Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPM 2006-43 - Conditions of Approval - 6/20/2007 City of Planninq & Development Department 2600 Fresno Street*Third Floor Nick P. Yovino Fresno, California 93721-3604 Director (559) 621-8277 FAX(559) 498-1026 March 30, 2007 Please reply to: Will Tackett (559) 621-8063 Harbison International, Inc. 2755 East Shaw Avenue, Ste. 101 Fresno, California 93710 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2006-43 DATED NOVEMBER 08, 2006, PROPOSING A 10-LOT PARCEL MAP FOR PROPERTY . LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH CEDAR AVENUE AND EAST HAMPTON WAY. (APN: 438-021-01) The City of Fresno Planning Division has completed its review of the subject parcel map dated November 08, 2006. Pursuant to Section 12-1205 of the Fresno Municipal Code, this letter is written to advise you that the Conditions of Approval dated March 30, 2007, are as noted on the attached document. I Appeal: The divider or any aggrieved person may file an appeal regarding to conditions of approval within fifteen (15) days from the date of approval. 'To protest the Director's decision regarding the conditions of approval,you must appeal by filing a written appeal with the Director of the Planning & Development Department. Appeal must include the appellant's interest in/or relationship to the subject property,the decision or action appealed,and specific reasons why the appellant believes the decision or action appealed should not be upheld. Appeals must be submitted to the Director of the Planning and Development Department prior to 5 p.m. on April 16, 2007. EXPIRATION: The approval or conditional approval of this tentative Parcel Map expires two years from the date of approval. The expiration shall terminate all proceedings and a final Parcel Map may not be filed without first processing a new Tentative Parcel Map. Modification of a Tentative Parcel Map after approval or conditional approval does not extend the two year time limit. EXTENSION: The divider may request an extension of the tentative map expiration date by filing a written application together with the fee set forth,in the Master Fee Schedule at the time of the request with the Director of the Planning & Development Department at least thirty days before the expiration date of the map. The applicant must state the reasons for requesting the extension. New conditions may be imposed if an extension is granted. Harbison International, Inc. Tentative Parcel Map No.2006-43 March 30, 2007 Page 2 An extension may not exceed.an aggregate of five years., If you wish additional information, please contact the City of Fresno,. Planning and Development Department, Planning Division, 2600 Fresno Street, Fresno, California 93721-3604; phone, (559) 621-8277. Your inquiry should be directed to either Rick Sommerville(engineering or improvements issues) or Will Tackett (planning or zoning issues). Should you have any questions regarding the conditions you must notify either Rick Sommerville at (559) 621-8277.or Will Tackett at (559) 621-8063 by April 16, 2007, to request a review of the conditions., Otherwise,the stipulated conditions of approval are in effect as of that date. No further notice will be sent. Sincerely, PLANNI DIVISION Will ckett, Planner 11 PI ing and Development Department Enclosures: Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No.2006-43 dated November 08, 2006 Conditions of Approval dated March 30, 2007 city of IMESNG \I// PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: March 30, 2007 TO: KEITH BERGTHOLD, Assistant Directo Planning and Development Department THROUGH: DARRELL UNRUH, Planning Manager Planning Division FROM: WILL TACKETT, Planner 11 Planning Division . .SUBJECT. REQUIRED FINDINGS AND APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL. MAP NO. 2006-43, (A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)WHICH PROPOSES TO CREATE A 10-LOT PARCEL MAP FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH CEDAR AVENUE AND EAST HAMPTON WAY (APN: 438-021-01) BACKGROUND Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-43 filed by Harbison International, Inc., on behalf of Fig Tree Properties, L.P., and accepted for processing on November 8,2006,proposes to create a 10 lot parcel map planned development for approximately 4.49 acres of property located on the southeast corner of the intersection of North Cedar Avenue and East Hampton Way. In addition to filing the parcel map the applicant had previously filed Rezone Application No. R-06-048 and Site Plan Review Application No. S-06-264: The rezone application is a request to reclassify the subject from the R-A(Single Family Residential —Agricultural) zone district to the C-P/cz(Administrative and Professional Office/with conditions of zoning)zone district which is consistent with the planned land use designation of office commercial as identified in the Fresno Yosemite International Airport and Environs Plan, McLane Community Plan and the 2025 Fresno General Plan. The rezone was approved by the Fresno City Council on January 30, 2007, per Ordinance Bill No. 2007-09 (Bill No. B-9). Upon approving the rezone application, the City Council adopted the following conditions of zoning: 1. No schools (public, private, parochial), hospitals, nursing homes, libraries, large residential support facilities, large child day care centers, adult day care facilities, churches,auditoriums,.concert halls,amphitheatres,apartment hotels,churches,exhibit halls, hotels, lodges clubs and fraternal organizations,banquet halls, multiple dwellings, fraternity or sorority houses, rooming and boarding houses or other uses that would concentrate a large number of people shall developed on the subject property. 2. -The project applicant shall submit and record an avigation easement that acknowledges the existence of the Fresno Yosemite International Airport. 3. The proposed office.buildings`shall be limited to single-story construction. Planning and Development Department Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-43. March 30, 2007 Page 2 Although two of these conditions of zoning relate to the site plan review application (and have been addressed in the conditions of approval for S-06-264), Condition No.2 has been incorporated into the conditions of.approval for Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-43 dated March 30, 2007. FurtCommissionh ,ontDecember 6 2 061icerl Resolution 12620. The by the Fresno City Planning Application Pp , P e site plan review application is requesting to develop the project site with nine single story office buildings ranging in size from 4,500 to 6,000 square feet for a total building area of 49,946 square feet. It is noted that Tentative Parcel Map No.2006-43 is proposing to create parcels that deviate from the property development standards of the C-P zone district given that three of the proposed parcels do not abut a public street or public right-of-way. Pursuant to Section 12-407.5 of the Fresno Municipal Code(FMC),the Director may modify property development standards of the underlying zone district subject to the filing and approval of a single unified project which is. covered by a development entitlement (i.e., S-06-264). However,because the approved site plan review did not depict the proposed parcel lines staff will require that the applicant submit a revised site plan inclusive of the proposed property lines as proposed per the parcel map. This condition,as well other responding agencies conditions have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval dated March 30,2007,for Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-43. REQUIRED FINDINGS An environmental assessment initial study was prepared for this project in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. This process included the distribution of requests for comment from other responsible or affected agencies'and interested organizations. The study indicates that the project, if approved, would conform to the land use designation and land use policies of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and is within the scope of the Master Environmental Impact Report No. 10130. Therefore, staff has issued a finding of conformity to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Master Environmental Impact Report(MEIR No. 10130)dated February 01; 2007, which incorporates a MEIR Mitigation Monitoring Checklist. This environmental finding was properly published and noticed on February 01, 2007, with no comments received to date. STATE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT The Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66410 et. seq.) requires that a proposed parcel map not be approved unless the map,together with its design and improvement,is found to be consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan(Finding No. 1 below). State law further provides that the proposed parcel map be denied approval if any one of the Finding Nos. 2-5, below, is made in the negative. 