Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutT-5461 - Conditions of Approval - 1/30/2006 REPORT TOTHE CITY COUNCIL. AGENDA ITEM NO. COUNCIL MEETING September 20, 2005 APPROVED BY FROM: NICK P. YOVINO, Director DEPARTMENT DIRECTO Planning and Development Depart CITY MANAGER , BY: GILBERT J. HARD, Planning n er Planning Division SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF REZONE APPLICATION NO. R-05-02AND ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. R-05-02/T-5461/C-0.5-22 Presented to City Cuncil KEY RESULT AREA Date �o o S Disposition Customer Satisfaction RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions: 1. APPROVE the environmental finding for Environmental Assessment No. R-05-02/T-5461/C-05-22 dated June 21, 2005, that the project proposal conforms to the provisions of the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MSIR No. 10130). 2. APPROVE Rezone Application No. R-05-02 which proposes to rezone the project site from the R-A (County) and R-A/UGM (Residential Agricultural/Urban Growth Management) zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management)zone district. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Rezone Application No. R-05-02 proposes to change the zone district from the R-A (County) and R-A/UGM (Residential Agricultural/Urban Growth Management) zone districts to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone district for approximately 66.4 acres (net) of property-located north of East Dakota Avenue between North Armstrong and North Temperance _- _._A-Venues 'The application would bring the subject property into conformance with the 2025 ��Fresno'General Plan and the McLane Community Plan, pursuant to Section 12-403-6-2 of the Fresno Municipal Code. On August 17, 2005, the Fresno City Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezone application to the City Council. The Planning Commission also took action to approve related Vesting Tentative Tract No. 5461/UGM, which proposes a 257-lot single-family residential subdivision on the subject property. It is noted that the Planning Commission action on the tentative tract map is final and therefore, no action is required by the City Council. KEY OBJECTIVE BALANCE Council action regarding this proposed land use application optimizes the three Key Objectives of Customer Satisfaction, Employee Satisfaction, and Financial Management. Affirmative action by the Council will result in timely deliverance of the review and processing of the application as is reasonably expected by the applicant/customer. Prudent financial management is demonstrated by the expeditious completion of this land use application inasmuch as the applicant/customer has paid to the city a fee for the processing of this application and that fee is, in turn, funding the operations of the Planning and Development Department. Employee satisfaction is derived from the fact that the professional and technical staff, who have reviewed and made a recommendation on this land use application, have done REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Rezone Application No. R-05-02 September 20, 2005 Page 2 so in a thorough and professional manner, thereby enhancing the sense of accomplishment in the completion of the application process. PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT A 257-lot single-family residential subdivision on approximately 66.4 acres (net) of property to be developed at an overall density of 3.9 dwelling units per acre APPLICANT Dunmore Homes (Engineer: Provost and Pritchard Engineering) LOCATION North of East Dakota Avenue between North Armstrong and North Temperance Avenues ; (Council District 4, Councilmember Westerlund) SITE SIZE 66.4 acres (net) LAND USE Existing - Vacant Proposed - Single Family Residential ZONING Existing - R-A (County)and R-A/UGM (Residential AgriculturaUUrban Growth Management) Proposed R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) PLAN DESIGNATION The proposed R-1/UGM zone district and 257-lot single family AND CONSISTENCY residential subdivision is consistent with the 2025 Fresno General Plan and. McLane Community Plan designation of the site for low and medium low,density residential planned land uses ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING Finding of Conformity to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report MEIR No. 101.30. dated June 21, PLAN COMMITTEE`'- --The project is located within the McLane Community"Plan area, RECOMMENDATION for which no citizen advisory committee exist STAFF RECOMMENDATION Aprove rezone application PLANNING COMMISSION On August 17, 2005, the Planning Commission voted to recommend RECOMMENDATION approval of the rezone application by a 6-0 vote. REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Rezone Application No. R-05-02 September 20, 2005 Page 3 BORDERING PROPERTY INFORMATION WPlanned Land Use Existing Zoning Existing Land Use North Not in Sphere of Influence R-A(County) Single Family Residential Medium Low Density Residential Rural Residential Low Density Residential South Low Density Residential R-A(County) Rural Residential Medium Density Residential R-A/UGM (Residential Agricu/turaUUrban Growth Management) East Medium Density Residential AE-20(County) Vacant West Low Density Residential and R-A/UGM (Residential Rural Residential Medium-Low Density Residential Agricultural/Urban Growth Management) ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING The initial study prepared for Environmental Assessment No. R-05-02/T-5461 considered potential environmental impacts associated with the subject rezone application.and subdivision map request. The study indicates that the project, if approved, would conform to the land use designation and land use policies of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and is within the scope of Master Environmental Impact Report No. 10130. Therefore, staff has issued a finding that the project proposal is in conformanceto the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR No. 10130) dated June 21, 2005, which incorporates' a MEIR Mitigation Monitoring Checklist. This environmental finding was properly noticed with no comments'filed within the 20-day review and comment period. —BACKGROUND]ANALYSIS -The'applicant, Dunmore Homes, has'filed Rezone Application-No..R-05 02 and Vesting Tentative Tract - Map No. 5461/UGM for approximately 66.4 (net) acres of property located north of East Dakota Avenue between North Temperance and North .Armstrong Avenues. The rezone application proposes to reclassify the subject property from the R-A (County) and R-A/UGM (Residential Agricultural/Urban Growth Management) zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family ResidentiaUUrban Growth Management) zone district. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM proposes to subdivide the 66.4-acre site into a 257-lot single family residential.subdivision at an .overall density of 3.9 dwelling units per acre. On November 19, 2002, the City Council, through Resolution No. 2002-379,'adopted the 2025 Fresno General Plan which also adopted the McLane, Community Plan. The McLane Community Plan designates 25.8 acres of the subject property for low (0.0-2.18 dwelling units per acre) density residential and 40.6 acres of the subject property for medium-low (2.19-4.98 dwelling units per acre) density residential land uses. The applicant wishes to pursue development of the subject property with 257 single family homes. The requested R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone district is considered consistent with the planned land uses contingent upon the development of the property in accordance with Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM. REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Rezone Application No. R-05-02 September 20, 2005 Page 4 Furthermore, the proposed development with a density of 3.9 dwelling units per acre demonstrates that the project site will be developed within the overall density of dwelling units anticipated by the 2025 Fresno General Plan and.McLane Community Plan as.provided by Section 12-403-B-2 of the Fresno Municipal Code (FMC), Fresno City Planning Commission On August 17, 2005 the Fresno City Planning Commission considered Rezone Application No. R-05-02 and after a complete hearing took action to recommend approval of the rezone application to the City Council by a vote of 6-0. It is also noted that the Commission, by the same vote, also took action to approve related Vesting Tentative Tract No. 5461/UGM. The Commission's action to approve the tentative map, involved two modifications to the staff recommended conditions of approval. The Commission reduced the required landscaped setback along East Dakota Avenue from 15 to 10 feet and required that the lots along the south side of proposed East Saginaw Way be increased in size for the portion of this proposed street located in the southeast corner of the subdivision site. It is noted that there was one surrounding property owner who spoke at the Planning Commission hearing in opposition to the project. The opposition mainly related to the lot sizes of the proposed lots along the south side of East Saginaw.Way and the dedication requirements along East Dakota Avenue. Water Resources and Public Water Supply The Water Division of the Department of Public Utilities has determined that there is an adequate source of water available to serve the project with the implementation of the UGM service delivery requirements and environmental impact mitigation measures. The nearest.presently available water service line:is located in North Armstrong Avenue, adjacent to the site. The Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control_District (FMFCD) has indicated that.permanent flood control. service.is not available for.this.project. The developer will be required to construct-temporary facilities until permanent facilities become available. _.- _implementation of,the 2025 Fre'sno_General Planpolic�es; mitigation:measures ofMaster, Environmental. Impact Repgrt No. 10130 .the.Water .Resources Management- Plan; and:the mitigation-measures-. - identified by the project environmental assessment/initial study will provide an adequate, reliable and sustainable water supply for the project's urban domestic and public safety consumptive purposes. Sewage Collection System Capacity Several major facility improvement projects have been implemented at the City of Fresno's Regional Wastewater Treatment and Reclamation Facility in order to accommodate the projected rates of population and employment growth up to a projected population holding capacity of 590,000 people. These improvements have been completed to provide an expanded wastewater treatment and reclamation capacity of 80 million gallons per day (MGD), which is sufficient to accommodate continued planned urban development including the proposed project. The Department of Public Utilities has determined that adequate sanitary sewer service is available to serve the project, subject to the mitigation measures imposed with the environmental assessment. The nearest public sanitary sewer main to serve this project is located in East Shields Avenue east of North Fowler Avenue. REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Rezone Application No. R-05-02 September 20, 2005 Page s Circulation Element Plan Policies and Major Street System Traffic Capacity The 2025 Fresno General Plan designates North Armstrong Avenue and East Dakota Avenue as collector streets, which typically requires a 94-foot right-of-way width, and designates North Temperance Avenue as a expressway street, which .typically requires a minimum 124-foot right-of-way. The applicant will be required to dedicate and construct improvements on North Armstrong, East Dakota and North Temperance Avenues. Other improvements include the construction of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and transition paving within the limits of the tract; construction of an underground street lighting system; and relinquishment of access rights to North Temperance and East Dakota Avenues for all residential lots adjacent to these major street frontages. These street improvements are outlined in more detail in the Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM Conditions of Approval dated August 17, 2005. A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) was prepared for the proposed project by Peters Engineering Group dated November 12, 2004. The proposed development of a 257-lot single family residential subdivision on the 66.4-acre project site can be expected to generate an average of 2,728 vehicle trips per day (VTD), which includes 160 a.m. and 181 p.m. peak hour trips. . The traffic study analyzed the intersections of East Clinton and North Armstrong Avenues, East Shields and North Armstrong Avenues, East Dakota and North Armstrong Avenues and East Dakota and North Temperance Avenues. In addition, the study analyzed the project's impact on the State Route 180. Interchanges with Clovis Avenue and Fowler Avenue. An important goal is to maintain acceptable levels of service along the highway and street network. To accomplish this, local agencies adopt minimum levels of service (LOS) in an attempt to control congestion that may result as new development occurs. Caltrans' minimum LOS is C except where prohibitive, according to information specified in Caltrans' A Guide For Traffic Impact Studies. The City of Fresno's minimum LOS design standard is LOS D. Traffic impacts are considered to occur whenever the LOS exceeds D on the City street system, or C on the State highway system. The results'of the study determined that all intersections that were analyzed are operating at acceptable levels of service at this time._: In addition, the study projected that all intersections will continue to q opera#e�at_ acce:Ptable.aeveL of sorvice m the year 2c2b, with the eventual srgnahza#ion and-wKier��ng -, of the intersections-to City standards. - Because the immediately surrounding properties are not developed, the planned major street and intersection improvements have not yet been completed as required by adopted plans, policies and development standards. However, the proposed project as well as other urban land uses developed as planned by the 2025 Fresno General Plan will be required to construct the planned major street system consistent with the public facility and service delivery requirements of the Urban Growth Management Program. In addition, the developer of this project, in accordance with the mitigation measures of Master Environmental Impact Report (No. 10130) certified by the Council with the adoption of the 2025 Fresno General Plan, will be required to pay impact fees specific to the traffic signalization of the major street intersections. State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), District 6, Office of Intergovernmental Relations has commented that development of the proposed residences will result in additional vehicle trips during the peak hour traffic periods which will impact the State Route (SR) 168 interchange at East Ashlan Avenue and the State Route (SR) 180 interchange at North Fowler Avenue. Caltrans recommended REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Rezone Application No. R-05-02 September 20, 2005 Page 6 that a traffic impact study be prepared "in order to assess the project-related impacts to the State Highway System and the pro-rata .share towards area-wide circulation improvements." Based on the results of the study, Caltrans acknowledged in the attached letter dated April 11, 2005 that the impacts from this project on the above interchanges will be minimal. Subdivision Design/Streets and Access Points This subdivision is.proposed to have one access point to North Armstrong Avenue and two access points to East Dakota Avenue. Since North Temperance Avenue is an expressway street, access to Temperance Avenue from this subdivision is not permitted. The Public Works Department, Transportation Planning Section.has reviewed the rezone application and tentative tract map. Public Works staff has determined that the streets adjacent to and near the subject site will be able to accommodate the quantity and kind of traffic generated, subject to the dedication and improvement of adjacent portions of North Armstrong, East Dakota and North Temperance Avenues to their ultimate planned width. The subdivision map proposes that six lots (Lots 67 through 72; inclusive) front onto North Armstrong Avenue, which is a designated collector street. Policy E-1-p of the 2025 General Plan, which is applied throughout the city, states that "new single-family residential lots shall not be allowed to front on a major street, unless it can be satisfactorily demonstrated that no feasible alternative means of access can be provided to the property. It is noted that these six lots have existing single family residences which currently access North Armstrong Avenue. Since these are not "nevi' single family residences, staff will ,. permit these lots to front onto access Armstrong Avenue, provided that the lots have a circular or hammer head driveway to avoid having to back a vehicle onto a major street. Landscaping/Walls Given that the proposed subdivision abuts planned collector and expressway streets, the developer will be required-to install 15 feet of landscaping along East Dakota and North Armstrong Avenue (collectors). 'In addition, the applicant will, be.required to install a solid wall at the rear of the required landscape setback, which will mitigate the adverse effect of noise generated by vehicles traveling on the adjacent_major streets.- ._ — - -- The proposed subdivision abuts a-planned expressway street (Temperance Avenue). In order to meet the Expressway Area .(EA)• zone district standards, the developer will be required to install 26 feet of landscaping along North Temperance Avenue. The 26-foot landscape strip will be combined with 10 feet of property within the public right-of-way between the property line and the curb to accommodate the required multi-purpose trail along Temperance Avenue. In addition, the applicant will be required to install a solid wall at the rear of the required landscape setback, which will mitigate the adverse effect of noise generated by vehicles traveling on the adjacent major street. The wall along Temperance Avenue shall be designed in accordance with the acoustical analysis prepared by Bollard and Brennan, Inca dated October 15, 2004, which addresses the noise impacts resulting from vehicle traffic on Temperance Avenue in this area. It is noted that the applicant will also be required to construct a multi-purpose trail along the south side of the Gould Canal. This trail will connect to the above noted trail along North Temperance Avenue. REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Rezone Application No. R-05-02 September 20, 2005 Page 7 CONCLUSION/ RECOMMENDATION The appropriateness of the proposed project has been examined with respect to its consistency with goals and policies of the McLane Community Plan and the 2025 Fresno General Plan; its compatibility with surrounding existing or proposed uses; and, its avoidance or mitigation of potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. . These factors have been evaluated as described above.and by the accompanying environmental assessment. Upon consideration of this evaluation, it can be concluded that the proposed Rezone Application No. R-05-02 is appropriate for the project site. DEBAelAK:\Master Files 2005\Rezone\R-05-002,T-5461,C-05-022--AR\R-05-02,T-5461 CC Rpt 9-20-05.doo Attachments: VicinityMap P Aerial photo of site Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM dated March 1, 2005 Letter from Caltrans dated April 11, 2005 Environmental Assessment No. R=05-02/T-5461, Finding of Conformity to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR No. 10130) dated June 21, 2005 Planning Commission Resolution (Rezone Application) Planning Commission Resolution (Tract Map) Ordinance Bill i ASHLAN - c:' rdg+�y;3 �'�" , t N. 1! f� >n,Lw'. *✓,a.'� v C'j-F`eak r r t , @ t s s hs 54 r``,� M7 a v s�-tr�� - . .+c f at'„ ..t..r Px,V-_ .xAw+ a...�. '{u C.•!�ert'� i4, >..i... }, - rt I d >'� t< 4 u d .�� t" A {t{a,F 1.�11 (a�,-A ✓ry f4y n 7 ' 31 f:^IJ tti�{ut 1 li i : tjY�4a t'�'4v;r�4•RI`j1�� I„�Ftyf 'tr.$)y s'��>:�d� ii i�ri e:+i�rl kal�r _ - _ _ - �il� - K - yg, - - - �} Na �� �r� °� �'�'<.n}�l; ���Axl hPu"(w�N,�;}`�!,47'x td y>r�°t.k����} Gµrk6�`�•'��n rL..�xM4{i}iV��a�f��4f F�h r• it1.�tT�t':e�Nwl 3'��,rtkdj ri�l nt y4 r�.�'I �Ri ��l{T�V%f4 ,.'fCbregZ� "t 1�dTi�}��nro4i �, •'��rT'�`.4�� � ham,.. @ t a� r � _ - - - - >, r 1„ A^ur w4 tt�,W-P ?�S��t�EN Syr?.y{�r�$){nri, »� f'i.�. fd;.x {/'rim"1R rn k`�'v L .,.ti7 Srr ..r. tJ,, r.:tylt ry, a4 ly ~t✓art x dk'rRf �'.::,��f Ik+e?i: s stn 4.�i�Fi��s}t�,`' WV}�Y}�'I.j{Tii�d'r ./ANt,Y �..if�:�i {' .�4 iC :..�• 'S. 1 �ft�v..1 ."Af�'wl�'Yk12 i.f.. d fFk ,�Al.� .C1 �a 1h. jit'�h }'d {h +1 t� tH ri",L 'ter s N. Y+: ,0 �k a} !•^' ...({j�, i"�a3'Ptt-i +ur.} —i ti r.-r f.'.d�any i�'� -.`'L}� Y .4 '�.,r... t1 {s.:; !i Yd}v[s rsl` y f 3 y i t u -u _ }`( 114 M'L+t.f if tqv. •zV:td" y:-"t,.n � 1„yw ! i cf�...�� ..'. �.rsi...i,. 'r V'3'...fa tT4LF i'L.,.aF:�"�, zY.��- LZ� Nn.«r- � C.�+ {..� tl le T� d •.'_. - ..1',:r d. .,,il. y`. }. _fi. 1. x ,�{ 'tf N ,:. a t. .. - x Y 7r ri _ .I'}`t- §"`t.. aiF�rd '1 .: .:." --- •� t W.tf:•1. � d{f k. f 1 �.�-7 '�da_,f} r i .."r,..� lh 7n-'.1.f,n'b�h -�,:. '4iy,9 ii`d5i1.L.-,y'r vd ' �b h �t ' 7+�N �y..+ -Ldf��� Y. .. .w.w a d11'#r g�1. - R si 7�w� '.{U',�'�rt /'{E dr, `v" a t r T:: r 7�., r �, suYr�^�t�1 n✓WiY ;63u § �5i c, `' ifiJ 4Nrar�h — nFv1`D ' a •rY`$7 t'u4s+ F.i.'hr v u t 4t"I } ;�k y} .. 2# .� /.�zf �,ttd t,1" 8�{ rrd4rc- 7f}'E�i•i}ha�2t ,�i-C�h{S'�*'T'fgy!,�dle}+� Jr s per ',n�, r �^'u }xl x'�: grf�t'{ta kig0$"^ � 'ir dr "d YY Grr .¢W .Sok x•'j.` } L ysr.'t'�''at'!t'hk4 irs M,: '1r2 yu' �9..fr^r;trriis.�;w+lkY i,+ f adv£} L.., h rs' rn�t'.a x''i":; I +s .mt}h 4{..,vrn,. r<" � :�" �.c.K }.�'C.,.�.„ a.r r"Z,ai• ra'i µS a ee.3( e+^� � r_ }f� iYgTu,s t-� 4 +,���r r,n,S*��.�>tuY..� Y��..,+fi q yir ysi, ax�,, ,t a r•s �'�1 'au1 F �1.�`ti1J''t�'i" s� }l`,'�7 .,ski 'hs L✓1�.�r ,r' .tl f 4 7,":1Wa �If T,._ fia+,i".1:{f i �h :�:a� F.��1 i���)'.f'i �k-I 4�t�iC s44'i,�i�v � q -4�,� fi�a, �"c',:i:�1.C��..^.,i}dl:?,�mr l `�.,...p Gw;tS�i£'.�I�i��ti�r�:�..�,..r}yd..c?if:`t, tt r Y {?i7>�t..:mrv^.,.s•uM��s.�.�>.�•�n—�.d`....tF�/r'��'1'u �_t.��.lv�.-.sriw�.,yy.r.ri�„li,.,..��}:�'.1.: �>{o_...:�v�,«tx.C,".u5.+ LEGEND � Subject Property rtY �I rwsYc} U.aM.Area VICINITY MAP PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT . VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5461/UGM " DEPARTMENT . REZONING APPLICATION NO. R-05-002 A.P.N..: - - 8,1 ,23-2 ,60 From AE-20(County)to R-1/UGM w e ZONE MAP: 2057 North of Dakota btwn Armstrong &Temperance ' BY/DATE: J.S. / 3-1-05 NOT TO SCALE rg } Atl,,. :a S•...... ^ cr z �"4:ix �f�. ,y�W+r 5:..v$ z-sSYo /� -,a•��1„�- � � �3� .5 1� ,1���'I'3 i.$�`.�k+ $�f� s y� ��:: 1r k '',,,,y"-,z, mf ' f^+�5€s'w. rl � ar..11 �-L° c•€ �'}u: a,-��+^ - � >i_a s:3 ,e. C .d t t d 3 a rrk {e.:aa'{�5 7 t9� r ,:A.' ''"., a..•e: al,. z�x�r�.�. ta�'"`$g ' 4 1 �f$i.. 4141'ir` .:.. INNER 3 K Sr` w� �?•v tfd'trr �,�`�A;' '"``xr' .' •'S`lg^ l$ ` ';51 � °+ s ,sE k e `sib ".5 1 re�'`�14'4.r7•e L' ;` a y .c 9 'Cp �• '? :`z t 1 ) .� aJ�ya pnX �.r,'`° g,'? qzr- r ? r1 r, •F- t a�/ s s f y Y �f 1 tj n r a 'A uS_ � dt rrFS.a'{ir,,,�p`xy-s`rt` { .;,- rW x :7' I e ,•'"�`1' 3 : ursv 1 �s W x Wilt, '�k�r5' �?s-.•s [E'shy t� q-fn t k t � f- a `x6 s 4'� '•, �WAP-R-1- 96 w t }e. ,,�" M1 L •�2��i��L+a�44�� �•'M..'£i.��' r f,'�t 7C 'R� ..r,i5N' ; k- � '� } 5 �3' T 1'�_' 1.. ` p i;'s�},, s�'M.r"ty 3"�,, q•#s�l}�,a.�rt '7�i7 r �<t,r ���rX3 xx �• y;;i.°l'Irrz-ly,�l'�t�,r��'3`',��7- £u °��y.Tat d°� _,�>�i :° rf. �. -.d�M .16.`. y r A L-:t�>RI e _.'�a-�i',�`�ty � . ,y � � �. f L y'`•S>,�Fr' g � ��� `r` 5@� r �� :1 ...3:: 4 t 5i; -�i•�. S �-f� - d �K#r� ,-. � z� �' ,tom-qtr U I 'f"': _.'�. + $ l:r� •u':t�s},f ..Yfi"r. r.tal �.$rsr'. vYk i:..' '�Sjra rZ ¢';;ar 6c�+'"5k � �2 'r r � t}`^a': ,�. Y �, RUN 01 � �- y`r, r a 11"A_ I >,4Y�) 11 C� C 9 � G#� � � .�• 4r4r .� z,�.5r� d �,Ri -,,s � 1r ��„ �r� �rrl�,.r-..A, -r u.i'"`'*�':.a'J z•r r v [ } n - ii r aA ur r �' 1 �i �.:t�v s � J �1 w� tN ca.?r>.F.+ep 4fi• .�.t 'MM. 4.���,•� �S 7.i�,yx.i C'` }"-� y� rr, y( �,r a Y ac yi}-�� T �r"-,rr1 �k 2 Y,W [�• tr n zL�.jttt, ry, ,� 3�'K.-�:f�`��t3 ),a >3i"' ]3' -� s h ' f}, X '11 , P' #f 'e� �Ais a t. >s•_ �+� `l:`. ° il e t+ 4 J•b n-U1 � 'i<Z6�3 a 1 * f r 1+ ar t Aa+ u t-s1 f tr ,, �r�i L„ses'A,t"a's.�w'��j?�'14rr } ?n�',,i^t � :S�i t`[ �� �.�,,-'ityvi•+A t, r.��}r�.��a7�--'�� �3�� su� �Y! .' 1-p,+£ w •�i by I,rr-n a'i r. ,r y qHk� i ^.^c,1S7i�, ® + �r !� ti ;�,I f'1r�,,�}•Z`�,-•'V,��i ,7y�..,y`f,rfrnf frX _MFS d �r. 5H �3s -L r'4 ti"`,r.n; x'r '^`�,. fi�aT'k;�� ♦ # ,�`. Ka°-•, w .,' nisi r5 q�. .rt( i .0 u I ' .+.; 4 wr 9iS 4u' �"b".-P JrxK Ff s�} ' r t tainZNto', :� ® s:a - � 4tj�,�,rr,J�b75:•is+z I�t�t.`"hF'-7��'�'u�`t} �#N.f`' 2+ [�s-�.r..s. j�,� ,�y�l ��`ex.5� s�r�Ct'� n�^- ;� ,,,,�' v.. tl .�.. t 'ti:� lcaa uwr>1-t '{. ,z1 a�,f� -£' I-y T.xr`��'.x��- n',.Sr'N « -1,:•-'t-i'. ��. >;: h lal . kci ,;; ,`9i:» .�.3-, t_sai•r rf� __. a `t"ay,`' fx'S-rX asr q3` M �- �f°Y'�ys�`i `!- +.31,+�.s y��.:t 3, t i � "xiwgri'- 4�[cvC ® `r;� i a.z %'� 5•f �yil�'.` [tR' arr f •r w X19 M+^-rS-�r 1. .;? ;5sa :.; la-.j. k�"`. b .r >:1 7}; "Fa ,t#c�y r s•,^--t"i?ikgf'isY,-r x rI 4r'F" hit' >•, Yr d i✓^ ? ��� .[I ��X rk a � �«4F � 644 r �; f r:: ryt rt cr 4r jry g f r gni + � 'tic >j yt�Y ✓'..,�'{s� w TFt i r t:..�'q rr' �� � .j �� e�i ! z w,A<ts �t�t� m,, ?tii� .� y '` ,9 k ay;f'r ,v,•a.,l. tI 1 a'ff , 1,�^.l��i O tt 7 x r`r' M i 7 w .+ r �t3g- .sF. T�'s- 1t ; c Y 'if'�r ♦ �, iIr rl � t1 r C �, �} 8 � 3 `� yr �:Fwt # : �v � C k 9�r s ° �` F tfy MR�a 1..3gt "r ++�rJ •it)t�� "r av .t� vr� •MHyj+n y} ...'".",'y+ ai.•a'+;i.. �i ;{ ii ■ r h:s Y ,( 4r -7Il �' 'aif y r bd ,r , w I Olna.t ,•vx,, �y•��.d}US+ �7E_y t},ra'�`n y�� x,l:'� 1 }`� t ��'+r"z k°`} I..j r� ,F C&'d..vJn''�A��l��� sF��'p�t�� "t rY' �`ih.� I+! :.�,�. A>r { r� a -k rt "� i{ �'r q, _ t,}��• ��«"x ,c..y1r,•�z a• ^„ `C r l �.: _ � fF� 11Ss ,�]f "fit 1 •�y s� I f k S ..� }� �,r,�� f`i> �,yW�i *5t- � � �•t � 6'yr�t� 5l•' T 1� 3�' 1L, T'r�� j 3� �z.� �` $ T'�M CTAt�e'r '� t't'e' ''�Y" ST?Y.4 T t 1. • ri. '_� `�1Z,'„sri�.x {+`r�"J;:a� '*} eia �' �a3F a�'Sj s���x,}^�. ..,';.,��3),3y�,r�.g �''.I:!��„�i-,rF.�a"'y�i��"�r;,°t�' •'°,as,;. �..aq-'�Y.�w�.'I �.`! 1 �.'ctA1y2,t ' s }yr ? 3' 1 ;1y.t5': gi .n ;x $#W gip. "u� �i'� ( jam ° r'1L�,:•i �` �i b'k I r r�F� .�:r7¢����._ 'tom i !r�`q c7' rg €..`*3 ?�.' f< 9r�, I 7,3� •� a3 Ar h�i s't4a:'4t,,,.; Si f3"� y iY�[ - u 4 J 7, pi� ��`3 x ' ;1 i!1t {Ci}wGhr sk � � 4yt"�' �a. 1 �}�• 4 `P. 1 �1 �1-,.�fSJp4•,4 r t W-1 Y3kI �rltlj j 1 r 't3 Y• .: a r .�Lt r�-�+u.i*'.+.a�:atsctiu..�as ' -u� G T s. -+1> t{, Y f• f"f•J11,•" r$. AA.yr +FA"d °M..r.,,k, -•,ti _„ y7 . i (f 3 z p r fr�y�tAtC� �i�il ,r -x'til l�V�p`x'r r d3iAt-!}5 gl z vo tF 7 f t ; A s `9 nza;ea i f 1 rr I`s;` Y of 9 s� Y r 4 } 19u ` t 811,33 A 'tt. a8.� Vim, t•Et4,�'-4 S�� 4 '. � 1• .. •�} RRrr[ �^�,{& '- a�„ `r� til 1�9i` @} '"& [ S.` "a r � [� 'S'�� a :� ex �``�,�R�° �- a"yr �sry°t"' T,i - '1 � �- ,e} ,br �l'��' .4.4ry+��{C`� S"� ji�"•�k'�.5�'1i4: "�I�'.rhe' �x.}{�� ���;� � ��� Jh+� I�,.�R..�,�`� ft<,�, � '8: '�"4t » W!111-- r .ei�^.k10�S'�'�)p1[• } 'tr'd ? *. 3'�V ,+ a F• ,y� xT`., `l s 3 pl AYtf,:.. Y. 'P t � � '{ V3- �� if• 's ,>� ,y 7 �� �t l•�vn� � _5 r� +yd H' x[. '4 i� 1 j�� J rh r 17- '•� 3 F r p ^r J"y" < , '' ""f, VP"Ir 51fi' r 3E. 7` r: .,, v�. v F ,v��'t�� r .� .et'} �.�..` j1�=�� „L3.. �'� rte;`^'� t,.� �-� ;;�}�"'T fir,. i' '� �.�• I.-43'",g _ , ice'.` �',F� '4� g F 2 .s•Cl +ii .F- dry 7� '�' �r ?d + r �•n 4 a � � a+ i � t y. .J`ra i�''a �� Itis a�''+'.��5i g•A? t ti s a. }� �`.Is _ .a � •5� l moi[. r .�"^" Y�ir j��}l�.q`�rF' R'a- I 5 ./� ,,,.a v a R ��k@ �4 �� bpp5�j ed€�• �� �d 1d•g �dpp1�1 . € «d �j d a F In p€ ga i! aJ o t z p � yu r.;3r L-,b %.lis1fa0 MC'7. 0 a rano 33ave3aMo> wtcN y — Z E pp gg a l ! W U N I[I OLLI - y ) ■ _ li C Se �g F fE rd Q Z.2 N m° *A � Og■ K LI Ifi ;,o y I w o'L I op O1R ��,.�,��C a i1i S c� N'� <rrra�y5" �rwp c I '� MR I ��z�3 - I 4. OS g �g S'"q `/{ ".+avq n2 rl n" {' rt IJ a f' f� • ._.... � N�FI'+. +�, ,.m■ Y 1 � aA i 7P�'r37'�T - (y�yr z �� <F Oi��i'ei��"�3 t'�.�.� �■ J I M.: � z k -�3��. � }�,' h�� -� I J k � � �•rn ,�o r�M��"4` rl�" it ply - - $� 1 r-� ; tl-� I ,` j I�L'Se J. ',.-�«.' ■ w I, I ' may■ 01 e rj i ?"' nG K:i 4• ;.vu.,�..n;:+".f+ r f _ ili,. !•^.-- I I i; rte■ �■n J PML a . u' :eti,n f F E i . P. J r n w ., __ .aL az 1 Op m■ :6-omwow■ r.J rnr.p��, a .�s em. _ 1011llO i I J r� w ,� / ul(IU� I �. er}e N....rl■ na �f ,I� :�� � r r•wi ..,4 I r N,-, '9. � I; � Y ..� tI I ■ I I.c 1171 YS ,9r. n I I I t ■ t r r'+ • r t i i 'T.I Ee.. t 't gyp■ I I - �R I [I I I i 18 pl •^-j I f °fi SI t r i2 Y y (. 7 i Y o` rt': - � ay. rri I �„ e�1 � � I " �. It l"�.°�+§ $s I �' � � � I i ■ u Y – "l M, �' -Sal ms' P■ j �' _.— �-: ��`I fl }a. t��I I,.I "� �� ��( .:. i�2pr.�j -,P,p'J Y •�� 'Q�h1Ci; /� - .x<,i "�. �, r I 1 ■u` I 10 a■ p■ f:—; `• —.p I r, 3 is xu it iv$+ B• a u: �_ Yf3+! I I ;.I_yJ. I_-.■ca ry � ('. y; .- nnxx. _ �.�.1 �_ J � o ox r iy LL��( DLT' �0 11113 1 i it I i� � ,. 1 1. ■■ ._.! _ _ ! r � i N7 U- � '� ����;� Z. .. / h sG �L I i AS —. �l�fi J n I _ Z Vie, -41 rp DNDHLWM HUM 77 IT d'y, 4�' �p'SNt„U_.ffC ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGERSTATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - 1352 WEST OLIVE AVENUE d P.O.BOX 12616 FRESNO,CA 93778-2616 ?NE (559)445-6666 Flex your power! 559 488-4088 YFY (559)488-4066 p (� VIE� Be energy efficient! April 11, 2005 APR 2�0 planning Division - Development Department - 213 1-IGR/CEQA c;►iY nF FRESNO 6-FRF-180-64.9+/- C-05-22,R-05-02 & TRACT 5461 MONTECITO Mr. Arnoldo Rodriguez City of Fresno Development Department 2600 Fresno Street, Third Floor Fresno, CA 93721-3604 Dear Mr. Rodriguez: We have reviewed the Traffic Impact Study(TIS) for the proposed rezone and Tract Map for the 256-lot single-family residential development located on the north side of East Dakota Avenue between North Armstrong and North Temperance Avenues._,Caltrans has the.following comments: Trips generated from this site are likely to impact the State.:Route (SR) 168 interchange at Ashlan Avenue and the future SR 180 interchange at Fowler. However;given the distance of this development from these two interchanges, the number of trips is anticipated to be minimal However, continued development has the potential to create cumulatively significant impacts to both transportation-and air quality. As cumulative impacts to these resources.were_not addressed --in the General Plan Update Master E1R, the City should consider a mechanism for evaluating, and mitigating, for them - a satea. The--City should consider a transit alternative for th>s project:_ There is su=fficient development within the area to support transit, and early planning could make such`an alternative feasible. ` Caltrans recommends that this project be routed to Fresno Area Express,(FAX) staff for their` review and comment, Please see Attachment Number 1 for other recommended transportation alternatives. The City should consider using the "Toolbox" from the San Joaquin Valley Growth Response Study to prepare an analysis of the impacts created by this and other approved developments in the City: This would help to.clarify issues that have been raised since.'the General Plan Update , re ardina densities in general and the Hi g b, g gh.Rise Comdor,specifically. Caltrans,is available to partner with the City in this endeavor. We request that this letter be made a part of the permanent public record for this project and that a copy of our letter be included in the staff reports for both the City Council and the Planning Commission. This will provide the decision-making body and the general public with a complete and accurate environmental evaluation for the project. "Caltrans improves mobility across California" Mr. Amoldo Rodriguez April 11, 2005 Page 2 If you have any questions, please call me at (559) 445=6666. Sincerely; MOSES STITES Office of Transportation Planning District 06 Enclosure C: Ms Barbara Goodwin, Council of Fresno County Governments l/ "Caltrans improves mobility across California" CITY OF FRESNO— ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT/INITIAL STUDY FINDING OF CONFORMITY/MSIR NO. 10130 Pursuant to Section 21157.1 of the California Public Resource Code DATE R EwED FOR FILING: (California Environmental Quality Act) the project described below is ZOOS JUS 2 l PM : 3 : etermined to be within the scope of the Master Environmental Impact Report HEIR) No. 10130 prepared for the 2025 Fresno General Plan CITY CLERK, FRESNO C4, Initial study is on file in the Planning and Development Department, City Hall, 2600 Fresno Street, Fresno, California 93721 (559) 621-8277 Applicant: Initial Study Prepared By: Dunmore Homes Arnoldo Rodriguez, Planner III 2150 Professional Dr. Ste. 150 June 21, 2005 Roseville, CA 95661 Environmental Assessment Number: Project Location (including APN): Rezone Application No. R-05-02/Vesting Tentative Approximately 67 acres of property located on the Tract Map T-5461/Conditional Use Permit Application north side of. East Dakota Avenue, between North No. C-05-22 Temperance and North Armstrong Avenues (APN; 310-200-17, 18, 23, .24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 54,` 7; 58,60 Project Description: Dunmore Homes, on the behalf of Frank and Herky Urabe, William and Barbara Graham; Ureka Herr and Nzue Siong, Roland Peek, Terry and Pam Carter, Rosemary Rendon, Robert and Bennie Leininger, Lennie and Dolores Hill and James Dirlam, has filed applications pertaining to approximately 67 acres of property located on the north side of East Dakota Avenue, between North Temperance and North Armstrong Avenues. Rezone Application No. R-05-02 proposes to rezone the subject site from the R-A/UGM (Single Family Residential-Agricultural DistrictlUrban Growth Management) Zone district and R-A (Single Family `ResidentiallAgriculturao (County of Fresno) zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban rowth Management) zone district. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. T-5461/UGM proposes to subdivide the project site into a 256-lot single family residential subdivision. Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05- 02 purposes a density transfer to facilitate the development of the subject site. The subject property is designated for low and medium-low density residential planned land uses by the McLane Community Plan and the 2025 Fresno General Plan. The project also' includes the detachment of the subject property from the Kings River Conservation-District- - and the Fresno .County Fire Protection District and annexation to the City of Fresno. for which..the Fresno County.L:Qcal Agency-Formation Commission (LAFCO:) isthe responsible agency � ;, _ ,� ;G - . .. -- 'Conformance to-Master Environriiental impactReport(MEIR NO. 101.30) x.The recently adopted 2025 Fresno General Plan and the McLane Community-Plan.designate the subject parcel for low ani' medium-low density residential planned land uses. The proposed zone district of the subject site conforms to the low and medium-low density residential planned land use designation as indicated by the 2025 Fresno General Plan "Planned Land Use and Zone District Consistency Matrix" as well as the adopted McLane Community Plan. The Planning and Development Department staff has prepared an initial study and environmental checklist and evaluated the proposed reorganization in accordance with the land use and environmental policies and provisions of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the related Master Environmental Impact Report (MSIR) No. 10130. The subject property is proposed to be developed with residential uses at an intensity and scale that is permitted by the planned land use and proposed zoning designations for the site. Thus, the proposed project will not facilitate an additional intensification of uses beyond that which already exists or would be allowed by the above-noted planned land use designation. Moreover, it is not expected that the future 'evelopment will adversely impact existing city service 'systems or the traffic circulation system that serves ne subject parcels. These infrastructure findings have been verified by the Public Works and Public Utilities Departments. It has been further determined that all.applicable mitigation measures of MEIR No. 10130 have Finding of Conformity Under MEIR No. 10130 Environmental Assessment No. R-05-02/T-5461/C-05-22 Page 2 June 21, 2005 been applied to the project necessary to assure that the project will not cause significant adverse cumulativ' impacts, growth inducing impacts, and irreversible significant effects beyond those identified by MEIR N 10130 as provided by CEQA Section. 