Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPM 2006-29 - Conditions of Approval - 11/20/2008 City of ICinICg-%\lw�, 17 F1111 :i�ri� Planning & Development Department 2600 Fresno Street •Third Floor Nick P. Yovino Fresno, California 93721-3604 Director (559) 621-8277 FAX (559) 498-1026 July 25, 2008 Please reply to: Will Tackett (559) 621-8063 Dale G. Mell & Associates 2090 North Winery Avenue Fresno, California 93703 SUBJECT: NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.2006-29 DATED MAY 02, 2008, PROPOSING A 7-LOT INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PARCEL MAP FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SOUTH ELM AVENUE BETWEEN EAST NORTH AND EAST ANNADALE AVENUES. (AP N[S]: 328-211-01) The City of Fresno Planning Division has completed its review of the subject parcel map dated May 02,2008. Pursuant to Section 12-1205 of the Fresno Municipal Code,this letter is written to advise you that the Conditions of Approval dated July 25, 2008, are as noted on the attached document. Appeal: The divider or any aggrieved person may file an appeal regarding to conditions of approval within fifteen (15) days from the date of approval. To protest the Director's decision regarding the conditions of approval, you must appeal by filing a written appeal with the Director of the Planning & Development Department. Appeal must include the appellant's interest in/or relationship to the subject property,the decision or action appealed, and specific reasons why the appellant believes the decision or action appealed should not be upheld. Appeals must be submitted to the Director of the Planning and Development Department prior to 5 p.m. on August 11, 2008. EXPIRATION: The approval or conditional approval of this tentative Parcel Map expires two years from the date of approval. The expiration shall terminate all proceedings and a final Parcel Map may not be filed without first processing a new Tentative Parcel Map. Modification of a Tentative Parcel Map after approval or conditional approval does not extend the two year time limit. EXTENSION: The divider may request an extension of the tentative map expiration date by filing a written application together with the fee set forth in the Master Fee Schedule at the time of the request with the Director of the Planning & Development Department at least thirty days before the expiration date of the map. The applicant must state the reasons for requesting the extension. New conditions may be imposed if an extension is granted. An extension may not exceed an aggregate of five years. Dale G. Mell &Associates Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-29 July 25, 2008 Page 2 If you wish additional information, please contact the City of Fresno, Planning and Development Department, Planning Division, 2600 Fresno Street, Fresno, California 93721-3604; phone, (559) 621-8277. Your inquiry should be directed to either Rick Sommerville(engineering or improvements issues) or Will Tackett (planning or zoning issues). Should you have any questions regarding the conditions you must notify either Rick Sommerville at (559) 621-8277 or Will Tackett at (559) 621-8063 by August 11, 2008, to request a review of the conditions. Otherwise,the stipulated conditions of approval are in effect as of that date. No further notice will be sent. Sincerely, PLANNI DIVISION Will T ckett, Planner III Plan i g and Development Department Enclosures: Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-29 dated May 02, 2008 Conditions of Approval dated July 25, 2008 City of lein PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: July, 2008 TO: NICK YOVINO, Director Planning and Development Department THROUGH: DARRELL UNRUH, Planning Manager Planning Division FROM: WILL TACKETT, Planner III Planning Division SUBJECT: REQUIRED FINDINGS AND APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2006- 29, WHICH PROPOSES TO CREATE A 7-LOT INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PARCEL MAP FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF SOUTH ELM AVENUE BETWEEN EAST NORTH AND EAST ANNADALE AVENUES. (APN[S]: 328-211-01) BACKGROUND Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-29 filed by Dale G. Mell&Associates, and accepted for processing on May 02, 2008, proposes to create a 7-lot industrial planned development parcel map for approximately 17.78 acres of property located on the east side of South Elm Avenue between East North and East Annadale Avenues. In addition to filing the parcel map the applicant has filed Site Plan Review Application No. S-07-205. Site Plan Review Application No. S-07-205 requests authorization to construct three new industrial buildings for office and warehousing uses on the subject property, which has already been developed with four existing industrial buildings. The newly proposed three buildings total an addition of approximately 170,223 square feet of building area to the subject property. The subject site is zoned M-1 (Light Manufacturing) zone district and is within the jurisdiction of the 2025 Fresno General Plan, Edison Community Plan,and the South Fresno Industrial Revitalization Area Redevelopment Plan. These plans designate the subject property for Light Industrial planned land uses. The existing M-1 (Light Manufacturing) zone district may be found to be consistent with the Light Industrial planned land use designation pursuant to Table 2 (Planned Land Use and Zone District Consistency Matrix) of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and applied to all community plans. It is noted that Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-29 is proposing to create parcels that deviate from the Design Standards of Article 10, Section 12-1011 given that not all of the proposed parcels abut a public street. However, pursuant to the same section of the subdivision ordinance, exceptions to this requirement may be made when adequate internal circulation is provided by a private street or streets in an approved planned development. Pursuant to Section 12-306-N-21, all otherwise required property development standards applicable to the proposed development standards applicable to the proposed development of a site, and to individual lots proposed to be created within such site, may be modified or waived provided the Director determines the proposed development conforms to the provisions of Subsection 21 and all Planning and Development Department Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-29 July Z 2008 Page 2 other applicable provisions of the code. Site Plan Review Application No. S-07-205 has been submitted for the subject property, which