Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-12-12 Council Agenda Item 11:15 AM CCoy a " REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL December 12, 2006 FROM: BRUCE A. RUDD, Assistant City Manager City Manager's Office THROUGH: NICK P. YOVINO, Direct Planning and Developm apartment BY: MICHAEL SIGALA, Manage Housing and Community De opment Divis SUBJECT: RECOMMEND CITY COUNCIL ADOPT RE: NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE TRAI ACQUISITION OF APPROXIMATELY 5.5 A LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF KING PEACH AVENUES FOR THE PROJECT, Al DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DIRECTOI AND RELATED DOCUMENTS ON BEHALF KEY RESULT AREA One Fresno RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council take the following actic 1. Adopt attached Resolution (Exhibit A) adopting the Cal Mitigated Negative Declaration identified as EA-06-38 F 2. Approve the $275,000 HOME funded acquisition of apr located on the south side of Kings Canyon Road betwe housing and transit development project; and 3. Authorize the Planning and Development Department [ Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property (Ex to the acquisition transaction, subject to review of the C EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City is proposing to acquire a vacant 5.5-acre parcel coca between Willow and Peach Avenues. The site is owned by was declared surplus property by FUSD in July of 2005. T Development ("Transit Village") that will include a multimoc affordable senior housing and town homes, and public ape represents the appraised value of $650,000 less a credit to th estate exchange with the City. The property will be purchases Program funds. AGENDA ITEM NO.: COUNCIL MEETING: December 12, 2006 APPROVED BY DEPARTMENT DIRECTO �4� CITY MANAGER ion iOLUTION ADOPTING THE CEQA MITIGATED VSIT VILLAGE PROJECT, APPROVE CRES OF VACANT REAL PROPERTY S CANYON ROAD BETWEEN WILLOW AND dD AUTHORIZE THE PLANNING AND :1 TO EXECUTE ACQUISITION AGREEMENTS OF THE CITY ins: ifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) ►repared for the Transit Village Project; and )roximately 5.5 acres of vacant real property an Willow and Peach Avenues for a future )irector to execute, on behalf of the City, the hibit B) and other related documents pertaining :ity Attorney as to form. led on the south side of Kings Canyon Road the Fresno Unified School District (FUSD) and he City intends to create a Transit Oriented lal bus transit hub, residential uses such as n space. The $275,000 purchase price e City of $375,000 from FUSD for a previous real J with Home Investment Partnerships (HOME) REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Transit Village Land Acquisition December 12, 2006 Page 2 KEY OBJECTIVE BALANCE Approval to acquire the approximately 5.5 acre parcel presents an opportunity to make a positive impact to the Customer Satisfaction, Employee Satisfaction, and Financial Management Key Objectives. Purchase of the site impacts the Customer Service aspect by demonstrating the City's commitment to strengthening linkages between transit use and housing. The purchase also attributes to Employee Satisfaction by recognizing and supporting inter -departmental efforts that help to achieve goals of the City's General Plan. In addition, it demonstrates creative and resourceful Financial Management by encouraging the practice of leveraging City resources. BACKGROUND City department staff from Planning and Development, Transportation/FAX, and Public Works have been in discussions with the Fresno Unified School District (FUSD) for approximately two years to purchase the subject vacant parcel. The property was declared surplus by FUSD in July of 2005. The site is the location of the former Elks Lodge and is adjacent to Greenburg Elementary School, The City intends to develop a portion of the site into a multimodal bus transit hub, similar to the facility located along Blackstone Avenue, fronting Manchester Mall. Other uses for the site include affordable senior housing, town homes and public open space. A preliminary site plan is shown in Exhibit C. The Department of Transportation/FAX estimates that there is a potential for five routes to service the area with the ability to accommodate up to eight buses for possible future expansion. The Planning and Development Department is proposing senior affordable housing and town homes for its portion of the site. The recommended action is for the acquisition of the parcel only. Staff will return to Council at a later date with additional agreements and funding commitments to develop the site. The City has conducted its due diligence of the site including a Phase One assessment, National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) review, California Environmental Policy Act (CEQA) review, an archeological survey, and other related assessments. During the course of the environmental reviews, the historic significance of the palm trees along Kings Canyon Road was addressed and presented at the December 12, 2005 Historic Preservation Commission meeting, From this meeting, and from staff communications with the State Historic Preservation Office, it has been determined that the 27 Washingtonia palm trees along Kings Canyon Road did not appear to be individually eligible for the National Register, but did appear to meet the threshold for treatment as historical resources for the purposes of CEQA. Hence, as the project plans are implemented, the City will follow the CEQA environmental assessment for appropriate treatment of historic resources on the project site. A General Plan Amendment and Rezone Application has been submitted to the Planning Division. A CEQA Mitigated Negative Declaration, Environmental Assessment (EA-06-03) dated November 17, 2006, was completed by the Housing and Community Development Division for acquisition of the parcel and Transit Village Project. The NEPA, completed on March 20, 2006, was determined to have a Finding of No Significant Impact. The Transit Village project will therefore not result in a significant impact on the quality of the human environment. The Interagency Housing Task Force considered and recommended approval of this item on January 18, 2006. REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL Transit Village Land Acquisition December 12, 2006 Page 3 HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION The Housing and Community Development Commission considered and recommended approval of this item on February 8, 2006, FISCAL IMPACT HOME Program funds for the proposed purchase is included in the Planning and Development Department's 2006-07 Fiscal Year Budget. APPENDICES Exhibit A — Resolution/CEQA document Exhibit B — Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property Exhibit C — Site Plan N YIM SIC NAI 12/ 12/06 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF FRESNO CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. EA-06-38, A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR ACQUISTION OF A 5.5 ACRE SITE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE TRANSIT VILLAGE PROJECT LOCATED SOUTH OF KINGS CANYON ROAD BETWEEN WILLOW AND PEACH AVENUES WHEREAS: A. The City of Fresno, a political subdivision of the State of California wishes to acquire a 5.5 acre parcel located on the south side of Kings Canyon between Willow and Peach Avenues for the purpose of developing the Transit Village Project; and B. The City will acquire the property site for a purchase price of $275,000, which represents the appraised value of $650,000 less a credit to the City of $375,000 from FUSD for a previous real estate exchange with the City; and C. The Transit Village Project consists of a multi -modal bus transit hub, residential use such as affordable senior housing, town homes, and public open space. D. Pursuit to provision of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and Fresno Municipal Code Chapter 12 Article 5, a public notice of proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration EA-06-38, was published as a public notice in the Fresno Bee, a newspaper of general circulation, filed with the City Clerk, and posted with the Fresno County Clerk's office on November 21, 2006; and E. The comment period for the CEQA Mitigated Negative Declaration environment assessment No. EA-06-38 ended on December 11, 2006; and F. Any comments received pertaining to this federal under taking was reviewed under the National Environmental Protection Policy ("NEPA") environmental assessment No. H-2005-01 with a Finding of No Significant Impact ("FONSI"); and G. Any additional comments received pertaining to the CEQA Mitigated Negative Declaration environmental assessment No. EA-06-38 will be reviewed and amended as needed during the General Plan amendment and rezone application process for the Transit Village Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FRESNO BASED UPON REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT PROVIDED: 1. The City of Fresno finds in accordance with its own independent judgment that based on the Mitigated Negative Declaration measures there is no substantial evidence in the record that the Transit Village Project may have a significant adverse effect on the environment caused by the project. 2. The City of Fresno has considered and hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration environmental assessment No. EA-06-38 together with this EXHIBIT A A A A A A i A A# A i CLERK'S CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF FRESNO ) ss. CITY OF FRESNO ) I, REBECCA E. KLISCH, City Clerk of the City of Fresno, certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the Council of the City of Fresno. California, at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of 2006. AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: REBECA E, KLISCH City Clerk By: Deputy APPROVED AS TO FORM: James C. Sanchez City Attorney By Dep'ry/✓ Environmental Assessment No, EA-06-38 Filed by the City of Fresno Planning and Development Department Housing and Community Development Division CITY OF FRESNO MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Initial Study is on file in the Planning and Environmental Development Department, City Hall Assessment Number: 2600 Fresno Street, Fresno, California 93721 EA-06-38 (559) 621-8277 APPLICANT: Assessor's Parcel Housing and Community Development Division Numbers: Planning and Development Department Oty of Fresno 472-021-01 T 2600 Fresno Street, Room 3076 Fresno, CA 93721-3605 2Pt�f, &1n`. 17 AN 10: 08 :ITS' CFFPIK. FRFSN[` r PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION: The project is located on an Filed with: approximately 5.5-acre site comprising vacant property south of East Kings Canyon REBECCA E. KLISCH, City Road and Eat of South Adler Avenue between Willow and Peach Avenues in Clerk Fresno, California. The proposed project includes the construction of, at a 2nd Floor - City Hall maximum, 100 units for rent or sale, available to the elderly, disabled, low-income 2600 Fresno Street SInLIC families and non -subsidized housing. The complex will provide Fresno, California 93721-3603 approximately 15,000 square feet of common space (library, gathering space, small kitchen and game room) and possibly an open recreation area. The 5.5-acre parcel Will be split into two parcels with the smaller parcel being purchased by the Fresno Area Transit (FAX) for its multi-niodal transit hub. The transit hub will provide public bus transportation service with special routes for senior citizens. The devrlopinent as described above constitutes the maxiinun7 extent of the proposed proiect. The proposed project has been evaluated with respect to each item on the attached environmental checklist. This completed checklist reflects comments of any applicable responsible agencies and research and analysis conducted to examine the interrelationship between the proposed project and the physical environment. The information contained in the Environmental Assessment Application, the checklist, and any attachments to the checklist, combine to form a record indicating that an initial study has been completed in compliance with the State CEQA Guidelines and the California Environmental Quality Act. Any rating of "2" on the checklist indicates that a specific adverse environmental effect has been identified in a category which is of sufficient magnitude to be of concern. Such an effect may be inherent in the nature and magnitude of the project or may be related to the design and characteristics of the individual project. Effects rated in this manner are not sufficient in themselves to require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and/or have been mitigated to the extent feasible. All new development activity and many non-physical projects contribute directly or indirectly toward a cumulative impact on the physical environment. The incremental effect contributed by this project toward such a cumulative effect is not considered substantial in itself, The proposed project is not expected to result in any significant adverse effects in terms of the factors considered on the environmental checklist, including any such factors for which minor effects have been identified. Cumulative effects of a significant nature are also not expected. The proposed project will not result in any adverse effects which fall within the "Mandatory Findings of Significance" contained in Section 15065 of the State CEQA Guidelines. The finding is therefore made that the proposed project will clearly not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. This Mitigated Negative Declaration will be deemed final and effective if no appeal is filed in the manner specified by Section 12-505 of the Fresno Municipal Code. INITIAL STUDY PREPARED BY: SUB TTED BY: Krazan and Associates Art Farkas r i ha i ligal I nni Manager PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: November 17, 2006 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION TRANSIT VILLAGE HOUSING AND TRANSIT HUB PROJECT SOUTH OF EAST KINGS CANYON ROAD AND EAST OF SOUTH ADLER AVENUE FRESNO, CALIFORNIA Project No. 014-06085 November 16, 2006 Prepared for: Ms. Corrina Nunez City of Fresno Planning and Development Dcpartrnent Housing and Community Development Division 2600 Fresno Street, Room 3076 Fresno, California 93721 (559) 621-8506 Prepared by: Krazan & Associates, liic, 215 West Dakota Clovis, California 93612 (559) 348-2200 Kxazw-i. ASSOCIATES, INC. SITE DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS TABLE OF CONTENTS Project No. 014-06085 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF STUDY..........................................................................I 2.0 DETERIIILNAT10N....................................................................................................................I 3.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND......................................................................................................3 3.1 Project Title...................................................................................................................................3 3.2 Project Location............................................................................................................................3 3.3 Lead Agency and Contact.............................................................................................................3 3.4 Project Proponent..........................................................................................................................3 3.5 Assessor's Parcel Numbers..........................................................................................................3 3.6 General Plan Designation and Zoning..........................................................................................3 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT.................................................................................................3 4.1 Project Location and Current Conditions.....................................................................................3 4.2 Project Design ...............................................................................................................................4 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST.........................................................................................5 5.1 AESTI-IETICS...............................................................................................................................5 5.2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES................................................................................................8 5.3 AIR QUALITY.................................................................................................I..........................19 5.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES....................................................................................................16 5.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES.......................................................................................................19 5.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS............................................................................................................22 5.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.......................................................................25 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY................................................................................27 5.9 LAND USE ........................................ .........31 5.10 MINERAL RESOURCES..........................................................................................................33 5.11 NOISE.......................................................................................34 5.12 POPULATION AND HOUSING...............................................................................................39 5.13 PUBLIC SERVICES...................................................................................................................40 5.14 RECREATION .......................... ....42 5.15 TRANSPORTATION..... , ........................................................................................................... 43 5.16 UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS.................................................................................53 5,17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE....................................................................56 CHECKLIST INFOR-INIATION SOURCES AND REFERENCES .................... .........................57 LLMITATIONS.........................................................................................................................................ng App-ev icel Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Krazan R Associates, Inc., August 10, 2006 ..............................A Historic Property Survev, Jon L. Brady, M.A., J & R Environmental Services, June 2, 2005 B Historic Property Sun-ey, Jon L. Brady, t%1A, J Lk R Environmental Services, August 28, 2005.............. C Environmental Assessment for HUD -Funded Proposals, No. H-2005-01, Rebecca Fraser, Consulting Plan-ner, March 20, 2006.............................................................................................................................. D Acoustical Analysis, Brown-Buntin Associates, Inc., September 12, 2006.................. I ....... ...,................... E Draft Traf is Impact Analysis, TMM Transportation Consultants, October 27, 2006.................................F r0--- rr... L-L & ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECI- LAICAL ENGINEERI -LAG + ENviRorJNErVTAL ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION TESTING & INSPECTION November 16, 2006 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL, QUALITY ACT (CEQA) INITIAL STUDY Project No. 014-06085 TRANSIT VILLAGE HOUSING AND TRANSIT HUB PROJECT SOUTH OF EAST KINGS CANYON ROAD AND EAST OF SOUTH ADLER AVENUE FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF STUDY This Initial Study (IS) of environmental conditions is being prepared to conform to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (California Code of Regulations §15000 et, seq.) for the City of Fresno, California, The IS evaluates the potential environmental impacts that might reasonably be anticipated to result from the development of the referenced project. This IS is intended to provide the City of Fresno and the general public with the relevant information needed in order to assess potential environmental impacts related to the proposed project. The environmental factors evaluated herein include the following: • Aesthetics • Biological Resources • Hazards & Ha7ardous Materials • Mineral Resources • Public Services • Utilities / Service Systems 2.0 DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: • Agriculture Resources • Cultural Resources • Hydrology / Water Quality_ • Noise • Recreation • Mandatory Findings of Significance • Air Quality • Geology / Soils • Land Use / Planning • Population / Housing • Transportation / Traffic ❑ I find that the proposed project COLTLD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. © I find that the although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or a -reed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATIOti will be: prepared. 21* Vest Dakota Avenue • Clovis, California 93612 • (559) 348-2200 • FAX (559) 348-2201 With Offices Serving the Western United States 9i='+, 1x5 CEQ.% 1S Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 2 ❑ I find that the proposed project may have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect l) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL MPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standard, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required, Si-nat Signature Date Date Arthur C. Farkas, RE No. 07818 Kxazan & Associates, c. Preparer KRAZAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Hlth Offices Serving the Western United Stales 114!"d.xc (-i_QA Is Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 3 3.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND 3.1 Project Title Transit Village housing and transit hub project. 3.2 Project Location The project is located on an approximately 5.5-acre site comprising vacant properly south of East Kings Canyon Road and East of South Adler Avenue between Willow and Peach Avenues in Fresno, California. 3.3 Lead Agency and Contact Ms. Corr -Ina Nunez, Project Manager City of Fresno Planning and Development Department Housing and Community Development Division 2600 Fresno Street, Room 3076 Fresno, California 93721 (559) 621-8506 3.4 Project Proponent City of Fresno Planning and Development Department Housing and Community Development Division 3.5 Assessor's Parcel Number 472-02 l -O 1 T 3.6 General Plan Designation and Zoning General Plan Designation: Medium Density Multiple Family Residential Zoning: Medium Density Multiple Family Residential (R-3) 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT 4.1 Project Location and Current Conditions The 5.5-acre vacant site is south of East Kings Canyon Road and East of South Adler Avenue in Fresno, California. The site is surrounded by multi -family houses and vacant land on the north (zoned C-2), Gettysburg Elementary School on the south (zoned R-3/BA-15), multi -family apartments on the east (zoned R-3BA-15) and vacant land and apartments on the west (zoned R-A/BA-15), The current zoning of the vacant subject site parcel is R-3 and the 2025 Fresno General Plan has designated the area as medium density multiple family residential. KRAZrVti & ASSOCIATES, ENC. With Offices Serving the lCestern United Slates W.-I ;k:)"S (-FQ,% IS Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 4 4.2 Project Design The proposed project includes the construction of, at a rnaxirnurn, 100 units for rent or sale, available to the elderly, disabled, low-income single families and rron-subsidized housing. The complex will provide approximately 15,000 square feet of common space (library, gathering space, small kitchen and Same room) and possibly an open recreation area. The 5.5-acre parcel will be split into two parcels with the smaller parcel being purchased by the Fresno Area Transit (FAX) for its multi -modal transit hub. The transit hub will provide public bus transportation service with special routes for senior citizens. The development as described above constitutes the maximum extent of the proposed project. KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. With Offices Serving the Western United Stares 111 4:,rw,45 rr.Qn IS Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 5 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST This section describes the existing environmental conditions on and near the subject site, as well as potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed project. The envirorunental checklist, as recommended in the CEQA Guidelines, is used to identify environmental impacts that could occur if the proposed project is implemented. The right-hand column in the checklist lists the source(s) for the answer to each question. The sources cited are identified at the end of the checklist. This section identifies the impacts which might result from the proposed project, explains the answers to checklist questions, and addresses mitigation measures that are proposed to reduce or avoid significant impacts. 5.1 AESTHETICS Discussion of Findings The present use of the site is vacant land. The project proposes construction of a 100-unit housing apartment complex and transit hub. The proposed project will be surrounded by multi-faniily residential housing, Gettysburg Elementary School and vacant land. There are no scenic vistas or scenic resources along a designated scenic highway that would be affected by this project, according to the April 1992 City of Fresno Development Department Roosevelt Community Plan Update. Circulation Plan. According to the 1-Iistoric Preservation section of a March 20, 2006 Environmerrtal:Issessineprt Jor HUD- fiinded Proposals by Rebecca Fraser, Consulting Plarmer, on December 27, 2004, Karana Hattersley- Drayrton, Historic Preservation Specialist, City of Fresno, reviewed the project and commented that an Archaeological Survey would need to be completed for the proposed project. A i. Archaeological Survey was completed for the proposed project on April 9. 2005 by Jon L, Brady. During the suney, the surface was checked for any signs of possible cultural activities. No prehistoric of historic cultural materials were identified during the pedestrian survey. The results of the subject were negative. The proposed project will have "No Effect" on any potentially significant historic properties. A Historic Property Survey was completed for the proposed project by Jon L. Brady on June 2, 2005 and revised August 28, 2005. The Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the current archaeological and architectural survey includes the subject property, adjacent property to the west and the palm trees in the City of'Fresno Right of Way fronting the parcel. The 27 Washingtonia palm trees within the project APE were recorded into the California Historical Resource Information System (see Historic Property Survey) due to their age, but determined not to meet the Section 106 definition of a historic property; this property was also determined riot eligible for listing in the California Register of Historic Resources or the City of Fresno Local Register of Historic Resources. In light of these research results. a finding of "No Historic Properties Affected" is recommended for this undertaking, pursuant 36 CFR 800.4 (d) (1). No further cultural investigation is recommended for the undertaking unless project plans are altered to include areas not covered by this study. It has been suggested that some of the trees he removed to allow both construction equipment and later Fresno Transit buses to safely access the proposed project area_ The author observed that the present access off Kings Canyon Road is approximately 150 feet wide. This would appear to be more than enough room for future access. Jon Brady strongly urged that ttie palm trees riot be removed. But in the KRAZAIN & ASSOCIATES, tNC. 10ith Offices Serving the Western United States ui ,:; CR)A is Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 6 event that trees must be removed, he recommends the trees be used as in -fill perhaps along Minnewawa Avenue south of Kings Canyon Road, The Historic Study was reviewed by Sunnyside Property Owners Association and they disagreed with Jon Brady's findings regarding the historicity of the 27 Washingtonia palm trees. City staff reviewed both the Historic. Property Survey, the letter form the Sutmyside Homeowners and additional comparative studies and presented recommendations to the Historic Preservation Commission at a noticed public hearing held on December 12, 2005. Ahcr additional testimony the commission adopted a resolution supporting the staff recommendation that the 27 Wash,ingtonia palm trees did not appear to be individually eligible for the National Register of Historic Places but did appear to niect the threshold for treatment as historical resources for the purposes of the California Envirmunental Quality Act. On December 14, 2005, a letter was sent to the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) requesting concurrence on the adequacy of the APE, that the level of studies were completed satisfactorily and that the undertaking as proposed will have no effect on historic properties, As of' the date of this Initial Study, no response was received from SHPO within the 30-day comment period. It was therefore concluded that the State Historic Preservation Office had no comment The City of Fresno has satisfactorily completed all actions and responsibilities under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. However, according to a November 6, 2006 email correspondence from Karana Hattersley-Drayton, "A mitigated neg dec would have to include provisions to avoid removing, or damaging the palm bees." No further cultural resources investigation is recommended for undertaking of the proposed project. AF,STi_IF..Ttt iVilTlCi tiCli� I iFASLJRF. Provisions should be made to avoid removing or damaging the Washingtonia palm trees on Kings Canyon Boulevard. Environmental Checklist AESTHETICS Potentially Potentially Impact Less Dian Significant With "tiiigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No[mpact Infomiation Source(s) Will the project: 1) Have a substantial adverse effect on a ❑ ❑ ❑ C scenic vista? 2) Substantially damage scenic resources, ❑ < ❑ ❑ 13,D includin-, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? 3) Substantially degrade the existing visual El El }' ElC character or quality of the site and its surroundings? 4) Create a new source of substantial light ❑ ❑ Q ❑ C. or glare which will adversely affect clay or ni ghttinte views in the area? KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. With Offices Serv-ing the Western United Stares Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 7 The project will be in compliance with the City's outdoor lighting shielding conditions. Implementation of the project will not introduce substantial new sources of light or glare to the project area. Conclusion The proposed project will not degrade the existing visual character or duality of the site and its surroundings. Therefore, the project will have a less than significant adverse aesthetic impact. (Less Than Significant Impact) KiUkZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. i3'ith Offices Servin,; the Western United States ;,e4110%% ('1-.Q,\ IS Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 8 5.2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES Discussion of Findings The proposed project is located in the Roosevelt Community Plan Area, surrounded by sinle-family houses, multi -family residential housing and vacant land. According to the 2025 Fresno General Plan and Master Environmental Impact Report #10130 (November 2002) under Loss of Productive Agricultural Resources, the proposed parcel is not under a Williamson Act Contract and, based upon the April 10, 2006 site reconnaissance of the subject site, is currently not utilized for agriculture. The proposed Site is planted for residential use. There will be no impact to farmland. Environmental Checklist AGRICULTUR.,kL, RESOURCES Potentially Significant Impact Loss man Significant wish Mitigation lricoTorafion Less Than Significant Impact No Impact lnformalion Source(s) Will the project: 1) Convert Prime Familand, unique ❑ ❑ ❑ X C Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farnland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Famtland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the Califonna Resources Agency, to non- agricultural uses? 2) Conflict with existing zoning f'or ❑ ❑ ❑ X C agricultural use, or a Williamson. Act contract! 3) fsivolve other changes in the existing ❑ ❑ X ❑ C environment, which, date to their location or nature, could result in conversion of familand, to non-agricultural use? Conclusion The project will have no adverse impact on agricultural land or agricultural activities, (Less Than Significant Impact) IiRAZA,N & ASSOCIATES, INC. With Offices Serving the If"estern united Stares Project No. 014-06085 Page No, 9 5.3 AIR QUALITY Discussion of Findings According to an April 18, 2006 lever from Debbie Johnson, Air Quality Specialist, Central Region with the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution control district (SJVAPCD) in response to a request for jurisdictional review and comments on the proposed Transit Village project, the SJVAPCD (District) has previously commented on this project to Becky Fraser for City of Fresno Housing Department: EA H- 2005-01, sent February 8, 2005. In conjunction with the referenced comments, the March 20, 2006 Environmental flssessmenl for HUD -funded Proposals by Rebecca Fraser, Consulting Planner, presented the following information in the Air Quality section: As a result of the San Joaquin Valley's climate and topography, the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin (SJVAB) is predisposed to poor air quality. High mountain ranges surrounding the Valley frequently create air layer inversions that prevent mixing of air masses. The number of sunny days and high temperatures in the suaimer favor the formation of ozone. In the winter, inversions form that often trap particulate matter. The project will contribute to the overall decline in air quality due to increased traffic and ongoing operational emissions. Although the project along would not gencratc significant air emissions, the increase in emissions from the project and others like it, cumulatively reduce the air quality in the San Joaquin Valley. The proposed construction of I00 rental and for -sale units for the elderly, disabled, low-income single -families, and non -subsidized housing would be mitigated to a level of less than significant. The federal Clean Air Act, as amended, directed the U,S. EPA to establish air quality standards for several air pollutants. Primary standards relate to the protection of the public's health and safety; secondary standards relate to the protection of the public from non -health effects. The air pollutants for which primary standards have been set are: • Carbon monoxide (CO) is an odorless gas that is highly toxic, CO is formed by the incomplete combustion of fuels. • Ozone (03) is formed by a complex series of chemical reactions between reactive organic gases (ROG), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), and sunli-hi. • Suspended particulate matter that is less than 10 microns in size (PNIIJ, riven its small size, can remain airborne for long periods and can be inhaled, pass through the respiratory system, and lodge into the lungs. • Fine particulate matter that is 2.5 microns or less (PM25) is similar to PMra, but smaller. It generally derives from combustion sources, • Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is a precursor to the formation of ozone, It results from combustion of fossil fuels. • Sulfur dioxide (S02) is formed by the combustion of fuels containing sulfur. • Lead (Pb) was a factor when leaded gasoline was available. Under the California Air Quality Act, the State also adopted primary and secondary standards for air pollutants. Geographic areas and air basins are classified for each pollutant as either "attainment" or "nonattainment." Areas designated as "nonattainment" are subject to further review and the imposition of pollutant control strategies. The nonattaintncat dcsignation is further subdivided into five cate-ories: man -final, moderate, serious, severe, and extreme. The KRALAN & ASSOCIATES, I.NC. With Offices Serving the ; Veslern United States n140"Sc EQA t5 Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 10 degree of an area's nonattainment status is affected by the extent of the pollution and the expected time period required achieving attainment. With respect to the Fresno area, the SJVAB has been classified as nonattain-ment for ozone and PM,(,. CO was recently reclassified from nonattainment to attainment by the U.S, EPA. In response to the SJVAB's nonattainrnent status for ozone and PMi,), the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) adopted air quality attainment plans as required by State and federal guidelines. The new attainment plans include more stringent permitting requirements and a greater level of control on stationary emissions within the District. Failure to implement the control measures may result in a loss of federal fi-nding for highways and may require sanctions on stationary sources. The Valley is subject to the most stringent requirements in the California Clean Air Act. These requirements include providing for a 5% per year reduction in nonattainrnent emissions, or including "every feasible measure" in the Air Quality Attainment Plan; establishing a permitting program that achieves a no-nct- increase in stationary source emission; developing strategies to reduce vehicle trips and miles traveled; increasing average vehicle rider ship to 1.5 persons during commute: hours; reducing population exposure to non -attainment pollutants by 25%,, establishing best available retrofit control technology requirements for permitted sources; and developing indirect and area source programs. As stated in the current Air Quality Attainment Plan, it is SJVAPCD's strategy to implement multiple tactics or control measures. These measures are, in turn, implemented through the extensive collection of District rules, regulations and permitting requirements established by the SJVAPCD, The SJVAPCD reviewed the proposed project and it does not appear that this project alone will results in any significant adverse air quality impacts, Construction of the project will contribute to short-term impacts on air quality in the form of increased dues and particulate matter, However, these impacts are local in nature and will cease upon completion of the project. The construction phase of the project will be subject to SJVAPCD Regulation VIII, Rule8020, related to control of dust and I'M,O. Continued growth in the Fresno metropolitan area and the region will contribute additional air pollutants from mobile, stationary, and area sources, thereby making it more difficult for the Air Basin to meet federal and state air quality standards thereby delaying compliance. The 2025 Fresno General Plan contains objective and policies to moderate effects on air quality. The General Plan calls for an increase in densities on certain parcels, mixed land uses, and a refoeus on existing neighborhoods. These policies wort: to reduce dependence on the private automobile use and to reduce vehicle miles traveled. The proposed project is consistent with these objective. In addition, the General Plan requires the City to implement all of the Reasonably Available Control Measures (RACM) identified in Exhibit A of Resolution No. 2002-119, adopted by the Fresno City Council on April 9, 2002. Although these measures will result in positive air quality effects, they may not offset effects caused by increased population. The following items are required rules adopted by the SJVAPCD to reduce emissions throughout the San Joaquin Valley and will apply to the project: Kxr--%ZAN & ASSOUATFS, INC, With Offices Serving the Western United States Project No. 014-06085 Page No. I 1 I. Regulate installation of both wood burning devices and natural gas -fired water heaters to limit the emissions of PIMI, and oxides of nitrogen (District Rule 4901 and Rule 4902). 2. Reduce Pivt}o emissions generated by human activity, including construction, road building, bulk materials storage, landfill operations, etc. (District Regulation VIII-Fugitive Dust Rules). 3. Regulate source operation that emits or May emit air contaminants or other materials (District Rule 4102). 4. Limit volatile organic compounds from architectural coatings (District Rule 4601). 5. Regulate paving operation by cutback, slow cure and emulsified asphalt, paving and maintenance operations (District Rule 4641). Mitigation The SIVAPCD encourages innovation in measures to reduce air quality impacts. There are a number of measures that could be incorporation into the design/operation of this project to provide additional reductions of the overall level of emissions. Listed below are several measures that should be implemented in the construction of the Youth Center. 1. Located trees on southern and western exposures to shade the building during hot summer months. Deciduous trees should be considered since they provide shade in the summer and allow the sun to reach the facility during the winder months. 2. Lnstall sidewalks and bikeways adjacent to the site and connect the sidewalks and bikeways to any nearby existing and planned open space areas, parks, schools, residential areas, and commercial areas to encourage walking and bicycling. 3.Include as many energy -conserving, features as possible in the desitn+construction of the new project. Examples include "green building," technology; increased wall and ceiling insulation (beyond building code requirements); energy efficient lighting; awning or other outside shading mechanism for windows; ceiling fans, orient the units to maximize passive -solar cooling and heating when practicable; and electrical outlets installed around the exterior of the buildings to encourage use of electric landscape maintenance equipment. 