Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPM 1999-01 - Conditions of Approval - 6/9/2008 :,ity of ITIM ff Development Department 2600 Fresno Street • Third Floor Nick P. Yovino Fresno, California 93721-3604 Director (559) 498-1591 FAX (559) 488-1020 December 21, 2000 Please Reply To: Robert Lewis (559) 498-4462 Ron Greenwood R.W. Greenwood Associates, Inc. 2558 East Olive Avenue Fresno, California 93701 Dear Mr. Greenwood: SUBJECT: NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF REVISED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 1999-01 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SOUTH GOLDEN STATE BOULEVARD AND EAST CHURCH AVENUE The City of Fresno Planning Division has completed its review of the Revised Tentative Parcel Map. Pursuant to FMC Section 12-1205(d)(1), this letter is written to advise that the Development Department Director has approved Revised Tentative Parcel Map No. 1999-01, dated November 14, 2000, subject to the Revised Conditions of Approval dated December 7, 2000. The Revised Tentative Parcel Map No. 1999-21, dated November 14, 2000, shall become, for all purposes, the conditionally approved Parcel Map and the original map which was approved is deemed withdrawn and shall no longer be of any force or effect for any purpose. Approval of a Revised Tentative Parcel Map shall not affect the anniversary date of the conditionally approved Tentative Parcel Map on April 20, 1999. APPEAL: Conditions imposed to accommodate or are necessary as a result of a revised tentative parcel map filed pursuant to the provisions of FMC Section 12-1205(d)(1) for minor revisions are not subject to appeal. EXPIRATION: The approval or conditional approval of this tentative Parcel Map expires two years from the original date of approval (April 20, 1999). The expiration shall terminate all proceedings and a final Parcel Map may not be filed without first processing a new Tentative Parcel Map. Modification of a Tentative Parcel Map after approval or conditional approval does not extend the above aggregate time limit. EXTENSION: The divider may request an extension of the tentative map expiration by filing a written application together with the fee set forth in the Master Fee Schedule at the time of the request with the Director of the Development Department as least thirty days before the expiration date of the map. The application must state the reasons for requesting the extension. New conditions may be imposed if an extension is granted. Ron Greenwood Page 2 December 21, 2000 An extension may not exceed an aggregate of 5 years. If you wish additional information, please contact the City of Fresno Development Department, Planning Division, 2600 Fresno Street, Fresno, California 93721-3604; phone 498-4462. Your inquiry should.,be directed to Robert Lewis. Sincerely, PL G DIVISION BURN E CH Planning Manager rclU:\rclfiles\documents\RTPML-1999-01 city of Development Department 2600 Fresno Street • Third Floor Nick P. Yovino Fresno, California 93721-3604 Director (559) 498-1591 FAX (559) 488-1020 April 16, 2001 Please Reply To: Robert Lewis (559) 498-4462 Ronald Greenwood R. W. Greenwood and Associates, Inc. 2558 East Olive Avenue Fresno, California 93701 Dear Mr. Greenwood: SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR A TWO YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING OF A FINAL MAP OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 99-01 Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01, filed by Foundry Park Investor and Willow Creek-Foundry Venture, proposes the creation of 14 parcels on a 47.8 acre parcel located on the south side of East Church Avenue between State Route 99 and South Golden State Boulevard. On April 20, 1999, the City of Fresno approved the subject£tentative parcel map for an initial two years. The approval of a tentative parcel map shall expire not later than two years from the date it was approved (Expiration Date of April 20, 2001). An extension, however, may be approved or approved with conditions in the manner provided by Section 12-1205(e)(2) of the Fresno Municipal Code relating to the extension of approval of tentative parcel maps (five year maximum per Subdivision Map Act). The City has received your timely request for an extension of time in accordance with Section 12-1205(e)(2) of the Fresno Municipal Code and in accordance with Section 66463.5 of the Subdivision Map Act. A two (2) year extension is hereby granted and the approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 is extended to an Expiration Date of April 20, 2003. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Sincerely, Nick . Yovino Director c: n;N:\reltica\&cumenL%\Ex7PM99-01 R. W. GREENWOOD ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND SURVEYING - PLANNING 2558 EAST OLIVE AVENUE - FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93701-1217 PHONE(559)268-7831 - FAX(559)268-3120 RONALD W GREENWOOD,C 12406 MEMBER MARK W.GREENWOOD,C.E.47332.L.S.6945 !1 --_-- C.P.A.37451 I� MAMERICAN SOCIETY RUDDIE D.BELL,L.S.4151 arch 6, 2001 CIVIL ENGINEERS CARL RICHARD ANDERSON,L.S.4853 ----- MAR 19 2001 INDUSTRIES BUILDING ASSOCIATION CITY City of Fresno BUILDING &SAF KESSTY SERVICES 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 ATTN: LOUIE ROCHA RE: PARCEL MAP NO. 99-01 Gentlemen: The purpose of this letter is to request on behalf of the owner, Foundry Park Investor, L.P. and Willow Creek-Foundry Venture, LLC, an extension of time for the recordation of the above mentioned project. More time is needed to complete this project. Please call me if you have any questions. Very truly yours, yonald NWOOD ASS O IATES, INC. Greenwoofl\/ RWG/gda 97097ext enclosure city of rn_Ww s a. DATE: August 17, 2001 TO: NICK YOVINO, Director Development Department THROUGH: RAYBURN BEA? lanning Manager Current Planning FROM: ROBERT LEWIS, Planner III 07r Entitlements and Land Division SUBJECT: REQUIRED FINDINGS AND APPROVAL OF REVISED VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 99-01 BACKGROUND Staff has received a second request for minor revisions to Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 submitted on July 20, 2001. The project would remain consistent with the density plan designation shown for the site on the Edison Community Plan and the South Van Ness Industrial Redevelopment Plan. Revised Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01, filed by R.W. Greenwood, on July 20. 2001, proposes to revise the original map by re-aligning the South Sarah Avenue cul-de-sac east to remove any required dedication from the abutting property to the west, modify right-of-way on Golden State Boulevard and Church Avenue to match Public Works Department street`des ign, and to relocates East Foundry Park Avenue to accommodate an existing power pole. Parcels A and F also will be adjusted to reflect the changes to the streets. The parcel map is on 47.8 acres located on the south side of East Church Avenue between State Route 99 and South Golden State Boulevard. The project site is zoned M-I (Light Industrial ) and M-3 (Heavy Industrial). Staff has determined that the proposed revision meets the provisions of the Fresno Municipal Code for minor revisions to approved tentative maps. In accordance with Section 12-1005.2(b)(3) of the Municipal Code, staff recommends that the Revised Map of Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 dated July 20, 2001, be approved by the Development Department Director and shall replace the previously approved map. Be advised that the anniversary date of the Director's approval of the original tentative map (April 20, 1999) is not affected by this approval of the revised map. Approval of a revised tentative parcel map is subject to the Development Director finding that the map is consistent with the officially adopted plans and policies of the City of Fresno. Staff has reviewed the proposed design and improvement of Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 and has determined that the map is not consistent with adopted plans and policies as described below. Please review the following required findings for determination of consistency for the tentative parcel map. Upon your determination that the required findings can not be made, the applicant will be notified of the disapproval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01. If, however, upon your NICK P. YOVINO Revised Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 Page 2 August 17, 2001 determination that the required findings can be made, the applicant will be notified of the revised conditions of approval of Revised Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01. REQUIRED FINDINGS California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) - The California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the State EIR Guidelines, Section 15061 (Review for Exemptions), permit a public agency to determine whether a particular project is exempt from CEQA. If a public agency finds that the activity is covered by the general activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA and a notice of exemption of no possibility of significant adverse effect is issued. Environmental Assessment No. TPM-99-01 was completed for this project. The Environmental Assessment showed that there is no evidence in the record that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was filed on March 31, 1999. State Subdivision Map Act - The Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66410 et. seq.) requires that a proposed parcel map not be approved unless the map, together with its design and improvement, is found to be consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan (Finding No. I below). State law further provides that the proposed parcel map be denied approval if any one of the Finding Nos. 2 -5, below, is made in the negative. 1. The proposed subdivision map, together with its design and improvement may not be consistent with the City's General Plan, the Edison Community Plan and the South Van Ness Industrial Redevelopment specific plan, because all of the applicable plans designate the site for heavy industrial land uses and the existing M-1 zoning of a portion of the project is not listed on the zoning consistency table of any plan and does not meet the plan criteria for a dissimilar uses or zoning. The South Van Ness Industrial Redevelopment plan requires approval by the Redevelopment Agency, which has also found the project not consistent with their plan. Contrary to Section IV-D- 11 [419] of the Redevelopment Plan the Redevelopment Agency has advised the City that "The Agency does not approve Subdivision Maps or Parcel Maps." Based on this response the City will not require Agency approval. The Development Department Director, however, has directed that the M-1 zone district is consistent with the Heavy Industrial land use designation and can be found consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan. 2. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type and density of development because of the flat terrain of the site and adequate access and drainage on and off the site. 3. The proposed subdivision design and improvements are not likely to cause substantial and considerable damage to the natural environment, including fish, wildlife or their habitat, because of the urbanized nature of the area in which the site is located. NICK P. YOVINO Revised Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 Page 3 August 17, 2001 4. The proposed subdivision design and improvements are not likely to cause serious public health and safety problems, because the conditions of approval have shown and will insure that the subdivision conforms with City health and safety standards. 5. The proposed subdivision design will not conflict with public easements within or through the site because conditions of approval will assure noninterference with any existing or proposed public easements. Staff, based on its own analysis, has determined that while the parcel map may comply with the design and property development standards of the Zoning Ordinance and local Parcel Map Ordinance, it is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan as required by the Map Act and those plans. However, the property's M-1 zoning does not conform to adopted plans and therefore requires that an off the table of consistency as allowed for in Chapter 12 of the Fresno Municipal Code be made. Since that finding has been completed, the map and zoning are now consistent with all applicable plans. DIRECTOR DETERMINATION 1. Based upon the above analysis, the Development Director finds that Revised Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 is consistent with the applicable plans and policies of the City of Fresno. 2. The Development Director hereby grants approval of Parcel Map No. 99-01 dated July 20, 2001, subject to the conditions of approval dated December 20, 2000. is ovino, Director rcUJ:/rclfiles/docu TPM2M9901 City of Ir _.,�, DATE: December 20, 2000 TO: NICK YOVINO, Director Development Departr=nt THROUGH: RAYBURN BEA P nning Manager Current Planning FROM: ROBERT LEWIS, Planner III Entitlements and Land Division SUBJECT: REQUIRED FINDINGS AND APPROVAL OF REVISED VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 99-01 BACKGROUND Staff has received a request for minor revisions to Revised Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 submitted on November 14, 2000. The project would remain consistent with the density plan designation shown for the site on the Edison Community Plan and the South Van Ness Industrial Redevelopment Plan. Revised Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01, filed by Tom Bernard, on November 14. 2000, proposes to revise the original map by reducing the number of parcels from 15 parcels to 14 parcels and to remove the proposed East Kaviland Avenue public street. The parcel map is on 47.8 acres located on the south side of East Church Avenue between State Route 99 and South Golden State Boulevard. The project site is zoned M-1 (Light Industrial ) and M-3 (Heavy Industrial). Staff has determined that the proposed revision meets the provisions of the Fresno Municipal Code for minor revisions to approved tentative maps. In accordance with Section 12-1005.2(b)(3) of the Municipal Code, staff recommends that the Revised Map of Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 dated November 14, 2000, be approved by the Development Department Director and shall replace the previously approved map. Be advised that the anniversary date of the Planning Commission approval of the original tentative map (April 20, 1999) is not affected by this approval of the revised map. Approval of a revised tentative parcel map is subject to the Development Director finding that the map is consistent with the officially adopted plans and policies of the City of Fresno. Staff has reviewed the proposed design and improvement of Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 and has determined that the map is not consistent with adopted plans and policies as described below. Please review the following required findings for determination of consistency for the tentative parcel map. Upon your determination that the required findings can not be made, the applicant will be notified of the disapproval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01. If, however, upon your determination that the required findings can be made, the applicant will be notified of the conditions of approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01. NICK P. YOVINO Revised Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 Page 2 December 20, 2000 REQUIRED FINDINGS California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) - The California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the State EIR Guidelines, Section 15061 (Review for Exemptions), permit a public agency to determine whether a particular project is exempt from CEQA. If a public agency finds that the activity is covered by the general activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA and a notice of exemption of no possibility of significant adverse effect is issued. Environmental Assessment No. TPM-99-01 was completed for this project. The Environmental Assessment showed that there is no evidence in the record that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was filed on March 31, 1999. State Subdivision Map Act- The Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66410 et. seq.) requires that a proposed parcel map not be approved unless the map, together with its design and improvement, is found to be consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan(Finding No. I below). State law further provides that the proposed parcel map be denied approval if any one of the Finding Nos. 2 -5, below, is made in the negative. 1. The proposed subdivision map, together with its design and improvement may not be consistent with the City's General Plan, the Edison Community Plan and the South Van Ness Industrial Redevelopment specific plan, because all of the applicable plans designate the site for heavy industrial land uses and the existing M-1 zoning of a portion of the project is not listed on the zoning consistency table of any plan and does not meet the plan criteria for a dissimilar uses or zoning. The South Van Ness Industrial Redevelopment plan requires approval by the Redevelopment Agency, which has also found the project not consistent with their plan. Contrary to Section IV-D- 11 [419] of the Redevelopment Plan the Redevelopment Agency has advised the City that "The Agency does not approve Subdivision Maps or Parcel Maps." Based on this response the City will not require Agency approval. The Development Department Director, however, has directed that the M-1 zone district is consistent with the Heavy Industrial land use designation and can be found consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan. 2. