Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutT-5436 - Conditions of Approval - 4/25/2006 City of IlClslCfi�� �\I/� Planning & Development Department 2600 Fresno Street- Third Floor Nick P. Yovino Fresno, California 93721-3604 Director (559) 621-8277 FAX (559) 498-1012 November 3, 2005 Please reply Paul Bernal (559) 621-8073 Provost & Pritchard Inc. Attention: Jeff O'Neal 286 West Cromwell Avenue Fresno, California 93711-6162 Dear Applicant: SUBJECT: FINAL ACTION BY THE FRESNO CITY COUNCIL REGARDING REZONE APPLICATION NO. R-05-33 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EAST CHURCH AND SOUTH PEACH AVENUES (APN: 481-090-27 &28) At is regular scheduled meeting on November 1, 2005; the Fresno City Council took the following action regarding the above-referenced application: 1. Approved the environmental finding of Environmental Assessment No. R-05-33/T-5436/C-05-110 dated August 18, 2005, that the project conforms to the provisions of the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR No. 10130). 2. Approved Rezone Application No. R-05-33 requesting to rezone approximately 31 acres of property from the AE-5/UGM(Exclusive Five Agricultural District/Urban Growth Management)zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential District/Urban Growth Management) zone district. On September 21, 2005, the City of Fresno Planning Commission approved the following: Approved Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM requesting to subdivide approximately 31 acres of property into a 168-lot, single family residential subdivision. 2. Approved Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110 proposing a planned development, which includes reduced lot sizes for the proposed 168-lots of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM. Enclosed is a copy of the Planning Commission Resolutions and City Council Ordinance Bill adopted for the rezone and conditional use permit applications and tentative tract map. Please note that this action shall become effective thirty-one days after is passage. If you have any questions regarding these items please contact me at the number listed above or via email at Paul.Bernal@fresno.gov. Sincerely, NNING DIVISION aul Bernal, Planner III Enclosures: Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 12305 [Rezone], 12306 [Tract], 12307 [CUP] City Council Ordinance Bill No. 2005-127 Cc: RZR Enterprises, LLC 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite K200, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 G`''of ,��� REPORT% rHE CITY COUNCIL f �cew AGENDA ITEM NO. COUNCIL MEETING 10-11-05 - October 11, 2005 APPROVED BY - FROM: NICK P. YOVINO, Director DEPARTMENT DIRECT Planning and Development De ent CITY MANAGER BY: GILBERT J. HAR , PI Hing n r Planning Division — SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF REZONE APPLICATION NO. R-05-33 AND ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. ' R-05-33/T-5436/C-05-110 KEY RESULT AREA Customer Satisfaction RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions: 1. APPROVE the environmental finding for Environmental Assessment No. R-05-33/T-5436/C-05- 110 dated August 18, 2005, that the project proposal conforms to the provisions of the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR No. 10130). 2. APPROVE Rezone Application No. R-05-33 which proposes to rezone the project site from the AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural District/Urban Growth Management) zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential District/Urban Growth Management)zone district. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group Inc., on behalf of RZR Enterprises, has filed Rezone Application No. R-05-33, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM, and Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110 pertaining to approximately 31.87 gross acres (30.71 net acres) of property located on the southwest corner of East Church and South Peach Avenues. Rezone Application No. R-05-33 proposes to reclassify the subject site from the AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural District/Urban Growth Managemeno zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential District/Urban Growth Managemeno zone district. The subject property is planned for medium density residential land uses and is developed with one rural single-family residence with accessory structures. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM proposes to subdivide the property into a 168-lot, single family residential subdivision. Conditional Use Permit Application C-05-110 proposes a planned development, which includes reduced lot sizes for the proposed 168 lots. According to the land use consistency table adopted with the 2025 Fresno General Plan (and applied within all community plans), the medium density residential planned land use designation allows 4.99 to 10.37 units per acre. Overall, the proposed subdivision density is 5.27 units per acre. The applications would bring the subject property into conformance with the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the Roosevelt Community Plan. On September 21, 2005, the Fresno City Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezone application to the City Council. The Planning Commission also took action to approve related Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM and Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110 on the subject property. It is noted that the Planning Commission action.on the tentative tract map and conditional use permit is final and therefore, no action is required by the City Council. REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Rezone Application No. R-05-33 October 11, 2005 Page 2 KEY OBJECTIVE BALANCE Council action regarding this proposed land use application optimizes the three Key Objectives of Customer Satisfaction, Employee Satisfaction, and Financial Management. Affirmative action by the Council will result in timely deliverance of the review and processing of the application as is reasonably expected by the applicant/customer. Prudent financial management is demonstrated by the expeditious completion of this land use application inasmuch as the applicant/customer has paid to the city a fee for the processing of this application and that fee is, in turn, funding the operations of the Planning and Development Department. Employee satisfaction is derived from the fact that the professional and technical staff, who have reviewed and made a recommendation on this land use application, have done so in a thorough and professional manner, thereby enhancing the sense of accomplishment in the completion of the application process. PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT A 168-lot, single family residential subdivision to be developed at an overall density of 5.27 units per acre APPLICANT RZR Enterprises (Engineer: Provost & Pritchard) LOCATION Southwest corner of East Church and South Peach Avenues (Council District 5, Councilmember Dages) SITE SIZE Approximately 31.87 gross acres LAND USE Existing - Rural single family residence Proposed - 168-lot single family residential subdivision ZONING Existing - AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural District/Urban Growth Management) zone district Proposed - R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential District/Urban Growth Management) zoned district PLAN DESIGNATION The proposed R-1/UGM zone district and 168-lot single family AND CONSISTENCY residential subdivision is consistent with the 2025 Fresno General Plan and Roosevelt Community Plan designation of the site for medium density residential planned land uses ENVIRONMENTAL Finding of Conformity to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master FINDING Environmental Impact Report (MEIR) No. 10130 dated August 18, 2005 PLAN COMMITTEE The Roosevelt Community Plan Advisory Committee RECOMMENDATION recommended approval of the proposed project at their July 25, 2005 meeting REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Rezone Application No. R-05-33 October 11, 2005 Page 3 STAFF Approve Rezone Application No. R-05-33 RECOMMENDATION PLANNING COMMISSION On September 21, 2005 the Planning Commission voted to RECOMMENDATION recommend approval of the rezone application by a 5-0 vote with one commissioner absent BORDERING PROPERTY INFORMATION Planned Land Use Existing Zoning Existing Land Use Medium Density R-1/UGM Single Family North Single Family Residential Districrban Residential Residential g y tit/U Growth Management Subdivision AE-5/EA/UGM South Medium Density Agricultural Exclusive Five Acre Rural Residential and Residential Minimum/ExpresswayArea Overlay Agricultural Land District/Urban Growth Management Public Facility AE-5/UGM & R-1/UGM (Elementary School) & Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural Elementary School East Medium-Low Density District/Urban Growth Management& Single and Single Family Residential Family Residential DistricdUrban Growth Residential Management Subdivision Public Facility(Special AE-5/UGM & AE-20/UGM West School) & Medium-High Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural Elementary School Density Residential & District/Urban Growth Management& and Rural Residences Central No. 23 Canal Exclusive Twenty Acre Agricultural District/Urban Growth Management ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING An environmental assessment initial study was prepared for this project in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. This process included the distribution of requests for comment from other responsible or affected agencies and interested organizations. The proposed project has been determined to be fully within the scope of MEIR No. 10130 as provided by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as codified in the Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21157.1(d) and the CEQA Guidelines Section 15177(c). It has been further determined that all applicable mitigation measures of MEIR No. 10130 have been applied to the project, together with project specific mitigation measures necessary to assure that the project will not cause significant adverse cumulative impacts, growth inducing impacts and irreversible significant effects beyond those identified by MEIR No. 10130 as provided by CEQA Section 15178(a). Therefore, staff has issued a finding that the project proposal is in conformance to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR No. 10130) dated August 18, 2005, which incorporates a MEIR Mitigation Monitoring Checklist. This environmental finding was properly published on August 18, 2005, with no comments received to date. REPORT TO THE CITY COUNG,_ Rezone Application No. R-05-33 October 11, 2005 Page 4 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Provost & Pritchard Engineering Inc., on behalf of RZR Enterprises, has filed Rezone Application No. R-05-33, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM, and Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110 pertaining to approximately 31.87 gross acres (30.71 net acres) of property located on the southwest comer of East Church and South Peach Avenues. Rezone Application No. R-05-33 proposes to reclassify the subject site from the AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural District/Urban Growth Management) zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential District/Urban Growth Management) zone district. The subject property is planned for medium density residential land uses and is developed with one rural single-family residence with accessory structures. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM proposes to subdivide the property into a 168-lot, single family subdivision. Conditional Use Permit Application C-05-110 proposes a planned development, which includes reduced lot sizes for the proposed 168 lots. According to the land use consistency table adopted with the 2025 Fresno General Plan (and applied within all community plans), the medium density residential planned land use designation allows 4.99 to 10.37 units per acre. Overall, the proposed subdivision density is 5.27 units per acre. On November 19, 2002, the City Council, through Resolution No. 2002-379, adopted the 2025 Fresno General Plan which also adopted the Roosevelt Community Plan. The Roosevelt Community Plan designates the subject property for medium density residential land uses (4.99 — 10.37 dwelling units per acre). The applicant wishes to pursue development of the subject property with 168 single family homes. The requested R-1/UGM zone district is considered consistent with the medium density residential land use designation. Furthermore, the proposed development with a density of 5.27 dwelling units per acre demonstrates that the project site will be developed within the overall density of dwelling units anticipated by the 2025 Fresno General Plan and Roosevelt Community Plan. Roosevelt Community Plan Citizens' Advisory Committee The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Roosevelt Community Plan. The Roosevelt Community Plan Citizens' Advisory Committee reviewed and recommended approval of the project at their July 25, 2005 meeting. Upon approval of the project the Committee recommended that the subdivision provide enhanced entryways and provide anti-graffiti landscaping to protect the masonry walls located on East Church and South Peach Avenues. The concerns of the committee have been addressed in the Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM dated September 21, 2005. Fresno City Planning Commission On September 21, 2005 the Fresno City Planning Commission considered Rezone Application No. R-05-33, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM and Conditional, Use Permit Application No. C-05-110. The Planning Commission, after a complete hearing took action to recommend approval of the rezone application to the City Council by a vote of 5-0 with one commissioner absent. It is also noted that the Commission, by the same vote, also took action to approve related Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM and Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110. Public Services Water Resources and Public Water Supply The Water Division of the Public Utilities Department has determined that there is an adequate source of water available to serve the project with the implementation of the Urban Growth Management (UGM) service delivery requirements and the environmental impact mitigation measures. It should also be noted that adverse groundwater conditions of limited supply and compromised quality have REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Rezone Application No. R-05-33 October 11, 2005 Page 5 also be noted that adverse groundwater conditions of limited supply and compromised quality have been well-documented by planning, environmental impact report, and technical studies over the past 20 years including the Master Environmental Impact Report No. 10130 for the 2025 Fresno General Plan, Final EIR No. 10100, Final EIR No. 10117, Final EIR No. SCH 95022029 (Fresno Metropolitan Water Resource Management Plan) et al. These conditions include water quality degradation due to DBCP, arsenic, iron, and manganese concentrations; low water well yields; limited aquifer storage capacity and recharge capacity; and, intensive urban or semi-urban development occurring upgradient from the Fresno Metropolitan Area. As a result, if approved, the proposed project would be required to contribute to short-term and long-range water supply and distribution remediation projects in order to adequately address this deficiency. The Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District has indicated that a portion of this project may be accommodated by their facilities, however the remaining portion will be required to be served by temporary facilities until permanent service is available. Sewage Collection System Capacity The Cities of Fresno and Clovis share jointly in the treatment capacity of the Fresno-Clovis Regional Wastewater Treatment and Reclamation Facility. In 1998, the treatment capacity was expanded to accommodate up to 80 million gallons per day, and was upgraded with modernized equipment to safeguard against equipment failures. However, in an attempt to serve the anticipated 790,000 metropolitan area population for the year 2025, one or more sub-regional treatment and reclamation facilities will be required. However, sanitary sewer service is available to serve the site, subject to the mitigation measures imposed with the environmental assessment, and any necessary sewer main extensions and connections. Fire Protection Services The project site is located within the city's UGM area and must comply with the applicable service delivery requirements necessary to provide not less than the minimum acceptable level of fire protection facilities and services appropriate for urban uses. Fire service will be provided by City of Fresno Fire Station No. MV 87 and future Fire Station No. 15, within two-and-one half miles of the subject property. Fresno Unified School District The project site is served by the Fresno Unified School District and is within the attendance boundaries of Story Elementary and Terronez Middle School. Circulation Element Plan Policies and Major Street System Traffic Capacity The development of the project site with the proposed 168 single-family residences, and the surrounding planned land uses designated by the 2025 Fresno General Plan and Roosevelt Community Plan, will be required to complete the planned major street network in accordance with applicable development policies and standards including the Urban Growth Management program. Both plans designate East Church Avenue as a collector street and South Peach Avenue as an arterial street. Arterial streets are typically developed with two travel lanes in each direction with somewhat limited access to abutting properties while Collector streets are typically developed with two travel lanes in each direction but without a median island. However, all street standards provide for a widened pavement width at major street intersections to allow for exclusive left- turn and right-turn lanes as well as bus bays or turnouts. REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Rezone Application No. R-05-33 October 11, 2005 Page 6 As required by the mitigation measures established by the certification of MEIR No. 10130, a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) was prepared by Peters Engineering Group (dated April 15, 2005) to evaluate the number of vehicle trips projected to be generated by the proposed project. Utilizing the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition, and associated computer software together with the COG's computerized traffic model, this analysis predicts the number of vehicle trips that will be generated from the proposed project and surrounding planned land uses, and the direction in which these trips will travel. The TIS analyzed the intersections at Peach and Church Avenues and Peach and Jensen Avenues. The study analyzed 168 single-family residential units. At 168 single-family residential dwelling units, the project is expected to generate an average of approximately 838 vehicle trips per day (VTD). Of these vehicle trips, it is projected that 128 will occur during the morning (7 to 9 a.m.) peak hour travel period and 171 will occur during the evening (4 to 6 p.m.) peak hour travel period. Because much of the immediately surrounding area (i.e. southeasternmost portion of the Roosevelt Community Plan Area) is not developed, the planned major street and intersection improvements have not yet been completed as required by adopted plans, policies and development standards. However, the proposed project, as well as other urban land uses developed as planned by the 2025 Fresno General Plan will be required to construct the planned major street system consistent with the public facility and service delivery requirements of the UGM Program. Required improvements include constructing median opening for left turns-in and outs in South Peach Avenue, dedication and street improvements for East Church and South Peach Avenues and signalizing the intersection at East Jensen and South Peach Avenues. In addition, the developer of this project, in accordance with the mitigation measures of Master Environmental Impact Report (No. 10130) which was certified by the Council with the adoption of the 2025 Fresno General Plan, will be required to pay impact fees specific to the traffic signalization of the major street intersections. State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), District 6, Office of Intergovemmental Relations has commented that the project is not expected to create significant impacts to the State Highway System. Subdivision Design/Streets and Access Points This subdivision is proposed to have two access points to South Peach Avenue and one to East Church Avenue. The subdivision is also proposes one stub street which would connect into any proposed future development subdivision to the south. The Public Works Department, Transportation Planning Section has reviewed the rezone application, conditional use permit and tentative tract map. Public Works staff has determined that the streets adjacent to and near the subject site will be able to accommodate the quantity and kind of traffic generated, subject to the dedication and improvement of adjacent portions of East Church and South Peach Avenues to their ultimate planned width. Landscaping/Common Open Space Given that the proposed subdivision abuts planned arterial and collector streets, the developer will be required to install 15 feet of landscaping along East Church Avenue (collector) and South Peach Avenue (Arterial). In addition, the applicant will be required to install a solid wall at the rear of the required landscape setback, which will mitigate the adverse effect of noise generated by vehicles traveling on the adjacent major streets. The developer will be required to provide at least five percent of the total project area for public or private common open space per Roosevelt Community Plan Policy No. 1-17.1. The required multi- REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Rezone Application No. R-05-33 October 11, 2005 Page 7 purpose trail to be constructed along the south end of Central No. 23 canal within the proposed subdivision will provide a concrete trail for pedestrians and bicyclists. This trail construction will apply toward the above-noted five percent open space requirement for this project. Trails Pursuant to 2025 Fresno General Plan Exhibit 9 and Policies E-15-a, E-15-1b, E-15-h, E-15-i and E-15-x and in accordance with Policies 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 and 3.2.3 of the 1990 Master Multi-Purpose Trails Manual, within the limits of the tract, the developer/owner shall construct appropriate improvements or provide appropriate security for a bicycle and pedestrian trail of an appropriate width along the southern side of the Central No. 23 canal. The location and width of the trail may be accommodated within and including the required public right-of-way and landscape easement located between the curb face and including the required public right-of-way. CONCLUSION / RECOMMENDATION The appropriateness of the proposed project has been examined with respect to its consistency with goals and policies of the Roosevelt Community Plan and the 2025 Fresno General Plan; its compatibility with surrounding existing or proposed uses; and, its avoidance or mitigation of potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. These factors have been evaluated as described above and by the accompanying environmental assessment. Upon consideration of this evaluation, it can be concluded that the proposed Rezone Application No. R-05-33 is appropriate for the project site. KAMaster Flles-2005\Rezone\R-05-033,C-05-110,T-5436 Southwest comer of Church d Peack—PB\City Council Reports and Information\City Council Report R-05.33.10-11-M.doc Attachments: Vicinity Map 2005 Aerial Photograph of Site Exhibit A, Proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM Letter from Caltrans dated June 23, 2005 Environmental Assessment No. R-05-33/T-5436/C-05-110, Finding of Conformity to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR No. 10130) dated August 18, 2005 Planning Commission Resolution 12305 (Rezone) Planning,Commission Resolution 12306 (Tentative Tract Map) Planning Commission Resolution 12307 (Conditional Use Permit) Ordinance Bill July. CUM 41rri I.HL i r,'HN5 rLHNNiNt; NO.486 F.1i2 ST —Of C'ALIFQR*1LA_gU,",C;S.T?41,J,= 79N AND 110USiN—r,Ar,Frrc_'1' nR l.n SCHWAR' �, ovcrnm DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1352 WEST OLIVE AVENUE P.O.sox 12616 FRESNO,CA 93778.2616 PHONE (559)445-6666 _ _ F(Cs your power! FAX (55)488-4088 (G j ,j ( v� t�1 Be energy efficient! TTY (559 488-4066 June 23,2005 JUN 2 3 2605 ' Flar?:ir:�Cia^3;on Uevelopmsnt D_^ ft7cert 2131-IGRICEQA T'( 1.r !r 6-FRE-99-19.2+/- C-05-110,R-05-53 & T-5436 RZR ENTERPRISES Mr.Paul Bernal City of Fresno Development Department 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93 721 Dear Mr.Bernal: We have reviewed the proposed 168-unit single-family residential development on the southwest corner of South Peach and East.Church Avenues. Caltrans has the fallowing comments: The proposed project,in and of itself, is not expected to create significant impacts to the State Highway Systems However,when combined with other development in the area, this project's impacts to the transportation/cimulation system and to air quality will be cumulatively significant As cumulative impacts to these resources were not addressed in the General Plan Update Master EIR, the City should consider a mechanism for evaluatingand mitigating for these impacts. The City should consider a transit alternative for this project The project is small,but when combined with other residential projects in the area, there is sufficient development to support transit, and early planning could make such an alternative feasible, Caltrans recommends that this project be routed to Fresno Area Express(FAX) staff for their review and comment. Please see Attachment Number 1 for other recommended transportation alternatives. If you have any questions,please call me at(559) 445-6666. Sincerely, . dlsrp MOSES STIFES Office of Transportation Planning District.6 Enclosure C: Ms.Barbara Goodwin, Council of Fresno County Governments "Cnlrrans improves mobility oerov Caftfomia" JUN-23.2005 2:41PM CAL TRANS PLANNING N0.466 P.2/2 ATTACHMENT NUMBER 1 CALTRANS RECON.I1vlENDATIONS FOR TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES: Ongoing development throughout the City of Fresno,including this project, will make traffic operations significantly worse by adding considerably to delay and congestion. Transit alternatives can help reduce congestion and delay and reduce overall degradation of air quality and gridlocked intersections. The City of Fresno should focus on ways to eliminate trips in addition to enhancing capacity, Transportation alternatives the City should consider include standard highway solutions along with the following: 1. Park and ride facilities on site or within the proximity of this project. 2. A study of the general accommodation and provision of mass transit in this area to provide insight on ways of increasing transit usage. 3. Exploring the potential of commuter shuttles. The shuttle could be financed through an assessment district and provide a way for individuals to utilize a park-and-ride facility or commercial area parking lot and be shuttled to various commercial/office centers within the area. Commuters who need to go further could use City of Fresno transit if the City planned for convenient connections. This may help to reduce the Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) demand seeking to use the State Highway System. 4. Providing for continuity of non-motorized transportation. 5. Exploring the potential for employer-sponsored carpools/vanpools or monthly transit passes for employees as well as including as a condition of project approval a covered transit stop as mitigation for project-related impacts to the transportation/circulation system.. 6. Exploring the potential for linldng the purchase of a monthly transit pass with new residential development as partial mitigation,for congestion and air quality impacts, and to ensure the long term viability of public transportation. FRESNO_ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12305 The Fresno City Planning Commission, at its regular meeting on September 21,2005, adopted the following resolution relating to Rezone Application No. R-05-33. WHEREAS, Rezone Application No. R-05-33 has been filed with the City of Fresno to rezone the property as described below: REQUESTED ZONING: R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential DistricNUrban Growth Management)zone district EXISTING ZONING: AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural District/Urban Growth Management)zone district APPLICANT: RZR Enterprises LOCATION: Southwest comer of East Church and South Peach Avenues APN: 481-090-27 & 481-090-28 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: From AE-5/UGM and to R-1/UGM: APN: 481-090-27 That portion of Lot 5 of Newhall Tract, According to the map thereof recorded in Book 2, Page 42 of Record of Surveys, Record of Said County described as follows: Commencing at the East one-quarter comer of Section 18,Township 14 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian; thence Westerly, parallel with the North line of said Lot 5,a distance of 450 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence Southerly, at right angles, 300 feet;thence Westerly parallel to the North line of said Lot 5 a distance of 160 feet; thence at right angels Northerly 300 feet to a point; thence Easterly, parallel to the North line of said Lot 5 a distance of 160 to the True Point of Beginning. APN: 481-090-28 Lots 5 and 6 of Newhall Tract, in the City of Fresno,County of Fresno, State of California, according to the map thereof recorded in Book 2, Page 42 of Record of Surveys, Fresno County Records. Excepting therefrom that portion thereof described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest comer of said Lot 5;thence South along the West line of Lots 5 and 6, 880.48 feet, a little more or less, to the centerline of Central Canal; thence Northeasterly along the centerline of Central Canal as follows: North 51 011' East,34.90 feet,38°53' East, 201.90 feet, North 25037' East, 501.10 feet, and North 6°10' West, 269.98 feet to the North line of Lot 5;thence South 87°18'West, along the Northerly line of Lot 5, 400.05 feet, more or less, to the point of commencement. Planning Commission Resolution No. 12305 Rezone Application No. R-05-33 September 21, 2005 Page 2 - Also excepting therefrom that portion thereof described as follows: Commencing at the East one-quarter corner of Section 18, Township 14 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian; thence Westerly, parallel with the North line of said Lot 5, a distance of 450 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence Southerly, at right angles, 300 feet; thence Westerly parallel to the North line of said Lot 5 a distance of 160 feet;thence at right angles to the North line of said Lot 5 a distance of 300 feet to a point;thence Easterly, parallel to the North line of said Lot 5 a distance of 160 feet to the True Point of Beginning. WHEREAS, the above-named applicant is requesting a zoning change on the above property in order to facilitate a 168 lot residential subdivision; and, WHEREAS,the Roosevelt Community Plan Citizens' Advisory Committee reviewed the application on July 25, 2005, and recommended approval; and, WHEREAS, the Fresno City Planning Commission on September 21, 2005, reviewed the subject rezone application in accordance with the policies of the Roosevelt Community Plan and the 2025 Fresno General Plan; and, WHEREAS, during the September 21, 2005, hearing, the Commission received a staff report and related information, environmental documents and considered testimony regarding the requested zoning change; and, WHEREAS, no neighbors spoke in opposition to the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Fresno City Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that there is no substantial evidence in the record to indicate that Rezone Application No. R-05-33 may have a significant effect on the environment as identified by the Finding of Conformity to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report(MEIR No. 10130) dated August 18, 2005, prepared for Environmental Assessment No. R-05-33/T-5436/C-05-110. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Fresno City Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council that the requested R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential District/Urban Growth Management)zone district be approved. Planning Commission Resolution No. 12305 Rezone Application No. R-05-33 September 21, 2005 Page 3 - The foregoing Resolution was adopted by the Fresno City Planning Commission upon a motion by Commissioner DiBuduo, seconded by Commissioner Vasquez (Vice Chair). VOTING: Ayes - DiBuduo, Vasquez (Vice Chair), Cherry, Kissler, Brand (Chair) Noes - None Not Voting - None Absent - Vang DATED: September 21, 2005 lRolout7ionyNo. VINO, Secretary CitPlanning Commission 12305 Rezone Application No. R-05-33 Filed by RZR Enterprises Action: Recommend Approval KAMASTER FILES-2005\REZONE\R-05.033,C-05-110,T-5436 SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CHURCH&PEACK-PB\CITY COUNCIL REPORTS AND INFORMATIOMR-05-33 PLANNING COMMISSINO RESOLUTION 12305.DOC FRESNO CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12306 The Fresno City Planning Commission at its regular meeting on September 21, 2005, adopted the following resolution pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act of the Government Code of the State of California and the Municipal Code of the City of Fresno. WHEREAS, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM was filed with the City of Fresno and proposes to subdivide the subject property into a 168-lot, single family residential subdivision on 31.87 gross acres (30.71 net acres) of land located on the southwest corner of East Church and South Peach Avenues; and, WHEREAS, the Roosevelt Community Plan Citizens' Advisory Committee, on July 25, 2005, reviewed and recommend approval of the tentative tract map; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Development Department staff recommended approval of the proposed project subject to all conditions of approval contained in the staff report dated September 21, 2005; and, WHEREAS, the Fresno City Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on September 21, 2005, to review the proposed subdivision and considered the staff report and invited testimony with respect to the proposed subdivision, and concluded that the tentative tract map is consistent with the 2025 Fresno General Plan and Roosevelt Community Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Fresno City Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that there is no substantial evidence in the record to indicate that Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM may have a significant effect on the environment as identified by the finding of conformity to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR No. 10130) dated August 18, 2005, prepared for Environmental Assessment No. R-05-33/T-5436/C-05-110. BE IT FURTHER RESOVLED that the Fresno City Planning Commission finds that approval of the tentative tract map subject to Section 12-403-B of the Fresno Municipal Code, is consistent with the 2025 Fresno General Plan and Roosevelt Community Plan and findings required pursuant to Section 66410 et. seq. of the Government Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Fresno City Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM subject to the Planning and Development Department Conditions of Approval dated September 21, 2005. The foregoing Resolution was adopted by the Fresno City Planning Commission upon a motion by Commissioner DiBuduo, seconded by Commissioner Vasquez (Vice Chair). VOTING: Ayes - DiBuduo, Vasquez (Vice Chair), Cherry, Kissler, Brand (Chair) Noes - None Not Voting - None Absent - Vang DATED: September 21, 2005 NI YOVINO, Secretary Fres City Planning Commission Resolution No. 12306 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM Filed by RZR Enterprises Action: Approve K: &Aw FYes-2005\Razons1J44)5-=.C-V-110.T-5436 Swllmed m of ChLmh 8 Peaek-PB1QIy Coundl Repots rd lyd n tlaAT-5436 PlannWq Ca i"n Rmdullon 12306.doe FRESNO_CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12307 The Fresno City Planning Commission, at its regular meeting on September 21,2005, adopted the following resolution relating to Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110. CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTED: Construct a 168-lot single family residential subdivision with reduced lot sizes and one outlot as common area/trail. PROPERTY LOCATION: 481-090-27 & 481-090-28 PROPOERTY DESCRIPTION: The site is located on the southwest comer of East Church and South Peach Avenues. EXISTING/PROPOSED ZONING: AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural District/Urban Growth Managemeno zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential District/Urban Growth Management) zone district WHEREAS, the Roosevelt Community Plan Citizens' Advisory Committee reviewed the application on July 25, 2005, and recommended approval; and, WHEREAS, the Fresno City Planning Commission during its September 21, 2005, meeting, reviewed and considered the subject conditional use permit application relative to the staff report and the Finding of Conformity to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR No. 10130) dated August 18, 2005, issued for the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Fresno City Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that there is no substantial evidence in the record to indicate that Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110 may have a significant effect on the environment as identified by the Finding of Conformity to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR No. 10130) dated August 18, 2005, prepared for Environmental Assessment No. R-05-33/T-5436/C-05-110. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Fresno City Planning Commission, as a result of its inspections, investigations and studies made by itself and in its behalf, and of testimonies offered at said hearing, has established that approval of the special permit would be in accordance with applicable provisions of the Fresno Municipal Code, including the determination that all findings have been made relative to the issuance of a conditional use permit for the proposed project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110 is approved, subject to the following conditions, incorporated in said conditional use permit file: 1. Development shall take place in substantial conformance with Exhibits A,B-1 and B-2 dated September 21, 2005. 2. Development shall take place in accordance with the Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110 dated September 21, 2005. Planning Commission Resolution No. 12307 Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110 September 21, 2005 Page 2 The foregoing Resolution was adopted by the Fresno City Planning Commission upon a motion by Commissioner DiBuduo, seconded by Commissioner Vasquez (Vice Chair). VOTING: Ayes - DiBuduo, Vasquez (Vice Chair), Cherry, Kissler, Brand (Chair) Noes - None Not Voting - None Absent - Vang DATED: September 21, 2005 NICK YOVINO, Secretary Fres City Planning Commission Resolution No. 12307 Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110 Filed by RZR Enterprises Action: Approve KAMasler Files-2005\Rezone\R-05-033,C-05-110,T-5436 Southwest comer of Church&Peaek—PBNCity Coundl Reports and InlormationlC-05-110 Planning Comnisslon Resolution 12307.doc Recording Requested by. City Clerk, Fresno, California No Fee-Govt. Code 6103 Return to City Clerk, Fresno Space above this line reserved for Fresno County Recorder=s Office ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRESNO PROPOSED AND INITIATED BY MOVED BY SECONDED BY BILL NO. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FRESNO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONE MAP OF THE CITY OF FRESNO HERETOFORE ADOPTED BY ARTICLES 1 TO 4.5 INCLUSIVE, CHAPTER 12, OF THE FRESNO MUNICIPAL CODE, BEING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FRESNO WHEREAS, Rezone Application No. R-05-33 has been filed by RZR Enterprises, property owner, with the City of Fresno to rezone property as described hereinbelow; and, WHEREAS, the Roosevelt Community Plan Citizens' Advisory Committee considered this application at its meeting of July 25, 2005, and recommended approval; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Article 4,Chapter 12,of the Fresno Municipal Code,the Planning Commission of the City of Fresno held a public hearing on the 21 s'day of September, 2005, to consider Rezone Application No. R-05-33 and related Environmental Assessment No. R-05-33fT-5436/ C-05-110, during which the Commission recommended to the Council of the City of Fresno approval of the subject environmental assessment and rezone application amending the City's Zoning Ordinance on real property described hereinbelow from the AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural District/Urban Growth Management) zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential District/Urban Growth Management)zone district; and, Ordinance Amending Official Zone Map Rezone Application No. R-05-33 October 11, 2005 Page 2 WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Fresno, on the 11"' day of October, 2005, received the recommendation of the Planning Commission. NOW,THEREFORE,THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRESNO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Based upon the testimony and information presented at the hearing and upon review and consideration of the environmental documentation provided, the adoption of the proposed rezoning is in the best interest of the City of Fresno. The Council finds in accordance with its own independent judgment that there is no substantial evidence in the record that the rezoning may have a significant effect on the environment as identified by the Finding of Conformity to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR No. 10130) dated August 18, 2005, prepared for Environmental Assessment No. R-05-33lT-5436/C-05-110. Accordingly, Environmental Assessment No. R-05-33/T-5436/C-05-110 is hereby approved. SECTION 2. The Council finds the requested R-1/UGM zone district is consistent with the existing medium density residential planned land use designation of the Roosevelt Community Plan and the 2025 Fresno General Plan, as specified in Section 12-403-B of the Fresno Municipal Code. SECTION 3. The Council finds that the zone district of the real property described hereinbelow, located in the City of Fresno and shown on the Official Zone Map of the City of Fresno, is reclassified from the AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural District/Urban Growth Management) zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential District/Urban Growth Management)zone district. From AE-5/UGM to R-1/UGM: APN: 481-090-27 That portion of Lot 5 of Newhall Tract, According to the map thereof recorded in Book 2, Page 42 of Record of Surveys, Record of Said County described as follows: Commencing at the East one-quarter corner of Section 18,Township 14 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian; thence Westerly, parallel with the North line of said Lot 5, a distance of 450 feet to the True Point of Beginning;thence Southerly,at right angles,300 feet;thence Westerly parallel to the North line of said Lot 5 a distance of 160 feet; thence at right angels Northerly 300 feet to a point; thence Easterly, parallel to the North line of said Lot 5 a distance of 160 to the True Point of Beginning. Ordinance Amending Official Zone Map Rezone Application No. R-05-33 October 11, 2005 Page 3 APN: 481-090-28 Lots 5 and 6 of Newhall Tract, in the City of Fresno,County of Fresno, State of California, according to the map thereof recorded in Book 2, Page 42 of Record of Surveys, Fresno County Records. Excepting therefrom that portion thereof described as follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Lot 5;thence South along the West line of Lots 5 and 6, 880.48 feet, a little more or less,to the centerline of Central Canal;thence Northeasterly along the centerline of Central Canal as follows: North 51 011' East, 34.90 feet, 38053' East, 201.90 feet, North 25037' East, 501.10 feet, and North 6010' West, 269.98 feet to the North line of Lot 5;thence South 87°18'W est, along the Northerly line of Lot 5, 400.05 feet, more or less, to the point of commencement. Also excepting therefrom that portion thereof described as follows: Commencing at the East one-quarter comer of Section 18,Township 14 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian; thence Westerly, parallel with the North line of said Lot 5,a distance of 450 feet to the True Point of Beginning;thence Southerly,at right angles,300 feet;thence Westerly parallel to the North line of said Lot 5 a distance of 160 feet;thence at right angles to the North line of said Lot 5 a distance of 300 feet to a point; thence Easterly, parallel to the North line of said Lot 5 a distance of 160 feet to the True Point of Beginning.. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall become effective and in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the thirty-first day after its passage. CLERK'S CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF FRESNO ) CITY OF FRESNO ) I, REBECCA E. KLISCH, City Clerk of the City of Fresno, certify that the foregoing ordinance was adopted by the Council of the City of Fresno, California, at a regular meeting held on the day of , 2005, by the following vote: Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstain: REBECCA E. KLISCH City Clerk By APPROVED AS TO FORM: HILDA CANTO MONTOY City Attorney By Deputy Rezone Application No. R-05-33 Filed by RZR Enterprises Assessor's Parcel Nos. 481-090-27 & 481-090-28 K:WWaster Flies-2005\Razone\R4)5-033,C-05-110,T-5436 Southwest comer of Church&Peack—PB\City Council Reports and Infortretion\R-05-33 City Council Ordinance Blll.doc /`4l PROVOST PR I TCHARD ENG, JUEI OCT 25 2005 9 . 12/STP 2 WATER L WASTEWATER FRESNO - VISALIA - BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROVO & LAND DEVELOPMENT PRI1CH RD ADRICULTURAL SERVICES 286 W.Cromwell Avenue DAIRY SERVICES Fresno.CA 93711-6162 LAND SURVEYING S GIS 559 449_2700 PLANNING 6 ENVIRONMENTAL FAX 559 449-2715 An Employee Owned Company DISTRICT MANAGEMENT I� [1`%h October 25, 2005 0 C T 2 �q 2005 Mr. Michael Dages, President Planning Dmsion Fresno City Council Develorx-nani ;a-��,:,rtrren; City Hall, 2nd Floor CI7Y or- " 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 RE: Continuance of Rezone Application No. R-05-33 and Environmental Findings Dear Mr. Dages: Thank you for accommodating our meeting on the morning of October 24. On behalf of our client, RZR Enterprises, Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group respectfully requests that the public hearing for Rezone Application No. R-05-33 be continued until the City Council meeting of November 1, 2005. During the ensuing week, it is our intent to work with you and Planning staff to ensure that our project meets the standards and goals that you and your constituency have established for District 5. Please feel free to contact me at 559.449.2700 or at wwa5hb ru nCa meng.com with any questions, comments, or concerns. Thank you for your consideration. Yours sincerely, William Wahb rn, PE Provost & P chard Engineering Cc: Gil Haro Paul Bernal G"of ,W REPORT TO*1r HE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM NO. VIII-D COMMISSION MEETING 9/21/05 September 21, 2005 APPROVED BY If FROM: STAFF, Planning Division Planning and Development- artme oEPARTMi Di TOR SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF REZONE APPLICATION NO. R-05-33, VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5436/UGM AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION NO. C-05-110 AND THE RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. R-05-33fr-5436/C-05-110 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Provost & Pritchard Engineering Group Inc., on behalf of RZR Enterprises, has filed Rezone Application No. R-05-33, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM, and Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110 pertaining to approximately 31.87 gross acres (30.71 net acres) of property located on the southwest corner of East Church and South Peach Avenues. Rezone Application No. R-05-33 proposes to reclassify the subject site from the AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural District/Urban Growth Management) zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential District/Urban Growth Management) zone district. The subject property is planned for medium density residential land uses and is developed with one rural single-family residence with accessory structures. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UG proposes to subdivide the property into a 168 lot, single family subdivision. Conditional Use Permit Application C-05-110 proposes a planned development, which includes reduced lot sizes for the proposed 168 lots. According to the land use consistency table adopted with the 2025 Fresno General Plan (and applied within all community plans), the medium density residential planned land use designation allows 4.99 to 10.97 units per acre. Overall, the proposed subdivision density is 5.27 units per acre. The applications would bring the subject property into conformance with the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the Roosevelt Community Plan. PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT A 168-lot, single family residential subdivision to be developed at an overall density of 5.27 units per acre APPLICANT RZR Enterprises (Engineer: Provost& Pritchard) LOCATION Southwest corner of East Church and South Peach Avenues (Council District 5, Councilmember Dages) SITE SIZE Approximately 31.87 gross acres (430.71 net acres) LAND USE Existing - Rural single family residence Proposed - 168-lot single family residential subdivision ZONING Existing - AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural District/Urban Growth Management)zone district Proposed - R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential District/Urban Growth Management) zoned district REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Rezone Application No. R-05-33 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110 September 21, 2005 Page 2 PLAN DESIGNATION The proposed R-1/UGM zone district and 1681-lot single family AND CONSISTENCY residential subdivision is consistent with the 2025 Fresno General Plan and Roosevelt Community Plan designation of the site for medium density residential planned land uses ENVIRONMENTAL Finding of Conformity filed on August 18, 2005 FINDING PLAN COMMITTEE The Roosevelt Community Plan Advisory Committee RECOMMENDATION recommended approval of the proposed project at its meeting on July 25, 2005 STAFF Recommend approval of the rezone application to the City Council RECOMMENDATION and approve the vesting tentative tract map and conditional use permit application subject to compliance with the Conditions of Approval for T-5436/UGM dated September 21, 2005 and Conditions of Approval for C-05-110 dated September 21, 2005 BORDERING PROPERTY INFORMATION Planned Land Use Existing Zoning Existing Land Use Medium Density R-1/UGM Single Family North Residential Y Single le Famil Residential District/Urban Residential Growth Management Subdivision AE-5/EA/UGM South Medium Density Agricultural Exclusive Five Acre Rural Residential and Residential Minimum/Expressway Area Overlay Agricultural Land District/Urban Growth Management Public Facility AE-5/UGM & R-1/UGM (Elementary School) & Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural Elementary School East Medium-Low Density District/Urban Growth Management& Single and Single Family Residential Family Residential District/Urban Growth Residential Management Subdivision Public Facility(Special AE-5/UGM &AE-20/UGM West School) & Medium-High Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural Elementary School Density Residential & District/Urban Growth Management& and Rural Residences Central No. 23 Canal Exclusive Twenty Acre Agricultural District/Urban Growth Management ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING An environmental assessment initial study was prepared for this project in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)-Guidelines. This process included the distribution of requests for comment from other responsible or affected agencies.and interested organizations. REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMi-vnISSION Rezone Application No. R-05-33 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110 September 21, 2005 Page 3 The proposed project has been determined to be fully within the scope of MEIR No. 10130 as provided by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as codified in the Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21157.1(d) and the CEQA Guidelines Section 15177(c). It has been further determined that all applicable mitigation measures of MEIR No. 10130 have been applied to the project, together with project specific mitigation measures necessary to assure that the project will not cause significant adverse cumulative impacts, growth inducing impacts and irreversible significant effects beyond those identified by MEIR No. 10130 as provided by CEQA Section 15178(a). Therefore, staff has issued a finding that the project proposal is in conformance to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR No. 10130) dated August 18, 2005, which incorporates a MEIR Mitigation Monitoring Checklist. This environmental finding was properly published on August 18, 2005, with no comments received to date BACKGROUND/ ANALYSIS Provost & Pritchard Engineering Inc., on behalf of RZR Enterprises, has filed Rezone Application No. R-05-33, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM, and Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110 pertaining to approximately 31.87 gross acres (30.71 net acres) of property located on the southwest corner of East Church and South Peach Avenues. Rezone Application No. R-05-33 proposes to reclassify the subject site from the AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural District/Urban Growth Management) zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential District/Urban Growth Management) zone district. The subject property is planned for medium density residential land uses and is developed with one rural single-family residence with accessory structures. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM proposes to subdivide the property into a 168 lot, single family subdivision. Conditional Use Permit Application C-05-100 proposes a planned development, which includes reduced lot sizes for the proposed 168 lots. According to the land use consistency table adopted with the 2025 Fresno General Plan (and applied within all community plans), the medium density residential planned land use designation allows 4.99 to 10.97 units per acre. Overall, the proposed subdivision density is 5.27 units per acre. Conditional Use Permit Application (CUP) In addition to submitting a vesting tentative tract map and rezone application, the applicant has also submitted CUP Application No. C-05-110 for the subject property. According to Section 12-306-N-21 of the FMC, a CUP must be obtained to create planned developments. As part of the CUP, an applicant may request a modification of development standards, including lot size, setbacks and yard areas. The applicant is proposing a planned development for all 168 lots. Public streets will serve the planned development in addition, it will contain reduced lot sizes in comparison to conventional subdivisions. The planned development helps meet several of the goals of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the Bullard Community Plan. One of these goals, Goal Number 5 of the 2025 Fresno General Plan indicates that the city supports the "Landscape of Choice-Principles and Strategies" as defined in Appendix A. Appendix A of the 2025 Fresno General Plan provides guiding principles for the Land Use Element of the 2025 Fresno General Plan by promoting development that utilizes urban land use as efficiently as possible. One such objective, Land Use/Residential Objective C-10, is aimed at "Promot[ing] the development of more compact, pedestrian friendly, single-family residential projects to aid in the conservation of resources such as land, energy, and material." Since this project allows for the development of more compact single-family residences, it will help to accomplish this objective. Similarly, this project helps meet some of the goals of the Roosevelt Community Plan. To illustrate, Section 1-6.8 of the Roosevelt Community Plan states that one of its goals is to "Provide for a diversity REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMrnISSION Rezone Application No. R-05-33 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110 September 21, 2005 Page 4 of housing types and housing opportunities to meet the needs of all ages and income levels." The proposed project is different from conventional subdivisions given that it provides shared open space and smaller lot sizes which offers a unique sense of community that is not commonly offered in conventional single family developments. Roosevelt Community Plan The subject property is located within the boundaries of the Roosevelt Community Plan. The Roosevelt Community Plan Advisory Committee reviewed and recommended approval of the project at their July 25, 2005 meeting. Upon approval of the project the Committee recommended that the subdivision provide enhanced entryways and provide anti-graffiti landscaping to protect the masonry walls located on East Church and South Peach Avenues. The Committees concerns have been addressed in the Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM dated September 21, 2005. Public Services Water Resources and Public Water Supply The Water Division of the Public Utilities Department has determined that there is an adequate source of water available to serve the project with the implementation of the Urban Growth Management (UGM) service delivery requirements and the environmental impact mitigation measures. It should also be noted that adverse groundwater conditions of limited supply and compromised quality have been well- documented by planning, environmental impact report, and technical studies over the past 20 years including the Master Environmental Impact Report No. 10130 for the 2025 Fresno General Plan, Final EIR No. 10100, Final EIR No. 10117, Final EIR No. SCH 95022029 (Fresno Metropolitan Water Resource Management Plan) et al. These conditions include water quality degradation due to DBCP, arsenic, iron, and manganese concentrations; low water well yields; limited aquifer storage capacity and recharge capacity; and, intensive urban or semi-urban development occurring upgradient from the Fresno Metropolitan Area. As a result, if approved, the proposed project would be required to contribute to short-term and long-range water supply and distribution remediation projects in order to adequately address this deficiency. The Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District has indicated that a portion of this project may be accommodated by their facilities, however the remaining portion will be required to be served by temporary facilities until permanent service is available. Sewage Collection System Capacity The Cities of Fresno and Clovis share jointly in the treatment capacity of the Fresno-Clovis Regional Wastewater Treatment and Reclamation Facility. In 1998, the treatment capacity was expanded to accommodate up to 80 million gallons per day, and was upgraded with modernized equipment to safeguard against equipment failures. However, in an attempt to serve the anticipated 790,000 metropolitan area population for the year 2025, one or more sub-regional treatment and reclamation facilities will be required. However, sanitary sewer service is available to serve the site, subject to the mitigation measures imposed with the environmental assessment, and any necessary sewer main extensions and connections. REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMmISSION Rezone Application No. R-05-33 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110 September 21, 2005 Page 5 Fire Protection Services The project site is located within the city's UGM area and must comply with the applicable service delivery requirements necessary to provide not less than the minimum acceptable level of fire protection facilities and services appropriate for urban uses. Fire service will be provided by City of Fresno Fire Station No. MV 87 and future Fire Station No. 15, within two and one half miles of the subject property. Fresno Unified School District The project site is served by the Fresno Unified School District and is within the attendance boundaries of Story Elementary and Terronez Middle School. Circulation Element Plan Policies and Major Street System Traffic Capacity The development of the project site with the proposed 168 single-family residences, and the surrounding planned land uses designated by the 2025 Fresno General Plan and Roosevelt Community Plan, will be required to complete the planned major street network in accordance with applicable development policies and standards including the Urban Growth Management program. Both plans designate East Church Avenue as a collector street and South Peach Avenue as an arterial street. Arterial streets are typically developed with two travel lanes in each direction with somewhat limited access to abutting properties while Collector streets are typically developed with two travel lanes in each direction but without a median island. However, all street standards provide for a widened pavement width at major street intersections to allow for exclusive left- turn and right-turn lanes as well as bus bays or turnouts. As required by the mitigation measures established by the certification of MEIR No. 10130, a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) was prepared by Peters Engineering Group (dated April 15, 2005) to evaluate the number of vehicle trips projected to be generated by the proposed project. Utilizing the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition, and associated computer software together with the COG's computerized traffic model, this analysis predicts the number of vehicle trips that will be generated from the proposed project and surrounding planned land uses, and the direction in which these trips will travel. The TIS analyzed the intersections at Peach and Church Avenues and Peach and Jensen Avenues. The study analyzed 168 single-family residential units. At 168 single-family residential dwelling units, the project is expected to generate an average of approximately 838 vehicle trips per day (VTD). Of these vehicle trips, it is projected that 128 will occur during the morning (7 to 9 a.m.) peak hour travel period and 171 will occur during the evening (4 to 6 p.m.) peak hour travel period. Because much of the immediately surrounding area (i.e. southeasternmost portion of the Roosevelt Community Plan Area) is not developed, the planned major street and intersection improvements have not yet been completed as required by adopted plans, policies and development standards. However, the proposed project, as well as other urban land uses developed as planned by the 2025 Fresno General Plan will be required to construct the planned major street system consistent with the public facility and service delivery requirements of the UGM Program. Required improvements include constructing median opening for left turns-in and outs in South Peach Avenue, dedication and street improvements for East Church and South Peach Avenues and signalizing the intersection at East Jensen and South Peach Avenues. In addition, the developer of this project, in accordance with the mitigation measures of Master Environmental Impact Report (No. 10130) which was certified by the Council with the adoption of the 2025 Fresno General Plan, will be required to pay impact fees specific to the traffic signalization of the major street intersections. REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION Rezone Application No. R-05-33 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110 September 21, 2005 Page 6 Subdivision Design/Streets and Access Points This subdivision is proposed to have two access points to South Peach Avenue and one to East Church Avenue. The subdivision is also proposes one stub street which would connect into any proposed future development subdivision to the south. The Public Works Department, Transportation Planning Section has reviewed the rezone application, conditional use permit and tentative tract map. Public Works staff has determined that the streets adjacent to and near the subject site will be able to accommodate the quantity and kind of traffic generated, subject to the dedication and improvement of adjacent portions of East Church and South Peach Avenues to their ultimate planned width Landscaping/Common Open Space Given that the proposed subdivision abuts planned arterial and collector streets, the developer will be required to install 15 feet of landscaping along East Church Avenue (collector) and South Peach Avenue (Arterial). In addition, the applicant will be required to install a solid wall at the rear of the required landscape setback, which will mitigate the adverse effect of noise generated by vehicles traveling on the adjacent major streets. The developer will be required to provide at least five percent of the total project area for public or private common open space per Roosevelt Community Plan Policy No. 1-17.1. The required multi- purpose trail to be constructed along the south end of Central No. 23 canal within the proposed subdivision will provide a concrete trail for pedestrians and bicyclists. This trail construction will apply toward the above-noted five percent open space requirement for this project. Trails Pursuant to 2025 Fresno General Plan Exhibit 9 and Policies E-15-a, E-15-b, E-15-h, E-1 5-i and E-1 5-x and in accordance with Policies 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 and 3.2.3 of the 1990 Master Multi-Purpose Trails Manual, within the limits of the tract, the developer/owner shall construct appropriate improvements or provide appropriate security for a bicycle and pedestrian trail of an appropriate width along the southern side of the Central No. 23 canal. The location and width of the trail may be accommodated within and including the required public right-of-way and landscape easement located between the curb face and including the required public right-of-way. Lot Area and Dimensions Conventional Subdivision The FMC requires that all lots within the R-1 zone district provide a minimum lot width of 60 feet and depth of 100 feet, with the exception of lots on curved streets and reversed corner lots and a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet. All of the parcels served by public streets meet or exceed the minimum lot dimensions and lot area. Setbacks Conventional Subdivision The FMC requires that all lots within the R-1 zone district provide a minimum front yard setback of 20 feet and a rear yard of 20 feet and five foot side yards, with the exception of corner lots and reversed corner lots which are required to avenue side yard setbacks of- 10-feet and 15-feet. All proposed development of the 168-lot will comply with the property development standard of the R-1 zone district. REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMwIISSION Rezone Application No. R-05-33 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110 September 21, 2005 Page 7 State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), District 6, Office of Intergovernmental Relations has commented that the project is not expected to create significant impacts to the State Highway System. Tentative Tract Map Findings The Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code §§ 66400, et seq.) requires that a proposed subdivision not be approved unless the map, together with its design and improvements, is found to be consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan (Finding No. 1 below). State law further provides that the proposed subdivision map be denied if any one of the Finding Nos. 2 - 5 below is made in the negative. In addition, State law requires that a subdivision be found to provide for future passive and natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision development (Finding No. 6 below). 1. The proposed subdivision map, together with its design and improvements, is consistent with the City's 2025 General Plan (there is not an applicable specific plan), because the Roosevelt Community Plan designates the site for medium density residential planned land use and the project design meets the density and zoning ordinance criteria for development in these plan designations. Furthermore, the applicant will be required to construct a trail, which will increase travel options. 2. This site is physically suitable for the proposed type and density of development, because conditions of approval will ensure adequate access and drainage on and off the site. 3. The proposed subdivision design and improvement is not likely to cause substantial and considerable damage to the natural environment, including fish, wildlife or their habitat, because of the urbanized nature of the area in which the site is located. 4. The proposed subdivision design and improvements are not likely to cause serious public health and safety problems, because the conditions of approval have shown and will insure that the subdivision conforms with City health and safety standards. 5. The proposed subdivision design will not conflict with public easements within or through the site, because conditions of approval will assure noninterference with any existing or proposed public easements. 6. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive and natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision, because of the appropriate use and placement of landscaping plant materials and because of the orientation of the proposed lots. The subdivision map, subject to the recommended conditions of approval, complies with the design and property development standards of the Zoning Ordinance and local Subdivision Ordinance. Based upon the plans and information submitted by the applicant and the recommended conditions of project approval, staff has determined that these findings can be made. REPORT TO THE PLANNING COWAISSION Rezone Application No. R-05-33 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110 September 21, 2005 Page 8 Conditional Use Permit Application Findings (Planned Development) Based upon analysis of the conditional use permit application and subject to the applicant's compliance with all of the conditions of approval noted below, staff concludes that the following required findings of Section 12-405-A-2 of the Fresno Municipal Code (FMC) can be made. FINDINGS PER FRESNO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 12-405-A-2. a. All applicable provisions of this Code are complied with and the site of the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use, and accommodate all yards, spaces, walls and fences, parking, loading, recycling areas, landscaping, and other required features,and, Finding a The subject site has an adequate amount of space to meet all applicable requirements of the "^ ` '�6,t Code and as established in the Special Permit conditions of approval dated September 21, s `: F 2005, including yards, spaces, walls and fences, parking, landscaping and other required M, r� features. b. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type to carry the quantity and kind of traffic generated by the proposed use;and, Finding b, ` Staff from the Public Works Department, Transportation Planning Section has determined that the proposed development can be accommodated b the adjacent streets and the proposed P P P Y 1 P P Y x*, project will be conditioned upon improvement of the adjacent major streets to their ultimate width. c. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the area in which the property is located. The third finding shall not apply to uses which are subject to the provision of Section 12-306-N-30 of this Code. °F�nd�ngc. ; The staff of the Planning and Development Department has determined that the proposed use well not be detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to property or improvements in the K area in which the property is located if developed in accordance with the various " conditions/requirements established through the related tentative tract map application review ; and conditional use permit application review process. Action by the Planning Commission regarding the rezone application will be a recommendation to the City Council. Planning Commission action on the proposed tentative tract map and conditional use permit, unless appealed to the Council, is final. CONCLUSION/ RECOMMENDATION The appropriateness of the proposed project has been examined with respect to its consistency with goals and policies of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the Roosevelt Community Plan; its compatibility with surrounding existing or proposed uses; and its avoidance or mitigation of potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. These factors have been evaluated as described above and by the accompanying environmental assessment. Upon consideration of this evaluation, it can be concluded that Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM is appropriate for the project site, subject to the conditions listed below. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission: REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMmISSION Rezone Application No. R-05-33 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110 September 21, 2005 Page 9 1. RECOMMEND APPROVAL to the City Council of the environmental finding of a mitigated negative declaration for Environmental Assessment No. R-05-33/T-5436/C-05-110 dated August 18, 2005. 2. RECOMMEND APPROVAL to the City Council of Rezone Application No. R-05-33 to rezone the subject site from the AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural DistrictlUrban Growth Management) zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential Districfi/Urban Growth Management) zone district. 3. APPROVE Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM subject to compliance with the Conditions of Approval dated September 21, 2005. 4. APPROVE Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110 subject to compliance with Conditions of Approval dated September 21, 2005 and Exhibits A and C dated September 21, 2005. Attachments: Vicinity Map 2005 Aerial Photograph of Site Exhibit A, Proposed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM Exhibit B, Proposed site plan for Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110 Exhibit C, Proposed floor plans and elevations for homes within the planned development Letter from Caltrans dated June 23, 2005 Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM dated September 21, 2005 including letters from Department of Public Works dated July 11, 20, 21 and September 15, 2005, Department of Public Utilities dated July 11, 2005 and July 20, 2005, Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District dated July 20, 2005, Fresno Irrigation District dated July 1, 2005 and San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District dated July 1, 2005 Conditions of Approval for CUP Application No. C-05-110 dated September 21, 2005 Environmental Assessment No. R-05-33lT-5436/C-05-110, Finding of Conformity to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR No. 10130) dated August 18, 2005 KAMaster Files-Tract Maps\Tract 5436 Paul Bernal (R-05-33&C-05-1 1 0)\Planning Commission Report T-5436,R-05-33,C-05-110 9-21-05.doc NBELGRAVIA ha a Ra � kmm q � ELGRAVIA a � ,'Z a, le BELGRAVIA >' BELGRAVIA i � , �. ,. TOWER z TOWER CHURC a R , k S r, �7 t S - D LC x' GROVE f � °� z ""`� ,a ;,, s tea• rY � ,# as 5 t �F ar s t ,x' LEGEND ® Subject Property U.G.M.Area VICINITY MAP PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 54361UGM N DEPARTMENT REZONE APPLICATION NO. R-05-053 A.P.N.: 481-090-27,28 From AE-5/UGM to R-1/UGM ' " CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. C-05-110 ZONE MAP:2654 Southwest corner, Church and Peach Aves. NOT TOSSCALE BY/DATE: _ J.S. / 6-23-05 Yl AN i,, �y I F � ' i � �. j..r 4+h. w .1 S'k„f r�! �,,,,, ,� �, r,��v.:�•.-f 'S* x� - � �t 2"• ok A41�� i 1 �,• r Y �' ■ � y I;,t, +. �, - ' 1 .:' c ? ..>, a R ''2 ';,,, 4f.. `� 1'"+• r �t a ''t,�1 � r a�`SP�"`a�!' �r=�}9 fa;•' � •�; t'.�U !I 'W''°' AAOft:.y+, i'�Y+.+G•..iw �s°pfi 9 '^ rt 4 '} 1' '-Yi li 1.�_j - n7ktCl) r.,�„'r;,_. �.... t� _ .--_...._^_fit _-._- .. ._._".5�a_{i°•_..''.LLWa`4as.•t+ei t-.R'm " �µM �';J I I � Y1• � }r rZp.{ .: fir% ! � t �rJ iS.adi .s a� �-a ytl.. i .' Y t I } 1 � t.. Si.4p.a..•y'�' a..q 4 y A 4i r4* A Lo � f o 1� .. I wr .K•%r, �n1f.F�r/"i rk' tri..t+..^a:.••,-�v-.-.....,su--`^I.` L..M ,a O It R '474 .4 i ; 1" 3� i•w fk4,, '+'>rJ` 1 ,' ,:�-,y.��..'R�u'A ,y' ''7. _� �;,h >•G ti 4.�.e a r t `..{r, ;1 41 W �� ;.c E>'tt •,.�'Yn`3p yam,.' +'" !!"' t - 7 { •. a r •l/a �,- + « SS t •K KYr ..L J1 '+ f+`9N �2Wh .�- ''.' t t,,,r yJ;' Y yyv� * ...r'-„q. w.,..« �t„� '..> »i,.-.%�, # �. ti i r 1 t-Y �I IQit� �� r k.y�y � '4 S �•.f b i t -. yk !, x' i..�r 4. 1 _ 1 ;.`� r4 �Ft i.. '^t {I �d>�,. sl ,g. s l.x a•.tv - •4dc•..` :• �:R` jr 71 1 .S�r✓'E f�� p � I r t 1.-,a)Y A�s .^-.r 6, I :� } �* a 1- �`rw:� �S - i�rWJ•}fi��7 �} f,€;n , t t ��S �i.t „y '�rw�r -:,.y f :wart r L a t i 4 ht +1 r t �•�r.*'rrr,s�+.C»..a�.a^�' -.�-r t .+ r. __ �H T +„ h� `.. ty -. .,;�.-,tl '`t,� ,.;✓-r�w ''ti �e� � _:4 R t i,y t , ! -5 I#r� .s,r(�.�a� �' � 1 ..�,� -�1'r c,• i tal� ,� h++ "F."'..•.�'x,�s� '+t' -.�y.�f 't �rI} r"i r 7.>rtAY1•ij��..� - "� '�. •;µ ' x Ytl -. � �-� ]S.'�r�" r r+„� 9 : l� �F iTf i.td •.�' � -- #c"` .e• �.r- t 4�U. •w w..dee v#t -k ri." iJ� J �•v s � j ���, F ?~wry R,,,, ._ q. ''k{6.'?��l�a 7�� r.,- h"r* i�.w+a�y'A°i 4 �K a s y ar T�ti�"•r"� .. �F; {Yv I a•� �� Z�r'r ^j, fX">C;a •� v. 't � + _�.33 y .1`+ � 4' A J � I}4. 1 '� � ���" �.; ,� -''�x�+br,ikE��,w{°��.� r r `.. � t �'Ys-•�' �it♦s:T"" ,. c 1 rfi I '64 t` 4 ti A �` ��`.�;>..,.a,,,.r,. ,�i n'•'�$°•y 1�:.., 3.. � � ..A � ...+ irt� t:,..r. � `�i'�r;.:»-�...�. ^:_� r�`` � _ ���. z, r. B s F = x .j I t CL a g y W o 2 � _ Y44eSe ¢���� x�I IM a �pp�t y�rx� (n o E _ J O U d ZQ 8 W Q vi I _ yy J _ •� F UZI Ld3# -� L --- "nii _^ 4son 1 uj I i � Y n wq --•era_� � � �i I I', I SII I I II I ,I� I I S I I ail I I . I I Y-M'ero rose 41w q-N9\Rc�-r-In v.M,n`.o\�w, :c fGOlI�!/f dvw 10va1 3nuv1N31 ONS3W 30 .11N 3l U3HU NI 8 ° ...�,«�..�.,,�... oNs383 30 kir, 3ti1 IRISOAONd ilw83d 3sn WN01DON00 5 V d d gC ^ 1 @ gfi � sea°S @BEF" gig . F3�5 • O 1 e ��`° O b,W A3 s�A� 9� PpE apsafiM. 9 i� b § 'a sSfiS �; �sy€� R83 •0•••0•••0.0•ts) ( n AgsQE - g*E !-9sa �� 3gS�e f de's@e •O••••••••••• W a d §n E €i5 � si €s g f��i6y o p l! y a !°fi5� 94 ci WIN.ku e I— W 6 V O 2� • •••••O••••• z = f gg z Z A -g 0 - U ` ray-'"�= _I_.: �„■� � Rs ui I I lyw I RZY m I .. -t�! �� , I rat >�ac''i I ">•S �I fwF �; �� � , ' ^� 7rG .. �: rsk L LIM. . o, r .ffaa I ;L t0 Y .. I Ylk� AF1Ce �: IIIf kTh m '+Iln, _--•s \'� '"rC Vii^ ' a o,_. -I'p".f"'I'° ---—` 1)! I I, !V A e^ q t� ly ,I W_ ku �' +r �*'-5�-�v�,� -'�,,,wr -�.ytS� ,,gym•... ,�r, Ti��� `^-K�`''��`r~`'f''` y :�,:..-�`�� �+'�- .;� 3� !4 �rTJd.' t`�3"'r.,.�w� � •�r�„� 7,w'��'�� �.. ,� -wi.'M."r' .:'e"',- '4' t' F yG'�. ,, �•f +T ,�� .�. � .Y..w' '�"/''Yy1S'��w ye-Y:3.'.l�l.fy';:�`'>.�,�� .4°'�' �Y �Y\•�,; y.- +��l v�t j�-�`.' �-�-�. ��s,. .