4. Include as many clean alternative energy features as possible to promote energy self-sufficiency. Examples include (but are not limited to): photovoltaic cells, solar thermal electricity systems, small wind turbines, etc. 5. Require construction equipment used at the project site to be equipped with catalysts/particulate traps to reduce particulate and NOx emissions. At the time bids are made, contractors must demonstrate the construction equipment uses is equipped with particulate filters andior KRtUAA & ASSOCIATES, INC. frith Offices Serving [lie Western United States Project No. 014-06085 Page No, 12 catalysts or prove why it is infeasible to have constriction equipments so equipped. 6. Use alternative fuel construction equipment if feasible. Replace fossil -fueled equipment with electrically driven equivalents (provided they are not nun via portable generator). Curtail construction during periods of high ambient pollutant concentrations. This may include ceasing construction during peak - hour vehicular traffic on adjacent roadways, and "Spare the Air Days" declared by the District. 9• Require that all diesel engines on the premises be shut off when not in use to reduce emissions from idlinu. Significance After Mitigation After implementation of the mitigation measures, impacts to air quality as a result of the project will be less significant. It is expected, however, that regional impacts will remain significant and unavoidable. In this regard, the City of Fresno adopted findings of significant unavoidable impacts and overriding considerations for air quality when certifying the Master FIR for the 2025 Fresno General Plan. The April 18, 2006 S.IVAPCD letter stated that the District offers the following comments in addition to previous comments: District rules and regulations are periodically updated. Bascd on the information provided, the proposed project will also be subject to tire following District rules, The foliowing items are rules that have been adopted by the District to reduce emissions throughout the San Joaquin Valley, and are required. This project may be subject to additional District Rules not enumerated below, To identify additional rules or regulations that apply to this project, or for further information, the applicant is strongly encouraged to contact the District's Small Business Assistance Office at (559) 230-5988. Current District rules can be found at http:!/www.vlleair.or;lntles+'lrulelti_1�im Regulation VM (Fugitive PM 10 Prohibitions) Rules 801 1-8081 are designed to reduce PIN110 emissions (predominantly dust/dirt) generated by human activity, including construction and demolition activities, road construction, bulk materials storage, paved and unpaved roads, carryout and trackout, landfill operations, etc. If a residential site is 1.0 to less than 10.0 acres, an ownerloperator must provide written notification to the District at least 48 hours prior to his./her intent to begin any eartlunoving activities as specified in Section 6.4.1 of [rule S021. A template of the District's Construction Notification Form is available at: The District's compliance assistance bulletin for construction sites can be found at: f�tlp�//«ru�v.yaJ+trir_irg.1h��sirL cor 1_l_0 ° 2fl�r'171%' AB ,.p.f Rule 4002 (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants) In the event that any portion of an existing building will be renovated, partially demolished or removed. KRAZAN R ASSOCIATES, INC. With Offices Serving the ;J"estern United Stares illlrL.�Cf�f�llh 1\ Project No. 014-06085 Page No. l 3 the project will be subject to District Rule 4002. Prior to any demolition activity, an asbestos survey of existing, structures on the project site may be required to identify the presence of any asbestos containing building material (ACBIVI). Any identified ACBM having the potential for disturbance must be removed by a certified asbestos contractor in accordance with CAL -OSHA requirements. If you have any questions concermn(I asbestos related requirements, please contact Mr. Brian Dobbs of this office at (559) 230- 5962, Ms. Jan Sudornier at (209) 557-6422, N1r. Sherman Yount at (661) 326-6933 or contact CAL -OSHA at (559) 454-1295. The District's Asbestos Requirements Bulletin can be found at http:JJval lava ir.orWbusinSconip yiashestosbultn.htrn. Rule 4103 (Open Burning) This rule regulates the use of open burmug and specified the types of materials that may be open burned. Agricultural material shall not be burned when the land use is converting from &4riculturc to non-agricultural purposes commercial, industrial, uistitutional, or residential uses), Section 5.1 of this rule prohibits the burning of trees and other vegetative (non-agricultural) material whericver the land is being developed for non-agricultural purposes. In the event that the project applicant burned or burns agricultural material, it would be in violation of Rule 4103 and be subject to District enforcement action, Rule 9510 (Indirect Source Review) This rule requires the applicants of certain development projects to submit an application to the District when applying for the development's last discretionary approval. The rule requires developers to mitigate emissions at the project site, to the extent feasible, and to pay a mitigation fee to the District for a percentage of the remaining emissions. The ISR rule becomes effective March 1, 2006. Projects that have not received a final discretionary approval by Nlarch 1, 2006 must submit an ISR application by March 31, 2006. The District encourages innovation ui measures to reduce air quality impacts. There are a number of features that could be incorporated into the design/operation of this project to provide additional reductions of the overall level of emissions. (Note: Some of the measures may already exist as City development standards. Any measure selected should be implemented to the fullest extent possible.) The updated suggestions listed below should not be considered all-inclusive and remain options that the agency with the land - use authority should consider for incorporation into the project. • Construction activity mitigation measures include; - Limit area subject to excavation, grading, and other construction activity at any one time. - Limit the hours of operation of heavy duty cquipment andlor the amount of equipment in use. - Replace fossil -fueled equipment with electrically driven equivalents (provided they are not run via a portable generator set). Apply idling time limits or require that all diesel engines be shut off when not in site on the premises to reduce emissions from idling. - Curtail construction during periods of high ambient pollutant concentrations; this may include ceasing of construction activity durin(T the peak -hour of' vehicular traffic on adjacent roadways, and "Spare the Air Days" declared by the District. Implement activity Manaaemen[ (e.g, rescheduling activIities to reduce short -terns impacts. KRaZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. With Offices Serving the: IVesterrr United Stares 01446M5 CEQA N Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 14 - During the smog season (May through October), lengthen the construction period to minimize the number of vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. Off road trucks should be equipped with on -road engines when possible. Minimize obstruction of traffic on adjacent roadways. • Construction equipment may be powered by diesel engines fueled by alternative diesel fuel blends or Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel (USLD), The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has verified specific alternative diesel fuel blends for NOs and PNI emission reduction. Only fuels that have been certified by CARB should be used, Information on biodiesel can be found on CARB's website at http:/iwww.arb.ca.eovlfuelslaltdiesel,'altdiesel.htm and the EPA`s websitc at http:'/,A,w%v.coa.gov/oms/mr)delsibiodsLhtm. The applicant should also use CARB certified alternative fueled engines in construction equipment where practicable, Alternative fueled equipment may be powered by Compressed Natural Gas (CNG), Liquid Propane Gas (LPG), electric motors, or other CARD certified off -road technologies. To find engines certified by the CAR-13, see their certification website http:J-%mw.arh.ca.tnv'ms roar'ot'froadlcert/cert.php. For more information on any of the technologies listed above, please contact Mr. Chris Acree, Senior Air Quality Specialist, at (559) 230-5829. • Construction equipment may be used that meets the current off -road engine emission standard (as certified by the CARB), or be re -powered with an engine that nicety this standard. Tier I, Tier If and Tier III engines have significantly less NOx and PM emissions compared to uncontrolled engines. To turd engines certified by the CARB, see litt��:� �vw_ rh.ca.gov%rrisi) rt. r.p. This site lists engines by t},pe, then manufacturer, The "Executive Order" shown what Tier the engine in certified as. Rule 9510 requires construction exhaust emissions to be reduced by 20 percent for NOx and 45 percent for PM 10 when compared to the statewide flea average or to pay an in lieu mitigation fee. For more information on heavy-duty engines, please contact Mr. Thomas Astone, Air Quality Specialist, at (559) 230-5800, Environmental Checklist AIR QUALITY Potentially Potentially Impact Less Than Significant with Nfitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No impact Infonnation 5ourcc(s1 Will the project: 1) Conflict with or obstruct implementation ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ GG of the applicable air quality plan? 2) Violate any air quality standard or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ GG contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation" KR#7AN & ASSOCIATES, INC. With Offices Serving the Western United States C'EQn IS Project No. 014-06085 Page No, 15 3) Result in a cumulatively considerable net ❑ © ❑ ❑ GG increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is classified as non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors'? 4) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial ❑ ❑ Q ❑ GG pollutant concentrations`.' 5) Create objectionable odors affecting a ❑ ❑ ❑X ❑ GG substantial number of people? Conclusion The proposed project will not result in significant long-term local or regional air quality impacts, Short- term air quality impacts associated with construction will be reduced to less than significant levels with rs. (Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation) iOCLATES, LVC. e I esfern L'nifed Slalcs IMAqM MA IS Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 16 5.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Discussion of Findings The subject site is located in a residential area of the City of Fresno and is not located in an officially designated wilderness area. The National Wilderness Preservation System map, dated August 2004, was prepared based on information provided by the U.S. Forest Service, U.S. Department of Fish & Game, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, and the National Park Service, A National Wilderness Preservation System map, a Califbriria Department of Fish & Game Wildlife Area Map dated 2004 and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangle (`Malaga, California, dated 1964 and photorevised in 1981, were reviewed to detemiitie if the subject site is located in an officially designated wilderness area. The subject site was not identified within the boundaries of an officially designated wilderness area. The U.S. Department of Fish & Game, Division of Realty, prepared the National Wildlife Refuge System map which identifies components of the National Wildlife Refuge System, was viewed on August 18, 2005. Review of the National Wildlife Refine System map and USGS topographic quadrangle vlalaga, California, dated 1964 and photorevised in 1981, indicates that the subject site is not identified within the boundaries of an officially designated wildlife refuge. The subject site is located in a residential area of the City of Fresno. Based on a review of tyre lklalaga, California Department of Fish & Game (CDF&G) Natural Diversity Database map overlay, dated November 29, ZOOS, no listed, threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitats are reported within the boundaries of the subject site. The subject site is located in a residential area of the City of Fresno. Based on a review of the Malaga, California CDF&G Natural Diversity Database map overlay, dated November 29, 2005, no proposed threatened or endangered species or proposed critical habitats are reported witNri the boundaries of the subject site. The subject site is located in a residential area of the City of Fresno. Based on the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Map, viewed on May 19, 2006, no wetland areas are identified at the location of the subject site. According to the USGS topographic quadrangle map Malaga, California, dated 1963 and photorevised in 1981, and information collected during Krazan's April 10, 2006 site reconnaissance, the location of the subject site appears to be outside wetland areas, waterways, and forested areas; therefore, no significant changes in surface features will be necessary. There are rro naturally occurring bodies of water discovered oil or adjacent to the subject site during the site reconnaissance conducted on April 10, 2006. The project site does not include riparian habitat, wetlands, or any other sensitive habitat, nor is the site adjacent to any wetlands, waterwa), or other sensitive habitat, lntplemerttation of the proposed project would not have any impact, direct or indirect, on wetlands. The project would riot have any direct or indirect impact on any special -status species or their habitat. Refer to Section 5.1 Aesthetics of this report for a discussion of issues related to the Washingtonia palrn trees extant on Kings Canyon Boulevard. KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, LNC. With 0JJ7c•es Sening the Western United Stales Project No. 014-0608- Page No. 17 Environmental Checklist BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Levis Tltan Significant Impact No Impact Information SoufCCNS� Will the project: 1) Have a substantial adverse effect, either ❑ ❑ E ❑ B,E directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? 2) Have a substantial adverse effect on any ❑ ❑ ❑ X B,E riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Depariment of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? 3) Have a substantial adverse effect on ❑ ❑ ❑ z B,E federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other nieans? 4) Interfere substantially with the movement ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ B,E of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? -) Conflict with any local policies or ❑ X i ❑ ❑ B E ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? 6) Conflict with the provisions of an ❑ ❑ E ❑ B,E adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? KRAZAN & ASSOCLVTES, INC. With Offices Servin- the Western United States :: t --i CF0A IS Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 18 Conclusion The proposed project will not result in any significant adverse biological impacts with the inclusion of the recommended mitigation measures. (Less Than Significant Impact) KR--kZ.kN & ASSOCIATES, INC. With Offices Serving the Western United Srares Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 19 5.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES Discussion of Findings According to the Historic Preservation section of a Nlarch 20, 2006 I nvironmental Assessment Inr NUD- Jirrided Proposals by Rebecca Fraser, Consulting Planner, on December 27, 2004, Karana Hattersley- Drayton, Historic Preservation Specialist, City of Fresno, reviewed the project and commented that an Archaeological Survey would need to be completed for the proposed project. A search was completed at the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) on June 26, 2004. There have been no recorded cultural resources within the project area. However, there has been one study immediately adjacent to the site FR-257 and three previous cultural resources surveys conducted within a V2 mile radius. There are no recorded cultural resources in the project area that are currently listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Repister, California Points of Historical Cnterest, the California Inventory of Historic Resources, or any known local registry. A follow- up search was completed at the CHRIS on April 25, 2006 which reiterated that there are no known cultural resources within the pro iect area that are listed in the national Register of Historic Places, the California Register, California Points of Historical interest, or the California State Historic landmarks. An Archaeological Survey was completed for the proposed project on April 9, 2005 by Jon L, Brady. During the survey, the surface was checked for any si��tis of possible cultural activities. No prehistoric. of historic cultural materials were identified during the pedestrian survey. The results of the subject were negative. The proposed project will have "No Effect" on any potentially significant historic properties. A Historic Property Survey was completed for the proposed project by Jon L. Brady on June 2, 2005 and revised August 28, 2005. 'The Area of Potential Effects (AYE) for the current archaeological and architectural survey includes the subject property, adjacent property to the west and the palm trees in the City of Fresno Right of Way fronting the parcel. The 27 Washing 'a palm trees within the project APE were recorded into the California Historical Resource lnfonnation System (see Historic Property Survey) due to their age, but determined not to meet the Section 106 definition of a historic property: this property was also determined not eligible for listing in the California Register of Historic Resources or the City of Fresno Local Register of Historic Resources. In light of these research results, a finding of "No Historic Properties Affected" is recommended for this undertaking, pursuant 36 CFR 800.4 (d) (1). No further cultural investigation is recommended for the undertaking unless project plans are altered to include areas not covered by this study_ It has been suggested that some of the trees be removed to allow both construction equipment and later Fresno Transit buses to safely access the proposed project area. The author observed that the present access off Kings Canyon Road is approximately 150 feet wide. This would appear to be more than enough room for future access. Jon Brady strongly urged that the palm trees not be removed. But in the event that trees must be removed, he recommends the trees be used as in -fill perhaps along vlinnewa%va Avenue south of Kings Canyon Road. The Historic Study was reviewed by Sunnyside Property Owners ,Association and they disagreed with Jon Brad},'s findings regarding the historicity of the 27 Washingtonia palm trees. City staff reviewed both the Historic Property Survey, the letter form the Surunyside Flomcowriers and additional comparative studies and presented recommendations to the Historic Preservation Commission at a noticed public hearing held on December 12, 2005, After additional testimony the commission adopted a resolution supporting the staff recortunendation that the 27 Washingtonia palm trees did not appear to be individually eligible for KRri7Ati & ASSOCIATES, INC. With Offices Serving the lVesrern United Stairs a1a06065 (:E0 A I Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 20 the National Register of Historic Places but did appear to meet the threshold for treatment as historical resources for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act. On December 14, 2005, a letter was sent to the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) requesting concurrence on the adequacy of the APE, that the level of studies were completed satisfactorily and that the undertaking as proposed will have no effect on historic properties. As of the date of this Initial Study, no response was received from SHPO within the 30-day comment period. It was therefore concluded that the State Historic Preservation Office had no comment. The City of Fresno has satisfactorily completed all actions and responsibilities under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. However, according to a November 6, 2006 email correspondence from Karam Hatterslev-Drayton, "A mitigated neg dec would have to include provisions to avoid removing or damaging the palm trees." No further cultural resources investigation is recommended for undertaking of the proposed project. HISTORIC PRESERVATION -MITIGATION MEASURES 1. If buried cultural materials are encountered during construction, all work in that area should be halted or diverted until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the nature and significance of the finds. 2. Provisions should be made to avoid renioving or damaging the Wasl6ngtonia palnt trees on Kings Canyon Boulevard. Environmental Checklist CI TI TLTRAI RESOURCES Potentially Significant Impact Lcas Ilran Significant With Mitigation lncomoration Less Than Sin ificant tmpact No Impact Inti�nnatron Sourcc(sj Will the project: l) Cause a substantial adverse change in ❑ ❑ z ❑ B,F,G,R,U the significance of an historical resource as defined by §15064.5? 2) Cause a substantial adverse change in ❑ ❑ z ❑ B,F,G.R,LI the significance of an archaeological resource as defined by §15064.5? 3) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ B,F,G,R,U paleontological resource or site, or unique geologic teature? 4) Disturb any human remains, including ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ B,F,G,R,U those interred outside of formal cemeteries? KRAZA_N & ASSOCIATES, INC. lVith Offees Serving the FVestern United States Project No. 014-06085 Pa -be No. 21 conciusion The proposed project will not result in significant cultural resources impacts in accordance with the recommended mitigation measures. (Less Than Significant Impact) KR:'kZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. With Offices Serving the IFlestern United Scares Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 22 5.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Discussion of Findings Geolo-ic Setting According to Krazan & Associates, Inc., project experience in the general vicinity of the subject site, the San Joaquin Valley, which includes the Fresno area, is a topographic and structural basin that is bounded on the cast by the Sierra Nevada and on the west by the Coast Ranges, The Sierra Nevada, a fault block dipping gently southxestward, is made up of igneous and metamorphic rocks of pre -Tertiary arc that comprise the basement complex beneath the Valley. The Coast Ranges contain folded and faulted sedimentary rocks of Mesozoic and Cenozoic age, which are similar to those rocks that underlie the Valley at depth and non -conformably overlie the basement complex, gently dipping to nearly horizontal sedimentary rocks of Tertiary and Quaternary age overlie the older rocks. These younger rocks are mostly of continental origin and in the Fresno area, they were derived from the Sierra Nevada. The San Joaquin River is the principal river in the area. Alluvial fans formed by this river are the largest geomorphic features in the Fresno area. The formation of the fans has resulted in rather flat regional topography. The Coast Ranges evolved as a result of folding, faulting and accretion of diverse ,geologic terrains. They are composed chiefly of sedimentary and metamorphic rocks that are sharply deformed into complex structures. They are broken by numerous faults, the San Andreas Fault being the most notable structural feature. Both the Sierra Nevada and Coast Range are geologically young mountain ranges and possess active and potentially active fault zones. iViajor active faults and fault zones occur at some distance to the cast, west and south of the Fresno area. The Owens Valley Fault Zone bounds the eastern edge of the Sierra Nevada black and contains both active and potentially active faults. Portions of the Ortigalita. Calaveras, Hayward and Finconada Faults, which are to the west, are considered potentially active. The San Andreas Fault is possibly the best known fault and is located about 60 to 70 miles to the west. There are no active fault traces in the project vicinity. Accordingly, the project area is not within an Earthquake Fault Zone (Special Studies Zone) and will not require a special site investigation by an Engineering Geologist. Fresno residents could feel the; affects of a large seismic event on one of the nearby active or potentially active fault zones. Fresno has experienced ground shaking from earthquakes in the historical past. According to the five County Seismic Safety Element, ground -shaking of VII intensity (NModified IViercali Scale) was felt in Fresno from the 1872 Owens Valley Earthquake. This is the largest known earthquake event affecting the Fresno area. Secondary hazards from earthquakes include rupture, seiche, landslides, liquefaction and subsidence, Since there are no known faults within the immediate area, ground rupture from surface faulting should not be a potential problem. Seiche and landslides are not hazards in the area either. Liquefaction potential (sudden loss of shear strength in a saturated cohesionless soil) should be low since groundwater occurs below 90 feet. Lastly, deep subsidence problems may be low to moderate according to the conclusions of the 5 County Seismic Safety Element. However, there are no known occurrences of stnietural or architectural damage due to deep subsidence in the Fresno area. KRAZAti & ASSOCIATES, INC. With Offices Serving the Western United States Project No, 014-06085 Page No. 23 Erosion ,According to April 18, 2006 correspondence from Rick Lyons, Design Technician I, the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (FMFCD), The F'v1FCD bears responsibility for storm water management within the Fresno -Clovis metropolitan area, including the area of tite subject site. Within the metropolitan area, storm runoff produced by land development is to be controlled through a system of pipelines and storm drainage retention basins. The proposed development will produce storm runoff, which must be properly discharged and mitigated. Such mitigation requires certain planned local drainage facilities inclusive of pipeline and storage basins. The CEQA and the national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Act requires the mitigation of adverse environmental impacts associated with land development projects. It is the position of' the District that increased storm runoff associated with land development is a significant adverse impact requiring mitigation at the time of, or prior to, development, The Federal Clean Water Act and the State General Permits for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Industrial Activities (State General Pemaits) require developers of construction projects disturbing one or more acres, and discharges associated with industrial activity not otherwise exempt front NPDES permitting, to implemelit controls to reduce pollutants, prohibit the discharge of waters other than storm water to the municipal stornr drain system, and meet water quality standards. These requirements apply both to pollutants generated during construction, and to those which may be generated by operations at the development after construction. Based upon the April 10, 2006 site reconnaissance, future construction activities may facilitate wind erosion from exposed soil. These impacts will be temporary and cease upon completion of the new construction activity. STORM WATFR MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The community has developed and adopted a Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan. Each property is required to contribute its pro-rata share to the cost of the public drainage systenr. It is this form of participation in the cost and/or construction of the drainage system that will mitigate the impact of development. The subject property lies within the FIvIFCD's Drainage Area "PP" and shall pay drainage fees pursuant to the Drainage Fee Ordinance prior to issuance of a building permit at the rates in effect at the time of such approval. 2. The District recommends that the City of Fresno require drainage covenants of the development to the south of this proposed project to allow surface runoff' to reach the existing Master Plan facilities located on East Lane Avenue. The existing I`laster Plan facilities will provide permanent drainage sen.-ice to the project. 3. The District will need to review and approve the site's final improvement plans prior to implementation. 4. The proposed development appears to be located within a 500-year flood prone area as designated on the latest Flood Insurance Rate Maps available to the District, necessitating appropriate flood plain management action. 5. Construction activity, including grading, clearing, grubbing, filling, excavation, development or redevelopment of land that results in a disturbance of one (1) acre or more of the total land area, or less if part of a larger plan of development or sale, must secure a stonn water discharge permit in compliance with the U.S, Environmental Protection Agency's NPDES regulations (CRF Parts 122-124, Nov, 1990). "The permit must be secured by fling a Notice of Intent for the State General Permit for Construction Activity with the State Water Resources Control Board. The notice must be filed prior to the start of construction. KPAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. With Offices Serving; the Western United Srates 0141WISi CfoA IS Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 24 Environmental Checklist GEOLOGY AND SOILS Potentially Significant Impact Lass 'than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Ilan Significant Impact No Impact Information Sources) Would the project: 1) Expose people or structures to potential ❑ ❑ X ❑ A substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: a) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as described on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning 'Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to Division of' Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.) b) Strong seismic ground shaking? c) Seismic -related ground failure, including, liquefaction? d) Landslides? 2) Result in substantial soil erosion or the ❑ © ❑ ❑ Z loss of topsoil? 3) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that ❑ ❑ ❑ ;< A is unstable;, or that will become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? 4) Be located on expansive soil, as defined ❑ ❑ Q ❑ A in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? 5) Have soils incapable of adequately ❑ ❑ Q ❑ A supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Conclusion Development of the proposed project, in conformance with standard engineering practices and the recommendations made in a geotechnical report conformin<R to standards of care common within the industry, would not result in significant geoiogic impacts. (Less Than Significant Impact) KP--1ZA,N & ASSOCIATES, INC. With Offices Sen ins; the lVestern United States Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 25 5.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Discussion of Findings A Phase I Envirotuuental Site Assessment (ESA) in conformance with the scope and limitations of The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTtiI) Practice E 1527-05 of the project site was performed, the findings of which are presented in a report dated August 10, 2006, Tile assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject site. According to the referenced ASTM guidance, the term recognized environmental conditions means the; presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water on the properly. Consequently, no evidence of an impact from toxic/liazardous/radioactive materials, contamination, chemicals or oases was revealed. Environmental Checklist HAZARDS AND FUkZARDOUS NIATEKALLS Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Malgation Incorporation Leas Tlian Significant Impact No Impact Infomixion Source(s) Would the project; l) Create a significant hazard to the public ❑ ❑ © ❑ E or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? 2) Create a significant hazard to the public ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ E or the envirotunent through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involvin-, the release of hazardous materials into the environment? 3) Emit hazardous emissions or handle ❑ ❑ X ❑ E hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? 4) Be located on a site which is included on ❑ ❑ ❑ Z E a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Govertunent Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the: environment? 5) For a project located within an airport ❑ ❑ ❑ Z E land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in ICRAZAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. With Offices Serving the Western United Slates CE.QA IS the project area? 6) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, Would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 7) Impair implementation of, or physically interfere with, an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? 8) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildfand fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 26 El ® E z ❑ El E E Conclnsion Based upon the findings of the Phase I ESA report, the project will not result in significant hazardous materials impacts. (Less Than Significant Impact) KRAZA` S ASSOCIATES, INC. With Offices Serving tire Western United Slates CJ14Ji�495 CEO: IS Project No, 014-06085 Page No. 27 5.8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Discussion of Findings According to the August 10, 2006 Phase I ESA repor4 for the subject site under Creolo�7 and Hvdrogeolo�V-, the subject site: is located within the San Joaquin Valley, a broad structural trough bound by the Sierra Nevada and Coast Ranges of California. The San Joaquin Valley, which comprises the southern portion of the Great Valley of California, has been filled with several thousand feet of sedimentary deposits. Sediments in the eastern valley, derived from the erosion of the Sierra Nevada, have been deposited by major to minor wcs:-floxino drainages and their tributaries. Near -surface sediments are dominated by sands and silty sands with lesser silts, minor clays, and gravel, The sedimentary deposits in the region form large coalescing alluvial flans with gentle slopes, The groundwater in the area is reported to be first encountered at a depth of approximately 90 feet below ground surface (bgs), The groundwater flox direction in the area of the suhject site is generally towards the southwest. According to the August 10, 2006 Phase I ESA report for the subject site under Porahle 4fiater Source, the water purveyor for the subject site is the City of Fresno. The City of FreSrlo'S water quality monitoring is an on program with water samples obtained on a regular basis, It is the responsibility of the City of Fresno to provide customers with potable water in compliance with the California State Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for primary drinking water constituents in water supplied to the public. On April 11, 2006, the City of Fresno Engineering Department (CFED) was contacted regarding municipal potable water service for the subject site. According to representatives of the CFED, potable water service has been available to the subject site since 1950. Kxazan's research indicates that the former on - site Elks Lodoc was constructed in at least 1959. Based on the date of development of the on -site vacant grocery store in at least 1959, it is presumed that the City of Fresno has provided municipal potable water service to the subject site since approximately 1959. Additionally, during Krazan's April 10, 2006 site reconnaissance, one water well was observed on the subject site. No information regarding analytical testing or construction specifications of the on -site well was found during the course of this assessment. If the on -site water well is not to be used in any planned redevelopment of the subject site, it should be property destroyed in accordance with State and local guidelines. Based upon the April 10, 2006 site reconnaissance, there are no surface bodies of water in the project area immediate vicinity or on the subject site itself according to the f ndings of the August 10, 2006 Phase 1 ESA report. HUD -EPA Region la, Sole Source Aquifers Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) of 1990, The project does not need to be referred to the EPA for project evaluation according to the VIOU of 1990 with HUD -EPA Region IX, Sole Source Aquifers. The proposed project is located within Flood Zone X (shaded), areas of 500-year flood; areas of 100-year flood with average depths of less than one foot, or with drainage areas less than one square mile and areas protected by levees from 100-year flood, per FEhiA Maps, Community Panel 06019C2130F, effective date July 19, 2001. Based upon a March 20, 2006 Envirotrrrrental Assessment for HUD fiUnded Proposals by Rebecca Fraser, Consultin- Planner, according to contact with Bret Johnson, Engineering Technician 1, Fresno Irrigation District (FID), February 20, 2005: FM does not own, operate or maintain any facilities located oft the applicant's property. FID expects no adverse impacts from the approval of the proposed 100 units for elderly, disabled and low income families. According to April 18, 2006 correspondence from Rick Lyons, Design Technician I, the Fresno Nletropolitan Flood Control District (FMFCD), The FNIFCD bears responsibility for storm water KR ZA.N &ASSOCIATES, LNC. With Offices Serving the Western united States Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 28 management within (lie Fresno -Clovis metropolitan area, including the area of the subject site. 'Within the metropolitan area, storm runoff produced by land development is to be controlled through a system of pipelines and storm drainage retention basins. The proposed development will produce storm runoff, which must be properly discharged and mitigated. Such mitigation requires certain planned local drainage facilities inclusive of pipeline and storage basins. The CEQA and the national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Act requires the mitigation of adverse environmental impacts associated with land development projects. It is the position of the District that increased storm runoff associated with land development is a significant adverse impact requiring mitigation at the time of, or prior to, development. The Federal Clean Water Act and the State General Permits for Storm \Vater Discharges Associated with Construction and Industrial Activities (State General Permits) require developers of construction projects disturbing one or more acres, and discharges associated with industrial activity not otherwise exempt from NPDES permitting, to implement controls to reduce pollutants, prohibit the discharge of waters other than storm water to the municipal storm drain system, and meet water quality standards. These requirements apply both to pollutants generated during construction, and to those which may be generated by operations at the development after construction. Based upon the April 10, 2006 site reconnaissance, future construction activities may facilitate wind erosion from exposed soil. These impacts wili be temporary and cease upon completion of the new construction activity. STORM WATER MITIGATION MFAStTRES 1. The community has developed and adopted a Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan. Each property is required to contribute its pro-rata share to the cost of the public drainage system. It is this form of participation in the cost and/or construction of the drainage system that will mitigate the impact of development. The subject properR' lies within the FylFCD's Draina�,e Area "PP" and shall pay drainage fees pursuant to the Drainage Fee Ordinance prior to issuance of a building permit at the rates in effect at the time of such approval. 2. The District recommends that the City of Fresno require drainage covenants of the development to the south of this proposed project to allow surface runoff to reach the existing Nfaster Plan facilities located on East Lane Avenue. The existing Master Plan facilities will provide permanent drainage service to the project. 3. The District will need to review and approve the site's final improvement plans prior to implementation. 4. The proposed development appears to be located within a 500-year flood prone area as designated on the latest Flood Insurance Rate Maps available to the District, necessitating appropriate flood plain management action. 5. Construction activity, including, grading, clearing, grubbing, filiing, excavation, development or redevelopment of land that results in a disturbance of one (1) acre or more of the total land area, or less if part of a larger plan of development or sale, must secure a storm water discharge permit in compliance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's NPDES regulations (CRF Parts 122-124, Nov. 1990). The permit must be secured by filing a Notice of Intent for the State General Permit for Construction Activity with the State Water Resources Control Board. The notice must be filed prior to the start of construction. KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. With Offices Serving the Westerly United Stutes Project No, 014-06085 Pate No. 29 Environmental Checklist EIYDROLOGY /%- D WATER QUALITY Potentially Significant lmpaet t css Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Lass T nag Significant Impact �" Impact Intomta non 5nurce(S) st Will the project: 1) Violate any water quality standards or ❑ ❑ Q ❑ B,l waste discharge requirements? 2) Substantially deplete ground«ater ❑ ❑ X ❑ B,E: supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there will be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells will drop to a level which will not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? 3) Substantially alter the existing drainage ❑ © ❑ ❑ B,E,Z pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which will result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? 4) Substantially alter the existing drainage ❑ X❑ ❑ ❑ B,E,Z pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate of amount of surface runoff in a manner which will result in flooding; on - or off -site? 5) Create or contribute ninoff water which ❑ Z ❑ ❑ B.E,Z will exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? 6) Otherwise substantially degrade water ❑ ❑ © ❑ B,E quality? 7) Place housing within a 100-year flood ❑ ❑ ❑ B,E hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation ntap? S) Place within a 100-year flood hazard ❑ ❑ © ❑ B.E,BB KRAGAN K ASSOCIATES, INC. FVith Offices Serving the fVestern United States n%AA,1,Q< cL,, 5 is area structures which will impede or redirect flood Bows? 9) Expose people or structures to a ❑ ❑ significant risk of loss, Injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? 