1. The proposed parcel map,together with its design and improvements are consistent with the City's Fresno Yosemite International Airport and Environs Plan, McLane Community Plan and the 2025 Fresno General Plan all of which designate the site for office commercial planned land uses which is consistent with the C-P/cz zone district as identified in Table 2 of the 2025 Fresno General Plan. Planning and Development Department Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-43 March 30, 2007 Page 3 2. The site is physically suitable for the proposed development because of the flat terrain of the site and adequate access and drainage on and off the site. The Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District will require that the drainage from the site be diverted to the Master Plan Inlets. 3. The proposed parcel map design and improvements are not likely to cause substantial and considerable damage to the natural environment,including.fish,wildlife or their habitat. The site is located in an area that is fully developed with industrial uses. The area does not and would not provide value for wildlife. 4. The proposed parcel map design and improvements are not likely to cause serious public health and safety problems,because the conditions of approval have shown and will insure that the subdivision conforms with City health and safety standards. In addition, during the entitlement process,staff will ensure that the conditions of zoning will be applied accordingly. 5. The proposed parcel map design will not conflict with pubic easements within or through the site because the conditions of approval will assure noninterference with any existing or proposed public easements. Staff, based on its own analysis, has determined that the parcel map,subject to the recommended conditions of approval,otherwise complies with the design and property development standards of the Zoning Ordinance and local Parcel Map Ordinance and recommends the approval of the parcel map. DIRECTOR DETERMINATION 1. Based upon the above analysis,the Planning and Development Director finds that Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-43 dated November 8, 2006, is consistent with the applicable plans and policies of the City of Fresno. 2. The Planning and Development Director hereby grants approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-43 dated November 8, 2006, subject to the conditions of approval dated March 30, 2007. Keith Bergthold, Assistant Director. Date N° Jo b( zo w ao8>� €� �ffi�m s Ltj rc F O o goo e < V - N >- ° LO.w 7 °fir << Y! f.. a1� b'!S 9b sis > 6 .26 3�!. H a z < Z �N z c 3 "ism x"Rom i lY �1zidm . wi< �� g b$ 13 af Q z Ea g � 5 �Gy �a a'< ..a��g�772 "*d' 2 'gd F- �a S z$n Z W ,7 zb °81 6ngm ug�� z W W Q `0 S$ iaa ova m3a° xxQ66 %dog` ;v z( q �ii� � 8€a5 7S o lSdS i •L� � M,'Q ii � li II �y. ,. �bNipNbJS��S12�2k3 ., .. - ., `� �� .1-m Z I 11 11 I ep e6 be i55 07 L....... ...3.90s*.00N(3.90s/.00n).wncf(,co'oce)•• . O- 11 .•rlh.' ';,;3.90.CIMN(3_90sY.0oN),L000f(,Lo'oa).. •• .•.... a a it W 14 .. Iz11 ^I CL = • u. 1 a � B pg tt ;,d 11 i n'»! 06,01 99'6 3.LI,fY00N I---. n.�z 11 „1 W .a -j - "— �w '� I I III IdG. � ,. 1v II It .. 1. 11 olo 1 -I ! .1769 -'.C*.WN y1„� .n`j z I II I = �.0z It S 41 � is o. .. ar9.693.Llf/.00N 04 a "' ami I II I - }v? '�.'� �9 -".•_- Gj 5iu� /�i i �1 until �VN�. bi g �U F= 1 -- U �jFi ^I �+ �=O -1_ 3. r4 m v ng ° -I- w " 9. O cR 0. I ` z 11 I ga Q m y ro z a -j- ol a- 8 w� 4 odaddodde� �g .moo- ❑ k LU a ,1969 3.4t MOON _jY-_ Q IRM 1h��Ucb z ¢ o 12 6 9 _ m O e H 1 11 { 1 d M•4l.f/.005 ,05'6zl 1 "L„s r p'i I .^1 [31Z 17 SG3 FivacT �+" II tu4. - 6 e 161- Q ga�g��ggztg 8$ o� 1 11, •:\ 1 Q ° m - - }.1_ r nn aanunn u .Sf ° W Ix ctf) ---- _4 r �� -- a -- - --- ---- --a--- d I it I •+ 41i g � 1 ZK H 3 M.LI,SY.00S ,6076Zr s p(1N3AV 8V430 H-L80N =vit s �)''— - - _—_}. --- _ _ --'- ((3.Ll,S/.ON))(Mll.S/AS) ((9B 6C9L))(,SB'6C9L) MLI,S/:005 ,SB'fiC9L ��� 1( sON18V38 30 SISVB 1 h a --T-- I ---- - -- I --------- - �i�. ° e T— I . jrc ! CITY OF FRESNO . PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MARCH 30, 2007 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP No. 2006-43 Southeast corner of the intersection of North Cedar Avenue and East Hampton Way NOTICE TO PROJECT APPLICANT _ All tentative maps ares ubject to the applicable provisions of the State Subdivision Map Act(SMA), Fresno Municipal Code (FMC), City policies,and City of Fresno Standard Specifications. The following specific conditions are applicable to this tentative map. In accordance with the provisions of Government Code §66020(d)(1), the imposition of fees, dedications, reservations or exactions for this project are subject to protest by the project applicant at the time of approval or conditional approval of the development or within 90 days after the date of the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations or exactions imposed on the development project. Upon conditional approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-43 a Planned Development, dated November 8,2006,the subdivider may prepare a Final Parcel Map in accordance with the approved tentative map. Note that a final parcel map may not be filed until the appeal period has expired. Should an appeal be filed pursuant to Section 12-1207 of the FMC,the application will be scheduled to be heard before the City of Fresno Planning Commission. The appellant may withdraw their appeal pursuant to-Section 12-1207.2 of the FMC. Concurrent with the filing of a final map and when the provisions of Section §66436 of the SMA apply, the subdivider is responsible to send, by certified mail, a sketch of the proposed final map, together with a copy of Section§66436(a)(3)(A)of the SMA,to any public entity or public utility which has previously acquired a right-of-way easement. LEGAL STATUS OF SITE TO BE SUBDIVIDED 1. The parcel map site was legally created as described in the Legal Description located on Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-43. PLAN CONSISTENCY -2. The subject site is located within the jurisdiction of the Fresno-Yosemite International Airport and-Environs Plan, McLane Community Plan and the 2025 Fresno General Plana All three plans designate the parcel map for development with office commercial planned land uses. Pursuant to Table 2 (Planned Land Use and Zone District Consistency Matrix) of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and applied within all community plans the existing C-P/cz (Administrative and Professional Office Districbwith conditions of zoning) zone district is consistent with the office commercial planned land use designation. Conditions of Approval ' Tentative Parcel Map.No. 2006-43 March 30, 2007 Page 2 . ZONING 3. Comply with the provisions of the State of California Government Code Sections §66410- §66499.58 of the SMA and the City FMC Chapter 12, Article 10 (Subdivision of Real Property). 4. Proposed Parcels "A through "F," inclusive, of Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-43 are consistent with the C-P/cz zone district pursuant to Section 12-306-N-21-a of the FMC. 5. Comply with all of the conditions of Site Plan Review Application No. S-06-264, see attached. 6. Execute cross access agreements between and across Parcels"A"through"J"inclusive to have access,to North Cedar Avenue. . 7. Execute a cross access agreement between this parcel map and the parcel to the south.\ .8. Execute a covenant between Parcels "A" through "J" inclusive, which assures that the subject site will be developed as an integrated center;and,that the architectural appearance of all buildings constructed on said parcels will be designed in a uniform fashion. CONDITIONS OF ZONING 9. The followingconditions of zoning are applicable to Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006- as adopted per Ordinance No. 2007-9 (Bill No. B-9): a) No schools (public, private, parochial), hospitals, nursing homes, libraries, large residential support facilities, large child day care centers, adult day care facilities, churches;auditoriums,concert halls,amphitheatres,apartment hotels,churches,exhibit halls, hotels, lodges, clubs or fraternal.organizations, banquet halls, multiple dwellings, fratemity or sorority houses, rooming and boarding houses or other uses that would concentrate a large number of people shall be developed on the subject property. b) The project applicant shall submit and record an avigation easement that acknowledges the existence of the Fresno Yosemite International Airport. c) The proposed office buildings shall be limited to single-story construction.. 