demonstrates vehicular access to proposed"landlocked" parcels and on-site vehicle circulation; including emergency and service vehicles. Staff will require that development of the subject property be in accordance with Site Plan Review Application No. S-07-205. This condition,as well other responding agencies conditions have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval dated July 7� 2008 for Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-29. REQUIRED FINDINGS An environmental assessment initial study was prepared for this project in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. This process included the distribution of requests for comment from other responsible or affected agencies and interested organizations. The initial study prepared for Environmental Assessment No. TPM-2006-29 considered potential environmental impacts associated with the tentative parcel map. The environmental assessment resulted in a Class 1 Categorical Exemption (Section 15301/Existing Facilities of the California Environmental Quality Act), filed on July , 2008 with the City Clerk. Staff determined that a Class 1 Categorical Exemption was appropriate given that the project does not propose an expansion of an existing use and involves a subdivision of existing industrial buildings, where no physical changes occur which are not otherwise exempt. STATE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT The Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66410 et. seq.) requires that a proposed parcel map not be approved unless the map,together with its design and improvement, is found to be consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan(Finding No. 1 below). State law further provides that the proposed parcel map be denied approval if any one of the Finding Nos. 2-5, below, is made in the negative. 1. The proposed parcel map,together with its design and improvements are consistent with the City's 2025 Fresno General Plan, Edison Community Plan, and the South Fresno Industrial Revitalization Area Redevelopment Plan; all of which designate the site for Light Industrial planned land uses which is consistent with the M-1 zone district as identified in Table 2 (Planned Land Use and Zone District Consistency Matrix)of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and applied to all community plans. 2. The site is physically suitable for the proposed development because of the flat terrain of the site and adequate access and drainage on and off the site. The Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District will require that the drainage from the site be provided through temporary service available through the existing private on-site system,which will divert drainage to the existing master plan facilities. 3. The proposed parcel map design and improvements are not likely to cause substantial and considerable damage to the natural environment, including fish,wildlife or their habitat. The site is located in an area that has been developed predominantly with industrial uses. The area does not and would not provide value for wildlife. Planning and Development Department Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-29 July 252008 Page 3 4. The proposed parcel map design and improvements are not likely to cause serious public health and safety problems, because the conditions of approval have shown and will insure that the subdivision conforms to City health and safety standards. 5. The proposed parcel map design will not conflict with pubic easements within or through the site because the conditions of approval will assure noninterference with any existing or proposed public easements. Staff, based on its own analysis, has determined that the parcel map, subject to the recommended conditions of approval, otherwise complies with the design and property development standards of the Zoning Ordinance and local Parcel Map Ordinance and recommends the approval of the parcel map. DIRECTOR DETERMINATION 1. Based upon the above analysis,the Planning and Development Director finds that Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-29 dated May 02, 2008, is consistent with the applicable plans and policies of the City of Fresno. 2. The Planning and Development Director hereby grants approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-29 dated May 02, 2008, subject to the conditions of approval. Nick Yov—in o, Date CITY OF FRESNO PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL JULY 25, 2008 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP No. 2006-29 "A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT" East side of South Elm Avenue between East North and East Annadale Avenues NOTICE TO PROJECT APPLICANT All tentative maps are subject to the applicable provisions of the State Subdivision Map Act(SMA), Fresno Municipal Code (FMC), City policies, and City of Fresno Standard Specifications. The following specific conditions are applicable to this tentative map. In accordance with the provisions of Government Code §66020(d)(1), the imposition of fees, dedications, reservations or exactions for this project are subject to protest by the project applicant at the time of approval or conditional approval of the development or within 90 days after the date of the imposition of the fees, dedications, reservations or exactions imposed on the development project. Upon conditional approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-29, a Planned Development, dated May 02, 2008, the subdivider may prepare a Final Parcel Map in accordance with the approved tentative map. Note that a final parcel map may not be filed until the appeal period has expired. Should an appeal be filed pursuant to Section 12-1207 of the FMC,the application will be scheduled to be heard before the City of Fresno Planning Commission. The appellant may withdraw their appeal pursuant to Section 12-1207.2 of the FMC. Concurrent with the filing of a final map and when the provisions of Section §66436 of the SMA apply, the subdivider is responsible to send, by certified mail, a sketch of the proposed final map, together with a copy of Section §66436(a)(3)(A) of the SMA,to any public entity or public utility which has previously acquired a right-of-way easement. LEGAL STATUS OF SITE TO BE SUBDIVIDED 1. The parcel map site is situated in the City of Fresno, County of Fresno, State of California, and was legally created as: The north half of Lots 137 and 138 of Fresno Colony, according to the Map thereof recorded August 1, 1881, in Book 2 Page 8 of Plats, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County. Excepting Therefrom that portion