15178(a). Per Section 21157.1 of the-California Public Resources Code (California Environmental Quality Act), it may be determined that a subsequent project falls within the scope of a MEIR, provided that the project does not cause significant impacts on the environment that were not previously examined by the MEIR. Relative to this specific project proposal, the environmental impacts noted in the MEIR, per the 2025 Fresno General Plan land use designations, include impacts associated with the low and medium-low residential land use designation specified for the subject property. Based on this initial study, the proposed project does not ,change the land use indicated for the subject parcel and will not generate additional significant effects not previously identified by.the. MEIR and no new additional mitigation measures are required. Therefore, the project proposal is within the scope of the MEIR as defined by Section 15177 of the CEQA Guidelines. Moreover, as lead agency for this project, the Planning and Development Department, per Section 15177 (d) of the CEQA Guidelines, has determined that all feasible mitigation measures from MEIR No. 10130 shall apply to the project proposal as noted in the attached mitigation monitoring checklist. Public notice has been provided regarding staffs finding in a manner prescribed by this section of the Guidelines and by .Section 21092 of the California Public Resources Code (CEQA provisions). • �� r G46ert J. Haro Date Planning Manager, City of Fresn KWasler Rs-2005%RemnelR-05002,T-6461,C-05-022—ARVinding of Conformity Cover.doc - - Attachments: Environmental Checklist/Initial Study for Environrndn.tal Assessment No. R-05-02/T-5461/C-05- 22 a �r -Mi#i ation Morntorin 56t-klist ' MEIR No.- 1 130 for :Environmental Assessment 9 ..._ 9 ( ) 02/T-5461/G05=22"' . ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) CHECKLIST POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS EA No. R-05-02/T-5461/C-05-22 1_0 TOPOGRAPHIC, SOIL, GEOLOGIC 11.0' URBAN SERVICES CONSIDERATIONS 1 11.1 Availability of fire protection `.1 Geologic hazards, unstable soil conditions 1 11.2 Lack of emergency vehicle access ` .2 Adverse change in topography or ground surface relief 1 11.3 Adequacy of design for crime prevention 1 1.3 Destruction of unique geologic or physical features 1 11.4 Overcrowding of school facilities 1 1.4 Increased water erosion 1 11.5 Availability of water mains of adequate size 1 11.6 Availability of sewer lines of adequate capacity 2.0 AIR QUALITY 1 11.7 Availability of storm water drainage facilities (on or off 1 2.1 Substantial indirect source of pollution site) 1 2.2 Direct on-site pollution generation 1 11.8. Availability of adequate park and recreation areas 1 2.3 Generation of objectionable odors -1 1.1.9 Unusually high solid waste generation . 1 2.4 Generation of dust except during construction 1 2.5 Adverse local climatic changes 12.0 HAZARDS 1 12.1 Risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances 3_0 WATER 1 12.2 Site subject to flooding 1 3.1 Insufficient ground water available for long-term project 1 12.3 Adverse change in course of flow of flood waters use 1 12.4 Potential hazards from aircraft accidents 1 3.2 Use of large quantities of ground water : . 1 12.5 Potential hazards from landfill and/or toxic waste sites 1 3.3 Wasteful use of ground water 1 3.4 Pollution of surface or ground water supplies 13.0 AESTHETICS 1 3.5 Reduction in ground water recharge 1 13.1 Obstruction to public or scenic vista or view 1 13.2 Creation of aesthetically offensive conditions 4_0 PLANT LIFE 1 13.3 Removal of street trees or other valuable vegetation 1 4.1 Reduction of the numbers of any unique,rare or 1 13.4 Architectural incompatibility with surrounding area endangered species 1 4.2 Reduction in acreage of agricultural crop 14.0 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL 1 4.3 Premature or unnecessary conversion of prime 1 14.1 Removal of historic building,disruption of agricultural land archaeological site 1 14.2 Construction or activity incompatible with adjacent 5.0 ANIMAL LIFE historic site 1 5.1 Reduction in the numbers of any rare, unique or endangered species 15.0 . ENERGY 1' 1.2 Deterioration or displacement of valuable wildlife habitat 1 15.1 Use of substantial amounts of energy or fuel -- 1 15.2 Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources 1 6_0 HUMAN HEALTH of energy 1 15.3. .Wasteful use of energy. 7.0 NOISE 1 7.1 Increases in existing noise levels EXPLANA71ON Of- RATINGS 1 7.2 Exposure to high noise levels °0"Insufficient Information ` 8.0 LIGHT AND GLARE Insufficient information is available to determine the potential 1 8.1 Production off-glare which will adversely affect residential environmental effects which may result from the proposed _- _,,_area5 _ - x project In thaS category _ 1-.._.8:2 Exposure of°residences to high levels of glare °1"Nq Sigftlmcant riviroi mental-Effect`..~ ` - - _ - e.proposed"project will not have an.adverse environmental 9_0 'LAND USE effect in this category, or any such effect is not substantially 1 9.1 Incompatibility with adopted plans and policies unusual or of undesirable magnitude. This rating is also 1 9.2 Acceleration of growth rate utilized in cases where the category is not applicable to the 1 9.3 Induces unplanned growth particular project under consideration. 1 9.4 Adverse change in existing or planned area °2"Moderate Environmental Effect characteristics The proposed project will have an adverse environmental effect in this category,which is of sufficient magnitude to be of 10.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION specific concern. However, this effect is not substantial 1 10.1 Generation of vehicle traffic sufficient to cause capacity enough in itself to require the preparation of an Environmental deficiencies on existing street system Impact Report, and is mitigable through project changes and 1 10.2 Cumulative increase in traffic on a major street for which conditions. capacity deficiencies are projected °3"Significant Adverse Environmental Effect 1 10.3 Specific traffic hazard to motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians The environmental effect identified in this category 1 10.4 Routing of non-residential traffic through residential area substantiates in itself or contributes towards a finding that the 1 10.5 Insufficient or poorly located parking proposed project has a potentially significant adverse effect on 1 10.6 Substantial increase in rail and/or air traffic the:environment sufficient to require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report. LL X x X w p E CD m T@ Lc) Q o a coo 0 N a Z W w w N Z m c aai m o .-� o c c c LIJ O 3 co 0 -j `o Co(L ° .oma o oma ° 7 d •C — N V- — N OV- — (D °na a>> ) Ona_ (D 0 °nc) � Q +� O W .VyC � �;- V y-•co �; - .V y cow; r c c o n ac o.n c c n ' p V ° co co a m ° co m a ° O m m C ° (L mo ata mo (L mo Z , W FW0 - 0 0 0 0 0 ZZ > m mE 0E ...Z rn Q Q m o m W W n aa) a aa)i n aa)i d' a v aria � W mmo mm0 ca (D N J O co m O co m O ym U W ('=j aLm. o °� a o � a o � a (D [U o aim a _m` � aim o _ _ CO V Z -L C '-' Z 0 W a) O U O c c j_- c O y N .0•2 - coLLI U IL -.0 j L Wtm CD y ui C fn — � - � U) ° m co -Fn N m - y L O C y _ N m cc � . min o :3 75° Cc°> c��° 0.( ° C ° °� cm a �.,..� J Z a O m- m ._ c O m N ._ O m co v) U) c— QW wmc > ° ° 3w � ca ° tea) .—= ° o o am F- � O ° co c0 �? mEEui m� � mU ° CL m - y � m 3 c W LL mMa m w c��° o o a>i w cC c� o c �� m y v_; m °n � Q N L 7 N 3 y y 7 °- C a) 7 U. c E -0 c co CL U � c � c,n o c0m ° — ° N = no c —'- cot � — n0 . -0 ._ c oc E m � Z O m N m o co -0 CO W @ E o a w 0 - CD r.=.,C,) D N y'2 ° C7 a mom = o o (D C n� Co2.c l y �� m w 4) mZ c O _2 aD — c.y t a co Co o d a o 6,. AD T O U - p m fo O a) o m vi 3 U p m m a) C .- 0 vi -- U m O >. rn mw _ Hama � mo3 : Z . O O co N m L — Lu C 0 a) na O C m � o na c C m o U ..v a m 0 E m m• a m'E 3 3 c: co rn o Ca-cu .tz _ ..�. .L. ° .y N •U ..a/ -..y c cj) -N a) 2,.. C_:>L m - -C -� .. .y...M m ` Lu Q .: Z N N N aJ'O co O:`O N L &) wn U.m O)° E � � 0 c N mC�--coo 0)c TC�.EN O co mU c c ca o cm m m Q W U .. Q o U_ L r-co 0 " n= . d - 0 n io b n,a>_) coma j O w L Z 0 -0 -- L N O a) E L L U m L C N 2 p E 0w o 3 � umi o �° E 3 �y� CO > 3 � v°i m m m T MC ° »- mo c 00a) N •`- � Z we ° c ` U c m ate) aaW -0 a m mss 0� 3U-) O Y >, y O cob aa) o c y c y � c0 3 E yew'- n� � N L .co Q C a) — C m c a) J C C C N a) m m .O O) a) '^ 8 O U �> pp d O p �. 0 .0 �. r U C 24- y V O.Q O F O L U nL a 0 •m U n j C C 0 ,= O U-) .. to C 7 tE ~ Co C¢ CO .+ n Co �p C 3 N O cu C U d U C N C c o a) E m U m m O a) �j m > N a) o f 3 m v a o o m U a m EE v :: m EN co m a ca E c0 .0 m m .0 Co 'L-' N p C•C 7 L-' N N ° y f�`D •L-• N m U O L a a) N N E Co C3 N co ~ C a) nL N co a 3 L .) COL L ° U Q N rn >, Q'c H co O -0 4 a)U n m c 0m • — 0. m a) m Um L .0 c c cot 0 o Em E o apt E no o (D c m o m� •3 j m � o 0 co O m U � fA O ' m c COna) .0 = nco0 — . y nv)O ,n m m m 0 cm m a) 0 d O N 5 7 a) O J y Co 0 �. J N L > .0 0 I I O E co aEi m m ca > cot Em aa) m� aai ca yW aa) co� N 3 a�L a) Qm Z a) Q > y E EQ Er a) � E EQ E m �u) E EQ m E >-a C •- '0 Q TaZ m occ > 3mw 0ccocco occ° oca) > $ w y N C a) j O m p N -O m O Co y O Co O O m-0 m O m 0 -O co ° J N Cm n0 > com m a) C ym m nL .(� C, 'D 0 r E N O (D 0 0 E co O E .c 0 C > O V m G� 3 ° m ui E m o a��o m m n� m . > O ~ r c�C a)�o N N.c 't C •to M C't p) co c n y m ' 0 a) a) L m m N d LL W m Z m c0.1 a co.0 m m C0.1 CLO — 'o E oD U n co H : y ILLW � ca CL m U U a o n tc� Q O cc 0 o az N W w U- rnw N V m c c y cc y cc cc 47 Z pc � 0 -E (D 13 � m 0 � m D c c c c E E E Qcc CL 0cc CL 0 c E c E O cc CL w 0 cc CL J W � iaQ c -� iaFL 0 -1 a o -` mao M -� 0.-�±- o� > orn> orn> orn > r ac a) n.5m nEa) oca) O +4) OW •S20,cpw vccp � vccp vccp � (> > jcacar � 5mmCa� zmm � cl m 5mmCm O aa mp aa cc iL cc acc 0 c W H m 0, U o () ZZ > � > > a) 2 ...Z N WW o._ o 2Cn C amC a0c a o � (L V � W mmo mMWmo m? � OC Q0. i o0m o Ei LL X X W 0 � � 1 O V a (D 00 � U U 'a o n o a ° N z U Ww IL U _ d Z m X T ❑ cCD - C f0 C QU U W - a) C C 7 � .a C � M a rnam Q o mm a '� E cow o mm «. mo o w pw 'C �' m c > 'a ° ate, T 1C � > n n� > 0 V a0D ii m0 Z W W F- - Z N W W c c m c 0 0 ° ° 0 a v J O O O O CL —J .°'c a LLJ V : V Z •C m -0 Q W O w m «- m � " m m m N ° c U- c m m cTi O C m o m v U 3 �' n x o cLi °' E Q U ma. ° � ` J Z r Cc m L ` o c o 0 0 0 a>) m o O E o U ° o c m N W 0 Q '3 ( o (� nom° m nU c U c cTi m w o U o c W F+ N U d C O N C U j ..O N N 7 C > N O n C° 1C m e m Cc U E m c c U U w " _ o m mo o. LO m U am a� Q n C g U m U •- > • w U o m �c Ern E m m m e m m w o a) Z.CD c o .. c o c c o o °� E c ►- O c c. 26 n : � w O N ,vl m e c °ny �, .� °.� �.° � � m � O U❑ E ' C C C m U C = m L cm U y N E Z O C C O O w E N C C ° v 0 U LL On C t W:. �� _ 'm - �0 0G f0-r- ``'c❑ °�YO Ouj L d' o _Eco nn, o '� o cpm Go m o .: E co C U N U U . - C N 7(n C U cc @ N > ) M L >. N. O N U N .a p_'n to ` ct c o m '2 >'� ct m y p'Z c m c -0 rno > = CD @ � w. U m o o c m N z mm aci ° . c o' occ o a) c o NU mm � �c t � N _O � o � n U.t m �E MU ° w o E c �' v Vi = m a) Ln C C m C N C E C O y _ C.0 N a� ' � U O U w -0 N O -2 O U E N U y 7 O U >, N - 7 N Q w - E c E m N m 'io � m. E U o m umi Eo ? -0 m V _ omE wo Cm cm > m5c0 oX cE ) 0-- :3 C a s o �, m w 'rnm m co m o C m m c �E U c c m x E a� o' r cG v m cn > > '3 .0 > � _ c m _ m m ° 2 m m U U — Z m o c c �} U U o Q-0 t0 N ° O _ ° N :U'� ° N'a. 3 °'s c0 U M cUo c>iZ Em Q ° > � o > occi sU ) L) @c EDm �mU f (D °� ° .no om cu 5 mm o me m U cUm € E amc C) mnm m o n m � No coLCCcU mo � On oo� 'c_ m � m a� '� E ° ooc E 'er ona) MU � c wU (a. >,.E c co c c m mm '� � Bio LO oc "o om c o .0 > � c � 'm3 c � o � ai � m off@ o >. Orn C 3 o c o v v n� o ° w� 'c cgs ° cmi m y nn Cc o Cc o U 'c n C U > > r w porn - m o n coo c ° c0 coo : 2 CX mo Em cc° o00 0 � a� tQ E :3 Qm (4 >` C C N r� E n n o C U C C U (:O U - U n ° C co N .0 d - Z ` m m :C r c0•� U C O >, O .m C Q)° m m 'n 'U X E U m i. Q O 34 cu Q 0 C me a) M d 7 c E � U m C'U c 0 ?-0 L Q) m c U Wau) W (an) C W o -� , ° 3 �° m -0 3m0 cE mn '�F � m cc ` CLU a) 9mUdo U = 'f0 >N C Q E m C N L O N U C N N U �p ` M L L y C L N c0 •� N y y ° O E O.~ E N o 1:5 CO N 'r- •C d F- `N H On ) ❑ � � mm U`. a� � UmU m to to . U — � �i o d U U 4? co .6 ci - U U co .a ci U :2 N ❑ E U. x x x W X x X X X x p E 0 u x x a m . U Q, LO Q ° O m o N v rn v U U U. W � �c W ti N (� CO :3 :3 Z a _m a) a a a a. J W oa nw o 0 C 0 c " o c o c o 0 0 p ' CL U. mc � m m @ja=i @gym @ja=i mho a=i a=i ch 2 E vm, > E E y � a.E caE �)n•E �) a.E E y E y E y r d y y o � o � o � 0 � a y a) o ..+ OW cc A? m _ = ym = a) m = mm = mm m_ m_ m _ p V m a) m w m m a) m m a) CL m a) a) m a) a) a) w a) a) w 0 0 D m 0 0 D d 0 0 d 0 0 d 0 0 d 0 0 0 D 0 D 0 D Z � p W W I— Z Z � m 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 0 0) Z rn W W . I— Q •— Z 2 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) °0) pia U � _1 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � . CL _j s a ° CC U LLI V Z a) @ a) a) >, �o m U) •0 — a) _ L a) w y U L. L C C C C > a) E C m O) m 0 w O O �._U) >+ Q'W -�w m (0 -� m m m y y m 0 j - O m y m`j -.L-. L 3 y- �, = 0 -� C p> C ESL Es @ � c � > c U 0 y @ 3 �' ° ? '` U mom. `1 0 C y c U) -d U N •0 'o .0 ' ; ° N .my. n. N j N y a) - a d Q J U.p c y c m m o y @ > 3 •_ 0 o m o 0 a) y �> C O m a) = U - 'C y N O y y = m'D - a) o m C M �Q. W `oU a) (D ? ayi CL .0 _ = m � c m - 0 . U E ) C•y _ � o .� m � E we � oo Z � �+ w y J+ U. m U.0 L_ 3 Q. .0 - .L-. > C ° p)'C OI C 0 a) .m W a) yw > m m U m . 3m � '_ � L m m o E 0 m E E �y Lf) a1 N C 0 C (0 C `a N >+ vi y 0) @ @ C m d y U Z N M N N .+ m � 0a.y m3vi U) = m v c a) _ moo a) o >, � m �� Z .C— 0) _ y .L... +y. � ,� a) 0-..=,m 3: .�. O 7 :� -. .«y 'b O E L. Q. y O N G- - 7 U y O _ a) 0 y 0.U U.O a) = N C _ 0 n > n c .. 0 _O G y-fn y E U) O:3 cn = N E w y O` ,� E N C O a) y C �. - N"•U > Q tl) m 0 ° ° 7 O m o 0 w n O C a). ca > L N m N O o) m c- y 'M__o X c �'Yo.m ."> 3 = o ai-m m a) m : d 3�a- a x m - - _ _.�.. ._.@ 4)_f0: m_ .E _ _C -� �. m _a)_ @ c,-'^O L -.a r : LL x x x x LU x x x x o m , Ca L) _ o n oQ ca0 o az N � i _ W } c W LL N V m c C Z mm . U U = W � c a n 3 J - ° c m e m e m e ° 0 0 dLL mEm mEm mEm mEm atom a a M rL c'0 0 aE nE oLOaa) E o0 o0 o +r OW = a0im c � � r- 0)0m c5cu mpm a� m GC� > ma>im cUa) aa) maiCL m maim aa) m anima aniw ` a00 a0Q a00a00 m0 0-5 05 Z � p W W v 2W -WF- � rn 0) 0) rn 0) 0) rn-Z c c c cc c cN c c cm 0 )Lu c C C O OO O O O 0 IL � mo. LLJ a' V m LU 0 V Z - aio o m Lo -0 E c mai m 0 o v' m v m NV W O cc .° � - o � v, «. ° mom cZ � U) jL O �. OC U ,,fl :N - 7 Z L vi 7 N 7 a N O m m tm _ .N m UO 0 C > > O m :'c ` c m CO ] m 0I 6 2CD 0 LL 7 n 0 m U f`D U U .V '0 a) C C ° Q O` d Z O C CN > 7 O = rnw rn N m O d n M -O CCU O � .� a J m 'vo pcp nm U s ° ° ° nv U m m u, E m c Q y a = N U - C C D1 ° U m' -0 C U' (D m ..O .0 m - F- W O ° m m �p ° v7 c o cu CU CD , c ;m .0 > E mcm g c W LL p vi w- = N .0 'U O m O O C w N C E c m.� c 3 U N cm d � � w. om T,cm c ia � m ::0 m 5 � m = OE aNi N ++ cm a`�'i aEi - aw . m rn m c C w , ° in � c O N 2 aci aEi CU ,CL °:S. �' '= . . ° o n: N m axi. a' >' N _. m. L m. 3 c .. . C w m _ 0 .E 3 .N ` w. Q1 � -O m L 'd = pp C '° m m- .� m v7 ° rn mC m'.. - U 0) j `� 3 U,L - r Cm.1 O m 7 U c.L �_. N ° L CU _ C v7 - ,- C - -0 c w. .r b m 0 C CA C U m 7 v7 @ c 7.. fQ m m U m Z O a� 0 c m S a m a> c m m cm m O ».O �- �' 0 c w C m C O : U m.._.: o m _ 0 3 E (n n" 3 �° OLE ° - f0 m 0 En $ � .nm c CLM ° m moi. m C m C U n >, 0 o - g U ° �. m 20c >, c u,.� Q W •o (D ( m cm ° (n CU mm.c m rn 0)m w m8 .9 ° o c p �. m = ° E m m � ECM O (D ° m cm m 0) > 0 >, m m m o a aci a>i y 0 m 'Cu �° 3 m o ow ° c -0 E �' � = E N Z C 0 a> N E ami fC0 m a> .0 m n 0 c Q U L vi _•ca C LO O Em " (D oar . Ear ° " � r w N me a OE;N'3 `0 c `° m m _ U �--• m n m '(` m m ;,fl U L 'C V) O cu C E f>0 c ' Q nc ' m m 0 m o " 0 N '3 0. 3 0 O O m m n m o u, m C7 E Na cam . acs 0 ami a c m m m m c a°i m e aa) c a o ° _ 3 0 ° m m m >. m c ° � Nom:_ > m m o ~ (D 0 -° Lm. o aE2m mom '0 m � v > `) C .-0QE3 .0 pcp c �. m Q E o C m ca w m w m j vi N 'E U 0 C j V c° m e U D a� c m E u, m °o. * m nm n=o m m c CL.-. N m m.•c ° 0) o E m m '3 0 0 o m o •C N•E p N c a = � C 7 CU C - O o N w :fl r : O 7 m _ ° m 9 0 > 0 � c m m Amo m o c � °o 0. 0 0 -0 � c p m 0 rn nm o - 0mo mac ° � �E0 N c N ccL zC .0m2 c0) 0 •am o •0 E fm (D mm mmc amm a`> cm m ` (n C mm c 00 nm 0 - 0 � C� m _ CL Z "�' .� U CL co N m + cu v7 C L m 0 ° m � L m ° m m O m C y 3 N N 'C Q mr .... y ° E m m 0 E c m M . o 'n c� >. c Q U c c c Ew U o ami nc 0 0) c rn w a� m w 0' >.o f0 .r 0 m U ° W sm Oa E m 3 N m c - ° .0 c m m U c C nc U N.0 m 0' Ecg `ca omc .L L �' m > mC 0 E a) m c Nmnc mc0 L ~ 0) m m H 'QN � ~ c p ? ami H aXi m m ~ c c ° o •Nc m vias - U CL nc M > m m n - r Z L M O C N n d W E w � m W CU . .0 W 0 W c � ai a ci o ai u vmi c�E ti U � ti $ LL. X X X X , sy. W X �r O 0 V 0- m v m c U 'a o °- Q X X X � Q o mo 0 0- z N o. c LLI m W L N L) Cc 0 c .coCa� C N G1 ZQ c) CO a) v v 0 vrn0 O JW m •Ooc m d aa) 4) a) - c - m c m m o a 0- 0- a� a� 0- a E E E E m Cm 0)n rnn r O U) .O U) a) E O U) a) E p an d p C p C .0 O r Q W °fpm O 'c a� to�-5 � c ° T_ 0 V ani = ani � m aCL ni = m a>> ."Cu ani aa) a>> (1) 0D 0D mO 0D Mo- 0 0- 00 .0- 0 dO . Z O W ° ° �. W F- c o 0 ov ov. c � �, ZZ � � maci:o c0 c c Z N W W •a n Eia no o c o c O m o f0 F-• Q 2 � 0 rn0T � rn� cp co. c � c ` � c J Y W c c � :_ - y n._ n._ no m o no.� o O d c� �r J O 0 > m CL m '0)o m` c` c)f0 E °)`° d J d d C c co o 0 0 0 ° 0 o o m .0 0 n 0 0)c 0,c rnn a 0) CL n 0 .06 .0maa)) m 0mmm c V Z L a) C �p •O 'O a) a) - L:'tn (DID a) -a) a) L a) v) 0)�a) v) U)U - a) a) C C �• vi rn -Z U a) >. a) vi �D > L Mn w O C U a) U) >. ° CO ° w cUa ° m v) " `'_ •Ov m m �o >1 p °nom m y 0-°i tm.- _ c E rncm N n � U c c a) nE °,m ;O y Q m .0 m �.. O 7 >,tn cE —o a� 0v mO c . cm mco00 �" 0- mo . _ Dc wo a) a D -0 ° JW L aimOcvcg 0m o c > > > y0 a) - mc > c °? a w00C 'D (n -0E � m > � � �, F- O mem � U != a� > n � L0o CL a� ca " .Oo my ( c oc y o o m a) O ° ° 3 0 me c nm WLL °nZ`co ac) c nE 03 � mn c tomo. 0mEEo .0) CL C9 (nma mcm E a) 5 ° c m cL m v n0 c a) v Oin y N. ;., E nm O y -> a a) " p o m o ° c E , c m = E .y ZO 'D CL waa)i00 0 O 30 a� 'xc Q C'A CO 0 m C p N :3..0 .` U) O n L U O O U �. CO(� 0 E V 0 d a) a) O . �p cc a) 4 . a) U c > p 0 rn w C - E CD U C � a) � to y > 0 2 0 O : my j m � mLL O E °� O a) E c n a) -5 n U a) (n m L O a) U) • v. _(U N L:.•� mC CL) •X i Yr�Z �J_U UC m .: C..� W u.� C 4- O O 0 a) U N_ y a) p m ° E 0 .L O r W: O.. � 0 _,U ,n y�m ._--Q D C C O .t L. ` m. O .m N (0, - � - 3 w � o) m Ccc m m e - -. °U -- o-m c 0 coo a) U) E -. _ TO � c L j n X y@ co C a) C '0 n "O N o m > N C 0 _ N O Q LL ac � s � O cc mnyaa)) mai 0a) c - — �.Q -8E > Q W y E U) N ` C O = 0 C U L C a) a) 3 0 0 0 m Ui O 0 O3: N C 0 N O" 2 -0 CL Cc n O m N n E y y a 0 N Z 7 m > 4' w .__ U U) f`0 N j pn - coL, fp .0 w L 0 f0 y € L - N O ) m •DO E •c a) U D Y p U) to •C m U L C y 0 tc CO .0 w a) U) 0 pF•• m - 3yoEm ` _ � 3X � c vip c ccm Em v_ `nOOg na) U > 0- .o m a 0 o `p `�° = _� `° o c a) m o ° O �' ° m � �° _ m om m Cc 0- o - c CO mw 0-i nrn 0-i ° mr > > ? o aUi 3U= - ` 3 n O a) Cc co~LO > m rnw m � � � ami M .9 � a) c y > y vi � c m cw� y > o C n� w 3 � c O x - m boa a) .4 o c c CM a) o 0 a) �,•XE moi m ° � 00cm co c - f .0 CL °� ca) ma) my N w mm EL m w p a) M a) E mm a) cc E0 � U •E pa) O CO ' N `U-n20 a) *r- 000 > E � m cy -0Ecn C.-60 000 nm S m . cmy o `� �• n w •0 - 4_. 0 p v) c O C O m a) m .- U C U C w a) y a) Cp p y U > m U 0 - 0 0 �. p 0 a) U U) a) m w N S2 a) O m c m p C N N n a° n0 co a) w V C c C m O N= m •O C m m a) >O _ - 3 a) m m n vi w a) N 7 0 L a) 7 0 "O w O t � y E3: c o a) s •0 a) m w °�-� 0 > m Um p E m m o � coQ Z U) Um o m coy y DE U = c 0m E3y > � pcow' co w a) L a) a) U) >,cn O .0 U a) 0-j O a w> � 3 c � y a>i m w COco y �o nm•0 nE y C c Mp ' o LU U pmm a`) a) 0 U) U •v � U �� aa) y � m y � a) ° o m m 0 0 a) FJ0c E2 a) '00 a) o E how � p o--� y °� 'm � o ° o I-•' O EO 3 p n'm I.... N y �.0a) c p � U N w V N >� U LL •d tl) d y �. .O 0 C d y 0 _ 7 On c U "O= �. a) O j -m •U O` > a) > Q M a) O L > m m p n ui U•y- '> c y a) nv 'p •O C L L - U l m a) L > 2 m � C U C • ` N a) � n n C � N C E d � � a) y3v vi a) � nE LLE a) C9 nw 2 � E _ comm CO co 5. co LL X X X X X W (D -o (D m a U `a Q oa Q C) m o 0 az N 1 1 W w LL N . V m m (D m m y Z O O O O O C QLLLI v � oCL u- ccoE cccE cccE ° E ° E M d G V o CD o �5; o co C) O W C mm C . > mm � � �22 w 0 a0 0- 0 aq a0 0- 0 Z rn c m c ° cm c (1) LLI CC �Z Z C C C O CC'° cO` '°O ,0 O ' CCCZ WW 8c `— coo �C0 J = .9 C13 e cao ooo ao c oo no c oao c LLJ 46 . 0 (D 6, (D a � Q) QJ EmmeEmt5amEmEcoE mc > ° c >IL O NU 5pNU -; p O ao - v U LLI V a ma ao rnC no C nC-nCp Cna n0 an•C Q O .. 0coa) cC0 O: ca am ca c) Oa) a) a) O OmmcaU Ommca c F- W C ° Q Z •0 a7 >,� y N d C r -0 cn C O L Q=_ � a) cn m ti cn U G. C7 cad -�_ � X ° « '. — = E _� 3 3w �a ° t CD tm C cu cc � a) O.O s a) - C •� U O to - m CO '�, a) O � 0 O V' v m ai cn cn r E ° cn c o m � Z rn a) tZ0- -j JZ m7 (DCE � �,-C.. .cn 3L � � .j .� d ` '� cn C (>0 .L.+ CNS. F'• � O co cn Ca mar c`a � 0 (D �' c�' O v7 ° c W z LLE �O a). n vi m cn O > O O C N a) C n LO .� U L N y N L O c0 N m CU r cn 'y v C �O (D N N ♦+ - a7 cn — - (D TC O m U L - C C m t/7 a) O ..,0. � _y S a w O ° a) N U ca N O cnm O to m O O (D >' � - C m� N � O C E Z O r L a) m a) ° O O C O C o U).= 0 O 0 3 E E ° O L U ° ,E TC O O O fl^O N C.� L,— p p t W O ° �. ° I-- �: o. N.v:°o ;6 vmi v., c ° Y':° �.�-.� o=: �... L U N 7 d N— C a) m .�'. > r- � � m a) = _��. > d a) ` E U ofav (D � ° nmm a) ? N E (n CLZt cn a) L Q Q ° > ca (D Eft (D c3ic� viyo via) O (D W ° .. o ` a)L ° o .0 a) c .. D c°i ° o a) a) mc U ) a) ° cac ma) ac) > '� c �a �_ c : tnc �a n o> N Z H d m(' m L .2 E C m m _ y a7 C n C a)L ° cn (D a) a) ° N :° — C1 — cn ._ n a) m a) N a) C LCA O 1] m a) C a) C C 3 O a)d ° d a7 O 7 L 'L O = U C F- syyc`� m3 0cc o � cmi v° oo aci � cCnr 0n 3 ° n Ca a) Q •° C m y ° ,� - O EO m -0 E E y •= '3 a) (n `p a7 U° ° p a7 w m cn 2 Q a a) U y 0 O p (D _ U � (D y O FCC cn n (n m O m > C O 'n �Cp m Q a) (D p w m a) O a7 ° w m C N y -C C .` C CL a) C 3 'C a) > vi a) a) O .L.., cn n p. ,.- � . a) as p a) _ y a co d vi v ` y ° > N L_ (0 m y .m. 1..� C C' U '0 7 U a) O 03 N 7 CL a) N C 7 E O a) C p N N co C a) a7 .° C a) w a) ��.. a O a) >,U C C t O) m O Lc) d m .0 ° O —a-S C O 0 Ca:E '3' a) :� w F) - a) n O �. N 0 U >, .° U C Y � � a) C C U m C E o E y `> a) a) C O .. C C a) m n-ffi .L-. C. E y > d y U m I I U � m — . a) _ Q O j ,N m '° a7 Z r a) L a m ° O •U O O a) C L O Q m _ cl Z m Om m ca m v°i c o 3 ° m m °co ca.0 C ° y m U ° i C 3 n W O.0 C O .y N O a) m L U a)Ca C '� E O '° OI C ° E C CO L N U L �. y d m p _ cu m ` N •C a) d y 2 3cr G1 >' a7 3 U N W z O. O` — U ` n E N c CL N U y O a) y •O a > E � a>i � ytn a°i � a Q2 ° tyo Q(nm UU) a (D Qca cu �. Ca) .E fn w L O N v) a7 C 10 N C a7 N C 3 U — n > m _ m m U a) -d U - d ILL X X X X X X X W 0 U -o a) U 'a o a � Q Q o mo o aZ N I I W } c c W LL O N V m Cl m� �m d Z Q p pCUp p p p p 7 JW Kaci -Do � m � aa)) E Cc � c O d E E a N m E a m E m E m E m E qrld � � c o mo N mo` 0) CLco 0)CLco O . w OW c ( ° a� oE EcO E � ° � Ea) Ea Q � � > c > w. E :' c > .. u c > c > c > c > V N m a) Mn o m N_N m ° N m a) m m O a. o. ap =U dp = fn ao ao a0 a0 Z a' W N :3 o W F- Off. ov ZZ c rn Lu ig rn rn a@acro o € N m w W CL c rn 0) 0) c0 (D.0 rn0)im o, 0CL v � J c):° Em 0 0 0 rn@ca °� N c O d c - a) co rn= - O -o W J Z CL a).Q O � 0.0 5 cu UJ 0 L) zV « -N CO w.O o L a) N N a) L y_ ' (0 E C. o o a ::(n >, Q W w d U ` - N E io N N 7 w _ 'O O N O 'N '@ @ .� C o o m a) o m � L c E _rn a� y ZEN Ern > . E mm .. l j O m CL o E m N N 3 c j w >`= 3 v� _ � � aaQ .7 aio ° Q Nom, (.9E c o � N.>, c rn w m E (DN >,d N C -p -p-. 2 o .0-p0 C N c f0 3 c m V=j c N FQ- W O J-_ .0 � > � m a�C9ma°`� 0) � ° m mmm , ` � a: a) 2 oN @@ i N N N_ 7 a) m O)0 c Z � +r o c � cOz � V C cLY is (D- E oL n V d o E N .c O m N .0 = y m N :3 a mg to of s EL y o E o 0 3 ° o v . ° c @ v m~ � Lc ain ov �' y N N.N >, E m L v N V a; - @ p• O E J w 3.2 t 'rn Z o `- aaa))-N - cL '— E oSDE N N N' O CU c)^•E __ U O.W m aO CD- umi Up ON yam- wNc Oyv � .. NCS-Nom N . aw.° . tZ (Zj E:.-. ° N ._ N O to N O' N 7 'o: c' a) - >i 0 U c .L• > N U u-) �O Z'C C E � `° @EU° aCc co `o � ....a oma >Y ao � cc - `°nc � . O c '(D :1 N c c 0 (a7 N .. CD CO U N ��«•• _ aac) N.:NooN ° NmN E: ° ° m v o aci m E > o)':. o v:,N•°:c rn N °; L t< m o o':O"C= U m in O _ c �_v a N `w LL '0 -'N C ,C c E N cu E .2 °ea CO) CO) .... c �'- co a)2: in _ 0 -toQ Q ° 4) m E n o o N o c mN cLN m vi E i° a->i aci ao CL ° o p W :E- '5) w m c c m y oc E E o 3 ° y .� a v� o N @ 'E `° Nc 7 CAO N .V O m L o 'm 2 O c d `C OR a) w "o y vi _ a) m p 7 O .«.. cn z i'_ w rn - N Z c = N O tNn E m y a m E aam N c N V@ O c ° N QTY cn N O cc U 0 E E m •N V!` ° `� U a) N d m N c 0 7 CC Lf) O � o 2i � c m EL ami c N a-) c N o) E a) `� E ca ° 'y m icn n = EU (D -(D CON E • "m T N m Nv �j ,Qe^� .0 '0 EuUc'E v�°i "u°iwa 'oy 'o m 'o� o ``° ° m `o eai@a) � � L � eo d t' V ca (ny y m. m d@ a)U L° C v-) C N a a) a) O O E -5 D v-. o n a) N m e N y m .. > •C N « N m w a) C- 0 O N 4: c N CT N d 'm N L N N N c 'O @ c O d a) c a) N m C) c N _ •� m •y CO L :-0 - a w'O N > > •rn N '> - 'O O "' ° ? a) w N U'._• c E C CD >, ami E o 'c 21,46 E ,,:.. - .- =- -o >' E o c0 N c> > . E o '7 N � 2 a) y m m . O 7 N Oo Co O c a s .7 a) - m E O t w a N m a) vEi c L p = cin c c v) c c f0 O N y w0 L a) .L - -U -3 N N a). 'cd 'p N cn aa) o a`a)) c N c > � .o «° � ° f0 .� m > -Z c o > m CN 3 c o a;� �p o N O N M a) c m c m c 05 N c L " rn c • ca N v v vNm N � .mc Nf0 coEo) 9 N ` >''C C) m e ` to 2 N CA to C N v COU m V U) c _�' m a) w ° 'd L' 0 .0) a ca fn a E a) N p c O. m O N 7 p N .0 N m U H N � 2 C N O C U O > N a) E •- " c c'c a E),V -p p• `0 _ � a) p � L tf) _ m e c m a m � - C= C fcn Q o m 'gyp d _ N C m ` cc c >,= 7 r` () c @ Eli C � O a a CD a m I I ° N � � a) w a) O C E C V m a 'O (O U-D m a) al N L "O c . U N m N N U Q m 0 O N a) > a)•gip m N in L c) a) a 0 c N .L.. C a) d N `m O ' 2 N m a) z a) 3: .o in m « m r. a) L . _ N a m U) - .- .aN Q y L a) 0 0 C= > m E S 'c D c 5 N c N O E Q L io m a) z 2 O N C�.- a p`• «_ C tT N � cp m� ra N V m 2 w O c ui W m e c '3 d o U) 'n ° Uc3 O cc N L LN, N a) a O L o O m a) V N a) -p d a) m •« _ "O w w m•° •m Z' c L N 0- >'C� N 2 3 v •c L c o « c N N C N - d cv Ec � ° Z m H m Q Ow o ff ° ° N Q E) m `°� •O �O N O N c O ca y y ui p a) uc)c.- z m m j >, _ 0 . = m N E "CA_ c C C) N rn c Ci N N • ri :3 � o• c (0 V N N L .. M .` m 0 o a) rn a) a) U) O L N E c •� Q Co CL � c 0 oU ° ° md-a Y o) NL ma H E • • • Yc«° N .� m m E 0 m LL X X W E m o U' CL •o m ca U = C . o a ° ¢ N ca 0 CL Z I _ W W W N U m O 0 Z gW J - c d cc c m M a - E � E r 4i L � .So co o O W u, a, r c U > ° a'� @ :> O FL ao Z W FW- L �, Z Z �..Z y W W 0 O 0 .0. 0 IL W U U W o U Z t: O -p O a) rn. w C1 C r C W A a W CL C N @ W of N a @oma � 0 p v N a > � � c ° � CLQ'- CO CL ca HWca p mca oW ca Cw. W cc > m cs o _mow ul CD ._ w O N y �. - aci m-@ o UI L] .° w .r > C ono om �� fj fn �� v cm $ ai a a me o L D W � - c �� y 2 = 0 �, N Z @ a) � � 0 - 0vrn@ cx 1- CL � � " 0 0 2 c m ° cc T CD caa nN �m a ~ 2 Esq- �• X C 3 � ~ CL N @ ccr-a w O m ami N N U =CO ` O C pCL Z6 o N .D r N `O Of O U N y p y A Sm co O Cl) s ° Ocp Q v mo ° W uci V 'c m ami ° m ° �.@ ° V tL � co@ ` •� c Amo L � (1) � as CL Cc CL ,Z�caa; CYEccooE FRESNO CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12277 The Fresno City Planning Commission, at its regular meeting on August 17, 2005, adopted the r.- following resolution relating to Rezone Application No. R-05-02. WHEREAS, Rezone Application No. R-05-02 has been filed with the City of Fresno to rezone the property as described below: REQUESTED ZONING: R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone district EXISTING ZONING: R-A/UGM (Residential Agricultural/Urban Growth Management) and R-A (County)zone districts APPLICANT: Dunmore Homes LOCATION: North side of East Dakota Avenue between North Armstrong and North Temperance Avenues APN: 310-200-17, 18, 23-29, 54, 58, 60 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Real property in the City of Fresno, County of Fresno, State of California, described as follows: That certain real property situated in Section 22, of Township 13 South, Range 21 East; Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, County of Fresno, State of California, according to the official plat thereof, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the south.line of-the northeast quarter of said Section 22, being 1321.19 feet Westerly'from the east quarter-corner of said Section 22; thence: 1�. . North 00°,28''54".East, a::distance of0 Og deet, to.a point on tfe northerly right of-way of. . . .. 7 - .. rt - Dakota:Avenue asshown on Plat ofFincher's Colony; Book 4 Page 63, Fresno County Records, said point also being the southeast corner of Deed Document No. 2003-170059, Official Records Fresno County; thence 2) North 00° 28' 54" East, along the east line of said Document No. 2003-170059, a distance of 330.00 feet, to the northwest corner of said Document No. 2003-170059, said point also being the easterly corner of Deed Document No. 1964-99020, Official Records Fresno County; thence 3) North 00° 28' 54" East, along the east line of said Document No. 1964-99020, a distance of 300.00 feet, to the northeast corner of said Document No. 1964-99020, said point also being the southwesterly corner of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 1231, Book 7 Page 51, Fresno County Records; thence along the southerly line of said Parcel 2 following the subsequent courses and distances: Planning.Commission Resolution No. 12277 Rezone Application No. R-05-02 August 17, 2005 Page t 4) South,891 26' 51" East, a distance of 330.00 feet; thence 5) South 000 28' 54"West, a,distance of 132.00 feet; thence 6) South 890 26' 51" East, a distance of 330.00 feet; thence 7) South 000 28' 54"West, a distance of 46.00 feet; thence 8) South 890 26' 51" East, a distance of 630.74 feet, to a point on the westerly right-of-way of Temperance Avenue as shown on the Precise Plans of Streets and Highways Map, Serial No. 45, sheets 10 & 11, Book 1 Pages 53-69, Fresno County Records, said point also being the southeast corner of said Parcel 2; thence leaving said southerly line 9) South 890 26' 51" East, a distance of 106.00 feet, to a point on the precise-plan-line of Temperance Avenue as shown on said Precise Plans Map; thence 10) North 000 25' 45" East, along said precise-plan-line, parallel with,'and 76.00 feet east of the east line of said Section 22, a distance of 447.08 feet, to a point on southerly right-of- way of the Gould Canal as shown on said Plat of Fincher's Colony; thence 11) North 590 20' 32"West, along said southerly right-of-way, a distance of 12168 feet, to a point on the westerly right-of-way of Temperance Avenue as shown on said Precise Plans Map; thence continuing along said southerly right-of-way 12) North 591 20' 32"West, a distance of 1492.65 feet, to a point on.the west line of the .northeast quarter.of the.-northeast quarter of said Section 22; thence continuing along ..:said southerly right-of-way line 13), North 59°,01' 20"W_ esti a distance of 188 78 feet,yto the northeasterly comery-f Parcel. "`- of Parcel Map, Book 3"Page 7 "Fresno County Records;~thence - 14) North 89° 20' 47"West, along the north line of said Parcel B, a distance of 1126.79 feet, to the northwest corner of said Parcel B, said point also being on the easterly right-of- way of Armstrong Avenue as shown on said Plat of Fincher's Colony;thence leaving said k north line 'aa 15) North 89° 20' 47"West, a distance of 60.00 feet, to a point on the westerly right-of-way of. Armstrong Avenue as shown on said Plat of Fincher's Colony; thence 16) South 001 32' 03"West, along said westerly right-of-way line, parallel with, and 30.00 feet west of the west line of the northeast quarter of said Section 22, a distance of 1148.67 feet; thence leaving said westerly right-of-way Planning Commission Resolution No. 12277 Rezone Application No. R-05-02 August 17, 2005 Page 3 17) South 890 23' 52" East, a distance of 60.00 feet, to a point on the easterly right-of-way of Armstrong Avenue as shown on said Plat of Fincher's Colony, said point also being the southwest corner of Parcel D of Parcel,Map, Book 1 Page 49, Fresno County Records; thence 18) South 890 23' 52" East, along the south line of said Parcel D, a distance of 630.00 feet, to the northwest corner of said Document No. 1964-99020; thence 19) South 000 32' 03"West, along the west line of said Document No. 1964-99020, a distance of 631.05 feet, to a point on the northerly right-of-way of Dakota Avenue as shown on said Plat of Fincher's Colony; thence 20) South 000 32' 03 West, a distance of 60.00 feet, to a point on the southerly right-of-way of Dakota Avenue as shown on said Plat of Fincher's Colony; thence 21) South 890 26' 51" East, along said southerly right-of-way, parallel with, and 30.00 feet south of the south line of the northeast quarter of said Section 22, a distance of 661.21 feet; thence leaving said southerly right-of-way 22) North 000 28' 54" East, a distance of 30.00 feet, to the Point of Beginning WHEREAS, the above-named applicant is requesting a zoning change on the above property in order to allow for a proposed 257-lot single-family residential subdivision; and, WHEREAS, the Fresno City Planning Commission on August 17, 2005, reviewed the subject rezone application in accordance with the policies of the McLane.Community Plan,and.the 2025 Fresno General Plan; and,. WHEREAS,_dunng.the August 17Commi , 2005 hearing the ssion received a_staff report and related x z information,environmental documents, and:66nsid6ir 2 testimony regarding"the r-'equested zoning _ change. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Fresno City Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that there is no substantial evidence in the record to indicate that Rezone Application No. R-05-02 may have a significant effect on the environment as identified by the Finding of Conformity to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR) No. 10130 £At;dated June 21, 2005, prepared for Environmental Assessment No. R-05-02/T-5461/C-05-22. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Fresno City Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City C. ouncil that the requested R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone district be approved. Planning Commission Resolution No. 12277 Rezone Application No. R-05-02 August 17, 2005 Page 4 The foregoing Resolution was adopted bythe. Fresno City Planning Commission upon a motion by Commissioner DiBuduo, seconded by Commissioner Vang. VOTING: - Ayes DiBuduo, Vang, Cherry, Kissler, Vasquez, Brand Noes - None Not Voting - None Absent - None yv DATED: August 17, 2005 N P. YOVINO, Secretary Fre o City Planning Commission Resolution No. 12277 Rezone Application No. R-05-02 Filed by Dunmore Homes Action: Recommend Approval DEB:lelAK\Common\Master Files 2005\REZONE\R-05-02,T-5461\R-05-02-PC Reso 12277 FRESNO CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12278 The Fresno City Planning Commission at its regular meeting on August 17, 2005, adopted the following resolution pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act of the Government Code of the State of California and the Municipal Code of the City of Fresno: WHEREAS, a Vesting Tentative Map of Tract No. 5461/UGM was filed with the City of Fresno and proposes a 257-lot single-family residential subdivision on 66.4 acres of land located on the north side of West Dakota Avenue between North Armstrong and North Temperance Avenues; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Development Department staff recommended approval of the proposed project subject to all conditions of approval contained in the staff report dated August 17, 2005; and, WHEREAS, the Fresno City Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on August 17, 2005, to review the proposed subdivision and considered the staff report and invited testimony and reviewed the requested subdivision in accordance with the policies of the McLane Community Plan and the 2025. Fresno General Plan; and, WHEREAS, a surrounding property owner spoke at the Planning Commission hearing and voiced concerns related to the proposed project's interface with the rural residential lots along West Dakota Avenue and the proposed dedication requirements on West Dakota Avenue. