HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution - City Council - 73-015 - 1973-01-04RESOLUTION NO. 73-15
A RESOJ .. UTION OF THE COUNCIL OF T!-IE eel' 'l OJ-' Vi{ '~:~NO
[>110'1' EWCJN0 ji;XEGUTJON OF LAND CONSERVATION CONTRAct'
uy cou;~TY OPf"iU'BNO U~!DL!( vn r.f.JAt-AS0f-! ftC~'
. HESO.LVJi;J), hy the Council of the City of Fresno, California,
that
1. The City of Fresno hereby prote;.;;ta the execution h/ Fresno
C(Junty, undor the provisions of the Williamson Act, specifically Governrnent
Code Secti.ons 51240, et seq. J of the hereinaHc.r-duHignated bnrl conservation
cont:rad covering the: ptl1'cBl of land hereinafter described, which contract
includes land within one mile of the exterior boundaries of the City of }'l·(}.!JnO.
2. It is the irltenL of Hw City of Fresno in prot.esting said contract to
preserve its option to succeed or not succeed to the right·s) duties .. and POWel'.s
of Fxesno County thereunder upon the annexation of any land included in said
contract, all as contemplated and provided for under the provisions oIsaid
Williamson Act. Said conh-ad covers land within one Inile of existing City
boundal'ies which may be annexed) and· the Council finds tl1at :it is publicly
dCB:irablc th().t the future use and control of s ,id landJ in the event of such ..
annexation, be under the total ju~risdidibn o[ the City) wHh full r5ght to
cictcrmirl£l Ow advisahiJity of succession to said contract. Protesting said
contract should not be construed to mean that the GUy of' Frof;11o docs ]lot
favor the retention of the subject property in agr icultural uses or that
property pwnCl'S be denied property lax incentives under the provisions of
the Williamson Act. Should the· suhj cct property he located within the area
des:ignatcd as Agricultnral Open Space by the City of Fresno General Plan,
which is now being revised, the City of FTesno may honor said colltract upon
annexation. 'ifd
3. For the reasons state~ in Paragrapb 2~ the Council .1'C!que~t6 Lhe
Local Agency Formation Commission to uphold and approve this protest~
... ~.
"4-
PASSED._ ................... ··,,··~-~
EfFECT IVE ••••••••••• _ ••••• P.···· ~ ~
4. '1'hl: City CleTk is directed to file forthwith a duly 12(:l'tifiod copy
(;f thin l'elH)[\I!icJl1 with the Local AgencyF'orn,ation Cot1l1uission of Fre:;no
5. The contrad ,.:hich is protested herein is designated in IGxhibit
CLERK'S CERTIFICATION
STATE OF CA.JAFORNIA
COUNTY OJ:'F1U~SNO 55.
CIT Y OF FRESNO
l~ JACQUELINE L. RYl .. E, City Clerk of the City of Fresno,
certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Council of the
City of Fresno., California, at a regular meeting held on the ht.h
day of January ,1972.
JACQUJ-::LINE L. RYIJE
City Clerk
-2··
EXH! Hrf ".i\" -----
LAND (~ONgEl{ VATIOI·.r c()rfL~!~.(7~:.
CONTRACT NO.: 5661
RECORD OWNER(H) (as last known to Council):
. '" ; ~ .',' ~ ~.
Zenel:J E. David and Mayme R.
4322 South Walnut
F rel-moJ California 937{)b
EXH1BIT "A"