of Lot 138 as deeded to the State of California by deed recorded October 19, 1966 in Book 5368 Page 516 as Document No. 74784 and being described as follows: Conditions of Approval Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-29 July 25, 2008 Page 2 That portion of the north half of said Lot 138 and that portion of the north half of the north half of Lot 139, both in Fresno Colony, as per Map recorded in Book 2 of Plats at Page 8, Fresno County Records, described as follows: Commencing for reference at the southwest corner of Section 22, Township 14 South, Range 20 East, Mt. Diablo Base and Meridian, said southwest corner being at coordinates Y=495 684.30 feet and x=1 768 436.10 feet; Thence (1), along the south line of said section S. 89041'49"E., 1324.35 feet to the southerly prolongation of the east line of said Lot 138; Thence (2), along said southerly prolongation and said east line, N. 0023'18" E., 663.57 feet to the southeast corner of the N. half of said Lot 138, said southeast corner of being the True Point of Beginning; Thence (3), along the south line of the north half of said Lot 138, N. 89°41'54" W., 94.86 feet; Thence (4), N. 5021'59" E., 666.17 feet to the north line of said Lot 138; Thence (5), along said north line and the north line of said Lot 139, S. 89042'00" E., 700.27 feet to the east line of said Lot 139; Thence (6), along last said east line, S. 0029'26" W., 331.79 feet to the south line of the north half of said Lot 139; Thence (7), along last said south line, N. 89049'57" W., 662.05 feet to first said east line; Thence (8), along first said east line, S. 0029'18" W., 331.79 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Also Excepting Therefrom that portion of Lot 137 of Fresno Colony, as per Map recorded August 1, 1881, in Book 2 of Plats at Page 8, Fresno County Records,described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of said lot; Thence (1), along the west line of said lot, South 0°28'47"West,648.44 feet to the south line of the north half of said lot; Thence (2), along said south line, south 89042'01" East, 12.00 feet; Thence (3), along the east line of the west 12 feet of said lot, North 0°28'47" East, 647.78 feet; Thence (4), North 1054'43" East, 0.66 of a foot to the north line of said lot; Thence (5), along said north line, North 89042'09"West, 12.02 feet to the Point of Beginning, Conditions of Approval Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-29 July 25, 2008 Page 3 as granted to the State of California by Deed recorded December 5, 1972 in Book 6100 Page 302 of Official Records as Document No. 09054. Also, Excepting Therefrom that portion of the north half of Lot 138 of Fresno Colony according to the Map thereof filed in Book 2, Page 8 of Plats, in the Office of the Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of the land described in a Deed to the State of California, recorded October 19, 1966 in Book 5368, Page 516, of Official Records of said County,said southwest corner being on the south line of the north half of said Lot, distant along said south line, North 89°41'54" West, 94.85 feet from the southeast corner of the north half of said lot; Thence (1), along the westerly line of said land, North 05021'59" East, 666.12 feet to the north line of said lot; Thence (2), along said north line, North 89042'01" West, 2018.00 feet; Thence (3), South 05°51'44" West, 299.61 feet; Thence (4), South 04054'53" West 366.51 feet to said south line; Thence (5), along said south line, South 89041'54" East, 19.88 feet to the Point of Beginning. As granted to the State of California by Deed recorded April 11, 1996 as Document No. 96046515. APN: 328-211-01 PLAN CONSISTENCY 2. The subject site is located within the jurisdiction of the 2025 Fresno General Plan, Edison Community Plan, and South Fresno Industrial Revitalization Redevelopment Plan. These plans designate the subject property for development with Light Industrial planned land uses. Pursuant to Table 2 (Planned Land Use and Zone District Consistency Matrix)of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and applied within all community plans the existing M-1 (Light Manufacturing) zone district is consistent with the Light Industrial planned land use designation for the subject property. ZONING 3. Comply with the provisions of the State of California Government Code Sections §66410 - §66499.58 of the SMA and the City FMC Chapter 12, Article 10 (Subdivision of Real Property). 4. Comply with all of the conditions of approval of Site Plan Review Application No. S-07-205. Conditions of Approval Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-29 July 25, 2008 Page 4 MODIFICATIONS TO PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 5. Proposed Parcels "A" through "G," inclusive, of Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-29 are consistent with the existing M-1 (Light Manufacturing) zone district subject to approval of a special permit for a planned development project. • NOTE: In accordance with Section 12-1011(6) every lot shall abut on a public street, except where adequate internal circulation is provided by a private street or streets in an approved planned unit development. a) All parcels must provide access to a public street right-of-way under a planned development special permit. i) Site Plan Review Application No. S-07-205 shall be approved prior to recordation of the Parcel Map and shall include the property lines as proposed pursuant to Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-29, dated May 02, 2008, thereby authorizing the creation of the industrial planned development. 6. Whenever a subdivision, includes area under common ownership and/or use, the use, maintenance, and operation thereof shall be administered by an owner's association regulated by covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&R's). a) Submit draft copies of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions/Owners Association documents (CC&R's)for review and approval. Final,executed and notarized documents shall be recorded with the parcel map. CC&R's are intended to satisfy and secure the enforceability of properties'obligations for retention and maintenance of access, utilities, facilities, and improvements; and, shall, at a minimum, address the following: i) Cross Access for ingress/egress and emergency access to buildings ii) Cross Drainage iii) Shared Parking iv) Shared solid waste facilities v) Maintenance of sewer, water and all other utilities vi) Maintenance of all landscaping within the limits of the participating properties vii) Maintenance and retention of fire suppression systems and underground