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type and density of development because of the flat terrain of the site and adequate access and drainage on and off the site. 3. The proposed subdivision design and improvements are not likely to cause substantial and considerable damage to the natural environment, including fish, wildlife or their habitat, because of the urbanized nature of the area in which the site is located. 4. The proposed subdivision design and improvements are not likely to cause serious public NICK P. YOV1NO Revised Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 Page 3 December 20, 2000 health and safety problems, because the conditions of approval have shown and will insure that the subdivision conforms with City health and safety standards. 5. The proposed subdivision design will not conflict with public easements within or through the site because conditions of approval will assure noninterference with any existing or proposed public easements. Staff, based on its own analysis, has determined that while the parcel map may comply with the design and property development standards of the Zoning Ordinance and local Parcel Map Ordinance, it is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan as required by the Map Act and those plans. However, the property's M-1 zoning does not conform to adopted plans and therefore requires that an off the table of consistency as allowed for in Chapter 12 of the Fresno Municipal Code be made. Since that finding has been completed, the map and zoning are now consistent with all applicable plans. DIRECTOR DETERMINATION 1. Based upon the above analysis, the Development Director finds that Revised Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 is consistent with the applicable plans and policies of the City of Fresno. 2. The Development Director hereby grants approval of Parcel Map No. 99-01 dated November 14, 2000, subject to the revised conditions of approval dated December 20, 2000. ' ovino, Director rcU7:/rclfiles/docum nts/RTPMM9901 City of rFIk U1: A&OF Development Department 2600 Fresno Street • Third Floor Alvin P. Solis, AICP Fresno, California 93721-3604 Director (209) 498-1591 FAX (209) 488-1020 April 23, 1999 Please reply to: Robert Lewis (209) 498-4462 Ron Greenwood R.W. Greenwood Associates, Inc. 2558 East Olive Avenue Fresno, California 93701 Dear Mr. Greenwood: SUBJECT: NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 99-01 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF EAST CHURCH AVENUE BETWEEN STATE HIGHWAY 99 AND SOUTH GOLDEN STATE BOULEVARD The City of Fresno Building and,Safety Services Division has completed its review of the subject map. Pursuant to FMC Section 12-1205(c), this letter is written to advise that the conditions of approval are as noted on the attached document, dated April 20, 1999. If you have any questions regarding the conditions you must notify either Bill Walls or Robert Lewis at 498-4451 no later than April 30, 1999, to request a review of the conditions. Otherwise, the stipulated conditions of approval are in effect as of that date. No further notice will be sent. Appeal: The divider or any aggrieved person may file an appeal regarding to conditions of approval within fifteen (15) days from the date of approval. To protest the Director's decision regarding the conditions of approval, you must appeal by filing a written appeal with the Director of the Development Department. Appeal must include the appellant's interest in/or relationship to the subject property, the decision or action appealed, and specific reasons why the appellant believes the decision or action appealed from should not be upheld Appeals must be submitted to the Director of the Development Department prior to 5 p.m. on May 5, 1999. Ron Greenwood Page 2 April 23, 1999 EXPIRATION: The approval or conditional approval of this tentative Parcel Map expires two years from the date of approval. The expiration shall terminate all proceedings and a final Parcel Map may not be filed without first processing a new Tentative Parcel Map. Modification of a Tentative Parcel Map after approval or conditional approval does not extend the two year time limit. EXTENSION: The divider may request an extension of the tentative map expiration date by filing a written application together with the fee set forth in the Master Fee Schedule at the time of the request with the Director of the Development Department at least thirty days before the expiration date of the map. The applicant must state the reasons for the requesting the extension. New conditions may be imposed if an extension is granted. An extension may not exceed an aggregate of five years. If you wish additional information, please contact the City of Fresno Development Department, Building and Safety"Services Division, 2600 Fresno Street, Fresno, California 93721-3604; phone, 498-4451. Your inquiry should be directed to either Mr. Ron Duarte (engineering or improvements issues) or Mr. Robert Lewis (planning or zoning issues). Sincerely, PLANNING DIVISION INIK YOVINO Deputy Director cwp/TPML9901 c: Tom Bernard oil i T 41 iPik uo �eSf ag 0 � @ $�J 0 a< na: N JS ro ® i e d Q,a 8q s awn Sw Fo @ p f! 1! , [c ra, �3 v I y S k 8 w. = O 15, Z Z $`���FFF°°°p 'S w I B J B7C. v,F 7�• s@ ip @ {�" 07 Z E.,, z Wz t JE,'" 'd 1jf s% j �8 r 2 �@ i lisp,�I �• �j°` FF?f& 5 Yf�@Q '!•'.T.+y/ � Ca �c�"�3 �c�Ya� f - ��1'; 5J 7s p' J4• \\�� f�f� eye��p77`";'g p�+'s-,x 8 ,A 91 It �/ �' J!C k J 0/ �' p _ a as✓ ba " � = a � g` �� It / /iT'1 I�� � �@i �' � '.��� �i �� 7�C�t'.A ��Cf=B •��r1a a�11 1}� ��� a¢c 666Y$�M•� 16�� aF0 i n Ilk' - 'j aAj sa`F �Imo•' _.�!a. =._._ R_.�J � i a,M I 6�, t^R w ae+'a.aavnY aBncd' I � g 1Eg !f '!;i a ► j i A ; Jp ?x"I i NEI )b $'I ; I � .'�`� �� 4i • ! a.lir i f f j 15*' f EFJlj }�� ie Bg li�i i @ 'oil k}}ij� 'y" i � � / Jii i J{e � J •{ Efil}i E ` � ±� J ��4 s J : f } @ 1 } j i � ' J ! KII I 3` Fgipli5 flpy{ifIlp! }! 96 teJik9 i¢t l t 8 l l Ft x 1 7} 3 8 J. h o f_±g� i911 ia�°'a a ��' � i` ` a i @i q}q6sJ 1piis 1 1p t} .Rf R fetl ^ 91 g1',- ' .y( i .• y i, d 0 !t. `. !- : !. 8qj ' Y[tR! R � 6 Z� � I s-Y 'i da 5 i f .p Y�\ f b s fLc., kRa•i ! J;j e', !/j+ 68. I!p { f ttB� �' �!i c .l'�`,�,. �_�" i : a o:J� .J J-k�q R•a �8. �i ��o�,ir .e@ �� � �!a s { .F,, ••# � a j �! !;}t9J da: ; ,,. Y s �!" • fx Q f B,,. ^ a RFs,. a j°i �- {{1s 6 Al,cJ [[ •� @J i° f �_ �, 1 C•x_ a J�" A- {�c l�(ff fJ iJJ= a j '�! 0 l9`'` �c `� s�=� °�' I 9a f � :Jke ° x}�fl J� •F!F ` ".AA!$• t:! � li su j 5• ,B '\•\, � g jF:�, �. @! ta:b� � f j @, j A §�itk BFa ' -a .e d I I 5-� a $�s $g@@5n „ ?ibi-- � #"fpi; 6• J� ? - • Ck6n1 5 f� i�a�"; f�Ikii AkF;J !. 3}6J i J`ibfpt: ° jR•d t `' J 6 .j�' F; ja16i 3J.;^ .A j•ll �` }'}J 3 �iBJ: t d 9y1 !JJfe'e A �RPS �B ^ age O _ �!t`f-r` 1 ➢ ire U' / ^' � a� f � - �Jaj- is =fi•x� Fz'�`-'7 E F lc;jl ` � �� i""•e F 'A =} i 1 J• � kl Ag8 9 :G y• a ! t "s f =1^,�- ! j,.�fi {pa�j `-Fr,1 `Y F J`iA` t" i EJSs J .L. e;„� pg^ � � Jti;e� 8$ tl35kj `89 ijN Fi p �ijdkE d.k j`�jY CD Y 3ekk JI 1 1, J� 3 i ;! 6 •Q►i S JJ{ i� F:'=J-`J tf'g�:iJ j {�_v_ � �JEEl!� t.! PJ.�-{y{y Egli(${F I�87{•sa u�$(g)t�jii��7 EPt j VP!FC kf x ps p City of Development Department 2600 Fresno Street • Third Floor Nick P. Yovino Fresno, California 93721-3604 Director (559) 498-1591 FAX (559) 488-1020 December 20, 2000 REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVISED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 99-01 The City of Fresno Development Department has completed a review of the subject revised tentative parcel map in accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act and the Fresno Municipal Code. The conditions of approval for Revised Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 are as follows: NOTICE TO PROJECT APPLICANT In accordance with the provisions of Government Code §66020(d)(1), the imposition of fees, dedications, reservations or exactions for this project are subject to protest by the project applicant at the time of approval or conditional approval of the development or within 90 days after the date of the impositiop of the fees, dedications, reservations or exactions imposed on the development project. I. Legal Status of Site to be Subdivided A. The parcel map site, was legally created. II. Zoning A. Proposed parcels are consistent with the existing M-1 and M-3 zoning of the parcel map site in terms of lot width, depth and area. All parcels abut a public street or right-of-way. B. The developer shall provided of a bicycle/pedestrian trail along the South Golden State Boulevard frontage. C. The placement of a parcel line in close proximity to any existing and/or proposed structure requires the structures be found in compliance with the fire resistive standards of the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 5. In the event the structures do not comply they must be modified so as to meet the requirement. Revised Conditions of Approval Revised Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 Page 2 December 20, 2000 The proposed structure(s) on the site may be affected due to the location of the proposed parcel line. Compliance with the prevailing Uniform Building Code as it relates to the exterior wall protection, allowable area, etc. (as applicable to new parcel line locations) must be demonstrated prior to final map submittal. Contact Development Department, Building and Safety Services at 498-1384. III. Plan Consistency A. The Fresno General Plan, the Edison Community Plan and the South Van Ness Industrial Redevelopment Plan designates the parcel map site for development with heavy industrial land uses. The Zoning District Consistency Table of the Fresno Municipal Code identifies neighborhood commercial land uses as consistent with the M-2, M-3 and S-L zone districts. The Development Department Director has determined that this parcel map is consistent with the General Plan and any specific plan. IV. On-Site Requirements A. Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District requirements: Comply with Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District memo dated December 12, 2000. B. Easements: The location, type, size, and record information of easements on and through the site must be shown on the final map. Provide Public Utility Easements (PUE) which may be required for P. G. & E. use. It is the owner's responsibility to provide P.G. & E. with adequate rights- of-way satisfactory to P.G. & E. If the property owner needs P.G. & E. to help assist in making the determination if an easement will be necessary, the property owner or their agent may contact the Scott Combs, Land Agent, Fresno Land Rights Office at 263-7375. The developer/owner will be responsible for the costs associated with any removal or relocation of existing facilities on the property. The City shall retain a 26-foot public utilities easement within the area of South Golden State Boulevard to be vacated. Revised Conditions of Approval Revised Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 Page 3 December 20, 2000 C. A relinquishment of vehicular and pedestrian access rights shall remain along the entire State Route 99 frontage and along the South Golden State Boulevard right-of-way except for the proposed South Foundry Park Boulevard right-of- way access to South Golden State Boulevard. This access restriction must be shown on the final parcel map. A. Street Improvements 1. All interior streets shall be dedicated in accordance with the 64-foot and 76-foot local industrial width as shown on Exhibit "A", and fully improved with standard curb, gutter, street lighting, and full width permanent street pavement. Sarah Avenue shall be improved to a 60- foot width between East Church Avenue and proposed Burns Avenue. All interior streets shall terminate in a 78-foot cul-de-sac per Public Works Standard P-23. 2. Install three street lights on Burns Avenue in accordance with Public Works Standard E-2. 3. Install three street lights on Sarah Avenue in accordance with Public Works Standard E-2. 4. Install four street lights on Pearl Avenue in accordance with Public Works Standard E-2. V. Street Dedications Dedicated proposed street rights-of-way in accordance with the proposed tentative parcel map. VI. Off-Site Improvement Requirements Construct the following listed improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to approval of the final parcel map. OR Revised Conditions of Approval Revised Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 Page 4 December 20, 2000 Enter into an agreement with the City of Fresno for their construction and/or installation and provide the City with a good and sufficient surety in the amount of the estimated costs of the improvements. A. Street Improvements 1. EAST CHURCH AVENUE-within the limits of the parcel map shall be dedicated in accordance with the Official Plan Line and improved with standard curb, gutter, sidewalk and underground street lighting (two street lights installed per Public Works Standard E-1) in accordance with the collector street standard width and 20 feet of permanent street pavement. An additional 10-foot by 100-foot dedication for right turn lane is required a South Golden State Boulevard. 2. SOUTH GOLDEN STATE BOULEVARD-within the limits of the parcel map shall be developed to a 148-foot right-of-way as shown on Exhibit "A" and shall be improved with curb, gutter and underground street lighting system (ten street lights installed per Public Work Standard E-1), and 20-foot of permanent street pavement. Twenty-six feet of the existing right-of-way may be vacated if approved by the City Council, except for 250-foot north of proposed Burns Avenue and 250-feet south of the proposed Burns Avenue. 3. SOUTH EAST AVENUE-within the limits of the map shall be dedicated to a 64-foot local industrial street standard width, and improved with standard curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting (four street lights installed per Public Works Standard E-2), and 20 feet fo permanent street pavement. 4. The developer shall relocate the traffic signal located at the southeast corner of East Church Avenue and South Golden State Boulevard. 5. The subdivider shall pay applicable fees for, but not limited to, street trees, street signs, water fees, sewer fees, and inspection fees in accordance with Resolution No. 79-606 and Resolution No. 80-420 (Master Fee Schedule), or any amendments, modifications or additions thereof and in accordance with the requirements of State law as related to vesting tentative tract maps. Revised Conditions of Approval Revised Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 Page 5 December 20, 2000 6. The subdivider shall make provisions for the physically handicapped in accordance with the Department of Public Works standards and as required by State law. 7. All existing and proposed utility systems shall be installed underground in accordance with Section 12-1011(h) of the Fresno Municipal Code. The subdivider's attention is directed to the installation of street lights in accordance with Resolution Nos. 68-187, 78-522, 81-219 and 88-229. 8. The subdivider shall construct a complete underground street light system as approved by the Traffic Engineer prior to final acceptance of the subdivision. Height, type, spacing, etc., of standards and luminaires shall be in accordance with Resolution Nos. 78-522 and 88-229 or any modification thereto approved by the City Council prior to installation and shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer prior to final map approval. All lights shall be dedicated to the City upon completion. Submit engineered construction plans to the Public Works Department for approval. 9. The subdivider shall furnish to the City acceptable security to guarantee the construction of the off-site street improvements in accordance with all applicable provisions of the Fresno Municipal Code and the State Subdivision Map Act. 10. All of the required street improvements shall be constructed and/or installed in accordance with City of Fresno standard specifications. B. Sanitary Sewer System 10-inch and 30-inch sanitary sewers are existing in East Church Avenue. A 10-inch sanitary sewer main exists in South East Avenue. These sewer mains are available to serve this site. No extension of the public the public sewer system is required. 1. If parcels are proposed to be served by a private onsite sewer system, C C & Rs and reciprocal access and maintenance easements must be provided. In addition, an engineered onsite utility plan showing the Revised Conditions of Approval Revised Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 Page 6 December 20, 2000 proposed outfall to the public sewer system must be submitted to the City for review and approval. 2. If not served by a private onsite sewer system, each separate parcel shall have its own house branch. 3. No connections shall be allowed to the high-pressure winery line in the Sarah Avenue alignments. 4. Comply with any additional conditions for service as given by the Public Utilities Department. 5. Sanitary sewer facilities shall be installed in accordance with Public Utilities Department standards, specification and policies. C. Water Service 10-inch and 12-inch water mains are existing in East Church and South East Avenues, respectively. These water mains are available to serve the site. 1. Extend a 12-inch water main in South Golden State Boulevard from the 12-inch main in South East Avenue to the 10-inch main in East Church Avenue. 