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Fresno City Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that there is no substantial evidence in the record to indicate that Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM may have a significant effect on the environment as identified by the Finding of Conformity to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR No. 10130) dated June 21, 2005, prepared for Environmental Assessment No. R-05-02/T-5461/C-05-22 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Fresno City Planning Commission finds that approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map,No..5461/UGM, subject to Section 12-403-B-2 of the Fresno Municipal Code, is consistent with the.adopted 2025 Fresno.General Plan and`McLane Community,Plan and the findings required'pursuant to Section 66410 et. seq. of the California Government Code. 7 B�IT fURTyER RESOL'JED that the Fresno City Planning Commission hereby approves Vesting Tentative"fractMap No. 5461/UGM subject to the'Planninyg-an-8 Development Department Conditions of= 4 Approval dated August 17, 2005,'and the following additions and modifications to those conditions: 1. The tier of lots along the south side of East Saginaw Way (Lots 180-197) shall be enlarged as determined appropriate by the Planning and Development Department Director. 2. Condition No. 13 shall be modified as follows: Provide a 26-foot landscaped easement (and irrigation system) along the rear property line of all lots which back-onto North Temperance Avenue. Provide a 10-foot landscaped easement (and irrigation system) along the side or rear property lines of all lots which side-onto or back-onto East Dakota Avenue and a 15-foot landscaped easement (and irrigation system) along the side property line of Lot 73 which sides-onto North Armstrong Avenue . Ref. Section 12-10114-3 of the Fresno Municipal Code. r Planning Commission Resolution No. 12278 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM August 17, 2005 Page 2 When the grading plan establishes a top of slope beyond the required landscape easement noted and the construction of the required wall is to be established coincident with the top of slope then the required minimum easement width shall be expanded to include the full landscaped area up to the wall location. The foregoing Resolution was adopted by the Fresno City Planning Commission upon a motion.by Commissioner DiBuduo, seconded by Commissioner Vang. VOTING: Ayes DiBuduo, Vang, Cherry, Kissler, Vasquez, Brand Noes None Not Voting None Absent - None DATED: August 17, 2005 INIC . VINO, Secretary Planning Commission Resolution No. 12278 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM Filed by Dunmore Homes Action: Approve KXommonWaster Rles.7.2005VAEZONETI-05-02,T-5461\13C Flew 12278-T-5461.wpd ,i:..,; }, Recording Requested by: City Clerk, Fresno, California A No Fee-Govt. Code 6103 Return to City Clerk, Fresno Space above this line reserved for Fresno County Recorder's Office ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRESNO PROPOSED AND INITIATED BY MOVED.BY SECONDED BY BILL NO: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FRESNO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONE MAP OF THE CITY OF FRESNO HERETOFORE ADOPTED BY ARTICLES 1 TO 4.5 INCLUSIVE, CHAPTER 12, OF THE FRESNO MUNICIPAL CODE, BEING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FRESNO WHEREAS., Rezone Application No. R-05-02 has been filed by Frank and Herky Urabe, William and Barbara Graham, Ureka Herr and Nzue Siong,.Roland Peek, Terry and Pam Carter,.Rosemary Rendon, Robertand Bennie Leininger, Lennie and..Dolores Hill, and James Dirlam, property owners,' with the City of. Fresno to_rezone:prope,rty as described herernbelow; and, --- .,,.,.-.. :,,. �.,. _._.,..� :ate,;...,,,. . ..•_ >:_ ..� ..> �;� .�. w .:� - .. rT r T WHEREAS, puirsuantto the provisions of Article 4, Chapter 12, of the-Fresno Municipal Code,`the Planning Commission of the City of Fresno held a public hearing on the 17th day of August, 2005, to consider Rezone Application No. R-05-02 and related Environmental Assessment No. R-05-02/ T-5461/C-05-22, during which the Commission recommended to the Council of the City of Fresno -approval of the subject environmental assessment and rezone application amending the City's Zoning a Ordinance on real property described hereinbelow from the R-A/UGM (Residential Agricultural/Urban 1"�Growth Management)and R-A (County) to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management)zone district; and, Ordinance Amending Official Zone Map Rezone Application No. R-05-02 September 20, 2005 Page t WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Fresno, on the 20th day of September, 2005, received the recommendation of the Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE,THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRESNO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Based upon the testimony and information presented at the hearing and upon review and consideration of the environmental documentation provided, the adoption of the proposed . rezoning is in the best interest of the City of Fresno. The Council finds in accordance with its own independent judgment that there is no substantial evidence in the record that the rezoning may have a significant effect on the environment as identified by the Finding of Environmental Conformity to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report(MEIR No. 10130) dated June 21, 2005, prepared for Environmental Assessment No. R-05-02/T-5461/C-05-22. Accordingly, Environmental Assessment No. R-05-02fT-5461/C-05-22 is hereby approved. l c SECTION 2. The Council finds the requested R-1/UGM zone district is consistent with the existing low and medium-low density residential land use designation of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and McLane Community-Plan as specified in Section 12-403-B-2 of the Fresno Municipal Code. <:SECTPON 3 The Council finds that the zone district of the real:property described hereinbelow, located in-the-City of Fresno and shown on-the Official Zone Map of the City of Fresno; is"reclassified'- from the R-A/UGM (Residential Agricultural/Urban Growth Management) and R-A (County) to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management)zone district: That certain real property situated in Section 22, of Township 13 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, County of Fresno, State of California, according to the official plat thereof, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at point on the south line of the northeast quarter of said Section 22, being 1321.19 feet westerly from the east quarter corner of said Section 22; thence: Ordinance Amending Official Zone Map .Rezone Application No. R-05-02 September 20, 2005 Page 3 1) North 000 28' 54" East, a distance of 30.'00 feet, to a point on the northerly right-of-way of Dakota Avenue as shown on Plat of Fincher's Colony, Book 4 Page 63, Fresno County Records, said point also being the southeast corner of Deed Document No. 2003-170059, Official Records Fresno County; thence 2) North 000 28' 54" East, along the east line of said Document.No. 2003-170059, a distance of 330.00 feet, to the northwest corner of said Document No. 2003-170059, said point also being the easterly corner of Deed Document No. 1964-99020, Official Records Fresno County; thence 3) North 000 28' 54" East, along the east line of said Document No. 1964-99020, a distance of 300.00 feet, to the northeast corner of said Document No. 1964-99020, said point also being the southwesterly corner of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 1231, Book 7 Page 51, Fresno County Records; thence along.the southerly line of said Parcel 2 following the subsequent courses and distances: 4) South 890 26' 51" East, a distance of 330.00 feet; thence 5) South 000 28' 54"West, a distance of 132.00.feet; thence 6) South 890 26' 51" East, a distance of 330.00 feet; thence 7) South 000. 28' 54"West, a distance of 46.00 feet; thence 8) South 890 26' 51" East, a distance of 630.74 feet, to.a point on the westerly right-of-way of Temperance Avenue as shown on the.Precise Plans of Streets and. Highways Map, Serial No. 45, sheets 10 & 11 Book 1 Pages 53-69, Fresno.County Records, said point also being the�southeast corner of said-Parcel 2; thence leaving. g said. outherly line A 9) South 89° 26' 51" East,..a distance of.106 00 feetr to a_point-on the,precise plan line of ' T Temperance•,Avenue as shown on'said Precise Rlans Mao;.thence k -f R• y -• 10) North 000.25' 45" East, along said precise-plan-line, parallel with, and 76.00 feet east of the east line of said Section 22, a distance of 447.08 feet, to a point on southerly right-of-way of the Gould Canal as shown on said Plat of Fincher's Colony; thence 11) North 590 20' 32"West, along said southerly right-of-way, a distance of 122.68 feet, to a point on the westerly right-of-way of Temperance Avenue as shown on said Precise Plans Map; thence continuing along said southerly right-of-way 12) North 590 20' 32"West, a distance of 1492.65 feet, to a point on the west line of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 22; thence continuing along said southerly right- of-way line 13) North 590 01' 20"West, a distance of 188.78 feet, to the northeasterly corner of Parcel B of J. Parcel Map, Book 3 Page 7, Fresno County Records; thence Ordinance Amending Official Zone Map Rezone Application No. R-05-02 September 20, 2005 Page 4 14) North 890 20' 47'West, along the north line of said Parcel B, a distance of 1126.79 feet, to the northwest corner of said Parcel B, said point also being on the easterly right-of-way of Armstrong Avenue as shown on said Plat of Fincher's Colony; thence leaving said north line 15) North 891 20'47"West, a distance of 60.00 feet, to a point on the westerly right-of-way of Armstrong Avenue as shown on said Plat of Fincher's Colony; thence 16) South 000 32' 03"West, along said westerly right-of-way line, parallel with, and 30.00 feet west of the west line of the northeast quarter of said Section 22, a distance of 1148.67 feet; thence leaving said westerly right-of-way 17) South 89 23' 52" East, a distance of 60.00 feet, to a point on the easterly right-of-way of Armstrong Avenue as shown on said Plat of Fincher's Colony, said point also being the southwest corner of Parcel D of Parcel Map, Book 1 Page 49, Fresno County Records; thence 18) South 890 23' 52" East, along the south line of said Parcel D, a distance of 630.00 feet, to the northwest corner of said Document No. 1964-99020; thence 19) South 000 32' 03" West,along the west line of said Document No. 1964-99020, a distance of 631.05 feet, to a point on the northerly right-of-way of Dakota Avenue as shown on said Plat of Fincher's Colony; thence 20) South 000 32' 03"West, a distance of 60.00 feet, to a point on the southerly right-of-way of Dakota Avenue as shown on said Plat of Fincher's Colony; thence 21) South 890 26'.51" East, along said southerly right-of-way, parallel with, and 30.00 feet south of the south line-of the northeast quarter of.said Section 22, a distance of 661.21 feet; thence leaving said southerly:right-of-way _ X22) North 00° 28 54" East a�distance of_30-0.0 feet to the Point-of Beginning:,_ - .. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall become effective and in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the thirty-first day after its passage and upon annexation of the subject property into the City of Fresno and upon payment of required fire district"transitional fees." .. a CLERK'S CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF FRESNO ) CITY OF FRESNO ) I, REBECCA E. KLISCH, City Clerk of the City of Fresno, certify that the foregoing ordinance was adopted by the Council of the City of Fresno, California, at a regular meeting held on the day of , 2005, by the following vote: Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstain: REBECCA E. KLISCH City Clerk By APPROVED AS TO FORM HILDA CANTU MONTOY City Attorney Ear - - .. :..I..'.. : :.-•-- .1..:- .a.-... rl viY'.4<<:" _:-:. 't' ..-iy..,-.e--.:.+r .. .i!.. -.-. ._ - . .e` ... - .. Y-.:'.. B -. -. Deputy Rezone Application No. R-05-02 Filed by Dunmore Homes "Assessor's Parcel No. 310-200-18, 23-29, 54, 58, 60 r 1. DEB:IelAK\Common\Master Files-2005\REZONE\R-05-02,T-5461\R-05-02-CC OrdBill City of , REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM NO. D COMMISSION MEETING 8-Irl-05 August 17, 2005 APPROVED BY rte., FROM: STAFF, Planning Divisi Planning and Developmen ent DIRI#4� SUBJECT: 'CONSIDERATION OF REZONE APPLICATION NO. R-05-02, VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5461/UGM, AND ENVIRONMENTAL FINDII G FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. R-05-02/T-5461/C-05-22 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Rezone Application No. R-05-02 proposes to change the zone district from the R-A (County) and R-A/UGM (Residential Agricultural/Urban Growth Management) zone districts to the R-1/UGM (Single Family ResidentiaUUrban Growth Management) zone district for approximately 66.4 acres (net) of. property located north of East Dakota Avenue between North Armstrong and North Temperance Avenues. The applicant, Dunmore Homes., has also filed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM proposing to subdivide the subject property into a 257-lot, single family residential subdivision at an overall density of 3.9 units per acre. The applications would bring the subject property into conformance with the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the McLane Community Plan, pursuant to Section 12-403-B-2 of the Fresno Municipal Code. This project also includes the detachment of a portion of.the subject property from the Fresno County Fire Protection District and the Kings River Conservation District and annexation of the property into the City of Fresno. This rezone application and subdivision map are supported by staff. PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT. A 257-lot single-family residential subdivision on approximately 66.4 acres (net) of property to be developed at an overall density of 3.9 dwelling units per acre APPLICANT Dunmore Homes (Engineer: Provost and Pritchard Engineering) LOCATION North of East Dakota Avenue between North Armstrong and North ..:.y.-- ':s v ,c_•• ..._n•.A ?Y.i� ?...e - -Avenue S -,_Temperarice_ (Council District 4, Coundlmember Westerlund) SITE SIZE 66.4 acres (net) LAND USE Existing - Vacant Proposed Single Family Residential ZONING Existing - R-A (County) and R-A/UGM (Residential Agricultural/Urban Growth Management) Proposed - R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) PLAN DESIGNATION The proposed . R-1/UGM zone district and 257-lot single family AND CONSISTENCY residential subdivision is consistent with the 2025 Fresno General Plan and McLane Community Plan designation of the site for low and medium low density residential planned land uses REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Rezone Application No. R-05-02 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM August 17, 2005 ., Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL_ FINDING Finding of Conformity to the 2025 Fresno. General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR) No. 10130 dated June 21, 2005 PLAN COMMITTEE No Committee for this area RECOMMENDATION STAFF RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval of rezone application and approve vesting tentative tract map subject to compliance with the Conditions of Approval for T-5461/UGM dated August 17, 2005 BORDERING PROPERTY INFORMATION Planned Land Use Existing Zoning Existing Land Use Not in.Sphere of Influence Single Family Residential North Medium Low.Densit Residential R-A(County) Y Rural Residential Low Density Residential South Low Density Residential R-A(County) Rural Residential Medium Density Residential R-A/UGM (Residential Agricultural/Urban Growth Management) East Medium Density Residential AE-20(County) Vacant West Low Density Residential and R-A/UGM (Residential Rural Residential Medium-Low Density Residential Agricultural/Urban Growth -.Maria ement).,, ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING The initial study prepared for Environmental Assessment No. R-05-02/T-5461 considered potential environmental impacts associated with the subject rezone application and subdivision map request. The study indicates that the project, if approved, would conform to the land use designation and land use policies of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and is within the scope of Master Environmental Impact Report No. 10130. Therefore, staff has issued a finding that the project proposal is in conformance to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR No. 10130) dated June 21, 2005, which incorporates a MEIR Mitigation Monitoring Checklist. This environmental finding was properly noticed with no comments filed within the 20-day review and comment period. BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS The applicant, Dunmore Homes, has filed Rezone Application No. R-05-02 and Vesting Tentative Tract "Map No. 5461/UGM for approximately 66.4 (net) acres of property located north of East Dakota Avenue between North Temperance and North Armstrong Avenues. The rezone application proposes to reclassify the subject property from the R-A (County) and R-A/UGM (Residential Agricultural/Urban Growth Management) zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Rezone Application No. R-05-02 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM �.; August 17, 2005 Page 3 M Management) zone district. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM proposes to subdivide the 66.4-acre site into a 257-lot single family residential subdivision at an overall density of 3.9 dwelling units per acre. On November 19, 2002, the City Council, through Resolution No..2002-379, adopted the 2025 Fresno General Plan which also adopted the McLane Community Plan. - The McLane Community Plan designates 25.8 acres of the subject property for low (0.0-2.18 dwelling units per acre) density residential and 40.6 acres of the subject property for medium-low (2.19-4.98 dwelling units per acre) f&. density residential land uses. The applicant wishes to pursue development of the subject property with 257 single family homes. The requested R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone district is considered consistent with the planned land uses contingent upon the development of the property in accordance with Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM. Furthermore, the proposed development-with a density of 3.9 dwelling units per acre demonstrates that the project site will be developed within the overall density of dwelling units anticipated by the 2025 Fresno General Plan and McLane Community Plan as provided by Section 12-403-B-2 of the Fresno Municipal Code (FMC). Water Resources and Public Water Supply The Water Division of the Department of Public Utilities has determined that there is an adequate source of water available to serve the project with the implementation of the UGM service delivery requirements and environmental impact mitigation measures. The nearest presently available water service line is located in North Armstrong Avenue, adjacent to the site. The Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (FMFCD) has indicated that permanent flood control service is not available for this project. The developer will be required to construct temporary facilities until permanent facilities become available. Implementation of the 2025 Fresno General Plan policies, mitigation measures of Master Environmental _lmpa.ct _Report No 101;30;, the Water Resourc-es ManagemQnt_,Plan,:._.and the mitigation, measures 77 _.._. = idehtified.-by`the-project environmental assessment/initial •study wiILprovide.an adequate, reliable and sustainable water supply for the project's urban domestic and-public,safety-consumptive purposes. Sewage Collection System Capacity Several major facility improvement projects have been implemented at the City of Fresno's Regional Wastewater Treatment and Reclamation Facility in order to accommodate the projected rates of population and employment growth up to a projected population holding capacity of 590,000 people. These improvements have been completed to provide an expanded wastewater treatment and reclamation capacity of 80 million gallons per day (MGD), which is sufficient to accommodate continued planned urban development including the proposed project. The Department of Public Utilities has determined that adequate sanitary sewer service is available to serve the project, subject to the mitigation measures imposed with the environmental assessment. The nearest public sanitary sewer main to serve this project is located in East Shields Avenue east of North Fowler Avenue. REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Rezone Application.No. R-05-02 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM August 17, 2005 Page.4 Circulation Element Plan Policies and Major Street System Traffic Capacity . The 2025 Fresno General Plan designates North Armstrong Avenue and East Dakota Avenue as collector streets, which typically requires a 94-foot right-of-way width, and designates North Temperance Avenue as a expressway street, which typically requires a minimum 124-foot right-of-way. The applicant will be required to dedicate and construct improvements on North Armstrong, East Dakota and North Temperance Avenues. Other improvements include the construction of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and transition paving within the limits of the tract; construction of an underground street lighting system; and relinquishment of access rights to North Temperance and.East Dakota Avenues for all residential lots adjacent to these major street frontages. These street improvements are outlined in more detail in the Vesting Tentative Tract. Map No. 5461/UGM Conditions of Approval dated August 17, 2005. A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) was prepared for the proposed project by Peters Engineering Group dated November 12, 2004. The proposed development of a 257-lot single family residential subdivision on the 66.4-acre project site can be expected to generate an average of 2,728 vehicle trips per day (VTD), which includes 160 a.m. and 181 p.m. peak hour trips. The traffic study analyzed the intersections of East Clinton and North Armstrong Avenues, East Shields and North Armstrong Avenues, East Dakota and North Armstrong Avenues and East Dakota and North Temperance Avenues. 1n addition, the study analyzed the project's impact on the State Route 180 Interchanges with Clovis Avenue and Fowler Avenue. An important goal is to maintain acceptable levels of service along the highway and street network. To accomplish this, local agencies adopt minimum levels of service (LOS) in an attempt to control congestion that may result as new development occurs. Caltrans' minimum LOS is C except where prohibitive,.according to information specified in Caltrans' A. Guide For Traffic Impact--Studies. The.City.. of Fresno's minimum LOS'-design standard-is LOS D. Traffic impacts are considered to occur whenever the LOS exceeds D on the City street system, or C on the State highway system TheresuIts of the�study=determined-That`all intersectionsV that were analyzed ace,operatir�g at°acceptable a levels of service at-this.time. In addition; the study, projected that all.,intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service in the year 2025, with the eventual signalization and widening of the intersections to City standards. Because the immediately surrounding properties are not developed, the planned major street and intersection improvements have not yet been completed as required by adopted plans, policies and development standards. However, the proposed project as well as other urban land uses developed as planned by the 2025 Fresno General Plan will be required to construct the planned major street system consistent with the public facility and service delivery requirements of the.Urban Growth Management Program. In addition, the developer of this project, in accordance with the mitigation measures of Master Environmental Impact Report (No. 10130) certified by the Council with the adoption of the 2025 Fresno General Plan, will be required to pay impact fees specific to the traffic signalization of the major street intersections. REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION - Rezone Application No. R-05-02 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM August 17, 2005 Page 5 State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), District 6, Office of Intergovernmental Relations has commented that development of the proposed residences will result in additional vehicle trips during the peak hour traffic periods which will impact the State Route (SR) 168 interchange at East Ashlan Avenue and the State Route (SR) 180 interchange at North Fowler Avenue. Caltrans recommended . that a traffic impact study be prepared "in order to assess the project-related impacts to the State Highway System and the pro-rata share towards area-wide circulation improvements." Based on the results of the study, Caltrans acknowledged in the attached letter dated April 11, 2005 that the impacts from this project on the above interchanges will be minimal. Subdivision Design/Streets and Access Points This subdivision is proposed to have one access point to North Armstrong Avenue and two access points to East Dakota Avenue. Since North Temperance Avenue is an expressway street, access to Temperance Avenue from this subdivision is not permitted. The Public Works Department, Transportation Planning Section has reviewed the rezone application and tentative tract map. Public Works staff has determined that the streets adjacent to and near the subject site will be able to accommodate the quantity and kind of traffic generated, subject to the dedication and improvement of adjacent portions of North Armstrong, East Dakota and North Temperance Avenues to their ultimate planned width. The subdivision map proposes that six lots (Lots 67 through 72, inclusive) front onto North Armstrong Avenue, which is a designated collector street. Policy E-1-p of the 2025 General Plan, which is applied throughout the city, states that "new single-family residential lots shall not be allowed to front on a major street, unless it can be satisfactorily demonstrated that no feasible alternative means of access can be provided to the property. It is noted that these six lots have existing single family residenceswhich currently.access North:Armstrong_Avehue.: Since.these`are not"nevisingle family residences, staff-will permit these lots to front onto access' Armstrong"Avenue, provided that the lots have a circular ,or hammer head driveway to avoid having to back a vehicle onto a major street. f .. r" Landsca in /Walls Given that the proposed subdivision abuts planned collector and expressway streets, the developer will be required to install 15 feet of landscaping along East Dakota and North Armstrong Avenue (collectors). In addition, the applicant will be required to install a solid wall at the rear of the required landscape setback, which will mitigate the adverse effect of noise generated by vehicles traveling on the adjacent major streets. The proposed subdivision abuts a planned expressway street (Temperance Avenue). In order to meet the Expressway Area (EA) zone district standards, the developer will be required to install 26 feet of landscaping along North Temperance Avenue. The 26-foot landscape strip will be combined with 10 feet of property within the public right-of-way between the property line and.the curb to accommodate the required multi-purpose trail along Temperance Avenue. In addition, the applicant will be required to install a solid wall at the rear of the required landscape setback, which will mitigate the adverse effect of noise generated by vehicles traveling on the adjacent major street. The wall along Temperance Avenue shall be designed in accordance with the acoustical analysis prepared by Bollard and Brennan, Inc. dated October 15, 2004, which addresses the noise impacts resulting from vehicle traffic on Temperance Avenue in this area. REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Rezone Application No. R-05-02 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM August 17, 2005 Page 6 It is noted that the applicant will also be required to construct a multi-purpose trail along the south side of the Gould Canal. This trail will connect to the above noted trail along North Temperance Avenue. Lot Dimensions The R-1/UGM zone district requires minimum lot sizes of 6,000 square feet for lots in the subdivision. All of the lots in the subdivision exceed the minimum lot size requirement. In addition, all lots meet or exceed the minimum.lot width (60 feet) and depth (100 feet)as required by the R-1 zone district. The subdivision map, based on the required findings for approval and subject to the recommended conditions of approval, and the standards and policies of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and McLane Community Plan, complies with applicable zoning, subdivision, and UGM requirements. Therefore, staff recommends approval. Tentative Tract Map Findings, The Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66400 et. seq.) requires that a proposed subdivision not be approved unless the map, together with its design and improvements, is found to be consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan (Finding No. 1 below). State law further provides that the proposed subdivision map be denied if any one of the Finding Nos. 2 - 5 below is made in the negative. In addition, State law requires that a subdivision be found to provide for future passive and natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision development (Finding No. 6 below). .1....The,proposed subdivision map, together.with its design--and.improvements,""is consistentWith the City's 2025 General Plan (there is not an applicable specific-plan); because the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the McLane Community Plan-designates the site for low and medium-low density residential land uses and sub ept t- Sectio. '12-403 B 2 of the Fresno Munici al Gbde, the ro ect"r design meets the density and zoning"ordinance.-criteria for development in these plan designations. ' 2. This site is physically suitable for the proposed type and density of development, because conditions of approval will ensure adequate access and drainage on and off the site. 3. The proposed subdivision design and improvement is not likely to cause substantial and considerable damage to the natural environment, including fish, wildlife or their habitat, because of the urbanized nature of the area in which the site is located. 4. The proposed subdivision design and improvements are not likely to cause serious public health and safety problems,,because the conditions of approval have shown and will insure that the subdivision conforms with City health and safety standards, subject to eliminating all lots that front onto West Clinton Avenue. REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Rezone Application No. R-05-02 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM August 17, 2005 Page 7 5. The proposed"subdivision design will not conflict with public easements within or through the site, because conditions of approval will assure noninterference with any existing or proposed public easements. 6. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive and natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision, because of the appropriate use and placement of landscaping plant materials and because of the orientation of the proposed.lots. The subdivision map, subject to the recommended conditions of approval, complies with the design and property development standards of the Zoning Ordinance and local Subdivision Ordinance. Based upon the plans and information submitted by the applicant and the recommended conditions of project approval, staff has determined that these findings can be made. Action by the Planning Commission regarding the rezone application will be a recommendation to the City Council. Planning Commission action on the proposed tentative tract map, unless appealed to the Council, is final. CONCLUSION / RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission take the following actions: 1. RECOMMEND APPROVAL of the environmental finding for Environmental Assessment No. R-05-02(T-5461 dated June 21, 2005,that the project proposal conforms to the provisions of the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR No. 10130). 2.. ..RECOMMEND APPROVAL to the City:Council:of,Rezone..Application No. R-05-02.which proposes to rezone the project site from the R-A (County) and R-A/UGM (Residential Agricultural/Urban Growth -Management) zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban- Growth - -- a Management)..-zone-district ^ - _ 3."APPROVE Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM subject to compliance with the Conditions of Approval dated August 17, 2005. KACommon\Master Files-2005VREZONE\R-05-02,T-5461\R-05-02,T-5461 PC Rpt 5-16-05.doc Attachments: Vicinity Map Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM dated March 1, 2005 Conditions of Approval for T-5461/UGM dated August 17, 2005, including letters from the Fresno Irrigation District (03/03/05), Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (04/14/05), San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (03/17/05), Clovis Unified School District (03/17/05), Fresno County Community Health (03/15/05), Solid Waste Division (March 30, 2005), Public Works Department (April 1, 2005). Letter from Caltrans dated April 11, 2005 Environmental Assessment No. R-05-02/T-5461, Finding of Conformity to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MSIR No. 10130) dated June 21, 2005 CITY OF FRESNO PLANNING,AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL August 17, 2005. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5461/UGM North of East Dakota Avenue between North Armstrong and North Temperance Avenues All tentative maps are subject to the applicable provisions of the State Subdivision Map Act, Fresno Municipal Code, City policies, and City of Fresno Standard Specifications. The following specific conditions are applicable to this vesting tentative map. The Urban Growth Management(UGM)Service Delivery Plan requirements are included in the following conditions of approval and are designated by the caption "Urban Growth Management Requirements. NOTICE TO PROJECT APPLICANT In accordance with the provisions of Government Code §66020(d)(1), the imposition of fees, dedications, reservations or exactions for this project are subject to protest by the project applicant at the time of approval or conditional approval of the development or within 90 days after the date of the imposition of the fees, dedications,reservations or exactions imposed on the development project. GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. Upon conditional approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.5461/UGM entitled "Exhibit A," dated April 22,2005,the subdivider may prepare a Final Map in accordance with the approved tentative map..Related Rezone Application No:R-Q5-02 shall be_a'pproved b'y;the:City Council to become'effective prior to Final Map approval. ter, Submit grading plans and a soils report to the Crty of FTesnoPlannmg and Development Department for verfcation pno to_Final."Map approvaF(Reference:'-Sections 12=1;022 and` 12=1023 of the Fresno Municipal Code):'., Grading*-plans shall indicate the location of any required walls and indicate the proposed width of required landscape easements or strips. Approval of the grading plan is required prior to Final Map approval. 3. At the time of Final Map submittal,the subdivider shall submit engineered construction plans to the City of Fresno Public Works, Public Utilities, and Planning and Development Departments for grading, public sanitary sewer system, public water system, street lighting system, public streets, and storm drainage, including other technical reports and engineered plans as necessary to construct the required.public improvements and work and applicable processing fees. 4. Engineered construction plans shall be approved by the City prior to the approval of the Final Map. If, at the time of Final Map approval, such plans have not been approved, the subdivider shall provide performance security in an amount established by the City to guarantee the r! completion of plans 5. Public utilities easements,as necessary,shall be shown on the Final Map and dedicated to the City of Fresno. Public utility easements beyond the limits of the Final Map, but required as a Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM August 17, 2005 Page 2 condition of development,shall be acquired at the subdivider's cost and shall be dedicated by separate instrument at the time of Final Map approval. The relocation of existing utilities necessitated by the required public improvements shall be paid for by the subdivider. The subdivider is responsible to contact the appropriate utility company for information. 6. Comply with the conditions, policies and standards set forth in the City of Fresno, Municipal Code,Article 10,Chapter 12, "Subdivision of Real Property;"Resolution No.68-187,"City Policy with Respect to Subdivisions;" and City of Fresno Standard Specifications, 2002 Edition, and any amendments thereto. 