication shall be sufficient to accommodate additional paving and any other grading or transitions as necessary based on 45 MPH design speeds. Q:\Traffic Impact Studies\T5493 nec Bryan and Gettysburg.doc A Dedicate and construct (2) 17' center section travel lanes along Gettysburg Avenue with 250' left turn lanes at all major intersections from the easterly limits of the tract to Polk Avenue. An additional 6'.of paving shall. be required adjacent to the 250' left turn lanes. Dedication shall be sufficient to accommodate additional paving and any other grading or transitions as necessary " based on 45 MPH design speeds. 5. This subdivision shall comply with additional "conditions of approval" set forth in tentative tract 5493. The applicant shall consult with the State of California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) to determine the California Environmental Quality Act levels of significance with regard to traffic impacts on CALTRANS'freeway facilities., If you have any question, please do not hesitate on contacting.David Padilla at (559)621-8798 or by email: david.Pad illaCcD-fresno.aov Sincerely, ose Luis Benavides, P.E., Traffic Engineering Manager Public Works Department,.Engineering Services f . I ffII V� C: Traffic Planning Reading File Louise Monroe,Supervising Engineering Technician,City of Fresno _2- - Q:\Tralfic Impact Studies\T5493 nec Bryan and Gettysburg.doc DEPARTMENT 4F PUBLIC W0. RKS TO: Shelby Chamberlain;Planner III Planning Division FROM: Ann Lillie, Senior Engineering Technician (559.621.8690) DATE: July 5,2005 SUBJECT: Tentative.Subdivision Map T-5493 (Located east side of North Bryan Avenue between . West Shaw Avenue and West Gettysburg alignment) The Department of Public Works has reviewed the Vesting Tentative Tract Map proposed by Lemley Land Sales,Inc., on engineering plans prepared by Quad Knopf, dated June 1.2005. The Department of Public Works offers the following comments regarding the Street Tree,Buffer/Parkway and Median Island Landscape conditions. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS STREET TREE REQUIREMENTS 1. . The subdivider is required to provide street trees on all public street frontages and for the dedication of planting and buffer landscaping easements. Street trees shall be planted at the rate of one tree for , each 60'of street frontage by the Developer. Tree planting shall be within a 10'Planting and Public Utility Easement. The subdivider is required to provide irrigation for all street trees. The irrigation system shall comply with FMC 12-306-23,Water Efficient Landscape Standards. Tree species to be planted as follows: STREET NAME STREET TREE SPECIES/COMMON NAME North Bryan Avenue Quercus lobata-Valley Oak West Gettysburg Avenue Celtis.australis European Hackberry *Note: Area along Bryan within FID easement will need to meet their planting requirements. 2. Street Tree Planting by Developer:For those lots having internal street tree frontage available for street tree planting, the developer shall plant one tree for each 60'of street frontage, or one tree per lot having street frontage, whichever is greater. a. Street tree inspection fees shall be collected for each 60'of public street frontage or one tree per ...lot whichever is greater. b. Street trees shall be planted in accordance with the City of Fresno,Department of Public Works ."Standard Specifications." c. .Landscape plans shall indicate street tree planting locations and species. Landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works,Engineering Services. A street tree planting permit shall be required for all residential street tree planting. d. Performance and payment securities,paid with final map,will be released when all landscaping installed on public and/or city controlled property is in conformance with the -Specifications of the City of Fresno. e. Upon acceptance of the required work,warranty security shall be furnished to or retained by the city for guaranty and warranty of the work fora period of ninety days following acceptance. BUFFER LANDSCAPING&MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS 1. The subdivider is required to provide long term maintenance for the landscape in-the landscape easements and rights-of-way. No planting,in PPEs which Outlot`.`C",Outlot"D"and Outlot"E"are called out as.The subdivider may petition for annexation in the Community Facilities District,or may form a Home Owner's Association. .2. Buffer Maintenance Through Annexation to the Community Facilities District Landscape and Irrigation plans are required and shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval prior to a Council approval of the final map. Plans shall be numbered to conform to and be included in the Department of Public Works street construction plan set for the final map. These fees are applicable when the subdivider elects to maintain the buffer landscaping by annexing to the city's Community,Facilities District. A. Landscaping shall comply with Landscape Buffer Development Standards approved by the City Council on October 2, 1990. Landscape and irrigation plans shall comply with Sections 12-306-23 &24 and 14-121 of the Fresno Municipal Code regarding Water Efficient Landscaping and Buffer landscaping. B. Should the proposed landscape buffers and/or parkway strips be located next to an existing buffer. and/or parkway strip,the planting concept shall simulate the adjacent landscape design to present a more uniform appearance on the street. Variances in the landscape concept will be acceptable,but the design of the new landscape buffer and/or parkway,strip shall strive to mimic the existing as much ` as possible. C. Landscape plans shall indicate grades on a cross-section detail to include fencing or wall details. All fencing shall be placed outside the landscape easement. Maximum slopes shall not exceed 4:1 with 1 foot of level ground between the slope and the back of the side walk and/or face of fence. Erosion control measures shall be implemented on all slopes of 4:1, including the use of synthetic erosion control netting in combination with ground cover species approved by the Department of Public Works/engineering Services Division. D. The water meter(s)serving the buffer landscaping shall be sized for the anticipated service flows. E. No private flags,signs or identification of any kind shall be permitted in the right-of-way,within the City-controlled easement or on the.fence or wall facing.the street. F. Landscaping in the right-of-way and landscape setback adjacent to water well sites shall be the responsibility of.the City of Fresno Water Division and may not be included in the CFD... MEDIAN ISLAND LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 1. When existing median islands front onto the proposed development project,applicants shall be required to submit plans showing the location and configuration of all median islands fronting the proposed project for review and evaluation for median island landscaping requirements. Existing utilities, including, but not limited to city water lines/service points, sanitary sewer, storm drains, electrical lines,existing landscaping including trees,shrubs,ground cover beds,irrigation facilities, and other miscellaneous landscape features shall also be clearly defined. if 2. Median island landscaping is required for all median islands that are required to be constructed and shall be in accordance with FMC section 12-306-24. All landscaping within the median island shall consist of only shallow rooted plants so as to not interfere with existing utilities. The subdivider shall be responsible for providing water service and irrigation to the landscaped median;islands. In addition,the Public Works Department requires 2 foot wide colored concrete strips on all proposed median islands with a 12 inch by 12 inch slate pattern in brick red. OUTLOTS 1. The Department of Public Works will not be responsible for the maintenance of any outlots if they are not included into the CFD2. If the outlots are to be included into the CFD2,the Department of Public Works will require approving landscape and irrigation plans prior to inclusion into the CFD2. i. TRAIL REQUIREMENTS 1: The trail shall be constructed in accordance with the "Master Trails Manual." The subdivider is responsible for the trail construction. The subdivider is responsible for all landscape and irrigation improvements for and within the trail. Construction plans shall be submitted and shall include landscaping and automatic drip irrigation design. Trail cross-sections will be required with submittal of Street Plans and Landscaping/Inigation Plans for review and approval. These plans shall be approved by the Department of Public Works. Landscaping within the regional/multipurpose trail shall include large, medium and low-growing shrubs planted from 3 to 6 feet apart depending on.: . variety,and trees spaced approximately 25 to 45 feet apart to provide 50% shade coverage onto the planting area and pathway. Landscaping adjacent to walls or fences shall comply with"Landscaped Buffer Development Standards." All planting areas shall be irrigated with an automatic system. i i i j . File No.210.45 FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS PUBLIC AGENCY DEVELOPER-. - Mr. EVELOPER .Mr. Gil Haro, Planning Manager LEMLEY LAND SALES, INC Planning.& Development Departmenf W. SHAW AVE., SUITE 122 City of Fresno FRESNO, CA 93711 2600 Fresno Street Fresno,CA 93721: PRELIMINARY FEE(S) (See below) DRAINAGE AREA " EO $247,502.00 MAP NO. 5493 DRAINAGE AREA AI " $45,192.00 DRAINAGE A ) "EO,AI, EN DRAINAGE AREA �' EN $50,916.00 DATE 2 DRAINAGE AREA TOTAL FEE $343,610.00 The proposed development will generate storm runoff which produces potentially significani environmental impacts and which must be properly discharged and mitigated pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. The Districi: in cooperation with the City and County has developed and adopted.the Storm Drainage anc Flood Control Master Plan. Compliance with and implementation of this Master Plan by this development project will satisfy the drainage related CEQA/NEPA impact.of the projeci mitigation requirements. The proposed development shall pay drainage fees pursuant to the Drainage Fee Ordinance prior to approval of the final map at the rates in effect at the time of such approval. The fee indicated above is based on the tentative map.:Contact the FMFCD project engineer prior tc approval of the final map for the fee.. a Considerations which may affect the fee obligation(s) or the timing or form of fee payment a) Fees related-to undeveloped or phased portions of the project may be deferrable b) Fees may be calculated based on the actual percentage of runoff if different than tha- typical for the zone district under which the development is being undertaken and if W permanent provisions are made to assure that the site remains in that configuration. c) Master Plan storm.drainage facilities may be constructed, or required to be constructed in lieu of paying fees. d) The actual cost incurredin constructing MasterPlan drainage system facilities is credited against the drainage fee obligation. s49; 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,.CA 937-7 (559)456-3292 - FAY(559)456-3194 . Two sided document FRESNO MERTOPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 2 of 4 e) When.the actual costs incurred in constructing Master Plan facilities exceeds the drainage fee obligation, reimbursement will be made for the excess costs from future fees collected by the District from other development. Approval of this development shall be conditioned upon compliance with these District Requirements. 1. a. Drainage from. the site shall be directed to X b. Grading and drainage patterns shall be as identified on Exhibit No. 1 AL-2 C., The grading and drainage patterns shown on the site plan conform to the adopted Storm.Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan. 2. The proposed development shall construct and/or dedicate Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan facilities located within the development or necessitated by any off-site ..improvements required by the approving agency.. X See Exhibit No. 1, see Paragraph No. 7. None required. 3. The following final improvement plans shall be submitted to the District for review prior to final development approval. X Grading Plan X Storm Drain Plan X ; Final Map X Street Plan X Water& Sewer Plan Other 4. Availability of drainage facilities a.. Permanent drainage service is available provided the developer'can verify to the satisfaction of the City of Fresno that runoff can be safely conveyer to the Master Plan.inlet(s). b. The construction.of facilities required by Paragraph No. 2 hereof will ermanent drainage service. provide p X c. Permanent drainage service will not be available. The Districl recommends temporary facilities until permanent service is available. y , d. See Exhibit No. 2 i 5. The proposed development: Appears to be located within a 500 year 100 year flood prone area as designated on the latest Flood Insurance Rate Maps available to the District necessitating appropriate floodplain management action. See attached Floodplain Policy. X Does not appear to be located within a flood prone area. 549; 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 : (559)456-3292 - FAX(559),456-3194 Two sided document _ FRESNO MERTOPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 3_ of 4 6. The Federal Clean Water Act and the State General Permits for Storm Water Discharge: Associated with Construction and Industrial Activities (State General Permits) require ' developers of construction pro jects disturbing five or more acres, and discharges as 4^ with industrial activity not otherwise exempt from National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)permitting, to implement controls to reduce pollutants, prohibit the discharge of waters other than storm water to the municipal storm drain system, and meet water quality standards. These requirements apply both to pollutants generated during construction and to those which may be generated by operations at the development after construction a. State General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activities,August 1999 (available at the District Office.) A State General Con structionPermit is required for all clearing, grading, and disturbances to the ground that result in soil disturbance of at least one acres (or less than one acre if part of a larger common plan of development or sale). Permittees are required 4 to: submit a Notice of Intent to be covered and must pay a permit fee to the State Water Resources Control Board (State Board), develop and implement a storm water pollution prevention plan, eliminate non-storm water discharges, conduct routine site inspections,.train employees in permit compliance, and complete an annual certification of compliance. b. State General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industria] Activities,April, 1997 (available at the District Office.) A State General Industrial Permit is required for specific types of industries described in the NPDES regulations or by Standard Industrial Classification(SIC) code. The following categories of industries are generally required to secure an industria permit: in trucking, recycling; and waste and hazardous waste management. Specific exemptions exist for manufacturing activities which occur entirely indoors. Permittees are required to: submit a Notice of Intent tc be covered and must pay a permit fee to the State Water Resources Control Board, develop and implement a storm water pollution prevention plan, eliminate non-storm water discharges, conduct routine site inspections, train { employees in permit compliance, sample.storm water runoff and test it for pollutant indicators, and annually submit a report to the State Board. sag; 5469 E.OLIVE FRESNO,CA 93727 (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)'456-3194 Two sided document FRESNO MERTOPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 4 of 4 c. The proposed development is encouraged to select and implement storm watez quality controls recommended in the Fresno-Clovis Storm Water Quality Management Construction and Post-Construction Guidelines (available at the District Office) to meet the requirements of the State General Permits,;eliminate the potential for non-storm water to enter the municipal storm drain system, and where' possible minimize contact with materials which may contaminate storm watez runoff. i" 7. A requirement of the District may be appealed by filing a written notice of appeal witf. the Secretary of the District within ten days of the date of this Notice of Requirements. 8. The District reserves the right to modify, reduce or add to these requirements, or revise fees, as necessary to accommodate changes made in the proposed development by the developer or requirements made by other agencies. i 9. X See Exhibit No. 2 for additional comments, recommendations and requirements. g If Gerald_E. LakenDistrict Engineer Project ngineer: Mark Will C: QUAD KNOPF, INC 8405 N. FRESNO ST., SUITE 300 FRESNO, CA 93720 5493 5469 E.OLIVE. FRESNO,CA 93727 (559)456-3292 -:FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document SHAW AVE. V — ------------------------ --- 'EN' III I RE ER I I I � F 11 APN# IIS 311-060-30 \\\ 'EN' �' , II } I '•E0. I j II II j 66" — wI EO' F Z I �� Cn 'AI' LU I . . APN#311-060-07 i Q RIALTO I AVE. 4 --2.-- ———— ———— BASIN b` C, 'Al' ,• q w . 1 24" 24" —. 1OD1 GETTYSBURG AVE. ALIGN. LEGEND ['. �_ Master Plan Facilities To Be Constructed By Developer&InletDirection Of Drainage Pipeline(size Shown), . 15"Wide Mowstrip To.Be Constructed By Developer —— Inlet Boundary p-----i'o7 Existing Master Plan Facilities Drainage Area Boundary - 40 ®--- Future Master Plan Facilities SCALE 1"=400'_ Future Pump Station w/Outfall TRACT 5493/ CUP 2005-081 DRAINAGE AMA:. "A " EXHIBIT NO. 1 FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT . - - DRAWN Sr. MN DATE &16105 ?MAA0mdWWGSM M19MTRACTS%5491dn - REVISED BY:— DATE — OTHER REQUIREMENTS EXHIBIT NO. 2 The cost of construction of Master Plan facilities,excluding dedication of storm drainage easements, is 'eligible for credit against the drainage.fee of the drainage area served by the facilities. A Development Agreement shall be executed with the District to effect such credit. Reimbursement provisions, in accordance with the Drainage Fee Ordinance,.will be included to the extent that Developer's Master Plancosts for an individual drainage area exceed the fee of said area. ;Should the facilities cost for such individual area total less than the fee of said area,the difference shall be paid .upon demand to the City or District. The District recommends a stub street from Tract 5493 to Assessor's Parcel Number(APN)311-060- . .30 located northeasterly of Tract 5493. This is necessary. to allow surface drainage from the southwestern corner of APN 311-060-30,as shown on Exhibit No. 1, to reach the future Master Plan inlet located within Tract 5493. Additionally, the Developer of Tract 5493 shall granta' drainage covenant for said portion of APN 311-060-30 to allow major storm flows to reach Gettysburg Avenue alignment and/or Bryan Avenue. If the stub street is not constructed, then theiDeveloper ,will .be responsible for the construction of a surface flowage channel, and dedication of a Surface Channel easement. The District additionally recommends a stub street from Tract 5493 to Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) 311-060-07. This,is necessary to allow surface drainage from that portion of Tract 5493,as shown on Exhibit No. 1,to reach the future Master Plan inlet located within APN 311-060- 07. . If the stub street is not constructed, Tract 5493 must provide non-Master Plan pipeline .. extensions or improved drainage channels to. allow drainage from this development to drain toward APN 311-060-07. The.Developer has the option to temporarily drain those portionsof Tract 5493 that lie within Drainage Areas "EN"and"EO", as shown on Exhibit No. 1,to Basin"Al"for temporary drainage service. Any facilities constructed to obtain temporary drainage service excluding those facilities shown on Exhibit No. 1 will not be eligible for fee credit. Additionally the Developer of,Tract 5493 will be required to excavate 12,000 c.y. from Basin "Al" to provide storage capacity for the development. Development No. Tract 5493 Page l of 2 engr\perm its\eahibiMtract\54930 m). OTHER REQUIREMENTS EXHIBIT NO. 2 The District recognizes that the alignment of the Master Plan facilities,as identified on Exhibit No. 1,is not consistent with the developer's proposed street patterns for Tract 5493.. The alignment may, be slightly realigned to be compatible with the proposed street layout for Tract 5493. However, drainage fee credit will only be granted for the Master Plan storm drain facilities identified on Exhibit No. 1: No surface run-off shall be directed towards the District basin. The District recomniends a single fence between the site and the District's basin. The Developer should contact the District so that alternatives to a dual fence can be reviewed. If a fence other than the existing chain link,fence is proposed, District review and approval of the proposed fence is required. The.District requests that the grading Engineer contact the District as early.as possible to review the proposed site grading for verification and acceptance of grades.at our,mutual property,line prior to preparing.a grading plan. Development No. Tract 5493 Page 2 of 2 engrtperm its\exh ibiMtract\54 93 Om) Sari Joaquin Valley. Air Pollution Control District June 21, 2005 . Reference No.,C2005:0498 Shelby Chamberlain . � �► City of Fresno JU�� 3 ' Planning & Development �t r ot1 2600 Fresno St., Third Floor Fresno, CA 93721-3604 Subject: C:.05 81 AP N 331-060-25 & -79 f. Dear Ms. Chamberlain, The San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (District) has reviewed the project referenced above and offers the following comments: The entire San Joaquin Valley Air Basin is designated non-attainment for ozone and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5). ..This project would contribute to the overall decline in air quality due';to increased traffic and ongoing operational emissions. Preliminary analysis indicates that this project alone would not generate significant air emissions. However, the increase in emissions from this project, and others like it, cumulatively reduce the air quality in the San Joaquin Valley.. A concerted effort should be made to reduce project-related emissions.as outlined below: I Based on the information provided, the proposed project will be subject to the following District rules. The following items are rules that have been adopted by the District to reduce emissions throughout the San Joaquin Valley, and are required. Current District rules can be found at— http://www.valleyair.org/rules/1 ruleslist.htm. Regulation VIII (Fugitive PM10 Prohibitions)- Regulation VIII (Rules 8011-8081) is a series of rules designed to reduce PM10 emissions(predominantly dust/dirt) generated by.human activity, including construction, road construction, bulk materials storage, landfill operations, etc. If a residential project is 10.0 or more acres in area, a Dust Control Plan must be submitted as specified in Section 6.3.1 of Rule 8021. If a residential site is 1.0 to less than 10.0 acres, an owner/operator must provide written notification to the. District at least 48 hours prior to his/her intent to begin.any earthmoving activities . (see section 6.4.1). A compliance assistance bulletin has been enclosed for the applicant. A template of the District's Dust Control Plan is available at: http://www.vallevair.org/busind/Compiv/PM 10/forms/DCP-Form%20-%2010-14-2004 jr)df Rule 4102 (Nuisance) applies to any source operation that emits or may emit air contaminants or other materials. In the event that.the project or construction of the project creates a public nuisance, it could be in.violation and be subject to District enforcement action. Rule 4103 (Open Burning) regulates the burning of agricultural material. Agricultural material shall not be burned when the land use is converting from agriculture to nonagricultural purposes. In the event that the project burned or burns agricultural material, it would be in violation of Rule 4103 and be subject to District enforcement action. Rule 4601 (Architectural Coatings) limits volatile organic compounds from architectural coatings. This rule specifies architectural coatings storage, clean .up and labeling requirements. 1 Ms. Chamberlain June 21,2005 T-5493, R-05-17, C-05-811 Page 2 . Rule 4641 (Cutback, Slow Cure, and Emulsified Asphalt, Paving and Maintenance Operations). If asphalt paving will be used, then paving operations of this project will be subject to Rule 4641. This rule applies to the manufacture and use of cutback asphalt, slow cure asphalt and emulsified asphalt for paving and maintenance operations. f. Rule 4901 (Wood Burning Fireplaces and Wood Burning Heaters) limits PM10 and PM2.5 emissions from residential development. Construction plans for residential developments may be affected by section 5.3, specifically: §5.3 Limitations on Wood Burning Fireplaces or Wood Burning Heaters in New Residential Developments. Beginning January 1,2004, . 5.3.1 No person shall install a wood burning fireplace in a new residential development with a density greater than two(2)dwelling units per acre. 5.3.2 No person shall install more than two (2) EPA Phase 11 Certified wood burning heaters per acre in any new residential development with a density equal to or greater than three (3) dwelling units per acre. 5.3.3 No person shall install more than one (1) wood burning fireplace or wood burning heater per dwelling unit in anynew residential development with a density equal to or less than two (2) dwelling units per acre. More information about Rule 4901 can be found at our website- www.valleyair.org. For compliance,assistance, please contact Mr. Wayne Clarke, Air Quality Compliance.Manager, at 230-5968. Rule 4902 (Residential Water,Heaters) limits emission of NOx from residential developments. The. District encourages innovation in measures to reduce air. quality impacts. There are a number of features that could be incorporated into the design/operation of this project to provide additional L reductions of the overall level of emissions. (Note: Some of the measures may already exist as City' development standards. Any measure selected should be implemented to the fullest extent possible.) The suggestions listed below should not be considered all-inclusive and remain options that the agency with the land-use authority should consider: *. ,. Trees should be carefully selected and located to protect the building(s). from energy consuming environmental conditions, and to shade paved areas. Trees should be selected to shade paved areas that will shade 50% of the area within 15 years. Structural soil should be used under paved areas to improve tree growth. A brochure has been included for the applicant. For Structural Soil see http://www..hort.cornell.edu/uhi/outreach/csc! For Tree Selection see. http://www.ufei.org/ For Urban Forestry seehttp://www cooIcornmuni ies.orq htt p:/wc ufr e.ucdavis.edu http://www.lgc.ora/bookstore/energv/downloads/siv treeguidelines.pdf • If transit service is available to the project site, improvements should be made to encourage its use. If transit service is not currently available, but is planned for the area in the future, easements should be reserved to provide for future improvements such as bus turnouts, loading areas, route signs and ; shade structures. .Appropriations made to facilitate public.or mass transit will help mitigate trips generated by the project. Sidewalks and bikeways should be installed throughout as much of the project as possible to encourage walking and bicycling. Connections to nearby public uses and commercial areas should " be made as direct as possible to promote walking for some.trips. Pedestrian and bike-oriented design reduces motor vehicle usage and their effects on air quality. Sidewalks and bikeways should be designed to separate pedestrian and bicycle pathways from vehicle paths. Sidewalks and bikeways should be designed to be accommodating and appropriately sized for anticipated future pedestrian and bicycle use. Such pathways should be easy to navigate, designed to facilitate pedestrian movement through the. project, and create a safe environment for all potential users Ms. Chamberlain June 21,2005 T-5493, R-05-17, C-05-81 Page 3 (pedestrian, bicycle and disabled) from obstacles and automobiles. Pathways through the project should be built in anticipation of future.growth/development. Specifically: Mid-block paths should be installed to facilitate pedestrian movement through long blocks (over 500' in length) and cul-de-sacs. A potential location for a mid-block path is between lots 147/124 & 146/125. • As many energy conserving and emission reducing features as possible should be included in the project. Energy conservation measures include both energy conservation through design and operational energy conservation. Examples include (but are not limited to): Increased energy efficiency (above California Title 24 Requirements) See http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/. - Energy efficient widows (double pane and/or Low-E) - Use Low and No-VOC coatings and paints. See South Coast's site for.No-VOC Coatings at http://www.acimd.qov/prdas/brochures/r)aintguide.html - High-albedo (reflecting) roofing material. See http://e6td.lbl.gov/coolroof/ Cool Paving. See http://www.harc.edu/harc/Projects/CoolHouston/, http://eande-Ibl.a6v/heatisland/ - Radiant heat barrier. See http://www.eere.energy.gov/consumerinfo/refbriefs/bc7.html'. - Energy efficient lighting, appliances, heating and cooling systems. See http://www.energvstar.Qov/ - Install solar water-heating system(s) . Install photovoltaic cells - Programmable.thermostat(s) for all heating and cooling systems - Awnings or other shading mechanism for windows Porch, patio and walkway overhangs Ceiling fans, whole house.fans Utilize passive solar cooling and heating designs. (e.g. natural convection, thermal flywheels) See http://www.eere.energy.gov/RE/solar--passive.htmI Utilize daylighting (natural lighting) systems .such as skylights, ,light shelves, interior transom windows etc. See http://www.advancedbuildings.org - Electrical outlets around the exterior of the unit(s) to encourage use of electric landscape maintenance equipment - Pre-wire the unit(s) with high speed modem connections/DSL and extra phone lines - . Natural gas fireplaces (instead of wood-burning fireplaces or heaters) Natural gas lines (if available to this area) and electrical outlets in backyard or patio areas to. encourage the use of gas and/or electric barbecues Low or non-polluting incentives items should be provided with each residential unit (such items. could include electric lawn mowers, reel mowers, leaf vacuums, gas or electric barbecues, etc.) Exits to adjoining streets should be designed to reduce time to re-enter traffic from the project site More information can be found at: http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/GreenBuildinp/ http://www.lgc.org, http://www.sustainable.doe.gov/, http://www.consumerenergvicenter:org/index.html • The applicant should implement measures to reduce the amount of vehicle traffic to and from the project area.that further reduce air pollution in the valley. This could include providing an information center for residents to coordinate carpooling. Check out the "Spare the Air' section of our website . www.valleyair.org . i The project should include as many clean alternative energy features as possible to promote energy self-sufficiency. Examples include (but are not limited to): photovoltaic cells,solar thermal electricity systems, small wind turbines, etc. Rebate and incentive programs are offered for alternative energy equipment. More information can found at- http://www.dsireusa.org , http:Hrredc.nrel.gov/, . httr)://www.eneray.ca.gov/renewables/ • Construction activity mitigation measures include. Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways from sites with a slope greater than one percent Install wheel washers for all exiting trucks, or wash off all trucks and equipment leaving the site Ms. Chamberlain June 21,2005 T-5493, R-05-17, C-05-81 Page 4 - Install wind breaks at windward side(s) of construction areas - Suspend excavation and grading activity when winds exceed 20 mph Limit area subject to excavation, grading, and other construction activity at any onetime - Limit the hours of operation of heavy duty equipment and/or the amount of equipment in use Replace fossil-fueled equipment with electrically driven equivalents (provided they are not.run via a portable generator set) - Curtail construction during periods of high ambient pollutant concentrations; this may include ceasing of construction activity during the peak-hour of vehicular traffic on adjacent roadways, and"Spare the Air Days"declared by the District. - Implement activity management (e.g. rescheduling.activities to reduce short-term impacts) - During the smog season (May through October), lengthen the construction period to.minimize the number of vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. Off road trucks should,be equipped with on-road engines when possible. Minimize obstruction of traffic on adjacent roadways. • The applicant should use California Air Resources Board (CARB) certified alternative fueled engines in construction equipment where practicable. Alternative fueled equipment may be powered by Compressed Natural Gas (CNG), Propane (LPG), electric motors, or other CARE certified off-road technologies. To find engines certified by the California Air Resources Board, see their certification website http_://www.arb.ca.gov/msproq/offroad/cerUcert.php. For more information on alternative fuel engines, please call.Mr. Chris Acree, Air Quality Specialist, at (559)230-5829. Construction equipment should have engines that meet the current off-road engine emission standard (as certified by the California Air Resources Board), or be repowered with an engine that meets this standard. Tier I and Tier 11 engines have significantly less NOx and PM emissions compared to ` Uncontrolled engines. To find engines certified by the California Air Resources Board, see http://www.arb.ca.gov/msproq/offroad/cerUcert.php. This site lists engines by type, then manufacturer. The "Executive Order" shows what Tier the engine is certified as. For more information on heavy-duty engines, please contact Mr. Kevin McCaffrey, Air Quality Specialist, at (559) 230-5831. Diesel equipment should use verified alternative diesel fuel blends, biodiesel, or Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel (ULSD). The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has verified specific alternative diesel fuel blends for NOx and PM emission reduction. Only fuels that.have been verified by CARB should be used. Information on alternative diesel blends can also be found at CARB's website- http://www.arb.ca.gov/fuels/diesel/altdiese!/altdiesel.htm. Information on biodiesel can be found on the EPA's website http://www.epa.gov/oms/models/biodsl.htm. District staff is available to meet with you and/or the applicant to further discuss the regulatory requirements that are associated with this project. If you have any questions or require further information, please call me at (559) 230-5800 or Mr. Hector R. Guerra, Senior Air*Quality Planner, (559) 230-5820 and provide the reference number at the top of this letter. Sincerely, r ILALrr �� G ` Chrystal Mei Air Quality Specialist Central Region Enclosure c:file i San Joaquin valley Air Pollution Control District i COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE BULLETIN October 2004 Fugitive Dust Control at Construction Sites New Requirements .Regulation VIII, Fugitive PM10 Prohibitions, of the District's Rules and Regulations apply to activities that . generate fugitive dust. Fugitive dust is emitted into the air by .activities that disturb the soil, such as from earthmoving activities and vehicular/equipment traffic on.unpaved surfaces. Windblown dust is also of concern at construction sites. The:D:i'Wict'adopted. Regulation VIII in 1993 and.its most recent amendments became effective on October 1, 2004. This is a basic summary of the,regulation's requirements as they apply to construction sites. Visible Dust'Emissions (VDE) may not exceed 20% opacity during periods when soil is being disturbed by equipment or by wind.at a.ny time: :Visible Dust Emissions opacity of 20% means dust that would obstruct an . obser'ver's view of an object by 20%. District inspectors are state certified to evaluate visible emissions:%:.Dust control may be achieved by applying water before/during earthwork and onto unpaved traffic.areas, phasing .