-y, SFr'-}XIS`�• �_. �;,��P t�"',� jriY. .� ��.� '�r :;,a��y�.�,`y��i`. 1,,��tYr FYi I ® '. -..,y ' y� '�, `Y '..tiy� � ..e "• i'.i.1t (�'-ar 4.�Y°' . • C-�R{AJ f;? .. � �k•�`xs`����,�d"'�`-��` � �'Y'�r,�'i p'k� ti 'r. 't�R,t'. � '�''. k.r."� i.'�,.,wi'L�,�r" 11rV� WN i"kE NOOK R� L 4.x1_ug rbt � tom; t v y 9r rp� •r�wr� c rte w Sq zr 7` 3 Yee 5 7 / [ r \' •i t rom - 3 t KITCHEN gYe '{" O ;: ..{eve,j4'$lw��'k�.,}`}A,y h + N:.✓c -S .�a�rl.n yv' y ail�'.x 1: •_ M f�r�7� �: ■ �"Y,�,�i ';'����. WALK CLOS V-V .r•i a.��':� .";� �' �' ' { ��s�, y}��:�; �K������. fir, �A�^Fr �4�7G � `.1_,"� .`S. yd^ ��. C.-=✓��:p�Jr+1f�� 1,�:•1 �xt' 1 tt ��;�ay `e r��t ✓ M"'�.-"rte ��.,". f.%9v '�i ..^ yj ie.. c 4 e' • , A l 'a rr i Nom.';'+ * 1:r� . rti i� ;,rtrl�o"4P t„I AL. '� ro"i�ri�'1/�• r^ `'�s.r""s�.�fi y.T �� m —'�i raj}�w,3�M1,���c`7Z , 7% Exhibit C' ,�: .,�'k' ��.��.r�LF�fi4x. a+r�a�.cv"` "•- �� a tr� ��� t F •� �i• an �m tJ,* ti ._rte`^ - _,fes ,•� t�`;�. 'll� a r�ak 14. _ i �Ytrrit PAV Cay + - � -+.. t '.,,rt :trop `_� �, ��• 1.t�y , �. �. g t _ ��u ��,�,, y�nap s +a.. '� +.�.j d. ,✓ v y ,ri t -,a t �m`� 4(,... �,F-s'r c:+ .•S_',,, 4}CF t tt r..>T�`�' f$.^£.�'.� � �iN. ; 1.r +r:' xo 4af')•f ,�'� ti� ,�.,.. k., lr lr; tM a Y , ekYyy�"',•'�-�sty.C'rP!,,,�k'�'{� � ..� / ! .,y ;. .1 �� � `� a' PP+j;Ii >rxsy! a t ! rfti.a�I'v e"`ai �� .1'"j r ,�-� �sT 1i - • s {i s 9'>•`t•Y:r 1 4 S Y,i' ' r„,`�* ''� , }L L,t tti ix 1 ,,,s i G •ti Y "�\ $ S / G 1 :t ' I�. I l t t �.,. , tt r •• y Fc`ht:4 �}y y Xtra r i`a ti F µ am 'W E 31 • A' r r rr �t ry�t's �' ] "fs� • Y !� "�/}I S L..' 1 had �, M1•�.P t^M1��1'4'}'x;M�"',�SrLS'��er j 1�� �] ` Y A' 1 r as J' t� ..i3+ r4 Ykt Sys p° 3 "P�`} t'4. r a - 1��;ati 4 n + R'�,'i'i 3���rS 5 .� r�]� � �4,� 1 y _. ':. � + F.i r> pyo • aC!' t ,' yrE 1 Y ♦�s^: x !„ 7rpp_ky 'i�,�•• �'9L µ - - ''Y .yR tj thc�YYaM�' �t�k��.� 2 t rk^_. s., c, .•t' ri„k SlAy,'�ri':S sk yis� 5 an r � v”, !" y ttN A. a a ti�' •r t:i+J '4°.S ��^r€ { x rw -+7��5K��r-{'���.. � '• r .��ra t„�I w I 7 �,, �: ,�' ,�C +�``' t ' 1 ' �t s x N• »aus r �-�'' �'�i dtt� I� ., R� _. G1 r :' � 1 � ��+sF t t t_ '• � i ^t� a � w'r�Ti +z�'.; �',� d1Y yw;ter •+d ' -r s , i 4 ti -r• ! _ Tt, n 1 t 1 1 ergutE� 1l I f w e M...f.s.-.� ...-r�r.,Krras.l+%+•� w 7 - Y .. t " s � �n �� r � t`xwr a •• fet :•.� I'M d Sr w 7 714. `' t•sq TTt t y^t4 y C ° 1 1a 'r4'1a4`-sem rt t n }{ t t r— r a 6�b..La�.,few, A" k5f•a { k tai r' '.u� aN ! A � 4 tr S.y "�q1�� Y.�•x�`t t t r9 u7 t t � ter i �_ �x - 1 e0'j2 lkgy,''. knyttgak t^{'" ea wt �1•, t , a z a �a '7 RStLG��a4� d+24d"'Ag�r � MOI",2fi# mi�9y � �,S` 1�„t' i t t o . 7 b C' = ca- ✓ i 4 g 1 44 r"" - '� '7fl 5F ?' ;.w : vvrlt I �Xv Lrn �U"•r t�. *.� t `� Ffn # § ]La"t,�. t h `ki r�r ",iwYs '�r.7 •`k ,tt wi 1. �� .� ,e �� I 1+ t33"fr i F •r 7 wSv ry Ak� < ,#re n ,s3 �S�" ,n � rt• .7 t. - �xs* 1 S s-v'-tl'1r;t �~✓'1- t�t'^a a" Pt u'i ' ,,.A yk'"' F�-- per. � _ ':aL 7 r - ��r 1 M y a yt4'!ia ttyh�15r7 "" r ''> `F '�°' ` 1 t �y t �"i� ♦ rt T tiat is {y1y$nlr �n Ii Old 'Xa t ° .7.! _ , r...t !.+ \, c '@ . Y,P h.. •t• ° If It - �' a , 4 t i tk^�xC M1 ati;a-C �' i�s zb-Pfd '� t,,.. - �'. iia q c.>t c �., ✓ t La'a p, � ry, t�3%'S f +,.c�• ����r+�ru�'fa��p�i(� -},._r. '�, fifa'r�t @,+, ♦.,. a � .i ;.• ION i r r uYikak,. s .rteW' y. 0s: t (j �t r .FS '11 Rl'�1 lry f k � itr l'n'S��.N�'k ��'� ° t�t;` z�wt4l'a� s� >�`Ja 2 "' �'�,, s t .A.fj. �7e �.�� ✓ �Sa �`ti (�,.-+eN�,7.,!�•, �}��"z�.yt3�.�a's�'c�,� 'n�� ° �. �� .` .'a'�yv t�Vf `+ �+� ri ,.� �.i* � .t d.'.. �.t�+ '�` . r�`",y4 +.y'i GS�"r.e ra^-3�v����,h''�'��k4'��r _" ��' ' n 1� a 'E,,���`3 .�]'iY.YLt."a'c� yri e I. •'=/�,-t yr�. o,'�.. r\�i�,�t,"��`� Budd���},k ���� .3:`�' r'rv� r�tt47� px. -T' �� "�`- •o - , � ��'ehn fid: , tb m"#r��n�'N'.��#��y� �{xt",'a�'tpn'�` n r„� � r-y 1\,,�F x y t�\S•y.'j`�M �>...fY .[r y• pY' ,•� i��♦ �i��c VJ1� �'�'. 1p&tr�"c�PnP}r''"`yr1�:G�''� � a-.1' n •�` �t.'y1 T �F'.,��s+ry`�.�,�`L. �����(� � � t . .: � s'.�"6�.°'� � 3 ,�: tf s,y• �x��1i ' t, y �D^ S� Y.��'�'pJ �f�:-�7�'"...`..''"° .hu s-?..- y,,, d° _...'}ri�'� t�ha �}s.y�N7�1+.i}.dt �r �r�r ��1. i � 'P L*�r. Y'1�ex,��'}.�y.�Yr' 3t ��y�ey crf' • t �. '� `{ w 1 M LU LL1 LU y QLU 44-1 Q 01 z E. 1CZIQATl1V7 1r� IN .70 I 1 2 1 1 gp I R L 5 I n cL �w'`C_'u• 1 4l w kyr 3 tl PIE u Yt' ;"if t" Ff�. PIL itS1y.F UJI � + � .x � �`� CA �'�'Y��}r��+{�• 3v,�e. r�N��'"�titY t�.. I gk �'� LL LL 4����� � w �- ��' I ,„,.,k c P'3M1 I �fr'°+x„Y�.�,�'� .£z'„�'�.at, �•�_ fi• W q \,"•� Q � d I O I u t L U-11. o I aJ » EFS Y j - :'� a �• »� +3 K. a 1 ' i r "g, �`68 U .r uat'�+ �� Q �'�k� �'•17 r r'� 0 x.k, 4 I P 7 ` w �raar "N h w Ctir<tt A � F3r �'XrF 1 � r� a �' r .a. �x".`"+�5-"�i'4"— �� �^� �y ��, r _ a yam«,,,•7 � ,;.I �F•. L �.� wJ`�s��� Ems 1 t,�'• VS _ ���� '1��' � I'S ti.k.K. 1'•(Yi?.Sw.��-rrrr•r'�`O 24':ymy �� �y �� �$!:r` 'b-,4,�F�"�Y� � ��•4jk�'Ji'Jp,y�.u_2a .,�t >�J „� �•.•3tiF.� ,+*,�'�'"• �y'Nb_E•�+w�t � y`� e' a y+�, • a ° � tY;...� ��, C•k.�Hy r'"`r1�,,tµ r l�T' F� taA - lye�I”�%'�Q/�a:,� ► � L>�ri� � r•, ...�c. � � •t.�. 'S r�+art 'x d b{" gg t► _ q t� 1� gyp. •. ey __. � va,/ ,�i 1 84 It •�, 'G+'iF v t r'S eau�.,�.,V tw�`� f"F ? �• ti"�.'1� �-t •� �, c�'^a ,. � .y�"� t � t. � Lac_ {i'j' 1. c std Ft4 xY_ ,t�,•h� •1�3y'�• t ILI 41 r F 7''"�" s t�� att{•I ' r,s. � t'�" w.� .a ✓� � !' t� '�j;*t� }� I • �� rr:�' �'-R.:��+`4.y,S" Y� '1t:'1,. ..'��T. a,.� �: ��.. � 1 �•� t �� - {�,�r,�F_; 1.1 �~•I ��} I to .. 7I IQ e � .�L� y�f- irk-` ��-� � �'•` [� ��...., `� ����, ;f c �L'Zk : _ ,.: ' �21� 'I � lay � _.� ,:� �• �. s ',[•r. w q+,Jv.�a.irI..�rl -r,lil L :, z ;;7 ! v M- ,�2•� s�yin,5 t - t' f'q i S t�, -'1-' } s; - � :�} ��'p�'�`�3T k ' `"",t n�� w� �•C' S•nT *S i'lt� .F I�T'x'1 S � C�:"',: .: "�, '•�• ,� 2y� ys: , Y$ "� �s d �� t«,Sr r�tl' �711[.r t` C`v�_'. j �'r'w^'!�-•�r , ! � 2 "FS f`{* P 3r .w•rM t t C 1 i. _ ,S _ ,/� �f^°�7:" s � a s _ I� � a t'�y�t s K�� it•]�I[ ..1.� ,��'� Jt ^`' W S t � `,� v4�� L 6 ,�<W,"ryl''ttl,r„�' r S1 �W(�.'i� 1t.;,7 'I" ��• r• o-� F. -r`'is � , , x ?� 2..y l w(�''•a L C7 7 .�'sr k t'4ajb,.ts -?.•? ';'j e� I 3 X94" a '1Yr 2' �i 1 A � �' '.i i � c k,d�� �,4���`� ���'�` � 4a["�r'S ,�y� 't ql I 1 * ".`#�I•. �` � . �.�� � z$�. � ,«a•S+`'"d �r � r�7LL�f,F 19{.e' ' a.t I + s � *.'t!� t 1 twa�',�C `:n.,�,. n...tY:`�f - �'' � x p F' I� ,j,{�`=3• L _�{••,. .�,.. ':.) �,�¢h`�s ..-ht*'1' ; ,sk tF1'raiw"7 r�ri •m .�C,, t ��SA• r Yl •y`(i y Y .Cs , 7� c M� ' +. D�.>bl�ve- 4 ?� .•riL Yt e�' i t�.yt� Y# r - � :x• �� f 6 ;`� a t �' ..ia J��`��r �`•f-inK4 k�*2 ` -... � i� ''• kl�,L..a s: s., .� � � ,��µ6°�'. * { 1 R t- t r[j� .� -r .�i�,i �•4L.�L}' .. 7 � 2 � rem� � { v Jfi {r1'sir^S, ��?� ��,t� , � - 1 '4S. 'f;'G� _-^r' { ?-s S,: 2:' �r '9 '„a. ', 5•^ t r j`,r i , .. ''''°��4,� .� t7r r - t vr•yJ•��� ilifi r.tee# a .,'y[ -. -.. .t !, "' 713•; ' ,p tr"dFtf .. �Kr•'."•r >:f •�- .., 3 "'f 'L tT o' 'p �� � ���x4�`�t-��.s�rr"u`'w� :�• �..Zd}��"�i���-"L r�jl' sc�i.+.t �w' ro ,&J� y �� � � , a� 1rtigk 4t 4 - �`j 3 i xfe p_ �rn� �f• � ' £,,4-�s,� LL '� m, _y�y �,� , �' �,•p ��� x�� •T • ,2�, :r;u��d'L' IF c ,Y.. `!`^ 2j �t�"r< ��j, rr'� `Y v ��T .! D�/_•ti.fc�,stgp. 3'�+.�...�^.�• '�~! •� ��„ ti,�h 'C��` K].'1 P A� i]��' S Y. '� Y� 5/Y'A.�..,,'A��A1.•u. -_'t •- .. _ T • ��'. i.tu- `1] 1. I v f r a}�•;E�� � .,: �'�`' i c � •�rts`+�r" i 'rSr..•1. .-..,c��' .� ti 1�wf�s�si. �#. .r.1. 1 ,W.,..l: ffi�r..tk'..e•.. ,S•A�. �.. /.N^�r• q,D"Sd ���.V-._� � laf ... fP'"F� �, �• . JUN-23.2005 2:41PM CAL TRANS PLANNING N0.4% P. 1i2 EUM 12E CALTEne —StiSrNT;SS.TRA RTA rT' \hM HOUSTNG AUNCY ag=-Tn- ARMITCi 13 Qo=m DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1352 WEST OLIVE AVENUE P.O.BOX 12616 FRESNO,CA 93778.2616 PHONE (559)445-6666 Flex your power! FAX (559)488-4088 Be energy offlci u! TTY (559)488-4066 R L �F� ''Jr D June 23,2005 J U N Z 3 2005 Plan:�ing Civision Ueveloprns-it Gz� ;;;;�cT''t 2131-IGR/CEQA, 6-FRE-99-19.2+/- C-05-110, R-05-53 &T-5436 RZR ENTERPRISES Mr.Paul Bernal City of Fresno Development Department 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 Dear Mr.Bemal: r We have reviewed the proposed 168-unit single-family residential development on the southwest corner of South Peach and East Church Avenues. Caltrans has the following comments; The proposed project,in and of itself,is not expected to create significant impacts to the State Highway System. However, when combined with other development in the area,this project's impacts to the transportation/circulation system and to air quality will be cumulatively significant. As cumulative impacts to these resources were not addressed in the General Plan Update Master EM,the City should consider a mechanism for evaluating and mitigating for these impacts. The City should consider a transit alternative for this project. The project is small,but when combined with other residential projects in the area,there is sufficient development to support transit, and early planning could make such an alternative feasible, Caltrans recommends that this project be routed to Fresno Area Express (FAX) Staff for their review and comment. Please see Attachment Number 1 for other recommended transportation alternatives. If you have any questions,please call me at(559) 445-6666. Sincerely, MOSES STITES Office of Transportation Planning District 6 Enclosure C: Ms.Barbara Goodwin, Council of Fresno County Governments "Calrrans improves mobility across California" JUN.23.2005 2:41PM CAL TRANS PLANNING N0.466 P.2i2 ATTACHMENT NUNSER 1 CALTRA.NS REOOMIVIENDATIONS FOR TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES: Ongoing development throughout the City of Fresno,including this project,will make traffic operations significantly worse by adding considerably to delay and congestion_ Transit alternatives can help reduce congestion and delay and reduce overall degradation of air quality and gridlocked intersections. The City of Fresno should focus on ways to eliminate trips in addition to enhancing capacity, Transportation alternatives the City should consider include Standard highway solutions along with the following: 1. Park and ride facilities on site or within the proximity of this project. 2. A study of the general accommodation and provision of mass transit in this area to provide insight on ways of increasing transit usage. 3. Exploring the potential of commuter shuttles. The shuttle could be financed through an assessment district and provide a way for individuals to utilize a park-and-ride facility or commercial area parking lot and be shuttled to various commercial/office centers within the area. Commuters who need to go Ruther could use City of Fresno transit if the City planned for convenient connections. This may help to reduce the Single Occupancy Vehicle(SOV) demand seeking to use the State Highway System. 4. Providing for continuity of non-motorized transportation. 5. Exploring the potential for employer-sponsored carpools/vanpools or monthly transit passes for employees as well as including as a condition of project approval a covered transit stop as mitigation for project-related impacts to the transportation/circulation system. 6. Exploring the potential for linking the purchase of a monthly transit pass with new residential development as partial mitigation for congestion and air quality impacts, and to ensure the long term viability of public transportation. CITY OF FRESNO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SEPTEMBER 21,2005 VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5436/UGM SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EAST CHURCH AND SOUTH PEACH AVENUES All tentative maps are subject to the applicable provisions of the State Subdivision Map Act, Fresno Municipal Code, City policies, and City of Fresno Standard Specifications. The following specific conditions are applicable to this vesting tentative map. The Urban Growth Management (UGM) Service Delivery Plan requirements are included in the following conditions of approval and are designated by the caption "Urban Growth Management Requirements." NOTICE TO PROJECT APPLICANT In accordance with the provisions of Government Code §66020(d)(1), the imposition of fees, dedications, reservations or exactions for this project are subject to protest by the project applicant at the time of approval or conditional approval of the development or within 90 days after the date of the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations or exactions imposed on the development project. GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. Upon conditional approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM entitled "Exhibit A," dated July 21, 2005, the subdivider may prepare a Final Map in accordance with the approved tentative map, and related Rezone Application No. R-05-33 and Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110. 2. Submit grading plans and a soils report to the City of Fresno Planning and Development Department for verification prior to Final Map approval (Reference: Sections 12-1022 and 12-1023 of the Fresno Municipal Code). Grading plans shall indicate the location of any required walls and indicate the proposed width of required landscape easements or strips. Approval of the grading plan is required prior to Final Map approval. 3. At the time of Final Map submittal, the subdivider shall submit engineered construction plans to the City of Fresno Public Works, Public Utilities, and Planning and Development Departments for grading, public sanitary sewer system, public water system, street lighting system, public streets, and storm drainage, including other technical reports and engineered plans as necessary to construct the required public improvements and work and applicable processing fees. 4. Engineered construction plans shall be approved by the City prior to the approval of the Final Map. If, at the time of Final Map approval, such plans have not been approved, the subdivider shall provide performance security in an amount established by the City to guarantee the completion of plans. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM September 21, 2005 Page 2 5. Public utilities easements, as necessary, shall be shown on the Final Map and dedicated to the City of Fresno. Public utility easements beyond the limits of the Final Map, but required as a condition of development, shall be acquired at the subdivider's cost and shall be dedicated by separate instrument at the time of Final Map approval. The relocation of existing utilities necessitated by the required public improvements shall be paid for by the subdivider. The subdivider is responsible to contact the appropriate utility company for information. 6. Comply with the conditions, policies and standards set forth in the City of Fresno, Municipal Code, Article 10, Chapter 12, "Subdivision of Real Property;" Resolution No. 68-187, "City Policy with Respect to Subdivisions;" and City of Fresno Standard Specifications, 2002 Edition, and any amendments thereto. 7. The developer/owner shall pay applicable fees for, but not limited to, plan checks for street improvements and other grading and construction; street trees, street signs, water and sewer service, and inspections in accordance with the City of Fresno Master Fee Schedule (City Resolution No. 79-606 and No. 80-420) and any amendments, modifications, or additions thereto; and in accordance with the requirements of State law as related to vesting tentative maps. 8. The subdivider shall furnish to the City acceptable security to guarantee the construction of the off-site street improvements in accordance with all applicable provisions of the Fresno Municipal Code (FMC) and the State Subdivision Map Act. The subdivider shall complete all the public improvements prior to the approval of the Final Map by the City. If, at the time of Final Map approval, any public improvements have not been completed and accepted in accordance with the standards of the City, the subdivider may elect to enter into an agreement with the City to thereafter guarantee the completion of the improvements. 9. As a condition of Final Map approval, the subdivider shall furnish to the City a subdivision guarantee listing all parties having any right, title or interest and the nature of their interest per State law. 10. Relinquish access rights to South Peach and East Church Avenues from all residential lots which abut these streets. Ref. Section 12-1011-f-3 of the Fresno Municipal Code. 11. Relinquish access rights along the northern property line of proposed lot 96, the southern property lines of proposed lots 55 and 97, the western property line of proposed lot 116. 12. Prior to final map approval, the owner of the subject property shall execute a "Right to Farm" covenant with the City of Fresno. Said covenant is to run with the land and shall acknowledge and agree that the subject property is in or near agricultural districts located in the County of Fresno and that the residents of said property should be prepared to accept the inconveniences and discomfort associated with normal farm Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM September 21, 2005 Page 3 activities. The "Right to Farm" covenant shall be recorded prior to or concurrent with the recording of the Final Map of Tentative Tract No. 5436/UGM. 13. Provide enhanced landscaped median entryways into the subdivision from East Church and South Peach Avenues. 14. Provide anti-graffiti landscaping for the required walls along East Church and South Peach Avenues. Landscaping and Walls 15. Pursuant to Section 12-1011-f of the FMC the developer/owner shall provide a 15-foot landscape easement (and irrigation system) along the northern property lines of lots which back-onto East Church Avenue and a 15-foot landscape easement (and irrigation system) along the eastern property lines of lots which back-onto South Peach Avenue. 16. Pursuant to 2025 Fresno General Plan Exhibit 9 and Policies E-15-a, E-15-b, E-15-h, E- 15-i and E-15-x and in accordance with Policies 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 and 3.2.3 of the 1990 Master Multi-Purpose Trails Manual, within the limits of the tract, the developer/owner shall construct appropriate improvements or provide appropriate security for a bicycle and pedestrian trail with accommodation of an appropriate width along the southern side of the Central No. 23 canal. The location and width of the trail may be accommodated within and including the required public right-of-way and landscape easement located between the curb face and including the required public right-of-way. 17. Construct a six-foot high solid masonry wall (at finished grade of proposed site) pursuant to the solid wall requirements of Section 12-306-H of the Fresno Municipal Code at the rear of the required 15-foot landscape easements along East Church and South Peach Avenues. Construction plans for required walls showing architectural appearance and location of all walls shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department for review prior to Final Map approval. 18. Provide a corner cut-off area at the intersection of East Church and South Peach Avenues in accordance with Section 12-306-H-3-d of the FMC. Corner cut-offs are established to provide an unobstructed view for vehicular and pedestrian traffic approaching an intersection. They are a triangular area formed by the property lines and a diagonal line adjoining points on the property lines, measured a specific distance from the point of their intersection. At the intersections of streets, this distance is 30 feet. The corner cut-off area shall be landscaped (including an irrigation system), and may be included within the City's Community Facilities District. 19. When the grading plan establishes a top of slope beyond the required landscape easement noted and the construction of the required wall is to be established coincident with the top of slope then the required minimum easement width shall be expanded to include the full landscaped area up to the wall location. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM September 21, 2005 Page 4 20. Maintenance of the required landscape easements, streets, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, medians, and street furniture may be the responsibility of the City's Community Facilities District. Contact the Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division, at (559) 621-8695 for information regarding the City's District. The property owners may petition the City for annexation to the City's District prior to final map approval. If approved by City Council, the following features may be maintained by the Community Facilities District see attached letter dated July 11, 2005: a. Landscaping and irrigation systems as approved by the Parks Department at the following locations: • Within the street easements (including median to centerline) and the landscape easement along the property lines that back-onto East Church and South Peach Avenues. b. All local streets, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, medians and street furniture as approved by the Public Works Department within the boundary of the map. c. All curbs and gutters, sidewalks, medians, street furniture and street (to centerline) within East Church and South Peach Avenues as approved by the Public Works Department along the map frontage. d. All street lights as approved by the Public Works Department within the boundary of the map. 21. If the developer/subdivider elects to petition for annexation into the City's Community Facilities District, he/she shall be required to provide the City of Fresno, Department of Public Works, with copies of signed acknowledgments from each purchaser of a lot within the subdivision, attesting to the purchasers understanding that the lot will have an annual maintenance assessment and that he/she is aware of the estimated amount of the assessment. The developer/subdivider shall execute and record a covenant on each lot providing notice that the subject property is subject to annual payment of the Community Facilities District assessment. 22. Should the City Council not approve the annexation of any or all of the maintenance items listed above, then the property owner/developer shall create a homeowner's association for the maintenance of these items and proposed private streets, utilities, and walls/gates. The proposed Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and the proposed instruments for the homeowners association shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department for review two weeks prior to final map approval. Said documents shall be recorded with the final map or alternatively submit recorded documents or documents for recording prior to final acceptance of subdivision improvements. Said documents shall include assignment of responsibility to the homeowners association for landscaping and other provisions as stated in the Planning and Development Department Guidelines for preparation of CC&Rs dated January 11, 1985. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM September 21, 2005 Page 5 23. Improvement plans for all required landscaping and irrigation systems shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department for review prior to Final Map approval. Lot Dimensions 24. Pursuant to Section 12-211.5-B of the FMC, all parcels within the R-1 zone district must provide the following minimum standards: Width Interior lots: 60 feet Corner lots: 65 feet Reversed corner lots: 70 feet Curved/cul-de-sac lots: 40 feet Depth Lots facing local streets: 100 feet Building Setbacks 25. Building setbacks shall be in accordance with the R-1/UGM zone district as shown on Exhibit A of Vesting Tentative Map Tract No. 5436/UGM dated June 21, 2005, and the provisions of Section 12-211.5-E of the Fresno Municipal Code, unless otherwise noted in these conditions. Information 26. Prior to the issuance of building permits for the subdivision, school construction fees shall be paid to the Fresno Unified School District in accordance with the school district's adopted schedule of fees. 27. Contact the United States Postal Service for the location and type of mailboxes to be installed in this subdivision. 28. Pursuant to Section 66456.1 of the Subdivision Map Act, which states `The right of the subdivider to file multiple Final Maps shall not limit the authority of the local agency to impose reasonable conditions relating to the filing of multiple Final Maps," any multiple final maps filed by the subdivider on this tract shall fully and independently conform to all provisions of Fresno Municipal Code Chapter 12, Article 10, Subdivision of Real Property. 29. The developer/owner shall obtain any and all permits required for the removal or demolition of any existing building or structure located within the subdivision boundaries. The developer/owner shall also obtain any and all permits required for the proper abandonment/closure of any existing water well, septic tank/leach field or cesspool, and irrigation pipeline on the subject property. All such permits shall be obtained prior to commencement of tract grading work, in accordance with Chapter 13 of the Fresno Municipal Code. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM September 21, 2005 Page 6 30. If archaeological and/or animal fossil material is encountered during project surveying, grading, excavating, or construction, work shall stop immediately. 31. If there are suspected human remains, the Fresno County Coroner shall be immediately contacted (business hours: (559) 268-0109; after hours the contact phone number is (559) 488-3111 for the Fresno County Sheriff's Department). If remains or other archaeological material is possibly Native American in origin, the Native American Heritage Commission (phone number (916) 653-4082) shall be immediately contacted, and the California Archaeological Inventory/Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center (phone number (805) 644-2289) shall be contacted to obtain a referral list of recognized archaeologists. 32. An archaeological assessment shall be conducted for the project, the site shall be formally recorded, and recommendations made to the City as to any further site investigation or site avoidance/preservation measures. 33. If animal fossils are uncovered, the Museum of Paleontology at the University of California, Berkeley shall be contacted to obtain a referral list of recognized paleontologists. An assessment shall be conducted by a paleontologist; if the paleontologist determines the material to be significant, a recommendation shall be made to the City as to any further site investigation or preservation measures. 34. Apportionment of Special Assessment: If, as part of this subdivision, a division will be made of any lot or parcel of land upon which there is an unpaid special assessment levied under any State or local law, including a division into condominium interest as defined in Section 783 of the Civil Code, the developer/owner shall file a written application with the City of Fresno Director of Public Works, requesting apportionment of the unpaid portion of the assessment or pay off such assessment in full. If the subdivider elects to apportion the assessment, the application shall contain the following information: a. A full description of each assessed lot, parcel or interest to be divided and of how such lot, parcel or interest will be divided; b. A request that the Engineer apportion the amount remaining unpaid on the assessment in accordance with applicable law; and c. Written consent of the owner(s) of each such lot, parcel, or interest to the requested apportionment. d. The application shall be filed prior to the approval of the Final Map(s) by the City and shall be accompanied by a fee in an amount specified in the Master Fee Resolution for each separate lot, parcel, or interest into which the original assessed lot, parcel or interest is to be divided. The fee shall be in an amount sufficient to Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM September 21, 2005 Page 7 pay all costs of the City and the Engineer of Work responsible for determining the initial assessment in making the requested apportionment. 35. The subdivider shall comply with Regulation VIII of the San Joaquin Valley Air Quality Pollution Control District for the control of particulate matter and fugitive dust during construction of this project. 36. Solid waste disposal for the subdivision shall be provided by the City of Fresno. The method of collection to be utilized in this tract shall be subject to approval of the Solid Waste Manager(see below-noted conditions). SOLID WASTE SERVICE 37. Comply with the memorandum from Donna Leslie of the Public Utilities Department, Solid Waste Division dated July 20, 2005. PARK SERVICE 38. Comply with the memorandum from Anne Lillie of the Public Works Department dated July 20, 2005. Urban Growth Management Requirements 39. The subdivider shall be required to pay the appropriate UGM Park Capital Fee at the time of Final Map approval. Fee payment may be deferred until time of building permit issuance in accordance with the requirements of Section 12-4.509-C-3 of the FMC. FIRE SERVICE 40. This project is within two and one-half miles from Fire Station No. MV 87 and future Fires Station No. 15. 41. Provide residential hydrants and fire flows per Public Works Standards with two sources of water. 42. Access is acceptable as shown on Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM dated June 21, 2005. 43. This project is subject to UGM Fire Service fees for Fire Station No. 15. Urban Growth Management Requirements 44. The subdivider shall be required to pay the appropriate Fire Station Capital Fee at the time of final map approval. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM September 21, 2005 Page 8 STREETS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY 45. The subdivider shall furnish to the City acceptable security to guarantee the construction of the off-site street improvements in accordance with all applicable provisions of the FMC and the State Subdivision Map Act. 46. The subdivider shall make provisions for disabled persons in accordance with the Department of Public Works standards and as required by State law. Handicap access ramps are required to be constructed in sidewalks at all corners within the limits of the tract. Where street furniture is located within the sidewalk area (fire hydrants, streetlights, etc.), a minimum of 48 inches of unobstructed path shall be maintained to satisfy the American Disabilities Act requirements. If necessary, dedicate a pedestrian easement to accommodate for the four-foot minimum unobstructed path requirement. 47. All of the required street improvements shall be constructed and/or installed in accordance with the City of Fresno Standard Specifications (2002 Edition). The following shall be submitted as a single package to the Pubic Works Department for review and approval: a. Signing and striping plans (per current California Department of Transportation standards); b. Street Construction Plans; and, c. Landscape and irrigation plans (median island and street trees within all parkways). 48. The subdivider shall underground all existing off-site overhead utilities and proposed utility systems in accordance with FMC Sections 12-1011, 8-801, and Resolution No. 78- 522, 88-229. 49. The subdivider shall construct an underground street lighting system per Public Works Standards within the limits of the tract. Spacing and design shall conform to Public Works Standards for collector (East Church Avenue), arterial (South Peach Avenue) and local streets. Height, type, spacing, etc., of standards and luminaries shall be in accordance with Resolution No. 68-187, 78-522, 81-219, and 88-229 or any modification thereto approved by the City Traffic Engineer prior to Final Map approval. Upon completion of the work by the subdivider and acceptance of the work by the City, the street lighting system shall be dedicated to the City. Submit engineered construction plans to the Public Works Department for approval. 50. All dead-end streets created by this subdivision shall be properly barricaded in accordance with City standards within seven days from the time the streets are surfaced or as directed by the Engineer. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM September 21,2005 Page 9 51. The developer shall comply with Rule 8060 of the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District for the control of fugitive dust requirements from paved and unpaved roads. 52. Comply with the memorandum from the Public Works Department, Engineering Division dated July 21, 2005. MAJOR STREETS East Church Avenue (Collector): 53. Dedicate 47 to 55 feet of property, from section line, for public street purposes within the limits of this subdivision to meet the City of Fresno Collector Standards. 54. Construct concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk to Public Works Standard P-5. The parkway shall be constructed to a 10-foot pattern within the limits of this tract and transition paving as necessary. 55. Construct 20 feet of permanent paving (measured from face of curb) within the limits of this subdivision. 56. Construct an underground street lighting system to Public Works Standard E-1 within the limits of this subdivision. Spacing and design shall conform to Public Works Standard E- 8 for Collector Streets. 57. Relinquish direct access rights to East Church Avenue from all lots within this tract (Reference Section 12-1011 of the FMC). South Peach Avenue (Arterial): 58. Dedicate 55 — 57 feet of property, from section line, for public street purposes within the limits of this subdivision to meet the City of Fresno's Arterial Standards. 59. Construct concrete curb and gutter and sidewalk to Public Works Standard P-5. Construct sidewalk to a 10-foot residential pattern. 60. Construct 20-feet of permanent paving within the limits of this subdivision. 61. Construct an 80-foot bus bay curb and gutter at the southwest corner of South Peach and East Church Avenues to Public Works Standard P-73, complete with a 10-foot monolithic sidewalk. 62. Construct an underground street lighting system to Public Works Standard E-1 within the limits of this subdivision. Spacing and design shall conform to Public Works Standard E-7 for Arterial Streets. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM September 21, 2005 Page 10 63. Relinquish direct vehicular access rights to South Peach Avenue from all lots within this subdivision. INTERIOR STREETS 64. Design and construct all curb, gutter, sidewalk (both sides), permanent paving, cul-de- sacs, and underground street lighting system on all interior streets to Public Works Standards. Sidewalk patterns shall comply with Public Works API Standards for 50 foot streets. 65. Any temporary dead-end streets created by this subdivision shall be properly barricaded in accordance with the Public Works Standard P-44. Specific Requirements 66. Relinquish direct vehicular access rights to: a. the north property line of lot 96. b. the south property line of lot 97 and 55. c. the west property line of lot 116. 67. The intersection of: a. South Peach Avenue at East Burns Avenue shall be limited to right-in and right- outturns. b. South Peach Avenue at East Grove Avenue shall be designed with a full median opening to allow for left turns-in and left turns-out. 68. The first order of work shall include a minimum of two points of vehicular access to the major streets for any phase of this development. 69. Dedicate 62' of property and provide medians at the Church Avenue at Cindy Avenue. (7-foot residential pattern — 20-foot travel lane — 8-foot median — 20-foot travel lane — 7- foot residential pattern). 70. East Grove Avenue: (adjacent to lot 55Y a. North side: Dedicate 27-feet and construct full offsite improvements. b. South side: Dedicate 16-feet and construct 12-feet of permanent paving with a 4-foot minimum drainage swale. 71. Irrigation /Canal Requirements: The developer shall enter into an agreement with the Fresno Irrigation District providing for piping the canal(s) and submit an executed copy of the agreement or commitment letter from FID to the Planning and Development Department. All piping shall be located outside of the proposed street right of way. Any piping across city streets shall be rubber gasketed reinforced concrete pipe (RGRCP) constructed perpendicular to the street. Submit engineered plans to Pubic Works Department, Engineering Division for review and approval. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM September 21, 2005 Page 11 72. Bike, Pedestrian and Equestrian Trail: Dedicate a 26-foot (minimum) easement for Bike and Pedestrian purposes only. (Additional right of way may be required for grading and drainage purposes.) Construct a 12400t wide bike and pedestrian trail/path, complete with lighting, signing, striping and landscaping, per the 2025 Fresno General Plan, Multi- Purpose Trails Plan Map and Public Works Standards P-59 and P-60. Identify route on the map and provide a cross section prior to the planning commission hearing. Submit engineered construction plans to Public Works. Submit lighting, signing and striping plan to Traffic Engineering for approval. Submit grading, landscape and irrigation plans to Engineering Services. An additional dedication is required for the equestrian portion, if required contact the Planning and Development Department at (559) 621-8073. 73. The Owner/Developer shall signalize the intersection of East Jensen Avenue at South Peach Avenue. Eligible work at this intersection can be credited against the required Traffic Signal Mitigation Impact Fee (TSMI fee) in Condition Number 72 below. Construction of said signal shall be done prior to any Phase One building occupancy. This proposed construction of this signal shall include, but not limited to the following: a. The intersection shall be signalized to City of Fresno Standards complete with actuation, westbound left turn phasing, and signal pre-emption. b. Widen the eastbound approach to one left turn lane, three through lanes and one separate right turn lane. c. Widen the westbound approach to one left turn lane, three through lanes and one right turn lane. d. Widen the southbound approach to one left turn lane, one through lane and one right turn lane. 74. The project shall pay its TSMI fee at the time of building permit based on the trip generation rate(s) as set forth in the latest edition of the ITE Generation Manual. The fee amount for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM is 168 (units) x 414.69 (fee rate as shown in the Master Fee Schedule) _ $69,668.00. Urban Growth Management Requirements 75. This map is in UGM major street zone D-1/E-2; therefore, pay all applicable UGM fees. East Church Avenue 76. Design and construct a Major Street Bridge (37) at the intersection of East Church Avenue and the Central No. 23 Canal. Public Works will apply this requirement to a minimum of 4 other subdivisions with each subdivision being responsible for a fee no greater than 1/5 of the cost of said bridge. The timing of the bridge construction shall occurrp for to close out of this subdivision or at such time that the City Engineer deems necessary, whichever is earlier. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM September 21, 2005 Page 12 South Peach Avenue 77. Dedicate and construct two 17-foot center section travel lanes and a raised concrete median island with a 250' left turn pockets at all major intersections from East Grove Avenue to East Jensen Avenue. Details of said street shall be depicted on the approved tentative tract map. Dedication shall be sufficient to accommodate arterial standard and any other grading or transitions as necessary based on a 55 MPH design speed. 78. Install a signal pole with a 150-watt safety light to Public Works Standards at the southwest corner of South Peach and East Church Avenues. 79. Dedicate sufficient right-of-way and construct additional paving for southbound to northbound U-turns at East Jensen Avenue. See Exhibit "B" attached to the Public Works memorandum dated September 15, 2005. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE 80. The following conditions are required to provide sewer service to the tract: 81. All sanitary sewer mains shall be extended within the proposed tract to provide service to each lot. 82. Abandon all existing on-site private sanitary sewer system. 