7. The developer/owner shall pay applicable fees for, but not limited to, plan checks for street improvements and other grading and construction; street trees, street signs, water service, sewering, and inspections in accordance with the City of Fresno Master Fee Schedule (City Resolution No. 79-606 and No. 80-420) and any amendments, modifications, or additions thereto; and in accordance with the requirements of State law as related to vesting tentative maps. 8. The subdivider shall furnish to the City acceptable security to guarantee the construction of the off-site street improvements in accordance with all applicable provisions of the Fresno Municipal Code and .the State Subdivision Map Act. The subdivider shall complete all the public improvements prior to the approval of the Final Map by the City. If, at the time of Final Map approval,any public improvements have not been completed and accepted in accordance with the standards of the City, the subdivider may elect to enter into an agreement with the City to thereafter guarantee the completion of the improvements. 9. As a condition of Final Map approval, the subdivider shall furnish to the City a subdivision guarantee listing all parties having any right,title, or interest and the nature of their interest per State law. -10. = Relinquish access rights to-North Temperance and East Dakota Avenues from-all residential lots- which abut these streets and to Lot 73 which abuts North Armstrong Avenue. Ref. Section 12- 1-0114-3 2- 1011 f 3 of the Fresno Municipal Code e _.. 11 Prior to final-map approval,-the owner of the subject property shall execute-a"Right to farm?_ covenant with the City of Fresno Said covenant is to run with the land and shall acknowledge and agree that the subject property is in or near agricultural districts located in the County of Fresno and that the residents of said property should be prepared to accept the inconveniences and discomfort associated with normal farm activities. The "Right to Farm" covenant shall be recorded prior to or concurrent with the recording of the Final Map of Tentative Tract No. 5461/UGM. Landscapinq and Walls 12. Pursuant to 2025 Fresno General Plan Exhibit 9 and Policies E-15-a, E-15-b, E-15-h,E-154 and E-15-x and in accordance with Policies 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 and 3.2.3 of the 1990 Master Multi- Purpose Trails Manual, within the limits of the tract, the developer/owner shall construct appropriate improvements or provide appropriate security for a bicycle/pedestrian trail with equestrian accommodation of an appropriate width along North Temperance Avenue and along the south side of the Gould Canal The location and width of the trail may be accommodated Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM August 17, 2005 Page 3 within and including the required public right-of-way and landscape easement located between the curb face and the required solid masonry wall along Temperance Avenue and within and including the required public right-of-way and Outlot"A"between the curb face on East Griffith and East Sussex Ways and the southerly right-of-way of the Gould Canal 13. Provide a 26-foot landscaped easement(and irrigation system)along the rear property line of all lots which back-onto North Temperance Avenue. Provide a 15-foot landscaped easement(and irrigation system) along the side or rear property lines of all lots which side-onto or back-onto East Dakota Avenue and along the side property line of Lot 73 which sides-onto North Armstrong Avenue . Ref. Section 12-1011-f-3 of the Fresno Municipal Code. When the grading plan establishes a top of slope beyond the required landscape easement noted and the construction of the required wall is to.be established coincident with the top of slope then the required minimum easement width shall be expanded to include the full landscaped area up to the wall location. 14. Maintenance of the required landscape easements along North Temperance, East Dakota and North Armstrong Avenues and Outlots A, B and C may be the responsibility of the City's Community Facilities District No. 2. Contact the Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division,for information regarding the city's District and comply with the requirements noted in the memorandum from the Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division, dated April 1, 2005. The property owner shall petition the City for annexation to the City's District prior to Final Map approval. 15. If the developer/subdivider elects to petition for annexation into the City's Community Facilities District, he/she shall be required to provide the City of Fresno, Department of Public Works,with copies of signed acknowledgments from each purchaser of a lot within the subdivision,attesting to the purchasers understanding that the lot will have an annual maintenance assessment and that he/she is aware of the estimated amount of the assessment. The developer/subdivider shall-=execute-:and record- a covenant: on each -lot._providing: notice that the subjectI. I -. property is subject to annual payment of the Community Facilities District assessment. 16 :Should;the City Counci[not.approve thee anneXation-of�uch Iandscape:areas into:Community .. - - - -- Facilities District No:2,the property owner/developer:shall create a°homeown`ers association for the maintenance of the landscape areas. The proposed Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions(CC&Rs)and the proposed instruments for the homeowners association shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department for review two weeks prior to Final Map approval. Said documents shall be recorded with the Final Map or alternatively submit recorded documents or documents.for recording prior to final acceptance of subdivision improvements. Said documents shall include assignment of responsibility to the owner's association for landscaping and other provisions as stated in the Development Department Guidelines for preparation of CC&Rs dated January 11, 1985. 17. Improvement plans for all required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department for review prior to Final Map approval. i4. 18. Construct a 6-foot high solid masonry wall along the rear or side property lines of all lots which back onto or side onto North Armstrong and East Dakota Avenues (solid wall to meet the requirements of Section 1.2-306-H, Fresno Municipal Code). Construct a 12-foot s.. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM August 17, 2005 Page 4 high solid masonry wall (or approved combination of solid wall and earth berm) along the rear property lines of all lots which back onto North Temperance Avenue. These walls as well as additional flanking walls are required pursuant to the acoustical analysis prepared by Bollard and.Brennan, Inc. dated October 15, 2004. Construction plans for required walls showing architectural appearance and location of all walls shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department for review prior to Final Map approval Construction plans for required walls showing architectural appearance and location of all walls shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department for review prior to Final Map approval. Building Setbacks 19. , Building setbacks shall be in accordance with the R-1/UGM zone district and the provisions of Fresno Municipal Code Section 12-207.5-E-1-c as shown on Exhibit"A"of Tentative Tract Map No.5461/UGM dated April 22,2005. There shall be a 10-foot side yard building setback on the "key Lot" side of Lots 78, 118, 183, 207, 229, 232, 240 and 255. Information 20. Prior to the issuance of building permits for the subdivision, school construction fees shall be paid to the Clovis Unified School District in accordance with the school district's adopted schedule of fees. 21. The proposed tentative tract map shall be annexed to the City of Fresno concurrent with, or prior to, final tract map approval, pursuant to all required fees and policies of the Fresno County Local Agency Formation Commission and the City of Fresno including any cost incurred to the City of Fresno by the detachment of the property from the Fresno County Fire Protection District. 22. Contact the United States Postal Service, Fresno Office,for the location and.type-of mailboxes #o be installed in this subdivision. 23 Pursuant to Section 66456.1 of the Subdivision Map Act, which states "The right of the subdwider to:fi{e mu{tip{e_Final.lviaps,sf}all notlimit tfe authority of the local_gency_to.impose _., . reasonable conditions relating to the fling of multiple Final Maps;"-any multiple final maps filed -= by the subdivider on this tract shall fully and independently conform to'all provisions of Fresno Municipal Code Chapter 12, Article 10, Subdivision of Real Property. 24. The developer/owner shall obtain any and all permits required for the removal or demolition of any existing building or structure located within the subdivision boundaries. The developer/owner shall also obtain any and all permits required for the proper abandonment/closure of any existing water well, septic tank/leach field or cesspool, and irrigation pipeline on the subject property. All such permits shall be obtained prior to commencement of tract grading work, in accordance with Chapter 13 of the Fresno Municipal Code. 25. If archaeological and/or animal fossil material is encountered during project surveying,grading, excavating, or construction, work shall stop immediately. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM August 17, 2005 Page 5 26. If there are suspected human remains, the Fresno County Coroner shall be immediately contacted (business hours: 559-268-0109;after hours the contact phone number is 559-488- 3111 for the Fresno County Sheriff's Department). If remains or other archaeological material is possibly Native American in origin,the Native American Heritage Commission (phone number 916-653-4082) shall be immediately contacted, and the California Archaeological Inventory/Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center(phone number:805-644-2289)shall be contacted to obtain a referral list of recognized archaeologists. An archaeological assessment shall be conducted for the project, the site shall be formally recorded, and recommendations made to the City as to any further site investigation or site avoidance/preservation measures. 27. If animal fossils are uncovered,the Museum of Paleontology at U.C.Berkeley shall be contacted to obtain a referral list of recognized paleontologists. An assessment shall be conducted by a paleontologist;if the paleontologist determines the material to be significant,a recommendation shall be made to the City as to any further site investigation or preservation measures. 28. Apportionment of Special Assessment: If, as part of this subdivision, a division will be made of any lot or parcel of land upon which there is an unpaid special assessment levied under any State or local law, including a division into condominium interest as defined in Section 783 of the Civil Code,the developer/owner shall file a written application with the City of Fresno Director of Public Works, requesting apportionment of the unpaid portion of the assessment or pay off such assessment in full. If the subdivider elects to apportion the assessment,the application shalt contain the following information: a. A full description of each assessed lot, parcel or interest to be divided and of how such lot, parcel or interest will be divided;. b. A request that the Engineer.apportion the amount remaining-unpaid on the assessment in accordance with applicable law; and Wratten consen#_of,---h a ow.ner(s) of.each,such.lot - = - - .. --=`aPPortionrnent The application shall be filed prior to the approval of the Final Map(s) by the City and shall be accompanied by a fee in an amount specified in the Master Fee Resolution for each separate lot, parcel,or interest into which the original assessed lot, parcel or interest is to be divided. The fee shall be in an amount sufficient to pay all costs of the City and the Engineer of Work responsible for determining the initial assessment in making the requested apportionment. 29. The subdivider shall comply with Regulation VIII of the San Joaquin Valley Air Quality Pollution Control District for the control of particulate matter and fugitive dust during construction of this project. 30. The subdivider shall obtain any and all permits required for the removal or demolition of any building or structure located within the subdivision boundaries. The developer shall also obtain any and all permits required for the closure of any septic tank, cesspool, or water well. All Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.5461/UGM August 17,2005 Page 6 permits shall be obtained prior to commencementof such work in accordance with Chapter 13 of the Fresno Municipal Code. 31. Solid waste disposal for the subdivision shall be provided by the City of Fresno. The method of collection to be utilized in this tract.shall be subject to approval of the Solid Waste Manager. See the attached memorandum from the Solid Waste Division dated March 30, 2005. PARK SERVICE 32. Contact the Parks Department for requirements. , Urban. Growth Management Requirements 33. `The subdivider shall be required to pay the appropriate UGM Park Capital Fee at the time of final map approval. Fee payment may be deferred until time of building permit issuance in accordance with the requirements of Section 1.2-4.509-C-3 of the Fresno Municipal Code. FIRE SERVICE 34. Fire service will be provided by City of Clovis Fire Station No. 16. Provide residential fire hydrants and fire flows per Public Works Standards with two sources of water. 35 Access is acceptable as shown. There shall be at least two points of access to the subdivision during construction. Urban Growth Management.Requirements 36. The subdivider shall be required to pay the appropriate Fire Station Capital Fee at the time of final map approval. Fee payment may be deferred until time of building permit issuance in,.,,.. accordance with the requirements of'Section,12--:509 C-3 of the Fresno Municipal Code. - 37 Solid waste dFisposal for the subdivision shall be provided by the City of Fresno The method of , z _.:coliectio`n�to.be.utilized in this tract shall be sublect.to approvat-!of the Salid`W'aste STREETS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY - 38. The subdivider shall furnish to the city acceptable security to guarantee the construction of the off-site street improvements in accordance with all applicable provisions of the Fresno Municipal Code and the State Subdivision Map Act. 39. The subdivider shall make provisions for disabled persons in accordance with the Department of Public Works standards and as required by State law. Handicap access ramps are required to be constructed in sidewalks at all corners within the limits of the tract. Where street furniture is located within the sidewalk area(i.e.,fire hydrants,streetlights,etc.),a minimum of 48 inches of unobstructed path shall be maintained to satisfy the American Disabilities Act requirements. If necessary, dedicate a pedestrian easement to accommodate for the 4-foot minimum unobstructed path requirement. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM August 17, 2005 Page 7 40. All of the required street improvements shall be constructed and/or installed in accordance with the City of Fresno Standard Specifications (2002 Edition). 41. The subdivider shall install all existing and proposed utility systems underground in accordance with Fresno Municipal Code Section 12-1011, 8-801 and Resolution No. 78-522/88-229. 42. The subdivider shall construct an underground street lighting system per Public Works Standards E-1 and E-2 within the limits of the tract. Spacing and design shall conform to Public Works Standards for local streets. Height,type,spacing,etc.,of standards and luminaires shall be in accordance with Resolutions No.68-187, 78-522,81-219 and 88-229 or any modification thereto approved by the City Traffic Engineer prior to Final Map approval. Upon completion of the work by the subdivider and acceptance of the work by the City, the street lighting system shall be dedicated to the City. Submit engineered construction plans to the Public Works .Department for approval. 43. All dead-end streets created by this subdivision shall be properly barricaded in accordance with City standards.within seven days from the time the streets are surfaced or as directed by the Engineer. 44. The developer shall comply with Rule 8060 of the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District for the control of fugitive dust requirements from paved and unpaved roads. 45. All required signing and striping shall be done and paid for by the developer/owner. The signing and striping plans shall be done per the current Caltrans standards and shall be submitted along with the street construction,traffic signal and streetlight plans for this tentative map to the Public Works Department. MAJOR STREETS North Armstrong.Avenue(Collector): 46 Dedicate 47 feet of property from section line for public street purposes,within the limits of this developrnen#:tq meetahe..current City ofresna Callector`Titandaids .Reference Pubaic W::orks, .. L Standard=P-6'9: - _ 47. Construct concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk to Public Works Standard P-5. The sidewalk pattern shall be constructed to a 10-foot residential pattern. 48. Construct 20 feet of permanent paving (measured from face of curb) within the limits of this subdivision. 49. Construct an underground street lighting system to Public Works Standard E-1 within the limits of this subdivision. Spacing and design shall conform to Public Works Standard E-8 for collector streets. 50. Relinquish direct vehicular access rights to North Armstrong Avenue from Lot 73. i i Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM August 17, 2005 Page 8 East Dakota Avenue (Collector): 51. Dedicate 42 feet of property from section line for public street purposes, within the limits of this development to meet the current City of Fresno Collector Standards. 52. Construct concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk to Public Works Standard P-5. The sidewalk pattern shall be constructed to a 10-foot residential pattern. 53. Construct 20 feet of permanent paving (measured from face of curb) within the limits of this subdivision. 54. Construct an underground street lighting system to Public Works Standard E-1 within the limits of this subdivision. Spacing and design shall conform to Public Works Standard E-8 for collector streets. 55. Relinquish direct vehicular access rights to East Dakota Avenue from all lots within this subdivision. North Temperance Avenue(Expressway) 56. Construct a pedestrian, bike and equestrian trail per the 2025 Fresno General Plan, Master Multi-Purpose Trails Manual and Public Works Standards. Construct an Expressway Barrier Fence per Public Works Standard P-74 and P-75. Dedicate a Multi-Purpose Trail Easement of sufficient width to accommodate the approved cross section. 57. Construct concrete curb and gutter to Public Works Standard P-5. The parkway shall be constructed to a ten foot pattern. .58., Construct 20 feet of permanent pavement within the limits of the,tract,and transition paving as necessary: - 59 Construct a trail lighting system within.the limits of this subdivision Spacing and design shall.- rte_ uf3mltted.for app:rovalof Trafiac, Erg'ineenng Y _ _ _ _ _, _ 60. Relinquish direct vehicular access rights to North Temperance Avenue from all lots within this tract. INTERIOR STREETS 61. Design and construct all curb,gutter,sidewalk(both sides),permanent paving,cul-de-sacs,and underground street lighting systems on all interior local streets to Public Works Standards. Sidewalk patterns shall comply with Public Works API Standards for 50-foot and 54 foot streets. 62. Any temporary dead-end streets created by this subdivision shall be properly barricaded in accordance with Public Works Standard P-44. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM August 17, 2005 Page 9 Specific Requirements 63. The first order of work shall include a minimum of two points of vehicular access to the major streets for any phase of this development. 64. Vacate all underlying existing streets with the proposed map. 65. Relinquish direct vehicular access rights to the east side of proposed Lot 1 and the west side of. proposed Lot 7. 66. Provide"circular"or"hammerhead"driveways for lots 67, 68,69, 70,71 and 72. Backing onto North Armstrong Avenue from these lots is prohibited. 67. Provide a corner cut-off area at the intersections of East Sussex Way/North Armstrong Avenue, East Dakota/North Joshua Avenues and East Dakota/North Holly Avenues in accordance with Section 12-306-H-3-d of the FMC. Corner cut-offs are established to provide an unobstructed view for vehicular and pedestrian traffic approaching an intersection.They are a triangular area formed by the property lines and a diagonal.line adjoining points on the property lines,measured a specific distance from the point of their intersection. At the intersections of streets, this distance is 30 feet. The corner cut-off area shall be landscaped(including an irrigation system), and may be included within the City's Community Facilities District. North Armstrong Avenue (Collector): 68. Dedicate and construct two 17-foot center section travel lanes with 150 foot left turn lanes at all major intersections from the northern limits of the map south to Shields Avenue. An additional 6 feet of paving shall be required adjacent to the left turn lanes. Dedication shall be sufficient to accommodate additional paving and any,other grading or transitions as necessary based on a 45 MPH design speed: East Dakota-Avenue-(Collector)._ a..t:C.•-.. ..r: •. .'._...s :#. ..:. 1 _... .1 ._.__..... $'s �: i .. {.:- .. .. - .-... -, _ _. 1 ,. � 5_....ny 69.- Dedicate and construct two 13-foot center section travel lanes from the southeastern limits of - this subdivision west to Armstrong Avenue. Dedicate and construct a 150 foot left turn lane at Dakota and Armstrong Avenues. An additional 6 feet of paving shall be required adjacent to the left turn lane. Dedication shall be sufficient to accommodate additional paving and any other grading or transitions as necessary based on a 45 MPH design speed. Urban Growth Management Requirements 70. This Map is in UGM major street zone D-1/E-2; therefore pay all applicable UGM Fees. Temperance Avenue (Expressway): 71. Dedicate and construct two 17-foot center section travel lanes and construct a raised concrete median within the limits of this subdivision. Dedication shall be sufficient to accommodate additional paving and any other grading or transitions as necessary based on a 55 MPH design speed. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM August 17, 2005 Page 10 72. Design and construct a Major Street Bridge at the intersection of Temperance and the Gould Canal. Public Works will apply this requirement to a minimum of four other subdivisions with each subdivision being responsible for a fee no greater than 1/5 of the cost of said bridge. Bridge construction shall occur prior to close out of this subdivision or at such time that the City Engineer deems it necessary, whichever occurs first. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE The nearest existing sewer main is a 24-inch sewer main in East Shields Avenue east of North Fowler Avenue. The following conditions are required to provide sanitary sewer service to the tract. 73. Extend the existing 24-inch sanitary sewer main in East Shields Avenue to North Armstrong Avenue. 74. Construct a 12-inch sewer main in North Armstrong Avenue,from East Shields Avenue to a point 1,320 feet north of Shields Avenue. 75. Construct a 10-inch sanitary sewer main in North Armstrong Avenue, from the 12-inch sanitary sewer main north to East Dakota Avenue. 76. Construct an 8-inch sanitary sewer main in North Armstrong Avenue from East Dakota Avenue north across the project frontage. 77. Construct an 8-inch sanitary sewer main in East Dakota Avenue from North Armstrong Avenue east across the project frontage. 78. Construct a 24-inch sanitary sewer main in East Shields Avenue from North Armstrong Avenue to 1,500 feet east. 79. Construct an 18-inch sanitary sewer main in East Shields Avenue from the 24-inch sanitary sewer main east to North Temperance Avenue Construct a-12-inch sanitary sewer rhain-in-North tefrmperance Avenue°from East Shields Avenue to 1,300 feet north. 81. Construct a 10-inch sanitary sewer main in North Temperance Avenue from the 12-inch sanitary sewer main north to East Dakota Avenue. 82. Construct an 8-inch sanitary sewer main in North Temperance Avenue from East Dakota Avenue north across the project frontage. 83. Sanitary sewer mains shall be extended within the proposed tract to provide sewer service to each lot created. 84. Separate sewer house branches shall be provided to each lot created within the subdivision, including properties fronting onto North Armstrong Avenue. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM August 17, 2005 Page 11 85. All public sewer facilities shall be constructed in accordance with Public Works Department standards, specifications, and policies. 86. A preliminary sewer layout shall be prepared by the Developer's Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Utilities for review and conceptual approval prior to submittal or acceptance of the developer's final map and engineered plan and profile improvement drawing for City review. 87. Engineered improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted for Department of Public Utilities review and approval for proposed additions to the sanitary sewer system. 88. Abandon all existing on-site private sanitary sewer systems. Urban Growth Management Requirements 89. Sewer lateral charges are due and shall be paid for the project. 90. Wastewater Facilities Charges are due and shall be paid for the project. 91. The developer shall pay appropriate and reasonable costs as established hereinafter by City Council for Fowler trunk sewer capacity allocated to this project. The developer shall, for the interim period, pay a fee of$1,000 per living unit or living unit equivalent. Once the fee has been determined, the developer will receive a refund for any fees paid in excess of the adopted fee. Or, the proposed project shall not be permitted service to the existing Fowler trunk sewer and must, therefore, construct a separate sewer pipeline from the project to an approved discharge location with adequate reserve capacity as determined by the City. WATER SERVICE -There is-an-existing 12 inch water main in North Armstrong Avenue,adjacent to the subject site. The . . .. . ,.:.`.following conditions are [squired i provide waterse 7v0 :to the tract__W0 r;-.*hs-shall.;be installed, w- - -before-street improvements and paving. 92. Construct a 16-inch water main (including installation of Cityfire hydrants)in East Dakota Avenue from North Armstrong to North Temperance Avenue. 93. Construct a 14-inch water main (including installation of City fire hydrants)in North Temperance Avenue from East Dakota Avenue north across the project frontage. 94. Water mains (including installation of City fire hydrants) shall be extended within the proposed tract to provide water service to each lot created. 95. Separate water services with meter boxes shall be provided to each lot created. 96. Two independent sources of water, meeting Federal and State Drinking Water Act Standards, are required to serve the tract including any subsequent phases thereof. The two-source requirement may be accomplished through any combination of water main extensions, Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM August 17, 2005 Page 12 construction of supply wells,or other acceptable sources of water supply approved by the Water Systems Manager. 97. All public water facilities shall be constructed in accordance with City of Fresno standards, specifications, and policies. 98. Construct a water supply well(s)on a site(s) dedicated to the City of Fresno. The well(s) shall be capable of producing a flow amount to meet a total demand of 600 gallons per minute, sufficient to serve peak water demand for the project and for fire suppression purposes, or an alternative flow amount that is acceptable to the Public Utilities Director and Fire Department Chief(or their designees). .Well sites shall be of a size and at a location acceptable to the Water Systems Manager. The cost of acquiring the well site and construction of the well shall be reimbursed from UGM Water Supply Well Service Area Fund 501s, in accordance with established UGM policies: 99. Water well construction shall include wellhead treatment facilities, if required. The cost of constructing wellhead treatment facilities shall be reimbursed from UGM Wellhead Treatment Service Area Fund 501s, in accordance with established UGM policies. 100. Dedicate a water supply and treatment site for installation of an above-ground water storage and treatment facility that will be installed and/or constructed by the City. The site shall'be of size and at a location acceptable to the Water Systems Manager for such purposes. The cost of acquiring the site shall be reimbursed from UGM Water Supply Well Service Area 501 s,in accordance with established UGM policies - 101. Existing on-site wells within the boundaries of the proposed development shall be sealed and abandoned in compliance with the California Well Standards, Bulletin 74-90 or current revisions, issued by California Department of Water Resources; and City of Fresno standards. .102. Engineered ,improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer are required for propoS,ed-a4ditions;to the.-ity W=ater,Sysfem 103. Installation of public fire hydrant(s) is required in accordance with City Standards. Urban Growth Management Requirements 104. Payment of appropriate water connection charges at the time of final map approval subject to deferral to building permit issuance as appropriate. 105. Payment for installation of wet tie(s), water service(s)and/or meter(s) is required 106. Pay UGM water fees for Water Service Area No. 501 S. URBAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS (GENERAL) 107. The developer of property located within the UGM boundaries shall comply with all sewer,water and street requirements and pay all applicable UGM fees imposed under the Urban Growth Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM August 17, 2005 Page 13 Management process (with appropriate credit given for the installation of required UGM improvements)in accordance with the requirements of State Law as related to vesting tentative tract maps. 108. The developer will be responsible for the relocation or reconstruction of any existing improvements or facilities necessary to construct any of the required UGM improvements. Right-of-Way Acquisition 109. The developer will be responsible for the acquisition of any necessary right-of-way to construct any of the required.improvements. 110. Rights-of-way acquisition shall include any rights-=of-way necessary for proper drainage,signing, pole relocation, and shoulder grading. In general, this will require right-of-way to be provided approximately 10 feet outside the travel lane. The exact requirement must be determined at the . project design stage based on the existing conditions and detailed design information. 111. In the event an acquisition of any easement or right-of-way is necessitated by the subject development, said acquisition will be accomplished prior to Final Map approval. The developer/owner should contact the Real Estate Section of the Public Works Department to receive procedural guidance in such.acquisitions. 112. Should such acquisition not be accomplished by the subdivider prior to Final Map approval,the e subdivider must request and grant to the City the full authority to attempt acquisition either. through negotiation or through its power of eminent domain. The subdivider shall furnish to the City Public Works Department, Engineering Division/Real Estate Section,an appraisal report or a request for an estimated appraisal amount(to be determined by the City of Fresno Real Estate -Section) prior to.preparation_of a Subdivision Agreement. 113. The subdivider shall submit adequate security in the form of a cash deposit to guarantee -payment of all-costs associated with the acquisition, including staff time, attorney's fees, J.r .appraisal;fees;.court,.costs;.and :all related`expenditures:.ancficosts necessary to effectahe , -"acquisition-of,such-easements or rights-of-way. FLOOD CONTROL AND DRAINAGE 114. The subdivider shall be required to pay any applicable storm drainage fees to comply with Fresno Municipal Code Chapter 13, Article 13. 115. The subdivider shall be required to comply with the specific requirements imposed by the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (FMFCD) for the subdivision or any amendments or modifications to those requirements, which may be granted by the FMFCD Board of Directors, pursuant to Section 13-1307 of the Fresno Municipal Code. These requirements are identified in the District's letter to the Planning and Development Department dated April 14, 2005. 116. Any temporary ponding basins constructed or enlarged to provide service to the subdivision shall be fenced in accordance with City standards within seven days from.the time the basin becomes operational or as directed by the City Engineer. Temporary ponding basins will be created Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM August 17, 2005 Page 14 through a covenant between the City and the Developer prior to Final Map approval. Maintenance of the temporary ponding basin shall be by the Developer until permanent service for the entire subdivision is provided. SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 117. The developer/owner shall comply with the requirements in the letter from the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District dated March 17, 2005, for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM: FRESNO IRRIGATION DISTRICT 118. Comply with the attached correspondence from the Fresno Irrigation District dated March 3, 2005. FRESNO COUNTY HEALTH 119. Comply with the attached correspondence from the Fresno County Department of Community Health dated March 15, 2005. DEVELOPMENT FEES AND CHARGES - 120. This project is subject to the following development fees and charges: PARKS DEPARTMENT FEE/RATE a. Street Tree Landscape Plan Review fee $56.00 b. Street Tree Installation fee - .$129.00/tree City-installed tree �.._S::treet- ree,lnspection.feed , :_ _. $3,O.D0/tree _` Developer-installed tree d. Maintenance District Plan Review fee $176.00 e. Maintenance District Inspection fee $305.00 f. Reinspection fee $29.00 FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FEE /RATE g. Metropolitan Flood Control District fee " Contact FMFCD for new fees. Rates increased March 1, 2004. SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES FEE RATE h. Lateral Sewer Charge $0.10/sq. ft. (to 100-foot depth) Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM August 17, 2005 Page 15 i.. Oversize Charge $0.05/sq. ft. (to 100-foot depth) j. Trunk Sewer Charge $344/living unit Service Area: Fowler k. Wastewater Facilities Charge .$2,119/living unit I: Copper Avenue Sewer Lift Station Charge n/a ' M. Fowler Trunk Sewer Interim Fee.Surety $1,000/living unit n. House Branch Sewer Charge n/a o. Millbrook Overlay Sewer n/a WATER CONNECTION CHARGES FEE RATE p. Service Connection Charge Fee based on service(s) and meter(s) sizes specified by owner; fee for service(s) and Meter(s) established by the Master Fee Schedule. q. Frontage Charge $6.50/lineal foot r. Transmission Grid Main Charge $643/gross acre S'. Transmission .Grid Main Bond Debt Service Charge $243/gross acre UGM V1/,ater Supply Fee` _.: $.5.82/ldvng.unit` , , - Service Area: 501 S u. Well Head Treatment Fee $238/living unit Service Area: 501 Y. Recharge Fee $75/living unit Service Area: 501 w. 1994 Bond Debt Service $244/living unit Service Area: 501 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE x. Northeast Fresno Policing Area n/a y. Traffic.Signal Charge $414.69/living unit ,. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5461/UGM August 17, 2005 Page 16 a URBAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT FEE RATE/CHARGE* z. UGM Fire Station Capital Fee $800/gross acre Service Area: Undesignated aa. UGM Park Fee$2392/gross acre Service Area: 2 bb.. Major Street Charge .$3161/adj. acre Service Area: D-1/E-2 cc. Major Street Bridge Charge $304/adj. acre Service Area: D-1/E-4 dd. UGM Grade Separation Fee n/a ee. Trunk Sewer Charge n/a Service Area: Fowler ff.