•work.to limit dust, and setting up wind fences to limit windblown dust r Soil Stabilization is required at regulated construction sites after normal working hours and on.weekends and holidays. This requirement also applies to inactive construction areas such as phased. .projects where disturbed land is left unattended. `Applying water to form a visible crust on the soil and, restricting vel, icle access are often effective for short-term stabilization of disturbed surface areas. Long-term;methodsinclding applying dust suppressants and establishing vegetative cover. Carryout and.Trackout occur when materials from emptied or loaded vehicles falls onto a paved surface or shoulder of a public road or when materials adhere to vehicle tires and are deposited onto!a paved surface or shoulder.of a public road. Should either occur, the material must be cleaned up at least daily, and immediately if it extends more than 50 feet from the exit point onto a paved road. The- appropriate! clean-up methods require the complete removal and cleanup of mud and dirt from the paved surface and shoulder. . Using a blower device or dry sweeping with any mechanical device other than a PM10-efficient street swep, e� 1s a violation. Larger construction sites must prevent carryout and trackout from occurring by installing gravel pads, grizzlies, wheel washers, paved interior roads, or a combination thereof at each exit point from the site. Access and Haul Roads that are unpaved, as well as unpaved vehicle and equipment traffic areas at. construction sites must have dust control. ' Speed limit signs. limiting vehicle speed to ;15 mph or le 3s. at construction sites must be posted every 500 feet. Storage Piles and Bulk Materials have handling, storage, and transportation requirements that in Jude applying water when handling materials, wetting or covering stored materials, and installing wind barri4rs to . limit VDE. Also, limiting vehicle speeds, loading haul trucks with a freeboard of six inches or greater along Northern Region Office Central Region Office Southern Region Office 4230 Kiernan Avenue,Suite 130 1990 East Gettysburg Avenue 2700"M" Street,Suite 275 Modesto,CA 95356-9321 . Fresno,CA 93726-0244 Bakersfield, CA 93301-2373 (209)557-6400 + FAX(209)557-6475 (559)230-6000 + FAX(559) 230-6062 (661) 326-6900 + FAX(661)316-6985 With applying water to the top of the load, and covering the cargo compartments are effectivemeasures for reducing VDE and carryout from vehicles transporting bulk materials. Demolition activities require the application of water to the exterior of the.buildings .and to unpaved surfaces where materials may fall. Consider all structures slated for,demolition as possibly being regulated because of asbestos, per District Rule 4002 - National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants. Contact the District well. before starting because 'a 10 working day notice will likely be required before a demolition can begin. Dust Control Plans identify the dust sources and describe the dust control measures that will be implemented before, during, and after any dust generating activity for the duration of the project..Owners or operators are . required to submit plans to the District if, at anytime, the project involves: • Residential developments of ten or more acres of disturbed surface area. Non-residential developments of five or more acres of disturbed surface area. a Relocating more than 2,500 cubic yards per day of materials on at least three days. Construction activities may not commence until the District has approved the Dust Control Plana Notification by owners or operators of construction projects that are at least one acre in size and where a Dust Control Plan is not required,.must provide written notification to the District at least 48 hours in.advance of any earthmoving activity. Record Keeping is required to document compliance with the rules and must be kept for each da 'any dust control measure is used. The District has developed record forms for water application, street sweeping, and "permanent" controls such as applying long term dust palliatives, vegetation, ground cover materials, paving, or a other durable materials. Records must be kept for one year after the end of dust generating activities (Title V . sources must.keep records for five years). Exemptions exist for several activities. Those occurring above 3,000 feet in elevation are exempt from all Regulation VIII requirements and Rule.8021 — Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and. Other . Earthmoving Activities exempts the following construction and earthmoving activities:. F , • .Blasting activities permitted by California Division of Industrial Safety. Maintenance or remodeling of existing buildings provided the addition is less than 50% of the site of the existing'building or less than 10,000 square feet (due to asbestos concerns, contact the District at-least two weeks ahead of time). • Additions to single family dwellings. • 'The disking of weeds and vegetation for fire prevention on sites smaller than f acre. Spreading of daily landfill cover to preserve public health and safety and to comply with California Integrated Waste Management Board requirements r Nuisances are prohibited at all times because_ District Rule 4102 Nuisance applies to all. construction sources of fugitive dust, whether or not they are exempt from. Regulation Vlll. It is important to.monitor dust- generating activities and implement appropriate dust control measures to limit the public's exposure to fugitive dust. For more information please contact the Compliance Division of the District office nearest to you.. Information on Regulation VIII, where you may obtain copies of record keeping forms, the Dust Control Plan template, and the Construction Notification form, is available on the District's website at:. www.valleyair.org COD COD E. N '•r ..< 7" O O 3 CD p O O ' ° 7 = y D c n o . In f ? 'ln y =' o - aR * c m m ° CD O CD 0- O O S CD O S - S ° lc a y ,D� o o `< - m m aR 3 ►-x o ° .a:- � CD C -o CD - C _C... y. N °, -p ►� D) ° CU 7 O - O e y O CSD n. _ Q CD..OXXO C 3 CD 'O x O y CD °' O 3 `� CD S O to CD a 7 7 3 y - O DC 7 O fiR c .W .-y O a =) S N aw CU C crz n O rr C- CA r. S -7 3 < CD ° Da " o v 3 : v ? Q o Da o CD - O r. - O) 3 .CD CD CD - - O - S > 3 -CD O ..a CD: (nCD 0 CDC 7 - 7 Oe CD CD ° 3 70 CD (v CD-. CD 00 y a) y CD Cn CD .(D d CD. . 3 .d C7 OCD O C 67 - S. O y C a - -G. 7 ..3 (n 7 . O O '" _a ... @ CD .� tU - '•. O O <. C. pq CD CD CD `G tD ° N ,�� •� r� �, CD C CD CD -3 01CD �G CD 01 qq d:Y "fid` _ , .. ma 01 " 0 -.CD ° o 0) m (1) 7 CD 'O O i Zr CCD ® . m m j _ � ` CD Da bCC CD O O CD < O u O 'a o o7a % `'5 n Q "� . C -3 d ` r: a - :3 13) CD 3 -tU 7 y. .m CD `G CD O (] CCD CD S O a au3 7 3'' O' O- ' --r - CD Q OR y p. -w O - T. cm .. O =r :3 7 .� CD- _o -0 '.41. y d 4: O r. CD ,. .,S, 7 - `G .: (D N -C 67 A CD - N 3 ...y. :O y L... �{ -. CD N m oa f Q CD - �' p. . r7+ O 0) 7 p) 0) .O -.a r+' y' 7 ,.� d.- -> co CL CCD — '•. Cn cL 0. CM CM Cn �' O CL CD W* .O ,.� .� (S O O fn N C Q 3 O O• .. F.. O C �)"Vw 23 CD ,, o 3. m d ... ,. . CL m p �. ° . 0 o a . y, a vw CO ° _ m 3 ° CD i 7 - -r. n) e'er. cl CDCD 7 " a pSj _C..� C 4 a 0 Cn CD n CD = ° Oat S C7 y 3 7 a YJ r. . N cn .J?. y. y .� 0 7. ,.A O CD CL cr co cr (D � O o (D D 7C CD 0 CD CD CD CD o0 W o CD 0 ��.. y cm 'Alm 2, Fo _ O' O. CTD. O :3'- CD O 7 I . . 7 0 C L CD 04 w} '�; J C t O (D - a ry CD 3; =r _ DR y L. ^ CD S c .� r;M 1 \ 0) 4 N ` p < .3 d -7 S air iF� fD fD I H _ S.1a +'�ti•��#I rt: w (D CD CL mSAMACD - a 4 1'rf y aLa,. Cn y to O. fL an ti l4nnn {1 ,a yl i c .S Z0 CD .0 CD W R.i� 8T s<.. �•" '➢ Cep y y `<O -_� 'O 0 M C CD ` ^ F =rS C C _ O N _a _ _ CU sr C '. CD < 7• CL . O �44�Yre t •f. cc„„ro „ t. t' dam :° -. O �. O - 7C' =rN 3' (OD X' G �- C .-. S O ° 7 D) CD a S cn k Y v+•` CD to .O. r- v y CD O (D °- 3 O - O 3 v r�``i »"x w! �nm -� S ?}0ki4 (D . — 3 N CDO om o < y 0 0 < CD S (D =rkl CD S Q (D 3- < S O o) 0R y CD - (n .7 CD CD '-`< ? CD -CD _ CD i Mel N+ IMP rw -�' 4 '4F``.. �" tr�` {ly'Q�te`�r' .9..'S'LXj�',art7'� EAM T � -Zy E x enc .g rw pf OOM as p .�S; i m " :>V '�Mc� � .. co xh4y v tom` a1 " (N'•C�Y,� � '�,y'{�� gR'�, ,y,�� c�M•�'."'.i .',�,x-0 ;4K a' 'rte J C T N - Ln lgrp t 3 .c o f� �. ° C CL .0 f0 r "V -.�i*Er✓� a ilil ill l'rtf 5 7 d -p ,y& ..Z-1 p cn cn N " ,Ua fA O cc Q) r a I 'n. •.A'a X '�z C O c > E ,f�a �� z , �"�5� .'X 11 I u rc O O 'c. a7 >, _ , h ra k�N,mm� (J .—. c ,;�. ,d t ql a 1,"i! r ,Pu m O o ., a) ° ," J Cj i�c 1r � I'yI71,)�r¢ .t M — f0 .w" �"� cc O ._ >. `5" H �S. lllu .IIIII F �nIll r t Q) ° _ In t0 ":*+N,�,�P`,�.• r a s ' �''1 SA�I'�' C _f0 C ; .? ?•4 Sr,,S �4 �,j�:.i.I4�iI Cc-- Cc cc m cn w h��r m s )lrlli'al�lr ylc O 0 - y,s•y SII Qi i''FfI . . :U v= ,a) a7. O (u O r i�l ;; y{`(,4.Vii. rl fJ s r Uy'seah�l �al �x'twye. d o ,U :" o m E ;M ur'" 'Tn'�i�iP Iia ht�G6x '.d (U Q C O O e0 a) Q y - p (U O E c�qox a�a .7 .0 C C . ' X,5 t 4I'111 IIS im.l o _ o o c c a) a) cn w - �"S ray`s a ` I'C`lm�'-ardd ma L�I.'i4 d (UMEW d m o -o o v `o w a>> )il a M " AN, . s_.kuN,+ a:"'r '7� -�K ' , n`T 't z �tn+ " rYT i.7'.Y(&x."^i"sl'++!� 3�w• r�� ,�r,Eyf w!,1��Sre.�I AIII � 1 AOM94) p ..Y a) Za) al rn E ° va > c ba c L ° �� t a o o r a� + w m .� o Q +- m , U) N p.a) _cc (D .c0 a) w y�+'s�' 'a<r'4t� ?. ' ea a) a) a) a) a) 1= N N c t C K a7 a s�{* . C o a f9 E a� t ba c t a o `� m x �cm O a !n ��ri 5r tsn , 1 �l..r O _ L �+ ba C. 'O.Oi 1. '� a)" n$ '—}FH 7 esa)a CS Oli O a) c Y �yO �-«-+��c.i�-baSb"�';,i<,�'. ..+at`uo.`.�t. c9G a) to a) Cn - .0 a) t' i. '(sY''75, a) N 'O C �`+ j '"c. UT s0 n C;w „ y m . o p> c c. � o w � � f9 �, C O. .N.. c0 O. 6 CL O. O a)�,F,�Y ykr— 3 �k O"? O L y �'' r4 pi's 11" P ° > m o ° a c ca c 3 az c°�3 ° �m N> N,u� to `O % c m m o m w ° a w ° w m F+ y U) fA a) U m c y 'O L .Q`_. p y to y°�v %�a)xO i3fr�;5�k 7 Q) (O O. .Y e0 m _ e0 a) 1]. Tmt g' s'-�"..?'.:,'S,d'O e,r1' y,_ ,f/l yi7,'at C•t� r i cn O a) t";"' a).aL - O _v '.O�O-. wOa-) ayOa)_—t3c0 �Uf�A,, t`o) ^y y OC mm 'yO .°.?.- ,0C, La+ CO L�+ Lc0 C 'O a.a..y OOO 1rySONa7"t)iO4'�I S ztJ•�/�. Np UCa U) .ry) a7.Xl11 ll O C O o o -p.Qy`° m ba .ta�y y Ym1 1:Y0iyCn I ''r('dM`Inyit�g Nak) l $ !ti c , was C c0 O L to ° 7 aJr O'Uh.,,x� -.rr 7.� a7ia ca 4 O a) _ y a) a) c0 +-• a) > rn r,C)' U .Q`_. U �+ ` >,Y O �taO+q T L � O. O c0 O L O Co a] O o L L yV t cn m (L)� a .. w co E t C'. r � o .ter }z �-{ y"c cnCa za� $ o (A 0 • • • • 'ti w 0 o >. o > ELoo . '� C. L CENTRAL UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTw� .. r� - a 4605 NORTH POLIi AVE FRESNO,CA 93722.5334 (559)276-5206 mryder@centralusd.kl2.ca.its U) n �. ¢AU DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENTL�<<� Dr. Marilou Ryder 11 �y L �yl TRUSTEES: JUL 1 el Ci dy Berube Terry Cox July 7, 2005J d;alJ� Judith Geringer {�i84;S1'�y ,,_,�j1t Theresa Hagans ' �$VCldGIiSe ' "� -Diana Milla City of Fresno UTY 0- Phil Rusconi Planning Department I Mike Yada 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 Attn: Shelby Chamberlain Subject: Tract 5493 Central Unified School District has the following conditions/comments.for the above project(s): Condition of approval: .1. School Developer Fees shall be paid on'all new.residential construction within the proposed subdivision, in accordance with a resolution adopted by the Central Unified School District, pursuant to Government Code section 65995 and Educational Code section 17620. .2. Install concrete sidewalks/curbs/gutters on both sides. of the interior streets for the proposed project in a manner consistent with the existing subdivisions in the area and to City standards. 3. Install a permanent school bus pull-out; per the attached design drawing, located along north bound Bryan Avenue adjacent to lots 77 & 78: Comments: The proposed project will add approximately 183 K-12 grade students to the District's average daily attendance. Number of lots / units = 318 - Grade Level # of Students Generated f K-6 grade students 114 7-8 grade students 30 9-12 grade students 39 TOTAL K-12 grade 183 JIM YOVINO JOHN MULLIGAN SARAH KOLIGIAN Assistant Superintendent,Personnel Cl-def Financial Officer Assistant Superintendent,Instruc'on (559)276-5224 (559)276-5200 (5�9)276-3115 FAX(559)276-0394 FAX(559)276-2983 FAX 559)276-3102 .. July 7, 2005 . Page 2 of 3 TT 5493 The District will be able to accommodate these new,students at the schools of attendance indicated below. To offset the cost to house these students, the District currently levies development fees of $2.24 per square foot for residential development and $0.36 per square foot for commercial / industrial development. Asa point of information, development fees are subject to increase every two years by the State Allocation Board. Any new development on the property will be subject to the development fees in place at the time development fee certificates are obtained. Sidewalks along interior ,neighborhood streets and major exterior streets provide the necessary identifiable boundary. between students and traffic, and provide'a safe place for students walking to and from existing school sites and bus stops. Bus transportation is currently provided for: • K-8'h grade students residing at least one mile or more from their school of attendance; 9th-12th grade students residing at least two miles or more from their school.of attendance. Bus transportation will be available for students attending the below identified elementary, middle and :. high schools in accordance with District standards and policies in effect at the time of enrollment. The District has concluded using interior subdivision streets are not adequate or safe for bus turning and/or navigation movements. Therefore, the District will require a permanent bus pull out, separated from traffic lanes by a concrete median strip. Attached is a design drawing that meets approval by the City Traffic Engineering Manager. The following school of attendance information is provided: • Elementary.School Information: (a) School Name: Madison Elementary r Address: 330 South Brawley • Middle School Information:. (a) School Name: EI Capitan Address: 4443 W. Weldon Ave. High School Information: (a) School Name: Central High School—East Campus Address: 3535 N. Cornelia Ave (b) Currently, Central High School - West Campus is a mandatory attendance 9t" grade school with optional programs for grades 10th -12`n The California Department of Education has current API scores - see: http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ap/indez.asp (however this site does not have current District enrollment data - see: http://www.ed-data.k12.ca.us/.) The District appreciates the opportunity to comment on above project. Should you have questions or need additional information, please contact me at 559-276-5203 or ddeelCa�centralusd.k12.ca.us. Sincerely, i . David Deel Facilities Planning Manager. Attachment C0ACRE7E a8W:AW 5MEWJX PFR Jr ) .. CRY 57D:,;DW- 1?--I.AIV®':P=D: SL18`;Mlll/ABM69ER 3 S Sryl /1ZOW,AT'mr om 1 vi w611L:13FAR`HE7NFIIV l!. FERIR AAS SUBONW. i. aF s7Aat f qK 'K 1 is fir,(=Lwm)?) 'g �-.rlaac.awaa�le � -- a �� w..at� :,fie r : LANDSWE M.CJ7Y SM DM P.S AAD.P-9 :'B`9►!A"X UdVfLXEE7E.WlEEYG1)/7FR. .- , - � :a n}F I Ag ER.6DE 10E84RS SAF t QONN��(� . Cf1V7ER .P7tONT AAiM 7Z61R O .BErp�pE y:.qEE%g:AAV::axr. W OF :L:NfiltSNaf.GYlrlflP SLA°E 6..QRJ3. 16V/8Y CflT7Dt(fYP� BLAIR,CHURCH.&.FLYNN SCALE. scHooL. us TURNOUT CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR NO SCALE COLLECTOR AND,.LQCAL';STREE:T ra tss9i ze,-sso ice.(sse)a�,-zsrs DR. BY: DATE SHEET P:G 9-10-04 1 of I I Ora.wing: P..•\204=0366\Dwg-Site`.Dwy:\,Iurnout.dwg; Layout {2I Plat by: paul filar 29, 2005 - 9:35am - CITY OF FRESNO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AUGUST 31,2005 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION NO. C-05-81 PART A PROJECT INFORMATION Assesor Parcel Nos. 311-060-25, 79 Street Location East side of North Bryan Avenue, between West.Shaw and West Gettysburg Avenues - Existing Zoning RR Fresno County) Proposed Zonin R-1/UGM and R-2/UGM Project Description. Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81 was filed in conjunction with Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM to allow the northerly 10-acre portion of the subdivision to be developed as a planned unit development with one outlot for open space/trail purposes and one outlot for access, increased lot coverage to.50%, reduced front yards of 10 feet, rear yards of 4 feet (except along the easterly boundary which must have a minimum of 10 feet) and 4 foot side mards, including street side yards on corner lots of 8 feet. PART B -GENERAL CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS The Fresno City Planning Commission, on August .31, 2005, will consider the special permit application subject to the enclosed list of conditions and Exhibits A and B dated June 1, 2005. IMPORTANT: PLEASE READ CAREFULLY Please note that this project may be subject to a variety of discretionary conditions of approval. These include conditions based on adopted City plans and policies, those determined through site plan review and environmental assessment essential to mitigate adverse effects on the environment including the health, safety, and welfare of the community, and recommended conditions for development that are not essential to health, safety, and welfare, but would on the whole enhance the project and its relationship to the neighborhood and environment. Discretionary conditions of approval are listed in the last section of this list of conditions under the . heading "Part F - Miscellaneous" and may be appealed. All code requirements, however, are mandatory and may only be modified by variance, provided the findings pursuant to Fresno Municipal Code Section 12-405.A can be made. Approval of this special permit shall be considered null and void in the event of failure by the applicant and/or the authorized representative, architect, engineer, or designer to disclose and delineate all facts and information relating to the subject property and the proposed development including, but not limited to, the following: 1. All existing and proposed improvements including but not limited to buildings and structures, signs and their uses, trees, walls, driveways, outdoor storage, and open land use areas on Conditions of Approval Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81 August 31, 2005 Page 2 the subject property and all of the preceding which are located on adjoining property and may encroach on the subject property; 2. All public and; private easements, rights-of-way and any actual or potential prescriptive easements or uses of the subject property; 3. Existing and. proposed grade differentials between the subject property;:and adjoining property zoned or planned for residential use. Approval of this special permit may become null and void in the event that development is nit completed in accordance with all the conditions and requirements imposed on this special. permit, the Zoning Ordinance, and all Public Works Standards and Specifications. The Development Department shall not assume responsibility for any deletions or omissions resulting from the special permit review process or for additions or alterations to construction plan not specifically submitted and reviewed and approved pursuant to this special permit or subsequent amendments or revisions. No uses of land, buildings, or structures other than those specifically approved pursuant to this site plan shall be permitted...(Include this note on the site plan.) Transfer all red line notes,etc., shown on all original conditional use permit exhibits (Exhibits A and B, dated June 1, 2005) to.the final site plan. CORRECTIONS SHALL INCLUDE ALL THOSE LISTED IN THIS DOCUMENT AND THOSE LISTED IN THE CORRECTION LIST PROVIDED BY THE PLAN CHECK PROCESS. To complete the backcheck process for building permit relative to planning and zoning' issues, submit eight copies of this corrected, final site plan, together with six copies of the elevations, landscape, and irrigation plans,. and any required covenants and/or studies or analyses to the Planning Division, for final review and approval, ten days before applying for building permits. Copies of this final approved site plan, elevations, landscape, and irrigation plans stamped by the Planning Division must be substituted for unstamped copies of same in each of the four sets of construction plans submitted for plan check prior to issuance of building permits. The'final approved site plan must also include all corrections identified in the plan check process. Be advised that on-site inspections will not be authorized unless the final stamped approved site plan, elevations, landscape, and irrigation plans are included in the plan check file copy. , Please call for an appointment for final sign-off for building permits following your receipt and substitution of the four copies of the stamped, corrected, approved exhibits in the plan check sets. Call Shelby Chamberlain at 559/621-8042. NOTICE TO PROJECT APPLICANT In accordance with the 'provisions of Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), the imposition of fees, dedication, reservations`or exactions for this project are subject to protest by the project applicantt the time of approval or conditional approval of the development or within 90 days after the date of th"e imposition of the fees, dedications, reservation or exactions imposed on the development project. Conditions of Approval Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81 August 31, 2005 Page 3 This notice does not apply to those fees, dedications, reservations or exactions which were previously imposed and duly noticed; or, where no notice.was previously required under the provisions of Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) in effect before January 1, 1997., PART C - PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS The following requirements are based on city records and the accuracy of the existing and proposed on-site and off-site conditions depicted on the exhibits submitted. Requirements not addressed due to omission or misrepresentation of information,` for which this review process is dependent, will be imposed whenever such conditions are disclosed. Questions relative to dedications, street improvements or off-street parking geometrics may be directed to Louise Monroe at 559/621-8678 and questions relative to utility connection charges and Urban Growth Management fees may be.directed to Frank Saburit at 559/621-8077 of the Planning and Development Department, Building and Safety Services Division,Land.Division and Engineering Section. 1. OFF-STREET PARKING FACILITIES AND GEOMETRICS a. Off-Street (on-site) parking facilities and geometrics shall conform to the City of Fresno, Public Works Department, Parking Manual, Standard Specifications and requirements..: b. The applicant shall provide access and directional signs (e.g. "Entrance," "Exit," "Right Turn Only," "One Way,! handicap signs, etc.) as determined by the.City Traffic Engineer and as noted on Exhibit A dated June 1, 2005. C. Parking lot pavement and drainage design shall be in accordance with Public Works Department Standard Drawing Nos. P-41, P-42 & P-43.and incorporated into the site drainage plan. Site drainage to alleys .requires approval by the City Engineer. A site drainage plan is required to be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Development Department, Building & Safety Services Division prior to the commencement of work. PART D - PLANNING/ZONING REQUIREMENTS PLANNING 1. Development is subject.to the following plans and policies: West Area Community Plan Medium-High Density Residential Land Use - -R-2, Low Density Multiple Family Residential, zone district(FMC Section 12-212) - Planned Development Section of the.Fresno Municipal Code (Section 12-306-N-21)- ZONING 2. Development is in accordance with the existing R-2/UGM zoning. POPULATION DENSITY (Residential Proiects) 3. The proposed density is approximately 7.4 dwelling units per acre, which is within the allowable Conditions of Approval Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81 August 31, 2005 Page 4 range of the medium-high density residential planned land use as provided by Fresno Municipal Code Section 12-403-B-2.b(1). LOT AREA 4. Each lot shall have a minimum area as shown on Exhibit A dated June 1, 2005, including any modifications made to meet the other conditions of approval for this conditional use permit application or the related Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM conditions of approv I, dated August 31; 2005. BUILDING HEIGHT i 5. The maximum allowable building height is 35 feet. The proposal is within the required height. EXCEPTIONS: Overheight structures may be approved by the City Planning Commission. However, no roof structure or any space above the height limit shall himallowed for the purpose of.providing additional living or floor space. Submit a letter together with the filing fee to the Secretary of the Planning Commission requesting approval. BUILDING SETBACK, OPEN SPACES AND LANDSCAPING 1 6. All front, rear and side yard setbacks shall be in compliance with the setbacks shown on Exhibit A dated June 1; 2005. These reduced setbacks shall be as follows: reduced front yards of 10 feet, rear yards of 4 feet (except along the easterly boundary which must have a;minimum of 1b ,feet) and 4 foot side yards, including street side yards on corner lots of 8 feet. Reduced front and rear yard setbacks of 15 feet, side yard setbacks of 4 feet and street side yard setbacks of 8 feet are permitted for all houses shown on Exhibit B, dated June 1, 2005. 7. The lot coverage'may be increased to 50% for those structures shown on Exhibit.B, dated June.. 1, 2005. 8. Provide the following minimum landscaped areas: a. 20 feet along North Bryan Avenue b. Outlot B as shown:on Exhibit A dated June 1, 2005 d. Area at the subdivision entrance from North Bryan Avenue No structures of any kind may be installed or maintained within the above landscaped areas. No exposed utility, boxes, transformers, meters, piping (excepting the backflow preventio�i, device) etc., are allowed to be located in the landscape areas or setbacks or on the street frontages of the buildings All transformers, etc. shall be shown on the site plan.' The backflow device shall be screened by landscaping or such other means as may be approved. 9. Trees shall be maintained in good health. However, trees may not be trimmed or pruned t reduce the natural height or overall crown of the tree, except as necessary for the health of th tree and public safety; or as may otherwise. be approved by the Planning and Development Department. (Put this note on the site and landscape plans.) 10. There shall be two trees planted in the front yard of every lot. e, Conditions of-Approval P, Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-04- ' .330 May 4, 2005 . .,Page 5 FENCES, HEDGES, AND WALLS 11. Walls and gates shall be in compliance with.Exhibit A dated June 1, 2005 and as indicated per Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM dated August 31, 2005. 12. Temporary fences to secure` projects under construction are allowed.' Any temporary fence y;. shall be adequately secured and constructed to prevent overturning due to wind, vandalism and/or casual contact by the general public. The construction shall be performed in such a " manner as to minimize any potential safety hazard which may occur as a result of improper fence installation or damage to the fence. ACCESS 13. Vehicular and pedestrian access shall be provided as indicated per Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM dated August 31, 2005. COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS 14. The covenants, conditions, and restrictions for the. owner's. association shall comply with Section 12-1026 of the Fresno Municipal Code. OUTDOOR ADVERTISING 15. Signs, other than directional signs, if applicable, are not approved for installation as part of this special permit. Submit for separate Sign Review. Contact Public Services for information at 559/621-8277. (Include this note on the site-plan.) BUILDING ELEVATIONS 16. All houses in the subject planned development shall be in compliance with elevations and plans shown in Exhibit B, dated June 1, 2005. PART E CITY AND OTHER SERVICES l: FIRE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS 1. Comply with requirements noted in Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM Conditions of Approval dated August 31, 2005. FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS 2. Comply with requirements noted.in Vesting Tentative Tract Map.No. 5493%UGM Conditions of Approval dated August 31, 2005. SOLID WASTE 3. Comply with requirements noted in Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM Conditions of Approval dated August 31, 2005. Conditions of Approval Conditional Use Permit Application,No.'C-05-81 August 31, 2005 Page 6 SCHOOL FEES 4. School fees must be paid prior to issuance of building permits. (Contact Sanger, Unified School District for further details.) Provide proof of payment (or no fee required) prior to issuance )f ..building permits. ; STREET TREE REQUIREMENTS 5. Comply with requirements noted in Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM Conditions of Approval dated August 31, 2005. SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT : 6.. Comply with requirements noted in Vesting Tentative_Tract Map No.:5493/UGM Conditionsof Approval dated August 31, 2005. PART F- MISCELLANEOUS Approval of this site plan is contingent upon the submittal of corrected site plans showing all .existing/proposed on-site conditions as reflected on all exhibits and the following: 1. If archaeological and/or animal fossil material is encountered during project surveying, grading, excavating, or construction,.work shall stop immediately. i 2. If there are suspected. human remains, the Fresno County Coroner shall be immediatel, contacted. If the remains or other archaeological material is possibly Native American in origin, the Native American Heritage Commission (Phone: 916/653-4082) shall be immediately contacted, and Ahe California Archaeological Inventory/Southern San Joaquin Valle& Information Center (Phone: 805/644-2289) shall be contacted to obtain a jreferral list of recognized archaeologists. An archaeological assessment shall be conducted for the project, the.site shall be formally recorded, and recommendations made to the City as' to any further site investigation onsite avoidance/preservation. 3. If animal fossils are uncovered, the Museum of Paleontology at U.C. Berkeley shall be contacted to obtain a referral list of recognized paleontologists. An assessment shall be conducted by a paleontologist and, if the paleontologist . determines the, material to be significant, it shall be preserved. All discretionary conditions of approval will ultimately be deemed mandatory unless appeale in writing to the Planning and Development Department Director within 15 days. K:\Master Files-2005\Rezone\R-05-017,T-5493,C-05-081 —SAC\C-05-81-COA.doc S_A71 OF ALIFORNIA—BUSINESS TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1352 WEST OLIVE AVENUE e P.O.BOX 12616 $ FRESNO,CA 93778-2616 Q, �!� �I ��/] (� PHONE (559)445-6666 �Z�� : �� r- h FLAX (559)488-4088 Ftez your power! TTY (559)488-4066 ®� g� r� Be energy efficient! t! U N 2 7 June 23, 2005 . F" x viwi t.gun 2131-IGR%CEQA 4C OS 8il,aR 05=17&T 5493 LEMLEY LAND SALES,INC. Ms. Shelby Chamberlain City of Fresno Development Department 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 Dear Ms. Chamberlain: We have reviewed the 244-lot single-family residential subdivision located northeast of the intersection of Bryan Avenue and the Gettysburg alignment. The traffic consultant previously provided the TIS to us. E { Caltrans has the following comments: x _ Caltrans concurs with the trip distribution/trip generation from the project's TIS: The TIS indicates that i the project would generate 247 trips during the evening peak travel period. The TIS further indicates that 28 project trips would impact the State Route(SR) 99 northbound off-ramp to Shaw and that there would be 13 eastbound project trips on this segment of Shaw. Based on previous traffic studies, it has been established that the SR 99 northbound off-ramp.to Shaw will require an additional turn lane in order to accommodate increasing demand. It has also been established that the Shaw overcrossing would need to be widened to accommodate additional eastbound traffic. The estimated cost for the off-ramp f improvement is$339,100,with a cost-per-trip value of$345 established on traffic data supplied by the Fresport development. The estimated cost for the overcrossing widening improvement is$1,130,252, with a cost-per-trip of$685, also based on traffic data supplied by the Fresport development. Therefore, it is recommended that this proposed development mitigate its impacts to the SR 99 interchange at Shaw ` Avenue, estimated to be$18,565. The City should consider a transit alternative for this project..When combined with other residential projects in the area, there is sufficient development to support transit,and early planning could make such an alternative feasible. Caltrans recommends that this project be routed to Fresno Area Express (FAX) staff for their review and comment. Please see Attachment Number 1 for other recommended transportation alternatives. If you have any questions,please call me at(559)445-6666. Sincerely, MOSES.STITES Office of Transportation Planning District 6 Enclosure ` C:. Mr.John Rowland,P.E.,Peters Engineering Group - - Ms.Barbara Goodwin, Council of Fresno County Governments - - - - - "!'nlrrnneimnrnvae.nnhilirirncrn.cc('nlifnrnin" ATTACHMENT NUMBER 1 CALTRANS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES: Ongoing development throughout the City of Fresno, including this project, will;make traffic operations significantly worse by adding considerably to delay and congestion. Transit alternatives can help reduce congestion and delay and reduce overall degradation of air quality and gridlocked intersections. The City of Fresno should focus on ways to eliminate trips in addition to enhancing capacity. Transportation alternatives the City should consider include standard.highway solutions along with the following: 1. Park and ride facilities on or within the proximity of this project. i 2. A study of the general accommodation and provision of mass transit in this area to provide insight on ways of increasing transit usage. 3. Exploring the potential of commuter shuttles. The shuttle could be financed through an assessment district and provide away for individuals to utilize apark-and',-ride facility or commercial area parking lot and.be shuttled to various commerciat/office centers within the area. Commuters who need to go further could use City of Fresno: , transit if the City planned for convenient connections. This may help to reduce the Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) demand seeking to use the State Highway System: 4. Providing for continuity ofnon-motorized transportation. 5. Exploring the potential for employer-sponsored carpools/vanpools or monthly.transit passes for.employees as well as including as a condition of project approval a.covered transit stop as mitigation for project-related impacts to the transportation/circulation system. 6. Exploring the potential for linking the purchase of a monthly transit pass.with new residential development as partial mitigation for congestion and air quality impacts, and to ensure the ion-term viability of public transportation. t CITY OF FRESNO — ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/ INITIAL STUDY FINDING OF CONFORMITY/MEIR NO. 10130 Pursuant to Section 21157.1 of the California Public Resource Code DATE RECEIVED FOR FILING: (California Environmental Quality Act) the project described below is ZODS JUL 2S PM 3: 42 determined to be within the scope of the Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR) No. 10130 prepared for the 2025 Fresno General Plan CITY CLERK,FRESNO C11 Initial study is on file in the Planning and Development Department, City Hall, . 2600 Fresno Street, Fresno,California 93721 (559) 621-8277 Applicant: Initial Study Prepared By: .Quad Knopf, on behalf of Lemley Land Sales Shelby Chamberlain,.Planner III 8405 North Fresno Street, Suite 300 July 28, 2005 Fresno,California 93720 Environmental Assessment Number: Project Location (including APN): Rezone Application No. R-05-17 Northeast. corner - of North Bryan and West Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM Gettysburg (alignment) Avenues. Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81 APN: 311-060-25, 79 Project Description: Rezone Application No. R-05-17 proposes to change the zoning of the property from the from the RR (Fresno County-Rural Residentiao. zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone district for 42 acres and to the R-2/UGM (Low Density.Multiple Family ResidentiaUUrban -: Growth Management) zone district for 10 acres. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. T-5493/UGM proposes to subdivide the 52-acre site into a 244-lot single family residential planned development with 2 outlots. Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81 is a request to develop the northerly 10 acres of the project site, which is proposed to be zoned R-2/UGM, as a planned unit development with gated private streets, landscaped outlots, reduced lot sizes, increased lot coverage and reduced front, side and rear yard setbacks. The property is within the jurisdiction of the West Area Community Plan and the 2025 Fresno General Plan. Both plans designate the property for medium and medium high density residential land uses; the the rezone application is consistent with the planned land use designation. The subject property is currently vacant and is surrounded by vacant property, a Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District ponding basin and residential development. The project also includes the detachment of the subject property from .the Kings River Conservation District and the North Central Fire Protection District and annexation to the City of Fresno. for which the Fresno County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) is the responsible agency. Conformance to Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR NO. 10130): The 2025 Fresno General Plan and West Area Community Plan designate the subject parcel for medium and medium high density residential planned land uses. The proposed R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) and R-21UGM (Low Density Multiple Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone districts for the subject property conforms to these medium and medium high density residential planned land use designations. The Planning and Development Department staff has prepared an initial study and environmental checklist and evaluated the proposed development in accordance with the land use and environmental policies and provisions of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the related Master Environmental. Impact Report (MEIR) No. 10130. The subject property is proposed for development with residential uses at an intensity and scale (4.99 to 10.37 dwelling units per acre for medium density residential uses and 10.38 to 18.15 dwelling:units per acre for medium high density residential uses) that is permitted by the existing planned land use and proposed zoning designation for the site. Thus, the development of the site with a 244-lot single family residential subdivision will not facilitate an additional intensification of uses beyond that which already exists or would be allowed by the above-noted planned land use designation. Moreover, it is not expected that the development will adversely impact existing city service systems or the traffic circulation system that serves the subject parcels. .These infrastructure findings have been verified by the Public Works and Public Utilities Finding of Conformity Under MEIR No. 10130 Environmental Assessment No. R-05-17/T-5493/C-05-81 Page 2 July 28, 2005 Departments. It has been further determined that all applicable mitigation measures of MEIR No. 10130 have been applied to the project necessary to assure that the project.will not cause significant adverse cumulative impacts, growth inducing impacts, and irreversible significant effects. beyond those.identified by MEIR No. 1.0130.as provided by CEQA Section 15178(a). Per Section 21157.1 of the Califomla Public.Resources Code (California Environmental Quality Act), i may be determined that a subsequent project falls within the scope of a MEIR, provided that the project does not cause significant impacts on the environment that were not previously examined by the MEIR. Relative to this specific project proposal, the environmental impacts noted in the MEIR, per the 2025 Fresno General Plan land use designations; include impacts associated with the medium and medium high density residential land use designation specified for the subject parcel. Based on this initial study, the proposed project does not change the land use indicated for the subject parcel and will not generate additional significant effects not ..previously identified by the MEIR and no new additional mitigation measures are required. Therefor, the project proposal is within the scope of the MEIR as defined by Section 15177 of the CEQA' uidelines. .Moreover, as lead agency for this project, the Planning and Development Department, per: Section 15177 (d) of the CEQA Guidelines, has determined that all feasible mitigation measures from MEIR No. 10130 shall apply to the project proposal as noted in the attached mi.tigation monitoring checklist.' Public notice has been provided regarding staff's finding in a manner prescribed by this section of the Guidelines and by Section 21092 of the California Public Resources Code (CEQA provisions). Darrell Unruh ate Planning Manager, City of Fresno K:\Master Files-2005\Rezone\R-05-0'17,T-5493,C-05-081 -SACW-05-17-T-5493-C-05-81 FINDING OF CONFORMITY.doc, Attachments: Environmental Checklist/Initial Study for Environmental Assessment No. R-05-17/'5493/ C-05-81 Mitigation Monitoring Checklist (MEIR No. 10130) for Environmental Assessment No. R-05-17/ T-5493/C-05-81/ C-04-334 r E r ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EA CHECKLIST POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS EA NO. R-05-17?-5493/C-05-87 1.0 TOPOGRAPHIC,SOIL,GEOLOGIC11.0 URBAN SERVICES CONSIDERATIONS 1 1.1,1 Availability of fire protection 1 1.1 Geologic hazards,unstable soil conditions 1 11.2 : Lack of emergency vehicle access 1 1.2 Adverse change in topo4raphy or ground surface relief 1 11.3 Adequacy of design for crime prevention 1 1.3 Destruction of unique geologic or physical features 1 11.4 overcrowding of school facilities 1 1.4 Increased water erosion 1 11.5 Availability of water mains of adequate size 1 11.6 Availability of sewer lines of adequate capacity . 2_0 AIR QUILITY 1 11,7 Availability of storm water drainage facilities (on or 1 2.1 Substantial indirect source of pollution off site) 1 2.2 Direct on=site pollution generation 1 11.8 Availability of adequate park and recreation areas 1 2.3 Generation of objectionable odors 1 .. 11.9 Unusually high solid waste generation 1 2.4 Generation of dust except during construction 1 2.5 - Adverse local climatic changes 12.0 HAZARDS 1 12.1 Risk of explosion or release of hazardous. 3_0 WATER substances 1 3.1 Insufficient ground water available for long-term project 1' 12.2 Site subject to flooding use 1 12.3 Adverse change in course of flow of flood waters 1 3.2 Use of large quantities of ground water 1 12.4 Potential hazards from aircraft accidents 1 3.3 Wasteful use of ground water 1 12.5. Potential hazards from landfill and/or toxic waste 1 3.4 Pollution of surface or ground water supplies sites 1 3.5. Reduction in ground water recharge 13.0 AESTHETICS 440 PLANT LIFE 1 :'13.1 Obstruction to public or scenic vista or view 1 Ti Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or' 1 -13.2 ' . Creation of aesthetically offensive conditions endangered species 1 .13.3 Removal of street trees or other valuable 1 4.2 Reduction in acreage of agricultural crop vegetation 1 4.3 Premature or unnecessary conversion of"prime 1 13.4 .Architectural incompatibility with surrounding area agricultural land 14.0 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL f 5_0 ANIMAL LIFE 1 14.1 Removal of historic building, disruption of • 1 5.1 Reduction in the numbers of any rare, unique or archaeological site endangered species 1 14.2 Construction or activity incompatible with adjacent 1 .5.2 Deterioration or displacement of valuable wildlife habitat historic site 6_0 HUMAN HEALTH 15.0 ENERGY 1 15.1 Use of substantial amounts of energy or fuel 7_0 NOISE 1 15.2 Substantial increase in demand upon existing 1 7.1 Increases in existing noise levels sources of energy 1 7.2 Exposure to high noise levels. 1 15.3 Wasteful use of energy 8.0 LIGHT AND GLARE EXPLANATION OF RATINGS 1 8.1 Production of glare which will adversely affect residential areas "0 Insufficient Information Insufficient information is available to determine the y. . 1 8.2 . Exposure of residences to high levels of glare - potential environmental effects which may result from the 9.0 LAND USE proposed project in this category. 1 Ti Incompatibility with adopted plans and policies No significant Environmental Effect 1 9.2 Acceleration of growth rate 1 9.3 Induces unplanned growth The -proposed project will not have an adverse 1 9.4 Adverse change in existing or planned area environmental effect in this category, or any such effect is characteristics not substantially unusual or of undesirable magnitude. This rating is also utilized in cases where the category is 10.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION not applicable to the particular project under consideration. 1 10.1 Generation of vehicle traffic sufficient to cause capacity, "2 Moderate Environmental Effect deficiencies on existing street system The proposed project will have an adverse environmental 1 10.2 Cumulative increase in traffic on a major street for which effect in this category, which is of sufficient,magnitude to capacity deficiencies are projected be of specific concern. However, this effect is not 1 10.3. Specific traffic hazard to motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians substantial enough in itself to require the preparation of an 1 10.4 Routing of non-residential.traffic through residential area Environmental Impact Report, and is mitigable through project changes and conditions. 1 10.5 Insufficient or poorly Iodated parking 1 10.6 Substantial increase in rail and/or air traffic "3" Significant Adverse Environmental Effect The environmental effect identified in this category substantiates in itself or contributes towards a finding that the proposed project has a potentially significant adverse effect on the environment sufficient to require the. preparation of an Environmental Impact Report. i U.LO X X W 0 N pcc E co a N ` n a a U cc m X Q X - cc c az I W y, w LL U m n 4) c C m C C m C C Z . m m m �I. p - C c C c p c c JW Yomn. Yomn. Yoma CL LL o` ra o` ra m `ora m 7 � o.C)> 3 0 CM � 0 CD OW a.- m o,.- m n.- m c cr a 3 c c0 n c c0 a V � Fcts a m� t1CtS CES Fa co O' 1= Om cc o m o m ° m ZZ >o > > m �Z N W W0 o � o Q Z n°'.ac) c am C am c a V ci W mo c0mo mo M c J owls oyio 0 f o Cl) d. - o :o v m 1 Q U tis o am a 0m n am n ° tea_ r . - Cc0co ac2co atom W r o W c O , W .L .. C - Z '.' m O m w.-0 O N —O c C w C N O S L O C O *- _y�. > c U)—�. .� cn O-c0 0 c0 y O - a) m c0 a) .a) C) . C3 oLai w `m �_m03r m � oanrn `m '� = � acimo coo'm p 0 mw -0 � m o_J c 0 � m o� p -0 - o o`> o > aa` ¢ Z W '0 `o a CL m o U) ° c °0 co � v 0 ° c y y o c y . : c m W 0 c0 c 3 � m v C cin as o ° ° _a m m cL c � O ° m c0 a) m cn m�a Ca c°a rn a m mom " a)cn ct 3 o C U. '0 Cl) a. m (a cm tc-`0pcm0 m0coNy rn ° N ..ao c U SCC c cm mt °' � � °C a 2 � � c°i c c �c m � C) c0N d `0 w -.0F_ - w- E o . w O m a)C - me N ' � . cn C7 C m � m o 0 mit m a� m � C ° y E D m I I asz C o C � •� c cn c co . ca o `-' c > � �° >, Up C) y oco om acoui a 0 C'SW � c � com Cl) r- m n.a. occo = a-CL n.Q,. � c . ca 3 j c L W mo v, 'o mL E 3 v rn� ami c m C5 Ln W m m� m m E� at m m � m m ctsmgr y c ° w j Z mN m mO y 0 c m ON ML y m CO °a: t0 0)0 c pCaL cn - o -M° C- c00 EN oy o c c c�v m` m U- a) dOc0ym am . '- c ammco > CL O .L L O 'O •� L_ O y L_ ? .p a) -r- LU C a 76 a) E nm mm�U � rn� 0o ` �w d Z CDa —0 M M CD CD W a mm= = c m � r� to NU ° .m U m � > r oo_ mii �cA= E ini> jc�`0 a° c� U d � � m Q 0 -C a) ocOo > 0 - CLCD 00 cma) oi o �L ° ° CL o o r UCl) -0 C y 0 �a a Q. U O t �U O_L C— � C) O.O C - -C C L7 0 an � a rn» acts F- mcQCoic�tacv0 m �'3s � a m � c`Oim E ° i0p Co at a m a cm o m v E o o co m m EN E (D c is E m c 3a>o m C N- O L C1 M O)ca t 0)a at -L CD= C) M 0 Co cctso F C _C a� y N 3 L coils j �t ci �'L O a) r E C N �_ U >. a) O U S a)H. co w O .-'O C L _ d m O 0 di. — _ -.I a) d:� E d O a) m w_L m a) a L y m a) O_ - ` E �`n am ao o co00 o cn3 EO ° ° c _ io en c . y - aNO �- (n a'' Ocn a) m m- o M L V' O �+N' 7 0 3 o f 7 0 o J C)CM L O L c) I 0 EyE ap mt0a) a) oCW mcpl'•' caf W c0 CIS-F N = � T— r Qo0 Z m ¢ >. cn E E > EL E � E EQ E m �cn E EQ m E � > � Q LcaZ oCc > 3mo CL =0 occ ° acm � o W y C c m 0 c0 o N-0 Ca) m o Co 'n O c0 m O c0 ctl O i0 O CME o m c m ac E >m c �0 d c0 E m e � y o �•�L m Sam tis .. OoE�� ° > � oE (n Coca O2EW cc 'C o a F_ _a o a� o`v ° o o� cn �c a `o E N co m a'y O r C 't= m a) N c L C y'� C? C 'C O) C �- a) a) 0 c •O O O m a) y O a)-C a7 a) O m a) - L c0 d u. W m Z m 0 n.mM o� .m v ao : o E m v CL U) o lJ. W LO0 N ca N V X a � 3m : • • ti` a� m Xacts cc p Q X X X v ¢ t ca o az II : W } wU- �� a . rn- a. Co- � ' L. m _ 1. m _c c m C_ c _ Z p 0 c c m 0 c C m a c c m 0 c c m aW Y c-caa Y � c-caa Y- ma Y - mo - . J caa ° caa 0 caa.° '- m a o roi n. o�> o rn> � 0 > r rnm 2Q nCm aCm nCm nr- m Q - O W O toc Qom;. �? W C D `; C Wa r_ C -r 7 � C N 7 C Co N 7 Co-CC m , � (CQ C O a}-n ca 0 a I--a ca Cl a F-a cn 0 a- I•-a ca 0 p W o � 0-- m W I- E o m m m o �Z N W W o 0 CM c n CD c � J Y W camp mCL CL CD CL C CD cm em 0 C vo. cam c . . � J oWm oOEia ooTn O v ca 0 � cl � aoma a`_ omm a $E I- W C 0 iQLLJ Z '0 :. � iamoC- OLmm.O� � r. (D 3 � > mN � �C N �. 0 a., 0 U y y a,R W o� -- c � m o y � U rn � �c O cc c . chin " m C ` aL >.0 coil E > m m v E m m a.0 N c o rn . 0. O m (D -0 i) C O >..- `a W.O.01D � C C m m •a L W. 0 a ¢ Z Cr. CD E13 c mia ca�L 3 m y rn�R = n- my --I U) in c a m o 7 3LL mU mom = W w 3. c m Q C : .. CDC -- ECD ch- W >.c C:2 I- � 0 ca m Z Co Enm c E m m cdCL cc na c � v C m . m R SCD -C 2 0 WLL rr ui O m >.= m m m CD W coL CD O c . L U ca m m a � �. �. ` � L . m � N � tm� y�� a� � �° o � �w �a�iCD M cn;m CO0. Z ON G~ C 0 C C -' C OC U m ui a m U U L a) t L O - Q . . CD N n p o m rn m o U W m o L m W is n W C m w I I O o mr rnc� ia > -0 m � Eo '� W co •amI U0 ca > c o W C m d L Co cC m t = m L C(D m 3 C O Co > m m U Z c� criCL vn m m.CD 7—= L) o -ca CL o Qao�� W x a� m0 � mn3� oma i,�� W m W ca .m W C C O L L W m E -0 a):2 -a C C > C O C 7E .. � n.O N c` QI L I-- m V > m yin a1 - O d m W Q ?� in d - EcY > mmo m � c� � � m0c>am I- p tco v $ inm m mai CD � nm 2y� m �- 03a to 3� . m�� m o a•- 0 aW �' o c W m ca E Q o m.. a E W o °' h- cL m- C � = o me W a m _ 0 ma E �. Y m m ` � m a n Siam U raa d� o-0 c = m ym (D co Utcmao0 c � CDCL:3 -°-� c cmrnm 0 0 U m C m Q. C m O - O ca m m m o Em'i m c C O W L - -C .- U C •N (a is y CL d m V U m L y m m � O o o m a) o is m c� Ea m m W 0 ¢ E � ¢� 0 rna� o CD m-.- i/j .. cn -L= 0 N L-mL W n. C L O_O C Q'.--, U Q `a m o o m m N •m C o o m o- m `� o U m a� E � m a L'3 N o Co a rn n " o m m o m y m Cia c E magic m a ¢ E _rn o C o t ca 3 ca aY m n � m EU my m cD c o 3 4 c m • .3m m c �. -- W c CL �'xCc o EEa) Em m'cm mg Wmc a � 3 U �� mcoo Wim c W �� m � o � • °� E= W m o ca � 'n � ai� mEa cmca _mmcm m = R cr= >.mo` mo O O O-. -CO V E L 0 U- 7 y "a C W U •O C a Co O O C ca O m *� Co a,•c m �= - n > - - 8u) oC'3 - m mF- `- CD N ca..-. ao E . a m y m m N o n c N W m m a mco E c c c E o . .. ,.Lb 3 m ; L a) U C N: m d m C m m m •ma m O m m C . .C _C m a.C U C U m O - 0 Co W W E D_C.. a) a � W -•b'a E. 0 y Lm o a _c o ��L0 0 o �' c m EEE - o ao o o X I I m 7 >L d x 0 m cjj 9) m >.W-U m m O a� G •a y O C W O.�O.m _� ¢m Z > = o o > m c CL c= -a `o c 2 >>..EL a > m m cc c° 13 c nm Q �r � oc m o c�� 23, 1 m 3= ,D c m m m o o� -W L1J Wo ayIcmi � o: Em. c1 75Eca3 o >L aEo �mm o o 2 o m E m` a-In -.0 W i .n.m c m aa) `-�°`_ o o ? n m E ca E L� o of c `o a) m � U W a0 Z� m m m e am m o ;` �0 v m m ui �? m E - co c w� t� `m •o•., m W W. X X LO o E o N Q m N G 5 � r 3 � � m x � U o• Q `o as a � x s m o . az w I I W m w U- Q Q wCL U`� U Cc J1J c w d iL E m oCIS: c 0 a E Q m a _a c E O ; 5 cc c �� oa;B U mmm m E'D > d 0 0 ti p 'm p r uJ V !-- - a. . = g rn rn rn J v0" 73 L J ,_ fz. a a c.� CIS. c w.. ai c LU t C C' r c0 : a) C c C C m N U m L m . m i �a o y cc CIS co E c a .�to o , � Q) 0 C m E 0 o w0 cc v > > cr - � c . a J � mL 'B CD °?.CMm mm me of cco yo o cm a� cd E o to c y - - CD a C'.uJ C Q '3 aU : a-- `0 0. to c w m y �� a � � o. c y . � �. � m o aaa oE 'c a� cm c > � o a ° o j LL ca c Ca U E ca c c y rn o = > > O 0 0 v , CD CL Lo rn > m t yo mCD ECD Em o a��im mm >. c ¢ C = c o• O . a� Ca ca o m E O c c o :_ oC ) N � o c U o C a � m a-= v m m O •o •` �UW a Cts U Oa v'- - m E vi - t U � m C R , a)m o c m -U L (D C a? C C •C CIS Ul C O m t CIS m p (M L. U m a)ca 0 _ J t o -0 -0 cx oc as a-' c c o p � > �U CD Q co o CIS 000� E vim. C, a) v� y E � ? o Qpm (a cr y ar " vi a y c m O Cl) c w p p at N --. . >.m as a d > m a) 3 m = t >. c` t a) c m . z acs v, W v m U ca a ,� N >, O ID p ui y (D a7 O O Fa O a) C Cf rnm c o c o �R m R � �' E o a � c� r°n `�° m 3 c m —,p (D :.vi p w . m CD O — t -0 •- Z m p aD m Q m > � c E w U (D tt c c co o So' C7L � cE rn � : o mpc E 0 wo CC m0 . Lb O ccaa C R m a) C 'cC a c c �j a to C m m m w M O` p E L •p - a) p o ,r E (D ui y 7 ,O eY >. Q) p— Of U Cara aRE �o cm cM > ac'i � `° aarn� m ca a� � aNc mLCL ch m R� c yo �E �, W ccs_ . cax. Emd o'- o cn H Z0 > > a > � c m— -M m .m o (D (D w n — z m o c c C7 y CISy o CS a) 3 'R N C O p _ p m :N O (D s CO y ca 1— 0 a) O C C m �cC U LO CL - iEO O Ca a) O o >CD ca O .�ca ` C O R m CJ c Ea mcm a= m arc C (D � v m E m Coe rna ` , ac m r V C w y y o 0 CL O •� C C CIS y E D C m y p•R Of y C" w U 'a T— y C C C — m y (D CD ... O CD o m c '. (D - C c >.CII CLL 3 c c` O G¢ p .p o s 3 m � .o U U CL-0 o o U c o c moo.. ca 0 m E y C a a ._ cp C O m y a) 5 ' o c — ca — y w O y — a) O a `c° c y coo E o o ca `O E o c ftl �O_ `O o c to E ca ¢m Q - CD •p p m` CD .a) a s�7 y y CM cl y >, m E y a a O v, ca m - Rs � cc' Ea o c c c � _.`o °' ern cc � aD tm a as 0 CL c = : a m m M m E c - m m o. c t a m y c U W a) a 3 W 0 - a p 3 R c o � Ria•o c� m .• m --_ c'R c Z. cis Z m c m U m o - 'co > m c a E r E m.,c m E t o 0 m c'N 'c a) cD m E-' tit a) = W cy � Qm' m_@a� _ vap OEa .� E (D •c om� CCL l- a� l- to cL cC m U -a) C.) a7 U a) fn"- Cn U ` N ~ O •O T •o cV rA ao m o , m LL WX °, . Ln � Nca co Q . ca u rn N o U X X a CD v � m ai m x >.m U a Q o a C13 o aZ v rn v o v o I W >. c z B. •- W LL Um cco c > > . _ Z a m a a a a Q a W `o a. Eo_- `o v:o- o cy ° c v c o 0 0 .J - c0oc c cmc cmc ca camp c c c E y a) r m co c o co cCD o r N N .. N o OW m� 0ca m °' cmc cmm cmm cmm mm m °' mm '- U > m Cm (D cmm caro mmm � mm m CD (D : 0 � co � � (00 E00 0. 00 a0Q Z Q p W W F- CD 0) CD cn 0) 0) �Z N WLZrn C) CDU c c c . c c c c c c a CD c CD Olrn0)c c O O O OO J O O O O O v CL Q CL m ccU - C rn � . VZ 4 m m m -0 -0 •o m >, v m m _ 'D m c _= m o o w U W 0 - _ - 0 cc c ° m c > m E. c mmrn � o3 m >. a m m c- m ,m a: y y mo o m = ai = w o m m U CL C7. 0.3 mw cN .. c r> m m - -- c3 - om o � rnc � � EC = cc=n mm mm > � 0 2 �:. cmi m � vi c-amm m � m` 0 ac° O °' Z a :3cnoc a ? > CC mo cn m m3m dmcr ca ° a J N _ m m •] ° C ° ca a) r c O .` m cc m o ca m c ca m 0 c c— .. aW vC7 CD a) maNi ate = c.= n m o 'Z m -0 E m CN I- O o E (D oo .- c mL� c Eco .: m o CC m m m o t 3 m m o m e me c c c c Z +• � vi >.`(a cn � c a v > c rnc.rm c ° mm m ° WLL t>s mm > cc gm- 3m c m v � �= camoE o � EE my cn .� m m ami m c m am >.E ed m cm m c c am o m m . CD N +• m 'a N m 3 5 r. c m a c m o m o >, Z � m [C ZO co 1= 2 m 0cw 3wo o ..� "vwo0 Er_ m o n :3 . O N -- c o v m o_ m.-- 'o y o ° iso m m CD CD a c . rr H I I = mom m o � o o - o m o rn o y o o am c o m U0 cc of= 'c � � Cl y o 0 .m (D o n moo= E m •mca m 3 y � m yCC co E c E C -= 0 om � c � � m Z m m °O 0 ' o O m` O ° m O_O ca c N > .w m m m _o rn U m a N Ya N vi m U 0 m 'm m r 0 = m o m d m m � to '° _ m W r vvimc mN �a E> 0 >% E 2: v m - ° W _ @ D ¢ m ¢.c C o x c � o o c " c o -o moi. ca m >.3 *0 3 ca ca om m E m ommm o -a o. mm = oc3 mmmm ¢ cnZ; W r° CD CD 0 m Id > n I�. E my --D-c `0 � c c"mi o =o ° 3 `� c Wim . D03 f~!) N ° C7 my m o cr- m r m m E m c m e a`a ��co 0 aa , m E o m •om > o .0 = - � - Eo m cc a a oN ca m` aa) c m N - o c caC� o o m > cmi m y m 30 0 o v°i m W oa.m o m ° o m mw r ca m =. m r x v o o o c o N is in C a_ c C m =ca Gr m m � w CD y CO � T NmL3mID` o_c°i `�° Emma 3crm as > m a`� c E oo c 00Cc oo yn co Z CD omni momZ � a: � in CC cm m o �� mm - - M = m3 c � c c 3 y� o d = -ca � ori m � > me c : 3 d m o o ° 8 CD 0 - -- oo m cn � (a � ` oCL asci cpm � cn -3 m - mm om Ev a] - W cL o !) '0 c y = v m m v cam > m w c � m� c �: m o E m c . o m o 'o coo m m o - CD m '3 o rn 3 m m o = - (D -= Z co ma. v -= c m m w 0 - CO CL d -0 .0 -3 c aC m 3 Cn 0 7 m = o o U p •cr � - 0 co C c= a ° m e �- LL- 3 E o m ° c � m m e m m 0 r m m e o. F- m m �� W m m e mt o m m=. = 3 cFv m am m E - c' c c a` � m mo _ r E m - m >.o a E o m m c E E= E m s ° ED ` om c r m oc W .° � 3 o.mo as c oras o o c ccri m mm �•- oo Zo ty +Ts cm = cam o `o m = o m ° rnoo me oo roo r > m m cm c - m > > c = cm -' m oC .asmw � moo E om 3 m v c m ° m -a = o � CD m0 cmc mr3 Nmm mm c mo 'EN c � co o .0m Em= CLcc to mom - mo � 0 ° 0 :3 mo•� mcca pd m oU '� m cEom moc ° ov : O cn c >,v a m y m y m C= ca y�a �s E c o 3 o j o m m m Er .c m m > m of m m o ca aai o �c cg dclmNccmo co � moc amE - m c � c`ma m � � C E� mm , " m ° cm I I m rn° m am m m _ = c CD - m` > ca m5 ' >, _ @.mt m c� ca m �� - oro ¢ m = c as E= o = c� cn m o c r o CO o c = cn E- = E m = ao m 3 �E Z cn ca mL c y as ca �o c � m o ° m m m cn c E m CL :3 Y Ez r cn r v co a'ca x ca r- r v o o CO �- r Co >,o m C),cn W Um mm Umm m v � ° U �° U m - = co � m w � o c m m �v mL m = U c c m w m m` v m Nv m ` o o r `a C C o cc v = o am o t m = -t m m m c as c oo N o t o m m = cnv c m d H C c m ° m e ~ .v U) m a) m ~ CU mks a ~� p o` � � o 0 =U = cU � ci `-° o CD a� ° civ c v 3 m � ui °'E coo ti aE co •o am oi -,y>.j ova IL O o 3 m m5 O :c°i O mo`m G= m o m cd .6 ci 0 c c0 O o.N� G 'n Cr m GNm w x x w x x x X 0 N Q ' ca . N C U o � � m 75 CIS r .r LL Z cm I I 1 W W LL_ CD c C Q Q U a � JW � c tic � c ° c a- n M C m C C m C C m C .C m C O pCIS C O 7. i a raE oo.E cc cmaE c"cc aE a m > cD a a � Q Cp = .2 r- .5ow .9ow `owm `ow `pcn OW �mm cmm �ca .cmm. .mpm m m U > smaa) � maai ccamm mmm m=a (D aai•s : aa) aoo aoo aoo aoo 0 mo a o,Z) r W Z N W W ° O O O O pIL 0 ° W a m v �_ c W C o: � W '�- � c°co C.? � Ec my m ° ° awi � E cZ m{`, incn >1 C'3 o rnE o " m.m . m -- Y 7 y ` N ? ?a N ` m m �! a) a) C 0) LL o ° c , > > o c .rte c m rnw °, m rnm ' O p cccn > - �0 CL � - ` 7 me c ccaammoc c - a a � ¢ 1 Z m •_ N C > m U rn.r rn m O p_ m O >. v a) vo a s m ° o o- - U w - w E ca C - cm 0' W C j V U C w 0 m m- C U > m m o m m! C •— O cy ° �' cmi cma� �? Em v ° � LL. `o y �oZ5 om mm v 3m 'o Eiia (D 30 ° oa U m m C ca C m QI Lo om >. cm c ca ca o CIS 53mm 0 w N o c w E m y : O m C cn U O_ ° y m Lm ` m C - c O m U �_ o �� m w ` ° o UAcwam ` w m! . N tmvm m t v � m3 c c ui ca a) >1 of 3w `ni' Ute . 0 j ca L m 3 U.L .-0 - — U O CO = U C L U w p .L C C � C.�° ° cmcn c maw m " m f0 E ca m m �rmc � m m, O cm ? m m c 3 - W wo cn mmo vim 0 a) � 'cE `m 3ov cc : a9 -0 mC °.c a ca a m0v a car CL 0 mc �Um U �'. N °- m C m C U m m.m..13 e .° O a m O C E•w o N ° m a) CL 3 U a >,O -o v a o o t a c s_ c y w W -0aximm `D mm � mmc (D m rnom - @0O .- ° o c' (a C m - > ° E coo m U m SC - m > mm c >. E T- m m C O m a cwCc 9 Co a m N •0 p m O m - cn an d '. pp Z C an d E m m m 3 (D.0 ca -m a C O• U - C w ca C Ltj O E m E � o o� E o E Vis- s cn m w o v E T.. m m m; m �p m t p 7 m o ca 3 > d V Q Qc m >`m a) CES° m m '3 ° a 3 o 0 3 ca o m m , . o 'w cn C •O L a=.L O m C _(0 .m m m 'ca C m m C m m t C d O. O o 3 v 7 m Cm >. w C p .O.w •p = > m O O w U tm. •p acd m C -O w U m � m > _cn C U p.•- ' .C c . 5 ca t m m m m m f0 m �t m m E ° m o .m E u o c� o - ,L c 6 o ) C w = m m a= m N c O. � wcc m � °� porno s E (D -0 mo ° o CIS -0 h Z E c ca ° oc -. w c `o' = m t ° s m `o m r; 0 m - ° c m - E2 'U w 0 m 3 m i. o a`o ° .° >.c 'c cnc 'o cm a m O - -O j O t '•. C -o t ca m m o N N w C T'L w C m m y U •m0 E 2 - C m w m C m _ C m - L p m C m c E m m m c o m m m m L m - Q - c o I I .. w U C N ca 7 ca m.. .w 7 c9 .o- 7 •m .0 m a O - a m0 c. m U O E > t 3 Q CD ° N.U O E m t >. C j m CL- O �. t N w w C. L C C cp •O cn m w 'O Z w >.- m ~' «• m E U C m cm -m - o w ca o •C C r y C Q U .. EL U o m ac o (m c rn m m is °'o am y- c o. CC >.o °CD ca U W D (D oa CS E m 3 y m y c m - E m m U rn c a= U ^-' � m o EU oiac � s ._ m > mc ° o ac moo C -- . . d ~ rntm � ~ a ca ~ ca � wE cw m � Lm � H (D (D F- � m ~ > .Q ..� :: c ° o `wc mm m o a: U mam a� Lam L r'm CO m ~ N a a M vi�> �' m a r 2: t ca 'N E m A '.CL - a di E C C� co IL ca u .° u1. u 3 LL ca a u o ai Li y °c� t ti o - Li - LL .. _ LA I O Nca Q 00 No V 0 CD ca Q °- ° ¢ Q` IX X X � - IL Zb c CL _ o _ LL Zm c ❑ Cl Cl m .m m m m m w QQ o aaE v ❑ vrn❑ ❑ ❑ JLII � � o� a� aci � � m .� m � m o CL a a- r- a E -pmE E E r - CC 0 o m m r O (n .m C o COcQ o CO O .. C1.O o QW ._❑ m - ❑ cm co m cm cm ,- a•= a-0 a= m c > a > c > C > U m m c m m CO m m m m m m m m O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ m ❑ .❑❑ lia ❑ a❑❑ a❑ CL Q m Cc w p j p N N W ~ o c c o` o o g ov ov 5; .-. ZZ c ammo a i � c C `-'Z N Lulu a- E m o_U o 0 0� o� HQ = 2 �`omv �c moo . co ` a: Wc - c - a._ a._ ho c c ao c c a J t. '-� O CM Ca rn o c'` a =1 a > E is c'> E m v IL c c U o - o .. o o m v o o m U m W Q U m c o �o �CL n rac n. CIS - �. O U O U O ca m m O CO m CO. . ' V Z.. C �z m�'0 m m Z- `'m m 'p m m vi a m m L m m CO m co cn W 0 � D m c m m m � CD z E m �`m a) a c > - cn cry - ami m U _ Y _ C U -. m N >� !Z' O ._ �? aI C m- m w d C U L..C C. : a m ca °- :a=ca to m - LA mo m E ' m v) c coa mo � O 0 � Ycn o c E ° v mov m o o c rnE - m o o m a Q' Z.. _ Cc vc L m o m �-o E - > C.m a ¢ J N •� crit? cv m a) Ca o c m > w m m m — m c > c m Q W _ m mr > o m .� p m - cot . o m ac EL w > O m m cc c � 1- � 0 .... cm `:m `o mU = m o � ms.0 m o_c 3 m ca - -Ca o o . C)cn CD o c IZ u. .. . o 2:-CL ca (D r m c aE c .3 ^ $ c m ovo v CL m o a N Q1 vE cL -0m mco � `cow `on :2 0E0Eu' m ca O N c m U o E '- - co ¢ O N 2 c m m C m m r ` E C O d 3 m N m m o I I Ca' c omNa i � oar m � c° mm asc m> c0 m o f (n o 0 E o m ° c m �t m m E 4u U ❑ Z co L C(Sm y 0 ' Ca ca cc Z mp N t C m C ch .cc m L (n C o 3 O w W m e y-m_ c c- m mv. m U U o m � 'N o c �' m . cam c W m c- o o m m cn 'a m U p m c 0- Lu (D'a o cc � =� vmCniaEAaa)im '° am ma y ° m �oE 3CaLNcaa ? D rn'v 3 m cam� m 0 C m � c- 0 s 0 o m �o c D `o� m ` N N m m c � 0 .o_ X m Rs m v o, v m m ca > m c m 3 LL m m m '° ca m m C_cn ° ° m m > E m U¢ rn— > Q W cmn E °m v) - m � � o = v c a' cmi . 2 :E m -p c" c m E 3 ca— — �T 3: N m- ` .m� O - 11 m C_ o m m m m .CL � w y--Z - .. Z > ca m a m - m m - is C_ _ L = C E o - p > ca m W__ m y m m m 7 o co c0 • L ❑ ca y m _ 00 O m ccaa •o E a C U ' Y p m m C m U L C L ° = m 7 •o (D (n p LO .'p .C_m •ca O C m ca y > C m o W. m m C a) N O �' m m m m m >— 3•X m m Cis c ca 0 O-a p Cca - m U �aR o � C._ Q= y U m 2 U •° m R L. 7 — p _ '— > C m o '° m m C_ o C — m ca m �" U-•D m ca m t m C_ a. CV) o C4 CryLm aa� m ` mca > > > o (D= - cn 3 ° rn . . . H •ymm � c " p cr me L om COOU (D m.- E m •j.Ca p� O C m m. m C to CD N N C S O L m ` O L m C G vJ �N C am m 3 me a m m Q� o mL m R � d cn`o c-�° c rn- o� m m m 'X � m o m �a 0 d c 3 C OCL C — ` U C O E Co a) m _ Ca -0 ti s mCOa) 0 s o ca. ca m �� mL > amC o_- U - o f m 'is � to `n - ° m O� m ° U >_- E j.cu C cn o E C a p m O mC - a p) CD a c o m m r-0 O O m.o m❑ c o a a� > o �. ° m m o o ° m U w > m m e m m v cn m ._ w .r m. S -C O COC fn U C C C m o 0 a L N > ¢ E C m j > m CO '° C m co m >. m — m m m C. a U C C _ - O mL — m m m m m m — E U — cn y.O m m p m 7 U L.`. m __ m 7 m-p L p 0 �a w _ E .0.m a R ._ m U d 2 .0 is L U Er. m E ¢ ra L m cn �. L= L O m L � r E N:> m .. c0 •�m E ca L o m Z m ,N m m O m y m L m fA 7 '_ U = C 'V L 3 m > N p (n "' C Q � y >1 - 'a CO Yc mo mz) m car mE >.U) Q ` Ummoca U o c m m m m am •o as - c o W. ' mo m m cmi c m w m `n a-°i o o� ca Ca 0 �� m U U C .. E m O m 'C p.:. m O E m CO m O o m D (n t O y ° U L O m C_.D.a L m m L C�. cri C to ._-C cn m - d F- Cpm� o ca (A F- _ amo ism(D 75U CL(n Ri m O L > m m �.O cn �. U U > r m r CD w m C_" p '0 - U m mL > C m r ao_C L tV c .. E IL tLLL_ mm3vcn0 LL Limj1° m t7C_s = Q� _ wmca Qsca LL W 0 N ❑ m N p O a a 'a)' m- C13m c T� 3 U U a a 75 CL >h m o aZ ' W I .I ZM CL m °' m m m w � JC, p p W Zm c c c IL C13 cc`° E mE a3E caE a QW cap ; c � CZ cm cm U > mm mm mm ma) � � ap ap ac ap ap rn C ❑ m c m m . m m . W cn > y w F- ov v . 0 -0 c70 0 ma c70 o-o v ZWZ W ` m c CIS o m `e e mN p _ m o c C.2 a` c c a' oon `o c moc- momom. - vm Q (� mo ' ca a > Em E ca E m > E > EE L. J d om cCao CL ao ac C CLL C c CL ac a m = � cn - OCIS mCIS C3 OCIS mmv Ommmo 0mmmc3 OCIS mCIS c W C o Cw •p m � � ` m aai5c .0ym � � :3 Z. c ;. me y �' � �>. _ C'3 = m •- o c' m m �mc E v 3 . Q _ o o -• m m c m xCIS m c c rn C =.O •o '' =° mr3 c mp `o C n �.m o m m o w is o m o vi Z. .0 � - vm m m y m E m comm m 01 > m aa ¢ . m = mcE >.c y3c o'ci -ma a y c m y m W c �' � m r = `� omm o - c C of L Cm3.. ca m O. m o m m U CL Q m O 'O - y .0 ; � �_ cmmv, m '. mn•- mm Em c3 � cN a o U) orn LL CD C13 m � - c j cv E � o � m n� yam° in a > o �° ac3 m c m o LO CD m mcts u? m aci �r o m m w y v o a o � . �_ m N :r m rLn� p (D o m nL . 3 E. � v m `n E m o o � � N. aai R m « m y o L m-0 m o U, o m ac `3 n 'i.. = I I �° •Nt o t y•o > j m mC m o` y R o � � n .'o m .'c Up — > v O N L .> N cc O TO O m . . W >`C Sin _ U C -D m C E y O _ N O � O.O O W — m O COE O C :m 1 > cmn m0 � mom COcn3 aCD WCD m m 5L E • W mm >Z Z v >.0 m ° o a-omc � r ma) a Lr m E m F-• m'o m 'o o ca z ._ m m .0 - ca - > 'n U m a) O m N O C m cc m CD > -Y. L is m 7 - C > G• o.. m _ 1 � o my m=° .n.mc m a3 � y E •E .N 3 cL m U. cn > .m . LU c N O > m;CL m �.rn C > m C U " W m O a) 'O " CD Z3 a ` EL _ c o my - .0 •- -0 o n. N >. n m m � = c m - c � Q. o. m o v — m _ L m C cc Z �F-• -0o30m y E mmm .Cosa as .0 ym m O CD - C LC v, v, mm -- a mn' _ m C � U)cp O L m C 3 .C C •7 �l`p .C o at O m` j L o L V CD F•- m •o (n o` `a o o cr m o o a o `�' m c C L 0 3 CL m m •= m a7 L O m O C a 'C m m C 0 C - cn - - cc U U Ca'3 CD � oNE cc ) o o'a o` m � E w �3 .v m Om oo ` M > O a7 .r U- m y m o O.m U U m o O m O O ; m " m � m F' cn n.a m `o cc > � � n i m � m. Q. m m `.�o m m o m o L m c CD m _ L c cr c mv� .- �¢ m m ` ai.> m of go y Q - v y � mom `- oo,. c n 'aiv � io � o = cn o oca m c c c > ti rmmairtu n. ac n.� - ormn0 �mocQ) -o mc ' co mc .- E mm r L L m m � a 07 m 7 O U) 0 O n'� a1 ` O U; uJ m m L m -O y 'O C v — U W cc CLO m >. U Oc r 07 2� C m C C C o Q O C'= C cn a) m.N•p Cm ca C O m ` >• U G WCD y m G ` - y O o c0 L a3 a) •�.� •C >,m 'O m U d m m m ` cn .i s = .� U C CVmCEp .EuJ ' m. a) C0 CCm ma CIS - CE y ` > cc Vm . .. I I O m o -y.2 m � � m o as- t m m m e c y o o ¢ m _ C - m. (nm r. 0 oco0o om o me mea mE cn CD 3mm m y U'm c > > Z 3 m C `U ca m `° m C � C m m `0 o3 v, `n o n LQ m m CD m cn 'cn m ca ? C f0 cn �3 ` St c oc m c m S m m o m m ca ca o y v rnE c .o` cm3 E'= m C m t in m �_ -O t m ` C L O m m C C O. 2- 0 7 'a V L m E x : o. m y -_. `°a= cv m m . m CL o 0cr � >.cflov 'm w ` o y' � yc . - v .. m io- E 'a mm om > 4) .O > E Z m y y m m n ¢ m «° •r o = atA.m.0 vJ c Q m �- aiam3cffmo`vLcm ni °mc mac ', � CL - cmEcn - 3v n.> m - mm US CD crime ci v ai LL; X W > X o ' N Q ro N U a m cII U n Q X X X X X X r ¢ az W } 0 ` 0 wLL U m o n�_ o _- o, o CL L Z ) (1) .05 � Z aW13 13 •D _• 0 "OC "O.0 - UC aC. aV- caE caEn`_ .y mEn` `° E : `° E mE asE . ¢ rn rn Cn rn � m rn r G a: C O - C o V C O U .S O C Q C O C O C) O W C N C N O E C m 0 C m C d C N C d r c > . c > `. E c > .. . . c> c > C > c > U came ca m T o m m rn �a cam cam m m ca m_ a0 n. Q.=U an=.cn a0 FL .. a.o ap Z CD W ` c. ° v .0 0 E CD imC: c ZZ 0 c � mm ` m c to W CC J Y W .9 'E o c c c Q a t� J c - E ca c�a m cc cn= v � mo o � o� CD W Q U c c 'c N m cc o� a, o cn m CO a W U W .L v o ) m mrd oro` `-0 `o L N >. >. m ' - E m c c m NU Q m m _ . N a)-0 N = � " nO 0 n cn >• 0 •m — U - - '— — N E ca N O j-0 m p 7.y O O 'y ca - 01 Q) C. a C'3 C moo m 8 .0 ca a) E Cn N m m z E N � N �-0 m a m � O p mnm o.Em� � YS ._� Y mm 0m JZ E� c°a UQ m � vC7CD E m N0 . Nc � � c °ca Eo c0 QW C LoE -a .>_ a) c om � mm -om mw cc ascC 'aca � � . oma°i0 cw Z CC ° Co - ca cao -(A = m m ii _ N-00 E 1= ` a)M ° m " ia rno g c �" 0 C — is Z 'a C C Y C - C T O C L U.> o f is m :'m p W cQ N m L m e CIS0 0 3 ami �. = O CISo N ai pF- `o r _ � . cC7 � n N m N y TE m � N3 $ m o c m a o a) jw 3 E � m o,c zQ C) N nm c a : CIS z C) 6 E — m � m� m aL cam. E U 'OCzz E m m m m = cmn O w m m ° ac m >.o v c '-v > CD 0 3 L �� c UO �[ as m O .0 U C o >. L C ca m C.p C m m.m m m CC in 0 U am� - 0 — n o cc a. .> Y c—`a mco ° o coo y aim Z o c m >` m c m o dam m. -NOL mia -cc 3 m m .0 -0 — 0 `o W CD a) 0c° 0mCU� '0� aci m Qc•tm to Em � m L °-cc coo ; LLI s00 .(D = - m0` °� c CD -0 Ni� -0 E N >. c = Em W ` _ 0o nc � m •3 = ' �a ca m.mmC7 cl aceto o mEcm :> �—' _ 0 C � (aa r — �9 o-N L = t m co m t C m O m N ` m N Cl) Z. N ca m m 0 Cl) N. n m m > an d Q .° m y m m EL o o E m m cL0 E D co E g 0 0 0 o.E`o c Q m m m O > C C m N m n Cl 0 0 CW � rornm LL c � m O m - 0 o'� m a) :° 0 'a -0 m ca E m `c_ ca ca rn 0 y U O co= 0 ami o C CL "C O m L •0 N 'm0 as _o m o m m' r cco o�'mcnE m � Nat m 0 cv 'm U00C `Om '9mmm � Z 0 j a U O N C m ,N m m C d 0 nnm m m ca m m m'N L r. ca m c0a Cc C ' O U "O L C vi 0 E •O — U F- 0 U m m m ca '° ui 0 L C O 3 'tO U - m U at c � E m. m � 'c �al m -0 6 CL rn� E m o N cmn - 7 EU m m m = mE- m m c 2maa -0 (� Q m yin -0 > m ��j o c m u-oiy--oc 'a 73 L 0 o E o E ma ° �CD s m ' Nc 0 o a �• U' L m C Co m a) fn o t.0 C m c - m n m O O � > y m m •o r m C N m a7 m �- o) U m ca L C m 0 -m° C o m C.m m L ca U V m C F' C m-0'U) � t m m d •a L 'a O)Cl) 7 U m> m N U > O m m a t - _m L U U m C m >, m E O d o a tom �� c m E o m � m m rrCD o OY m m co m o` a n m s n _ cl E 7 O C L O= ,� C Cin C c N ca —0 0 d m o a U m t U 3 ca m m O r momma -o ) > O ° mm0m m . m o Mc m > ° C• 3 ° 0) CD a °? r N > M .m C m C c`II C U A V m y U m [0 Z C L m C N m N y et ca m n m i m m >�y U 'm U N 7 N ca U N "0 m Q U m m •C m ca m L C-'` NL C - O C maiaca o. Emm°1 0y1- c°•m oN m Y m .0 m c 0 m ° � ccmo � -- ca C co CU cl c a c c°n mra Q o m 0 m y c m CES '0 a m e >.= o 0 CD � .� U ° as ai5� 2 o'� 0.aa) 0.ca I d6 U m ca U p o.mmm mt > m � EmZ- CymOyt ° mn. oc m � C .a) aNi camoc . Emm � � m ¢m Z m 3� m m � • m� mL m m e ca 0- m E c cn a Y-o • y (D y � Q r m- m m z o o E °= Qac c ami c� rn� c uo U m E -C C Cl CD cow y ° E W EYLL m >. Q o r 0`o > U m c r- C m e Chin 0 ° c 3 0 4. . m Nt r- (D y dMmm m -0 3 a m .o m Cm �UCDCD0 - . C c m ` m t,C m 7-�� C t t d. C(7 C N O m .m. --i .� .FL- 0 C°J c cp E > N a) Q Z Z _ a7 3 Q m o o O •m O m C O N y m y 3 ~ Q C m o O� N m m is �, ? ca N2L — ME•�c9 � d' Cm ��mr � NmmONG *; 7m �0 > a asF- U oU 0 0U) 0- � Y rn Yu ca IL F- E . . . Y m � m E 0 ca LL X W LX ,. Ln O N Q co CD N o . — �.� a m y m 3 U ca a CL co 0 az w � �- W m o D W13 m c m 0- rnE co 2 c a c c Q W c m c m V > :� m m j aO aO . Q 1 1W- rn cm 'z N WW c . ° o i d v J O J .0 - -W O c iz .L `o vmrn yU W O v c L c y a �, c m . m — CO) d m v CO ca 0 CD i CL ' cn CLcnE - c_ ul ca t3 omm� aC. m ° O N o o > in - cn O m .... v N m e m m c oE cu -5 UD C O Q•C i o a m t0 .: W .. C ... . - W > m cn 3 d C — CO) d° cn �7 Q ° CD m m ° LU C C �- L N 2: °' m rnrny..m T m _m N co z m ) C m LO a a, a c m ctm U 0 CC13a m m m a cr) _ � Ez �E o oF-LO ° a m � � M m c = y E ' E-0 1� mm Ln Z3 Z3 0) . Ln ov - 2-m m. -M = mm rn � m N ° ym 5 � c m m m > Ca MO � tm zcoo � Qm a al W m U v m m L N = U caC y F- m F- m cam •O Q C m O . r a zc aEmE FRESNO CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12284 The Fresno City Planning Commission,at its regular meeting on August 31,2005,adopted the following resolution relating to Rezone Application No, R-05-17. WHEREAS, Rezone Application No. R-05-17 has been filed with the City of Fresno by Lemley Land Sales and Centex Homes to rezone the property as described below: REQUESTED ZONING: R-2/UGM(Low Density Multiple Family ResidentiallUrban Growth Management)zone district for the northerly 10 acres of the site and R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management)zone district for the southerly 46-acre portion of the project site EXISTING ZONING: RR (Fresno County-Rural Residential)zone district APPLICANT: Lemley Land Sales, Inc. and Centex Homes LOCATION:. Northeast corner of North Bryan and West Gettysburg (alignment)Avenues APN 311-060-25 and 7.9 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: From RR (Fresno County)to R-2/UGM: TO BE ADDED From RR (Fresno County)to R-1/UGM: TO BE ADDED WHEREAS,the above-named applicant is requesting a zoning change on the above property in order to allow for a proposed 243-lot single family residential subdivision; and, WHEREAS,the West Area Community Plan Advisory Committee reviewed the application on August 29,2005,but took no formal action regarding the tentative tract map application because there was not a quorum present; and, WHEREAS,the Fresno City Planning Commission on August 31,2005, reviewed the subject rezone application in accordance with the policies of the West Area Community Plan and the 2025 Fresno General Plan; and, WHEREAS, during the August 31,2005, hearing, the Commission received a staff report and related information, environmental documents and considered testimony regarding the requested zoning change; and, WHEREAS, no neighbors spoke in opposition to the project. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Fresno City Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that there is no substantial evidence in the record to indicate that Rezone Application No. R-05-17 may have a significant effect on the environment as identified by the Finding of Conformity to Master Environmental Impact Report No. 10130,dated July 28, 2005, prepared for Environmental Assessment No. R-05-17/C-05-81/T-5493. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Fresno City Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council that the requested R-2/UGM (Low Density Multiple Family Residential/Urban Growth Management)zone district for Planning Commission Resolution No. 12284 Rezone Application No. R-05-17 August 31, 2005 Page 2 the northerly 10 acres of the project site and R-1/UGM(Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management)zone district for the southerly 46 acres of the project site be approved. The foregoing Resolution was adopted by the Fresno City Planning Commission upon a motion by Commissioner Kissler, seconded by Commissioner Cherry. VOTING: Ayes. - Kissler, Cherry, DiBuduo, Vang,.Vasquez Noes. - None Not Voting None Absent Brand { DATED: August 31, 2005 NICK P. YOVINO, Secretary Fresno City Planning Commission Resolution.No. 12284 i Rezone Application No. R-05-17 Filed by Centex Homes and Lemley Land Sales Inc— Action: Action: Recommend Approval K:1Master Files-20051RezonelR-05-017,T-5493,C-05-081—SAMR-05-17-PC Reso.doc i i r ' j FRESNO CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12285 The Fresno City Planning Commission at its regular meeting on August 31, 2005, adopted the following resolution pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act of the Government Code of the State.of California and the Municipal Code of the City of Fresno WHEREAS, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM was filed by Centex Homes and Lemley Land Sales, Inc. with the City of Fresno and proposes to subdivide the subject property into a 243-lot single family residential subdivision on approximately 56 acres of land located on the northeast corner of North Bryan and'West Gettysburg (alignment)Avenues; and, WHEREAS,the West Area Community Plan Advisory Committee reviewed the application on August 29, 2005, but took no formal action regarding the tentative tract map application because there was not a quorum present; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Development Department staff recommended approval of the proposed project subject to all conditions of.approval contained in the staff report dated August 31, 2005, as modified below; and, WHEREAS, the Fresno City Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on August 31, 2005, to review the proposed subdivision and considered the staff report and invited testimony with respect to the proposed subdivision. - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Fresno City Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that there is no substantial evidence in the record to indicate that Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM will not have a significant effect on the environment as identified by the Finding of Conformity to Master Environmental Impact Report No. 10130 dated July 28, 2005, prepared for Environmental Assessment No. R-05-17/C-05-81fT-5493. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Fresno City Planning Commission finds that approval of the tentative tract map subject to Section 12-403-B of the Fresno Municipal Code, is consistent with the adopted 2025 Fresno General Plan and the West Area Community Plan and the findings required pursuant to Section 66410 et. seq. of the Government Code. , BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Fresno City Planning Commission hereby approves Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM subject to the Planning and Development Department Conditions of Approval dated August 31,2005 and subject to the following clarifications, modifications and additions to Condition Nos. 21 and 64 of the Conditions of Approval pursuant to the Planning Commission action of August 31, 2005: 21. Maintain a 30'36'appr-ep4'�te width for the trails along the north side of the subject site,- e iv�e_st Side ee�NeFth GFe6ta Avenue, a�eng the eastboundaF),eg the F44F=GD pending basin and along North Bryan Avenue, as shown on Exhibit A-1, dated August 17, 2005. The trail width may be configured through a combination of street right-of-way and landscape or planting and public utilities easements. Refer to Public Works memorandum dated August 29,. 2005. Provide a 20' wide pedestrian access point to West Gettysburg Avenue. 64. . 12'Bike-Pedestrian Path/Trail.Revise map to provide a 20'26'(minimum)easementforBike and Pedestrian purposes within the limits of this subdivision (from Gettysburg to the northerly limits of this subdivision). (Additional right of way may be required for drainage and grading purposes.) Construct a Bike and Pedestrian trail/path, complete with signing,striping and landscaping,per the 2025 Fresno General Plan, Multi-Purpose Trails Plan Map and Public Works Standards and Exhibit"B" Identify route on the map and provide across section prior to the planning commission hearing. Trail construction shall be per Public Works Standard P-59 and P-60. Submit " Planning Commission Resolution No..12285 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM_ Page 2 August 31, 2005 engineered construction plans to Public Works. Submit signing and striping plan to Traffic Engineering for approval. Submit grading, landscape and irrigation plans to Engineering Services. (A mid-block crossing is not approved.. Construct trail to cross at Bryan and Gettysburg.) The foregoing Resolution was adopted by the Fresno City Planning Commission upon a motion by Commissioner Kissler, seconded by Commissioner Cherry. VOTING: Ayes Kissler, Cherry, DiBuduo,Vang, Vasquez Noes _ None Not Voting None Absent - Brand DATED: August 31, 2005 Y VINO, Secretary Fres o ity Planning Commission Res tion No. 12285 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No 5493/UGM Filed by Centex Homes and Lemley Land Sales, Inc Action: Approve with conditions. i KAMaster Files-20051Rezone\R-05-01.7,T-5493,C-05-081 —SAMT-5493-PC Reso.doc 1 i ,l i .I i FRESNO CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.12285 The Fresno City Planning Commission at its regular meeting on August 31,2005, adopted the following resolution relating to Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81. CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTED: Reduces the front,.rear and side yard setback; reduces the minimum lot area; establishes a planned development with gated private streets for the 74 lots within the northerly 10- acre portion of the site of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM from the required R-2 zone district standard minimums. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:' Located on the easterly side of North Bryan Avenue, between West Shaw and West Bullard Avenues EXISTING ZONING: RR (Fresno County-Rural Residential) PROPOSED ZONING: R-1/UGM, Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management WHEREAS, .the West Area Community Plan Citizens Advisory. Committee, on August 29, 2005, reviewed the project but took no formal action since there was not a quorum present; and WHEREAS, the Fresno.City Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on August 31, 2005, to review the proposed conditional use permit and considered the staff report and invited testimony and reviewed the requested project in accordance with the policies of the West Area Community Plan and the 2025 Fresno General Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Fresno City Planning Commission, as a result of its inspections, investigations and studies made by itself and in its behalf, and of testimonies offered at said hearing, has established that approval of the special permit would be in accordance with applicable provisions of the Fresno ..Municipal Code, including the determination that all findings have.been made relative to the issuance of a conditional use permit for the proposed project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Fresno City Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that there is no substantial evidence in the record to indicate that Conditional Use Permit Application,No. C-05-81 will not have a significant effect on the environment as identified by the Finding of Conformity to Master Environmental Impact Report No. 10130 dated July 28,, 2005, prepared for Environmental Assessment'No. R-05-17/C-05-81/T-5493. BE IT FURTHER.RESOLVED that the Fresno City Planning Commission hereby approves Conditional Use Permit Application.No. C-05-81 subject to the Planning and Development Department Conditions of Approval dated August 31, 2005. The foregoing Resolution was adopted by the Fresno City Planning Commission- upon a motion by Commissioner Kissler, seconded by Commissioner Cherry: VOTING: Ayes Kissler, Cherry, DiBuduo, Vang, Vasquez Noes - None Not Voting None Absent - Brand i i Planning Commission Resolution No. 12286`. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM : August 31, 2005 Page 2 DATED: August 31, 2005 K OVINO., Secretary Fres o City Planning Commission Resolution No. 12286 Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81 ..Filed by Centex Homes and Lemley', Land Sales, lnc. - Action:Approve with conditions as noted above K:\Master Files-2005\Rezone\R-05-017,T-5493,C-05-081 —SAC\C-05-81 PC Reso.doc i 1 } Recording Requested by: City Clerk, Fresno, California `No Fee-Govt. Code 6103 Return to City.Clerk, Fresno Space above this line reserved for Fresno County Recorder's Office ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRESNO PROPOSED AND INITIATED BY MOVED BY - SECONDED BY BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FRESNO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONE MAP OF THE CITY OF FRESNO HERETOFORE ADOPTED BY ARTICLES 1 TO 4.5 INCLUSIVE, CHAPTER 12, OF THE FRESNO MUNICIPAL CODE, BEING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FRESNO WHEREAS Rezone Application No. R-05-17 has been fled by Centex Homes and LemI a Land . Sales, Inc., on behalf of Frank Ciano, Betty Ciano, Marjorie Ciano Nolte, and John Ciano, Jr., property owners, with the City of Fresno to rezone property as described hereinbelow; and, WHEREAS,the West Area Community Plan Advisory Committee considered this application at its meeting of September 12, 2005, and recommended approval; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Article 4,Chapter 12,of the Fresno Municipal Code,the . Planning Commission of the City of Fresno held a public hearing on the 31st day of August, 2005, to consider Rezone Application No.R-05-17 and related Environmental Assessment No.R-05-17/C-05-81/T- 5493, during which the Commission recommended to the Council of the City of Fresno approval of the subject environmental assessment and rezone application amending the City's Zoning Ordinance on real property described hereinbelow from the R-R (Fresno County-Rural Residential) zone district to the R 1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) and R-2/UGM (Low Density Multiple Family.Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone districts; and, t . Ordinance Amending Official Zone Map Rezone Application No. R-05-17 Page 2 WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Fresno, on.the 20th day of September, 2005, re,eived the recommendation of the Planning Commission, NOW,THEREFORE,THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRESNO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Based upon the testimony and information presented at the hearing and upon review and consideration of the environmental documentation provided, the adoption of the proposed rezoning is in the best interest of the City of Fresno..The Council finds in accordance with its own indep ndent judgment that there is no substantial evidence in the record that the rezoning may have a signficant effect on the environment as identified by the Finding of Conformity to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR No. 10130) dated July 28, 2005, prepar d for Environmental Assessment No..R-05-17/C-05-81/T-5493. Accordingly, Environmental,Assessm nt No. { R-05-17/C-05-81/T-5493 is hereby approved. - SECTION 2. The Council finds the requested R-1/UGM(Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management)and R-2/UGM (Low Density Multiple Family Residential/Urban Growth Management)zone districts are consistent with'the existing medium and medium-high density residential planned.Jod use designations of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the West Area Community Planus specified in Section 12-403-B of the Fresno Municipal Code. SECTION 3. The Council finds that the zone district of the real property described hereinbelow, located in the County of Fresno and shown on the Official Zone Map of the City of Fresno, is reclasified from the existing RR (Fresno County- Rural Residential) to the requested R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) 10 acres and R-2/UGM Low Den g ) ( ) ( city Multiple Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) (46 acres) zone districts. From RR (Fresno County)to R-2/UGM: TO BE ADDED From RR (Fresno County)to R-1/UGM: TO BE ADDED Ordinance Amending Official Zone Map Rezone Application No. R-05-17 Page 3 SECTION 4. This ordinance shall become effective and in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m.on the thirty-first day after its passage and upon annexation of the subject.property to the City of Fresno and upon payment of required fire district"transition fees." I I CLERK'S CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF FRESNO ) CITY OF FRESNO ) I, REBECCA.E. KLISCH, City Clerk of the City of Fresno, certify that the foregoing ordinance was adopted by the Council of the.City of Fresno, California, at a regular meeting held.on the day of 2005, by the following vote: Ayes: Noes: ' 1 Absent: : Abstain: 1 REBECCA E. KLISCH City Clerk By APPROVED AS TO FORM: HILDA CANTU MONTOY City Attorney By Deputy Rezone Application No. R-05-17 Filed. by Centex Homes and Lemley Land Sales, Inc., on behalf of Frank Ciano, Betty Ciano, Marjorie Ciano Nolte, and John Ciano, Jr., property owners Assessor's Parcel Nos. 311-060-25 and 79 KAMaster Files-20051Rezone\R-05-017,T-5493,C-05-081 —SAC\R-05-17 CC.Ordinance Bill.doc Recording Requested by: City Clerk, Fresno, California No Fee-Govt. Code 6103 Return to City Clerk, Fresno 5 Space above this line reserved for Fresno County Recorders Office ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRESNO PROPOSED AND INITIATED BY MOVED BY Calhoun SECONDED BY Perea BILL NO. B-106 ORDINANCE NO. 2005-108 2 AN ORDINANCE OF THECITY F FRESNO CALIFORNIA, M OA ENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONE MAP OF THE CITY OF FRESNO HERETOFORE ADOPTED BY ARTICLES 1 TO 4.5 INCLUSIVE, CHAPTER 12, OF THE FRESNO MUNICIPAL CODE,BEING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FRESNO WHEREAS, Rezone Application No. R-05-17 has been filed by Centex Homes and Lemley Land Sales, Inc., on behalf of Frank Ciano, Betty Ciano, Marjorie Ciano Nolte, and John Ciano, Jr., property owners,with the City of Fresno to rezone property as described hereinbelow; and, - WHEREAS,the West Area Community Plan Advisory Committee considered this application at its meeting of September 12, 2005, and recommended approval; and, WHEREAS,pursuant to the provisions of Article 4,Chapter 12,of the Fresno Municipal Code,the PlanningCommission of the Ci of Fresno held a public hearing on the 31 st da of August, 2005, to City P 9 Y 9 consider Rezone Application No.R-05-17 and related Environmental Assessment No. R-05-17/C-05-81/T- 5493, during which the Commission recommended to the Council of the City of Fresno approval of the subject environmental assessment and rezone application amending the City's Zoning Ordinance on real property described hereinbelow from the R-R (Fresno County-Rural Residential) zone district to the R- 1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) and R-2/UGM (Low Density Multiple Family ResidentiaUUrban Growth Management)zone districts; and, J m #Ordinance Amending Official Zone Map " :=Rezone Application No. R-05-17 WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Fresno, on the 20th day of September, 2005, received the recommendation of the Planning Commission. NOW,THEREFORE,THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRESNO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Based upon the testimony and information presented at the heating and upon.review and consideration of the environmental documentation provided,the adoption of the proposed rezoning . is in the best interest of the City of Fresno. The Council finds in accordance with its own independent judgment that there is no substantial evidence in the record that.the rezoning may have a significant effect on the environment as identified by the Finding of Conformity to the 2025 Fresno Gener 11 Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR No. 10130) dated July 28, 2005, prepare d for Environmental Assessment No. R-05-17/C-05-81/T-5493. Accordingly, Environmental Assessment No. R-05-17/C-05-81/T-5493 is hereby,approved. SECTION 2. The Council finds the requested R-1/UGM(Single Family ResidentiabVrban Growth Management)and R-2/UGM(Low Density Multiple Family Residential/Urban Growth Managemen#)zone districts are consistent with the existing medium and.medium-high density residential planned la d use desi nations of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the West Area Community Plan as specified in ection 9 tY 12-403-B of the Fresno Municipal Code. SECTION 3. The Council finds that the zone district of the real property described hereinbelow,. located in the County of Fresno and shown on.the Official Zone Map of the City of Fresno,is reclassified from the existing RR (Fresno County- Rural Residentiao to the.requested R-1/ UGM (Single =Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) (10 acres). and R-2/UGM (Low Density Multiple Family Residential/Urban Growth Management)(46 acres) zone districts. From RR (Fresno County)to R-2/UGM: That portion of the West half of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 16, Township 13 South, Range 19 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, in the County of Fresno, State of California, according to the official plat thereof more particularly described as follows: Ordinance Amending Official Zone Map 1,fRezone Application No. R-05-17 Page 3 Commencing at the North quarter corner of said Section 16; Thence South 00°02'43" West, along the West line of the - Northeast quarter of said Section 16,a distance of 660.00 feet,to THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence North 89°57'43" East, a distance of 659.83 feet to the East line of the West half of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 16; Thence South 00003'30"West,along said East line,a distance of 659.64 feet to the North line of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast.quarter of said Section 16; Thence South 89066'55"West,along said North line a distance of 659.68 feet to the West line of the Northeast quarter of said Section 16; Thence North 00002'43"East, along said West line, a distance of 659.80 feet to THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Contains 9.992 acres, more or less. From RR (Fresno County)to R-1/UGM: That portion of the West half of the Northeast quarter of Section 16, Township 13 South, Range 19 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian,in the County of Fresno,State of California,according to the official plat thereof, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the North quarter comer of said Section 16; Thence South 00002'43" West, along the West line of the Northeast quarter of said Section 16, a distance of 1319.80 feet, to THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, being the Northwest - Corner of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 16; Thence North 89056'55" East, along the North line of the Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of said Section 16, a distance of 1319.36 feet to the East line of the West half of the Northeast quarter of said Section 16; Thence South 00004'17"West,along said East line,a distance of 660.03 feet to the North line of the Parcel granted to Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District per Document No. 93033620, Official Records Fresno County; Thence South 89°56'44"W est,along said North line,a distance of 235.17 feet to the Northwest Corner thereof; Ordinance Amending Official Zone Map *} ;� Rezone Application No. R-05-17 Page 4 `TAS Az` •"•ten... .:., .. 1 ..Thence South 00004'1 T'West,along the West line of said Parcel granted to Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District, a distance of 629.69 feet,to the North line of the Parcel granted to the Fresno Traction Company per Deed recorded October 7, 1913, per Book 535; Page 196 of Deeds, Fresno County Records; Thence South 89056'44"West,along said North line,a distance of 1083.60 feet to the West line of the Northeast quarter o', said Section 16; i Thence North 00002'43° East, along said West line,a distance of 1289.80 feet to THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Contains 35.656 acres, more or less. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall become effective and in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m.on the thirty-first da after its passage and upon annexation of the subject roe to the Ci of Fres o and rtY Y P 9 P J property City upon.payment of required fire district"transition fees." r i CLERK'S CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF FRESNO ) CITY OF FRESNO ) I, REBECCA E. KLISCH, City Clerk of the City of Fresno, certify that the foregoing ordinance was adopted by the Council of the City of Fresno, California, at a regular meeting held on the 20th day of September ,2005, by the following vote: Ayes`: Calhoun, Perea, Sterling, Westerlund, Dages Noes: Boyajian. Absent: Duncan Abstain: None . REBECCA E. KLISCH City Clerk By T)d; f APPROVED AS TO FORM: HILDA CANTU MONTOY City Attorney By Deputy Rezone Application No. R-05-17 Filed by Centex Homes and Lemley Land Sales, Inc., on behalf of Frank Ciano, Betty Ciano, Marjorie Ciano Nolte, and John Ciano, Jr., property owners Assessor's Parcel Nos. 311-060-25 and 79 KAMaster Files-20051Remne\R-05-017,T-5493,C-05-081 —SAC\R-05-17 CC Ordinance Bill.doc E200510000409 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION DATE RECEIVED FOR FILING: TO: _ Office of Planning and Research FROM: CITY OF FRESNO 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Planning and Development Dept. Sacramento,CA 95814 2600 Fresno St.,Rm 3043 Fresno,CA 93721-3604 X County Clerk County of Fresno SEP w 3 2005 2221 Kern Street Fresno,CA 93721 FRESNA CQUNTYOLE K Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21152 of the Pui ' so SUBJECT �. I Environmental Assessment No. R-05-17/C-05-81R-5493 Project Title City of Fresno Planning and Development Department N/A Shelby Chamberlain, Planner Ill (559) 621-8042 State Clearinghouse Number Lead Agency Contact Person Area CodelTelephone (if subject to Clearinghouse) 56t acres located on the northeast corner of West Gettysburg and North Bryan Avenues, Fresno City/County Project Location(include County) Project Description: Quad Knopf, on behalf of Centex Homes and Lemley Land Sales, has filed Rezone Application No. R-05-17, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM and Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81 pertaining to .approximately 56 acres of property located on the northeast comer of North Bryan and West Gettysburg Avenues. The project applications propose to rezone the subject property from the.RR (Fresno County-Rural Residentian zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Managemeno and R-2/UGM (Low Density . Multiple Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone districts and allow for the development of a 244-lot single family residential planned development subdivision. The northerly 10 acres of the subdivision will be developed as a gated private street planned unit development with reduced setbacks and increased lot coverage. The project also includes the detachment of the subject property from the North Central Fire Protection District and the Kings River Conservation District and annexation to - the City of Fresno for which the Fresno County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) is the,responsible agency. This is to advise that the Council of the City of Fresno, the Lead Agency, has approved the above-described project on Seotember 20, 2005 and has made the following determinations regarding this project: 1. The project [ ]will [X]will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. [ ] An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. [ J A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. [X ] A determination of project conformity to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental lmp�act Report (City of Fresno MEIR No. 10130/SCH No. 2001071097) was made. 3. Mitigation measures [X]were [ ]were not made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations [ J was [X]was not adopted for this project. 5. Findings . [ j were [X]were not made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the above-described Finding of Conformity with comments and responses and record of project approval is available to the general public at the City of Fresno Planning & Development Department, 2600 Fresno Street, Room 3046, Fresno, California 93721. Darrell Unruh Date Planning Manager, City of Fresno Attachments: De Minimis Finding Project Vicinity Map Environmental Assessment No.R-05-17/C-05-81/T-5493 Finding of Conformity E2010510000409 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OFFISH AND. GAME CERTIFICATE.OF FEE EXEMPTION DE MINIMIS IMPACT FINDING FOR CITY OF FRESNO ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. R-05-17/C-05-81/T-5493 LEAD AGENCY: City of Fresno, Planning and Development Department, 2600 Fresno Street, Fresno,California 93721 PROJECT TITLE AND LOCATION: Rezone Application No. R-05-17, Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM, located in the unincorporated portion of Fresno County, within the City of Fresno Sphere of influence, on the northeast corner of West Gettysburg and North Bryan Avenues (APN Nos. 311-060-25 and 79). PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Quad Knopf, on behalf of Lemley Land Sales, has filed Rezone Application. No. R-05-17, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM and Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81 pertaining to approximately 52 acres of property located on the east side of North Bryan Avenue, between West Shaw and West Gettysburg Avenues. The project applications propose to rezone the subject property from the RR (Fresno County-Rural Residential) zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential%Urban Growth Management) and . R-2/UGM (Low Density Multiple Family ResidentiaUUrban Growth Management) zone districts and allow for the development of a 244-lot single family residential planned development subdivision. The northerly 10 acres of the subdivision will be developed as a gated private street planned unit development with reduced setbacks and increased lot coverage. The project also includes the detachment of the subject property from the North Central Fire Protection District and the Kings River Conservation District and annexation to the City of Fresno for which the Fresno County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) is the responsible agency. The property is vacant, formerly cultivated land with no sensitive or listed vegetation (ruderal vegetation, controlled by disking), no evidence of the presence of any listed wildlife species, and no surface water features. I FINDING OF EXEMPTION: Pursuant to the above-noted environmental assessment, Finding of Conformity to Master Environmental Impact Report No. 10130 for the 2025 Fresno General Plan has been prepared by the lead agency for the proposed project. There is no evidence in the record that the proposed project may have an adverse effect on wildlife resources. "I hereby certify that the public agency has made the above finding and that the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in. Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code." Darrell Unruh, Planning Manager Advance Planning Division Date: September 20, 2005 Section 711.4, Fish and Game Code ST&E OF CALIFORNIA BUSINESS TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENE+GER Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 13.52 WEST OLIVE AVENUE P.O.BOX 12616 FRESNO,CA 93778-2616 PHONE (559)445-6666 Flez your power! FAX (559)488-4088 Be energy efficient! TTY (559)488-4066.. JUN 2 4 Z��a June 23, 2005 r:'., n PI n in�q Tis° nt �2131-IGR/CEQA �1,1, t�, 6 FRE-)9 28,1+/ 05,17�;8tT.59 LEMLEY LAND SALES,INC. Ms. Shelby Chamberlain City of Fresno Development Department { 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 Dear Ms. Chamberlain: We have reviewed the 244-lot single-family residential subdivision located northeast of!the intersection of Bryan Avenue and the Gettysburg alignment. The traffic consultant previously provided the TIS to Is. Caltrans has the following comments: _ Caltrans concurs with the trip distribution/trip generation from the project's TIS. The TIS indicates that the project would generate 247 trips during the evening peak travel period. The TIS further indicates that 28 project trips would impact the State Route...(SR) 99 northbound off-ramp to Shaw and that there would be 13:eastbound.project trips on this segment of Shaw. Based on previous traffic studies, it has been established that.the SR 99 northbound off-ramp to Shaw will require an additional turn lane in order to accommodate increasing demand. It has also been.established that the Shaw,overcrossing would need to be widened to accommodate additional eastbound traffic. The estimated cost for the off-ramp improvement is $339,100,with a cost-per-trip value of$345 established on traffic data supplied by the Fresport development. The estimated cost for the overcrossing widening improvement is$1,130,252, . with a cost-per-trip of$685, also based on traffic data supplied by the Fresport development. Therefore, it is recommended that this proposed development,mitigate its impacts to the SR 99 interchange at Sha, Avenue, estimated to be$18,565. The City should.consider a transit alternative for this project. When combined with other residential projects in the area, there is sufficient development to support transit, and early planning could make such an alternative feasible. Caltrans recommends that this project be routed to Fresno Area Express (FAX) staff for their review and comment. Please see.Attachment Number l.for other recommended transportation alternatives. If you have any questions,please call me at(559) 445-6666. Sincerely,, MOSES STITES Office of Transportation Planning District 6. Enclosure C: Mr. John Rowland,P.E.;Peters Engineering Group Ms.Barbara Goodwin, Council,of Fresno County Governments "Caltrans improves mobility across California." ATTACHMENT NUMBER 1 CALTRANS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES: Ongoing development throughout the City.of Fresno, including this project, will make traffic operations significantly worse by adding considerably to delay and congestion. Transit alternatives can help reduce congestion and delay and reduce overall degradation. of air quality and gridlocked intersections. ,The City of Fresno should focus on ways to eliminate trips in addition to enhancing capacity. Transportation alternatives the City should consider include standard highway.solutions along with the following: 1. Park and ride facilities on site or within the proximity of this project. 2. A study of the general accommodation and provision of mass transit in this area to provide insight on ways of increasing transit usage. 3. Exploring the potential of commuter shuttles. The shuttle could be financed through an assessment district and provide a way for individuals to utilize a park-and-ride facility or commercial area parking lot and be shuttled to various commercial/office centers within the area. Commuters who need to go further could use City of Fresno transit if the City planned for convenient connections. This may help to reduce the Single Occupancy Vehicle(SOV)demand seeking to use the State Highway System. 4. Providing for continuity of non-motorized transportation. 5. Exploring the potential for employer-sponsored carpools/vanpools or monthly.transit passes for.employees as well as including as a condition of project approval a covered transit stop as mitigation for project-related impacts to the transportation/circulation system. . 6. Exploring the potential for linking the purchase of a monthly transit pass with new residential development as partial mitigation for congestion and air quality impacts, and to ensure the long tern viability of public transportation. cTnTE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS TRANSPORTATION.AND HOUSING AGENCY ARNOLD SCHW ARZENEGGERYGovemor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION t 1352 WEST OLIVE AVENUE P.O.BOX 12616 FRESNO,CA 93778-2616 . PHONE (559)445-6666 Flet your)ower! FAX (559)488-4088 (� Be energy aII tcient! TTY (559)488-4066 ( L=� UU) j August 30, lobs SEP 0 1 2005 Planning Division 2131-IGR/CEQA Development Department, 6-FRE-99-28.1+/- CITY OrpeI�� C-05-81, R-05-17 & T-5493 LEMLEY LAND SALES, INC. Mr. Nick Yovino, Director City of Fresno Development Department 2600 Fresno Street,Room 3043 Fresno, CA 93721 Dear Mr. Yovino: We have received a copy of the August 31,2005 Planning Commission staff report for the above- named project. While the conditions of project approval include mitigation for this project's. : impacts to the State Highway System, the narrative contained in the staff report is misleading. The staff report incdes the statement.that this the General Plan Update MEIR. TheGeneralPlan Update MEIR did athat impactsbeyond p of evaluate impacts to State facilities and therefore cannot.be relied upon to support this project. Further, even if State facilities had been analyzed within the MEIR, the City has identified project specific mitigation to State Highways.'Because of this condition, there are clearly impacts beyond what was evaluated in the MEIR. Caltrans requests that the staff report be corrected to delete this statement. The staff report states that the City does not have a nexus/rough proportionality study to demonstrate a property owner/developer's proportionate share of costs for capitol improvements. The project prepared a traffic study.- The traffic study identified traffic impacts to broth local streets and State facilities. This is a nexus study. Caltrans provided the proportionality,based on the traffic study and our costs for identified improvements. This represents the proportionality. Caltrans requests that the staff report be corrected to delete this paragraph. The staff report, once again, raises the question of an accounting procedure. Caltrans has provided City Planning staff, Planning Commissioners, some City Council members and the City's legal department with copies of our accounting procedures. Caltrans requests that the staff report be corrected to delete this statement. These are the same issues that Caltrans has attempted to correct on previous staff reports. In some cases, we have made progress. Unfortunately, these statements occasionally still appear in staff reports. This type of language does not lend itself to supporting the cooperation that Caltrans and the City are attempting to achieve. "Caltrans itnproves inability across California's Mr. Nick Yovino August 30, 2005 Page 2 Please provide this letter to the Planning Commission prior to this item being heard. r " If you have an'y questions, please call me at (559) 445-6666. Sincerely, °a MOSES STITES Office of Transportation Planning District 6 C: Mr..Martin Keck, Caltrans Legal Department Mr. Michael Slater, City of Fresno Legal Department Mr. Dennis Gaab, Centex Homes Mr. Darrell.Unruh, City of Fresno Development Department Ms.Shelby Chamberlain, City of Fresno Development Department Ms. Barbara Goodwin, Council of Fresno County Governments "Caltrans improver mobility across California City 01 �ii REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO: COUNCIL MEETING September 20, 2005 APPROVED 6Y FROM: NICK P. YOVINO, Director Planning and Development Department DEPARrMENroiREcr BY: DARRELL UNRUH, Planning Manager CITY MANAGER Planning Division , SUBJECT: . CONSIDERATION OF REZONE APPLICATION NO. R-05-17, AND ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. R-05-17/C-05-81/T-5493 KEY RESULT AREA Customer Satisfaction RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council take the following action: 1. APPROVE the environmental finding for Environmental Assessment No. R-05-17/C-05-81/T-5493, dated July 28, 2005, that the project proposal conforms to the provisions of the;2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report(MSIR No. 10130)., 2. APPROVE Rezone Application No. R-05-17 which .proposes to reclassify approximately 56 acres of property located on the east side of North Bryan Avenue, between West Shaw and West Gettysburg Avenues from the R-R (Fresno County-Rural Residential) zone district to the R=1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) and R-2/UGM (Low Density Multiple Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone districts. i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Rezone Application No. R-05=17, filed by Quad Knopf, on behalf of Lemley Land Sales Inc. and Centex. Homes, proposes to reclassify approximately 56 acres of property located on the east side of North Bryan Avenue, between West Shaw and West Gettysburg Avenues from the R-R (Fresno County-Rural Residential) zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) and R- 2/UGM (Low Density Multiple Family`.Residential/Urban Growth Management) ;zone districts. This application would bring the subject property into conformance with the West Area Community Plan and the 2025 Fresno General Plan, which designate the property for medium and-medium high density residential-planned land uses. This map is supported by staff and the West Area Community Plan Citizens AdvisoryCommittee. KEY OBJECTIVE BALANCE Council action regarding this proposed land use application optimizes the three Key Objectives of Customer Satisfaction, Employee Satisfaction, and Financial Management. Affirmative actio by the Council will result in timely deliverance of the review and processing of the application as is reasonably expected by the applicant/customer. Prudent financial management is demonstrated by the expeditious completion of this land use application inasmuch as the applicant/customer has paid to the city a fee for the processing of this application and that fee is, in turn, funding the operations of the Planing and Development Department. Employee satisfaction is derived from the fact that the professional and technical staff, who have reviewed and made a recommendation on this land use application, have done so in a thorough and professional manner, thereby enhancing the sense of accomplishment in the completion of the application process. REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Rezone Application No. R-05-17 September 20,.2005 Page 2 PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT Request to rezone the project site from the R-R (Fresno County-Rural Residential) zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residentiall Urban Growth Management) and R-2/UGM (Low Density Multiple Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone districts, which would facilitate a 243-lot single family residential subdivision to be developed at an overall density of 4.3 dwelling units per acre APPLICANT. Centex Homes and Lemley Land Sales, Inc. (Engineer: Quad Knopf) LOCATION East side of North Bryan Avenue, between West Shaw and West Gettysburg Avenues (Council District 2, Councilmember Calhoun) SITE SIZE 56 acres LAND USE Existing - Vacant Proposed Single Family Residential ZONING Existing - R-R(Fresno County-Rural Residential) Proposed - R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) and R-2/UGM (Low Density Multiple.Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) PLAN DESIGNATION The proposed R-1/UGM and R-2/UGM zone districts and the 243-lot AND CONSISTENCY single family residential subdivision are consistent with the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the West Area Community Plan designation of the site for medium and medium high density residential land use (4.99 to 10.37 units per acre) ENVIRONMENTAL Finding of Conformity to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master FINDING Environmental Impact Report(MSIR No. 10130) dated July 28, 2005 -PLAN COMMITTEE The West Area Community Plan Citizens Advisory Committee RECOMMENDATION reviewed the project at their meeting on August 29, 2005;•however, there was not a quorum and no official action was taken. The committee reviewed the project again at their meeting on September. 12, 2005 and took action to recommend approval of the applications. STAFF Approve the rezone application and related environmental assessment RECOMMENDATION PLANNING COMMISSION On August 31,2005, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to RECOMMENDATION recommend approval of the rezone application BORDERING PROPERTY INFORMATION IPRNAN Planned Land Use Existing Zoning Existing Land Use a' North Office Commercial Fresno County-Rural Residential Vacant South Medium and Medium High R-R Agricultural Density Residential Fresno County-Rural Residential REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Rezone Application No, R-0.5-17 September 20, 2005: i Page 3 Medium and Medium High R R EastDensity Residential Agriculture( Fresno County-Rural Residential Open Space-Ponding Basin R-R Rural Residential and Single - Low and Medium ' Fresno Count Rural Residential County-Rural Residential larev d West Density Residential with Tract 5352 e R-1/UGM upon annexation j ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING The initial study prepared for Environmental Assessment No. R-05-17/T-5493/C-05-81 considered potential environmental impacts associated with the subject rezone, vesting tentative tract dap and conditional use permit request. The study indicates that the project, if approved, would conform to the medium and medium high density residential planned land use designations and land use policies of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and is within the scope of Master Environmental Impact Report No 10130.. Therefore, staff has issued a finding that the project proposal is in conformance to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MSIR No. 10130) dated July 28, 2005, which incorporates a MEIR Mitigation Monitoring Checklist. This.environmental finding was properly p blished with no comments received to date. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The applicant, Quad Knopf, on-behalf of Lemley Land Sales Inc. and Centex Homes, has filed Rezone Application No. R-05-17, Vesting Tentative Tract. Map •No. 5493/UGM and Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81 for 56 acres of property located on the east side of North Bryan Avenue, between West Shaw and West Gettysburg Avenues. Rezone Application No. R-05-17 proposes to reclassify the subject site from the R-R (Fresno County-Rural Residential) zone district to the R-2/UGM (Low Density . Multiple Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone district for the northerly 10 acres of the project site and to the R-1/.UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone district for the southerly 46 acres of the project site. The applicant also filed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM and Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81 which propose to, subdivide th� subject property into a 744ot single family planned development and a 169-lot single family rAsidential subdivision. The conditional use permit application will allow the northerly 10-acre portion oil Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM to be developed as a gated, private street planned unit development. with reduced lot sizes, reduced setbacks and increased lot coverage. The tentative tract r map and conditional use permit applications were approved by the Planning Commission at their meeting on August 31, 2005 and no appeals have been received. The project site is designated for medium and medium high density residential use by the 2025 Fresno General Plan and West Area Community Plan.. According to the "Planned Land Use and Zone District Consistency Matrix" `(Table 2) adopted with the 2025 Fresno General Plan (and applied within all community.plans), the medium density residential land use designation for the southerly 46 acres of the project site allows for 4.99 to 10.37 dwelling units per acre.- However, Fresno Municipal Code Section 12- 403-B-2-b-1 allows development of a project site not less than the minimum density of the next lower land use designation, which is medium-low density residential (2.19 to 4.98 dwelling units per acre). The proposed density for this portion of the site is 3.6 dwelling units per acre. The medium high density residential land use designation.allows for 10.38 to 18.15 dwelling units per acre on the northerly 10-acre portion of the project site. That portion of the site will be developed with 7.4 dwelling units per acre which meets the density requirements. The overall density for the project is approximately 4.3 dwelling units per acre. Therefore,Vesting Tentative Map No. 5493/UGM is consistent with the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the West Area Community Plan. REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL r Rezone Application No. R-05-17 September 20, 2005 Page 4 Surrounding land uses are characterized by rural residential and single family residences (approved with Tract 5352) to the west, while property to the north, south and east are vacant or are developed with agricultural type uses. West Area Community Plan Citizens Advisory Committee The West Area Community Plan Citizens Advisory Committee reviewed the project at its meeting on August 29, 2005; however, there was not a quorum and no formal action was taken on the project. The committee reviewed the project again at their meeting on September 12, 2005 and took action to recommend approval of the project. Fresno City Planning Commission This project was considered by the Fresno City Planning Commission at its meeting of August 31, 2005. After a full and complete hearing, the Planning Commission resolved to recommend approval of Rezone Application No. R-05-17 which requested to reclassify the subject site from the R-R (Fresno County-Rural Residentiao zone district to the R-2/UGM (Low .Density Multiple Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone district for the northerly 10 acres of the project site and to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone district for the southerly 46 acres of the project site. Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81 Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-81 was filed in conjunction with Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM to allow the northerly 10-acre portion of the subdivision to be developed as a planned unit development with one outlot for open space/trail purposes and one outlot for access, increased lot `coverage to 50%, reduced front yards of 10 feet, rear yards of 4 feet (except along the easterly boundary which must have a minimum of 10 feet) and 4 foot side yards, including street side yards on corner lots of 8 feet. There will be one main access point to North Bryan Avenue and a secondary exit-only gate to North Bryan Avenue. Circulation Element Plan Policies and Major Street System Traffic Capacity According to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Circulation Map, North Bryan Avenue is defined as a collector street. The Public Works Department Traffic Division has .reviewed the proposed development and has determined that the streets relating to the site will be able to carry the quantity and kind of traffic generated subject to several improvements. These improvements include dedicating required right-of- way and constructing street paving within the limits of the tract map; installing curb, gutter, sidewalk; construction of an underground street lighting system; and relinquishment of access rights to North Bryan Avenue for all residential lots adjacent to this street frontage. These street improvements.are outlined in more detail in the Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM Conditions of Approval dated August 31, 2005. When the City of Fresno Master Environmental Impact Report (MSIR) No. 10130 was certified by the City Council for the 2025 Fresno General Plan, a determination. was made to require project-specific traffic assessments for projects which would generate 100 or more vehicle trips during. weekday. peak hours. Given the number of lots in this project, a special traffic study, dated May 27, 2005, was prepared by Peters Engineering Group. The study concluded that the intersections of Shaw and Bryan .Avenues, Shaw and Hayes Avenues and Shaw and Parkway Avenues will continue to function at an acceptable level of service through the year 2025 with construction of the project. Eventual buildout of the surrounding area and construction of required street improvements to city standards of new developments will ensure that this intersection maintains an acceptable level of service. The Department of Public Works has reviewed the traffic study and recommended the following requirements of the development based upon information in the traffic study, which are included in the tentative tract map conditions of approval: REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Rezone Application No..R-05-17 September 20, 2005 Page 5 • .The project shall pay its fair share, 2.5%,.towards the cost of improvements to the intersection at Shaw and Parkway Avenues. This fee shall be in the amount of $6,500 and is not eligible for fee credit or reimbursement and is due at the time of building permit. • The project shall pay its Traffic Signal Mitigation Impact fee as detailed in the fee section of these conditions. i • Dedicate and construct two 17' center.section travel lanes along Shaw Avenue with 2501 left turn lanes at all major intersections from Bryan Avenue to Parkway Avenue. An additional 6' of paving shall be required adjacent to the 250' left turn lanes. Dedication shall be sufficient to accommodate additional.paving and any other grading or transitions as,necessary based on a 45 MPH design speed. . Dedicate and construct two 17' center section travel lanes along Gettysburg Avenue with 250' left turn lanes at all major intersections from the easterly limits of the tract to Polk'Avenue. An additional 6' of paving shall be required adjacent to the 250' left turn lanes. Dedication shall be sufficient to accommodate additional paving and any other grading or transitions as necessary based on a 45 MPH design speed. The Public Works Department staff has concluded that this project does not have significant adverse impacts upon the city's transportation system and that its nonsignificant impacts are mitigable through the city's standard Urban Growth Management (UGM) process and project requirements for this development as well as other development in the area. In concert with the other developments that are approved pursuant to the 2025 Fresno General Plan, the developer will be required to install improvements and to pay fees toward development of the major street system as outlined in the Public Facilities Elem6t of the general plan and will be required to provide for the installation of traffic control. measures (e.g. signals, stop Lights, etc.) installed per UGM policies and ongoing traffic studies. Interior Streets, Required Sidewalks and Multi-purpose Trail The developer will be required to design and construct all street-related improvements as shown on Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM Exhibit.A, dated June 1, 2005, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM Exhibit A-1,_ dated August 17, 2005. All streets in the southerly porti8n of the subdivision will be developed with interior local streets having a right-of-way width of 50 or 54 feet as permitted with Public Works Standards. 'Installation of sidewalks will be required on both sides of the streets throughout this portion of the subdivision. The streets in the planned development porti6n of the will have a minimum width of 38 feet. The Multi-Purpose Trails Plan Map (Exhibit 9) in the 2025 General Plan depicts a bicycle/pedestrian/equestrian trail as well as a bicycle/pedestrian trail on the pr8ject site. The tentative tract map conditions of approval require that these trails be built along the northerly, westerly and easterly boundaries of the site. Public Facilities The Public Utilities Department has determined that there is an adequate source of water available to serve the project with the implementation of UGM service delivery requirements and environmenttal impact mitigation measures. Implementation of the 2025 Fresno General Plan policies, mitigation meAsures of .,Master .Environmental Impact Report No. 10130, the Water Resources Management Plan, and the mitigation measures identified by the. project environmental assessment/initial study will provide an adequate, reliable and sustainable water supply for the project's urban. domestic and publc safety consumptive purposes. These measures include the construction of one or more water supply well sites, including wellhead treatment facilities, which will be dedicated to the City of Fresno.' REPORT TO THE'CITY COUNCIL Rezone Application No. R-05-17 September 20, 2005.: Page 6 The.Public Utilities Department has determined that adequate sanitary sewer service is available to serve the project, subject to the mitigation measures imposed with the environmental assessment. Several major facility improvement projects have been implemented at the City of Fresno's Regional Wastewater Treatment and Reclamation Facility in order to accommodate the projected rates of population and employment growth up to a projected population holding capacity of 590,000 people. These improvements have been completed to provide an expanded wastewater treatment and reclamation capacity of 80 million gallons per day (MGD) which is sufficient to accommodate continued planned urban development including the proposed project. The City of Fresno Fire Department has submitted comments that the proposed project is located within three miles of permanent and temporary Fire Station No. 18. There is a conditional use permit application that has been approved for the construction of a temporary fire station at the southeast corner of North Grantland and West Bullard Avenues, within the boundaries of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 5247/UGM. If any buildings are constructed at the project site for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM prior to the construction and operation of this temporary fire.station, they must meet UGM service requirements for fire service. Some options for service include constructing homes on every other lot or installing fire sprinklers in the homes; the complete list requirements.are outlined in the Fresno Municipal Code in the Urban Growth Management section. Landscaping/Walls Given that the proposed subdivision abuts two collector streets, and in accordance with the West Area Community Plan Policy No. W-3-b, the developer will be required to install 15 feet of landscaping along North Bryan and West Gettysburg Avenues, with the exception of those areas where a multi-purpose trail is located. In addition, the applicant will be required to install a solid wall at the rear of the required landscape setback as required by the Fresno Municipal Code. Lot Dimensions The R-1 zone district requires minimum lot sizes of 6,000 square feet for lots in the subdivision. Lots in the southerly portion of the subdivision all meet or exceed the minimum lot size requirement as well as the lot width (60 feet) and depth (100 feet) requirements. The northerly portion of the site, which is'proposed to be zoned R-2/UGM does not have a minimum lot area requirement for each lot within a planned development subdivision. However, the zone district does stipulate. a population density requirement which specifies that there be not more than one dwelling unit for every 2,700 square feet of site area. The building setbacks on each lot have been modified to allow for minimum front yards of 10 feet, rear yards of 4 feet (except along the easterly boundary which must have a minimum of 10 feet) and 4 foot side yards, including street side yards on corner lots of 8 feet. - State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) A copy of the traffic analysis prepared for the project by Peters Engineering Group was forwarded to California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), District.6, Office of Intergovernmental Relations. The Caltrans staff has submitted the attached comments dated June 23, 2005, indicating that the proposed project will impact the state highway system. The letter from Caltrans contends that the developers of the proposed project should pay $18,565 to mitigate those impacts, which the applicant has agreed to pay. Staff considered Caltrans letter in preparing the initial study and determined that this project does not create any impacts, including cumulative impacts, that were not identified in MEIR No. 10130. City staff notes that potential cumulative traffic impacts of full buildout of the 2025 Fresno General Plan were analyzed in MEIR No. 10130. ; ,. Although the City has met its legal obligations for addressing impacts to the state highway system for purposes of CEQA, the City has not ruled out working with Caltrans to obtain fees for the state highway t REPORT.TO THE CITY COUNCIL Rezone Application No. R-05-17 f September 20; 2005 4 Page 7 system for projects such as this one. At this time, the City does not have a legally,permissible r ieans for collecting fees for such a purpose. A legally permissible means for collecting impact fees under the Mitigation Fee Act (California Government Code §§ 60000, et seq.), among other things, would require a capital improvement plan, a nexus/rough proportionality study that demonstrated a property owner/developer's proportionate share of costs to those capital improvements, and, an accounting system for using funds collected. Along with other cities and Fresno County, the City of Fresno has partnered with the Fresno County Council of Governments and Caltrans on a regional study of state highway facility capacity and measures needed to preserve and improve capacity of those facilities. A Partnership in Planning grant has been obtained to complete a regional freewaydeficiency study for the greater Fresno-Clovis-Madera Metropolitan area. This study focuses on facilities projected to be most impacted by projected increases in traffic, identification of the sources and patterns of vehicle traffic within the greater metropolitan area and the improvements that would be necessary to provide adequate vehicular capacity. Findings from this study may allow proportionate traffic impact fees to be implemented by cities and counties in the study area, upon adoption by the respective jurisdictions. In addition to a proportionate share study, a mechanism would be.needed for the City to collect traffic impact fees and eitherhold those funds or deliver them to a separate agency for improvements to facilities the City does not control or maintain. The City has offered to cooperate with Caltrans in developing such a mechanism, including using the model used by the City for collecting fees for FMFCD and/or entering into a. Joint Powers Authority or an .MOU. Staff representatives of the City of Fresno and Caltrans continue to conference in order to identify a mutually agreeable strategy to implement a fair and quitable traffic impact fee for state highway facilities. CONCLUSION / RECOMMENDATION The appropriateness of the proposed project has been examined with respect to its;consistency with goals and policies of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the West Area Community plan; its compatibility with surrounding existing or proposed uses; and its avoidance or mitigation of potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. These factors . have been evaluated as described above and by the accompanying environmental assessment. Upon consideration of this evaluation, it can be concluded that Rezone Application No. R-05-17 is appropriate for the project site. Therefore,`staff recommends that the City Council approve the application. Attachments: Vicinity Map Aerial Photograph of the site Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5493/UGM dated August 17, 2005 Letters from the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) dated June 23, 2005 and August 30, 2005 Environmental Assessment No. R-05-17/T-549.3/C-05-81; Finding of Conformity to 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MSIR No. 10130) dated July 28, 2005 Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 12284, 12285, 12286 Ordinance Bill City of .PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DATE:. •July 7, 2005 TO:. SHELY CHAMBERLAIN, Planner IIL. Planning and Development Department FROM: JOE PAFF, Senior Engineering Technician Public Works Department SUBJECT: CONDITIONS FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 5493 AND.COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 1. The long term maintenance of the following items is the ultimate responsibility of the owner/developer. If approved by.Council,the following features may maintained by a Community Facilities District. • Maintenance of all Landscaping and Irrigation systems as approved by the Public Works Department within the street easements (including medians) and the landscape easements . along the property lines that side or back-onto N. Bryan and W. Gettysberg Avenues. ■ Maintenance of all Landscaping and Irrigation systems as approved by Public Works Department within Outlots B, C, D and E. Maintenance of Sidewalks and Street Furniture as approved by the Public Works Department . within the street easements and the landscape easements along the property lines border N. Bryan and W. Gettysberg Avenues. ■ Maintenance of all interior Local Street Pavement, Curbs,Gutters, Sidewalks, Medians and Street Furniture as approved by the Public Works Department within the boundary of the tentative map, • Maintenance and operating costs of all Street Lights as approved by the Public Works i Department within the boundary of the tentative map. ■ Maintenance of all Street Trees as approved by the Public Works Department within the boundary of the tentative map. 2. Proceedings to place the Final Map into a CFD may not commence until the.territory has been annexed into the City of Fresno. .3. Construction plans for all features to be maintained by a CFD for a final map shall be included in the final map submission to the.Development Department for processing. This shall include a Street Tree Location and Street Tree Species (by street) map. Landscaping plans shall contain actual tree and plant counts by species and include the areas (in square feet)of turf, shrubs and trees, and sidewalks or other paved areas within all landscaped areas. 4. Should the Council or owner/developer choose not to include the maintenance of the items listed in section 1 above in a CFD,the property owner/developer shall provide for the maintenance of all of the above items by the property owners. Any change affecting the Items in these conditions requires revision of this letter of conditions. If you have any questions, please call me at 621-8695 i": c:PW File No. 10770 File:\word\cfd2\ttmapreview\tt5493 conditions 4 City of Department of Public Utilities Solid Waste Division 1325 E. EI Dorado Fresno, California 93706-2014 (559) 621-1452 www.fresno.gov i July 6, 2005 TO: Shelby Chamberlain,Planner III Planning and Development Department THROUGH: Robert Weakley, Chief ofOP erations Department of Public Utilities, Solid Waste Division Donna s FROM: o a L esl'ie Staff A sistant Department of Public Utilities, Solid Waste Division SUBJECT: TT 5493, Solid Waste Conditions of Approval The Department of Public Utilities, Solid Waste Division, has completed a review oflthe Vesting Tentative Tract Map 5493. The following requirements and conditions are to be placed on this vesting tentative tract map as a condition of approval by the Department of Public Utilities. General Reguirements: Tract 5493 will be serviced as Single Family Residential properties with Basic Container Service. Property owners will receive 3 containers to be used as follows: 1 Gray container for solid waste, 1 Green container for green waste and 1.Blue container for recyclable material. 1 The owners, lessees or other tenants of the residential dwellings on service day, before 6:00 a.m., shall place their solid waste containers at the edge of the curb approximately 4 feet apart and not blocking any vehicle accesses in accordance with the City of Fresno's Solid Waste Management Division Standards. r' Per Municipal Code, Section 9-404 Solid Waste Disposal Regulations, Section C,10. No Solid Waste container nor residential rubbish shall be allowed to remain at the curbline after 8:00 p.m. on the collection day. Page I of 2 Special Conditions: Project Phasing: All streets shall connect to one another or a temporary turnaround shall f' be provided. Turnaround shall be large enough to accommodate a solid waste vehicle that is approximately 35' feet long with a turning radius of 44'. Turnaround shall be clear.of all vehicles by 6:00 a.m. on the solid waste service day. Turning Template: Developer shall provide a turning template for the gated section of this subdivision. Corners show only 40', solid waste requires a 44'turning radius. • Solid.Waste requires access to gates by 6:00 a.m. • Frontage concerns on Lots 12, 22, 37 and 53. Solid waste containers are approximately 3'x 3' and shall be spaced approximately 4' feet apart. Space required for three containers is approximately 17'. Page 2 of 2 J:\Conditions of Approval_TT5493.wpd i i. Street..' Name Review TM-5493 6-2-05 . : r Street Name Status Repaired Change West Shaw Avenue Good Outlot A interior streets see note West Santa Ana Avenue Chane 'new name' W. Acacia Ave. Chane West Acacia Avenue West Acacia Avenue Good West San Gabriel Avenue Good West Rialto Avenue Good West Pico Avenue Good Biola Branch Southern Pacific Railroad Chane West.Gettysburg Avenue North Bryan Avenue Good North Emory Avenue Chane North Massera Avenue North Sandrini Avenue Chane North Brent Avenue N. Rosalia Ave. Chane North Rosalia Avenue North Rosalia Avenue Good North Cresta Avenue Good Note: New street names for private streets must be unique to the County of Fresno and must not have the suffix of avenue, road, or street i , �' A i � - tl �•' OFFICES OF - i`e 3fr PHONE(559)233-7161 FAX(559)233-8227 1 2907 SOUTH MAPLE AVENUE ` FRESNO,CALIFORNIA 93725-2218 Your Most Valuable Resource-Water p June 17, 2005 t. JUN 2 0 200 Ms. Shelby Chamberlain p %R,,ori City of Fresno Planning and Development Dept: 2600 Fresno Street, Room 3043 Fresno, CA 93 721-3 604 RE: VTTM No. 5493, R-05-17.& C-05-81 —FID's Silvia No. 47 Canal, Wheaton No. 518 (pvt) Dear Ms. Chamberlain: FID's comments and requests are as follows: 1. FID's Silvia No. 47 canal traverses the subject property as shown on the enclosed map. 2. FID requires the applicant grant an exclusive pipeline easement to. FID and pipe the Silvia No. 47 canal across the proposed development in accordance with FID standards, and that the applicant enters into an agreement with FID for that purpose. The applicant will need to meet with FID to determine the pipeline alignment and required pipeline diameter. 3. FID estimates the minimum inside diameter of pipe required for the Sylvia canal to be 48 inch. A pipe of this size and the accompanying 40' easement limits the available space for the placement of buildings and permanent improvements on commercial property and virtually precludes homeowners `from installing permanent improvements such as swimming pools, concrete floored sheds, large trees, etc... It has been FID's experience that there are severe maintenance issues with pipelines that traverse through back yards or commercial properties. Should the pipeline need to be excavated for repair or replacement large areas of landscaping, parking lots, etc... need to be removed at the landowners expense; Therefore, FID recommends aligning the proposed pipeline with Shaw and Bryan Avenues as shown on the enclosed map. By aligning the pipeline next to road right-of-ways FID only requires 20 feet of easement instead of the 40 feet required through private property. 4. FID does not allow its.easements to be in common use with public utility easements but will allow its easement to be in common use with landscape easements. FID recommends all block walls and fences be located outside of its easement. Agencies\City\VTTM5493'R-05-17 C-05-81 BOARD OF President JACOB ANDRESEN, Vice-President JEFFERY G. BOSWELL DIRECTORS JEFF NEELY,EDDIE NIEDERFRANK,STEVEN G.BALLS, General Manager GARY SERRATO Ms. Shelby Chamberlain ..June 17, 2005 Page 2 of 2 5. FID will require a Common Use of Easements Agreement between FID and the City of Fresno for all Landscape easements which overlap FID's easement. 6. FID requires the applicant submit a grading and drainage plan for FID approval which shows that the proposed development will not endanger the structural integrity of the pipeline, or result in drainage patterns that will adversely affect FID or the applicant. 7. FID requires its easement be shown on the map with proper recording information, ant that FID be made a party to signing all plans which affect its easement and canal/pipeline facility and also be made party.to signing the.final map. 8.` FID requests the applicant be exempted from any, q condition that would require the construction of public facilities or conveyance of deeds or easements within FID's caA easement to any other party without FID's written consent. :FID may have additional comments regarding the subject proposal and suggests th applicant and or the.applicants engineer contact FID at their earliest convenience. . F l0or informational purposes, a private canal known as the Wheaton No. 518 traverses the subject property as shown on the enclosed map. This is an active canal and will need to remain in service.. Thank you for submitting this for our review. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns at 233-7161 extension 317 or biohnson@fresnoirrigation.com. Sincerely; Bret Johnson Engineering Technician I Cc: Quad Knopf Lemley Land Sales, Inc. Agencies\City\VTTM5493 R-05-17 C-0-81 : wm Traffic Ire act Stud � p y . � 1 : - Tract 5493 71 Northeast of thelntersecton,of Bryan Avenue and the Getfysbur Ali nrrienf 9► 9► Fresno, California .- !,j r 5 - , Prepared'For;. Quad Knopf, Inc 8:405 North Fresno Street; Suite 30`0 (( - Fresno, California 93720. Da l e. , May 27, 2005 i Job No M1 05-030.01 PETERS ENGINEERING G R 0 P �) A CALIFORNIA CORPORA TION 55 SHAW AVENUE,. SUITE 220 PHONE. (559) 299 1 '544 CLOVIS, rCAL1FORNli4:93:61 2 FAX.,(.5.59')..299-:): 722 PETERSENGINEERING GROUP A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION 55 SHAW AVENUE, SUITE 220 : PHONE (559) 299-1544 CLOVIS, CALIFORNIA 9361 2 FAX (559) 299-1 722 Ms. Sarah Ross May 27, 2005 Quad Knopf, Inc. 8405 North Fresno Street,Suite 300 Fresno, California 93720` Subject: Traffic Impact Study Tract 5493 Northeast of the Intersection of Bryan Avenue and the Gettysburg.Alignment Fresno, California Introduction :This report presents the results of a traffic impact study for the subject project in Fresno, .California. This analysis focuses on the anticipated effect on vehicle traffic resulting from the project: Project Description Tract 5493 is expected to include 244 single-family residential units on approximately 56.7 gross acres. The site is located northeast of the intersection of Bryan Avenue and the Gettysburg alignment. The project is separated into two portions. The northern portion consists of a gated community with 74 lots .that will have access only to!Bryan. The remaining portion contains 170 lots with access to both Bryan and Gettysburg. A Site Vicinity Map is shown in the attached Figure 1, and a Site Plan is shown in Figure 2. Study Area and Time Period The study intersections were determined.by the City. of Fresno based" on the anticipated project traffic distribution. This report includes analysis of the following intersections: 1. Shaw/Bryan, 2. Shaw/Hayes, 3. Shaw/Parkway(Polk), and 4. Gettysburg/Hayes. The study time periods include the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours determined between 7:00 and 9:00 a.m. and between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m.: The peak hours were to be analyzed for the following conditions: 1. Existing Conditions, 2. Existing Plus Project Conditions,and 3. Future With Project Conditions(Year 2025): In addition, a trip trace is provided indicating the number of project trips expected at the Shaw Avenue/State Route (SR) 99 interchanges. , Traffic Impact Study—Tract 5493 May 27,2005 Fresno,Califomia Page 2 Lane Configurations and Intersection Control The existing lane configurations and 'intersection control at the study intersections are illustrated in Figure 3, Existing Lane Configurations. At the study intersections, the City of Fresno General Plan designates Shaw and Polk Avenues as arterials and Bryan, Hayes, and Gettysburg as collectors. Parkway Avenue is considered a local road. The ultimate. configuration of arterials and collectors at intersections is typically defined by City of Fresno . Standard Drawing P69 with one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane. It is also typically assumed that the intersections of arterials and collectors will be signalized by the year 2025. The cumulative conditions at the intersection of Shaw and Parkway will include the addition of protected left-turn phasing on. the. northbound and southbound approaches based on conditions applied to other projects. Bryan Avenue does not currently:exist north of Shaw Avenue but is.expected to be . constructed north of Shaw prior to the year 2025. Trip Generation Data provided in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 7[h Edition, were used to estimate the number of trips anticipated to be generated by the project based on. the number of homes. Table 1 presents the trip generation information: The trip generation calculations are attached following the figures at the end of the text of this report. Table l Project Trip Generation Time Period Trips Entering Site Trivs Exiting Site Weekday 1,182 1,182 Weekday AM Peak Hour 45 138 Weekday PM Peak Hour 156 91 Pass-by and captured-trip reductions were not applied. The.distribution of project traffic to the adjacent road network was based on a select zone analysis using the 2025 Fresno County travel model. The select zone analysis was performed by. Council of Fresno County Governments (COG) staff using information provided by Peters Engineering Group. The anticipated project traffic volumes at the study intersections are shown in Figures 4 and 5 for opening year and future conditions, respectively. The results of the select zone analysis incorporating the peak.hour traffic volumes presented in Table 1 are attached. Pending Projects The traffic volumes expected to be generated by other projects in the vicinity of the project site are included in the analyses. In particular, the traffic volumes expected to be generated by Tracts 5224, 5298, 5352, and 5363 are considered. In addition, the traffic expected to be generated by a proposed mini storage facility on the south side of Shaw between Hayes and Polk is considered. The traffic volumes were obtained from Traffic Impact Study reports by Peters Engineering Group dated April 26, 2004, August 27, 2004, September 14,.2004) October 6, 2004, January 6, 2005, and.May 17, 2005. The combined other-projects traffic volumes are presented in Figure 6. 