2. Provide separate water services for each parcel created; or, 3. If parcels are proposed to be served by a private onsite water system, C C & Rs and reciprocal access and maintenance easements must be provided. In addition, an engineered onsite water utility plan showing the proposed connection to the public water system must be submitted to the City for review and approval. 4. Water facilities shall be installed in accordance with the Public Utilities Department standards, specifications and policies. D. Parks, Recreation and Community Services Revised Conditions of Approval Revised Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 Page 7 December 20, 2000 1. Comply with the Parks memorandum dated September 22, 1998. E. Fire Department 1. The South Pearl Avenue cul-de-sac is approved as shown provided a 12- inch water main is installed from the Pearl/Burns intersection to the end of the Pearl Avenue cul-de-sac. 2. All buildings on lots located on the Pearl Avenue cul-de-sac shall be provided with fire sprinklers approved by the Fire Marshal. F. California Department of Transportation 1. No drainage shall be allowed onto the State right-of-way for State Route (SR) 99. 2. The existing fence along the State right-of-way must remain in place. If any modification of the fence is proposed, State standards and specifications must be met and an Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the State of California, Department of Transportation. Questions regarding any encroachment permit process may be directed to Brenda Felder, Permits Engineer, at (559) 488-4209 VII. GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS REQUIREMENTS A. DEDICATIONS. The subdivider shall dedicate public easements to facilitate the construction of curbs, gutters, sidewalk, bus bays, right turn lanes, bike lanes, bike paths, multi-purpose trail, wheelchair ramps and public utilities in accordance with City plans, ordinances, resolutions and policies, the Standard . Specifications of the Public Works Department within the limits of the parcel map. Additionally, a minimum 4 foot wide clear path of travel is required along the public sidewalk on all frontages of the property as required by Title 24 of the California Administration Code as determined by the City Engineer. An on-site pedestrian easement and construction of a path may be required if Title 24 provisions can not be met within the public rights of way. All such public easements shall be identified and dedicated with the processing and recordation of the Parcel Map or at the time of Special Permit reviews for the proposed development of the parcels. Revised Conditions of Approval Revised Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 Page 8 December 20, 2000 B. STREET IMPROVEMENTS. The subdivider shall construct curb, gutters, curb returns and landings, wheelchair ramps, sidewalks with street tree wells and irrigation systems (when applicable), permanent pavement, street/safety lighting, bike lanes, bike paths, multi-purpose trail, walls and fences in accordance with City plans, ordinances, resolutions, policies and the Standard Specifications of the Public Works Department within the limits of the parcel map. Existing improvements that are not to the planned alignment shall be removed and required improvements installed to the new street alignment and grade. Existing improvements to remain in place shall be repaired if determined to be damaged and/or off grade by the City Engineer. Existing driveway approaches not identified for cijrrent or future utilization shall be removed and sidewalk (when applicable), curb and gutter shall be installed to match existing or proposed street line and grade as determined by the City Engineer. C. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM. The subdivider shall connect each parcel being created to the City of Fresno's sanitary sewer system with a separate sewer house branch unless other arrangements are approved by the City Engineer. All sanitary sewer system improvements shall be constructed in accordance with City plans, ordinances, resolutions, policies and the Standard Specifications of the Public Works Department. The subdivider is required to construct sewer main extensions to serve the parcel map in a manner determined by the City Engineer. The connection to the City's sanitary sewer system requires the payment of all applicable sewer connection charges in accordance with the provisions of FMC Chapter 9, Article 5 prior to the approval of the map. D. WATER SYSTEM. The subdivider shall connect each parcel being created to the City of Fresno's water system with a separate water services and meters unless other arrangements are approved by the City Engineer. All water system improvements shall be constructed in accordance with City plans, ordinances, resolutions, policies and the Standard Specifications of the Public Works Department. The subdivider is required to construct water main extensions to serve the parcel map in a manner determined by the City Engineer. The connection to the City's sanitary sewer system requires the Revised Conditions of Approval Revised Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 Page 9 December 20, 2000 payment of all applicable water connection charges in accordance with the provisions of FMC Chapter 14, Article 1 prior to the approval of the map E. STREET, SEWER AND WATER CONSTRUCTION PLANS. The subdivider shall provide street, sewer and water construction plans for the required public improvements as determined by the City Engineer. Such plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of Street Work permits. F. CONSTRUCTION/DEFERRAL. The subdivider shall construct the street, sanitary sewer system and water system improvements required for this parcel map, and the work deemed completed by acceptance of the work by the City Engineer, prior to the approval and recordation of the Parcel Map. Alternatively, the subdivider may request the deferral of the construction of such improvements with a parcel map agreement. The City Engineer may approve such agreement wherein the subdivider will be required to provide an Engineer's Estimate of the work. The agreement will be prepared by the City and will require performance securities as determined by the City Engineer. VIII. Development Fees Industrial Development Incentives (Informational Only) The City Council on June 17, 1997 adopted Ordinance No. 97-29 (effective July 28, 1997) establishing Section 12, Article15 of the Fresno Municipal Code to provide the following development incentives for parcels zoned M-1, M-2, M-3 or M-1-P: Impact Fee Reduction. Provides for the reduction of the number of units for sewer and water connection charges for low flow users as determined by the Director of the Public Utilities Department, based on certified estimates, the City Engineer's opinion and an agreement with the City. Impact Fee Waiver. Waives the Trunk Sewer and Major Facilities Trunk Sewer fees for projects within the trunk sewer service areas for Herndon, Cornelia and Fowler. Impact Fee Deferral. Provides for the deferral of the payment of various sewer and water connection charges, and UGM fees to the time of occupancy under an Revised Conditions of Approval Revised Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 Page 10 December 20, 2000 agreement with the City. Impact Fee Financing. Provides for the financing of the sewer Wastewater Facilities Charge over a 5 year period under an agreement with the city. Public Improvement Deferral. Provides for the deferral of certain public infra- structure improvements, by agreement, if the appropriate findings are made by the Public Works Director. For additional information on these incentives, please contact Rick Sommerville at 498-2740. All fees noted in this section shall be due and payable to the City of Fresno prior to the approval of the final parcel map. All fee quotations are based on current rates. Applicant shall pay the fee in effect at the time of final map approval. A. Metropolitan Flood Control District Drainage Area "I I" $1342700.00 B. City of Fresno Fees and Charges PARKS DEPARTMENT 1. Street Tree Landscape Plan Review fee $37.00 2. Street Tree Installation fee City installed tree $102.00/tree 3. Street Tree Inspection fee Developer installed tree $28.00/tree 4. Maintenance District Plan Review fee $132.00 5. Maintenance District Inspection fee $293.00 SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES FEE RATE Revised Conditions of Approval Revised Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 Page 11 December 20, 2000 6. Lateral Sewer Charge $0.10/square foot (to 100 ft depth) 7. Oversize Charge $0.05/square foot (to 100 ft depth) 8. Trunk Sewer Charge n/a Service Area: 9. Wastewater Facilities Charge S.T.E.P. 10. House Branch Sewer Charge n/a 11. Millbrook Overlay Sewer n/a WATER CONNECTION CHARGES FEE RATE 12. Service Connection Charge Fee based on service(s) and meter(s) sizes specified by owner; fee for service(s) and Meter(s) established by the Master Fee Schedule. 13. Frontage Charge $6.50/lineal foot 14. Fire Hydrant Charge $1.25/100 square feet (to 250 feet parcel depth) 15. Transmission Grid Main Charge $560/gross acre 16. Transmission Grid Main Bond $243/gross acre Debt Service Charge 19. UGM Water Supply Fee n/a Service Area: 20. Well Head Treatment Fee n/a Service Area: 21. Recharge Fee n/a Revised Conditions of Approval Revised Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 Page 12 December 20, 2000 Service Area: 22. 1994 Bond Debt Service n/a Service Area: 501 URBAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT FEE RATE/CHARGE* 23. UGM Fire Station Capital Fee n/a Service Area: 24. UGM Park Fee n/a Service Area: 25. Major Street Charge n/a Service Area: 26. Major Street Bridge Charge n/a Service Area: 27. Traffic Signal Charge n/a 28. UGM Grade Separation Fee n/a Service Area: 29. UGM At-Grade Railroad Crossing Fee n/a Service Area: 30. Trunk Sewer Charge n/a Service Area: 31. Street Acquisition/Construction Charge n/a IX. Final Parcel Map - Requirements for SUBMISSION See the attached Final Map Checklist. GOVERNMENT COOE 966020(d)(1) A protest filed pursuant to subdivision (a) Shall be filed at the time of approval or conditional approval of the development or within 90 days after the date of the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions to be imposed on a development project. Each local agency shall provide to the project applicant a notice in writing at the time of the approval of the project or at the time of the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions, a statement of the amount of the fees or a description of the dedications, reservations, or other exactions, and notification that the 90-day approval period in which the applicant may protest has begun. Tentative Parcel Map No. 99 - 01 Revised 12/05/00 Revised 8/06/01 SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES FEE RATE 1. Lateral Sewer Charge $0.10/square foot (to 100'depth) 2. Oversize Charge $0.05/square foot (to 100'depth) 3. Trunk Sewer Charge n/a Service Area: 4. Wastewater Facilities Charge S.T.E.F. Program 5. House Branch Sewer Charge n/a 6. Millbrook Overlay Sewer n/a WATER CONNECTION CHARGES FEE BATE 7. Service Connection Charge Fee based on 5ervice(5) and meter(5) Sizes Specified by owner, fee for 5ervice(5) and Meter(5) cota0ohed by the Master Fee Schedule. 8. Frontage Charge $6.50/lineal foot 9. Fire Hydrant Charge $1.25/100 Square feet (to 250 feet parcel depth) 10. Tran5mi55ion Grid Main Charge $560/gro55 acre 11. Tran5mi55ion Grid Main Bond Debt Service Charge $243/gro55 acre 12. UGM Water Supply Fee n/a Service Area: 13. Well Head Treatment Fee n/a Service Area: 14. Recharge Fee n/a Service Area: 15. 1994 Bond Debt Service n/a Service Area: URBAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT FEE RATE/CHARGE" 10. UGM Fire Station Capital Fee n/a Service Area: 17. UGM Park Fee n/a Service Area: 18. Major Street Charge n/a Service Area: 19. Major Street Bridge Charge n/a Service Area: 20. Traffic Signal Charge n/a 21. UGM Grade Separation Fee n/a 22. UGM At-Grade Railroad Cro55ing Fee n/a Service Area: 23. Trunk Sewer Charge n/a Service Area: 24. `Street Acquisition/Construction Charge n/a c!\myfiler\wp\pmrcquir\tpm99-Otrevi5cd 12105/00 City of REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. COUNCIL MEETING 3�z199 j APPROVED BY March 2, 1999 l .- DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR FROM: ALVIN P. SOLIS, Director Development Department CITYMANAGER BY: MARK I. WILLIAMSON, P.E., Deputy Director f� .V�-Building and Safety Services Division SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ALIGNMENTS AND WIDTHS OF PROPOSED PUBLIC STREETS FOR AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED BY THOMAS BERNARD ON THE WESTERLY SIDE OF GOLDEN STATE BOULEVARD BETWEEN EAST CHURCH AND EAST JENSEN AVENUE BACKGROUND Thomas Bernard proposes a 14-lot,43 acre,industrial subdivision with public streets as shown on Exhibit A,Tentative Parcel Map. The proposed streets are intended to facilitate the development of the lot as shown in Exhibit A. The Development Department considers the proposed development as a high priority project and is expediting the project to avoid any delays in processing and development. The proposed subdivision will be processed in accordance with the provisions of the Parcel Map Ordinance However,local ordinance and the Subdivision Map Act require that the City Council approve the street alignments and widths proposed for the subdivision prior to the approval of the tentative map. The Department of Public Works, based on its own review of the proposed street alignments and widths which includes a cul-de-sac street terminating in Parcel O without a turnaround, concluded that the streets as proposed are acceptable and recommend that they be approved. The proposed streets are not expected to have a significant effect on the environment. However, an environmental assessment will be prepare for the tentative parcel map which will address the potential impacts of the proposed subdivision as well as the proposed streets. THE ISSUE The issue before the City Council is whether to approve the proposed street alignments and widths. RECOMMENDATION Based on the independent reviews of the Development Department and the Department of Public Works,it is concluded that the proposed street alignments and widths are acceptable and will accommodate the development of the proposed subdivision for industrial use without affecting existing vehicular circulation. Therefore it is recommended that the City Council take the following action: 1. Approve the proposed street alignments and widths as shown on Exhibit A; and 2. Delegate authority to the Director of Public Works to approve any modifications to the proposed street alignments and widths as may be deemed necessary and appropriate. J:\WP\ParcelMaps\PM 9901 RCC STR.wpd Attachments: Exhibit A Department of Public Works memorandum dated February 25, 1999 City of Cine PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT February 26, 1999 TO: ALVIN P. SOLIS, Director Develop entfDep rtment FROM: RAY N G. ity Engineer Public Works Administration SUBJECT: REVIEW OF INTERNAL STREET SYSTEM FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 99-01 1 hereby approve the internal layout of streets proposed by the above parcel map as conforming with Pubic Works standards. RGS/SEDP/PMN99-01 City of in PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DATE : TO: ART WAHLENMAIER, Supervising_Planner Development Department FROM: JIM WILSON, Civil Engine?king Traffic Engineering and Division SUBJECT : PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. Cj —Qf' General Requirements Related to City ordinances, policies, and standards . f 1 . The subdivider shall pay applicable funds for, but not limited to, street trees, street signs, water fees, sewer fees, and inspection fees in accordance with Resolution No . 79-606 and Resolution No . 80-420 (Master Fee Schedule) , or any amendments, modifications or additions thereof. Streets and Rights-of-Way 2 . The subdivider shall make provisions for the physically handicapped in accordance with the Department of Public Works standards and as required by State law. 3 . All existing and proposed utility systems shall be installed underground in accordance with Section 12-1011 (h) of the Fresno Municipal Code . The subdivider' s attention is directed to the installation of street lights in accordance with Resolution Nos . 68-187, 78-522, 81-219 and 88-229 . 4 . The subdivider shall construct a complete underground street light system as approved by the Traffic Engineer prior to final acceptance of the subdivision. Height, type, spacing, etc . , of standards and luminaires shall be in accordance with Resolution No . 78-522 and 88-229 or any modification thereto approved by the City Council prior to installation, (, X040,64 57,4 �-- /o Sr 410;llr5 P,6,fe, E—( 57D . cHv R AVCC - z sr 4.iy,q7-5 F °. 5-i srv. 3, EgsT AVE, 4 sT, 1-1P175 P��e . �- 2 STo- �. 3Ue'V5 AVE 3 57', klC "175 r,E�P E -L STD. Page 2 SgRAN �T 3 5T, L/C,,ifr$ "vje'c' C-C-?- S TD. -- ng4j L 411 - TO. 7, aJ VILAND AVa— Z 5T 41G �/zS and shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer. All lights shall be dedicated to the City upon completion. Submit engineered construction plans to the Public Works Department for approval .. S . The subdivider shall furnish to the City acceptable security to guarantee the construction of the off-site street improvements in accordance with all applicable provisions of the Fresno Municipal Code and the State Subdivision Map Act . 