10) Be subject to inundation by sciche, ❑ ❑ tsunami, or mudflow'? Project No. 014-06085 Page No_ 30 © ❑ B,E.BB El B,E Conclusion With the implementation of the mitigation measures above, the proposed project will not result in significant hydrology or water quality impacts. (Less Than Significant with Mitigation) KRAZAh & ASSOCIATES, LAC. With Offices Serving the Western United Stater' 1 e111—C "Ln t IC Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 31 5.9 L:_`D USE Discussion of Hudings The: subject property is located in the Roosevelt Community Plan Area which, according to the April 1992 Roosevelt Community Plan, is characterized by highly diversified residential neighborhoods and older strip commercial corridors. The eastern portion of the planning area is dominated by a low density residential development pattern. In the northwestern areas of the cornrnunity, residential densities are much higher. Existing single-family homes are located on smaller more conventional lots within the northwest areas. According to the April 1992 Roosevelt Cormtttrnity Plan, there is a need to provide new affordable very low and low income quality housing mixed with higher market end projects to instill neighborhood harmony and economic stability. The proposed project would provide low to very low income families an opportunity to live in quality housing within a stable neighborhood. The project would he beneficial to the community and the families that live therein. The implementation of this proposed project will return vacant land to a productive viable use, assist in the removal of conditions of blight in the community, and provide a resource for the provision of much needed very low arid low income housutg arid public transportation accomunodations. The subject site is generally a rectangular -shaped parcel. The 5.5-acre vacant site is south of East Kings Canyon Road and East of South Adler Avenue in Fresno, California. The site is surrounded by multi- family houses and vacant land on the north (zoned C-2), Gettysburg Elementary School on the south (zoned R-3IBA-15), multi -family apartments on the east (zoned R-3/13A-15) and vacant land and apartments on the west (zoned R-A/BA-15). The ctrn-ent zoning of the vacant subject site parcel is R-3 and the 2025 Fresno General Plan has designated the area as medium density multiple family residential. The proposed project includes the construction of, at a maximum, 100 units for rent or sale, available to the elderly, disabled, low-income single families arid non -subsidized housing. The complex will provide approximately 15,000 square feet of common space (library, gathering space, small kitchen and game roorn) and possibly an open recreation area. The 5.5-acre parcel will be split into two parcels with the smaller parcel being purchased by the Fresno Area Transit (FAX) for its multi -modal transit hub. The transit hub will provide public hus transportation service with special routes for senior citizens, The development as described above constitutes the maximum extent of the proposed project. The proposed project would provide low to very low income families an opportunity to live in new af'f'ordable quality housing within a stahle neighborhood. Based upon the April 1992 Roosevelt Community Plan, this area has continued to experience a series of migrational waves. Strong population growth is predicted to continue in the Roosevelt Community area attributable in part to the immigration raid secondary -migration of Latin American and Southeast Asian populations. Consequently, trends likely to continue in the absence of the project would be related to a historical pattern of new lower quality higher density residential uses in the Roosevelt Community area. Environmental Checklist Less Iltan Potentially Significant Less "Than No Information LAND USF: Significant with Significant Impact Source(sl Impact Mitication Impact Inca oration Will the project, 1) Phvsiealiv divide an established ❑ ❑ ❑ %` B,C,D community? 2) Conflict with any applicable land use ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ B,C,D plan, policy, or regulation of an agency KRAZ:LN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Iflith 0Jfrces Serving the Western United Stares 040&M5 CEOA IS with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect`? 3) Conflict wilh any applicable habitat consm,ation plan or natural cortuttunity conservation plan`? Conclusion n Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 32 B,C.D The proposed project is compatible with CXiStlIlg uses in the surrounding area and all land use impacts that could result frorn the project appear to be less than significant. (Less Than Significant impact) KRAZXN & ASSOCIATES, L\C. Wirh Offices Serving fire Weslern United States M :r1.nv< Ci IIA is Project No. 014-06085 Pa-e No. 33 5.10 MINERAL RESOURCES Discussion of Findings The project is within a developed urban area, It does not contain any known or designated mineral resources, Based on the above discussion, development on the site would not impact any known or designated mineral resources. Environmental Checklist Evl ftAL RESOURCES PotmtialIy Significant Impact Less 71tan Significant With Mitigation Incorporation LCSS -Man Significant Impact No [inpact Information Snurcc(s) Will tlic project: l) Result in the loss of availability of a ❑ ❑ ❑ %! A,C,E; known mineral resource that will be of value of the region and that residents of the state? 2) Result in the loss of availability of a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑X A,C,E locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use larV Conclusion The project will not result in a significant impact from the loss of availability of a known mineral resource. (No Impact) KRAZA-N & ASSOCIATES, UNC. With Offices Serving; the ti'cstern United Slates Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 34 5.11 NOISE Discussion of Findings Environmental Noise BaekL,,round According to the 2025 Fresno General Plan Draft blaster EIR No. 10130, noise is generally defined as loud, unpleasant, unexpected or undesired sound that is typically associated with human activity and interferes with or disrupts normal activities. Although exposure to high noise levels has been demonstrated to cause hearing loss, the principal human response to environmental noise is annoyance. The response of individuals to similar noise events is diverse and influenced by the type of noise, the perceived importance of the noise and its appropriateness in the setting, the time of day and type of activity durin,, which the: noise occurs, and the sensitivity of the individual. Some land uses are considered sensitive to noise. Noise sensitive receptors are land uses associated with indoor and/or outdoor activities that may be subject to stress and/or significant interference from noise. They often include residential dwellings, mobile homes, hotels, motels, hospitals, nursing homes, educational facilities, and libraries, hadustrial, commercial, agricultural, and urban reserve land uses are generally not considered sensitive to ambient noise. Overview oflni.� Sources On a community -wide basis, the three major noise sources that affect the City are transportation -related: streets and freeways; railroad operations along he Burlington Northern -Santa Fe Railroad line and the Union Pacific Railroad line; and airport operations at the Fresno Yosemite International Airport and the Downtown Fresno Chandler Airport. Noise sources that have an area -wide effect are generaliy stationary in nature; however, given their operational characteristics, they may generate noise or vibrations that affect property located near the noise source. Examples include locations of industrial activity and sites where large numbers of persons assemble, such as stadiums. On a neighborhood level, noise sources include schools, specific land uses, use of lawn equipment, barking dogs, locations of air conditioner units, etc. Noise sources that are temporary in nature include construction activities. However, depending on the equipment used and distance between the activity and the receptor, noise levels from certain activities, such as earthrnoving and grading, can generate elevated levels of noise. ii tki,F� -IaL� Poi c p l ing to the $Lu1�Ama The City's primary tools with respect to noise are the Noise Element of the 2025 Fresno General Plan and the City of Fresno Noise Ordinance, The City's current Noise Element classifies various categories of land uses as sensitive, moderately sensitive, and insensitive. Noise regulation is achieved through the City of Fresno's Noise Ordinance. This ordinance was developed to be consistent with the Noise Element of the 2025 Fresno General Plan. However, it is used chiefly to spot regulate or provide case -by -case control rather than as a broad -based community plarimilti tool. Regulation of stationary or fixed noise sources is achieved through the City of Fresno's Noise Ordinance. This ordinance was developed to be consistent with the Nose Element. However, it is used to regulate noise at property lines rather than as a broad -based community -planning tool. In areas that are in transition from ruraL`agricultural to urban, noise from typical a ricultural activities, such as planting, harvesting, sprayin", pruning, animal husbandry, and agricultural wells and pumps (especially diesel -powered unites) has caused complaints from aeighboring urban residents. On the other KRIZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. IFith Offirp• Servinv Ihr lVeviern Vnin d Crnrnc Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 35 hand, rural residential areas typically experience low noise levels. Rural residents have expressed corrceni about the loss of "peace and quiet' cause by nearby urban land uses. State Policies The State of California Office of Noise Control has developed compatibility guidelines to minimize noise exposure to a variety of land uses, The reconinrended noise metric to be used is the CNtEL, is the noise metric currently specified in the State aeronautics Code for evaluation of noise impacts in aircraft operations. In addition, CNEL is specified in the State Sound Transmission Control Standards for new multi-farruty residential structures as well as in the State guidelines for the preparation and content of Noise Elements. According to the guidelines, a land use or proposed project in the "Normally Acceptable" category will be considered compatible with the noise levels set forth in the land use/noise compatibility standards without special noise abatement measures. A land use or proposed project in an area that is "Conditionally Acceptable" should only be allowed following an acoustical study that recommends site -specific noise attenuation measures that can effectively reduce interior and exterior noise exposure to acceptable levels. CCR, Title 24, Noise Insulation Standards (CCR Title 24) requires an acoustical analysis for multi -family dwellutgs in areas that exceed 60 dBA, showing that the proposed design will limit interior noise in habitable rooms to 45 CNEL or below. Worst -case noise levels, either existing or future, must be used. Future noise levels must be predicted at least 10 years from the time of building permit application. Federal Policies The Noise Control Act of 1972 (PL 92-574) established a national policy "to promote and environment for all Americans free from noise that jeopardizes their public health and welfare." The Act provides for a division of powers between the federal, State, and local govcnunents, in which the primary federal responsibility is for noise source emission control, with the states and other aaencies retaining the rights to control noise sources and the level of noise within their communities and jurisdictions. The Noise Control Act was supplemented by the Quiet Communities Act of 1978 (PL 95-609), HUD Guidelines 24 CRD 51, subpart B, has identified site acceptability standards for residential development. Exterior sound levels up to 65 dBA Ldn are considered acceptable. Sound levels between 65 dBA and 75 dBA Ld„ are considered normally unacceptable. The standard is applied at locations where it is determined that quiet outdoor space is required in an area ancillary to the principal use of the site, such as rear yards. Based upon the unique nature of the proposed residential development incorporating a public transportation transit hub, Brown-Buntin Associates, Ire., completed a September 12, 2006 report titled Acoustical Analysis, Transit Village, 5080 East Kings Carryon Road, Fresno, California for the City of Fresno, Housing and Community Development Department. The following Conclusions and Recommendations are excerpted from the referenced report. The proposed Transit Village Project will comply with the exterior and interior noise level standards of the City of Fresno and HUD with regard to traffic noise exposure. The: proposed design of the project will not comply with the exterior noise level requirements of the City with regard to the proposed transit hub, which is considered a stationary noise source, This is due to the close proximity of the proposed transit hub to existing and proposed residential uses, the fact that the transit hub would need to operate earlier than 7:00 am (when noise standards are more restrictive), and the fact that buses within the current transit fleet produce significant noise levels. Potential noise mitigation measures ICRAZAdN & ASSOCIATES, INC. ►f ith Offrees Serving the Western United States AI�fW1Ri!-1-na lC Project No. 014-06035 Page No. 36 that could be used to minimize the noise impact of the proposed transit hub include the following: 1. Re -design the project to locate the transit but as far as possible from existing or proposed residential uses. 2. Transition to a quieter transit bus fleet over titne, reducing the future noise impacts of the project. 3. Construct sound walls to acoustically shield existing or proposed residential uses from noise generated by the transit hub. The specific height and location of sound walls will depend upon the final site design, and a detailed acoustical analysis will be required to document sound wall performance. It is possible that a rc-designed project may not be able to achieve full compliance with the Citj-'s noise standards with regard to the transit hub. Provide mechanical ventilation or air conditioning for all residential units within the project so that windows and doors may remain closed for the required acoustical insulation. Ensurc that exterior doors, excluding glass doors, are solid -core wood or insulated steel with perimeter weather-stripping and threshold seals. The conclusions and recommendations of this acoustical analysis are based upon the best information known to Brown-Buntin Associates, Inc. (BBA) at the time the analysis was prepared concerning the proposed site plan, project grading, projected future traffic volumes, vehicle speeds, truck mix, roadway configuration, and transit hub location and operations. Any significant changes in these factors may require a reevaluation of the findings of this report. Additionally, any significant future changes in motor vehicle technology, noise regulations or other factors beyond BBA's control may result in long- term noise results different from those described by this analysis. Nt-?IU_1T0J1!QQ A!VLN, NtFtAL LL RFS On October 30, 2006, the City of Fresno, Housing and Community Development Department, issued the followinc memorandum in response to the conclusions and recommendations of the September 12, 2006 Brown-Buntin Acoustical Analysis for the proposed project: Transit Village Noise Study Response In development of the Transit Village Project, the City will incorporate all possible noise mitigation measures to minimize noise impact resulting from the proposed transit hub activity. Every effort will be made to comply with the City's noise standard ordinance or any acceptable variance thereof. As suggested in the Acoustical Analysis for the project, the City will/has implemented the following: The site plan was redesigned to relocate the transit hub closer to Kings Canyon Road and as far away as possible from the proposed housing units that will be constructed at the south end of the site. KICAZAN & ASSOCIATES. INC. lVith Offid-ov .Cvrvi►ry the Wvctorn llnilvd .Crnrr c Project No. 0 1 4-06035 Page No. 37 2. The City Department of Transportation FAX is transitioning from diesel to compressed natural gas fueled buses to provide for quieter and cleaner running buses. The Department's longer term outlook calls for transitioning to even quieter fuel efficient hybrid electric powered buses. Since the current practice is to maintain a bus for a useful life of twelve (12) years, the Department foresees these transitions taking place over the next 12 to 15 year period. 3. A sound wall will be constructed at the northwest corner and along the length of the west portion of site to reduce noise impacl to the existing and neighboring housing units. Brown-Buntin and Associates evaluated the noise impact for this western portion of the project using two different sound wall height scenarios. The height that provides for the greatest noise impact will be included in the development of the final site plan and in construction of the project. The City will use the necessary noise attenuation materials and sources in development of the project. 4. A heating ventilation and air conditioning system will be provided in each housing unit developed as part of the housutg portion of the proposed project. S. Noise attenuation materials will be used to construct the exterior walls, windows, and doors to reduce interior noise. Michael Sigala, Manager, (-Lousing and Community Development Division and John Downs, Senior Transit Planner, Transportation/FAX will be responsible for nionitoring and responding to noise mitigated measures. The proposed project involves development of temporary noise sensitive uses. However, �Iftcr construction of the 100 residential units and multi -modal transportation hub, temporary noise associated with the construction will cease. The temporary noise sensitive uses will be limited to day -time hours. (Monday — Friday 7,00 am. to 7:00 p.m.). Environmental Checklist NOISE Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Th;ut Signifcant Impact do Ittipact lnttonnauon SUUrCC(5) Will the project result in: 1) Exposure of persons to or generation of ❑ ® ❑ ❑ C,H,L noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? 2) Exposure of persons to, or peneration ❑ ❑ ❑ C,H,L Of" excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? KRAZA\ K A,SSOCLATES, INC. Iitth OJfrces-Servim the lVester►r United Stares 014 -:` ('[--()A IS 3) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? 4) A substantial temporm-y or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? 5) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, will the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels'? 6) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, will the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Conclusion With the implementation of the recommended r significant noise impacts. (Less Than Significar Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 38 ❑ ❑ © ❑ C,H.L ❑ ® ❑ ❑ C,H,L ❑ ❑ ❑ z C ❑ ❑ ❑ E C nitigation measures, the proposed project will not result in tt impact with Mitigation) KIRAZA,N & ASSOCIATES, INC. FVW, lhr, 1upoorn 1lnilprl Can►nc Project No. 014-0608 Page No, 39 5.12 POPLLATION A.ND HOUSING Discussion of Findings The subject propeny is located in the Roosevelt Community Plan .urea. One goal is establishing and maintaining safe, attractive and stable residential neighborhoods with compatible relationships between housing types and densities. This project is intended to create multi -family housing opportunities for very low and low-income families with the proposed apartment complex. The majority of the area surrounding the proposed project is also planned for residential uses, and as a result, the project is considered to be compatible with surrounding land uses. The proposed project, the construction of' 100 units of affordable housing and public transportation hub, will not have .a significant impact on demographics in the area under the presumption that it will serve the housing needs of the population currently present in the general project area. The new residential housing will provide much needed housing for low and very low income families. There are no existing residential or commercial structures on the site. Therefore, no displacenfent of population will occur as a result of this project. Environmental Checklist POPULATION 2VND HOUSING Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Sipificani With 'Mitiption Incomoratiorl Less Than Significant Impact yO Impact Infanncts Ss urc() Will the project: 1) Induce substantial population growth in ❑ ❑ r ❑ C an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? 2) Displace substantial numbers of existing ❑ ❑ ❑ z C housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 3) Displace substantial numbers of people, ❑ ❑ ❑❑ C necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Conclusion The proposed project will not result in significant population and housing impacts. (Less Than Significant Impact) KRAZAN & ASSOCLkTES, INC. With Offices Servitrg the lVesrerrr [%aired Srares Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 40 5.13 PUBLIC SERVICES Discussion of Findings Fire Service No comment was received as of the date of this IS from an April 6, 2006 request for comments letter mailed and faxed to the City of Fresno Fire Department. Consequently, based upon the subject site location in an established district of the Fresno Fire Department, it is anticipated that fire services will not be impacted. Police Service No comment was received as of the date of this IS from an April 6, 2006 request for comments letter mailed and faxed to the City of Fresno Police Department. Consequently, based upon the subject site location in an established district of the Fresno Police Department, it is anticipated that police services will not be impacted. Schools Effects related to schools may be considered to be significant if the project would result in the generation of students that could not be reasonably accommodated by the particular school district, However, the school district has established developer's fees to help offset construction costs for existing schools. According to the Fresno Unified School District, Facilities Nlanagement and Planning, any new development on the subject property will be subject to development fees for residential development. Recrgati(rAI F j . Based upon the subject site location within the urban setting of the city of Fresno, there are numerous recreational facilities located within a reasonable distance from the proposed development available in the community to serve the proposed project. Availability of recreation facilities will not represent an impact. Enkironmental Checklist PUBLIC SERVICES potentially Significant Impact Lacs Tltan significant with 4iill gation Incorporaiion Less Than Significam linpact It 1rTip3cl lnlonnatron Source(s) Will the project: 1) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the need for new or ph; sicaily altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire Protection? 1 El z El L KfOLZA-N & ASSOCLaTES, INC. W ices Servine dre JVestern United Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 41 Police Protection? ❑ ❑ z ❑ C Schools? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ C Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ C Other Public Facilities? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ C Conclusion The project will incrementally increase demand for ail public services, including school capacity, fire and police sen-ices at the project site within those parameters for gro%vth anticipated in the 2025 Fresno General Plan. The project will not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with a need for new facilities in order to maintain acceptable levels of service or performance objectives for public services. (Less Than Significant Impact) iiRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. JVith Offices Serving the. Western United Stares Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 42 5.14 RECREATION Discussion of Findings Based upon the subject site location within the urban setting, of the city of Fresno, there are numerous recreational facilities located within a reasonable distance from the proposed development available in the community to serve the proposed project. Availability of recreation facilities will not represent an impact. The site will be developed with a design incorporating a public transportation hub. Inclusion of the public transportation hub will facilitate convenient transportation for residents of the proposed housing project to take advantage of available recreation facilities within the city of Fresno Based upon the subject site location within the urban setting of the city of Fresno, there are numerous cultural facilities located within a reasonable distance from (lie proposed development available in the community to serve tite proposed project. Environmental Checklist RECREATION Potentially Significant Impact Lcss Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Titan Significant Impact No Impact Information SoarcL�s) Will the project; l) Increase the use of existing ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ C ncig,hborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility will occur or be accelerated? 2) Docs the project include recreational ❑ ❑ © ❑ C facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which rni(ht have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Conclusion The proposed project will not result in significant impacts on the environment as a result of the use; of recreational facilities. (Less Than Significant Impact) KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. With Office., N rvini, the lV srern United Slates Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 43 5.15 `I R- iNSPORTATION Discussion of )Findings According, to the March 20, 2006 Environntcnlal AsseS.Meldl for HUD funded Proposals by Rebecca Fraser, Consulting Planter, the proposed project, constniction of 100 housing units and the multi -modal transit hub, will not impact the existing roadways, according to the Draft Master Environmental Impact Report for tilt: 2025 Fresno General Plan, Currently, Kings Canyon Road between W'iliow and Peach is an Arterial and currently has a Level of Service (LOS) of "C." The current daily volume (Year 2002) is 22,300. The 2025 daily volume is 29,940. At Year 2025, the LOS will still be a "C," The City of Fresno has adopted LOS "D" as an acceptable operation standard for its major street network. A LOS of "C" is in the range of stable flow, but marks the beginning of the range of flow in which the operations of individual vehicles becomes significantly affected by interactions with other vehicles in the traffic stream. The proposed project is located oil State Highway 180, Caltrans will be relinquishing this portion of' State Highway 180 to the City of Fresno in the not -too -distant future. Intersection Level of Service Definitions Based on Average Del et Level of Average Control Service Description Delay Per Vehicle see.) Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable progression A 10.0 or less and short cycle lengths. Operations with low delay occurring with good progression andlor B 10.1 to 20.0 short cycle lengths. Operations with average delays occurring from fair progression and C 20.1 to 35.0 longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures begin to appear. Operations with longer delays due to a combination of unfavorable D progression, long cycle lengths, or high V/C ratios. \lany vehicles stop 35.1 to 55.0 and individual cycle failures are noticeable, Operations with high delay values indicating poor progression, long E cycle lengths, or high V/C ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent 55.1 to S0.0 occurrences. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. Operation with delays unacceptable to most drivers due to F Greater than 80.0 oversaturation. poor progression, or very long cycle iengths. Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual (2000). Washington . D.C. In response to an April 6, 2006 Krazan & Associates request for comments letter regarding jurisdictional review for the proposed Transit Village project, \Moses Stites of Caltrans, Office of Transportation Planning, District 6, responded with the followisig continents in an April 19, 2006 letter: KRAGAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. With Offices Serving the Western Unified Srates Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 44 Caltrans has reviewed the environmental assessment for the "Transit Village Property" located on the south side of East Kings Canyon (State Route 180) and South Adler Avenue. l e have the following comments: There is insufficient information to fully evaluate this project's impacts to the State Highway System. Caltrans will have further comments when the additional details of the project come forward. The project description indicates that the property will be developed with up to 100 unites of mixed single-family or multi -family housing. Depending; on the mix of uses and the number of' units, the project may exceed the 100 peak -hour tnp generation the City of Fresno uses as a threshold to require a traffic study. Should it be necessary for this project to conduct a traffic study, please reference the Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, dated December 2002, and send the scope of the TIS to Caltrans before the traffic study is conducted. Caltrans Guide, while advisory, contains Best Practices and give insight into Caltrans' expectations when reviewing a traffic study. If the trace consultant has any issues or concerns regarding the use of the Guide or its interpretation, please contact us so resolution can be reached, We carmot, based on the information supplied, deternnine if this project will impact the intersection of State Route (SR) 180 and Clovis Avenue. Caltrans has collected funds from several developments to mitigate for impacts to this intersection. These funds were used to construct left -turn lanes on west and eastbound East Kings Canyon. We will continue to request mitigation for this intersection, using future fiends to construct right - turn lanes from SR 180 to Clovis Avenue. We recomnnend that the City begin to collect fair shares for this intersection in order to add left -turn lanes to north and southbound Clovis Avenue. This would improve the operation of tine intersection. Caltrans will be relinquishing this portion of State Highway 180 to the City in the not - too -distant future. Should the City request a dedication of right-of-way from this project, Caltrans will accept the annount of right-of-way to accommodate the City's ultimate con figuration for East Kings Canyon Road. Should the applicant develop tine project prior to tine relinquishment of SR 180 to the City, an encroaclimcnt pernnit from Caltrans will be required if activities are proposed within, under or over the State highway nights -of -way- Activity and work planned ill the State right-of-way shall be performed to State standards and specifications, at no costs to the State. Engineering, plans, calculations, specifications, and reports (documents) shall be stamped and sig-ned by a licensed Engineer or Architect. Engineering documents for encroachment permit activity and work in the State right-of-way may be submitted using English Units. The Pennit Department and tine Environmental Plarnning Branch will review and approve tine activity and wort: in the State Right -of -Way before an encroachment permit is issued. Encroachment permits will be issued in accordance with Streets and Highway Codes, Section 671.5, "Time Limitations." Encroachments permits do nut run with the land. A change or ownership requires a new permit application. Also, if the project is developed prior to the relinquishment, the following wig] apply: It is the Department's policy to minimize new access points to State Highways. Caltrans will need to evaluate the project's planned connection to the Statc Highway. KR.AZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. With Offices Serving the if'estern Unired .States Project No, 014-06085 Page No. 45 2, Any existing or proposed driveways accessing State right-of-way must meet current State standards. 3. Caltrans recommends that the applicant construct a sidewalk alon- the property's frontage with SR 180. The sidewalk should be at least 5 feet wide. 4. Existing curb, gutter and sidewalk, and curb ramps may need to he reconstructed to meet current A.DA standards or other applicable State or Federal accessibility and safety requirements. 5. All existing concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk that is damaged, broken and/or cracked shall be removed and replaced in -kind. 6, Any and all damaged concrete surfaces within the ri,,ht-of-way which pose a safety hazard due to potential tripping hazards shall be replaced or repaired in accordance with ADA and/or applicable State or Federal requirements. 7. No water from the site shall be allowed onto the State right-or-wav without the Department's approval. 8. The owner needs to submit the pedestrian improvements proposed in the State right-of-way to the Department of State Architect (DSA) for certification. The encroachment permit authorizing the work will not be used until the pedestrian improvements in the State right-of-way are certified by the DSA. The owner needs to contact Saher Yassa at (916) 323-2643 for the submittal requirements, 9. No advertising signs are: allowed in or over the State right-of-way. A sigrt permit may be required for advertising signs adjacent to and visible from the State Highway rights -of -way, The project proponent must construct and maintain the advertising signs without access to the State Routes. Contact Susan Swenson at (209) 948-7869 or (209) 948-7641 for additional information or to obtain a sign permit application. Additional information on Caltrans Outdoor Advertising Pennit requirements may also be found on the Internet at ww,A �d!�yt_ca.,Za�e�']t_ginha, 10. Landscaping and irrigation should be kept outside of the State right-of- way. If not, a landscape and irrigation maintenance agreement is required between the Department and the local jurisdiction before an encroachment permit is issued for the work in the State right-of-way. Early planning could make transit a viable alternative for residents of ibis project. Caltrans recommends that the project be routed to Fresno Area Express (FAX) staff for their review and coinment. Please see below for other recommended transportation alternatives, KRAZ,X—N & ASSOCIATES, INC. With !Offices Serving the Western United States oi.W R5 Project No. 014-06085 Page No, 46 Caltrans Recommendations for Transportation Alternatives Ongoing development throughout the City of Fresno, including this project, will make traffic operations significantly worse by adding considerably to delay and congestion. gestion and delay and reduce overall degradation Transit alternatives can help reduce con of air quality and gridlocked intersections. 'The City of Fresno should focus on ways to eliminate trips in addition to eiAiancing capacity. Transportation alternatives the City should consider include standard highway solutions along with the following: Park and ride facilities on site or within the proximity of this project. 2. A study of the general accommodation and provision of mass transit in this area to provide insight on ways of increasing transit usage, 3. Exploring the potential of commuter shuttles. The shuttle could be financed through an assessment district and provide a way for individuals to utilize a park -and -ride facility or commercial area parking lot and be shuttled to various cornmercialioffiee centers within the area. Commuters who need to go further could use City of Fresno transit if the City planned for convenient connections. This may help to reduce the Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) demand seeking to use the State Highway System, 4. Providing for continuity of non -motorized transportation. 5. Exploring the potential for employer -sponsored carpoolsi'vanpools or monthly transit passes for employees as well as including as a condition of project approval a covered transit stop as mitigation for project -related impacts to the transportation/circulation system. 