10. The project applicant shall submit and record an avigation easement that acknowledges the existence of the Fresno Yosemite International Airport. MODIFICATIONS TO PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 11. Proposed parcels must be consistent with the C-P/cz zone district for the parcel map site in terms of lot depth and area subject to approval of a special permit for a planned development. All parcels must provide access to public street rights-of-way under a planned development special permit. Conditions of Approval Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-43 March 30, 2007 Page 3 12. Site Plan Review Application No. S-06-264,which was approved on December 6, 2006, by the City of Fresno Planning Commission, authorized the development of the 4.49.acre site with nine single story office buildings. Site Plan Review Application No. S-06-264 shall be revised to include the property lines as proposed per Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-43, dated November 8, 2006, thereby authorizing the creation of the planned development. Contact the Planning and Development Department at(559)621-8277 for further information regarding the submittal of the revised site plan. 13. Submit. draft copies of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions/Owners Association documents (CC & R's)for review and approval. Final, executed and notarized documents are to be located with the parcel map. CC&R's shall conform with the provisions of Section. 12-1026 of the FMC and address ingress, egress, sewer and water service maintenance and access, fire protection, solid waste service,. storm drainage, parking, architectural appearance and landscaping as follows: i. Cross Access for ingress/egress . ii. . Cross Drainage iii. Covenant for Shared Parking iv. Covenant to maintain sewer, water and all other utilities v. Covenant for fire protection underground water supplies vi. "Covenant to maintain all landscaping within the limits of this map vii. Covenant for shared solid waste facilities viii. Provide Covenant Agreement for access to land locked parcels ix. Provide Covenant Agreement for maintenance of fire suppression water system x. Provide Covenant Agreement which assures architectural uniformity across parcels 14. The placement of a parcel line in close proximity to any existing and/or proposed structures requires that the structure be found in compliance with the fire resistive standards of the Uniformed Building Code, Chapter 5. In the event the structures do not comply they must be modified so as to meet the requirement. 15. The proposed structure(s) on the site may be affected due to the location of the proposed parcel lines. Compliance with the prevailing Uniform Building Code as it relates to exterior wall protection, allowable area, etc. (as applicable to new parcel line locations) must be demonstrated prior to final map submittal. Contact the Planning and Development Department, Building and Safety Services Division at (559) 621-8200. . GENERAL CONDITIONS 16. All off-site and public improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the Public Works Department Standards,Specifications and Policies. Engineered construction plans and estimates for all or part of the required work shall be required prior to the issuance of Street Work Permits unless otherwise determined by the City Engineer. The cost for such plan preparation, review and construction inspection shall be at the subdivider's expense. • NOTE: Engineered construction plans shall be submitted to the Planning and Conditions of Approval - Tentative Parcel Map No.2006-43 March 30, 2007 Page 4 Development Department for approval concurrent with the final map. 17. Any existing utilities, including but not limited to, street lights, traffic signals, fire hydrants, poles (power, telephone, cable, etc.), which must be relocated or removed in conjunction with the construction of these off-site improvement requirements,shall be the responsibility and at the expense of the subdivider. 18. All existing overhead utilities,including but not limited to,electrical systems,communication systems and street lighting systems shall be placed underground in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-1011 and Resolution No. 78-522/88-229, and the policies of.the Public Works Department. 19. When streettsafety lighting installations are required,'street lighting plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the Traffic Engineer prior to the issuance of permits for the work. Services to street lighting installations shall be separated from the electrical service(s) serving the development. The type, location and service for street lighting installations shall be as determined by the Traffic Engineer. Street lighting installations shall be dedicated to the City upon.completion and acceptance of the installations. 20.,­ Sidewalks(including wheelchair ramp landings)and driveway approaches,for undeveloped parcels of this parcel map,shall be required and constructed at the.time of site development. a) Curb ramps are required at all corners within the limits of this parcel map. 21 Whenever covenants or agreements are required,they shall be prepared by the city upon receipt of the fee in accordance with the adopted Master Fee Schedule. All covenants and agreements must be approved by the City Attorney's Office and shall be recorded with the final parcel.map. 22. Telephone, cable, and other public utilities which propose above-ground facilities (such as cabinets) determined by the Planning and Development Director to be oversized shall be located in an additional easement area outside of the required landscape strip. 23. All work and engineered plans for public improvements shall conform to the 2002 Edition of the City of Fresno Standard Specifications and.Drawings(City Council Resolution No.70-36 and Resolution Nos. 84-361) and any amendments thereto, hereinafter referred to as the Public Works Standards.. 24. The subdivider shall dedicate and construct public easements to facilitate the construction of curbs, gutters, sidewalks with street tree wells and irrigation systems (when applicable), permanent pavement, street/safety lighting, bus bays, right turn lanes, bike lanes, bike paths, multi-purpose trail,wheelchair ramps and public utilities in accordance with City plans, ordinances, resolutions and policies, and the Standard Specifications of the Public Works Department within the limits of the parcel map. 25. Existing improvements that are not to the planned alignment shall be removed and required improvements installed to the new street alignment and grade. Existing improvements to Conditions of Approval Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-43 March 30, 2007 Page 5 remain in place shall be repaired if determined to be damaged and/or off grade by the City Engineer. Existing driveway approaches not identified for current or future utilization shall be removed and sidewalk(when applicable),curb and gutter shall be installed to match existing or proposed street line and grade as determined by the City Engineer. 26. A minimum four foot wide clear path of travel is required along the public sidewalk on all frontages of the property as required by Title 24 of the California Administration Code as determined by the City Engineer. An on-site pedestrian easement and construction of a path may be required if Title 24 provisions cannot be met within the public rights-of-way. All such public easements shall be identified and dedicated with the processing and recordation of the Final Parcel Map and/or at the time of Special Permit review for the proposed` development of the parcel(s). 27. All required signing and striping shall be installed and paid for by the developer/owner.The signing and striping plans shall comply with the current Caltrans standards and shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval as a part of the street improvement plans for this tentative map. 28. The subdivider may either construct or install the required improvements,when required;or, enter into a bonded secured agreement with the City of Fresno providing for the construction of the required improvements and sufficient security prior to the approval of the final parcel map, SPECIFIC CONDITIONS STREETS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY 29. Comply with all of the conditions of the Public Works Department, Engineering Division memorandum dated,February 08, 2007. North Cedar Avenue (Arterial): 30. Dedicate 70 feet of property, measured from section line, for public street purposes within the limits of this map. 31. Dedicate a corner cut(for a 25-foot return)for public street purposes at the southeast corner of North Cedar Avenue and East Hampton Way for a standard curb ramp. 32. Construct concrete curb and. gutter, built to a 10-foot pattern, in accordance with Public .Works Standard P-5. 