* Street Acquisition/Construction Charge n/a K:\MASTER FILES-2005\'REZONE\R-05-02\T-5461-UGM-COA 8-17-05.130C r b x� OFFICES OF F.. •t" PHONE(559)233-7161 FAX(559)233-8227 2907 SOUTH MAPLE AVENUE FRESNO,CALIFORNIA 93725-2 18 Your Most Valuable Resource-Water 9F� F12 March 3, 2005 MAR 0 7 2005 Mr. Arnoldo Rodriguez City of Fresno Planning Division Development Department Planning & Development Department CITY OF FRESNO 2600 Fresno Street, Third Floor Fresno, CA 93721-360 RE: VTTM No. 5461, RA No. 05-02, CUP No. C-05-22—FID's Gould No. 97 Canal Dear Mr. Rodriguez: FID's comments and requests are as follows: 1. FID's Gould No. 97 canal traverses the northeast side of the subject property as shown on the enclosed map. 2. FID requires the applicant grant an exclusive canal easement to FID and concrete line, encase in box culvert.or other approved means to protect canal integrity, the Gould No. 97 Canal across the proposed development in accordance with FID standards, and that the applicant enter into an agreement with FID for that purpose. The applicant will need to meet with FID to determine the,canal alignment and required canal dimensions: 3. FID requires the applicant submit a grading and drainage'plan for FID approval which shows that the'proposed development will not endanger the structural integrity of the canal, or,result m drainage patterns that will adversely affect FID or the applicant 4 "FID requires its easement"be's'li6" one-`iriap with proper recording inforindf on, and that FID be made a party to signing all plans.which affect its easement and canal/pipeline facility and also be made party to signing the final reap. 5. FID requires all trail improvements and easements for trail purposes be outside FID's easement and that no portion of said easements shall be in common use. Thank you for submitting this for our review. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns at 233-7161 extension 317 or bjohnson �fresnoirrigation.com. Sincerely, Bret Johnson Engineering Technician 1 Agencies\City\VTTM5461 RA05-02 C-05-22 BOARD OF President JACOB ANDRESEN, Vice-President JEFFERY G. BOSWELL DIRECTORS JEFF NEELY,EDDIE NIEDERFRANK,STEVEN G.BALLS, General Manager GARY SERRATO San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District March 17, 2005 Reference No. C20050143 Arnoldo Rodriguez RECEIVED Planning & Development 2600 Fresno St., Third Floor MAR 2 Fresno, CA 93721-3604 Planning Division Development Department Subject: T-5461, R-05-02, C-05-22 (6708 East Dakota Avenue) CITY OF FRESNO Dear Mr. Rodriguez: The San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (District) has reviewed the project referenced above and offers the following comments: The entire San Joaquin Valley Air Basin. is classified non-attainment for ozone and fine particulate matter (PM10). This project will contribute to the overall decline in air quality due to increased traffic and ongoing . operational emissions. This project may generate significant air emissions and it will reduce the air quality in the San Joaquin Valley. The project will make it more difficult to meet mandated emission reductions and air quality standards. A concerted effort should be made to reduce project-related emissions as outlined below: Preliminary analysis indicated that the potential emissions from this project exceed the District's Thresholds of Significance for adverse air quality impacts. These thresholds are 10 tons per year for either of the following two ozone precursor emissions: reactive organic gases (ROG) or oxides of nitrogen (NOx). The District recommends the preparation of an Air Quality Impact Assessment(AQIA) and a Traffic Impact Study to determine impacts when projects are of this size, unless an analysis has been accomplished for a recent' . previousapprovalsuch as a general plan amendment or zone change. Please indicate.to the.District if the project has been analyzed and what the results were from any previous study. . The,:'Distriet doesnot typically :recommend quantfymgsPM10 ernissions from construction activities the District- considers that PM10.- emissions are reduced to .levels considered less-than-significant through" compliance with the.District's Regulation VIII (Fugitive PM10 Prohibitions) rules. If construction activity is especially intense, or sensitive receptors are nearby, the District recommends applying the enhanced PM40 control measures listed in the Guide for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts (GAMAQI). However, construction generated ROG and NOx may exceed the District's annual ozone precursor thresholds, and may be a significant source of air pollution. The District recommends using the URBEMIS 2002 program to calculate project area and operational emissions and to identify mitigation measures that. reduce impacts. URBEMIS can be downloaded from the South Coast Air Quality Management District's website at: httr)://www.agmd.gov/cepa/urbemis.html. If the analysis reveals that the emissions generated bythis project will exceed the District's thresholds, this project may significantly impact the ambient air quality if not sufficiently mitigated. The project applicant or consultant is encouraged to consult with District staff for assistance in determining appropriate methodology and model inputs. Questions regarding URBEMIS 2002 should be directed to Hector Guerra at (559) 230- 5800. Mr. Rodriguez March 17, 2005 T-5461, R-05-02, C-05-22 Page 2 Based on the information provided, the proposed project will be subject to the following District rules. The following items are rules that have been".adopted by the District to reduce emissions throughout the San Joaquin Valley, and are required. Current District rules can be found at http://www.valleyair.org/rules/1 ruleslist.htm. Regulation VIII (Fugitive PM10 Prohibitions)-Regulation VIII (Rules 8011-8081) is a series of rules designed to reduce PM10 emissions (predominantly dust/dirt) generated by human activity, including construction, road construction, bulk materials storage, landfill operations, etc. If a residential project is 10.0 or more acres in area, a Dust Control Plan must be submitted as-specified in Section 6.3.1 of Rule 8021. If a residential site is 1.0 to less than 10.0 acres, an owner/operator must provide written notification to the District at least 48 hours prior to his/her intent to begin any earthmoving activities (see section 6.4.1). A compliance assistance bulletin has been enclosed for the applicant. A template of the District's Dust Control Plan is available at:http://www.valleyair.org/busind/comply/PM10/forms/DCP- Form%20-%2010-14-2004.pd f Rule 4102 (Nuisance) applies to any source operation that emits or may emit air contaminants or other materials. In the event that the project or construction of the project creates a public nuisance, it could be in violation and be subject to District enforcement action. Rule 4103 (Open Burning) regulates the burning of agricultural material. Agricultural material shall not be burned when the land use is converting from agriculture to nonagricultural purposes. In the event that the project burned or burns agricultural material, it would be in violation of Rule 4103 and be subject to District enforcement action. Rule 4601 (Architectural Coatings) limits volatile organic compounds.from architectural coatings. This rules specifies architectural coatings storage, clean up and labeling requirements. Rule 4641 (Cutback, Slow Cure, and Emulsified Asphalt, Paving and Maintenance Operations). If asphalt paving will be used, then paving operations of this project will be subject to Rule 4641. This rule applies to the manufacture and use of cutback asphalt, slow cure asphalt and emulsified asphalt for paving and.maintenance operations. Rule 4902 (Residential Water Heaters) limits emission of NOx from residential developments. Rule 4901 (Wood Burning_Fireplaces,and Wood Burning Heaters) and Rule 4902 (Residential Water Heaters) limit the emissions of PM10 and NOx in residential developments. On July 17, 2003, the District's Governing Board adopted amendments to Rule 4901. Construction plans for residential ,developments may be affected by:section 5 3 specifically §5.3"LImitations,on`Wood''hu—ming Fxeplaces-or Wood•8Uming'tieaters'in New Residential Developments. Beginning January 1,2004, 5.3.1 No person shall install a wood burning fireplace in.a new residential development with a density greater than two(2)dwelling units per acre. .5.3.2 No person shall install more than two(2)EPA Phase 11 Certified wood burning heaters per acre in any new residential development with a density equal to or greater than three (3) dwelling units per acre. 5.3.3 No person shall install more than one (1) wood burning fireplace or wood burning heater per dwelling unit in any new residential development with a density equal to or less than two (2) dwelling units per acre. More information about Rule 4901 can be found at our website- www.valleyair.org. For compliance assistance, please contact Mr.Wayne Clarke, Air Quality Compliance Manager, at 230-5968. The District encourages innovation in measures to reduce air,quality impacts. There are a number of measures that could be incorporated into the design/operation of this project to provide additional reductions of the overall level of emissions. (Note: Some of the measures may already exist as City development standards. Any measure selected should be implemented to the fullest extent possible.) The measures listed below should not be considered all-inclusive and remain options that the project proponent should consider: Mr. Rodriguez March 17, 2005 T-5461, R-05-02, C-05-22 Page 3 • Trees should be carefully. selected and located to protect the buildings from energy consuming environmental conditions, and to shade paved areas. Structural soil should be used under paved areas to improve tree growth. A brochure has been included for the applicant. For Structural Soil see htti)://www.hort.cornell.edu/uhi/outreach/csc/ For Tree Selection see http://www.ufei.org/ For Urban Forestry see http://www.coolcommunities.org http://wdufre.ucdavis.edu http://www.lgc.org/bookstore/energv/downloads/siv treeguidelines.pdf • If transit service is available to the project site, improvements should be made to encourage its use. If . transit service is not currently available,but-is planned for the area in the future, easements should be reserved to provide for future improvements such as bus turnouts, loading areas, route signs and shade structures. Appropriations made to facilitate public or mass transit will help mitigate trips generated by the project. • Sidewalks and bikeways should be installed throughout as much of the project as possible to encourage walking and bicycling. Connections to nearby public uses and commercial areas should be made as direct as possible to promote walking for some trips. Pedestrian and bike-oriented design reduces motor . vehicle usage and their effects on air quality.. Sidewalks and bikeways should be designed to separate pedestrian and bicycle pathways from vehicle paths. Sidewalks and bikeways should be designed to be accommodating and appropriately sized for anticipated future pedestrian and bicycle use. Such pathways should be easy to navigate, designed to facilitate pedestrian movement through the project, and create a safe environment for all potential users (pedestrian, bicycle and disabled) from obstacles and automobiles. Pathways through the project should be built in anticipation of future growth. . As many energy-conserving features as .possible should be included the project. Energy conservation' measures include both energy conservation through design and operational energy conservation. Examples include (but are not limited to): - Increased energy efficiency(above California Title 24.Requirements) See http://www.energy.ca.-gov/title24/: Energy efficient widows (double pane and/or Low-E) High-albedo.(reflecting) roofing material. See http://eetd.lbi.gov/coolroof/ - Cool Paving. See http://www.harc.edu/hart/Projects/Cool Houston/ , http://eande.lbi.gov/heatisland/ - Radiant heat barrier. See http://www.eere.energy.gov/consumerinfo/refbriefs/bc7.html Energy efficient-.lighting, appliances,`heating-and-cooling systems. See http://www.energystar.goV/' Install solar water-heating system(s) Install photovoltaic cells y - Programrri'able tFfid ----at(s)forall heating and cooling systems - . Awnings or other shading mechanism for windows Porch, patio and walkway overhangs - Ceiling fans, whole house fans Orient the units to maximize passive solar cooling and heating when practicable Utilize passive solar cooling and heating designs. (e.g. natural convection, thermal flywheels) See http://www.eere.enerciy.ciov/RE/solar passive.html Utilize daylighting (natural lighting) systems such as skylights, light shelves, interior transom windows etc. See http://www.advancedbuildings.org Electrical outlets around the exterior of the unit(s)to encourage use of electric landscape maintenance equipment - Pre-wire the units with high speed modem connections/DSL and extra phone.lines - Natural gas fireplaces (instead of wood-burning fireplaces or heaters) Natural gas lines (if available to this area)and electrical outlets in backyard or patio areas to encourage the use of gas and/or electric barbecues - Low or non-polluting incentives items should be provided with each residential unit (such items could include electric lawn mowers, reel mowers, leaf vacuums, gas or electric barbecues, etc.) - Exits to adjoining streets should be designed to reduce time to re-enter traffic from the project site More information can be found at: http://www.lgc.org, http://www.sustainable.doe.gov/, http://www.consumerenergvicenter.org/index.htm_l httb://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/GreenBuilding Mr. Rodriguez March 17, 2005 T-5461, R-05-02, C-05-22.. Page 4 • The applicant should implement measures to reduce the amount of vehicle traffic to and from the project area that further reduce air.pollution"in the valley. This could include providing an information center for residents to coordinate carpooling. Check out . the "Spare the Air' section of our website www.valleyair.org • . The project should include as many clean alternative energy features as possible to promote energy self- sufficiency. Examples include (but are not limited to): photovoltaic cells, solar thermal electricity systems, small wind turbines, etc. Rebate and incentive programs are offered for alternative energy equipment. More information can found at- http://www.dsireusa.org/, http://rredc.nrel.gov/, http://www.energy.ca.gov/renewables/ • Construction activity mitigation measures include: - Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to .prevent silt runoff to public roadways from Sites with a slope areater than one percent Install wheel washers for all exiting trucks, or was off all trucks and equipment ieaving the site Install windbreaks at windward side(s)of construction areas Suspend excavation and grading activity when winds exceed 20 mph - Limit area subject to excavation, grading, and other construction activity at any one times Use catalyst equipped diesel construction equipment. - Minimize idling time (e.g. 10 minute maximum) - Limit the hours of operation of heavy duty equipment and/or the amount of equipment in use Replace fossil-fueled equipment with electrically driven equivalents (provided they are not run via a portable generator set) - Curtail construction during periods of high ambient pollutant concentrations; this may include ceasing of construction activity during the peak-hour of vehicular traffic on adjacent roadways, and"Spare the Air Days"declared by the District. Implement activity management(e.g. rescheduling activities to reduce short-term impacts) Construction equipment should have engines that are Tier II (if available as certified by the Air Resources Board). Tier I and Tier II (2.5 gram) engines have a significantly less PM and NOx emissions compared to uncontrolled engines. Onsite equipment should be equipped with 1998 or . newer engines. Engines built after 1998 are cleaner Tier II engines. To find engines certified by the Air Resources Board, see http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/offroad/cert/cert.php. This site lists engines by type; then manufacturer. The "Executive Order" shows what Tier the engine is certified as. Formoreinformation on heavy-duty engines, please.contact Mr. Kevin McCaffrey, Air Quality Specialist, at (559) 230-5831. - - Off road trucks should be equipped with on-road engines when possible. Light Duty Cars and Trucks should be alternative fueled gr hybrids A } _ District staff is available to meet with you and/or the app licant to-further-discuss the Y . - 9 Y q - re ulafor re uirements - that are associated with this project. .If you have any questions.or require further information, please call me at(559) 230-5800. Sincerely, Debbie Johnson Air Quality Specialist MAR.17.2005 5:47PM CLOVIS UNIF SCH DIST N0:892 P.1 CLOVIS u N I F I 'E D March 17, 2005 SCHOOL DISTRICT 1650 HERNDON AVENUE Arnoldo Rodriguez,Planner rII CLOVI5.CA93611-0567 City of Fresno 559327.W00Planning&Development Department www,doNausd.k l z.raus - 2600 Fresno Street,Third Floor Fresno, CA 93721-3604 SUBJECT: Tentative Tract No. 5461,Rezone No. R-05-02, CUP No. C-05-22 North side of Dakota between Armstrong and Temperance GOVERNING 50ARD Sandra A.acttigel Dear Mr.Rodriguez: Vivien D.Herykrd The purpose of this letter is to provide school district information relative to the Glnny L.liovzcplan iuchard Lake, c.r.,A. above-referenced application and to comply with Business and Professions Code Elizabeth f.Sandoval section 11010, subdivision (b)(11)(A) regarding the .provision of school-related Jim van Volklnbarg.D.D.S. information to the subdivider/owner and the State Department of Real Estate. Susan M.Walker. D.Hst Residential development resulting from the project will affect the District by generating students that will need to be housed in District schools. Assuming that the project site will be developed with 250 new single family units (256 lots proposed, six with existing homes to remain), the following comments can be made at this time: ADMINISTRATION TerryBradley.Ed.D:, 1. The number of students generated by the project is estimated as follows: grades Supedntcad=t vigonla IL Boris,W.D. K-6, 94 students;-grades-7-8,22 students; grades 9-,12,..3,8 students. - .. Associate Superlarendent Danlel E.Kalaer,Ed.D. 2. Elementary School Information: Associate Superintrndcnt - a WllUatit C McGyltt 7 AssarJaresoptr/nrendenr (a) Thetu vct land is presently;.W-i the attends ce-area of the elementary' Janet L.Young,ed:o: - school (grades K-6)listed below-::. :. _ - AssocrateSuperintendent• School Name: Freedom Elementary School Address 2955 Gettysburg, Clovis, CA 93611 Telephone: (559)327-8500 Capacity: 700 Enrollment: 770 (CBEDS Enrollment 2004-05 School Year) (b) The District will be acquiring a new elementary school site at the southeast Dakota and Armstrong Avenues, immediately south of the project site. In addition, the District owns an elementary site at the northwest comer of Ashlan and Leonard Avenues (part of the Reagan Educational Center). The future construction of schools ou these sites will allow the District to keep pace with anticipated development activity in the southeast area of the District. MAR-17.2005 5:48PM CLOVIS UNIF SCH DIST NO.892 P.2 ,Y.. Arnoldo.Rodriguez 5 March17, 2005 Page 2 (c) Because of rapid growth in the District and the District's plans for construction of new school facilities, it is possible that (1) adjustment of school attendance -areas could occur in the future such that students residing in the project area may be required to attend an elementary school other than Freedom, and (2) students residing in the project area may attend more than one elementary school within the District during i their elementary school years, i i 3. Intermediate and High School Information: (a) The project area is currently served by the following intermediate school (grades 7-8)and high school (grades 9-12): School Name: Reyburn Intermediate School Address: 4300 N. Dewolf, Clovis, CA 93611 !_ Telephone: (559) 327-4500 Capacity. 1,377 Enrollment: 1,472 (CBEDS Enrollment 2004-05 School Year) School Name: Clovis East High School Address: 4343 N.Leonard, Clovis, CA 93611 Telephone: (559) 327-4000 Capacity. 2,700 Enrollment: 2,555 (CBEDS Enrollment 2004-05-School Year) (b) The District will be locating an educational center in the portion of the Distnct south of_theGould Canal, which will include a high,school, an. _ interinedrate school and otherfacihties T1ie fiiture construction of these facilities will allow the District .to'- keep pace with anticipated development activity in the southeast area of the District. 4. Bus transportation is currently provided for grades K-6 students residing further than one mile from school and for grades 7-12 students residing farther than two and one-half miles from school. Transportation will be available for students attending the above-identified elementary, intermediate and high I schools in accordance with District standards in effect at the time of enrollment. 5. The District currently levies a school facilities fee of$2.42 per square foot for residential development- New development on the subject property will be subject to the fee in place at the time fee certificates are obtained. MAR- 17.2005 5:4ePM CLOVIS UNIF SCH DIST N0.692 P.3 Arnoldo Rodriguez March 17, 2005 Page 3 '. The District hereby requests that the information in this letter be provided by the ownertsubdivider to all prospective purchasers of property within the project. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the project. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, Bill McGuire Associate Superintendent Administrative Services _ b co U� County of Fresno i Department of Community Health C Brad Maggy, Director 1856 � ARES " March 15, 2005 �� n�D 999999999 ENO D L00010061 i PE 2602 Arnoldo Rodriguez 14AR 17 2005 City of Fresno Development Department Planning DI islort 2600 Fresno Street DeVelOPMent OF FRtsNo Fresno, CA 93721 CITY Dear Mr. Rodriguez: PROJECT NUMBER: T-5461/R-05-02/C-05-22 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION: A 256-lot single-family residential subdivision; rezone from R-A/UGM to R-1/UGM. The site is 69.7 acres located on the north side of East Dakota Avenue between North Armstrong and North Temperance Avenues. LIST THE SPECIFIC ADVERSE IMPACTS IN YOUR AREA OF.EXPERTISE WHICH MAY RESULT FROM APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT. PLEASE LIST SPECIFIC MITIGATION MEASURES THAT YOU WOULD RECOMMEND AS CONDITIONS OF PROJECT APPROVAL.TO REDUCE ANY SIGNIFICANT'ADVERSE IMPACTS. - AN•ENUIRONM ENTAL-=_IMPACT:-REPORT The ro ect_h'as the= otential to -� _ result.-in significant adverse environmental impacts [X] A NEGATIVE DECLARATION: The project may have adverse impacts but impacts can be mitigated without further study or are not serious enough to warrant an Environmental Impact Report. [ ] NEITHER OF THE ABOVE, INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO DRAW ANY CONCLUSIONS: The following additional information should be provided: Additional Comments: • The conditions as described in the "Conclusions and Recommendations" section on pages 5 and 6 of the Environmental Noise Analysis should be accepted as mitigation measures for the project. Without these measures the proposed noise sensitive 1221 Fulton Mall/P.O.Box 11867/Fresno, California 93775/(559)445-3357/FAX(559)445-3379 ., .. C......1 C........,...-...n....,............a C1:.........,-e,..,....fl ..1.loA F.....I....e. Arnoldo Rodriguez .March 15, 2005 T-5461/R-05-02/C-05-22 Page 2 receivers will be subjected to a level of noise in excess of the City of Fresno Noise Element standards. • The Environmental. Noise Analysis indicates that the noise barrier along Temperance Avenue shall be no less than 12 feet in height. The tract map submitted by the applicant indicates only a 6-foor high wall at that location. A 12- foot wall should be required. • The Environmental Noise Analysis indicates that the recommended sound wall will not mitigate noise impacts for two-story homes located along Temperance Avenue. It is recommended that two-story homes not be built on lots 196-202, or that a detailed interior noise assessment be conducted, as indicated in the "Conclusions and Recommendations" section of.the Environmental Noise Analysis. • Construction permits for the 256-lot residential subdivision should be subject to assurance of sewer capacity of the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility. Concurrence should be obtained from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). For.more information, contact staff at (559) 445-5116. • Construction permits for the 256-lot residential subdivision should be subject to assurance that the City of Fresno community water system has the capacity and quality to serve this project. Concurrence should be obtained from the State Department of Health Services, Division of Drinking Water and Environmental Management (DDWEM). For more information call (559) 447-3300. : • The Fresno County Department of Community Healthis concerned that abandoned water wells are not being properly destroyed, particularly with respect to new :.._development projects -As city boundarie�ex and, community services'are prodded`*A -P . to areas originally served only by individual=dom.estir=and agricultural-wells. - Improper abandonment of such wells presents a significant risk of contaminating the city's community water supply. For this reason, when development occurs, it is extremely important to ensure the safe and proper destruction of all abandoned water wells. Prior to destruction of any existing agricultural well(s), a sample of the upper most fluid in the well column should be sampled for lubricating oil. The presence of oil staining around the well may indicate the use of lubricating oil to maintain the well pump. Should lubricating oil be found in the well, the oil should be removed from the well prior to placement of fill material for destruction. The "oily water" removed from the well must be handled in accordance with federal, state and local government requirements. Transportation of these materials on public roadways may require special permits and licensure. Arnoldo Rodriguez March 15, 2005 T-5461/R-05-02/C-05-22 Page 2 The Department of Community Health is available to provide consultation in cooperation with your city in order to encourage the proper destruction of wells and safeguard our water quality. City staff may contact Ed Yamamoto, Environmental Health Specialist, Water Surveillance Program, at (559) 445-3357 for more information. Appropriate measures should be incorporated into the project to minimize potentially significant short-term localized noise impacts to noise sensitive receivers caused by the operation of construction equipment. Construction specifications for the project should require that all construction.equipment be maintained according to the manufacturers' specifications, and that noise generating construction equipment be equipped with mufflers. In addition, consideration should .be given to limiting noise- generating construction activities to.daytime hours as specified in your municipal code. • The two (2) acre minimum parcel size was originally established by the Regional Water Quality Control Board and incorporated into the Fresno County General Plan with the intent of having a minimum parcel size anywhere in the County that could be expected to support individual water and septic systems. The sizing was designed to meet minimum Regional Water Quality Control Board guidelines for onsite sewage disposal setbacks from wells and to limit the concentration of permanent septic systems and individual water systems in a given area. Lots 67-72 appear to be approximately 1 acre in size. When available, the remaining residences should be required to connect to City water and sewer ststems. The following comments pertain to the demolition"of the existing"structures: Should any of-ttese.structures have ani=actrve rodent or:insectanfetatibnwthen=the "=-infestation should`be°abated prior to.demolition of the-structures in order. to°prevent_ -. the spread of vectors to adjacent properties. • In the process of demolishing the existing structures, the contractor may encounter asbestos containing construction materials and materials coated with lead based paints: • If asbestos containing materials are encountered, contact the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District at (559) 230-6000 for more information. If lead based paints are suspected to have been used in these structures, then the contractor hired to demolish the existing structures should contact the following agencies for possible new regulations regarding their removal: .. Arnoldo Rodriguez March 15, 2005 T-5461/R-05-02/C-05-22 Page 2 San Joaquin Valley Air PollutionControl District at (559) 230- 6000 for more information. State of California, Industrial Relations Department, Division of Occupational Safety and Health, Consultation Service (CAL-OSHA) at (559) 454-5302 for more information. • Any construction materials deemed hazardous as identified in the demolition process must be characterized and disposed of in accordance with current federal, state, and local requirements. • Should any underground storage tank(s) be found on the premises, the applicant shall apply for and secure an Underground Storage Tank Removal Permit from the Fresno County Department of Community Health, Environmental Health Division. Contact the Certified Unified Program Agency at (559) 445-3271 for more information: REVIEWED BY: Kathleen B yer, Environmental Health Specialist III (559) 445-3357 kb cc: Ed Yamamoto, Environmental Health Division 77 T-5461-Dunmore homes City of r-011MAnle r ®s� Department of Public Utilities Solid Waste Division 1325 E. EI Dorado Fresno, California 93706-2014 (559) 621-1452 www.fresno.gov March 30, 2005 TO: Amoldo Rodriquez, Planner III Development Department, Planning Division THROUGH: Robert Gedert, Chief of Operations Department of Public Utilities, Solid Waste Division FROM: Donna Leslie, Staff Assistant Department of Public Utilities, Solid Waste Division SUBJECT: TT 5461, Solid Waste Conditions of Approval The Department of Public Utilities, Solid Waste Division, has completed a review of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map 5461,which was submitted by Provost&Pritchard. The following requirements and conditions are to be placed on this vesting tentative tract map as a condition of approval by the Department of Public Utilities. General Requirements: • Tract 5461 will be serviced as Single Family Residential properties with Basic Container Service Property owners wd,receive 3 containers to'be used as follows:_P&a-coritasner j :._ . for solid waste, 1 Greeri containerfof green waste and 1 Blue container for.recyclable` material. • The owners, lessees or other tenants of the residential dwellings on service day, before 6:00 a.m., shall place their solid waste containers at the edge of the curb approximately 4 feet apart and not blocking any vehicle accesses in accordance with the City of Fresno's Solid Waste Management Division Standards. • Per Municipal Code, Section 9-404 Solid Waste Disposal Regulations, Section C,10._ No Solid Waste container nor residential rubbish shall be allowed to remain at the curb line after 8:00 p.m. on the collection day. J:\Conditionsof Approval TT5461 _.wpd TF City of ®��i�, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DATE: April 1, 2005 REVISED TO: ARNOLDO RODRIGUEZ, Planner III Planning and Development Department FROM: JOE PAFF, Engineering Technician Public Works Department SUBJECT: CONDITIONS FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 5461 AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 1. If approved by the following features may bem maintained b a Community District. ■ Maintenance of all Landscaping and Irrigation systems as approved by the Public Works Department within the street easements (including median to center of median)and the landscape easements along the property lines that side or back-onto N.Armstrong, N. Temperance and E.Dakota Avenues. ■ Maintenance of all Landscaping and Irrigation systems as approved by the Public Works Department within the street easements (including median)and the landscape easements along the property lines that side or back-onto N. Pearwood Avenue and N.Apricot Avenue. ■ Maintenance and operating costs of all Landscaping and Irrigation systems,Trails and Trail Lighting systems as approved by the Public Works Department within the open space areas designated as Outlots A, B and C and the trail along N. Temperance Ave. ■ Maintenance of all Sidewalks and Street Furniture located within landscaped easements and street rights-of-way adjacent to N.Temperance, N. Armstrong and E. Dakota Avenues and bordering the tentative map. ■ Maintenance of all non-private interior Local Street Pavement, Curbs, Gutters, Sidewalks, Medians and Street Furniture as approved by the Public Works Department within the boundary of the tentative map. Maintenance and Operating costs of all Street Lights as'approved by the Public Works Department within the boundary of the tentative map. Maintenance of all Street Trees_as approved by the Public Works Department w!thin the boundar—4.h e�tentative�rnap - 2. Proceedings to place the Final Map into a CFD may not commence until the territory has been annexed into the City of Fresno. 3. Construction plans for all features to be maintained by a CFD for a final map shall be included in the final map submission to the Development.Department for processing. 4. Should the owner/developer choose to not be included within a CFD for the maintenance of the items listed in section 1 above, the property owner/developer shall privatize all common areas, including streets, within the tentative map and provide for the maintenance of all of the above items by the property owners. Any change affecting the Items in these conditions requires revision of this letter. If you have any questions, please call me at 621-8695 a PW File No.10770 File:\word\cfd2\ttmapreview\tt5461 �sle TTM /. � Y. w> "04 ofRecording Requested by.:. ► City Clerk, Fresno, California No Fee Govt Code 6103 Return to City Clerk,Fresno Space above this line reserved for Fresno County Recorder's Office ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRESNO PROPOSED AND INITIATED BY MOVED BY. Westerlund SECONDED BY Perea BILL NO. B-112 ORDINANCE NO. 2005-111 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FRESNO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONE MAP OF THE CITY OF FRESNO HERETOFORE ADOPTED BY ARTICLES 1 TO 4.5 INCLUSIVE, CHAPTER 12, OF THE FRESNO MUNICIPAL CODE, BEING THE ZONING.ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FRESNO WHEREAS, Rezone Application No. R-05-02 has been filed by Frank and Herky Urabe, William and Barbara Graham,Ureka Herr and Nzue Siong, Roland Peek, Terry and Pam Carter, Rosemary Rendon, Robert and Bennie Leininger, Lennie and Dolores Hill, and James Dirlam, property owners, with the City of Fresno to rezone property as described hereinbelow; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Article 4, Chapter 12, of the Fresno Municipal Code, the Planning Commission of the City of Fresno held a public hearing on the 17th day of August, 2005, to consider Rezone Application No. R-05-02 and related Environmental Assessment No. R-05-02/ T-5461/C-05-22, during which the Commission recommended to the Council of the City of Fresno approval of the subject environmental assessment and rezone application amending the City's Zoning Ordinance on real property described hereinbelow from the R-A/UGM (Residential AgriculturaU Urban Growth Management)and R-A (County) to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management)zone district; and, e r Ordinance Amending Official Zone Map 'fiezone Application No. R-05-02 September 20, 2005 . Page 2 WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Fresno, on the 20th day of September, 2005, received the recommendation of the Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRESNO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Based upon the testimony and information presented at the hearing and upon review and consideration of the environmental documentation provided, the adoption of the proposed rezoning is in the best interest of the City of Fresno. The Council finds in accordance with its own independent judgment that there is no substantial evidence in the record that the rezoning may have a significant effect on the environment as identified by the Finding of Environmental Conformity to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MSIR No. 10130) dated June 21, 2005, prepared for Environmental Assessment.No. R-05-02/T-5461/C-05-22. Accordingly, Environmental Assessment No. R-05-02/T-5461/C-05=22 is hereby approved. SECTION 2. The Council finds the requested R-1/UGM zone district is consistent with the existing low and medium-low density residential land use designation of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and McLane Community Plan as specified in Section 12-403-B-2 of the Fresno Municipal Code. ::. ,SECTION'S The Council finds.that:the zone_distnct'of the real property descrif3ed:herembelow; located in the City of Fresno and shown on the Official Zone Map of the City of Fresno, is reclassified from the R-A/UGM (Residential Agricultural/Urban Growth Management) and R-A (County) to the R-1/UGM (Single Family ResidentiaUUrban Growth Management)zone district: That certain real property situated in Section 22, of Township 13 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, County of Fresno, State of California, according to the official plat thereof, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at point on the south line of the northeast quarter of said Section 22, being 1321.19 feet westerly from the east quarter corner of said Section 22; thence: tib Ordinance Amending Official Zone Map " Reione Application No. R 05-02 . ,. ci. eptember 20, 2005 1) North 00° 28' 54" East,a distance of 30.00 feet, to a point on the northerly right-of-way of Dakota Avenue as shown on Plat of.Fincher's Colony, Book 4 Page 63, Fresno County Records, said point also being the southeast corner of Deed Document No. 2003-170059, `'Off icial Records Fresno County; thence 2) North 00° 28' 54" East, along the east line of said Document.No. 2003-170059, a distance of .330.00 feet, to the northwest corner of said Document No. 2003-170059, said point also being the easterly corner of Deed Document No. 1964-99020, Official Records Fresno County; thence , 3) North 000 28' 54" East, along the east line of said Document No. 1964-99020, a distance of 300.00 feet, to the northeast corner of said Document No. 1964-99020, said point also being the southwesterly corner of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 1231, Book 7 Page 51, Fresno County Records; thence along the southerly line of said Parcel 2 following the subsequent courses and distances: 4).