water supplies, if applicable. viii) Design and development standards for a unified development • NOTE: Any amendment by the association to the above provisions or any other provision specifying any right of the City shall require the prior written consent of the City. GENERAL CONDITIONS 7. Any existing and/or proposed structure(s) on the site maybe affected due to the location of the proposed parcel lines. The placement of a parcel line in close proximity to any existing Conditions of Approval Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-29 July 25, 2008 Page 5 and/or proposed structure(s) requires that the structure(s) be found in compliance with the fire resistive standards of the Uniformed Building Code, Chapter 5. a) Compliance with the prevailing Uniform Building Code as it relates to exterior wall protection, allowable area, etc. (as applicable to new parcel line locations) must be demonstrated prior to recordation of the Parcel Map. Contact the Planning and Development Department, Building and Safety Services Division at (559) 621-8200. • NOTE: In the event the structures do not comply they must be modified so as to meet the requirement. 8. All off-site and public improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the Public Works Department Standards, Specifications and Policies. Engineered construction plans and estimates for all or part of the required work shall be required prior to the issuance of Street Work Permits unless otherwise determined by the City Engineer. The cost for such plan preparation, review and construction inspection shall be at the subdivider's expense. 9. Any existing utilities, including but not limited to, street lights, traffic signals, fire hydrants, poles (power, telephone, cable, etc.), which must be relocated or removed in conjunction with the construction of these off-site improvement requirements, shall be the responsibility and at the expense of the subdivider. 10. All existing overhead utilities, including but not limited to, electrical systems,communication systems and street lighting systems shall be placed underground in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-1011 and Resolution No. 78-522/88-229, and the policies of the Public Works Department. 11. When street/safety lighting installations are required, street lighting plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the Traffic Engineer prior to the issuance of permits for the work. Services to street lighting installations shall be separated from the electrical service(s) serving the development. The type, location and service for street lighting installations shall be as determined by the Traffic Engineer. Street lighting installations shall be dedicated to the City upon completion and acceptance of the installations. 12. Sidewalks (including wheelchair ramp landings) and driveway approaches,for undeveloped parcels of this parcel map,shall be required and constructed at the time of site development. a) Curb ramps are required at all corners within the limits of this parcel map. 13. Whenever covenants or agreements are required, they shall be prepared by the city upon receipt of the fee in accordance with the adopted Master Fee Schedule. All covenants and agreements must be approved by the City Attorney's Office and shall be recorded with the final parcel map. 14. Telephone, cable, and other public utilities which propose above-ground facilities (such as cabinets) determined by the Planning and Development Director to be oversized shall be located in an additional easement area outside of the required landscape strip. Conditions of Approval Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-29 July 25, 2008 Page 6 15. All work and engineered plans for public improvements shall conform to the 2002 Edition of the City of Fresno Standard Specifications and Drawings(City Council Resolution No.70-36 and Resolution Nos. 84-361) and any amendments thereto, hereinafter referred to as the Public Works Standards. 16. The subdivider shall dedicate and construct public easements to facilitate the construction of curbs, gutters, sidewalks with street tree wells and irrigation systems (when applicable), permanent pavement, street/safety lighting, bus bays, right turn lanes, bike lanes, bike paths, multi-purpose trail,wheelchair ramps and public utilities in accordance with City plans, ordinances, resolutions and policies, and the Standard Specifications of the Public Works Department within the limits of the parcel map. 17. Existing improvements that are not to the planned alignment shall be removed and required improvements installed to the new street alignment and grade. Existing improvements to remain in place shall be repaired if determined to be damaged and/or off grade by the City Engineer. Existing driveway approaches not identified for current or future utilization shall be removed and sidewalk(when applicable),curb and gutter shall be installed to match existing or proposed street line and grade as determined by the City Engineer. 18. A minimum four foot wide clear path of travel is required along the public sidewalk on all frontages of the property as required by Title 24 of the California Administration Code as determined by the City Engineer. An on-site pedestrian easement and construction of a path may be required if Title 24 provisions cannot be met within the public rights-of-way. All such public easements shall be identified and dedicated with the processing and recordation of the Final Parcel Map and/or at the time of Special Permit review for the proposed development of the parcel(s). 19. All required signing and striping shall be installed and paid for by the developer/owner. The signing and striping plans shall comply with the current Caltrans standards and shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval as a part of the street improvement plans for this tentative map. 20. Additional off-site improvements will be required at the time of future site plan review. 21. The subdivider may either construct or install the required improvements,when required;or, enter into a bonded secured agreement with the City of Fresno providing for the construction of the required improvements and sufficient security prior to the approval of the final parcel map. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS STREETS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY 22. Comply with all of the requirements and conditions of the Public Works Department, Engineering Division memorandum dated June 06, 2008. Conditions of Approval Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-29 July 25, 2008 Page 7 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE Sanitary Sewer Requirements: The nearest sanitary sewer main to serve the proposed project is a 12-inch sanitary sewer main located in South Elm Avenue. Sanitary sewer facilities will be available to provide service to the site subject to the following requirements: 23. On-site sanitary sewer facilities shall be private. 24. Separate sewer house branches are required for each lot. 25. Comply with all of the requirements of the Department of Public Utilities, Planning and Engineering memorandum dated May 21, 2008. Sanitary Sewer Fees: 26. The following Sewer Connection Charges are due and shall be paid for the Project: a) Sewer Lateral Charge b) Oversize Sewer Charge c) Trunk Sewer Charge WATER SERVICE The following conditions are required to provide water service to the development: 27. Separate water services with meters shall be provided to each parcel. 28. Seal and abandon existing on-site well(s) in compliance with the State of California Well Standards, Bulletin 74-90 or current revisions issued by California Department of Water Resources and City of Fresno standards. 29. Two independent sources of water, meeting Federal and State Drinking Water Act Standards,are required to serve the development including any subsequent phases thereof. The two-source requirement may be accomplished through a combination of water main extensions, construction of supply wells, or other acceptable sources of water supply approved by the Water Systems Manager. 30. All public water facilities shall be constructed in accordance with Public Works Department Standards, specifications, and policies. 31. Comply with all of the requirements of the Department of Public Utilities, Water Division memorandum dated May 27, 2008. Conditions of Approval Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-29 July 25, 2008 Page 8 FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT (FMFCD) 32. The subdivider shall be required to comply with all of the specific requirements imposed by the FMFCD for the subdivision or any amendments or modifications to those requirements, which may be granted by the FMFCD Board of Directors, pursuant to Section 13-1307 of the FMC. These requirements are identified in the attached District's letter to the Planning and Development Department dated June 06, 2008. FIRE PREVENTION 33. Comply with all of the requirements of the attached Fresno Fire Department memorandum dated May 20, 2008. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) 34. Attached for the applicant's records and consideration is the Caltrans memorandum dated May 22, 2008. • NOTE: The proposed planned development's proportional share for improving the State Route 41 undercrossing at East North Avenue has been conditioned upon Site Plan Review Application No. S-07-205 and shall be due prior to development on the subject property. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS-SPECIAL DISTRICTS/PROJECTS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY 35. Attached for the applicant's records and consideration is the memorandum from the Department of Public Works, Parks Supervisor dated May 22, 2008. DEVELOPMENT FEES AND CHARGES This project is subject to the following development fees and charges: Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District FEE/ RATE Metropolitan Flood Control District Fee $0.00 SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES FEE RATE a. Lateral Sewer Charge* $0.10/sq. ft. (to 100' depth) b. Oversize Charge* $0.05/sq. ft. (to 100' depth) c. Trunk Sewer Charge N/A Service Area: d. Wastewater Facilities Charge S.T.E.P. Conditions of Approval Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-29 July 25, 2008 Page 9 e. Fowler Trunk Sewer Interim Fee Surety^ N/A f. House Branch Sewer Charger N/A WATER CONNECTION CHARGES FEE RATE g. Service Connection Charge Fee based on service(s) and meter(s) sizes specified by owner; fee for service(s) and Meter(s) established by the Master Fee Schedule. h. Frontage Charge► $6.50/lineal foot i. Transmission Grid Main Charge* $643/gross acre (parcels 5 gross acres or more) j. Transmission Grid Main Bond $243.00/gross acre Debt Service Charge * (parcels 5 gross acres or more) k. UGM Water Supply Feer N/A Service Area: I. Well Head Treatment Feer N/A Service Area: m. Recharge Feer N/A Service Area: n. 1994 Bond Debt Service► N/A Service Area: CITYWIDE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FEE RATE o. Fire Facilities Impact Feet Industrial $150.00/1000 sq. ft. t p. Park Facility Impact Feet N/A q. Quimby Parkland Dedication Feer N/A r. Citywide Locally Significant Street Charge+ Industrial $2,541.00/adj. acre Conditions of Approval Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-29 July 25, 2008 Page 10 s. New Growth Area Major Street Charge+ N/A t. Police Facilities Impact Fee$ Industrial $422.00/1000 sq. ft t u. Traffic Signal Charge* $45.98/ADT t Notes: Living Unit Equivalents are calculated by multiplying the number of Net Acres by 5.8 Living Unit Equivalents for commercial or 3.0 Living Unit Equivalents for industrial to arrive at the total number of Living Unit Equivalents. ♦ Upon occupancy of the project,the subdivider shall pay the appropriate sewer facility charge pursuant to the Simple Tiered Equity Program (STEP) as determined by the Department of Public Utilities, Wastewater Division, Environmental Services Section (559-621-5153). -16 Due at time of development * Deferrable through Fee Deferral Covenant. Due at time of subdivision. $ Due at occupancy. t Building areas to be calculated to the nearest square foot. Traffic Signal Fee is subject to review and conditions of approval from Transportation Planning through the entitlement review process based on Average Daily Trips of the proposed project. City of ff DATE: June 6, 2008 TO: Will Tackett, Planner III Development Department, Planning Division, Current Planning THROUGH: Louise Gilio, Traffic Planning Supervisor Public Works Department, Engineering Divisio FROM: Ann Lillie, Senior Engineering Technician Public Works Department, Engineering Division SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 2006-29, Public Works Conditions of Approval Location: Elm Avenue: between North and Annadale Owner: Firoz K. Husen/Timothy Mitchell STREET IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS The Public Works Department, Traffic Planning Section, has completed its review and the following requirements are to be placed on this tentative map as a condition of approval by the Public Works Department. Construct or install the required improvements, or contact Gary Witzel at (559) 