6 . All of the required street improvements shall be constructed and/or installed in accordance with City of Fresno standard specifications . koC.04- I ►VDv 5 T121f}L 7 . All interior streets shall be dedicated in accordance with the (pq� - and -foot ,' ��r^,}� •� width (s) as shown on Exhibit "A", and fully improve with standard curb, gutter, street lighting, and full width permanent street pavement . v 6ArAH To�BE �-o' WID,E 6ETu/E8m �cE46k.: 6 N 1KTr_k10P, S EE, 8 . A -cnd streets crsated by thiss on al 50AkL TaRM1Nl}?f be properly barri. nce with City IN 78 t c.U1. - DE standards withi (7) days r 'me the 5/�CS PtEk CITY' stree surfaced or as directed by the Engin STD. 'P-2 3 9 • CNU(zCIk- AVS. within the limits of the map, shall be dedicated (in accordance with the Official Plan Lane) and improved with standard curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, and 20 feet of permanent street pavement . ADDI-r10,V z_ /Of X /00" DED1e_1.4T/01V /0?, R r y N z zu>z,v I-,q-AIE g �x-c,o,5,v .sly}j55% 10 . within the limits of the map, shall be dedicated to the -foot LoGsZL /N�dST�/.�}L street standard width, (-!-a ' }` the— 94f ^; -' P, a and improved with standard curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, and 20 feet of permanent street pavement . 4l�- 11 . L 7-A 4V , C o he map, '-mac a�Qre to a /98 r -deet trePt�. dn r as shown on Exhibit "A" ) and improved with standard curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, and ZD ' feet of permanent street pavement . _261 1 p F E:KIS 7_11/0 elf H r D4 W4 Y TO 94E� VA c 4 T�D zEx c=P T 7; 14 T Fo.e z Sd ' l/oR 7/-f o A-- ,B0"-5 AIVD Z s'o 5av7fl Ole-- 66,'A_'N6 771AE V4C 47_10AV 5�V4kL / g� z4 , Page 3 12 . The s vider shall install "No Parking a ne" signs on gn spacing is not to exceed 150 fee s specifie City Traffic Enginee . 13 . All it tion pipeline in the Ig t-of-way sh be rubber einforced concrete pipe and -r L subject one time $3 . einear foot maintenance fee File No. 210.411 FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS PUBLIC AGENCY DEVELOPER Eq Mr. Alan Kawakami, Chief Engineering Tech.FOUNDRY PARK INVESTORS, L.P. Development Services Department 2510 S. EAST AVE. City of Fresno FRESNO, CA 93706 2600 Fresno Street - Fresno, CA 93721 MAP NO. 99-001REV. PRELIMINARY FEE(S) (See below) DRAINAGE AREA(S) " II1 - DRAINAGE AREA II1 $134,700.00 DATE 08—C* -01 DRAINAGE AREA " - - TOTAL FEE $134,700.00 The proposed development will generate storm runoff which produces potentially significant environmental impacts and which must be properly discharged and mitigated pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. The District in cooperation with the City and County has developed and adopted the Storm Drainage and Z Flood Control Master Plan. Compliance with and implementation of this Master Plan by this O development project will satisfy the drainage related CEQA/NEPA impact of the project mitigation requirements. ■ The proposed development shall pay drainage fees pursuant to the Drainage Fee Ordinance prior to approval of the final map at the rates in effect at the time of such approval. The fee indicated above is based on the tentative map. Contact the FMFCD project engineer prior to approval of the final map for the fee. Considerations which may affect the fee obligation(s) or the timing or form of fee payment: O a) Fees related to undeveloped or phased portions of the project may be deferrable. O b) Fees may be calculated based on the actual percentage of runoff if different than that typical for the zone district under which the development is being undertaken and if X permanent provisions are made to assure that the site remains in that configuration. M c) Master Plan storm drainage facilities may be constructed, or required to be constructed in lieu of paying fees. ■ d) The actual cost incurred in constructing Master Plan drainage system facilities is credited against the drainage fee obligation. 99-01REV..xls 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 2 of 4 e) When the actual costs incurred in constructing Master Plan facilities exceeds the drainage fee obligation, reimbursement will be made for the excess costs from future fees collected by the District from other development. Approval of this development shall be conditioned upon compliance with these District Requirements. 1. a. Drainage from the site shall be directed to X b. Grading and drainage patterns shall be as identified on Exhibit No. 1. C. The grading and drainage patterns shown on the site plan conform to the adopted Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan. 2. The proposed development shall construct and/or dedicate Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan facilities located within the development or necessitated by any off-site improvements required by the approving agency. X See Exhibit No. 1, see Paragraph No. 7. None required. 3. The following final improvement plans shall be submitted to the District for review prior to final development approval. X Grading Plan X Storm Drain Plan _Final Map X Street Plan X Water& Sewer Plan Other 4. Availability of drainage facilities a. Permanent.drainage service is available provided the developer can verify to the satisfaction of the City of Fresno that runoff can be safely conveyed to the Master Plan inlet(s). X b. The construction of facilities required by Paragraph No. 2 hereof will provide permanent drainage service. C. Permanent drainage service will not be available. The District recommends temporary facilities until permanent service is available. Temporary service is available through d. See Exhibit No. 2. 5. The proposed development: X Appears to be located within a X 500 year 100 year flood prone area as designated on the latest Flood Insurance Rate Maps available to the District, necessitating appropriate floodplain management action. See attached Floodplain Policy. Does not appear to be located within a flood prone area. 99-01REV.xls 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 3 of 4 6. The Federal Clean Water Act and the State General Permits for Storm Water Discharges M4 Associated with Construction and Industrial Activities (State General Permits) require developers of construction projects disturbing five or more acres, and discharges associated with industrial activity not otherwise exempt from National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)permitting, to implement controls to reduce pollutants, prohibit the discharge of waters other than storm water to the municipal storm drain system, and meet water quality standards. These requirements apply both to pollutants generated during construction, and to those which may be generated by operations at the development after construction. a. State General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activities, August 1999 (available at the District Office.) A State General Construction Permit is required for all clearing, grading, and disturbances to the ground that result in soil disturbance of at least five acres (or less than five acres if part of a larger common plan of development or sale). Permittees are required to: submit a Notice of Intent to be covered and must pay a permit fee to the State Water Resources Control Board (State Board), develop and implement a storm water pollution prevention plan, eliminate non-storm water discharges, Z conduct routine site inspections, train employees in permit compliance, and O complete an annual certification of compliance. Under the Phase II federal storm water quality regulations a State General Construction Storm Water Permit will be required for all activities that disturb one acre no later than November, 2003. b. State General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities, April, 1997 (available at the District Office.) A State General 1 Industrial Permit is required for specific types of industries described in the O NPDES regulations or by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code. The following categories of industries are generally required to secure an industrial permit: manufacturing; trucking; recycling; and waste and hazardous waste management. Specific exemptions exist for manufacturing activities which occur entirely indoors. Permittees are required to: submit a Notice of Intent to X be covered and must pay a permit fee to the State Water Resources Control Board, develop and implement a storm water pollution prevention plan, eliminate non-storm water discharges, conduct routine site inspections, train employees in permit compliance, sample storm water runoff and test it for pollutant indicators, and annually submit a report to the State Board. ■ 99-01REV xls 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 4 of 4 C. The proposed development is encouraged to select and implement storm water quality controls recommended in the Fresno-Clovis Storm Water Quality Management Construction and Post-Construction Guidelines (available at the District Office) to meet the requirements of the State General Permits, eliminate the potential for non-storm water to enter the municipal storm drain system, and where possible minimize contact with materials which may contaminate storm water runoff. 7. A requirement of the District may be appealed by filing a written notice of appeal with the Secretary of the District within ten days of the date of this Notice of Requirements. 8. The District reserves the right to modify, reduce or add to these requirements, or revise fees, as necessary to accommodate changes made in the proposed development by the developer or requirements made by other agencies. 9. X See Exhibit No. 2 for additional comments, recommendations and requirements. � _vim era d E. Lake an, District Engineer Project Engineer: Denise Wade C: R.W. GREENWOOD ASSOCIATES, INC. 2558 E. OLIVE AVE. FRESNO, CA 93701 99-01REV.As 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS SCHEMATIC, \ DISTANCES ARE APPROXIMATE. 84" CHURCH a4'• AVE. ' �o ' o ^-�� 41 \ I SOUTH F SCALE I"=400' 42" 36" i F PARCEL K J 36' 20' i 1 PARCEL N \' PARCEL L I i `9 I II Q 9 I I 1 I ----------J Q LEGEND w 20' STORM DRAIN EASEMENT TO BE DEDICATED \ TO THE DISTRICT BY THE DEVELOPER MASTER PLAN FACILITIES TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY DEVELOPER — PIPELINE (SIZE SHOWN) & INLET. ------MASTER PLAN FACILITIES TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY DISTRICT — — — FUTURE MASTER PLAN FACILITIES DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE INLET BOUNDARY DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY — — — MASTER PLAN FACILITIES CONSTRUCTED BY DISTRICT, CONTRACT 111-78 4 EXISTING MASTER PLAN FACILITIES TPM 99-001 (REVISED) DRAINAGE AREA: "III" EXHIBIT N0. 1 FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT DAG M:\DWGS\EXHIBITS\CITYPM\99-001.DWG c�-2-(y}{Jp OTHER REQUIREMENTS EXHIBIT NO. 2 The cost of construction of Master Plan facilities,excluding dedication of storm drainage easements, is eligible for credit against the drainage fee of the drainage area served by the facilities. A Development Agreement shall be executed with the District to effect such credit. Reimbursement provisions, in accordance with the Drainage Fee Ordinance, will be included to the extent that Developer's Master Plan costs for an individual drainage area exceed the fee of said area. Should the facilities cost for such individual area total less than the fee of said area, the difference shall be paid upon demand to the City or District. Pursuant to the ordinance code, the drainage fee identified on the cover page of this notice is the estimated cost of the facilities required by Paragraph No. 2 of said notice. The Developer of TPM 99-001 paid the District $54,284 towards the funding of the "Master Plan Facilities Constructed by District, Contract II1-78", as shown on Exhibit No. 1. Said payment shall be credited against the drainage fee obligation of the land of TPM 99-001. The Developer shall dedicate a twenty-foot (20`) wide storm drain easement as shown on Exhibit No.1 as a condition of the final map. No encroachments into the easement will be permitted including, but not limited to, foundations, roof overhangs, swimming pools, and trees. Cross drainage covenants are requited on Parcels"K","L",and"N"to allow surface runoff to reach Master Planned facilities located on south Foundry Park Boulevard. In an effort to improve storm water runoff quality, outdoor storage areas shall be constructed and maintained such that material which generates contaminants will not be conveyed by runoff into the storm drain system. The District encourages,but does not require that roof drains from non-residential development be constructed such that they are directed onto and through a landscaped grassy swale area to filter out pollutants from roof runoff. Runoff from areas where industrial activities, product, or merchandise come into contact with and may contaminate storm water must be directed through landscaped areas or otherwise treated before discharging it off-site or into a storm drain. Roofs covering such areas are reconunended. Cleaning of such areas by sweeping instead of washing is to be required unless such wash water can be directed to the sanitary sewer system. Storm drains receiving untreated runoff from such areas that directly connect to the District's system will not be permitted. Loading docks,depressed areas, and areas servicing or fueling vehicles are specifically subject to these requirements. The District's policy governing said industrial site NPDES program requirements are attached. Development No. TPM 99-001 (Revised) engr\permit\exhibit2\city-tpm\tpm99-001(revised 7-25-01) FLOOD PLAIN POLICY Primary Flood Plains Because of the relatively high velocities and volumes of flood flow associated with primary flood plains, and because the primary flood plain is responsible for passing the greatest percentage of the flood event, development located in such flood plains is subject to substantial risk, both to itself and to others as a result of the potential for blockage and diversion of flood waters. In view of these factors, the following policy statement is proposed: Policy 1) All proposed development activity shall be the subject of a detailed hydrological flood hazard investigation to determine the relationship of the proposed development to the secondary flood plain and the primary flood plain; and, further, to identify the estimated high water elevation of the 100-year flood event. 2) All development and/or permanent improvement activity which, if located within the primary floodway, may unduly impede, retard, or change the direction of flow of water either, by itself, or by the catching or collecting of other debris or is placed where the flow of water would carry such obstruction downstream to the damage or detriment of either life or property, should not be permitted. Secondary Flood Plains Because development within secondary flood plains is subject to inundation,but without the threat of increased velocities of flood waters, and because the excessive development of the secondary flood plain can result in increased water surface elevations through displacement of flood waters, the following policy statement is suggested: Policy 1) Development in secondary flood plains is generally acceptable when a detailed hydrological flood hazard investigation report had been prepared indicating that the area proposed for development is located within a secondary as opposed to a primary flood plain. 2) The development must be properly flood proofed below the estimated high water elevation of the 100-year flood event. 3) The development is accomplished is such a way as to prohibit the displacement of any and all flood waters from that portion of the flood plain to be developed. sandy99\ricky.h\michelle.d\floodplain policy-form Clty ofFresno �ocdn&I����, � 2000 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Date: December 04, 2000 TO: ROBERT LEWIS, Planner III Development Department, Land division From: TEFFRA BELETE, Engineering Technician II Public Works Department, Engineering Division SUBJECT: SANITARY SEWER AND WATER REQUIREMENTS FOR REVISED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 1999-01 General The subject site is located Northeast side of Freeway 99 between Church and Jensen Avenues. Sewer and Water Sewer and water requirements provided on April 20, 1999, Conditions of approval, section V of B, and C will stay the same unless,or otherwise this conditions have been mate. Enclosed is the copy of sewer and water requirement provided on April 20, 1999 under conditions of approval. C: Eric B. Froberg Doug Hecker 1n Conditions of Approval Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 April 20, 1999 B. Sanitary Sewer 10-inch and a 30-inch sanitary sewer mains exist in East Church Avenue. A 10-inch sanitary sewer main exists in South East Avenue. These mains are available to serve this site. 1. The developer shall extend an 8-inch sewer in South East Avenue from the existing 10-inch main in South East Avenue to serve proposed Parcel s 2. The developer shall provided CC&Rs for private use across parcels created. 1 3. Each separate parcel shall have its own house branch. 4. No connections shall be allowed to the high-pressure winery line in the Sarah Avenue alignment. 5. Comply with any additional conditions for service as given by the Public Works Department. 6. Sanitary sewer facilities shall be installed in accordance with Public Utilities Department standards, specifications and policies. C. Water Improvements 10-inch and 12-inch water mains are located in East Church and South East Avenues, respectively. These mains are available to serve the site. 1. Extend a 12-inch water main in South Golden State Boulevard form the 12-inch main in South East Avenue to the 10-inch main in East Church Avenue. 