05-030-report.doc ,h Traffic Impact Study-Tract 5493 May 27,2005 Fresno,California Page 3 Existing and Future Traffic Volumes Existing traffic volumes were determined by performing manual turningmovement counts at the study intersections between 7:00 and 9:00 a.m. and between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. on weekdays (Tuesday through Thursday only). The existing peak-hour turning movement volumes are presented in Figure 7. The cumulative-without-project .traffic;volumes are presented in Figure 8 and are the result of adding the existing traffic volumes and the pending projects traffic volumes. The cumulative-with-project traffic volumes (opening day) are presented in Figure 9. Future traffic volumes with the project for the year: 2025 were determined using the : Increment Method developed by the COG. The results of the select zone analysis were incorporated into the year 2025 loaded network by the COG. The base year and year 2025 model traffic volumes used in the analyses are attached. Future turning movements were determined based on the methods presented in the Chapter 8 of the Transportation Research Board National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 255 entitled"Highway Traffic Data for Urbanized Area Project Planning`and Design.". Future-with-project traffic volumes are presented in Figure 10. Proiect Traffic on Freeway Interchanees The volume of project traffic expected at the Shaw Avenue/SR 99 interchange is taken,. directly from the results of the select zone analysis and is presented in the Table 2. The 2025 select zone analysis printouts on which the volumes are based are attached. Table 2 Year 2025 Proiect Traffic at Shaw/SR 99 Interchange Movement AM Peak PM Peak F ]Hour Tris Hour Tri s NB on ramp from EB Shaw 0 0 NB on ramp from WB Shaw 0 0 SB on ramp from EB Shaw 46 22 SB on ramp from WB Shaw 0 0 NB off ramp to Shaw 11 28 SB off ramp to Shaw 0 0 EB through on Shaw 25 13 WB through on Shaw 8 22 NB—Northbound SB-Southbound EB—Eastbound W$-Westbound Analyses The levels of service at the study intersections were determined using the computer program Synchro 6 (Build 612), which is based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual procedures for calculating levels of service. Level of service characteristics for both unsignalized an signalized intersections are presented in Tables 3 and 4. 05-030-report.doc Traffic Impact Study. Tract 5493. May 27,2005 Fresno,California Page 4 Table 3 Level of Service Characteristics for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Description Average Vehicle Dela seconds A Little or no delay. 0-10 B Short traffic delays. >10-15 C Average traffic delays. >15-25 D Long traffic delays. >25-35 E Very long traffic delays. >35-50 F Stop-and-go conditions. >50 Table 4 Level of Service Characteristics for Signalized Intersections Level of Average Vehicle Delay Service _T Description seconds A Uncongested operations;all queues clear in a single cycle. <10 B Very light congestion;an occasional phase is fully utilized. >10-20 C Light congestion;occasional queues on approaches. >20-35 Significant congestion on critical approaches, but intersection is functional.. Cars required to wait through D more than one cycle during short peaks. No long-standing >35-55 queues formed. Severe congestionwith some long-standing queues on E critical approaches. Traffic queue may block nearby >55-80 intersection(s)upstream of critical Approach(es). F Total breakdown,stop-and-go conditions. >80 The City of.Fresno requires that an intersection level of service D or better be maintained. Table 5 presents the results of the intersection analyses. Levels of service are presented for the intersections as a whole and for each turning movement, as applicable. The overall intersection level ofservice is considered the most reliable.. The individual turning movement levels of service are more dependent upon variable factors such as signal timing and should be used only as a guide. 05-030-report.doc Traffic Impact Study—Tract 5493 May 27,2005 Fresno,California Page 5 Table 5 Intersection Level of Service Summa —AMP Peak Hours r 1 . Leyel Existing Cumulative Future With Approach g With Project Project 2025 AM PM AM PM AM PM - FiaW 1D y ND' B hkn- Eastbound L DNE DNE DNE DNE D i D Eastbound T DNS DNS DNS DNS B C Eastbound R DNS DNS DNS DNS A A Westbound L A A A A C D Westbound T A A A A B C Westbound R DNE DNE DNE DNE A A Northbound L B B C C D D Northbound T DNE DNE DNE DNE B C Northbound R. B B C C A A Southbound L DNE DNE DNE DNE D D Southbound T DNE DNE DNE DNE B ! B Southbound R DNE DNE DNE DNE A A Eastbound T DNS DNS DNS DNS B C Eastbound R DNS DNS DNS DNS A A Westbound L A A A A C C Westbound T DNS DNS DNS DNS A A Northbound L C C C C B C Northbound R B B B B B A Eastbound L C E F F D E Eastbound T E F F F D E Eastbound R E F F F A B Westbound L E E F F E E Westbound T A B D E B B Westbound R A B D E A A Northbound L B C E E D E Northbound T C C F F C E Northbound R C C F F C A j Southbound L F F F F E E Southbound T B C C C C D Southbound R B C C C B B 05-030-report.doc Traffic Impact Study—Tract 5493 May 27,2005 Fresno,Califomia Page 6 d k. Table 5 Intersection Level of Service Summary-AM(PM) Peak Hours , ;Tntersection .a9� '' k " �evelof Service �in 7 Existing Cumulative Future With Approach With Project Project 2025 AM PM AM PM AM PM Eastbound L DNE DNE DNE DNE C E Eastbound T DNE DNE DNE DNE C D Eastbound R DNE DNE DNE DNE A A Westbound L DNE DNE DNE DNE C D Westbound T DNE_ DNE DNE DNE C D Westbound R DNE DNE DNE DNE A A Northbound L DNE DNE DNE DNE A A Northbound T DNE DNE DNE DNE DNS DNS Northbound R DNE DNE • DNE DNE DNS DNS Southbound L DNE DNE DNE DNE A A Southbound T DNE DNE DNE DNE DNS DNS Southbound RDNE DNE DNE DNE DNS DNS L—Left turn . R—Right turn T—Through DNS-Does not stop ND—Not Defined DNE—Does not exist .. These analyses and previous analyses have revealed levels of service below Dat the intersection of Shaw and Parkway based on cumulative-without-project and cumulative-with- project conditions. Table 6 presents the results of additional, analyses including mitigation measures as described in the table. Table 6 Intersection Mitigations and Level of Service Summary Level of Intersection Scenario Mitigations Service AM(PM Cumulative Two southbound and westbound left-turn lanes, two Shaw/Parkway . With Project lanes notdre nuired)tbound lanes(separate right-turn D(D) Discussion The resultsofthe intersection analyses indicate that the intersections of Shaw/Bryan and Shaw/Hayes are currently operating at acceptable levels of service and are expected to continue to operate at acceptable levels of service with construction of the project and the other pending projects. These intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable levels of service through the year 2025 with signalization and build out in accordance with.. City of Fresno Standard Drawing P69. The results of the.intersection analyses indicate that the intersection of Gettysburg and Hayes, which does not currently exist, is expected to operate at acceptable levels of service through the year 2025 with build out in.accordance with City of Fresno Standard Drawing P69. Signalization may not be required prior to the year 2025. 05-030-report.doc Traffic Impact Study—Tract 5493 May 27,2005 Fresno,California - Page 7 The analysis of the intersection of Shaw and Parkway. indicates that the intersection is currently operating below the.City standard level of service during the p.m. peak hour. Based on cumulative conditions without the project as described in previous reports, an unacceptable level of service is expected at the intersection even with the condition to add protected northbound and southbound left-turn phasing. Interim mitigation measures that would be required without the project in order to achieve acceptable overall levels of service include construction of an additional westbound left-turn lane (resulting ina' total of two westbound left-turn lanes), an additional southbound left-tum lane (resulting inia total of two southbound left-turn lanes), and additional eastbound and westbound through lanes (for a total of two through lanes in each direction). . Additional northbound lanes were not considered due to right-of-way,constraints previously noted by City staff. No;additional mitigations would be required with construction of the project. The ultimate configuration of Shaw and Parkway is expected to require two left-turn lanes on all approaches, three through lanes on Shaw, one right-turn lane on the eastbound, westbound, and southbound approaches, and two right-turn lanes on the northbound approach. One of the northbound right-turnlanes may be combined with a through lane. An alternate configuration would be expected if the intersection is modified to accommodate a southbound off-ramp from SR 99. The scope of this traffic impact study did not include analysis of various alternatives related to interchange modifications. Equitable Share Calculations We understand that the anticipated upgrades at the intersection of Shaw and Parkway are not included in the City of Fresno traffic signal impact fee. Therefore, the City typically requires an equitable share calculation to determine a project's required mitigation of the impacts at the intersection. The following equation is used to determine a project's equitable share of the cost of improvements required as mitigation of impacts: T P = Te—TE Where: P =The equitable share of the project's traffic impact; T=The project trips generated during the peak hour of the adjacent State Highway facility; TB = The forecasted (future with project) traffic volume on, the impacted State highway facility; TE = The existing traffic on the. State Highway facility plus approved projects traffic. (cumulative) Table 7 presents equitable share responsibility calculations. Since there are other pending projects in the vicinity of the project, it is our opinion that the only equitable application of the above equation is to use same existing traffic volumes rather than cumulative traffic volumes for each of the projects. :For equity, the existing and future traffic volumes used in Table 7 were obtained from previous traffic impact studies (see Pending Projects section of this report). 05-030-report.doc Traffic Impact Study—Tract 5493 May 27,2005 Fresno,California Page 8 Table 7 Equitable Share Responsibility Calculations—Weekday PM Peak Hour Project Existing Future Equitable Location Mitigation Share Traffic Traffic Traffic (Percent) Shaw/Parkway Traffic signal 85 2,259 5,640 2.5 upgrades is The City of Fresno has indicated that the cost of the anticipated improvements at the intersection of Shaw and Polk is estimated to be $260,000.00. Therefore, the project's 2.5- percent share of the cost would be $6,500.00. Conclusions Generally-accepted traffic engineering principles and methods were employed to estimate the amount of traffic expected to be generated by the project and to analyze the traffic conditions expected to exist in the future. The conclusion of this traffic impact study is that the existing road network at the study locations is adequate or can be mitigated to accommodate the proposed development based on opening day conditions. The study further concludes that the planned road network at the study locations is adequate or can be mitigated to accommodate the proposed development through the year 2025. Recommendations and Mitigations The following mitigations are suggested to mitigate traffic impacts determined as a result of the analyses described herein. L . Based on cumulative-without-project conditions and cumulative-with-project conditions, the intersection of.Shaw and Parkway should be widened to the extent possible, and protected left-turn phasing should be added for the northbound and southbound approaches as previously required of pending projects. It is anticipated that an intersection configuration including two westbound left-turn lanes, two southbound left-turn lanes, and two eastbound and westbound through lanes will provide acceptable levels of service. The intersection should be coordinated with the signals at the Shaw/99 interchange to provide optimal operation. 2.. Based on future conditions, the intersection of Shaw. and Parkway should be widened to provide two left-turn lanes on each approach, three through lanes on Shaw, and one right-turn lane on each approach. Two northbound right-turn lanes should be provided; one of the right-turn lanes may be combined with a through lane. These recommendations may. not apply if the configuration of the proposed Shaw/99 interchange modifications result in redistribution of traffic expected at the intersection of Shaw and Parkway. 05-030-report.doc Traffic Impact Study—Tract 5493 May 27,2005 Fresno,California Page 9 Thank you for the opportunity to perform these analyses for you. Please feel free to call our office if you have any questions. PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP Q�oFEssto� Q 6�O bV�� J No.52153 ,, John Rowland P.E. ExpJ 2-31-12� o Cr Attachments: Figures 0` CAS-\F� F s through 10 1 � 1� 07 L`1 Trip Generation Calculations Fresno County Travel Model Information Intersection Analyses. f 05-030-report.doc HERNDON m 3 SIERRA FI 3 GARDEN BULLARD PROJECT LOCATION RSTOW a` SHAW ' G SSUR 41 — ASHLAN, DAKOTA SHIELDS 9 CLINTON MCKINLEY FRESNO OLIVE BELMONT � 8l) WHITESBRIDGE CALIFORNIA CHURCH .. c JENSEN g r _.. . _.. w ---w N 0 0 a Li Site Vicinity Map Proposed NIX Tract 5493 Fresno, Califomia Not to Scale PETERS . ENGINEERING GROUP Figure 1. ti MI I 1 MA All NFRI!, I LF w yI�- 1�•y(��� f � ON lima allI mail y MIN INS _ 1 c � ►� = a�-31m jail 44 IN ailing I i ■ I 44 46 P 4 . Q Q Shaw ® Ave. Shaw Ave. Shaw Ave. P P r . (D mN a Gettysburg--------------------------Ave. - Eg>' ■ ..N car k LEGEND EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATIONS ® Signalized Intersection sto a sign Proposed hDirection or Travel Tract 5493 P Protected Left Tum Fresno, California Not to Scare PETERS ENGINEERING 13R❑UP Figure 3 . a L 0(0) 0(0) 4 24(55) ~ 23(0 ) a j- 24(57) Q� 0(0) ' 1' r 0(� Shaw Ave. Shaw `^ Ave. Shaw (0)°. (43)79 04 ■ (0)° ■ ■ (31)9 m (0)0 (42)83 (D on x (L m L s o s °(0) M■ /J -� Gettysburg T�(Oo � Ave. 0 0 0 (0)0 N Q T LEGEND OPENING. DAY PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 20 - AM Peak Hour Volumes (20)- PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed ! Direction or Travel Tract 5493 Fresno California Nott Scale PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP Fig ire 4 m L °) L ° o o 0(0) :'r 20(43) .. o o ,9(60) r20(45) Q 0(8) /e• °(0) . Shaw Ave. Shaw Ave. Shaw i Ave. (o)0: (0)0 (0)0 .. 7 (35)71 (8 1 .Q^... ..N - N133 - I� _ - a L g -g 0( 0) _... : G p - 2(4) 1 4 j- 0(0) Gettysburg Ave. I0)6 . h T f `4'3 - n o 0 (14)14 Z CD Ci ' LEGEND FUTURE PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 20 - AM Peak Hour Volumes (20)- PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Dlredi000fTravel Tract 5493 Fresno, California Not to Scale PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP Fi9Ure 5 6 a L 288(1 64) 4(6) 21 (59) N 36(63) Qr17(54) Q 0(0) `i 0(0) Shaw Ave. Shaw i Ave. Shaw ` Ave. . _ (7) 11 00 ..(28)40 .04 (9)19 (7)2IM (0)0 (33)49 M* m Q (4)6' r. .C - to 2 rt] a , m h L 0(0) 0(0) Gettysburg Ave. (0)0 1 l0)0 o o c (0)0 y d m L LEGEND OTHER PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 20 - AM Peak Hour Volumes (20)- PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed hDirection of Travel Tract 5493 Fresno, California Not to Scale PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP Fig:re6 I a 243(368) 285(354) 304(428) Q r 7(25) Q. 23(40) 367(653) Shaw ` Ave. Shaw Ave. Shaw * ` Ave. (271)350 .� (277)371 (8)4 (4)7. w (5)6 n (375)534 m (21)23 F N ..dCOco - .' .. .. _. 0 a' s s L 0(0) o ;o a � Gettysburg Ave. oho .� 000 (0)-0 o 0 0 a 1 II j C 4 ,- LEGEND EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES 20.- AM Peak Hour Volumes (20)- PM Peak Hour Volumes . Proposed hDirection of Travel Tract 5493 Fresno, California Not to Scale PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP Figure 7 ¢ m L 333(26 ). - n � M 247(374) .. -306(413) Q1 i r 340(491) <424(79) Q 23(40) , 367(653) Shaw Ave. Shaw Ave. Shaw ` I Ave. (278)361 y (305)411 j17)23 (11)9 c (5)6 �1► (406)563 a `o v (25)31 C .. m _ M . t0 - cc o_ I . f o(o) 0 \\ «� 1- Gettysburg Q Ave. 0© t (0)0.. , oao , • (0)a .. .. N - I, M J. I LEGEND CUMULATIVE WITHOUT PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 20 - AM Peak Hour Volumes (20)- PM Peak Hour Volumes PropOSed ( oireawmofTravel Tract 5493 Fresno, California Not t Scale PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP Fig're 8 i 333(263) - m m m - 247(374) _ .330_(468)_ O1 n 363(553) M .. ¢� 46(,36) Q ` 23(48) ` 367(653) Shaw y Ave. Shaw Ave. Shaw Ave. (278)361 00 ^ 10 .(348)489 y (17)23 (42) 17. m pe - -(450)666 10 - v n �n N A .. .Q... Q YI 01 1`] ca N i.'. 0.. - Q L s o o 0(rn o a o Aj Gettysburg Ave. (a)o y a o a (o)o Z LEGEND CUMULATIVE WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 20 - AM Peak Hour Volumes (20)- PM Peak Hour Volumes . .Proposed rEr Direction or Travel Tract 5493 Fresno, California Not to Scale PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP Figure 9 m a' q a L • 169(104) Z.. 167(181,) � � v m 'm' N 388(626) 709� c (874). � � � 848(1354) 1, 69(2 05) ¢ Ave. $haw 4r 144(398) 1 567(114 ) Shaw ` Ave. Shaw (73)85 (741)931 .(26)17 ■ (491)598 noc .(107)32 Z (1187) 1526 w* o (23)35 r. = _ - - (65)41 .�� V R', m 3 r cc M _ i . , M 4110s m 1 (,o) 4j 4r Gettysburg Ave. .(39)99 (33)54 - .:... ,..N -. .. . to LEGEND FUTURE (2025) WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 20 - AM Peak Hour Volumes (20)- PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed hDirection of Travel Tract 5493 Fresno, CaliforniaNot to Scale PETER5 ENGINEERING GROUP Figure 10 . TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS ITE Trip Generation, 7th Edition Single-Family Detached Housing Code 210 Project: 05-030.01 , Tentative Tract No.: . 5493 Location: Bryan Avenue and the Gettysburg Avenue alignment. Number of Units: 244 AM Peak Hour Traffic:. Percentage Entering: 25% Percentage Exiting: 75% Average: 183.00 Entering: 45.75 Exiting: 137.25 Entering: 45 Best Fit: 180.23 Entering: 45.06 ..Exiting: 138 Exiting: 135.17 PM Peak Hour Traffic:. Percentage Entering: 63% Percentage Exiting: 37%° Average: 246.44 Entering: 155.26 Exiting: 91.18 Entering: 156 Best.Fit:. 239.24 Entering: 150.72 Exiting: 91. Exiting: 88.52 Weekday Traffic: Percentage Entering: 50% ..,Percentage Exiting: . 50% .. Average: 2335.08 Entering: .1167.54 Exiting: 1167.54 Entering: 1182 Best Fit: 2362.31 Entering: 1181.15. Exiting: 1182 Exiting: 1181.15. PETER5 ENGINEERING GRouP py \p..'. 5' - t. LLI L LO— Imo.tO L — J a O 4: Alod -1 0 0 f - _ 0 _ 0 d 0 I � moai � m 1 N N > Y. O • L Ito cd ate o�ed 6e O�ed �- m o 0 0. 0 r 0 0 O go c 3 ec' 0 0 U o AeMM19d feAWed C r I L to ✓L N ca 0 M Ln ca N �� O � N Q d _ - C O N m d Island Wale rpark Drive. IT p oc T�NIfOC y o o 0 0 ' Island Waterpark Drive: 3 ! Morn ro 1 LmM .n0 m saAeH s4AeH Hayes ri1 0 9 9 7 t 14 `> 8 8 .14 r v sa�CeH say aH Hayes mC70 to to NOCe; vi,00- - T. � C,4C14 W - i m 2 . ° 1 a (D . o i 0 L. 1 1 p 2. o Z > r Q, c, d - muzo r-m ro 47 m tv. ca 3 _ � m O Bryan uetig uetigr uefus r: a ue,Vg,o 0 0 '. uefug C o 22 V9 b9 S9 S 0 'acc 35 to 1, 1701 '` V 3 SO1 Q7 E 9 S C L O 35 88 68N 4 68 S fi (D Bryan ue/ug,!o o uetig ? ueAjg uetig uefuL w g ILL N fLesch e-m I CO Co /U C 0 0 ! O � � N l 0 O f a(n C� Q pajoo .-r t.- C p O 0 r CD 3 f 0 0 vs 1 ip CD t} 8?�o pUo �\ h �Pue!.wee .p eluxeJ� o Pue AueJJ pueuej� PUelluerJ 0 0 0 0 o 0 o a �':o t o puepuel! pueguej!D puelluetD i puegueaE) puepuejL . F , . w s�9g ��/ /ip /% •� o ' i �- - all o,°' r �o ns lz cob �c�,0 NMt �� "G6, O � 0,:� rr i yQ' /O O j/ i x¢90 .�S�yP f if vj . j- U, NAL /4 Co co 10 ' o C6 tu to cc LL �. ` o o o o N mo(3) .-to m. r . C(n.- r o l 5 s - o a . ;f 0 • mow ALO m CA t0 N Q . h En(;C a d.N �110l-r t0 rte' d� VOd Polk _ CD " o o trir£ 9L G. 196 L017 G5Z 271 LU nn�1co ,�: ago m.5 6 L G 174CO L CO o r L �ilod tiL£ 328 ti Mod Polk CL i" 06L AennNJed D r CO (D J !` CO Ln CD 04 �rca � LO ccooc(O�, L,. � f • 09 _. � N N N ' 0 4 NV sa�teH SOAeH r Y6R Ww L o M f £6R Z9L. _ $ s= I -Otic -VC!, 0 cu Q J L9z i LZ o � R sa.(eH sarteH d W N IL ccacnto rn� OfN -corn� : r,�;coco N f_ Nccq cgcn ; Q f 4 176 6 135` S _ 1 197 12 i 3U5 .. k F. uetig � ue,Ug i tiEL � SZt ZLL OM .. 06G uetig uetig . �. - @ co v N e7 - :. .CNO Mh c0- i M N N N X- _ ,.LCf) T Oco t - (7� UJT TT � 41 L v NIOd Lot? 6t4L :. L,9S NIod 3cfj,�- C)co 3 co co U o CL N deM"Ied 6SZ 0 .06L �ieM)iJed its m 0 o LL. a to � N Q I to M N M a r: 3:c) ow 3 mm CO .Cr m 'W� oo� ago ham - a � L n� CL G tv • ;ti , I N Lma a.� C = � o [ v c .. L w � N � a L' to o R N I a I I )HOd ti lip l LSb L - 0 s LSE Hlad41 r,:99 (f, 3o�K to C-4 �. �N� NN(n .. . �a AeAgje teAqjed 96E b£S UE S£b 'LlZ E9b' z W 6£L Aem)wBd ABAMJed N I o -a o. u CCa 91 0 v m o L o d c a ., LL iQ . N C !d C4 a cn vi cc N f0 - =CO LO f. L .: LLI I i !33 Li. 3 Q1 t•. in 43� ca — OWNN' isp� 0 4 . H m E o c I — v � � c co 0 A i M O V I 3 IL O O y O y a� E ; Li a ss N c o .e� J a l I - I - r rJ1 ' I i - ( 1 i u U i CO N T N N Q R O 1 f a a . 1 i y � d d: E Z 2 i cu c inr J o 9 lNam 0 � LALU CL cVcu C i 1 a ' ;ncwo c) M r �co ice✓ '3A �m rr - ` OLZ 113 6£ LU rug 63 -- LLL 49 S6Z 87 ZSL nj C, ;i tn ,n 3 `? C` Bland Waterpark Drive a, a r, 22 a :ct 23 .E co+e} ��co mN 4� t[)i C J c .r y 9 .. I ,r 35 .. _ �. Aland Waterpark Dnve> : cv co 3 w�Ln fn r sadeH saABH Hayes L. LLS Ltd 445 Z69 £17S 452 2 �6 - tr8Z 96L 236 l �4Q. WL L L9 530 39sOAeH saAeH Hayes 61 , . , .. . 3 i y to UIA . _. � V w � e- Strti14 7 ELE w m c . _ .......385172 ' - -- �f S- -- -- w —£8-L 4 Z---- VO - 2�. C C? LLZ 3 16 LE 58 ca C o y cu ' CN co rn N CL i LL. cm ` a ca 10 r o W mom 'nit .. N co i 47 Bryan - uetig ue,Ug ueAjg iz ueks; ueAGg: 654 9VL LLL i Sb9 98S. �, S86 709 ZLg ZL9 LZL 07-9 c7 OLS 366 Strb SLV ` 712 9S8 "IR 99C LEE 81Z ' QS1 L99 6£S Bryan uekEp, R uetig ueX4g, uetig uehs8 N to 'v y. i m (� C7 15 Z4 3 c L �� 5 rn 6LE 6ew �p�airU s 0 m m coCD 3: Shaw Avenue & Bryan Avenue Existing- 5/27/2 �-'�.'��.'. '��'.,..� r^�V��,,UtGRtt#"UCA�moPn'4r'E.civtIHPMUaL�.'+x..q.x'v,£n^sa.nnFsC..CFsx`.,u�x.c��l...0C^n.x:5awv.w.w.o-Uaooee�p_rooI.gptnsx.^..`oe..ar.einr.a^C.,a,�Ef.a",n'gea.la�wans:'w^'2xdw.plar=e^isdY:s�'k„uv,ucu.U..�,.x.s;24w�.aco'c,i3rmzye.w..�"xetac^frk/G�,sn.rwwd.m,�1w:e.svis�)�rnmc�3„.".rt^e��onrs.a�rt�:la.rpr.m�r3,nC�o�v.-t�..r"^s�asa".Py asv.a=eo�.e:err.W�r���s'.,u:.H*�we,nAp.�qnfit*tr.•nan,��„eoe twe,,tnct..t4:^Frxo"�,cmao�lcr+w"cddn..ew"e.fla^-�n..t afi'�"»wwc,a�,'F:Yc�,re�o,Yufc,.Nts`+�...«5^^>�rS�^ew�Dtr.tio.�lr"r,ne,+�T..o,wa�sug.'R^.(wlg,hdx^-,c"wBnaiyce.icnu,Iw,i."�.P,�.'�.o*,.o:•s"..�.yk,amtcrwb°tiwi•,:x�Ye»i�ew�*"�naeiotr.a�pY�qc uw��5xs 5���.e.eS)xo��`x.�.�,-taa�33y:.�m',srmx+��t4.p;x:�r.g�.'���'�.,.u�,s�•.z.s rhxcw�"no,o3,^€slw.,au.).,�ca.r,(a�'�,3=.'<..w��er>Mm(.:�r..kl.r�4..af.mv��.r�wr(..<.l,�.�i,;,s%.�,.•`�.�steJ:a.�.°hk�c.n+u�';.^»ft�..��Ys.'w�a a.��'ma8�p;vw�m.`4.6".,�s'.�Z.s-�a��:«.<'i:-aa�.va�.;.m�wf.rS��g��3.�x:a.t�.e.xh�;»o�a•sr�`.f:ry^G,h„�rmCr,.�x�"xy uiY�ba�'.�+u►��xi',.�'�"����� n.l �w.ac�t:�,�>`a9�3a.j,.rd•`�..?.^�.��.'"sI��"txi�s�.�_>zr��`���"a"�s�r-�t.,aa�„�rp��il.i�n,d'?s'`�e�}ia&.*l£,^»`�•�"�„�ti�Yt'�7�,".G:xi:'��psSr,'u�y��Py�`r&zK,��".»�s.�r��s`1&.�x,c.!�i.�;,;�wii.�`�"i�,�F��`,.:�,"�.ti;30zr,�sa'r�a:�''.�}.+���¢Gau�4a�.�.G��'.�s�q+riv.crr.sf,.cr���''a��.:u�:Sn,F�e�.81�r1aa�rLdro.h:g L�na,�-.�a:�,'xu«��q«.,�t22.u�a/00.,ae�:`.53'w.,,�m.2^�n,�s:k.:a�rr'^`�nxasa��u�4.r��"»�."�xxs��w°�`�^�`a«,"�}•-xY°?�";�����.'�=•�,•„-��v�^�t33.,�,.�,�ua'��$,�6�,r;�a«F�r�✓'�^..t'..4';.:��:.�;uAs.y:F^'tt,:�.=wiy�%�4"k..��q�.m_�z,"w��«�'�'r,.'..�::�.:_a�,�+:w�u°r`_>;�:r.�a:���...�.,'tiu�5S.a��u0uz.=,��'`.,:,'a„.',,kTx�"���'.a`.k�x�>'..�»�z.s�^ux��w��3u�r�_Q.^.F�.��;drI����.�.:d�C�.�i..'7"�_-y+4isc...”�.89„�.«x,�,,.a�,,w��.^,����r;.h}»�'�".-...F•al.�,�,�r1�,z.�$�e.8�',�S_.vRb5,,5"-.Y".�i�a.rs+.t,>,.,�g.�j«wa�3."aeh.✓"Y.'Y.���.kra..�«ar<�. ch,.°C'Y'a=.`,��"..n��'3dtvr:.«.„9�,'-.G�r".:.��2;wi,�:'»w�»-J.'�i�,y��32'�u,^ol<:»tiz.,r��":'-'-�a,,ry�,::;:�,�S?ty`��'-'-•n`.�".«�8^gysr.,,.���•c��..s"11�',^.a..t YF..-,.'&�,.^»x,,�..-�0��z aq�.�mu.�?t,n�.•.i�2i..�,.4.��Y�1r.��^..4..v2�x"Ba�042C.,.a,�.�w._•s�.�..�3�`,���9.wa8'...��,�qo,°>4 J."�f A�.k�1�.`.Q1`...2433��.z9�580"°atx.:...�`rw*�...�'a.�fa��,.".y' .:s , a�^� '.,�u���,r�',;,„t".',�,<„�t+�+��nz'ut,-�`.."�.�,��.,�yf?aru`f4%:��'k�st`i"t,"�vt�':.`�y;szkcx�es-���'..iwu.�":5;t��u���"�.a.»��a.`e��te,„`�..�,�,�u�e�v".�i,'^L;ew.:.'3�'�.:,'�.`mua".�w`��s_•3�_-'W:3_�vi&`�-`.'.i.�P".t�.�x,;...�'�r,w�...fi.���sw"��,���*,e1a:kr'�.�.�°»$x�,"a�yrYr"°�.���F`�„w�4E;�n:,�<„«a:,��'r��u!s�'��x.��=Y;��a��;�.a��.€xS�»;`r.`u�ia��.�r.z�°<�..�Ys',��a.��a_a�:xi.��.�.".x,n�aso-��y*u;»...�.���war„�^�..��u�:,k,.J��_�.'y���wi'�>*a�;��?r".,{-...��.x.'�Y�1+'<:.:2�r.i-i:r;,aM-^�ari�"7.��g' s`ry,�.,.k����"��'...�§�l.,�z'�"'},�u��`',,r�"��"a°a..«�.���."Fs,r":0.„w5�3,�,.�.��'��,s.��_rtir�.�n',-�..�'.k�',��°z�a,�:�'arkk;A'4;z3v�x.��:”.L�.'�#s;�i.'.�.::�-+.,�,;.',,n.1`.�n.^.��,.���.»;ve����„°f'_���1?.�-�:-a.;.°s�,�,�i:,.zF�~���„,'.��_��r•,.,b�,-*,w�s�"���i�',�� �.�.t.."�a��1a���'w”.�����..b.g'�:"��'�.d�,�5:�I,�,��'.('��.�:��u�Ar�."�„,u�•'�,�.��f.."m�s.R;�xw'��vr'"���itTMe`^."�..,+'��,s.��.�k:� �3!�.�"si�e��a�k"..r>."7r�,yL,z�',":.�at�.>"��F�"�M�.,�s�.�-'�.ter�m�a,,���o��w�ML,,k�2.�:,£���,�.�>t��„c3.>�x�`yxrc..��w�G:?"�,.tm'��;L��zG:✓�'�,Exy+:. irm�,��ax�°�d�sa'z t*�”.� iuGT�1.7*x.•�g�:.w�a�.ng ...."r,'�u.v:�.�:.,',';"z':�aa��tt•ti,.�'.�u�;:j.:s'J:,a:Y:'..,'`d,r.:�"F;>tt,u`FM��� ;�:-;s•".�?fi'��- 5/27/2 a� 0� 5HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Lane Configurations PDX Grade 0% 0% f PWalking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare(veh) Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 420 714 412 p0 queue free% 96 96 , t-�55 � ��s +x�.kuw ........... Volume Left 0 0 8 15 cSH 1700 1700 1139 520 V0 rd awwe :ac "'R V:c _q .s�. Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 1 6 Lane LOS A Approach LOS B Average Delay 0.8 Analysis Period (min) 15 A0s:ttT�.�YY�b �39if�as_z�..JJ; : u� .r: � .._ ' ���e"�"'l�'�xa�;�. Yk-;i �t7� tn�'«x�ti`+`�':3,s9``.:. �y� 's%^ .i}�'�', "�� 7r �` �,�`,�d".'" 5.'v s5,y�'�r °,w ate' x� �13T�3;.:;: car }T«"�..+r'• "'�c "s �,a...mi.xC�s.:�..".,�5:+..w.�lt>'�, ,L�:.'�sSti �u kaaysa�kr,S..r: -�,.�,a�. °�....:m�.� ..T�#S.:-�i<rs` `,a,�s >3'-` '�,�,,�•� ;,�,,,. ,<'sr"Y�"�'�� a .�' •� e��,`��vz�a t5 i �� Baseline Synchro 6 RN port Peters Engineering Group Page 1 5: Shaw Avenue & Hayes Avenue ` Existing-AM HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5/27/2005 oBL' 1\IBFCf A.4i5'F.YtiykRx� Y „n.. .w. L', eft+", .(_ Lane Configurations a .. 5ignControl R.E Ferree , Free ,Stop � u � ° �.�. z.�a'r��'xd Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 c•� - �s s1�'�i a "� a d s.«� fig' ,�{�,.za,�, - a�' Zfi s�s"�"` §'r.. �:.�x z �,..&� �1 ��.,v, »v.e;�.�,a„za.a.aa,'s..a...a. ,,;�,�.�..�:...,�.v.b-.,.,m.,_..,.,, m�... .�t.:��<_3,.,.«�,..,��,,,:;v s,.,.. ...w..,z .,�ra,�Cduxs-.N.�,�.....%,i: � m,.4.Yw.>;. w...a:.,:�.�a✓,.f, �,,_.:�,"Yi�..-s,._,...;..t rn - - Pedestrians >, Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh) �,<.-.�,t�..E« ...:...� ... ._...«.,aw sr.,w+ ``•�.,,am. .vs:,za:n.a«..,�:a:Sss.�..�..,�..,�,.ctib wza ,..u; .N w.�Rw;a.:t..."«:w,�,.��a,.-a."�i'.-s..«..,, 7v, ,,,.mss«<, r.-v"�.� "'.��"s. '«.;.; P��,....�,„', „uk�..s.�.,z�:n Median storage veh) e,:, czar ..«�.•w�x,d..a«d.a-..,_ �.'i�.,.a.» -,x,:::-��,.�.....,,, ..�-.r�ts:�%�,.;,^:mss.. aeti^Awa.-a.�,w.�".v.,�,�:�,�:��,.�G�,ac�? °����a�,a.,�„�.n.�::�.�s�.xa,��:x�a..,..,J��:. a.�z.7..,.�<r�"��& pX, platoon unblocked vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 444 826 436 'RI` tC 2 stage (s)a�x p0 queue free% 98 98 91 Fly 5,1.� Volume Left 0 0 27 8 0 .r cSH 1700 1700 1117 334 620 %olume to Ca ci 0 260 00 0 02 ” 0 02 ` Q 09 4 �'•� �, . � Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 O F 2 .. 2 w ri 7 :. Lane LOS A C g Approach LOS B I k I' Average Delay. 1.2 s xa, x t wr ° t fir' r r Intersection it ma s 4 0 ° lU Level of SeNcCe r q `... Analysis Period (min) 15 0, N-. Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1 7: Shaw Avenue & Parkway Existing-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5/27/2005 z.s�, a r � �an� �^-^ Lame Group h t _. EBL ,ABT EBR =SWBUBT BLSNBt R ,SBLSZ SF Lane Configurations Itleal�Flow(v Fi I„�{��� ���1900�1900, 1900 �1900`'.� 190q 1900 1900���1900fr���1900��1900�'g1�900���1900 tsttr:�r,e;a:.C,»«i..a,az.,\�u.P�....p.;a,:�,as•�.a`,.ax��',.'ans:N+au�.s�m:a,�..��:aa..�w�,ak=�cr.,s.•wm ur,..,,a>.,wr«�nG.r.:.,:.s.+»��:z......t a-.r..._r., �.u..w,.a..:m�.:t.wro:.u�,,.,.,...s,..�,s ..»,.x,.3.+,.::az,x>.SL..,,,2:a.�a...».».�sM.., .a-ex..m.��...+...�..�..a1r,.,ucs Total Lost Time(s) 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 t«m.�..y. a u»,u.wsva,.a.. a. .«.�wz�`�. ;r,.. .,Au,+sN',wz?a..+,..... ...,w�wuaxin a,�.a�...wsa..Aa..k.....,..aw...,v�ct -a..w •.u.�c�.�» V�,u.,,,.uku. ..aaw.a......m».s.r.......��` Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ::a r•a� ,..rr ..,K' y a;�' ,:�..ac ,x•�•v �^a'�Rar�y '•.�+ x 92^"^ r��,,,,�"x�'q'» - �^ � �•r�K&"� ^�*^� ,�, x.a ,� >•-. - Lane Util Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' 1.00 1 00 1.00 1 X00 � �Tn�P px�u•:'s �^p' ,�'° ,"dwa sti r��p "�.,__� Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 ��.Flo�iii ''iot�r� a` 1770 X1852 Opt 1770: "1827'x, -O '1�770 '``�'1�fi`09�'��0��317�70�b1'-833 � a ��'0 Fit Permitted 0.950 . 0.950 0.701 0.237 SaFlow,r e�m17701852 3#0 F1770.'' 18271' ' Q 13Q'61609 0441 1'833 ;, F 0. �.,�ro Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes _ rx}.wks '2'; ..r;ve••; "`r^ �, �, a Y"'s:"�°r,:*..z,��""'s"�"r"Y3 '��" �'«z�" i "'""m": 'v'fr''� --•nsyr a � ><•;�,� �R,xM 100 Headway Factor 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 �z ,r„�.,.a'*"."'fi•e�1^ xr "$��r3"�Y:.&��"=a'�,t '�� �^.,cz^� .�S"� {� '"�r 3 �„ L`7";. mer' $�2$tr»iy� �, ,a ,t i '� ,�. 3 .�:�` Link Distance (ft) 2652 1415 2857 487 L-.�r=.w,:.�sa.�v s4.�(.�') ��:�sw. ar'Laeivalz�,a.,2c.#„`�.. � ^"� i.�..�7d.ar..r.,� .: &r q: -a .v §�vas,w;a � � xSsns- rr -'k.,5,. � SaF �:*,,..a,.u.>;��.. .�„$ka t �-un �.'•. . Volume (vph) 4 534 23 367 304 45 43 54 538 95 72 8 Peak Fiour$Faetor, '0 92 M,O 92 °Q`92 0 92 "`0 92� 92 0 92 0 92�g0g,5,7 IN0 92 Add. Flow(vph) 4 580 25 399 330 49 47 59 585 103 78 9 '..cz,h'�Y="" tt aR x� M""�,F^".;u'�• �,�.^ag^�e^� �n>^.,,..x,.. ^.,��« j _.� sm` -s �rte^ Y 'fit^"' x. z.. �."-z Apr � ^S =� � ..M. Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Perm a t -xK a5^*x; -�.x ,t` "*Y^ _ -m--^��r*„ »'�'e��""'"„,,� a,�"�"� �'blP+� �,mv" 'n,���r^� �"�"�'�"�s`w.k y f�•s .x�er-,"�r' fir..; ;,s .. Permitted Phases 2 Fti 6 Def ta�'vt«:vc:aix�ra»��:» '"�d�s�;s:. ,�, ,_F �:a �t .,� t'�', rt�C`,����`u�a'+zz...�s�;:rv'�s,.�ror�a,,.,:�,,�; :"`�.:,.3kr •��z�Y:axn'. « ..s`�.�use k"`��.r�aavazs� ui:4.L Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 '4.0 4.0 5n_ Total Split(s) 8.5 25.1 0.0 19.0 35.6 0.0 20.9 20.9 0.0 20.9 2b.9 0.0 Maximum Green (s) 4.5 20.6 15.0 31.1 16.4 16.4 16.4 16.4 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 .1 0 1.0 1.0 i'Surar:::;z^^x�•FttF fi:.". .:'a n �'�'�RT+` mom• ^-. � i��r � ,� ,r>adr ^� ^'^"' ,'�,��� ^n�� � 3`�'�r k:K � �'�'s�x�.'y � �'..a��"+;'R",�S� sE ,�„...� '�`;� Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None . None None None Min Min Min Min ar^rc ta..T a•YE'"' �£i ro � z r i >mst }y "'%'' , s. `'Y s'"'T� Waik Turie (s}#�, t 5 0 a 5 D 5 0 x 5 0 =E5 Q x5 0 . . -* '�.�,a.,.,." ,...s~, ,,. ..,:...#. t. uatt�.i..�.n'�,-..m .,.:r 4.a:.a - Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 .11.0Y i. Act Effct Green (s)\ 4.5 21.1 15.0 38.4 16.3 16.3 16.3 16.3 Actuated /C Ratio '0 Q6 0 33 0 23 a 6Q 0 2 " ,2 ' 0,25 0 25 .A...�.5 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.99 0.97 0.35 0.14 0.87 0.92 0.19 ,ay _ e � i 2,`�`x'��r .�-- n,:��.•`s.,�-a �. •, � a t�s� 3 ,�' '�" �a x -; ",.,��v :g�" ��`'�� '� Control�7ela ���� x=30&� 59 7 � , =65x7•` �8 3s;� � �� ��19'8 �21 4 ���� 90�7�,3=� 18 3� �� 4 �..u.:�, ..ra� .<....-=J..�.,3,�..,:.'Ew�.,:�t�.}3�.as�:.�-'�&,a.,;.°_;�.<_a,.,..�s ....,.�,«�.,,.Faw.�xa.,...�a..«�zxs-�:v �«�. .:. ::sre�a».,..... .k .w•w.�..-..'i.��. �....�,.a�*..�,.•..�»,:.'M`..ae�e..„r�o �r'�. ,.b..as?e:. Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 "0.0 0.0 - P r Total"Delay } r306537 8 3 [9 8 2�'4 Mwy 90 7 X18 3 "# ,,.,a.,0tta. 7. n s€,... LOS C E E A B C F B Approach LOS, E D C E Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1 7: Shaw Avenue & Parkway. Existing-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5/27/2005.p. .�.:.. w,p�BMs 9...c...a..� .,:.rtcscl,...�... :,xl.� ,....",.,,�. .., >•cm....�.%"...;'�,f P_ a=;...,L.r_,..,. s ?.&.�. ,�._'..:.� tier .e x`� L'�x.� - Queue Length 95th (ft) 10 #440 #319 146 38 #266d. #124 . 56 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Ca ac�ty vph)= M112 X610= 4 X412 fi096 HIS 340748&_ 11'5483 { x.x�,,. .��. ...�. .ss:��.#..>, .R„�,�.�,.w:�.�... _.r,✓2r;...,�...�_ ._�.._�&�3..». �,..c... w.� .,n.�rrn,...�d.,... ..._ Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 y0 0 - Spillback �. .., ,z.,a. ..<. ..,..,.�.. .....�,...,��...w r_v�. .�'.�..sem, ✓,.amd�s: .�..a_:�s. .�..,rassL�,�.,� .,�`n..-:w k'e��,... '...». ,y> �,..»� ,.,.,. a,4. .c.,.. vx._�sr...,. ,..z �; ' Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Length: 65 Actuated CycleLength Natural Cycle:65 .� 'Y+s-'• r,�` YV.^^� Wit-,a. ^a^ °^_^.,max ^we +^-.� aA'� � .,..s �g xis^mrg r s�.�^Y'a�,,� -^�„ '�" r. y ..,�.; Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.99 fit � fnter"sectio LDS l lntersecfion5ignaCDefaw` ,. .i,= Intersection Capacity Utilization 104.5% ICU Level of Service G , ''figt -tax � Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. n.,�;,�,«.,a.•L;,a >cc.. .z�.9�w."wca,....�«u�a .u..�.+s.,,.�,.� �,,.,,s.crr..,,.k._,,,...�.a,.a..�..�.e.,..Gc .�,.�'��. »..r,s...x�'�,�%.,,..a� .»s„ �.wa,.,v,�.".,�«�X ;t � Splits and Phases: 7: Shaw Avenue& Parkway It o2 4r' 03 —► o4 01- �u J;J.:Y!4:.�L'i"..'iS',;,"'h'c� '.<,.i.°'9'Y''N�'>..,"s�". :n�,. �s+.7.V�r i� ���"�.:.vtWn ���� V.s��'.k ✓t�.t �.x°.�fl. ,tt$Y} �.1F, 06 07 �h- 08 2 a I - 20.9 Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 2 3: Shaw Avenue & Bryan Avenue ''-'.`.....:.''.. :. tw�CGr`ali.�S�,r4P�Lt����rarxCAut�cI�UaHP..,'�+..Vat�n55i c�nns»//.,C'e/��»�.,4m='+«w".,,C'-e:C,Mtx>.il.�.ax.;�."000woe,sYpsi�''"oo.�.-..c<�ta..tea»��+tg'wxru,mV�Twareea",r3,ixx�..(,'apr2l�ll.sv^m`P�"n*u,��„usa.d.�u�,n,.uuCu,r:ns,....sca�S�s.aw a.axcF.,rrntk"c�.amr',+.=tw.rr.t.ra,^,.;.er'a�:`„sm.o�."�s:r,�.:y^nswE.),rim'�,::.:q`er..:�,o.S^:,ma.xr'C;:ua�ar,d�'>l,Yxvn>t.".";wa�swxtrYUPe�.,ornl'eex:X.°n.,",uiRIn..c.a.`^.f.,�p"wn�T�a,r.wnOeetge^e',h uxa1�.Rlcrcewx"x��aa flaxfr»Lc^za°�ae�l.x'�°�l��n"FD'vmhttY't"cn�e''€TtoaR,l.q(.rn,B',c.^.<ty}:�sirn.,',o.1rv,oso�.ut�a�,+:c.qw...1ea_.ae,�'.orap.i.„x.ktvirl.�:.a(e�,t.»mx.Dnago*nos-.t:�c.t�t:y".kCse�N.�aet,x.i,.;t.a�!:'rk2rx��.h�har'ac�n�.rc'�ar.*,:.•�� ,�C'sevet�'o+i.a;��.')*„'�v.v,aa�"m^Cyaa�}s�,.m.w,.!�,uyat�.g,um,."'.'�t.Iawaa,hY.b.-���f�vn.uovw�l�a6>a»,,r'+,a'hc���$.`4,a(a.m,�'�,..+",�e�,-..�a,~i�^z5t/'w.Tmeur�f,F`�(`.,!l�.F.'x,.$�s a;..a''�S.�.h,c.h,su�:,>a,f9}h-�:;E�$.,h"�a'�ufiD'�;i�r:�^d�-§3�f�.ta.V`,»"*i.►�."ti�a,r�"..�m���.JP.s»,'�reh�.,`��u�.t�=''.+&o �»�=u�•ra'�.uax'te�t,m;»a„a.]..�+�a`.e"',s-•.^�a�.#.`';�","a�we€, s rA.j'"��l,��'���F�'st�u�^..e�_5a"��u,��a,m'-t�"e,'�{x^i;.�"��.,�:,+�,;`.�"�`x',3��_'..'z4��l�`c.r.s_ai�ft;�>��se.,�it.ae`�:.-.�z:'�.,.t���-a�#��w�"�'X�'�'ufl.,'FY�..���'�Ehv�sak.�33a-.�-,�.„�23,'�.:us,a-.k�`xl,x,"°�.,ar.a.����3 a"t�.U�B„��.'Fe�0.--,1e70�ti,a.-u±•�a...°.a�3�.-�a.�`wi.��.��.�o.a....i3a,1a,i"+►�"}��.�aT°�08'.�,z+ea�.�111,.',�xa'.�.��a.,�Yz".t.."�,,*�..na:_.'•.,w.a,.�,"�'wR�nr���.i�u,u"�s..an�`ste.�^.«"'�?z.��.ic;e.���r*w.*�e.,�,S.*�,',a"e-a:i;,,w.�r.a��E,:'..�.'.�a�:..s:=».;�ax��rr�i,`��^:..,3`u-.2_�.�,`,.uw�,,e�'�?:;vfJ:.c�.wa."."M�u'zzw,,`;v*.'s,1^',»,,r`�,»:^xL1r�s�ir�3`�,.r�'.0$'"„.�mix.,s.ku{���„�.p�'s'"�.0",.�^�h.'x«£.r'az��t�a-��t�^.`BL�-1,i'.",'5.ik.,."�0ka�,,fi��c's�xi..a��°�.�,'�.r�„,m�u�c.��-..ttz"...ar'R;,,`4.,�.4.''4'�w��0a4.f.»X3x�.�:Y�i>,�:»�,«.:..S,"w.s.:v«.'`wmRs.,��i.�x�.^.w<" maf�_:.=.s:.':u',:'.c-�v.�,��";:.”S,-='���C.��,;z�5`Fm"a.�•w„»7`.���r..,a,aur}��rx,3�=,�'��=w.'',�.ff-r,�xza�'��,#*,°'„�s�>�.�sa°Uz3f..d."�.'�N��r,�€��z{.-r�wi.^�`'»��s'�;E�"a��uw"�S,�``va'.��.`z�`w'���.a�`:�"sa.s?_3".�ok�S7�.rr��,''�.z`_L6.�dt"umew,'»��x.-.ir�"�'..6nro.o.:s.,.,�,:r��c,-e".��e��e,,sm,��^�,,�,qr�.r->�„^a,.;3s:64�e�_.Q,7p.g�t�a_�:"'+�va^�.�kax•9�..`",-"�.,,x€'�.,a.���.,',�ma�«.S�m utt���.„����"..':�zR,a�w;-..'�w.�aa�,°,':'S.,".>�.',�u..Fur.�s.�s,,»�,:,%s�F..,?a^�a.,�.��.3�<:>.w,°z^,.;».P,'r.���..�,'�..3iv.'�ch3.��.�',"a1..cr..��rs'?>�;:.'i''a�.az.t_`��#�-;�..::��aa�;X:.T�.Y.om.."�..eu,s,raa���„��.���°:ra�'„,;�*":;��5t.�t��ix zr.�.�`i""++���.'a�9i£;:�,€:«�fr�a.���'.M%.��•,.„�`�;��-.::'tx,ts�,e,'`:.w�r"�.�yv's.w��1�r,,m.,�d�.td,.m3�»,s.,�_n3e�n .ca`.�x4.",'t�.a:«�a�wrs.��.r,�a,�v�„n�u'a4„'.�a�-a�vs:.�k�w�v€»§^;.����,-.an"�$�.��t.r�aaSa�..x}.i;.2i3�ic».,wafi«��.��.��w....eF.��s:�aa�a,.”�x5',v.�'^"t.zP���i,-_"a�o�-&�a�'.�`;',.`a`n��v:h�'Ys,n,'����n”+.s�S'.�1��oa:ar���,�rn.�r3iL.��'`�'�.r','..;�.b�,a”,a.'�a�::":..,.�".�'a°,„?..�..�»+.'�.as”*,s,�u.."��"x��„..a»>�°'�.�`'tew,��.te.a�u'a�P.''�a,.�x-Ms��y-�"nz��,��e�.'�Li":,5Rm,'.*���t<��.°�"x.s�rex�.a�..�-s,".:"�r�:..t..^',.�z,.``z.tr;.�HM�.�a.�..,`,��„�.�,»,�«,��.a�T..,�Y�•.?.'�"�.��,uu„�'.,�.a8xLrk'.i.`.fi,�«}cx,n'�:a�„i'�&s.t��`.'�1a.»�.,Anzs.,�:s�y"��.'.r�.x.-��^'�'.,�.r.Csa�"..',�.,..z:'?.