6. Exploring the potential for linking the purchase of a monthly transit pass with new residential development as partial mitigation for congestion and air quality impacts, and to ensure the long term viability of public transportation. There is no explanation in the project description of the project's title "Transit Village Property." We are unclear whether this is property once owned by the transit agency, now being considered for housing or whether the design includes aspects of "Transit Oriented Development" or "TOD." If this is intended as a TOD, Caltrans would like to review the specifics of the design. If the development is truly transit -oriented, the projcct-related impacts to the State f-Iighway System may be reduced, The document is available at. - Please sec Attachment Number One for other recommendations for transportation alternatives. KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Wirlr Offices Serving; the Western United Stares Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 47 Please be advised that any future development adjacent to a State Route, whether the entitlement is deemed by the lead agency to be discretionary or ministerial should be sent to Caltrans for review. In a subsequent July 27, 2006 Caltrans letter addressed to iklr. Jose Benavides, P.E., TJKAv1 Transportation Consultants, Mr. Stites states: Caltrans has reviewed the scope of the traffic impact study for the "Transit Village Property" located on the south side of East Kings Canyon (State Route 180) and South Adler Avenue. We have the following comments: Caltrans has identified a need for an additional turn lane at the State Route (SR) 99 northbound ofF ramp to Jensen Avenue. The study should determine the development's traffic impacts to this location and calculate a fair share to mitigate for the impact. Caltrans has also identified a need to improve capacity at the East Kings Canyon Road (State Route 180) and Clovis Avenue intersection. Westbound and eastbound right -turn lanes on East Kings Canyon Road are needed. We understand that the City has i icluded these improvements in their impact fee program. We will accept the amount the City determines should be directed toward this intersection as mitigation for this project's impacts to this portion of the State Highway System. While the improvements mentioned above will improve operations at (lie intersection, dual left -turn lanes on the northbound leg of Clovis Avenue at East Kings Canyon Road are needed to optimize traffic flow. We have recommended to the City that they begin to collect fair shares front development to implement this improvement. There is no explanation in the project description of the project's title "Transit Village Proper-v." We are unclear whether this is properly once owned by the transit agency, now being considered for housing or whether the design includes aspects of "Transit Oriented Development" or "TOD." If this is intended as a TOD, Caltrans would like to review the specifics of the design. if the development is truly transit -oriented, the project -related impacts to the State Highway System may be reduced, Caltrans Office of Mass Transportation has prepared an evaluation of TOD projects that will provide some guidance. The document is available at: littp:i/www.dot.ca.gov/hq/MassTrans/docjJdfTl'OD2rFOD Compendium pdf. 1�p���r�d�TUDr Based upon the circumstances created by the proposed 100-unit residential development and public transportation hub and observations and comments presented by Caltrans, TJKM Transportation Consultants produced an October 27, 2006 report titled Dra_Jt Tra is Impact Analvsis for the Transit Village Project Located on the South Side of Kings Canyon Road Between South fVillotiv Avenue and South Peach Avenue in the City of Fresno for the City of Fresno. The scope of work was prepared via consultation with the City of Fresno Traffic Engineering, County of Fresno and Caltrans Traffic Plaruiing staff. According to Ms. Corrina Nunez with the City of Fresno, copies of the referenced TJKNI Draft Traffic Impact Analysis report were distributed to the City of Fresno. County of Fresno and Caltrans on November 7, 2006 for review and comment. The following Conclusions and Recommendations are excerpted from the referenced report, KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INK. With OffiresSen,inr the Western United States f ) V,MiXi f'Ffl % IC Project No. 014.06085 Page No. 48 Conclusions and Recommendations Conclusions arid recommendations regardin<the proposed Transit Village Project to be located on the south side of East Kings Canyon Road between South Willow and South Peach Avenues are provided below: Existing Conditions • Under the scenario, the intersection of South Nfinnewawa Avenue/Nast Kings Canyon Road satisfies the rural peak hour signal warrant during the a.m. peak hour but not during the p.m. peak hour. It is recommended that the City of Fresno add this intersection to the Ciry`s Traffic Signal Mitigation Impact Fee during its next signal fee update. Existing Plus Project Conditions (Year 2008) • The proposed project is expected to generate 1,177 daily, 81 a.m., arid 84 p.m. peak hour trips. Of the 1,177 daily trip` 792 or 67 percent are transit trips while 385 and non - transit trips. • It is reconunended that this project pay the City of Fresno Traffic Signal Mitigation Impact Fee (TSIMI) of $41.47 per daily non -transit trio to mitigate any impacts to the City's traffic sional network. • Compared to the existing plaruIed land use, the project will slightly increase traffic by 139 more daily, but will reduce peak hour traffic by 257 less a.m. peak hour and 37 less p.m. peak hour trips. • The difference in trips is a 13.4 percent increase; in daily trips, a decrease of 76.0 percent of a.m. peak hour trips and a 30.6 percent decrease in p.m. peak hour trips. • An evaluation of site: access arid circulation uidicated no deficiencies. • In an effort to minimize impacts to last Kings Canyon Road the following is reconunended at the proposed Transit Village traffic signal: Westbound u-turns should be prohibited o That the westbound left -turn lane be adequately signed and marked as an exclusive Bus -Only lane o That the proposed signal be interconnected with the traffic signals at the intersection of Wal-'Nlart Drive./Kings Canyon Road and that their timing be coordinated o That a channelizing median island (pork chop) be constructed on South Adler Avenue as shown on Figure 2 in an effort to minimize vehicular conflicts. o A raised median island should be constructed similar to that shown on Figure 2 in order to prevent future traffic from the property to north from entering the exclusive "Busses Only" left turn lane. • In addition to the existing north -south crosswalk located at the Wal-Mart Drive/Kings Canyon Road signal an additional crosswalk will be implemented at the proposed transit sil al on the cast leg of Kings Canyon Road to enable the safe pedestrian crossing I'Mbetween the Transit Village and the Wal-Mart shopping center across the: street. KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. With Offices Serving the Western United States U;4i.!,: �C1:QA IS Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 49 • Under this scenario, the intersection of South Nfinnewawa Avenue/East Kings Canyon Road continuous to satisfy rural peak hour signal warrant during the a,m. peak. New Terra (Existing Plus Approved and Pipeline Projects Plus Project) Conditions (Year 2005) • Except for the intersection of South IMinrtewa,-va and East Kings Canyon Road, all study intersections and segntents are expected to operate at or better than the City of Fresno LOS D threshold. • It is recommended that any driveways or local street access to the existing vacant property at the northeast corner of Kings Canyon Road and South Adler Avenue be limited to the area between South Adler Avenue and a point 155 feet east of the South Adler Avenue right-of-way and that a pork chop similar to that shown in Figure 2 be constructed, • To improve the LOS at the intersections of South Peach Avenue'East Kings Canyon Road the following is recommended. o That the intersection be signalized while retaining its current intersection geometries, o Protective left turn phasing only in the east and west directions are provided. • Under this scenario, the intersection of South Wr-mewawa Avenuc/East Kings Canyon Road continues to satisfy rural peak hour signal warrant during the a.m. peak hour but not the p.m. peak hour. Cumulative Year 2025 No Project Conditions • Under this scenario, the intersection of East Kings Canyon Road/South Peach Avenue is projected to operate below the City of Fresno LOS D threshold during the p.m, peak hour. To improve the LOS at this intersection, it is recommended that the following changes be made to existin- conditions: 1. On additional westbound thru lane 2. Change: the existing eastbound thru-right choice lane to a tlu-u lane and construct an additional eastbound tluu lane 3. One eastbound right turn lane 4. One additional southbound left -turn lane • With the recommended improvements, the LOS for this intersection will improve to LOS D with 35.8 seconds of delay per vehicle during the a.m. peak hour and LOS D with 45.2 seconds of delay per vehicle during the p.m. peak hour • Under this scenario, the LOS for the segment of East Kings Canyon Road between Wal-ivlart Drive and South Peach Avenue is projected to operate below the City of Fresno LOS D threshold. To improve the segment LOS it would require that this segment of East Kings Canyon Road be constructed as a six -lane fac'thty. In order to construct a six lane facility while minimizing the need for right-of-way the fallowing lane and curb to right-of-way pattern should be considered; o That the median island to face of curb dimension be set to 37 feet 0 That the number one lane be 12 feet wide o That the number two lane be l 1 feet wide KR-AZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. With Of rces Serving the Western tinited Stales Project No. 014-06085 Page No, 50 o That the number three lane be 14 feet wide o That curbside parking be prohibited o That this segment be signed as a bike route o That the curb to the right-of-way pattern be eight feet wide Cumulative Year 2025 Plus Project Conditions • The LOS for the intersection of East Kings Canyon Road/South Peach Avenue is projected to operated at LOS D with 45.4 seconds of delay per vehicle during the a.m. peak hour and LOS E with 67.4 seconds of delay per vehicle during the p.m. peak hour, To improve the LOS at this intersection the same intersection improvements recommended in the previous scenario are necessary. • With the recommended improvements, the LOS for this intersection will improve to LOS D with 38,2 seconds of delay per vehicle during the a.m. peak hour and LOS D with 45.2 seconds of delay per vehicle during the p.m, peak hour. • Upon build out of the City of Fresno 2025 General Plan circulation element and the recommended improvements in the previous scenarios, all study intersections and segments are projected to operate at an acceptable LOS D of better. • It is recommended that the City consider increasing the storage lengths of the left and right turn lanes as indicated in the Cumulative 2023 queuing analysis. CITY OF F&F_. NO VIF.4y A N f rOiKtMF1uT 0 S1yFC ft1l. STIDY In a November 15, 2006 letter from Bryan D. Jones, T.E., Traffic Engineering ,Nlanager, City of Fresno Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering, to Jose Luis Benavides, P.E. with TJKA-I Transportation Consultants, comments were presented based upon the City of Fresno's review of the TJKM October 27, 2006 Traffic Impact Study for the Transit Village Project. The following comments are excerpted from the referenced letter. APPROVED for Planning Commission We reviewed the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) for the proposed subject protect which consists of 70 Senior Adult Housing Units, 24 Residential Townhomes/Condominiums ,md a F.4X Transit Center with 8 bus routes. The previous 2025 General Plan land use designation was for an Elementary School. The site is approximately 5.5 acres. The followim, comments are from Traffic Engineering staffs' review of the study. General Comments The trip generation for the proposed land use based on the ITF Trip Generation iManual is acceptable. however, the project will have to develop as senior housing to utilize the reduced trip generations and a covenant with the buildings shall be put in place to require Senior Housing. In addition, since the townhonics+condominium land use trip generation was used the site must be developed with townhotnes?condorrtiniurns rather than apartments. The proposed project is projected to generate approximately 1,177 average daily trips, 81 trips during the AM peak hour and 84 trips during the PM peak hour. 792 of the daily trips are transit FAX bus trips. Compared to the existing planned land use, the project will increase traffic by 139 daily trips, but reduce AIM peak hour traffic by 257 trips and 37 Plvl peak hour trips. However, KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. With Offices Servtn% the Western United States Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 51 5.5 acres is a pretty small Elementary School site for Fresno, so it is questionable whether the assumption of 805 students on this campus would be feasible as most Elcmentary School sites are 10 acres. 2. This project shall pay its Traffic Signal Mitigation Impact (TSNlr) Fee of 541.47 per Average Daily Trip (ADT) at the time of building permit. Based on 385 non -transit ADT and the current (TS%Ml) rate the project shall pay S15,965.95. 3. This project proposes to break the continuous median orr Kings Canyon Road and install a westbound Bus Only Left -turn Lane Traffic Signal. • This si-nal shall restrict westbound U-turns (prohibit). • The westbound left -turn lane shall be adequately signed and marked as an exclusive Bus -Only lane. • The proposed signalized intersection shall be interconnected, coordinated, and synchronized with the Kings Canyon Roa&Willow Avenue and Kings Canyon RoadAValmart Drive intersections to reduce delays to through vehicles on Kings Canyon Road with the new ITS Phase 3 Signal Coordination and Synchronization project. This new intersection was not anticipated with the Phase 3 project and will be the responsibility of the Transit Village project. • It may be beneficial for the project to install an ITS camera pole near the Transit area similar to the Manchester Transit Center. This would enable FAN employees to observe the Transit Center via the Traffic Operations Center. To restrict southbound left -turd and through movements frotn Adler Avenue that are not currently allowed because of the median on Kings Carryon Road, the Transit Village shall install a charuielized median island (pork chop) on Adler Adler. To prevent future vehicle traffic from the undeveloped Walmart property on the north side of Kings Canyon Road from entering the Bus Only left -turn lane, the proposed Transit Village shall construct a raised median island delineating the left - turn pocket. The driveway from the undeveloped Walmart property near Lite left -turn pocket shall be lintited to right -in and out turns and have a raised median island (pork chop) delineating this movement and restricting access to [he left -turn pocket, This driveway shall be located west of the opening for the left -turn pocket. • The cost of engineering design and construction of this signal is not reimbursable and can not be credited against the TSMI fee as this sir_mal is for the sole purpose of access to this project. V • The project proposes and shall install a pedestrian crosswalk with the signtal installation on the east leg of the Transit Bus Signal intersection to facilitate pedestrians crossing Kings Canyon Road. 4. The proposed project shall make necessary improvements and right -of --way dedications along adjacent public streets as per City of Fresno standards and requirements KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. With Offices Serving the Western United Stunts Q15Cr (j,� is Project No. 014-06085 Paee No. 52 Environmental Checklist TRANS PORTATIONITRAFI:IC Pozentiadly Significant I:npdct Less Pi an Significant «Vith Mitigation Inco ration Less Than Significant Impact No Impact on tnforre(s Source(s) es) Will the project: 1) Cause an uicreasc in traffic which is ❑ C,I,T,V substantial in relation to the existing traffic toad and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio of roads, or congestion at intersections)? 2) Exceed, either individually or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ C,I,T,V cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion rnana(ycment agency for designated roads or highways? 3) Result in change in air traffic patterns, ❑ ❑ ❑ \ C including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? 4) Substantially increase hazards due to a ❑ ❑X ❑ ❑ C,I,T,V design feature (c.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible land uses (e.g., farm equipment)? 5) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ C,I,T,V 6) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ ❑ % ❑ C,I,T,V 7) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or ❑ ® ❑ ❑ C,I,T,V programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus, turnouts, bicycle racks)? Conclusion The proposed project would not result in substantial additional peak hour traffic in the area or result in significant impacts to the transportation system with implementation of recommended mitigation measures. (Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation incorporation) KRAZA,N R ASSOCIATES, INC. With Offices Serving the O'estern United Slates Project No. 014-06085 Page No, 53 5,16 UTILI"I'IES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS Discussion of Findings According to the August 10, 2006 Phase I ESA report for the subject site under Potable Water Source, the water purveyor for the subject site is the City of Fresno. The City of Fresno's water quality monitoring is an on -going program with water samples obtained on a regular basis, It is the responsibility of the City of Fresno to provide customers with potable water in compliance with the California State Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for primary drinking water constituents in water supplied to the public. On April 11, 2006. the City of Fresno Engineering Department (CFED) was contacted regarding municipal potable water service for the subject site. According to representatives of the CFED, potable water service has been available to the subject site since 1950. Krazan's research indicates that the former or► - site Elks Lodge was constructed in at least 1959. Based on the date of development of the on -site vacant grocery store in at least 1959, it is presumed that the City of Fresno has provided municipal potable water service to the subject site since approximately 1959, Additionally, during Krazan's April 10, 2006 site recormaissanee, one water well was observed on the subject site. No information regarding; analytical testing or construction specifications of tine on -site well was found during the course of this assessment. If the on -site water well is not to be used in any planned redevelopment of the subject site, it should be properly destroyed in accordance with State and local guidelines. Based upon a March 20, 2006 Environmental Assessment for HUD_jtuaded Proposals by Rebecca Fraser, Consultinc Planner, according to contact with Bret Johnson, Engineering Technician I, Fresno Irrigation District (FID), February 20, 2005: FID does not own, operate or maintain any facilities located on the applicant's property. FID expects no adverse impacts from the approval of the proposed 100 units for elderly, disabled and low income families. City of Fresno, Department of Public Works, Michael Kint, Assistant Director, stated in an April 17, 2006 letter that comments on sewer and water will be addressed following site; plan review and submission of other applications. The proposed project will need to comply with City Codes, ordinances and conditions of approval that may be established at the time formal applications are submitted. Typical Public Works conditions of approval include, but are not limited to: dedicating road right of way for street purposes; offering landscape and pedestrian easements; construction of roads, utilities (water, sewer, electrical, cable TV, flood control, etc.); undergrounding of existing overhead utilities; payment of all fees including impact fees adopted by the Council; installation of landscaping; annexation to a community facilities district for maintenance of certain infrastructures; and construction of traffic signals, median islands, sidewalks, and street li"htiltg. According to April 18, 2006 correspondence from Rick Lyons, Design Technician I, the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District (FMFCD), The FMFCD bears responsibility for stonn water management within the Fresno -Clovis metropolitan area, including the area of the: subject site. Within the metropolitan area, storm runoff produced by land development is to be controlled through a system of pipelines and storm drainage retention basins. The proposed development will produce storm runoff, which must be properly discharged and mitigated. Such mitigation requires certain planned local drainage facilities inclusive of pipeline and storage basins, The CEQA and the: national Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Act requires the mitigation of adverse environmental impacts associated with land development projects. It is the position of the District that increased storm runoff associated with land development is a significant adverse impact requiring mitigation at the time of, or prior to, development. The Federal Clean Water Act and the State General Permits for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Industrial Activities (State General Permits) require developers of construction projects disturbing one or more acres, and discharges associated with industrial activity not othcm,isc exempt KRAGAN h ASSOCIATES, INC. With Dffrce Serving the Western United Slates 014060s= r17.0A Is Project No, 014-06085 Page No. 54 from NPDES permitting, to implement controls to reduce pollutants, prohibit the discharge of waters other than storm water to the municipal storm drain system, and meet water quality standards. These requirements apply both to pollutants generated during construction, and to those which may be generated by operations at the development after construction. Based upon the April 10, 2006 site reconnaissance, future construction activities may facilitate wind erosion from exposed soil. These impacts will be temporary and cease upon completion of the new construction activity. STORM WATER ,IMITIGATION MEASURES 1. The community has developed and adopted a Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master Plan. Each property is required to contribute its pro-rata share to the cost of the: public drainage system. It is this forth of participation in the cost and/or construction of the drainage system that will mitigate the impact of development. The subject property, lies within the FNIFCD's Drainage Area "PP" and shall pay drainage fees pursuant to the Drainage Fee Ordinance prior to issuance of a building permit at the rates in effect at the tine of such approval. 2, The District recommends that the City of Fresno require drainage covenants of the development to the south of tivs proposed project to allow surface runoff To reach the existing Master Plan facilities located on East Line Avenue. The existing Master Plan facilities will provide pernnanent drainage service to the project. 3. The District will need to review and approve the: site's final improvement plans prior to itnplenientation. 4. The proposed development appears to be located within a 500-year flood prone area as designated on the latest Flood Insurance Rate Maps available to the District, necessitating appropriate; flood plain management action. 5, Construction activity, including grading, clearing, grubbing, tilling, excavation, development or redevelopment of land that results in a disturbance of one (1) acre or more of the total land area, or less if part of a larger plats of development or sale, must secure a stonn water discharge permit in compliance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agcncy's NPDES regulations (CRF Parts 122-124, Nov, 1990). The permit must be secured by filing a Notice of Intent for the State General Permit for Construction Activity with the: State Water Resources Control Board. The notice must be; filed prior to the start of construction. Environmental Checklist UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Potentially Significant Imtract Less Than Sigriificant With ;4titigation Inca oration Le,+ Than Significant Impact NO Impact Information Source(s) Will the project 1) Exceed wastewater treatment ❑ ❑ E ❑ C,D requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? 2) Require or result in the construction of ❑ ❑ X ❑ C,D rlcw water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? KRAZAIN & ASSOCLXTES, INC. 411111 Offices Serving the Western United States 3) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant envirorunental effects? 4) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? 5) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to sere the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? 6) Be served by it landfill with sufficient permined capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? 7) Comply with federal, state:, and local statues and regulations related to solid waste? ❑ 1 Project No. 0 14-0608 5 Page No. 55 © ❑ ❑ I C,D,Z ❑ ❑ 0 ID 11 El z ❑ 1 ❑ i C,D C,D C,D C,D Conclusion The project will not rquire new, utility lines and will not exceed the capacity of existing utility systems. (Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporation) tiRAZAN & ASSOCIATE:S, LNC. Kt ich Offces Sen-ing the Western United Scales 014^r,�.:RS (-Epn IS Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 56 5.17 INIANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Discussion of Findings The proposed project will not result in any significant impacts. Mitigation measures are included in the project to reduce projected impacts to less than significant as relates to aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, storm water drainage and erosion of'soils, transportation, and noise. Environmental Checklist MANDATORY FINDING OF SIGN�IC.au�10E Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With %litigation Inca oration Less Than Significant ]mpact {} Impact Information source(s) 1) Does the project have the potential to ❑ z ❑ ❑ degrade the quality oh the euvironment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildfife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? 2) Does the project have impacts that are ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of' a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? 3) Does the project have envi.rormletital ❑ < ❑ ❑ effects which will cause substantial effects oil human beings, either directly or indirectly? KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. With Offices Serving the Western United Stales Project No. 014-06085 Page No, 57 CHECKLIST INFORANIATION SOURCES AND REFERENCES A. CEQA Guidelines — Environmental Thresholds (California Code of Regulations § 15000 et. seq.) (Professional judgment and expertise and review of project plans). B. Environmental Assessment far HUD fitndud Proposals, Rebecca Fraser, Consulting PIatnner, March 20, 2006. C. 2025 Fresno General Plan and Master Envirotunental Impact Report # I0130 (November 2002). D. Roosevelt Community Plan (April 1992). E. Phase I Environmental Site assessment, Krazan & Associates, Inc,, ,august 10, 2006. F. Hisla-ic Property Survey, Jon L. Brady, M.A., J & R Environmental Services, June 2, 2005, G, Historic Property Survey, Jon L. Brady, M.A., J & R Environmental Services, august 28, 2005. H. Acoustical analysis, Brown-Buntin Associates, Inc, September 12, 2006. I. Draft Traffic Impact analysis, TJKM Transportation Consultants, October 27, 2006. J. City of Fresno i-View Geographical Information System. K. City of Fresno, Public Works Department, Michael Kirn, Assistant Director. L. City of Fresno, Planning and Development Department, Cortina Nunez, Project Manager, M. City of Fresno Public Utilities Department, Doug Hecker, Supervising Engineering Tecluucian. N. City of Fresno Fire Department Fire, Chief Randy R. Bruegman. 0. City of Fresno Parks and Recreation Department, Randall L, Cooper, Director. R City of Fresno Police Department, SE Policing District, Captain Patrick Farmer. Q. City of Fresno, Fresno Area Express, John Downs, Senior Transit Planner. R. City of Fresno, Karana Hattersley-Drayton, Historic Preservation Project Nlana-cr. S. City of Fresno, Airports Administration, L. Nathan Sanchez, Engineering Technlclan. T. City of Fresno, Traffic Engineering Manager, Scott Mozier. U. California Historic Resource Information System, Adele Baldwin, Assistant Coordinator. V. California Department of Transportation/Caltrans, Office of Transportation Planning, I4loses Stites. W. California Department of Fish & Game (CDF&G) Natural Diversity Database map. X. County of' Fresno, Department of Community Health - Human Services System, Glenn Allen, Environmental Health Specialist IULand Use. Y. Fresno Irrigation District, Brctt Johnson, Engineering Technician I. Z. Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District, Nfark Will, Engineer. AA, Fresno Unified School District, Facilities ,tilanagcmcnt & Planning Jose Alvarado, Interim Executive Director_ BB. Federal Emery=ency Management Auency. Flood Insurance Rate Maps. KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. YWth Offices Serving the Western United States nisr.,a rrn.� is Project No. 014-06085 Page No, 58 CC. HUD -EPA Region IX, Sole Source Aquifers MOU of 1990. DD. HUD Noise Guidebook. EK Native American Heritage Commission, Rob Wood. FF. Santa Rosa Rancheria, Clarence Atwell, Chairperson. GG. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, Cluystal L. ivleier, Air Quality Specialist. HH. Table Mountain Rancheria, Johli Goodfellow, Envirorunerital Coordinator; Rob Pennell, Cultural Resources Director; Michael Russell, Tribal Administrator; Lee,L%Jtn Walker -Grant, Chairperson, II. U.S. Fish K. Wildlife Service Wetlands N-4ap. JJ. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangle Malaga, California, dated 1964 and photoinspected 1981 KR.aZAN & ASSOCIATES, [NC. 13 ith Offices Sen4n,; the Western United States Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 59 LIMITATIONS This Initial Study (IS) was prepared on behalf of the Lead Agency, the City of Fresno, in conformance with the requirements of the California Enviromucrilal Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (California Code of Regulations § 15000 et. seq.). The findings presented in this IS were based upon field observations during a single property visit, review of available data, and correspondence wish regulatory and advisory agencies and stakeholder parties for jurisdictional review based upon reasonable and practical response -time expectations. Observations describe only the conditions present at the time of this assessment. The data reviewed and observations made are limited to accessible areas and currently available records. Krazan cannot guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the regulatory and advisory agency records reviewed. Additionally, in assessing the property, Krazan has relied in good faith upon representations and information provided by individuals noted in the report with respect to jurisdictional concerns and corruncnts, present operations and existing property conditions, and the historical uses of the property. In the case of written requests for jurisdictional review from oversight agencies or concerned parties, absence of response from parties consulted by the request deadline date was interpreted to indicate a response of no comment. It must also be understood that changing circumstances in the property usagi, proposed property usage, subject site zoning, and changes in the environmental status of the other nearby properties can alter the validity of conclusions and information contained in this report. Therefore, the data obtained are clear and accurate only to the degree implied by the sources and methods used. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the client City of Fresno, Planning and Development Department, Housing and Community Development Division and shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the applicable contract between the client and Krazan. ;'1ny third party use of this report, Shall also be st.rbject to the terms and conditions governing the work in the contract between the client and Krazan. The unauthorized use of, reliance on, or release of the infonziation contained in this report without the express written consent of Krazan is strictly prohibited and will be without risk or liability to Kira za r t. KR ZA`' S ASSOCIATES, [NC. With Offices Serving the Western United States (TQA is W, ti J J y 91 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT TRANSIT VILLAGE PROPERTY SOUTH OF EAST KINGS CAINYON ROAD AiND EASTOF SOUTH ADLER AVENUE F'RESNO, CALIFORNIA Pursuant to ASTM F-1527-05 Project No. 014-06085 August 10, 2006 Prep:ued for: Ms. Corrina Nunez City of Fresno, Planning and Deveiopnicnt Department 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, California 93721 (559) 621-8506 Prepared by: Ksazan & Associates. Inc. 215 West Dakota Clovis, California 93612 (5 5 9) 3 4 8 -2200 Kxazari& AS5QC,A,.5. INC SITE DEVELOPMFNI ENGINEERS ` XBLE OF CONTENTS Project No. 014-060,85 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUt1N1,1IARY.................................. .......................................................................... I 2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF ASSESS,NIENT.............................................................................2 2.1 1 urposu.............. 2.2 Scope of Work..................................................................................................................................2 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION....................................................................................................................3 3.1 Geology and iiydroteology ....... 4.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE..........................................................................................................3 4.1 Observations...................................................................................................................................4 4.2 :adjacent Streets and Property Usage...............................................................................................5 4.3 Asbestos -Containing, Building Materials.........................................................................................5 4.4 Potable Water Source.... .......... ....... ...................... ....... .......... ................................ ................... 5 4.5 Sewage Disposal System.................................................................................................................6 5.0 USER -PROVIDED LNFORINIATION..........................................................................................6 5.1 Preliminary Title Rcport...................................................................................................................6 5.2 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment User Ouesnonnaire........................................................... 7 6.0 SITE USAGE SURVEY.................................................................................................................8 6.1 Site History................................................................................................ ............8 6.2 Agncultural Chemicals..................................................................................................................10 6.3 Regulatory AgencyIriterfacc.......................................................................................................... 11 6.4 Regulatory ;agency Lists Review................................................................................................. 12 7.0 DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS•...................................................................................................15 7.1 Evaluation of'Data Gaps/Data Failure............................................................................................ 16 8.0 CONCLUSIONS/OPLNIONS ......................................................................................................17 9.0 LIiv11TATIONS............................................................................................................................ I7 111.0 QU:ALL.IFICATIONS.....................................................................................................................18 REFERENCES.................................................................................................................I........................21) IL - Vicinity %,1ap ..,— ............................................._.....................................following References SiteMap ......... ............................................ ............................................................... followin Vicinity M ip Photographs......................................................................................................................following Site Map Chicago Title Preliruinary Title Report.......................................................................................................:. Phase I ESA All .appropriate Inquiry (AA-1) User Questionnaire............................................................... B Cit.,-of Fresno Planning and Development Department Records ... ................................... ........................... C Environmental Data Resources. Inc. (EDR) Sanborn Fire Insurance Map No C'o�-crazc Letter ................ D Phase I ESA LVkl Previous Owner (Questionnaire ....................... LocalArea Tribal Records .............. .................................. --................................................................ ....... F EDRRadius NIap Rcport.............................................. ......... ....... ........ ........ ........ ...... .......... ............... (J V or *XaZan & AS 10 C I A T ES , t \i C o,tGTEC�4ri1C.4L CriGItJEERIMG « ENftROl~l.Mv+ Nr.AL CN,ttiEEBir,i, CONSTRUCNON rE,'INc; =V Ir`1$AErilor4 Nupu z 10, 2006 PRASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT TRANSIT VILLAGE PROPEWFY SOUTH OF EAST- KINGS CANYON ROM) .1NU EAST OF SOUTH M)LER AVENUE' 1,RESNO, CALIFORNIA 1.0 FXECU'I'IVF, SU IiN-IA.RY Project No. 014-06085 Kritzan,-�- ASSOC1atCS, Inc. (Krazart) has conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of*ihc Transit Village Property located south of East Kints Canyon Road and east of South .A�dier AVe13uC in Fresno, California (subject site). Krazan conducted the Phase I E.S.A of the subject sitv in conformance 4vith the American Society for T-esting and 41aterials (ASTM) E1527-05 Siandurd Practice �"or- I:nvironmenial SiteAssessments: Phase I Envrronmerml Site ,assessment Process This Phase I ESA consimites all appropriate inquiry (A.M) designed to Identify recognized envimrmncawi conditions (RFCs) in connection with the: previous ownership and uses of the subject site as defined by AS'1-M EI-52?-05. :ASTiM E1527-05 Section 1.1.1 Reco�mizerd Environmental Conditions - Z'hc term rctru rrzed environmawal condiiium means the presence or likely presence of any Jrazurdotis subsionces or perrnleum producis on a pronerry un,lLr txmditions that tltdicait an existing rclnsc, a past release, or a material iirr-ear of a release of any h(rzal-dowk '"Ib.slunccs or petroiewp produels into sinictures on titc pro.oerry or into the yrround, groundwawr, or sur6ce water on the properiv. Thr terns includes hazardous subsiances or perroleurn produces eNvn under con-ditions in compliYince with laws. The terns is not intended to include de n:inirrris conditions ihxl genarally do not present a thruat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be t6c subject of an enforcement action if brouLlit to the attention of appropriat4� tovcsnmentai a�cncies. Conditions dcterniliwd to be de minirnis are not rccog,l izCd c<rivironmetrial can itions. Krazan's Findings of this Phase I ESA revealed no evidence of RECs in connection with the subject site. Hie following site devcloprnent issue is presented: • During Krazau'ti April 10, 2006 site recori-naissance. one water well, associated pump, an oil rescn-oir, and a waicr pressure aboveground sloraue lank (AST) were observed within the southeastern portion of' the subject site. If- the water well is not to be used in any planned deyciopment of the suhject title, it Should be properly destroyed in accordance with Statc: and local «tulduimcs. 215 «'cst Dakota Avenue • Clovis, Califelrniil 93612 • (559) 348-22110 • FAX (5-59) 348-2201 With Of -ces Serving; the, Wevern united State 151a S.-.AI Mat I Protect No, 014-06085 Pacre No. 2 The following Title Report issue is presented: • The subject site Preliminary Title Report (PR) was reviewed to icientifv environmental liens or activity and use limitations which may have occurred on or exist in connection with the subjecl site, as indicated by the subject site PR. Krazan's review of the PR indicated no deed restrictions or environmental liens were recorded for the subject site that indicate the subject site has been subject to any "cleanup" orders as imposed by any local, State or Federal a-encies pursuant to CERCLA and the SBLRBRA. Flowevcr, as quoted from the subject site PR, "it is important to note that this PR is not a written representation as to the Condition of Title (COT) and may nog list all liens, defects and encumbrances affecting title to the SubteCt SttC land." 2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF :ASSESSMENT 2.1 Purpose According to AS NI E 1527-05, the pumose of this practice is to define goud cornmcl—ciai and customary practice in the United States of ,kriierica for conduc;tin�g, ass envirownertal wire assussmcnr of a parsel of commercial real estate with respect to the range of contaminants within the scope of the Compreiicnsiv,; Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability ;Let (('E:RCL,1) (42 U.S.C. §9601) and petroleum products As such, this practice is intended to pemlit a user to satis?'v one of'the requirements to qualify for the innocenr landowner, conriguous property owner, or hona Tide prospemve purchaser limitation on CERCLA liability (hereinafter. the "landowner liubilit4 Protectinn.s, " or "LLI's "'): that is. the practice that constitutes "all appropriate inquir-v into the previous ownership and uses of the property, consistent with good commercial or customary praclicc.. as defined at 42 1 .S.C, �9601(35)(B). 2.2 Scope of Work The Phase I ESA includes the following scope of work: a) a review of local rcguiaton! agency records. b) a review of local, state, and federal regy-ulawry agency lists compiled by Environmental Data Resources. Inc. (EDR), c) a review oI' historical aerial photot4raphs, d) a review of pertinent building permit records and city directories, e) a site reconnaissance of existing on -site conditions and observations oi' adjacent property uses, and i imcrvic%v(s) with person(s) knowled2eable of the previous and current ownership and uses of the subject site. The scone of work for this Phasc 1 ESA conforms to ASTN4 I`] I Krazan .vas provided written authorization to conduct the. Please 1 ESA by ,tits. Comina Nuncz of the. City of Fresno in the June 13. 2006 First Amendment to the October 1, 2005 Agreement bet%vecn tics City of Fresno and Krazan. KRAZAN & ASSOC k,rrS, >~,C. if'ith Offices Servin, the Western United States III -IfwdA%,%A 1 Ilk— i Project No. 014-06085 Page No... 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION General property infonnation and property use arc summarized in Table I Refer to the Vicinity Map (Figurc No. 1) located after the Reference Section. TABLE I Summary of Property Information Topographic Map: I U.S. Geological Suncy, 7.5 minute Malaga, California topographic quadrangle map, dated 1964, photorevised 1981 Topog-raphic Nlap Location! Northeastern quarter of Section 7, Township 14 South, Ransze 21 East, Mount Diablo Baseline: and ;Meridian Topography: Relatl<,cly flat, approximately 310 feet above mean sea level General Location: South ofEast Kin(-,s Canvon Road and East of South Adier Avenue Asse;sor's Parcel Nurnber: 472-021-01T Approximate Depth to Groundwater: 90 feet below ground surface (bgs), State of California Department of Water Resources (DWR)* Retaional Groundwater flow Direction: Southwest. DWR Existing Usc: Vacant Land * State of Cali fonua, Department of Water Resources, Lines o% Fqual Flevarion of {Parer- in Wells Ilncorj;ncd rlc�uiler, San Jr�agtrirr Valley, Spring 2004, 3.I Geolop• and Hydrogeology The suhject site is located within the San Joaquin Vallee, a broad structural trough bound by the Sierra Nevada and Coast Ranges of California. The: San Joaquin �'allcy, which comprises the southern portion of the Great Vaflev of California, has been Iillcd with several thousand feet of sedimentary deposits. Sediment, in the casterzi valley, derived from the erosion of the Sierra Nevada, have been deposited by maior to minor drainages and their tributaries. Near surface sediments are dominated by sands and silty stands ,vith lesser silts, minor clays, and -Travel. `fhc sedimentary deposits in the region form iar e coalcs ink alluvial fans with aentic slopes. Theroundwarer in the area is rcportcd tohe first encountered at a depth of approximately 90 feet bgs. The groundwater flow direction in the area of the subject site is !generally towards the southwest. 4.0 SITF; RFC'ONNAISSANCI? A site reconnaissance, w,MCa included a visual observation oS'the subiect site and surrounding properties, was conducted by Kra-r-tn's environmental professional and environmental assessor on April 10, 2006. Krazan's environmental professional and environmental assessor were unaccompanied. The objective of the site ru•.onnaissartcc is to obtain infOrmaticm indicati.n` the likelihood of identifying recognized K RAZAN S kSSO(-Tk`I'ES, INC. With Officcrs Serving the Western United Slates uli09LBSA2,I P}uxf Project No. 0 14-06085 PaLle No. 4 environmental conditions, includinL, hazardous substances and petroleuni products, in connection with the property (including soils, surface waters, and groundwater.). 4.1 Observations Table 11 summarizes conditions encountered duri'riuy our site reconnaissance. A discussion of visual observations follows Table 11. Refer to the Site Map (Figure No. 2) and color photographs following the text for the locations of items discussed in this section of the report. TABLE II Suininary of Site Reconnaissance Feature Ob3crved Not Obsenvd Structures (txistina) I X . . ........ . ............. Evidence of past uses (foundation s, debris) -FI a. substances art `ear 9U L)etrSl!etni_pyoducts (includ(na containers) Abovu�rqund.stora�m tanks (ASTs) -U-n..der.Eouad sioragc tanks (LISTs) or evidence of USTs Evidence of Underground Pipelines . .. .. .... . ... ... . . . . ....... . .... ....... §yt�opgt_punj 'ous odors Pools of liquid likely to be hazardous materials or petmleurn products .......... . .. . ..... Drums . ... . . . .. . . ... . ......... . .. . . . . .. ....... -..n—nttfiedsubstance containers _t9tont i4 nine equipment _41orinated biPher)V) (PCE3).con Subsurface hydraulic —'-e,'q­—UIP _Tent - - ------ - Heatin2yentilatiorValr conditioning (TTVAC) Stains or curros'nn ort 00M, Walh, orCel[iiDC . ........... ---19or . dralns.Lind sums Storm Drains Pits, rids, or la cons Stained soil andlo.r Pavement . . ........ ........... Soil Piles Strrss,ed vcgtation on Waste or wastewater discharges to surface or surface waters on subject site. (inclu.d..i..r.i.cy-storm%vater) Wells (Irniphon, domestic, dry, iniwlion. abandoned, lionil-ori wells Septic SVSEeTn.,; ..X X . .... X X X X X X X X X —X X X X X The subject site comprises 5.389 acres of vacant land located within the northern portion of The associated Fresno County Assessor's Parcel Number (AIINJ) of 472-021-01T (See Photograph No. 1) Refer to Figure No. 2, Site Map. for locations of the following referenced on -site features: • One lyre hydrant %vas observed within the north -central portion of the subject site (Svc Plrio[ogmph No 2). No evidence of hazardous material storaLeiwaste was observed adjacent to the tire hydrant. • One brick and cinderblock outdoor bar and barbecue structure was observed within the southeastern portion of the subject site (Svc Photograph No, 3). No evidence of hazardous material storage/waste was observed adiacent to the barbecue. KR,kZ-kN & kssouvrES, INC. With Offices Servin�- the lVestern United States OL 9KMA A I ?1Mft I Proaect No. 014-06W Paee No. c • One water well and associated oil reservoir, water pressure AST, and a utility pole were observed to be located wrtilltl a chain -]line fence Within the southeastern portion of the subject site (Sce Photogrraph No. 4). No evidence of hazardous material storagciwaste was observed adjacent to the on -site water well, oil reservoir AST, or utility pole. • Durin-, the visual observations of llic suhject site, no hazardous materialshvaste were observes. Exposed surface soils did not exhibit obvious signs of discoloration. No obvious evidence (vent pipes. fill pipes, dispensers, etc.) of tJSTs was noted within the areas observed. No stilndim� wotcr or major depressions were observed on the subject site:. No indications of former structures, such as loundatious, were observed on the subject site. No pole- or pact -mounted transformers were observed on the subject site. 4.2 Adjacent Streets and Property Usage Table III surnruarizes the current adjacent roads and adjacent property uses observed during the sit.. recorvlaissance. TABLE III _ Adjacent Streets and Property Use Direction _ Adjacent Struct Ad-jacent Property Oise North East Kings Canvon Road Vacant Land South None Fresno Finifted School District-Grecnberf7 Eletnemary East None Residential V4W None KtJsiderttial Based on the observed uses of the properties located itrlmediatcly adjacent to the subicct site, it is unlikclt. that si4mificant quantities of hazardous materials are stored at the adjacent properties. 4.3 asbestos -Containing Building IN-Literials No structures are located on the subject site. Therefore, asbestos -containing huiidin materials (ACKMs) are not considered an on -site enviroruncntal concern at this tiro::. 4A Potable Neater Source The water purveyor for the subject site is the City of Fresno The City of Fresno's water quaht4 monitoring is .m on -go ink program with water samples obtained on a regular basis. It is the responsihiiity of the. City of- Fresno to provide customers witli potable water in compliance with the California State -iaxirnuin Contaminant Levels (�"-1CLs) far primary drinking water constituents in water supplied to the public. On April 11, 2006, the Cav of Fresno Engineering Department (CFED) was contacted reLardirW municipal potable water service for the subject site. According to representatives of the CFED, potable water service has been available to the suhject site since 19-0. Krazan's research indicates that the former on -site Elks Lodge was constnictcd in at least 1959. Based on the date of devciopment of the on - site vacant err ccn stoic in at Ic ast 1959. it is presumed that the City of- Fresno has prr�vided municipal K AZAN' & .%,SSOCIATES, INC. JVith Officrs Sert-irw the ;Vesiern b-nitcd .States 01AW3S .1AI Phvx Project No. 014-0608� Pa. ,e No. 6 potable water service to the subject site since approximately M9 %dditionaily, during Krazan's ;\pill 10, 2006 site reconnaissance, one water well was r>bscrvcd on the suhjCCt site. No inibmiation regarding anal}'tical testing or constntction specifications of the on -tilts: well was found during* the course of this a s ssrnent. If the on -site water well is not to he used in any planned redevelopment of the sunjuct site, it should be properly destroyed in accordance with State and local LIuidcliucs. 4.5 Sewage Disposal System On March 2S. 2006, the CFED was contacted regarding sewer serice for the subjcia site. according to a representative of the CF1 D, sewer service has hcen availahle to the subject site since I0_ Based on tlze. date of dcvelopmerlt of the former on -situ Eks Lodt-,,e in at least 19-59. it is presumed that the City of Fresno has provided municipal sewer service io the subject site since approximately 1959. Mr. Tom Adams, Fnvtroramental Control Officer with Illc (_'itv of Fresno I'ubhc I.:tilitics Department[ (CF-PUD), has indicated that only industrial facilities are monitored for sewer violations: thercfMc. no sewer violations are on file i'or the subject site. 5.0 USER -PROVIDED INFORI+,lATION review of a uscT-provided Prcli-mina' Title Rep an and a cornpleicci phase 1 ESA user que. tloiukaire_ W1s conducted in order to help identify pertinent information regarding potential environmental impacts associated with the subject site 5.1 Preliminary Title Report On April 10, 2-000, a Preliminary '1 itic Report (PR) for the suhjc.cl site by ChicaLc Cornpally % as provided to Krazan by !v1s Corrina Nunez. With the: City of Fresno, Plarilim-, and Devcioprtterit Department, Krazan's client and the Phase I ESA user. The suhie:ct site PR was reviewed to iderink potential deed restrictions, environmental liens or activity and use: limitations (AL'Ls) which may Dave occurred on or exist in connection with the subject site as indicated bY the suhiect site PR. Krazan's review of thu 11R indicated no need restriciiorts, envirortrncnial Betts or AUk for ilic subicui site. However, as quoted from the subject site PR, "it is irriportant to note that this Preliminary Report is not a wnuen representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, detects and encuntbmucLs affecting title to the land." The absence of review of the final Title Report represents a data gap. 'fhercfore, K.razan recommends that at the close of the real estate transaction and upon [tic issuance of the. [trial 1-itle Report (T1k) that the final "IR be reviewed and arty information deviating from that prescnted in KRAZAN & ASSOCIATES, INC, IVith Offices .Servin., the IVevern United States 01-41. C1HSAAS 19. 1 Projeel No. 014-0608 Pare No. " the VR reviewed Herein re%caiin, evidence of RECs be evaluated and documented in conjunction witl, this repnrt. Please refer to Appendix \ for a copy of the PR. 5.2 Phase I Environmental Site ;Assessment User Questionnaire On Aprii 10, 2006, a completed Phase: I ESA User (questionnaire was received from \NIs. Nunez. Plcasc refer to Appendix 11 for a copy of the completed User Ouestiotmaire. [n order to quality for one of the Landowner Liabihiv !'rotecnons (LLPs) offered by the Small Business Liabfiliv Relief and Brownfiefds Revitalization Act cif' 2001 (the "Broiv?0elds-frnendmunts''), the riser tiiu';t provide the following tnfOmlation (if available) to the envu-onmenied 1)roressionai. Failure to prrniuc this informauon Could result in a determination that "ail ah1)roPria1e inauir.i, ' is not complete. C'ne use: is asked to provide fnformatfon or knowledge. of the E'ollowln-: • I;nvironinental cleanup liens that are filed or recorded apinst the site • Activity and land use limitations that are in place on the site or that have been filed or recorded fat a rcrostrv. • Specialized knowledgc or experience of the person seeking to quality for the LLPs. • Relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the properry if it were not contaminated. • Conirrioniy }sown or reasonahiv asceriairahie. information about the 1x-op0-r,,. • The degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of contamination at the pro ner-iv, and the ability to detect the contamination by appropriate investigation. :\ccording to the answers to the questioanaire. Vts. Nunez, to the best of her kriowleLIL! as tlius :r Of tl)k Phase 1 ESA, was not aware oi' any environmental cleanup liens or activity or land use linutanons that have- been filed or recorded against the subject site; and NIs. Nunez has no specialized knox1ed2e nr experience of the prior nature of the: business, processes or chemical utilization on the sub�cct site. \1s. Nunez stated that the subject site was historically utilized for an I iks Lodge- however. AMs, Nunez indlci►mi that she did not have tiniw icdce of' the past or current presence of specific chemicals or hazardous rriatcriak, unauthorized spills or chemical releases or of any environmental cleanup liens In Cotmcellori wirli the subject site. Additionally, hls. Nunez stated that the purchase price of the subject siic mr.wnaabix, miFiccts fair market value., considering the appraised value of the property wah respect to fyreviklus ne.14,011atiorts between the City of Fresno and the prDperiy owner. KRAZAN &ASSOCIATES, INC. {fitly Offices Servirr the li estern limited Stale QJ4F*U6JAAJ i'b3 c I Proicct No. 014-0608` Page No. S 6.0 SITF LSAGF SURVEY The propeny u:tage survey included assessing, property history, and revsewinry. local. stab:, and ['ederal re,-Tulatory aLencv records_ 6.1 Site History A review of historical aerial photographs, contacts with the City of Fresno Plaruurtg and Development Department (CFPDD) records, reasonably ascertainable Haines Criss -Cross Directories (IiCCDs) and Palk Guide Directories (P(;Ds), Sanborn I ire Insurance Maps (SFI.Ms'�, and Phase I ESA intcrvicws Werc conducted to assess the history of the subject site Aerial Photo-raph Interpretation Historical aerial pitoto� MI)IIS dated 1937, 1950, 1961. 19-1 3, 1947, 1993, 1998. and 2005 were reviewcC to asst:ss the history of the suhicct site. These photographs were obtained froru the California State University, Fresno (CSUF) - Henry Maciden Lihrar}, Fresno. Calift)rnia and via the Interact websit� Giobexpiorcr.com. The aerial photograph summary is provided below in Table IV. TABLE IV Summary of Aerial Photorrtrph_Review Year/Scale Site Use Site and Adjacent Property Observation 1937 Vacant Land The subjeel site appears to be vacant land Adjacent Properties to the south, east, and west appear [o be utilized for a_Oculturai purposzs raid vacant land to the north of the suViect site. 1950 Vacant Land Conditions on the subject site and adjacent properties appear relativeiv 1" = 660' similar to those noted in the 1937 aerial photograph exeunt for the absence of agricultural practices on the adjacent property to the west, 1961 Elks Conditions on the subject site and the adjacent properties appear ?" = 66l)' relativeiv similar to those noted in the 1950 aerial photograph except fur the presence of a structure located within the southeastern portion of the Subject site_ 1973 Elks Lodge Conditions on the subject site and the adjacent properties appear I" = 660' relatively similar to those; noted in tine 1961 aerial pliotocranh. I9S,7 Elks Lodge Conditions on the subject site and the adjacent propenies appear 1 " = 1000' relativeiv similar to those noted in the 1973 aerial photograph except for the presence of residential dcvulopmetu on rite adjacent properties 10 the cast and west of the subject site. 1993 E.RS Lo4lc Conditions on the subject site and the adjacent propertiuti appear I" = 1,350' relatively similar to those noted in the I097 aerial photograph. 1999 Vaa:ant Land The subject site appears to be vacant land. Conditions on The ad-wcmt 1 " = l ,350' properties appear relativeiv similar to those rioted in the 1993 aerial photo,2ranh 2005 Vacant Land Conditions on [lie subject site and the adjacent properties appear I" = 32I?' roll ativeIv similar to those rated in the.. I99SS aerial phnWPTaprh KIt-XZAti & ASSOCIATES. INC. lVirh Offices Servinti the O'estern United Staies MiUd hk AAt PTLaR I Project No. 014-06M'. I'at?e No 9 Cih, of Fresno Plannin;; and Development Department Records On March 14, 2000, the CFPDD was visited to obtain building permit records for the subjcct site address of 50SO Dist Kings Canyon Read. The subjcct site address wLis provided to K-razan by Ivlr. Duanc I1111TOrci tl;e S+;cretary liar the l.resno Elks CIO), the historical owners of tree slubiect site. Accordin{, to rcprescnt.stivc of the CFPDD, seven building permit records are on file with the CFPDD for the subject site and are listed helow in Table V, inciudim, date of issue, type of record, and a brief description S appiicabie Howuvcr, no permits for items such as underground storage tanks, septic Systems, or demolition, are on file with the CFPDD for the subjcct site. Copies of legible CFPDD records are inc'.uded )it Appendix C. T:.R L E V Summary rat Buddin; Department Records r� Daie Record Typc I)CSc,ripnon 5080 )Ettst Kinus Canon 0_Y20i 1955 Building Permit \o Desenption O9." �r 1962 Building Permit addition of athletic Facility I li'01/1962 Electrical Permit lnst.alltn!, outlets, fixtures, and switches 11111,;1968 Electrical Perniit %II -in- outlets and fixtures 0()`2$I196 Electrical Ptmut .addition of receptacles 07e'22,19-10 Building Permit Repair fire darnauc O8-130.1191 S Buildinn Perms ,addition of reinforced concretc to building 1(il17'199I Demolition Pemia Dcmoiishin<o Elks Building 1;,'1T1.�97 Pcrtuit S��r!icTank;�bt3r�donrnent .- Haines Cris. -Cross and Polk Guide Directories Reasonably ascenamable HCCDs Lind 11GDs slated 1937 drrouUh 2005 were reviewed utilizim, annroxunateiy live -year intervals at the Fresno County i'ublic Libran.-Central Branch locateu in Fresno. California f r the subjcct site address of St180 Past Kings Canyon. A summary of 1'GDs infhrMation i', prey mn d b0ov, to Tahle VI. TABLE 'VI Baines Criis-i rossiPolk Guide Directory Sumntan, Andress Owner/Occupant Yvan 5080 East Kiu-s Canyon No Lsun, 1937, 1939. 1944, 1949, 1953, and 1958 Elks Lodge No, 439 1963. 1968, 1972, 1976, 1980, 1985. and 1990 Elks Lod,e Social Club No Llstine 1995. 2000. 4rnd 2005 Sanborn Fire Insurance flaps Krazan re%icws SKIM', to evaluate prior land use of the subject site and the adtacem prolic:rues. Sf UN -Is typically exist for cities with popuiattoris of 2.000 or mare, the co%oragc dependent on the )(3cation of the subjcct site within the city lirruts. On April 6, 2006, Krazan cowractcd with MR to provide copies o1 KRAL.VN & ASSOCIATES, INC. With of ivo Sen,inL the Weslern United Slure,% 1;14oml8i, Al I Fula Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 10 available SFI%1s for the subject site and the adjacent Properties as far bade as 1867. E,DR's search of SFI1,Is revealed no coverage for the subject site and the adjacent properties Refer to ,Appendix D for a copy of the EDR SHIM ,,N;o Coverage Letter Phase I [environmental Site Assessment Questionnaire - Owner A Phase I FSA interview with the owner of the subject site:, Fresno Unii-icd School District II't7SD), was not reasonable ascertainable. Multiple attempts to interview jti1r. .lose .Alvarado. Interim Executive Director, FI_!SD Facilities Manatement and Planning, proved unsuccessl=ul and a Phase I ESA Oueationryaire was riot returned. Consequently, information regarding the current and historical uses of rile SLI'mcct site obtained From interview of an owner constitutes a data gap. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Questionnaire - Previons Owner On :%aril 11, ?OQb, a Phase I ESA Questioruiaire was received by Krazan from IN-lr. Duane IIufford the Secretary iOr the Fr:;sno Elks Club, the previous owner of the subject site. The inlcr.�Icw is dcsigned to provide pertinent information regarding potential environmental impacts associated with the subject site. Please refer to Appendix E for a copy of the completed Previous Owner Questionnaire. :According_ to the answers within the questionnaire, Mr. Hufford stated that the subject site was historically iailized i'or an Fresno ;risks Ciuh. Mr. Hufford stated that he is unaware of any Institutional Controls or Enuincerint' Controls filed or recorded against the subject site.. Nlr. Hufford stated that a former .structure was located on the subject site that was utilized as the Fresno Elks Club, Mr. I lufford stated that the suhiect site structure was connected to municipal city water and city, sewer. ;ldditionally, ;Nir, Hufford stated that he is not aware of an,,, contamination associated with the su*ct site. -lccordinQ to the answers within the questionnaire, N­1r. Hufford had no knowledge of tin -site treatment andlor discharge of waste; on -site leach Fields, dr}, wells, sumps, or disposal ponds: use, storage, or disposal of hazardOus tnatesials; exlstln, or fanner AS -Is or US -Cis; hazardous materials spills; buried materials: monitorin„ dornestic, or imoation wells that are associated with the subject site. 6.2 A-ricultural Chemicals Review oi-historical aerial photngnrphs indicates the subject site was no( utilized fOr agricultural purposes lion at least 1937 to the present. Ccroscyuently, the use, storaoe, and application of agricultural rh&hicals at the subject site; are not considered in environmental concern. KR,kZ:k\ & ASSOCIA'rF.S. INC. I[ ith Offices Scrvin the Western (inited States 01406Ox5AA1 PI.I Project No. 014-06045 Page No. I I o.3 Re;ulatory Agency interface A review of rcLTuiatory agency records was conducted to help determine if hazardous materials have been handled, stored, or generated on tite subject site and;`or the adjacent properties and businesses. Reoulatm- records arc reviewed based on the i6llowing criteria: 1) properties with known gmoundwatcr contamination chat arc located within 500 reef of tlic subject site; `?) properties that are adjacent or in proxirtiuv to tile: subject site Included within the EDR repot, or noted during the site recotulaissarnce to possibly handle, store, or -encratu hazardous materials. Fresno County Ucpartment of Comntuuity Health, Environmental Health System 'Flit: Fresno Comity Department (if Cornmrfnity Health, 1`nvironmental Health System (F(1_;HS) is tirf lead tcgulattfry agency or Certified Unificd Pro<_,.ram Agency WUPA) for hazardous materials handlin, facilitic.r in [ resm Courtly. Kraztfn's review of the FCE1 IS Hazardous %ilaterials Resource List dated July 2006. iiw:l.x1in , Miscellaneous Site Files (U.S. EPA. Cal -EPA, Fresno County ;\�_,cncv !~lies, ctc. ). UST:IcAlmz undcr,,round storroe tangy; (LUST) files, and Hazardous Mattrials Business 1'Ian (Hti113I1) files, indicated that no I-Iy1BP/USTfLUST records are on file with the FC'1 HS for the subject site or adjacent properties. California Regional XVater Quality Control Board The California RC(_7101al Water QUa]ity Control Beard (RWOCLI) is the lead regulatory acencv for surface ciischar, n and ­Foundwatcr leaking US'] (LUST') sites located within tire; C:enlral San Joaquin Valley On July 26. 2000, the RWOCH was contacted regarding potential LUST records for the subject site and file adiacutu properties. According to representatives of the R'< QCB. no records of LUSTS arc oil file with the R\V{1CB for the subject site or adjacent facilities. City' of Fresno Fire Department The City of Fresno Firc Department (CF1 1)) has jurisdiction for the fire protection for the subject site and the immediate vtcintty. According represcritattves of' the CFFD, records of hazardous materials incident~ are kept ny the FCEFIS, Additionaily, hazardous/flammable incidents are [fled according to the date of occurrence and not by the locauon of occurrence with the CI`FD T'hercforc, records ol' hazardousrflarnmabie releases or incidents were not. reasonably ascertainable from tihe C'FFD. Local Area 'Frihal Records On April 6. 2006, Krazan mailed letters to local area trines regarding requests for records �md comments pct7ainim-, to potential tribal-re�gistcred IISTs. ASTs. hazardous materials stor;f�gcrusj�!c. an�or K.RAZAN— & ASSOCIATES, INC. ;Vith Offices Scrrvirr,t; fire If c Stan Ur:ited States 0144AH5AA1 N-3m 1 Proiect No. 014-06055 Pa�-,e No. 1 contaminated cleanup records for the subject site. The letters were mailed to Mr. ;dike Sisco, Chairperson for Santa Rosa Rarichena, IMr. Phillip Ilunter, Chairperson for Tule River Indian Tribe, tilr. Ron 4 en-nuth. Chairperson for Kern Valley Indian Community, Mr. Hector Franco, Chairperson for Wukehumni bribe, and IMr. Bob Pennell, Tribal Cultural Resources Director for -fable Mountain Ranchcria. In a letter dated April 19, 2006, i'vlr. Bob Pennell from the Table Mountain Rancheria responded to Kra/ari's request stating Table Mountain Ranchcn'a has no concerns regarding the Transit Village Property and declined participation at this time As of the date of this report, Krazan has received only Mr. Bob Pennell's response. According to the EDR Radius Map Report, no tribal records arc listed for the subject site or the adjacent properties. Refer to ;-Appendix F for a cope of the Table Mountain) Rancheria Letter. 6.4 Re;uiatory Agency Lists Review Several agencies have published docunicrus that list uusi ie,5ses or properties which have handled Hazardous materials or waste or may have experienced site contamination. The lists consulted in the course of our assessment wcre compiled by EDR and Krazan on April 6, 2006, and represent reasonably ascertainable current listings. Krazan did not verify the locations and distances of every property listed by EDR. Krazan verified the location and distances of the properties Krazan decuied as having the potential to adversely impact the subject site. The actual location of the listed properties may differ from the EDR listing Table VII summarizes the listed properties located within the AS-1-IM Search Radii. The actual distances of the listed properties (which are summarized in Table VII) are based on observations during Krazan's site reconnaissance. No EDR-listed unmapped (orphan) sites were determined to he located on or adjacent to the subject site. The EDR Radius Map report is included in Appendix U. TA11LE VIl isted Properties EDR Radius flap Summary subject I V. I ' to "'i I '!i to'/j 1 'f: to 1 Datahuse I -Type of Records Site Ylil_eT Mile Mile Mile Federal ASTN1 Standard; _ NPL Sins for pnonry r- t:, nu If Pint sad INPL. Propocd NPt. clean p nw,, 1 0 Cs f1 b Q — f1 � 0 DOisted NPL NPL_D7:Ictiims aY l} !! 0 o NPL Lich$ FrdLml Supuhfund Liens _ 0^'— �- D.itahasc Of rotenlially hazardous waste sites � I I C FR�'1 _IC f,i r nn-;6hle inrluzinn on the \1111. tY l7 fl � CERC,�1FR AP Sites designated as No further Action anti � retnoycci from the CERCLIS 1 I} ;} I rt 0 r C0RR--%CTS RCRA CLartccj}yC..' Au ion AL:iiylt. y RCRA rcgisterLd sites tier tramport, More ;u,d I) IY _ li t 0 j} RCRA-? SD _ _disposai {) 0 f) rl -" RCRA Lg. Quan Gen RCRA r:gisicred largc guTieratoll of hazardous Wasic iscilitiL-s_ 0 f1 ' f7 --- RCKPL Sin. Quan. C)en RCRA registared srxlall gcncraturs of I llaxdrdous w<asic f=0i11LN 0 Il IY — — K L A\ & ASSOCIATES. INC. if"ith Offices Servbi.; the 16estern Cnited States 01 4i1fi AS A.41 Pham I Pmr:_lcct No, 014-( M'5 Pagc tio. 13 TABLE VII (coot.) Listed Proaerties EDR Radius Map Summary Damligsr Type of Rteords — - — �mcrveney Response iduttlicatlon Symcm of F-RNS spills HMIR`i coruains naxardous mawrial spill HMIRS im:idc,ns tc-Donee to DOT USLNG CONTROLS Enizineuring C0111T IS Sites List US [NST — CONTROL Sites wits, insti1U110nal cuntn,IS _ DQD De urtmt mi of DLtcme SjMr FURS Ft,rmcrly used LhfcnSe Sites II -I SS I 8RO',�'4FIELD7 BrowrtfieIds Seta; List N P L Superlund Itsr of site LL6cr settltnnum U1 CONSENT Iiti ailnnInail l�Trc RecClyds of DLcm.on docur,tent sites atd in ,ne rR,D cica.tnun ol`NM sites LJ IMT Uranium Mih Tai'linn SIte:s ODI _ _ U en Dumn Invrs,t,}ry -- TRJS Toxic Release Inventory System databLsu ldt:ntitics manufacturers and importers of TS1:A chemical substance% Tracking sysiem of pmsiic.idc enlorcement FITS actimis and compliance activities SSTS 5ccnoii , Trjcxino Swath — I ldentifies genmaiors, transporters, commercial PADS scorers and;os brok�T, ;end disnuscsn ar' PCSs I ii)it rial L1a-ri sing Tricmg System lists ti11L�s MLTS which nn L= or use ra&,gacRve rwma riul s Subjwrl ' <1A ✓. 10 V. !/. to V., 'A to { Site �iile mile Niile mile i I Q f! , 0 U Ui 0 0 iI 1) rr 0 - -- -- 14 1h'ES !+rtinrs hiamr index Fiic 1} 0 G -- — FIN17.S F:sctlira liidex S,,st iwFac}lily Identlllr:allK 11 lnitialivc J'rt,erun Surnmun' lzmnn ,--- f reeds base on cnfcnrccrnl:rn aciieot,x Issued to KARTS ma]or violatom `state and Lucal ASTM Standard: A%VP annual Wi rknlari SYLL.S tareett-1I for cltthrtuo Con l inntxi 'r:azardous suh�;l,.ut t C .reteatsi Cal -Silty new+vertrCA Toxic Pits Toxic Pits c1cartup lLwilitics CA Bond Exp f km $nnd Ex cnditurc Plant NFA NoFurtha:rAction Duim- manon WE _ Proacrnes Needing Furlllcr Fv3luw,0Y1 REF Unconfirmed Pmpur es RcfrTeu to Another A cnt:v .SCH SGhcKd PTY)mTv-, r_k'aivation Pmu-TLim Slate: Latndtill Active. Clomi. and )aactivc Landfills _ ,3tes which have been issued wu_ k: discharge CA WDS 1 rC viremcfllS WM UDS:541'AT %XMM e MaAiSOC,n::111 Unit Data ia5c for mickmg and inveniury of,waSkC nLaM J L'Mu-nt units ClirtcNe H;a2.,r(iLIUS, Was1C & Substances Sites L.i.si LUST Leak me Undarernund SiDrnarTjnks remin CA SL,IC Statewide Shills, Lcaks, lnvcstigatiun,-, ana r'htLaiu s List LIST y Rr�im&ed underground tSJti:S KItA"ZAN .L ASSOCIATES, INC. 11"ith Offices .Semirg the Western Ultitcrl.Srrrres n�Aohuvsk.11 I''ru�.� Project No. 014-06085 Page No. 14 TABLE VII (cont.) i .istert Prnnprf-ies - EDR Radius Map Summary -- Subject -Y. r. t6 YNJ VEl� batabase ry of Recurds site Mile �1iicLle Facility Inventan, Database of active and CA FID UST macovc USTlncatiims-- I lazavinus xubstance stora,�c cantaincrt HEST UST I dacahase oc usT sites (1 to I AS -_II celstcnd abnvetin ound tt— _ SWRCS' Recycler Database 0 0 0 it -- Fresno Ca. CUT'A Cmified Unit W P'rourarn Aeeucy t) (} Statewide Environmemai f= Auanon and SWCEI'S 11ST Plunnine System U tl ? -- CfJMIRS Accademal rcbm-w-s or St11Ils slt,cs_ 0 -__ _ I hnpaa( to dFiHking Water and pownual hcultL hkxlfv of risk to !h�uhltic I 0 0 0 0 0 (J 0 0 — DEED List of Deed, Restrictions 0 VCP Voluntary Clean Up Pro anics 0 rI 1) 0 CUEAN1ERS A Iig of dry Cle,ner rciatctl taciI11%cs 0 0 0 --- f� WIP W61 Jnvesrii'anan Proeram Case Ltsi i it 1 0 0 — —� COP= OfllaZardous waste manifests rocclved F1 ZNF,T tJv the bTSC i} -- - Emt Emk!wins Inventory Data --- Tribal ASTM Standard INDIAN USERV I Indian Restxvaiiuns -- I to o { tl U INDJAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on indkm l _ Limit _ fI _ 0 0 1] TNDIAN 17ST Undcr_crouM Smriur Tanks on Indiar, Land 0 (i EDT{ Proprietary ltecer& Manufactured Dias P1an1s 0 0 CDR Flisic rical Auto Stations t5 0 0 n Il I — EDR Tiislurical Cleaners 6 r No Sibs In rddius idem lied - _ Not 9174YGIILd Victor llusso Residence approximately 300 feet to the northwest 5(147 Easi 1%lono Avenuc According to F:DR, this facilttyrproperty is listed as a Fresno County CUPA, His10ncal U7ST, LUST, Cortese, CA FID UST, and a SWEEPS UST site located within 1.229 feet of the subject site. During Krazan'.s April 10, 2006 site reconnaissance, this facility was obser,,cd to ne located approximately 100 feet to the northwest of the subjrct site. liaz:srdous materials records for this facility are on file with the FCE1IS. Based cut the distance of tills facility to the subject site and its generally hydraulically am—radicnl location, tills facility is not anticipated to pose an adverse impact to the subject site. Wal-,Mart Store �2001 approximately 400 feet to the northeast 5125 East Kings Canvon Road According to EDR, this facility is listed as a Fresno Co. CUPA and a SWEEPS UST site located within 974 feet of the subject site. During Krazarl*s :April 10. 2006 site reccanriaissattcu, this facility was obsen,cd to be located approximately 400 feet to the nortlicast of the subject site. Based on the distance of this facility to the subject tiitc, this facil'sty is not anticipated to pose an adverse: impact to the subject site. t:RAZ N S. ASSOCIATES, INC, JVOI: Offices Serving~ llw Kestern Linited States III $WSSAM M'16C I Project No. 0 14-0608 5 P,12e No. 15 The subject site address was not listed in the EDR-provided <>ovemnncnt database report. The remaining properties within the specified search radius of the subject site which appeared on local, state, or federaily published lists of sites that use or have had releases of hazardous materials are of sufficient distance an&or situatcd hvdraulically cross- or down-gTadictri from the subject site such that impact to the: suhicct site is nit likely. Rio cnglneenne control sites, sites with institutional controls, or sites with deed restrictions were listed for the subject site, adjacent sites or vicinity properties in the EDR-provided govcniment database report. No Indian rescr-vations or leaking US-hs (LUSTS) on Indian land were reported inn the subject site, Aditrcent sites or vicinity properties in the LDR-provided government database report. '.0 DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS Historical Uses-, Based on Krazan's review of historical aerial photographs. a site reconnaissance, and contacts with the local retrulatory agencies and the previous owner of the subject site, the potential for recognized environmental conditions to exist in connection with the historical uses of the subject site appears to he low. Current Uses; Bused on Krazan's site reconnaissance, contacts with local re2,uiatory agencies, Mid coritact with the previous owner of the subject site, the potential for recognized environmental conditions to exist in coruiectton with the current uses of the subject site appears to be low. The following -Citic Report issue is presented: The subject site Preliminary Title Report (PR) was reviewed to identify environmental liens or activity and use limitations which may have occurrcd on or exist in connection with the subject site as indicated by the subject site PR. Krazan's review of the 1'R indicated no deed restrictions or environmental liens wcrc recorded for the subject site: tha'. indica c the subject site has been subject to any "cleanup" orders as unposed by any local. Suite or federal agencies pursuant to CLRCLA and the SBLRBFU%. I loweyer, as quoted from the suhiect site PR, "it is important to note that this PlZ is not a Written representation as to the ('ondition of Title (COT) and may not list all liens. defects and crsctunhrances affecting title to the subject site land." Therefore, Krazan recommends that at the close of the real estate transaction and upon the issuance of the final Title Report (FR) that the final TR be reviewed for anv deviations from the information contained in the 1'R. KRAZAN & ASSOCIA'YES, INC, With Offices Serrin the Keswrnr Orited States Q J4%O8JAA: Ptaac I Proiect No. 0 14-0608 5 Pa<,e No. 16 Adjacent Properties: Cried on Krazan's tiJJ observations, review of the EDR Radius flap report- and consultation with local :er uiator`a af-enc iex, lhx potential for reco«ttired environmentai conditions to exist in connection with the sun-ject ;its from adj*we1n1 property uses appears to be tow _ Data Crap: Phase I ESA interview with the owner of the subject site was not reasonable ascertainable. Consexnteruly, additional information, if any, regarding the current and historical uses of the subject site was nest nNuined tlirow.,,h an interview with the owner. 7.1 Evaivatiou of Data Gaps/Data failure In a.c:ordance with ASTM F 1 5? 1-ii? "uid:tnce, data .!aps represent a lack of or �nability to ohim;i information required by this practice despite good faith efforts by the envsrotimental pmfr:ssiortal to >athcr such iniorntation. Data saps may result from iticornplcteness in any of the activities required 'n%: this practice. Data (ailure represents the failure to achieve the historical research obiccts of this practice ever, after reviewing the standard historical sources that are reasonably ascertainable and likciv to 'oe useful. Data failure is one type of data gap. The following is a surrunary of data saps encountered in the process ot. prcparin2 this report including an observation as the presumed significance of that data Barr to the ccmchlsions Ali this assessment. :° bLnjL c (If EiT)71 itIe JR c According to the client City of, Fresno, a Preliminary Title Report in lieu of a Condition of "Title Report was utilized to fillfill the client's needs in regards to this Phase 1 ESA. Taken in consicicration with the availuble apparent information obtained in the course of pr;-paring tills report in conjunction with professional experience, there is no evidence to suggest that this data gap alter the conclusions of this assesstent. However, the contents oi' a Condition of''I-itic Report arc unknown. • ,LNbs -31c e of jntQudY w with t ( i'ro�s ,, �'A' Takca to amsideration with the available apparent information obtained in the course of preparing, this report in conjunctron with professional experience, there is no evidence to suggest that this data gap alter the conclusions of this assessment. I lowcvcr, the contents of an interview with the current subject site owner are unLnown. MUL AN & ASSOCIATES, ES, INC. With Offices Serving the Wevern United Stares 0140WES4,hr Project No_ 014-06085 Pa,2e No. 17 • :Absence of Responses to Tribal Records R(cluest Taken in consideration with the available apparent infnmiation obtained to the course of preParin­ this rcpon in coniunction with nrofussional experience. ihet•_- is no ev denc:c to su(,Llest that (h1S data Tap rnr°h[ alter the CottClUSi[7nc; of tht:; ,] sC slllCni. 11Crw4y�T. it-ic ct)n[en[s l7 unreceived responscs to tribal records requests are unknown, 8.0 C'ONCLUSIONSIOPINIONS We Gave conducted a phase I ESA of'the subject site in conformance: with the scope and limitations of the ;15TM 1i1527-05 Siandard Practic'c for Environmental Site Av.sC.scrxc+rr.v Phu.'w l f;�rwrr�itnrcr,;rrl Sil, :f,+.rtssmcw Process. Any deviations from this practice were nrcviously dcscnbed In tllis rcpon. Tlits assessment has revealed no eviderice of recognized enviromriLval conditions in uotuaectior: with the suhiect site. The 10ilowinP site development issue is presented: Durimi Krazau's .=lpril W. 2006 site reconnaissance, one water well, associated porno, an oil reservoir, and a water pressure aboveuround storage tartk (AST) were obscrticd withiaa the southuastern portion of the subject site. If the water well is not to be used in any planned development of the subject site, it should he properly destroyed in accordance with State and local -zuidelines. The following Title Report issue is presented: • The subject site Preliminary fitie Report (PR) was reviewed to identity environmental hens or activity and use limitations which may have occurred on or exist in conncctaola with tlac subiecs site, ati indicated by the subject site PR. Krizan's review of the PR indicated no deed rc•strictaon.� or environmental liens wen: recorded for the subject site that Indicate the subject site ltas been .subject to any "cleanup" orders as imposed by anv local, State or Federal aL�encics purstrant 10 CERCLA and the SBI_nKA. However, as quoted from the subject site: PR, "it is important to note that this PR is not a written representation as to the Condition i)f Title (COT) and may non list all hens, defects and encumbrances affecting title to tl)e subjc et silt land." 9.0 LINITTATIONS The site rcconnaissatace and research of the subject sltc: has been hrnrc6 in scope. Fins sync oi' assessment iti undertaken xith the calculated risk that the presence, lull nature. ;]nd exlcru 01 contarnination would nut be revealed by visual observation alone. Although a thorou�,li site FGQ()nr1',HSSafiCC w;a5 COMIcted in accordance with -\STM Guidelines and cinpiovin.g, a profession.tl standard of care, no warranty is giver,. either expressed or implied, that hazardous inatcnai contantinatlon Or bk"Cd %J- MCL-iuris, Vvbich would nol hivc hecn disclosed 1hrou1_'ll this :11ves112atInn. dig riot exist at lhi ' KPArAN &ASSOCIATES. LNG Ridr I1jJias Serving the Western United Strtres u141W:{i!0AAI hltirc � Project No. 014-0608. Page No. 15 subicct :;tic. Therefore, the data obtained are clear and accurate only to the degee implied by the sources and methods used. The findings presented in this report were teased upon field observations during, a single property visit. review of available data, and discussions with local regulatory and advisory agencies. Observations describe only the conditions present at the tine of this investigation. The data reviewed and observations made are, limited to accessible areas and currently available records searched. Krazan :;annot guarantee the conic lctel:ess or accuracv of the reeulatory agency records rcvicvved, additionally, in evaluating the property, Krazan has relied in good faith upon representations and information provided by individuals noted in the report :with respect to present operations and CXiMilhl property Conditions, and the historical uses of the property. It must also be understood that changing circumstances in the property usage. proposed property usaac, subicct site zoning, and chanucs in the environmental status of tiie other nearhv properties can aitcr the validity of conciusions and information contained in this report. Therefore, the data obtained arc clear and accurate 0:11V to the de2ree implied by the sources and methods used. 'Ihis report is provided for the exclusive use oC the client noted on tine cover pa17e and shall be subject to the icrrns and Conditions in the applicable contract between the client and Krazan. ,iffy third party use of this report. ineludintx use by Client's icnder, shall also he subject to the terms and conditions tioveming the work to the contract bctWcen thte client and Krazan. The unauthoriz,cd use of, reliance on, or r lease Of' the 1llf0r1na11or1 contained in this report Without the CXPress written consent of Krazan is strictly prohibitcd and will be without risk or liability to Krazan. Conclusions and recommendations contained in this report arc based oft the evaluation of information made avatiahic dunnz the course of this assessment. It is not warranted that sueh data Cannot 'n,: superseded by future environmental. to -al, rcotcchnical or technical developments. Conseyucrttiy, Liven the possiblhit} for unanticipated haZardous conditions to exist on a subject site which may not have been discovered. this phase I hSA is not intended as thu hasis for a huver or developer of real property ut waive lheir rights of"recovery hascd upon environmental unknowns. Pardus that choose to waive nights of recover-V prior to situ development do do at their own risk. 10.0 011A ,IFI('ATIONS This Plmsu I FA was conducted under the supurvision or responsible charge of Krazan's undersigned cnvtrcnutte:tt,tl �trtrlesictnrrl with fron, the undursiL�ned rc isturud cnLuiecr. fhc work wa,, KRAZAA & ASSOCIATES, INC. Rath Offices Sen,rr'rn the lVestern f.`rtited Slates aeaaeaQS:\.41 Ptzc.l prole! No. Oia+ 6085 Pa a & o, 19 Gon6eGtd inaSodanccwiBASTNIE15273% generai IyaCECp ed ddu4g 22dagJGrenv mRm7m! due %h «e% place at $etime oE$epreparation obEwepd.Ig 3G¢;gq&ymmm|polkiG. qc 6e2a2 that. m !Y g of our pm Sgm | brow»dam and lociDk «: r et $e defimfiu of en G mnmema pm Ra A2| as deter d 6 §31110 of40 C ER 112 and we Bay Fy m« yc gu3 3 GS m: basedoned«36m:maim, and expJkncemaw&aapmpcilyo0ben±u±.history, and wo,7n£$n wubeGgmpm-t % %ei vudvclopcdadpJy c the %|ap 2mpn2emguao in mmGm m±z«31Ge 2a,aar war pmG ko e! G nh in 40 C FR Ban 2 2 AH&|ZD ERT3mE Respectfully g'1)rllitt, ERAZ, & ASSOCI I.S.INC. &ABR H. »Omll R m Remn» G e4o/ < N .53«! Dean Alexandev Principal EngGcuE RG E No. 0020: 1."RC E No l4:'4 . r EHn R. T nine umnmenml3ASmr kR %6%.N & ASSOCIATES. INC. With Offices Srvi; the Westerntrrtww mwMF,arPh;=I Project No, 014-060S5 Patie No, 20 REFERENCh:S :%criai photographs Iocated at the Callf'orriia State University Fresno (CSUT) - Henn' Madden I..ihran, Frc:Snil. Calilbrnia and via the Internet wensitc GloncXpiorcr.cc7m. California Envirottmcntal ProtCCLIori Agency (Cal -EPA), Recorded Deed Restriction List, 1994. Cal -EPA, Deprtrncnt oC Toxic Substances Cornrol (D-I'SC) Envirostor Webstte. Caiifs m a Regional %Vater OLlalfty CCOrttrol Board (R%VQCB) Geotracker Website, Chicago Title Prchirimary Title Report. City of Fresno Piannam, and Devcloprnenl Department (CITDD). City oi' Fresno )~nLmccrtn�-, Department (CFEU). City of Fresm) Fire Department (('FFD). Federal ttrid State re11ula10ry av7cncy lists compiled by Environmental Data Resources. Inc. (E DRI. Fresno County Duparimc_nl of Community Health, Environmental Iicalth System (FCEI-IS). Master Hazardous Materials Handlin', Facilities List, Juiv 2005. Flaincs [Cris -Grass and Polk Guide Directoncs for the C RV of Fresno, FrCSrlo Count' NNW Lihrarv- Ccntrai Branch, Fresno, Caiiiomia. Huhford, \Ir. Duane, the Secretary for the Fresno Elks Club, the previous owner of the subjccl site. Nunez, \Ms. Corrina, of the City of Fresno, Planning and Development Department, the user of tine Phase I Environmental Site ikssessmeut (ESA). Sanborn Fire hisurance Mops for the City of Fresn>, (FDR). Stale of California. Department Of %'hater Resources, 1 iners o% Lquul h7cw lion of ;i (ucr rya lt"eiL Unconfined riquiltrr. 5',in .loaquin L'ulfev, Sj)rmg 2004. The Munger Map Book, Calii'orrnia - Alaska Oil & Gas Fields. Munger \-laps - 2001. U.S. EPA Federal Superfund Liens List and the 1,.S. EPA California Liens, 1995. U.S. Geolvc6cal Sunny. 7.5 minute Milla2a, California topographic tluadrantic reap, dated 1904, hilolorc•vtscd 1981. KRA%A.y &ASSOCIATES. INC. Wirlt Offices Serving the lVesrern United Stales !iI 1K9AAI r'IL1 i I _I IGRAvr I+ASe [.1 AVC '=��r _�:.� '- - "-- -• _ Jr g.,:I. .. - Pal. k ; -- 7 9H y� sin y ^ y-- -- •1 • . :. ! . i ■ - ' . F, FUL gif $� � IIF ,may .. ''J .7ir.� __... � r -r. - ,I�Lc,.. ' �•, • iz ■ _ � vu ;rEe Al LC.�i{.'..1��[[11. - ,. i}I 1 1;{p'•.. �. y r� - r. ; Sir- -figmrnUnilw r _Ill• J - �'[ull'�r11 Fi±�] =1.ri _ ._�� .. imp -�. �;oH�Rhi i},w •r -a;,Y rnr„p- El 300 &Ra4�y •'��'•}� E.Frrii�ehl 31 _ •I. h'1AI' SOURCE: 7.5 NUNUTE- ShRiES L'-S.G.S. FOPOCIRAPHIC NIAP MALAGA, CA DA-FED 1964 PHOT'OREVISED 1991 41::10 wl:il.f" I� FtrL-T � r1 • aLL LOLATONS A417 01h1ENSvINS A&EAI"I"RO MATE VICINITY NIA' Scwc AS SHOWN G°tr t9/06 , %a" ' W m' Kxa fU TANS[T VILLAGE PROPERTY Pro— by'• �'�°°"'" by SOU111 OF EAST KINGS CANYON RO;',D .kN-D S, A E. R I SITE DEVEL( P.ME\T ENGINEERS EAST 01' SOUTH ADLER Air F:,NUE' Projece No. F'QLWC no Offices Scrvlrit' thin %Vcstirn 11[liteil States FRESNO.CALIFORNIA n 4-OAC ti 1 .4 •' L� w�'y `i yr. yi % �, '/� "��',Y�. I�� ;{I s��• � a�j� f „ r 1 ol- I' Ilk rp y _ F.'s„ ��" Vie,•--•Sn1 �1'x` k. y. r.•,,►..i.�'.-r'-{ �'�i:v M'� 5 •--. :},}"a '� • �' �L I =f': 4�f.�•, , .. tr fin,'7-. �; .��".. '�r�r•�''!--r:,c� r _ r�1,+..+5r}... X.'4rY. _':!: :•iSi.:.'i��•:5w Lt.7.i,41;.r V .,� .r Y it L •` .'� ` -. '— ,w_'f •"Lr CRr�t::{�YU�*- •'�f`r. ,�'� .,�h.;.Y._b.+I� ' - � :'- j. T'',;ter. „-v;�,'�'vr_•y�'.?"'�''S � tine. 