- South 890 26' 51" East, a distance of 330.00 feet;thence 5) . .South 000 28' 54"West, a distance of 132.00 feet;thence 6) South 890 26' 51" East, a distance of 330.00 feet; thence 7) South 000 28' 54"West, a distance of 46.00 feet; thence 8) South 890 26' 51" East, a distance of 630.74 feet, to a point on the westerly right-of-way of Temperance Avenue as shown on the Precise Plans of Streets and Highways Map, Serial No. 45, sheets 10 & 1.1, Book 1 Pages 53-69, Fresno County Records, said point also being .. ti -the southeast corner of said Parcel 2; thence leaving said.southerly.line 9) South 89° 26'-51" East,.a,distanceof 10600 feet„to a point on the precise plan line_of _ Temperance Avenue`as shown on said Precise Plans Map; thence r 10) North 000 25' 45" East, along said precise-plan-line, parallel with, and 76.00 feet east of the east line of said Section 22, a distance of 447.08 feet, to a point on southerly right-of-way of the Gould Canal as shown on said Plat of Fincher's Colony; thence 11) North 590 20' 32"West, along said southerly right-of-way, a distance of 122.68 feet, to a point on the westerly right-of-way of Temperance Avenue as shown on said Precise Plans Map; . thence continuing along said southerly right-of-way . 12) - North 590 20' 32"West, a distance of 1492.65 feet, to a point on the west line of the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 22; thence continuing along said southerly right- of-way line .13), North 590 01' 20"West, a distance of 188.78 feet, to the northeasterly comer of Parcel B of Parcel Map, Book 3 Page 7, Fresno County Records; thence � ��Gidinance Amending Official Zone Map Rezone Application No. R-05-02 September 20, 2005 Page 4 14) North 890 20'47"West,along the north line of said Parcel B, a distance of 1126.79 feet, to the northwest corner of said Parcel B, said point also being on the easterly right-of-way of Armstrong Avenue as shown on said Plat of Fincher's Colony; thence leaving said north line 15) North 890 20' 47"West, a distance of 60.00 feet, to a point on the westerly right-of-way of Armstrong Avenue as shown on said Plat of Fincher's Colony; thence 16) South 000 32' 03"West, along said westerly right-of-way line, parallel with, and 30.00 feet west of the west line of the northeast quarter of said Section 22, a distance of 1148.67 feet; thence leaving said westerly right-of-way 17) 'South 890 23' 52" East, a distance of 60.00 feet, to a point on the easterly right-of-way of Armstrong Avenue as shown on said Plat of Fincher's Colony, said point also being the southwest corner of Parcel D of Parcel Map, Book 1 Page 49, Fresno County Records; thence 18) South 890 23' 52" East, along the south line of said Parcel D, a distance of 630.00 feet, to the northwest corner of said Document No. 1964-99020;thence 19) South 000 32' 03"West, along the west line of said Document No. 1964-99020, a distance of 631.05 feet,to a point on the northerly right-of-way of Dakota Avenue as shown on said Plat of Fincher's Colony; thence 20) South 000 32' 03"West, a distance of 60.00 feet, to a point on the southerly.right-of-way of Dakota Avenue as shown on said Plat of Fincher's Colony; thence 21) South 890 26' 51" East, along said southerly right-of-way, parallel with, and 30.00 feet south of the south line.of the northeast quarter of said Section 22, a distance of 661.21 feet; thence - leaving said southerly right-of-way 2�) North 00°28'-54"-East, a distance of 30 00 feet, to the Point of Begnn iing �� t 3 SECTION 4. This ordinance shall become effective and in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the thirty-first day after its passage and upon annexation of the subject property into the City of Fresno and upon payment of required fire district"transitional fees." CLERK'S CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF FRESNO ) CITY OF FRESNO ) I, REBECCA E. KLISCH, City Clerk of the City of Fresno, certify that the foregoing ordinance was adopted by the Council of the City of Fresno, California, at a regular meeting held on the 27th day of September , 2005, by the following vote: Ayes: Calhoun, Duncan, Perea, Sterling, Westerlund, Dages Noes: Boyaj ian Absent: None Abstain: None REBECCA E. KLISCH City Clerk By APPROVED AS TO FORM: HILDA CANTU MONTOY City Attorney u By . . _ Deputy Rezone Application No. R-05-02 Filed by Dunmore Homes Assessor's Parcel No. 310-200-18, 23-29, 54, 58, 60 DEBaOAMCommon\Master Files-2005\REZONE\R-05-02,T-5461\R-05-02-CC OrdBill S DIRK POESCHEL 923 Van Ness Avenue,Suite 200 • Fresno, California 93721 e ■ Land Development Services,Inc. 559/445-0374•FAX:559/445-0551 •email:dpoeschel®dplds.com S October 18, 2005 CEIV ED Mr. David E. Braun,Planner III OCT 1 8 2005 Planning &Development Department City of Fresno Y; 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 SUBJECT Tentative Tract Map No. 5461 Dear Mr. Braun: The subject map was approved by the Fresno City Council on September 27, 2005. This letter is to request that you immediately begin.annexation to the City of Fresno of the property and initiate the required consultation with Fresno County. Please let me know the meeting date so that my client and I may attend the consultation along with the city,county and LAFCo representatives. So that my client can plan for the development of his property, please keep me informed of the annexation process status. If you have any questions, please.feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Dirk Poeschel, AICP a- .w c:': Mr. Mike Lutz Mr. Bernard Jimenez ,/Mr. Nick Yovino Ms. Terri Harmon G:\WPDOCS\Dunmore Homes(T-5461)05-13\Correspondence\d braun annexation.doc FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 2 of 4 e) When the actual costs incurred in constructing Master Plan facilities exceeds the drainage fee obligation, reimbursement will be made for the excess costs from future fees collected by the District from other development. Approval of this development shall be conditioned upon compliance with these District Requirements. 1. a. Drainage from the site shall be directed to X b. Grading and drainage patterns shall be as identified on Exhibit No. 1 AL-2 C. The grading and drainage patterns shown on the site plan conform to the adopted Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan. 2. The proposed development shall construct and/or dedicate Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan facilities located within the development or necessitated by any off-site improvements required by the approving agency: X Developer shall construct facilities as shown on Exhibit No. 1 as "Master Plan Facilities to be constructed by Developer". None required. 3. The following final improvement plans shall be submitted to the District for review prior to final development approval: X Grading Plan X Storm Drain Plan Final Map X Street Plan X Water& Sewer Plan Other 4. Availability of drainage facilities: a. Permanent drainage service is available provided the developer can verify to the satisfaction of the City of Fresno that runoff can be safely conveyed to the 1vlaster Plan inlet(s). _ b. The construction of facilities required by'Paragraph No. 2 hereof will provide permanent drainage service. X c. Permanent drainage service will not be available. The District recommends temporary facilities until permanent service is available. d. See Exhibit No. 2. 5. The proposed development: Appears to be located within a 500 year 100 year flood prone area as designated on the latest Flood Insurance Rate Maps available to the District, necessitating appropriate floodplain management action. See attached Floodplain Policy. X Does not appear to be located within a flood prone area. 2005-022 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 3 of 4 6• The Federal Clean Water Act and the State General Permits for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Industrial Activities (State General Permits)require developers of construction projects disturbing one or more acres, and discharges associated with industrial activity not otherwise exempt from National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) C permitting, to implement controls to reduce pollutants,prohibit the discharge of waters other than storm water to the municipal storm drain system, and meet water quality standards. These requirements apply both to pollutants generated during construction, and to those which may be generated by operations at the development after construction. a. State General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activities, approved August 1999, (modified December 2002.) A State General Construction Permit is required for all clearing, grading, and disturbances to the ground that result in soil disturbance of at least one acre (or less than one acre if part of a larger common plan of development or sale). Permittees are required to: submit a Notice of Intent to be covered and.must pay a permit fee to the State Water Resources Control Z Board (State Board), develop and implement a storm water pollution prevention plan, eliminate non-storm water discharges,conduct routine site inspections,train employees O. in permit compliance, and complete an annual certification of compliance. : - O b. State General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities, O April, 1997 (available at the District Office.) A State General Industrial Permit is ;:.. -..required for specific types of-ndustries:described.in:the NPD.ES-re ulations or:b q ..p �p .. .. .� ..._ _ g y Standard Industrial-Classification-.(SIC)code."The following categories of industries are generally required to secure an industrial permit:manufacturing;trucking; O recycling; and waste and hazardous waste management. Specific exemptions exist for manufacturing activities which occur entirely indoors. Permittees are required to: submit a Notice of Intent to be covered and must pay a permit fee to the State Water Resources Control Board, develop and implement a storm water pollution prevention plan, eliminate non-storm water discharges, conduct routine site inspections, train employees in permit compliance, sample storm water runoff and test it for pollutant indicators, and annually submit a report to the State Board. 2005.022 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document i FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 4 of 4 C. The proposed development is encouraged to select and implement storm water quality controls recommended in the Fresno-Clovis Storm Water Quality Management Construction and Post-Construction Guidelines (available at the District Office) to meet the requirements of the State General Permits, eliminate the potential for non- storm water to enter the municipal storm drain system, and where possible minimize contact with materials which may contaminate storm water runoff. 7. A requirement of the District may be appealed by filing a written notice of appeal with the Secretary of the District within ten days of the date.of this Notice of Requirements_ 8. The District reserves the right to modify, reduce or add to these requirements, or revise fees,as necessary to accommodate changes made in the proposed development by the developer or requirements made by other agencies. - 9. X See Exhibit No. 2 for additional comments;recommendations and requirements. Gerald E. Lakem Proje Engineer: Jamie Miller. District.Engineer C: PROVOST& PRITCHARD 286 WEST CROMWELL FRESNO, CA 93711 2005.022 5469 E..OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document J NOTE -1 THIS DRAWING IS SCHEMATIC, —'— �_• DISTANCES ARE APPROXIMATE. APN I �\\ ,; 77-7 #310-200-51 I 1 L f BASIN I I I f .I I � '1G' 11G' I 'BU' I 'BV' - 1 I I I I: I I I Ll.l� I I • r r Q I f I ABV � \ I I C' Z Ill IW Z fw 36° •• I —- 6 __ _ 30 r ------------ ——— - — ------- -- --- zol DAKOTA AVE. LEGEND Master Plan Facilities To Be Constructed By Developer Pipeline(size Shown)&Inlet. C�--— Existing Master Plan Facilities ®---• Future Master Plan Facilities Direction Of Drainage SCALE 1"=400' ——----— Inlet Boundary • Drainage Area Boundary CUP 2005-022 • EXHIBIT N0. 1 DRAINAGE AREA:"BV" k FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT vied k .. .. DRAWN BY: MM DATE WSW K%utoc tllDWG WEMiBmaTYDUPmm22.Crp REVISED BY: — DATE: — OTHER REQUIREMENTS EXHIBIT NO. 2 . The cost of construction of Master Plan facilities,excluding dedication of storm drainage easements, is eligible for credit against the drainage fee of the drainage area served by the facilities. A Development Agreement shall be executed with the District to effect such credit. Reimbursement provisions, in accordance with the Drainage Fee Ordinance, will be included to the extent that Developer's Master Plan costs for an individual drainage area exceed the fee of said area. Shouldthe facilities cost for such individual area total less than the fee of said area,the difference shall be paid upon demand to the City or District. The District recommends a stub street from CUP 2005-022 to Assessor's Parcel Number(APN)310- .200-51. 10.200-51. This is necessary to allow surface drainage. from APN 310-200-51 to reach the future Master Plan inlet located within CUP 2005-022. Additionally,the Developer of CUP 2005-022 shall grant a drainage covenant for APN 310-200-51 located directly north of CUP 2005-022 to allow major storm flows from APN 310-200-51 to reach Dakota Avenue. If the stub street is not constructed,then the Developer will be responsible for the construction of a surface flowage channel, and dedication of a Surface Channel easement. Development No. CUP 2005-022 e n gr\permits\exh i b i t2\city-c u p\2005\200 5.022 0 m) File No.210.45 FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE,OF REQUIREMENTS PUBLIC AGENCY DEVELOPER Mr. Gil Haro, Planning Manager DUNMORE HOMES Planning & Development Department 2150 PROFESSIONAL DR. STE. 150 City of Fresno ROSEVILLE, CA 95661 2600 Fresno Street Ph (916)771-7500 Fresno, CA 93721 MAP NO. 5461 PRELIMINARY FEE(S) See below) M4 DRAINAGE AREA(S) " BV DRAINAGE AREA BV $359,394.00 .DATE_H IL4—y 5 DRAINAGE AREA " - TOTAL FEE $359,394.00 The proposed development will generate storm runoff which produces potentially significant environmental impacts and which must be properly discharged and mitigated pursuant to the Z California Environmental Quality Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. The O District in cooperation with the City and County has developed and adopted the Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan. Compliance with and implementation of this Master Plan by this development project will satisfy the drainage related CEQAINEPA impact of the project mitigation requirements. The proposed development shall pay drainage fees pursuant to the Drainage Fee Ordinance prior to approval of the final map at the rates in effect at the time of such approval. The fee _ indicated above is based on the tentative map. Contact the FMFCD project engineer prior to approval-bf the final map for the fee. Consider'al-kons which,may affect the fee.obligation(s) or the tinning or form of fee payment. - a) Fees related to undeveloped or phased portions of the project may be deferrable. b) Fees may be calculated based on the actual percentage of runoff if different than that typical for the zone district under which the development is being undertaken and if permanent provisions are made to assure that the site remains in that configuration. c) Master Plan storm drainage facilities may be constructed, or required to be constructed in lieu of paying fees. d) The actual cost incurred in constructing Master Plan drainage system facilities is credited against the drainage fee obligation. 5461 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 2 of 4 e) When the actual costs incurred in constructing Master Plan facilities exceeds the drainage fee obligation, reimbursement will be made for the excess costs from future fees collected by the District from.other development. Approval of this development shall be conditioned upon compliance with these District Requirements. 1. a. Drainage from the site shall be directed to X b. Grading and drainage patterns shall be as identified on Exhibit No. 1 4-4 C. The grading and drainage patterns shown on the site plan conform to the adopted Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan: 2. The proposed development shall construct and/or dedicate Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan facilities located within the development or necessitated by any off-site improvements required by the approving agency: X Developer shall construct facilities as shown on Exhibit No. 1 as "Master Plan Facilities to be constructed by Developer None required. 3. The following final improvement plans shall be submitted to the District for review prior to final development approval: X Grading Plan X Storm Drain Plan X Final Map X Street Plan X Water& Sewer Plan Other 4. Availability of drainage facilities: a. Permanent drainage service is available provided the developer can verify to the satisfaction of the City of Fresno that runoff can be safely conveyed to the Master-:Plan inlets) b. The construction of facilities required by Paragraph No. 2 hereof will provide permanent drainage service. X c. Permanent drainage service will not be available. .The District recommends temporary facilities until permanent service is available. d. See Exhibit No. 2. 5. The proposed development: Appears to be located within a 500 year 100 year flood prone area as designated on the latest Flood Insurance Rate Maps available to the District, necessitating appropriate floodplain management action. See,attached Floodplain Policy. X Does not appear to be located within a flood prone area. 5461 5469 E.OLIVE FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document FRESNO,METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 3 of 4 6• The Federal Clean Water Act and the State General Permits for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Industrial.Activities (State General Permits) require developers M4 of construction projects disturbing one or more acres, and discharges associated with industrial activity not otherwise.exempt from National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting, to implement controls to reduce pollutants, prohibit the discharge of waters other than storm water to the municipal storm drain system, andmeet water quality standards. These requirements apply both to pollutants generated during construction, and to those which may be generated by operations at the development after construction. a. State General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activities, approved August 1999, (modified December 2002.) A State General Construction Permit is required for all clearing, grading, and disturbances to the ground , that result in soil disturbance of at least one acre (or less than one acre if part of a larger common plan of development or sale). Permittees are required to: submit a Notice of Intent to be covered and must pay a permit fee to the State Water Resources Control Board (State Board), develop and implement a storm water pollution prevention plan, eliminate non-storm water discharges, conduct routine site inspections, train employees O in permit compliance, and complete an annual certification of compliance. b State General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated.with Industrial Activities, April, 1997 (available at the District Office.) A State General Industrial Permit is _.,b regilired for specific types of: industries described In the NPDES,regulations or;by Standard Industrial Classificahoii(SIC)`'code. 'The"following ca#egories'o.f industries ` are generally required to secure an industrial permit: manufacturing; trucking; recycling; and waste and hazardous waste management. Specific exemptions exist for manufacturing activities which occur entirely indoors. Permittees are required to: submit a Notice of Intent to be covered and must pay a permit fee to the State Water Resources Control Board, develop and implement a storm water pollution prevention plan, eliminate non-storm water discharges, conduct routine site inspections, train employees in permit compliance, sample storm water runoff and test it for pollutant indicators, and annually submit a report to the State Board. 5461 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 4 of 4 C. The proposed development is encouraged to select and implement storm water quality controls recommended in the Fresno-Clovis Storm Water Quality Management Construction and Post-Construction Guidelines (available at the District Office) to meet the requirements of the State General Permits, eliminate the potential for non- storm water to enter the municipal storm drain system, and where possible minimize contact with materials which may contaminate storm water runoff. 7. A requirement of the District may be appealed by filing a written notice of appeal with the Secretary of the District within ten days of the date of this Notice of Requirements. g, The District reserves the right to modify, reduce or add to these requirements, or revise fees, as necessary to accommodate changes made in the proposed development by the developer or requirements made by other agencies. 9. X See Exhibit No. 2 for additional comments, recommendations and requirements. Gerald E. Lake an, Pro' t Engineer: Jamie Miller District Engineer C: PROVOST& PRITCHARD 286 W. CROMWELL AVE. FRESNO, CA 93711 Ph (559)449-2700 5461 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document v NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS SCHEMATIC, DISTANCES ARE APPROXIMATE. I APN #310.200-51 I i f I BASIN I. I f I. ,1G, 11G' BU BV' I I I_ I' lJJ I I \ r z (q I ; I i / f I W I Zf W LU f fIL I Is 36" I --3�= ----------- 301' r ------------------------- ----- ---- ------------ I Col. DAKOTA AVE. // I y i I ——— 1 LEGEND ♦_ Master Plan Facilities To Be Constructed By Developer Pipeline(size Shown)&Inlet. o-- Existing Master Plan Facilities 0----• Future Master Plan Facilities Direction Of Drainage SCALE 111=4001 —————— Inlet Boundary IN Drainage Area Boundary TRACT 5461 EXHIBIT N0. 1 DRAINA { AREA: 1IBVII ,�:rs• ul� FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT DRAWN BY:MM DATE: yens KVwtameDWGUE1WIBMTRACTS151.Un REVISED BY: — DATE — OTHER REQUIREMENTS EXHIBIT NO. 2 The cost of construction of Master Plan facilities,excluding dedication of storm drainage easements, is eligible for credit against the drainage fee of the. drainage area served by the facilities. A Development Agreement shall be executed with the District to effect such credit. Reimbursement provisions, in accordance with the Drainage. Fee Ordinance, will be included to the extent that Developer's Master P Ian costs for an individual drainage area exceed the fee of said area. Should the facilities cost for such.individual area total less than the fee of said area,the difference shall be paid upon demand to the City or.District. The District recommends a stub street from Tract 5461 to Assessor's Parcel Number(APN)310-200- 51. This is necessary to allow surface drainage from APN 310-200-51 to reach the future Master Plan inlet located within Tract 5461. Additionally, the Developer of Tract 5461 shall grant a drainage covenant for APN 310-200-51 located directly north of Tract 5461 to allow major storm flows from APN 310-200-51 to reach Dakota Avenue. If the stub street is not constructed, then the Developer will be responsible for the construction of a surface flowage.channel, and dedication of a Surface Channel easement. Development No. Tract 5461 en gr\perm its\ex h i b i t2\tract\54610 m) street Name Review TM-5461 ..3-11-05 Street Name Status Required Change East Bellaire Way Chane East Sussex Way Street B Chane East Griffith Way East Sussex Way Chane East Pontiac Way East Griffith Avenue Chane East Farrin Avenue East Pontiac Way Chane East Saginaw Way East Saginaw Avenue Chane East Flint Way East Lansing Way Good East Dakota Avenue Good North Armstrong Avenue Good North Filbert Avenue Chane North Shelly Avenue North Holly Avenue Chane _ North Pearwood Avenue North Jasmine Avenue Chane 'New Name' North Joshua Avenue Chane North Apricot Avenue North McKelyy Avenue Chane North McKelveyAvenue North Magnolia Avenue Chane North Dee Ann Avenue North Pistachio Avenue Chane North Arroyo Avenue North Arro o Avenue Chane 'New Name' reference TM-5424 North Tem erance Avenue Good ---'Fresno AllAmedcaCtly City of 2000 City Hall 559-621-8800 Public Works Department 2600 Fresno Street,Rm.4064 David Healey, Director Fresno,CA 93721-3623 www.fresno.gov March 31, 2005 Peters Engineering Group. 55 Shaw Avenue, Suite 220 Clovis, CA. 93612 Attn: John Rowland SUBJECT: TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY (TIS) REVIEW FOR THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION T5461; LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TEMPERANCE AND DAKOTA AVENUE This project proposes to construct 285 single family residential units. Based on the ITE Trip Generation manual it is estimated that this project will generate 214 am and 288 pm peak hour trips.All projects that are. projected to generate 100 or more peak hour trips shall prepare a TIS as identified in the 2025 Fresno General Plan, Mitigation Measure B-4, b: 1. Revise report to include one lane in each direction along Dakota Avenue separated by two-way continuous left turn lane per Exhibit B. 2. Construct a traffic "mini-circle" as a traffic calming measure at the intersection of Bellaire and (Jasmine) use new name or relocate the northerly extension west to eliminate a 4-way intersection. This project shall pay its Traffic Signal Mitigation Impact Fee at the time of building permit based on the trip generation rate(s)as set forth in the latest edition of the ITE Generation Manual. Refer to the adopted Master Fee Schedule for fee rate. This fee shall be paid at time of building permit with the above mentioned mitigation measure(s). If you have any question, please do not hesitate on contacting David Padilla at(559)621-8798 or by email: david.oadilla(cbfresno.gov J Sincerely,2 - Jose Luis Benavides, P.E., Traffic Engineering Mana Public Works Department, Engineering Services C: Traffic Planning Reading File Louise Monroe, Supervising Engineering Technician,City of Fresno I_ G:1Traffic Impact Studies1T5461 Response.DOC PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP A CALIFORNIA .CORPORATION 55 SHAW AVENUE, SUITE 220 PHONE (559,) 299-1 544 CLOVIS, CALIFORNIA 9361 2 FAX (559) 299-1 722 Mr. Brian Kesler November 12, 2004 Dunmore Homes, LLC 2150 Professional Drive, Suite 150 Roseville, California 95661 Subject: Traffic Impact Study Proposed Residential Development Northwest of the Intersection Temperance and Dakota Avenues Fresno, California Introduction This report presents the results of a traffic impact study for a proposed residential development in Fresno, California. This analysis.focuses on the anticipated effect of vehicle traffic resulting from the project. Proiect Description Based on the conceptual map provided to Peters Engineering Group, the proposed project includes 285 single-family residential lots located northwest of the intersection of Dakota and ( Temperance Avenues: The site covers an area of approximately 61 acres. Site access will be from two streets intersecting Dakota Avenue and one street intersecting Armstrong Avenue. A Site Vicinity Map is shown in Figure 1 and a Site Plan is shown in Figure 2. Study Area and Time Period This report includes analysis of the following intersections: • Dakota and Armstrong Avenues • Dakota and Temperance Avenues 771'. -Shields-and Armstrong-Avenues - Clinton and Armstrong Avenues In addition, a trip trace is provided indicating the number of project trips expected at the Clovis Avenue/State Route (SR) .180 and Fowler Avenue/SR 180 interchanges. The study time periods include the weekday AM and PM peak hours determined between 7:00 and 9:00 AM and between 4:00 and 6:00 PM. The peak hours were analyzed for the following conditions: _ • Existing Conditions, ` ect Conditions,i Cumulative-Without-Project • Cumulative-With-Project Conditions, and • Future With Project Conditions (Year 2025). 04-089-report.doc cr Traffic Impact Study—Proposed Residential Development November 12,2004 Northwest of Temperance and Dakota Avenues, Fresno,California Page 2 Lane Configurations and Intersection Control The existing lane configurations and intersection control are illustrated in Figure 3, Existing Lane Configurations. For future conditions, it is assumed that the study intersections will be built out to their ultimate configuration in accordance with City of Fresno standards. The City of Fresno General Plan designates Dakota, Armstrong, and Clinton Avenues as collectors, Shields Avenue as an arterial, and Temperance Avenue as an expressway. Therefore, the ultimate configuration of the intersections is expected to include one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane in each direction, with the exception that Temperance is planned for three through lanes. The intersections of arterials, collectors, and expressways are expected to be signalized in the future: Trip Generation Data provided in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 7`h Edition,. , (Code 210, Single-Family Detached Housing) were used to estimate the number of trips anticipated to be generated by the project based on the number of lots. Table 1 presents the trip generation information. Table 1 Proiect Trip Generation Time Period Trips Entering Site Trips Exiting Site Weekday 1,364 1,364 Weekday AM Peak Hour 54 160 Weekday PM Peak Hour 181 107 Pass-by and captured-trip reductions were not applied. The distribution of project traffic to the adjacent road network was based on a 2025 Fresno County travel model select zone analysis performed for the study by Council of Fresno County Governments (COG) staff using information provided by Peters Engineering Group. .The anticipated project traffic volumes at the study intersections are shown in Figure 4. The trip generation calculations are attached following the figures at the end of the text of this report. The results of the select zone analysis, incorporatingthe Peak hour traffic volumes resented in Table 1, are also P P "attached follow ng'the trip,generation`caleulations.. Other Proiects The traffic volumes expected to be generated by other projects in the vicinity of the project site are included in the analyses. In particular, traffic resulting from the following projects is included: • 240 homes proposed along the entire frontage on the north side of Shields Avenue between Temperance and Locan (tract number not yet determined), • 127 homes proposed southeast of the intersection of Clinton and Armstrong (tract number not yet determined), and • Tract 5424, 145 homes proposed northwest of the intersection of Clinton and Temperance. The 127-lot project was addressed in a Traffic Impact Study by Peters Engineering.Group dated November 2, 2004. The other two projects will be specifically analyzed in forthcoming Traffic Impact Study—Proposed Residential Development November 12,2004 Northwest of Temperance and Dakota Avenues, Fresno,California Page 3 traffic impact study reports by Peters Engineering Group. The combined other-projects traffic volumes are presented in Figure 5. Existing and Future Traffic Volumes The existing traffic volumes were determined by performing traffic counts at the study intersections. Weekday (Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday) manual turning movement counts were performed between 7:00 and 9:00 AM and between 4:00 and 6:00 PM. The existing peak-hour turning movement volumes are presented in Figure 6. Cumulative- without-project traffic volumes are presented in Figure 7 and are the result of adding the other-projects traffic volumes to the existing traffic volumes. Cumulative-with-project traffic volumes are presented in Figure 8 Future traffic volumes with the project for the year 2025 were determined using the Increment Method developed by the COG. .The results of the select zone analysis were incorporated into the year 2025 loaded network by the COG. The year 2004 and 2025 model traffic volumes used in the analyses are attached. Future turning movements were determined based on the methods presented in the Chapter 8 of the Transportation Research Board National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 255 entitled "Highway Traffic Data for Urbanized Area Project Planning and Design." Future-with-project traffic volumes are presented in Figure 9. Project Traffic on State Highways The volume of project traffic expected at the Clovis Avenue/SR 180 and Fowler Avenue/SR 180 interchanges is taken directly from the results of the select zone analysis and is presented in the Table 2. The 2025 select zone analysis printouts on which the volumes are based are i attached. Table 2 Year 2025 Proiect Traffic at SR 180 Interchanges AM Peak PM Peak Movement Hour Tris Hour Trips ,SR 180 WB:onrfrom:Clovis.Avenue ;SR'..180'WB',offt6'Clovis°Avenue ;.. _s 0. _ . , .a SR 180 EB on from Clovis Avenue 0 0 SR 180 EB off to Clovis Avenue 1 9 SR 180 WB at Clovis Avenue 15 8 SR 180 EB at Clovis Avenue 5 11 Clovis Avenue NB across SR 180 0 1 Clovis Avenue SB across SR 180 0 1 SR 180 WB on from SB Fowler Avenue 15 8 SR 180 WB on from NB Fowler Avenue 0 0 SR 180 WB off to Fowler Avenue 0 0 SR 180 EB on from Fowler Avenue 0 0 SR 180 EB off to Fowler Avenue 5 11 SR 180 WB at Fowler Avenue 0 0 SR 180 EB at Fowler Avenue 0 0 Fowler Avenue NB across SR 180 1 4 Fowler Avenue SB across SR 180 3 2 Traffic Impact Study-Proposed Residential Development November 12,2004 Northwest of Temperance and Dakota Avenues, Fresno,California Page 4 Analyses The intersection levels of service were determined using the computer program Synchro 6 (Build 612) for unsignalized and signalized intersections,. which is based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual procedures. for calculating levels of service. Level of service characteristics for both unsignalized and signalized intersections are presented in Tables 3 and 4. The Cityof Fresno requires that a level of service D or better be maintained. Therefore, levels of service A through D are considered acceptable and levels of service E and F are considered unacceptable. Table 3 Level of Service Characteristics for Unsignalized Intersections J. Level of Service Description Average Vehicle Delay (seconds) A Little or no delay. 