33. Construct 20 feet of permanent asphalt concrete paving, from face of curb, in accordance with Public Works Standard P-50. 34. Construct an underground street lighting system (2 lights) in accordance with Public Works Standard E-1within the limits of this map. Spacing and design shall conform to Public Works Standard E-7 for Arterial Streets. Conditions of Approval Tentative Parcel Map No.2006-43 March 30, 2007 Page 6 East Hampton Way(Local): 35. Dedicate 30 feet of property, measured from centerline,for public street purposes within the limits of this map. 36. Construct concrete curb and gutter, built to a 10-foot pattern, in accordance with Public Works Standard.P-5. 37. Construct 18 feet,from face of curb, of permanent asphalt concrete paving in accordance with Public.Works Standard P-50. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE Sanitary Sewer Requirements: Sanitary sewer facilities will be available to provide service to the site subject to the following requirements: - 38. All on-site sewer mains shall be private. 39. Abandon all existing on-site private sanitary septic systems. 40. The project developer should contact Wastewater Management Division/Environmental Services (559)621-5100 regarding conditions of service for special users. 41 Comply with all of the requirements of the Department of Public Utilities, Planning and Engineering memorandum dated November 28, 2006. Sanitary Sewer Fees: 42. The following Sewer Connection Charges are due and shall be paid for the.Project: a) Sewer Lateral Charge b) Oversize Sewer Charge c) Trunk Sewer Charge d) Sewer Facility Charge WATER SERVICE 43. Separate services with meter boxes shall be provided to each parcel. 44. Seal and abandon existing on-site well(s) in compliance with the State of California Well Standards, Bulletin 74-90 or current revisions issued by California Department of Water Resources and City of Fresno standards: 45. Two independent sources of., water, meeting Federal and State Drinking Water Act Conditions of Approval Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-43 March 30, 2007 Page 7 Standards,are required to serve the development including any subsequent phases thereof. The two-source requirement may be accomplished through a combination of water main extensions, construction of supply wells, or other acceptable sources. of water supply approved by the Water Systems Manager. 46. All public water facilities shall be constructed in accordance with Public Works Department, standards, specifications and policies: 47. Comply with all of the requirements of the Department of Public Utilities, Water Division memorandum dated November 27, 2006. FIRE SERVICE 48. The Fresno Fire Department has no requirements at this time for Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-43. FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT (FMFCD) .49. The subdivider shall be required to comply with all of the specific requirements imposed by the FMFCD for the subdivision or any amendments or modifications to those requirements, which maybe granted by the FMFCD Board of Directors, pursuant to Section 13-1307 of the FMC.'These requirements are identified in the attached District's letter,to the Planning and Development Department dated December 6, 2006. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) 50. Caltrans staff has reviewed the proposed project(see attached letter dated November 27, 2006)and stated that a traffic study should be prepared. This project does not meet the City of Fresno threshold for the preparation of a traffic study(see attached memorandum from the Public Works Department, Engineering.Division dated October 05,2006. DEVELOPMENT FEES AND CHARGES This project is subject to the following development fees and charges: Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District FEE/ RATE 1. Metropolitan Flood Control District Fee $0.00 SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES FEE RATE 2. Lateral Sewer Charge* $0.10/sq. ft. (to 100' depth) 3. Oversize Charge* $0.05/sq. ft. (to 100' depth) 4. Trunk Sewer Charge N/A Service Area: Conditions of Approval Tentative Parcel Map No.2006-43 March 30, 2007 Page 8 5. Wastewater Facilities Charge S.T.E.P. 6. Copper Avenue Sewer Lift Station Charge* N/A 7. Fowler Trunk Sewer Interim Fee Surety* N/A 8...House Branch Sewer Charger N/A 9. Millbrook Overlay Sewer* N/A WATER CONNECTION CHARGES FEE RATE 10. Service Connection Charge Fee based on service(s) and meter(s) sizes specified by owner; fee for service(s) and Meter(s): established by the Master Fee Schedule. 11. Frontage Charge► $6.50/lineal foot 1.2. Transmission Grid Main Charge* $804/net acre (parcels under 5 gross acres) 13. Transmission Grid Main Bond $304/net acre Debt Service Charge w► (parcels under 5 gross acres) 14. . UGM Water Supply Fees N/A Service Area: 15. Well Head Treatment Fee♦ N/A Service Area: 16. Recharge Feet N/A Service Area: : . 17. 1994 Bond Debt Service* . .N/A Service Area: DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FEE RATE 18. Fire Facilities Impact Fee- Citywide$"' $236/1000sq.ft t 19. Park Facility Impact Fee - Citywide$*' N/A 20. Quimby Parkland Dedication Feev** N/A r Conditions of Approval Tentative Parcel,Map No.2006-43 March 30, 2007 Page 9 .'21.. Police Facilities Impact Fee - Citywide$'* $665/1000sq.ft t 22. Traffic Signal Charge*, $1.78/sq.ft t URBAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT FEE RATE 23. Major Street Chargee N/A Service Area: 24. Major Street Bridge Charge* N/A Service Area: 25. UGM Grade Separation Fee* N/A Service Area: 26. UGM Trunk Sewer Charge ► N/A Service Area: 27. Street Acquisition/Construction Charger N/A Notes: Living Unit Equivalents are calculated by multiplying the number of Net Acres by 5.8 Living Unit Equivalents for commercial or 3.0 Living Unit Equivalents for industrial to arrive at the total number of Living Unit Equivalents. Fee applicable to all maps accepted for filing after August 30,2005 ♦ Upon occupancy of the project,the subdivider shall pay the appropriate sewer facility charge pursuant to the Simple Tiered Equity Program (STEP) as determined by the Department of Public Utilities, Wastewater Division, Environmental Services Section (559-621-5153). 4 Due at time of development Deferrable through Fee Deferral Covenant. Due at time of subdivision. $ Due at occupancy. Building areas to be calculated to the nearest square.foot. Traffic Signal Fee is subject to review and conditions of approval from Transportation Planning through the entitlement review process based on Average.Daily Trips of,the proposed project. City of DATE: February 8, 2007 TO: Paul Bernal, Planner III Development Department, Planning Division, Curnkqt Planning THROUGH: Louise Gilio, Traffic Planning Supervisor Public Works Department, Engineering Division FROM: Gregory A. Jenness, Senior Engineering.Technician Public Works Department, Engineering Division SUBJECT: Location:. Southeast Mt p 2006-43, Public Works Conditions of Approval corner of North Cedar Avenue and East Hampton Way. Owner: Milton Barbi s STREET IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS The Public Works Department, Traffic Planning Section,has completed its review and the following requirements are to be placed on this tentative map as a condition of approval by the Public Works /Department. ✓Construct or install the required improvements, or contact Gary Witzel at (559) 621-8725 to enter into a bonded secured agreement for.these improvements. This must be executed prior to perfection. of this parcel map. General Conditions Repair or replace all existing damaged and/or.off-g rade offsite concrete improvements as determined by the City of Fresno Public Works Department, Construction Management Division, (559) 62.1-5500. • Submittal of engineered construction plans to the Planning and Development Department for approval must be made rp for to the final map. f All required signing and striping shall be installed and paid for by the developer/owner. The signing and striping plans shall comply with the current Caltrans standards and be submitted as a part of the street.improvement plans. • Additional offsite improvements will be required at the time of future site plan review. ✓ Curb ramps are required at all corners within the limits of this parcel map. ✓ Underground all existing offsite overhead utilities with the limits of this map in accordance with Fresno Municipal Code Section*12-1011 and Resolution No. 78- .522/88-229. Pagel of 2 T:\TRAFFIC ENGINEERING\Traffic Planning\Parcel Maps\CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR PARCEL MAPS\TentPM200643 Cedar& Hampton.doc Maior Streets: North Cedar Avenue: Arterial 1. Dedicate 70' of property, measured from section Line, for public street purposes within the limits of this map. 2. Dedicate a corner cut, (for a 25' return), for a public street purposes at the south east corner of North Cedar Avenue and East Hampton Way for a standard curb ramp. 3. Construct concrete curb and gutter, built to a 10' pattern, in accordance with Public Works Standard P-5. , 4. Construct 20' of permanent asphalt concrete.paving, from face of curb, in accordance with Public Works Standard P-50. 