83. A preliminary sewer design layout shall be prepared by the Developers Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Utilities for review and conceptual approvals prior to submittal or acceptance of the developers final map and engineered plan and profile improvement drawing for City review. 84. Public sewer facilities shall be constructed in accordance with the Department of Public Works standards, specifications, and policies. 85. Sanitary sewer mains shall be extended within the proposed tract to provide sewer service to each lot created. 86. Engineered improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted to the Department of Public Utilities for review and approval for any proposed additions to the sanitary sewer system. Urban Growth Management Requirements 87. The project is located within Sewer Oversize Reimbursement Service Area No. 35. 88. Sewer lateral, Oversize Sewer, Trunk Sewer and Wastewater Facilities charges are due and shall be paid for the project. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM September 21,2005 Page 13 WATER SERVICE 89. The following conditions are required to provide water service to the tract: 90. Water mains (including installation of City fire hydrants) shall be extended within the proposed tract to provide water service to each lot created. 91. Separate water services with meter boxes shall be provided to each lot created. 92. Construct a water supply well(s) on a site(s) dedicated to the City of Fresno. The well(s) shall be capable of producing a minimum total demand of 500 gallons per minute, sufficient to serve peak water demand for the project. Well site(s) shall be of a size(s) and at a location(s) acceptable to the Water Systems Manager. The cost of acquiring the well site and construction of the well(s) shall be reimbursed from UGM Water Supply Well Service Area Fund 501s, in accordance with established UGM policies (see attached letter dated January 10, 2005) 93. Water well construction shall include wellhead treatment facilities, if required, and provided there are sufficient funds available in the UGM Wellhead Treatment Fund for the area. The cost of constructing wellhead treatment facilities shall be reimbursed from UGM Wellhead Treatment Service Area Fund 501s, in accordance with established UGM policies. 94. Dedicate a water supply and treatment site for installation of an above ground water storage and treatment facility that will be installed and/or constructed by the City. The site shall be of size and at a location acceptable to the Water Systems Manager. The cost of acquiring the site shall be reimbursed from UGM Water Supply Well Service Area Fund 501 s, in accordance with established UGM policies. 95. Two independent sources of water meeting Federal and State Drinking Water Act Standards are required to serve the tract including any subsequent phases thereof. The two-source requirement may be accomplished through any combination of water main extensions, construction of supply wells, or other acceptable sources of water supply approved by the Water Systems Manager. 96. Seal and abandon existing on-site wells in compliance with the State of California Well Standards, Bulletin 74-90 or current revisions issued by the California Department of Water Resources and City of Fresno standards. 97. All public water facilities shall be constructed in accordance with the Department of Public Works standards, specifications, and policies. 98. Engineered improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer are required for proposed additions to the city water system. 99. Installation of public fire hydrant(s) is required in accordance with City Standards. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM September 21, 2005 Page 14 100. Payment for installation of water service(s) and/or meter(s) is required. Urban Growth Management Requirements 101. Payment of appropriate water connection charges at the time of final map approval subject to deferral to building permit issuance as appropriate. 102. Payment for installation of water service(s) and/or meter(s) is required. 103. Pay UGM water fees for Water Service Area No. 501 S. URBAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS(GENERAL) 104. The developer of property located within the UGM boundaries shall comply with all sewer, water and street requirements and pay all applicable UGM fees imposed under the Urban Growth Management process (with appropriate credit given for the installation of required UGM improvements) in accordance with the requirements of State Law as related to vesting tentative tract maps. 105. The developer will be responsible for the relocation or reconstruction of any existing improvements or facilities necessary to construct any of the required UGM improvements. Right-of-Way Acquisition 106. The developer will be responsible for the acquisition of any necessary right-of-way to construct any of the required improvements. 107. Rights-of-way acquisition shall include any rights-of-way necessary for proper drainage, signing, pole relocation, and shoulder grading. In general, this will require right-of-way to be provided approximately 10 feet outside the travel lane. The exact requirement must be determined at the project design stage based on the existing conditions and detailed design information. 108. In the event an acquisition of any easement or right-of-way is necessitated by the subject development, said acquisition will be accomplished prior to Final Map approval. The developer/owner should contact the Real Estate Section of the Public Works Department to receive procedural guidance in such acquisitions. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM September 21, 2005 Page 15 109. Should such acquisition not be accomplished by the subdivider prior to Final Map approval, the subdivider must request and grant to the City the full authority to attempt acquisition either through negotiation or through its power of eminent domain. The subdivider shall furnish to the City Public Works Department, Engineering Division/ Real Estate Section, an appraisal report or a request for an estimated appraisal amount (to be determined by the City of Fresno Real Estate Section) prior to preparation of a Subdivision Agreement. 110. The subdivider shall submit adequate security in the form of a cash deposit to guarantee payment of all costs associated with the acquisition, including staff time, attorney's fees, appraisal fees, court costs, and all related expenditures and costs necessary to effect the acquisition of such easements or rights-of-way. FLOOD CONTROL AND DRAINAGE 111. The subdivider shall be required to comply with the specific requirements imposed by the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (FMFCD) for the subdivision or any amendments or modifications to those requirements which may be granted by the FMFCD Board of Directors, pursuant to Section 13-1307 of the Fresno Municipal Code. These requirements are identified in the District's letters to the Planning and Development Department dated July 20, 2005. 112. Any temporary ponding basins constructed or enlarged to provide service to the subdivision shall be fenced in accordance with City standards within seven days from the time the basin becomes operational or as directed by the City Engineer. Temporary ponding basins will be created through a covenant between the City and the Developer prior to Final Map approval. Maintenance of the temporary ponding basin shall be by the Developer until permanent service for the entire subdivision is provided. FRESNO IRRIGATION DISTRICT 113. The developer/owner shall comply with the requirements in the letter from the Fresno Irrigation District dated January 5, 2005. SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 114. The developer/owner shall comply with the requirements in the letter from the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District dated July 1, 2005. Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM September 21, 2005 Page 16 DEVELOPMENT FEES AND CHARGES This project is subject to the following fees and charges: SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES FEE RATE 1. Lateral Sewer Charge $0.10/sq. ft. (to 100' depth) 2. Oversize Charge $0.05/sq. ft. (to 100' depth) 3. Trunk Sewer Charge $344/living unit Service Area: Fowler 4. Wastewater Facilities Charge $2,119/living unit 5. Copper Avenue Sewer Lift Station Charge n/a 6. Fowler Trunk Sewer Interim Fee Surety n/a 7. House Branch Sewer Charge n/a 8. Millbrook Overlay Sewer n/a WATER CONNECTION CHARGES FEE RATE 9. Service Connection Charge: Fee based on service(s) and meter(s) sizes specified by owner; fee for service(s) and Meter(s) established by the Master Fee Schedule. 10. Frontage Charge $6.50/lineal foot 11. Transmission Grid Main Charge $643/gross acre (parcels 5 gross acres or more) 12. Transmission Grid Main Bond Debt $243/gorss acre (parcels 5 gross Service Charge acres or more) 13. UGM Water Supply Fee $582/living unit Service Area: 501-S 14. Well Head Treatment Fee $238/Living Unit Service Area: 501 15. Recharge Fee $75/living unit Service Area: 501 Conditions of Approval Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM September 21, 2005 Page 17 16. 1994 Bond Debt Service $244/living unit Service Area: 501 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE 17. Northeast Fresno Policing Area n/a 18. Traffic Signal Charge $414.96/living unit URBAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT FEE RATE/CHARGE* 19. UGM Fire Station Capital Fee $605/gross acre Service Area: 15 20. UGM Park Fee $2392/gross acre Service Area: 2 21. Major Street Charge $3161/adj. acre Service Area: D-1/E-2 22. Major Street Bridge Charge $304/adj. acre Service Area: D-1/E-2 23. UGM Grade Separation Fee n/a 24. Trunk Sewer Charge n/a Service Area: 25. *Street Acquisition/Construction Charge n/a K:\Master Files•Tract Maps\Tract 5436 Paul Bernal (R-05-33&C-05-110)\T-5436 Conditions of Approval 9-21-05.doc CITY OF FRESNO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SPECIAL PERMIT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110 September 21, 2005 PART A- PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Assessor's Parcel No. 481-090-27 &28 2. Job Address: 2396 South Peach Avenue 3. Street Location: Southwest corner of East Church and South Peach Avenues 4. Existing/Proposed Zoning: AE-5/UGM - R-1/UGM zoning proposed under related Rezone Application No. R-05-33 5. Zone Map No. 2554 6. Project Description: Development of a 168-lot single family residential planned development subdivision with reduced lot sizes. PART B -GENERAL CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS The Fresno City Planning Commission on September 21,2005,will consider the special permit application subject to the enclosed list of conditions and Exhibits A, B-1, B-2 dated September 21, 2005. This project was subject to the completion of the notice and appeal period for the department's finding that the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment. A notice of a finding of conformity to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR) No. 10130 was published on August 18,2005,providing any interested party with an appeal period of 20 days. Notice of the hearing for the special permit was mailed to surrounding property owners on September 9, 2005. Building permits will not be issued for this project until the Planning Commission and City Council have acted on the project. IMPORTANT: PLEASE READ CAREFULLY Please note that this project may be subject to a variety of discretionary conditions of approval. These include conditions based on adopted city plans and policies,those determined through site plan review and environmental assessment essential to mitigate adverse effects on the environment including the health, safety, and welfare of the community, and recommended conditions for development that are not essential to health, safety,and welfare, but would on the whole enhance the project and its relationship to the neighborhood and environment. Conditions of Approval Conditional Use Permit No. C-05-110 September 21, 2005 Page 2 Discretionary conditions of approval are listed in the last section of this list of conditions under the heading "Part F-Miscellaneous"and may be appealed. All code requirements, however,are mandatory and may only be modified by variance, provided the findings pursuant to Fresno Municipal Code Section 12-405.A can be made. All discretionary conditions of approval will ultimately be deemed mandatory upon final approval. Approval of this special permit shall be considered null and void in the event of failure by the applicant and/or the authorized representative, architect, engineer, or designer to disclose and delineate all facts and information relating to the subject property and the proposed development including,but not limited to, the following: 1. All existing and proposed improvements including but not limited to buildings and structures,signs and their uses, trees, walls, driveways, outdoor storage, and open land use areas on the subject property and all of the preceding which are located on adjoining property and may encroach on the subject property; 2. All public and private easements, rights-of-way and any actual or potential prescriptive easements or uses of the subject property; 3. Existing and proposed grade differentials between the subject property and adjoining property zoned or planned for residential use. Approval of this special permit may become null and void in the event that development is not completed in accordance with all the conditions and requirements imposed on this special permit, the Zoning Ordinance, and all Public Works Standards and Specifications. The Planning and Development Department shall not assume responsibility for any deletions or omissions resulting from the special permit review process or for additions or alterations to construction plan not specifically submitted and reviewed and approved pursuant to this special permit or subsequent amendments or revisions. No uses of land, buildings, or structures other than those specifically approved pursuant to this site plan shall be permitted. Outdoor sales and display areas are not permitted as part of this application. (Include this note on the site plan.) Transfer all red line notes, etc., shown on all original site plan exhibits dated September 21, 2005, to the final site plan. CORRECTIONS SHALL INCLUDE ALL THOSE LISTED IN THIS DOCUMENT AND THOSE LISTED IN THE CORRECTION LIST PROVIDED BY THE PLAN CHECK PROCESS. To complete the backcheck process for building permit relative to planning and zoning issues,submit eight copies of this corrected,final site plan,together with six copies of the elevations, landscape,and irrigation plans,and any required covenants and/or studies or analyses to the Planning Division for final review and approval ten days before applying for building permits. Copies of this final approved site plan,elevations,landscape,and irrigation plans stamped by the Planning Division must be substituted for unstamped copies of same in each of the four sets of construction plans submitted for plan check prior to issuance of building permits. The final approved site plan must also include all corrections identified in the plan check process. Conditions of Approval Conditional Use Permit No.C-05-110 September 21, 2005 Page 3 Be advised that on-site inspections will not be authorized unless the final stamped approved site plan, elevations, landscape, and irrigation plans are included in the plan check file copy. Please call for an appointment for final sign-off for building permits following your receipt and substitution of the four copies of the stamped,corrected,approved exhibits in the plan check sets. Call Paul Bernal at 559/621-8073. NOTICE TO PROJECT APPLICANT In accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), the imposition of fees, dedication, reservations or exactions for this project are subject to protest by the project applicant at the time of approval or conditional.approval of the development or within 90 days after the date of the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservation or exactions imposed on the development project. This notice does not apply to those fees, dedications, reservations or exactions which were previously imposed and duly notice;or,where no notice was previously required under the provisions of Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) in effect before January 1, 1997. PART C - PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT& PARKING LOT REQUIREMENTS The following requirements are based on City records and the accuracy of the existing and proposed on-site and off-site conditions depicted on the exhibits submitted by the applicant. Requirements which may not have been addressed due to omission or misrepresentation of information,for which this review process is dependent, will be imposed whenever such conditions are discovered. Questions relating to dedications, street improvements or parking lot geometrics may be directed to the Public Works Department, Transportation Division, David Padilla at 559/621-8798. 1. STREET DEDICATIONS AND ENCROACHMENT PERMITS Identify all street furniture, e.g. public utility poles and boxes, guy wires, signs, fire hydrants, bus stop benches, mail boxes, news stands, trash receptacles, tree wells, etc., within the public right-of-way. Also, identify the required 4-foot minimum path of travel along the public sidewalk directly in front of property, as required by the California Administration Code (Title 24). A pedestrian easement may be required if Title 24 requirements cannot be met. East Church Avenue (Collector): a. Dedicate 47 to 55 feet of property, from section line, for public street purposes within the limits of this subdivision to meet the City of Fresno Collector Standards. South Peach Avenue (Arterial): b. Dedicate 55 — 57 feet of property, from section line, for public street purposes within the limits of this subdivision to meet the City of Fresno's Arterial Standards. Conditions of Approval Conditional Use Permit No. C-05-110 September 21, 2005 Page 4 2. STREET IMPROVEMENTS All improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the Standard Specifications and Standard Drawings of the City of Fresno, Public Works Department or street construction plans required and approved by the City Engineer. The performance of any work within the public street rights-of-way (including pedestrian and utility easements) requires a STREET WORK PERMIT RPIOP to commencement of work. Contact the Public Works Department Engineering Services Section at 559/621-8686 for detailed information. All required street improvements must be completed and accepted by the city prior to occupancy. Repair all damaged and/or grade off-site concrete improvements as determined by the Public Works Department Construction Management Division at 559/621-5500. East Church Avenue (Collector): a. Construct concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk to Public Works Standard P-5. The parkway shall be constructed to a 10-foot pattern within the limits of this tract and transition paving as necessary. b. Construct 20 feet of permanent paving (measured from face of curb)within the limits of this subdivision. C. Construct an underground street lighting system to Public Works Standard E-1 within the limits of this subdivision. Spacing and design shall conform to Public Works Standard E-8 for Collector Streets. South Peach Avenue (Arterial): d. Construct concrete curb and gutter and sidewalk to Public Works Standard P-5. Construct sidewalk to a 10-foot residential pattern. e. Construct 20-feet of permanent paving within the limits of this subdivision. f. Construct an 80-foot bus bay curb and gutter at the southwest corner of South Peach and East Church Avenues to Public Works Standard P-73, complete with a 10-foot monolithic sidewalk. g. Construct an underground street lighting system to Public Works Standard E-1 within the limits of this subdivision. Spacing and design shall conform to Public Works Standard E-7 for Arterial Streets. INTERIOR STREETS: h. Design and construct all curb,gutter,sidewalk(both sides), permanent paving,cul-de-sacs, and underground street lighting system on all interior streets to Public Works Standards. Sidewalk patterns shall comply with Public Works API Standards for 50-foot streets. L Any temporary dead-end streets created by this subdivision shall be properly barricaded in accordance with the Public Works Standard P-44. Conditions of Approval Conditional Use Permit No. C-05-110 September 21, 2005 Page 5 3. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS a. Comply with the Conditions of Approval Nos. 64 through 72 for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM. 4. SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES The following Sewer Connection Charges are due and shall be paid for this project. a. Sewer Lateral Charge b. Oversize Sewer Charge C. Trunk Sewer Charge: Fowler d. Wastewater Facilities Charge (Residential Only) 5. WATER CONNECTION CHARGES The following Water Charges are due and shall be paid for this Project: a. Payment for installation of water service(s) and/or meter(s) is required. b. Water connection Charges are due and shall be paid by the developer/owner. 6. IRRIGATION DITCH/CANAL REQUIREMENTS a. Comply with Fresno Irrigation Districts memorandum dated January 5, 2005. 7. URBAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT (UGM) REQUIREMENTS AND FEES Submittal of engineered construction plans to Public Works for approval must be maderp for to issuance of building permits. Contact David Padilla at 559/621-8798 or Greg Jenness at 559/621-8812 for questions regarding the UGM construction requirements. a. This tentative tract map is in UGM major street zone D-1/E-2; therefore will be required to pay all applicable UGM fees. b. Applicable UGM Fees for this project are detailed in the conditions of approval for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM. East Church Avenue (Collector): C. Design and construct a Major Street Bridge(37)at the intersection of East Church Avenue and the Central No. 23 Canal. Public Works will apply this requirement to a minimum of 4 other subdivisions with each subdivision being responsible for a fee no greater than 1/5 of the cost of said bridge. The timing of the bridge construction shall occur rior to close out of this subdivision or at such time that the City Engineer deems necessary,whichever is earlier. Conditions of Approval Conditional Use Permit No. C-05-110 September 21, 2005 Page 6 South Peach Avenue (Arterial): d. Dedicate and construct two 17-foot center section travel lanes and a raised concrete median island with a 250'left turn pockets at all major intersections from East Grove Avenue to East Jensen Avenue. Details of said street shall be depicted on the approved tentative tract map. Dedication shall be sufficient to accommodate arterial standard and any other grading or transitions as necessary based on a 55 MPH design speed. e. Install a signal pole with a 150-watt safety light to Public Works Standards at the southwest corner of South Peach and East Church Avenues. f. Dedicate sufficient right-of-way and construct additional paving for southbound to northbound U-tums at East Jensen Avenue. See Exhibit "B" attached to the Public Works memorandum dated September 15, 2005. PART D- PLANNING/ZONING REQUIREMENTS PLANNING 1. Development is subject to, and consistent with, the following plans and policies: • 2025 Fresno General Plan • Roosevelt Community Plan ZONING 2. Existing zoning is AE-5/UGM; development is proposed in accordance with the R-1/UGM zoning requested under related Rezone Application No. R-05-110. Approval of this special permit is subject to approval of the zone district amendment and compliance with any conditions of zoning approval. BUILDING HEIGHT 3. The maximum allowable building height is two-stories, not to exceed 30 feet. All proposed units are less than 30 feet in height. BUILDING SETBACK, OPEN SPACES AND LANDSCAPING 4. Setbacks shall be in accordance with Exhibit A dated September 21, 2005. Front and rear yard building setbacks shall be a minimum of 20 feet. 5. Provide the following minimum landscaped areas: a. Provide a 15-foot landscape easement(and irrigation system)along the property lines of all lots which back-onto or side-onto East Church Avenue. b. Provide a 15-foot landscape easement(and irrigation system)along the property lines of all lots which back-onto or side-onto South Peach Avenue. 6. Median Island Landscaping: See attached memorandum for the Public Utilities Department dated July 20, 2005. Conditions of Approval Conditional Use Permit No. C-05-110 September 21, 2005 Page 7 7. Provide one medium size tree for each 60 feet of street frontage or one per lot whichever is greater. Trees shall be planted as required in order to shade and enhance adjacent property and public rights-of-way. Refer to the attached"Performance Standards for Parking Lot Shading,"for the tree list and further details. NOTE: One medium sized tree is defined as attaining a height of 30-60 feet at maturity. Two small trees, up to 30-feet high at maturity may be substituted for one medium sized tree. 8. Trees shall be maintained in good health. However,trees may not be trimmed or pruned to reduce the natural height or overall crown of the tree, except as necessary for the health of the tree and public safety; or as may otherwise be approved by the Planning and Development Department. (Put this note on the site and landscape plans.) 9. Submit six copies of landscaping and irrigation plans prepared by a landscape professional, showing the number and types of trees,to the Planning Division. These plans must be reviewed and approved prior to obtaining building permits. 10. Landscaping in the front yard must be in place before issuance of the certificate of occupancy. (Include this note on the site plan and landscape plan.) 11. Prior to final inspection, a written certification, signed by a landscape professional approved by the Director, shall be submitted stating that the required landscaping and irrigation system was installed in accordance with the landscaping and irrigation plans approved by the Planning Division, Development Department. (Include this note on the site plan.) A certification form is enclosed for future use. SPACE BETWEEN BUILDINGS 12. Provide lot areas and building setbacks as shown on Exhibit A" dated September 21, 2005. FENCES, HEDGES, AND WALLS Temporary fences to secure projects under construction are allowed. Any temporary fence shall be adequately secured and constructed to prevent overturning due to wind,vandalism,and/orcasual contact by the general public. The construction shall be performed in such a manner as to minimize any potential safety hazard which may occur as a result of improper fence installation or damage to the fence. 13. Construct a 6-foot high solid masonry wall along the rear or side property lines of all lots which back onto East Church and South Peach Avenues (solid wall to meet the requirements of Section 12-306-H, Fresno Municipal Code). Construction plans for required walls showing architectural appearance and location of all walls shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department for review prior to Final Map approval. Construction plans for required walls showing architectural appearance and location of all walls shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department for review prior to Final Map approval. 14. Provide a corner cut-off area at the intersections of East Church and South Peach Avenues in accordance with Section 12-306-H-3-d of the FMC. Corner cut-offs are established to provide an unobstructed view for vehicular and pedestrian traffic approaching an intersection. They are a Conditions of Approval Conditional Use Permit No. C-05-110 September 21, 2005 Page 8 triangular area formed by the property lines and a diagonal line adjoining points on the property lines, measured a specific distance from the point of their intersection. At the intersections of streets,this distance is 30 feet. The corner cut-off area shall be landscaped(including an irrigation system), and may be included within the City's Community Facilities District. ACCESS/TRAIL 15. Vehicular and/or pedestrian access is provided as shown on attached Exhibit A dated September 21, 2005. 16. Pursuant to 2025 Fresno General Plan Exhibit 9 and Policies E-15-a, E-15-b, E-15-h, E-1 5-i and E- 15-x and in accordance with Policies 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 and 3.2.3 of the 1990 Master Multi-Purpose Trails Manual, within the limits of the tract, the developer/owner shall construct appropriate improvements or provide appropriate security for a bicycle and pedestrian trail with accommodation of an appropriate width along the southern side of the Central No.23 canal. The location and width of the trail may be accommodated within and including the required public right- of-way and landscape easement located between the curb face and including the required public right-of-way. OUTDOOR ADVERTISING 17. Signs other than directional skins, if applicable are not approved for installation as part of this special permit. Submit for separate Master Sign Program or Sign Review Application. Applications and requirements for submittal are available at the Planning Division's Public Front Counter. (Include this note on the site plan.) PART E - CITY AND OTHER SERVICES FIRE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS 1. Comply with the attached requirements of the Fire Department dated June 23,2005(Contact Fire Prevention, 559/621-4141 for further information.) SOLID WASTE COLLECTION 2. Development shall be in accordance with attached memorandum from the Solid Waste Division dated July 20, 2005. Contact Solid Waste Management Division, Public Utilities Department at 559/621-1811, between 8 a.m. and 9 a.m. regarding this issue. FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS 3. Comply with the attached Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District memorandums,dated July 20, 2005. (Contact Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District at 559/456-3292 for further information.) Conditions of Approval Conditional Use Permit No. C-05-110 September 21, 2005 Page 9 NOTE: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency requires that a Notice of Intent for a general National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit be filed for all industrial uses listed in Attachment C provided by FMFCD and for any construction site of five or more acres of land. It is the property or business owner's responsibility to ensure that the Notice of Intent is filed in accordance with the regulations published in Volume 55. No. 222 of the Federal Register. SCHOOL FEES 4. School fees must be paid prior to issuance of building permits. (Contact Fresno Unified School District.) Provide proof of payment (or no fee required) prior to issuance of building permits. STREET TREE REQUIREMENTS 5. Provide street trees per the attached memorandum from the Public Works Department dated July 20, 2005. SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 6. Comply with attached correspondence from the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District dated July 1, 2005, and attached policies on dust and ozone mitigation. FRESNO IRRIGATION DISTRICT 7. Comply with attached correspondence from the Fresno Irrigation District dated July 1, 2005. PART F - MISCELLANEOUS Approval of this site plan is contingent upon the submittal of corrected site plans showing all existing/proposed on-site conditions as reflected on all exhibits (dated September 21, 2005) and the following: 1. If archaeological and/or animal fossil material is encountered during project surveying, grading, excavating, or construction, work shall stop immediately. 2. If there are suspected human remains, the Fresno County Coroner shall be immediately contacted (business hours: 559/268-0109; after hours the contact phone number is 559/488-3111 for the Fresno County Sheriff's Department). If remains or other archaeological material is possibly Native American in origin,the Native American Heritage Commission(phone number 916/653-4082)shall be immediately contacted, and the California Archaeological Inventory/Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center (phone number 805/644-2289) shall be contacted to obtain a referral list of recognized archaeologists. 3. If animal fossils are uncovered, the Museum of Paleontology at U.C. Berkeley shall be contacted to obtain a referral list of recognized paleontologists. An assessment shall be conducted by a paleontologist; if the paleontologist determines the material to be significant,a recommendation shall be made to the City as to any further site investigation or preservation measures. Conditions of Approval Conditional Use Permit No. C-05-110 September 21, 2005 Page 10 4. If there are suspected human remains,the Fresno County Coroner shall be immediately contacted. If the remains or other archaeological material is possibly Native American in origin, the Native American Heritage Commission (Phone: 916/653-4082) shall be immediately contacted, and the California Archaeological Inventory/Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center (Phone: 805/644-2289) shall be contacted to obtain a referral list of recognized archaeologists. An archaeological assessment shall be conducted for the project,the site shall be formally recorded,and recommendations made to the City as to any further site investigation or site avoidance/preservation. All discretionary conditions of approval will ultimately be deemed mandatory upon final approval of this conditional use permit. DEB:IeI:\KAMASTER FILES-TRACT MAPS\TRACT 5436 PAUL BERNAL (R-05-33&C-05-110)\C-05-110 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 9-21- 05.DOC City of ����E�EPaRI,��yr� r�lC�m%��►�� Fire Department 450 M Street Randy R. Bruegman Fresno, California 93721-3083 ` q�; Fire Chief 559-621-4000 FAX#559-498-4261f�fSERV www.fresno.gov Date 6-23-05 TO: Paul Bernal, Planner III Development D partment, Planning Division FROM: Mike Schmidt;' upervising Fire Prevention Inspector Fire Prevention Bureau SUBJECT: Tentative Tract No. 5436, R-05-53 The Fire Department has completed a review of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map 5436, which was submitted by Provost & Pritchard. The following requirements and conditions are to be placed on this vesting tentative tract map as a condition of approval by the Fire Department. General Requirements: This project is within 2.5 miles of Fire Station No. MV 87 and future Station 15. This project is subject to UGM Fire service fees for Fire station No. 15. Provide (residential) hydrants and fire flows per Public works standards with two sources of water. Access is acceptable as shown. Pauf Bernal -TT 5436 conditions-Paul.doc _ Page 1 City of PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DATE: July 11,2005 TO: PAUL BERNAL, Planner III Planning and Development Department FROM: ANN LILLIE,Senior Engineering Technician Public Works Department SUBJECT: CONDITIONS FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 5436 AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 1. The long term maintenance of the following items is the ultimate responsibility of the owner/developer. If approved by Council,the following features may be maintained by a Community Facilities District. • Maintenance of all Landscaping and Irrigation systems as approved by the Public Works Department within the street easements(including half of medians)and the landscape easements along the property lines that side or back-onto East Church and South Peach Avenues. • Maintenance of all Landscaping,Irrigation systems and Trail Improvements as approved by the Public Works Department within the trail Outlot"A". • Maintenance of Sidewalks and Street Furniture as approved by the Public Works Department within the street easements and the landscape easements along the property lines border East Church and South Peach Avenues. • Maintenance of all entry Landscaping and Irrigation systems,and Special Entry Treatments within the street easements and the landscape easements within E.Bums,S.Cindy and E.Grove Avenues. • Maintenance of all interior Local Street Pavement,Curbs,Gutters,Sidewalks,Medians and Street Furniture as approved by the Public Works Department within the boundary of the tentative map. • Maintenance and operating costs of all Street Lights as approved by the Public Works Department within the boundary of the tentative map. ■ Maintenance of all Street Trees as approved by the Public Works Department within the boundary of the tentative map. 2. Proceedings to place the Final Map into a CFD may not commence until the territory has been annexed into the City of Fresno. 3. Construction plans for all features to be maintained by a CFD for a final map shall be included in the final map submission to the Development Department for processing. This shall include a Street Tree Location and Street Tree Species(by street)map. Landscaping plans shall contain actual tree and plant counts by species and include the areas (in square feet)of turf,shrubs and trees,and sidewalks or other paved areas within all landscaped areas. 4. Should the Council or owner/developer choose not to include the maintenance of the items listed in section 1 above in a CFD,the property owner/developer shall provide for the maintenance of all of the above items by the property owners. Any change affecting the Items in these conditions requires revision of this letter of conditions. If you have any questions,please call me at 621-8690 c:PW File No.10770 File:\word\cfd2\ttmapreview\tt5436 conditions D E P A R T M E N T O F P U B L I C W O R K S TO: Paul Bernal, Planner III Planning Division FROM: Ann Lillie,Senior Engineering Technician(559.621.8690) DATE: July 20, 2005 SUBJECT: Tentative Subdivision Map T-5436(Located Southwest corner of East Church and South Peach Avenues) The Department of Public Works has reviewed the Tentative Subdivision Map proposed by RZR Enterprises, LLC, on engineering plans prepared by Provost& Pritchard, dated April 8, 2004. The Department of Public Works offers the following comments regarding the Street Tree,Buffer/Parkway and Median Island Landscape conditions. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS STREET TREES REQUIREMENTS 1. The subdivider is required to provide street trees on all public street frontages. Dedication of a fifteen (15) foot buffer landscaping easement along Church and twenty(20) foot along Peach is required. Street trees shall be planted at the rate of one tree for each 60'of street frontage. Tree planting shall be within.a 10'Planting and Public Utility Easement. Street trees shall be planted by the Developer. The subdivider is required to provide automatic drip irrigation for all street trees. The irrigation system shall comply with FMC 12-306-23. Tree species to be planted as follows: STREET NAME STREET TREE SPECIES/COMMON NAME East Church Avenue Cinnamomum camphora-Camphor South Peach Avenue Pistacia chinensis-Chinese Pistache 2. Street Tree Planting by Developer: For those lots having internal street tree frontage available for street tree planting, the developer shall plant one tree for each 60'of street frontage, or one tree per lot having street frontage, whichever is greater. a. Street tree inspection fees shall be collected for each 60'of public street frontage or one tree per lot whichever is greater. b. Street trees shall be planted in accordance with the City of Fresno,Department of Public Works"Standard Specifications." c. Landscape plans shall indicate street tree planting locations and species. Landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works, Engineering Services. A street tree planting permit shall be required for all residential street tree planting. d. Performance and payment securities,paid with final map,will be released when all landscaping installed on public and/or city controlled property is in conformance with the Specifications of the City of Fresno. e. Upon acceptance of the required work, warranty security shall be furnished to or retained by the city for guaranty and warranty of the work for a period of ninety days following acceptance. BUFFER LANDSCAPING&MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS 1. The subdivider is required to provide long term maintenance for the landscape in the landscape easements and rights-of-way. The subdivider may petition for annexation in the Community Facilities District,or may form a Home Owner's Association. 