0-10 B Short traffic delays. >10-15 C Average traffic delays. >15-25 D Long traffic delays. >25-35 E Very long traffic delays. >35-50 F Stop-and-go conditions. >50 Table 4 Level of Service Characteristics for Signalized Intersections Level of Average Vehicle Delay Description Service (seconds) A Uncongested operations; all queues clear in a single cycle. <10 B Very light congestion;an occasional phase is fully utilized. >10-20 C Light congestion;occasional queues on approaches. >20-35 j.. Significant congestion on critical approaches, but intersection is functional. Cars. required to wait through more than one cycle during short-peaks. No long-standing >35-55 queues formed. Severe congestion with some long-standing queues on E critical a roaches Traffic'' queue may block nearby >557,80 intersection(s)u stream of cntical`a roaches) .;= - _ -- - - . F Total breakdown;stop-and-go conditions. > 80 Table 5 presents the results of the intersection analyses. The level of service is presented for the overall intersection and for each turning movement where applicable. The overall level of service is considered the most reliable; the individual turning-movement levels of service are less reliable because they are more dependent upon signal timing and variations in traffic volumes. The individual turning movement levels of service should be used only as a guide. The overall intersection level of service is not defined by the Highway Capacity Manual for is two-way stop-sign controlled intersections. The analysis output is attached to this report. Traffic Impact Study—Proposed Residential Development November 12, 2004 Northwest of Temperance and Dakota Avenues, Fresno, California Page 5 Table 5 Intersection Level of Service Summary aiaa Leve_ ofetv�cer ,. y,. ,. Existing Cumulative Cumulative Future With Approach Without Project. With Project Project(2025)* AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM CI1ntOn&,�1I IItS�troll k.... . :B '' Eastbound L B B B B B C C C Eastbound T B B B B B C B B Eastbound R B B B B B C A A Westbound L B B B B C . B C C Westbound T B B B B C B B B Westbound R B B B B C B A A Northbound L A A A. A A A C C Northbound T A A A A A A B B Northbound R A A A A A A A A Southbound L A A A A A A C C Southbound T A A A A A A B B Southbound R A A A A A A A A Shieils&Axmsiron17 RI3 � ANTS: ' ''NDS rNDk Eastbound D - D Eastbound T C D Eastbound R A A Westbound L D D Westbound T B C Westbound R A A Northbound L UC UC UC UC UC UC D D Northbound T C C Northbound R A B Southbound L D D Southbound T C C Southbound R A E� k &fix strq . F SND } N ' , ID NDS , NbB Eastbound L. B B B B B B. C C.. . Eastbound°;T B B B .B: =B1 113_ Eastbound'R B B B .B. ._ B -B_ -A- A Westbound L B B B B B' B C C Westbound T B B B B B B B B Westbound R B B B B B B A B Northbound L A A A A A A B C Northbound T A A A A A A A B Northbound R A A A A A A A A Southbound L A A A A A A C C Southbound T A A A A A A A A Southbound R A A A A A A A A Traffic Impact Study—Proposed Residential Development November 12,2004 Northwest of Temperance and Dakota Avenues,Fresno, California Page 6 eyel,of,Se _. e r Existing Cumulative Cumulative Future With Approach Without Project With Project Project(2025) AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM Eastbound L B� B C B C B BB Eastbound R B B C B C B A A Northbound L A A A A A A B C Northbound T A A A A A A A A Southbound T DNS DNS DNS DNS DNS DNS A B Southbound R DNS DNS DNS DNS DNS DNS A A L-Left turn R-Right tum T-Through DNS-Does not stop ND-Level of service not defined UC.-Not analyzed,under construction * Future conditions assume signalization of the intersection and build out in accordance with City of Fresno "Standard Drawing P69 ,7 Discussion The results of the level-of-service. analyses indicate the study intersections are currently operating at acceptable levels of service and are expected to continue to operate at acceptable levels of service through the year 2025 with construction of the project based on the projected traffic volumes and .eventual widening/signalization of the intersections to conform to City standards. Conclusions I Generally-accepted traffic engineering principles and.methods were employed to estimate the amount of traffic expected to be generated by the project and to analyze the traffic conditions expected to exist in the future. The conclusion of this traffic impact study is that the study intersections are expected to operate at acceptable levels of service with construction of the project through the year 2025 assuming eventual build out to City standards. ( Thank you for the opportunity to perform-this traffic impact study. Please feel free to call.our 4 office if you have any questions, PETERg EN0INE ERING GRU OoFessfoNq� ?:a, of John Rowland, P.E. Attachments: Figures 1 through 9 q CIVit` @ aq Q€ CAL Trip Generation Calculations Select Zone Analysis and Fresno County Travel Model Output Intersection Analyses TEAGI IE a z PINEDALENEE RNDON SIE RA FI GA DEN BL LLARD BAR STOW SHAW C.S.0 F. CLOVES SHAW -GU SBUR 41 1 8 PROJECT LOCATION ASH DAKOT. y. n99 168 r S IIELDS i :: CLINTON MCKINLEY 0 VE 180 TULME FRESNO VENTURA PINGS CANYO f . BUTIR SPTC RR t4 gv CALWA w z z O �.. . ,Z.. U > N Q Site Vicinity Map Proposed Residential Development Fresno, California Not to Scale Figurel PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP r- a I I r� > a I I . N w V 2 a — _ n I � It1 Z I 1 .:... _... .. _._ _ .EA51SDAKO7A C ,r; - _ .::AVENUE.;... .. SITE PLAN Proposed Residential Development Fresno, California Not to Scale PETERS ENGINEERING 13ROUP Figure ai y Dakota y Ave. Dakota y Ave. o c E ¢ E` r I Shields Ave. N .. Q r Clinton Ave. v c 0 N - E - Q LEGEND EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATIONS Signalized Intersection' ST0 Stop Sign Proposed Direction of Travel Residential Development Fresno, California Not to Scale PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP Figure 3 CD. CLi a' a' o(0) . O N O df O 0('1) Dakota Ave. Dakota Ave: (5)0 (10) 17 (°)0 Q N CD C N E ¢ E CD IL N N O r Shields -Ave. (15)2 (0)o ) E CD .1L Ono Clinton Ave (5)0 O m O Z O N O Cf LEGEND PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 20 - AM Peak Hour Volumes (20)- PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Direction of Travel Residential Development Fresno, California Not to Scale PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP Figure d; a' . ¢> 9(6) Dakota `^ Ave. Dakota Ave : (13)2 y (13)2 - - O - N. y CL.. Q - - N O ' (0) - o O o 31 (18) l �► Shields J Ave:. (25) 10 V V _ rn O N N Q o m 29(26) _'27_(_14),, y -.. — Clinton Ave. : .(36)15 - ., O Q - LEGEND OTHER PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 20 - AM Peak Hour Volumes (20)- PM Peak Hour Volumes, _ Proposed h Direction of Travel Residential Development Fresno, California Not to Scale PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP Figure 5 L 3 ni m m m Dakota Ave. Dakota Ave. . . (27)11 ,-(24)32 - ...(14)27 N - - (8)5 m _ CY) - .. 4) - CO. C L n0 Shields 8 Ave. ao� z 0 Q Q Q L , (7) s 43(25) - 1r' Clinton .. ..(88) 136. - - rn .. - C LEGEND EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES 20 - AM Peak Hour Volumes (20)- PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed h Direction of Travel Residential Development Fresno, California Not to Scale PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP Figure CLi di a' Q' L 3 ; N Dakota ` Ave. Dakota Ave. (27) 11 (24)32 0.7 �``1 (27)29 N m (21)7 A (5)42 O -N... . N .. N _ CL - �. Q N r ai Q L Shields Ave. CM Z E i Q N * 25(21) 72(53) Clinton Ave.- (124) 151 - m m rn -O Q - LEGEND CUMULATIVE WITHOUT PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 20 - AM Peak Hour Volumes - (20)- PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed Diredion of Travel Residential Development Fresno, California Not to Scale PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP Figure 7 A Q . Q di m L 3(1) m 51 (2a) Dakota Ave. Dakota Ave. (27)11.. '� .. _ (31)41 ■ - ., .(32)29 (31)24 Q m O t0 N C ECL Q E . H . ai Q L Shields Ave. Z 0 y E Q ai Q _ 72(53) - Clinton Ave (54)a (,29)15, y N C E LEGEND CUMULATIVE WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 20 - AM Peak Hour Volumes (20)- PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed h Direction of Travel Residential Development Fresno, California Not to Scale PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP Figure 8 a; a' Q L 30(;7) Q Dakota Ave. Dakota` Ave. (73)22 .. (95)78 ■ (86)51, _ (91)36 .� v Q. o - rn N I O C - Q Q E Q .. uci rn vri 96(355) - - r N 336'(299) 428(384) - - Shields Ave. (262)48 (377) 156 y 'n Q c - - - (283)214.. N o o E Q ai Q ..�-.,.N 13.(42) .. .. - .. .. .. *M .,358(231) 151 (70),x' �, fi Clinton .,., Ave. - (501)125 (54)52 rn c 00 ` LEGEND . FUTURE (2025) WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 20 AM Peak Hour Volumes (20)- PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed h Direction at Travel Residential Development Fresno, California Not to Scale PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP Figure 9 y TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS ITE Trip,Generation, 7th Edition Single-Family Detached Housing Code 210 Project: Dunmore Homes Tentative Tract No.: Unknown Location: North side of Dakota between Armstrong and Temperance r: Number of Units: 285 AM Peak Hour Traffic: Percentage Entering: 25% " Percentage Exiting: 75% Average: 213.75 Entering: 53.44 Exiting: 160.31 Entering: .54 Best Fit: . 208.93 Entering: 52.23 Exiting: 160 Exiting: 156.70. PM Peak Hour Traffic: Percentage Entering: 63% Percentage Exiting: 37% Average: 287.85 Entering: 181.35 Exiting: 106.50 Entering: 181 Best Fit: 275.13 Entering: 173.33 Exiting: 107 f Exiting: 101.80 l Weekday Traffic: - Percentage Entering: 50% Percentage Exiting: 50% Average: 2727.45 Entering: 1363.73 Exiting: 1363.73 Entering: 1364 Best Fit: 2725.18 Entering: 1362.59 Exiting: 1364 Exiting: 1362.59 E . PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP t is d LU 01 CD ` W CI C I 0 1 O o C11 Il � JI co o I O O . ap in o � foo I 1 � N C i _ i` CD SR 180 ' O 0 0 CO $ MO O � � c mac. 0 � a V sino 6 0 Clovis V a w e IC CloviClovis Clovis O slnolC Ciovi ai Clovis H = Y ti 1 q a> W Z Li � � . I .. to CDQ 0 / N N fn I /o I I co to co I r- � I co ern . C.4 c) ¢. N o a Cal l0 � � V is 0 c ! (D w l / 4)1 4)I 4) / C.I N�. 0! i I Ji i co/ I. O � i o i goo i 0 j SR 180 cc .8 O N co q7 CL V R C p (Lrw S L 15 b b = .p O b 4 l L N = Y Jalono4 Fowler//o �almo� �almo� to to O Li :4 Jalnnog, Fowlers Q o Jalmo=l Jalmozi Q LL 3 /0 E E p 4) 0 2 / Z Z N O CO) I i V,O CO ir - I - - / - CO I U) ^ R R N / CLI I m 0 0 d 0 o C coo c c C U U NOY 2—N I C LLI 0 0 0 o al 0 o OI. 0 � . ml 0 0 o ° ° ° 0 o i O O C C O O - U U L) U i i bZ 9Z 21 l.Z .b. 4 b " 8� eouejadwal __� Temperance eouejadwal aoue�adwal aouejadwal e�adwal Temperance :. aouaouejadwal Ko 0 o K o 0 0 11 8 0-8-- 7 L 9�. O o v o n 0 m m d C3 0 00 . oO OOY YON Q c) rL R 0 C C Coto .. O O U U ` C N 0 0 0 0 F— _ 0 ° 0 0 C d Q C CO IV 0 c. v a c 0 0 o 0 0. 0 0 c c J Li - OM C Coln - OO OO CLOY YON _ C) U _ -- U U N N ZE -Oz Oz 14 - LL 8 8 5 N 6uoi;swiy 6ua;suuy 6uoi;swiy I Armstrong Buojlswjv 6ua;suLy 6uo.4suLy Armstrong Zb Z£ Z£ 21 . ZZ £l £L 10 I I i � � I o 0 CO� _C _Cr �tO o0 00' v�2 2MCO i 1 0 { 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 is -._. ...................o CC oO i� o ° o0 0O SOY Ycr)r` ` co c c r) Q-i Ca CO-0 d` I-NL LMLO -00 00 OG. 00 _ Mr N ONr Z 0 0 0 00 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 : . JeOo-1 Locan Locan ueOo-1 ueoo-1 ueoo-( ueoo-! «: deoo-1 Locan Locan uedoueOo-1 ueoo-1 ueoo-` Q' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ( 0 L 0 0 0 0 0 0 , �. C c a v WCO Ca0 CDC-4 ; hML LMh 00 00 - 00 - O rL L .. 01, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c c a Cl) ; CO M Lu� L M h O 0G O r L L M r U)Q Q O^ Co Co 1 m b 7 L L 6Z 6Z 6Z 26 9 9 6 6 S S S 4 > ejedwal Temperance aoueJadwal aoueJadwal aoueJadwal, aoueJadwal Temperar u zJadwal Temperance aoueJadwal aoueJadwal aoueJadwal aoueJadwal Temp 4 r( O � £ 3 L 8 8 8. N M Ol 8 I p m • _ 1'-NL LOQ OQ]Y Yh00 I a1 M Nr o0 d doo I > .Y Q Q 0 0 to I d d: p bb 0 1 - 0 0 o0 0M 0 1 0 0 O LO 08Z 0 1 0 0 C 0 6l 0 1 0 0CO M to Q ... i..NL. LOQ OO ^ CO `'C M O -O.. O.O 00 . - .. /A �+ Q Q COr <r vo ro m m�� �� moo IN j:.. O O 140 C 20 bS 54 8b Ltr ZE I a 26 LZL a 72 Y -6uoJ suL Y 6uailswjy : 6664swJ O >Istrong` - Armstrong 3. d f N {:. istrong Armstrong6uoJ;suu d 6uoJtsuliv 6uoJ;suu' �. 15 6Z 29 69 69 Zq i m 35 cn-v y N r 88 E£ ZE ZZ ¢ ¢ m m vCa G 00 00 00 rOY POLO O 00 - -O CO N NNLO .. CO M - L L 0 CDCO Cl)04 0 0 0 0 0 ¢ ¢� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l. 0 0 0 0 i c c ca rn Cl) ` 0)CO N 04CO0O. Cy . LU) Ca, q. 0 0 0 0 .r O Y P O L O. 0 0 0 0 O(�O O N S ¢ ¢ Q Q ` i 11 0 0 0 0 S S 8 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 l �� "-wler JaIMoj JaIMoj J91M0j JajMoj JajMoj ielmoj `{ wler JaIMoj JajMOj JajMoj JajMoj JajMoj ielmoj i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 118 0 0 0 0 0 0 b Ol Cl) N NI N f6 - Cp d'N 75 N I �' L L i C mm LL > > ` O O e0o O 0 O 'p O COca ca COOO O O O O tp to u)d. N N LU 0 (9 ► 0 0 0 0 0 Ci 0 0 0 00 0 . eoo� ueool ueool ueool ueoon. . ueoo ^uJ' ueoo-1 3 3.. ueoo-1 ueool ueool ueool ueoo61 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0o m �o0 0 0 ooL Lor 0 0 n m m lA lA rn m 00 0000- �0 d 00 rnoo 3 3 0 0 0 co m 0 0 00 M Lo 0 0 0 0 m m 0 0. U) m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 p 3 3 rn m i tp 00 M X 0 0 —0 L L r r - - 7 c) m m fi) U) .2:` i ` 0 0 I " O b I ] . Z ` Z Z 9 ci 'ijadwal aauejadwal eouejadwal aoue�adwal eouejadwal _ aoueiadu! uejadwal aouejadwal eouejedwal eouejedwo.L aouejedwal - aouejaduj 3 ca Z Z Z £ £ E 10 3 rn m L j 0 I—y 2 0 0 3. 3 00 woo > Y 0 0 r r - 0 o co co O O I R R mm U) U) 0) (D !� m 0 p 0 0 o j c o 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 ° ioao 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 _ 1 00 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 01 mjtL – fA OoN %1r _ 0..0 00 00L •c.00, 00 00 00 00 IO" R m m to to m I C-4 Q mm N 0 (D LZ 3suu b Armstrong 6uoilsw.y 6uo1;suliy- 6uoIlsuliy 6ualsuL i ., ;.:JlswJy Armstrong buoalsuuy 6uoilswiy 6uoilsuuy 6uatsuL'i d OL OL 9Z 28 0£ Z£ E£ b£ 0 3 3 ... rNm mrN c)N� �rN 00 l I 0 CDO 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 .. _... ._.__. --- --- ...... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 01 2 i N 00 0o m @ m m - MN� �rN - oo 00 C-4 11) b 9 9 b b Ll 9 9 L g 9 LZ I y A04 Jalmozi JaInn0=1 JaInn0=1 JaInn0=1 JIalnn0=1 ! c`a nod 191moZI Jajnno:j Jajo= nn Ja� o= �elmo� p nn0 p 0 £ E b0 0 L L Sl I L m; ca M Of04 Of ... OO OO rN >. (J)"r OO OO N-T-C Lr' OO OO . N C N N 0 C7 Q Q b b ll 11 0 0 0.. UJI g 9 `Z _21 0 0 0 11 Jalnno� Jalmo:1 JalmO� Fowler Jalmo= Jalmozi m Jalnnozi Jalmo:1 JalnAO:1 Fowler Jalnno=1 Jalnnozi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 81, 18 0 0 0 Q cc 3 rn rn c —LO O U > > m m tt9 nlU) 00 O o, �f�N N��. C:) - - �N U) US N OO a. ,ar• 0 0 Q Q V. 0 (7 - 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 - ... c C. 0 CIJ �- Q Q U) E. - n D W d Oo 0o h caves p 0 c7 0 0 e>IS/^2 JJ als'�_... - elsln eJJ21S - - .. - O N L L N p elsln eJJalB Q ¢ I m 0 ` p Low £ rn rn ;2 O > > _ <n u� Nvao > Nom . Y rcn - - tom 1 0 0 p 1 a , 0 0 C d cc 1 ; O O 0 0 N i III . 0 0CO \ I c 3 3.. -C �ti o 0 L NJ �. LOQ 00 00 U.)!2 ?. j0 - ... - Cc N' C 6 6 6 6 S S NQ N Q 0 IO slnoF� I�_. ". Sinop slnol� shop SA =c sslno�� slnol� lV slAoiO slnolOSIA 10 ",.,. slnolO sloop slnojO sinolO +, S S S 9 Z Z c c 0 _ v bl Sl Sl Sl 8 8 �rL 0.)co 0 0 0 - 0 ^y r 0) CO . p Q 0 p 0 \� G L O O O O _ O O O O 0 c c � m 1 0 0 1 CO Q Nrnco 0 p 0' 0 0 Q U Minnewawa ememauuyy Minnewawa ememauulyy ememauulyy Minnewawa ememauwyy Minnewawa ememauulyy ememauulyy I as 00 p 0 0 m mco I IC. 0 00 0 �c0 N i U) O O 00 00 0o cQo T V00 00 00 l t mi .7 IM d 4 C i.. 9w LOM 22 •� WI m m ,v4 N-1 .. N-T LN1O +�+ COa g 15 9G L Ul 10 12 U Z ( L m1 : )can Locan ue30-1 ueOo-1 I ueoo-1 c ( uooUe3o �LocanLocan I moi . II .6 12 Zl L E '. `14 16 9L E Z N N r. 'O j tiM Ill i COO 2 U1(3) .� r: N U) I . 56 L4 ' 9b 12 5 i. I 0 I 57 Zi. 6Z 20 z {{ OL N- M L{L N V N I . � U) O p` PI V C 606 909 909 999 999 689 > ! 0 287 L8Z 99Z 6EZ 6EZ 307 (aa inperance aouejadwal aouejadwal aoueaadwal Temperance_ ` o :mperance eouejadwal aouejadwal aouejadwal Temperance = Q c 506 909 909 Z817 Z817 521 C = 381 l8E 08E WE OZE 479 V Y to o O d y I m m v v d eYoa tv NNY -le CO COrn LD Vim^ � O. Q �� ❑ C1 -- NIU) U)N� .� .�. ... _ 4 EZ 33 N 13 I . _ -2.'. - 1 - r - I � 13 3 �� I .24 4 5 01 6 I . t0 f0 - CO Ul. '( ^� O OCON CO� n - Mto� 0)CO j t 7 O N M Y Y C O M .. O OCe) ,N t U M 00 I 295Z8Z Z8Z Z017 89 ISL Z9 69Z i Armstrong fiuoj;sway Sua;sway 6ua;sway �. Armstrong 6ua;suuv 6ua;swJy 6ua;suuy r;. 195 98l 40Z lCz 162 lbl 8ll 4LZ to to v v .., LO COO O OCON - - rCO Go .. Cl) CO LC1 N M -4 -4 - CO to I � I 9Z - 23 8 L17 R 04 23 0 Z4 3 OZ 17 0 t£ m 6l 30 0 OZ CL NN I - - NVL LNtD - LLII ilof i . . L Zll Lll a' i Z L Z I ueoo-1 ueoo-I ueoo-I _ uepo� ueoo-I MOO d� L £ i £ Z £ di v v C c -N VL L 00 00 CO Co C CN� 56 L6 0Z 12 i � EL 1 i 57 Z L OZ. 20 ZL 6 6 6Z j CD Lo:2 'D O)ao - - C C - - CD m-i. off' OCD ��. . o g,nN r�vL LNC NiA_C CLCD N 999 689 889 650 2 6EZ 307 68Z 315 7S y c � . ieouejedwe j- Temperance eoueaedwal Temperance R O eouejedwe j_ Temperance eouejedwe L Temperance N y Z8b 521 29 514 ON 479 e9b .452 a a* 3 O i i N eine Ro I to R � - - 0 'T N NCoM.. - C) Oma , - __CN C CO't UI)(N MN C. d r. IL o W G4 - - .19 - LL a EZ 33 22 £ o c . . j 6 4 3 E o R CIA Co')V .N N N N '�' �V �.N C C S M N.� q 0) Cn W C) U i Z8Z ZOb 06£ 89£ � . Z968Z 9LZ L9L Gua;sway 6ua;swJy 6ua;swJy 6ua;swJy 6uo.gswiy 6ualswjy 6ua;swJy 6uoj;suLy —I� LOZ 6£Z b£Z 98L 8ll bLZ SbZ bZZ i - N N 0 o RI I Co� CT Cn � N Co Co Co Co N N C CNS - 1!)Co M Co L L� R� U) COU U j Vi i 8Lb K b i 0 �t 9l i �I 0 I . 0 oz 9z £ 0 41 CL 1-00t tLf)1- U) U) CI L7 388 88E L8bL8b 69b m :`6 111. 111 99 l9 LS S .a an Locan ueoo-7 ueoo-1 ueoo-1 ueoo-j IM C ocan Locan ueoo-1 ueoo1 ueoo- ueoo-1 W 3 206 _90Z £6Z . " 96Z b6Z to g 291 L6Z LSZ OSZ L8Z CD U) u)r) o� �¢? f�(Dti� ton I �I L I yl C 6E I d 109 � LZ fZ£ 6b L ; ; ro CC NO N dNco !i 1941 Lb6L Lb6L ZSOZ ZSOZ 90LZ 2557 1031 LEM LEOL p 906. 906 L99 1082 erance aouejadwa-Laouejadwal aouejadwa-L aouejadwa-L Temperance .:perance 2ouejadwa_L eouejadwaj. eouejedwa_L eouejedwa_L Temperance M 1342 Zb£L Zb£L Lgt4 Lgt4 ll9l 1813 - d 1684 b891 b89L 88918851 9L9l .1860 O , - N(n OO(g00 (^DC): c)O O - H bb 4 41 Z9L 33 C p o OL 1 26 99 13 p _ C 0 CD - --- to .: 9Z 4 28 LS l 25 w d Y 6L 1 55 Zb 45 LL. �a D cc m OO' n co cn tid: vM COo oj�v - ti N- ^ -o -oc' .. O w co — 916 906 j 8b6 980L 396 lZ£ LOZ 96b Armstrong 6uaasuuy 6uatswJy 6uatswiy j Armstrong Guo.4suUy 6uoJasuUy 6ua;swiy 761 98L Ll8 996 743 999 665 698 I CO cc N .92 2D _ N (0 - hcOL tVm I U) U) SL 63 SZ £ZL OZ 106 l 9c _.._ ......... y LL 43 Z Se cc is EE 125 Z 08 V cc cc • r.-co (D(D (D O O N h - n c*7 _ (p^. n -p -�^^ � (h(0 N ti N N'4 N O M to CO .� coo CO N N co I� t0 I �?Vzl £ZEL 98ZL Z£LL 6bZl 08 O ISZL LbL 6L9OOb 6Eb b9£ N Mo= JalMo,j JaIM0=1 Jalmo,j JaIM0=1 JalMod as JajMoj JalMoj. JalMoj aa�Mo,� JalMod a I �" c ^.o o cl cor) C C o '� coin_ I •moi LV O bbSZ 2685 'C 9£0l 979 H aouelatlwal aoue atlwal Temperance I y aouejadwal 0081 aouejadwa Temperance i (008 kr 0 0 .T 1866 I —� bl8l o Ke D =N Co 1875 I U U i o C 93 o 29 ur CO =N CO i U U i 82 55 j !n o CD CDU U.NW - i > 16. 1 R R a+ 54 91 c C a c - --.. O c M CD 36 B - O .. `I. 29 9Z m d Y N C i I. q N C C Is7 Coo o CC) 00 .T ; •.� .O- CD - SCD = CN00 CLO -i - - U U _ £80 L 990 L .. 6£b 9Lb 6uaLswiy 6uollswiy Gua;swiy 6uoA}suuy SL6 Z96 ££8 U9 tu. +r l O I �I .7 #. N COMC. _CMr �nNj MPI C.', s.. W CD U U CN G) i ' HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing AM 16: Dakota & Temperance 11/11/2004 IUIOV�Cn2n �EBI� x8 ,,� 1 � T 345 Lane Configurations Sign Control,,: Sfiop Free ;Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/I%) 32 5 2, ,.194 2997= Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Hourly flow rate(uphJ 4''3 , 7 3 2592 399 63 Pedestrians Lane Width(ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) P rcent;'Blockage Right turn flare(veh) MedianYPe t�oriez , Median storage veh) tJ - pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume': 6.94`'`.. d30 d614. vC1, stage 1 cont vol VIC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 694 430 461 .,.... tC, 2 stage(s) p0 queue free % 90 99 100 cM c *01 Leh/h 48 fi25 1'0©} Volume;.Total 49 2611 Volume Left 43 3 0 Volume iRight,, 6� cSH 428 1100 1700 Volumed Capacity 2 000 'r:02 0'1 � ` I Queue Length 95th (ft) 10 0 . Cor=ttrol5belay(s)� << `145 �7�1 fl 0 4 z; , Lane LOS B A „APproach De fy �. Approach LOS B Average Delay 1.0 Intersection C'a°,pacify UtiGzatioriY. 8 6% IQU Leyel of N. Service A f Analysis Period (min) 15 a Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1 e. F; HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis. Existing AM 18: Clinton & Armstrong 11/11/2004 l Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Sto,pFree: Free: Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume (vehlh), 3 136„ 69 1f5 43 1 8 ?8` 16 5 102 4 F Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0,87 0.87 0.87 Hourly flow rate (Yph),,., 4 1T62 82: 18 52 ,:' 1 , _ 10 34: ZO 6 117 5 .. Pedestrians Lane V1ldth,(ft) XA Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent;Blockage '; Right turn flare (veh) Medan 10 None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal.(ft) PX, platoon unblocked C coriflicting volume;. X2:2 2a4 1`20 358 iEJ7.„ a 44„ 1i2? 04, 4 vC1, stage 1 conf vol . vC2, stage 2 conf,vo vCu, unblocked vol 222 204 120 358 197 44 122 54 tC $ingal (s) v= 1 t ,5 6 2 7 1 5 6 2' d 1>.; "•1 tC 2 stage (s) 0- 4Q 33 r 5 40 33 22 2.2 p0 queue free % 99 76 91 96 92 100 99 100 cM capadi (ueh`lh) 885" 685 i 9 4'42 8J2 1026 ;1485 1552' (r zzyy ,:. Volume,Total 24:8 72. ;63 -j! 1` Volume Left 4 18 10 6 j . , V 10 n.' Right $2 1 20 5 cSH 75.1 608 1465 1552 �. Wolumet0 Capacity' 3;3 . 0 1'2 Q01 0 UO Queue Length 95th (ft) 36 10 1 0 ControlDeia s 12 111: 7 1 2 0 4 >... Y ) Lane LOS $. B A A Y: 1 pproach Delay A .(s)� 12 1 11"7 1 2' `. ., .. ,.; Approach LOS B B p Average Delay7.8 I`ttersecfion Ca`paaty Util¢atloI25 1°1a fr' 'IGU Leuel o`f Seriee, A Analysis Period (min) 15 i Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing AM 20: Dakota & Armstrong 11/11/2004 Lane Configurations , , , , Sign Control. Shop Stop Free Free Grade 0°I° .0% 0% 0% Volume(veh/h) 1'1 27 42 1 42 ;, 32 4"9 1 1 134 31 Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 .0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 Hourly flow rate(vph). 16 39 6� 1 60 4 46 70;' 191 44 Pedestrians Lane Width£t(ft) ...a Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent'Blockage ` '' ' Right turn flare (veh) Median storage veh) U'�stroa'm signal (ft) _. pX, platoon unblocked - C,�conflictmgolume; X4`13 379 214 "d :1400158 71 236 7.1 vC1, stage 1 confvol RC2,stage 2,conf vol,fi .. ;x ' vCu, unblocked vol 413 379 214 458 . 401 71 236 71 4:'1 tC, 2 stage (s) t.F 4 0 3 3 3 5 4 Q 3"3.' . 2 2.;:` 22 p0 queue free% 97 93 93 100 88 100 97 100 c 486 533 g26 438 S1J „ 992 : 1331 1529.. Volume Left 16 1 46 1 Volume Right 60 4 r, 1 44 cSH 645 533 1331 1529 Volume Queue Length 95th (ft) 16 10 3 0 G"c5ritrol'Delay 31, 2 0 1 Lane LOS --B. B A q - C Approach LOS S g. . 12 832, 0 1 Average Delay 4.8 lntersectiori Capacity Utiliza#inn 33 $% ICU Leel of Senr�pe ' A Analysis Period (min) 15 i Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 3 HCM Unsignalized Intersection.Capacity Analysis Existing PM 16: Dakota &Temperance 11/11/2004 Lane Configurations Y Sign Control ..5 Shap ,_ ... .F,ree :.Free Grade, . 0% 0% 0% Volurne'(veh/h) 24 8 3 27 : 183 Peak Hour Factor 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 Hourly,flow rate�vpFt): 31 ;'f0 4 ,•.•;295 238•,; 9 � . Pedestrians Lane 1Ndth (�) x Walking Speed (ft/s) P;ercenf;rBtockage i; Right turn flare (veh) Mi'dianAype N,or1e, Median storage veh) U, Oa signal (ft;) pX, platoon unblocked AMP .4�.. 5.4 x,42 247x , . •_.. ,.., �+gam_. � , .� ,.., .... vC 1, stage 1 conf vol stage 2 conf vol:;' vCu, unblocked vol 545 242 247 0;1)1,singale 04`1 6 4 r 6 2 4 1 tC, 2 stage (s) PO queue free % 94 99 100 cM capacrty(yehyliJ 1;31 Volume Totaf " '42 2:99 24T, Volume Left 31 4 0 - cSH 550 1319 1700 Volurr"iye b Capacity 0 08 b 00 Q:95 Queue Length 95th (ft) 6 0 0 Control lay F Lane LOS -; Y B A ?Ppro�ch Delay Approach LOS B . ..ca Average Delay 0.9 I;iterseetion Capacity Utt�izaton3=,. �24r3% ��F 1CU=Leuel;�of Sernce A ... Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing PM 18: Clinton & Armstrong 11/11/2004 r Lane Configurations , , , , Sign Control. : SCo,P Stop Free Free Grade 0% . 0% 0% 0% (veh Volume /h:) 915. :; 5.<, 82: 2 4: 46 11 Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.77 0.77 0.77 , 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.70 0.70 0.70 Hourly flow rate (vph) 37 111 ,,-; i 1` 6 32 9 6,` 95 2. 6 66 16 Pedestrians Lene Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent-Bfock�ge Right turn flare (veh) Median tyf?e ..r No`rtie Norge Median storage veh) tJpsrearn signal (it) ^ pX, platoon unblocked �G conflictin'g,�Solume ,21;8 „'fi94 x'74 ,��60 y�2�1 97,,= $1 98: vC1, stage 1 confvol - vC2, stage 2 conf voY. NO s vCu, unblocked vol 218 , 194 74 260 201 97 81 Y 98 tC,sirige (s) ' 71 65 :62 71 fi5 62 tC, 2 stage (s) p0 queue free % - 95 84 99 99' 95 99 100 100 cM capacity,(vehlh,) X00 66.. 988.. 97 60 960 `x'516 1496 Uolur�eTotal 1=59 48 103 `x 87 Volume Left 37 6 6 . 6 i Valt�m <Ri9h, cSH 712 713 1516 1496 r Votume;to Capacity 0 2... fa;oT . 00 O,DO Queue Length 95th (ft) 21 5 0 0 Confrbl Deiay(s) 1"1.;5 X10 4� 4 0 5 Lane LOS B B.. A _../A.. 7. Approach Approach LOS B., B . Average Delay 6.1 Intersection Pon, U.23,T% ICU Leuelof Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing PM .20: Dakota & Armstrong 11/11/2004 Lane Configurations Sign Contr„ol Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0%° 0% 0% Volume:(veh/h), 27 14 5 1 11 1 14 1 4 �; 4 62 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.74 0.74 0.74 Hourly flow rate(vph�, 34 18 x 6 3 14 1 16 143 ' 1:; 5 84 11 Pedestriansis ”. Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) PercentBlocka9e Right turn flare (veh) IVled�an: pe None one , N Median storage.veh),. lJpstreams�gnal pX, platoon unblocked v confilictipgvolume; 2'8;3 276 89 290 ;281 14 95 144 vC 1, stage 1 conf vol RC2 stage 2 conf dol vCu, unblocked vol 283 .276 89 290 281 143 95 144 tC dingle Vis) tri "v6 5 Z ' ;'7 11, tC, 2 stage(s) r tF (s) 35 40 33 350 33' 2 22 p0 queue free % 95 97 y99 100 98 100 99 100 e`M caciry(yah/,h) . 5 6229 63Gr ., 619 z 904 .1499 143'9 900 Volume,Total Volume Left 34 1 16 5 VolumeFRight _ 4 '11 � . �. ..A,� ,.�.. � cSH 665 635 1499 1439 Volumeao Ca acct 0 09 O,fl31J1 0 00 P. . Y .: Queue Length 95th (ft) 7 2 1 0 Control'De)ay(5) 1UsJ . ..,. -Lane LOS g B A Approach Delay (s) 10x9 10:8 , ;0� j0 4 _ l . Approach LOS B 8 . . `S" c Y 'mss�t� �'���� `gd i .-�p�z-s•'w,� ,m�" 1 a� i7 .,3. �. ,T.��r aq . Average Delay 2.9 litersetion Capacitcorr 27.2% ICUhLevel oferuacek A Analysis Period (min) 15 _.,.. it Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 3 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Cumulative Without Project AM 16: Dakota & Temperance 11/12/2004 Lane Configurations Sign„Confirol Stop Free Free « . Grade 0% 0% 0% Volume(uefi/h) x 332 7 131 X235 316 47 ".... ,e. Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Hourly,flow rate (`!ph)s 43 63 Pedestrians....y. Lane Width P). Walking Speed (fUs) Percent Blockage w Right turn flare(veh)' IVlediai�type h , .>dloneFt`` .... Median storage veh) U '` pstream srgn�a34(ft) S pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflictm volume _ 795 453 484 vC1, stage 1 conf vol C2 stag 2 con vol ��,. R ... a . , . vCu, unblocked vol 795 453 484 tC, 2 stage(s) p0 queue free% _88. ,. 98, 99 W C,M, capacityh(veh/f�) 352 00 1 n79 Volume Total � � k =5� 328 , „484 Volume Left 43 1,5 O Volume R�ght> cSH 380 1079 1700 Vw"m,fo 0 Capacity O-m-, 0:b1 28 g . Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 . 1 0 Lane LOS f Approach Delayri(s) 1E6' . t z Approach LOS. C , Average Delay 1.2 Intersection Capacity UtiUzation 31„3% F 1CU Leuel;of Service„ , A zx.W ... Analysis Period (min) 15 I... ... ...klc. Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Cumulative Without Project AM 18: Clinton & Armstrong 11/12/2004 Moue,e tip, � �' � `"""�SL�._�B�T� BR � $i.TBT,,rWB� FJ�L�f��iJBT�NBR fry B��d 5BT S�R Lane Configurations , , - , SIgt1 Control; Stop Stop Free; Free. Grade 0% .0% 0% 0% Volume (veh/h) 5 151 69, 42 �2 1*8' 28 2`8 13 102 15 25 Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.87 0.87 0.87 Hourly flow rate(� h; 6 180 $2 : 51..x. g$., D.n;.. .22 „3x,34 1:5, 1y17 17 4. P ) <> Pedestrians LnUUidth:(ft) xwy " Walking Speed (ft/s) Petoentl3lockage r < Right turn flare (veh) Median hype None on`e.. .. Median storage veh)F l=lpstream;signal(ft) PX, platoon unblocked V conflictingolurne 325 268 126 423 259 54 134 ' 68 vC1, stage 1 conf vol . uC2,stage 2_co"tfvol: y vCu, unblocked vol 325 268 126 423 259 51 134 68 tC singly(s) 7 1 6 5 6 ON. 5 5 2 4 i. tC, 2 stage(s) p0 queue free % 99 71 91 86 86 97 98 99 C. capacityw�,(ynehlf) X34 522 $ 92676 629x1011450 ; ti ,;; F 1533 n„�&,»t, t�. ,,,�..,.amu,« °� � ,v..��•, —x,r3' .,,s,.�n, �.a. �a ,r. ',a„�.« ., ',�` , .. ,�;,...��$ ,�. .a���,,,, VolurneTotal < w 268 r 1709149 Volume Left 6 51 22 . . 15 Volume Rrght cSH 689 554 1450 1533 0 39 0 31 0 021 X01 volume,to Cap�crty ,�59 Queue Length 95th (ft) 46 32 1 1 X10, .. Control:Delay�`s) Lane LOS B B A A Approach LOS B B :,: ;1:a�11'('.rseeti�l�1�v11.r':r.�Yrt ����' 5 �E.�,. ,'��1��f .�+...�,r. ..a:�.,.,�`'1 .�.,.r•`Y'i ,.� ...�,., ,�� :�.:'a�:::�R,?�;��, ��,s._.. .,_ .. t^s, ', :.ia: .,..t. - a Average Delay. 9.4 lr<te�sectron Capacity UErhzatroin 3$ 1°/° IC' Level of Sernce A Analysis Period (min) 15 a ... _ „ ..,.. i. ” Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Cumulative Without Project AM 20: Dakota & Armstrong 11/12/2004 Lane Configurations , Sgn7Control stop Stop, Free Fee . Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% 51 3 32' 56 1 1 138 3`1 . ......r r,,. Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 Hourly;flow rate EYP► , 6.. .:14 ,.. : 11.97. 44 f P. Vl Pedestrians f{ neSV dl,h �"). y C Y y Walking Speed (ft/s).. Percent giockage Right turn flare (veh) Medlantype ., No None, Median storage veh) Upstream slgnal(ft� pX, platoon unblocked vConfllctmg, €olume. vC1, stage 1 conf vol RC2 stage 2 conf vol ' ,.. vCu, unblocked vol 435. 395 . 219 475 416 81 241 81 154 1 , tC, 2 stage (s) t-F.O 31.5 40 33 35 4Q , 33 :, . 22 22:: . ,. PO queue free %° 97 92 93 100 86 100 97 100 cM,capac�tfy�ueh/h)` 5 F '523 8204245D8 9�9 1325 1516= VolumeaTotal z. 117 79 a , 127h 2!�377 Volume Left 16 1 46 1 Volume;Right,, 6D 4 1 44 cSH 627 520 1325 1516 P Volume to Ca acrY Q,19 0 15003 0 00 tY , Queue Length 95th (ft) 17 13 3 0 ntrol Delay(s) 12 0 13`2 3 0 0 1` '-Lane LOS-- . Approach Delay.Gsl 12' 13 2 3 0 01 , v„ ` YNn M Approach LOS b B B . �V ,v� Average Delay 5.0 I'ihtersectlon` pactty Ubllzaiiorr 534 $% ICI! Le�el'yo#Seivlce, A Analysis Period (min) 15, . . Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 3 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Cumulative Without Project PM 16: Dakota & Temperance 11/12/2004 j Lane Configurations Sign Controf; Stop Free Free Grade .: 0% 0% 0%' Uolum;e (veh/h'), 24 25 ;, ,11 : 6 X21 Peak Hour Factor 0.77 . 0.77 0.77 0.77 , 0.77 0.77 HourlyflowFrate(yph) 3a1_. X27 14M-m 332 295 t. 9 ,, Pedestrians Lane 1N�dth,(ft) x 4 Walking Speed (ft/s) Right turn flare (veh) Median;�P� None �. Median storage veh) Ups-,r ,p M,,yr.$1g.ina`I (ft) z pX, platoon unblocked vC,xconlictirtig volume <4...266099 30 . , ;.r ,a. .,m_„ x. vC1, stage 1 conf vol �,�2, stage Z cdnf uol: Y= "-_ vCu, unblocked vol 660 299 304 tC single(s) 6 4 F4 1 tC, 2 stage (s) p0 queue free % 93 96 99 eM capapityx( ehJh), :423 s x740127 „" Cfi er GttO L�rt, `�1�__ s. �,-��, �;��� Volume Total' ,58r X7 304.' x'`$ >,,4 x Volume Left 31 14 0 V-1 Right 27x0 9 F cSH529 1257 1700 Vo[u�ne<to Capaify 0<11; 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 1 0 - Lane LOS B A i Approach Delay�(ss) .:' > 12 70 4 , ;�?0'y° F.s < a Approach LOS B Average Delay 1.3 (intersection Capcity;Utilrzation 34% IEU Levea of,Serice; A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group . Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Cumulative Without Project PM 18: Clinton & Armstrong ' 11/12/2004 Mnue �; ��,EBL y���EBT��Bt��WB� r1N8T�"WSI�� �N� 'a�NBTNSR��. �BL�� 51�31 �SI3R Lane Configurations Sign Control '' Stop 5tap Free Free Grade 0% 0%. :. 0% 0% Volum?e,(vehJh). 43 124 16^ 9 53 21 5 82'I 2- 2I7 46 18 Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.70 0.70 0.70 Hourly flow rate(�ph$); -54 157 20, ,. 25 69, 27. 6; 95. 24 39' 66' 26 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) 0,110 Right turn flare (veh) Me�ianaype. ?; 40ne No ne Median storage veh) Upstream slgnal,,(ft), pX, platoon unblocked vC,,con#lictmg m „volue 337 287, 79 374 2=88 1D8 9.1 ' 920 vC1, stage 1 conf vol RC2, stage 2 cnnfvgl u vCu, unblocked vol 337 287 79 374 288 108 91 120 5 6 2 1 5 = 6�2° tC single(s)h 1 v tC 2 stage (s) 35< 4D < 33 &5 x'4 D' 33 `22 22 p0 queue free% 90 74 98 94 89 97 100 97 cM capacity veh/h),.. 535 604 982 447 6Q3 946 1 X03 14fi8 Volurne Total c 232 x 121 126 � 0 µ VDlume Left 54 25 6 39 Volume,Right; 20 27 24 26 u cSH 606 610 1503 1468 Volume to Capxacity` 01!'3, 8 0-,"10i' Queue Length 95th (ft) 45 18 0 2 Control„ ela Lane LOS - . --B B A A ._ Approach Delajr(S) 14;,6 12 4 0 4 4 Approach LOS B B Average Delay 8.6 Intersection Capacity, J,tilization X2:2% 1ClJ Lepl of SerViee „ A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Cumulative Without Project PM 20: Dakota & Armstrong 11/12/2004 IVlaueentEBL E$T �3R TaIUBL� I [ IBR� V Bf�� BTr NBR SQL SS1R Lane Configurations , Sign Contiol, Stop Stop Free: Free Grade... 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume„`(veh/hJ. 27 27� 1`, ,F' 19 1 14., 13.0; 1 4 72 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80. 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.74 0.74 0.74 Hourly flow rate:(RPh)_; 3'44 6 1 2 1 16<. 97 11 Pedestrians Lane Wdrth Walking Speed (ft/s) Perc�nti:Bfockage f Right turn flare (veh) Median .a x H.. Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked �C conflicting<�olum ; 309 296 103 319 301 „ 150 „ i Orb:, 15;1 vC1 stage 1 conf vol v2, stage 2 c6m � �. ��� vCu, unblocked vol 309 296 103 319 301 150 108 11 151 tC sinjleq(s}Mznx 11 x 6..�z62 7 1 65 2 4�- ,.. 4` tC, 2 stage (s) Y4 A. p0 queue free % 95 94 99 100 96 100 99 100 cap617. 6° 6 9 2 596 603 , - 89,6. ' 1482 : - 143.1' I , div c onLiane' ;�'� Mir�3��� V,.olum Tatel 74 26 167 114 Volume Left 34 1 16 5 I VolumeRiglif=, », cSH 631 612 1482 1431 Vrur1etti Capac�typ 012 a r,� £ . . , . ri ,�: Queue nLength�95th (ft) 10,. 3 . 1. b. Gontrols'Delay Vis) 11,5 11T 1 80 4 A; Lane LOS B B A A Approach LOS B B Average Delay 3.5 PnMrsecp Capa�dity Utilization 28 % l U Level;.ofi Service„ A Analysis Period (min) 15 is Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 3 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Cumulative With Project AM 16: Dakota & Temperance 11/12/2004 �s 4v t l f , Lane Configurations SignM:11- R. Stop 3 Fpree $nFre r. Grade 0%° 0% 0%° , Uolum'e;(veh/h) 316". .. . 50 Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Hourlyflowrate (�ph�)�r, >" , ,Xff Pedestrians Lane Width . . Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent-Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Medan"type, Nave Median storage veh) U,'pstream signal ( ) ,' �� sf „ pX, platoon unblocked . v:C, conflictin volume' # 455 488 ' vC1, stage 1 conf vol RC2 stage 2 conf ubf ` ` Y vCu, unblocked vol 811 455 488 tC, single �s� 6 4 tC, 2 stage '(s) . . PO queue free % 84., 95 98 VolumeTotal87 335„ A88, Volume Left 55 21 0 W©1ume,Right .:" 32 067 cSH 408 1075 1700 i ° tapacity O.Z1 0.02 0',;29 Queue Length 95th (ft) 20 2 0 f Lane LOS _ :,.: C A Approach Dera:y(s) 16 2 0 7 0'0 Approach LOS C Average Delay 1.8 Intersection CapacityxUillzaionM „$ 35.9°I° I < LeuelFofi Service A : . Analysis Period (min) 15 ,. , - Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Cumulative With Project AM 18: Clinton & Armstrong 11/12/2004 Lane Configurations , , 4* Sign Control Stop Stop Free. Free Grade 0% 0% 0%. 0% Volume(veh/h) 8 151 _69 4,2 72 25. 18 36` 2:8 1>3 134 25 Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.84 0.84. 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.87 0.87 0.87 Hourly flow rate (vph)'` 1`0 180 82 51 88y. 30 y 22 44 34 15 154 29 Pedestrians Lane 1Nitlth ff` Ry Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage ' x Right turn flare (veh) Me�Jiar yp@ : y �Noune � done Median storage veh) U streini signal (ft) z pX, platoon unblocked v;C ,conflictingvolurn 38 X320188 G 475 X318 t;1 L83 78 ..a.. .i...' �.�.... ..r. a , ... ., vC1, stage 1 conf vol u.C2,'stage 2.cr,nfUol= vCu, unblocked vol 378 320 168 475 318 61 . 183 78 7 C3.... "6 2 7 1 6 5 6 1 4:1'; tC, 2 stage(s) 40 3 3 2.2'. 2 2" PO queue free % 98 69 91 85 85 97 98 99 f cM capa"city (veh/h) 488 X581 N 8G 338' 3 1004 '1392 1520. � �� ectid'ri Lane,# B1 _ 1• � 8 � � � � � � � �_ volume Total ." 