2. Each separate parcel shall have its own water service. 3. Water facilities shall be installed in accordance with Public Utilities Department standards, specifications and policies. City of cIn LM-d%_&u\\II/ Public Works Department City Hall • 559-498-1602 Fresno 2600 Fresno Street, Rm. 4019 Fresno, California 93721-3623 AlAmMuCKV August 3, 2001 1 I 11 I I 2000 TO: BOB LEWIS, Development Department THROUGH: BOB MADEWELL, Chief of Traffic Planning ( ` Public Works Department (J FROM: JOSE LUIS BENAVIDES, Engineer II _-J t.gA� Transportation Studies & Grants SUBJECT: REVISED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 1999-01, SW corner of Church Ave and Golden State Blvd Public Works, Transportation Studies Division, has completed the review of the Revised Tentative Parcel Map 1999-01, which was submitted by Thomas J. Bernard. We are,concerned that the proposed relocation of East Foundry Park Avenue will necessitate a change order for the construction of the left turn lane on Golden State onto East Foundry Park Avenue. The City of Fresno has already awarded this job and will go to construction in the near future. Construction management is now in charge of this Capital Improvement Project. We are requesting that R. W. Greenwood officially notify Efren Banuelos at Construction Management of the proposed relocation of East Foundry Park Avenue. More detailed information will need to be worked out between R. W. Greenwood and Construction Management for this change order in construction to take place. D:\TRACT&PARCEL MAP REQUIREMENTS\PM1999-Olcomments.doc R. W. GREENWOOD ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND SURVEYING PLANNING 2558 EAST OLIVE AVENUE • FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93701-1217 PHONE(559)268-7831 • FAX(559)268-3120 • EMAIL: rwgassoc®pacbe1I.net RONALD W.GREENWOOD,C.E.12406 MEMBER MARK W.GREENWOOD,C.E.47332,L.S.6945 C.P.A.37451 AMERICAN SOCIETY RUDDIE D.BELL,L.S.4151 July 10, 2001 CIVIL ENGINEERS CARL RICHARD ANDERSON,L.S.4853 CALIFORNIA BUILDING INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION City of Fresno Planning Division Development Department City Hall 2600 Fresno Street, Rm 3043 Fresno, Ca. 93 721-3 604 Attn: Robert Lewis Re: Revised Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 Dear Mr. Lewis, The purpose of this letter is to request a revision of the previously approved Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01. We have clouded the areas of revision on the "Revised" map submitted to you. Please review the list below for proposed changes shown on our Revised Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01. 1. Adjacent property owner was unwilling to provide the necessary dedication as shown previously. a. position of cul-de-sac bubble. b. property dimensions and areas of parcels adjacent to cul-de-sac bubble. 2. Golden State Boulevard ultimate right-of-way per Directors determination. a. property dimensions and areas of adjacent parcels. b. Church Avenue right-of-way re-alignment c. relocation of East Foundry Park Avenue to accommodate existing power pole. 3. Parcel area adjustment to Parcels A and F through L caused by revisions 1 and 2. If you have any questions please contact us. Sincerely, R.W. GREENWOOD ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark W. Greenwood MWG/llk D-97097.rev.tpm enclosure LV December 29, 2000 j��,✓ , i TO: BOB LEWIS, Development Department ENGiNtRIN L�No © NTP11raTM� FROM: JOSE LUIS BENAVIDES Engineer II Qts�i�lMT Transportation Studies & Grants Q�YI iQN�E�TlpNSION THROUGH: BOB MADEWELL, Chief of Traffic Planning Public Works Department SUBJECT: REVISED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 1999-01, SW corner of Church Ave and Golden State Blvd Public Works, Transportation Studies Division, has completed the review of Tentative Parcel Map 1999-01, which was submitted by Thomas J. Bernard. The following requirements are requested to be placed on this parcel map as a condition of approval by the Public Works Department. Frontage Improvements E. Church Avenue: F 1. Within the limits of the map, shall be dedicated in accordance with the Official Plan Line for Church Ave (SERIAL No. 42) and improved with, street lighting (2 street lights per E-1 Std.), concrete curb and gutter and 20ft. of permanent paving. Construct AC transition pavement as necessary. An additional 10' X 100' dedication will be required for a right hand turn lane at Golden State Blvd. 2. Install an underground steel pole street lighting system to Collector street standards, between S. Sarah Ave and S. Golden State Blvd. S. Golden State Blvd: 1. Within the limits of the map, shall be dedicated 146 feet (79 feet west of the centerline and 67 feet east of the centerline) with corner cutoffs at the intersection of Golden State Blvd and Church Ave, and Golden State Blvd and East Avenue. Golden State Blvd shall be improved with standard curb and gutter, street lighting (10 streetlights per E-1 Std.), 20 feet of permanent street paving and a 22 feet multi-purpose trail. Construct AC transition pavement as necessary. . 2. 21 feet of right of way is to be vacated, except that for 100 feet west of East Avenue return the vacation shall be 13feet and then shall transition from 13 feet back to 21 northwesterly in 60 feet. E:\MyFiles\Tract&PM Requirements\PM1999-01.doc 1 3. No on-street parking shall be allowed on Golden State Blvd. 4. Relocate the traffic signal at the southwest corner of Church and Golden State. S. East Avenue: 1. Within the limits of the map, shall be dedicated to the 64ft. local industrial street standard width, and improved with standard concrete curb and gutter, street lighting (4 streetlights per E-2 Std.), and 20ft. of permanent street paving. Construct AC transition pavement as necessary. 2. Install an underground steel-pole street lighting system to local industrial street standards. Local Street Improvements 1. All interior streets shall be dedicated to the 64 feet and 76 feet local industrial street standard widths, and improved with standard concrete curb and gutter, street lighting, and permanent street paving; except that S Sara St is to be 60 ft. wide. Construct AC transition pavement as necessary. 2. All interior streets shall terminate with 78ft. cul-de-sacs per Public Works Standard P-23. 3. Install an underground steel pole street lighting system to local street industrial street standards (3 streetlights on E Burns Ave per E-2 Std., 3 streetlights on S Sarah St per E-2 Std., and 4 streetlights on S Pearl Ave per E-2 Std.). Urban Growth Management Requirements 1. This Parcel Map is not in a UGM zone. EAMyFiles\Tract&PM Requirements\PM 1999-0 1.doc 2 PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO: Robert Lewis, Planner FROM: DIANE WETZEL, Tree Program Specialist(498-4908 DATE: 3/8//99 SUBJECT: Parcel Map No. 99-01 The Parks, Recreation& Community Services Department has reviewed the Engineering plan submitted for review by R.W. Greenwood, dated 8/31/98. The following comments are submitted based on the parcels as shown, without any existing street trees. STREET TREE COMMENTS: A. One tree shall be required for each 60'of lineal street frontage. The developer shall designate the method of tree installation in the public right of way: OPTION A: Street Tree Planting by Parks Division-Parks may plant one tree for each 60'of street frontage, or one tree per lot having street frontage, whichever is greater. Fees shall be collected for any sidelot frontage at the rate of one tree for the first 60', two trees when the frontage is 61 - 120'. 1. The developer shall notify Parks to mark tree locations and to drill through hardpan upon completion of curb and gutter construction. 2. Street tree planting fees shall be paid in accordance with the Master Fee Schedule. OPTION B. Street Tree Planting by Developer-The developer may plant one tree for each 60'of street frontage, or one tree per lot having street frontage,whichever is greater. For any side lot frontage, trees shall be planted at the rate of one tree for the first sixty feet,two trees when the frontage is 61 to 120'. 3. Trees shall be planted in accordance with "Specifications for Developer Street Tree Planting". The developer shall contact Parks to determine tree species required on each street. 4. Landscape plans shall indicate street tree planting locations and species. Landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department. A street tree planting permit shall be required for all tree planting. 5. Performance and payment securities, paid with final map,will be released when all landscaping installed on public and/or city controlled property is in conformance with Parks Division's planting specifications and meets the specifications of the city. 6. Street tree inspection fees shall be paid in accordance with the Master Fee Schedule. B. STREET TREE IRRIGATION Regardless of which option is taken, irrigation shall be provided to all trees in conformance with FMC 12-306-N-23. March 8, 1999 Page 2 Parks Division comments re:Parcel Map No. 99-01 C. MEDIAN ISLAND LANDSCAPING 7. Median Island Landscaping is not a Parcel Map requirement. But as a courtesy to the applicant for use during his planning, the Median Island Landscaping requirements are reported. They will be applied during the site plan review process. At that time, and in accordance with FMC Section 12-306-N-24, median landscaping may be required. Applicants shall be required to submit plans showing the location and configuration of all median islands fronting the proposed project. Existing utilities, including, but not limited to city water lines/service points, sanitary sewer, storm drains, electrical lines, existing landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground cover beds, irrigation facilities,and other miscellaneous landscape features shall also be clearly defined. Median islands shall be landscaped as required by FMC 12-N-306-24. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for median island(s) that are not currently planted with a full range of ornamental vegetation, including trees, shrubs,and ground covers. The project proponent shall consult with the office of the Parks Planning Coordinator(498-2733) before submitting plans to coordinate design and construction activities. 8. At the option of the applicant,a fee may be paid in lieu of landscaping the median. The fee, as currently listed in the City Master Fee Resolution is $4.42/SF for medians in an uncapped condition(no hardscape material such as AC, Concrete, or other such material covering the island that may need to be broken out prior to planting). The current approved in lieu of fee for medians in a capped condition is $5.46/SF. Median islands less then 5 feet in width(face of curb to face of curb dimension) shall be exempt from either the landscaping or in lieu of fee requirement. D. PARKS/OPEN SPACE&UGM The proposed project is not in an UGM Park area . E. PARKS DEPARTMENT FEES TO BE COLLECTED 9. Collect the Street Tree Landscape Plan Review fee of$37.00 (Acct. #781963-3184) 10. Depending on the options selected above the following fees shall be collected for street trees: Option A: Collect the 15 Gallon Street Tree Installation fee(for City installed street trees) @ $129.00 per tree (Acct. 9781963-3205). Option B: Collect the Street Tree Inspection fee (for tree plantings by private party) @ 28.00 per tree (Acct. #781963-3210). 11. Future or concurrent site plan review will also address required street tree planting and median island landscape installation and associated fees. San .Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District March 9, 1999 fir:i d. '` � 990124 .pr� MAR '� U $99 Robert Lewis Df`WI.: ,1f11 N9%NT LAND DIVISION ENc3i;1et il;ryc�;;.-rlv;c:t; DIVtSloN City of Fresno Development Dept. LAND Dlt'151JN i-CTION 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721-3604 Subiect: TPM 99-01 (proposed industrial parcel map, located on SW side cf Golden State Blvd. between E. Church and South East Avenues) Dear Mr. Lewis: The San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (District) has reviewed the project referenced above and offers the following comments: The entire San Joaquin Valley is nonattainment for ozone and fine particulate matter (PM- 10). This project would contribute to the overall decline in air quality through the following actions: the operation of permitted sources within the industrial area, increases in traffic, operation of landscape maintenance equipment, and space and water heating if gas-fired appliances are used. Although this project alone would not generate significant air emissions, the increase in emissions from this project, and others like it, would cumulatively reduce the air quality in the San Joaquin Valley. Thus, the project would make it more difficult to meet mandated emission reductions and air quality standards. A concerted effort should therefore be made to reduce project-related emissions, as outlined below: The construction phase of these projects would be subject to certain aspects of District Regulation VIII, which is a required series of rules designed to reduce PM-10 emissions generated by human activity. A synopsis highlighting many of the requirements of this Regulation has been enclosed. The land uses that would occur within the proposed industrial park would potentially be subject to the permitting requirements of the District. Any equipment subject to the District's Permit to Operate requirements must obtain an Authority to Construct (ATC) from the District. Construction of equipment which requires an ATC, and intimately related David L. Crow Executive Director/Air Pollution Control Officer Northern Region Office Central Region Office Southern Region Office 4230 Kiernan Avenue, Suite 130 1990 East Gettysburg Avenue 2700 M Street,Suite 275 Modesto,CA 95356-9321 Fresno,CA 93726-0244 Bakersfield,CA 93301-2370 (209)557-6400 4 FAX(209)557-6475 (559)230-6000•FAX(559)230-6061 (661)326-6900 4 FAX(661)326-6985 Mr. Robert Lewis March 9, 1999 TPM 99-01 Page 2 appurtenances such as foundations and utility hookups for the equipment, cannot begin until an ATC is obtained. Construction of equipment not requiring a District permit is not subject to this ATC requirement. Depending upon the nature and complexity of the application and staff workload, ATC approval can take several months. There are a number of mitigation measures which can be incorporated into the design and development of these projects to reduce their overall level of emissions. These measures are recommended, but are not required by the District. (Note: Some of the mitigation measures may already exist as City development standards. All other measures should be implemented to the fullest extent possible.) This list should not be considered all-inclusive. The District encourages innovation in measures to reduce air quality impacts. 1. As many energy conserving features as possible should be included in the design/construction of the new buildings. Examples include (but are not limited to) increased wall and ceiling insulation (beyond building code requirements), energy efficient lighting, high efficiency appliances and solar-assisted water heating; 2. Any gas-fired appliances should be low nitrogen oxide (NOx) emitting gas-fired appliances complying with California NOx Emission Rule #1121; 3. Trees should be carefully selected and located to shade the building(s) during the hot summer months. This measure should be implemented on southern and western exposures. Deciduous trees should be considered since they provide shade in the summer and allow the sun to reach the building(s) during the cold winter months; 4. Bicycle parking facilities for patrons and employees should be provided. Employee bicycle parking should be enclosed or in a covered secure area; 5. If transit service is available to the project site, improvements should be made to encourage its use. If transit service is not currently available, but is planned for the area in the future, appropriate easements should be reserved to provide for future improvements such as bus turnouts, loading areas and shelters; 6. Direct pedestrian access to the main entrance of the project from existing or potential public transit stops and the sidewalk should be provided. Such access should consist of paved walkways or ramps and should be physically separated from parking areas and vehicle access routes; 7. Exits onto adjoining streets should be carefully designed to reduce time required to re-enter traffic from the project site. In addition, an asbestos survey of any existing structures may be required prior to any renovation or demolition activity to identify the presence of any asbestos containing building material (ACBM). Any identified ACBM having the potential for disturbance must be removed by a certified asbestos contractor in accordance with CAL-OSHA requirements. If Mr. Robert Lewis March 9, 1999 TPM 99-01 Page 3 you have any questions concerning asbestos related requirements, please contact Mr. Bob Bashian of this office at 230-5972, or contact CAL-OSHA at 454-1295. A synopsis of the District's Asbestos Compliance Assistance Bulletin has been enclosed for your review. District staff is available to meet with you and/or the applicant to further discuss the regulatory requirements and suggested mitigation measures that are associated with this project. If you have any questions, or require further information, please call me 230-5800. Sincer Darren Palm Environmental Planner Enclosures SAN JOAQUIN V. LEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTIOK ONTROL DISTRICT Regulation Vlll Fugitive Dust/PM-10 Synopsis Rule 8010 Administrative Requirements Section Applicability Requirements/Implementation 2.0 Applicability:This regulation applies to specified outdoor man-made sources of fugitive dust for the purpose of attaining health-based standards for fine particulate matter(PM-10). [For the purpose of this regulation,visible dust emissions (VDE)is defined as:visible dust of such opacity as to obscure an observer's view to a degree equal to or greater than an opacity of 40%,for a period or periods aggregating more than three minutes in any one hour,except as set forth in Rule 8030, 5.1.1 4.0 Exemptions:(All Regulation Vlll Rules)Actions required by law to protect the environment;current District permitted activities with PM-10 control measures greater than or equal to this regulation; public health&safety emergency operations lasting less than 30 days;vegetative reduction required by a Federal, State or local agency for fire prevention; and activities conducted above the elevation of 3000 feet(but not including reporting requirements specified in Rule 8060), or during freezing conditions. 