2. Buffer Maintenance Through Annexation to the Community Facilities District. Landscape and Irrigation plans are required and shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval prior to a Council approval of the final map. Plans shall be numbered to conform to and be included in the Department of Public Works street construction plan set for the final map. These fees are applicable when the subdivider elects to maintain the buffer landscaping by annexing to the city's Community Facilities District. 1. Landscaping shall comply with Landscape Buffer Development Standards approved by the City Council on October 2, 1990. Landscape and irrigation plans shall comply with Sections 12-306-23 &24 and 14-121 of the Fresno Municipal Code regarding Water Efficient Landscaping and Buffer landscaping. 2. Should the proposed landscape buffers and/or parkway strips be located next to an existing buffer and/or parkway strip,the planting concept shall simulate the adjacent landscape design to present a more uniform appearance on the street. Variances in the landscape concept will be acceptable, but the design of the new landscape buffer and/or parkway strip shall strive to mimic the existing as much as possible. 3. Landscape plans shall indicate grades and show fencing or wall details. All fencing shall be placed outside the landscape easement. Maximum slopes shall not exceed 4:1 with 1 foot of level ground between the slope and the back of the side walk and/or face of fence. Erosion control measures shall be implemented on all slopes of 4:1, including the use of synthetic erosion control netting in combination with ground cover species approved by the Department of Public Works/Engineering Services Division. 4. The water meter(s)serving the buffer landscaping shall be sized for the anticipated service flows. 5. No private flags,signs or identification of any kind shall be permitted in the right-of-way,within the City-controlled easement or on the fence or wall facing the street. 6. Landscaping in the right-of-way and landscape setback adjacent to water well sites shall be the responsibility of the City of Fresno Water Division and may not be included in the CFD. MEDIAN ISLAND LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 1. When median islands front onto the proposed development project, applicants shall be required to submit plans showing the location and configuration of all median islands fronting the proposed project for review and evaluation for median island landscaping requirements. Existing utilities, including,but not limited to city water lines/service points, sanitary sewer, storm drains, electrical lines,existing landscaping including trees,shrubs,ground cover beds,irrigation facilities,and other miscellaneous landscape features shall also be clearly defined. If a new median is required by the Traffic Division,the median island landscaping shall be applied as per FMC section 12-306-24. The Public Works Department requires 2 foot wide colored concrete strips on all proposed median islands with a 12 inch by 12 inch slate pattern in brick red. OUTLOTS 1. THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS will not be responsible for the maintenance of any outlots if they are not included into the CFD2. If the outlots are to be included into the CFD2, the Department of Public Works will require approving landscape and irrigation plans prior to inclusion into the CFD2. BIKE PATH 1. All proposed Multipurpose Paths shall be constructed in accordance with city requirements and standards. Thirty six (36) feet is required for current Bike/Pedestrian and landscaping standard. Cross-sections will be required with Street Plans and Landscaping Plans for review. ■ Fresno A°''"td1iG1" City of L©RMr_%lk!=,�\\I N'111_-ii;a%s City Hall 559-621-8800 Public Works Department 2600 Fresno Street,Rm.4064 David Healey,Director Fresno, CA 93721-3623 www.fresno.aov July 21, 2005 Peters Engineering Group John Rowland 55 Bullard Ave, Suite 220 Clovis, CA. 93612 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 5436 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY The City of Fresno, Traffic Planning Section has reviewed the Traffic Impact Study(TIS) dated April 15, 2005 for the Tentative Tract 5436 located southwest of the intersection of Church and Peach Avenues. Upon re- submittal of the revised TIS a review fee in the amount of$288.00 (based on $72.00 per hour)shall be submitted to the City of Fresno Public Works Traffic Engineering Section prior to accepting this TIS. The City's review and subsequent comments, listed below, are dependent on the above mention description. 1. As a condition of the proposed project, the Owner/Developer shall signalize the intersection of Jensen at Peach Avenue. Eligible work at this intersection can be credited against the required Traffic Signal Mitigation Impact Fee (TSMI fee) in item number 2 below. Construction of said signal shall be done prior to any Phase One building occupancy.This proposed construction of this signal shall include, but not limited to the following: a. The intersection shall be signalized to City of Fresno Standards complete with actuation, westbound left turn phasing, and signal pre-emption. b. Widen the eastbound approach to one (1) left, three (3)through lanes, and one (1) separate right. c. Widen the westbound approach to one (1) left, three (3) lanes, and one (1)right turn lane. d. Widen the southbound approach to one (1) left, one (1)through lane, and one (1) right turn lane. 2. This project shall pay its Traffic Signal Mitigation Impact Fee (TSMI Fee) at the time of building permit based on the trip generation rate(s) as set forth in the latest edition of the ITE Generation Manual. The fee amount for T5436 is 168 (units) x 414.69 (fee rate as shown in the Master Fee Schedule) _ $ 69,668.00 If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at(559)621-8798 or at David.Padilla@fresno.gov Sincerely, . l Jose Luis Benavides, P.E., Traffic Engineering Manager Public Works Department, Engineering Services Attachment: Invoice-#2005025 C: Traffic Engineering Reading File Louise Monroe.City of Fresno QATraffic Impact Studies'75436 Peach at Church.doc City of ITIMIT'921h Ike-\\I DATE: September 15, 2005 REVISION duly 21, 2005 TO: Paul Bernal, Planner III Development Department, Planning Division THROUGH: Scott Mozier jGse Luis PeRa tides, P.E., Traffic Engineering Manager Public Works Department, Engineering Division FROM: Louise Monroe, Traffic Planning Supervisor Public Works Department, Engineering Division SUBJECT: TT 5436, Public Works Conditions of Approval (S/W corner of Peach and Church) The Public Works Department, Traffic Planning Section, has completed its review and the following requirements are to be placed on this tentative map as a condition of approval by the Public Works Department. General Conditions: Provide curb ramps at all corners within the limits of this subdivision. Underground all existing offsite overhead utilities with the limits of this map in accordance with Fresno Municipal Code Section 12-1011 and Resolution No. 78-522188-229. Submit the following plans, as applicable, in a single package, to the Planning and Development Department for review and approval: Street Construction, Signing, Striping, Traffic Signal and Streetlight and Trail Lighting, Signing and Striping. Frontage Improvement Requirements: Major Streets: Church Avenue: Collector 1. Dedicate 47'-55' of property, from section line, for public street purposes within the limits of this subdivision to meet the City of Fresno's Collector Standards. 2. Construct concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk to Public Works Standard P-5. The sidewalk pattern shall be constructed to a 10' residential pattern. 3. Construct 20' of permanent paving (measured from face of curb) within the limits of this sub- division. 4. Construct an underground street lighting system to Public Works Standard E-1 within the limits of this subdivision. Spacing and design shall conform to Public Works Standard E-8 for Collector Streets. 5. Relinquish direct vehicular access rights to Church Avenue from all lots within this subdivision. Page 1 of 3 C:\Louise\TRACT MAPS\T-5436 REVISION PEACH AND CHURCH.doc Peach Avenue: Arterial 1. Dedicate 55'-57' of property, from section line, for public street purposes within the limits of this subdivision to meet the City of Fresno's Arterial Standards. 2. Construct concrete curb and gutter and sidewalk to Public Works Standard P-5. Construct sidewalk to a 10' residential pattern. 3. Construct 20' of permanent paving within the limits of this subdivision. 4. Construct an 80' bus bay curb and gutter at the southwest corner of Peach and Church to Public Works Standard P-73, complete with a 10' monolithic sidewalk. 5. Construct an underground street lighting system to Public Works Standard E-1 within the limits of this subdivision. Spacing and design shall conform to Public Works Standard E-7 for Arterial Streets. 6. Relinquish direct vehicular access.rights to Peach Avenue from all lots within this subdivision. Interior Streets: Design and construct all curb, gutter, sidewalk, (both sides), permanent paving, cul-de-sacs, and underground street lighting systems on all interior local streets to Public Works Standards. Sidewalk patterns shall comply with Public Works API Standards for 50' and 54' streets. Any temporary dead-end streets created by this subdivision shall be properly barricaded in accordance with the Pubic Works Standard P-44. Specific Mitigation Requirements: 1. This tract will generate 126 a.m./ 170 p.m. peak hour trips, therefore, a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) is required and has been submitted. Comply with the mitigation measure requirements of the attached letter dated July 21, 2005 and signed by the Traffic Engineering Manager. 2. Relinquish direct vehicular access rights to a. the north property line of lot 96. b. the south property line of lot 97 and 55. c. the west property line of lot 116. 3. The intersection of : a. Peach at Burns shall be limited to right-in and right-out turns. b. Peach at Grove shall be designed with a full median opening to allow for left turns-in and left turns-out. 4. The first order of work shall include a minimum of two points of vehicular access to the major streets for any phase of this development. 5. Dedicate 62' of property and provide medians at the Church Avenue at Cindy Avenue. (7' residential pattern - 20' travel lane-8' median -20' travel lane-7' residential pattern) 6. Grove Avenue: (adjacent to lot 55) a. North side: Dedicate 27' and construct full offsite improvements. b. South side: Dedicate 16' and construct 12' of permanent paving with a 4' minimum drainage Swale. 7. Irrigation /Canal Requirements: The developer shall enter into an agreement with the Fresno Irrigation District providing for piping the canal(s) and submit an executed copy of the agreement or commitment letter from FID to the Planning and Development Department. All piping shall be located outside of the proposed street right of way. Any piping across city streets shall be rubber gasketed reinforced concrete pipe (RGRCP) constructed perpendicular to the street. Submit engineered plans to Pubic Works Department, Engineering Division for review and approval. Page 2 of 3 C:\Louise\TRACT MAPS\T-5436 REVISION PEACH AND CHURCH.doc 8. Bike, Pedestrian and Equestrian Trail.- Dwe tG thezXiGtiRg develepmeRt-to the-69wth est-we Dedicate a 26' (minimum) easement for Bike and Pedestrian purposes only. (Additional right of way may be required for grading and drainage purposes.) This Department does not support the equestrian component of the trail due to health and safety issues. Construct a 12' wide bike and pedestrian trail/path, complete with lighting, signing, striping and landscaping, per the 2025 Fresno General Plan, Multi-Purpose Trails Plan Map and Public Works Standards P-59 and P-60. Identify route on the map and provide a cross section prior to the planning commission hearing. Submit engineered construction plans to Public Works. Submit lighting, signing and striping plan to Traffic Engineering for approval. Submit grading, landscape and irrigation plans to Engineering Services. An additional dedication is required for the equestrian portion, if required. Contact Planning and Development. 9. . UGM Requirements: This Map is in UGM major street zone D-1/E-2; therefore pay all applicable UGM fees. Church Avenue: Collector 1. Design and construct a Major Street Bridge (37) at the intersection of Church and the Central No. 23 Canal. Public Works will apply this requirement to a minimum of 4 other subdivisions with each subdivision being responsible for a fee no greater than 1/5 of the cost of said bridge. The timing of the bridge construction shall occur prior to close out of this subdivision or at such time that the City Engineer deems necessary, whichever is earlier. Peach Avenue:Arterial 1. Dedicate and construct (2) 17' center section travel lanes and a raised concrete median island with a 250' left turn pockets at all major intersections from Grove to Jensen. Details of said street shall be depicted on the approved tentative tract map. Dedication shall be sufficient to accommodate arterial standard and any other grading or transitions as necessary based on a 55 MPH design speed. 2. Install a signal pole with a 150-watt safety light to Public Works Standards at the southwest corner of Peach and Church Avenues. 3. Dedicate sufficient right-of-way and construct additional paving for southbound to northbound U-turns at Jensen. See Exhibit "B". Page 3of3 CALouise\TRACT MAPS\T-5436 REVISION PEACH AND CHURCH.doc I 1 1 1. 1 1 VARIES I 37' MIN PROPERTY LINE I o a olw f=- z SECTION LINE u PROPERTY LINE z � XnT,-J 1br--' I T I > I ¢ I of W i 4 ; l i ' City of DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Bate: January 11, 2005 To: PAUL BERNAL,Planner H Planning and Development Department, Current Planning From.: DOUG HECKER, Supervising Engineering Technician Public Utilities Department, Planning and Engineering Division Subject: SANITARY SEWER AND WATER REQUIREMENTS FOR T-5436/UGM, C-05-110 AND R-05-53 General Vesting Tentative T-5436/UGM, C-05-110 and R-05-53 are proposing a 168-lot single-family residential planned development subdivision, rezoning form AE-5/UGM to R-1/UGM on 30.7 acres located on the southwest corner of East Church and South Peach Avenues. Envkonmental Recommendations A NEGATIVE DECLARATION MAY BE ISSUED: The project may have adverse impacts but impacts can be mitigated without further study or are not serious enough to warrant an Environment Impact Report. Sanitary Sewer Requirements An 8-inch sanitary sewer main exists in East Church Avenue and a 60-inch sanitary sewer main exists in South Peach Avenue to serve the proposed project. Sanitary sewer facilities will be available to prm,de:service to the site subject to the following requirements: L All sanitary sewer mains shall be extended within the proposed tract to provide service to each lot_ 2_ Abandon all existing on-site private sanitary sewer systems. 3_ A Preliminary sewer design layout shall be prepared by the Developer's Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Utilities for review and conceptual approvals prior to submittal or acceptance of the developers final map and engineered plan& profile improvement drawing for City review. 4_ Public sewer facilities shall be constructed in accordance with the Department of Public Works standards, specifications, and policies. 5_ Engineered improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil'Engineer are required for proposed additions to the sanitary sewer system. Sanitary Sewer UGM This project is located in the following Urban Growth Management Service Areas: 1. Sewer Oversize Reifnbursement S.A.: #35 Sanitary Sewer Fees The following Sewer Connection Charges are due and shall be paid for the Project: 1. Sewer Lateral Charge 2. Oversize Sewer Charge 3. Trunk Sewer Charge: Fowler 4. Wastewater Facilities Charge (Residential Only) Water Requirements A 14-inch water main is located in East Church Avenue and a 14-inch water main in South Peach Avenue to serve the proposed project. Water facilities are currently available to provide service to the site, subject to the following requirements: 1. Water mains (including installation of City fire hydrants) shall be extended within the proposed tract to provide water service to each lot created. 2. Separate water services with meter boxes shall be provided to each lot created. 3. Seal and abandon existing on-site well(s) in compliance with the State of California Well Standards, Bulletin 74-90 or current revisions issued by California Department of Water Resources and City of Fresno standards. 4. Installation of public fire hydrant(s) is required in accordance with City Standards. 5. Construct a water supply well(s) on a site(s) dedicated to the City of Fresno. The well(s) shall be capable of producing a minimum total demand of 500 gallons per minute. Well site(s) shall be of a size(s) and at a location(s) acceptable to the Water Systems Manager. The cost of acquiring the well site(s) and construction of the well(s) shall be reimbursed from UGM Water Supply Well Service Area Fund 501s, in accordance with established UGM policies 6. Water well construction shall include wellhead treatment facilities, if required. The cost of constructing wellhead treatment facilities shall be reimbursed from UGM Wellhead Treatment Service Area Fund 501 s, in accordance with established UGM policies 7. Two independent sources of water, meeting Federal and State Drinxing Water Act Standards, are required to serve the tract including any subsequent phases thereof. The two-source requirement may be accomplished through any combination of water main extensions, construction of supply wells, or other acceptable sources of water supply approved by the Water Systems Manager. 8. All public water facilities shall be constructed in accordance with the Department of Public Works standards, specifications, and policies. 9. Engineered improvement plans prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer are required for proposed additions to the City Water System. Water UGM 1. UGM Water Service Area: #501s Water Fees 1. Payment for installation of water service(s) and/or meter(s) is required. 2. Water Connection Charges are due and shall be paid for the Project. City of rilC�■.i�p� Department of Public Utilities Solid Waste Division 1325 E. EI Dorado • Fresno, California 93706-2014 (559) 621-1452 www.fresno.gov July 20, 2005 TO: Paul Bernal, Planner III Planning and Development Department THROUGH: Robert Weakley, Chief of Operations Department of Public Utilities, Solid Waste Division FROM: Donna Leslie, Staff Assistant�� Department of Public Utilities, Solid Waste Division SUBJECT: TT 5436, Solid Waste Conditions of Approval The Department of Public Utilities, Solid Waste Division, has completed a review of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map 5436 that was submitted by Provost&Pritchard on behalf of RZR Enterprises. The following requirements and conditions are to be placed on this vesting tentative tract map as a condition of approval by the Department of Public Utilities. General Requirements: • Tract 5436 will be serviced as Single Family Residential properties with Basic Container Service. Property owners will receive 3 containers to be used as follows: 1 Gray container for solid waste, 1 Green container for green waste and 1 Blue container for recyclable material. • The owners, lessees or other tenants of the residential dwellings on service day,before 6:00 a.m., shall place their solid waste containers at the edge of the curb approximately 4 feet apart and not blocking any vehicle accesses in accordance with the City of Fresno's Solid Waste Management Division Standards. • Per Municipal Code, Section 9-404 Solid Waste Disposal Regulations, Section C,10. No Solid Waste container nor residential rubbish shall be allowed to remain at the curbline after 8:00 p.m. on the collection day. Special Conditions: • Provide a full street where East Grove meets South Peach. Solid waste requires 18' of clearance in the path the truck travels and also requires a 44'turning radius at all corners. Page 1 of 2 • There is a temporary ponding basin on lots 21, 22 and 23. If these lots are later in-filled with homes then a covenant will be required for lots 21 and 22. • Project phasing- all streets shall connect to one another or a temporary turnaround shall be provided. Turnaround shall be large enough to accommodate a solid waste vehicle with a turning radius of 44'. Turnaround shall be kept clear of all vehicles on the solid waste service day. Covenant Requirement: • Lots 21 will be required to place their container at the corner of lot 20. Lot 22 will place their container at the edge of lot 23 for service. Page 2 of 2 J:\Conditions of Approva1_TT5436.wpd File No.210.45 FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS PUBLIC AGENCY DEVELOPER Mr. Gil Haro, Planning Manager RZR ENTERPRISE, LLC Planning & Development Department 3151 AIRWAY AVENUE SUITE K-200 City of Fresno COSTA MESA, CA 92626 2600 Fresno Street - Fresno, CA 93721 MAP NO. 5436 PRELIMINARY FEE(S) (See below) DRAINAG ARE (S) " BD - DRAINAGE AREA BD $150,949.00 DATE �,p ��S DRAINAGE AREA - - TOTAL FEE $150,949.00 The proposed development will generate storm runoff which produces potentially significant environmental impacts and which must be properly discharged and mitigated pursuant to the Z California Environmental Quality Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. The District in cooperation with the City and County has developed and adopted the Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan. Compliance with and implementation of this Master Plan by this development project will satisfy the drainage related CEQA/NEPA impact of the project mitigation requirements. The proposed development shall pay drainage fees pursuant to the Drainage Fee Ordinance prior to approval of the final map at the rates in effect at the time of such approval. The fee indicated above is based on the tentative map. Contact the FMFCD project engineer prior to approval of the final map for the fee. W Considerations which may affect the fee obligation(s) or the timing or form of fee payment: a) Fees related to undeveloped or phased portions of the project may be deferrable. b) Fees may be calculated based on the actual percentage of runoff if different than that typical for the zone district under which the development is being undertaken and if permanent provisions are made to assure that the site remains in that configuration. c) Master Plan storm drainage facilities may be constructed, or required to be constructed in lieu of paying fees. d) The actual cost incurred in constructing Master Plan drainage system facilities is credited against the drainage fee obligation. 5436 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 2 of 4 e) When the actual costs incurred in constructing Master Plan facilities exceeds the drainage fee obligation, reimbursement will be made for the excess costs from future fees collected by the District from other development. Approval of this development shall be conditioned upon compliance with these District Requirements. 1. a. Drainage from the site shall be directed to X b. Grading and drainage patterns shall be as identified on Exhibit No. 1-AL-2- C. 4c. The grading and drainage patterns shown on the site plan conform to the adopted Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan. 2. The proposed development shall construct and/or dedicate Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan facilities located within the development or necessitated by any off-site improvements required by the approving agency: X Developer shall construct facilities as shown on Exhibit No. 1 as "Master Plan Facilities to be constructed by Developer". None required. 3. The following final improvement plans shall be submitted to the District for review prior to final development approval: X Grading Plan X Storm Drain Plan X Final Map X Street Plan X Water& Sewer Plan Other 4. Availability of drainage facilities: a. Permanent drainage service is available provided the developer can verify to the satisfaction of the City of Fresno that runoff can be safely conveyed to the Master Plan inlet(s). b. The construction of facilities required by Paragraph No. 2 hereof will provide permanent drainage service. X c. Permanent drainage service will not be available. The District recommends temporary facilities until permanent service is available. d. See Exhibit No. 2. 5. The proposed development: Appears to be located within a _500 year 100 year flood prone area as designated on the latest Flood Insurance Rate Maps available to the District, necessitating appropriate floodplain management action. See attached Floodplain Policy. X Does not appear to be located within a flood prone area. 5436 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 3 of 4 6. The Federal Clean Water Act and the State General Permits for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Industrial Activities(State General Permits)require developers of construction projects disturbing one or more acres, and discharges associated with industrial activity not otherwise exempt from National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting, to implement controls to reduce pollutants, prohibit the discharge of waters other than storm water to the municipal storm drain system, and meet water quality standards. These requirements apply both to pollutants generated during construction, and to those which may be generated by operations at the development after construction. a. State General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activities, approved August 1999, (modified December 2002.) A State General Construction Permit is required for all clearing, grading, and disturbances to the ground that result in soil disturbance of at least one acre (or less than one acre if part of a larger common plan of development or sale). Permittees are required to: submit a Notice of Intent to be covered and must pay a permit fee to the State Water Resources Control Z Board (State Board), develop and implement a storm water pollution prevention plan, eliminate non-storm water discharges, conduct routine site inspections, train employees 0 in permit compliance, and complete an annual certification of compliance.. b. State General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities, April, 1997 (available at the District Office.) A State General Industrial Permit is required for specific types of industries described in the NPDES regulations or by Standard Industrial Classification(SIC) code. The following categories of industries are generally required to secure an industrial permit: manufacturing; trucking; recycling; and waste and hazardous waste management. Specific exemptions exist for manufacturing activities which occur entirely indoors. Permittees are required to: submit a Notice of Intent to be covered and must pay a permit fee to the State Water Resources Control Board, develop and implement a storm water pollution prevention plan, eliminate non-storm water discharges, conduct routine site inspections, train employees in permit compliance, sample storm water runoff and test it for pollutant indicators, and annually submit a report to the State Board. 5436 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAx(559)456-3194 Two sided document 1 FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 4 of 4 C. The proposed development is encouraged to select and implement storm water quality controls recommended in the Fresno-Clovis Storm Water Quality Management Construction and Post-Construction Guidelines (available at the District Office) to meet the requirements of the State General Permits, eliminate the potential for non- storm water to enter the municipal storm drain system, and where possible minimize contact with materials which may contaminate storm water runoff. 7. A requirement of the District may be appealed by filing a written notice of appeal with the Secretary of the District within ten days of the date of this Notice of Requirements. 8. The District reserves the right to modify, reduce or add to these requirements, or revise fees, as necessary to accommodate changes made in the proposed development by the developer or requirements made by other agencies. 9. X See Exhibit No. 2 for additional comments, recommendatio d requirements. Gerald E. Lake , Project Engine : R1c yons District Engineer C: PROVOST& PRITCHARD ENGINEERING 286 WEST CROMWELL AVENUE FRESNO, CA 93711 5436 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document ------CHlRQM-----AVE,--- � ------------- ! Iw I IQ I I I I + � I 5 I .11Q W 'BF' SCALE 1"=300' 'BD' 30" I I / I I I I = I REPLACE TYPE V INLET I I / I I W/FMFCD TYPED'INLET I I-------_ ------ I I 1 I I I I I r ! I f I l � r I I !. APN# I II 481-120-03 ! I. I I� I I 1 I I I I I� 36" I 36" j LEGEND I I Master Plan Facilities To Be Constructed By Developer- Pipeline(Size Shown)&Inlet. — Existing Master Plan Facilities Future Master Plan Facilities Direction Of Drainage —————— Inlet Boundary Existing Temporary Inlet TRACT 5436 CUP 2005-110 EXHIBIT NO. 1 DRAINAGE AREA: "BD FRESNO MN ETROPOLITAFLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT II K'Ao17'WOBWE"BMTRACTS3476.Mp DRAWN BY: MM DATE: 7,5(15 REVISED BY: — DATE: — OTHER REQUIREMENTS EXHIBIT NO. 2 The cost of construction of Master Plan facilities, excluding dedication of storm drainage easements, is eligible for credit against the drainage fee of the drainage area served by the facilities. A Development Agreement shall be executed with the District to effect such credit. Reimbursement provisions, in accordance with the Drainage Fee Ordinance, will be included to the extent that Developer's Master Plan costs for an individual drainage area exceed the fee of said area. Should the facilities cost for such individual area total less than the fee of said area, the difference shall be paid upon demand to the City or District. The District recommends stub streets to the south from Tract 5436 to Assessor's Parcel Number 481-120-03. This is necessary to allow surface drainage from Tract 5436 to reach the future Master Plan inlets located south of the proposed development. If the stub streets are not constructed, the developer of Tract 5436 must provide drainage channels to allow drainage from this development to drain in a southerly direction towards Jensen Avenue. Additionally, the developer of Tract 5436 shall acquire a drainage covenant from Assessor's Parcel Number 481- 120-03 located directly south of Tract 5436 to allow surface drainage and major storm flows from Tract 5436 to reach the future Master Plan inlets and Jensen Avenue. Our records indicate that there is not continuous existing curb and gutter to convey runoff to the Master Plan inlet located,at Peach Avenue. The Developer shall be required to provide documentation and/or improvements satisfactory to the City of Fresno to allow for conveyance of storm water to the inlet location. The subject site contains a portion of a canal or pipeline that is used to manage recharge, storm water, and/or flood flows. The existing capacity must be preserved as part of site development. Additionally, site development may not interfere with the ability to operate and maintain the canal or pipeline. Development No. Tract 5436 engr\permit\exh ibits2\tract\543 6(r]) File No.210.413 FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS PUBLIC AGENCY. DEVELOPER Mr. Gil Haro, Planning Manager RZR ENTERPRISE, LLC Planning & Development Department 3151 AIRWAY AVENUE SUITE K-200 C City of Fresno COSTA MESA, CA 92626 2600 Fresno Street - Fresno, CA 93721 PROJECT NO. 2005-110 PRELIMINARY FEE(S) (See below) DRAINAGE AREA " BD " " - " DRAINAGE AREA " BD " $150,949.00 DATE 7C)i� , DRAINAGE AREA - - APN 481-090-27 & 28 TOTAL FEE $150,949.00 ADDRESS SWC CHURCH & PEACH AVE. The proposed development will generate storm runoff which produces potentially significant environmental impacts and which must be properly discharged and mitigated pursuant to the Z California Environmental Quality Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. The District O 'in cooperation with the City and County has developed and adopted the Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan. Compliance with and implementation of this Master Plan by this development project will satisfy the drainage related CEQA/NEPA impact of the project mitigation requirements. The proposed development shall pay drainage fees pursuant to the Drainage Fee Ordinance prior t issuance of a building permit at the rates in effect at the time of such issuance. The fee O indicated above is valid through February 28, 20 06 based on the site plan submitted to O the District on 06/21/05 Contact FMFCD for a revised fee in cases where changes are Ul made in the proposed site plan which materially alter the proposed impervious area. I Considerations which may affect the fee obligation(s) or the timing or form of fee payment: j a) Fees related to undeveloped or phased portions of the project may be deferrable. b) Fees may be calculated based on the actual percentage of runoff if different than that O typical for the zone district under which the development is being undertaken and if permanent provisions are made to assure that the site remains in that configuration. c) Master Plan storm drainage facilities may be constructed, or required to be constructed in lieu of paying fees. d) The actual cost incurred in constructing Master Plan drainage system facilities is credited against the drainage fee obligation. 2005-110 - 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document , FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 2 of 4 e) When the actual costs incurred in constructing Master Plan facilities exceeds the drainage fee obligation, reimbursement will be made for the excess costs from future fees collected by the District from other development. Approval of this development shall be conditioned upon compliance with these District Requirements. 1. a. Drainage from the site shall be directed to X b. Grading and drainage patterns shall be as identified on Exhibit No. 1 AL-2 C. The grading and drainage patterns shown on the site plan conform to the adopted Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan. 2. The proposed development shall construct and/or dedicate Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan facilities located within the development or necessitated by any off-site improvements required by the approving agency: X Developer shall construct facilities as shown on Exhibit No. 1 as "Master Plan Facilities to be constructed by Developer". None required. 3. The following final improvement plans shall be submitted to the District for review prior to final development approval: X Grading Plan X Storm Drain Plan X Final Map X Street Plan X Water& Sewer Plan Other 4. Availability of drainage facilities: a. Permanent drainage service is available provided the developer can verify to the satisfaction of the City of Fresno that runoff can be safely conveyed to the Master Plan inlet(s). b. The construction of facilities required by Paragraph No. 2 hereof will provide permanent drainage service. X c. Permanent drainage service will not be available. The District recommends temporary facilities until permanent service is available. Temper-, — A— is available thfeug d. See Exhibit No. 2. 5. The proposed development: Appears to be located within a _500 year 100 year flood prone area as designated on the latest Flood Insurance Rate Maps available to the District, necessitating appropriate floodplain management action. See attached Floodplain Policy. X Does not appear to be located within a flood prone area. 2005.110 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 3 of 4 6. The Federal Clean Water Act and the State General Permits for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Industrial Activities (State General Permits) require developers 0 of construction projects disturbing one or more acres, and discharges associated with industrial activity not otherwise exempt from National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) permitting, to implement controls to reduce pollutants, prohibit the discharge of waters other than storm water to the municipal storm drain system, and meet water quality standards. These requirements apply both to pollutants generated during construction, and to those which may be generated by operations at the development after construction. a. State General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activities, approved August 1999, (modified December 2002.) A State General Construction Permit is required for all clearing, grading, and disturbances to the ground that result in soil disturbance of at least one acre (or less than one acre if part of a larger common plan of development or sale). Permittees are required to: submit a Notice of Intent to be covered and must pay a permit fee to the State Water Resources Control Board (State Board), Z develop and implement a storm water pollution prevention plan, eliminate non-storm O water discharges, conduct routine site inspections, train employees in permit compliance, and complete an annual certification of compliance. C b. State General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities, O April, 1997 (available at the District Office.) A State General Industrial Permit is required for specific types of industries described in the NPDES regulations or by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code. The following categories of industries are generally required to secure an industrial permit: manufacturing; trucking; recycling; and j waste and hazardous waste management. Specific exemptions exist for manufacturing activities which occur entirely indoors. Permittees are required to: submit a Notice of Intent to be covered and must pay a permit fee to the State Water Resources Control O Board, develop and implement a storm water pollution prevention plan, eliminate non- storm water discharges, conduct routine site inspections, train employees in permit compliance, sample storm water runoff and test it for pollutant indicators, and annually submit a report to the State Board. 2005-110 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX (559)456-3194 Two sided document FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 4 of 4 C. The proposed development is encouraged to select and implement storm water quality controls recommended in the Fresno-Clovis Storm Water Quality Management Construction and Post-Construction Guidelines (available at the District Office) to meet the requirements of the State General Permits, eliminate the potential for non-storm water to enter the municipal storm drain system, and where possible minimize contact with materials which may contaminate storm water runoff. 7. A requirement of the District may be appealed by filing a written notice of appeal with the Secretary of the District within ten days of the date of this Notice of Requirements. 8. The District reserves the right to modify, reduce or add to these requirements, or revise fees, as necessary to accommodate changes made in the proposed development by the developer or requirements made by other agencies. 9. X See Exhibit No. 2 for additional comments, recommendations and requirements. erald E. Lakemwf, Project Engineer. Mck-fyqns District Engineer C: PROVOST& PRITCHARD ENGINEERING 286 WEST CROMWELL AVENUE FRESNO, CA 93711 2005.110 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document �� � III � III11 � ► ii11 � I I I I I r Iw I IQ I I I I ! � I I ` I 'BF' 30' SCALE 1"=300' 'BD' I I _ ! I ' REPLACE TYPE'E'INLET I I I W/FMFCD TYPE'D'INLET I I------------- I ! I I I I I I II I I1I I I I I I APN# I I 481-120-03 �I I III I m I I- I ! I I I K 36' 1 36" 1 CN LEGEND I I ffj�. Master Plan Facilities To Be Constructed By Developer- Pipeline(Size Shown)&Inlet. 