's II[[rj • he's' i�.1m i . rti,:' - ml c MO L Z C) CHI CAGO TITLE CO1,11PANY PRELIMINARY REPORT Datod as ot: July 29, 2004 at 7.20 APIs Ordei No. 5647294 - JT CHIC -GO TITLE COMPANY hereby reports that a is prepared to Issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a Policy or Poli&ers of Title Insurance describing Me land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set 'orth. insurim I against loss which may be sustained try reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception in Schedule 8 or not excluded from coverage oursuant to the printed Schedules. Con&rions and StlpLla.Ions of said Pnticy lorms The pr nted Exceptions and Fxclusi❑ns from the coverage of said Pdlcy or Policies are set fonh in the attached list Copies of the Policy forms are available upon request, Please read the exceptions shown or referred to In Schedule 9 and the exceptions and exclusions set forth In the attach) rd list of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you wttn notice of maners which are not covered under the terms of the this Insurance policy and should be carefully considered, It Is Import.int to note that this preliminary report Is not a written representation as to the condition of [file and may not list all Lens, defects, and encumbrances affecting title to the land. THIS FEPORT (AND ANY SUPPLEMENTS OR AMENDMENTS HERETO) 15 ISSUED SOLELY FOR THE PLIFIPOSE OF FACIU rATING THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE AND NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREBY IF IT IS DESIRi:D THAT LIABILITY BE ASSUMED PRIOR TO THE iSSUANCF OF A POLICY OF 7TLE INSURANCE, A BINCER OR CC NWITMENT SHOULD ISE REQUESTED. The for-n of pollcy of title insurance contemplated by this report is: CI.TA STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY - 1990 Visit Us On The Web: avestamd+vision ctt com ilia Department _ Escrow Department: CH1CAG0 TITLE COMPANY CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY 2510 S DUTH FAST AVENUE. SUITE 600 733C N. Palm Ave., Suite 101 FRESN O. CA 93706 Fresno. CA 9371, (559)4; .7-2314 FAX: (559) 457-23r36 (559) 451-3700 FAX: (559) 431-8906 Escrow No.. C05647294 .lay Tor es ITLE ()FFICEH PPP - -1 iG5f59',. .Judy Pezcidt ESCROW OFFICER p4 J SCHEDULE B (continued) Order Nc 5647294 JT Your Rcf: Lessor, Fr�nnc UnLficd School D1Gtric� Lesste. Frtsrc lln.fsed School Drst__ct Fducat:ona' �ac�:ities Corporation Recorded: June 20C1, as nacumei.* No. 2001-007826S, Qftic_al Records li A lease with certain terms, ccvena.nt6, conditions and provi91.ons set forth therein. Lessor: Fresno Unified School Da9Lrict Educational Faci7:cies Corporation Fresno Unified Schoa`_ Osstr,ct Recorded Juae 7, 2001, as Document No. 200:-0078266, Oitic-,al Re::crds ?, By as n:;sig=me Agreeme dated :un_ 1, 21701, Fresno UniriNd Schoo: I]ist:ic- Educational Faci1it;Cs Corporation assigned certain rights in the ltases sez for7h in paragraphs 13 and '_4 to U.S. Bank Trust National Association as Trustee tor the benefit of bondholders. Said assignment wd, recorded Junc 7, 2001, dS Document No. 2001-0078267, Official Records. END OF SCHEDULE B NOTE NO, 1: The charge for a policy of title insurance, whan issued through this title order, will be 'based on the ba:gir (r.or. sl:QrL-tern) [lclt insurance rAzt 1107E NO, 2: There are NO cornve-yasnces affecting said land, recorded with-,n thr< M years of �he date of this report. Typed and reviewed by: gmt -�cL.i�FC •? i1_ ; RCi nr r F (t- I U-CUUU I lulI UJ' U I rlj 1 1 � ' A r IILJI V.) +! ua ,iv• J4�TVV L v+ i d � 5 T� i ♦ OO � a gym. I '- 3nt nraN ------- - f _ I I y 5 � N tr-tisv q - 1 I i I ca I Q I I I 1 F 5 gl I 1,'I�a L LL! 6, ------------- I� 1 ' R j � ; 1 T ry9 1 � rco 1 I I ll '^ I _r- 1 •� 5 rT � I YMYM3NNaY S 1 L_ !� n L. Lti � p [N 1rY11 W I a �la,\ � rr►\ � h Ptaysa w n � L � M r t p oa Lu Q LU .~. h 4i 1 IL ? J Cl I Am I ; cn s YII " I ti y * d I 1��� y I I w '� ± , tlS • ' 1 n }6 A 3Ar z ZI + rw4. � ■ I r'r {_ f, jQ.•?ry MOT}!M'S I Ql/YYir1j i Y L''AS:7rLp-"or. • r„ :nc. --,A Assasaa.r r.,:l- 472, Grant' 5d47 294 Co'xa,rrxC; N � 5' o 4 � 4 a� N r: L V o A CL nqy CVO N � Il A A[idc�-1001tic:l0 0'056h?294 JT LIST OF PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS CAUFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY - 1990 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGI= Tho, talra,nns3 matiari are, AAoriblivy YACluacd Ircm LhC covuraga of this pairs{ rird ?n9 COnlp--fly wrli not bay 105� or b3fi1rl9'3, LTJ�t&. attamey? fee6 a' expun: OS wnlcrl 3fise by letaSdn 01: (al Any Iaw, Ordinance ur govornme)tai regulation (.nuutlrrg but not hrnrlud to 6,iflding and .wring laws ordinances, Cr rogriations) ra.tfrLhrg, rOaulatrrg, pidhlb,ting or tasting to l` the Occupancy, uuu, or er�oytnent rx ihA land- {ii) Mrs chardclef almei40nS or IOCztlan Of any impfoytment rvw a' hateafSef afflc'led an the land, (i1i) a Sep9ratiGn to ownef5nfp of a cnanoc rn the dlmerrsone of are)1 of Ilia land or any parcel at wnloh the 13nd Isar was ar part: or (lvl environnlpnta pratemun. cr Ito etioq of any v!c:tMoq of `Ris11a laws, orainurers Or governmental regulatlerts, exCept 10 1Re extent Intl, it notice Of tine ontofCCm4nr 1116=1 ar a n6l1Ce Of A Cetoc;, lien p1 VncurnDranCe roeulling tram a vic!anlon of alleged violation affecting trio far,a has bavn reco-riled rn In& public records at Dale of 15 6cy (b) My Cdvetnme11W police powe• rat excluded by (a; above, exbaCi m 111e exte'lt Ma: a noueff of Ina exerclst IrRareot Of a na':re of a select, Iren or er.cumgrancu resurrng from d vlolatlon or 151110itgOd vtO1a11on dtlutl;ng me land has Lean recd7fdcd in the Pub14c rucaf&I at [late at Polley. Rights of eminent domain unrest noucia of Iha Axe(clse theruot rue dean rncorde U n the pubrtc records at Dare of Fbhcyr, but Nit excruoing from covetagt! any takrn© wnlcn her; occurred prior to Data of Poltc; �.111041 would pe btnd.np on rhu rlgute of A purch iser fc! valuewrtnout knowVadga Defa=c, liens, encumbrances, ad,terse claims or other marwra: ia) wnether Mr not :ecoradd In the cublrc recorgr< at Data Of POlky, but created. Fufftlred, assumed or aclieed to by tine Insured cralrranc (L; not known Sit the Carnpany, net recorded in the public records at Date at Polley, but known to Ire lnzurod ciaimdnr Linz nct 0',sc10su-4 it writing to tr)e Company by me maurea claimant prior to Ihava lle the insured claimant becamr an insured under thla policy: (c) rut;ulting 1n nU 'tlfia of cemage M th% Ineufed cl"ell-TWL (d) attachlr-a or created subsequent to Date of Policy, ai (�) resuftln4 !n IOSS Or daM.2g i Witch would not hive been luxtaln" it tried insured clajmant had paid value for Zhu rnsiat n monquge nr the estate or interest rnsured by Ihler Polley. UntinfarceAaw,y of rite loan of the im;urvc rnortgaga because of Me ability ❑r tuilure of the, rnsurco at Dale of Roircy, of the 1naarllly or fa,lufa of any subsequent owner of the indeatoone-w to comply wim appipoan18 doing butinuec lawn of the ataW rn wnier tfii!'tinA it +11 V QVud Inval City or urwnlCfivatw y x the teen of tno insured morepage, or claim tnereaf, which an --us put of ills tranaac; on a rdencu0 by lho insured maregaga and 16 batiad upon usury or wry consumer Craml protemon a V utnKn-lendlno fdw. Any claim, vvhl_h ariees out at the trananction ve►ling In thfr in%urad the &State or inte+est ;naured by inls pancy ce To irzin&iaan crediting th© interest of the insured ienaec by reason of"Operation of federal bankruptcy, SL7+0 insolvency O! sentlar cf4clta's r:ghtr laws LXCEP7IONS FROM COVERAGE This poll.:y dncrl not rraure egarnel loss of carnage (and the: Company will not pay cast. - attorneys' feaa or arptanses) whrcn arrs) oy reason of 1 Ta: HS Or assessm CfllS which am flat srowr as awo)ng I:Cns by Chu recora6 of any iaAing autnerrty, the: 'eve :es wAuL Cf asisassmerl5 On faai property ar fly the public rucoraa, =,r,cneaings by a public agercy wnicn may retsuif rn laxas Of aaaaazrnentn. a' not„cue ci sucfl plocoedinos whelnur cr not crown by Inn raceme, f such agency or by Ire public rt]co1ds y Ar1r tact,_ rirghtn- 1nt+revi or ClarmO which are net Shown by mo p.rbllc reccrc3 but which could of, asc:nBinud Oy an inEaecl.Ur1 of IN ar.d cr which m ty be asserted ]y persons In pdssass,on therabi 3 Emvrrienis, lien®, or enrumurances. or G131ms triereal, W11rcri 3re not itiown by the put1k, IBCb R1a 4. Li«ropetrCrae., conflict. n Coundary lino., arertago 1n area, en-lfoa"menm, or any L,rnar tocto wh,Lr a correct Our, (ay would CIISti cGSa and wnich ar , not mown by the public reoorg3. ti (et) :-Ln Catemecf mining nizilms. (b) taservai,onL co vxcept.ons rn patent; or in A --Is akil Orr7ing the ,ssua+Lte Tureot: ici waiet'I'}RIY. �i:;'f^.c:I[ 111113 to w:dmi. wnam(Ar Or tali thin matinrs Accopted under (,ij. (b) or lc; are 3ROwn fly SRo -uoilr recrtrds 111 +. !v �UVv I1Vi5 Vi/' Vf_ IllI vi I l V� . 11 �. �/15V , ..,� - —----— Atrac— .ioOrdcrNu. 045597294 CT AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION RESIDENTIAL TITL? INSLIPANCE POLICY EXCLUSIONS In aadmo 1 to trio 4.iciotions in Scrreoule ©, you ate not insurea against iom casts a aonley's fae6 ana axpenaes rei:un:ng lrcm Garitstrmentdi Felice paWer• slid ttho axlatence Cr violation of any law or govarrirantat regulation. This IndLoeS t;ullaing a"ia zoning nrdinantes and also laws and regulations Wncerring; 1wid use land divi4ion imprerument on The land environrneoot prnleetson his exclusion dOaa not apory to Ths v{Olabona or the Cnfatcoment of TP6%u matterr. which appear :n the puOhc rucoraS at a91:cy gate. This cxctusion does not :imtt the znninG co%wfage aescnoed in trams t2 and 13 of Ccivered Title Rieke. Ti-e r'gltt to take a* lend by condemning It, unlrsss. a catics a.1 exercising the rlghl appears in irs public recorciz on the Potic.y pate Mu faktng nappened prior to ltta %IiCy Gate and is binding on you If you bought the Sand without XnOwinq of Ire T.ak:ncq 1 Tnln Rirkc, teat ate crt ttterY, allawnd. or agreed to by yea that are known to you, but not to ua, on trio Pc5cy Gate - unless they appuarea in tea public recardc that teault in no ioaa to you Mal firal aft= your lilte after The Policy Datt • Tis doaa not Ilmh the ifkb4W and M2LWI ',ion onvua6e in rem. 8 of ;avnrea Tiro Aieks i Failure to pay value for your We Lac* of a r gt't, to any lara our&iao tha arvla spRciAlly described and, retilrred to In itchrn ;1 of Schrtduie A or in streets, alteys, ci Wd1Crwaya that l000 your land Thra exclusion aces not limit the aizvow cowrage in Item 5 of Covered TOO Risko. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE In addition to the Exceptions, you are not insured agarnat loss. costs, Qnerneya' teas anC expenses resulting frcm: Sgn•wone darmirB an Intetrev in your land by reason of A Edsomente not shown in trio public recofas _ 8. Boundary dlcoutec not shown In the public racards mprovements owned by your neignbor placied On yhsur land it addrtton io a apple farndy ,esidnncn, your exiving structure con3iam et one Of more AdCdionat J-"ltlnq knit, Itur'n 12 o' Covered Title Pja7+s doati mi rnsvra you against IOU, coals, anCrnay3' lees, and aVense3 roaulting horn - A Tee forcad removal of any Additional D mllinQ Unn or, B The forced conversion of any Addiuona! Dweiling Unit Dark to Its ariginal use, it saiq Addaional Dwelling Unit was vithar constructed Cr comfe cl to use as a dwalliny unit in violation of any law or gortirrlmunl eg4laltan AMEFUCAN LANE] TrTLE ASSCOAT10N HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE It4URANCE t10-1T-gej OCC'.LUSIONS in tddiTior, to the Exceptions in Scneduie 5, You are not inured agagisl toss, mm, allomey is fees. and expaneo6 rdbulur•,g trim 1. Gavemrrrerital police power, dnd The existence or vrailation atariy laver or Government reguLabon. This Includes old nances, laws una regulations conQuming: a. bwlding c. Lend usd i. and division b zonlnq d, improvements on tits Land t environmental protac ion Triis notica of the vtotauart cr enlorcgment eppeers in the Public Armies at the Policy NIA This F-Aclus-on does not limit the coverage descrlboci to Covered fiiak 14, 15, 16. 1 7, of 24, 2. 'The lailure of Yaur sxls rig Ct1uCTurer6, or ary part of them, to be constiactca in acsardanca wrgh ApplicaWa Guiding rides Thu Excliusion does not apply to violayorlc of oud4zing Cooee it ratica of trio violation fippogir; in the Public Rzcorde 31 tha policy rate- The right to take trio Lund by oonaemning it, unlea.97 I Z. 1*10u�P Of exAfc;&nQ 111A rignt appaam in the Public Ritimms at the Policy Qule;or b the teking napperhed before the Pokey Date and is Wnding on You If You bought the Land wrThout f nOw0g of Ind Taking Risks. tt that are croated, allowca, or agreed to by You, wneTner or not they appear in the PubI :x;cvrro;; h. tnal are Known to You = the Policy Owe, but not tG U3, unleCd T^.ey aQpodr In the PubIIC %Cor[t3 at the PCIIry Dale. c that rosuh in no You 10 You, or d that 1.1r9l occur aver ire Policy Hale - lhis does nat 6mi1 the coverage descnboo in Covered Rick 7, g d, 22, 23. 24 ur 2.. FalljftL to pay vaii:e & Your Tills. h "iCk of a r1o'll r, to ally land eut,lde Me arha opecificmy daacrlbed and referred to,n paragraph 3 of Sched..ie A, and b in Weeta, 9iieys, or waterways that touch ihl: Land. Tni.'axciusion coca nart iirnn inn covcruga Qe_cribed in Ca+crna li 11 Qr 18. Ai �d7T'P iv; �:!y'C1a EXHIBIT "A" APN, 472-021 -01T (portion) That portion of Lot 75 of Easterby Rancho, in tt.e City of Fresno, County of Fresno, State of California, according to the map thereof recorded in Book 2, at Page 6 of Plats, Fresno County Records, more particuiarly described as follows: COMMENCING at the northwest comer of Lot 76 of said Easterby Rancho; thence S 69'27'54" E, along the north line of said Lots 75 and 76, a distance of 647.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this oescription; thence S 0045'49" W, parallel with the west line of said Lot 76, a distance of 373,44 feet; thence S 89°29'37" E, a distance of 284.69 feet; thence S 0032'24" W, a distance of 40.00 feet: thence S 89°24'52" E, a distance of 194.29 feet; thence S 0°31'45' W, a distance of 50.75 feet; thence S 89'28'15* E, a distance of 142.15; thence N 0"45'49" E, parallel with tree west line of said Lot 76, a distance of 4604.20 feet to a point on the north line of said Lot 75. said point being 1268.50 feet east of the northwest corner of said Lot 76, as rneastired along the north line of said Lots 75 and 76; thence N 89°27'54' W, along the north line of said Lot 75, a distance of 621.50 feet to tho TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the north 29.00 feet. Contains an area of 5,389 Acres, more or less. For the purposes of this description the northwest comer of said Lot 76 is taken to be 30.00 feet south of the north line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 14 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, and 20.00 feet east of tale west line of said Northeast Quarter of Section 7. GQ LAND Sit S pp\) G Cqs LS 5O96 OF CAQ� 2�Q �-151 1 5-A-7721 D:\DATAIW P%Kirtgs Canyon Intermodei Housirg 5ite.wpd EXHIBIT "B" OF SF Tra CORNER EAST KINGS CANYON ROAD OF SECT ON CORNER 1 -' OF SECT1pN 7 14121 —L-S 89'ZTS•�- E �` 2&47,5T 1 r �. -�- -- - �--------------N89'zT54•w--52i.5d__,-r__r ? 647 GO � y NW CORNER OF LOT 76 ci c r "' a 3 ry . Lil I� i= Ll > 7i Z.v �C7 4v 1 I Q L3 -a �Oi ji ~ l5. tj = tidy 10 z �fr ai p I� �N WANE C - - -&4ST-=ANE-AVE -- 4^- a I LINE TABLE BFAR1hG LENGTH so -Mo SU,� ti S 84"2937' E 284.647 I �4}a�-03UGL4 LF oPA L2 S g'3724' W 40.Co 1 1-3 S M4'52' E 144.29, a w L4 S 0'3 P45' W SC 75' g S 5 841281 S E ! 42. I S� NO SCALE OF 1NL)iC4TEE PARS TD BE G,RAWM TO T'riE 0 YOF FAZSNO 5.289 Acurs= ar.r .� `F.pr CITY OF FRESNO arc 2.;ca_1 s, CEPFRTNFN7 CF PUft'C'NOiKS aG do Pt -A 'NO. 2762 CA 6Y J PARCEL TO 5E GRANTED TO THE CITY OF a A.- �r FRESNO FOR INTERMODAL / HOUSING SITE OA "�' "�_ 15-A-7721 K zq-q is LAP v y nr-lU-LUUU IiL'Ix 00 4z] r111 vI I � 'fiL:.11U - — -- inn Phase l FSA Uier Questionnaire Transit Village Property Southeast of East Kings Canyon Road and South Adler Avenue Fresno, California K&A Project No, 01406,085 Rf Mn cnt.into_rrr_A Name, Comma Nuncz Da, c:lApril 10. 2006. Company City of Fresno Phonc: (5,591 b21-R506 Introduction "lr order to qualify for one of the Landowner 1_iahiiity Protections U-P.O offered by the Small Business Li, bility Relief and Brownfield Revitalization Act of -1001 (the `Brownficids Amendmcnts'), the user must provide the following information (if available) to the enviroamenital professional_ Failure to prr.wde this information ;:ould result in a determination that 'all appropriate irquin,' is .not completed"- Arierican Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) EI527-05 Apperulix X3: Usm Questionnaire 1 .are you aware of any environmental cleanup liens against the subject site that are filtd or rocordcd un ler federal, tribal, state. or local iawl "u 2. ATe you aware of any activity use limitations (AU1a) such as cno tu_ering controls, Iand use re .irictions, or institutional controls rhai are in place at the subje`t site and/or have ban filed or recorded in a registry wider federal, tribal- state, or Incal law' i,o. 3 As the user of the Please I Environmentai Site Assessment (ESA), do you have any specialized k.iowledge or cxpenence related to the subyect site or nearby properties? For example, are you involved ir, the same bno of business as the curTeni or former occupants of the subject site or an adjacent properly si. that you would have spcciauzc:d knowledge of the chemicals and processes used by tlus type of b isiness'' 4 Docs the purchase price being paid for the subject site remonabiv reflect the fair market value of the s,birel sitr7 if you conclude that them: is a difference, have you considered whetheT the lower purchase trice is because contamination is known or believed to be present at the subject site? I he value of the property was ,A2pra►sed a 65Q,0f)U. oweer,- t, he_C ity iq paying a-purchasc Qricc of 2?S i}i}0. The 537�,000 difference is a credit from the Fn�s o U iled School District (owner) for a previous (1990) real estate exchange with the City. This transaction as Wr l as the nrevioLLc (1990} t;dnspStion was pc-rformed by Real Estate Agents m the Cin-'s DeMariment of Pubiic Works. lose ;,IvitrdQ o�US17 {457-61 19) may have more knower c about the site. The site is the. forma Elk,;; lodge which has now hmr removed. J. kre you aware of corrmonly tsttown or rtasonablf asect-lainabic uliot:nation about the subject site lat would help the environmental professianai to identify condittom indicative of releases or thrcatrned reh aset"? For example: A. Do you know the past uses of the subject sttc? Former F.lk I.odue Site. H Do you 6mow of specific chemicals that are present or on4C were gncscrtt at the subject site? tr Do you i-toA. o spills or other rhernicai releases tna: have taken place at the tiuE)J=L site? D. Do you know of any cttvirorunenrai cleanups that heve takem place at the subject sst�:' tio. 6 N the user of the Phase i ESA, based on flour Imowlos gc and experience related to the subicct site, arc tht-r:. any obvtous indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of cuntanunation at the subject six., No 1. the user of this Phase i ESA (or authorized respresentative of the User), do hereby attest that I have c trctul]Y considered the auesttans herein 3rtd have presented answer s ro the best of my .k-nou ledge an a )iltty based upon the Rosponsibihtics of the User as required Wilhin ASTIvt RI 52,-05 guidance. I ame C_ orrtna Nunez Datc (Plaa+epr�nt) `tg*nature 0 &q Z'1 rk: t1�Ss{w` �rFllF3: I.\ 1, 1 A� ','+t'i . _1..;,fl."'*�'I'. ,.- ;M1: i'... L*d}.r •1,4._j4.�+..4C S rl''. �C4� I_.�'�r,11 ttt it�ILr> ^uu l �? iS crsi4in. rrw Abh.,uailan It'UPA;ohl,rh7F tlfiKnm�r n .5hellta i*ud {3? �� urs rll Lhc Iy' Imo• . _ :ti.� �,-,a.c,,;.w•,� a - �L e,C1 ,fl:Y XT-IF •,�'�'��Y�rty,�v5ic1LL't•:+I�r1}tY1��,'r F �If,cfdf�'`'aa1*}itiL++�l`fnitsq'tJCIIh�LaLx211nFi{,�i.Yd�IH`hll�i?.tR��_r]}�d17F-,�,`ayroi+xl�l#�7SIs,rt�Li�[{�l',livi�t'�icf:�ewre:l•.;r�l,ICI..... r:. r i +cal or1; niLkw�res5r�?� +�c!�ter r ag.t ortt l`#+ng�� JlutcE i47F4,��,"'hr�3°�5r .: rd.. ci! oer�n.'tlauv�: r1' L tid.. nn t,L•.I v = L r, {{ t:C. i'Mi7111 kla LfFr� �1.�y�r�yi6•f'oli4b•t.r,crtrr_ri:i"`i'�'; ',y f;^h ""'�`-;� Ptlra1?4%hmr•',i 1` 'fii llrn,'IhL' I nr4a ldn5i5++iii�Yl.3lr t7ii clg4-N ,r - " ITriWWitY��Tii5i1�*+r�5t.5Ssrunit'��rer.+i�u�trn�Ati:F:.'dT,n.Liti•II\�:sF,►`C4YI�elytiisjlfll"lP�w'�if�iii�l7ra`S`• �4H±�r_vrcS«tl�r.�cfl&cln„ :f,.•,I'.+L il��•5il511f�',:�L4J. n r{r . - !:- ,:ti'r *,.,�#. rr i L f�ryor•.' OWN, yn.r 41 lie • 3 /s �r{S i '!S•Y %'i► i_—`j :,"L if+ ...::Iv;•'^�•r-,4r. �'+; 1F.�F�_ :•'?.�-:.:'..:._ , .� S • k; �? irlk � ;L/!- �; lrr!'=w �.'�! +�_..•. '" — .Tr: _F.,iF��y�; .�+�: �','�t.} .. r��i �!'�. �— � •F+��7. 1'Ky A'Yri 'Y-J> -L+A .+-4,,. .. L'?'. i11''1S/7 �-+, �„'A�,r L^w. ". ��,' .J f'lA�r,�}Y. is .; ,:�':��' t ii�.yzrf •�.v ;CIe�. ' ♦- '4 rr,: lj -- Lr�1,�Y ,Ylf �.�, Ia„.,. ILI K•ri r..'. '+f+?r�Cr.�i-Yk'.f.4S."' I- +) '^_' ,�. Yf'.��• ,L'�, :7�'. YiLr %'� t'��T1'}Ti�'`• -. ,.._.. ;'r_.�iILNn.rr�}I F'}'- �:1-�.._ .r. �y 7�:1, W ? M. Ir1 �•,�.ik?rr,!��� ... - Y';-. '�^L�IC � �'�C ..� `4.Y-_ r - r`r- Yd', . ri `Fxi-"•F?LY-- ' �. ra?�w i..ry`w+r:M•'' ":, ' �j . ,''Y���i+. � .';/. "':A.`:r.L v.�•f`. .' 'I:��y�a.'F►����y�'al'a��'. r r. �r � � � � 3sr� Y�{r�r,r•� �''•M1 . x:},7 ��-��F'•"' �-rl�'.ii.i ; ...- � Ott ` zl •��f,!•? ^7 rd .•'�"-.',r5�i}„+ �h��11s� •.='� =r ^'y' .�'�7.h: rf.7 ti��' f�Y, r�:. s.,t +a�._.,tjrr��; �rIT�R,��y,}:G'��.: _. �-f' •G- M1�[5�/p't r`,h, %G.:':7�a &�r:�'r.4�S5]-... ,•ytv±+`.r,�e}4r, �"'r"i•r!�'i,1A"Il.?5 Oirtc r";K,�rsi,5k:�_i.. • � 41. 3 'rl �.Ri �' �.•,.. #y��...w ,�rity.�iY'Yww''-. r .. -..�'I'`�, *i�,.� 7' r `�iP�, �r, jF��*�4Y�!i`�4i�?�i r �7 �Li• �I ,�.��5 ���iw=L�iL��rn' �. - ..$ice '6: IC 73:�-'T'�'.."+:���5�.,��•,�L°rr��' lr�ti:`."I>.;. hs,[�,4�1'� 4"�"`=.j`�xa ` •.. �:. 2_�a1-"+5i'~...S.i.i"?1,:`u; +f'.,'•�k:k� +ILe�_ ,,.-;, w f�1'i`#�•,� "� `•�.:�` �i+i"=?r;.�e�, r�, : ;H�yt.�i� .��+.�'�'�,''nr�y' r � :'f', �r - "s + v�l}-i 'y } '{ `Z;rr'�1�Llt���"`.��.��i V'`a;h55.r .- .7't. I. ,�'?w�.. �+*,i�LUt r,5?r�L'I.;. #t M n ,..�-r.....i`iV ` +W.L:.w • �.I,r-rkr��,,,�' ;•b�' •2 '�'�x'�'`rr''. • � i :`7 _ �R ,,"FN_'�'�Sr". S .i�!`57:LSl 1. L ..-.--•�i---- j4'. •" ';�j(,KLt -�F �„�����. -F�4 1�33�L��'S".:.'iti,',;� 'f "w,r,,r ��j��,A •••_ V P�>rim#:t:�i�c;�A,'.`Y�.,'"->*���`'1��r.:, JY� RROJE.... GUAB ....... X.7 G P-T F& CA= amjn,�­.' 'C&d Box), ­­',o"-7",)Gwul t4Rxrweffswww Put (@a. C450clw evsGargwf ow ,sr.LSvnm Fbaoftn Pitt ,*Tap p "bu Fw" V ANO re ie4ufzprm_jl r"w j3vxA W ,4.aff, Pml, 2 an Wr W f Ul T ii (-)F �.TH Ef-CU V PMIF� vm.0PMEN"r.- , 'DF.PARTMrN ., __ Er-O'COMMI !�.�EF.TbR cxc vcrry­ANf),'0UAU_ry Of LIFE" By:,)MpLEWNTING:'< 'T IV !,mvj­.ANn V URR ENT -PLANNINGAU X-1 1vT$.1 .4': 1, D 1141 Y ST '.,m A,: 7"-- . SAf (;I..NL A A W C.FETYA &lhl SJI I NT N SURSTA, .w W4 .6:i,pth flVlf)I;ATII INY CA sm- mg WAGCtvwmw - W,�,VJMKOW ;twaw;P�Dffi 1Jjn/� / I DO Ur 'Umm- AND ASSIST lglTY�STA_NbAkDS 'FOP UFF F-AFE-rY, AM) I:r-ICILIJT J" TII-'.S_.T0 SI IA"',_M II.-. (-ol m5l: 0LAND ANI) I tM 1. 1 c n 9M.P6531w .4ONTROLDISTRCT NIFIE-D-AIR. 0 I Iscutnw-! RE 0 099 Tuc urnns St, --270G st" �,7 . ' 2� ..3 1 .. r— k 93721 Fh) r!�r� 0 O'KEM.11old, CA 92501 (8 0 518 S 2- 5 20 0 (2 0914 97-1 OAd t NIs*dcr&'LsA YQn c ulire 2rui Kcra C Vc F = CadaZection ISZ27.:!vquiraG nut 1SSuu 2 deMO11:'U(D! i Clare --.'ari_oxcnp4j 0M, the NaLicnnl --misria: Polf DM Va1cy UninWi ed.' r-PolluUon: cnW'Dicl.. It Is 1;w Apqi►cari',' raquired CjqnML1r6 Ana rezurn,min form to 6c,appropflMin city or county builCiri< 00- F"IX tf: V.M (O'lect cacripu6if", MIN; eld Ilk X, 7 7 - 14 MY It, ielhdrdii—mblii kiy ilcnnr,ir" "70 L—4W. 1F theArmolibon,ppilen.r )n tppfbbOPd— 3h. i I1H -applIca .4 In 14, v­- 17�MA-taftrj COMInerd Vr' r•~+wlr..y. :i45:1 n. .wau I f i0i.LNr stirDim (SWUM, ?CO'U$E1ONt.Y F.�' -'4 6 weldeffia a�s I _1�11%flddp�q �FC a on raid rc t n I AF-CD n! Ion ls�xem 0 exits. d ram j4�01c-atlon !1ex f6l' e fI ' a a.fth.2 Projt-ct' I FISH Mew" 11, rb K 1 t'I bi y i (rE[D)R* -rnvlronrncnta I Data Resources Inc "Linking Technology u1Yti Tradition's) Sanborn® Map Report Ship To: Enn R. Tronv Order Date: 4,'6;--1006 Completion Date: 4i61-2R00 Krazan & .yssociat::s, Inc. Inquiry #: 1649859? ? I > West Dakota P.O. #: Erin R. Trnnc (Mavis, (.', 9:>61? Site Name: Transli VillatLYe 1'ropem° Address: SEC' of K1nt,s Canvon Rd'S Adicr Avg ';ustomer Project: 01=l060I 5 City/State: Fresno. CA � .03R910I'EP i 5 9 - 4�-_'200 Cross Streets: This document reports chat th;: lar,est and most complct. colIccilon of Sanborn fire imiararncc inaps has I)cen rcv�ir wed based on ci1cnl supplied iniormallon, and firL insurance maps dcpictinrg'he tar,c! prn.ncriy aN the spccilied address vvc;c not idennfi :d, NO COVERAGE This Rr pqn cool acne cer.am ihl LVTnaaOn moinLq Irilf1i :, ram{} G7 puolrC and osr r xaw ors QeAW ,e try ,wu.a We 10 r rmcu onnmlvoi Cam ii VWLIrMS. M II c3mnol t , oonutcKc Irom l his Fte9w tvai ruNwage rn%wmai,on %w me wryet ark? rurfo+ lidlrl prD09rlrr, aoeS a01 yvSi Ism amel aouicpes. N .0 WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLiEP. iv FAADE'NV T.r EVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA AESOuRCES INC. SPECI�'ICer r Y C(SCL-".45 THE MAKING OF AN' SUi,H W RRMITIES. INCLLVNG WUNGLIT .1kh' IGN. IMERC1"TABILITv O-R FITNCSS FOR A PARTICULAR U5E OR PVRPOSE. ALL RISK 15 ASSUMED BY THG USER IN NO E%VJT SHAD 1=NVIRONMEt,rTA1, DATA iES0IIRCE5. INC. 9E LL ALE tO A YOrwE. WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR L)MMvIONS. NEGLIG3:NCE. ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER '—%USE. =OP. ANY LMS OF DAMAGE. INCLUDING. VYITF%OUT LIMITATION, SPEGLAL. INME1I70.L. C-ONSE.OUE47LAL. OR E+.EmPLARY QAW,5E.5 At4y LL WLSTY GW TKE PART OF Ean+lSi[,%MF=rFAL DATA RESOURCES MC. IS 5TRIvTLY UWITEO TO A R[FUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID xOR THhS R6PhOKF Pum,.7 .1 is .C. pM Ih15 Report A5 IS ARy anuYse5.4Vimsle`:. rzunq;. environmanra1 r+;k titers or rrsk C cm 13ruv%5Ed in Tins R*,>m ws vtLw%jed Ior du5L38UW.. purPMes only. Tnd are nC rr,Ier,aoo so prov4a. not srculd lisCy De tntelpfL;L'* as [�JmN 9 any tans 'ggai ginq, ❑L pmdietron or Iorecasr ol. ariv EtewiriinrranL31 n.sk Iv an'{ picoorry rJrrly a Pt%ase I EnwaQrmw, Sr a ASsetrsman; pigr%N red Oy an P,flylacinrOn1al p1can orcwioa Monrretron iogarQrn� Ew tr% cnln¢nW re Iiir airy p4wwrry. AddMxl* LRe InFortnn+ron mvrdeo in U,rs Rayon is not io Ce tonsiruetl as IegaJ a0rro! Gopyrrgns 2rJD5 ter E ^rrronrrl'rimi data Resources. Isrc Ali n3nis re serval R uploduoWn m .lrry ined+ti cr tlrrmat. irl wnao or n par. OI Iny rr,�wnn ur rnzia v Emyeonme,i ial LVQ R er•.rwrc1i s tnc., or ds a1filgle9. 15 Drcrhouua wim yr pnar wrrllen oern,rssian FO R aril 1%5 ingc, ? 1nc4Li7iro, SarMfn antl 5 an?, ym Uapi are I I Drsgrnarx; of Enairp( rnMeraL Daizi R e5DW AEL. ln[. nr us 3rfliS19Y. iUl 011r er ira9ornark: LISOd n{'rfli n Uri; Lira pnxmrty ollrftr raspecU is awoeis 0 uF+iQ[,= Tf�.x? =C� Or:1=]F�►'I p7 EPA FAESNO ELk'S 9 �. r.ayut 55s 3a� t Z9C n . C2 I :N'TERVB'i QUEST[OSS PAit OTMncr Ry Procc: i:a C� � `1��� Prot=Cl Tvncnc _ �a,L�1+ ,�� �� �.., '" � �l �'�(• .+�, SL(6: Adcxc`'5: V 1 [nu:rv.01v With' Tcicpi:ont: No' �x �--- -,� - - . , _ - Fsx tic: )(-Histclncai Aciaresc of the former E lits L OOee Ki,owledge of Pretirotrs Owncr(s) ,wid Piton. Ni4mbeo? How a^- yuu aisu::Lucd subjecl s.tc"— Homer long have vou''ri"m tt=occatcr wily sutileCt si;c i Want :c tic sl:bject si-c cw ;act._' ,ysG.� for", G%,Cli�f 1� Are:hft-r j:(rucr-xes on ibn :sbjeci sur" How Y-any7 Do yo:: know of any prcviow sanxw:ts 'm trc subicct site" Uo you have eny =rrent o- past knowledge of the pm cmx cr uadergnsund or atove;;-mun4 51ar a�C ;ans s being located on the SL' i3] mac: sae'' Do you k: vw k:f any c;z nizal or hazes -Lour +.natcrials, ncrsisiew '.,scd, or discharged on the subjev. site' Lea oze :creole o1 arry irstitritiana) ; on:ros Cle',Wq- r --nc% or F n3 refrrwg Corrr'oi+ 1 cfu ry wul,s rr vCCor h:ed aragui+at the Sul ,.iv Stdc',—mo__----- Do you Know o: any bused mat-,nais such as g nrnage dumpN or'vurn pits or the sub)e, t Are tt=c 'Z:=ntiv or w,:m there historically any septic sysicns srd or watt -ells ]scald cC Lae subject r3% a.oy ,try Are there any dzinacc of dispoia'; po;ids located oz —* iu sLb= s the subjeet site co_.nezed to muuicmdi water lad sewer coo ;7u %rate uny' c:?rrrrori %tone, rk�asonah1v as,.o fainai le. or specxn i=ra kna-wiedg•- nr CxocTienec ,Owed n, rht rrrtr)ecr t7je or-- Pe�c No i FF-GSE tll : Apr. ,-' -006 05:-1.SF�1 P-1 FFCt'1 FFC'�t E�► Y =3 _ u�at ri tru As icjc 559 348 2 t 9C p„ yn; ttzv� �•cvt �)z5 ald c.aiion,� rMC,'I ! TO :bn presc;;:c of �'ic!y prcy_ ;rc o :cninr;ir_at,o,i .31 u-'c p,. VOU gave. ar,f :cl:vurnS a"' OUl k accm property as;!Lye such as ga;olinc stal;u�S, ;ndosLria; e::es v- US•fs o: AST, ca adiacz-t--- Nnuw ti'la+r C��'r•� Sl Page'.tia. 9 MI: Leanne Waiker-Grant T ml Chairperson Rob Castro Tnbal Vice -Chairperson Craig Martinez Secretary/Treasurer Ray Barnes Member at Large Aaron Jones I_Tiber at Large 23736 Sky Harbour Road Post Office Box 4 10 Frnant California 93626 (539) 622-25B7 Fax (.5591 622-269 3 TABLE MOUNTAIN RANCHERIA TRIBAL GOVERNMENT OFFICE April 19, 2006 Arthur C. Farkas, Environmental Division Manager 215 W. Dakota Ave., Clovis, Ca, 93612 RE: Krazan Project No. 014-06085, Proposed Transit Village Property Dear Arthur C. Farkas This is in response to your letter dated April 6, 2006, regarding Krazan Project No 014-06085, Proposed transit Village Property, Fresno, Ca. Thank you for notifying us of the potential development and the request for consultation. We have no concerns regarding this propem and decline participation at this time. We would appreciate being notified in the unlikely event that cultural resources are identified during; any future development. Sincerely, Bob Pennell Tribal Cultural Resources Director 559.325.0351 C� The EDR Radius MapTM Report Transit Village Property SEC of Kings Canyon Rd/S Adler Ave Fresno, CA 93727 Inquire Number: 1649869.1s April 06, 2006 Rx Environmental Data Resources Inc The Standard in Environmental Risk Management Information 440 Wheelers Farms Road Milford, Connecticut 06461 Nationwide Customer Service Telephone: 1-800-352-0050 Fax: 1-800-231-6802 Internet: www.edrnet.com TABLE OF CONTENTS S ECi70N PAGE Executive Summary. _ - . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ E31 Overview Map. - 2 Detail Map- _ . _ . . Map Findings Summary- ___------- ----------- 4 Map Findings. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 Orphan Summary.----- -------- ---------- 13 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking - - - - - - - _ _ .. _ _ GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM GeoCheck - Not Requested Thank ,you for your business. Please cDnacl EDR at 1-8011-352-0050 with any questions or cornments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Tradcfnark NDtitu Tl)rs Report cci amsi certain inlortramm abtalried 110n,, a varlely OF public 2rit3 other SOufoeS redSOngbly a'w;3iLi]bJe in Emnronment,�l Data Rewunes. Inc II :nnnnl be wndu6Ld irom Mis Report thal cover d a nionmaWri.. Ice the tarclel and surrour�ing properties � daenol elllsr Iron Olkter sourtias NO WA.RRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, 15 MADE Vi"IHTSOEVER 1N CON4.1=CrION W74 THIS REPORT. ENIARONIr WrAL DATA RES0URCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY 1ASCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANT125, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION. MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUME❑ BY THE USER - IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABtE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS. NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE. FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WMIOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL. CONSEQUENTIALOR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILM ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. bS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF T-HE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. PurCnaser a=e0I5 this ReDorl W'> 1Y' My analy^ es. esiamates, ralinas eff"rpnmentdl nsk IeveiS Or r15k 004Je5 prCvlder] in IhiS Report are! prnv,4ed 4pr illustrauva purposes only, anr9 afB R01 inlnntle.A [0 PIOVI&. for should In" be inie-preled 3S providing any iacls regarding, ox piedicliDn or Iore.:asi of. any env,ronmE+1las risk For any propecly Cniy a Phase I En+nranm;nlal 5ile A; SeSSnzent perlarmed by an envirdnmenidl pwfuSsbflal ran pto%+OL InfarmaWn rC9n arrilr4g Meevii-m resi"•aI nsk ICr any propefty Addibanally. u,a inlonrlation prbvsd2tl in Phis R9V�arl is not la be amsuved a5legal aCvlce CapVng3it 20BG by Envlronme,rltal rJaia R6sDurcB:5, irc. AIL ilghls reservsd JReprWuc lt3p ir, any ale-W or flynr.zil. In whale or in past of any Ntparl of rnap Df Environmanlai Data ReseurC*s, MC., or rls affiIia1eS. iS pWrityiled w1lhout pnar Wriu6n permi5.5ipn EDR anti iLs ;n9os (includir7g _Sangnm end Sanborn 61apI afe tradEmarks of Emir nmencal Data ReSouices. Inc or il3 aPrNales V rather lrademark5 used henpir Ire Ihe± piuperly DI Ihatr respective. ownErs TC I649H$ I , Pafi3e I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A searcn of avaiiat)la environmental recants was condu ;led by env%mDnenE?J �aa r.°r,-outmms. Inc (EDR}. The report was designed to assist parties seeking ip meet the sea(c.", r-_auirtunerrs of EPA's Slandards and Practir_Ps for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmenlai Site Assessrnems {E 1527-05) or custom reo.Utr�ernanls developed for the evaluation of enwircinmenlal nsk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMAtlOT4 AODR�SS SEC OF KINGS CANYON RD1S ADLER Av'E FRESNO. CA 93727 COORDINATES Latitude (N❑nh): Loingitude (West): Universal Tranverse Marcator UTM ?t fhtetsrsj: UTM Y rMetersi: Elevation 35 734DOO - 6' 44' 2 w" 119 724103 - 119' 43' 25 B" carte 11 256746.4 406B622.5 313 ft. aDOVE Sea IeVel USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY Target Property Nlap 3n119-176 MALAGA. CA Most Recent Revision.: 1981 TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target proaany was not Iisled %n any of the databases searched by EDP. DATAHABES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No maaped snes were iound +n EDR's search of available ('reasonabiy ascenainaole ') governimant records ellher on the taTaet property ar within the search radius arQur}d the target property for the fallowing databases FEDERAL RECORDS NPL --- -- ........ ..auonal Priority List Proposed NPL . - ---. ---- Proposed Nalional Priority Lzsi Sites Delisted NPL ..... --. ..... Naiional Priority List Deletions NPL RECOVERY--- - -- - --- ---. Federal Sucwrfund Liens CERCLIS_ -------- Comprehensive Environmental Resuanse. Compensauon, and Liability information System CERC-NFRAP. -. -- --__ CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Panned CORRACTS------ --.--------- Correcime Action Report RCRA-TS0E----------------- Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information RCRA-LQG---------------- .. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information TC1649863 is E➢ EZU11VE SUMiMAR`' ? EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RCRASOG_ . ...... Resource Conservation and Recovery Act inio7—mianon ERNS Emergency Response Notification System HMIRS_.. Hazardous ilaterlais Inlormation Recorang System US ENG CONTROLS. _ _ Engineering Controls Sites Lisl US INST CONTROL--__- Sites with Institutional Controls DOD__ Department of Defense Sites FUDS----------------- . . . - Formeriy Used Defense Silos US BROWNFIELDS _ _ A Listing of Brownbaeids Sites CONSENT. _. Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Oecrees ROD- _. ______ _________ Records Of Decision UMTRA-------------------- UraniumMill Tailings Sites ODI_ ------------------- Open Dump Inventory TRIS--- _ ______ .-. Toxic Chemical Retease Inventory System TSCA Toxic Substances ControlAct FITS --------------------- FiFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticiae. Funglr;ide, d Rodenlicide Act;ITSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) SSTS -------------------- . Section 7 Tracking Systems PADS.------------------ --- -- ~CB Actmly Database Systern MLTS------------------------ Material Licensing Tracking System MINES .----------- -- . Mines Master3ndex File FINDS__ ---_-______-_ ------- Facility Inde%-SystemlFauility ReQistr1 System RAATS.......... .----- ----- RCRA Admimstrative Action Tracking Systerzi STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS AWP------- -------- ,.__ _._ Annual WorkpJan Sites Cal -Sites---- ----------_.. Caisttes Database CA BOND EXP. PLAN_ - ----- Bond Expenditure Plan NFA-------------------------- No Further Action Determination NFE-----________________.-.- Properties Needing Further Evaluation REF -------------------------- Unconfirmed Properlies Referred to Another Agency SCH------------------- ______ Scf:ool Property Evaivation Program Toxic Pits___________________ Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites SWFJUF-------------- . Solid Waste Information System CA WDS--------------------- Waste Discharge Syslem SWRCY______________________ Reeycier Dataoase SLIC___---------------------- Statewide SLIC Cases UST -------------------- --.__- Active UST Facilities AST ----- -------------------- Aboveground ?ulroieumStorag�-,+'anwFacilities CHMIRS--------------------- California Hazardous Malertal Incident Repot System Notify 65----------- __________ Propositton65Records DEED________________________ Deed Restri; boil Listing VCP-.--------- ------------.-- VotunraryCleanupProgram Properties CLEARERS__________________ Cleaner Facilities WIP-------- ------------------ We11 Investigation Program Case List CDL------------------- _...... Clandestine Drug Latas HAZNET_____________________ Facility and Manitesi Data EMI. ._______------------- Emissions Inventory Data TRIBAL RFcr1Rns INDIAN RESERV------------- Jndian Reservations INDIAN LUST ..-_____-___--- Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on indian Land INDIAN LIST_ _ - - ..... ------- Underground Storage Tanks Dn Indian Land EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS Manufactured Gas Plants... EDR FrvlDrietary Manufactured Gi3a Plana Tc•9g98G9.15 EXECUTfVE SUMWkRY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SURROUNDING SIT=S: SEARCH RESULTS ,::,:v;.nding saes wcr+2 Identified. Elevalions have been determined from the USGS Dicuilal Elevation Model anct shuild be evaluated on a relative tnot an at}SGILItel basis. Reiative elevation informairon between sites of close proximity should be field venFled Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target properly have been dlftsrent,ated below from sites with an elevation lower than the tamer property. Page numbers and map Identificallon numners refer to the F-DR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases Unmappable (arphan) Snes are not considered in the foregolnq analySiS. STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS V+tMUDSISWAT: The Waste Management Unit Database System Is used for program traohlny- and tnvcr,ory ct waste Maragarnent unils. Th$ gourd) Is the State Waler Resouices Control Board. A review of we WMUDS!V,'VAi hs;, as provided by EDR. and dated 0410//2000 has revealed that *Mere is t Wk1UDS,S'rdAT site within anproxlmately 0.5 miles of the target property. Lower Elevation Addrr:-Ss GENTZ CONSTRUC`ION COMPANY-'%IVIL WILLOW AVE. Dist I Dir Map ID Page 114 - 1i2S`P) 7 10 CORTESE: Tryis oatabase Identifies public arinking water wells with delectable levels of ontarnination. nazardous sulDVance sites se2ecteC for remedial action, sites with known toxic material identltied t'trougn Me airandened Site assessment program. Silos with USTs having a repol0e release and all solid waste disposal facilities from which there is known migration. The source Is the California Environ+nenlal Protection Agency101Yce of Emergency Information. A review DJ the Cortese list. as wovided by EDR. and dated G4101f2001 has revealed that there Is 1 Cortese site volhrn approximately 0.5 miles of the target property EqualfNigher Elevation Address Dist i Dir Map ID Page VICTOR MUSSO RESIDENCE 5046 MONO AVE E 118 - 1/4NNW 83 7 LUST: The Leaking OndeTground Storage Tank Ificidenl Repons contain an inventory of Tapeined leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come tram the State Water Resources Control Board Leakrrtc Underground Storage Tank Information System A review of the LUST Its'., as provided by EDR, and dated 0110912G06 has revealed that there are 2 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property EquatlHigher Elevation VICTOR MUSSO RESIDENCE Faalcy Statu: Case �It7�et0 Lower Elevation ARCO #5803 Facility Status No Arlon Address 5046 MONO AVE E Address 4897 KINGS CANYON E Dist I Dir Map ID Page 1/8 - 114 NNW B3 7 Dist I Dir Map ID Page 114-112WNW 8 11 TC IGAMg. Is EXF---JTrJt SUMMARY 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CA FlD: The F��Trty InvR -aary Dataoase contains active and Inactive underground storage lank Iocaliars5. ire ,.,c a S;ate Vllaler Resource GantT41 Board. A review o; try � rlrJ UST i list as provided 6y EDR, and Gated t0I31'199� has revsaled Iha; mere is t CA FID UST site within aoproxrrrlateiy 0.25 miles of The target property EquallHigher Elevation PRIVATE RESIDENCE Address 5046 E MONO Dist / Dir Map ID Page 118 - 114NNW 64 8 HIST UST: Hislaftal UST Registered Database. A review of vie HIST UST 1is1, as provided by EDR, and dated 10;t511991) has reMealed that there ss 1 HIST UST slse wrlttiin approxlmalely C 25 miIBS 01 the target property Eoual/Higher Elevation HOME Address Dist / Dir Map ID Page 5046 E MONO AVE 118 - V4NrJ'.