621-8725 to enter into a bonded secured agreement for these improvements. This must be executed prior to perfection of this parcel map. General Conditions • Repair or replace all existing damaged and/or off-grade offsite concrete improvements as determined by the City of Fresno Public Works Department, Construction Management Division, (559) 621-5500. • Submittal of engineered construction plans to the Planning and Development Department for approval must be made prior to the final map. • All required signing and striping shall be installed and paid for by the developer/owner. The signing and striping plans shall comply with the current Caltrans standards and be submitted as a part of the street improvement plans. • Additional offsite improvements will be required at the time of future site plan review. • Curb ramps are required at all corners within the limits of this parcel map. • Underground all existing offsite overhead utilities with the limits of this map in accordance with Fresno Municipal Code Section 12-1011 and Resolution No. 78-522/88-229. Traffic Impact Study A Traffic Impact Study is not required Page 1 of 1 PM 2006-29 2949 South Elm Avenue City of ITIMIELn ir DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES Date: May 21, 2008 To: WILL TACKETT, Planner III Planning and Development Department From: ROBERT A. DIAZ, Senior Engineering Technician Department of Public Utilities, Planning and Engineering Subject: SANITARY SEWER REQUIREMENTS FOR PM-2006-29 General Vesting Tentative PM-2006-29 proposes approximately 17.78 acres of property located on the east side of South Elm Avenue between East North and East Annadale Avenues. Environmental Recommendations A NEGATIVE DECLARATION MAY BE ISSUED: The project may have adverse impacts but impacts can be mitigated without further study or are not serious enough to warrant an Environment Impact Report. Sanitary Sewer Requirements The nearest sanitary sewer mains to serve the proposed project are a 12-inch sewer main located in South Elm Avenue. Sanitary sewer facilities are available to provide service to the site subject to the following requirements: 1. On-site sanitary sewer facilities shall be private. 2. Separate sewer house branches are required for each new lot create. Sanitary Sewer Fees The following Sewer Connection Charges are due and shall be paid for the Project: 1. Sewer Lateral Charge 2. Oversize Sewer Charge 3. Trunk Sewer Charge City of on oen L ff-WIL=7- ZX2 a VA®a WA TER DIVISION Date: May 27, 2008 To: DOUG HECKER, Supervising Engineering Technician Department of Public Utilities, Administration From: MICHAEL CARBAJAL, Supervising Engineering Technician Department of Public Utilities, Water Division Subject: WATER REQUIREMENTS FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2006-29 The following conditions are required to provide water service to the development. 1. Separate water services with meters shall be provided to each parcel. 2. Seal and abandon existing on-site well(s) in compliance with the State of California Well Standards, Bulletin 74-90 or current revisions issued by California Department of Water Resources and City of Fresno standards. 3. Two independent sources of water, meeting Federal and State Drinking Water Act Standards, are required to serve the development including any subsequent phases thereof. The two-source requirement may be accomplished through a combination of water main extensions, construction of supply wells, or other acceptable sources of water supply approved by the Water Systems Manager. 4. All public water facilities shall be constructed in accordance with Public Works Department standards, specifications, and policies. TAPRO,IM\MEC\Conditions of Approval\PM 2006-29 052708.doc File No. 210.411 FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS PUBLIC AGENCY DEVELOPER Eq Mr. Gil Haro, Planning Manager Tim Mitchell Planning & Development Department 8615 Elder Creek Rd. Suite 100 City of Fresno Sacramento, CA. 95828 2600 Fresno Street - Fresno, CA 93721 MAP NO. 2006-029 PRELIMINARY FEE(S) (See below) DRAINAGE AREA(S) " KK AV DRAINAGE AREA It KK $0.00 DATE (Q (o Q� DRAINAGE AREA " AV $0.00 TOTAL FEE $0.00 The proposed development will generate storm runoff which produces potentially significant environmental impacts and which must-be properly discharged and mitigated pursuant to the - California Environmental Quality Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. The O District in cooperation with the City and County has developed and adopted the Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan. Compliance with and implementation of this Master Plan by this development project will satisfy the drainage related CEQAJNEPA impact of the project mitigation requirements. The proposed development shall pay drainage fees pursuant to the Drainage Fee Ordinance prior to approval of the final map at the rates in effect at the time of such approval. The fee O indicated above is based on the tentative map. Contact the FMFCD project engineer prior to approval of the final map for the fee. o ;Considerations which.may affeq the fee.obligation s) or the,,timing or,form of fee payment: _ Fees related to undeveloped or phased portions of the project may be.deferrable� b) Fees may be calculated based on the actual percentage of runoff if different than that typical for the zone district under which the development is being undertaken and if permanent provisions are made to assure that the site remains in that configuration. c) Master Plan storm drainage facilities may be constructed, or required to be constructed in lieu of paying fees. d) The actual cost incurred in constructing Master Plan drainage system facilities is credited against the drainage fee obligation. 2006-029.s1s 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document . FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 2 of 4 e) When the actual costs incurred in constructing Master Plan facilities exceeds the drainage fee obligation, reimbursement will be made for the excess costs from future fees collected by the District from other development. Approval of this development shall be conditioned upon compliance with these District Requirements. 1. a. Drainage from the site shall be directed to X b. Grading and drainage patterns shall be as identified on Exhibit No. 1 -4-42 C. The grading and drainage patterns shown on the site plan conform to the adopted Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan. 2. The proposed development shall construct and/or dedicate Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan facilities located within the development or necessitated by any off-site improvements required by the approving agency: Developer shall construct facilities as shown on Exhibit No. 1 as "Master Plan Facilities to be constructed by Developer". X None required. 