1�-- '— Existing Master Plan Facilities Future Master Plan Facilities Direction Of Drainage —————— Inlet Boundary ® Existing Temporary Inlet TRACT 5436 • CUP 2005-110 EXHIBIT N0, 1 DRAINAGE AREA: "BD" FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1" Q' D7'WO S MMMACTSWXAn DRAWN BY: MM DATE; 7/5OS OTHER REQUIREMENTS EXHIBIT NO. 2 The cost of construction of Master Plan facilities,excluding dedication of storm drainage easements, is eligible for credit against the drainage fee of the drainage area served by the facilities. A Development Agreement shall be executed with the District to effect such credit. Reimbursement provisions, in accordance with the Drainage Fee Ordinance, will be included to the extent that Developer's Master Plan costs for an individual drainage area exceed the fee of said area. Should the facilities cost for such individual area total less than the fee of said area,the difference shall be paid upon demand to the City or District. The District recommends stub streets to the south from CUP 2005-110 to Assessor's Parcel Number 481-120-03. This is necessary to allow surface drainage from CUP 2005-110 to reach the future Master Plan inlets.located south of the proposed development. If the stub streets are not constructed, the developer of CUP 2005-110 must provide drainage channels to allow drainage from this development to drain in a southerly direction towards Jensen Avenue. Additionally,the developer of CUP 2005-110 shall acquire a drainage covenant from Assessor's Parcel Number 481-120-03 located directly south of CUP 2005-110 to allow surface drainage and major storm flows from CUP 2005-110 to reach the future Master Plan inlets and Jensen Avenue. Our records indicate that there is not continuous existing curb and gutter to convey runoff to the Master Plan inlet located at Peach Avenue. The Developer shall be required to provide documentation and/or improvements satisfactory to the City of Fresno to allow for conveyance of storm water to the inlet location. The subject site. contains a portion of a canal or pipeline that is used to manage recharge, storm water, and/or flood flows. The existing capacity must be preserved as part of site development. Additionally,site development may not interfere with the ability to operate and maintain the canal or pipeline. Development No. CUP 2005-110 engr\permits\exhibit2\city-cup\2005\2005-110(rl) ', OFFICES OF CM41OftAT � � I►- PHONE 559 233-7161 FAX(559)233-8227 2907 SOUTH MAPLE AVENUE - ..a.. -� — — FRESNO,CA 75- 18 Your Most Valuable Resource-Water C LJ July 1, 2005 J U L p 7 2005 Mr. Paul Bernal rr,n� C°wi�iOn ,,.,,s ;y ,tent City of Fresno f=:._.. .3 Planning and Development Dept. 2600 Fresno Street, 3rd Floor Fresno, CA 93721-3604 RE: VTTM No. 5436, RA No. R-05-53 & CUP No. C-05-110—FID's Central No. 23 Canal Dear Mr. Bernal: FID's comments and requests are as follows: 1. FID's Central No. 23 canal traverses the west side of the subject property as shown on the enclosed map. 2. FID requires the applicant grant an exclusive canal easement to FID and concrete line, encase in box culvert .or other approved means to protect canal integrity, the Central Canal across the proposed development in accordance with FID standards, and that the applicant enter into an agreement with FID for that purpose. The applicant will need to meet with FID to determine the canal alignment and required canal dimensions. 3. FID's minimum easement requirements for the Central Canal are highlighted on the "DISTRICT CANAL RIGHT OF WAY REQUIREMENTS" sheet which is enclosed for your reference. 4. FID requires its easement be shown on the map with proper recording information, and that PID he made a party to signing all plans which affect its easement and crnul/pipe Lre facility and also be made party to signing the final map. 5. FID requires the applicant submit a grading and drainage plan for FID approval which shows that the proposed development will not endanger the structural integrity of the canal, or result in drainage patterns that will adversely affect FID or the applicant. 6. FID requires all trail improvements and easements for trail purposes be located outside FID's easement and that no portion of said easements shall be in common use. FID does not allow tree canopies to encroach within its easements for open canals. 7. FID does not allow its easements to be in common use with public utility easements but will allow its easement to be in common use with landscape easements. FID recommends all block walls and fences be located outside of its easement. 8. FID requires the applicant enter into an Encroachment Agreement with FID for all permanent improvements placed on or constructed within'FID's easement. Agencies\City\TM5436 R-05-53 C-05-110 BOARD OF President JACOB ANDRESEN, Vice-President JEFFERY G. BOSWELL DIRECTORS JEFF NEELY,EDDIE NIEDERFRANK,STEVEN G BALLS, General Manager GARY SERRATO Mr. Paul Bernal July 1, 2005 Page 2 of 2 Thank you for submitting this for our review. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns at 233-7161 extension 317 or biohnson a fresnoirri ation.com. Sincerely, Bret Johnson Engineering Technician I cc: Provost & Pritchard Engineering RZR Enterprises, LLC Agencies\City\TM5436 R-05-53 C-05-110 FTII TIPIERCE 0 T DOVEWOOD LN m ADLER c z 0 KINGS VIEW DR o co z m o - 0 r, cn 03 to 0 0 tOn m 0 5 m m m z D � �_ T O D v TIMMY -o 2� FOOTHILL BLVD O 0 T c �o W13H 0 T CINDY III 00 OD +� n Cl coIL o N $ A 1 OD m iF A l '• m z 0 G7 m 0 a� W D ®lil III KAREN } PEACH 01 LEMONWOOD LN SUMMERFIELD LN 0 ? N U m M O r > . rn z ED M r 0 'O E Z y�7 M ■ EXH(B(T 11121 (PAGE 3 OF 4) 3 oz LJ Y AS REQUIRED °- BUT NO LE55 THAN 20' 1D 20' 15 2, 1 MAX 50 GFS 4 UP ,s F AT GRADE OR CUT 5EGTION FILL SECTION STANDARD STANDARD Q oz _Da z AS REQUIRED "J BUT NO LESS THAN 17 15' r r 1'MAx UNDER 50 CF5 AT GRADE 5ECTION FILL SECTION STANDARD STANDARD O QZ 3 r-:3 C z AS PMUIRED �7 BUT NO LF-55 THAN 17 15' 4- UNDER CUT 5ECTION FI N STANDARD N.TERNA OI ADD 2 FEET TO EMBANKMENT WIDTH TO O2 THE ALTERNATE SECTION CAN BE U5ED IF ESTABLISH OVERALL R/W WIDTH TO ACCOMODATE THE OVERALL WIDTH EXCEEDS THE STANDARD GRADER BLADE CLEARANCE. WIDTH AND 15 PERMITTED ONLY WIZEN DISTRICT OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FUNCTIONS DO NOT REQUIRE A STANDARD ROADWAY. DISTRICT CANAL RIGHT OF WAY REQUIREMENTS REV. 7/1/95 FRE5NO IRRIGATION D15TPIGT ENGINEERING HANDBOOK PAGE NO. 10 r � San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District July 1, 2005 Reference No. C20050598 Ft Planning Division Development Department Attn: Paul Bernal J U L 0 2005 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721-3604 Subject: T-5436, R-05-53, C-05-110-APN: 481-090-27 &'28 Dear Mr. Bernal: The San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (District) has reviewed the project referenced above and offers the following comments: The entire San Joaquin Valley Air Basin is designated non-attainment for ozone and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5). This project would contribute to the overall decline in air quality due to increased traffic and ongoing operational emissions. Preliminary analysis indicates that this project alone would not generate significant air emissions. However, the increase in emissions from this project, and others like it, cumulatively reduce the air quality in the San Joaquin Valley. A concerted effort should be made to reduce project-related emissions.as outlined below: Based on the information provided, the proposed project will be subject to the following District rules. The following items are rules that have been adopted by the District to reduce emissions throughout the San Joaquin Valley, and are required. Current District rules can be found at— http://www.valleyair.org/rules/1 ruleslist.htm. Regulation Vill (Fugitive PM10 Prohibitions)- Regulation VIII (Rules 8011-8081) is a series of rules designed to reduce PM10 emissions (predominantly dust/dirt) generated by human activity, including construction, road construction, bulk materials storage, landfill operations, etc. If a residential project is 10.0 or more acres in area, a Dust Control Plan must be submitted as specified in Section 6.3.1 of Rule 8021. If a residential s-its is 1.0 to !ess than 10.0 acres, an owner/operator must provide written notification to the District at least 48 hours prior to his/her intent to begin any earthmoving activities (see section 6.4.1). A compliance assistance bulletin has been enclosed for the applicant. A template of the District's Dust Control Plan is available at: http://www.valleyair.org/busind/comply/PM 10/forms/DCP-Form°/a20-%2010-14-2004.pdf Rule 4002 (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants). In the event that any portion, of an existing building will be renovated, partially demolished or removed, the project will be subject to District Rule 4002. Prior to any demolition activity, an asbestos survey of existing structures on the project site may be required to identify the presence of any asbestos containing building material (ACBM). Any identified ACBM having the potential for disturbance must be removed by a certified asbestos-contractor in accordance with CAL-OSHA requirements. If you have any questions concerning asbestos related requirements, please contact Mr. Dwayne England of this office at (559) 230-5973, or contact CAL-OSHA at (559) 454-1295. An Asbestos Requirements Bulletin has been enclosed for the applicant. Rule 4102 (Nuisance) applies to any source operation that emits or may emit air contaminants or other materials. In the event that the project or construction of the project creates a public nuisance, it could be in violation and be subject to District enforcement action. Mr. Bemal July 1, 2005 T-5436, R-05-53, C-05-110 Page 2 Rule 4103 (Open Burning) regulates the burning of agricultural material. Agricultural material shall not be burned when the land use is converting from agriculture to nonagricultural purposes. In the event that the project burned or burns agriculturalmaterial, it would be in violation of Rule 4103 and be subject to District enforcement action. Rule 4601 (Architectural Coatings) limits volatile organic compounds from architectural coatings. This rule specifies architectural coatings storage, clean up and labeling requirements. Rule 4641 (Cutback, Slow Cure, and Emulsified Asphalt, Paving and Maintenance Operations). If asphalt paving will be used, then paving operations of this project will be subject to Rule 4641. This rule applies to the manufacture and use of cutback asphalt, slow cure asphalt and emulsified asphalt for paving and maintenance operations. Rule 4901 (Wood Burning Fireplaces and Wood Burning Heaters) limits PM10 and PM2.5 emissions from residential development. Construction plans for residential developments may be affected by section 5.3,specifically: §5.3 Limitations on Wood Burning Fireplaces or Wood Burning Heaters in New Residential Developments. Beginning January 1, 2004, 5.3.1 No person shall install a wood burning fireplace in a new residential development with a density greater than two(2)dwelling units per acre. 5.3.2 No person shall install more than two (2) EPA Phase II Certified wood burning heaters per acre in any new residential development with a density equal to or greater than three (3) dwelling units per acre. 5.3.3 No person shall install more than one (1)wood burning fireplace or wood burning heater per dwelling unit in any new residential development with a density equal to or less than two (2) dwelling units per acre. More information about Rule 4901 can be found at our website- www.valleyair.org. For compliance assistance, please contact Mr. Wayne Clarke, Air Quality Compliance Manager, at 230-5968. Rule 4902 (Residential Water Heaters) limits emission of NOx from residential developments. The District encourages innovation in measures to reduce air quality impacts. There are a number of features that could be incorporated into the design/operation of this project to provide additional reductions of the overall level of emissions. (Note: Some of the measures may already exist as City development standards. Any measure selected should be implemented to the fullest extent possible.) The suggestions listed below should not be considered all-inclusive and remain options that the agency with the land-use authority should consider: • Trees should be carefully selected and located to protect the building(s) from energy consuming environmental conditions, and to shade paved areas. Trees should be selected to shade paved areas that will shade 50% of the area within 15 years. Structural soil should be used under paved areas to improve tree growth. A brochure has been included for the applicant. For Structural Soil see http://www.hort.cornell.edu/uhi/outreach/csc/ For Tree Selection see http://www.ufei.org/ For Urban Forestry see http://www.coolcommunities.org http://wcufre.ucdavis.edu http://www.lgc.org/bookstore/energy/downloads/siv treeguidelines.pdf • If transit service is available to the project site, improvements should be made to encourage its use. If transit service is not currently available, but is planned for the area in the future, easements should be reserved to provide for future improvements such as bus turnouts, loading areas, route signs and shade structures. Appropriations made to facilitate public or mass transit will help mitigate trips generated by the project. Mr. Bemal July 1, 2005 T-5436,R-05-53, C-05-110 Page 3 • As many energy conserving and emission reducing features as possible should be included in the project. Energy conservation measures include both energy conservation through design and operational energy conservation. Examples include (but are not limited to): - Increased energy efficiency(above California Title 24 Requirements) See http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/. - Energy efficient widows (double pane and/or Low-E) - Use Low and No-VOC coatings and paints. See South Coast's site for No-VOC Coatings at http://www.aamd.gov/business/brochures/zerovoc.html - High-albedo(reflecting)roofing material. See http://eetd.Ibl.gov/coolroof/ - Cool Paving. See http:f/www.harc.edu/harc/Proiects/Cool Houston/, http://eande.ibl.gov/heatisland/ - Radiant heat barrier. - Energy efficient lighting, appliances, heating and cooling systems. See http://www.energystar.gov/ - Install solar water-heating system(s) - Install photovoltaic cells - Install geothermal heat pump system(s) - Programmable thermostat(s)for all heating and cooling systems - Awnings or other shading mechanism for windows - Porch, patio and walkway overhangs - Ceiling fans, whole house fans - Utilize passive solar cooling and heating designs. (e.g. natural convection, thermal flywheels) See htti3://www.eere.energy.gov/RE/solar passive.html - Utilize daylighting (natural lighting) systems such as skylights, light shelves, interior transom windows etc. See http://www.advancedbuildings.or_q - Electrical outlets around the exterior of the unit(s) to encourage use of electric landscape maintenance equipment - Pre-wire the unit(s)with high speed modem connections/DSL and extra phone lines - Natural gas fireplaces (instead of wood-burning fireplaces or heaters) - Natural gas lines (if available to this area) and electrical outlets in backyard or patio areas to encourage the use of gas and/or electric barbecues Low or non-polluting incentives items should be provided with each residential unit (such items could include electric lawn mowers, reel mowers, leaf vacuums, gas or electric barbecues, etc.) Exits to adjoining streets should be designed to reduce time to re-enter traffic from the project site More information can be found at: http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/GreenBuilding/, 11 tp://www.lgc.org, http://www.sustainable.doe.gov/, http://www.consumerenerqvicenter.org/index.html • The applicant should implement measures to reduce the amount of vehicle traffic to and from the project area that further reduce air pollution in the valley. This could include providing an information center forresidents to coordinate carpooling. Check out the "Spare the Air' section of our website www.valleyair.org • The project should include as many clean alternative energy features as possible to promote energy self-sufficiency. Examples include (but are not limited to): photovoltaic cells, solar thermal electricity systems, small wind turbines, etc. Rebate and incentive programs are offered for alternative energy equipment. More information can found at- http://www.dsireusa.org/, http://rredc.nrel.gov/, http://www.energy.cagov/renewables/ • Construction activity mitigation measures include: - Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways from sites with a slope greater than one percent - Install wheel washers for all exiting trucks, or wash off all trucks and equipment leaving the site - Install wind breaks at windward side(s)of construction areas ■ Mr. Bemal July 1, 2005 T-5436,R-05-53, C-05-110 Page 4 - Suspend excavation and grading activity when winds exceed 20 mph Limit area subject to excavation, grading, and other construction activity at any one time Limit the hours of operation of heavy duty equipment and/or the amount of equipment in use - Replace fossil-fueled equipment with electrically driven equivalents (provided they are not run via a portable generator set) Curtail construction during periods of high ambient pollutant concentrations; this may include ceasing of construction activity during the peak-hour of vehicular traffic on adjacent roadways, and "Spare the Air Days" declared by the District. - Implement activity management(e.g. rescheduling activities to reduce short-term impacts) - During the smog season (May through October), lengthen the construction period to minimize the number 6f vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. - Off road trucks should be equipped with on-road engines when possible. - Minimize obstruction of traffic on adjacent roadways. • The applicant should use California Air Resources Board (CARB) certified alternative fueled engines in construction equipment where practicable. Alternative fueled equipment may be powered by Compressed Natural Gas (CNG), Propane (LPG), electric motors, or other CARB certified off-road. technologies. To find engines certified by the California Air Resources Board, see their certification website http://www.arb.ca.gov/msproq/offroad/cert/cert.php. For more information on alternative fuel engines, please call Mr. Chris Acree, Air Quality Specialist, at(559)230-5829. • Construction equipment should have engines that meet the current off-road engine emission standard .(as certified by the California Air Resources Board), or be repowered with an engine that meets this standard. Tier I and Tier II engines have significantly less NOx and PM emissions compared to uncontrolled engines. To find engines certified by the California Air Resources Board, see http://www.arb.ca.qov/msproq/offroad/cert/cert.php. This site lists engines by type, then manufacturer. The "Executive Order" shows what Tier the engine is certified as. For more information on heavy-duty engines, please contact Mr. Kevin McCaffrey, Air Quality Specialist, at (559)230-5831. District staff is available to meet with you and/or the applicant to further discuss the regulatory requirements that are associated with this project. If you have any questions or require further information, please call me at (559) 230-5835 or Mr. Hector Guerra, Senior Air Quality Planner, at (559) 230-8520 and please provide the reference number at the top of this letter. Sincerely, Catherine Thao Air Quality Student Intern Central Region Enclosures c:file CITY OF FRESN -ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 11TIAL STUDY FINDING OF CONFORMITY/MEIR NO. 10130 r� Pursuant to Section 21157.1 of the California Public Resource Code DATE RE6tLVE ;OR G: (California Environmental Quality Act) the project described below is determined to be within the scope of the Master Environmental Impact Report `cam CP (MEIR) No. 10130 prepared for the 2025 Fresno General Plan Initial study is on file in the Planning and Development Department, City Hall, mac^ t 2600 Fresno Street, Fresno, California 93721 pyo td` (559) 621-8277 Applicant: Initial Study Prepared By: Provost & Pritchard Inc., on behalf of RZR Enterprises Paul Bernal, Planner III 286 West Cromwell Avenue August 18, 2005 Fresno, California 9371 1-61 62 Environmental Assessment Number: Project Location (including APN): Rezone Application No. R-05-033 Southwest corner of East Church and South Peach Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5436/UGM Avenues Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-05-110 APN: 481-090-27 & 28 Project Description: RZR Enterprises, LLC. has filed Rezone Application No. R-05-033, Conditional Use Permit Application (CUP) No. C-05-110 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. T-5436/UGM regarding approximately 31.87 acres of property located on the southwest corner of E. Church and S. Peach Avenues. The rezone application would re-designate the site from AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural District/Urban Growth Managemeno zone district to the R-1/UGM (Singe Family Residential District/Urban Growth Management) zone district. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. T-5436/UGM, is proposing to subdivide the subject property into a 168-lot, single-family residential planned development at a density of 5.27 units per acre. The CUP application requests authorization to establish a planned development for the tentative tract map. The property is within the jurisdiction of the Southeast Fresno Revitalization Plan (Redevelopment Agency [RDA]), the Roosevelt Community Plan and the 2025 Fresno General Plan. All three plans designate the property for medium density residential land uses; therefore, the rezone application is consistent with the planned land use designation. The subject property is currently developed with a rural single-family residence and is surrounded by a residential subdivision to the north, a church to the east, Storey Elementary to west and a rural residence to the south. Conformance to Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR NO. 10130): The 2025 Fresno General Plan and Roosevelt Community Plan designate the subject parcel for medium density residential planned land uses. The proposed R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone district for the subject property conforms to the medium density residential planned land use designation. The Planning and Development Department staff has prepared an initial study and environmental checklist and evaluated the proposed development in accordance with the land use and environmental policies and provisions of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the related Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR) No. 10130. The subject property is proposed for development with residential uses at an intensity and scale (4.99 to 10.37 dwelling units per acre for medium density residential planned land use) that is permitted by the existing planned land use and proposed zoning designation for the site. Thus, the development of the site with a 168-lot single-family residential subdivision (5.27 units per acre) will not facilitate an;,additional intensification of uses beyond that which already exists or would be allowed by the above-noted planned land use designation. Moreover, it is not expected that the development will adversely impact existing city service systems or the traffic circulation system that serves the subject parcels. These infrastructure findings have been verified by the Public Works and Public Utilities Departments. It has been further determined that all applicable mitigation measures of MEIR No. 10130 have been applied to the project necessary to assure that the project will not cause significant adverse cumulative impacts, growth inducing impacts, and irreversible Finding of Conformity Under MEIR No. .1130 Environmental Assessment No. R-05-033/T-5436/C-05-110 Page 2 August 18, 2005 Per Section 21157.1 of the California Public Resources Code (California Environmental Quality Act), it may be determined that a subsequent project falls within the scope of a MEIR, provided that the project does not cause significant impacts on the environment that were not previously examined by the MEIR. Relative to this specific project proposal, the environmental impacts noted in the MEIR, per the 2025 Fresno General Plan land use designations, include impacts associated with the medium density residential land use designation specified for the subject parcel. Based on this initial study, the proposed project does not change the land use indicated for the subject parcel and will not generate additional significant effects not previously identified by the MEIR and no new additional mitigation measures are required. Therefore, the project proposal is within the scope of the MEIR as defined by Section 15177 of the CEQA Guidelines. Moreover, as lead agency for this project, the Planning and Development Department, per Section 15177 (d) of the CEQA Guidelines, has determined that all feasible mitigation measures from MEIR No. 10130 shall apply to the project proposal as noted in the attached mitigation monitoring checklist. Public notice has been provided regarding staff's finding in a manner prescribed by this section of the Guidelines and by Section 21092 of the California Public Resources Code (CEQA provisions). I- , --- ca", g, GiIbe . roDate Planning Manager, Ci Fresno KAMaster Files-2005\Rezone\R-05-033,C-05-110,T-5436 Southwest corner of Church&Peack—MR-05-033,C-05-110,T-5436 FINDING OF CONFORMn-Y.doc Attachments: Environmental Checklist/Initial Study for Environmental Assessment No. R-05-033/T-5436/ C-05-110 Mitigation Monitoring Checklist (MEIR No. 10130) for Environmental Assessment No. R-05-033/ T-5436/C-05-110 ENVIP''NMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) CHE- -LIST F.. j'ENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFEC'i, EA NO. R-05-033?-5436/C-05-110 1_0 TOPOGRAPHIC,SOIL,GEOLOGIC 11.0 URBAN SERVICES CONSIDERATIONS 1 11.1 Availability of fire protection 1 1.1 Geologic hazards,unstable soil conditions 1 11.2 Lack of emergency vehicle access 1 1.2 Adverse change in topography or ground surface relief 1 11.3 Adequacy of design for crime prevention 1 1.3 Destruction of unique geologic or physical features 1 11.4 Overcrowding of school facilities 1 1.4 Increased water erosion 1 11.5 Availability of water mains of adequate size 1 11.6 Availability of sewer lines of adequate capacity 2_0 AIR QUILITY 1 11.7 Availability of storm water drainage facilities (on or 1 2.1 Substantial indirect source of pollution off site) 1 2.2 Direct on-site pollution generation 1 11.8 Availability of adequate park and recreation areas 1 2.3 Generation of objectionable odors 1 11.9 Unusually high solid waste generation 1 2.4 Generation of dust except during construction 1 2.5 Adverse local climatic changes 12.0 HAZARDS 1 12.1 Risk of explosion or release of hazardous 3_0 WATER substances 1 3.1 Insufficient ground water available for long-term project 1 12.2 Site subject to flooding use 1 12.3 Adverse change in course of flow of flood waters 1 3.2 Use of large quantities of ground water 1 12.4 Potential hazards from aircraft accidents 1 3.3 Wasteful use of ground water 1 12.5 Potential hazards from landfill and/or toxic waste 1 3.4 Pollution of surface or ground water supplies sites 1 3.5 Reduction in ground water recharge 13.0 AESTHETICS 4_0 PLANT LIFE 1 13.1 Obstruction to public or scenic vista or view 1 4.1 Reduction of the numbers of any unique,rare or 1 13.2 Creation of aesthetically offensive conditions endangered species 1 13.3 Removal of street trees or other valuable 1 4.2 Reduction in acreage of agricultural crop vegetation 1 4.3 Premature or unnecessary conversion of prime 1 13.4 Architectural incompatibility with surrounding area agricultural land 14.0 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL 5_0 ANIMAL LIFE 1 14.1 Removal of historic building, disruption of 1 5.1 Reduction in the numbers of any rare, unique or archaeological site endangered species . 1 14.2 Construction or activity incompatible with adjacent 1 5.2 Deterioration or displacement of valuable wildlife habitat historic site 6_0 HUMAN HEALTH 15.0 ENERGY 1 15.1 Use of substantial amounts of energy or fuel 7_0 NOISE 1 15.2 Substantial increase in demand upon existing 1 7.1 Increases in existing noise levels sources of energy 1 7.2 Exposure to high noise levels 1 15.3 Wasteful use of energy 8.0 LIGHT AND GLARE EXPLANATION OF RATINGS 1 8.1 Production of glare which will adversely affect "0" Insufficient Information residential areas Insufficient information is available to determine the 1 8.2 Exposure of residences to high levels of glare potential environmental effects which may result from the 9.0 LAND USE proposed project in this category. 1 9.1 Incompatibility with adopted plans and policies "1" No significant Environmental Effect 1 9.2 Acceleration of growth rate The proposed project will not have an adverse 1 9.3 Induces unplanned growth 1 9.4 Adverse change in existing or planned area environmental effect in this category, or any such effect is characteristics not substantially unusual or of undesirable magnitude. This rating is also utilized in cases where the category is 10.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION not applicable to the particular project under consideration. 1 10.1 Generation of vehicle traffic sufficient to cause capacity "2" Moderate Environmental Effect deficiencies on existing street system The proposed project will have an adverse environmental 1 10.2 Cumulative increase in traffic on a major street for which effect in this category, which is of sufficient magnitude to capacity deficiencies are projected 1 10.3 Specific traffic hazard to motorists,bicyclists, be of specific concern. However, this effect is not pedestrians substantial enough in itself to require the preparation of an 1 10.4 Routing of non-residential traffic through residential area Environmental Impact Report, and is mitigable through project changes and conditions. 1 10.5 Insufficient or poorly located parking 1 10.6 Substantial increase in rail and/or air traffic "3" Significant Adverse Environmental Effect The environmental effect identified in this category substantiates in itself or contributes towards a finding that the proposed project has a potentially significant adverse effect on the environment sufficient to require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report. LL X X 'Af LO W d O ] N T ` kcc 0 t � O •y »}i+' a ^ m 441 L13 Xca ca 0 CL Z I I W �, W LL «. V aaj c c m c c m C Z c p O c m c m c c m � W Y� cOa Y� cOa Y.� cca C CV) d LL `oradCM> `Ora —aoi ora a0i T- O W U N C L] �; U N c o �; U N c o c c c c c c T V > j ca cc c aa) c ca cc c CD c ca me m O a� a ca a ca a aso Z cc LLJp o m o m o a) ZZ j °' > 2 > m `-'Z N WW 0 = 0= 0= � -Q-j Y - LLI aCD amo am0 0 C d a) a) o � -j oca 0ca OC Sca OC c s CL W Q U ar r oc a Oc a •`Oc a v O _ a a = a cc cc c �- Lcaca. �� co �� co c W w o 0 0 . U W i c " Z � Nw .n o C � c-D L)c d O y N C '� T y T Q 0 > � Q N cm - - ca o ca v ca N O m C m CO m d U G. C7 cL Cc CIS '30 Ca ca cnc ns T— mN rn ° 0 = x ca 0 U a 0] N m U W O c° Wa Hca ca � Caoas 75cao o2! aa < J N « c > U m r_ c p U �. m =O N N Q c Ca c N Q W C ` 3 U U y m 'o U U U o - m c 0 c F' Q 0 o � ca m m ' cri m � j ia -- O aca 16 !E aim `° 3 g c W LL cc a a = ,c° o oC\1 zi ami E = 0 cm 0 c o0 c° � �' 0,a N ca ao c U n � mL N -0 � c a$� � � o c me E m � Q Z O asc\J m `O NW .nF N 2 CES W E O.n NW 0 io me me I I O N G ca C7 C m d O m L ° a r m c 7 'c_n 'C m m0 0 CO co Z C O U c •0 O c N U c N U Ca 0 U c 0 > N T U O N .0 •0 co `.r O m •O CO y � U O N m U C ._ ca c` Z r o m CD as O ca N D as C L C— Cls a c -- 0 0 3 " L!J O LL v — m m -'—._ ° U E Q r � � > c c`o - rn> m0 c c� E 3 E 3 c c`o m m a-0 -0 0W p Ly W ns m fn. m J ns m m d CES-- ns m N c m W Z aNic\j0 (D N m0 N m E N m -0N -am) N m m a � a: rno � (n m � t CD V) ccoC7J coo rn� mC7 EN 0 « mC7 c o rn� co am m 0 �'y 'Ro am c am m m > a Q � '_ 0 « W L_ = z = 0-0 — L_ L00Nm LL .0 (D — Cmc`a o �j [C o 2 3 CD n M o C U E 3r. (D y n > ; 3 n y m m CIS y CD CD LU Z c �o c `� '� c m o c m .2 ao j o CD �� CD m m — 0 m ns m N(D a m ) = = o m N � C7 cnUCD 0 ini> > w. � a y � cm= E inv� a� � « Y �.� N F- N � m � c c' c N -0 cco0 3 . N .0 0. :3 mC5 m 0 N.D m Q o m O ns U '> O m a J C O O m m c° ° .D '0 T U c ' CD (� U aQ U CD CD U a« c 'ca U a� 0I c 0 LL O l0 a Ln �� ""' N W ca- a ca m CO '3 w 2 0 m N U N E V _ 0 C U C' (D E `nso0o o c° CD ma c000a m - c �cv CD C.) E vasm Euimca mN EcE m30� c :c ca N o L o c C'm m L 0 O cn c D)— U L a m m C7 ° t0 $ N N C • a. N N C 3 L " N C i L j `�° .T L O N p E a rn >. m o " m ~ o N O -0w c ms am 0 CD m L_ m c C CD m m co io a 0 m CD W .n m an d N m m a O io E c `p N 0 cLp U m U o N fn p o y .O y 3 ° E 0 ca C rnN m a my m. a �0 -- a ON n > «mo C :SNE O Co � C � c3 Co NOo Co o = o � r O•- -- FC — NLL m co ~ N aTL m Qm Z 0Q > m EEQE= � w EEQE > mcn Om c — � m Q r CO Z m O C c > 3 m ,� O c c C c y 0 O c c 0 o c m ' 0 W N C c N @ 0 co O cn-6 c 6 O co y O co a) 0 co D .iq 0 � OO '0 CD a' 0 a�iNioa0 m � Nm ionicE-E a�iN � w OmaL =-' 30m lil 0 « EEm ° 0 00 € LCD oco 0 « Em a>iaoNE O •> O H r c t m o m ` CV c 'OC '� c.N C Ch c = DI N c a o G Litt coo Z m y aw n c .E m y ao �-5 E m 0 a °v; sL N LL X X O °ya W (V qty "• - C C16 r E o U , Q x i pontoon 41 m xQvy T h U.n CL ¢ " m o CLZ I I W W LL U m CC m CD C C OI C Z O 0 c m 0 C m 0 C m y O rn O rn O c E c E c E W m 0 cc CL0 N n y —= ca CL - — M d LL �? o 0)> �? o rn > -L- = rn > *- 2 n C m C.C N n•C N O 0 W 2 cpm in c0 � in c0 � r U > > c�cum� m � cro� m Sro0ani c; a:, coo aHa ca a. Ha. m0 Z Q W o m 0 m 0 m W F- � mTT mmaEi ZZ > — >— > — �Z 1 WW 2 = 2= 2 = 22 nm c nm C nm c J �da 0 � : ca 0 �d C)� m WQ o_ cn o`ca o �Q F¢- W = � �0 . 0 — � rocna CL cc aroma o U Z 'i � - Z U mw � O �' c c c-_�c �' (A m O c O *- vi >, dCW'3 >s «i NrnCm= 'ro � rnOm0m rn0 d = a) m a) NC _ � xm g m >,c°OJ3o m >,'50n0) mT tomm\ moo) � 0 O caW 'D � mn cn — cc0ca co > — cu0 02: IL 8: ,_J Z O O 0 0 r m O C 0 ca U «. N p ra y 0 O C y C N QW C o ro U3 � : Urn U 0o a' cl c z cc O w — �' m rri m�� m -- Coo0)0. m = ym m 3 0 c WU. � � ca mo o a>i ami m U c m o m c0 c �y rnIn, z (V noc U � Qc0)-C � Qcm cna� .5—2 co)� EcO �Q Z O O N N `0 O W .0 H y w Co 0 E 5 .0 y W 0 ca LM C `� 0)C O N C7 c m � z O 0 NAL 0 n5 NM cro rn E� d m I I CL OC mro U0 c Z C 0 U C 0 -.. C 0 U C y M 0 'U C ; > '«� rn T E > � co oro rood 0M0D 0 5M w Uc '� caca Z o m If na `O mia � � nn CL c _ na ca c m o 3 : o � ti m — � o m� v — o '"._ ._ 0 — oro o E� 'u W ToLO > Cro Ecud0 c � E3 � 3 c � dia d `° 0 UJ `a - 0 O N U W ro N In N N E .""� m n> > «> is m a) -0 ca C m H ZayiN 0. (D cc 0 me c aciECD (DmCL � �oC (/) — = In m Cl) cc CD .coo 0>C ca C7 aN 0 0 m (7 o c � CD ca m =o W L - Zca� S - ODOD o(DE L v mtrdm 0C) 0 3 .0 y 0 c U E 3 �y.0 > 3 .0 m m m rna) O rw OD 0 N Z C 'p O C " U C C 'D '0WL - O dl .O :' u) d N — N N d T O O d COm = m rn YUL `� F- � v (D 'D c in C y -0 CO 3 co-0— n.0 dog d m L N Q 0 D Co U > C N Co J C D 0 N N cu Cc 'C O.a •O .O C 7 U n H U U m a) U d 0«. U n j r C C O O d c U N A rn 0 O.0 L C:... m _ p W Y to Lh o�� = m F_- �' � ¢ y m n� �' � '3Lc 03 3 o � � v d E 0 mo O p car 0 Co me me a N c m n d C Uodc°'i E E = cmima' � ENOD rrnnmm ECo � 3 �> c v M •C y N 0 -C d c`a cm c t Of O O O c` C (M= U m N f` co O O 0 is y rn F C n L y y C 3 L " rn rn L j m L p d p E ,r N 0 a O 0 •a H � y 0 -D O o Ea' °' E m c° E no °' dw� d m EwL y m d mnL o rn E o � 0 0 m U o m o a cn 3 � EC7 ca 0` S cc' m rn S 6. C* � �« d— cn. 0 m nmOJN >t�o 0)In O C `omC0c3 C0 � Eo0W CofN — OTor O E m m d m d NL E m d m � m m y d cam 3 nil d ¢ m Z d ¢ > rn E E > Er � � E E ¢ E m mm E E ¢ d _E >.0 Q �cc m 0. (D O OcccmCcco occ � oc ( ? o W N C C N N O _m O toC\j-O C a) O _m co 0 m cr, m O m z .ro m 0 'O CD V c' Ev J d o `° �N O E m c m air E .� d o m mr .a�eis O S o m D o E ._ m > o E o QC .� 0 E a>i 0nE ami E 0 O '> O ~ r C 'C N O N O N C 'C C •in .m cli � cm 'n C ro m co N O C 'D O O m d w ' O N C m N CO N CD L m CL LL W m Z m U n co L 7 m U n 0 .`-. -5 E m 0 n rn ►- : +L-. t y LL a\ CM a N O) U mea a a� m Q m N in .a Q ca Q X M 1 CL Z ! ! W } W LL Um a �� a o) a 0)- o c)� Zp � c •� CD pc '� a) pc � m pc ' m QW Y � c—°oa y° ccaa Y ° ccaa Y° ma O J o iu � O � � o �� O dW 3orn> 30�,> 30rn> 30a>> o O W nc () nc m ac () nc m c� ycm _ c� yco ,: c� ycm c� ycm _ T > C C .0 n C c C'a -0 c c.° -0 c c .° a V O c` a) C a) 7 O C a) 7 O C a) 7 O C a) O aHCL a)m aHa tam aF- CL a) 0 0- a- cum Z W ° d Z5 o-SL , m .. ZZ o T o o c'a _ 0 p 2 vZ A W ac no c n'v c m CL a) CL c CL c - ° a) WQ U ccQ c � caa oi= c cvu ca a `Oa) cc, aaE O o Z co y O 'y 0O a) U -. N O a) c_> cyu ca U U c a V >, Q W O a) CO O C C —L a) a)0 m cc a) 3 N .cc$ C j >,•C cm C d C U y CO CMN '° y m y.- O E m 3 -° a) C a) y n V Ch ca m c C a) C a)•cn "� a) C ` a L >, O y _ > a) y 0 a) L'y a O p) JZ ca CaE a) ca ca L :t U m �+ C O V n 3 as-° c Cl) .y 7 C C O O E C"� Q)'-' a) CO. y co y :B , C L Q W C cu C7)O y d N a) 3 •- p O L y y y a) COcn L N- C .y F- O m > cn E > � � �= c ° c `° oascaL oc Z � m a) ca) as ° - (D na)0C a) c � �� � 3 caQ W LL y Co ° o cn m ° >' ° y d c ° can g - � as y ° _Q)co 0H cc0cn `�° wmccn'rnma) C '0 p ca (4 — fungi � Z O = o Qa c cam ° o v m � � o � = m rn � 0 � m ON no o ff° CDc)�'� >, o � a) Eo yva) c2-0w Um ° n-0 cu >,'ct ° N ° " > > 3 c E ° rnC o y'm 3 0 N cs E ` co m m � � Com ` g o ° c = as o mY v > OCL o W t6 Y a) y C d O o O V O a) C y L y o C o — CC W 0 mm. -c:E dd0m Oo ° c W Q n3 cmc ECD > d (D m : c'o � �n c`u0ooi3� _ _ O y d.0 ca a). -O O C ` 'O Cl) Cl) 3 y'o ° O °'n CL c o U c rn a) ca E o o c Q Q ° E n Ev ` cam oL m- 03 m W � � C E d ?, m ( mLL c o 3 C a) o O ai � a0 CLQ m U o c nein __ _ m CD(D y � co > m a) c3 � � m0y `co m mm ° O - E •ca) tO Uc a) a) o iuNCcaa))a c` CO 0 p coQEc2`u a� SCD" 0 a N i` m U L O )cN a) y n C L 0 0 -o c E (D0. O r c0O as y � > a) a d cn O O as a C C O O r CL C'3 Coc° myrn w CD° omEaci m ° ° cac EnY ° -0QEvi N a C to a) y�. t6 Cl.Ur a)L � U p�O � .c.� c C C 3 � O Lb p ° 3 mac o n ° E E o . ° ° ° c ° 3 (D •- m . m m C Q y c O C C -o o U •E cN O C y C C C) 0c ° 0.o c� 15o0aw) � wc°Tnoc Zorn = =.- rz=n a) o cmc ° Q•0 cu °'° cm ca 2 m ° c� c = >, o E•O 0 0 N 7 cu N L O L N LL E j y -° C y O a) � O m CO ca O C'cu O d O` U ` - a a) y O to (J -p a) a) w .- m U .` n 3 d O E n a1 nm .0 m v, o > C3a 6 y m d.� nE c m c c 0 •° $ _o' a) N a) a),C N O C n N p -� C a) a) a) U co O a) C C acioc c) `-° cLi mo'0 a) � 'yE ac (D m vv ENO t : m � Ln�O �p� -0Oycm EE3O aot ca ! ! •aE°7s > Lc c°i) ` (v co dy U mca OL c►� O '� -n CL CD CD E 0 0) dC 0 ° L mC aCD W Qa • fy n c a) O > a ai C C ca -> OZ a) O O L c CD W n ° U c a) co C a) (Do o >, a) O Ca n L -° C O •y >, • ) N COO '° C a) Q) E O y 3 � E U a) c ° C >, m m a)� o Eav iocn° EdC � Qca � � Eym . a) LL c U ° U m y m = N > n • p no vC O N No m c ciui c n o0mod mm co -6 w5 cE m � cca ;acuE LL VVI:LO ' O W x y O NR X w: CV 06ca r AU 0 ..�iA G 1 + t N m t U QSiM 1r ria T3 l �i� a v _m x U . i ca O az m I I U w u. Zxm �C �cm UCD co O a LL cli c (Dm O m o �m a E CV) Q �o r o j d p � cx o Cl 0LL1 cmco c am > Cm v r V co aa) N m C d c; a. 00 u_ o coo Z Q � W H Z Z a:0 a.J -Y � Qa. m a: a: U O ca O O O c W cn o L) z m '0 ' c co Oc vv '0 m 3 0 yU Q W "� (o (o O ca m c co ca co m N U C O O C m T a0 _ cm c Ea o2E 3 N n_ x ms dE ¢ n mom 20 p c g cam E c c w m d ca m = ¢ co a ` co m m> > cr E " c a 'J N [o co o� C E o f � m o U) ami c n Q W = Q .3 ani n 0 n� co a y c m rn w c>i co n � c o I_ Q O T m U E C >, O -c m C a) co m m > `n C IZ LL «. m m d c d O m c m Cc C C C: y 7 p _ m > C > co p ro d 2 LO > `° rno (1) (D 03 Ern Ea) c m mm CC CD U o D CV = = m ro E ro con 0 cZE _ mn W[C CL mo I I a: CV m coi c a co cm E ai >t m � 'cn c m CO(D m 'm o c aa) U D 0 � C o U) - v � ccos v m � d,� U E =m. E c O m % mc E p' c 2 mN "W SC13 o U- ca co 0 o m o m COmc y O Q W E v -0-o o= a CL 0. 