5.1 Chemical Stabilizing Agents. Must meet ARB/EPA acceptability and air/water quality standards. 5.4 Dust Palliative and Asphalt Paving. Shall comply with other applicable District Rules(i.e. Rule 4641). 5.5 Mud and Dirt Trackout. Requirements in this regulation do not exempt owners/operators from other agencies'required permits for dirt and mud cleanup. Rule 802,0 Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction - 2.0 Applicability:Any construction,demolition,excavation, extraction,water mining related disturbances of soil,and the initial construction of landfills prior to commencement of landfill operations. 4.0 Exemptions: Land preparation for agriculture, not including land preparation for construction of structures intended for agricultural use;;blasting activities;maintenance or remodeling activities when total building area is not increased more than 50%or 10,000 sq.ft. (but not including ancillary construction such as expanding parking lots); renovation of ground water recharge basins; activities approved prior to October 21, 1993;and solar drying&harvesting of sedimentary calcium carbonate precipitates. Compliance with Section 5.1 of this rule is not required where soil moisture or natural crusting is sufficient to limit VDE;. 5.1 Land clearing,grubbing,scraping, Effective dust suppression utilizing water, presoaking,wetting agent,or other surfactant. excavation,land leveling,grading,cut &fill, and demolition activities. Operation of wrecking balls or All exterior surfaces of a building up to six stories in height shall be wetted during demolition. wrecking equipment. Materials resulting from razing or demolition shall be wetted during off-site removal. 5.2 All disturbed areas of a construction Effective stabilization to limit VDE(40%)by utilizing water, a chemical stabilizer/suppressant,or site,including storage piles, not used planting vegetative ground cover. for seven or more days. 5.3 On-site unpaved roads and off-site Effective control of fugitive dust to limit VDE(40%)by utilizing water or a chemical stabilizer/ unpaved access roads. suppressant. 5.4 Public paved roads,shoulders,and Limit or promptly remove any accumulation of mud or dirt at the end of work day or once every 24 access ways adjacent to the site. hours. Recommend use of paved aprons,gravel strips, or wheel washers. The use of blower devices for the removal of accumulations is prohibited. The use of dry rotary brushes is prohibited, except where preceded or accompanied by wetting to limit dust emissions. Rule 8030 Storage, Handling and Transport of Bulk Materials 2.0 Applicability: Outdoor handling/storage of bulk material emitting visible dust. Additional requirements may apply if compliance with this Rule requires the installation or modification of equipment under existing District permit. 4.0 Exemptions: Conditions where moisture content of the material is sufficient to limit VDE; agricultural harvesting and open area drying of agricultural crop materials,timber harvesting and storage of logs;dust free materials; materials less than 250 cubic yards at a single site;and materials subject to damage by wetting. 5.1 Transport of bulk materials in an Chute/conveyer must be fully enclosed, or spray equipment wets materials to limit VDE(20% outdoor area for a distance of twelve opacity)as defined in District Rule 4101-Visible Emissions, or materials conveyed are washed, feet or greater with the use of a chute separated, or screened to remove PM-10. or conveyor device. 5.2 Materials transported by vehicle, Limit or promptly remove any accumulation of mud or dirt at the end of work day or once every 24 except equipment on site adding to or hours. Wet material to limit VDE(40%), or provide at least six inches of freeboard space from the removing from storage piles. top of the transport container,or cover the container. 5.3 Outdoor storage of materials greater Cover materials or stabilize to limit to VDE to 40%utilizing water, a chemical stabilizer/suppressant, than 250 cubic yards. or a vegetative cover within seven days after the addition or removal of materials. g:/p1n/cega/cegacom/reg8 2-22-99 Rule 804.0 Landfills 2.0 Applicability. All operational landfill sites,landfill closure activities,and activities conducted at closed landfill sites which disturb surface soils covering an area of more than one acre. 5.1 Construction of a landfill site. Requirements of District Rule 8020 and the California Code of Regulations(CCR)Sections 17616 and 18222 apply. 5.2 Adjacent public paved roads, Limit or promptly remove any accumulation of mud or dirt at the end of work day or once every 24 shoulders&accesses. hours. Recommend use of paved aprons,gravel strips,or wheel washers. The use of blower devices for the removal of accumulations is prohibited. The use of dry rotary brushes is prohibited, except where preceded or accompanied by wetting to limit dust emissions. 5.2.1 Interior roads of the landfill site. Landfill roads connected to off-site adjacent paved public roads must be paved for a sufficient distance to allow mud and dirt accumulation to drop off. Sufficient cleaning of interior roads to limit carry out onto the off-site public roads. The use of blower devices for removal of accumulations is prohibited. Use of dry rotary brushes is prohibited,except when preceded or accompanied by sufficient wetting. 5.4 Storage of construction vehicles, Rule 8070 applies. equipment,and materials. 6.1 Report of Disposal Site Information Keep a copy of RDSI at the landfill site or other site approved by District,for inspection by authorized (RDSI). District employees upon request. Rule'8060 Paved and Unpaved Road 2.0 Applicability: Any paved,or unpaved public or private road,street,highway, freeway,alley,way,access drive, access easement,or driveway constructed or modified after December 10, 1993. Road construction and repair activities are subject to requirements set forth in Rule 8020. Exemptions: Easements and roads providing access for not more than ten residences; paved roads less than three miles in length,and 4.0 unpaved roads less than'/ mile in length;agricultural access roads;gated roads owned by a public agency,special district,or public utility on which public access is prohibited; road maintenance and resurfacing activities, not including reconstruction or modifications that add travel lanes or traffic capacity;and roads which have been approved,or for which construction bids have been awarded,prior to December 10, 1993. 5.1.1 New construction,modifications,or Comply with American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials(AASHTO) approvals of paved roads with guidelines for the width of shoulders and median shoulders. Additional requirements,exemptions or projected average daily vehicle trips of alternative compliance measures may apply. 500 vehicles or more. 5.2 Construction and use of new unpaved At least 50%of the length of the new unpaved road surface is controlled by application of chemical roads or road segments(except where dust suppressant/stabilizer,or the entire unpaved surface is controlled by application of water at least natural moisture is sufficient to limit one time per week as necessary,or at least 25%of the length of the new unpaved road is paved to VIDE). provide a permanent stable surface. 6.1 Government Agencies with jurisdiction Require preparation and submittal of a written report to the SJVUAPCD documenting compliance over publicly maintained paved roads with the provisions of this Rule. Initial report prepared for the year 1994 and biennially thereafter. open to public access. I Additional requirements apply. Rule 8070 Parking,Shipping;Receiving,Transfer,Fueling and Service areas 2.0 Applicability. All unpaved vehicle and/or equipment parking areas,fueling and service areas;and shipping, receiving,and transfer areas which are of one acre or larger in size. 3.0 Exemptions: Activities described above which are conducted on sites less than one acre in size;agricultural activities,including storage, maintenance,and parking of agricultural equipment associated with those activities;temporary areas used for timber harvesting activities;and exposed surfaces of lake and river beds. 4.1 On days the area is used(except Application of either water at least once daily,a chemical dust suppressant/stabilizer in accordance where natural moisture is sufficient to with manufacturer's recommendations for road applications,or gravel to the entire surface. limit VIDE). 4.2 Public paved roads,shoulders,and Limit or promptly remove any accumulation of mud or dirt at the end of work day or once every 24 access ways adjacent to the site. hours. Recommend use of paved aprons,gravel strips,or wheel washers. The use of blower devices for the removal of accumulations is prohibited. The use of dry rotary brushes is prohibited, except where preceded or accompanied by wetting to limit dust emissions. For additional information, please contact the Compliance Division of your nearest regional office: Northern Region Central Region Southern Region 4230 Kiernan Avenue, Suite 130 1990 East Gettysburg Ave. 2700 M Street, Suite 275 Modesto CA 95356-9321 Fresno CA 93726 Bakersfield CA 93301-2370 (209) 557-6400 (559) 230-5950 (661) 326-6900 SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT Compliance Assistance Bulletin- December, 1994 Asbestos Synopsis 4.M��N, E Prior to any renovation or demolition of a facility Inspect:Conduct an asbestos inspection of the site before: -Any renovation in which 160 sq. ft. of building materials, or 260 linear feet of pipe insulation will be disturbed, or -Any demolition of a facility with or without asbestos-containing materials Nom:Submit an asbestos notification form for any regulated renovation or demolition, 10 working days before the activity. Fees: Fees must be paid to the District with the notification for all regulated renovations and demolitions. Demolition Release Form: Prior to any demolition, you must have completed a demolition release form. Upon its approval by the District this signed form may be used as proof (needed by the building official) of compliance with, or exemption from, the NESHAP notification requirements. Submit this form to the building department with your application for a demolition pen it. Applicability FaciHties subject to the NESHAP (regulated facilities) include all commercial buildings, apartments with more than 4 units, other structures and non-portable equipment. Single family dwellings may be exempt, but only on a case by case basis. Demolitions subject to the NESHAP (regulated demolitions) are demolitions of facilities described above, whether or not asbestos is present. Regulated renovation applies to any activity in which 160 sq.ft. of regulated asbestos-containing building materials or 260 linear feet of asbestos-containing pipe insulation is disturbed at a regulated facility. T Definitions 555 Facilities: Facilities subject to the rule include "all structures, installations, buildings and equipment, except for single family dwellings and apartments with four or fewer dwelling units." Single family dwellings and apartments are also subject to the regulation if: -There is more than one building at a site being renovated or demolished, or -The building had been used for, or is being removed for a commercial or public use,or is to be used as a training burn exercise. Demolition: In addition to the total destruction of a structure, demolitions include "the removal of any structural load-bearing member from a facility together with any related handling operations or the intentional burning of a building" (training burns conducted by a fire fighting agency). Also, the separation of a structure from its foundation prior to relocation is a demolition. Renovation: Altering a facility or one or more facility components in any way, including the stripping or removal of regulated asbestos-containing material (RACM) from a facility component. Renovations include all activities in which asbestos could be disturbed at a regulated facility, including the clean up and removal of debris from buildings which have burned. JM h:\ceqajoan\asbstosl.syn SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION WNTROL DISTRICT Compliance Assistance Bulletin- December, 1994 Asbestos Synopsis Definitions,Continued �tal$ted Ao�ncugeenaAining (1) Friable asbestos-containing material(ACM). (2) Category 1 nonfriable ACM in poor condition and "has become friable"or that has or will be subjected to sanding,grinding,cutting,or abrading. (3) Category II nonfriabla ACM that has a high probability of becoming, or as become, crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation. Friable Asbestos-Containing Any material containing more than 1 percent asbestos, as determined by Polarized Light Materia//ACM): Microscopy (PLM) testing, which, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Category/non friable ACM: Any asbestos-containing packings, gaskets, resilient floor coverings, and asphalt roofing products containing more than 1 percent asbestos as determined by PLM testing. Category I/nonfriable ACM: Any asbestos-containing materials, excluding Category 1 ACM, containing more than 1 percent asbestos as determined by PLM testing, which when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized,or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Inspection:done by, or under the direction of a Cal-OSHA certified consultant prior to: e Any regulated demolition. o Any renovation activity in which more than 160 sq. ft.of any building material or 260 linear feet of pipe insulation will be disturbed. An inspection is not required if the material to be disturbed is stipulated to be asbestos-containing and will be removed in accordance with the NESHAP. Inspection Report Must Include: m A schematic showing the location of all tested materials. m The following data for all asbestos-containing materials: 1.The amount and description of each material. 2. Percent asbestos content. 