3. The following final improvement plans shall be submitted to the District for review prior to final development approval: X Grading Plan Storm Drain Plan Final Map Street Plan Water& Sewer Plan Other 4. Availability of drainage facilities: a. Permanent drainage service is available provided the developer can verify to the satisfaction of the City of Fresno that runoff can be safely conveyed to the MasterPlan inlet(s). - b_; -�:Me-construction offacilities-required by Paragraph No. 2 hereof will provide.permanent;.drainage service X c. Permanent drainage service will not be available. The District recommends temporary facilities until permanent service is available. Temporary service is available through the existing on-site system d. See Exhibit No. 2. 5. The proposed development: Appears to be located within a 100 year flood prone area as designated on the latest Flood Insurance Rate Maps available to the District, necessitating appropriate floodplain management action. (See attached Floodplain Policy.) 2006-029.xis 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 3 of 4 Appears to be located within a 500 year flood prone area as designated on the latest Flood Insurance Rate Maps available to the District. X Does not appear to be located within a flood prone area. 6. The subject site contains a portion of a canal or pipeline that is used to manage recharge, storm water, and/or flood flows. The existing capacity must be preserved as part of site development. Additionally, site development may not interfere with the ability to operate and maintain the canal or pipeline. 7. The Federal Clean Water Act and the State General Permits for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Industrial Activities (State General Permits) require developers of construction projects disturbing one or more acres, and discharges associated with industrial activity not otherwise exempt from National Pollutant Discharge Elimination.System (NPDES) permitting, to implement controls to reduce pollutants., prohibit the discharge of waters other than storm water to the municipal storm drain system, and meet water quality standards. These requirements apply both to pollutants generated during construction, and to those which O may be generated by operations at the development after construction. ■ a. State General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activities, approved August 1999, (modified December 2002.) A State General Construction Permit is required for all clearing, grading, and disturbances to the ground that result in soil disturbance of at least one acre (or less than one acre if part of a O larger common plan of development or sale). Permittees are required to: submit a O Notice of Intent to be covered and must pay a permit fee to the State Water Resources Control Board (State Board), develop and implement a storm water pollution .prevention plan, eliminate non-storm water discharges, conduct routine site inspections, train employees in Permit compliance, and complete an annual _ certification of compliance. - O b:- State General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities, April, 1997 (available at the District Office.) A State General Industrial Permit is required for specific types of industries described in the NPDES regulations or by Standard Industrial Classification(SIC) code. The following categories of industries _ are generally required to secure an industrial permit: manufacturing; trucking, recycling; and waste and hazardous waste management. Specific exemptions exist for manufacturing activities which occur entirely indoors. Permittees are required to: submit a Notice of Intent to be covered and must pay a permit fee to the State Water Resources Control Board, develop and implement a storm water pollution prevention plan, eliminate non-storm water discharges, conduct routine site inspections, train employees in permit compliance, sample storm water runoff and test it for pollutant indicators, and annually submit a report to the State Board. 2006-029.xis 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS Page 4 of 4 C. The proposed development is encouraged to select and implement storm water quality controls recommended in the Fresno-Clovis Storm Water Quality Management Construction and Post-Construction Guidelines (available at the District Office) to meet the requirements of the State General Permits, eliminate the potential for non- storm water to enter the municipal storm drain system, and where possible minimize contact with materials which may contaminate storm water runoff. 8. A requirement of the District may be appealed by filing a written notice of appeal with the Secretary of the District within ten days of the date of this Notice of Requirements. 9. The District reserves the right to modify, reduce or add to these requirements, or revise fees, as necessary to accommodate changes made in the proposed development by the developer or requirements made by other agencies. 10. -X See Exhibit No. 2 for additional comments, recommendations and requirements.. erald E. Lakeman, Project ngineer: Gary Chapman District Engineer C: Dale G. Mell & Associates 2090 N. Winery Ave Fresno, CA. 93703 2006-029.xis 5469 E.OLIVE - FRESNO,CA 93727 - (559)456-3292 - FAX(559)456-3194 Two sided document NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS SCHEMATIC, " "KK" 24, DISTANCES ARE APPROXIMATE. I ---,AV's--- -------- � V III PARCEL a PARCEL PARCEL Y w II A B I "Div Ui 1 I N I � II PARCEL "KK" 1101 "AV., 3i �- I W l Q PARCEL I PARCEL I PARCEL I I I „F„ ' „G„ „E„ I Q W = '-- ------- ----- -- x n I cu v. - 24" I 36" 36" I IM i w TPM 2006-029 o-36" I I I � I I � I I I I I I I i I I � I I I I I ❑ NORTH AVE. I EXEMP- -— 48" --—— _48' 42" — 42" 36' — 24" I. ,.AV" EXEMP LEGEND ® Existing 25'Wide Storm Drainage Easement — — Existing Master Plan Facilities ®— Future Master Plan Facilities ---- Private Facilities D Existing Master Plan Outfall — Direction Of Drainage SCALE 1"=200' __ _ Inlet Boundary TPM 2006-029 Drainage Area Boundary DRAINAGE AREAS: EXHIBIT N0. 