5. Construct an underground street lighting system (2 lights) in accordance with Public Works Standard E-1 within the limits of this map. Spacing and design shall conform to Public Works Standard E-7 for Arterial Streets. East Hampton Way: Local 1. Dedicate 30' of property, measured from center line, for public street purposes within the limits of this map. 2. Construct concrete curb and gutter, built to a 10' pattern, in accordance with Public Works Standard P-5. 3. Construct 18',from face of curb, of permanent asphalt concrete paving in accordance with Public Works Standard P-50. Page 2 of 2 T:\TRAFFIC ENGINEERING\Traffic Planning\Parcel Maps\CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR PARCEL MAPS\TentPM200643 Cedar& Hampton.doc x, ' >z City of PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT: DATE: October 5, 2006 TO: Mike Sanchez, Supervising Planner Development Department, Planning Division THROUGH: Louise Gilio, Traffic Planning Supervisor . Public Works Department, Engineering Divisio FROM: Greg Jenness, Senior Engineering Technician Public Works Department, Engineering Division REZONE APPLICATION NO. R-06-048 OWNER (S): Milton Barbis APN (S): 438-020-01 FROM: R-A TO: C-P LOCATION: 4074 North Cedar Avenue 1. Trip Generation a. Existing: 10 Average Daily Trips (ADT) b. Proposed: 549 Average Daily Trips (ADT) AM Total Peak: 76 Trips PM Total Peak: 72 Trips 2. Highway Capacity a. , North Cedar Avenue: Arterial 1. Existing Lanes: 4 lanes divided 32,000 ADT '2. Year Counted: 2005 20,410 ADT 3. Projected Lanes: 4 lanes divided 32,000 ADT- 3. Traffic Impact Study (TIS) required: No Page 1 of 1 T:ITRAFFIC ENGINEERING\Traffic Planning\Rezone\R-06-048 4074 N.Cedar.doc City of V -®l I A,4 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Date: December 06, 2006 To: PAUL BERNAL, Planner III Planning and Development Department, Current Planning From: CHRIS WEIBERT, Management Analyst II Public.Utilities Department, Administration Subject: Proposed tentative parcel map 2006-43, approximately 4.77 acres, located on the southeast corner of North Cedar Avenue and East Hampton Way. Does Project Affect Your AgeneWurisdiction No -Project does not directly affect Solid Waste Division Recommended ondiHons of Approval None. Page l of 1 _. City of - e %®®` DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Date: November 28, 2006 To: : PAUL BERNAL, Planner III Planning and Development Department From GREG CONTRERAS,Senior Engineering Technician Department of Public Utilities, Planning and Engineering Subject: SANITARY SEWER REQUIREMENTS FOR PM-2006-43 General Proposed tentative parcel map 2006-43, approximately 4.77 acres,located on the southeast corner of North Cedar Avenue and East Hampton Way. Environmental Recommendations . A NEGATIVE DECLARATION MAY BE ISSUED: The project may have adverse impacts but impacts can be mitigated without further study or are not.serious enough to warrant an Environment Impact Report. Sanitary Sewer Requirements Sanitary sewer facilities will be available to provide service to the site subject to the following .requirements: 1 All on-site sewer mains shall be private. 2. Abandon all existing on-site private sanitary septic systems. 3. The project developer should contact,Wastewater Management Division/Environmental Services (559) 621-5100 regarding conditions of service for special users. : Sanitary Sewer Fees The following Sewer Connection Charges are due and shall be paid for the Project: I. Sewer Lateral Charge 2. Oversize Sewer Charge 3. Trunk sewer Charge 4.. Sewer Facility Charge City of WATER DIVISION Date: November 27, 2006 To: DOUG HECKER, Supervising Engineering Technician Department of Public Utilities, Administration Through: MICHAEL CARBAJAL, Supervising Engineering Technician Department of Public Utilities, Water Division From: ANITA LUERA, Senior Engineering Technician Department of Public Utilities,Water Division Subject: WATER REQUIREMENTS FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2006-43. The following conditions are required to provide water service to the development. .1. Separate services with meter boxes shall be provided to each parcel. 2. Seal and abandon existing on-site well(s) in compliance with the State of California Well Standards, Bulletin 74-90 or current revisions issued by California Department of Water Resources and City of Fresno standards. 3. Two independent sources of water, meeting Federal and State Drinking Water Act Standards, are required to serve the development including any subsequent phases thereof. The two-source requirement may be accomplished through a combination of water main extensions,construction of supply wells, or other acceptable sources of water supply approved by the Water Systems Manager. 4. All public water facilities shall be constructed in accordance with Public Works Department standards,specifications, and policies. C:\DOCUME-1\GREGOR-1.000\LOCALS-1\Temp\PM 2006-43 112706.doc File No.210.411 FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF.REQUIREMENTS PUBLIC AGENCY DEVELOPER Mr. Gil Haro, Planning Manager FIG TREE PROPERTIES, LP Planning& Development Department 7650 N. PALM AVE., SUITE 105 City of Fresno FRESNO, CA 93711 2600 Fresno Street. Fresno, CA 93721 MAP NO: 2006-043 PRELIMINARY FEE(S) (See below) DRAINAGE A(S) „ JJ „ �, DRAINAGE AREA JJ $0.00 DATE ' l2� DRAINAGE AREA TOTALFEE $0.00 The proposed development will generate.storm runoffwhich produces potentially significant environmental impacts and which must be properly discharged and mitigated pursuant to the Z California Environmental Quality Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. The District in cooperation with the City and County has developed and adopted the Storm O Drainage and Flood Control Master.Plan. Compliance with and implementation of this Master Plan by his.development project will satisfy the drainage related CEQA/NEPA impact of the project mitigation requirements. The proposed development shall pay drainage fees pursuant to the Drainage Fee Ordinance prior to approval of the final map at the rates in effect at the time of such approval. The fee O indicated above is based on the tentative map. Contact the FMFCD project engineer prior to approval of the final map for the fee. O Considerations which may affect the fee.obligation(s) or the timing or form of fee payment: a) Fees related to undeveloped or phased portions of the project may be deferrable. O b) Fees may be calculated based on the actual percentage of runoff if different than that typical for the zone district under which the development is being undertaken and if permanent provisions are made to assure that the,site remains in that configuration. C) Master Plan storm drainage facilities may be constructed, or required to be - constructed in lieu of paying fees: d) The actual cost incurred in constructing Master Plan drainage system facilities is credited against the drainage fee obligation. 2006.043 5469 E.OLIVE FRESNO,CA 93727 (559)456-3292 FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document FRESNO ME7 'POLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DI' :ICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 2 of 4 e) When the actual costs incurred in constructing Master Plan facilities exceeds the drainage fee obligation, reimbursement will be made for the excess costs from future fees collected by the District from other development. Approval of this development shall be conditioned upon compliance with these District Requirements. 