`I 86 9 Fresno Co, CUPA: Certified Unified ProaTarn Agency. CUPA s are responsible for impiemenling a unMad hazardous waste management replatar• program. The agency provides o1,eersrgt11 al businesses ihai deal with hazardous mateclals, operate undergrounC storage tanks or abovegruund st4Tage lanks A review of the Fresno Cc CU?A list. 2S provided by EDR, and dated 01118120t}6 teas reveated that there 2se 2 Fresno Co. CUPA sites wilhin approximately 0.25 miles of the large! properly EquallHigher Elevation Address Dist I Dir Map ID Page 1NAL-MART STORE P2001 5125 E KINGS CANYON 1!8 - 114NE Al 6 VICTOR 1AUSS0 5046 E MON0 118 - If4NNW 65 9 SWEEPS: Stale',vrde EnvironmeTtlal Evaluation and Planning System This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SVVRO13 in the early 1-980's the Issting is Do longr#r updated or maintained. T118 locai,39ency 4s the contact for rnore snforrnaiion on a ate an the SWEEPS 11w A review of the SWEEPS UST Iis1. as providEd by EDR, and dated 0610 IN 994 h2is resealed Thal there are 2 SWEEPS UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target properly Equal/Higher Elevation OVAL MART STORES PRIVATE RESIDENCE Address Dist 1 Dir Map ID Page 5125 K1NCS CANYON RD 118 - 11,4 h;F 5046 E MONO 118 - 114 NNW 94 8 TC11s Er. tlTM-- SuM-MAR 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Due io poor ar inmquaie addre~ s mr or 5abon. Itla Iollowing sues were not mappel Site Name ANTHONY PROPERTY JENSEN PROPERTY SANGER ROCK & SAND CALJFORNIA AQUEDUCT NlC1{'S TRUCKING, INC "-ELEVEN STORE 42237-19635' TED ISHEIM BUCKINGHAM PROPERTY MANAGElyIENT Da aaasefsl Fresno Go. CUPA Fresno Co CUPA Fresno Go. CIJ PA CHMIR , Fresno Co. CUPA S'w'IJ FLF UST HJST LIST FINDS 7C iCASIN69 is ExECu-Udx Sl t.11.'hR s 4k OVERVIEW MAP - 1649M9.1 s Target Rropemy A :Mites al elgra➢ons higher 1h:3n nr equal la The Largel property indian Reservations SIA Areas of GonGmrr • Sites at a+egahans lower than Power transmission lines Ore tzrgel prapufl�j J . r Oil & Gas pipelines � u Flan�ctuiedGasPiants NarlonaJ Pr,on�rList Sale; flood gone ❑ Landfill SEtas 540•year Rood zone redera! Wetlands SITE NAME Transit Village Property CLIENT: Krazan & Associates, Ire. ADDRESS: SEC of Kings Canyon Rd1S Adler Ave COrITACT. Enn R. Tram--, Fresno CA 93727 INQUIRY ✓f: 1649869.1s LATILONG, 36.73401I19.7241 DATE: April 06.2006 —ALA DETAIL MAP - 1649869.1 s E Ilrr!] Sr # �1 o. a I E UMB AA i F J { E.u,AarP u f AAVE Tar 0- P1 Pra perty o ini, rn 114 u1k, r So_-atelevanoruvag"rll',an or equal tc the L-jrgei rrroperry Indian Reservations BIA „ Areas or Concern + Sites at elevation`s lower than Power trar>_smrsnon lines the target pronerTy Dil s Gas pipel�nes 1 t�lanutacturod (�asl�la�t; ' Ci IDO-year Hood zone SenSdwv_ Receptors 0 Nanonal Piionty Lst-cd1eS .500-year flood zone EJ Federal Wetlands 1-71 Landfill Sites ❑epL Defense Sites SITE NAME: Transa Village Property CLIENT: Krazan & Associates, Inc. ADDRESS: SEC of Kings Canyon Rd1S Adler Ave CONTACT: Erin R. Trcne Fresno CA 93727 INQUIRY q: 1649869. is i_AT1LONG: 36.7-401 1 19.7241 DATE: April 065, 2006 G,er.ai a MW FBR I— o rb* I r Arrr Rd ff?rfM Da:abasc FEDERAL RECORDS MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY se-arctl Target D;siancx Totai Property (Miles) 11e 1"8 - i14 1 4 - 112 1i2 - 1 1 Plotted NPL Proposed NPL Delisted NFIL NPL R :GOVERY CERCLIS CERC-NFRAP CORRACTS RCRRA TSD RCPA La. Quan Gen RGRA Sm Qran. Gee,. ERNS HEIRS US ENG GONTROLS US INST CONTROL DOD FUDS U5 BROWNPIELDS CONSENT ROD U NIA TRA Odl TRIS TSCA r i-C 5 SSTS PADS I'ALTS MINES FINDS PJnATS STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS AwP Cal -saes CA Bone Exp P�,w NFA NFE REF SCH TOx+C Fits State Landfill CA WOS +NNIUOSISWAT cartese 5WRCY LUST CA FID UST 1000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 1.000 0 0 0 D NR 0 1.000 0 D D 0 NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0.500 0 0 0 ) JR NR 0 1.000 0 0 0 D NR 0 0.500 0 D D NR NR C 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 TP NR 'JR NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR I:I 0.500 0 D D NR NR 0 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0' 1.040 0 0 0 0 NR G t.004 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR D 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR N{R D TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 T? NR NR NR NR NR 0 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR Nib G TP NR NFZ NR NFR NR C. 1.000 0 0 0 G NR 0 1 00G 0 0 0 I` R: 0 1.000 0 C C D NR 0 0.250 0 D NR NR NR 0 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR D 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR r 0.5W) 0 0 1 NR NR 1 C Sera 0 1 0 NR NR + 0.50 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0.500 0 1 1 NR NR 2 D 250 0 1 NR NR NR 1 :, sc4J2651s Page MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY a Datat3 Search Target Distance Property (.Milesj SLIC 0.5C0 US r 0.250 MIST UST 0.250 AST 0.250 Fresno Co. CUPA 0.250 SWEEMS UST 0.250 CHMIRS TP No1ity 65 1.000 GEED 0.5c0 VCP 0.500 DRYCLEANERS 0.2513 IMP D.250 COL TP HAZNET TP EMI. TP TRIBAL RECORDS INDIAN RESERV INDIAN LUST INDIAN UST EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS 1.000 4.S 00 1),250 lvlanulactured G n Ranrs 1 000 NOTES TP = Targel Properly NR = Not Requested at I.N9 Search Distance. Sites may De Jested In more than tine dalabase Total 118 I IE; - 114 114 - 112 112 - 1 1 Piotted 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0 2 NR NR NR 2 0 2 NR NR NR 2 NR NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0 NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR NR 0 C 0 G 0 NR 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0 TC164}069.ls Pages Map ID MAP FINDINGS Drrectmi i D15arce C star._ W ; FOR ID Jtumber Elevdl;Ofi 5i1e Dalabaselsf EPA ID Nurgty5r Al WAL-MART STORE 92001 Fresno Co. CUPA S106176736 NE 5125 E KINGS CANYON NIA 118.11: FRESNO, CA 93727 974 tl. Site 1 of 2 in cluster A Relylive: Higher �.Ur-"A Facility ID FA02E9092 Actual: Regi" CUPA 315 ft flrogram ElemeLrwLARGE QUANTITY GENE7rATOR Owr',er Nacre 1+JAL-MART STORES INC- APM Number Nw reported Facdity ID FAD269092 Region CUPA Pmygram Elm.menl AUTO REPf-IR1MAINTEFJANCEMUDEL PLATr• Owner Name WAL-MART SCORES INC APNI Number Not reP4rlell Faoldy ID FA0269092 Region CUPA, Program E;emenL CLQSED UST FACILITY93ATA VAULT Owner Name 'A'AL•MA-RT ST(iRES INC AP11A Number No) r2Parleu I acility 1D FAD20492 Region CUPA Prpgram Elernenl CLQSr=o HAZARDOUS 4wASTE TREATMENT UNIT Owner Marne OJAL-MART STORES INC APM Number Nat MpWetl A2 WAL MART STORES SWEEPS UST S106934175 NE 5125 KINGS CANYON RC N/A 118-114 FRESNO, CA 93727 974 ft Site 2 of 2 in cluster A Relative: Higher SWEEPS Status A Actual Comp Number ::34�A 315 ft Numj3er 1 eUafd 01 EOualiiatlon Not re parted Ref Date . 05-18-93 Art Date 11-19-93 Created Date 11-19-93 Tank SLAu, A pwner Tank Id 1 Swicb TaM, Id l O Qp-43313.1-0D0901 Acty Date L; 113-93 Capaaly INN Tat* Use DIL Stg . W Content WASTE 0 1 L Nurrtiar 0' Tanks Tr- 1F4J5C9 1s Page 6 �,�ap z Direr= DG=— Ela.;ir SiL= E3 NNW 1 IB -114 1229 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 314 ft. VICTOR WUSSO RESIDENCE 504-6 MONO AVE E FRESNO, CA 93727 Site 1 of 4 in cluster B MAP FINDINGS" EDR ID Nt.mSer Dalabasefs) ERA ID Wmter State L13ST Cross Stre'v- V11LL0W S Qly Leaked NCI reD w-ted Cas? NumMr Nal repo+led Reg Board Not repaied Gherrrwcal Gasolene Lead Agency Loc1 Ager-cy Lizi-,zl Agency 10000 Case Type Coil onry Status: Case Closed Review Date' Not repn,te(l Fonfinn Leak Ni3t repoYled Warilplan Nut reported Prelim Assess Nor repDrted PollutonChar Notleponed teemed Plan No' retuned Rerned Art pp. Nat. reparled Mcnuoring Not reporled Close Oaia 2000-11-14 W.00.0Fl Release pate Not reWned Cleanup Fund Id 146'5 Discuvec Dale Not reported Entcroemeni Dt . 1965-01-01 W 00 00 Eni Type- Nei repnrted Enter Date ' Not reP4+te4 Furidmc}. Resporssbe party SLafllmuaJs SU5 Flow Discovered: Tank Closure How Slapped Nui reparled Inlenm Not renamed '-eak Ca4se WINK Leak Source LINK NTT13E Dale Nat reporiea Max WDE GW Not reooried MT6E, Tested S+Ie NOT Tested for VIT E.includes lJnknown and NDf AnWyza� Pnotlly Not rcporred t-ccal Cas,* tt Nor reported Benerioal- Not repaned Start -DA41 G+N Ouasrier Nol reported Max tJ-1BE .5atl Not raveotd Soil Qualrfies Nut raganad 1-1y0r BaSjn 4 SAN SOAOUIN 15-22) Operator Not ropaned Oversipi 1'rgrn LUST Review Date 1990-11-U613.06:DO Slao Datc NO relpoRed Work 5u5Dende-d No Responsible PanyVICTOR MIJSS0 RP Address 5D46 E MONG. FRESHC. CA 93727 Gl=il td 7U6O19002E5 OTg Name Not repweo GonLa❑ Person Not reported MTBE Cori 0 Mine Fuel- ' Wale` System NOrriL Not ie,0crted LUST S104404085 Cortese NIA TC1_4996g Is P,<q-i Map ID MAP FINDINGS Di recLar - — Dtsaance DslaTlx (IL) EDR ID NumMr Elevation Sire Garase;s} EPA I(] NOmper VICTDR MUSSD RESIDENCE {Continued) S10.1404095 Weil Nawe No( rpparter} Di -.lance To Lust 0 Wasie Discharge Glaosil ID Nat rr., oned Wa51e E+iSGh Assigned Name. No feponed Summary AN ASSESSLIENT To OETF-RMINt EXTENT OF IMPACT iS CURP.ENTLY IN PROGRESS LUST Region 5 Subs1wwm: GASOLIt4E Care Type: Sat wly Program LUST 91aff InULai r� DAM Care Number. 5T100=26B S1alu5 Case CI45ed MTBE Code Nrn tieadAge nclr Leal CO RTE SE Region CORTESE Far Adweas 2 504& I„1QNo AVC E B4 PRIVATE RESIDENCE CA FID UST S101591339 NNW 5046 E MONO SWEEPS UST N(A 113-114 FRESND, CA 93727 1229 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster B Relative: Higher FIQ- Facddyl0 1C013O236 Reguiate11) 00049350 Actuat: kigq fay Amwe Ijr6ergrciund 13iorage Tank Lacahon 314 It. Cortese Cod Not rep€rned SIC Code Nol Teorted SiS4u5 Aclrve EaalllyTal 170y}255-5173 N1aiITo. Nol repotted SC96 E MONo FRE.SNO. CA gaZ27 Coniart .Nol iepaieb Cantacl Tel Not reppried OJNs No N41 repprre NQCES Nx Not repwt!d r-teaiicm 1G-fzl 3 Modihec 06i40;40 tiFA ID Kai reponm Commem-� NO! rgptxied EWE=-FS SI,1us A Camp Number 4$35b Alurnl7Pr 9 Board Of E¢ualfzal,00, A4-D31535 Ref D819 11-1E-90 Act Date 11-16-K Creamm Dale 02-29-H lank Slatus A Cmner Tank Id 1 Swrca Tank 10 144300-439358-011DWI Am DaIe 074a1-5 Ca papCy Nolr&xAad Tarik Use h1 V FUEL Sig P Canlerlf REG UNLEADED Number Of Tanks 2 Slaw:, A Corrp Number 49356 TC16.:983gis Pone Map IG ❑i reran DsSIZ Disiarce {P J--+atron ~P= B5 NNW 118-114 1229 tt. Relative: Higher Actual: 314 ft. 56 NNW 118-1f4 1229 f1 Relative: Higher Actual: 314 ft. MAP FINOINGS PRfVATE RE:S1D—"CE (Continued( Numaer 9 9aard 0I EQuall.?,3Uor, 44-03155S Ref bare 11-16-90 AaOate 11-15-90 Crealea Dale 02-29-98 Tarn Status. A C}vnerTankld 2 Swrcb Tank IC ?IM00-049358-000002 Am Dale 07-01-85 Gaipaoly Not reporl!'il Tank Use M.V, FUEL S1g P Content REr� UNLEADED Number Of Tanks Not repovetl VICTOR MUSSO 5046 c MONO FRESNO. CA 93727 Site 3 of 4 in cluster B CU?A Facainy 10 PA0265G1D Region- GUPA Pragrarn Element F DRMEN CONTAMINATED SITE]CLEANUP COMPLETE Owner Name MUSSQ. VICTOR APM Numher- Not reported Facility ID FAD266&10 Region wUPA Program Element CLOSED UST WA ILITYrDATA VAULT Owne: Name MUS.SQ, VICTOR APM Numpgr Nm1 tellot-Ied HOME 5046 E MONO AVE FRESNO, CA 93727 Site 4 of 4 in cluster 6 UST HIST Fecthb/ ID 49358 Talai Tanks 2 Owner Ailgfess 5W6 F— MONO i RESNO CA 93727 Tank Used fcW PRODUCT Tank Nunn 1 Tangy rapacvy 004110000 Type of Fuel UNLEADED Leak Dmertian. Slack Inwentor Cpntaa Name Not repotted �7amlily Type N31 rnporled Facdily ID 49358 Total Tanks 2 Owner Address 5046 E. N-101`40 FRESNQ4 CA 93727 Tank Usk for PRODUCT EDR ID Nurnher Delabasafsl EPA ID Nunim S101581336 Fresno Co. CUPA S106176769 NIA H1ST UST U00159293= NIA CwNer Name VICTOR 8 MARY MLJSSG Region STATE C,on:ainer Num 1 rear Ifh`olaliLd Not rt OrLs`,! Tank Conslru=ow Nat ReporlL:C Telephone. (209) n'� r"-.113 Other Type HOh' Owner Name VICTOR $ t,1ARY W.USSCJ Region .STATE T;,164' 8M9 Is page 9 IL1ap ID Direction Di�-.ldnce Dista.noe (t1.) Elevawn Sue trtgp 1=I!<JD1NG5 HOME {Continued} Tank Nurn 2 Tank Capar%ty 431XIGOODO i ype of Fucl UNLEADED Lt:ak Deteclrar- Stack Inverlpr Conrad Name Nol rep�wipd F Cilrty Typv Net reparled 7 GENTZ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY-W1L SW WILLOW AVE. 114-112 FRESNO. CA 2222 tt. Relative: '•'MUDS Lower RBglr)lt Oale of L.a5l Fatilaly Edit. Actual: Last Facility Edilars- 308 it. Waste DVnange SYjlem ID Sohd Waste Warrnatran ID' Wasle 91s0arge System. Solid Waste AssessmLQM Test Program FaaRy Name, ToAjc Poo Cleanup Act Program Resource vansefvatron Recovery Awl Program Oepanment a' Defense Open Ir} PoUh;.: Number Df %VMUDS a Facgity: Facility Teleghone- PnmmySlanaard trdustnal Classifw71i6n SemndaryStanbard InduslnalClassrficauon Sakd Waste Assessment Test Prograrn Name NPID Tonnage Regional 9.oard ID Nlrrlvppal Sall Waste $ uperoYd2r Sut>C+tapier t5 Rag Board PraFect 4tfrcef Section Range RCRAFauIHy llVasle Discharge R$qurrgments Base Mendran Faaiq DsscngtLQrl Sec -MA nHorrng Rupl. Frequency Threat 14 Waler Qua lily. Not reparled Agency GENT? CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Address Not reparled DepanmFn; No rappned C-an1at IVot rel>Urleb Telapiicme Not reoaned Lanopwner N01reovned Address CA Telephone Not reponwJ Contact Not repa,had EDR ID Number EPA ID NumDer 0001592934 C.xRarner Num 2 Y ear Ins ailed: Not reported Tank Gpnslru.Mon- Nat Reparled Terapnone. (209) 255-0173 Omar Type HOME WMUDS'SWAT S103442285 NIA 5F Natrepaned NDI reported 5IM00033002 Notreaarte-d Fat Se True Nat raponud False False False False 1 Not reoorted Nat reparteC t401 sepctteo GENTZ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Nbt rragonad Nat repwed r 315E False False JC Not repacted Nai reported No[ reporied Not repCw10 Fuse Nal reported Not reported T�:1Fr49B59 1s Page 10 Map ID D iredror. Dt5tarr_e DrMrx [R) Elevelran Sile MAP FINDINGS 6 ARCO1t5803 WNW 4897 KINGS CANYON 114-1r2 FRESNO, CA 93727 2432 tt. Relative: SWe LUST Lower Cross Street 74INERY Oty Leaked Not reported Actual: lase Number Not reported 311 Ft. Reg Boara. No, rLpo:ted Chemical' Gasoline Lead Agency 1_n al Agerz:y Local Agerz;y 10C90 Case Type Ur.tlermad Status: No Action Re4iew Dale Not reported V114rkplan Not reported Polluuon Cna< Not reported Remed Amon Not reponed Monii-anng N01 re rled Clare Gale Not rej-:Srled RE! lease Dalr Not repoMuC Cleanup Fund Id . Nol reported Discover Dale Not repined Eniorcertrent tat 19d5-91-01 00 00 05 EnIType NarieTaken Erstw Dale NDI teponed Funding Nol reperteC SIati Inillals, JIM How D,szvere4 Su!asurfac-e Monita"ing Wow StopWd Nal reported Inlertm Not reported Leak Cause UNK Leak Source UNK N TBS -Date Not reported Max NITRE GVV Not reooncJ EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Numrty LUST S105418571 Fresno Co. CUPA NIA Confirm Leak Not reported Prelim ASSess Nat repaned Remed Plan foot reposed M T 9= Tesied VTBR Cerecled. Sile ieslad for MT9E 3 MTSF (jeleGle'd Pnonty Medium pnnnly Lo .al Case A Not reported BeneFipal: Not. reported Slate DAM GIN Qualifier Not reported Max M7191� Soil Nat reported Sod 0ualiKer Nal re0ortel Nyor basin # SAN JOAQUIN (5=22) Operator Ar'2C0 Pf?OCIUCTS COMPANY Oversight Prgrn LUST Review Dale 2002-01A7 0000:00 Slop Oale Nat reported Work Suspended No "Reworsible PariyARCO PRODUCTS COMPANY PP Adilress PO BOX 5038 ARTESIA CA 901D2-5031 C}iobal Ia. TD6D 19921)09 Org Name- Not reported Contact Persar. tool reported MTSF Gone. 0 "be Fuol 1 1iilater riystem Name Not reported Well Name Not cepcneC TC1643869.1s Paige 1. Map ID Direction DIstanre Dislaro-p IH ) Flerlalian SitL MAP FINDIWGS ARCO 45803 (Continued) ,JhGiaroe To Lust 0 Waste Discharge Global ID- Nat reponed Vdaste Disch A 51gned N %me: Nul rep- eC rnmary - Nol repJrled LUST Remit 5 Subsiante GASOLINE Case Type Unoefined Prograrn LUST Staff Initials' DAM (;ase Ndmt)er 5;aluF. No Anton PATBf Cady W4 Lead Agency Local CL1PA Facility IQ FA432675K Reg)on CUPA PTogram. clernenl.CDNTAMINATED IJST SITEiEHi LEA0 AGENCY Caner Name ARCO PPDDUCTS CC APh1 humoer Not ieporled 5T10WG 7w Dn 1D Number v; EPA ID N�4mte{ E 105418571 TC15498$9 15 P i(ie 12 § 1.7 j G j I \§jjIF, \)Q / R a0000000 W.£E555E5 5 lu w W W LU w LU IEU±IEE/ GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED ! DATA CURRENCY TRACKING To mwtilain currem:y of the iallawing lederal anti Slate 0alaeases- EDR 4antam Itie a.pprnpnale govsrrr' aF-.rz- . or. a monthly or C,•ianerly Wrzs. as requided. Number of Days to Update: Pmvide5 wnfirmauffn that EDR is reparung re{ords 1rra1 rave bin unmswi tiwMir 90 days Irom the dalethr government agency mach 1ne imormalk n avadaNe 10 Ihg qualiC FEDERAL RECORDS NPL; NatianaiPnancyiim National Pfianties List (Superfund} Tt,s NPL IS a mDse: of CE:RCU5 aM idendr?es aver 1,�00 sores for pn4nty Cleanup under Me Suteramd Program. NPL sties may enmmpas; relatively large arms. As sins. FOR Drcryioe3 oolpgcin Coverage 1v over 1.fM NPL ssle naundaneS praouced by EPA's Enviranmentel Photo-graphLC mlerprelauxsn Cenler (EPIC) ono regional EPA otrices Date of Gavemment Version- 02;24rM0B Oate Data Arrived at EDR: 03-101f�0b6 Date Mede ACJL%?e in Reports t13i31j'2M6 Nu-11er at pays to Updaia 3D NPL Site Boundaries Source- EPA Tel9pnpme. WA Lasl EbR ComtaCf- 0341i200Z NEzt Sc'nenaled EDR Cogitad: 05Y01120% Data Rgtease Frequency: Quarierty- Source: EPAs Environmental Pt.0tool aphirtntssptetation Cancer ]EPIC) T,;leohone 202-564-7333 EPA Ragcon # Tetepnone B 17-9t A-11a3 EPA Regiar. 3 t9leplime 215- 9,14- 5418 EPA Region 4 Telsr ane 404-562-13D33 EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214--B55-6659 EPA Pegaan Teiephone 30�312.6174 Proposed NPL- PrapoSsd National Pnonly Lill Sites ID ale of Gavemrnent Version 02fi24+2006 Source' EPA Dale Oata Amved al EDR 03,4112006 TelenMnne NJA Oatu Made Active in Reparts. 0M1P2006 Last EDR Conlam, 0YOW2006 Numbef of Days to Update. 3D 149KI ScheduleC EDR 'C+rlact 051111,20G5 Oaia Release Ffe uency- Quartert�; DELISTED NPL Nali❑nal PnonN L.isi Geleiioms The National Oil and Hazardous Sul3stances Pollution C4nUmgency Plan INCP) e51MAtisK" Ine cnlerLa 11-1W the EPA uses to delete sites t nm the NPL In ar-mrdance with 40 CFR 300 425 feI saes may t:e 0eteler, rrom ine NOL wnere no Ilrrrher fuspor.Se i5 appropnale Bale of Gowemment Vermiafl DnA.2006 Dale Data Arrived al FOR 03MIMD06 Date Made AZLve in ReperL^ Q3+ 1;206E Number of flays to Upaale. 30 Source- EPA Tetegrerse NJA Last EDR Con= 0Mli"200$ Next Scheduled FOR Contact. 05,11;2006 Data Release rrequercyr Ouanerly NPL RECOVERY: FHder4 SuDeriurd Lte nm Feaeml Superfund Clerks UrWer the autnority granled the USEPA by CERCLA al 1930. the USEPA has ma authonry to Ills bens against ri2al 1)ro0erly imorder. w feCOv6Y remedial action extler+Clture5 orwid3r.. the GIopenyawner received n UTIIZ2 ran 01 POLE nhaI Iiabito USEPA carripiies a listing a1 Filed maiiCk-s of Superlund Lrens Gate s71 Govemmeni Version 10115119911 bate Data Arnved at EDR OV02'1994 Gale It1ad� Active in RVPDns. G3'3dit3gZ Numo,itr 0i Clays to UpaaIp: 56 Source EPA Tgle4 mne 2132-55-4-2157 Last EDR Cantacr. iim&,2006 Next Schedule9 EDR Conlacl 06Lr=2046 Data Release Frequency No UDWe Plammed Tu1649B8B 1.9 Page GRA GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED l DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CERCLIS: Chmprener 7 +.-, nurse. Compensaiia,. and ziaaility Inlom+aUan SysEern CERCLIS rorslairs -,A-La qr, pnuxally `�rrius *isle sites plat nave been reponed to the USEPA by shales. municiparNes. private OompnriKm aT7d ws aL permru. piL-s.ra't to SErdon 103 or i11e Uemptehe;nsive Envhronrnenlal ReWi)nre. Gomoensalicn. arid '-iat�l¢y Art iC�-7RCLA}. C:-::RCUS COTMaw-- w2s which are eili,er proposed to or an Ltl,e NauonaI Pr*nues List (NPL+and sues rfi dt 2m rn the Screening and asses.smant phase for p65Sible Ir,ctusion on Me NPL Date of Uovemmenl, Version' IW24124D5 Dale Data Arrrlea al =D;R T21411.2D05 Dale M800 A,-jve m Rer7arls: 01fi3OO)% Number al Days io Update: 40 SDtlTre EPA Taleprsone 71;,3-41SA223 Last EDR COnlact: 03121r2M6 Nexi Scheduled EDR Gonlac; 46; tW20n6 Data Release Frequency Quaneriy CERCLIS-NFRAP, CERCLIS No rumen Remeoial Action Planned ArcnrvM s+lss are sites Ihal have been rerr,3veC and archived irom the rnvenlory of E.ERCLIS sqe;; Arcr-wed 51alu5 indicates that. to 0te t}e51 of EPA'S knowledge, as5pFrment at a Site nas been cmmplelao and lha{ EPA has determined no lur11let steps wdl oe taken to list this site on the National pnanbes List (NPL). unless inicrmabon irAicwes this neoroon was not apprapnale Or orher conslderatlons require a recommendallan for h51mg al a paler we This beasran bows n4l reGessanly mean that Itiere rs no hazard assonaled w+`n a given sde; it army means rhal, b8se0 upon available idGn-nabon, MLI 1or-atian is hot judged ID be a powlial NPL Sate Do Le of Govemmer.1 Vergran, 10R412DD5 Dale DaLa Amwad w EOR- 12'211-2M5 0211E Me de ArLivt9 1n Reoorls• a1l3C�2D46 Number Or Days to UpOale. 40 Source. ;-:PA T*eors ! 703-413-0223 Last EDR Contact. 03.121.2006 Next Scheduled EDR GenlaLt 081Tgi2006 Data Release Frequency: Quarleny CORRACTS: Crxtectrie Aaron Report CORRACTS 16"lifies nazardous waste handlers w+th RCRA correcuve aol oa aclrv,ly Dale 0( GavEsnmanl Version 12)2912005 Dale Dala Arrived al ECR. 01f11,2066 Date Made Active in Repays: CZi2112006 Nrlrnber a( Oays la Update 41 543urr=e. EPA Telephone 860-424-9346 Last EDR Conran: 031D5,12006 Next Sctimided LDR Contact- (00�126)6 Data Release Frequency QuaiteMy RCRA: Resource Ccnsarvahnn ana Recavery Ad lnfosmalLon RCRAInto iS EPA s C.omDrenensiye inlgrtnauon sysSer'l, providing access In data supporLng Lhe ResDLir17-6 CDnsarvaliun and Reww!ry Art fRu�ZA} of 1 E176 and the: HazirJOtLS anlli Solid Wasle AmencimerlS (RSWAI (il U$Q RC;RA)nl4 replacer} the data rewofijing and reDoMng at)ditles, of the ReaolLrce Gongervalian and Recawtry InicomaiLon System (RCRIS) The database Lfidudea seleCvve,nl'o4-matlon on sites whLch generate, Irgtispurl. score, treat andlor 0Lsp1)9e 131 hazardous waste a-5 defined by the Resource CDnservaiipn ants Recovery ACl fRCR41 Conditionally @s.empt SmalI quar6irt generators (C£5SaGsI gimer@it? less than 104 0g. a hazardous waste, or lest than 1 kg of acule4y hazardous waste per monlh .Srnadl quanUly generators (SQGs7 generate between 100 kg and 1.04Q kg of 1wavlous waste pe, rThontn, Large gU&r.hty generators (LQGSI generate over 1.000 kilsgrarns (kgl of rlaza=us waste, or over 1 kg of arL"W hazaxrous waste per rnoMM Transporters are individuals er entilies that move hazardous waste from the generaiarof+-rile to a 9acliNMal c.3n recycle neat. score or dtspos6of Ina waste TSOFs treat. soya. or d15p45e of ]he 1wmie. Dale of Gov ernmem VeesFoat: 42,2112D06 Dale Data Arnvern al EJDR 0ND1121d05 Dale hlage Active in Reports 03131/2005 Number Of Days to Update 30 Souree. EPA Telr;phone 600-424-9346 Last EDR Ganact: D310112C06 Next Sr-heouled EDR Contact. D9.`24e2006 Data Roleaae FrequerLay. Qusneriy =RNS: Emergency Response Notiicatian System GTiercgeney Raspar,sa NaliriCatlor System ERNS remros anal slores inlarmalion Dn repanad releases of aii anal nazara�)us Subslanre5. Dale of Government Version 12r31r21)0-5 Sciume, Nasrorral Response Genler, United STOLE- Coast Guard gate Data Amyrr1 al EDR- 0111212006 Telepnane 2QZ-2fi0-2342 Date Made Acr,ve in Reparzs 02f21F2006 Last EDR Canri3o: 01r12170D6 NumMi- of Days to UDome 40 Next Scheduled 8DR Coma-= W-'24;24D6 Data Release Frequency: annually T FA!a 139 IS PageGR 2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED 1 DATA CURRENCY TRACKING WAIRS: hazordous IAalenals lnrdrnaDon Reporting Syslurn 'Nazar us malenals laladeili Report Sys lam `ih1IRS conlairss Mazardaus material Sall incideni.5 reps lei m DC Gale of Governmenl Version- 12r31+FD45 Dale Dala A\mved al EDR 0111d!2005 Dale Made k, owe in Reporu- ❑ 121P2f}D5 Number of Da" to Update. 36 Source- Ll l)epanment of T raAKKMt &r Telephone 202.3f&4555 Last EDR Comacr 0111612006 Next Scneduled FOR Contact: W17,7C3o Data Release Frequency. Annually US ENG CONTROLS. Englneenng Controls Sites List A IiSUng of :¢les will engmeenng cantrom m place- Engrneennrg consrals include various farms of Laos, b4idding lourrdalium- limits. an0 ITedtment rnelhoas to Creare palnway etiminallon for TL-gulaled SubsLances IC enter en%irenrnenlal r OO.@ Or edecl human liea0.. Dale Dr Govemrmenl Vernon W(32f K05 Dale b3leAm;e(1alEl)R QBr12J2D05 Date Made Active in (Reports. IN6r2O05 hlurrner of Gays to Up(Jate: 55 Source Enw4nrrvental Protection Agency Telepnbne- 703-603-886i La51 EDR Cpnla_J: 0343F2i)N Next Scheriuled EDR C,onlad: 07;0120CB Dala Release Frequency Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites %min In5lilomal Canvcts A jirling of ;qes with inslrtutlanal conlrOlS if' l3laCe InSlrtu600W ConUOIS mGuGe OCIM1115 lia live measures. such ar, grouiAwaler use Te5{riclion5. conSLrurJjon restncticnns. pr0ppM use reslficllons_ and msi !emeuialf4n Care Tt�Owxemenls intended is prevent exp4SurL' io con12mu12mo mnair]Iitg On Site Creed rerMrljcns are generally regrlirec as pan of tMe InStitulionaI canlrpl5 Data of Government Version D1 W2005 Dale Data AmveC al EDR 02111!21p@5 Dale Made Active in Remrls 1)410ra'2UDa Numl)Pr DI Dtivs to Update. 54 Source Ermmrrmentall Praleciian Agency Teilepharre: 70 3-543 3-8B67 Last EDR Conlacl: 0_Y13r20&6 Nexl5chaduled EDR Contact. 417R03f2006 Data Release Frequency Vanes DOD: Depanmenl of Defense Sires This dale 5el cprt5,5is of federally awned or administered lands. adrrunistafed by Me DpDanment of Gefenre. that have any a+ea equal la or greater than 640 arras a? 11143 lJnd�d Stales. Prlerty Rico. and the D S Virgin Islae%5 Cate aiGcv;emmenl Version 1MV20N Date Data µmwed al EDR. 02 CL&QO05 Dale Maae Aclve m Reports OW04,7005 Numtyer of Days In Update t77 Sauna USGS Telepnone. 7D3-59 �$01 ,-= FOR Corva-_L: 02W20r.6 New; 5cheduled EDR Consact D5i0$f241(16 Data !?Mease Fr"uency- Semi -Annually FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sikes The liming ncluites kv all m5 of Formerly Used Deiense Giles prap(�rues wMeie the U5 Army CDrps of Engir.oary IS acoveiy working or will lake necessary Cleanup actions Date al Gay emra.entVe7ian IV051-2Q0�_ Do leDaaaAm%fedalEDR 01119i2C06 Dale Made A --bye in Repom: 0=2046 Number of Day; to Up;we 33 US BROWNFIELDS: A Lr5wrg of BrowrrFielUs S11e:; Source U.S Arm Corps of Engrneeis Te iephom : 2G2-528-428 5 Last EDR Con Iacl' D3a13312OD5 Next 5choduled ECiR 1CjDnlad 07103QQD5 47a1ai Release Frequency: Varr9m 1649869 1s Pau 3R-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SF -ARCHED 1 DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Inciudec in the llsLng are bravm�5a- propertres awresaes by C000eraln+e o gie6m&n1 Recip3erris and L-mwnii; Cw prnperter adtlra'.seC by T arC-aiza-d 5mwr4eLos ¢= rrrYrls Targeted BrDwnrields Ass,ssmenls-EPA s Tarc;eieq Bruwnnelds Assessmenl5 fTBAI Anx;rcrn u5 � in, help alas, tribes. and m,uniapalities-esperJally lhase iffioul EPA BfOwnfelxis A-seasmenl Dernarstrabon PPiilot -rmumrze the un[enaiMies of rontaminalian oilen aSsaGalkd wdh hrownfields UrSaer the TEA program.. ---PA prrmd.s ru ding anclar techns:al assislanca fear envuonmental assessments at briiwnflWs ssr-� Ir1r0ucjrlout U-ta couritry Targeted Brnwnfialds Assessments supplement and worlcwlth orhereFrorls under EPA's 9rewnfields Inilialive to promole aaanuo and retlevelopmenl of bmwnfields GaaperauveAgreemenl RecipiLmis-Stales. pQJI!IcaI rLjp&vrsaons. lartlon@s. and Indian Inbils became J3rown6elm Cleanup Revolving Loan rui7d (BCRLF) ooaperabva agreement reeVienrs when Inay enler Inlo BCRLF cooperafive agre.rnerds wllh Me U.5 EPA. EPA selects BCRLF ox*erabve agreement reopienls cased on a proposal and apprcauor process 6CRLF roaperarrve a�re--rnenl rer..ro%en%must use EFTA funds prnwr[ied lhraugh BCRLF cnoperduv9 agrecrhenl roc s hod tW0Wf1ne1dS-nalaied ❑eanup acilvrlre5 Dale of Governmeril Vers+an 11f2912035 Date Gala Amved W EUR 12fou1 005 Dale #,lade A=V';e in Rnarm (11r3912C06 Nurnber of Days 10 Upoize: 56 Source Envut.nmemal Praler:lion Agency T9lepliwe: 202-&66"-2777' LaM EDR Conlacl 0303r20M Next -' �aawait EDR Canlacl: 45il2120v5 Data Rstuaea Frequency Semi -Annually CONSENT: Suoerfund (CERCLA) Coiisenl De�-rees Major ie�al seltlemimm rhat estaphsh responsibility ant Standards for cleanup al NPL (5uperfundl sites Released pencil =alSy try Untied Slates Disvict Couns after settlement by parties to klmatron matters bate of Gavemmenl Verson 12i14 2004 Source Depar.menl of Juvrce- Gonsenl Decree Library Data Data Amvrd al EDR: 0211 51)05 Tatelrhone vanas Date Made Active in Reports f}4 25,;2W5 Last EDR Conia--a 03112.2OQG Nurnbet43f Days ID Update: 69 Naxl Schadtaad EDR Contact- D424+20M Data Rehea5e Frequency Vanes ROD: Records Of De:isian Retard of Nctsion ROD da:;umertiis mandale a permanent remedy at an NPL (Supertynd) site onnlaininq lechn cal and haallfi tnfpnnal+Dr. la aid in lr•,r aeanup Dale of Governmenl Vernon 12107)2D45 Dale Dam Amver# al EUR 1)`!A]62096 Dale fA a-Ie Active in Repoils: M1r2i)N Number of Days ID Update: 46 Source EPA Telephone. 763-4 l b-C 22.3 Last EDR Contact. W05.;200s Next Scheduler, EDR Contacl 07(43.20% Data Release Frequency Anns,aJly UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Siles Uranium ore was mined by private oomparves for leaefal govemmenl use in nanomal duiense programs VVnen the mills Shut down, large pities of the sand -like m2lenal;mill tailings) tom@in aher uranrurn has been extracled irnm the ore Levcis at Tluman exposure to ractoactwe malenals It= the piles are law. however. in sDme cases taihng5 ware user; a!; ron-9LMdi0n matanals ❑erare rh.e palenu3l haallh razarus or fhe laurngs ware recognised Date of Govemment Version 1104r20105 Date Data Amved al e0R I v2$+2W4 Data Made Active in Reports 01r30l2b116 Number of Dav5 to Update. 61 Source rzlepartrmwnf or Energy Telephone 505-845-0011 Lasl EDR Caniact: 03:2U2006 Newt Scheduled O-DR Contact' DE7'19+2Dfi5 Data Reverie Frequency" Vanes ODI: Open Domp Inventonr An Open dumo is defined as a disposal 1aGlity [Pat does mt Cr+inply with one or rnoce a1 the Pali 25" or Parr 25, SOIALL D Galena Dalo of +aowtnwnenl Version D611111985 Dale Dala fJTrveG at EDR- 09109CD04 Dale klade AL-bve in Repors 39-1112004 Numher of Days io Update 39 5auroe Erniron"mal Prace,_lion Agency Telepnane 800-42d-9346 Lasl EDR Contacl C6j109{2014 Next Snetiuled 'cDR CorleCL WA Data Reieare Frequency No Update PlafioaC TZ 1T-,4083r,' is Page G€ A GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED 1 DATA CURRENCY TRACKING IRIS; TaxiC Chernical Release IrrrentolySyStem Toxic release Inventory System TRIS wdenrAe5 haalibes which relLkam! toxic rnenucols 101he a, w r?-rr air. land ut reportable t�uan Wes under SARA ill le ill section 313 Dam of Government Versvxl. r2,r y1-?gb3 Da1s Dal Amvt;d al EDR- 0'.'1312ZO'� Date Made Active in Rectors. QEV17i2GQ5 Number of Days to Dodaie- 35 Sourr;e {PA Te Iephona. 202- 56fi -0254 Last EDR Caniact G312112006 Neil Scheduled EDR Contact 0 ii1J2048 Data Release Frequency. Anrwalry TSCA.: -Toxic Substances COrLMl Avl Toxic Sub slarices-or%rot AcL'rSCA ioen4fixs rnarwiSvWrer5 and importers b1 rtismicA SLiQUances mciuded on 111e TSCA Chemical Substance 1nve:imry list. II includes data on the ptbduruon v6unx of Mese sons'anres by ptar:l 5119 Dale of Government Version: IV31120D2 Date Data Arnveo at EDR: 0412712D04 Owe Made Active u7 Repans- 05r2112004 Number o1 Days to UDdatL 24 Scurrx- EPA TelepMan e: 202-2H - 5521 Lasi EDR Conlac; 43fMr20g6 t%ex1 Schejluleb 1-:DR CaMad 04)17r24U5 Data Release Frequency Every d Years FITS; , IFP)V TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Furw�ic+de, & Rwenlidda ALI'dTSGi (Toxic 5ubslances C.pnlTol kola FITS tracks a41ministrarrle cases and peSlirid-2 eRf0rc.ernen1 actions and imimptiance aelmlies retaled 1a F1FRA. TSCA and EACRA (E.merg.enry Planning and Communrry RIghi-to-Kr.aw ACI) To maintain currency. EDR contacts the Agency on a gUanedy bads. Date of Gavarnrnefll Vers+an 011171200E Scurtre- EPNOf>-ica o1 Plavar7lion. Pesbcide5 an4 Toxin Subsi.ODCes Daie Data Amved at EDR a1(24)'2006 Telepnone 202-566.1567 Dale Made Active in Reports. 0127r' W6 Last EDR Ccrltacl. 03120121,10E Number of Days. to Ut7dale 34 Next Scneduled FOR CDnIaC1 r19-120Co Data flelgase Frequency' Ouanetly FTTS INSP: F1FRA.' TSCA Tracking System • FIFRA (Federal Insecli6ae, FunginclQ. 3 Radenucde A03 TSCA [Toxic: SUb5wrnces COMT01 Anal Daie ❑I Ggve�mrneni Varsror. 01117f2006 Dale Fiala Arnved at EDR: 0 V24 2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 02127)2C Number of Days to Update. 34 Source: EPA Telepnc*je 202-566-1657 Last FOR Conlacl 030),2006 NEW SiT+uduled EDR Contac M'1912006 Da1a Release Fregur!nc; auarlerly SSTS: Section 7 Trac:kjna Syslerns SeClign 7 of Ine Federal Insetvcrde, Fungtade and Rgdenri❑de Act. as ameMFLd fQ 5121 6291 requires all reai5lemd pasiimde-prrnduung 551ab1tshment5 to submit a report 10 the Ernriranmenial Prol,---tron Agency by Migrch 1st eacr% year Each eslat)hsrnsenl must repDn the types anri ,3mauniS pl pesD:,ides aCILWa ingtedierns and devices tsein% prodw-ed. and lhase having been pmduced and sold Dr 6istnDuted in me past Year Dale of Gowemnlerll Version- 1213112.03 Date Data Amved at EDR 0110��4-1905 Dale Made Aebve in Rely 0112512Gt75 Numt;er of Davy to Updale. 22 Source EPA TeleRnaiie- 242-v64-42133 ♦_asl EDR. Conlacl 031p6 2006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact 07i1712005 Data Release i:requency Armud{ly PADS: PCE Ac.uvlly Database Sysiern PCE) Activity Daiit)aF,5 PADS 1rSenU1'ies 4]9r!i-aiors. Iransparters. zommer-nal slcfers andlor brokers aril disposers of P4:B'S wtia are regwTed Iq notify one EPA at su&. actrvr11e5 Date of GcivemmeeRl Vernon 12F27,2f)g5 Dale Daia Amviad al FOR fl2rDarZ0U6 Date Made Active eR Rerans 02.12712QG6 Number of Days la UpdatD 14 Source EPA Telephme 2112-5&B-Mi D Las: EDR Conlacl- D2A)BrZ]06 Next Scheduled EDR Cor,tazl 051DW2DO6 Oai2 ReaeaSe Freauency- MrTually TC1o49S69Is P-q,2GR-5 C- GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED I DATA CURRENCY TRACKING I MLTS-MalefiailUcerisirsg Trackn"; Syster MLTS 15 mainlairsed by r--e Nuclear ice,--rr rr Z.-rn ; ane :,oniains a list 0approxlnulely a.10f} ones wi^.l�7 p0!i,5es5 or use radra2--we fnatena:s and *T=, ar- Su17!Bct in NRC licensirig requirements To matnlain clJ"12n^;. EDR czniacY me Aywrcy on a quanarly basis Dale of Government VerSrorl. 02110)'2006 Dale Data Am -.-ad al EDR- 0211 F120p6 Dale Made Active in Rep-c S. C3,211 po6 Number of flays to Updale 43 5ourcrtx. Nu�ear Reyulaiorr ComrTuss::an Teiephan.e. 301-415-7169 Last FDR Contact. 04413+'2606 Next 5ctieduled EDR Conlacl 07103,21006 Dail Rp4ease Frequency Quarterly MINES: Mines MasrefrrdezFle CortiainS all mine idenuficaham numbers issued for mines acvve or c-oaoad since 1971 The data sIsQ Inauges vtat3bon inlarmaLnr, Dale of Government versran 1110a12605 Source 13epartmenl of t-abor, Mine Safely ar.d H4a11h A6MLnisl:aljan Dale Data Arnved at EDR' TV27 2005 Teiepnane. 363-231-5459 Dale Made Active in Repgrl5' 0113Q121jpg Last EGR Cpntacr• 03f291200E Nurrrber (il Oava to Update. 34 Next 5cher3uled EDR Contact 0W&'2CG6 Data iR9lease 1=requency' Semi -Annually FINDS: Facility Index SystemTracility Registry System Far Ally Index System FINDS contains boit', laalily usfomiaLian and .pointeTG io other sou fceS ITrai aontam rroOfa detail EDR incudes the ?Dllewrrg FrINDS datatases to th)s repair- PG5 (Permit Cwmpllance System) AIRS f+heramelnc 1nlormatlon Relneval System 1, DOCKET ftn4orcemenl Da-irel used fa manage and track rniar mlicn on pyil Iudtual enlorcemeill Cases for all er mfaftmental 5latutesi. FURS (Federal Urdemzound Ir)ecriam CoraJDll. C-DQC1{ fCnrntnel Dock System used to tract cnmfnaI emiorcerrent actroris for all an+nfanrttemal stalulesl. FFIS (Fedefel �:at:ililie S InfaRTatrCR Systeml, STATE (Slate Environmental Laws and Statuies)- and PADS IPCB ftcl,vily Data System) Date Df Government Version: Cllf6g 20Cr6 Date Data. AmvBd a1 EDR 01F76,7 W5 Dale Made Acllve,n Repons: Onli'2005 Number of pays to UP0.118- 36 Sourct-�'. EPA Telepl•,cne: NfA Last EDR CDnlact: 04103,'2006 Next Scheduled EDR Ccniact: 6763i2006 Data Release Frequency Quarlariy RAATS: RCRA AdnunisLrattve Act iao. Tradking System RCRA AdrnrnisItalia n Ac!j(3n Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enlorcemenl actions 15suM under RCP-'k Dertainsng to r idiot Y141aJar% arrd includes admigislra4vcs and Crvi'i actions t]rou9hl. by the EPA FDr adminislra0an action's alter 5epiernber 30. 1995. Bata enlry to the RAATa Natabara was disconitnu EPA will retain a rot,V of the =abasel for histanca% recods. 11 was necessary to lermr}ale RAATS because a dem lase,n aQenCy raSourcas rradr it irnDo5SJh1e ID oantlnue 10 updale the information r..ontained in the Odlabdse Date of Goveitimerl Versmn 04i17i1995 DaLE; Data AmvedatEDR 417103,'1995 Oale Made Active in Repons: 06i0711%5 Number of Days to U-Lcale. 35 Source EPA TeI�!PhCrne 2(12-M4-4104 Last EDR Contad: W1Gfi--2DC6 Next Scheduled EDR Contaot- 0$'65i20Cr6 Data Release Frequency Na Update Planned BRS: Bie+wiial Raaponimg S?slem The Dienival Reporung System iS a national system administered by tr.e ZPA that cotlerls Gala on the gerteraGCrn and management a! hazar(3ouS wasle. BP Gap Iufes derailed Cara from t'xo groups Large Quantity Generators FLOG) arvi Treatmerd, Storage. and Disposal Fablitles Dale of Gaverin np-m Vet -man 12n1120D.3 (late Data Arrived a1 EDR: 05'17i2005 Date Made Aritve in Repnrin 08104120A5 Number of Davy to Update 1.8 Source. EPAfNTIS Telephone 800-4?4-93d6 Lasi EDR Coniac! 03.17:260F Next Scheduled EDR Cc:ntacl' 06f122+200a Data Release Frequently B+ennially T� 1fi49Bv9 1s Pate GR.n GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED 1 DATA CURRENCY TRACKING STATE AND LOCAL RECORDS AWP: Annual Workplan Sites KWWn hi2L@Tdou5 Waite Sties LdJdowria DTSC's Annual a:iorkolan tAWPI, formerly 9EP, idenllfies 1 m3 r N-aa€aoUs subsianca saes largefed for dial up. Dale or CCverhmeni VeTSW 091C01`X)05 Source Cahfomra Envaro7rTaanlal Rrrolecuon Agrsncy Cafe Dala Armed at EDP: 0&'29)`2005 Telephone 91 Fr323-3405 Dwe Made ACLtre in Repcds- 01'21."40135 Last EDR Cmwd 04*5)26Q6 Nurnber of Days la Update 23 Next Scheduled FOR Contact. 05.'29.r20rj�6 Dala Release Frequency. Annually CALSftCS: Calsrles Dalabase Tf1e CalsileS atalabase contarns potenllal ar cDnfarmed ha:-arGau5 Substance please properties. In 1996. C3ldomia EPA reevaluated and sagnifcarlrly reduced lire irumper of Sates an the Galsrtes dalaease. Dale of Gavernment Version 0&'n12005 Dare Data Amued at F=DR 08291'2005 Dale V.Mt Active in Reperls. UW21;2055 Naarnbcr Of Days to Updale 21 Source DepanniaN of Toxic 5ub5;anc15 Control Telephore: 916 323 34p0 j_astEDRCanlad OQ05i200E Nerr St-netld'ed EDR Gonti--1 05F29,213D6 Dales f eleasr_ FieauenCy Quaneny CA BOND EXP, PLAN: bond=xpertiddure Plan Depanrr*nI of Health Servvices develajl8b a site-Speafic exp"cliture� plan as the bases for an appra4rrauon. of HaaaraaU5 Sub5tance Cleanup frond Ail funds. II is not updated Dale D' G4vernn7eril V Brraon D 1'r71 f i 983 Dale D21a AmvEd al EDR 07.r2711994 Date Ma4e Active rn ReponS- 08102)199d Number ❑I Days Lu Upaale & Source De9artmstrl of k19211h Services Telephone 916-255-2118 Last SDR Coma.[ 4,�Sf3111994 Nexi Scheduled EDR G4macl- WA Bala Release ErequetlLy: No UpoaIe Planned NFA: No Furlhec Action Delerminalion Tres category oacdwrrs pa-Dpenaer al whrcri DTSG has mane a clear detE rrim"ali That ute property ODes nol pose EL prablLLm tD the enwonment or 10 public rlealltr Data of Gavemment Versa❑n DlWa;2005 Dale Dala Arrived at FOR 0!529120135 Date tkle4e Ac5rv8 an ReQono 1 Gr7F'2045 Nunwer of Gays 1D Up7a1.e 3a Source Departmenl of Toxic Sub -stances Carrlyd Telephone 5116-323-3a04 Last EDR GN1ta :- 0415512DOZ Nexl5CYledutiGd EDR Contact 0T. I 2505 Data Release Flequeriuy, Quarwily NFE: Properiaes NeedanS FurtherEwalunlaan Thar c31ei�?cry -no nla.rtrs Dropertaes Ihat are suspectedof beanq oanlaminaled -rne54� are unopnf=ed conramanaled ptOperUeS that need ro De a55e5.5ed Using trxe PEA process YEA an Progress andic-ni m progerlaeS where DTSG as ourrentlycpnqu�,lrng a PE -A PEA aaclurraxd inda2.a19s propBrll$S where GT$C has aseterrnaned a PEA is required. but Rot Cuffendv ur49'-way Cate Df Govemmasnt version 08f0&2045 Date Dala Amvad at EDR 09;25;2005 Dace Made Aovve an Re- cWS 439.r2i 12005 Number of UapS to Update. 23 5ourc-e DepanmenI of Toxic- Substances Control Telephark 9iB-323-34G6 Last EDR Gontarl. DV0512006 Next Scxledi-b d EDR Cow au- 05 DD6 Dala Release Flersuoncy- Quarterly REF: Unoanfarmed Prgpertras Referred to AnoLher Agency Ths category ,aMams �rroperbes where wniaminalran ha: not: been cz]nfimred aoC wnt" were del ermined as ml re+3unrng doact Dr SC Stle NlLbgaliorn Program aCponor overrrghl. Accordingly, these sala3s have Gees referred to analh-r 51,94e or local requlaiary agency Dale al GLiveTmeritVersion 041U812005 Date Data Amyed al EDR 4W9.`2005 Date Mad eAmve an ReUDns IQ'OE;2CQ5 number Qf Da-,5 to I1pdale J.0 Source Departmenl of Tox:v Substances Cnnlyd Telephone 91Er323-3400 Last EDR Ganlacl 000512,356 Next Samedu led EDR. Gentaot D512912056 pale Release Frequency Quaneny TC1fagg591s PageGR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED !DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SCH: ScrW Prape ty Evalualicn Program This ategory contains proposes: aw exisbrr,--rt)oi =as v-a: s'b aev)g evaluated by GTSC for passible hazardous maIeras conLaminaticn, In same cases. 1ht-s= pmDu-mas fray De lowed in me GalSltes category depending cn the ley at W Ihrreal 1a public Pi?ah art sarsty or the evvvoaiTfleN O--y hose Dale or Govemmeni VersK)r: C8t%7005 Dole Dana Amwed at EDR Cd2924Q5 Dale klw�a Active in RepWnis 10,' GMO5 Nurriz r of ❑ays. la Update, 38 SuAm-e. Depasvmgn of 7gxr~ Substanre5 Qonlzol Telep hpne 91 w"s2�-340 Last EDR Ccritact 134;05f2006 Naxl Scheduled EDR Contact D512912006 Data Release Frequency Quarterly TOXIC PITS: Tnxi„ Pits Cleanup Ad Sites Toxic Pff.5 ClaanupAct Sites TOXIC PITS i(112n[fie. sites suspeoed o! cznta"ng Tiazacocu5 subsianr:e5where deanUp has not yet been campXwe•d. Date of Govemr-4m Versmn. 07;QV1995 Date Data Arrived al EDP: Da'30i'l995 Gale Mende Aches in Repons. 091261995 NUn-der of DayS t0 Update 27 Source- State Waier Resources Gonlrol Board Tr}leprsop e: 916-227-43 64 La51 EDR Contziol ir'3Q 2QC5 Neil Scheduled EDR Contact. 05,-13112406 Dale Release Frequency' No UMale Planned SWFILF (SWS4: Solid Waste Inioimatlon System ACUv�!.;lased and Ina.CJave Landrills, SWF1;,F rsGordS typically contain an inye nlary of solid waste disposal lacihuas or landfills. The5e may be actry9 of i naclive facililies or open dumps lhaI sait$d 10 meel RC4A Seciion 4W4 01116ha [Or Solid wasie landfills 4r di'sNsal sites. Dale of Gveernmeni Versicr., IM&2d05 Date Data ArrneO al EDR. 12f1 Y2005 Dale hdac#a Active in Reports 01119 006 Numw al rays to Update'. 37 S9urze; Irilrtgrated Wade 1lanar�errw_n;pard Telephpng• 916-34 i-6320 �ast CDR Contaci 03115!2006 t4vict Scheduled EbR Contam 06112,12W,13 Data Release FrQQU'mCy QuarlerlY CA WDS: Waste Discharge -System SiteS whirl] have beef; issued wasle discharge requirements Dale of Gpvemmenl Ver5enn 12119F20D5 gate DataAmved at EDR 12121120W5 C�31e Mane Active in Repels (11.1g1�006 Number or pays la Updala, �J Source: Stale Water Resources Gonlml B02sd Teiavhane 916-341-5227 Last EDR Cant2oi' 03121f2l)C6 ,4eill Schedu lea EDR QmIad OF1191213C5 Data Release Frequency Ouafli;Vj WMUDSISWAT: Waste managemeni Unit Database Waste klalragemeni Una Database System MUDS is used by the Stale Weiler Resaluces Control Board staff and the Regional Waler Quality Control 940ards for picgrarn trzt0cing and myer,lory al wasie managernenl units. +h't,9UD5 i5 comaosew of 1I3e lolkiwir5g dalabases, Facility Inlprmarion. Scliedulad' IRSDeCWns Information. Waste Managemenl Unii Jnformation. ,WAT arggram Infgrmaiien. SWAT Report Summary Iriiormalion S*AT Report Summary Data Chapter 15 (formerly SuDchaC',er 15j Inl6rrnalior. Chapter t5 Mpnilanng Paramelam, MCA Program Inlonr.algn. RCRA Program. I7domiaP4f,. C--3G ie, 1pipm 3bon aria tntetesled Parl.�s lnlvTrL31rgn Dale o! Gavvrnhtent Version C5df311201)0 Dale DaLa Amved at E13R 0411W000 Date Made Ajnve in RE:ports,, 05A 120DO Number ❑I Days to Update 30 Source State Water Resources Conitol Board Telephone- 91 E-2274A48 Last EUR Contact- 0310612006 Next Scheduled EDR Canlact. 06105?2rv'{16 Data Release Frequency.. Quarleny CORTESE: 'Corlere" Hazarraous Waste 8 Substances Sites Ust The siles lar lire Hsi are desgruiled by the Stale Wrier Resource Conlru7 Board (LOST). IJ3e Inragvivva V.Iaslu Board (SV%VLS1, and Me Dr parneRl pr Toxic 5utalarces Contras (Cal -Sites) This hslang r5 nr) longer updwaa by the sLaie asgencyr 7;;1r�498G9 is Page GR-S GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED l DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Dale of Governmenl Vefsipn 0410V2401 Source CAL EPA!OfFiice a1 Emergency inic malwn Daly Data Arrived at EDR: 05.'29,2CQ1 Telephone- 916-323-51QQ Dale Made Active in Repass: 07r'252001 Last -DR Cantacl: 02106121)M Number of Days t4 Llpdala. 