3 r cC13 m o� > >.U v a`, cca o ccoca voE vmi � � m vi co Ec � o ¢ gym C � Q Q m > mm am 3mco C d to sTo m ocm 0m naro Co aci C cCo a m •o - - c E m ns CL o c° ca 0 o 0 a' co co m E mca L 0S °'ca C E C7n a) rC rn- oro erne Co E Eco co a) ami 'n comic Z -0 cn Yc U) m m Ccn m m = m m � co n cc CD °O cn y m m co m c •— E c ay wo � n v cn2 O Q Nevi EE �c Ems co � � Em m `� E ON oc� y yon -o0 o r 0 ca cE� w 0 O y m N o o w 0)m N Co n io o N C c_Co Y d !_- Z` � > > o > •o � c E r m aci o o m ( a' m y — Zc o c OI N y T•f0 m ro 0 O .r .- O y 7 V m.D 3 y N C C .ca cA-. ca U ci cmc mro acini c'c`°icco EES me C))Q. co oc co ca. mem c. ca -0w " n o C7 L C co ca N y 0 � O n p O C C N N E ,0 p c/� C m co m C my me mm n>, Evi c co _gym � � � m amm .O � `ons Lbi ocv CLca_ oro � -0cc > m c co3 m Omai E � y E � c`o T m - O co n m nvo _2 CD (D 0C c0 my n.n cooco ow cn _cg 3 C U m > > O m — co-0 �' y 'C O -y y O 7 1 I Q Com c � eco � � orn Edo LO Ero cE oo_on " 0 - -C w � `� ¢ m 0 O m y U V aj n n E Nia y w 'O >. c`.� m y n o C m co co m Z m ca c 'EC co .� m O C CO T O Co C O w :5 rn o co co "N -X y co Q nY �' m nm m m m in �m a3i o Fs n ai Uu.l m w 3 Cr 0 n0 c 'm c m `m -- E m U c C = :3 C o'ca c y c O ro m e CU QE 3 E ro '� E t o ami m �N scL y 0 cL m a>i co m co > �'0 W o O E o ~ E m `o S o � :0 nm ~ mH a cn o co m U m .� U co U m cn to U N O O rY� Nin �! y0 L ILL U U 2' co �d ci -6 6 W co m 6 -o U :2 CR 6 E U- X X X Y Ln C W X X X h k` X X X N ,. ao a E T O c0 U, o Q �4M1 m Y ' cc CL y ['' cc 0 aZ U 07 U U U U I I W LL Z a cUCD a a a a D Q oFL f o v -- v -- p a LJ. aci 'D m aa)i CD c° E (D m E m m E m cu aci CD aci aci M 2 ¢ r mr m c_ or �or �or �or r �' r r T O Q W ca °' 0 ca CO °� c m m c m «t c 6 ca c d ca ca°? ca � ca m T > a_ -0 a L CC > a C > C > a C > a a_ 0. a= U m • ra) m � mm mmm � mm � mm m -- a) a) C5 0D cu 0D a00 a00 d00 EL00 05 00 0D Z Q uiu W F-- \/ ¢fl J-1 tY W a. 0)Qd 0 c c c c c c rc c c c c W ¢ � O O O O O O O O O o U Z ` m m vv v m >, v m m v - m - iaL = m o r- o v mU Q W O a7 L C _L a7 ca ca O v`mi ca > `� O a7 L a7 a s 3 m O c m m c ca C c o y `� ia �- c 3 o m cn O °� rnm fa cn m _ C U O cn p +� O O j cLn o 'n CD a ca � > -0v U 2 c m -- a� y vU n aQ J N p y,� O C O d O m C U0 co j ca ca m O y y O m C C ca N Q W C v0 m m m a' cn CL cP m c ia `v c E 0'o 6 E O co N }"' O 7 E O U «- O — C C Z ¢ r-. m O y U ca m O y 3 a > C O C O) C p N m 'za O WU- cd � mcn'= > cam � c�oa � Sia c m v 'c L cu ca oia E � _o' er � N �CD vcmm c3 yaL ��v d rn cu :3 c° aCOo �, z � m Utz ZO rncocn � p � cn 3mo � ..� .O vcnoo Er- m aumi (� N -- o o V y o_ m v ID 0 5 6 0 m m N co � � m " aaa>i ac N~ I I ¢ Ea mocCL c � m o � m own Amo a > •m • cn Eoov y0 Hca U0 o cine E m o E in °� E m e `` ._ O O d C a)cn *= > m - > > m cc E c 3 o a0 m c m > - m - m m m o CD Z d E ca ro y (n m U � O N m m= � 'D O s tC v m m ca m � m `6 2 W 'D (D 'EIrmia 'D -0 > o > ci o Um `° m '> 3 � 3cca La ¢ 0CD cu E mEm ocomca 8) -5 a� CD o N CD a)cam ? a) Clm din W mcEaic car> U WEL � '" av o " � E 0 0 - - 3mccaac � d Dm ~ DC7 mv= - a) I-- cs `" m E m o c a `° rn� `-° 0 an �vmi .- Q Q ocn E 'U c � � y CO o Co >- m y 0 co °� m m m ca U c 3 o o m e W N m ca m � v o " as U3 S � cam m ? x o m 0 � o RD U0 is •— ca C a.m, W L C � L L = C[ m a) -- ca ca Q CV) � N " 3 va)a_' O o cu o cs0 3 'S- c m � `v c . ca Cain a) CD o y ym aU a) � ? m me E o cc U3 � � Z c � -o=7E o m m a� mz ca m a) N� a � cc o QE a .` � Co-� m c cn Q � c 3 y- � dLiE OLS m -5 > me E 3 a� m c° o m > � c'x o m �' F" v � CD 0-- C � c 0. L) 3 `° c c�a v 0m rn m U d> •U) _ m m o m E m �QR 3 0 o oL c > > � - mU) m 'S o rn �CD 3 a� COco-0- d CO is o aEi � ro 'o T _V c m cn O a7 a a L L C jr m 0 7 m L 0 7 -O O CD a0 Lb cn = U me W Oma cn 3 � = mc mO � c Cl F.. .o E cc a7 cn� o _ ) E - U > " o 19� �� Ca 1) o� c aaci m E '3 m a) c G C m m .., a7 — Q m CL E L E m _ .O U .� O m U ca 0 ca O 7 L cn Q 2 m L C ca L m O O m 0 0 m U a d U y c O N M m (DE'E cco c � cn > > � � m vrnv caco � � ov � Ec c a) f7 t m N v m m p 3 ca m y m o L c ca c m v m Sin c c CO o =- m o O my o m E m o Y -0 cc c r 3 • cn m m ai � is �.5= 'co m � � m e E1rn ca C >.� O` N O O = y dr y cn m E E .0 E O LO N C m c U«_. C ca ca U L E C O 3 0 mc 0 N cti m c E � � m m -o _> m O O ip m c a m p C C C ¢ CO C C m ca — _ CO U > a y E — C C (n cG ca '� O 'Dm C E .` m .� = m U C O I I ca Of O m a m a7 — L C � — ca m N m•— - m t ca m > m 45 L = p Q CD O L C fa E = L C:n cn m C > L .a.1 C O) _L L E O ca L 0-0 m mcls 3 L E Z rn L y a)L C O O m 2:,M C m E 0 7 m y t� W e `n E O a 7= E L a y � U o m �a"a x ca a Y- �� 5 o m y_ m �,m U w rnm W Um �Ccn? UcnmU � U � VaE SEE lfv o0m� -0Uom- mid mvcmn m 0 E C is m � v m ro L C m in cn m CO m N m V E L CO C L O 0 O m 0 L m L .0 m m m L cU C is N L L O m Rf L ca- O L m U a7 Gni FL- acid o ~ m c H U N S FL- d o ~ `c_U cca � t a m o `o � .0 o U 'p ca ui ca o m o U ch •� m m m CO o F- L CD a is ri v c v is u' cri v; v r� a E co o a ai d o r v a IL 0 O 3 a) a)a>i .0 0 7 0 0 N - fD Q = m0. COcco .6 U D c ca d a S2 m U m O N m U. s X X O W X X X X N h u V f• F Cd Q V ro CD YS y, .1�fi• t ��' L r O CD Al ca cc U a U a ,en � Z I I W } W Li Z m ro m Q Q U — E U U -0.p .p .p �, F J W c a) c C ro c c ro c C a) c M •o o c > j O n LL c° Ea) c° Ea) c° Ea) ca Ea) tLroya) C CL T Q CD a. �p r �p� C'CL O y a) r O y O y O OW •Emm Cma$ c � � c -yam a) 0m a) a) U coa) a) � a) a) � a) a) roam mt. cd a) � m � c; d 0 0 (L 0 0 d 0 0 iL 0 0 0 :D ca 0 0 D 0 D Z Q G W W 1— � Q w = W mJ r r Oa c c c C c LLIt R Q Q — O O O O O O O c W O V W 'O L c C .0 7 a) E CO m y O O y aC Ln ) 7 c Z N y >+ Q. O •� N c U ca •" 7 N y C y y m a) 'a1 N C C " 7 �` O O O c 7 7 O V C - 'p ` o N O)W 7 ca D a) LL 7 a O ca V (� U `C C U a) a) C c o cr d Z C c)N > j Z'O O) a) a) o a ° U � a) O - 'Op Q Q Cl) � � O C aa) C L p a1 7 a1 ay U m —a°, c° cn E 'C U m C � 7 CV U — c CA 0 U a) V O G U > a) a) O a) a) C y H Q 0- 7 c� a' `° o y, ``�° o o) m � c .row y c > E ca o c W LL p 7 CO L U O c yCD �o a) C - y G E .a) 4C 3 U y �o Ln a1 Om Ca) c Ca cO 5o m cyms of p a) Zo •"= c) yyE mY oy c -- y Ua oy - a) °) c � ¢ ON g EE z5. U � c m � U)= U -0 ma N a) yro � y f f `° m s a) 3 c c vi d o o f 3 `� U D O)O) 7 ftl) - a) 3 V L m U O y U Q)y-0 U y o j oa) p = -0E d .r roc) y - E u> c m c � ca a) 'c as Z Two cc° 7 3c - c o m do o m L) Co po W cq V a) U 0. U a) a) a) O O O L () W O D _ V G 7E5 C ` — U a) U V C E a O C 3 0'o _ U O 7 CD a C O L 7 `.0 Ca C O c` •a •C a) c C U N U a) c LLI a: 30 .- o � y. cow c°'ioy o m y na cr Y a) 2- o3 E fQ (/� a 3 - 7 L E U — m cC a) p_ O 7 p_ N C Q'v) ca m N a) ca U .r 7 'o`.'D _ U p a� c � c Q W -0 0 0 0 rn3 o y m c `° aa)) c ac) C M rnca � � d 0L) 7 p c 2 ca cE E c° > 7E coo a) 0 m - C - ma) yo p � m c'1 a) CO y a _ c y y� c0 m a� ca o 7 c o EL ro = E LO Z c 'o N d O E •° aa)) ca a) 3 m-c c5a m O. O c O' U y y 0 C Q a) ca aa) ooro E — c ca L a) 7 dcn a) � Ey3� acini c° v E b •` a) D O ca m d L �_ y p 7 a) o _ E > c m o C d > 7 m y ? a) 7 a 3 0 o a) N m aro a) 'O ac 'E m > a) �. m a) o � y 3 X ca c c U 3 ro cn p m �_ m'y c •O ca :3 N d c ca a) a2 O C a) a) C N a) C d E M o3 7 m c m >. G p cn = > m ro o 0 ca o - p ~ � .� C M a � m ro c U � c > y ro V 0•F, 7 c c C 7 a« U N y 17 •— O > d O ca 0 O Q E O C ca a) a) 7 U (n E U 0 C 7 V` a) G U .� U cd0M mdC CIS 75 EEDE y � O a) acaa_ m m p c y t o dye v`7i m e � cya 3 y O o `m o - - � - �>%.cD o ern ' � tM - aia o c m a) 4) o m aL a) 6) E o o y cO o 0 o - c -U 2 E o o rn N C — "O 7 O v7 c _ la a) a) a) C •�, L U C a) a) U -pCL D. C 2 m c E � � E C o m � = c y `a c y cis o 0 0 _ ro I I W.-V C p` N 7 a) 0 7 a2 7 a) O a 0 — c a) U m E > L 3 Q m p Zoo CUL cn e c e.o a y `� `a c c ro� 3 a) m � Z m U ov ,E y '-' m 7 m O ca m y m o y ca o G C °� y c Q V y c c ro c E U O N 0. 00 am C' p) co .o 'c «>. Q)U 0.Ca � C O W OO7ca Eo, 3N >,o a1 ) a) c m « c � _ m mac- E a' a) 0 y c aC U N � m +�•• L E U n- m O m c 0 L ca > ca G 7 y a) U a) '- a) O.C C 'a) 7 L c (,� F a) N .2 F•• 'c a) ca H rocx— m C N U a) N L a) d L N a1 ro - N O m� c75 o m y D y o 7 oC o v H o 0- ID o. � co m L T fa ca a) CN a C 7 L'7 > L �} N O- r L ;a N Ear N Q a di E � 0 m W ca 0 -0 uw 0 3 W c E cd a ci -o ai Li ro c3: :;E- LL 00 - Li_ Q LL X X X X O W X N Cd r q N 0) O 3 A` ). a' 1 C m mco U Q U .M ;a a tF"V r �_>xa � �Q Q Xat X a X t\ co 0 r 4 • :. ...+C i::. IL Z W rn ani _ o W LL Zm 0 CL m m co m m m Q U U — U U 0 U Co 0 JW > >'Doc 5 aocaa)i � Gaa)) cm cd O aLL. rL rLGmm Q- � `nE vcE co E c° E co T Q O W O W N = O W CL CD m CL m p Co d p S o o O O W m D 0 co m 0 C y � C 5 •C m r U > m anima rm m CL m CL)` mmaa) roa>i mm O . 0D 0D as 0Ma. o a. 00 a0 d0 Z Q � W LU W W O 7 O Z Z O C O O O O C O C Z N W Wp �a p C p C O C 0 0 019 c C a� n0 &.2ao c C ao c c CC J Y W 0) �� m o �c �c �� �co m -0)-Co m C. J L GC > EcC > EmO d O 22 -S 0- -i; ooy ood . D) tea - ac QCIO aas vc W CL'E c o co o m G ac a c ac a ca O Ocomco OU Op OU Ommco Ocomm c W ° U W 0 « m m C C cn W V m !_,co C m Ir 0 a) 7 G > L y t p C c L N m d U ♦Z v d73 co0 0 °r ai W ro C U r -0 -D co m co �LL O Q7 co •N d O1m � O p N cEn �' omGE � v m � � � `� ac —a co 0cooca corn D Z, _z a) coo _ - c L ° m $ o m. �� E - > 0. as Cl) mL? cv m to o ~ cL � c > > EL 16 > tom C Q C ma) - caOmc vcn - co .. o acL .rme C .- f- � p Nmoa>iUm ` can � � cm +,0 3a' cco `vvo � W � c oc W W cc 0 cn aci c nE o 3 � � m a � : m o m o D 0 "& E o _D)a � Ll9 C7 � FL as � c ° cm c � om vamc 0 " C.) in m N +_• m m0 W e `� m v o o co U C E '- c m _ E Z O v n" W E m m co ~ E c m g 'D 3 O `° E y m m o I I ON G mnsG UN oami� oo m � NC7ca W co G o d v m (n m E U U D mmm� ` mm � OMS s 20 mC � co0) ~ c- � ym (D > m E � NG cm Coc a) w c° " - Lt Z _E W L ` N m _y a '� N t C .m.- GO 0) a] y W C 0 3 �:W W m co ~ ~ U C C 0 .x — U U O ce U W 'D C._ Co co m C W d C C _O O m m ro C W -D 2 ca U O m C O tL E CLC O � Q ~ '" U m o'cn ~ .- m m 'D C am m a � Y m m O C 3 co " N co W = �= 3 cam rnm m y m co c - o 0 -6 - o C O E m F- Cl) m co c- a X W to= m v a a°'i m io m > m 'G m Q Q a) m O � C 0 c� m dy m m (D m G > E c Qv E > W W Ey (n Cp vCc ice. d � mea] co mm3 M m � � m � a) 3 N � CJ m� O am a$ a)cd � E o � Z ZLo co r d W `� co d C1_7 O m W ca C ~ (L_A Co 7 y m co O m co-5 E C U Y p y y (a U L C -0 .� Q m` d W C p m U 3 y o E E ` �n a' 3 X c W o a ca •� � v y o �v m O Q oCC c a0 mL ~ o o a) o o o c� ai o co > � m m o 0 r - a � m cpo °' a� o �= m m E 0 - cn `° c° C m a a O C U O 6 L m m W O m 7 > o m .- C-)L _ ` 3 O Lb F- 'ymca� GQ� o 0- coC m EN mm > c m3m ~ LmEmm c O m m > y ai G L m W ` O « c 3 c'cL m 0 .- min m W G c m ._ .. m "- >. o ~ -- co v U_ a) m 3 rn -a m -'X 0— _= m m M m _y o `� c o d Q) a] X E C m N G C O C = y U C m _m m cv Wmmm0'0m Oo m m m « E mL > nWa ac°noc = am m N N y 0 m 0 W m ° U > E — cn C W E G a O (n ~ } m C 7 co . W — -D tq O P W D y YO ] a:_ O W C O G U ro > d «. O U .i O y co 0 `m ~ m G U y w U > cn U ,cn m m O 0 m W m W «7 m _G T2 C O (n C y U C C C (n O O a« .y-.. > Q E C .co > > m m G m W m > Q d •�m m as m m N aaW � U G C m > O =� p m om« O I I O mQ w m E � L� ap m � m y m �_ m o ° > m �L cn 2_ E mL o d Qm Z SLA _m fa Co CIS W ~ coW 0 L L ~ ~ E = C •U m L `n 3 Z > y 0 y ~ C . N O m — W (n 7 U — m m W E >.m p` ca U a) m O m Q >I.O T 3 .`- Lo �_ N N r G m to as a.cUn -D M L r C O-0 O W U .O cis � � m V C U ' U W C LL N W N W d ° O W d m U y CIS t mU � o �nEmo moo (D E how mo o �� W mc� YIn V L E. p-a= L m W L G �!! C � •_ c U, � � y m ._ L a y n a� H c ° m_� o _ ~ o �i � 'ov a' E Uv U a _m `3 0 � • cm _`m C m - m. 07 U m O m 0 -0 y > (n (n O co 11i U.y .0 'j r m r W . m a-0 "p -0 C C r E U 7 W m t > G i m r p• a c N C �• IZ LL LL m W 3'D W m LL a E LL T 7 N m d r Ct: W m ca m cn y 3•W LL x x x x s W Y coca p r A^ E m d inca 0 a Z 1 I W w LL U m ani ani m ani ani Z p 0 0 0 0 0 v v v Q W c � c � c � c o d LL cc o) E ca ca ca CF) � Q co co co co con p OW 'cam cm cap cm c � r U mm mm mm a) � aa0 a0 .5a) a0 Z rn rn rn ^` 0 m c m c m c m c m Q W 0 W 'C cn cn cn W F- _ Z Z o C � C O C -O C O C I- Q N WW om roc om me om me om me om n`occ0 n`occ0 n`occo n`occ0 n`occ Q -� -Y W �ro m 0'c �� m 0'c �� m 0'c �� m 0 c �� a) o Oa � ..J c > Ecn � c > Emm c > Eca � c > Eca2 c > Ec0 v dJ a .0om _0 oom � � 'oom2 - .00oomo m W Q U me no c 5- ao cm c- no c a- no me n cc cc - 0 w 0 w 0 0camm0 0cumca0 0caa) ca0 Ommcc c UW 0 Z i c0 >1 cc = d nC)C L 0 C OL 7 _ L d c w w r 0 >. Q W O i0c� m .c m m a) 3 � 3 ,r ._ o m y m U aU = m c ,:- m X :3_ mY m m c v`o v"mi c c w m 6r- CD � p o `Oyro� c m0 � 0Yc Eom c •oro � m m aa ¢ aN r mca E Z .%c n 3L o m .� no -2 c v 0) w � � N 7 m us m y C m m U n C m 7 O 0 C .- F- � O cmaiym Ana mm � � � w 'o' oc`� U o ami oW Z :_. m L ca d O �` y O m ca '� c ro O W LL cC E - o m c CL c c s y 0 > ° car 0) v o c)vni Lo _� m ca rn m L O c0 0 'tA -0 w E ca m m Z o .� ca 0� D ami S'c o " ca of E m � •0 a) `c0 •ami E -0 o o � !r O � �� ca mL mco Lac � ow omnc � a) ;r0 : o.6 J- o � > c0 m m o c` o 0 n o m c UD C c0 o >'o o m � y � = v c � E w � L +-•.0 ca n0 c cr v cNpv m o m o E o O m m W oc ro� ro m o o umi � �y c CL o Em E �n o aEi a � " j cc W cc m c° >.ro Z >. �r moo n D � m = N m > ai W m m cO F- m` O w cti O m .U.. C � m Y m — •O > U O N U '0 O d N — m co m > L m O C > d `) Cl) Cl) oro.oSmm n `Oro mai EES 3ccLnaZim c m > m Q Q - C > @ " -0 m s L E > m m - U 0 " W m. m C 0 a) W m o > mL -0 ca y o m e = r -' o � m m w U m n `0 Eca v = me `° c ca- � � = o n � �- n ons Z y m C m j E .0 'a co N �p C n C o y (n ca U `o ca L w L m a) a) Ln ca 0)O m c0 -D y y n m L O w m O ca m 0 w L_ O o m16 L a) y cU0 L O O U_a) O C •0 X 0 0 � U C N c r tq •� O cd U p` .O r a) > a7 O LL ca m y O Q d U d N d 0 O O m U O•O O E a 0 +. - Ql - m O ` C U O O y m 0 > (mn 7 v•> m y O 'C n O co > a) ca C y 7 cu � d > -0 — a- m o� N y 0. '� C ca 0 .0 O m u O en N c d y-0 -0 U V >p w C Cf C O O ; m CV) a� -c �n E= c0 ca cco m m -0)� a) _m •c w aa)) y m ro � O LLca L d O O a 0 `n_ m O to O N 7 n ca c0 0 O d eC c O N n m v m O c m L " m cn m Q) c U y p C ` (C C 0 0 d U O C C O N L •- � 0 m d 0 " O a) (b 'V 0:3 W C Y .0 A a) C -0 w c� E y _>-- � m c 3 v w v m c"mnLy E m a� cc - ami I I c o o m v_ c0 o c o �' -- aci c `n.- o n- •- o Q m p ca o y o d v o coo Z ca Y nm `o o''m o o m Z m m m m v m m= m a� _c m , 3 oL m o a) `n cn v.- vi o c a Q 3 C m U m 0) cO ro d " 0 L o w C 'r .m ca rn-0 Z c ca C c` a) 0) o-Dc c � n cam_ - ca caw Hca m m W C 0 a) 0 m ca ca 'V a) a) m 'o)E O cn `O 0) c O ` C w +� m O c ce en m L o -0 L m ro c— L o m m C c _ch �- 0 v 0cr L > 7 m m X +� 7 0 y m y O O 'U _ m om U n E .m f0 ca o U m > 'a) > E `-' > w c ` w m a) a Q a) m t o Qcl1 m U 'y E m Q as ) C �� >. � cn d � ca) U)- - 3: 0 - 0- > ca � mca � `mcf0i � � aim ci -6 ai LL x Lo O W ° x Nco T s E 0 x cu t0 it y' U p ' � ' a co 0 IL Z I I W } ° o LU LL. U m ani ani N'- nai m m m m ani Q O O 0 � y 0 � JD 0 W C C y C C cn C C C C - N a) a)cu coD C N N C m C a) C a) C m O d u- rnCL E rnEa- a rnCL Ea- cu cc cu rnCL E CV)T C O C O V y C O U C O C O C O C O O Q W C N C p E C or o •C N C m C N C N T (> > cam m � m0 marn �a m � -5 (1) m � m � O d0 d 2U a- in a `ao d0 n_p Z CL) m W > > W Z °� O c �Z N WWo_ c`-° oc-° oE IL Q t d )-a me � 0) 0) 0)Ea) a 0)v 0) CD 6 (� C. � C c C C =.ca C = m c m a: a: - Ocnmm O O O Ocna) m 0 .0N O c W O V Z L U U L a) m L C L ° a) a) ° N m . T m = m E n o O n 0 >1 QW p CD a .r of - - C) In � o ° L ooy - ca dmo c�0o 'o � eDL cu N ° m ZEA' -E -6 cE rnC MQ O CU UQmc N3a� C7E > :E o � m >, Cc 0 = c0 :3 ad < C CV C - O a) J N C j m m >; m 2 c� •D-D ~O cv C m 3 C m cn - C QW LoE -0 nm ° � � 0) '0m ca mcz CD ac oma°) o cN F- � O v -0 - � cD (j in00m ii � `nv E P mn ° � carno oc Z W *+ •o c - ca Z c c L... Y-- C cmi_) m �L U ? o E - m •0 O W cn a)�a L a) C o 0'3 m 2 •0� ai-0 o L a Cl) C U _rn N to CA EL NoEo U mD v > CC U vm � m0v a) mN N 0 o >, E m T D LD r_ c as n O E -jw 3 0 o cm � Q Z N n m c c E h «� y m aa)) p0 t N E U o Z V E y n N y I I t ,cis o `oo va m ° �' ° fl c� >,o cmi C -v > �U ,n 3 3 �c c UD > a) m 'mD N U n �, c O d 7 cc h b ° m a m > ca a) CO U C •0 N � 2 C ca r a) C U N (D E h .0 -0 _ a) m O W nm E E E cD a m _o m U o aci m ° cpm s s C �' CD (D m ° �cu c o 0 W cD o c L) a) CU .0 c m -0nC7 Nii maX) c m >,_CoEj > m O mL ? N x '32 y ro m « Lo m C Q 0 2 CD � ,E._ « U N N �O c Z ca h m m ca•C N m 0 = 0 �, N O• ° cu m > •-a) N m m m 2 E N O c 2 C) a) — m Q)L `p N y -E U d N O_ O C cp W c � rn � w � Cc � cNmc ? c � 0 In m � en-Dm caEm `_cwcc c*� ° D) o me O mL O m E 2 O c a nmw O CD vi a� m o o `� ° Z .7 Z cc0 � CD en mNenm E a) 00- C .0 ro U00C 00 '� � mm Ln O = w U E m N CZ - C .- O n n m h m cn N N m m h L 0 m M cn y� 0_ U L C N O E - U H O U m r m c M 'D Vj O L C D y m O V O H (D -o o '� � os N m o « ai c2 umi CD E.� D) E m •CU E m m m m a) y DU m T Q — 0 m ° E 2 U - U, 0 0 `O m 'p ca '_O 0 ` O N `D ` C C L C O O T L m C m a) m (0 cr.n O L O 0 C L U n •E D E 'D p N a) m a) N m D. C en m 0 n m O O m > m C p 0 M d C cm U a) m C c U) •D O c aN) c � m �+0 0 m o c Incu -0 m ) cam m mn� n 0) m > j N a) > ca o o m m m LU: c E c ' a) >,a) E :E a) m c c -o > E o cz m a > E o �m . � U CD a) m D U v o 0 0 ° o o C m nn 0 m ca -- m ° s � n� m a) E c CL L z E iq c c � C o O m N n U m m e v 3 m a) a) M mono � NC > � omamiO � m cum o � � m > av3cy o CD (D Om O m ca C C c m C c U) Z (D 0 a) ca? cCa Q L m` ami c aNi `n `n ca cn ca 26 cu cua)a >,.N aa) E 'o �c �' c `n 0)CL aN In a� aUi a o -- a�miv c o C'. c c E v C C o m N m E a 2 c `O_ •r- E 0 D °o o2r aNio a)05 s UH m e c m acct ° S � �C c N ¢ oCD m m _ N'E Co a- mc >'2 0t U c mciiC" ornnmCL I 1 HX p oomm � � > CDm E `� c � 00i -- s � � do � �In � _� ami Ngo mN0ma) Qm Z m 3 .0 W ca:5 m om aL) 'o`o m e ma m E. c C, Z cc a) a)CD ¢ OLS CU Q L m c`u Z ° m C n- - c 6- a`) A cu cm� m (6 U g 2 o o 6 H E `W 2 :sc mom, Q ° too > U 2C r c3 a� c h 0Uc3 0 y+, cc 'D cn (D C m 0 •m �.0 c a) a) n >,C7 m = p m CD -0 IL •` L c 0 co co C m j C a) V c c _ m m -C ca c O C N m ca Hca Q rn� m O � OQ 0 .00 � c0Om N2N ,no ~ m QvCiv � .2 CC m m ? _TE v'� n'vco i N `N-C C7 E D)m CO a O N d QC))N N N N a) O L •_ C7 cn E T •= Q m C CO `oU U acnar .n SC Cl) S t and H E X c 5 a) J m T E c0) c LL o � o q 06E co U ' . CL (D { \ q k OCL 6a = < . aZ CL Z w . . . . W L k � � C zi S c c = 2 = Z 2 o CL !L ccE coE 0 LU �@ � ° USI $ / G C5 � c 1c . 2 . � LU w . 22 22 � « 2 � � a: -j .19 � � o 0 O � a: 3 3 . LU k � 2 § o � L 7a 72a C) @� CL — § fca § & e@ 20 \ / \ ƒ � E 77& 2 2 o2 ° EIk � < « � c � q [ \ a / `5 g ƒ � o4A /\ � e >Z LL CD / k / � kCL k 0 Gk 2S ' % k\ O q CD CD Re \ ( „ -0 [ / � r / c z E2 aef@ LU 7 7 co U) � � } ° @ � p LU a / = U) E0 m b/ CD CD R2 0 5 � � = L ƒ s 07 -Z § � / 03C Rr (DA ' LO 0 9q 2 & & m . . \- C0 - - � « E\ § � £ � '7 o cz (D U) a L = 3 E k C f _ƒ U � d � \ o Z;5k ° Q k =dE o a) . �o@_a J) k - C E. al � SE5 =s# _ @ CD CD 5 � _ � � . „ <_ k \ / U)_ § > _% 0 � 0c O £ CD2 � ° ° 7 / ( f ■ � \ 2 a al 2 / . / E» a z \ 6JEJ CITY OF FRESNO NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS: - -- NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT mitigated negative declarations have been prepared by the City of Fresno Planning and Development Department resulting from Initial Study and Environmental Assessment (EA) of the projects described below: EA NO. 05-31: URS, on behalf of the City of Fresno, Airports Department, has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the development of a new consolidated Rental Car facility at Fresno Yosemite International Airport. The consolidated rental car facility will be located just west of the main terminal building, adjacent to the baggage claim facility and will result in increase operational efficiency, cost effectiveness, and enhance customer service. Approximately six acres of existing rental car facilities would be redeveloped, while an additional 13 acres would be developed to accommodate the new consolidated facility. Vehicular access into the new consolidated rental car facility would remain unchanged, from E. Clinton Way. A formal site plan is expected to submitted in the immediate future. EA No. R-05-033/C-05-110/T-5436/UGM: RZR Enterprises, LLC. has filed Rezone Application No. R-05-033, Conditional Use Permit Application (CUP) No. C-05-110 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. T-5436/UGM regarding approximately 31.87 acres of property located on the southwest corner of E. Church and S. Peach Avenues. The rezone application would re-designate the site from AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre Agricultural District/Urban Growth Management) zone district to the R-1/UGM (Singe Family Residential District/Urban Growth Management) zone district. The CUP application requests authorization to establish a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. T-5436/UGM, which is proposing to subdivide the subject property into a 168-lot, single-family residential planned unit development. These applications have been tentatively scheduled to be heard by the Fresno City Planning Commission on Wednesday, September 21, 2005. ANY INTERESTED PERSON may comment on the mitigated negative declarations to the Fresno City Planning Commission, 2600 Fresno Street, Fresno, California 93721- 3604. A comment must be in writing and must state (1) the appellant's name and address, (2) the appellant's interest in or relationship to the project, (3) the decision being appealed, and (4) the specific reason(s) why such decision should not be upheld. Any comment must be submitted on or before September 7, 2005, or the Planning Commission date as noted above. Additional information on the proposed project, including copies of the environmental finding, may be obtained from the. City of Fresno Planning and Development Department, City Hall, 2600 Fresno Street, Room 3043, Fresno, California, or contact Mike Sanchez at (559) 621-8040 for EA NO. 05-31 and Paul Bernal at (559) 621-8073 for EA No. R-05-033/C-05-110/T-5436/UGM. Your remarks are welcomed and will be considered in the final decision. FINDING OF CONFORMITY UNDER MEIR NO. 10130: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT pursuant to Section 21157.1 of the California Public Resources Code (California Environmental Quality Act) the projects described below have been determined to be within the scope of the Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR) No. 10130 prepared for the 2025 Fresno General Plan. EA No. R-04-56/C-04-145/MD-04-26: Woodward Park Baptist Church, has filed Rezone Application No. R-04-56, Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-04-145, and Minor Deviation Application No. MD-04-26 for approximately six acres located on the southwest corner of N. Maple and E. Teague Avenues. Rezone Application No. R-04-56 proposes to rezone the subject property from the AE-5/UGM (Exclusive Five Acre AgriculturaUUrban Growth Management) zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone district. Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-04-145 proposes to construct a four-phase expansion of the existing church. The multi-phased project will include the construction of new classrooms, offices, a storage building, additional parking area, an interior remodel of the gymnasium, and a new sanctuary building. The related minor deviation application is a request to increase the allowable building height by ten percent. EA No. R-04-68/T-5388N-05-07: Spradling Construction, Inc. has filed Tentative Tract Map No. 5388/UGM, Rezoning Application No. R-04-68, Variance Application No. V-05- 07, and a request to vacate portions of N. Salinas Avenue and N. Dante Avenue. These applications relate to 11.3 acres of property currently zoned R-A/UGM (Residential and Agricultural District/Urban Growth Management Area) for property located on the west side of N. Salinas Avenue between W. San Jose Avenue and the Herndon Canal. Rezone Application No. R-04-59 proposes to rezone this property to R-1/UGM (Single- Family Residential District/UGM Area) zone district. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. T- 5388/UGM proposes to subdivide the subject property into 42 single family residential parcels, to install related infrastructure to serve this project, and to relocate irrigation structures. Variance Application No. V-05-07 proposes to reduce the lot depth for six of the proposed lots. The portion of N. Salinas Avenue proposed for vacation is the westerly half of the segment between W. San Jose Avenue and the Herndon Canal, where the east half of the street right-of-way has already been vacated. The portion of N. Dante Avenue being vacated is the segment between the N. Salinas Avenue right-of- way and the future alignment of W. San Jose Avenue being constructed with this subdivision. The public hearing regarding this tract map conducted by the Fresno City Planning Commission is being continued from Wednesday, August 17, 2005 to Wednesday, September 7, 2005 at 6:00 p.m. or thereafter, and will be held at the location noted below. EA No. R-04-106/ C-04-322iT-5413: Lafferty Homes has filed applications pertaining to approximately 18.2 acres of property located on the southeast corner of S. Armstrong and E. Hamilton Avenues. Rezone Application No. R-04-106 proposes to rezone the subject site from the AE-20/UGM (Agricultural Exclusive-20 acre minimum/Urban Growth Management) zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family ResidentiaUUrban Growth Management) zone district. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. T-5413/UGM and Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-04-322 propose to subdivide the project site into a 91-lot single family residential planned development subdivision. EA No. R-04-107/C-04-323/T-5188: Lafferty Homes has filed applications pertaining to approximately 17.6 acres of property located on the southwest corner of S. Temperance and E. Butler Avenues. Rezone Application No. R-04-107 proposes to rezone the subject site from the AE-20/UGM (Agricultural Exclusive-20 acre minimum /Urban Growth Management) zone district to the R-1/UGM (Single Family Residential/Urban Growth Management) zone district. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. T-5188/UGM and Conditional Use Permit Application No. C-04-323 propose to subdivide the project site into an 80-lot (plus one outlot) single family residential planned development subdivision. EA No. R-05-042: A.K.J Properties has filed Rezone Application No. R-05-042 pertaining to approximately 0.20 acres of property located on the northeast corner of E. Whites Bridge Avenue and S. Modoc Street. The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject site from the C-6 (Heavy Commercial District) zone district to the R-2-A (Low, Density Multiple Family Residential District, One Story) zone district. EA No. R-05-053: Donald Sims has filed Rezone Application No. R-05-053 pertaining to approximately 0.23 acres of property located on the south side of E. Whites Bridge Avenue between S. Plumas Street and S:Thorne Avenue. The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject site from the C-6 (Heavy Commercial District) zone district to the R-2- A (Low Density Multiple Family Residential District, One Story) zone district. EA No. TPM No. 2005-13: Duncan Enterprises has filed Tentative Parcel Map No. 2005-13 pertaining to approximately 15.77 acres of property located on the north side of E. Shields Avenue between N. Duke and N. Sabre Avenues. Tentative Parcel Map No. 2005-13 is a request to subdivide the site into ten parcels of land for industrial purposes. EA No. TPM No. 2005-14: Grubb & Ellis has filed Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 2005-14 pertaining to approximately 5.35 acres of property located on the north side of W. McKinley Avenue between N. Golden State Boulevard and State Route 99. Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 2005-14 is a request to subdivide the subject site into six parcels of land for industrial purposes. Pursuant to Section 21157.1 of CEQA, it may be determined that a subsequent project falls within the scope of a MEIR provided that the project does not cause significant impacts on the environment that were not previously examined by the MEIR. Since the projects do not change the land use indicated for the subject properties by'the 2025 Fresno General Plan and will not generate significant effects not previously identified by the MEIR staff has determined that the subject applications are within the scope of the MEIR and, as such, shall be subject to the appropriate mitigation measures contained therein as required by Section 15177 of the CEQA Guidelines. No additional specific mitigation measures will be required of the projects. ANY INTERESTED PERSON may comment on the environmental conformity finding findings to the Fresno City-Planning Commission, Fresno City Hall, 2600 Fresno Street, Fresno, California 93721-3604. Public hearings have been tentatively scheduled before the City of Fresno Planning Commission on Wednesday, September 7, 2005, beginning at 6:00 p.m. A comment must be in writing and must state (1) the appellant's name and address, (2) the appellant's interest in or relationship to the project, (3) the decision being appealed, and (4) the specific reason(s) why such decision should not be upheld. Any comment must be submitted on or before September 7, 2005. Your remarks are welcomed and will be considered in the final decision. Additional information on the proposed projects, including copies of the environmental finding, may be obtained from the City of Fresno Planning and Development Department, City Hall, 2600 Fresno Street, Room 3043, Fresno, California, or contact Dawn Marple at (559) 621-8058 for EA No. R-04-56/C-04-145/MD-04-26; Sandra Brock at (559) 621-8041 for EA No. R-04- 68/T-5388N-05-07; David Braun for at (559) 621-8038 for EA No. R-04-106/ C-04- 322lT-5413 and EA No. R-04-107/C-04-323/T-5188; Paul Bernal at (559) 621-8073 for EA No. R-05-042, EA No. R-05-053, EA No. TPM No. 2005-13 and EA No. TPM No. 2005-14: Do Not Publish Sign-Off and Identification Below This Line Planning and Development Department City of Fresno PUBLICATION DATE: August 18, 2005 Traffic Impact Study' - , Tentative Tract No. 5436 Southwest of the Intersection of Peach and Church Avenues ` Fresno, California ��►- TUt 21 , 2 4 Prepared For: .. RZR Enterprises 3151 Airway Avenue Costa Mesa, California 92,626 Date: IRzc,' D April 15, 2005 1c� -22- Job'No.: 05-008.01 PETERS ENGINEERING G`ROUp- �� - A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION 55 ;SHAW AVENUE, SUITE 220 PHONE 1559) 299-1 544 CLOVIS, CALIFORNIA 9361 2 FAX (559) 2.99-1 722 PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION 55 SHAW AVENUE, SUITE 220 PHONE (559) 299-1 544 CL❑VIS, CALIFORNIA 9361 2 FAX (559) 299-1 722 Mr. Rauf Gajiani April 15, 2005 RZR Enterprises 3151 Airway Avenue, Suite K-200 Costa Mesa, California 92626 Subject: Traffic Impact Study Tentative Tract No. 5436 Southwest of the Intersection Peach and Church Avenues Fresno, California Introduction This report presents the results of a traffic impact study for a proposed residential development in Fresno, California. This analysis focuses on the anticipated effect of vehicle traffic resulting from the project. Proiect Description The project is expected to include 168 single-family residential units. The site is located southwest of the intersection of Peach and Church Avenues. Site access will be provided from one street connecting with Church Avenue and from two streets connecting with Peach Avenue. Access will also be provided to the subdivision south of the site. A Site Vicinity Map is shown in Figure 1 and a Site Plan is shown in Figure 2. Study Area and Time Period This report includes analysis of the following intersections: • Peach and Church Avenues, and • Peach and Jensen Avenues. Trip traces are provided indicating the number of project trips expected at the following interchanges: • Jensen Avenue/State Route 99, • Jensen Avenue/State Route 41, and • Peach Avenue/State Route 180. The study time periods include the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours determined between 7:00 and 9:00 a.m. and between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. The peak hours were analyzed for the following conditions: • Existing Conditions, • Cumulative-With-Project Conditions, and • Future-With-Project Conditions (Year 2025). 05-008-report.doc Traffic Impact Study—Tentative Tract No.5436 April 15,2005 Southwest of Peach and Church Avenues, Fresno,California Page 2 Lane Configurations The existing lane configurations and intersection control are illustrated in Figure 3, Existing Lane Configurations. For future conditions, it is assumed that the study intersections will be built out to their ultimate configuration in accordance with City of Fresno standards. The City of Fresno General Plan designates Jensen Avenue as an expressway at the study location. Therefore, Jensen is expected to have three lanes in each direction by the year 2025. Peach Avenue is designated as an arterial and Church Avenue is designated as a collector at the study locations. Therefore, the ultimate configuration of the intersections is expected to include one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane in each direction (with the exception that Jensen will have three through lanes). The intersections of expressway, arterials, and collectors are expected to be signalized in the future. Trip Generation Data provided in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 7`h Edition, were used to estimate the number of trips anticipated to be generated by the project based on the number of lots. Table 1 presents the trip generation information. Table 1 Proiect Trip Generation Time Period Trips Entering Site Trips Exiting Site Weekday 838 838 Weekday AM Peak Hour 32 96 Weekda PM Peak Hour 108 63 Pass-by and captured-trip reductions were not applied to the project traffic volumes. The distribution of project traffic to the adjacent road network was based on a select zone analysis using the 2025 Fresno County travel model. The select zone analysis was performed by Council of Fresno County Governments (COG) staff using information provided by Peters Engineering Group. The anticipated project traffic volumes at the study intersections are shown in Figure 4. The trip generation calculations are attached following the figures at the end of the text of this report. The results of the select zone analysis incorporating the peak hour traffic volumes presented in Table 1 are also attached following the trip generation calculations. Other Proiects The traffic volumes expected to be generated by other projects in the vicinity of the project site are included in the analyses. Specifically, the traffic expected to be generated by Tract 5235 as presented in the Traffic Impact Study report dated November 24, 2003 by Peters Engineering Group was included in the analysis. The other-projects traffic volumes are presented in Figure 5. Existing and Future Traffic Volumes i The existing traffic volumes were determined by performing manual turning-movement ' traffic counts at the study intersections between 7:00 and 9:00 a.m. and between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. on a weekday (Tuesday through Thursday). The existing peak-hour turning i movement volumes are presented in Figure 6. Cumulative-without-project traffic volumes Traffic Impact Study-Tentative Tract No.5436 April 15,2005 Southwest of Peach and Church Avenues, Fresno,California Page 3 are presented in Figure 7 and are the result of adding the other-projects traffic volumes to the existing traffic volumes. Cumulative-with-project traffic volumes are presented in Figure 8. Future traffic volumes with the project for the year 2025 were determined using the Increment Method developed by the COG. The results of the select zone analysis were incorporated into the year 2025 loaded network by the COG. The year 2005 and 2025 model traffic volumes used in the analyses are attached. Future turning movements were determined based on the methods presented in the Chapter 8 of the Transportation Research Board National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 255 entitled "Highway Traffic Data for Urbanized Area Project Planning and Design." Future-with-project traffic volumes are presented in Figure 9. Proiect Traffic on State Highways The volume of project traffic expected at three freeway interchanges near the project site is taken directly from the results of the select zone analysis and is presented in the Table 2. The 2025 select zone analysis printouts on which the volumes are based are attached. Table 2 Year 2025 Proiect Traffic at Freeway Interchanges Total Movement a.m.Peak p.m. Peak Hour Hour SR 180 WB on from Peach Avenue 9 3 SR 180 WB off to Peach Avenue 0 0 SR 180 EB on from Peach Avenue 0 0 SR 180 EB off to Peach Avenue 4 9 SR 180 WB at Peach Avenue 0 0 SR 180 EB at Peach Avenue 0 0 Peach Avenue NB across SR 180 3 1 Peach Avenue SB across SR 180 1 5 SR 99 NB on from WB Jensen Avenue 7 4 SR 99 NB on from EB Jensen Avenue 0 0 SR 99 NB off to Jensen Avenue 0 0 r SR 99 SB on from WB Jensen Avenue 0 0 SR 99 SB on from EB Jensen Avenue 0 0 SR 99 SB off to Jensen Avenue 3 8 SR 99 NB at Jensen Avenue 0 0 SR 99 SB at Jensen Avenue 0 0 Jensen Avenue WB across SR 99 3 2 Jensen Avenue EB across SR 99 1 3 SR 41 NB on from WB Jensen Avenue 0 0 SR 41 NB on from EB Jensen Avenue 0 0 SR 41 NB off to Jensen Avenue 0 0 SR 41 SB on from WB Jensen Avenue 0 0 SR 41 SB on from EB Jensen Avenue 0 0 SR 41 SB off to Jensen Avenue 0 0 j SR 41 NB at Jensen Avenue 0 0 SR 41 SB at Jensen Avenue 0 0 Jensen Avenue WB across SR 41 2 1 Jensen Avenue EB across SR 41 1 2 i Traffic Impact Study—Tentative Tract No.5436 April 15,2005 Southwest of Peach and Church Avenues, Fresno,California Page 4 1 Analyses The intersection levels ofservice were determined using the computer program Synchro 6 (Build 612) for unsignalized and signalized intersections, which is based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual procedures for calculating levels of service. Level of service characteristics for both unsignalized and signalized intersections are presented in Tables 3 and 4. The City of Fresno requires that a level of service D or better be maintained. Therefore, levels of service A through D are considered acceptable and levels of service E and F are considered unacceptable. Table 3 Level of Service Characteristics for Unsianalized Intersections Level of Service Description Average Vehicle Delay seconds A Little or no delay. 0-10 B Short traffic delays. >10-15 C Average traffic delays. >15-25 D Long traffic delays. >25-35 i E Very long traffic delays. >35-50 J F Stop-and-go conditions. >50 Table 4 Level of Service Characteristics for Signalized Intersections Level of Descrition Average Vehicle Delay Service p (seconds) A Uncongested operations;all queues clear in a single cycle. <10 B Very light congestion;an occasional phase is fully utilized. >10-20 C Light congestion;occasional queues on approaches. >20-35 Significant congestion on critical approaches, but intersection is functional. Cars required to wait through D more than one cycle during short peaks. No long-standing >35-55 queues formed. 4, Severe congestion with some long-standing queues on E critical approaches. Traffic queue may block nearby >55-80 intersection(s)upstream of critical approach(es). F Total breakdown,stop-and-go conditions. > 80 Table 5 presents the results of the intersection analyses. The level of service is presented for the overall intersection and for each turning movement where applicable. The overall level of service is considered the most reliable; the individual turning-movement levels of service are less reliable because they are more dependent upon signal timing and variations in traffic volumes. The individual turning movement levels of service should be used only as a guide. The overall intersection level of service is not defined by the Highway Capacity Manual for two-way stop-sign controlled intersections. The analysis output is attached to this report. Traffic Impact Study—Tentative Tract No.5436 April 15,2005 Southwest of Peach and Church Avenues, Fresno,California Page 5 Table 5 Intersection Level of Service Summary Existing Cumulative Future With Approach With Project Project(2025) a.m. p.m. a.m. p.m. a.m. p.ni. *757 Eastbound L B A C A F E Eastbound T DNS DNS DNS DNS B D Eastbound R A A Westbound L A B A B E F Westbound T DNS DNS DNS DNS C D Westbound R A A Northbound L E F Northbound T F F F F D D Northbound R B B Southbound L F F F F F F Southbound T D C Southbound R C B C B A A U 70 Eastbound L D D Eastbound T B A B A C C Eastbound R A A Westbound L D D Westbound T B A C A C C Westbound R A A Northbound L C D Northbound T B A B B C C Northbound R A A Southbound L D D Southbound T B A B A C B Southbound R A A L—Left turn R—Right turn T—Through DNS—Does not stop ND—Level of service not defined * Assumes signalization of the intersection and build out in accordance with City of Fresno Standard Drawing P69 Discussion The results of the level-of-service analyses indicate that the intersection of Peach and Church Avenues currently operates at acceptable levels of service and is expected to continue to operate at acceptable levels of service after construction of the project. With future signalization and build out in accordance with City of Fresno Standard Drawing P69 the intersection is expected to operate at acceptable levels of service through the year 2025. The intersection of Jensen and Peach Avenues currently experiences unacceptable levels of service on the northbound and southbound approaches. The proposed project and other projects are expected to contribute additional traffic to the southbound approach. Signalization of the intersection is expected to be required to mitigate the unacceptable levels of service. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) presents criteria to assist in the determination of the need for traffic signals. The peak hour warrant was Traffic Impact Study—Tentative Tract No.5436 April 15,2005 Southwest of Peach and Church Avenues,Fresno, California Page 6 analyzed as part of this study to determine whether traffic signals are expected to be warranted based on existing and cumulative-with-project conditions. The peak-hour warrant analyses indicate that the need for signalization based on the existing conditions is not clearly justified and would be subjective, especially considering that a large portion of the delayed southbound traffic turns right and would not benefit substantially from a traffic signal. However, the peak-hour warrant analysis indicate that traffic signals at the intersection are likely to be warranted based on cumulative-with-project conditions, even if southbound right turns are neglected. The peak hour traffic signal warrant plot is attached. i The intersection of Jensen and Peach is expected to operate at acceptable levels of service with signalization through the year 2025. The left turns at the intersection will likely experience delays corresponding to levels of service E or F. In general, the projected left-turn traffic volumes and queue lengths do not suggest that additional left-turn lanes should be constructed. However, the analyses indicate that the queue length for the eastbound left turn may be on the order of approximately 350 feet. As such, the length of the eastbound left-turn lane should be maximized. . Conclusions Generally-accepted traffic engineering principles and methods were employed to estimate the amount of traffic expected to be generated by the project and to analyze the traffic conditions expected to exist in the future. The conclusion of this traffic impact study is that traffic signals are likely to be warranted at the intersection of Peach and Jensen Avenues based on the cumulative-with-project conditions. The study intersections are expected to operate at acceptable levels of service with construction of the project through the year 2025 assuming eventual build out to City standards. Mitigations The intersection of Jensen and Peach Avenues is expected to require signalization based on k cumulative-with-project conditions. The length of the eastbound left-turn lane should be maximized based on a projected year 2025 queue length of approximately 350 feet. Thank you for the opportunity to perform this traffic impact study. Please feel free to call our office if you have any questions. Q4flFCoS10�, `�,. PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP A0R W4,q c\,� / c N0.52753 John Rowland, P.E. Exp.12-31-06 J CIVIV Attachments: Figures t through 9 OL( lS-05 Trip Generation Calculations Select Zone Analysis and Fresno County Travel Model Output Intersection Analyses Peak Hour Volume Warrant SIERRA 3A DEN or BL LLARD BAR STOW SHAW A C.S.0 F. JCLOVIS G B RG 41 168 ASH 16 L-\J— CLINTON MCKINLEY OL VE 180 9171 MONT TULAR r "TURA FRESNO J INGS ICW B ER o z v PROJECT LOCATION SPTC RR N aw w JENSEN U CAUVA N � � O 3 W 3 W AMERICAN = r , i Site Vicinity Map Proposed Tract 5436 Fresno, California Not to Scale PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP Figure MPP NO� W 6% BKz rG1� I , yMnye. NJax^ox^+fAY�_•u�^ .,m:G�� q ... .. ry. .... l.l'I V h1V LIV � i III 110 109 _108 107 y .Wu5 c 104 il b fqq�l 6 115 114 113 f9DY 5777 sSmY: 1909 150 Y SYOY P@9 a1�Y simr _59ar ��' : : 5 .... ^� t 103 I22 I23 12�, 125 126 127 12 { 102 I 120 121 $ iI 1 17 I u° k 1/°1Y 4J �'CNIY 1.wSY SAY SigY SIa9 SIIOY S1wY 'SIIOS SIw9 SIgJ � `sloe ��. p f ° i SANS llJ 134 133 132\ 131 130 129: I0y ; I 140 t..38.. l37 136 135 mss! SP7Y SIDY 4 MAY T 1%WYsF- fPiT.; S79Y StBT SPIT SzaY SZal o ; i55LUT s 1 6 � i i 14 I 148 150 151 I`53 1-54.cr �y 152 141Y 142 143 144 14�. 146 S�7 y�T 1— MY SAY S>aY Cw % 7°1Y 167 166 165 I64 I63 1,62 16 I SAT SAY SAT I60 159 1545 157 156 11y i1 - f j SyNT SAY SAT sA! SAJ SAS SSST iSWIr S'�T i . i «} I I kwr 91 92 b 94 j t'ma 86 $7 88 89 i C '=Y �u1Y 1112 S87Y j 81 158e 2 5a8ei SZ�D4Y LOT Sm7s Umr umr fim u \ i I I ( i 1 i A 66 65 64 Lest wa 8 y ` X69 618 6 . j 75 74 73 72 71 70 cu1T cwlY swlr 77! 714 saaT Samr im7Y umT S.niti; ' 7,I717I 57/ S1NT SM7T jUXT SADY _ -- ! 60 i : cecY �.— 32 33y 34 ' — i ! 2 r, . ar7r 29 � �y sPq SPOT Uuy' ' 30 f 15mT 3 5 1 m 1907 sPtT 1 call_ wlil uoT 1 - ;� i 59 �i 26 43 VI unr ._ ' S7m9 57077 't �• r ,w 25 44 ':42` A I 40 39 3B 37 Lm 555mi 570)S Y SPLT MY ill S®Y T SPST 2 I I I 4 !�.aT r�T �� 9 8 7. SS �S1/IT 1797 eSImY:..eSaesy , � ----- 5b7i } 24 iIF -- • I `i 46 _ •------------ qy 50 5 '52 53 5_ : `•....C... „ '. 1 r ! C4i8BT SP1T 7]7Y SD7T SS17T� 5P7T _ 15 16 17 18 19 20 1 47 14 Y; � 6877 .SjI�T f1mT SPD! l7mT S®r S®T S®T 59J[ t ,. �; z• V YJmY 1 ,r ,r sr ROA s : Site Plan Proposed Tract 5436 Fresno, California Not to Scale PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP Figure a «�j�► 43. Church ® r Ave. 1 ® � �► tit� t U l0 d a ai a r Jensen ® Ave. J r U l0 d Q I LEGEND EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATIONS Signalized Intersection ® Stop Sign Proposed hDirection of Travel Tract 5436 Fresno, California Not to Scale I PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP Figure 3 a s L 0(0) _ s 4(12) Church t Ave. (4)27 ■ I (7)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0)0 L U (0 N o_ i i > a 1L 3(9) m a m 0(0) Jensen Ave. (ie)s Jt r/ L (0)o y 0 0 (0)0 o 0 0 i U C) EL I i LEGEND PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 20 - AM Peak Hour Volumes j; (20)- PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed hDirection of Travel Tract 5436 I Fresno, California Not to Scale PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP Figure 4 a 54(32) N_ h D ' m 25(17) 36(21) Church Ave. (8)2 1 (31)7 No o o w t U l0 N o_ I i a a, 5(17) a rn 0(0) Jensen ` Ave. ,I (35)10 r is (0)0 No O N O O 0 O f B m a i I, I : r r j E> LEGEND OTHER PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 20 - AM Peak Hour Volumes (20)- PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed hDirection of Travel Tract 5436 I Fresno, California Not to Scale PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP Figure 5 ai a N o v *6. 66(8) C 96(5) «� 1 tl► r 29(1) Church ` Ave. (96)167 (13)97 y m m N N til O N 0 (24)21 ,, v L U W a) a ai a n n v *4AW 56(51) m 1171 (505) 14(14) Jensen Ave. (114)110 (932)409 No n o (12)18 Z L U a1 a) o_ I I LEGEND EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES 20 - AM Peak Hour Volumes t, (20)- PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed I` h Direction of Travel Tract 5436 Fresno, California Not to Scale PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP Figure �I n n 5 L 120(40) n_ n O 121 (22) «� 1 �► r 65(22) Church ` Ave. (104) 169 (44)104 MO n n a (24)21 T t U l0 d a I ai < L61 (66) 1171 (505) 1 ,C 14(14) Jensen Ave. (149)120 i (932)409 rn o (12)16 Z v+ L U l0 d 0- LEGEND LEGEND CUMULATIVE WITHOUT PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 20 - AM Peak Hour Volumes i (20)- PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed hDirection of Travel Tract 5436 Fresno, California Not to Scale i PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP Figure 7 d a .n ro^i m L 120(40) c m m 125(34) J, 65(22) Church Ave. (106)196 i (51)111 a M N e (24)21 e r U lL m a di a r *409 64(77) m _ n e 1171 (505) Jensen Ave. (164) 126 I (932)409 so 0 0 N m N N (12) 18 :S F�- t U l0 N a I> i LEGEND CUMULATIVE WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES t. 20 - AM Peak Hour Volumes (20)- PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed 41 Direction of Travel Tract 5436 Fresno, California Not to scale PETERS. ENGINEERING GROUP Figure 8 a N o, IL 298(193) N � 515(379) jl 155(94) Church ` Ave. (193)217 (534)232 N c f0 N N (188)32 M1 L i U f0 07 i a ai Q 109(143) r N g ° ON 2532(1697) ,J 1 r 101 (122) Jensen Ave. k (288)218 � � V (2150)1289 no rn c (94)132 .S N U [0 d a i i i. L> LEGEND FUTURE (2025) WITH PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES 20 - AM Peak Hour Volumes (20)- PM Peak Hour Volumes Proposed hDirection of Travel Tract 5436 Fresno, California Not to scale i PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP Figure 9 TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS ITE Trip Generation, 7th Edition Single-Family Detached Housing Code 210 Project: 05-008.01 Tentative Tract No.: Tract 5436 Location: Peach and Church Number of Units: 168 AM Peak Hour Traffic: Percentage Entering: 25% Percentage Exiting: 75% Average: 126.00 Entering: 31.50 Exiting: 94.50 Entering: 32 Best Fit: 127.03 Entering: 31.76 Exiting: 96 Exiting: 95.27 PM Peak Hour Traffic: Percentage Entering: 63% Percentage Exiting: 37% i I. Average: 169.68 Entering: 106.90 Exiting: 62.78 Entering: 108 i Best Fit: 170.98 Entering: 107.72 Exiting: 63 Exiting: 63.26 Weekday Traffic: Percentage Entering: 50% Percentage Exiting: 50% C Average: 1607.76 Entering: 803.88 Exiting: 803.88 Entering: 838 Best Fit: 1675.80 Entering: 837.90 Exiting: 838 Exiting: 837.90 I i PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP L� i nJ i I t� C)0 0 Cl co v i o co � 00 � U i i N � d O � O l = S $ > Y £ Z6 Z( H yoead yoea 4Oead d M ao 4P4ad o -- yea 43e0d a t o m 4 q O v 9 00 S q6 U o U F C N Q L N_ LLIN N o 0 cn cn ' N Q � 0 ami 0 a� 086 aS I I I I i 0 Q 0 O i I 0 foo � 'lot �� i I � RJ C C O t O V/ C: w rL 73 C C j Vi CD m i ro c / j•i% 66/uesuer 0CN � ' ,• ZZ IX X00 O % � y i' WC, � d r ob ecyec o Cl o i Cl LL 'rn 0 0 66/u8suer w /"• c c m r. 0 SO i leas 0 1 �`� Jense�g9 3 ,I S I I I � c c j N�„� C C � �„� • � N i- C.} f1 L LU 0 TV 0 p Cherry tija4o Cherry --— 41J940 O 0 p 0 ami ami 0 '� N N N d N � 0 0 0 N N M N r N 0 N 0 O 0 �b/uasua 0 � p i p Je�sene �`�, p0 �- � 0 tq �• [ p O lb aS 0 :bb, o m = 0 S'z o > sC vii u�i �.�S'G cc R! .--N W W N- --�.I_ 0 ��9^ �"" d to l 4 as_ -, -, 0 M o 0 � 9 �Cy�l Cs` u�! °° �. S \ •, a o Cc 0 cc 10 , 16 i 0 " O0 --��, LL y -- ``_ O Jensen/SR 41 ----- Jensen/SR 41 b O N as Jensen/SR 41 c p 0 Q 0 0 0 C O N t i O N ; I is C C NC C N f: I I 0 O 0 Q 0 C C m N .-N N y N l 0 0 rye tJ fn L j 0) CL G ca U J L L v v L L U U N N O r � � trl 10 30 g C LZ 0 11 = yoead Peach Peach Y yoead Peach Peach L y OL 7 31 CL CL 8Z 10 22 d o O .a o V Ci to O to o ` N Q Co t Lir Cr) LL N U U Lo >. N � C C N Q j 32 C 64 N v N 15 y 66 I. L U N CD L L M U U i 0 0 0 0 -- - 0 0 0 0 ■ Li i u' Nn D1 N? CO C C U) U U 4 L1 t: L_ bl 10 30 6Z 6 -L LZ 0 11 01, 1 i) ynead Peach Peach yOead Peach Weed Peach Peach yOead Peach Ol L L 7 31 OE 4 8Z _ v .10' r22 1,z 3 � c c N tD L 0 15 L L Fib O 47 non pCq� U ° ° 0 0 to v O 0 0 0 0 0 I � CQ a) M OC 00 �o� G CO L U U -moi p > ed 8 b i b 2 � E� 0 0 0 �,CL " o MOIIIAA MOIIM MOIIIM WiIIOW O d � O MOIIiM -- -- MOIIM --- — MOIIIM WIIIOW Q V -f p b 00 1 V O to E� cc CI 0 0 0 c to L L LN LL z r-ID 7 Lim OC 00 �� N N 1Q >% N O Q p 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 o m 0 ° ocDL LIt C)C.) 0n U U y I' i 2 Z 1 b i 1 0 0 L Chestnut anulsayO Chestnut ;nulsayo Chestnut ;nuasayO Chestnut lnuisayO 1 l 1 g 2 0 o z i Co Co C C CO (D 4) LO LO 0) Cn 0)(D(0 or C C nJ rL cs C Lf)CY) (D 4)(0 LO CO 'D 27 24 7 27 23 21 15 19 22 40 0 E CN LO C r- 0 M 0 eD a, C: C: > CN CN L Or CD CO > cc 40 blb 346 346 IFLE 225 w LO 00 99ir 392 392 US 149 CD CD 4oe9d Peach Peach LIOB9d Peach 0 LO C) IP89d Peach Peach LIDE9d Peach 0 x 99E 303 303 US 173 = CL 699 m 2 r-513, C, c, 513 Irog 226 :3 Lf) LL LO to 04 CM CO C,,CA LO CO a) ID Lf) r-.Ce) (n (r CO C:) 0 CO 2 '0 :3 10 20 Sb 1 26 94 p 15 34 Oz Cn 1—n 00 (h th 0)0) CO (D ii I . LK 99Z I 9LZ 182 98Z Oqz s9z 49 is I moilm MOIIIAA MOIHAA Willow Moll!M MOON MOIIIAA Willow 09z t?OZ 1.1Z 142 Oge Z6Z L6Z 103 ,o m 2 u)N 0 4) p C) C: C: CY) T— (D Cf)m 0) 43 4) (o CID Co CO (1) (D CO r- CI) U) Ca C, CO N N (CV WC!!2N Ci CO T <D 0 t--0 Z: Z: Com) CO W (1)CD z 0 CA C4 0, ac) C, COL LMS 95 48 Z9 27 1,19 28 ZZ, 129 74 40 59 9 till 0 40 121 E CO 0 0 CnC> M 0 Cn CO pp > CO'IrC:D CNO CO Cn CO r.- t C,2 N 0 'SCO Cn 11:31, �O OD u > jE cc S88 839 859 9Z6 791 VV9 606 617 V99 267 Peach Peach 43e8d Peach 1-101328d Peach Peach 43e8d Peach cc CD 16 999 L09 508 c CL 9911, c,) v 652 X964 1769 601 CL ,32�3 12 C')tor- C, CI) to LO (5 ILL 64 N 11 'n cc CIA ro- SD CO C%, C4 c u") LO (n U)CO 0) .* a C 0 15 N C,4 0 N 66 OD C) to LOsLNOr - o U 38 9L 2 13 34 41 Lf 1 21 t79 23 38 60 Z9 Co Cr) CM CD (n Ca C"! to' UNOr 11 C14 (D C"! LU L1,9 9L9 518 OEG SLE L9S 89 mOlHAA mollim MOON Willow m011lAA MOMM MOIRM Willow z9v CLE Ol.t? 319 99L 969 Z09 258 CO CO u) CD CI) u)C> m :3 :3 R CO Cn V- CD X- cl�Cn (0 LO (14 N 1 0 �CZ-4 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing - AM 3: Church & Peach 4/14/2005 Lane Configurations ►� �, �, Si n Contfat ti' Sto Sto Sto Sto Volume (vph) 167 97 21 29 96 66 29 135 1 76 154 1 Peak Hour Factar ' 0 80 4. ,0 80 ^ 0 80 0 80 0., 4 a 0 84 p 80 w 0 8Q 0 80 U80 ' .0'40,22- 80 8b _. Hourly flow rate(vph) 209 121 26 36 120 82 36 169 1 95 192 1 Volume Total (vph) 209 148 36 203 36 170 95 194 Volume Left{vphj ..§. 209.; '0.. _ 36 0 36 Volume Right(vph) 0 26 0 83 0 1 .0... 1 Departure Headway (s) 6.9 6.3 7.1 6.3 7.2 6.7 7.1 6.6 Degree Utilization,x 0 40ry 0 26 ,t 07 0 35 C3 0T 0 32a Capacity(veh/h) 499 545 476 540 468 505 479 519 Cdrtrol Delay(s). 13 2&5 10 2,' > . 9:4 11:5 u 9 6`$X11 6 .,M10 5 411 9 Approach Delay(s) 12.0 11.2 11.2 11.5 i4pproach,LOS HCM Level of Service B (OWsO10Capacity f Se�rrce rA Analysis Period (min) 15 ... ...,u..,.. „ >..• ..a. ...-:.e. .. .ry .,z .nA..,xR ..Lx i,.��„a.tf���3 .xw....<7,Yv. ,..,E,"xr-s",,. .,..�. .r .c.. .. <r. .. t. a . ., .. _ ,. I �r I I ' it 1 I . Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1 i HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing - AM 6: Jensen & Peach 1I4/14/2005 Lane Configurations 0 gn CQrtrof n a'..,3 „yFree ,Stop ...... Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Vofume ° 1171 56 1 17 10 ' 42' Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 F laurly flow rate(vP[�) ' '122 454x 20 16 130h a 62 f _ 19q Pedestrians Lane Width,: Walking Speed (ft/s) t�ertntffocka'e ,raf s-'biz Right turn flare(veh) xrr a ® x i Sar ss .r Median pe s r Nome tyi Nin , .. .. .n,. .. -hx,.v. . .�..� , . .. .. . ....... .A Median storage veh) Upstrea signaE(ftp _ ,. pX, platoon unblocked vC,N ponflcting�plurne 136 , �.m. f,.' . k "r X15 i X2103„ � 7 N 85r; ?082 68 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2�stage cant voC _ Er r R h�..�-�-, ,. vCu, unblocked vol 1363 474 1551 2103 237 1856 2082 682 tC .,�stn �e//skk v K NO, y w T 7 5 6 n 6 9 j 7 5 6 5 6 9 5 ..,.�.1 L� F„a�'�...�. � ....>.,., .�e...,:�«.Mm.,, m. tC, 2 stage (s) rX Nw p0 queue free % 76 99 0 50 99v 0� 0 64 cNf cpacfty//veh/h 500 084 � M° ?.� fi,f < " �38 64'x 22 3uq „392 Volume Totel 122 303r f71$ 116 � 867 Volume Left 122 0 0 16 0 0 1 47 0 V e x � �, flumRs h cSH 500 1700 1700 1084 1700 1700 0 28 392 Queue Length 95th (ft) 24 0 0 1 0 0 Err Err 40 �:dntral Defay„(s) x ` 14T5 � "0`Q 0`0, ;84 0 00 r'` Err Err 19 2 x +5+ .!�A,Y ...,k r,NH,v2 v,..,6e..;h..._.-.+ .>..2<.Sn..,.aA a.➢�A.1 '- mux,_ Lane LOS B A F F C DAppoe[ayis) 3 b a#fix r' 3 01tt5� A Err 38fx r P Approach LOS F F Average Delay Err fn�e �ctian Capacity Ufili�ettoorl� � � ,�612b1°`�����A�tCLf�.�"�ue'�b�'Sen�itce'� � ,o- � �� �; Analysis Period (min) 15 nMMU A Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing - PM 3: Church & Peach 4/14/2005 Lane Configurations Stop _ 0 Stop to P Volume (vph) 96 13 24 1 5 8 16 212 6 24 109 72 J: �,"'10,.?-9 �.,90 - 0 90, 90'... '0,90 0 .90.... 0.90 Peak Hourly flow rate(vph) 107 14 6 6 '18 :-,236, 7 27 121 80 Volume Total(vph) 107 41 1 14 18 242 27 201 Vof .. ........ e, -1 IQ M Volume Right(vph) 0 27 0 9 0 7 0 80 0-1 (Y 0, Ha 4f Departure Headway(s) 6.2 5.3 6.4 5.5 5.7 5.2 5.8 5.0 0 0.�04 8�.-:�: tili2bt, Degree.10 .0 O-_ -02-:z'j,:Q;,.jU5­ 2, Capacity(veh/h) 542 634 514 596 606 672 600 699 —` De 7 8 Approach Delay(s) 8.9 7.5 9.6 8.6 Ov !9MOk"Iff 25 M11j; M J;pg! D'W" CM Level of Service A a MZO 9 aci Vt Intei* i C- 0 1 t A R Analysis Period (min) 15 i NO II Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing - PM 6: Jensen & Peach 4/14/2005 Lane Configurations Sign Control .,�� .free Free Stop. ... Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% �/olume(veh ) w ' 114 932 12 14 505 51 6 33 22'! 44' 27 " °5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourltow rate(vpf� 12T 103 r a v 13. 1& �561 57 7 -' " 37 '�a 24',' 49 . 3058 Pedestrians Nne Utr�dth� �,a ... � � ..r,. . Walking Speed (ft/s) M Right turn flare(veh) Md�art !pe Median storage veh) U;strearxt sr((��"n,I A pX, platoon unblocked VO conflicting volume 618 z 1049 16 w.,.. .., . x, .... . 80 ?194 5Z4 1434 1'923. 309 . w.. . ,_ .. . vC1 stage 1 cont vol uG2, stage 2 conf vCu, unblocked vol 618 1049 1680 1944 524 1434 1923 309 tG�aing{e{s} 41 ygr41 x 7 5 6 5 ° 6 9 7 5. 6. 6s9 tC, 2 stage (s) ... p0 queue free % 87 98 77 33 95 0 47 92 Nl capacity jvel lh}; 2.951 587 . .0 h � us (ume`Ectal w X127. Y,t.fi90 x3359.3, 16 fy7,4 244 68 79 58 ' Volume Left 127 0 0 16 0 0 7 49 0 n_ 58 cSH 958 1700 1700 '659 1700 1700 71 42 687 )/glume to Capel xfi0a 1 `0 4 21y' b 0 ��0220143 95 . 1 863 08 .. „ Queue Length 95th (ft) 11 0 0 2 0 0 121 205 7 ControI'D'efaY ) . �, a_ r9,3; � Q(� O D „`18 60 O .A.Mat?.0> 192 2614 7 "10 7 , ... . � .e . �..�, Lane LOS A B F F B Approach De1y<(a) 1t ,... ._ ,.H.,a � ,`A Q 3 �. '.,_ ., t2 2 359 4 .. ., r ,P ra, Approach LOS F F Average Delay 31.5 jrrtersecfon Capacity Utilizations; 50 6% < ICtJ Level of Service r Y, Analysis Period (min) 15 n RA'a.o �.a � e.:r, :�., �'i-;A.�_e, �r�i,.�...,, , :�,.r" ..,<�.,...�. . .,r; .,fit„• .a .�. 7,,ma,_a .., .,..� _ . , ., ,. e .'#;'-.J,. Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Cumulative With Project AM 3: Church & Peach 4/14/2005 igvemen =31 Lane Configurations Sign Control,.s,.w .. Stop R Stop Stop .. Stop .. ` Volume (vph) 196 111 21 65 125 120 29 141 1 95 178 1 Peak Haur Pactor ` k d 8, 0 8Q �Q 8�1 s0 80 0 80 0 80 0 80 0 80 Oa80 0 80! 0 80 O 8t7 ..... , �u, Hourly flow rate (vph) 245 139 26 81 156 �y[150 36 176 1 119 222 1 ROYOWI.. � Volume Total (vph) 245 165 81 306 36 178 119 224 Volume Lift(vph) 245' 0 119 Q Volume Right(vph) 0 26 0 150 0 1 0 1 Hadt(s) , 53 d Os r 053 0 310 53 d a3 0 53 ; 0 03... . . .. , . Departure Headway(s) 7.5 6.9 7.6 6.7 8.0 7.5 7.8 7.3 Degree Utrlization,,X, 95[ 32 ,0.�7,.,a.D.,57.e Q00 37,...,Q 26 .p. 45 Capacity(veh/h) 461 499 453 508 421 452 440 473 Cantroi Delay(s) .1.7 3 0;.>. 11 9 X10'9 17 2..x.. .,10 5 r �' 7.., 121- A 9 1 • Approach Delay(s) 14.9 15.9 13.1 14.0 Apraach' 8 . W LWA- • DIaYuw�,_., ._ ,.." ... . HCM Level of Service 8 l,hfersecttan Capacity,,�Jtilizatdor► „K 56 9fa ICllLeveipof Service ., s'- Analysis Period (min) 15 i x t'nr I S I Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Cumulative With Project AM 6: Jensen & Peach 4/14/2005 4% Lane Configurations Sign o"C' n tT ree. -P St p ... ....... F Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% ........... "'l 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 15 0, 7-1 A: 6 tA Ho.urlyflo'wja*�*'Y' 3 Pedestrians L6h ... N . Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Bloc ,.., ....... Right turn flare(veh) Mr Wdl t— ,y an�- A, Median storage vel) Utreern F a, PX, platoon unblocked � ,,�:-�: YC fl, volume lum 474 04 2 :22 686 VC1, stage 1 conf vol YC,Z-",st.a'gd 2"b6,n ' vCu, unblocked vol 1372 474 1648 2148 237 1697 2122 686 tq samgleIs), , tC, 2 stage (s) V, 3 pO queue free % 72 99a 0 34 99 0 0 50 ,108* 6 AP 1/clurne.fetal 140 303 171 96 867° 505' '}_334 124 196 Volume Left 140 0 0 16 0 0 1 71 0 cSH 496 1700 1700 1084 1700 1700 0 21 390 Queue Length 95th (ft) 29 0 0 1 0 0 Err Err 68 N,, 4 ��7'223 2 ".0 Co e6["1De*,( nt Lane L OS C A F F Del TErr.,�- 90Z 3" .7 road App ay'(s) Approach LOS F F 16 111 M i In I � ;i gil I Average Delay Err .......... zR Analysis Period (min) i- 5 4 Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 2 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Cumulative With Project PM 3: Church & Peach 4/14/2005 Lane Configurations �, Sign Control, Stop Stop Stop':' Stap. ,,.r .. ..., - Volume (vph) 108 51 24 22 34 40 16 242 1 79 130 1 Peak,Hour Factor 0,9 0 90 0 90 0,90 0 90 0 90 M`0 90.: A.90, 0.90 0.90 0M.., 09D Hourly flow rate (vph) 120 57 27 24 38 44 18 269 1 88 144 1 Volume Total (vph) 120 83 24 82 18 270 88 146 Volume Leffi 4uP0 0 24 0 5 18 0 88 .. z 0 Volume Right(vph) 0 27 0 44 0 1 0 1 Had).�s) 0..5 '.,4,19. f 53. .. 0 03 0 53 d 03 k Departure Headway(s) 6.6 5.9 6.7 5.9 6.2 5.7 6.3 5.8 Degree";lJtilization4.22 014 0 05 0',13 0 03 0 43 015 ., 0 23-` Capacity (veh/h) 514 574 494 566 552 606 545 594 Control'l3elay;(s) 10.2 8 6 8'"9 8 6 8 2 11 8.," 9 2 9 3 Approach Delay(s) 9.5 8.6 11.6 9.3 pproach LOSS: r A .., play �U HCM Level of Service B Intersect on Capacity Utilization r 39 8°!° a ICII Level of SO ce !�` Analysis Period (min) 15 l I I LI i I L Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Cumulative With Project PM 6: Jensen & Peach 4/14/2005 - Lane Configurations 0 0 �, �► Signtontroly _,,. ...Free . ., Stop . Stop Grade.,. :. 0% 0% 0% 0% Volumg(veh/h� 164 a, . 932 , .._.. ..., 14 505 ..,., ?.. �,v `'... 45.. ,. .22,A , ....,60', .., .<34.....> 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 -"0.96­"6"9-0 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow,Arate s(vph) 182 . 1036 4 13 16 561 86 _ _ �.. '. 50.Y' 24:° 67:.. 38 99; Pedestrians LePPM d44,111"k-K11"1111.1" ��,. .. Walking Speed (ft/s) Pircer�i Bjocka'gex Right turn flare(veh) Md�art, YP� '� x x None None Median storage veh? pX, platoon unblocked vC, corgi#lctingx�olumeX049 F 1828 2084 524; ;1567 2048, 323 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 647 1049 1828 2084 524 1567 2048 323 ;r` �M .�.. „' .....,. ..,_� �,' �. 6�.._..,.�6 6...... tC, 2 stage.(s)., w. , 4 � 2 �bj .r& .,.«3 p0 queue free% 81 98 28 0 95� 0 1386 d cso� 1jveh/h553�935 y" ?" X65 s Yfw M9 €r 4198'`} ;0 4 ' 672 ., .nom. ... Voturne 1`ot6l n 1$2 690 'y4 x,359 rs 16 374,. 273 81 104 91 :: Volume Left 182 0 0 16` p” �0�. 7 67 0 Vblurne Right , £ , =Q F 0 ' 13 U s dad 86 24 01, cSH 935 1700 1700 659 1700 1700 41 0 672 i G C 4 i'�Y^9 .PY r �lfuextpCaaci �_s,x ���01 �.t} `'1� �'. . , Queue Length 95th (ft) 18 0 0 2 0 0 214 Err 12 Control Delay�s _. t5 Q�.k.,a. 0�6 671 9 Lane LOS A B F F B Approach DefaY.(s) .. .. ..1,4„ �4 ,' . ,.,; ? ' ;.v a , , 671 9 t Err Approach LOS F F Average Delay Err *Vttrsectron Capacity EJfil�zaiiork.'ti^n 51 3°l 'IClL:evel �.,. ..._ . E Analysis Period (min) 15 i �� '�s ai �, d ♦ x ti acb - n w. 0 -.: Ta`�' 1 E =xw < [. �,. t Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future 2025 With Project AM 3: Church & Peach 4/14/2005 4\ t d ,n s,,,.F. ,.,>„..yxx, .,s,r „n. n..,,..,... r -.tW.i. T✓$w.' :r.,... s a f,"rs .- 4. .. ✓f tf 3u -oma Lane Configurations tt r tt r I tt r tt r Ideal Flow v ti l Y `1900 1900 '1900 19110 W 1900 1900 „}11900 1900 ` 1900,', 1980 all., 19 ,0; Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lading*Detetor.. t � ,�. _..,50 50 , µ ?0 .... 50 ._, y. 50 50w Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 �0� 0 0 0 Turning_Sgeedmph) y " .... � gf X15 15 915 +9 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt ,0 800 8513 850 9 850': 0 ... Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 $atd„Flow pro#j. . ks, Ax1Z7 �,3"539 11583 "1770 3539 1583 1770 u 3539 1583 1770; 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd Flovu(germ) , x'17705391583 1? � �35313TM 177039h158 q�7Zfl "353 158 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd FlowRTOR� a � p 3Z2 ' ,' w ., "J3 1:74 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L[r�k Speed(m.Qh '... ' �� Q ' z X30z& Link Distance (ft) 3649 3589 2769 2944 Ttavel T�rne s 82 9 81 6 62 9 66.9 ., �.�.i. A ..x .. >>&.. � 4 ..,.. ...feat�.+4(,.s �d'�,. ,va✓'. .. "� Volume (vph) 217 232 32 155 515 298 62242 106 175 229 139 F?eak Hour Facto 0 3 0 800f7��0�800 3t} � kf 80 t 0 80' 0 80„ 0"800 80 0 g0a��0 80 "» .. Adj. Flow(vph) 271 290 40 194 644 372 78 302 132 219 286 174 LneroupFlow(vph2Z129 " 46�4 ;3778 ` 302 f32 19 � `,281„ 4 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Protec ecl PhasesR� 3y,� L �� ����� �E ,a,� ���Z�, �'3C �'{o 8�� -- �'�R°✓''y, ' ;�5 ' F Permitted Phases 4 8 2..i, 6 M-8 Detector;,Ph2ses $7 4..v $..53z �. 1` 6 6 Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split("s) 5" h'20 5�z 20 5, "8�5 X20 5 29 58 5 0'S , 20 58 5a X20 20`F5. � b�.. .m.., Total Split 18.0 22.8 22 e p O w .8 15.7 20.5 20.5 12.9 21.5 21.5 15.0 23.6 23.6 TO q Sgkit(d/o) .s'£ ,a 24 Oa/o f3 4%«5302 �a�X10 9��0� 7 3n/ 7 u3% 2°ia 8 7r°lo 28 7b/o X10 }°10 �� 5%x"3 5 Maximum Green (s) 14.0 18.3 18.3 11.7 16.0 16.0 8.9 17.0 17.0 �11.0 19.1 19.1 Yellow Time(/s)WE 3}0 5 0` 5 F 3;5` 3 0 ., 3 5 3 5 3 a 3 5W3 5 All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1=eacf/Lag 5 each Lag LagxLeadag Lag; a' ea¢ Lag�r Lag Lead Lag La`g Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extensions 493 0;� 3 0 3 0 3 Q ,3 0 � gf 3 0A 3 0' 3.0 3.0 30 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min 1 8 5oE i f A KI . balk Tttte,( r> k 5`a0 50 5 5 0 5 0 µ 5 OF" ' 5 0 �'`3k .,k,,,, Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Act Effct Green (s) 13.1 18.1 18.1 10.6 15.6 15.6 7.7 11.6 11.6 10.6 16.8 16.8 y 'as #lo,., sx aV 2047 , 07��k 01 ��U3�0 s23 0 . 0. 7���d 1,f A "r6ta tYa2 r� i v/c Ratio 0.78 0.30 0.09 0.69 0.78 0.57 0.39 0.50 0.35 0.78 0.32 0.33 "t"Y .a <.a,s4w,.. Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 a.. �21 10�, Ct� 3a?, 6ET .326 LOS D C A D C A C C A D C A Approach LOS C C C C Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Pagel Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future 2025 With Project AM 3: Church & Peach * 4/14/2005 IN% .v'....,.5 If f X1111 4n� Y rry a.',I Y,f, �1� R 8R7y .5,�' SJR k d Queue Length,50th (ft):. .s109' .., . . 0 78 :134, 0.,.. < .,31.. , 62 " D 91 55 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #193 77 18 #131 176 39 64 85 30 #172 77 32 Internal LnkDiSf Turn Bay Length (ft) Base t ap ty+vett9,5 4--"",' 306 865" X668 X225 855 483 291 314 578 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 0 Spllbael�:CaR RetluCtn„x__. . , .... .,t3 d.. 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Redl�ced vlc Ratio 0 7�1p 0 29 0 08 ...0:63 A 74 0'S6 yDQ35 y X135_ 0 27 0 75, 0 28` 0.30 Area7ype <. Other Cycle Length: 75 Actuated C cte Len tFt 67 � .� � , , Natural Cycle: 75 Control TypeAcfuafed Jncoordtnateel 3 g 4 � �.,.... , � ,m. u.T...... .. ti ,.., � .. ,. ...w. .�.�, Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.78 Int h;Sigrn�l Delay Intersection LOSS C _ w, vd. Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis. eriotl (mm _. � :.., ri ... . .� 6::''ru",V... xi>5 _6.nC' 4 . # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. � QU@Ue'SII�Wn'!S FnaXFmf1f71`after tW0 CyCIeS s .. k...a Splits and Phases: 3♦: Church & Peach � 01 Ik" o2 o3 -!;,* o4 o5 o6 o7 08 i Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future 2025 With Project AM 6: Jensen & Peach 4/14/2005 OR Lane Configurations r +}t r t, tt r icleai Flow( x A19Q0' 1900 190Q 1900 1900 1;900 19Q0 1900 , 1900, 1900;` .1900` „1900 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading50, . _..50 ..,.,. 0 50 ,,.. 50.. .. .54._, ,,50 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turn�ng:Speed(mph)r " , r 15 .. 9 95 9 15 .. Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 .} :..a. ..,,'��0 850. 0 850 , . ... k fl 850 0850: Flt Protected 0.9500.950 N 0.950 0.950a Satd Fiow�prot�'a°` sx$ i77a 5085 1583 1770,.. 5x85, 1583 NF1°770 3539 1583 ` 1770 3539 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satt1 Flnuv(perm) „ > „` 1770' 5085E f583 1770 ,F5085 41583 1770 k e 3539 1583~ 1770 3539; 158.3 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said `Flow .143,. ` 77�,.,. yy $0 > . 226. Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 '1.66 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link S eed m h 3(l¢ F 30 `30 Sp „ .._. _ ._ . ..y��. ,. r... ,. ,._ .. . . x .. .p, .. Link Distance (ft) 3672 5163 2362 2769 Volume (vph) 218 1289 132 101 2532 109 5 79 74 99 204 208 Beak Hotir Factot0 02 ; 402 0' 2 0 92, •.0 92` 92 A-92, 0 92 Adj. Flow(vph) 237 1401 143 110 2752 118 5 86 80 108 222 226 Lane Group Flow(vphy}f'' 237 k140, 14~3 110 a 2752 118 �a 5" S � 80 1fl8 222; X26 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm "Ef ✓ a x Protected Phases ? s3 4 3 � a ..,, 1 ..5 2 � 1 �.. � � ik leas����a � .,�. ..,+: „S's��,��,.... :a'!a Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector h' Minimum FInitial (s) 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 Minimum Split 0s7 q8 5 �Os5 x2© 58 52a 5 x20 5 µ8 52fl 520 5 8 5 `20.5 20 Total Split(s) 22.0 76.4 76.4 19.6 74.0 74.0 8.5 21.5 21.5 12.5 25.5 25.5 1"otal Spllt 8°05 t1°f 56 9°fo�56`9% fi,5% 6 °fo„16 5% 9,6% 19.6% Maximum Green (s) 18.0 71.9 71.9 15.6 69.5 69.5 4.5 17.0 17.0 8.5 21.0 21.0 Yi~linw . ._ P All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lead/Lag; ,: Lea Lag La 'Lead .. Lacy; ag Lags ; l✓a� Lea Lag,.>.7 Lag. Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes O310 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min 5'6 a 5 0 5 0 5:Q :. .. ,.. . Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Idstrtan Calls(#/ht} 00 t 0 m v 0 wl�d Act Effct Green (s) 18.0 75.7 75.7 12.3 70.0 70.0 4.5 9.4 9.4 F$ 8.5 20.3 a X20.3 v/c Ratio 0.90 0.44 0.14 0.62 0.94 0.13 0.08 0.32 0.41 0.88 0.38 0.50 E' Rcr 'aY > Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS F B A E C A E D B F D A 01 xT + 'z`Z,a z iX z s ... Approach LOS C C D D Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future 2025 With Project AM 6: Jensen & Peach ♦ 4/14/2005 Queue Length 50th eft 18,5" 19 0 84 691 z �3 4 X34 85 y 81 0 4 Queue Length 95th (ft) #357 275 28 148 #928 44 _ 19 61 48 #204 131 74 Internal- pi5t eft).. ..;,. 3592 ' °,. . '5083 < ., _. ...'k., 2282 2689.' Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacityx(vph) 262' 3159 1038 220 2920 942 r �i2 476 123 .621; 464 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sllback dap Reductn" �'... . _, 0. .. .,.0.. 0 T 0 0 0 0' , .. , Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fteduped v/c Ra#IOy (}9D' 44 q 1 � b 50 i O*94#A rd 13 �C1x�180 � 028 i 0 88 0 36 (149' Area TypeQthera Cycle Length: 130 Ac#uated Cycle,tength„'121 ” Natural Cycle: 130 Eontrol Type Actuated UncooMrted�_.> Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.94 Intersection Signal Detay Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.2% ICU Level of Service E Analy'"F'enad, a-. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. `Queue shown►s maximurn after two w.-.. ...I. Splits and Phases: 6: Jensen & Peach � 01 f o2 03 -7,* o4 ,g +#= 0 06 07 08 i- i i Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future 2025 With Project PM 3: Church & Peach 4/14/2005 Lane Configurations tt r ttr tt r tt r ... . .. ... [deaI F o (yphpI) 1900„ z1900 1900 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ..... .... 6 ................. p :I*din Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TIn" 16-1, pr ing'-$ppe p Lane Util. Factor1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 a 65 0 A'8'50 21, Fit Protected 0.650 0.950 0.950 0.950 0,"�35;39`i'-.,,��45,83: '5' 7 3R.,, 1583 %tdl! Flow f Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes . .... ........ '2 ]R 'M. 168 '81 a4 a a X - `2 low- Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link, Speed'(mph) `i3 0:: Link Distance (ft) 3649 3589 2769 2944 Travel6 T* - Volume (vph) 193 534 188 94 379 193 95 401 231 336 291 155 0, P. H t V Q.v PVT, Adj. Flow(vph) 210 580 204 102 412 210 103 436 251 365 316 168 9 i21013"""A" "T"72161"f "46,T' Z418 514 La=ne"'Ghou Flow M" 64A ......... nm 316 K 11 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 .. .. ........ .0 r'P'h se' Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 a-m ii�B In 4M p M, itil 8'lit-f Total Split(s) 15.0 24.2 24.2 11.3 20.5 20.5 14.2 21.5 21.5 23.0 30.3 30.3 Total .#D _S! 6 T�, p 8 MIX!! 6 A- q�p"W87 Maximum Green (s) 11.0 19.7 19.7 7.3 16.0 16.0 10.2 17.0 17.0 19.0 25.8 25.8 Y"Itow A 3�S All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.6 1.0 1.6 1.6 X "�"t"L an eed,i,, X Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes H RIP 3' 0 �A'11,111.1%94m` ', , P!1�1��;41'1,,..�,�':3 Recall Mode, None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min W 01, 50 0, Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 %p Me, clan Cats /1r ATN A'1,06& 4,42 -422, a, AS M; 61' Act Effct Green (s) 10.7 20.1 20.1 7.0 13.9 13.9 8.6 14.5 14.5 17.6 25.9 25.9 plll 10411111111-51K v/c Ratio 0.81 0.59 0.35 0.61 0.61 0.45 0.50 0.62 0.49 0.86 0.25 0.25 -4S Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4:'6 LOS D C A D C A D C A D B A Approach LOS C C C C Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Pagel Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future 2025 With Project PM 3: Church & Peach 4/14/2005 Queue l ength.5ath u�ftj 100 132 a` 0 48 `95 0 47 10 t 58 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #223 190 49 #118 143 53 97 148 57 #325 92 40 Interna(Link DisiA(ft)Q 3569 3509 2689 2$64 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Cap�c�ty*(�rph) k70' 1a1'I. .. :598 I73 781 5134 ,g30 824 561. £' 457' 1284 68 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sp!IlbacK.Cap ' itctn. 0.. . -..,Q 0 0 Q 0 Q 0 0 , . . _ 0 _ 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Redu ed;v/c R ' w( 78, a 4 57 t3 34 ? 0 59 0:53 41 6 3 ` b 53 0 45 0 80 0 2 0:25 Area Type Ofher , r` s. . .. .._ ... Cycle Length: 80 Adtuated-'Cycle Length-7' 9 g x Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type Actuated=Unccoi"dmated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.86 Intersectron Signal Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.2% ICU Level of Service C Aiatysi Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future 2025 With Project PM 6: Jensen & Peach ♦ 14/14/200`5 5 M709077, 00'' '... ,.-..r t„ �. i ,R "4 .MM .' ,}�,� ham:.. FRO .y 'L ti?"t-R xd.., .. ,. .,:.. ... .. .o'.c� 90 Lane Configurations ttt r ttt r tt r tt r fdeal`Ffow(yphpl) 190 1900 1900 x 1900 19001900 1900 `1900 1900 1.900;- 1900 1900 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leading Detector (ftp _ ,50' SA 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50; 50 k...... ,x.,..,. , _. Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 Turnmg.Speed jFnpF �. .. k5 ... '9.. 15 9 15 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 0 850 A 850 Q 850.. ` 0 85A �,....., �.....w r.. .. Flt Protected 0.950 0.9 50 0.950 0.950 Satd`Flow(prat)° 1770x 50>�5&R 1583 ,a f770 5085 1;583 1770 3539 ;1583 1770 3639. 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd Fio" (perm) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583` 1,77 3539 1583 ` 1770;; ?3539 1583 � .. Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd Flow,(RTQR� a w 98 g p, 155 x 176 230 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link Speed (mph 30r '30 30 3U Link Distance (ft) 3672 5163 2362 2769 y Travel Tune (s) r ,83 5 , 117 3 63 7" 62 9 d , ... a. . Volume(vph) 288 2150 94 122 1697 143 82 374 228 119 249 184 Peak Hour Factor9 Q 9t 092 t"0392 0 92 {0 9z :0 92 0 9 ; 0 92 0 92 M 0 92 0 92 Adj. Flow(vph) 313 2337 102 133 1845 155 89 407 248 129 271 200 Lane Group Flow(uph) f �313233T 1b2 v, 3 1845` k 1,55 89 407 248r,x„c 129; 271; ;200 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Pf,.otectee Phasesxh 4 5r . .. : k,�.Ikmis�,.,�. Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 22 1 � betector F�11ase5 , , x, ? . .xgn� Ty � , ., .,. S 'i Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 M%nimum'Split(s) ....f..a5 ; 20 5 X20 8 5r 260;5.. $ 20 5; _... Total Split(s) 20.1 45.7 45.7 11.4 37.0 37.0 9.5 21.7 21.7 x 11.2 23.4 23.4 Tota}Split(%q) . r22 3%a 5a 8%x50,8%12 7%n + 1 1°a� �;1010 X10 610 741°l° 24 1 d/�w2 4°1x;:26 0°to 26.Ob%: Maximum Green (s) 16.1 41.2 41.2 7.4 32.5 32.5 5.5 17.2 17.2 7.2 18.9 18.9 5" . 35 Q � 3.5'�: . .... 3 0G3 35 All Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 .H t t - an ssv Le`aag; Lead �Lagx� Lag aadLala Lea 'd L' La �agY Lead Cag e La `k ,5a> �e�x. 9 g 9 Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes uehicle 1=xtensions " 0 "a3.,a0 1 3 3 b", 3'G',3t� �3 0 �`3 0 3 0 3 5..... 3 0 ,f,.. , ,wn,++�,.>,., ,.,� xta .. .n N,rte.��5.,.. Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min None Min Min alk�ime(� F� " SAx x OS4 5050 X50, , 50 '. ... 50 5,0 .. ,`..� Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Act Effct Green (s) 16.1 41.7 41.7 7.4 33.0 33.0 5.5 15.4 _ 15.4 7.2 17.1 17.1 to ed.c fC atr �,. 0x4 ��0 47 �{kOB w f1 8 8��CAMI E f v/c Ratio 0.96 0.97 0.13 0.89 0.96 0.22 0.80 0.65 0.59 0.89 0.39 0.43 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ITIAN Dlay,, ,..., y79fr. 35 6 .. :5 ..92F4 18 ;4 r85 692 3U 72 , LOS E D A F D A« F D B F.. . ...C A pprQa h©ear ` �' 39 4� g ,4 2 .., ..., a.,.....a. _.. ..� _�.. .. . . �"_�.� . �.�.. ,» �.��...T. ����,x 35 Approach LOS D D D D Synchro 6 Report Peters Engineering Group Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Future 2025 With Project PM 6: Jensen & Peach ♦ (4/14/2005 I t 41 Queue Length 50th tft) 17 454 ... , 76„ 368 . D 50 111 35 73 69 0 A Queue Length 95th (ft) #345 #603 27 #186 #494 39 #136 159 108 #181 105 54 Internal Link Dist(fit} 3592 5083 2282 2589 . ,... �r� Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Ga'pacit (uph} x ;, 325 2418 804` ,.,149 1913 ,592 11 t,. ' S96 453 145'' 753 49$ Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 �0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback;Cap,Reductn. ..,, .,U ...,.. ,. 0 0 ... 0 0 0 �0..: 0 Ot,... Q , .. '0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduci v/c Ratio f}96 0 97 `.5 3.. Qr89 m t7 96ex 0 22 (180 0 58 D 55 4 9 17 36 i�40 . ..,.,:,t` hlrea Tyke Other... . Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Gycle'I_eragth Natural Cycle: 90 C©ntrol Type Actuated=Uncoordinated rti Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.97 IOtersection Sigrtal,Dejay 39 7 Intesectrn LOS D' Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.0% ICU Level of Service D AnalysrsrPeriodF=w ,' 25 Nd ,.x � ,.. ..b . . . # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maimOm after fwo cycfas A M .....;: :.._� _ Splits and Phases: S: Jensen & Peach♦ 01 10 o2 f m3 ► o4 05 � 06 07 �--- 08 WWI I Synchro S Report Peters Engineering Group Page 4 Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-15 Figure 9-9 PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT (Rural Areas) 500 2 OR MORE LANES(MAJOR)&2 OR MORE LANES(MINOR) 2 ' a > 400 = 2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR)&1 LANE(MINOR]--- - --`— W O OR 1 LANE(MAJOR)&2 OR MORE LANES(MINOR) LU rr 300 a X w 02200 � J O > .(3100 1 LANE(MAJOR)&1 LANE(MINOR) 0 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 l�i 'Tt,-,S e v, MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES-VPH �x1S�ING A� w/o R��fJT TU��1S * NOTE: 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD,.VOLUME FOR MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 75 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER Q GumU✓OT)V6 �� THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING.WITH ONE LANE. C�nw+a�AtrVE w� PRo-I ,�/d R�GNr ru�Ns.