�:"�,�'„`;��;F&�^•a,�k''°`;,.�e4ru,°�,x,,�uc:fi:.`w:�.`"k.��-�.,��."ta.rc,����..��as'.fl��k.`u��«'�,,w:;�:.V#.r,��_":r^r,�.»,"-.°��,�:�sx��s=.�s��:,f_�..e�'.0.k,..aie��-.zs�'�a"a,,,,��:tia.,�a9.t€..r����m°a�..iz.r.,�.��''-<...e�„n�n:�iawa�'�A�`'te_'#or'�''^.a"Sa�'.”�v".i^i.<3,:ri.y�e�''lw!.xCen��'�a:�.a�;.��..�,�S�-£. x�s.�.�"xes.:�d�.rs`''`�.r;»Ak.�����r�k�'`�',.�',”'',','�&-,3x.,.:i,al%.Y�:&.�Zxr'..`Sr�:-Sb.s,��u..�uLt"����t2*"RG.f�.'a4�.ffix``��€Kz�1.vae:-'"��.r�'',.'x?n.i�u-.,r,.�.;ms.�..s�,z..�.�x.uta.��.,x.s's,�`t.�«��"���-"e"a»„,°.';xsf.I:��»�ti.a�wn"�,�a^,''x�,.`.�s..'e�n`„:x.''���.•��eta..'"a^���.�`°»'��x7-a�����"�w,Y^azEui�y'.��u`�z.:�"t'�"�,�a'���.`�.s��„�E.x�`.:5Q.,C�ks�k..�.�*,�iz:��:'��k.��`w'"�,�4'�aN':i�-<�-4C•M,=:`xro rv"<wix i ss�,;'..�!a�y���t33w�i''�s. ."..�Ln��.a�S�ud;m�..'a'z«k z��;.'•za;u:1>.a=swxiuct�3r.�.� +.K..��g �£R �-�� P� M 5/27/2 05 �5HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4% Lane Configurations Grade 0% 0% 0% 0.90 0.90 .Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Pedestrians Walking Speed(f/s)" _ !w' Right tum flare (veh) Median storage veh) pX platoon unblocked Y vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 306 766 301 tC, 2 stage(s) p0 queue free % 98 99 98 �tc " rEB ' Volume Left 0 0 28 3 cSH 1700 1700 1255 604 IT, Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 2 2 Lane LOS AB Approach LO5 B sZ Average Delay 0.6 Analysis Period (min) 15 i. .� , . .. - .-. - . ' .,- Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1 5: Shaw Avenue & Hayes Avenue Existing-PM HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5/27/2005 4-- /01 -� JIOv2ment'� Lane Configurations ]� - ,� �'� - �Ign�.Cofltfol - :x.,.. � ;�.az. .:.«o.-...,ate,. #,.,._ ., ,,µ...xa�w, ...,.a2i M�:a�,.,a '��`,2�s✓.¢. _,�.w. .�. n-;....�.>rc,�::..,x,w sxi.�w:r£��__.�..sd;.m �5'�' max°'`,:„ _ Grade 0% 0% 0% .b..,_. a_ ,�nE.< ,mow_ ���y ����.�«�,..�✓�..�.,.F_. c __,a�.�,�i�r `�1�,.�'�- '�,,�..;Y"���,.....,�.^: ,.a_..w�,,,�-a:��.uaa.>��a Peak Hour Factor m 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 } '{ ^�,x r» f x #" W Hourly flow rate uph} 3Q8 6� 4493� ,...wa .u,,..awsx�,..,..:u�b. .x�,..e �s»,.a. Pedestrians T - Walking Speed (ft/s) I?ercent$lockage 'o....,�.wn>...r�. Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) l�pstream signal*(ft) �5 5 � �` � � �•� �, � � ,� pX,platoon unblocked vC1, stage 1 cont vol` vCu, unblocked vol w. 313 790 30$ tC 2 stage (s) �ILI" ,sw`-w��<:c�:.rw_.,,.za-.,...w:a^w. p0 queue free % 96 99 94 Directions L 60M`10� `1 B�1" B nT,�WB NB NB y� Ny n �'r:.„., .. ., i .,."i°,.. s sem- < Volume Total 308 6 X38 4 £ 44 y �Y � ��,�» Volume Left 0 0 44 4 0 cSH 1700 1700 1247 346 732 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 3 1 5 Lane LOS A C B rApproach LOS ry� B A t Average Delay 1.3 Intersection Capacity tJti6zafion ��48 8%�l��� 1CU Leuelfbf Service ���� �' `� ��� z������� - x - Analysis Period (min) 15 €T. f „ .t.u�, ,uu._. a' r�.,.�.:__... Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1 7: Shaw Avenue & Parkway. Existing-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5/27/2005 a-� Lane Configurations I,dealzFlovu(u[�h I �� (`1900 19001900 19�001900�� 1900� {19Q0 1x9001900,,r.,1900� X1900 190 aZw,. .�i:.:.w. +,:nxa..xsz.. .z°ct .x.. Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 J 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.04.0 Leatling,Detector(ft) ���50�� � 50 ��' � � H�50� r 5Q �' rj� ���•b0 r� ,50"My�� Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 'mi "�% � A t ,-'r °^T ^2' ,' �r 3 ',rcr �'rn, -�s�a"`�,'*'+r•'� :���`^��+�q'!�" s� Y',s,:: ��".� � 'fie'* -'."5 Turpin Lane Utrl Factor 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 100 �"' Flt Protected 0 950 0 950 0.950 0.950 0. ".r z'RF f3 -,Ny"t . t?ap, ! sir " 9'-=+ ,, x.+ Satd "FlowrL1rot1 � �1770 ;18480 177Q 1811� t �$1770162101770; °1796�< 0 ,:...c..»�iW:awt.hu:_..u.,.�1'yLs, .!.w«'3... >xu �v.°�,«.s,,,,,,„..L, ...:,,.,..U,.,.,,.SY..ahr..&��..>.a,.,..a,,:.u�.w..d�,.-,rs3�.:sa,«..ffim.k�,..,s.� e.>. ......,,.w,..u, a .,.,:..:...,.,<'a..« s.�a..«� xxk;+. Flt Permitted 0.950 0 950 0.732 0.135 Satd°Flow erm *r °1770 1F848, 0 1 ,7,0 181+1• . 0F,1364` 6' 1" a 25T Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes 'iv - Satd:. Flow(RTOR) 2 � 18 f F 295T;y.^� A 3 .n7.." Zi ........v!t'�. z�rz,u Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link Distance (ft) 2652 1415 2857 487 . vu,>"+.i� �: :renes e` q sI �r "�s s ,S � a ,.r.,.� �^�.'� r+�:,r..�,,,^»�»�'.",.3:'"__ �.��5'°'<o*+r n ^C- t.m, •� •*a� �� Volume(vph) 8 375 21 653 428 99 41 64 423 112 27 _ 8 Peak�Hour Factor ° v `�0=92 092092'.: 0 92 „92��0 92 0 92 0-92' Q 92��092��� OH92� ©?.92 ,...ru:uw:si.w,.w;:.. Add Flow(vph) 9 408 23 710 465 108 .45 70 460 122 29 9 x�cA,a,.::.yr s Lane Goup,Flow(yph) w , 9 431 :_ .0 �710573 :. , 5a 9 5 � 4= 0 122 , 380 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Perm <"."�*^ �xw^'^," �'�;�' "�r'�w��'•S" � •s �� fir •�"�� �' �. .,..r' �"'��...�a�� �" �'�'�,��� � °�,��F�� .�, t '�•,� Permitted Phases 2 6 � v .:,�'° ��-�•4�C" ; ^�a� a 4s�u ��"~: »�� �? �`��T�3 r ?.�'-� �, ?'��-a A. � � s��Y y'^��, .c°o-�.���a�-�� ;� � `# Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 .,4.0 . 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 • uw -«_asz.cwvd�s3,.:.��,�awr�a�s•,)z.:.�=..>.,,.�s"sM.;ax.a :,Y. +.t;> ,: ,...,,�,.,L:, ,�a.:da:,.m.�sa...::i,.v�n.. yx:,�.k,«.w,..�•i�:,�� .x�.s,A�um�.`Ps�+±�"�'��,.kxi:. >.:7.�3'" � x Total Split(s) 8.5 29.3 0.0 47.0 . 67.8 0 0 33.7 33.7 0.0 33.7 33.7 10.0 Maximum Green (s) 4.5 24.8 43.0 63.3 29.2 29.2 29.2 29.2 �Yellow Time s 3 0 u w 3 5 3 03 5t � 3 5 1 3 5 3 5 �3 5= „z s a%xx,w.N..x<w,,..H<�m..,,.$r:. .,.. ,a ,,;:,<,m ". '.rna rt,.,r�a': , ,H �3.a..,.sw:er.a.. . All Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 .....'M R:L.' AW'...y,Y+'�,{,ryFk�r y'n'j°�y"P.�`M h':AY,S 'R"�. � �AF�ha x +,mfa'^y..n�.£�'`a^*^n`°''^i e`�:�,, sem'Y � b�� -'�+ `5. .2'"3Y'� ",S"'yzt"Jx `IX'' •C 'a Lead Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes e* <yrr k !t'm a"",.`t y Vehicle Exension(s 3 0 3 a 3 0 3 0 3 U 3 03 �PaMUU Recall Mode None None None one Min Min Min Min ssWalkxTrme(s) s :. •�' �5 0 �.. '" s ,f.: A 5 0�' s:�� ` 5�0 5 0 � � _. c5 0 C u..liw�,st�2A, •ca S�r ��` a: '<.�av� �`�.� � � �. �^` � ��. •.. � u< ""�;�x'� ti� rte9 a4�^at` s-. .s �z�t ns '.. 112 ..�. Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0. .11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 .. \ ) t� "&.� �. A� a' ,3.��'�, a'�'•.xda.. `,�'a,�i;.a+�,. ..feM..�w,kxA..�a �,#�t"«a Act Effct Green (s) 4.5 25.3 43.0 70.6 29.7 29.7 . 29.7 29.7 M ..s»»•x :,ta,x„s.-��u„�rn,rw.�.�a�. we.�"� .aah3,�.. ,.r..u..'�i*i_�i«ai..�. •..�` .: <..�.X. �a'.a., v/c Ratio 0.13 1.01 1.03 0.49 .0.12 0.81 1.79 0;08 Queue Delay 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 =- � LOS E F E B C C F C Approach LOS TF D C -F Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1 7: Shaw Avenue & ParkwayExisting-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5/27/2005 Lane Gro ' 1� BT EB"'tom BL BTW R B ST P NF2 .Queue Length 95th(ft) 23 #518 . #765 323 54 #345 #249 42 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0i3 0 N .O OW 0 0 - ritersectton�Su;m�nary,,��M ��� Cycle Length 110 j - ,gctuated Natural Cycle 110 Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.79 �;.�-ia,� ,-a•i -,sz..< y,g� ..�"� �-'..�. �r-r�,n- 'rT �^��:e �*:: �, �? �� .� "�i a".�"�r^^�. .+vim.} �� s� Intersection Capacity Utilization 106.2% ICU Level of Service G Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two,cycles x ,, j ...�u h �. � �. s> a.r,cu..x. a.s. u.�a«.,._..,,..... .snz .t ,3itr'.e.,^ .a,,.:�i Via., 1�-a�»1.r.a.a,»..:. s.., ..,W..,-Zz 2c.. n .....», ., Splits and Phases: 7: Shaw Avenue & Parkway Ir 02 - ■ 03 - ,. -s �i: -ss s _a•,`r x.Trir, t 9nN mom- �$ rte:. t ,. JY- pc > 20 _.,.. . ..:daS. F _�"'f �S», 06 07 i�— 0$ S.'tai'��t„?�a.,?^,.�,� - C; i Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 2 3: Shaw Avenue & Bryan Avenue Cumulative With Project- M HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis` 5/27/2005 Lane Configurations } a ;'°€o ,;, « Sign�Contr�l � t � �F,ree ��. a-, Free Stop � �� � _.ca.,a...�.uM.t�..,,4s - Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 r S•S�:!.»rte E a'a:a :-.:�,t-< �' ', r " �'. � ^s°- a"K"z "':'y",.�"1 „�.+it �^".i.'� � r�c..r—.R.,�'an-s :x"-+� r r� a a»du ux�.m, suwdu«a.;m�ce�aawt...v..,..�isn.,t»�, ...�,.,,m�-ia�...azm�m,,s„,„,,.,�.,✓.«,....y�-. �«a.,..a �.,.«,�rrt a.aan�',�'�;,.�w.vs.;� ..�ds� Pedestrians Walking Speed.(ft/s) ' ' m' a"'� Peregent Blockages , . °��a.w »iam^as� Right turn flare (veh) `N�^2,, Metliantype � �� u � � NopeMIb xz•.�a�,x,. iu„a.Y.:S:=��:,,r�_. ��..� E=:i N.,a..;�# � e.�v.�.�..s�c,��:.;a�� u�.�.�,.�,w.,...;.,...>��-,a” 4, ; � �,,.z ��`a�,.�� a. a � r , Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked . vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 445 828 425 tC, 2 stage (s) Y^',to�^:',•+.�'i"2f. 1��»1 a�„ � � ��" aye r �'xs'�'�v�,tC._ f'�z"�� "sem rr" r' n^�..,*rr,,.r�ar a ^a�`';:d��:'��. ,p' �"'�'�'�.'s�"qs ,�^� s€. - p0 queue free % 95 83 76 .� � x�ra. a. µ;ti.+vx� ..K,,,,� ^ya.; vn+ t �'�.+�•r :.a»��r t t_.� t d s ter.€'F�i a,�'�` m z y `°.�`�. �3 � �� r� ''`. a:_.p a�?'�' �""�a` 'p Volume Left 0 0 56 54 cSH 1700 1700 1115 505 �/olum`eto Ca ami �:D=250 01' t' Q 05 0 41 � ��� Y r"a7 $ 1 ,r Y Lig �n.,:>...., .,:w=, i.,:><sz»r.S,;,t ,.t, ... `"a's..:,:..�� .e _:......m.,'.. -a Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 4 50 R Control Delay s)"a=,i�, 0^0 , 0 0l 8 17 0 r r �- �� Lane LOS A C ' ,��.au•:.��..w...,�o-s.x:ax .n. ,. ..:.. r 1 kr,:: '%. Y�.., � .':az.�,arot >,,.:nb".,tio.:,Ss,�u,,., s;a£�wu.?u:�'.�»:'kNN,b£�x.K,s:-sz. �s. .. �. .,,��... ,,+wh> ».,. ,s�:..... �u..ax .uz,. .,, . Approach LOS C �• L'' i.. Intersection;Sumnaary Average Delay 4.1 �In�tersecion rCapac ,Uti�zaiony @55,2%°, ICtJ Lee o Service a, IN Analysis Period (min) 15 ' Baseline Synchro 6 R port Peters Engineering Group Page 1 5: Shaw Avenue & Hayes Avenue Cumulative With Project-AM HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5/27/2005 - Lane Configurations r - S�gn - Grade 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Hourly flow rate,;(vph�� X575 � 7 � 27 ��388�� 8 ���� 62��� � � �� �� t� � � �"�� ��}_ ���• Pedestrians .n Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent;Blockage . z .. .,RFk, sF Right turn flare (veh) Median typed f fVon� a 3a Median storage eh) - U�pstreamsignal 'RE - pX, platoon unblocked vC1 stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vols y 582 1018 575, .�... xa. � E. tC, 2 stage(s) I p0 queue free % 97 97 88 �Y.., ...,.a ,�Fe..w.>.t�a,w. .; '�.mow x az.�:n..w,..H,�� .,.,w��v .x,.a8,:3w, xw.wsr.aa>,.�.;�'.,a^Sa �.rru�,�.-.�,+z;;>~« .".�..>G�`.x�<r�°+,.<&,,�..,»✓.a.<...v.�..�.�r,. �`�.:�' �,:a*;u,,.», a "s�:ii D'irect[on Lane# °EB 1B WI3 1 N 1 NB to i , Volume Left TO 0 27 8 0 . cSH 1700 1700 992 256 517 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 2 2 10 Control DefaY(S),� ��� �?T 4.O.�F � 0�0� 0 9�•..�9�5 �_���9�:�� ����. �"'�._ .�,� ..�:'� �.� ��µ���., ����r:.���.�� Lane LOS A C B Approach LOS B I�1,terSeGtldn 5urnma �„” �� ; ; r' �,.��m'�` _ �a�xk`�'n ��•�.� K " � a�'� ����,a,a� 3c- .����x�� < _ � rrx'�,;, �c- Average Delay 1.2 Intersecfion Capacity tJttlization � g46 3% �� ICU-Level of Seruice� Mnq; Analysis Period (min) 15 Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1 7: Shaw Avenue & Parkway Cumulative With Project-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5127/2005 Pie- up"ER i"", B; L NBT ; BR NB B rF x NB SSB " T S R Lane Configurations ^c^:acarmi R, S"°,, d,x,•N r "' r.., �z y'x L k'`H sr< tf x ' g Ideal,Flow,(uphpl} 1900 `1900_ 190019fl0 1900 19Qo 190019002 1;900 900 ^ 1900 ��t".z,e.,,..aj,s,z.�,.,.�m Total Lost Time (s) 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 140 40 40 m�, ^! KLeading Defector,(ft) x ,50 50 . 50 X50 , M 0_ , •.:t a v �« M,` wa,ia.,.: �:1 `-x. ,„x. x •w S a'3, -3 �v. a�«uw»+w' xs rw .,m,.m3ka. Trailing Detector(ft) 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 1 IT'urrin �S eed m h � � X15 �r� tx.+.a-�.l«i:�.aa-g>n,ezPuw,ct,..,,....(_�. �..�h;,....;.-ao�.,b....«.,.�.5.«:. �,��,..»,�i� <5Ya.,_�aA�r Xls���.,aa�i�,��n..,,a...��ka.Ya`fi�ec a��".-3k�.�,r•.c�,i,�.t.,;T. ....«s.., `.�,zsk„;. ..R,dukk���,� �. '.a....w»..�,W .,aw.a. Lane Util Factor 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 �' w+.ar.0 3 b t^n'X R„' KS, S'� '^,' F bh�'T'�' "^'C2'iT=e'C^ir-e Y'"•w-„ i.`�, F�`': `i'�T�',.: ET t` �'1 ''Vj �7, !„aa, aw"..,a. Kz.u'w'sd tr�.x... ->:.,.,,.�. m_��w �.,. �r, .a.Ya�««;:.t rs,,,�.�.c'�so ,>�+,.,;G,. �.&ia a ��sS� ¢ �r •„fes-u:W:w a.�«.».«„„r,£t;, Flt Protected .0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 17701850r 17701r7.,290��7:701,628'' 0 "1770 °1818 urCl 5atd Flow;(protJ .� a..4 � u.�:.n�,.��:��z �A�., .a��:,. �,.,;,. _,.���,��;�.�.�;. �..� �:��•.�. �:�<���a�:x�.r. „��x , Flt Permitted 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes r,.w`�..�.,vv�.+.»runw....»3. .,..,,nxx"r .'&•.ac.'�:a7's .�.a-..�r..�.3 s�.�..<..,«�,..,..r. a:. �a��:<,...:,,.r:.� - >.x.t.,.'.•hm.k.in.� Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 mH1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' a3z.�%' 7°?�^�'3% s"�"`' Wn, �r$c.'^f�z ",�,' m"�e`g'3 t s 3 a Ci a, ^m.�x4,t §'i� .^^r •,mr�r�^�y'.�^�S�b"' '4fi'#T Link Distance(ft) 2652 1415 2857 487 .n.r;?'.a'y"`"4 ~^Y" «'R'.xn rC� � .a a„� -!ar"�" -F`.��'` i$�'w"�.<::.a"'"J ire^ r r`'� Y, �• xrx.* a. ,c rc^a7�,- a � s Volume(vph) 23 666 31 367 363 333 51 101 538 238 96 18 r�eaC HoiarFactor� 0 920 92 0 92,3 92 =0 92 �0 92�92��0 92Q�92O r92MW09n X092 Adj. Flow(vph) 25 724 34 399 395 362 55 110 585 259 104 20 �x d 3: HIM Lane Group Flow( ph)� 25 758 �� .399: '7 .. aN� M_ 6�� ., •3kOxy ?59 a K124 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot �' r^-s`<�^�_: �^ �, "'�a^� ���`' r. �z a r,r� .iauxx ����.' y� a � �;� �,,,a=z� "�"� "•*' �r �v`++a-c 3 � �^+�:^ Pt`btected F'hases,•�� �, z4 �, � �3 8 � �:�5 � 2 � �� �6 '�,_ ��;��_ .voosva L w•h a saw .} A �� as �a k�>' Ji :' � xa,,,.ar;sa•:m..,c�.we, r,aa.a.,<.,e--�.��,.«,rwc�e...u� ...,:_.«.,.�•z'�::� ,�C.»„�,.,�<�. acMu. ,>s>.,. v,ss,.,..a�:«;�k':«._xi..'�:✓.�a...a.�':aw�' �a.�<, .,tw.t"au�e�...;.<a�'��t �„w.,..�::�. �,,.y��»:�' a'¢itw Permitted Phases V,'ar.,.s��r �r � 4 6,E . .w.�ar.erxn4c,��,aa+.« s�,,....a�.+�..�3�>`uIIsi.�'�� r,z+:"u~,w"aa�3,�svu�;.'4rw..m..a� .'.y' a."-�����:.:t.*,s. .�._s.� ....�_s..w<.... •��"L >w:,.,ai3 :x�.,'Ics�uu uu:.w.,.,fi m�..�r..,va�s:L �•.�.�?A"i,' . Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ' ry t$',:3*'A'P m, :T •�xT T �"` 'sP Y^ TF "M I""y�'^^ ,x `� °T 4aaay..caax..as..�a.u .,n,-«.�...c �' c�., ,v v., �u..°.� ,dYiY.iw�.,"a«a..•sr'$.�rs�'�..,.a�..,�''. r.�,',wk'�so��w.u ,z.&�,- u.,zs f.-'1rhA....«�s«��r ks..�:�°,., 'ra,Gul�xaaa,Aa��& Total Split(s) 8.5 46.0 0.0 26.0 63.5 0.0 13.6 39.0 0.0 19.0 44 40.0 „-...,�5-r�K.«•..:�.,a a..�. ��,.m�s.........a«e�S.e<rau�nz�t�a.+.x�n Maximum Green (s) 4.5 41.5 , 22.0 59.0 9.1 34.5 14.5 39.9 All Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 v q •x`�.,tr x a�"^""k-z"' i'r �Leacf/Lag s p c *, Lead Lag <r r Leads Lag f E ,Lead La T t �N_:�LeadW La ,,<;.:,c.=W�.::«.,,,..g, Lead Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None Min None Min . •2 r tt� h `c"ra.�>ti. r«,c we �,",�. r � }a �.,�„. y„.r, '"�'" ^F }"" a . a�.•a-,,,a�'�w,wsa�a�, e�,rwE�..�e. ,,.,' `'Ti..�»mss.aw.�a,s+rn,.a.�.,. ,.�.».«�,>n.�- �us..t� e,.,�.<¢,.<,. w,Lk...„.',�'.�sv a--ua8`�wx:::ts�...,,.ziw.a:�:.,.. .,e Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 ��s?x• �s :, v�mss. � - a r t ''P"^g r-„ac, ,•q s�� �!' �Y��"'& n''r q xa�, r`y., aswrv� aR-.s,�•,ae ;rata '4'<Tn -t�. - I Act Effct Green (s) 4 5 .42.0 22.0 62.9 8.7 35.0 15.0 43.4 ' w�..w,...o»•.c;.ar<.w.e,xN��.sx�:c..uwr..�au.. .�...-aa`.kii�,,.�;s::.c.�,s.:..,.,.,,„u..y�,.s ...��„ss'fva�, .,th,.;....m'uu:�u.xx� .k..x..�.»".:s�,<:,..,�;,u.:tiwo�,,......:.'s „�'�«-ir.ts<rr...,act"iw�,:.....s�:±.:euk."�.a�•-:�,.ze:»va:kk k:e.,,,_�;Jsai v/c Ratio 0.42 1.27 1.33 0.88 0.47 1.19. .1.27 0.20 f ^t z 'Rccx-a : 3' r•ten 't`a e ::""+ '`4.-" `^Cr� "� "as- ,�.,F """ •,. -�,„_« z t �,. m - ontrol Delay " .4$2 5 169 7 y 211a X42 1 68 I30 199 631 3 p a..v:.:a�k-v��,z,'w« wsewa�,.�l: .w'^i�,a.w, -,......,�w..A;+�".,<»rv,:.., .wa4.,,,,.... - zsa. �-'�a..a., •,,.u:�Sc-'".�„�:. ..J.,,at.... »,-to�.�ar�ku���....`a�.',�.'.� .Y;.:a'a.'.�xium «� .r�-�, «.-3� -% Queue Delay 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 LOS F F F D E F F C cuw.,.,.u»�em. „«.6...,:z,,.K ...�:.bv2.S:aw:r?.v ur.....�.�w....,a'. ».,«�,_..r.�..»�«z�aak.t.>r..X....:.5�....,ws.b.,e..Wr-. ,'�sa..»�w..max._ w�.waa.�sY,a��u.,:�._S•�=:�.�w�,.«asd3t:��,:.,.c«'��+".aa�+.swwgxx .w.ftu;zr Approach LOS F F F F Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1 7: Shaw Avenue & Parkway Cumulative With Project-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5/27/2005 Queue Length 95th (ft) 52 #1051 #639 #833 91 #815 #448 124 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capaaty{uph) 60 599 300 61 128' t 586 l 204 611 .. ,x.:�.�:,.;a»N4_-,x>�.n„ ..p. ,�-� �9 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 u,. Storage Cap Reductn O,.H . 0 0 0 p p: 0 0 Redu�cetl v/c Ratio z 0 42 r x1 27133 0 88 � �D4 1 19 X1270 20 , ...,.;�a, 1 11tSGIY?C1,SlL(IlmaCyv ...am, <„ .,xis;.., Ott:, x•d ,M *�, ,mm., 2-ak' .t �...,-. .t, ,.:�,. .k. .„s., 3,w :, .S- - n •3r x :P urea T Des Other- avV .., ..r..,...,<....as,z..�lw.....»,. i-> Cycle Length 130 Actuated Cycfe't�eng�h �'i�30 � � �� Natural Cycle: 130 ,�- _. Maximum v/c Ratio 1.33 :: a 4x,..7m ,..,>•b ',` ;te. r ra^,; n-:��< <,*e 'e" g., Intersection Signal Delay 125 1 Intersec�an ELOS F Egf Intersection Capacity Utilization 122.3% ICU Level of Service H - Ahalys�s Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. "W:3�g Splits and Phases: 7: Shaw Avenue & Parkway 4 01 1 02 4' 03 04 4o-. 0506 0 08 1y3 44y s-1 121 85 63.5 Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 2 3: Shaw Avenue & Bryan Avenue Cumulative With Project- w HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5/27/2tN05 4r " �'�""x.sv �.✓' �u �k'..��'� e;,.¢2 � ac f � .� � sF�E�s-a M',,' r� x, -. sY�xr4»i x "' � ' Lane Configurations a Grade 0% . 0%° 0%Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 ` "Y"� �r ;•t�{ ^'M `Y}'�:.� °�'a/� b 'H�,�°"AJ�f l '`F� fi � � � 'X'1 `i,•N"�S'^.. ^Wr.� 6 *"� ' a. Pedestrians ' ,���.-,v 7��/,j♦ v'"'x"5�5 � n �ro 2ay� �'-�°""'� :�;L�"` .. «r�� rir^9a^^� n* ,«. �..^F'*z'��..3�^m�ri'"'�^'"� ,� _ '"�'u��'?�.,�^v s+r�*e,�x Walking Speed (fYs) 'z.P.�s •`�',��+'� �'R`��v').�,.,,'fi.:�. xcent loekaaea u z N. .a: wz. :... °� � Right turn flare (veh) p F Median storage veh) ' "d' UpsSCtream sae.rrc.�smw.�eh, >� pX, platoon unblocked vC1 stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol, 356 1027 309 �a»ra`r'� xt n a• ��.. �m T'°°� *°Ms�;x��� � � � ��.. ..«.+,q,��r �N �..."s"y Y� � � x -'-�".z"�„',�v+r { _ 0..ws.>}8w:mar s�.w�._.�.(nnar.�,w.t...k'�..�„�x .,..,+,+�x�.7.`»fia.�-�:,....�m.,.bx«°.�:,"�,�i„�'a„�..N,aa+s."'��'u ✓'�_u,.� ,��r3,aa»s�..,�,�..,.jos=�,.���.ya.�,,,«�2e,�x-mow ...xM'iK�;,:n'�,„.:.5,� ti.r°>w...Yr,,.�z�aa, d.,.!.,�Y4;'dt tC, 2 stage (s) p..�"'”.;�"k � t.�i.. £x�^�. r�,�""�?` ' x'0 "7,z�`��''G`�1 v '� ,; � ',�.1�r^�zzE c �� 'i•x s� x�"`�xt� r .,t�."�,F3,y�.�: zr`�`" `,�d€ l�dr�'a}i' p0 queue free% 87 87 88 .-'. ...:+.ernu.�,;m.,�•8nr ��s-c`� rt +��': H?�'�'.h �kr�..,.�. rw.»..,,wau_�r_�u;..,u,i,�kwws��, �a:�»z��k3+.6.:.w_,xx.M._.». ,,..«.. _.u,_x..�.�.:-s,��"�'�...c�'''��s..,t.'...z`sa:::.emsa�.'s�aa�"�w,.��.� ��.Ads'' nn.*•�,,"p'•x'.,�. tog,91T L n 4,44 `yS"� ��� t; �� � �� .a rs?<� ' s� x ��"• �a x r* ��' �`",�gra� "- �' � M ti^.;,��x '"�e r�'x��jr�� �^ Volume Left 0 0 151 30 � 21:17,511.0 ���s� � cSH 1700 1700 1203 464 UsF � Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 11 24 Lane LOS A C ' 3^"M"'"�cuti•`n' r� 1xP^s?' ,x �..�,'� ��,r� rt `� "^pr:�"�:"` N e �.:.�s.^ ^."'.- �"` .�a°.r ""`�"°.�x`"`�m" 'c� �_.'}"'a".s,. '�g,�p' w"'� ���t Approach LOS t ,.wC 51 ilel$ec onSara ty Average Delay 3.5 atl Je �'C'f'7^'P"3xx^^" Y Intersection C�2p3CIttl�IZOm ._ � ., 58 1°l° ., d,.a (C.t� e1Te1 OSerVIC.@ � r :;" & xe Analysis Period (min) 15 - ' Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Pagel , 5: Shaw Avenue & Hayes Avenue Cumulative With Project-PM HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5/27/2005 --�. - 4 /01 . Lane Configurations �► '� .__.. ss��.�._>.a.�� ���.,»a.� < s„m':.,�.�:tw.�»s,:�a.-• ate.w ,� � ,��:.�:�..: »��, .:.�t a��x”��,:n,.�,.�...,�<.�: s..�a...w�:.� ..-�...�.«..e.�§...:. .. Grade 0% 0% p% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly_flow rate(uph) ti 387 b 6 _ ' 53 .x.520 w . . �`. ,, 4 a�: .. ..,�.x>....s ._Se.bd�.,G�a u Pedestrians - Walking Speed (ft/s)k. •;...'?> s� �r� -�r<'^.�e £,�z€ sm r y .a Percent Blockagse a, ,� h : � „...'s.. ,.w».I.x,.� Right turn flare(veh) ................. " ,•�:-wx„ ..-r o, ,�a ��«a,. ,.'�„» � <§l ua2 ' -Q u,�w.r>.�6, t s>i.,,aw....,.aM�.:-,� u.W.w.aas,.awl`".��.ru%z ;af` . 'a'r�..�.�> �;€st.»n..at«:a'ar"� „�M�s,�M�.aao.k,.a, ... .Ys Median storage veh) �: rm� �-;.�v x �. .;,� �""..� t"'}`a '�,c.c�r"'.� "�<�'� .. .." � c min <�rr* n �,.�• ^s�" 'S m ate,-mya° g PX, Platoon unblocked :rn § tia ,'-r it` "':.�m ,T„=. ^y^' �y •'4'�-*r�„a •� r�.�, ,,z � ,n _ vC1, stage 1 conf vol ' �`•.� fl:P+ n `,�i'i�'"`6^'9 c�a'Ip`"��.cp"`F KPS»' i S %7E-"i E"'Ijg" 3 "'>YS S,*3 N Y• 4 vCu, unblocked vol 392N< 1013 387 - tC, 2 stage (s) �% '• � .r s ��`' ry 3 ''"�.�, v�. a ��m � � ��" � ,+ 7 s C'e-�zW$ �°' '""','t'�"'&r"T�z�3��•'":; I PO queue free% 95 98 93 cM capactty(sveh/h�r ' � � 1x166 - w a>_..a v:x».i-m.,_ »,.»,..,..,3.&.,:�. .r.K.t 3u,..a„ ., .,,,,_..3s'�,.,, il"I..Z ,e3m- : Uolume;Total 387 6 5?3, 4 44 sr 1 a .x�•.._, <..wiz.ss..P+�.,<.<r.», „�h. :.. »,aa , .e.�«r<Em� .. Volume Left 0 0 53a 4� 0 cSH 1700 1700 1166 253 661 Volume to Capacity FF0230`00 0 05y 0&020 07 . „ :s, 4.,» ,� �� x Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 4 1 5 .,. Lane LOS A C B ...:' ,• .q. � ar+?� +�" � as,h R^ Mr � "g «^z� Y� +^,�..>. ,, ? a".` fi »+er< "x`.z°..s^ "-"�"': 3 "< Approach LOS B . --!•,tea-^^,� �,^+ � �mr""fis',sr-<.SP"'�.,,' x n ?y�*....�., .,.r,..�9e. s,�^ Fr�'"'h'v`�= _ Average Delay 1.3 �0 � ° 1CU Level of Seniice xf sr B k , f:nterseelion Capacity tJti6�ation 58'9/° „. +z, _..., ...x�...<<_-.s,.k ..baa:.-:f.., ,..,,<� w;»w�,. ... s'.».,,a4t»s....,..,<«s...a<....,..x,..•,.:.x.,�,�,....$.,..:�:>°`�. ..» <:. .« �...a_".. a>...<�wsc. ':rJz.as Analysis Period"(min) 15 1.? �z � f'L >>r u"" �- x� �..." ,'`�.x z�s »,:. � ,� x� r y, ^°3-.^• �a Pr ""� � .z Y-k Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1 7: Shaw Avenue & Parkway Cumulative With Project-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5/27/2005 Lane Configurations rlcfealxFlow( ph`pl) `�� 1900 '1900 190b19U0 ,1900' 19001900101900� t`90�0 19001,900 ' 1900. n,�r..osn.,.»"'as.w.w>s�ea.,,.�.<x...,_u,.e..atxax<�.3�»'�Ss. � .,,«,>ttr>»e??r�'.a< .s.,. „u .fin»,...�,.�»,: m:'" , <v,-. .,.,r�a.�.n:..a,>,�w.<«qF..a>rwz;.,�.ov.,re•3a�..ae .......aw°:..am .k,<,....:..a.�...�*»k.1.,.,:. . Total Lost Time (s) 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 - "`"6 w:.. 't"';,�-•g' '�"<s.z i'"zri -c5�""" •w r " m v mS° ,zas y� ..r Lane Util Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 J.00 1.00 1.)o Fit :1 as It Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0..950 0.950 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Les Satd„�FlowRTOR � 2 22 a ,».in Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00, 1.00 1.00 1.001 00 1.00 1 L00 Mt- 9 e ,s•.^.a• s ><"E''_` r�., `'P ra �+ {zrn' t"=s' ar-*a>a s "T"i ✓ r 'g• Link Speedmph) w � � 30 rg � s <,X30e K 5} 30 � Link Distance (ft) 2652 1415 2857 487 - Volume(vph) 17 450 25 653 553 263 45 99 423 439 84 17 (--wo'koFa¢ctor� � 0 92� 3:0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 b�92" a0'n ,0 92 Oi 92� 0 92" .0 2� n.a .»t.a,•cM,spa'•` x.^.,=.s;.s.axa?�,.e,,:<,� .,.�,e,, '".ex.,, Add Flow(vph) 18 489 27 710 601 286 49 108 460 477 91 18 a:.;,ss<waaar< ,,.,e+::.,.,.mau...x,.a�l�,..,<.�.�'"�E .,�,. «....«.min*sm. ;,Gw«..<.z_.rUa.°a.�i.�..�.�,�::�'<;ras4rx�.;5,,:.�6a»,n,�br,��.«atttr���.a„8�.,a,,.xxs,,,.u,imus r_, .c` '::'��"''�`ss .�•zr.^E»«.<: .a;:r+utidaxn„<. �s';a. ".Turn Type Prot Prot Prot - Prot " T*n�'.^:,'w�^ro si .. ° ���<;;,a <z�.-nDR'�`�s" '•�•v` �� 5 �°�^TiY z�rr"z a z5,�A` "iT�•:�" �r ��r �^tn'�`�"e�z,�^M...m- �.x�s+^ ,�3,.sa� Permitted Phases Detecto�Rhases$ 3 7 r 4 .: 3y8 Ewa"a[..Rwkr<xxtm4a"rM",T.a5.�•.z ret�m,.a,zsz`".,�,:al...:..:�..r„ s*il=:�,.�«:.�`u�,..a:^3„S4ex...v�uma a.. &a-:: s¢"'.r,.�,:s�»w,..�.,.'..,sti' �'wx<,..&a:=�; °v��.�..; <s:.:, ,,,.�&..z....:�. ...»�`oa a.=xix..,�.....«k..,..✓x4n � ;.Cuw Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 0 4.0 4.0 4.6 4 0 M:. �xi>.a». a4 .v 1. s .w.ai•< -`�'YF j&s««.,s, ,� �ea b,,n z-' .wY^3'»,<.;2s4 +;3.�w"a2a bw, .,..Y 3.a »� .'�i. 3 �a a ,baa ti;r..v�r�.�.c, w` <a-..,,8 .. Total Split(s) 8.5 34.0 0.0 42.0 67 5 0 0 13 5 34.0 0 0 30 0 50 50 0 v-='�+' "� �^�"5.� ^'<'^��s 0-y�;}• 0 u'f > � 0 '� 0 �� r0'�d�� 0 �' 0 ���P .`^ S',�"0,'�""""'""'""0 %'rs`r <ro 0 Maximum Green (s) 4.5 29.5 38.0 63.0 9.0 29.5 25.5 46.0 YellowT�me°(s) Y ss. sa�sc r>t.<0.eve.�t,=o sx.�.��.d„uz"R�'s' ..,�.:�'�u. a«C, ._.l<.n«.=s�,�..A<�.4s,.e,. =k7�" w .a..3'.< 7=�«,a�..z„�M,va<k`�w,z�, ..ra.�,�°w�,a.v.:;z.,m,E.s�a.��a.d�ws.�A„��s,a.9.✓�.....s9aw.2a.::�., All Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 . 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1,0 w 1.0 ° ay` r iS ax Nz ,vera LeadlLag b � Lead Lag o Lead LagU B LeadLa v _ Lead� Lag�` ✓ ,.u...z, .> +u `;a.=,, r o a a..rwY rzu,.wx�sa..ra ts.zauWaN Lead Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s)� �, 3 0� �, 3 Q �a �� � 3 0 x �3 04 }E3 Yom•.�� 0<�,�¢�b3 0�'���ps,�t- ����3 0�"3 0���- � Recall Mode None None None None None Min None Min .. Vavt.,...waz�:iisw's..�...,a,...,Ft*:_AP.>..,.a.,,.:.ia..rc�r.,=; .w�,».ire�.;"�s,�� a>w;'...,kP,,,.`s-sr,<,.;3.._, � ,>..sr .>z..z>.�>�,.bd.,u.�:L.a°.,x x7...,,_�.�.,�Sr:..-..RM3>1,<c�,'�. enz'�'�x.w..�:«sr>,.,,,. .,,...i�.�,...�aaa'm... -�•,; Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 ..11.0 11.0 � .»,., R a z� r•;,.;.r^-*»^ 3 ,a3 � � x �" �"s � '�.�"r'�'^,«y+ � k a`� �' axo ��,-t ? 7 "'�`x"� Act Effct Green (s) 4.5 30.0 38.01 68.6 . 8.6 30.0 26.0 49.4 v/c Ratio 0.33 1.30 .1.48 1.01 0.45 1.23 1.45 0.17 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 fi.w.<.,.v»,asur$1:na4...s.:ra<,.�,a .n ;.,X.axa�$.., 1�.�a.a.�y..,.p, xi.,u-,m.a,a,b�,a=f<3z,.«,,,�..� z.b a..r.., xu'tt' ,-�sn&'s,�„.,�im, 9.F,�'�.�..,_..<":.,<,sKE��awa.:�. .Yrhiaii+z <�«a.,,..-, ,..5'.�,. •:ar..�..h.x...o, :C....z. LOS F F F E E F F C cy+•rwrr n tm^^..;.s-#r r "C<" tx-t�z �� �+ .s+�., � M g<s r s ..x e ¢ ��"�t fl r::�xtr c �' asr �"<,x c^ � a "'*9.>n�a '� Approach LOS F F F F Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1 7: Shaw Avenue & Parkway Cumulative With Project-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5/27/2005 Queue Length 95th (ft) 44 #829 #1131 #1154 88 #769 #810 113 . Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 „s z Sprlltiaek3Cap Reductn ° 0 F , 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ra 0 33 �1 301 48 1 01 0 42 1 23 4 ' Reducedv/c »w.x...w. ....53uci „a�,x4,_�..rx,,...,.u»-e,..ti i.�,-. -.;:::..ID�..h.�rza�,�*.a.-r��-...,�_..ffi....>..va..�a�„tr,..,� ��a.�'..a,;;�✓�:.�.�< e4.w�.w„�.l c�.:,,,•,a»sa:x,�.�.�:.,�to. .{�,..>u,.::...�.,.,.wi,.a;:F'Lz�m ,�azts..3am�a.� - Cycle Length 140 Actuated Cycle Length 1408 er .-. : .w ,* w b ._ «. „ Natural Cycle: 140 Control'Type FActuated Uncoordrnated a a� � .� ,� Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.48 fhtersectron 5tgnal Delay 170 3a �„ y Intersection LQS F r Intersection Capacity Utilization 130.3% ICU Level of Service H Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. " 3 s n 4,7%07 Queue shown is,maxrmurn after,two cycles a. ,.r �.�». .�a.� - Splits and Phases: 7: Shaw Avenue& Parkway } 01 I s2 4, 03 _'* o4 05 06 „ 08 ow G,Y "Vy .T .'€""3 7.3 5 s `JO2r:S �. ._ .,..am ._. 5 S? 67.rJ='Sr Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 2 7: Shaw Avenue& Parkway Cumulative With Project-AM-Mitigated Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5/27/2005 Lane rG ounn d£ , ��� BL " EB�t EBRBLUIB 1NBR NBLS i3T NS „ p Lane Configurations ��, � 'f`�i '� � T+ Ideal Flow v h"`I 1900 19001900' 9001900m1900 900 1900 19001900 '1900` 190 Total Lost Time (s) 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 i ,wG.. �w.wx s ._x,. .� � �_ t.+•,a .s,x...0..*xa�,,w:ax .,.kncu&,.,,,A.2x �xa...��<_,_ -�m: „„vg�,. „�«d.. s„ .i:m..xiea'w -x.a>e.,mx S:;s,xY.B:u,.:, �...,.,.n.. P, Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.97 0:95 0.95 1 A0 1.00 1.00 0:97 1.00 1}00 z 3"' 7 ane* ar q -r ff ON NiZ0 993° g2 � Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 t7�770�� Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes YesYes 3��� Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 100 ' mm«.n ��te•r'^'S„+» �+ -s �m�,�*' .'' *a«'�'� _" ,» "w..� ,5^�` s�-"Ei.'��`r-� -. �' . .,�..�-'� *'� �a��'�5 �'ys sr�x. Link Distance(ft) 2652 1415 2857 487 .,..zd� > ravelTime (s) � � 60 3y � ; 32£2 � 64''9 s , I1 Volume(vph) 23 666 31 367 363 .. 333 51 101 538 .238 96 18 Feak�f-�our Facto��J w,0 9� 0,�92Q 920 92 ,0 9,2-��92��'0 920 92 w �0 Z���OF�92�� �,0;92��� 92 Ada Flow(vph) 25 724 34 399 395 362 55 110 585 259 104 20 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Permitted Phases ss*:+,- � •; S s "� -^^-h��r , s 4,, w' ., '. .�,3'*fi"--«�i 2�" ,�„�'�''a 7'��a�'�s1 "s' -.+s*��^.5 mom*. "�H. . Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum,Spli (s) ."8 5. 20 5 8 5 3 2Q 5 8 5 X20:5 z $ 5 20 as ON '�c5 Total Split(s) 9.5 25.0 0.0 16.0 31.5 .0.0 11.1 37.0 0.0 12.0 37.9 0 0 �"OIn Maximum Green (s) 5.5 20.5 12.0 27.0 6.6 32.5 7.5 33.4 ' �ua+ca,v�:1+;��'m&s.,,.rw.,"n. � :G�N sww3.nema.,remix.a�aS'..k>"w� '�'�.m�".,`t <.,..as�,..,,m.��az*...�.o-,.�s.'m.,-.,a:,�:�t�r.�>A �.,2r.m;c�.,�m„.-,,,.-..�.-a'ars'd.:,�..a�',ta,.�at &.y"a`�•�i. ..;L`raaa�v. iS}+s. All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 .1.0 1,0 1.0 1,0 Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes - d `f �s,a r� � .xc x�zxf•��.�-"2a"��n7¢ d ' 5'�b� �, '�."",.,¢ a '��a" `� """2" �. 's,�"'� ra"�5++i- �,P" 5 ''T rns s a,c a�+ a- . 1x. .a w::e�'<s..a „a',. ;.,,+,a awua4� a4.��i.9� ..a.:�x _ x...�'�,�'r.x...,f,.,t-.sa- ��B�o-."z�w rte-,.: sa3.r.'sxsv. x ';�^tr.��a .__ l.,a...Nx,s;�;.w.x ., ,....<�.,...w�r'Sa.,.✓a..�...,k: ''�trk:l Recall Mode None None None None None Min None, Min L Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11,0 11.0 11.0 Pedestnan Ca11s #/tr)� �����a 0 � �� � �. •� �Q ��� � � �;0 � � � � � Act Effct Green (s) 5.5 20.3 1 11.8 32.5 6.9 29.9 8.1 33.4 .?n. .r �.�.39.�.���¢ v/c Ratio 0_.23 0.91 0.85 0.54 0.40 0.95 0.81 0.17 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS D D D B D C E B - Approach LOS Dn. C D D Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group: Page 1 7: Shaw Avenue & Parkway Cumulative With Project-AM-Mitigated Lanes, Volumes; Timings 5/27/2005 anraup ;;, EBL EBS , E RV11BL,,.tN6 li1NBR�„' I�tBµL h[Sfi: P BRA SB'�LBfi�SBR Queue Length 95th (ft) 39 #332 #195 186 68 #486 #141 80 Tum Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t^' � � "� x°i i r � '� •+ga �x nom,. _^„��ts-.�""� x '^�, r�, � ( i.x^za� :sial �0 0 Storage Cap ReductnN s0 0 0 0 0� 0 0 0x _u .s„.,....�,�.w,.M.,,� ...aRsr,.1.�.,.�k&� ....,,.. ,w-��-,.,<o:.�...z...2 .�3,« ,.zs,.�,. .a.."-,�,...,_ax.-.m..,.s;..sa,..��...rza_.�n_>t..�.Mra''�..,,o K � � F`•,se s� - s "�s_.��''� � �„• �s, "� Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle;Length6 2 `�� f Natural Cycle: 90 Control Tf e 'Actuated tJndo�ordinated�` �� '����`� „� �`���� r-�•` '�-��� .�x: � � � `� °' ���x� � , �;; c:aeca..«u,bas:.�,,:wa",yp N...:�.�t:a ..x,s ...:xr�r.,.x�.,,.c.. �,:>,.�..s.,a.«e.: :., ,�..'�,'�.�T,Ms,-:<..dt,....��`J�w.a..a�.au�'u-«,�.Pa��. �.<« "'. nz�„'�ruu;;�F ...ux.7..:.«k'4.w�3v�.u.�,.,,,�.�.�s,_:::�;- ..z ,' ,.•..��: Maximum v/c Ratio:.0.95 Intersection Signal Delay�37 2 � a s F � �� Intersection L45 Q � �� , 3 �H �� Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.5% ICU Level of Service E AnalA mac ,, "sis,wPerind .w Y (, t # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queu'e'shown isoaximum after�two cv\/�cles ter;' ,�a x M...�,ux3x :w,.,:xa«.„.�axr, r.«.»v ax... e,.,aa«,e:..s,¢�,«�, ;«:x. •: .1,.,..;g„Ywc.,.w:s...r�.,�.ss'.Fi�., ..az«...:aII -a«a: '�F.«r..ss., ..!�..an,...btca'x«+ ,,a.«,, s�',.',_ .�'"�.. .,_ Az` ;' - Splits and Phases: 7: Shaw Avenue &.Parkway Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 2 7: Shaw Avenue & Parkway Cumulative With Project-PM-Mitigated Lanes, Volumes, Timings - 5/27/2005 Lane Configurations Total Lost Time(s) 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 TO iLeadng Deu�e'ctor,(ft�.s�..� �:,50.,uR 50 ..,,��„� Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..., Lane Util Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95. 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1 X00 5,�.� r< �"'°i�".�'v�..�.",� ✓� �z. .:." ka pr P�r�"�s�."�T^s -�-�-'��.�'q'<a.»,t r�;;,�u. ^w �a`�*�r .�:r�5"nr.^ ,�1'"`" "_'m �, " kw..�,awN.a.w..><„�'sae.,m e�aar:,,.MxF es..xis.=� ,as.&a"�7„�'�'a,�..,.w.f .,.s�. .a.��:� Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 SattlFlow r roti ��1770 �3511 k�0 433 3369 .0; t70137� '„� '? 3433 d981e� 0 dr:+cz<.a�aa.s.,µaWwP\.P_ urem/,;.e'",r. az,.,.k.,.W;v3 ,.. ..: E .,.s..: .s,:; ., . .« _. Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 5atc Flow,(perm� 3 X1770" X3511 0 3x433 "X3690 y 177 01687 , 0 433 k�1816 0 ' ,ksay,,,.c.�.xaaia.-x«w.�a�.� n.s.;au ar- a'�7..,�.w- `_w.�wu�,�.A�a...,, �m...,a,�.!�.�r;�3.wl.arec,:k:arka�.s.•�&m^a.«a�r..✓,..,»�,w,.wF.&,a�3,.�«......,x�. ,.ra„-zzc...,,ka;�wsc�,.i ..,.,,..SJ.f�M..,.,rw=ww.xa�.,.- ,.,...; Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 100 .� x a;� *»>•rh`^s 'r'.;.;s ^�,r*�c�'a:+'r�,��M��� ��e ��s +� z ,#,rte asrxyg"".��, 2.�n� .�'tw?���"`�,g� '�- 'ate� �,° .�" . Link Distance(ft) 2652 1415 2857 487 '"'•.;�'s' .`*„',,,':?°r �xr� % e k,r .d,.h ynvcrv,,' t 'n" .~x^� '-'`µ. r'„',�. '<tr",�:, v T z .� ." � Volume (vph) 17 450 25 653 553 263 45 99 423 439 84 17. .�.x Adj. Flow(vph) 18 489 27 710 601 286 49 108 460 477 91 18 .; �.,..� ! "i�r^+ �".pJ'Y' .^y„�, .^3` •.rte ,�'r 1 an,�x r?+, .r � nr�w ^re r CT` � LaneiGrou Flow(upi 18 516 e. 0 710 887 r= 0� 49 X56$ Oy 47 1Q9 0' I , . ;YLx�,Y...,..b . ,.. ,. ,.....,wn.,v : «. .� ..f-zwzs,,.����;,'vL �2 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Permitted Phases Detectors -� � �e � ���� s���� ������'� •�� ` 5�-� 2 ��,��M ��, �6,�`�;, , � ` Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 0�aa,ku..:��,1,,.,.. �,�'a ,.xv�:.na>,,.,,sr..s„�5.v, . :wc ..Lkirraui� .r,:;,«�+.i,�.as...>�a%a� 4 0 �....:� ,e+ ms's-^x.� ��gy'' «: ar r-' ,�s�f�.SfS e%1 r t � �' e,.is fi .g w^n'Y,'.",';7_ r•;�?a� 4'". 's" :,.^:m^^ve, r.; � vr» ><a,.,u.,, x.'�.��md�, Total Split(s) 8.5 20.5 0.0 23.6 35.6 0.0 . 10.7 28.4 0.0 17.5 35.2 0.0 3 �:,:J'7 0 � mt"-� 3=.t "�z.3�s�•. ° x �;.,�. 0 Yh`;.,f;�""y O ..,f s O -'�, O�"x �.0. c a � i"' �., O �zr O 4� r� 0 ;"'" � 0 ii m..,...n;�,=,z.,�w,.....,.,,��.�ns 3c...�-�... ��+2,a.,,.,......k.. a,»;,zz ,-:rv� .zx§?�,.....,.. Wxsm..-dv.�a..�.»ussr�c ,.f�i„w Maximum Green (s) 4.5 16.0 19.6 31.1 6.2 23.9 13.0 30.7 �:;�^'� 05, .aw+wli�..n5 ww:�>� All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1..0 1.0 . 1.0 :tabiso:aL' aaY.tzar.,.�,aai.dkr=,*ss_..ae_xa'�,..:. aa...,...a. ,...a �^szsv, , : Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ,..�.�«. . ..a.=xar. . rsA�, .,...a...e� . Recall Mode None None None None None Min None Min Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 uz.A. +a� .� ,� .'�' :a......� ..ia 11 0 Pedesi:nan�Cal�s�(#/hr a=���' . _ , ...�.,.;..�„�, . .z. _: .. .�. .,,..� Act Effct Green (s) 4.5 15.8 19.4 35.9 6.6 22.9 13.5 34.2 "s�4"v5 ,re�^,*e Actuated..9/C f2atio ,0 05,. r 0..18 .. z �0 Q 070 26 4 3. > v/c Ratio 0.21 0.81 0.93 0.62 0.39 0.95 0.90 0.15 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 To�al,Delay��,. .�=� €4-���8�. .,.��„��: :�a� LOS D . D D C D D E B Approach LOS D D . D wv ..,p � :. Baseline Synchro 6 R port Peters Engineering Group Page 1 7: Shaw Avenue & Parkway Cumulative With. Project-PM-Mitigated Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5/27/2005 Queue Length 95th (ft) 32 #221 .#317 272 63 #407 #231 75 lnte�nalhGnkFDist(ft) ���� 2572 � �� '1335 �� �� � �277g7 Turn Bay Length (ft) Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'r r SpiiNb Cap�Reductn .:zn..avnssx... x_.— Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 `< ,h ° '. "v a,,r.. .5 `"�' ., lntersect<on Summary .., .. T . _.., l Cycle Length: 90e .,.� Natural Cycle: 90 Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.95 t IyntersectionSgnal�Delay 41 0 �. � � � �. K Intersection LOS D} � � � ,ti � �; �� Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.0% ICU Level of Service E .r v� �:�«x � � ,:�✓ � .. t�"�` r r�" `" xr�� '"�'km<as ..s';"�7�:� '�"-:.,fig s b r:a,aa s v" '� '� k,.'.�.�: 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Splits and Phases: 7: Shaw Avenue& Parkway 01 I 02 � 03 �" A 4So . i y J,4$ � �# ? E , 20,Y, 053 06 07 08 10.75` >.. 35.m2 S xa :Y s .. :3 3'- Baseline Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 2 3: Shaw Avenue & Bryan Avenue Future (2025) With Project-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings - 5/27/2005 Lane Configurations tt r '� tt r Ideal Ftow v h�lx 1-900 19001900 1900: 19001900 '1900 19`00 '1900 1900 1'90 `19 0, �, Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0' 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 tas.,k>tixa,>;rxa ._..