3.Whether or not the material is friable. Notification:An asbestos notification must be submitted to the District at least 10 working days prior to: 1.Any regulated demolition 2.Any renovation in which more than 160 sq.ft.or 260 linear ft. of RACM will be disturbed. A copy of the Asbestos Inspection Report must be Included with the Nodflcation. Notification will not be considered complete, nor will the 10 working day notice period begin until all required information and fees and fees have been submitted to the District. Fees.District Rule 3050 requires that nonrefundable asbestos fees be received along with asbestos job notifications. Fees must be paid for regulated asbestos abatement projects and regulated demolition projects,whether or not asbestos is present. [After emolition Release Form: The California Health and Safety Code requires that the city or county building official have proof of ompliance with, or exemption from,the asbestos notification requirement before he or she issues a demolition permit. the District has received a demolition notification and is satisfied that the NESHAP notification requirements have been omplied with,the District will issue a Demolition Release Form to the person who submitted the notification. Recycling and Waste Disposal._The asbestos notification must also identify any building materials which will be recycled after removal from a project. The name of the recycling contractor and location of such activity must be identified. For additional information please contact the compliance division of your nearest District regional office: Northern Region Central Region Region 4230 Kiernan Avenue,Suite 130 Modesto, CA 95356 1990 East Gettysburg Avenue Fresno,CA 93726 (209)557-6400 (559)230-5950 2700 M Street,SuiteSouthern Bakersfield,CA 93301 (661)326-6900 JM h:lcegaioan+asbstosl.syn � COUP Human Services System Community Health Department Gary M. Carozza, Director 1856 Adult Services Department Children &Family Services Department �,R S Employment &Temporary Assistance Department March 12, 1999 Robert Lewis City of Fresno Development Department 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, California 93721-3604 Dear Mr. Lewis: Project No.: TPM 99-01 Project Description and Location: Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01, a 15- parcel industrial parcel map on 47.8 acres of M-1 and M-3 zone property located on the south side of East Church Avenue between Golden State Boulevard and State Highway 99, the uses permitted by right in the M-3 zone district within this project, the vacation of 26 feet of street right-of-way and the waiver of direct access on the southwest side of Golden State Boulevard between East Church and South East Avenue. Comments/Concerns: Since all of the tenants have not been identified for this application, the full range of M-1 and M-3 uses must be considered. The potential adverse impacts could include (but are not limited to) storage of hazardous materials and/or wastes, medical waste, solid waste, water quality degradation, excessive noise, and odors. Recommended Conditions of Approval: Prior to recordation of the Final Map, it is recommended that the existing well on Parcel I, along with the existing abandoned well shaft located inside the concrete box on Parcel I, be destroyed under permit from the City of Fresno. Should a retail food establishment be proposed, prior to issuance of building permits, the tenant must submit complete food facility plans and specifications to the Fresno County Department of Community Health, Environmental Health 1221 Fulton Mall/P.O.Box 11867/Fresno,California 93775/ (209) /FAX(209) Equal Employment Opportunity•Affirmative Action•Disabled Employer Robert Lewis TPM 99-01 March 12, 1999 Page 2 System, for review and approval. Contact the Consumer Food Protection Program at (559) 445-3392 for more information. Prior to operation, the tenant shall apply for and obtain a license to sell alcoholic beverages. Contact the California Alcoholic Beverage Control Department at (559) 225-6334 for more information. Tenants should be advised that construction and operating permits may be required by the State of California, Dept. of Health Services for wholesale food manufacturing. Contact the staff at the Division of Food and Drug at (559) 445- 5323 for more information. Certain uses allowed may utilize hazardous materials or create hazardous wastes. Prior to occupancy, if a tenant with such uses is proposed, the applicant shall complete and submit either a Hazardous Materials Business Plan or a Business Plan Exemption form to the Fresno County Department of Community Health, Environmental Health System. Contact the Hazardous Materials Disclosure/Registration Program at (559) 445-3271 for more information. All hazardous waste shall be handled in accordance with requirements set forth in the California Health and Safety Code, Chapter 6.5. This chapter discusses proper labeling, storage and handling of hazardous wastes. Certain uses allowed may utilize underground storage tank systems. If a tenant with such uses is proposed, then the tenant shall submit three (3) sets of complete plans and specifications regarding the installation of any underground storage tanks to the Fresno County Department of Community Health, Environmental Health System. Contact the Underground Storage Tank Program, at (559) 445-3271 for more information. Tenants may have to file a statement regarding any proposed aboveground petroleum storage tanks with the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Contact their office at (559) 445-5116 for more information. Due to the proximity of the proposed project to residential uses, consideration should be given to conformance with the Noise Element of the City of Fresno General Plan. Robert Lewis TPM 99-01 March 12, 1999 Page 3 Tenants may be required to obtain a Medical Waste Permit From the California Department of Health Services, Medical Waste Management Program. Contact John Winn at (916) 322-2206 or (916) 322-2042 for more information. Tenants should be advised of the State of California Public Resources Code, Division 30; Waste Management, Chapter 16; Waste Tire Facilities and Chapter 19; Waste Tire Haulers, which may require the Owner/Operator to obtain a permit From the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB). Contact the CIWMB, Tire Unit Permit Branch, at (916) 255-3896 for additional information. REVIEWED BY: Lynn Klinkby, Environmental Health Analyst III 559 445-3376 LK\lk c: Casagrande\Tolzmann, Environmental Health System Randy Reyes, Environmental Health System Vince Mendes, Environmental Health System cNandlpm99-01 Pacific Gas and Electric Company South Valle Land Rights Office Y 9 650 0 Street.Third Floor December 15, 2000 Fresno.CA 93760-0001 559 263 7297 Fax 559.263.7388 Development Department Engineering Services Division Land Division Section 2600 Fresno Street, Room 3043 Fresno, CA. 93721-3604 Attn: Robert Lewis OUR FILE: Danish Creamery 115kV Tap Dear Mr. Lewis, We have reviewed Revised Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 and have the following comments. The revised tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01 shows a portion of Golden State Boulevard being vacated by this map. PG&E has within this portion of Golden State Boulevard a newly constructed 115kV electric transmission line. PG&E requests that the full width of the portion of Golden State Boulevard that is being vacated by this parcel map be retained as a Public Utility Easement, or have it mandated by the City of Fresno that the developer/property owner grant an easement to PG&E that will adequately cover the facilities prior to the recordation of this map. Please have the developer/property owner contact PG&E for easement preparation . PG&E also requests that a Public Utility Easement (PUE), ten feet (10') in width, be dedicated contiguous to all street(s) boundaries located within said Parcel Map and that a PUE be incorporated within all private roads located within said Parcel Map. Existing gas or electric facility relocations necessitated by new street improvements (which are required as conditions.of a development's final acceptance by the City of Fresno) will be at the expense of the developer. The developer may need to identify the exact location of all the existing pole line facilities for the City of Fresno to determine if removal or rearrangement of facilities may be required. Thank you for the opportunity to review the plans of this Tentative Parcel Map. If you have any question, please contact me at 263-7374. Sincerely Tom Json Senior Land Technician cc: Rod Goodwin, PG&E STATE OF CALIFORNIA-BUSINESS,TRANSPORTATh—AND HOUSING AGENCY GRAY DAVIS,Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1352 West Olive Avenue Post Office Box 12616 ~_;f L, Fresno, California 93778 TDD (559) 488-4066 MAR 10 1999 . ,,' FAX (559) 488-4088 CITY OF FRESNO March 8,1999 �N , - NINE N DEPARTMENT LAND DIVISfON SRV'CES DIV ECT ON&ON 2131-IGR/CEQA 6-FRE-99-19.2 TPM-99-01 City of Fresno Land Division Development Department 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721-3604 Attention: Robert Lewis We have reviewed the vesting tentative parcel map for a 15-parcel industrial parcel map on 47.8 acres located on the south side of East Church Avenue between Golden State Boulevard and State Route (SR)99. Caltrans has the following comments: Of particular concern is the 9R 99 and Jensen Avenue interchange. A traffic study is needed to assess the project related impact on the State highway system and the pro-rata share towards area wide circulation improvements. The scope needs to be sent to Caltrans before the traffic study is conducted. Please use "A Guide for Traffic Impact Studies," State Department of Transportation. Please forward the traffic study for our review and comment. Questions regarding the traffic study need to be referred to Sharri-Bender Ehlert,Transportation Engineer, at(559) 488-4334. If you have any other questions, please call me at (559) 445-6666. Sincerely, b'1s-I MOSES STITES Office of Transportation Planning PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO: Robert Lewis,Planner FROM: DIANE WETZEL, Tree Program Specialist(498-4908) DATE: July 24, 2001 SUBJECT: Parcel Map No. 99-01 The Parks,Recreation&Community Services Department has reviewed the Engineering plan submitted for review by R.W. Greenwood, dated 8/31/98. The following comments are submitted based on the parcels as shown, without any existing street trees. STREET TREE COMMENTS: A. One tree shall be required for each 60'of lineal street frontage. The developer shall designate the method of tree installation in the public right of way: OPTION A: Street Tree Planting by Parks Division-Parks may plant one tree for each 60' of street frontage, or one tree per lot having street frontage, whichever is greater. Fees shall be collected for any sidelot frontage at the rate of one tree for the first 60',two trees when the frontage is 61 - 120'. 1. The developer shall notify Parks to mark tree locations and to drill through hardpan upon completion of curb and gutter construction. { 2. Street tree planting fees shall be paid in accordance with the Master Fee Schedule. OPTION B. Street Tree Planting by Developer-The developer may plant one tree for each 60' of street frontage, or one tree per lot having street frontage,whichever is greater. For any side lot frontage, trees shall be planted at the rate of one tree for the first sixty feet,two trees when the frontage is 61 to 120'. 3. Trees shall be planted in accordance with "Specifications for Developer Street Tree Planting". The developer shall contact Parks to determine tree species required on each street. 4. Landscape plans shall indicate street tree planting locations and species. Landscape plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks,Recreation and Community Services Department. A street tree planting permit shall be required for all tree planting. 5. Performance and payment securities,paid with final map,will be released when all landscaping installed on public and/or city controlled property is in conformance with Parks Division's planting specifications and meets the specifications of the city. 6. Street tree inspection fees shall be paid in accordance with the Master Fee Schedule. B. STREET TREE IRRIGATION Regardless of which option is taken, irrigation shall be provided to all trees in conformance with FMC 12-306-N-23. July 24,2001 Page 2 Parks Division comments re:Parcel Map No.99-01 C. PARKS DEPARTMENT FEES TO BE COLLECTED 7. Collect the Street Tree Landscape Plan Review fee of$56.00(Acct.34599,Fund 424001, Org#179900) 8. Depending on the options selected above the following fees shall be collected for street trees: Option A: Collect the 15 Gallon Street Tree Installation fee (for City installed street trees)@ $129.00 per tree (Acct. # 34856,Fund 424001, Org 179900). Option B: Collect the Street Tree Inspection fee(for tree plantings by private party) @ 30.00 per tree(Acct. Acct. # 34856,Fund#24001,Org 179900). 9. Future or concurrent site plan review"will also address required street tree planting and median island landscape installation and associated fees. { CITY OF FRESNO MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION RE"' LVED Initial Study is on file in the Development Environmental �9 V'A3 3 I Aid 8: OQ Department, City Hall, 2600 Fresno Street, Assessment Number: Fresno, California 93721 (209) 498-4441 TPM-99-01 0;TY CLL ;,1 RESh;O CA APPLICANT: Assessor's Parcel Tom Bernard Number: 2510 South East Avenue 479-030-67 Fresno, California 93706 479-320-19 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION: Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 99- Filed with: 01,a 15-parcel industrial parcel map on 47.8 acres of M-1 and M-3 zone property REBECCA E. KLISCH, City Clerk located on the south side of East Church Avenue between Golden State Boulevard 2nd Floor - City Hall and State Highway 99, the uses permitted by right in the M-3 zone district within 2600 Fresno Street the site of this project,the vacation of 26 feet of street right-of-way and a portion Fresno, California 93721-3603 of the waiver of direct access on the southwest side of Golden State Boulevard between East Church and South East Avenue. The proposed project has been evaluated with respect to each item on the attached environmental checklist. This completed checklist reflects comments of any applicable responsible agencies and research and analysis conducted to examine the interrelationship between the proposed project and the physical environment. The information contained in the Environmental Assessment Application, the checklist, and any attachments to the checklist, combine to form a record indicating that an initial study has been completed in compliance with the State CEQA Guidelines and the California Environmental Quality Act. Any rating of "2" on the checklist indicates that a specific adverse environmental effect has been identified in a category which is of sufficient magnitude to be of concern. Such an effect may be inherent in the nature and magnitude of the project or may be related to the design and characteristics of the individual project. Effects rated in this manner are not sufficient in themselves to require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and/or have been mitigated to the extent feasible. All new development activity and many non-physical projects contribute directly or indirectly toward a cumulative impact on the physical environment. The incremental effect contributed by this project toward such a cumulative effect is not considered substantial in itself. The proposed project is not expected to result in any significant adverse effects in terms of the factors considered on the environmental checklist, including any such factors for which minor effects have been identified. Cumulative effects of a significant nature are also not expected. The proposed project will not result in any adverse effects which fall within the "Mandatory Findings of Significance" contained in Section 15065 of the State CEQA Guidelines. The finding is therefore made that the proposed project will clearly not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. This Mitigated Negative Declaration will be deemed final rd effec ' e 'f no appeal is filed in the manner specified by Section 12-505 of the Fresno Municipal Code. INITIAL STUDY PREPARED BY: BM BY: Robert Lewis, Planner III DATE: March 31, 1999 yburn Beach, PI ni Manager Current Planning Di ision MNDTPM9901 EN MONMENTAL CHEC �ST Potential Environmental Effects EA NO. TPM-99-01 1.0 TOPOGRAPHIC, SOIL, GEOLOGIC 10.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION CONSIDERATIONS 1 10.1 Generation of vehicle traffic sufficient to 1_ 1.1 Geologic hazards, unstable soil conditions cause capacity deficiencies on existing 1 1.2 Adverse change in topography or ground street system surface relief 1 10.2 Cumulative increase in traffic on a major 1 1.3 Destruction of unique geologic or street for which capacity deficiencies are physical features projected 1 1.4 Increased water erosion 1 10.3 Specific traffic hazard to motorists, bicyclists, or pedestrians 2.0 AIR QUALITY 1 10.4 Routing of non-residential traffic through 1 ` 2.1 Substantial indirect source of pollution residential area (large vehicle generator) 1 10.5 Insufficient or poorly located parking 1 2.2 Direct on-site pollution generation 1 10.6 Substantial increase in rail and/or air 1 2.3 Generation of objectionable odors traffic 1 2.4 Generation of dust except during construction 11 .0 URBAN SERVICES 1_ 2.5 Adverse local climatic changes 1 11.1 Availability of fire protection 1 11 .2 Lack of emergency vehicle access 3.0 WATER 1 11.3 Adequacy of design for crime prevention 1 3.1 Insufficient ground water available for 1 1 1 .4 Overcrowding of school facilities long-term project use 1 1 1 .5 Availability of water mains of adequate 1 3.2 Use of large quantities of ground water size 1 3.3 Wasteful use of ground water 1 11 .6 Availability of sewer lines of adequate 1 ` 3.4 Pollution of surface or ground water capacity supplies 1 1 1 .7 Availability of storm water drainage 1 3.5 Reduction in ground water recharge facilities (on or off-site) 1 1 1 .8 Availability of adequate park and 4.0 PLANT LIFE recreation areas 1 4.1 Reduction of the numbers of any unique, 1 11 .9 Unusually high solid waste generation rare, or endangered species 1 4.2 Reduction in acreage of agricultural crop 12.0 HAZARDS 1 4.3 Premature or unnecessary conversion of 1 12.1 Risk of explosion or release of hazardous prime agricultural land substances 2 12.2 Site subject to flooding 5.0 ANIMAL LIFE 1 12.3 Adverse change in course of flow of 1 5.1 Reduction in the numbers of any rare, flood waters unique, or endangered species 1 12.4 Potential hazards from aircraft accidents 1 5.2 Deterioration or displacement of valuable 1 12.5 Potential hazards from landfill and/or wildlife habitat toxic waste sites 1 6.0 HUMAN HEALTH 13.0 AESTHETICS 1 13.1 Obstruction to public or scenic vista or 7.0 NOISE view 1 7.1 Increases in existing noise levels 1 13.2 Creation of aesthetically offensive 1 7.2 Exposure to high noise levels conditions 1 13.3 Removal of street trees or other valuable 8.0 LIGHT AND GLARE vegetation 1 8.1 Production of glare, which will adversely 1 13.4 Architectural incompatibility with affect residential areas surrounding area 1 8.2 Exposure of residences to high levels of glare 14.0 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL 1 14.1 Removal of historic building, disruption of 9.0 LAND USE archaeological site 2 9.1 Incompatibility with adopted plans and 1 14.2 Construction or activity incompatible with policies adjacent historic site 1 9.2 Acceleration of growth rate 1 9.3 Induces unplanned growth 15.0 ENERGY 1 9.4 Adverse change in existing or planned 1 15.1 Use of substantial amounts of fuel or area characteristics energy 1 15.2 Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy 1 15.3 Wasteful use of energy SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR EXPLANATION OF RATINGS :Proj.EnvChklist 1 Explanation of Ratings 0 Insufficient Information Insufficient information is available to determine the potential environmental effects which may result from the proposed project in this category. No Significant Environmental Effect The proposed project will not have an adverse environmental effect in this category, or any such effect is not substantially unusual or of undesirable magnitude. This rating is also utilized in cases where the category is not applicable to the particular project under consideration. " 211 Moderate Environmental Effect The proposed project will have an adverse environmental effect in this category, which is of sufficient magnitude to be of specific concern. However, this effect is not substantial enough in itself to require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report. 