1 1=27 "KK"&"AV" FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT DRAWN BY: MDHW DATE: 11290 K WulocadOWGSIOE%HIBITIGITYPM0006-029- .dwg REVISED BY: — DATE: — • OTHER REQUIREMENTS EXHIBIT NO. 2 There is an existing twenty-five (25') wide storm drain easement along the south property line as shown on Exhibit No. 1. No encroachments into the easement shall be permitted including, but not limited to, foundations, roof overhangs, swimming pools, and trees. The following paragraphs only apply towards development of the individual parcels and are not conditions for the recording of the map. In an effort to improve storm water runoff quality, outdoor storage areas shall be constructed and maintained such that material which generates contaminants will not be conveyed by runoff into the storm drain system. The District encourages, but does not require that roof drains from non-residential development be constructed such that they are directed onto and through a landscaped grassy swale area to filter out pollutants from roof runoff. Runoff from areas where industrial activities, product, or merchandise come into contact with and may contaminate storm water must be directed through landscaped areas or otherwise treated before discharging it off-site or into a storm drain. Roofs covering such areas are recommended.,Cleaning of such areas by sweeping instead of washing is to be required unless such wash water can be directed to the sanitary sewer system. Storm drains receiving untreated runoff from such areas that directly connect to the District's system will not be permitted. Loading docks, depressed areas, and areas servicing or fueling vehicles are specifically subject to these requirements. The District's policy governing said industrial site NPDES program requirements are attached. Development No. TPM 2006-029 engr\perm it\exh i bit2\city-tpm\2006\2006-029(gc) vt E S �O Randy R. Bruegman Fire Chief Bureau of Fire Prevention and Investigative Services 450 M Street Fresno, California 93721-3083 j R (559) 621-4000 FAX (559)498-4323 www.fresno.gov DATE: May 20, 2008 TO: Will Tackett, Planner III Planning and Development Department FROM: Rick Fultz, Senior Fire Prevention Inspector Fire Department SUBJECT: 2949 S Elm, Proposed Tentative Parcel Map 2006-29 The Fire Department has completed a review of the Proposed Tentative Parcel Map 2006-29. The following requirements and conditions are to be placed on this Pre App tentative tract map as a condition of approval by the Fire Department. General Requirements: This project is within 2 miles of Fresno City Fire Station No. 7. Provide a covenant for shared fire fighting access and water supply throughout the site. Other site access and hydrant issues will be addressed on Site Plan or CUP review. "To protect and serve and to put service above all else." WATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS.TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWA RZENEGGER Govemor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1352 WEST OLIVE AVENUE d P. O. BOX 12616 FRESNO,CA 93778-2616 �� n PHONE (559)488-4347 ��// i �;� Flex your power! FAX (559)488-4088 Be energy efficient! TTY (559)488-4066 May 22, 2008 ant Dept 0ll-Y OF F,-,�SNO 213 1-IGR/CEQA 6-FRE-41-20.1 TPM 2006-29 (S-07-205) BUZZ OATES Mr. Will Tackett City of Fresno Development Department 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721 Dear Mr. Tackett: Caltrans has reviewed the parcel map for the parcel adjacent to State Route (SR) 41,just North of East North Avenue. We previously reviewed a site plan for the three tilt-up shell buildings at this same location. We have the following comments: When reviewing the site plan, we made comments on this project's impacts to the SR 41/North Avenue interchange. Given the nature and size of the proposed development, we estimated that this site would generate 78 trips during the morning and evening peak travel periods. We projected that approximately 75% of the generated trips (58 trips) would utilize SR 41 in order to travel to and from the proposed development. We also projected that 75% of the 58 freeway trips would be traveling to and from the region located north of the interchange (43 trips north, 15 trips south). The remaining 20 trips would be distributed equally to the north, south, east, and west along Elm and North Avenues. A need for two additional through lanes at the SR 41 Undercrossing at North Avenue has previously been identified. In addition to these through lanes at this interchange, the signals at the northbound and southbound ramp intersections will need to be modified. A review of the current ramp volumes does not indicate that any of the ramps would need to be widened in the next twenty years. The total estimated cost for all of these improvements is therefore $1,500,000. The calculated cost-per-trip was determined to be $534. We assumed, based on the information provided with the site plan that the more significant demand from this development would occur during the evening peak travel period and that the directional distribution of the proposed development would be 25% entering and 75% exiting. Based on this distribution, we projected that 4 trips would impact the SR 41 northbound off-ramp, 11 trips would impact the southbound on-ramp, 11 trips the southbound off-ramp, and 32 trips the northbound on-ramp. The trips impacting the northbound on and off-ramps (4 and 32) would also impact the SR 41 Undercrossing at North Avenue. An additional 5 trips utilizing North Avenue would impact the Undercrossing. This results in a total of 41 trips generated by the proposed development that would impact the undercrossing. Therefore, the proposed development's proportional share for improving the "Caltrans improves mobility across California" Mr. Will Tackett May 22, 2008 Page 2 undercrossing is estimated to be $21,900 (City formula). We previously requested that the site plan be conditioned to mitigate in this amount. If you have any questions, please call me at (559) 488-4347. Sincerely, QS D ZaL-J�—, JOANNE STRIEBICH Office of Transportation Planning District 6 C: Mr. Scott Mozier, City of Fresno Public Works Department Mr. Bryan Jones, City of Fresno Public Works Department Ms Barbara Goodwin, Council of Fresno County Governments "Caltrans improves mobility across California" DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TO: Will Tackett, Planner III Planning Department FROM: Hilary Kimber,Parks Supervisor II (559.621.8794) Public Works,Engineering Division DATE: May 22, 2008 SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 2006-29 The Department of Public Works offers the following comments regarding TPM 2006-29 2909 S. Elm Avenue,dated May 1, 2008: 1. This project will require the planting of eleven (11) street trees South Elm Avenue. This requirement is currently waived since this requirement has already been met with the required eleven tree wells and planted trees. If any of these street trees dies,please replace as necessary.