1. X a. Drainage from the site shall be directed to adjacent roadways. b. Grading and drainage patterns shall be as identified on Exhibit No. 1 H 2 c. The grading and drainage patterns shown on the site plan conform to the adopted Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan. 2. The proposed development shall construct and/or dedicate Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan facilities located within the development or necessitated by any off-site improvements required by the approving agency: Developer shall construct facilities as shown on Exhibit No..1 as"Master Plan Facilities to be constructed by Developer": X None required. 3.1 The following final improvement plans shall be submitted to the District for review prior to final development approval: -X Grading Plan. Storm Drain Plan Final Map Street Plan Water& Sewer Plan Other 4. Availability of drainage facilities: X a. Permanent drainage service is available provided the developer can verify to the satisfaction of the City of Fresno that runoff can be safely conveyed to the Master Plan inlet(s). b., The construction of facilities required by Paragraph No. 2 hereof will provide permanent drainage service. c: Permanent drainage service will not be available. The District recommends temporary facilities until permanent service is available. Temporary service is available through d. See Exhibit No. 2. . 5. The proposed development: Appears to be located within a 100 year flood prone area as designated on the latest Flood Insurance Rate Maps available to the District, necessating appropriate floodplain management action. (See attached Floodplain Policy.) 2066-043 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 3 of 4 X Appears to be located within a 500 year flood prone area as designated on the latest Flood Insurance Rate Maps available to the District. Does not appear to be located within a flood prone area. 6 The Federal Clean Water Act and the State General Permits for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Industrial Activities (State General Permits) require developers of construction projects disturbing one or more acres, and discharges associated with industrial activity not otherwise exempt from National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) . permitting, to implement controls to reduce pollutants, prohibit the discharge of waters other than storm water to the municipal storm drain system, and meet water quality standards. These requirements apply both to pollutants generated during construction, and to those which maybe generated by operations at the development after construction. State General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activities, approved August 1999, (modified December 2002.) A State General O ; Construction Permit is required for all clearing, grading, and disturbances to the ground. that result in soil disturbance of at least one acre (or less.than one acre if part of a larger " common plan of development or sale). Permittees are required to: submit a Notice of . Intent to be covered and must paya permit fee to the State Water Resources Control Board(State Board), develop and implement alstorm water pollution prevention plan, O eliminate non-storm water discharges,conduct routine site inspections, train employees in permit compliance, and complete an annual certification of compliance. O O b. State General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities, April, 1,997 (available at the District Office.) A State General Industrial Permit is required for specific types of industries described in the NPDES regulations or by Standard Industrial.Classification (SIC) code. The following categories of industries are generally required to secure an industrial permit:manufacturing; trucking; recycling; and waste and hazardous waste management. Specific exemptions exist for manufacturing activities which occur entirely indoors. Permittees are required to: submit a Notice of Intent to be covered and must pay a permit fee to the State Water _Resources Control Board,.develop and implement a storm water pollution prevention plan, eliminate non-storm water discharges, conduct routine site inspections, train employees in permit compliance, sample storm water runoff and test it for pollutant indicators, and annually submit a report to the State Board. 2006-043 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 4 of 4 c• The proposed development is encouraged to select and implement storm water quality controls recommended in the Fresno-Clovis Storm Water Quality Management Construction and Post-Construction Guidelines(available at the District Office).to meet the requirements of the State General Permits,eliminate the potential for non storm.water to enter the municipal storm drain system, and where possible minimize contact with materials which may contaminate storm water runoff. 7. A requirement of the District may be`appealed by filing a written notice of appeal with the Secretaryof the District within ten days of the date of this Notice of Requirements. 8. The District reserves the right to modify, reduce or add to these requirements, or revise fees,.as necessary to accommodate changes made in the proposed development by the developer or requirements made by other agencies. 9. X` See Exhibit No. 2 for additional comments, recommendations and requirements.. Gerald E. Lakeman, Project Engineer: Rick Lyns District Engineer C: HARBISON INTERNATIONAL, INC.,... 2755 E. SHAW AVE., SUITE.101 FRESNO, CA 93710 2006.043 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 (559)456-3292 FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document OTHER REQUIREMENTS. EXHIBIT NO. 2 The following paragraphs only apply towards development of the individual parcels and are not conditions for the recording of the map: In an effort to improve storm water runoff quality, outdoor storage areas shall be constructed and maintained such that material which generates contaminants will not be.conveyed by runoff into the storm drain system. The District encourages, but does not require that roof drains from non-residential development be constructed such that they are directed onto and through a landscaped grassy swale area to filter out pollutants from roof runoff. Runoff from areas where industrial activities, product, or merchandise come into contact with and may contaminate storm water must be directed through landscaped areas or otherwise treated before discharging it off-site or into a storm drain. .Roofs covering such areas are recommended. Cleaning of such areas by sweeping instead of washing is to be required unless such wash water can be directed to the sanitary sewer system. Storm drains receiving untreated runoff from such areas that directly connect to. the District's system will not be permitted. Loading.docks, depressed areas, and areas servicing or fueling vehicles are specifically subject to these requirements. The District's policy governing said industrial site NPDES program ..requirements.are available. Contract the District's Environmental Department for further,information regarding these policies related to industrial site requirements. Development No. TPM 2006-043 engr\permit\euhibit2\city-tpm\2006\2006-043(rl) STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS.TRANSPOR" '-)N AND HOUSING AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER Govemor -DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ` 1352 WEST OLIVE AVENUE P:O.BOX 12616 FRESNO,CA 93778-2616 PHONE (559)445-6666 Flex your power! FAX (559)488-4088 --=----.. TTY (559)488-4066 Be energy efficient! November 27, 2006 �� Q�EVE QM�� 2131-IGR/CEQA fV 6-FRE-168-3.2 TPM 2006-43 (PREV. R-06-048 & S-06-264) OFFICE BUILDINGS VILLAGE AT GRANITE PARK Mr. Paul Bernal City of Fresno Development Department 2600 Fresno Street, Third Floor Fresno, CA 93721-3604 Dear Mr. Bernal: Caltrans.has reviewed the entative parcel map for:the.property proposed to be developed with nine single=story office buildings. The proj ec0swithinthe development known as``Village at Granite Park." We have.the following comments: The office portion of the project,by itself, will generate less than the 100 peak-hour trips the City uses as a threshold to require a traffic study. However,when combined with other uses proposed at the Village at Granite Park, the traffic generation will be.significantly over this threshold. A Traffic Impact Study(TIS) is needed to assess the project-related impacts to the State Highway system and appropriate mitigation measures. Please have the preparer of the traffic study reference the Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, dated December 2002, and send the scope of the TIS to Caltrans before the traffic study is conducted. Caltrans Guide, while advisory, contains Best Practices and gives insight into Caltrans' expectations when reviewing a traffic study. If the traffic consultant has any issues or concerns regarding the use of the Guide or its interpretation,please contact us so resolution can be.reached. Caltrans was not provided with an opportunity to review the original application for the Village at Granite Park. To our knowledge, this development has not prepared a traffic study and has never evaluated its traffic impacts, either to.local roads or.to the State Highway System. Our preference would be that a traffic study be prepared for the whole.of the development,rather than piece.