*y.r+ar�:xassc�a:.�r.�_.'a�zc„`!3 A'�6,,�u��',.,.�.z.<�a`�!: a�.�,aT�'a�ks"x�`'� »,.,tt�,n�::4'd�a.,:5�,1„5dts•» <..,....maoa.u.-� .ix.....,.. s:+.a:,�„#x,�°i�,..«L ,hv�S?s`.Y�xe.mxt;„,z...i.�.s�a�GeiK:�x.a�w'.�w�,.iz:.k�v i�»• Lane UtilFactor .1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 .0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 - �Frt:. Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 `Sa'�d Flows rod ;,;���`��'� '1�770���3539 :1583`.X1770:��3539��s"1583 �1770'��' 353.9�1,583b�'th7�70y� 35;39� �1Y5 3 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 5atd�' Flow Fr�herin ` ,1770�� X3539 158f3 1770e3539 1583 17.70 35 9 x,58 1�s 70i :3539-,�ltl kaz!e 'a,Gu�.�;.n...tltN x,p:..ortsl�s,�"`eu �`..�oscorut x u�d�a+�u.ar.,a.«.w._s� �s�" ''':w�.o. • �U.:✓--+�w.,t �waw '.':e, «.sir .,3.�.»� �" '`µ'a ��',;$a Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes 5atd Flow`/RTOR) 38r F 220 , a 184� ' R 2 s„+ ' Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 sauz..adi�waa.,su@a-`a{�r�,a�pw:au.� 4r+ .ata.,..,.,.e.a!�wS,. �a�.l��..�t:.auwP.� u,k,..,tiw��,o "����sua 4.ia .. i-.b�S.�'w_.ate,. e .-..:,«%„x�M«a�Yk.d�,.::Y�.✓u�,`�?."d�'�.�.�.,,..�.`».��..,_.d ke-sr,.,e,.. w.as�-wuM�i Link Distance(ft) - 2077. 2620 1310 823 ''. Rus'�,�^.�, .gs�,.e^er tir- s^'.qs � ;.!vC{ e �-«# rvs «« >x.. .se�r n ..r m"FK''",r�Y^•rr`%F �,: � €xw^� «�, r z>»n�-.a.T'" rr�o '�- *?. _ •,� .z,:ar :�v§a'>..., �_4�.,.ba_.s�i«tay.:itt.»,ro.,m��w,.:...�:.,;R«`.u'ffi'�.,Sa.�ss,ar. .a, ...x,�...w�.�'u..'�"::,.M,>s:�.L.anax 'xx..«:. ,.svvzr.� a .�saz.,r.,....l�,s.�„ra,:'�z.�..' Volume (vph) 85 598 35 56 455 202 69 388 169 84 243. 39 ,�..r:M:,,a,..,?ars,..SzS.ri•.ra.�.ax✓o..daa,-�;F�eu��€,54��,EZ:a-'s.;'�w"�„�,,,x.m..�..u>»#r yah �...+r-..zF;...�„kaa<>�.�a�:;?r„�nx ..¢_�,._,:.. x�>.,k.surr��, :x3r,.n<�.,,..,��z.rx.,m.:x > wrrr s...oe�a "�kraax. RfS'`"�ra w.�zr - - Add Flow(vph) 92 650 38 61 495 220 75 422 184 91 264 42 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm n`'ts:^:�n'mt r«,"3 r � Protec(ed Piases� � 7� - mSf.�v, .s.swzsxw�...cacexa»:saaanwv rxaa:,.,r` f�'-A3a'�`_'`� zo Permitted Phases 4 8 2 N 6 Minimum Initial (s) 40 40 40 40°'ir 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 r^ "gsx'..e,� s c^„M•� .. «;*++€ Ls, a x ' "�""'.�'_'..-.mac* rs" ;`*' sss w ""i y. *u 0 rc Minimum SpGTa(Fs} <; 8 20 2Q00 �8 5 X20 5 X20 58 5 x20 5 X20 5��8 5 *20520 5 sreh4.4m.,..:x_x.,,wwa�.-v.ts:..«:ab.au..3 aX�s�>•-a m ,:�t"fe,:a3 aaa�..nt...,. ` .,c,._'«,:«v<x«ar��...:Fa::<v�,..,.w:&r:.:.x:,-�tz�a.:�.,,,w.,»�.:.s' »�.,%�.®a»,,.:.<.,e:..�dw,mx...s+aa°az,..tr, w,ewu,..,x ...,«M.z:,�.,mss,»dk:'z�*tc,_ n w, .md.L.n': ' Tota Split(s) 9.0 21.0 21.0 8.5 20.5 20.5 8.8 21.5 21.5 9.0 21.7 211 7 MaximumGreen (s) 50 165 165 45 160 160 48 170 170 50 172 172 w«t ,a�.>:°'�"`�' "'"s'"'�� K qty ,y" t I € ''�,"� �e�,� "^�^ ;�+ �R r�"''.,a.-a ' "'z�M �" �S �'�a�^- '�"' •''. cel�y, u s!sY .,r-.sm^r,E r . �3�5 - All Red Time{s) 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 �a(7 Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes - .•.r. a sY+���r+r�^zt�"�;°';z+rr��. �#�*�" s y;t ui� ,wK.0 .:�a^ � s' tc� �� �� ti s'K^.°.:F v� C m- : � = t a3^ - Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 1.1.0 11.0 11.0 11 0 *n;^^m�< � a, � rk� .'�"a� �se��r s•r oxo -� 'c�.� s�.'�' �z-�.'_,�'� �*' �' P ,� t'r'�'s. Act Effct Green (s) 53 159 159 48 138 138 51 126 126 53 145 X145 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.56 0.07 0 37 0.49 0.36 0.43. 0.46 0.34 0.49 0.25 0;08 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 '. s3�.,::._..xi,.,,,a.:x.�snuYu,,,�.� .���w1.a,. .,sma�,xls,u„nv�.�»'k.:s: z�sa�.�',.,�sss`�,,.....a�Fee?5 ,...«ra,.�- �...,....,n.sM:a.��';i,..a.''xa wt�&a'�.,,.�a,...a�...�,,.t.«„ ..�"u..,r:a�:�, «r,A.a�rna:,. �u*>a.i.�,.�.�.e�� �'k�sa�,+�:.k.•xas LOS D B A C,. B A D B A D B A 5�� ..,<.�_.u�,x€.;,..«.�.:v.F'.a,:'.�bs. i�: .:�u.:e.+ i=;�3a�,« ;�ti ��.�xi ,. ... ��e.,e�`�.,.�.�.t..,,��a:�...�..,�».a„�:a��,.,a.m.;�•r:.v�M>r,;u.�:�-�.. `,�.„u.,,��:� ...u�.,,:� Approach LOS B B 8 B Baseline Synchro 6 Riport Peters Engineering Group P,ge 1 3: Shaw Avenue& Bryan Avenue Future (2025) With Project-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings ' 5/27/2005 Queue Length°50th (it) ' `» 30 '940 1y9 X69f� X24 62 0 '29 37 0 . .,. w_. .r H. . ._.: .. ,.: Queue Length 95th (ft) #93 157 18 #61 119 43 #75 99 38 #92 63' A< 19 Turn Bay Length (ft) . :Base Capacity;(uph)��� ; 186 1304�� ;607 X163 =��204� 683�" 174 X221' ,667k �1�86 � 1�289� X604 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 „0 0. 0 :SptllbackCa Retluctn � 00� 0� 0OtQ p � 0 0 rp Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;Reduced,v/c�a2tio q, #z,� ,0 49� X0;50 � Q�06�, a�37�Q 41 '0 32�� a 43 ' 0 35�0�2850�49��'�0.2DK��Q 07 "`'a`v--'�^.x^ct"'��"�-"��.�--•""'S'�i�:�°��"� E�t"?:�xs `moi.'�"�„s. ....- v ";�sFi'���` nterseetion=Summa Cycle Length: 60 ;Actuated..Cycle LengtFrS .�F � �hy �, ._ a r. ., 14M Natural Cycle: 60 ControlType Actuated kUncoordinafed3 � k t , s. ,.,ti�u,..,n.�v Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.56 Intersection Signal Delay 17M1 #$ } Intersection LOS B 3 =g - Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.6% ICU Level of Service A - .w # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer: r Y7 �,�r �:-m^ "fid`"- '�.�e �r�P�� ��"`ueue shown is max�murn after two cycles x >s� � ` ✓rs.�"5,,.,&."�,.Me :» ,�.s r.:i•&,,.,., ,..�,�%�.a,. �+. "Sc�`�.. ,�s,a �.>r � � .. I Splits and Phases: 3: Shaw Avenue& Bryan Avenue 01 I''i, o2 til'o3 o4 . Y � � - .J1$�«ax',�x,..,af _..:: �,,. .�rt....�_,,a.an.�;.�«,,va.t.;�:�'Ir'•.�:. ,s �...�� _.:: O:,k,.$x.�-sz,a..�:- �1�1 M1 AN tc ( 05 j 06 07 �� 08 . $..�.Sa[L..,w�+x ..E '21,.0.�Sd4,i a31�.'��.`'.�a'. "'RY'y�mH} .'��.s .✓.� .�S3.:���(h..`3gQ+Y 2 �V.w7FJ�^',�I'a"Yh..z .f'^F �'`X'.'t.,nh s�'i���is� Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 2 5: Shaw Avenue & Hayes Avenue Future (2025) With Project-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5/27I2o0�5 -► { /* . Lane Configurations Total Lost Time (s) 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0' 4 0 �, ,�,t,A ���.�k.,an,..��. sa...,a,�. _z» aa,.v,;a..�, �°x`^i>u.,�+�,��,.�. -..0 e,o,R.«.,,w ...�,.�-..�.�'cF ..�:�.:�;:wexe.,,w-�: a�,m,✓3.w,,,.�.�..,«.>.».,.,�a :r», - Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 ar°b tUfrlltlg°JpeeUml< YP .) 3» ¢a a Lane Util Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 KAM, Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 - 'Sattl Flt Permitted .0.950 0.950 �atd,��F�low�(perm)�»��x� �� 3539 �1y583a�;1770 3539,:,1770� �158� Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Headway Factor 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1.00 30" L..xs�<sw4.:�, wWSe,R�•U. aJ,ti s., Cd$S wax�k`_,,,,.�„m: .raa.,.,-., "^w a� 'dms,.�..,asw .....�� `u:.n,.u_..auseMmnts<zd.:3zPPa+.�^.....Mo,...d2iP,.r„�'a' .x� - - Link Distance (ft) 2620 2652 2623 � �d��t?xm� Travel dime' � � =59 3 fi0 3 59 6 I;AM :.� '�,rt��::`"'s,.t�.».s: `.L»^ s:�Gaz�a.��`; 'Y�»'S,,�r,�.i;' . Volume (vph) 931 32 144 709 61 492 Add Flow(vph) 1012 35 157 771 66 535 x- Turn Type Perm Prot Perm Permitted Phases 4 Z "07"s .....tE��a�.�.���r�a'�'�'���w�n�''.?�3,u`jai,�`,d.»w3"�`a' �,l..l�.=s� .�.'si - Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 : Total Split(s) 25 0 25 0 12 4 37 4 22.6 22.6 Maximum Green (s) 20.5 20.5 8.4 32.9 18.1 18.1 `ix'P�^^T w" 10111,,_1112M.,r^ +n- q - (ellt�vw ryTirnai4s) y„s ��,,m 3 5{�?3 5 3 0 5 >�3 �mx r Y} � AU Mu °a '+»aha'' Wyk'c ' All Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 . 1.0 Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes x sx�*"m?-^.?t .a my„. - :r-s'°9, r^a� x Vehicle Extension (s) �3 Q a 3 0 ® F a vew-..0 wuaur�awuv».w°A+�,�,za+,r ,u v�_`�„ .,,�kr.<-0P�.�„»��. ,.da.. ,�.o .*&Ss�» �-».,.w.a :• o ,xm x.m.�r .�;��J .w�£w.,�s'e.ms&�^.. _.x.«s,a�,.�.�.�k.�ram,w..�. ms? Recall Mode None None None None Min Min Wa�k�Time (s)� ��� � ��,,, 5 0�� 5 0 � 5 0� �, 5 0 ,��5 0 ��� fi#� k, -�����,,���•� � � � ;� a ,�h Flash Dont Walk(s) . 11.0. 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 >z Act Effct Green (s) 19.1 19.1 8.0 28.0 13.6 13.6 r.�»,,-�.x=,.: z.� x- Actuated g/C,Ratio sa, .�, t .-..s=i.�: .a�a v/c Ratio 0.75 0.06 0.58 0.39 . 0.14 0.80 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 rt LOS C A B B �y..,.�».«.. .�xa m�� ^� �� �, � s=^=^.��^^� a�,x„r%�°'" ax, '�F^ '�� 3 - � ^k�•zs��t-. ^� �^�,.,�, �»r� sz Approach Dewy t h1a8 B A 5k11 4 X13 7 i �µ a � x� Approach LOS B B. B Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters.Engineering Group - Page 3 5: Shaw Avenue & Hayes Avenue Future (2025) With Project-AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5/27/2005 an�rGroup� ^,�" , EBTEBRVIBL B '� CSB£ NBRh � � f Queue Length'50th (ft�M 153 �0 50` 62 17 57� � � ,..^ Queue Length 95th (ft) #252 15 #125 106 41 #207 Turn Bay Length (ft) Basepaci "(u h) 146w4 676` 289 2156 X6'16 76 max' w .u,.. - .a... Starvation Cap Reductn 00 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 ..N 0 0 0 0 0 terse ttc on Sr►mary M ix � �s f ,?f3. AreaTYpe,� .. <_.spa Other .m . . � r .w, �� ,. _ b " :re�. �x� .. � w� .:��s.3x Cycle Length 60 ActuatedrC clekLengfh�0�5: � z � u - Natural Cycle:60. Gontrol Type Actuafed Uncoordinated ti „.�x...,Tti., Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.80 ;°, 8Ar " 4 Intersection Si nal Delay 1 � r Intersection LOSB . ,^sat', A r Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.9% ICU Level of Service B i�A .mz..,.h..,. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Splits and Phases: 5: Shaw Avenue &Hayes Avenue 'Y' o2 4 o3 ' 04 og _ 37..4' is - - Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group. Page 4 7: Shaw Avenue& Parkway Future (2025) With Project-A Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5/27/2005 :LaneGraup ` ;, tr f ,4vFBL ,d EBTEBRriBLWBfWB2f NB B (BR� SBLBT5 R Lane Configurations_ 1) ttt r ttt r fl� r n tt r Ideal,Flow(uphpl .1900 19001900@� 1900Fj19001900190019;005 61900r; 1µ900 y 1;900 i1w900 Total Lost Time(s) 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 4Lea .,00. Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0..,aA* ..:.�+a�i-�aLn�.,;�,.«ts,... .�:'.w.„. 0 10 0 0 �-r�t .,s�;x r-*� *'�i'r' ,� �*. rf "zF�r,.;�R�' i �r t'�p >6' 1.�v � ��ex �.ht E'� .�:7 ^x s'^"x . a•`�"1 �- €urnrng .aa, Lane Util Factor 0.97 0.91 1 00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.95 1.100 kaS G�k � � �aakr -s ..3x«.�, .vaf t�t k ,�.-." , 3�.. �at.2,�xs7: .,.,x�x .� „+ amu,• t mcr a.,d �Y s,.um,r.« 4x...:.1r�.-; " Fit Protected 0.950 .0.950 0.950 0.950 Sattl Flow(pyo = 3433 , 5085 158334335065 X1583, 3433 ` 3000' ' 1441433 X339 1583. Flt Permitted 0 950 0 950 0 950 0 950 Sattl Flow(perm) k3433 ,5085158334335085 f 583 343 30;00144 3433 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Headway Factor 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 . 1 00 E., �Ck,�peed ,w�uw�.,:.r.�..m�ww"s2.:. .0...« ,x�...vx`,...w�.„,a.,�av.J:�a. •:,.k.w�„���� '>� aa�=.w+n+�xks,... a.•...,,,.� ,,.,,xszahis.,.k.,x.,.,s.�}!as.��.t,�_�:�.���ux�n,.��..�.c„ aa ..�m`��,,,. Link Distance (ft) 2652 1415 2857 487 • xa l.�nx;et;..a�,�.k .dr,,..sa.a,,.x..,�3 'x:k�.���L�s;.: :3.G,w"...'�'.:its.a1�.,5..„cw �.x„�4�.��.+?,�+.�,f�..3a�-:�4x� .., a:`�� ,.x��:.fuv'"�w�,.w:a;xi�`;ttaµ.,�..` „su,LwE,..l'Y"�r.�akli��uxi...,5.b....,,:...,7 "-,r�3'S.,.:aL+"�Ot.a'is,�; Volume (vph) 17 ..1526 41 567 ,848 167 81 135 905 159. 74 15 } a � L� .n�r....>�r.,idw �uakv�x.�.xr r.„.�kc.�a.,...�wt�,h.t s. ..r.�.',"d<a.a.. ."�, .�,... ..,s"�.¢�, m.,�l.`��d..�su.uw.�a,. .a.o.-kms..`kms., .a.u. .,,:,..:. ..a �:,, std.,n.,> na�.0 ,a Aax,,.,,»�.nw,x d.«•S.�M,. .,.G. Adj. Flow(vph) 18 1659 45 616 922 182 88 147 984 173 80 16 wrea,o.a.x�`vx...,as Yb'.xa�tna_'��, k�� ,�,a.�n'A.wa,;,...0 asza¢nS.,:... �.� ;. r,•acmzsw<b:. a,a.,a �,a's�.,�,z e.,...�.zu.Via:Yz. E:.�«7,m,,..m,��.`�a,nu�,2«��sw,ia�,.. Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm. " a�"^x4r;;x� �^"x � � �� «.^°.r H r ^fir•' � . ..�.�"" .' r, "P�x'^x �„ y b��r,�.�.:,}•a..,..wre.u»Y xasaaac.,�,'>a'`.vk���1a,°�,.k',•.,w.,,w'.�,s'�.R,b�.'�sW,.,.. ,wsa-x.a v'«.�5,1.��'-,'�"..��nx.- :x,r�3.�aw»wa-p-vw�.�u.z..�c o,�,.,."w�arr'a3,.:..,«w.._,�.�:'w. .,suayss: .,i 0. �'S;�.�z�aL:x�+�a� . Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 . � � -'-'�:.. "�4� *��x �v,�„�+ '��-'^^'s-�.s-�_r�w��^°,�.. �� � ��,-��-��� x _. ��F�S.ra�f�, fi� �s,'�`�5,.., "C y-�t��m`- •;�'. Rwa¢..w ta.:,r<va.ae3a...Ca.du v3„e&� '� �',x'��ak�cu�aa�....u�-,,,,�,,.�.x.,.,.,�;,,e �S,ua.." ,.•1a�fic.rL��,� v�x��;-sks��,�*...�. S�m�,, sa,,:. ..�..w..ya .'.'�c..,u., ,��s..ra..z„,�' s2'xe._,si's-.gx sea.a,� " Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4 0 4.0. 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Total Split(s) 8.5 34.4 34.4 21A 47.0 47.0 9.7 25.0 25.0 9.5 24.82'4 8 •.a,nriseauxueaaH�»w..�Ac.��m�SS ,t�:*�`�s`��rex�. <,.xfi..s.,..^.�,.���,w���s.�, ,....,tea .a��caaz: ..�". .sr.: �'kv.-v,.. "aa�.Baa+,,.,+,...:,.-.-a,.,>...��ru:?sw*,-:�C�Zie.��ie;w'xh,?x's-:a,-��., :rr.,:wsx,�i "a.,aw. Maximum Green (s) 4.5 29.9 29.9 17.1 42.5 42 5 5.2 20.5 20.5 5 0 20.3 20 3 ��.wmw'.,»ama<ww.�'a+Y..+z.?'»�'"�w�t�' ..�..a.rc.baa'?axrc5,nae.v.,..,`b-=.�.a4auR,,,:q.nom.,..,,.1 z,..w,.. ",e�dr,�,.aw ...r�•Zis�La.,.'«`*A'...u.:�;;2aw._-saf.y.�..�..as 'a:�att.bsa.'�,az�...Il.&.a,•�raa,.= �'i�',w.,:�' `a�aa�,...�+.wP. FF'F., aa.J�, All Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 0 1 0 1.0 1 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lead/Lag ���n;��� �.Lead y�,� Lag Lag�k .LeaQd�������Lag r ,Lag a Lead�� Lag� L`ag Lead£ fr Lags ag x-as_wan�,a,,, � . a,.0...ek ._.. .,.� a, .. .�...,.,r., ,.. -, ru.,.�......�. a«.,a�,a:..,..:..,..7.�xaz= auzo,;,�,:.• Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode . None None None None None None None " Min Min. None in Min L( r Walk Time(s) < , 5 0 s 5 0 { � n5 0R�O �5 05 0 5 O rzX 5 0 ,_..rte„F .��,,, ,�� �., ._.�.<,�s��� ,, .aa,,.;�am Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 .11'.0 i..<s,...,w.a-,.rw-.,a,�n..-w.<.�+.,�xz.., fix....«::..,..�w��ex',{�u aar.,,,:a�w*„a-.....�,s:«� ,,,.:.''-.3'M..T,,..+s-,t..s'hu.z.�a.+ .x.' v. .�.,.i n c...a.,�.,�a. .�,...i� ».�' a,v�u z�"�'?zz•r Act Effct Green(s) 4.5 30.5 30.5 17.1 48.2 48.2 5.7 18.3 18.3 5.5 n 20.3 20.3. v/c Ratio 0.11 0.94 0.08 0.92 0.33 0.19 0.40 0 89dr 0.91 0.80 0.10 ( .04 Queue Delay 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0000 sf otal De(ay �N 43 39 7 6 9 55 12 2 2 T� 46 220 7 30 3n x68 6 2772 9 -•ei,ax».. .s taf:�a,.,3 r` '.:tn va§.tu..ad' ...�+�l., zt '� a x" a.aa. jz e 5 . LOS D D A E B A D C C E C B uv..-,..a,..,,:xe�.0..,..aa...::C.u.,r ..�`ah �„d,«....w,xaS'S...:,,. .rP-?w`i�h.s?:r..+a: .:..a.�'a..,.....,. �?W'a"'�R�;a�'a....k.e�ma.,�..�,.ti,6.mxecNma.,.,.,..as�,..,v^�,u "3 4.,,._...•:.. Approach LOS D C C D Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1 7: Shaw Avenue& Parkway Future (2025) With Project-AM : Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5/27/2005 - Queue Length 95th (ft) 16 #445 23 #284 148 33 .49 159 #326 #107 37 16 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Ca(�aci v❑h) b���� 1:65 =�,1�3h��"582�� 672 �28D6�� 955� ��219� �'�932 ,� 567,�' 217 ' 839387 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �Reduc�dy/c�Rat�o � T.� 4�'4.1 �%�094� .���SK�,.092x0;>3;3���4�19w„�040'�' FQ69;�OF�7 �0800`10�`"��Ox04 .rte—*^^<-•--s�'^x--*^.'s^�.,�^ �,�.� x ���''�”" �. Cycle Length 90 z.�, .�s�,wa.. ..arJ.btn.«p.• .a�ea„���r,A.�re�_ . �x ,. ..... ae,�� .+.wf_:...c� u, �'�.- c�---�.->::��2�.....�.,..a�.�..>. .,.�.,..d5:,;. .�z,,,�i'r:.avt..<�,�:aY�..._:�.w=F.�ta..,�.��: Natural Cycle 90 Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.94 -! �rr� ,. a re ^�r� p#y�'s � ;-�' { � �� �•ir' n"�' � —�,.m�^^�s � �:c^7� v�& ��� 3 �f� 3� ;. � _ Intersection Si nal Delay 32 3 � � � -� Inferse'�tlon LOSS C ,V• � r �� � �, �:; Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.4°t° ICU Level of Service D 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. Splits and Phases: 7: Shaw Avenue& Parkway \11 +� 01 o o 2 03 -7�* 04 25:$� 05 06 07 r-- 08 V I 977"T"'77 n . 85 r 47.s .,_:Via. ?R +�,`C�,•' -rs'�.k'R s v N y Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 2 12: Gettysburg Ave. & Hayes Avenue Future (2025) With Project-AM HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5/27/2Od5 Movement��,����3 '�„�EB �,�E6T��V�EBR �NB `aft .BT "iNBR�NBL����� Bfi���£ FB�"�rBL� SSB tP ;56,; Lane Configurations tt r tt r tt tf �^, t'x a ?5• ;, 'c' ""'.,,,e"`. ,Free'^'°1} r Si n Control t �� . Free �� x .r.���..am_ .baa ,»,.rszu.'-_....«.? s ...�s-�,® Grade 0% 0% � 0% 0%0% � ... r ..'.� i _:. m"`",'lei .`z"'. ,:�� -.::. ,,., E � � _ szx �. :o.,>�'�" � �:r�': 3,r'P;,: :,• e'�',X"`_u. >.: Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 2 H'ourl�"/flow rate § .:1fi08 11� 59 24f1 �4,5� a �, Yi' '` � p'"� '�` :...;....v`�, � r,, �",r";. x.. �,. ^, .,..`�tas�r..,r:s,..,u ..�..a+x.awx .:.c uas....�v��ssa..�..tet m;,s�.Via.. ,.i,,:. ..»„ax.�.,..3,.��.�-„,�"+,sd` ,cs,.�,� .,adr,. �,,.r�'�Sas;s; Pedestrians �, �.,as a m� ��r err I C'�"ir. S3 3 �-� �•”" � x s s "�: .,� �. �:. 'tea` � T `�#"� .a a r"z : Walking Speed (fUs) ,..m. M � ,,.• "�,a ri :r�'`�y-^�..�,u,�^' ,,, �� ����,;-�rz�a,�..�.-.,�,��x���";�'c�°^� s�s '« +�. '.xr� �,E� x"�• s x'-,x,. fi �''' � . r,`e to � •v r.C �' x � .z s'�,- 9 ,,�.y v�`a f �"D�s*�a �: v xu..u�.,r,�,uar..aa3�u.n,a�,,..sz,.„,:9��,N,�S...�.� •�xsn��:.,?a.,..�a.<a.....<�,< ..:...�s-.aw..+ e.�u�..�aea..,:;x.,, a....7.x...� ..._.Is.,�;z,�.,�.1 ate, ..z.w�c�. «..,..s,.�..�s.,.�.w.,aa�sw1a ..d>. Right turn flare (veh) ^-�..:^>c'. �� xmcl•m.� � �. '�„,�`;-�,�'^� �� �r '�'`� ' t .-r v��iti� '�"�„""v`r �"�- �^'."�� a�,�'"'sw"�,.�r^°�^,,t'°'"'xr,�,a y�""rr�"n':.S' �� _ . nxiw.,y:�ixiaeaa,.a�.S.t =,..e����5�m„w.sana'aaz�i.�,esud�;;:a.mei«saa'�`at,uv,w2�a,»,z$„�3r,.�„^ � �,,:..«�,',�Ua-k7�»��`.�.�'.,rz,�.,..b,«.wt,«:.�.z.P'w� ..1..,w1A,�'`a.nr.�e�„3✓�°y��5stu,xx.,,.w }`..�'C' Median storage veh) pX platoon unblocked e s u"''�S�' cx: rr.• tw, wx�a �`"b " �' -rr5 '#'.,c, �s � """.""":"L�r ,�s"r'r ”`_ �'°r'�.` ,'af e �' '�' vC1 stage 1 conf vol /�"`•""�° � c "' "�,y w � �”e �l� ,,,�raz� � ��£� �`�t`'�t S�`r;, "`�� ra t r� n� � 'ax.� �' x� �'�^ .� �,xV2y:stage 2sConf VoI r s�3 t Si "' � ,�'3„����.���rCiM�x`3."`,�a.L.n.a.�k ,c. �€ .� a':,,�,,�• l�' .�a s ��. a�x�sr�A� :. _. vCu, unblocked vol 520 737 88 671 701 220 182 482 - oli r a�x:�auca ,. .M„a,»,,,fix.,«,« ,��'3.u:.d"'�.v,::.,,,,�;a.*,�.µF ww�m,-r. ..si a:.', ,..a.,wa, u ..,, �•�. }. tC, 2 stage(s) f ^�a^^e•xn m*-�„. "cjt. �� dv '°^.^ "4' 4 0 `�, "^ ,�5 ��' 4.04.5� � h`°"'�^`° '"5 ^'`,,,�"'sn � z..;s. eu4,,argz 6: p0 queue free% 73 97 94 92 100 94 99 97 rx+ •�^•�:r.�”TTMC""""a,:^��" v c r -`n`^.�,�,�-rr»^— ^m^t. ^� c»• "� i ,r<'�" "'x" '1^?,�, . Direc' ""ti n; Lar�e# ` EB; E 2' EBSB"TiBm2BNB 4NB� NB B 3N4 0� ��-220�' �� Volume Left 108 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 9 0 0 10 xr#.uu.,.._.ai::, r:,.,, ..e., zx.,�;�... ii.X�.u,,.xx.,.,..a..,�.:.,,..s.,:w...�.a n!t....�.�,,.:s..¢w4..x?aaxa�,....._.,.�cxc.:s�„r,.:>. »Mc.-.Sa»�Z.aa.s,.:....d. rokt a.wx.:;,rk. �.,..,,�xv xxa,�.,.»„�:.fib tty,.ai„�::,.x.:�Lc,,..z.. .x•.;,v.,�- .:...a cSH 402 332 332 953 305 349 349 784 1391 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capac}�/ i0"27 p 02 0 020 06 ?08 0 000 OQ 006 0 01a 13 , 0:1302 Queue Length 95th (ft) 27 1 1 5 6 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 , fa,t,•.r.wa;ww:d.__e.::yaa7ax�.b)�.:v.Mwa,a�.�.w.,.:.5.,.z:;s,�,..x:ash'..,.....s�......:�:xas;,s.�•: m.,�^>3,..�u.,,:...�x:�.° ss."'a�r.._.»..w�..xz�..:.:.,xv,..:.>:ai.. ,..,,,,.e,w»,:,,,�..,�a-.�masr�•,s»...�.o.��,-:.� h„a:x.-,.etc.0?t➢1..:.'s�.i�.....a�,.sar:_z: Lane LOS C C C A C C C A A Approach LOS 8 B Average Delay 4.0 Analysis Period (min) 15 ,v A�,: F” x +a r a"r. "' rA' 'fit” .... 'r' '�' ""`2�w` 5 -"'og g -a x", Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1 3: Shaw Avenue & Bryan Avenue Future (2025) With Project-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5/27/2005 Lane Configurations tt r tt r � tt r ,Ideal°F.fow�up=hpl �, n'�»h,y#1900 ��900 � 900 �1'900� 1900 3� 1900 Wei 1900 �1900_�`1900 , 1900y�1,9Q0 3�19k00 Total Lost Time (s) . , 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0. 4.0 4.0 4.0 -4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 �eading�`Detector(ft) E`� � e�� `' Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 .1.00 0.95 .1.00� 1.00 0.95�F1.00 �Y1.00 0.95 1.00� .. Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Sad�Flow(prat)~�yy�� ,17�70���3539 ��1F583 770, 3539 ��!583 ��17,0 3539 _�1583��1�770�3539u,1583: Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Sa#d»Flow(Perm) w 177035391583N 177035391583m1s770 3539 �1583�177�0�3539 1583 Right Turn on Red - Yes Yes Yes Yes Headway.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 X1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link Distance (ft) 2077 2620 1310 823 �_..��s, rt�iYx.,G`_5 Volume (vph) 73 491 23 205 626 104 23 476 130 147 468 .97 :Peak HourFactor � ��0 92�0�92��v 0�92� 0 920 92 �' 0 921 0 92�'�'0 92'�0 92-� '�0�92 0�92� ��0'`92 Adj. Flow(vph) 79 534 25 223 680 113 25 517 141 ,n .. 160 509 105 Lan�e�Group F�fow(vp � 79, �53� 25223, 680 113�� �25���5�17'� ��141` �w160��509 ,N���105 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Permitted Phases 4 8 2 t,6 d Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 .4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum S lit(s) r` x �8 5�X20 520 5 S ` 205 " 20 5 8 5 20 5 X20 5 $ 5` X20 620 5 Total Split(s) 9.8 20.5 20.5 15.0 25.7 25.7 8.5 21.5 21,5 13.0 26.0 26.0 otalS ht %E sem' 14 0% 29 3% 29 3°1° 21 4% 36 7% 36 7% 12 1°l° E30�7%' 30k7%a Maximum Green (s) �5.8 16.0 16.0 11.0 21.2 21.2 4.5 17.0 17.0 9.0 21.5 . 21.5 .. r a � v R s,R � a ez� , AN s»•a s _ .g..` . All-Red Time (s) a 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 _ 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lead/Lag3 ex ,mLead Lag Lag LeadLag x Lag Lead Lag Lag Leach La Lag _r'.��.. Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yeses Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ^' T.. '°Y ."` ..x 'Ya'eo llehicleExtension(s)r 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 d3 0 3r0 a3 0 £y3 0 3a 3`0 3 0 n , v Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Act Effct Green (s) 5.9 14.1 14.1 10.5 21.7 21.7 4.7 14.5 14.5 8.4 20.9 . 20.9 Actuated g/C KRatio x. 0 090 23, 0 23 0 1f7 035 0,350 07' 0 24� 0 24 1E} 13 „0 34s 0 34' v/c Ratio 0.48 0.66 . 0.07 0.74 0.54 0.18 0.20 0.62 0.29 0.68 0.42 0.17 Queue Delay 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total Delay' X41 2 `25 5 9.7 40 5�20 5 5 0 35 7 2'4 '6 02 41 9 17 3 5 0. .e_ LOS D C.,._., AP D C A D C :A D B A Approach LOS C C C Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Pagel 3: Shaw Avenue& Bryan Avenue Future (2025) With Project-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5/27/2005 'L'anx' ;. tet, l=6Lry "„' ,EBT', BR. Bl� I6R w k1 NBRSLSBT Sf k ., �.,.� ,a w,... ., _ v ,. .._A.., _ _,.,, .. e. .,. ...�,. ,. '.�� Queue Length 95th (ft) #85 158 17 #202 183 32 33 150 39 #151 133 31 �Internal Link Drst rpt 1997 2540 _ M 1230 °743 �«a. *.:, Turn Bay Length (ft) BaseCe acr v h 167 946 44 t39f` 1301' 654 X125992` 546' 254 �1 k - Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .L,:>.......:. Fwd:&arttii:K»1:Fsc'x..LLxluLv'>X$.��k:u'uixw.�xu.Aw�u.:4:>..�F.:TihXw �>A:.w R�r.> .aoum.>& — nte�etron Cycle Length: 70 t'E2 yrnzx,:,'� xr .�,e>�}���,. �"»:,$ 1{;” '7 ��;.p"�""�"„ 2��"�'` �yr.'-,ry-"r �?`R���m x �rarc:s^�s���rye'c`�•�.'�•''ps'�`r�" a"'�`k z'�� `"`�8"'K' w"�, �'° � - �Crlu�Ied�,CY�ril,G�.«gah Natural Cycle 70 't >.,�� '� '?Ck�.c"`�i"""°"""�"TSS�'-' ^'��+' �^ -vim': ��s ,�' .�� - +�>_.z�t'�^�•-,�+N n �r"rr a, .. .Emsxwa:...,w.�>:<.�»:r»a�Ce.,.a,a�1.,a.a<».�.,a��>?n.�..,�:a*.�,>�ax ,s>,.,mma�x .�„ >:>..,�, .t.�:�3��»".�:z.�.wb.. .a -w".: .•.....�x :s.c"�,> a:F�«a:��;�..k�aa.>�:k�:k, '�;>.m'�,° w� .3�'�'�r,"��'��:iu Maximum We Ratio: 0.74 ..:wamawkx.,s,auir.�,. s>�ss:ak....aN-> �U:;�.=.uta„ �s:.ez. <.,...�;�kx,a�.a.�«d^.�,•^'4'".<�n.>w:.'�> w.�.�uid. :�.�.,u,«. w.��.,.an.,...":,. awra�...;r,x..a.a4..,.�.:`. ""�s�,�'''�z>,:.=�"?w>,..:'�3;�%� .'i��,�..sM,>�` ,'t.:r�,.a�'3a: '� Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.6% ICU Level of Service B 5 �%r �JERI,, # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer Splits and Phases: 3: Shaw Avenue& Bryan Avenue 07 1'' m2 m3 M' 04 HIP$"." +t `+dC`,�, M!:�'%�r w 05 o6 07 08 s.✓h�� `. �. �'S� �Pvy° a>,ys�«�.�Y#`� � �:.. { �:iK•a Q; a ka:v :�>�-� Y �`�`�+xi, int kit m.n q r t�,�y'.ras't# .�� Baseline Syndhro 6 R kport Peters Engineering Group Page 2 5: Shaw Avenue & Hayes Avenue Future (2025) With Project-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5/27/2005 Lane Grou EBT EBR t/VBL WBT N$L iR u - 3 Lane Configurations tt r ' Jf V1i r Ideal Flow(�phpl) n 1,9001900 19Q0 190019Q01900g.. ., : .. <. � :., Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leaden°g Dete"ctor(ftx � :50f 50 ,s S0`, 5050x 3 3 bc.. m. - Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Util. Factor_, 0.95 . 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 SagFfow�prot) 3539 1553 1f770 X3539 X7701583 z F aea .ea...�..�.:.:ra.� s . .. .,.«���'�......:. .,..�. _ �,. ...a..rz., u.�.�.�..,:=., r�=.,xr�.,x�w._ •swz&''�v,u�. ..., ,....�m�n �� .z<�x,�..�»sem-��.z, .,:.a�,,.�'�,. M.. .s Flt Permitted - 0.950 0.950 - Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1µ.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Link Distance (ft) 2620 2652 2623 z z R Trauel Tsme », GO . x 'Taa _.,.$.,.-.-..�,-.rs:�wass�� .� m.x:..,.«$.�..,�m ,�c, »b..,s..rw,a�:r�>_:. .r.�.,_,« du5-.a aY�,L'vs� , .+w.•� .<,`>�',.rr: ...n.F.« xw u.«,�s>,.:�,a .sr`n c. �..�,.. _ Volume(vph) 741 107 398 874 71 356 Adj. Flow(vph) 805 116 . 433 950 77 387 �a- LaneYGrouplow(�vph} 805 1"16 433 950 77387 x ,__ Tum Type Perm Prot Perm Protecfetl Permitted Phases 4 2 Minimum Initial (s) �M 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0: Total Split(s)w 21.0 21.0 22.0 43.0 22.0 22.0 . �:e• 0 '..".; c O a 0 u0- 0 � 0 3.a-r "�. O �7z ".� �� ,� Yn.�"�-amsr�'`" r�;�*"":� - otar lSpllt(/o) ..v . 3%w32 Maximum Green (s) 16.5 16.5 18.0 38.5 17.5 17.5 - All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (63.0 . 3 Recall Mode None None None None Min Min Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Act Effct Green (s) 16.0 16.0 16.5 36.6 9.2 9.2 v/c Ratio 0.77 0.21 0.80 0.40 0.25 0.65 . Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS - .C A C A C A Approach_Dela Approach LOS C B A Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page.3 5: Shaw Avenue & Hayes Avenue future (2025) With Project-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5/27/2005 ..... Queue Length 95th (ft) #246 33 #306 122 52 58 rvN!�`,„. �,,,'^�..' 'tTw 4� x.�^^wr "^a 4w '"";'�'"s"�` � §� '�t" � -r✓k #q ��g�r ->r�.'m, ',.'.�'� 'E�"�,�.C"'�' ,� <rri "`�.kY Turn Bay Length (ft) � rx r'v°m"a t r L'� "c x -�* ra""`° "., �.. ac' � .'"."« 3 r*a.:. -dw"+*:.:s •� ..r .. 6xse.x»nes,.Rte". ..,�s.�. .,a� ..�' 'n,u�?....sr .,. :�,xek"._�6r�a�F.:•ax ..,t',�.3.S�aanr:i�x.?:r..-..a.�.�»,n. .::.�,rw�..»,.,,i,b.�.a�. r-»,::.r ��.w:.m rF ,&:."Y,.�f' ��, ...,uax;aux':��<+�3..s.,s.kixw�..`»"$ml�`r3.i:u !;1uS - . Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 s "^"^.s� ^tet. ,-".-. -r� 'x .F�,"e..a'�!n S r',�"�'..• �""` ,ts s'.uk�`re'» �'�:4�� 7 -°"r`d"�+�3 �� ,v .�sr�' ::� � ��.`�"' "�a°�.s>��m47�y `'Y'" r'' Spillbaa�kmCap x w Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 N . .. o-....>�.a,.,.:Il�ss,.xt..c�.,».ou.<Pz:aa.zc»»u?n:»,:",aaa»#3a::w,sr.>..�t,.�,.:�„F- .r._•�,ry.-aaxzsa.4.x5:.�:v�,..x�:w.:�:..�.`�.w`»x.-Wim,,,:m��.,w».:<rc .a.<x�.'�. �i,`s`�"13?>�w:k��' ni?.�u x.,�».m '^� ,`T me secort"�Summa ^ F �� � MMr ,r ti � kt �3 Area hype ` Other u .. cxcwwxF. N,Irc Cycle Length 65 �x.^re„+++.e:�• ^, r�,� '�3" �."r� \ t _ ��` m�« m . ^�.� ,z. s rn mm �. ^9'r y»a ^w3� s,.,,�� �I�i �.c�.:a �.�.....'�..',.x;�'�..,_��.'ffi�a��'.:�•�,�,5�.�..:«;?2a.R:���" �..+�*3:��:��.���p � ���`»,.P�.;w x;,:";�` x:r .a� Natural Cycle 65 • S ra:a,s� r,.. "'V �,xr* � �. ,»t ur^W' s xr-"'°'�r�-'� "'."^�4'�so- ^r+,�m re^ a �^:' � � �' �, �." fit.n Control�Type: Actuaied'Uncoorc�inated��� �� � 1 ��k ��� � ��' ����'� � >� ��� ���•��� � �' ����, Maximum v/c Ratio. 0.90 Intersection Signal Delay 14 ��. ,� z�� W� �� - � Intersection�L,OB ��� r �� y � �� la?a.�.w..�o,�',ww xs..,,ux, sw,n..ate..,rc wa ,•at�x..�ua��.,at....mem,.u,�,at. ri"..�x`�'°w..i>�:�a�:+e x �...a,�.-;. �.,.a,.«.,.,.;� .�',. ��, +:s.,»�'-.'«s'�w.�.��.w.'r; '�``3,?�.�. .� �`�f. .: Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.5% ICU Level of Service B .a .t��i `. � �.��,.sa'a..a.,s., °�... Y�u4•r.�vra�.�..•,.:dsa.�t. � � t.J..C,�.x ixx»'�xl;�. ."¢cSrt'i. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. a,�rs ' Queuey hown is:rnaxirnum after two cycles g ., 3 � � r � �, k�r:.b'.,56A�,mci s...,.rw,�.« ,.,:x.Auaa.,..,Sdiaa,:.�,.:crass.,a�.u.�.x,...,r.anil�......Wx�i-eo .. <'&. �Yt`a+."`�.Uar'' .Z:;��i's`�E�:,a.� ...�s��aa...S:r:;�k,�3�ra�iYm'6wS,Cwr,,.�°�`.r...,.»wu'e°•` W.e�1,,.wwu.,�,» ��... Splits and Phases: 5: Shaw Avenue & Hayes Avenue o2 7 o3 ' v4 T }1. 1)3x K ayJ i t L Yn, uu C - ,',, li': 22<S,3tS�. iir�z ,i:1iu�.�a�..ta'vr5'i."..`„''t«us��c,: �' �j.M ?«u _.f'�s `'r f3' _ bs m ..�. 1£i¢`',. „e° �,'�t5'-..u°�v'�.M Sed ., .. eka „a» a. OS Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 4 7: Shaw Avenue & Parkway. Future (2025)With Project-PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5/27/2005 ane ;roup a �f., BLy, EBT� EBR ` NBLITV6T, SRS' NBL'NBT NBR� TEM BTBR Lane Configurations tit r M tt " � 3tf Ideal Flow(uphpl) 81900 190019Q0� 1900. r1900 1900 ` 1900 :19001900, 19DQw1900y 100 �..�. ,..max « .�, Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 X4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft] 50 50 k 50 5050 50 50 50 50a 5050 A 50 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 k 0 0 01 0 0 w 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph)' 215 uKi 9 � 15� p 9 X159� 1� yz �� 9 r...aw.a.. :Gay.....__.Ys-s ...,`1au,•'�daa _N, a6»«a,` „�.H .Buu... x,.cw.. A ate.a,...ns...S..: .maw'-�w,,,, ..,xasa ,a .:, Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.95 1.00 xra, �als..z..z'. x m k, .,..,�' .,,zs :.�,�.,�� ..��,.,. �t ... v.ate e.«... a ...,.+✓.�,.w,aa.-,I ;,,w._u�..a�^..� ,«.�. ,.axsas.. �awzW �t«.=xrau a ate,_,x�..«, Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 SatdFlow r roti X3433 08x5 1`583 s x,3433' :5085183 3433 3390j1k441t 3433 339 15$3 ...k.Mar,,,_ Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd�Flow�(perm)��'���"' r3�33� x5085 1583��3433 ; �085,�sF583� 3433����390-��j4�4µ1��34�33539����583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes ;Satd��Flow�RTOR) ��� � � �66 3 � � _�=h �x �°�- 122�� � ���� s �" 295���� � ; � _✓���,> ::.kaa;la�..;,3..+.kcv., Headway Factor .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link Distance(ft) 2652 ry 1415 2857 487 t' x a 'x TravelTirne(s), 60 3 E m� 32 2 r 64 9 X11 1 a .. r4r.csF1�'. ....+a ..�=_,, ,,: .°,�,-ku..,•rknc..�.a,r .-bss.�«.tr..:a._ -.,5�a, r,. ..��x>. c „n»34 :� .,a-.� $".� �ki.,bskrt..., ,,... ,..aF:cc.,.»c - Volume (vph)w 26 1187 65 1141 1354 .112 101 653 271 64 H '34 18 Peak°HourtFactor n 0 92 0 920 92 0 92 0 92 {0 92 0 92' ,0 92 0 ��©920 92 0 92 n'.w..�d'on f2'. .5 aSn. ,.:,v4"a.o..<� ..3is.n n.. ..wY.✓.aw ..°2. ... 1.. .w.:.z�r.,A4s,. ,«. k.'nK✓�. �D:.....i r'3xi7�ro «..aexe.xd p26' Adj. Flow(vph) 28 1290 _a, 71 1240 1472 122 110 710 295 70 a37 20 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm ar^.. ProtectedPhaes 7 4 2115 1 6 k _«.� .�.,w. ,.�. a. ,.,, .xa....<.,w£r%:«l�n,au a..�....,..u.�`. ., E,_._&,°.amc r ,..«.,-=.a..W,.S. ..' .,w° .w,' .,, z.. ....aw..:.,-« a..«,,,:.;::✓, ,a '.nu�a..r Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Total Split(s) 8.5 34.0 34.0 47.0 72.5 72.5 12.2 30.5 . 30.5 8.5 26.8 26.8 f'�'otal S' Itt '% i ?:1't°!o 28 3°l0= 28 3°109 2°�06 4% SD 4% 10 2%0':25 4%u 25 4% .1°/�22 3°!0 -2. 3% ;..a�('g�._.,�.s .<.. _ 'w"'- ���,kra.man:;. ,3 Maximum Green (s) 4.5 29.5 29.5 43.0 68.0 68.0 7.7 26.0 26.0 4.0_ 22.3 22.3 All-Red.Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes f Yes Yes Yes r z30O8Q0 Recall Mode - None None None None None `None None Min Min None Min Min Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Peestnan _0 N .. Act Effct Green (s) 4.5 30.0 30.0 43.1 72.1 72.1 8.0 26.4 26°4 4.5 21.1 21.1 Actuated< IC F2atto 004 `�0'25� D 25 �`�0 36�'��0 61°� X0'61 " 0'07'm�0 22� 0 22 OSd4�' 0 18'� �0 18 v/c Ratio 0.22 1.00 0.16 0.99 : 0.47 . 0.12M 0.48 0.94 0.54 0.54 0.06 0.07 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS E E B E B A E E A E D B Approach Delay 65 93 450 0a 5 2 r.»..a.aa..a�...a. Approach LOS E . C D p. . Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1 7: Shaw Avenue & Parkway Future (2025) With Project-P Lanes, Volumes, Timings 5/27/2065 7-11 ane Group'r,s : �r EB " dT5 BR B MINI, B' BTS BR S� �SBTR Queue Lengfh 50tti(ft) 11 .`2376 3 m 500 ta239 0 43��300R rA 0 X27 '�? ; .zaluw. Queue Length 95th (ft) 27 #482 40 #653 279 26 73 #425 83 #54 28 22 Turn Bay Length (ft) 73"4 "';� Base;yCapac�ty(vph) 1127 X292 451 1250 X3101 R 1013 238 760 552 X129' '"63118 4w.:.u,i ,w xuc xw. .ss:t a xv c ar .s i ,c n .x: ti;. :.2 rxr x..z: aw-„ k•s.:,. .>,a,.:�€u:.xn xw. az'�a. r>? Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1+^�"'^».cp.;,.,. sr»""YTX*?,^-..-t'°'^£7�^c.. t,� h+,«.r,.^.,.^.•r aaac" ,a*. r.�"�^.,�v� � a}.�"'y,'a"r'P' "-�".4'"-ate .r-",-`�S c ,�"a< ""�+�.,� a,�'''°"'k,'�'.�'t* ''A"s?s r."' _ 0' ... @.P,_rv.._rz,....u. x.�P saxes_ .,:,..auaw:�ru'..z.,��e✓%.}.;.��.sx�,.i...��_.,.Fkx,»,„,u.�..sa.'°m. �,�:sk. '..:...�.�,>„�.,M.,;Z..xm.�.t._.r�n..„,,.kr.,.:.�....>._.. ��.,..>„.s.+a°' �>._w�:.:.,._ :x;Y�..=�:.��a x..,zro u r •'l;t. Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Retluced�vlc;�Ratio �� 022 x„ ?1 00 0�16�k�,0 990 47h� 0 12� 0 46 �, 0e93� t,0:53 �' Q�54���Q 05�;”0 06 �. ,..,w..,..e.,.✓a.:ema.., .. Yw'�kxw<...�m�.:�.�:r.�i xa,:,.u: ;w<enA� ._Y., .�.,v..�Y'� ...,�.z.,..a....�s`,......x.:»� smk:....,,ar.-:r '�.d$k. �x..,...�..>s:rmx�:m�-�.�»��,..;;u. ,..a ...5 ..... �<:c.az crFa �.�y eters con;Sprn .'J K �'i”. ar w,.rx'?. i,•sztx�4s 'k''S %'jA 3" ;f5 a - _� "C`T °4 a £d `;a`e p '}1 t..sx x 3 x "x Cycle Length: 120 �., ... xr£""4ex^.^m,� »'>~.,5,,•m'�'ta''�F'» �-ms'�w.-r^-,�.%^� � w M'"q�`aw�ar;rr�^e" � `+�e�aagv, fis� F"#�?.r e+ . Natural Cycle 120 - ac t.,xrcp zf,¢^xa s;:s:. �-t,✓.`^ ^r^ w. �x �,'�"r,mr�x°.�"k". °""� �,'�'�"n"�,sr-�' � �� ua a°a v.��" °'"",4.>,';`''''y.,it""�`r M� `' � z� .. Maximum v/c Ratio 1.00 r,•,.,.xt^'N,ra.'!"' S.MW ^'-trvXx'r sar s :: ga,.z -, ?, "^'xr.. "�: ".e "REEK' e,"4' ,Y r,a ';a. •vM' e . Intersection Si nal Dela X46 0 k � � � �� ' ��.r �Intersec('ion�LOS�D �� .zx„>..x. >. :�...«r•<a�..w•,._;..u•>,:s Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.9% ICU Level of Service F �. x+aa.�v.v>w`:odx.u.rtax«�"ar'.i.ffissx,»,�5.xnw,:�.,.�,x.,.s .;�a�?,.Y e � ..u.�..ran.,...y.:�•.:e'�. � �s,�au�.,,�_>a�,t.........,3s�.z�?ua-.cnz..xs S�u�,,; ."�„a�>ak:.,.,;n`,Y zC `r �,7x',�4 `,4+ ��� G� Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite �' Queue skrown is}rnax�rnum after two cycles t � R , ” , . u �x ":�� � .. � , �r . �.x.a..,r.w,w t.� ..,ok.SadU.a��s>,.,as-�as,.>.ad u mss:, :, ,•rrm•x.�, r`.>,at re f.zs ...��a�+.,., �`• �' # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. �,� ,r n' a� .' z a s• �: "' xa -A.,r�, *�`:; � '�• mss' r •c � �. �,,. � . Splits and Phases. ` 7: Shaw Avenue & Parkway 01 t� 02 7 03 �" o4 r ONEs'e m b, r' ($+!k w:[Hy-,E- .rte °.���.,.:.��.. 1 05 � 06 0 08 t ?y c,��z p r' �, 0 83:5 r'�2 J�3`: ` �"z.� z. .i k":; ` �:>s .:st A .;s u''� �,�:.:,.3usf_.,:'. 1 L:2:Sf. Y 20i?Oka�S'+`x S "a'4"M....�,�.x,a .. �°:,T�,r _ >w��. Baseline Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 2 12: Gettysburg Ave. & Hayes Avenue Future (2025) With Project-PM HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis5/27/2005 Lane Configurations tt r }t r tt r Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(ueh/h) m 39� 5 33� D; X10 X60 v9' 341 �45 71 447 y 93 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92w 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourl flow�atevph) 42 �5 �fi541p1a; 65b 64 X37 7 � 49 7 486 1D1 : Pedestrians '��k ' - ' Lane Width ft' � � m � . w3a, � ,te'�� Walking Speed (ft/s) w._ Right turn flare (veh) "�" :. " „�•S `^ T x' C36� �` xe r M- x',,.,grit a,.. - a zs ;«-^,.., e --. y 1lllediantypetJone� � ones a ..,tea Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) - pX, platoon unblocked} '5 ' uC,,confihcting�olurnef341 1882w4 .,93124®#...;xf �s1$58 � ,D 420 a vC1, stage 1 conf vol. s^,,, ..;.�K ^•��'�' m: � �,nrs.� �u+^^:; ,,,y ,� ;y- :.s� d� �t.'L 7. - � rnyK� x,x o'�.' �'(.. vCu, unblocked vol 1024 1188 243 935 1240 185 587 420,.. tC, 2 stage (s) �2 � ,.�. ,. 93 92 93 93 " •., v4�^,�'.��x,�;�: - PO queue free% 72 97 95 71, Dire tc Qn La# � f3 1 �E 2� €B 3"SEB 4� W1 � B2" B B�4"�NB 1 � 2N"9 3 �NB Volume Totalt x ,42 3 M. 3 x.36 54$ 5` 5 65 6;4185185 , ?49 «� ._...a�...... Volume Left 42 .0 0_M 0 54 0 -0 ,0 . 64 0 0 0 (7 cSH 149 163 163 758 184 151 151 825 984 1700 1700 1700 I. Queue Length 95th (ft)i 28 1 1 4 29< 3 3 6 5 ra 0 0 0. Lane LOS E D D A D D D A A Approach LOS D C Average Delay 4.5 Inte�section�Cap�acitywUtd¢atrofi�- � �35�1°I°�� $i�GU Level of,�erulCe � .us,.��. _� „s�...a <...,.rt� :ms= s, Analysis Period (min) 15 p BaselineSynchro 6.Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1