3 Significant Adverse Environmental Effect The environmental effect identified in this category substantiates in itself or contributed toward a finding that the proposed project has a potentially significant adverse effect on the environment sufficient to require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INITIAL STUDY For Application No. EA-TPM-99-01 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.99-019 THE USES PERMITTED IN THE M-3 ZONE DISTRICT BY RIGHTS VACATION OF 26 FEET OF STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AND A PORTION OF THE WAIVER OF ACCESS ON GOLDEN STATE BOULEVARD BETWEEN EAST CHURCH AND SOUTH EAST AVENUES Project Description: Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01, a 15-parcel industrial parcel map on 47.8 acres of M-1 and M-3 zone property located on the south side of East Church Avenue between Golden State Boulevard and State Highway 99, the uses permitted by right in the M-3 zone district within the site of this project, the vacation of 26 feet of street right-of-way and a portion of the waiver of direct access on the southwest side of Golden State Boulevard between East Church and South East Avenue. Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 98-21 proposes the creation of 15 industrial parcels. Because the entire parcel map site is designated for heavy industrial land use by the Fresno General Plan, the Edison Community Plan and the South Van Ness Industrial Redevelopment Plan, the portion of the site zoned M-1, Light Industrial should be rezoned to the M-2, M-3, or SL zone districts. All proposed lots of the parcel map are consistent with the M-2, M-3 and S-L zone districts in regards to lot area and lot dimension. All lots will have frontage and access to a local industrial street. This initial study is also reviewing uses.s permitted in the M-3 zoned district which are permitted by right. Land.uses permitted by right in the M-3 zone district are subject only to Site Plan Review. The use permitted by right in the "M-3" Heavy Manufacturing District are intended to provide for the development of industrial uses which include fabrication, manufacturing, assembly or processing of materials that are in already processed form and which do not in their maintenance, assembly, manufacture or plant operation create smoke, gas, odor, dust, sound, vibration, soot or lighting to any degree which might be obnoxious or offensive to persons residing in or conducting business in either this or any other district. The uses permitted by right in the M-3 zone district are provided in the attached list of uses. Building set backs are required by the zoning ordinance when abutting a residential district. All most all of the proposed parcels abut property zoned and planned for industrial use and would not be subject to building set backs required by the zoning ordinance. Each lot would have sufficient area for parking. Bordering Property Information: Planned Land Use Zoning Existing Land Use North Light Industrial M-1 Light Industrial South Heavy Industrial C-M Commercial and Light Industrial East Heavy Industrial M-1 and Light and Heavy Industrial M-3 EA No. 99-01 Initial Study Tentative Parcel Map No 99-01, M-3 Zone Uses, Vacation of right-of-way and waiver of access on Golden State Boulevard Page 2 March 31, 1999 West Heavy Industrial M-1 and Light and Heavy Industrial M-3 Staff has reviewed the above-referenced project proposal and consulted with all affected agencies. Approval of the project may contribute to the creation of some environmental impacts, and the project may be impacted by existing environmental situations, as addressed in detail below. IMPACT SCORING INTERPRETATION AND SUMMARY: 1.0--TOPOGRAPHIC, SOIL, GEOLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS There are no geologic hazards or unstable soil conditions known to exist on the site. The major streets involved in this project are constructed at-grade, preserving existing topography to the fullest extent practicable. The local street alignment and widths shall be approved by the City Council and will provide drainage in the project area. 2.0--AIR QUALITY The project site is located in Fresno County, which, in addition to the rest of the San Joaquin Valley, has consistently exceeded State and Federal ozone and PM-10 standards. Fresno County is a designated Federal and State non-attainment area for ozone/oxidants and fine particulate matter (PM10). The project area is also within the federally-designated Fresno Carbon Monoxide Non- attainment Area. The proposed project may indirectly contribute insignificantly to a decline in local air quality, because new industrial use and the new local street system. However, the area is planned for industrial uses and the streets can accommodate bicyclists. General emission controls for vehicular smog check equipment, vehicle fuel composition, and off road/utility equipment are under the oversight of the California Air Resources Board. In this region, the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD) is charged with monitoring and improving local air quality under Federal and State Clean Air Acts and Clean Air Act Amendments. To control and reduce emissions which contribute to the above-noted pollutants, the SJVUAPCD has promulgated a series of air quality improvement plans and air quality attainment plans, and continues to adopt Rules to implement the plans. In addition, the SJVUAPCD has formalized its recommendations for good land use planning aimed toward reduction of air pollution (although the SJVUAPCD has no regulatory authority over land use per se. Through the final improvement of W. Kearney Boulevard, this project will be subject to SJVUAPCD Regulation VIII, a series of SJVUAPCD Rules for the control of dust and fine particulate matter. These rules mandate the implementation of dust control measures during construction projects and regular street sweeping to remove dirt and dust which may be entrained by vehicles passing over paved streets. EA No. 99-01 Initial Study Tentative Parcel Map No 99-01, M-3 Zone Uses, Vacation of right-of-way and waiver of access on Golden State Boulevard Page 3 March 31, 1999 3.0--WATER The Water Division of the City of Fresno Department of Public Utilities states that this project will have no impact on the City of Fresno water system. The area to the southeast, however, is showing signs of some ground water contamination from hydrocarbons. Because the contamination has not reached this site and may not for some time, no mitigation measures are necessary. 4.0--PLANT LIFE 5.0--ANIM4L LIFE There are no native plants or significant wildlife populations on the project site. 6.0--HUMAN HEALTH Aside from temporary dust generation which could occur during improvement of the project site, the project is not expected to have any other impacts on human health as the uses permitted by right are uses which include fabrication, manufacturing, assembly or processing of materials that are in already processed form and which do not in their maintenance, assembly, manufacture or plant operation create smoke, gas, odor, dust, sound, vibration, soot or lighting to any degree which might be obnoxious or offensive to persons residing in or conducting business in either this or any other district. 7.0--NOISE Because this site is intended for industrial uses, noise for traffic or adjacent use will not impact this site. Also the uses permitted by right to be developed on this site are uses which include fabrication, manufacturing, assembly or processing of materials that are in already processed form and which do not in their maintenance, assembly, manufacture or plant operation create smoke, gas, odor, dust, sound, vibration, soot or lighting to any degree which might be obnoxious or offensive to persons residing in or conducting business in either this or any other district. 8.0--LIGHT AND GLARE As with noise, incidental light and glare may impinge upon residential areas from traffic on the major streets involved in the project. No other impacts are expected to result in the uses permitted by fight- 9.0--LAND USE The Fresno General Plan, the Edison Community Plan, and the South Van Ness Industrial Redevelopment Plan designate the site of Tentative Parcel Map No. 98-21 for development with heavy industrial land uses. M-2, M-3 and S-L zone districts are consistent with the heavy industrial land use designation of the all the Plans. A portion of the site of the proposed tentative parcel map is zone M-1, light industrial zone district which is not listed on the zoning consistency table of any of the plans -i EA No. 99-01 Initial Study Tentative Parcel Map No 99-01, M-3 Zone Uses, Vacation of right-of-way and waiver of access on Golden State Boulevard Page 4 March 31, 1999 as consistent with the heavy industrial land use designation. In order to find the tentative parcel map consistent with the Fresno General Plan and any specific plan, as required by Section 66473.5 of the State Subdivision Map Act would normally require the owner to rezone that area to the M-2, M-3 or SL zone district or amend those plans to the light industrial land use designation for the area zone M-1. The Development Department Director, however, has given direction that the M-1 zone district is consistent with the Heavy Industrial land use designation and that he finds that the tentative parcel map can be found consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan and that the tentative map can be approved. 10.0--TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION The local industrial public streets are required to be developed in accordance with Public Works adopted by the City Council in accordance with Section 66411 and 66474.2 of the Map Act. Several of the propose streets do not meet public works adopted standards and will be required to meet adopted standards. The City traffic engineer has indicated that the exist major streets are adequate to provide service for this site, but will require the dedication of a turn lane on East Church Avenue in accordance with the Official Plan Line for this street. The California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS), in response to City staffs request for comments on this project believe City should assess the project's impact on State-Route 99 and Jensen Avenue interchange to determine the project's pro rata responsibility for area-wide circulation improvements. The City's Public Works Department has concluded it is the responsibility of Caltrans to design and construct the freeway improvements, the cost of which are addressed either through Measure "C" or standard State funding mechanisms. City staff, therefore, finds that because no development fee has been established for these improvements and are the responsibility of Caltrans the developer of the tentative subdivision map can not be required to pay this unidentified improvement cost. 11.0--URBAN SERVICES This project is not expected to have any adverse impacts on urban services. City utilities will not have to be relocated (except that the fire hydrant mentioned above will be relocated subsequent to approval of this project). No reservations of easements will be needed because all utility structures are in the remaining street rights-of-way and easements. Private utilities (electric/PG&E; telephone/Pacific Bell; and cable communications/MediaOne) have reported that they do not require reservations for their facilities. EA No. 99-01 Initial Study Tentative Parcel Map No 99-01, M-3 Zone Uses, Vacation of right-of-way and waiver of access on Golden State Boulevard Page 5 March 31, 1999 12.2—SITE SUBJECT TO FLOODING According to Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), the subject property is within the 100- to 500-year flood plain. It is noted that the Flood Hazard Maps indicated a general sheet flow direction during flooding conditions from the northeast to the southwest. The Army Corps of Engineers indicate, however, that the 100- to 500-year event is minor and is expected to be one-foot maximum depth designated on the FIRM map in the "B" zone. New development within areas of special flood hazard must conform to Fresno Municipal Code Section 13-160 governing development in flood plains. Staff also notes that the conditions of approval will assure that any adverse effects relating to flooding on the site are mitigated. 13.0--AESTHETICS No public or scenic vista will be obstructed by the development. No park strip landscaping or other valuable vegetation will be removed for this project. There is privately maintained landscaping interior to the monolithic sidewalk pattern of this project. 14.0--HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL When the project site develops, or when any street work contract (or work rules if the project is done by the City) is required to abide by specific procedures to ensure that any possible archaeological or paleontological sites (or crime scene/evidence) will be protected: 1. If material that may be human remains, animal fossils, or archaeological material is encountered during project surveying, grading, excavating, or construction, all work shall stop immediately. 2. If the material is, or includes, suspected human remains, the Fresno County Coroner shall be immediately contacted for his determination as to whether the material is prehistoric in nature. If the remains or other archaeological material is possibly Native American in origin, the Native American Heritage Commission shall be immediately contacted, and the California Archaeological Inventory/Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center shall be contacted to obtain a referral list of recognized archaeologists. An archaeological assessment shall be conducted for the project, the site shall be formally recorded, and recommendations made to the City as to any further site investigation or site avoidance/preservation. 3. If the material is human-related, but does not include human remains; and if this archaeological material is possibly Native American in origin, the Native American Heritage Commission shall be immediately contacted and the California Archaeological Inventory/Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center shall be contacted to obtain a referral list of recognized archaeologists. An archaeological assessment shall be conducted for the project, the site shall be formally recorded, and recommendations made to the City as to any further site investigation or site avoidance/preservation. 'l EA No. 99-01 Initial Study Tentative Parcel Map No 99-01, M-3 Zone Uses, Vacation of right-of-way and waiver of access on Golden State Boulevard Page 6 March 31, 1999 4. If animal fossils are uncovered, the Museum of Paleontology, U.C. Bc.keley shall be contacted to obtain a referral list of recognized paleor. ologists. An �ssessme• - s : 11 be cc,ducted by a paleontologist and, if the paleontologist de-,. -m-ines the m�_serial to 1 ; :. nificar, , it shall be preserved. DETER.M WATION On the basis of this initial evaluation, it is determined that the proposed prc: eLt is consistent with all applicable City plans and policies and conforms tc l applicable zoming stun.d1::: s and rt yquirements. It is further determined that the proposed project will not have a significant el'::,. on the environment. This is based upon the mitigation measures require.' as conditions of project r•,^roval for the special permit, which have been added to the. p-c;: as d,: :ed, t_::: cond :ions up;::, :;char dative declaration can be recommended. A Tv1ITI+:�i.TEB' i�'EGEtiTIVE:�ECLA.�. .:' �N WII:i� BE PREPARED. ,ins-rn�oi EA No. 99-01 Initial Study Tentative Parcel Map No 99-01, M-3 Zone Uses, Vacation of right-of-way and waiver of access on Golden State Boulevard Page 7 March 31, 1999 CITY OF FRESNO MONITORING CHIECKLIST FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) NO. TPM-99-01 This monitoring checklist for the above noted environmental assessment is being prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) and is intended to establish a reporting/monitoring program for Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-01, as required under Assembly Bill 3180. Implem�ntrztion of mitigation measures as noted below will be required upon the request for entitlements for the subject property -i Elavironniental Assessment(EA) No. TPM-99-01. 2.1—Substantial Indirect Source of Pollution 12.2-Site-Subject to Flooding MMGA'ITON MEASURE IMPLEMENTED BY WHEN IMPLEMENTED VERIFIED BY 2.1 Dust, ozone and PM-10 control Developer During all phases of Development Departmei measures as required by EA construction TPM-99-01 for the project site. 12.2 Tentative Parcel Map Development Prior to Final Parcel Map Development Departmej No. 99-01 will be conditioned Department Building Approval to comply with Section 12-160 and Safety Division if the Fresno Municipal Code.