-meal as projects are proposed.. However, we,-understand thatproviding an analysis as each project' submits an application may be the only feasible method as the Village at Granite Park development has undergone numerous changes since its approval and may undergo more before it is entirely constructed. "Caltrans improves mobility across California" Mr. Paul Bernal November 27, 2006 Page 2 If you have any questions,please call me at(559) 445-6666. Sincerely, MOSES STITES Office of Transportation Planning District 6 C: Mr. Scott Mozier, City of Fresno Public Works Department Mr. Bryan Jones, City of Fresno Public Works Department Ms. Barbara Goodwin, Council of Fresno County Governments "Caltrans improves mobility across California" OFFICES OF A. I PHONE(559)233-7161 FAX(559)233-8227 r 2907 SOUTH MAPLE AVENUE FRESNO,CALIFORNIA 93725-2218 Your Most Valuable Resource Water November 27, 2006 ,., Mr. Paul Bernal 0) rLO� City of Fresno I ��J �� X04 Planning and Development Dept. \ �y 2600 Fresno Street, 3f0 Floor Fresno,CA 93721-3604 RE: TPM No. 2006-43, APN 438-021-01, 4074 N. Cedar Avenue Dear Mr. Bernal: FID's comments and requests are follows: 1. FID does not own, operate or maintain any facilities located on the applicant's property: 2: FID expects no adverse impacts from the approval of the subject proposal. Thank you for submitting this for our review, Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns.at 233-7161 extension 317 or bjohnsongfresnoirrigation.com: Sincerely, RRGVCS�w CO- __; Bret Johnso Engineering Technician I Agencies\C ity\PM2006-43 BOARD OF President JACOB ANDRESEN. Vice-President JEFFERY G. BOSWELL DIRECTORS - .JEFF NEELY.EDDIE NIEDERFRANK.STEVEN G BALLS. General Manager GARY SERRATO Street Name Review TPM-2006-43 12-28-06 Street Name Status Required Change East Hampton Way Good North Cedar Avenue Good City of rnc-�:..�..` CENTRAL EASTERN IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE PROJECT REVIEW December 4, 2006 --y - Project Record item 3d PROJECT INFORMATION Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-43 Southeast Corner of North Cedar Avenue and East Hampton Way (APN:' 438-021-01) Review proposed tentative parcel map design for Tentative Parcel Map No.2006-43 for approximately 4.77 acres of property located on the southeast corner of`North Cedar Avenue and East Hampton.Way. The property is zoned C-P.(Administrative and Professional Office). (Staff member: Paul Bernal) COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION E APPROVE ❑ APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS ❑ DENY ❑ NO ACTION �NwTIMKEN BROWN CLARK HUMPHREY KOSSARAS LARSON POULTER SEABURG Approve Y Y-M Y Y-S Deny Abstain Absent A A A q COMMITTEE CONDITIONS/ COMMENTS The Committee recommended to the Director approval of the tentative parcel map by motion of Larson, second by Seaburg;motion carried(M/SIC, vote 4-0-4). Staff Liaison: Date: TENTATIVE PARCEL kP NO. 2006-43 " GOVERNMENT CODE§66020(d)(1) A protest filed pursuant to subdivision (a) shall be filed at the time of approval or conditional approval of the development or within 90 days after the date of the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions to be imposed on a development project. Each local agency shall provide to the project applicant a notice in writing at the time of the approval of the project or at the time of the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions, a statement of the amount of the fees or a description of the dedications, reservations, or other exactions, and notification that the 90-day approval period in which the applicant may protest has begun. Improvements and payments shall not be required on or in front of any undeveloped portion of a net acreage of ten acres or more which exists after the division of land. All improvements and payments to be completed with development. SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES FEE RATE a. Lateral Sewer Charge* , $0.10/sq, ft. (to 100' depth) b. Oversize Charge* $0.05/sq. ft. (to 100' depth) c. Trunk Sewer Charge N/A Service Area: d. Wastewater Facilities Charge S.T.E.P.♦ e. Copper Avenue Sewer Lift Station Charge* N/A f. Fowler Trunk Sewer Interim Fee Surety* _ N/A g. House Branch Sewer Charger N/A h. Millbrook Overlay Sewer* N/A WATER CONNECTION CHARGES FEE RATE 'i. Service Connection Charge Fee based on service(s) and meter(s) sizes specified by owner;. fee for service(s) and Meter(s) established by the Master Fee Schedule. j. Frontage Charge* $6.50/lineal foot k. Transmission Grid Main Charges $804/net acre (parcels under 5 gross acres) I. Transmission Grid Main Bond Debt Service Charge w► $304/net acre (parcels under 5 gross acres) m. UGM Water Supply Feev . N/A Service Area: A Well Head Treatment Feer N/A Service Area: o. Recharge Feev N/A Service Area: p. 1994 Bond Debt Service* . N/A Service Area: DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FEE RATE q. Fire Facilities Impact Fee - Citywide$*" $236/1000sq.ft t r. Park Facility Impact Fee Citywide$** N/A S. Quimby Parkland Dedication Fee f** N/A t. Police Facilities Impact Fee - Citywide$** $665/1000sq.ft t u. .Traffic Signal Charge* $1.78/sq.ft t URBAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT FEE RATE v. Major Street Charge*, N/A Service Area: w. Major Street Bridge Charge* N/A Service Area: x. . UGM Grade Separation Fee* N/A Service Area: y. UGM Trunk Sewer Charges N/A _ Service Area: z. Street Acquisition/Construction Charger N/A Notes: *Living Unit Equivalents are calculated by multiplying the number of Net Acres by 5.8 Living Unit Equivalents for commercial or 3.0 Living Unit Equivalents for industrial to arrive at the total number of Living Unit Equivalents. Fee applicable to all maps accepted for filing after August 30,2005 ♦ Upon occupancy of the project, the subdivider shall pay the appropriate'sewer facility charge pursuant to the Simple Tiered Equity Program (STEP)as determined by the Department of Public Utilities,Wastewater Division, Environmental Services Section (559-621-5153). 46 Due at time of development 4 Deferrable through Fee Deferral Covenant. V Due at time of subdivision. $ Due at occupancy. t Building areas to be calculated to the nearest square foot. Traffic Signal Fee is subject to review and conditions of approval from Transportation Planning through the entitlement review process based on Average Daily Trips of the proposed project. CITY OF FRESnv — ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEN i i INI.E200710000054 FINDING OF CONFORMITY/MEIR NO. 10130 __ Pursuant to Section 21157.1 of the California Public Resource Code TE R EIv OR - G: (California Environmental Quality 'Act) the project described below is determined to be within the scope of the Master Environmental Impact Report FEB 01 2007 (MEIR) No. 10130 prepared for the 2025 Fresno General Plan Initial study is on file in the Planning and Development Department, City.Hal , F N ��kNTY C aR2600 Fresno Street, Fresno, California 93721 y _ (559) 621-8277 PUTY .Applicant: Initial Study Prepared By: Fig Tree Properties, L.P. Paul Bernal, Planner III . 