271 1':70 100 198,,E, .: Volume Left .10 51 22 15 VolumeR�ghfi ... „ 82 30 ' 344 .29 .. . ".... .. °. :- � �a , cSH 642.x 510 1 1392 1520 f V�Iume to Caaclty 42 33 Ow02 0 a1 r,. Queue Length 95th (ft) 52 36 1 1 C`ontrolODelay(s) 14;:6 X15 5 ;1 8� 0 6 . -Lane LOS- `B C A_ A A�proactiDelay Vis) 14 6 15 51Y6 Approach LOS.. B C Average Delay 9.4 Intersection Capacity Utilizatir� 40.x% I U Level�fi Seruie A! Analysis Period (min) 15 i: . Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 2 � a . HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Cumulative With Project AM 20: Dakota & Armstrong 11/12/2004 S Lane Configurations , , , , Sign Conrtrol,, g . , t4p Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% VolumeF(veh/h) 11F 29 `42 Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 Hourly f1oW rate'(YP,.h)" 1`6 41 M'60 1 73, F 4 ,46 106:. 1. 1 2.:89 44 Pedestrians Lane;UU�dthilkfl)Y . Y =v Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage . .., , . .. . . KIM", ,..,.. . ,. , Right turn flare (veh) Median (Ype N;6' ;None Median storage veh) Upstre„am sig,ral (ft) : pX, Platoon unblocked vC *c fl' I volume 539 499 304. . .579 F 5Z1 101 326 10 vC1, stage 1 conf vol C2 `sta e 2canf vol, ` _� � x y I. .. .<.g. ..,..._6l ..... s. .},.e.., ._.gum, ., 3u��._.r b�-: vCu, unblocked vol 539 499 304 579 521 101 326 101 tC, 2 stage (s) t (s) 35 40 ,3 3 2 2 22 p0 queue free % 96 .91 m92 100 84 100 96 100 IE cM capacity km 6, ss 3835 X736 X54 443 . 95, 123,41 14.9:1; I�Bir71111-80M� W � � ya Volume Left 16 1 46 1 �lbt�r�e'Rlgtit cSH 549 454 1234 1491 _ Volutteao,Cap2c�ty. 0.21: 0;1.7 OI 04 0 00 Queue Length 95th (ft) 20 15 3 0 Confrol'Dela 's 13;:3 1°4 0 Y� ) . :,: 27 00. Lane.LOS B B_ A A AP,P�`oach Approach LOS B. B Average Delay 4.7 tntersecfiora Capacity;Utifizatlon „ 387% ICULevel'of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 3 HCM.Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Cumulative With Project PM 16: Dakota & Temperance - 11112/2004 Lane Configurations Sign Control£ "Stop` Free rFree Grade 0% 0% 0% Volrftey, X31` 3140 256, 227 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.77 0.77 . 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 Houray flow rate(uph): 400 52 332 295 19 Pedestrians Walking Speed (ft/s) Peg, n#:Blockage, Right turn flare (veh) Med�erl;type ; ,Nt3n ..,3 e � ` Median storage Veh) Upstre'afn signal (ft) '= '. pX, platoon unblocked vC, confltctir�g uolum 74"! 305 3�4 5 r. . . ,. . . . . . : ... . vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 741 305 314 tC ,64, tC, 2 stage (s) F4 � .... .. ... ... PO queue free % 89 95 96 I cell capaci(y,( eh1lY);AAfib 735 1246 UbluneTotal= :Y . <81 48 314 �..> Volume Left 40 52 O>, Volurne,Right Y 40 0 19 490 1246 1700 cSH - _ Vdlume,to Capacity, 0 6 ' 0 04 la 18 Queue Length 95th (ft) 15 3 0 r Control Delay(s) 13' Lane LOS - B A Approach Deiay Approach LOS B , : �4,.a; ,�.. ✓i;,� a��r l el eCtLO er�l 11311fr1 � ., ,iso. , .. 3 �. a Average Delay 2.1 ln�ersecfi�n �ap�city`Util�zatc�.m ,�a. 4?:2% ..; . 1Ct�Level of,Seruice ;' `�` A _ Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Cumulative With Project PM 4. 18: Clinton & Armstrong 11/12/2004 Lane Configurations 4, , , , Sign Controh ; Shop ;:Stop :free Free. Grade 0% 0%° 0% 0% Uolume,(veh/fa),•, 54 129 16 19 53 21 5'. 1,02 21, 27 59 26 Peak Hour Factor 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.77_ 0.77 0.77 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.70 0.70 0.70 Hourly.filow rate (yph)' 68 163 20 23 X69 27 ; 119 24 39 84 37 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) 21 Walking Speed (fUs) Pecent'�Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Meciiantype .. .: Median storage veh) pX, platoon unblocked �, coriflictirrgbiume 384 335 ' 103 X424 X41 i31 fi21 143 x.,. . . vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC`2;'st" 2 cz7nf vbi'' vCu, unblocked vol 384 335 103 424 341 131 . 121 143 fC`Arlgle tC, 2 stage (s) 4 0 3 3 35 4,0.,. 3 PO queue free % 86 71 98 94 88 97 100 97 CM capac�ty�(vehfh) 493 568 952 A02 563 9Y19 1A66 1440 ��re�tl�4 Y, 3T . . F � , . Volume Left 68 25 6 39 C YO, ume'Rrght , 5020 , , .- ,.._ 3 566 1466 . 1440 Vo(umetb�apacir 0. 15 0;210 DO 003 . .. j Queue Length 95th (ft) ` 57 20 0 2 Control�Delay(s) k , 1'��5 „13 1 ;0 3 2,D . . • _ Lane LOS - C B A A.: _0 Dela s X16 5 , 13 1 Approach LOSy( � C ,s- B „ .. . `�+4M'Rk :C}. c .Y-. ^'.C' 'A S •LCa`^^� �F - [S "R" Average Delay 8.9 I,',ntersectron Capacity Uttirzatiotr, 39.;:1% . ICU Level of Service_. A Analysis Period (min) 15 is< Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Cumulative With Project PM 20: Dakota & Armstrong - 11/12/2004 k rl Lane Configurations , , Signg Qanrol ' Stop. `f Stop Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Volume(yeh/h)' 2- 3r2 5 1 ?20 1 14 178 Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.74 0.74 0.74 HoUr�y flow ratex{yph) 34 40 6 n x 1 2;; 1 16 205' 1 142 11 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft)'; Walking Speed (ft/s). . P:e�centBfackage:. , : ,. ': Right turn flare(veh) Median type .'`, . s done None Median storage veh) lJpstream signYal (ft). pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting.volur-e 4.09 3;90 1.17 422 401 2fl5 ." 153'1 206 vC1, stage 1 conf vol MIN id . vCu, unblocked vol 409 . 396 147 422 401 205 153 206 . x71 tC;2 stage (s) tF ( ) x, "M> 13 ` t35 frAO . 3. X22 2.2 p0 queue free % 9492 99 100 95 100 ` 99 100 f c„Mrcapaciy{ueh/h) F 526 ,X33 90Oy 502 Y 530 835” 1428 1366 ,8'0�'� `27 Volume Left 34 1 16 5 . V.olume�} �ght # 11fi cSH 547 537 1428 1366 Uolrneto Capacity. .,::: 01' 0 05 01 Q�0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 13 4 1 0 Lane LOS B B A _ :_ A = 4 ApProaeh Delay(s.) 1}2,:7 12,1 0 6 'fl 321, �.. Approach LOS. B B 77" Average Delay 3.1 Intersection Capacity Ut►4azatian 32 2°l0 x 1Ct bevel of Seance A .. . . Analysis Period(min) 15 nzw Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future 2025 With Project AM 16: Dakota & Temperance .11/11/2004 Lane Configurations r +t} ttt Ideai�Flow(uphill") ' 190Oa 190 1900 1900 1;900 1900 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0. 4.0 4.0 4.0 , Leading Detector (ft)- 50 50 50 50 50, Trailing Detector(ft) 00 0 0 0 0 TurnmgSpeed (mph), 151, 9 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 Fit 0 850 850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Setd flow{prof) 177:0 1583 1770 5085 s 5085 1583 ; . . Flt Permitted 0.9500.950 Setd Flow(perm) a,. 177,0 .,.15 177b08 508 1583 , RIM. . .. Right Turn on Red Yes Yes SatdF,low`(RT:Q ) :rag 1181 - Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 LnkSpeetf{mph) 30 30 3 Link Distance(ft) 2613 1328 2536 30 2 57 6 Volume (vph) 78 36 16 846 1074 109 Peek Hvorar,�actor a., 0 9 .9 ...0920 9 ` 092 r 092 Adj. Flow(vph) 85 39 17 920 1167 118 ` Lane Group Flow(vph} 85 39 1 A'" . 1'167 118, Turn Type Perm Prot Perm I Protected phases. 4 5 2 g Permitted Phases 4 6 D`etector,Phases. : 4 4, 5 2 6 6 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Mmimu;m�Split,fs) ;,,,.;" ,,,20 5� 20a�5 85 2A 5� 20�'S '205= Total Split(s) 23.5 23.5 11.5 36.5 25.0 25.0 Total Split(°Io) 3g 2°!0 ' /oF 2% 9 OD 8/a d1' ✓o 41 T/o �0 A s A O a s Maximum Green (s) 19.0 19.0 7.5 32.0. -20 5 20:5 Yellow Time (s); 3`5 3s5 3 0 3 5 8 5 3 5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1 01.0 Lead/,Lag Lead YLag Lag y g p I Lead-La O timize. Yes - - ' Yes Yes Vehicle^`Extension Recall Mode None None None Min Min Min 1Nalk Time (s) � Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian CIIs (#/hr) 0S. Act Effct Green (s) 10.3 10.3 7.1 44.5. 41.8 41.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0 1,6 0 16 .0;10 0 67 0 67' v/c Ratio 0.30 0.14 0.10 0.25 0.34 0.11 Control Delay i 3°9 �i 5 Queue Delay . 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Deiay 13 9 6°5F" , ,139 0 . 3 5 5 83 2 3 LOS B A B A A . A Approach Approach LOS B. A �.A Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Pagel Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future 2025 With Project AM 16: Dakota & Temperance 11/11/2004 I Q"uaue Length:50th (f#) 16 D 3, _ 27 37 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 51 18 18 52 127 22 Irternal;;Lrnk Dist(ft) 2533 1248 2456 Turn Bay Length (ft) Bast Capacity(uph) 53°1 502 213 X799 3400 1097 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 S. illbac'k Oap R du A' 0 0' Q. :' 0 % Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 R'eduCad vIC Ratio 0 16 0 08 0-08 X24' 0 340 11 nt@rS C 900" 1411 'w"3113""" sir a M 5 � Cycle Length: 60. Actuated Cycles Length 562 6 tti �r Natural Cycle: 50 C;ontr;ol„Type Actuated Uncoordrnaed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.34 Irtersectronrgnal [.elay 5 1 Intersection LOS,A> Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.7% ICU Level of Service A AO*is Penrod:(min,)h 5 Splits and Phases: 16: Dakota& Temperance t o2 o4 *3 "�s,^�a w spa,, a+wAW NO OR N 4 o5 v 06 I Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future 2025 With Project AM 18: Clinton & Armstrong 11/11/2004 Lane Configurations v 9 tt r tt r tt" r tt Id`eal,Ftow (upllpl) 190A 1900 19;00 . 1900 1;900 " 1900. 19Q0: 1900:.: 1900: 1900 19:0.0 19:0"0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead+ng!Detector(ft) 5:0 50 50 :5(1 50 ,` 0 50 50 5t > 50 50 50 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T rn+n.g-S- Ph) 15 ... . : 9 15 PRO. 1,.5 9 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00. 0.95 c° 1.00 1.00 0.95. 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0 $50 0'$50 0.850. 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 S, F1, 1770 $539 15;83 1770 3;539 1583 1770' 3539' 1583 1770 3539 1:583 Flt Permitted 0.950 _ 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd Flow(,perm) 177;0 3539 1583 1770 3'i539 " 1'583, , ;1770 ;: 3539:: 1583; 1770 3'539 1;5;83 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lti�k Speed (m"ph) 30 3® .tia 3Q Link Distance (ft) 1356 . 1306 4031 2684 T.raue171me918: Volume (vph) '3 125 52 151 358 13 33 179 99 47 . 780 25 Peak 3Hour Factor92 a 9 0 92 0 92: 0 92 0.;9,2.,: 0:92 Adj. Flow(vph) 3 136 57 164 389 14 36 195 108 51 848 27 LarJe group<Flow(vph r3 1236 '57 164 389 14 3E"' 195 108; 51 848 27 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Permitted Phases 48 2 6 Detector Phases. 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimuri Split(s) 8h5 20;;5 2 5 i8 5 20'5 20 5 8 5;' 20 5 85 2:0'.:5 20.5 Total Split(s) 8.5 20.5 20.5 13.0 25.0 25.0 8.5 23.0 23.0 8.5 23.0 23.0 Total�Sp'li (%,) 131"% 31 5% 31 5p/° 20;0%a 3855°1° 3;8;5% 1v3 1%o w5 4%' 35 4%: 13 1: 35 4% 354% :: Maximum Green (s) 4.5 16.0 16.'0 9.0 20.5 20.5 4.5 18.5 18.5 4.5 ' 18.5 18.5 Mello �TmeR(s ' 0 3'5 35 ' 30 35 35 3Q 35 35 30 3." 3;5 .,t ..: x�nx .u... .. .. s r, r. lk _:_10 1..0 P All Red Time-(s) f 1.0 1..0 .,I,..o 1 0 1 0 J-0 .1.0 1 0 T..O 1:0 ti LedlLagRII , , Lag 5 Lead Lag ` LaLead, ;Lag Lag' Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes. Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehiclextenstion 3z 0 3-r 0 3z;0 3.0 30 3:0 "3,0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min 1Nalk Time (s) 50 50 50 50, 50;: 50' .. 5:0 5:0 Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Ped'estnart Calls (#/hr); w0 u 0° c0 b 0; :0 0 3 Act Effct Green (s) .4.6 8.6 8.6 8.3 16.8 16.8 4.6 18.0 18.0 4.6 18.0 18.0 ated g/C Ratio 0 38 0 18 Mop. a;17 ActuD 3s5 035 Q 09 8 38 0 38 0 09 0,:3;8, 0`38 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.21 0.17 0.55 0.31 .0.02 0.23 0.14 0.16 0.33 0.63 0.04 G'ontroJ Delay 27=0 1'9;.918, 2$ 31::5 1 fi.5 6.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T©tal Delay 27 ® 1:9.9 .7 8 .28 3 -12 8 8 3 29.2 12:7 45 31.5 16.5 6.7 LOS C B A C B A C B A C B A Approach Defy i 65 172 11 9 17:,0 Approach LOS B B B B Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future 2025 With Project AM 18: Clinton & Armstrong 11/11/2004 Queue Length`50th (ft{), 1 17 0. 41 33 A 9 . 17. 0 13 92% l Queue Length 95th (ft) 8 42 25 #127 95 11 37 47 28 48 204 15 Internal Link Dist('ft) 127`6 1``226 : 3951 2604 Turn Bay Length (ft) - Base Capacity(uph) 152 1087 526 324 1:483 672 155:;::; 1,427 703' 155 1427 654 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5"pillbackCap Retluctr0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio ,5�1 0 260 a2 0 23 0 14 :01',!"."5 0 33 0 5'9 O D4. A"rea Type Other Cycle Length: 65 Actuated Cycle Leng#h 49 4 Natural Cycle: 65 _ C'ontrol'fype actuated Unoobrdinafed O „ Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.63 Intersec(in Signal DelrayInteectin Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis;0e -d (mm) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is.maxis after twa cycles. I : Splits and Phases: 18' Clinton &Armstrong 01 t'> o2 03 � A p� 01-1 MIN o5 1� og6 y o7 08 'O �5 -:. %g' s' Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 4 { Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future 2025 With Project AM 19: Shields &Armstrong 11/11/2004 Lane Configurationstt r ttt Ideal Flow (vph°pl) 190:0 1900 19;00 1'000 1!:900 '1900 ";1900, 1900 1900` 1900 19.00 1900 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leaden Detector ft 50 50 50 >0 50 5(7 50,. 50. 5,0- 50 50 50 9 ( ,) Trailing Detector(ft) 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) mv5i. 9 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Fit % ` .. . ... . .0 850 Q.850 0 850E 0 850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 S:atd ,flow,(prof) 1770 3539 15x83 1770 3.;539 1583 1770 3539: 1,583'< 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd .Flow (perch) 1770 35;39 1583 1770 3539 -1583 1770' 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said "F,low(RTOR) 233. 104 226 2Z7 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. .1.00 1.00 Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30q 30 Link Distance (ft) 1356 1306 2684 2656 Travel Time (s) 3Q`8 y29 �Y T 61 0 60;4 Volume (vph) 48 156 214 428 336 w 96 224 64 208. 237 325 255 Freak Hour Factor 0 9 0 92 ®=9Q'9 0'92 ®92 0 92 0 92; 0 92 0:92 .0.92 0.:92 €' Adj. Flow(vph) 52 170 233 465 365 104 243 70 226 258 353 277 Lane�Gro`uplow 1uph 52 1x0 , . 23 465,, 365 104 a, 243 70 . 22 258 35;3 277 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Frotected Phases 7 43 $ f Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 =6 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 .4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 . 4.0 4.0 mUrn SplitO 8 20':5 2,0'5 8 5 20 5 20 5. 8 5 20.5 20:5: 85 20:5 20.5 Total Split (s) 10.9 20.5 20.5 29.0 38.6 38.6 18.0 21.5 21.5 19.0 22.5 22.5 Total Spllt(%) ; 121% 22c8✓o ,22$%z 32`2°0,42.9%,4 9% 20 0°Io 23.9%,"23 9°l025.0°10 25.0% Maximum Green (s) 6.9 16.0 16.0 25.0 34.1 34.1 14.0 17.0 17.0. : 15.0 18:0 18.0 , 5 Yellow Time fs);, 3.0 35 3Y0 3 5 3 5,:; 3 0;` 3 6 3 5; 3-.0 3:5 3:5 All-Red,Time:(s) 1:.0 1;0. 1_:.0 . ,. 1:0 1.0.: . _1.0_, 1.0;_: 10:_ LLad/Lag Leatl Lag L: g rLeaci` Lag, Lag" Lead Lag,' Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag ' Otimize? Yes- Yes. Yes -Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s). 3.0 „3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3`0 3 b 3t0 30 30 30. Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk Time5:0 5:0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 F�;edesfran Cals Act Effct Green (s) ..6.5 9.9 9.9 23.6 31.5 31.5 13.3 12.9 12.9 14.1 13.7 13.7 Actuated g/C Ratio Q8 Oy93 013 . 031 0 41 041 017 0 17`' 0 1, 0.18 0.1;8 0:1-8 v/c Ratio 0.36 0.37 0.57 0.86 0.25 0.15 0.79 0.12 0.50 0.79 0.56 0.54 Control Delay . r 4352$ $ 3 40 11 °3 4,7 49 Q 2g8' 7,4, 47 1 31.3 71 <` Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 tal Delay 43 5 32 8 :8 3 40 1 17 3 4 7 49"0 .: 28.8, 7.4 47 To .1 31:;3' 7:1 LOS D _ C A D B A D C A D C A APProaeh Delay 21;5 27 3 28:9 28.4 Approach LOS C C C C Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future 2025 With Project AM " 19: Shields & Armstrong 11/11/2004 Queue Length 50th (ff) ;25r,. 41 0 211 67 0 116 15 0 1.22 84' 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 64 . 73 61 #435 107 31 #264 35 58 #274 134 63 L'nternal;'Link Dist(ft) ' 1276 1226 2604 2576 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity`(vph) 151 708 .603 570 1562 757-' 324: 769 521 346 810 576 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cauctn0 0 p 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 , 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Red„ucd vlc,R°atio070 09- 6 (3 43 0 75 p 44 0;4$ tn�ersect�on�umm` � . .;.,a,..,.��.,.,.,.. - ..�Z,;.„�n Area pl. . Other; Cycle Length: 90 A7cft,iated Cycle Length 76 8^' ... Y Natural Cycle: 90 Controf'TypeActuatcd Uncoordinated Maximum vIc Ratio: 0.86 lntersecfion �gnal De27 , i tioI atersection LQS'' C Intersec h lay .� Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Penod�{mm15EIR - E . # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum£aftEr two cycles Splits and Phases: 19: Shields &Armstrong a1 02 41, 03 1-7,* 04 N .� 1,111, .nt z w - i6i£V� �iSY�.9�R� �€.' '���I 'a£.�$.�����,t m5 'I . 06 07 08 33=6s Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future 2025 With Project AM 20: Dakota & Armstrong 11/11/2004 TImo +,. 4l Lane roup �w�� EBL �ET� $R � 1 ,F��UU$TWBR,, NBL ABT182� S,B: � ST g PSBR Lane Configurations . !IF (uphill) 1900 1,000 1900 19D0 1900 , 1900 ;1900 1,900;; , 19,00, 1,90Q 19010 1900 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0' 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 S. - 50• 50 50. 50 S0 50 . 50: 50 50 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (rnph)'. 15 9 15 , 9 15 9 15: 9 Lane Util. Factor. 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 :rt 0 8500 850. 0 $50. 0.850 Flt Protected : 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 S;atdt Flow(prof) 170 3539 1583 170 $539', . 1583 a :177Q 3539; 15$3' 177:0 3539 15:83 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Said Flow(perm) 1770 353x915:83 170 3539 „ 15$3, ,;177,0 3539•' 1583` 177;0 3539 158;3 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes S'a#d ,Flow(RTOR) 51 33 T: 54 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link Link Distance (ft) 1356 2613 2656 2679 Travel Ttme•(sa; 3Q'8 59 4 60 4' N Volume(vph) 22 51 47 6 75 30. 34 291 6 8 - 674 50 Peek Hcsur Factor 0 92 092 0'32 yd 92 0 92 0 92 ® 92 0 92: 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 Y . .x .. Adj. Flow(vph) 24 55 51 7 82 33 37 316 7 9 733 54 i:.:. 3 5? 7 82 33 37 e $16. 7 Lane Grbu,p Flow(vph) 24 �5 . . 9 73. 54 Turn Type Prot.. Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm ProtectedPhases 7 ;4 x � .3 $, r;' S ry 2: 1" 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector`Phases 4, 4 3 8 8 5 2• 1 6; 6 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimurrn Spi1t(s)• , 8;5 20 5 5 8 5° ' 20 5 , 20 5 8.5 `r 20-5 20°5: 8 5 2Q'5 20.5 Total Split,(s) 8.5 20.5 20.5 8.5 20.5 20.5 9.0 22.5 22.5 8.5 22.0 22.0 Total`Spl,lt14'2% 342% X34 2% 14.2%a�34 2% 3,4 2°Io 1;a 0%„ 7 5% 37 5%0 14 % ,36 % 3.6-.7% j Maximum Green (s) 4:0 16.5 16.5 4:5 16.0 16.0. 5.0 18.0 18.0 4.5 17.5 17.5 1 l�eflow 30 5;' 3.5. 3'0 3'.5' 3:5 AA-Red Time,.(s) .. 1.0 1.0 1.0 :1.0 1..0. 1-.0 1:0. .. :;1:.0: 1.0 1..0 .. .1.;0- 1.0---.1 Lead/Lag ,. Lead, Lag La Lead`:` La La Lead_.. Lag Lag Lag Lead- Lag g g: . g Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes' `Yes Yes VehiclEx#ensron (s) 30 3y0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 (� 3 0;: 3,0 3,Q 3.':0 .3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min Walk 5 0' S 0 50 50 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 . 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 RedestranC, l1s (#/hr)= `.. 0 0,. -.g:. . ,ry �. 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 5.9 8.5 8.5 5.9 9.0 9.0 6.6 Y 42.6 42.6 5.9 40.2 40.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0r 10 0;4 ,0;14 410, 0 15 Q.75 v/c Ratio 0.14 0.11 0.19 0.04 0.15 0.12 0.19 0.11 0.01 0.05 0.28 0.04 C;ontrol.•Delay: 21 1 14 3, 7 3 20 3- 13 9 8 2 19 3 4 7 5.5' 20:4 6.7 4.0 i' Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 l'otal Delay 2`1 1 4 3 . ,3. 20 3 4::7 5.5 2,04 6 7 4.0 LOS C B A _ C B A B A A C A A ApproachsDelay "128 w. v`:.� 2 $' Approach LOS B B A A Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group, Page 7 Lanes, Volumes,Timings Future 2025 With Project AM 20: Dakota & Armstrong 11/11/2004 Laperoup $, :: . . _,..g`� EBT BR WBL iNB VdBRNL NBT NB SBL SBT_ BF2 Queue Langth,50th (ft) 1 1 0 1 1 0 1.; 0, 0 1 0 0. Queue Length 95th (ft) 25 20 23 12 26 19 33 58 6 13. ' 141 18 InternalLink is (ft), 1276 2533 2576;; 2599 Turn Bay Length (ft) Buse Gapacity'(vph) 1<74 1027 X96 a74 x;027 483 " 199 ° 2820: 1263 1`74 2670 120;8 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 ',` 0 0' 0 0 0' 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v!c R:atio 0 14 0 05 0::10 0 04 0 08 0 07 019, 0 1a 0 01 0.05 07 0;04 rterse�f�on£ umma Area Type Other;'. _ Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle'!Len,gtt': 53 5 Natural Cycle: 60 G:ontrol ype Actuated Unco Or.dmafined , Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.28 Intersectidby, tgnal Defy= 7 6 lntersaction LAS`-A Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.8% . ICU Level of Service A An'zJ' '15 Splits and Phases: 20: Dakota &Armstrong 01 I o2 m3 -'Z,* o4 Of BURROW '5 4 05 06 07 �--- 08 r 2,2 'E`�2'���ai���.����..���, " IR5.0M(.JrF.�k; L' Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 8 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future 2025 With Project PM 16: Dakota & Temperance ' 11/11/2004 , ` t - Lane Configurations ttt ttt r Ideal Flow(ypfipl) 1:900 1>900 1"900, 1-900 1900 1900 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 L'eadin'g;Detecaor(ft) ..50K. 50 5"0 50 50 ..:':. 50 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tjurnmg Speed'(n? :h)' 1`5_ 9 15 9:. Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 Flt Protected 0.950` 0.950 Satd Flow(p,r,=ot) 177;0 177© 35'085 50$5 15$3 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 S. Flow(perm) 17-770',-. 15$3 1770 5D85 .-.5085 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link Distance (ft) 2613 1328 2536 Ti All`Gime 4 4 30 2 57 6` ,. .,.. Volume (vph) 95 91 102 1614 1403 91 Peak H:OUr Factor 0 92 0 92 Ox.92 0..92 0 92' �0 92 Adj. Flow(vph) 103 99 111 1754 1525 99 Lane Group FI'ow(uph) 1'03' 99 1;11, '1,7Z4- 11525 J Turn Type Perm Prot Perm Protected Phases Permitted Phases 4 6 Detector Phases ,.. 4 4 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 20%5 2fl 5 85 205 :205 205 Total Split(s) 20.5 20.5 : 12.0. 39.5 27.5 27.5 Total Split(°la)' _ 0% 65;;8% 5 8°Ja 45 8°f Maximum Green (s) 16.0 16.0 8.0 35.0 23 0 23 0 l Yellow Tme(s) 35 35 3 0 5 8'$6. 3`�v ;-.Alt=Red Time.(s) .1.0 1-:0 1.0 .1:0. 1-.0 1:.0. Lead/Lag Lead. Lag- Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Y.es Vehacle Extension (s)'; 3,0 3 0 :3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 Recall Mode None None . None Min Min Min Walk Tune.(S),. 5:0 5A 5 0 5 0 5 0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian C'[ls(#/hr); 0 0. , Act Effct Green (s) 10.5 10.5 8.6 48.3 36.4 36.4 Actuated 03 d 55 0".55." v/c Ratio 0.37 0.30 0.49 0.47 0.54 0.11 Control Delay 11 :9 1 27 4 4 f 1 2 . . `2 9 .. � .- Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delar 19:9 6 1 27 4 4,5 1'1 2 F 2 9 _. LOS B A C A B A ;4pproach Delay 13a` 5 9 10' Approach LOS B A B Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1 lanes, Volumes, Timings Future 2025 With.Project PM 16: Dakota & Temperance 11/11/2004 Queue Lengthy-50th (ft) 28 32 : ..f 7, Queue Length 95th (ft) 63 30 74 126 191 21 Internal Lm ( ) 4 k Dist ft 2533 1=248 256 ... Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Opacity,(uph) 43.6 464 237 3:739 2827 924 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0, 0 0 S:�illlSaolC"Clap`Reductn 0 Q 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 .:- 0 0 Rcduoedry/c Ratio x„0 24 0 21 0 47 Q 47 0 54 . 0 11 Area Type Other Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Gycle Leng#h 66 Natural..Cycle: 60 Control TYPe Actuated Uncoord�n,ated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.54 Intersection Signal Delay 8 Intrsecbon LOQ A Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min)`;15 Splits and Phases: 16: Dakota &Temperance Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future 2025 With Project PM 18: Clinton & Armstrong 11/11/2004 Lane Configurations ld�al`Ffdw(�rphpl), 190n0 1°900 1900 zf900 1900.. .19©C y' 1900 .' 1900 1900190;0 1900 1':900 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0. 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 LeadingDetector(ft) 5'0 50 50 50 h 50 't 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 .0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 Turning Speed,( Tp, ) 9' 15. 9 15 9 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00. . 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 .1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt ;t 0 $50 0 850:;'-. 0 850: 0.85:0 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 S;atd Ffow4(prot) x770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1<583 17370,`: 3539' 1583 1770 3539 15..:83 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd FL'ow(perm)...... 1770 3539 1583 1,770 3539 153 1770 3539 1583 177;0 3539 15'.83. Right Turn on Red Yes. Yes Yes Yes Satd FElow(RTOR) 59 46 a 40 90 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 . 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link Speed (mph) 30,. 30 30'. 0: Link Distance(ft) 1356 . 1306 4031 2684 Tavel Times) „f 30 8 29 7, 91 6 6:1;0 Volume (vph) 76 501 54 70 231 42 65. 695 37 43 523 83 P, dk,hiouracfor 092 „0 92 O ryg 'E az Oy92,. 0 �2 0 92 0 92. 0 92 0 92 092 0:92 0:92 Adj. Flow(vph) 83545 59 76 251 46 71. 755 40 47 568 90 I;ane Group,Flow('ypf�) 83f 551/ X59 X fl�6' 251 46 7,1,. 755 40 47 568 90 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm. Protected Physes: 7 g 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Pp etector Phases -' 7 . 4 4. 3 , 8 8 5: 2< 2 1. 6` 6 Minimum Initial(s) . 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 i l Minimum 5pltt(s) ;; $Y5 2p,5 20 5 ' Y 8y505 20 5, 8Y5 20 20 5 85 20;5 20 5 . Total Split(s) 9.0 20.5 20.5 9.0 20.5 20.5 9.0 22.0 22.0 . 8.5 21.5 21.5 Total Split 34 2% 15;Obl° 34 2% 34 2°�0 :15 0% 36 7%<36 7%: i4,2% 35 8E% 35 8% �. Maximum Green (s) 5.0 16.0 16.0 5.0 16.0. 16:0 : 5.0 17.5 17.5 4.5 17.0 17.0, r Yellow Tune(s 30 3:5 r35 3 03 5, 3 5;. ; 30 ' 3 5` 3. 3.0 All-Re.dTime:(s) 1`0 1Q 1,.0 1.0 I.-G:. 1._0:. . 1.0._ , .1,4,.. :..1.01, 1;_0 1::0 , ._1.0 . Leaci/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead l.ag y Lag ':Lead Lag; Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes .Yes . Yes vehicle;Extension3E0 3r0 3i:0 3;0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min "Mtn (s) 5 0 5 0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 . 11.0 11.0 11.0 F?:edestnn>Calls (#/hO 0 " 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 5.3 13.2 13.2 . 5.3 13.2 13.2 5.3 15.3 15.3 4.8 15.1 15.1 Actuated g/Cato d 1'1 0;29 0:29 0 11 ;09 0 2g10.4.1. l 0 33, 0.33 0.10 0.33 0.33 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.54 0.12 0.40 0.25 0.09 0.37 0.64 0.07 0.27 0.49 0.16 Control D3glay „ 34$ 17 4 33 1 ;15Y8. 5 6 31 17 1,, 6 4 30:0 16;0 61 52 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . Total Delay 34,,:8 17 4 6 1 33 l 158� 31 Ir 0, 17 30,:00: 5.2 LOS C B A C B A C B A C B A Approach 0 A5 6 Approach LOS B B B B Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 3 p% Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future 2025 With Project PM 18: Clinton & Armstrong 11/11/2004 Iw 41 �• , :. f— L�neGroGp� p'� �r �,,�, Queue Length-50th (ft)` 28 88 0 26 37 0 " 2, 118 0 16 85� 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #82 132 23 #73 63 20 #67 182 18 45 134 27 Lnternaf Lmk Dist(ft) 1276 1'226 3951; 2604 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base.Capacity (vph); 191 1264 603 .191 . 1,264 595 191 1388;3 645 1.7.3 1360 664 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S;polback Cap Reductn 0 :0. . 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced y!c R`atio 0 43 0 43 0=10 fly 40 .;( 20 0,08;.; 0 37 .: 0 54 0.0.6 0.27 0::4.2 0.14 a' - 11trSectlQ�1 nld` _ar _�a�raa.«1.a_<u; '?�.. r ea`Type` Q. Cycle Length: 60 AciatM. ed t✓ycle;Lengh 46 1„r Natural Cycle: 60 G;ontro'1Type,Actuated Uncoordmafed Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.64 Inlersecfion Signal,Delay 17 5 Intersection LOS B. Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Peri # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is..maximurn aftertivuo cy,:cles£ Splits and Phases: 18: Clinton &Armstrong f - i. . Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future 2025 With Project PM 19: Shields & Armstrong 11/11/2004 ane op EBL kE67� EBS 1VBL�WI3T �11(8R NgitBTNBR5�1 SBT58F Lane Configurations tt r tt r '� tt r I tt r Ideal Flh I 1h 90.0< 1900` 1900: 1900 1900 19:00 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 . 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading£Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 = 50 50 50 50 50' 50 5;0 50 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turn4.118,peed (mph�, 1.5 ' 9 15 " 1'S 9; 15 9 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0 850 0 850 0:85;0 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Sattl Flow(prot) , 1770, , 3'539 1.583 1770 3539. 1583 1;1770 :; 35a::, 1583: 1770 3;539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd Flow(perm)J., 17:70 35; 9 15x83 1770 3:539 , 1583;. ;;1770. ; 3539`:' 9583 17.70 .3539 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Sattl Flow(RTOR) : . 308 X86vm4„67 1.63 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link Speetl (mph.) 30 4 ."' 430. 30`' ;3' Link Distance(ft) 1356 1306 2684 . 2656 Tuel�aTime x Volume (vph) - 262 377 283. . 384 299 355 278 330 ' 476 257 192 150 Peak Hour Factor 0 9; 0;92 092 b92 , x0 92 ;0 92 0 92 -1 0 92 0.92 0.92 0:92 0:92 Adj. Flow(vph) 285 410 308 417 325 386 302 359 517 279 209 163 L ne Group Flow,(�pfij 28 41e0 ,3.08, u417 32°5, :`386 302 35 51:7 279 209 163 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm I ? o#ected Phases 7' 5.. 2. 6. f Permitted Phases 4• 8 2 fi Detector Phases 4 4 3 $ 8. 5<.': 2 2 1 6 6 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s), 8.5 20`v 20 5, 8 5, 20 5 20 5-.'" 8.5 20.5' 2..0, 8.5 20.5 20.5 Total Split(s) 22.6 20.5 20.5 27.0 24.9 24.9 21.0 22.5 22.5 20.0 21.5 21.5 Total,S„pllt(%o�r= 25 1% 22 8% 22 8�/0 30:0% 2T % 27 7% 23 3% 25 0% '2-5.09 : 22.2% 23.9% 23.9% Maximum Green (s) 18.6 16.0 16.0 23.0 20.4 20.4 17.0 18.0 18.0 16.0 17.0 17.0 Yellow l line O 3.0 355 3 p 3 5 35 3 b 3 5 X3,5 3 b 35 3 5 ,:. . M '- All-Red Time.(s) w:,. 9.0 1.0. ,1.0 . . 1..0 1.0 1.0 .: 1 0, 1,0:. 1;0. 1_.,P, 1.0. 1.0 - L2atl/Lag -L"@a<i> Lag= L'ag Lead ;Lag Lags 1Lead ,. Lag.' Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-;Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes =.Yes- Yes ---Yes. --.Yes Yes Vehicle:Extension,,{.s,),: 3:0 3 0 3 0, 3 0 3 0 3,0 3 0` 3.0 34.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min WWI Ti ,0, 5 0 5.0 5.0 50 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Petle trlan Calls(#/hr); RO 0 0 Ok (3; 0 0 0 Act Effct Green(s) 16.3 14.4 14.4 21.6 19.7 19.7 16.2 14.8 14.8 15.1 13.8 13.8 Actuated`g/C;Ratiom ' ' 0 2On }0 7 0;17, t3 2G0 24 0 2 0 20 „ 0 b 18 : 0 10 0 18 17 0'17 v/c Ratio 0.81 0.66 0.58 0.90 0.38 0.57 0.87 0.56 0.77 0.86 0.35 0.41 Control 3Delay. 4'4;9 36:4 $ 2 48 9 . :28=9= 6 8, 54 3 18'.A 1.2:0 54:4 322 8.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TotalDelay. 44::9 36;4 8 2 48 9 28 9 6.8 54:3 33.6 12:.0 544 32.2 8:0 LOS D D A D C A D C B D C A Approach belay 30,:2 .28 7 . 28 4 , 356 Approach LOS C : C C D Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future 2025 With Project PM 19: Shields & Armstrong 11/11/2004 WBr'WBR"., T0SBR Queue Length;50th(ft) 1'49, „ 1,11 0 223 80 0 164 95 24 152 54 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #277 163 70 #406 122 72 #320 139 135 #300 86 51 I:mternal:;Link D`iSt(ft); 1276:. 1226 2604 2576 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base,Capacity;'(uph) ; 394 7:00 560 492 896,.; 689: 367 770 71.0 345 728: 45'5 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S...' back Cap.Reductr0. 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R'educetl uic R` tlo 0.7,2 Q5,9 055„ 085 ;(3536 0 56.x'; 0 82 047; 0 73; 0 81 0;29 0;3'6 Area,Type Other'. Cycle Length: 90 Actuetd Natural Cycle: 90 C:ontral hypeActuatetl Uncoordrnated „ Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.90 IiStersecfionSrO'nal Delay 30r 4 `Iniersection LOQ F C Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis-Period (min).15 #. 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown rs maximum after;two cycles, Splits and Phases: 19: Shields &Armstrong r Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future 2025 With Project PM 20: Dakota & Armstrong 11/11/2004 P;°a e Group z' �EBL�)�B 1=8fIUB WBT' NBRNB� �N81 ` �NBR "SBS SBSBR Lane Configurations tt r tt , rtt r tt r Ideal Flow(vphcpl) 1900 1900 1„900 1900 1i,9 1900 1900 1900 1,900 19Q0 19b0 1900 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 ' 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading petector"(ft); 50 50 50 , 50 50 50 50 , 50 50. 50 50 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TarnGng Speed(rra,ph} 15 9 1S z 9 15< :9 1'S 9 „ . Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 . 1.00 1.00: 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt X50 0$50 0 850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0:950 0.950 Satd 177;0 3539= 15:83 .1`770, 3=539. . 1583, ; 1770.;; 3539: 1583;' 177:(? 3539 1'583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd„Flow(Perm) 177°;Q, 3539 15$3 1`70 3'539. . 1583 1770;'' 3530=; 1583: 1:770 3539 1:583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes :. Satd Flouv(RTORa„ 2 1.8 14: 27 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link Spemph} 30 30: 3n 3 Link Distance (.ft) 1356 2613 2656 2679 Travel'Tme 6O,yd 60;9 Volume (vph) 73 86 20 24 92 17 40 709 13 57 572 25 Peak Hour Fac#ar 0 92 0 0 0 J2 0 92 a 9 OR92 > _©92` b 92`," 0<92 0 92 0 92. 0.92 b.sti.. >.. Adj. Flow(vph) ` 79 93 22 26 100. 18 43 771 14 62 622 27 1 Lane Groupj=1ow( phi X79 93 ri 322 . ,2"6 100.. 1$ 43 771 i4; 62 622_ 27 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm P;oteeted Pi�ases 4 . .' 8 5:' 2;' 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detec#orAPhas`es Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Mnirnurn Split' s 8 5 20w 20 5 z8tg 5 X20 5 8 5 2020.5 2 Total Split(s) 9.0 1 21.0 21.0 8.5 20.5 20.5 8.5 22.0 22.0 8.5 22.0 22.0 Total Spli#(�o}.;'; 15D°lo 85fl°!° 3540°l° ,14,2°/Q� 34:2°1b 342°!0 1g'L°lo 3S 7%'::36,7%: 14.29/.0 36':7% 367% 1 Maximum Green (s) 4.5 17.0 17.0 4.5 16 0 16 0 4 5 17.5 17.5 4.5 17.5 17.5 Yellow Time s; 3630 3,0 3 0 _ 3 5 3 6 -, 3 0: 3.5, 3 5' 3;0 3;5 35 ( .).. All-Red Time_(s) :._ 1.0_ 1_.0 1.0 1.0 1 0.. ,:.:;1.0 1:0..:. :.1..0 1:.0: 1,.0 ;1,0 1: 0 . La L Lead La Lag; Lead, Lig Lag -4 ` Lead/Lag Leaf L;ag Lag Lead,. 9 g. 9.' Lead Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes' °=Yes_ Yes Yes .=Yes Yes - Yes C/ehicle Extensron=(s) 3 0 3'0 3 Q 3 0 3s0� 3..0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min 1Nalk Trme(s)< 5y0 5 A 5 0 5 9 5 0 : 5 0; 5,0° 5:0 .> Flash pont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 : 11.0 11.0 11.0 P;edestnan falls 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 6.2 13.3 13.3 5.5 8.9 8.9 5.5 35.9 35.9 5.6 38.0 38.0 Actuated g/C R;atio 0,1fl 01 01 Q`98 . ,x9�4 014 0 09 , 01 6a; 0.09 0 64 Q;;64 v/c Ratio 0.46 0.12 0.06 0.18 0.20 0.08 0.28 0.36 0.01 0.39 0.27 0.03 A72^ �fl 8 4 6 5; 28 7 90 5 6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 ToIal,Delay€ "E 29,5 ` X14:0 8 6 y 26 8 7 4 0 3 27 2„ 10 8 6.5 28.7 9;0 56 LOS C B A C B B C B A C A A Appreacfi Delay 19;7 '18.2 11.6 40.6 Approach LOS B B B B Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future 2025 With Project PM 20: Dakota & Armstrong 11/11/2004 , - t— ���L� `"1V6�'� NBR Queue,Lth 50th (ft;) c2 9, 0 7 X13 ,': 0 1� 96 0 eng1=8 50 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #64 28 15 26 31 13 37 151 9 48 118 13 I;iternal Lmk Dist,(ft) 127fi6 2533 ,,: 25;76'. 2599' Turn Bay Length (ft) B'ase..C'apacity (vph.) 173 1:034 _ 478. ,,48 941 434: 1=52 2,158 97.1 157 2269 1025 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 00 0 0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 SpillbaCk Cap Reductn 0 0 0. 0 0 D 0 0' D 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0 4:6 0 09 0'.05 Q 1�8 n 11sb 04 0 28 0 36; 0 01 0 39 . 0 27 003 Area Type Cycle Length: 60 Ac#ua�ted Cycle.Leng#h 59 2T v Natural Cycle: 60 . _- Gontrol:Type Aotuate.d Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.46 IYtersectian�Stgnal Delay 1�� , kk._..... .. ,x�l`ntersactfo:n'LOS: �j1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.6% ICU Level of Service A Anlysis z.. # .'65th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.. tau ue 9b 4 rn �,uycl s Splits and Phases: 20: Dakota &Armstrong Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 8