7650 North Palm Avenue, Suite 105 February 1, 2007 Fresno, California 93711 Environmental Assessment Number: Project Location (including APN): Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-43 Southeast corner of North Cedar.Avenue and East Hampton Way (APN: 438-021-01) Project Description: Tentative Parcel Map No..2006-43 is_requesting to subdivide approximately 4.49 acres of the property into a 10 lot parcel map planned development. The subject is located. on the located at the southeast corner of North Cedar Avenue and East Hampton Way and is zoned C-P/cz (Administrative and Professional Office/with conditions of zoning). The Fresno Yosemite International Airport and Environs Plan, McLane Community Plan and the 2025 Fresno General Plan designate the subject site for office commercial planned land uses which is consistent with the C-P/cz (Administrative and Professional Office/with conditions of zoning). zone district as identified in Table 2 of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and applied within all community plans. In addition, the subject site is located within Airport Protection Zone III. Conformance to Master Environmental Impact Report(MEIR NO. 10130): The recently adopted 2025 Fresno General Plan, the Fresno Yosemite International Airport and Environs Plan and McLane Community Plan designate the subject site for office commercial planned land uses. The C-P/cz zone district for the subject.property conforms to the office commercial planned land use designation. The Planning and Development Department staff has prepared an initial study and environmental checklist and evaluated the proposed rezone application in accordance with the land use and environmental policies and provisions of the 2025 Fresno.General Plan and the related Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR) No. 10130. The subject property is currently vacant but may be developed at an intensity and scale that is permitted by the planned land use for the site. Thus, the parcel map will not facilitate an additional intensification of uses beyond that, which already exists or would be allowed by the above-noted planned land use designation. Moreover, it is not expected that the future development will adversely impact existing city service systems or the traffic circulation system that serves the subject parcels. These infrastructure findings have been verified by the Public Works and Public Utilities Departments. It has been further determined that all applicable mitigation measures of MEIR No. 10130 shall be applied to the project necessary to assure that the.project will not cause significant adverse cumulative impacts, growth inducing impacts, and irreversible significant effects beyond those identified by MEIR No. 10130 as provided.by CEQA Section 15178(a). Per Section 21157.1 of the California Public Resources Code (California Environmental Quality Act), it may be determined that a subsequent project falls within the scope of a MEIR, provided that the project does not cause significant impacts on the environment that were not previously examined by the MEIR. Relative to this specific project proposal, the environmental impacts noted in the MEIR, per the 2025 Fresno General Plan ..land use designations, include impacts associated with the office commercial planned land use designation specified for the subject property. Based on this initial study, the proposed project does not change the land use indicated for the subject parcel and will not generate additional significant effects not previously identified by the MEIR and no new additional mitigation measures are required. Therefore, the project proposal is within the scope of the MEIR as defined by Section 15177 of the CEQA Guidelines. Finding of Conformity Under MEIR No. 10130 Environmental Assessment No.TPM No. 2006-43 February 1, 2007 Page 2 Moreover, as lead agency for this project, the Planning.and Development Department, per Section 15177 (d). of the CEQA Guidelines, has determined that all feasible mitigation..measures from MEIR No. 10130 shall apply to the project proposal as noted in the attached mitigation monitoring checklist. Public notice has been provided regarding staff's finding in a manner prescribed by this section of the Guidelines and by Section 21092 of the California Public Resources Code (CEQA provisions). Gilbert J. Haro Q .Date Planning Manager, City of Fresno Attachments: Environmental ChecklisUlnitial Study for Environmental Assessment No. TPM No. 2006-43 Mitigation Monitoring Checklist (MEIR No. 10130) for Environmental Assessment No. TPM No. 2004-43 KUMaster Ries-Parcel Maps\Parcel Maps 2006\TPM 2006-Q.—Harbison International—PSTINDING OF CONFORMITY.doc j i �� / 1 ■ ial ■■ ii �i ■+� I EN1 )NMENTAL ASSESSMENT(EA) CH' 'WST . JTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFEL.. EA NO. TPM No. 2006-43 1_0 TOPOGRAPHIC,SOIL,GEOLOGIC 11.0 URBAN SERVICES CONSIDERATIONS 1 11.1 Availability of fire protection 1 1.1. Geologic hazards,unstable soil conditions 1 11.2 Lack of emergency vehicle access 1 .1.2 Adverse change in topography or ground surface relief 1 _ 11.3 Adequacy of design for crime prevention 1 1.3 Destruction of unique geologic or physical features 1 11.4 . Overcrowding of school facilities 1 1.4 Increased water erosion 1 11.5 Availability of water mains of adequate size 1 11.6 Availability of sewer lines of adequate capacity 2_0 AIR GIUILITY 1 11.7 Availability of storm water drainage facilities(on or 1 2.1 Substantial indirect source of pollution off site 1 2.2 Direct on-site pollution generation 1 11.8 Availability of adequate park and recreation areas 1 2.3 Generation of objectionable odors 1 11.9 Unusually high solid waste generation 1 2.4 Generation of dust except during construction 1 2.5 Adverse local climatic changes. 12.0 HAZARDS 1 12.1 Risk of explosion or release of hazardous 3_0 WATER. substances 1 3.1 Insufficient ground water available for long-term project 1 12.2 Site subject to flooding use 1 ' 12.3 Adverse change in course of flow of flood waters 1 ` 3.2 Use of large quantities of ground water 1 12.4 Potential hazards from aircraft accidents 1 3.3 Wasteful use of ground water 1 12..5: Potential hazards from landfill and/or toxic waste 1 3.4 Pollution of surface or ground wafer supplies sites 1 3.5 Reduction in ground water recharge 13.0 AESTHETICS 4.0 PLANT LIFE 1 13.1 Obstruction to public or scenic vista or view . 1 4.1Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or 1 13.2 Creation of aesthetically offensive conditions. endangered species 1 13.3 Removal of street trees or other valuable 1 4.2 Reduction in acreage of agricultural crop vegetation 1 4.3b, Premature or unnecessary conversion of prime 1 13.4 Architectural incompatibility with surrounding area agricultural land 14.0 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL 5_0 ANIMAL LIFE 1 14.1 Removal of.historic building,disruption of 1 5.1 Reduction in the numbers of any rare, unique or archaeological site endangered species 1 14.2. Construction or activity incompatible with adjacent 1 5.2 Deterioration or displacement"of valuable wildlife habitat historic site 6_0 HUMAN HEALTH 15.0 ENERGY 1 15.1 Use of substantial amounts of energy or fuel 7_0 .NOISE 1 15.2 Substantial increase in demand upon existing 1 7.1 Increases in existing noise levels sources of energy 1 7.2 Exposure to high noise levels 1 15.3 Wasteful use of energy 8_0 LIGHT AND GLARE EXPLANATION OF RATINGS 1 " 8.1 Production of glare which will adversely affect residential areas "0" Insufficient Information 1 8.2 Exposure of residences to high levels of glare Insufficient information is available to determine the potential environmental effects which may result from the 9_0 LAND USE Proposed project in this category. 1 9.1 Incompatibility with adopted plans and policies "1" No significant 1 9.2 Acceleration of growth rate Environmental Effect 1 9.3. Induces unplanned growth The proposed project will not have an adverse 1 9.4 Adverse change in existing or planned area environmental effect in this category, or any such effect is characteristics not substantially unusual or of undesirable magnitude. This rating is also utilized in cases where the category is 10.0 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION not applicable to the particular project under consideration. 1 10.1 Generation of vehicle traffic sufficient to cause capacity „2" Moderate Environmental Effect deficiencies on existing street system ` 1 10.2 Cumulative increase in traffic on a major street for which The proposed project will have an adverse environmental capacity deficiencies are projected effect in this category, which is of sufficient magnitude to 1 10.3 Specific traffic hazard to motorists, bicyclists, be of specific concern. However, this effect is not pedestrians substantial enough in itself to require the preparation of an 1 10.4 Routing of non-residential traffic through residential area Environmental Impact Report, and is mitigable through 1 10.5 Insufficient or poorly located parking project changes and conditions. ' 1 10.6 Substantial increase in rail and/or air traffic "3" Significant Adverse Environmental Effect The environmental effect identified in this category substantiates in itself or contributes towards a finding that the proposed project has a potentially significant adverse -effect on the environment sufficient to require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report.