5S Next 8lieduled EDR Ccniad: �)4124l21306 Data Release �requencp; No Update r"�lanned SYVRCT: Reoirier Dalaaasc A living of reuvoing lacdd,es in Cahromia Gate of Governmenl Verstnn: ❑f1051 006 Date Dala Arnved at EDR: 011l3E!FMd5 Date Made Active. in Rrrports 01f,'1l2046 Number of Days to Utldate 22 Source Depanmeni of Consfrrvaoon Teteptsone 916-323-3836 Last EDR Canta,t: 01109126415 Next Scheduled EDR C€rnlart: 134110)' T1)06 Dala.Release Fra4uenry:Quarlerly LUST; Gs[nracker's Leaking Unuergraund Fuel Tank Rapon Leaking Uriliargfound Storage Tank Irladenl ReparlG LUST recorns contain an lnveniory of resorted lealunq urw1ergrp1jnr, sloracle Iant incidents. Not all stales maintain 11neme remi'ds. and {he inlprmaLon slara6 vane'. by stale Date dt C-naemTnEmiVerson- 011091204E Sourc0: Stales Waler Resources Conlral Board Dale Data hmwad at EDR 01j'09f2406 Telephone 916-341-5752 Date Maio• Active in Reports: J113112446 Last E4R Crmtact: 131IC912046 Number nt Days to Updale 22 Next Soneouled EDR Contact 04f1c1120106 iDala Reieasa Frequency- Quarleny LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank L6ak'is, Los Angdos Venlura caurxliF's For more current inft�rmaiion, please refer to We State Wale- Resources Control 8aarti s LUST database Dale 4f GovBrnmEnt Ver5i4r. 0g107f2004 Source' California Regional Water Quality Control Seard Los ".9les Regaan ry i Daha Oala Arnved at EDR 0911)7i201]14 fialepnone. 213.576-65DO Date Made Active in Repcd:i— 1LV1Z'2l]04 Last EDR Cantet:t: 03fi28120Cr6 Number of Days to Update 35 Next Srhedulaa EDR Conrad: 06E 26126C-'o Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG BL: Leaking iJmjerrro*Ra Storage Tank Case Lisling 1 ar rr'Cra current inlalm2Lon, please refer to the State tNaler Resources Ci�nlxpl Doard's LUST 6arabase Date ql Gov 1min enl Version Q910912QD3 Sdurre- vawornia Regional Water Civakre C-pntrgl BDaid Lahanlan Re4ron 051 Date Data Arrived at EDR- 0911 &12N 3 Teleprlcine: 916-542-5A24 C1ale Mace Acliwe in Reports: I X0712003 Lasl ED?R Conra l- 0310612006 Nurnoer of Days to Updare 27 Neix'. Scheduled EDR Conlacl r-&TJ5i2DD6 Data Re4ease Fregvancy No Update Planned LUST REG 9: Leaking UnGer¢round Storage Tank Report Jrange- River5lde. San Qle�?o counties For mare current informotion. please refer to me Slate %Naier Resources Control aoard'a LUST Gaiaume ❑we el Governrriafit vefs,oar 0310112NI Saurre Califwaa Regional Water Quality Conirpl Board San Diego Region 19l Dale DataAmwed al EOP 44F-1 20DI Telephone 358,4E,7.2980 Dale +Made Active in Repass- 45r2112001 Last EttR Contact 01.11612006 hum'jer al Da,s io Updale 28 Next Sck+.ecluled EDR Camaci 0411712UO6 Data Raleaae rlepuency' h1p Upoale Planned LUST REG B: Leaking Undei�]rourd Storage Tanks Calilomia Regional Water Quality Contra) Board Santa Ana Region (8i Fc4r mare current mfw aiion. please Talar io the State Vimer Resources Control l3oard's i-U5t database Dale oI Gavvornem Vefs*n- p21141200'S Source Calilomia Regional Wale Qu@My C--mrot board Santa Aria Region fB1 Date Da12 Amued a1 EDR 0211E,2a05 Telephone 951-782-4130 Dale klab Active in Repot- 133f=1305 Lass FOR Cwtact 021Lb12006 Numtoer of Days to Update` 41 Next Scheduled EDR Contact 051136121]06 Data Release Frequency Vanes TC1649869 15 Pac1e CrR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED ! DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LUST REG 7: Leakin,9 Underground Storage Tank Case! Date of Govemnpnt Version' 0225?`1d4 Sour-. CaFiumia Ror_Xtiral Waler aualrly Conircl Ooaly F{rv$r &mn Rego,, {�} Dale Data Armed at EDIT: 4Er252--i elexrhme 76Cr346-7.:91 Daie Made ACOve in Repbrls: 03e2:,2004 Las, rDR 12,;t7,2DD5 Nur71C�r Of days to Update 27 Nex; SCheduted EDR Canlao,: 03f27a2QC(a Data Release Frequency No Update rlanrLij LUST REG 6V: Leaking Unde+rround Storage Tank CASE LrStrng Dale Of Governrneni Vershm 40107.2095 Spurre, ;al forn+d Reghwal'.^,aler Quality COnlrol board ViclOrville 6rarzzh Qlfzl! ($'l bale Della Arrived at EDR 0Bd0712D05 Talepmne 760-3413-7491 Dale Made Act,ve in Reports' 0612KCI05 Last EDR Comact 04103.? Number of bays to Update 22 Next Schedule -a EDR Gernert- 07,+0312006 Gata Release Frequency. No Update Planned LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tar* Database Date oi Govamment Versirm 91115121046 SDuire- Caufomia Reoianal Waler Dual uyComm I9oaro Central Val+ey Rag Ion (5) Data Dala Amvetl al EDR- 01MV2M Telephone. 9164b-1-3291 Date Made Active in ReDts- 0Z12V?M6 Last EDR Contact. 0i11Ev2006 Number Or Days La Updal8 36 Next Scheduled EDR Cnnta-t- OWQI'2006 Data Release �-recuerlcy Ouarlany LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Slardge Tank Database Dale of GDvamment Version D5f19 20OJ Source Caldomia Regl4nal Wafer Duality C,ontral goarq Central CO351 Reg!on r„ bale Pala Amveo at EDR- o519r2M3 Telelonam�: 906-549-3147 DateMade Acuve in ReporrS-fl61D2/,?W3 Last EIJR Contact 021'•3R006 Number 6f D7v5 Ip Update 14 Next Scheduled �bR Contact: 06!15!-4006 Data Release Frequency No Update Planned LUST REG 1: Acuve Toxic Sile Invesliga' or) Det Norte. Humboldt. Lake. Mendoarto, Modnc, Siskiyou. Sonarna. Trinity muntre5 For more rurfenl inlarmahcn. please reFer tv the $1,31e. Water Resources CoWml Bo"'a LUST r]aiatta e Dale of Govemrneret Version- OZOV2r)C71 Source California Regroiral V14a,er Quality Gonlrol Bi3aro Nortr) Coast Gate Data Arnved al EDR: D2f29t2,ND 7elephrene• 767-�576-2220 Owe Made Acuve rn Reparls- 03129b'2001 Last EDR Contact 02'20J2006 Number 0' Days ID Update: 29 Next Scheduled EDR Canlart: '05."L?JDOE, Data Reiease FretlueriGy. No Update Planneg LUST REG 2: cruel Leak List Dale at Gouernmi nM Verson 0913W20C" Source Caidorma RLgiorlaI WaIer Quality CorirraI 802f0 San Francis2o 13av Reagan f2i Dale Da la Arrnwe-d a1 EDR 1-%Qa121}33 Telephone. 510-2e6-04S7 DalefvlaoE Act,va In Repurls t WIV2OCw Lasl EDR CDnla t 011D9F2013E Number of Days to Update 3D Next Scheaule4 EDR Contact 04;1012006 Chia Reiease Frequency- Quarreny CA Flf3 1U5T: Fautrty Invenlary Dalabase The Faulity Invemory Datanase tF1Dl C- ntdm5 a t1istcTsrzl hsling Of a�ve anr3+narhve underground slarage lanx tocaltc,l5 from tht Slate W21W Ret,13 4t C011tf0l Board. Refer to locaurnw7rj source for current Bala Dale Of Government Vvm4an 14J31 1994 SDurce: California Env,fonrMental Protecuon Agenmy Oale Dala Amur ;l al EDR: Q9m&,1945 Tetephone, 916-341-5851 Dale'ladii AMve m RE:mnG.09r25r1995 Lase EDR Contact 11r23r19 Number of 0-s}: 10 Up7ala, 24 Next Scheduled EDR Cimi=: NIA Data Release Frequency No Update Ptanrred T�:16-15$691s PageGR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED 1 DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLYW`: Stalawide SLIC Cat S Tie 5a}dls. Leaks. lnvesTlgaUons. and Cleanups {SLIC) hst7ngs Incauoes unauthorized Oisrhaiges rrom spill;; ar',d leans, other Ihan horn undeiRraund storage ranks or [trier regulaled sties. DaIg 01 G€>„trnfnent Vwscrn 01r09.20rYsi 5owme- Stab Water Rernwrces Control $card Dala Sala Amvpd at EDP- OVI) '2046 Telephone. 916-341-5752 male Mad Acliwe its Re ports. 01;3I.2006 Lust EDR Contact. 01l09120CS Number of Davy 10 Updake 22 Nexl SctledL:leij SOR Conlacl: 0411012QUD Data Releww Frequency Vanes SLIC REG 1 : ACUwe Togo Site Inverligations [Dale of Govemment Ve€sicP1 04103+2003 Source: Gaifumla Reguanai Water Ouallty Control 19a d. MxM Coast RLeq*n (1) ❑ale Data Arnved al EDR S34i13717D03 Teiephana, 747-576-2229 Dale Made Aiztivi� iR Reports 0412S'203 Last EDR Contact 02.Q0e20D5 Uurnser of Days to tJOale 18 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05--'22,UI)6 Data Release Frequency: Nrs Uwale Planned SLIC REG 2: S00G. Leap: . Invesigalion $ Cleanup C-osl Reo€vefy Li lrng Afiy canlaminalEd site Itiat impaus 0.rour}dwaler or has the patenlLal to impacl gsoundwatef Gate of Goveinmeril Version 09r30120G4 Source Regional 'Nase r Oualdy Control Board San Fruncigco Ray Regtpn r21 Gate Dala AMvac al EDR 10r29r'2004 Telepnone. 514-286-0457 data Mage AGl,ve m Reports 1111912004 Lasr EDR Cantacl -�1r09,r20p6 Numee or Days to Uldaale. 30 Next Swedule-d EDR CAwlact' 44nr1r2046 [)ale Release Fri qusncy Quarsarly SLIC REG 3: Spills. Leairs. Invesr getion S Cleanup Cast Rew%m-rV Listing Any c intan-mr.aled site that imoacts grovmNvaler or has the potenliat its impart ground%aler Dale of GovernrsterA Vaisran 021t7;2006 Source. Caiiforma Reglona] v':ater Qua,ity Control BaaTd Genlrat Coast Region f3� Date Data Arf,ved al EOR. 0207r2606 Teiephane. 805-5 9-3147 Dale glade Ac4we in Reports lDT13;2C--% Last EDR Contact- C2f13:2DDE Number of Da-fs so Updae-. 24 Naxt Sumduled EDR C12MZICL 050512006 Data r'leleasa frequency- Semi -Annually SLIC F1EG a: Spills. Leaks. Iriveslsgalion & Cleanup Gorr Reccoery Lisuriq Any contaminated site That impac. groundwater of has the poteribal to Impart groundwater dale of GcwL-mrreni Varsiar. 11 07120C4 Source: region Water 0ualily C4nlral Board Los Angeles fRegian Ie) dale Data Amved al FOR 1111 er'70BA Te4ephme 213-576-5609 Dale Made Aclive in Reports 0110412005 Last EDR Contau. 01123-' {OD6 NIAMOW of Days Ia Update 47 Nexl Schsdu46 EDR Ccmact - 04r24r2G06 0ala Reiaase Frequent Vanes SLIC REG 5' Spill; Leaks. Inve5Ugai%on $ Cleanuo Cost Recovery [iatu,g umlegulatec 5des Shal imgacl groundwater c' hay8 the DGlentrdt 10 rrripacl grou€101vater Dale rl Gowa+nmem Version 03r01,7005 Soulca. Regional Vmer Oualdy Control ar.3rd GemraI Vaaley Reg%on r5l Dale D&,a Arrived al EDR. OW05120CS Telephone. 916-4E4-3291 pa la blade Ac%wv tit Reports: 04r21,2W5 Last EDR Contact. 04!135+2006 t`lurnoef of Days to Locale, i 6 Nuxt Scheduled EDR Ct7NW: 071012008 DataRelsase Fraquency Semi -Annually SLIC REG[ BV-. Sgilis. Le-05 InvesligaUan & Cleanup Case Rc-, vt ry LiStwiq Dale of Govemmeri Version D5r2412005 Source IRegional'oV3ter Quality Control Boaid.'liyorvdiB 8ramrf Dale Data &[roved a1 EDR. 0525''2C05 Tetephane' 619-2.1 5593 Dale Made Active in Re parts. D&+1li 2045 Last EDR Conrad 04103r2DD6 Numper o' pays to Update ?2 Next Scheduled EDP Comacl NfG3,'2006 Dwa Reease Frequency Semi-AnnuaMy 7: '1649969 is ndrle GR 7 1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED I DATA CURRENCY TRACKING. SLIC REG 61-: SLIC Sites Dale of Government Ve mov: W137r2OD4 Source Catifonira Reg+nnal >i a.gr t 11y Control Board. Lananran Region Dale Data ArTived at Ebf;: C9+o712C04 Telept',one- 53C> 2 Q a I e Made Aave ire Repots: I(WI2'2170c P-ast EDR Copra; BS+Da20Co NumC�er of pays to LJpdale 35 Next Scheduled DR Corltacx 06di] '2Ci06 Data Release Frequency No UFxwte Planned SLIC REG 7: SLIC List Dale al Govt!mrnernl Version I1l24t20J4 Source' Calafamia Regional Ouairry Corl2rof Board. Colcxaao River Bann Re�icn Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11.129r2CO4 Telephone. 7630-34$-7491 Dale Made Active in Reports: DV0412005 last EDR Contact: 031C153r2G% Numbef of Days to Update 36 Next SrSteduled FOR Cori!arl: LIYZ z CC Data Raleasia Frequency No UpdaLL Plalmned SLIC REG B: Spills Lr;aks. Irrvesiigal�vn a Cleanuo Cost Recovery Listing Dale of Guy mNmnl Vessron 1Ill 7i204 Source Califumia Region Waller Duality Conitol 90ard Santa Ana Regtcn (31 Date Cato Amved at EDR. 01r172M6 Telephone- 951482-3298 Dake Made Active in Repwq: p2j2l12&06 L.asl EDR Cgnt3CL 04Ap5,21105 Numtaer of Days 10 Update: 35 Next SraleduleC EDR Comtad: 07r03r!006 Data Re*ase Frequency Semi-ARmAlty SLIC REG 9: SP415. Leaks. 1rlvesijgattnrr & Cleanup Cos, Recovery Lislirn3 Dale of GovertvncnL Version QM4120U5 Source C;alifprnra Regional Waller Oualily Con!rol Board San Diego Region f9'1 Date Data Amved at EDR 12041 2005 Telephone: 858-467.29M DaIa Made ACirve in Reporls: 0111912006 Last EDR Gontaa: 03113t2006 Number of Days ID Updal9. 36 Next Scheduled EDR Czmtacl. n29.r2006 Data Release Freclutm y. Annually UST: Aclive UST FacdlLies Active UST facilities gatl,ereta Jrom 111e local regulatory agenaes Daly~ -of Govemment Vetsiar. 01 r0912006 Date Data Amverl al EDR 0103$r2006 Dale Made Active ih reports- 01131f2DO15 Number of Days to Updale 27 Soume. SWRC13 Tr:lephone: 916 3AI-5651 l-ast EDR Ccmlact: 4110912005 Next Scheduled EDR CmLarl Oaf162096 Data Release Frequency Semi -Annually HIST UST: Hazardous Suustarlce Storage Contair%e� Database The Hazardpu5 Substance Suymiga Container Database is a nislonraf iishn-4 a.'UST Sites. Ralar to ]oC2UCQurtty- 5outc2c for current dam Data 0l Governmenl Versaon 10715i19H ScurCe Slate Water ReSourreS CQMJ III Baa(V Dale Dal Am-ja6 al =0R 012E+1491 Telephone- 916 34t.5851 Dale Made Ac4ve in ReWm 0,T-11 ZA991 LasL SDR Cantacl 07.2&2001 Numberaf Days la Upaale 18 Next Scheduled EDR Contact. N)A Data Release Freruancr No Upbale Planned AST; ptovegrouod Peuoleaurr. Storage Tank FacabLies RegisLered Ahovegraurid Ejofage Tanks. Daze al Govemn-Fam Version: o1J3D120o5 Source. Slate Wales RLsaurcas Comm! Board Dale Data Arrived at EDR. 01130r2M Telephone 916-341-5712 Dale Made Anve in Reports- 02J 17f2W6 Last FOR Conia:l: D1130.12006 Number of Crays to Up>lale 13 Next Scheduled EDR Cwact. 45v�11 20 Data Release Frequency- Quarlarly TC1649B6a15 PageGR-1-- GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED 1 DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SW'G:YS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing .cw+vCls=nvifonmeN3l Evalualron and Pl.inning Syslem Th;s uridergraund slur@ge Wfik IislrTig was Updaled and r.-4i;ramtd by a company canmcted by Ehe SWRCB in irie Early 1990 s. The Iisimg is no longer updaiea cr maintained ine ktr� aaen;y is the contact formaie inlmmallon on a sits on the SVF-EPS list. DaL- a: Gowernrt,ehl Velson G6.'01f1994 Dale Daly Amva-1al EDR. D7)'W 2W5 Dale Made Alive In f2eporis 09.'f 1 T2005 NkImoer of pays la Update 35 Scurm Stale Water Resources Control $Gard Telephone: WA Last EDR Ccinta^r• nr'f?NFL'005 NW Scheduled EDR Coruact' N!A Oata Release Frequency. No Up4aie PSanrled CHMIRS: Catiform@ klaZardbUS Malenal Ihouenl Report System CaMomia.HazaTdous Malarial Incident Reporting SysL:m. CHMIRS mmains ialiar-MaUori Dn reported Hazardous material inGdef}ls (aCW19ntdl rtieaSaS (IT SPrII's} Dale nl Govomrrent vers,on 12:'3t'200a Dale Data Arrrve*j dl EDR 1 tf30r2Da5 Date h'ade Aclive in Raporls 01II$!QG ES Number io' Days tp 11pdale 50 Sauce Offices of Emergent:y Se€vlam Telephone. 916 -$4 Sr940U Last EDR Comar=t 0212012D46 Next 5&Mded EIDR Canl.act DST22r2006 Bala Release Frequency: Vanes NOTIFY 65: Pfopasltion 65 Records Pr3pasrpck-i 65 NoliTii, al on Re�_pMs. NOTIFY 65 zintarns Iaollty nalltcWlons atmul any release wrneh rOuld impart dnnKirrg walar @no trlereoy expDSe Me public 1D a Qalemial heallti risk NLe of Governmenl Version 10,21!1993 Date Data okmvi d al FOR 11101r1993 base Mace Activa in Repgr1S' I Vl 911y93 Number el Days io Updala' 16 Source Stale Water Resaijrces Conlrcl Board Taleproone 91C�5-31]116 Last EDR Gon1au, 01!1612006 Ne,Xt Scheduled EbR Conlacl: 0407i4o06 Data Release Fiequency, No Update planned DEED: Geed Re51.11cim 1-15srng Sile Miugallon @rid BnownfielQS Reuse Program Eacilky SdeS vnlh teed ReslncuonS & Harardous'-Pla,te Management Program Facility Sites with ❑fed 1 Land Use R�-slrirdon The DTSC Site Mitiga3lian ano ♦3rawnfields Reuse PfCgTam f!3%ll3?P1 IIs1 rndudes saes Caeangd up under Vie prngrdms oversrgnt and generally aces not jnutl9e curreiil or former n@7-ardaus waSlid Iacililia5 Ihat rellu%rod a ha2afdous waste 13oltry permit The list represcmtf-, feed ,QsT.rtions Vial are active Some Sites helve rnulliple deed restnclivns Ttie DTSC Hazardous Wasla Atanagemenl Ploaram 4HWMP) has developed a list of current or former naaar0ous waste facilIli as that nave a recorded land use reslnclion at the kocal Caunly rem der 9 ofTsce The taAa use rasuicuons on lhis list wete requited by trw9 DTSC FiWMP as a result of the presence as hazarilpus wbstances thd3i remam or, site 3rler the iadllty (a- par of the laolily) nay seen €Jnsed or cleaned up. The hjpes of land use resuicuan include tleed riotice. dfierl reslndif5-i Dr a land use resirir-lrcin thal binds current arid future ownem Date of GDvernmenl Vai5r4n 41103 2006 Dale Dam Arnved at EDR 011i7if2Gfl6 Dale t Mae Ackive in Reppns 0 Vl &-2C106 Nurr,aer of pays to Ijpdate 15 Source Deparlmenl of TOxic Substances Can[t�i T eieohofie. 916-323-3400 Lase EDR ;,onion" C4105,'2006 Ne11 SvhEdulcd EDR Ca*itaci. "u7103.200E Dz,la Release rre4uen;,y Semi-Annual6y VCP: Volumary Cleanup Program Prope-hiss Cantains low Mien[ IeveJ properlles wit e,uTer rknfirmed a ur.-anfirmed releases and Joe pt43lecl proponents have request teal DTSC ove•.Se9 invesligat„ort arid.or dear+up arlivriiss and nave agreed io pravide Coverage for DTSC' costs Dale of Govommanl Version 08ID62005 Gale data Amvo at EDR DE12912n45 Date fti'ade Aclrve in ReponS. 09121r2635 Number of Days to Update 23 Source Departmeni of Toxic Substances C.OnIral Telephwie : 91 &32 3.3400 Last EUR Contact. 1irD5)2D06 Next S P. duled EDR Contaci. 05 Q9f2006 Data Ruieasi� Frequency Quamt rly TC1$A%Ei9 1s page GR 13 LL GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED 1 DATA CURRENCY TRACKING DRYCLEANERS: Gteangr Facilities A list of drydearler related taulities 11,al nave EPA ID numoeEs. Tress arp a +Mc- aM.sr. S1C codes: power laundries, lamely and Commerual: garment ure_-mrg and c,..allers aged Imes, w3ply, cun-cparaled laundries and ueanlng, arydeansnq plane, exrapi runs mxpa awx uphal�,r dearung-. industnai LaundeSers: Laundry ,and garmen'. serrices Date of Govemmenl Versron 04118i2005 Dal DaGArnved at EDR- 6di1&2005 Dale Made Acuve in ReOW-5: 05J0512DD5 Number of Days 1a Update- I Saur,;.e: Deparlmt nt of T wuc Substance Control Tele})hona- 91 Er327=L4R3 Lass EDR Contact: D4f0312DD5 Next Scheduled EDR Contact 07103!20D6 Data ROeme Frequency- Annually VVJP: W911 IAvesl1y4)l1on Program Gase List Well Invesligatxon Program case In the San Gabnel and San Ferfanda V211e;r area Dale of Govemrnenl Version 01 I2006 Date Gala Amved at El) R- 01P2412W6 Gale Made Acuvs in Report_-- 0212112OD6 Nurnbero, Days w L odale 28 Source Los Ar eles Water Quality Qnniioi Board Telephone: 213-5715-67a Last EDR ContaL-,,I- 111r23124100 Next Stheduied EDR Contact W-2412006 Data Release Frequency: Vanes CDL: Clandesline Omg Labs 4lisling of drug lab IOCahonS L151ing of a locatsonl in (PISdalabase aces not indtnte thal any illegal dni$ lao maL8nals were Dr were not present them end tloes nol canSLluIe a del ermInaba n that the Ibcation eilh9r requups �r does Hal moues addiliortal Cleanup work Date of Government. Vervan IZr31,2005 Dale Data Armed at MR 07110l2006 bale Wad i'+C1rva In Report,- C3i13l91006 Number of Da•1s 1D Updale 3 1 Source, Oepdrimenl of TDxlc 5ubstartas Control Te lapTicne : 916-265-fi504 L-asl FOR Contact: GZr0&!21)06 Next Scheduled 5t3R COr-MCt: 00241200-3 Data Retaase Frequency: Varies HAZNET: Fadhty and M2nifssl Data Facilyry anO M.Qnife�t Ddld The d,CLtd ig eKlr�Lcl+�d tnpm me +es p+ haurdDuswaste manifests, received each year by the GTSC The annual volume al manifests +s rypically 700,000 - 1.0012,13M annually, repre-entir approximately w50-060. 500.000 shomems. Bata are from the manifest. submitl�9 wilhout correction. and Iherelare many cpnlatn Some inyak d •slues tar data elements suc" as, generator 10. TSb ID, waste category, and disposal rnelhod DaIe of Govemmenl ': ers 4ri 12y3112003 Source CalHomia tnvrranmenlal Prolectian Agrsncy Dale Data Arnved at �i R 1011 L!ZD05 Telephane. 916-255-1136 Date Mamie Active in Repots- tg01,?GO5 Last EDR Caniact: 02!24,201]5 Number of Dnvs to Ll9date 20 Nexl Scheduled EDR Contact- 05fW201}6 Data Release Frequency. Annually EMI: ErrnssionslRventorYData TO)acs and rntana polluaanl efrussinns. data cNic-'led by WeAR13 and Wi;aJ arc pollution agencies Dale DI Govemmenl Version. 111:11 f2003 pale Rasa Arnvea at EDR• 07.'19r2045 Dale Made Active iri ReL,aits D&r11'2005 Number o1 Days to U,7bate 23 TRIBAL RECORDS Source Cairl6mla fur ResOurC$5 Board Telephone: 916 3?2.2994 Last EpR Contact O11 6;20D� Nett Scheduled EDR Contact: 4311712DD6 Data Release Frequency: Vanes INDIAN RESEAV: Indi.an ResElrv3rmns This map layer porli-3-es indian adiTsiniWered lands ul the Un,ted Slates that r,]ve an,; areal eaual to 4r [greater than 640 acres Data pi Gpv�rnrnenl yers an 120112OD4 Dale Data Amyed al EDR 021M201)5 Dare Made Active in Reparts OW04i'2005 Number of Dal+s to Update 117 5ourcr USGS Telephone, 202-2175-37'10 Last EDR Contaci: D2108i?ODs Next Sncduled EDR Corvacl 05106?20136 Data Release Fiequenc•y- Semi -Annually Tc,I64W?9 12 p'-1ge GR t.l L__GbV7NMENT RECORDS SEARCHED !DATA CURRENCY TRACKING W04AN LUST: LRzKinig Underground 51.arage Tanks an Inilia?S Land L11�T--S or.:fCiAn kanc N1 Alaska, Bann. Oregon. and Washirimor. Date of G>v mefil VefswCn 09J0r1200S Gala DL-Aa A{T:ed at EDR- 091a}W005 Date Made Agave in RepWs 10. 31120D5 NumtrnrOi Days to Updata. 53 Source EPA Regmrl 10 7e?ephone 20�-553-285- Lass EDR Contact: 01!1012M Next Scneduled EDR Contact: 0512212006 Data Release Frequency- Vanes INDIAN LUST: Le$lang Unq�-rground Storage Tanks on Ir',dlan Land LUSTS an Irriian land in AnZOM. Califcrnie,. New fhe;xlC0 and Nevada Date of Gov emrnranl Version. 12JG3i2005 Date -Data Aniveo at EDR: 01r032M Date btacm Anse in Reports- GIil9120D6 Nurnbwof Days lv Updale 15 Source Cnvlrartrn-2nlalProle[uanAtjer.;.y Telep?-twe: 415-972.3372 Last EDP Conlact: 0212012006 Next `rrheduted 5DR Contact' 05122.20M Data Release Frequency. %lanes INDIAN UST: Underground 5Sarage Tanks on Indian Lard Date of Government Version: 1110&12(105 Dale [Data Annved at EDR 1114!�r<'1165 Dale Made Acnve in Rep3ns 1Z'IZ2C65 NLim6erof Da'y5 In Upoale 33 EDR PROPRIETARY RECORDS Saurca: EPA Region 9 Teaept,onaa. 415-571,-D64 Last EDR Contact, 02,20F2f)G6 Next' ScriedWed EDR Conl= D5.r=2K6 Data Reieasia Frequency- Vanes Manufactured Gas Plants: eDR Plopnstary Manuiaciured GaG Plants The =_CR Proviaary Manuiaclurnd Gas Plant Database inciugas recorg3 nt coal yss Plants Irnanuianured gas plants) CoW led by E-DR's researchers Manulaciurea gas sites were used M the Uniled Stale% tfom the 18at4's 10 1950's to pmOuce a Baas llyat mukd tre disinhuted and used as iuel. These plants used wr)ale ail, rash. seal. ar a mvlLire of Coal, ail, and water Thal also produced a significant amaunl of waste. Many of the t7yproducts of 1ha gas C=41uction. siren as coal tar (.oily waste conlairliilg votalile an0 coin-4alalile Chemicalst. sludges, oils and other compounds aTe polenlialSy hazarnous to human health ana the environment. The bypradu.l iram this process was lrequi�nity disaosed of directly ai lhol planl SitE and L-an 112Man) OT 517read slo%&Iy, 9i�ryir5g a5 a wnLouuus source 0l a0d and gmundwsler C9niartunalr4n Dale a14;QvLrnmem7Versicon NIF Date Date Amved at EDR NIA Dale hia#e As11ve in ReportsNlj, Nusnloerof UayG to UOdaia NIA COUNTY RECORDS ALAMEDA COUNTY. Source EDR. Inc Telephone NIA LaGI EDR Contar1: NIA Next Sched7uted EDR Contact. NJA Oata Release Frequency No Updale Planned Contarnioated Sites A MA- Sq of aanlarninated sites overseen by Ine Toxic RdeaGe Program foil 2rA OTounownler car5taminaliDn from chemical relg sees anC spills) and the Leawmg underground Storage Tank Program Isoil and grcund walar GanL3minalaon Irom leaking petroleum UST&I Dale of G,overnmeni Version WJ16e2W6 Dale Data Arrrved a: EDR: DDI7F20D5 Dale Made Actwe in Repon5- 0113120p5 Ntimr�er or Day;, to UpCale 24 Underground Tanks Source Alameda County EnwronmentaI Healm Servaces Telephone. 510-567-67 00 Last EDR Contact: 01123''2006 Nexl S�hf doled EDR CDnracf CA42412006 Data Releiasi� Frequency. Senn-Airnually TC1S498SA1s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED 1 DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version- 02127ftZ6 54urCB. Alameda County Lr7WValas—,.a; hEaEl. 5efvsEes Daze paia Amyerj at EDR: 02;2B,.2u06 Telephone 51�_5o,7-, tW Date M_3dri Active In Reports 0312312006 Last EDR C-ontacn: 0?27,20 - Nurnber of pays to Update 23 Ned Saiedulad EDR Cantavl. G ..2d.'2l]f o Dala Release i rmquenc{ Semn-Annually CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: Silo List List ir;dudK rite$ iron the un4ergr�alnd tank, ttazarC'Du, waste generator and ty=ness pJa Q?9t prmgrams Dale of Government Version 12a09,2005 Source Contra Costa Health Services Departmei;l bale Data PLM eed at EDR. t2l'0M12005 Telepnor,e. 925-W-22136 Uate Made Acuvfe in Reonrls Ot119.21J% Lasi EDR Coniaci. 02113/2006 Number o' Days to Updeie 41 Next Sc_hedule:� EDR Conlact. 45129121M6 Oa1a Ri Heasn rraquer.Cy. Semi-rnmially FRESNO COUNTY: CUPA Resources List Ctenlod Unified Program Agency CU¢A's are re5j3onsltrle for irnplgmenling a unified tiazardous malenals and bazwdous waste r ar%agefnanl regulatory wogram 7fie agWay pruvsdey pve'gaGhl of businesses Mal Beal vnLh r azardous mWETOtS, operale underground sic; age lanks ar a0cveground storaga tonku Dale of Governmeril Vuts,on 01.'18120N 5ourre Dept. or Gbrnmunity Health Date data Amved at EDR- f}111&MH Tetephgne 559 145-3271 Dale Made Active in Raponz.- 01-21;21M Last fDR Contact: DI Y 1t312{]06 Number 01 Days to uNate 3d Next SUreduled EDR Contact- 05109j'2006 Data Release Frequency SerrrAnnuaity KERN COUNT': Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing seem County Saes and T apu Listing mare of GoverrrrhenI Veruor, 121D4r1110S Dare hataAmwed al EDR' 1Z'092005 Date Macle ACirde in Reports, 01111IM06 Number of Days to UDd810- 33 LOS ANGELES COUNTY: Saurre Kern Counl En%monment Hea3ilri Services Oeparlmertl 7"prrame: 66 1-&62-8 7 QG La ail EDf,rJonlarr 131127121306 Next Schmi led EDR Camay 00.10.`,Q00E Data Release Frequency Quarterly San Gabriel Valley Areas of Concern aan Ga=nel Va1wy area-,wnere VO; Cmnta+ninalaon iS al or above the NICL as designalsd byregian 9 EPA office Dale of Govemmenl VerSlon 12'3111993 Source. EPA Region 9 Dale Data Amved at EDR: DIM711999 TOLphane 415-972-3173 Date Mane Active In Reports NIA Last EDR Gontacl- 07A Gills 98 Nurrn-.r of Days to Liodale- 0 Next Scheduled EDR Conlacl: WA Data Release Frequency No Update Planned City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank pale o° GDveitimirit VerSlon 02;27,700o Dali; Data Arrived at EDR 02121;12D06 Dalc Made: Active In Reports' 6�C3241}5 Numt]er Dt Ddys is Update 23 Scurr.e City of El Segundo Fire Dewrtmew Telepnona 310-52e-273C) t_ast FOR Contact- C-212712006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact 05fl&?00a Data Release Frerniency- Semi -Annually T';16498fi91S PageGR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED 1 DATA CURRENCY TRACKING City & Loing Beach Umiarground Storage Tank Fuca of Govemme-M Verwn: 431213i7403 Dale Dana Amv�ea at EDR: 10,'2312D03 DaL Maoa Alva in *Ruts' 1112fy7003 Nun- OfDays to Update 314 City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Dale of Government Vat sioll: 021M20106 Dale Data Amvi , at ED-R 0212812DOF7 Dale Mali Active in Repcfts- 03.12320n Number of Days to Update 23 Source City of Lonr, Beach Fwe Gsparrmeni 'Telephone. 562-57D-2563 Lasi r=bR Canted DZ'2412006 Next 5crieduJed EDR ConMcl- 05)22r20176 Dala Release Frequency Amnuallp Source City of Torrarr—Fire Depanmem Telephone. 310-61 &247 3 Last EDR CAnlacl 0127,201u6 Next Scheduled EDR CgntaVr: 0515J2006 (Data Release �requef)cy Semi -Annually HMS: Street Number List Induslnal'A'asle and Undergrm,= Storage Tank Silas dale of Gaysrrm,ant Version: 1Qf31;2C)5 Date Data Amved at EDR• 0VJ 1G 2&06 Gale Made Achma in Repans Q2;Z1j'2W6 Number of Days to lJoaa*. 22 List of Solid Waste Facilities ❑ale of Govemmenl Version 02114I2066 Owe Dora Amved at EDR 02.12& M.6 Dais tit !de Acllve in Reports il-VI 244f3 Numnor of Days to Update. 13 City of Los Angeles Landfills Dale ul Gcvan o,^t Vefciam 03101F2M5 Date Dala Arrved al EDR: 03-0812005 Dale Made Aczuui� in Repasts- 0410$12WS Number of {Jays is Undaie. 21 Source Department al Public VVDNs Telephone 62G45B-3517 Las iED13Contact g2'1312DI5 Next 5rhWuled EDR CgnWcl, L35'n5120Co Da la Release Frequency Sem%,r-Anually Source La Counly Cleoarlmenl of taublir Warks Telepnone 513456-5185 Last EDR Camacl 021t$r2006 Next Schedr,led ECR CoriiacL 015115J2006 Data Release 'rrepuency• Vanes Scufci` Engineering $ Canstruclin Division Telephone 213473-7069 Last EDR Coma cl- 031t512OX Next Scheduled EDR Corltacl O611nG06 Data Release rrequen-l- Vanes Site Mitigation List Jrdustnal sites Thal have nab swe 5of1 ci spin or compiainl. Hale or Government Var-*W: 0i 10�N2DH Dale (Data Arrived al EDR: 62116120QE Dale Made Ac,uve in Reports: 0303,21XIfi NufnDar Of Days LO UQcate 25 MARIN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Siles Currently perrnilled USTs In Mann County Dane of Govemmeni VafGm 02 I0120QG Date Dalzt Amved a' EDR 42,'2012036 Dale Made Acfve in Regis 03,2342DG6 Number of Days to Update- 2.3 NAPA COUNTY: 5aurre. Community Heafth Simives Telephone 323-894-78G6 Last EDiR Gonla i 42103f2D06 Next 5ChCtduleC EI]R Cor%10C, G-505.2130E Data Release Frequanr j ijinually Source Public "brom Depeflrnent Waste Managemenl Teiepmrte- 415-4g9�E47 Last EI}R ConlaC_ D1.r30,2M Ner1 5cne-awed EUR Conlarl 05)01;21}Q6 Data € mEase Frequency Sern•Annually TC 1&49859 15 ? is GF.-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED 1 DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Sites With Reported Contamination Data a. Government Versvl. 1212712005 Source: Naga ;-_- my Deparvfivr.l of rwurrnerrml Maragament Dale Data ArrrvedatEOR 12J2KOO5 Telepnone. 7r,"E3-4269 Dace Made Active in €tenons 0 Ul912W6 L{ns1 EDR Contacc [ s'271'2006 Nurriner0'.Dais t4 Update.22 N*Xl5ct,eduleq!EDR . Contact Data Release Frequency Ssmr-Annually Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Date or-Sovemment Version 121271200n Dale Data Arnyred at EDR 12,r2&2405 Date Made Active in Reports 01A 112GO6 NurrMef oI Days 1a Update 14 ORANGE COUNTY List of Industrial Site Cleanups Pg1101eurr.anc non-petrplewm spd35 Dale of Govemmeni Version 1210VMU15 Dale Data Armed at EDR: 12f2GQ 45 Dale t,1ad5 Achve in Reparls 0111912066 Numbe; of Days In Update. 30 Source Napa County Deaartrnenl pr Environmental Management Telephcwte 707-2521-4259 Last EDR GmSazt 03i27124C5 Next Scrreduied EDR Carilact. 06.i'2�2008 Data Release Frequency: Annually Source Heauh Care Agency Telephone 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact 0311}012006 Next Scheduwed ---DR Contact 051D512006 Data Release Frequency Annually List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Orange Ccvr.IV Urttsergrour,d Slcrage Tank Cleanups fLUSTj Date o+ Govemmeni Verslcn. 121G1i2005 Date rALa Arrived at EDR 17f '2C05 Gale Ma" Active in Repots 01r19r2006 Number at Days to Update 30 Source: Health Care Agency telephone 714-834-34146 Lasl EDR Contact: 0.311)er2006 Next .Sclmduled FOR Contac, 051051'211015 Data Retease Frequency Quarterly List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Crarge County UndergrounC Storage Tarr. Farihlies (UST) Dale of Govemnyenl Version: 121O1e2005 Dale Data Arrived el EDR 1211612005 Date Made Auwe in Reporls 0VI ti2006 Number of Days io Upeau!. 28 PLACER COUNTY. Source, health Care Agency TuI4xjharit; 714-334-34x46 Last EDR Cantaa. 0M81213W Next SChedulod EDP Cunlact- C610512005 Data Rerease, Frequency Quarterly Master List or Facilities List ir0ude5 aW wgraund lank;, underground 45nks ar.d cleanup sites Date: Of GCNernment Version 01,1812006 Dale Data Anwed at ECIR. 0111ELTOD6 Date Maas Acbva in Re,Vorls' 02,21121X16 Nurrt�Eir of Days to Update 34 RIVERSIDE COUNTY: GOutCC' Placcw County Health and HuMafl Survlces Telephone 530-889.7312 Last EDR Conrad 0312012006 Next Schaduied EbR Contact 06119120063 DataPueeasa Frequercy. SRmi--.nnuaily TC1644BB9ts PaceL-R-1B GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING, Underground Shxagc Tank Tank List Dale of Gaysrnment Ve0-SAX! G2'09F20Q6 Data Data P,- tw al EAR: 1.11CV2006 Gale Ma-dw Azvw-a in Reocm- Qy7gr?.g06 numt:er of Dawn to 4ipjaLe_ ?7 Source'. Health ServKez Agercy TetaRh4ne: g5i-358.5055 Lasl FOR COhtact' 01116+-20% Next Scheduled EDR Contact W,7i20G6 Dala Release Fmquen y Quanerty Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Rwersl4e Cutimy Underground Slorage -Tank Cleanup Sites {LLISTI Data of Governrnnnt VerS+on 02f09r2006 Dale Data Arnved at EDR'. 02i1L1rM6 Date Made ,4cUue In ReporLS: 0303l2M13 Number al bays to Update: 31 SACRAMENTO COUNTY: CS - Contaminated Sites Dale of Govemmeni Version QZQ1_:2D03 Dale Daia Aunved a[ Et)R D2113120bi; Oa Le Made Active in Repons 4)311334'S Number01 Ca";s 13 Lupr']ale 28 SOurCe: DeparlmenL of Pub4ic FleaG1n Teielinane aS1-35B 5�}55 Last -EDR Conlazi DIilty;2096 Next Scrieouled EbR Contact: U:M 7+2905 Gala Rettaase Fiequomy Ouarleny Source Sar-ramflnu County Envlronmentit blana"Mer.1 Te1ept3ane 3iCs-$75.9di16 Lasl tOft Contact 01!3&MM Next Scrladujad EDR Grintact: G5.r0ii200G Daia Retease Frequency duarlerty ML -Regulatory Compliance Master List Any OU-5111e55 that ri*as nozardOLIS materials on site - riazardous malenaa storage siles, urna*ground sla rage tanks. waste genaiators Date ai Gravemmenl Veislon MD01213 6 Data Data Amted at EDR, 02,11612006 Dale Made Ardtre In Repass 031112DOB %urr:7er r]i 4ay5 :o UpCale 31 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: Source: Sacramenlo Gounly Envlronrnentaf Management Telephone: 915-87S- 106 LastEDRGor11avt:01` r20016 Next Schemded I=QR Cimiacl 05i01 2M43 Gala Releass Frequency Ouaneriy Haxardnus Matenal Permits Tres I15LUng induces umergrounC slarage tanks. mLCdiczl, waste handleTsrgeneratpry. haaardaus malarrals rianalers. hazardous waste generalors, and wosie oil generatotsrhandters Dale of Government Vernon 12'21a405 Dale Data A+mvea al EDR 1lj'2W2DOS Date Maas Acrive in Repons 0 1 f I KNCC Numoercrpayr�1oLlpda1R �74 SAN DIEGO COUNTY: Sauna San Bernardino County Fire Dgparlmenl K92=OuS M@Lenals DIVISIY- TeleRrtOne 90P-367-3047. Last EDR Camas' 03r46f200fi Next SizheluleO EDR Caniart D6105r2006 Dula Rclaase Frequency QUaredy Hazardous Materials Management Division Database T17r- flal; 78se 111C1us3e5 HE56 - This reporl contains the 131jsine55 nwie. sile edgers, humness phone r.uflOer, eS.ablishmenl W pem,n nurnt4r, Lype of perrnli. DM thebu5ine-55 slalus HE1, -In additKxl to prov4inglne same,nlarrnatlen provided in the HE58 I,stin,, HEi 7 proviO&S inspeclion dales, vmla lions received ay the estat7115MM, hazardous wd61e genefateld, iW Quar%bly, rnelhod of storage, 1rNalmer1ldlspQM of waste! anC Lhe hauler, and Infomiamr, on undrsigiourtd slarage Links Unaulhorize6 Release 1-is,1 - lncdudeS a summary of environmental. cbnlaminallon CZS65 In Sail Dega CpuNy (Underground lank c2ses. non•lai-4 Cases. grpundwales c8nlamin3LOr), and 59t1 coniarminaLnn are mcludad ) Tf )6-19964 1s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED 1 DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Gavernn'ent Version 0511612005 Data Data Amved at EDR: 0511w20305 Date Maffa Active in Reports: 0611E?2COS Numtver of Days la U=ate 29 Solid Waste facilities San Diego CGunrs Solid Waste Facilities. Dale of Government Version 1 1101;2005 Date Data Amvad at EDR. 12129;2C05 Date Made Active in Reports 01119fi2056 Number al Days to Update. 21 SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY: Local Oversile Facilities Daleaf Gavemi-wi Vernon 12.107r2005 Dare Data Amved a1 CDF! '7J47QDQ5 mite Made AC.Uwe to Reports 0111ar2&06 Number Df Days to U90ale 431 tlnclWgrcund Storage Tank Information Dais of Government Version 1107,12005 Date Data Arnverl at EDR. 12;07;200F Hate Matte Active in Ri2rzr1;- Oill 1;2MC Nurrow of Days to upcate_ 35 SAN MATEO COUNTY: Source Han rCousMa[an af; ,1aroc)err-,=--- :. Telephone 619-33&2?SF3 Las( CDPZ Contcvj: 04)C5'2006 Neat Scheilured EDR C n am Ci7;03,W015 Data Release Frequency' Quarterly 3ouree Deparimenl of Health Seances Teteprione- 619-338-2209 Last EDR Contact- 02:20i2006 Ncnt Scheduled EDR Contact' 05122i2MG Data Release Frequency Vanes SaurCP_. Departmkgl Of Public Hrallh San Francisco C,auniy Telepliwe: d l5.252-3S2L Last EDR. Canted Ct31D612DQfs Ntx1 Sctiebuled EDR Canlact 0-6i0a.26C6 Data Re4ease Frequency Quarterly .Source. pepartment of Public Hea11h Te+eNhone 415-2,52-3920 Last'iDR Contari- 0:714G12446 Next ScheoLded EDR Contact 0f.'D5i20CG Data Release Freslut:%y: 0uarterly Business Inventory List indudes Hazardous lVa;Gnals Bu:tness Plan, haxBroou4 waste generators. arC untl4qrgr6u17o storage tanks Date of Govem,meni Verstan:0VW,107 6 Data Data Amvad at EDR 3101322006 Dale Made A,,Lja in Reports 01 e3112006 Number of Days to Update 21 Fuel Leak List Dale of Government Version. 0111 112G.6 Owe Data Amved a1 EDR 01112;t00E Date Woe Acwe in Reperls:C1;3IQ008 Number of flays to Upuale 19 SANTA CLARA COUNTY: Source San htaleo County Env,mnmental Healm Services Dr:isian ieiephone 550-363.1921 Last EDR Cbnlact 01v09t2006 Next Scheduled EDR Contact 0421 W2015 Data Rulease Frequency. Annually Souice San Mateo County EPWGnmental Health Services Dwisior i e4ePhorSe: $5C-3+}3.1921 Lasi EDR Carltact: OVC912006 Nexi Scheduled EDR Contact C1 IM-2606 Dato Releage Frequency. Semi -Annually Fuel Leak Site Activity Report A lisbr'g of open and uo�;e.d leaking underground sLomge tanks. This listing Is no longer updated by the onunty Lsakirg underground storage lanky are now hatidled by the Department of Envirenmomal H,!-iilh -rQ Ib49Idb9.1 s Page GR-29 GOVERNMENT RE -CORDS SEARCHED 1 DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Dale of Gove; rr,&-,sy, ' era—=7 a.29s?fl05 Data Data Amvec T, EDR-- Date Ma0e Acmve n Rem: 04,71,W05 Number of Days to Upra4e 72 Source Santa Clara Valley Water Disincl Telephone : 408-265- 2600 Last EDR Contact- 0312812006 Next 5GMeduled FOR Conlw-r 06r2&2006 Data Release Frequency No Update Planned LOP Listing A hsung of open leaking untlarruund storage tanks Dale of Govi�mmefll Version 10 412005 Date Da [,a Arrived a1 EDR: 11/25/2005 Dale Marne Active in Reports: 121; 212035 Nurt-tier of Days to Upda[d. 14 Hazardous Material Facilities Dale of Goverrtmerl Version- 121121200E Dale Grata AmveC al EDR 1 Z'1212Wi Dale Nicide Active in Reppn5. 01119120Df5 Numt]er OI Days la Up0a1@ 38 SOLANO COUNTY: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks gale of Gavemnsenl Version 12;12005 Dale pats Arn4e;] at EOR- 121t4,-2MS Datu Made Ar-live in aepons: 0111912006 No"er of Days to Update 36 Underground Storage Tanks Date of Government Version t(1t312005 Cate Data Arrived a1 FOR lVaIJ2005 Made Acln, in Reports 12)M8'2005 Number of Day I4D+Jp4jale: 38 SONOIMA COUNTY: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites Dale of Government ve-,-,an. 01+23120GE Date Dala Amveq at EDR Dif212006 Dale Made Active in RepW5 (21213)D6 Number Of Days 10 Upcale. 29 SUTTER COUNTY. Underground Storage Tanks Date Of GoVISmmeRL Ver:iun- 1210110005 Date Data Amved al EO:R D1l05,2006 (Dale Made A,-ijve in Repasts 41:3112046 Number of Days to Upc6als. 26 VENTURA COUNTY: Source- Depanmem of Envuonmeotal Health Telephone 409-918.3417 Last Wk Conlart: WJ29120C,11 Next Scheduled FOR Cy)mact 06 26 20176 Data Release Frecuen>~f Vanez, Sourr&- City of San ,lase Fire Department Tplephor.e 44$•277-4659 Lasl EDR Contact:0210Fs;2006 Neal SCr,eduled EDR Contact 46+05120H Data Release Frequefm.y- Annually Sourca. Solana County Department o! Ewaarimental kian,gerneni Telephane: 707-784-077 0 Lasl EDR Contact. 03127/2006 Next Scheduled EDR Gonla;t 06",Z'2035 Data Release Frequency Quanerly SoufCe S017no County D9paflment of Envnenmenlal Pei@nagameni Teteahone. 7 0 7-704-67 7 0 Last EDR Contact 03.71240E Next Scheduled CIR Contact: 4Yajl2i2006 Data Release FrC:;uency Quarleny Swrce Department of He21in Services Telephony . 70 7.5a$ -6Eb 5 Lasl ED'R Contact- 01;2.1r20M N,esl Scheduled EDR Cont;9cl: D412412005 Dala Release Frequerrvy. Quarterly Source. Sutler County Depanment of A4pcurtuse Telephone 530-1322-7500 La51 FOR Contact 0W17-121105 tioxi Somduied EDR Comtacl: 07M. 20H Lala.Release Frequency Semi -Annually TC1649964 is Page GIR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS. SEARCHED I DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks The BVVT list ifldi=es by site address wnelher the Env iron mentaI Irlea1111 Drvis,or. has Bus.tr*M P.ar, IZ . Wale Produce: (W), and(br Underground Tank IT) information Ddlt of 1= uoernmenl Version 111313i20GS Source Ventura Caunty EnvlwrlT�UaI health Divis or Date Data Arxived 21 EDR: 011D4;2oo6 Telephone 005.6�4-2613 Date Made Active to Reports D1119120D6 Last EDR Contact. l]31t5r2pDE Number o: Days to Update- 15 Next Schc-duied EDR Contact: 06.1212OM Data Release Frequency Quarterly Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Vunlura Caunty Inventory of Closed. Illegal Abanaoned, and inactive Sues Dale nl aavprnmeni Version 1181D112005 Date Data Amved at EDR. Gq.12012405 Dale Made Acawe In Repans I DM 512DD5 Nurser of Days to Update 16 Source Envirof ML—nlal MealLn Dnriti:en Telephone 805-554-21113 Lasl EDR Conla=t U2.2CV20M Next SU!eduled ED9. Contact: 0�i=2046 Data Release Frequency Annually Listing of Underground dank Cleanup Sites Ventura uruniy UMergrWund Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST) Dale of Govem"nt Version 112012065 Date Data Amved at EDR b1ra,31 M6 Da1P Mare Aulrve in RepWr, 11111WOOH5 NumDerol Days la Update 15 Source Envuormigntal Health Divrwc Telephone 805-c54-2813 Lasl EDR Canlacl' G31I51.2U06 Next SC1leduled EDR Cc-nlact W12,2006 Data Release Frequency Cuar'turly Underground Tank Closed Sites List Velmut2 Courtly Operai mg Undergrpund Storage Tank Sites (U5"'Uftderground Tank Closed Sites List Date of Gavemmeri Version: 12129121)G5 Date Data Amwetl at EDR: 01120-2046 Date blade Active in Repuns: 0211512DI]5 Ntimrer of Days to Unoate- 25 YOLO COUNTY. Source: Environmental Health Qvisio•. Telephone. 805.654-2813 Last EDR Contact- 01111/2006 Next Scheduled EDR Canlanl: C4110.'2006 Data Release Freque ,y Quarterly, Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Date o'. Gavernrnen; Version. 0 10 13008 Dale Data Anr:eo at EDR Q21G91tC?u Date Made Active in feel - 03 0912C06 Number ❑1 Days to Update. 28 OTHER DATABASE(S) Source Yaio G4unly Department of Health Telephone 53D-666-8646 Last EDR Ccntar.1- Ui115iZ0% Next Scberu*d EDR Contact C14117,2006 rsala Release Frequency. Annually Depending on the geagraa3tiC area oovsred by this rspolt. the data provided in these speLialty t}alabascs may or may not be complete for eiiample, tn., r pstenc 6 weu3ngs intormamo data to ri :•rn_ I;v report Boos not mean ihal all wetlands, to ine amm ctivered by the reparl are included krlaactovar, Mt aosence of any reporlerl wetlands intoirnalioil does not necessariry mein lhat wenanQg W npI 43Mi51 in lySe area Coverers by the report OillGas Prpeimes: This Gala was obtained by EDP Irom the USGS in 1594 It is refened ;o by USES as GeoData Dxgilal Line G, iipr 5 )rpm 1 104.40E-70le Maps It was er1ra,-3e4 (Torn the Iransporiabwn colequry mJudrng same oil, but orimatly gas pipeline Electric Power Transmission Line Data Sou me. PennWeil Cu+pecauar Tolei)Aone {8 01823-2T7 This map MULNjes 13110nnau0r. capynghled by PenllVJell Cprp4rauon. Tbis information is provided cn a best of oq W54 and Penr.Well Corporation dcSS not guarantee its accura_-y no, warrant t15 htr �.ss for any panicuLa' purpose Such In(omialron has been reprinlec with the permission Cf PennWell TC113498i55 1s Parke G' 22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED 1 DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Sensitive Recopiors: T-i— a-a>:trbnCLals tteeme'rl 5Pn5ilive receptors due to iki srlragile immune Systems antl spgctal senSdmly to Qn,riaatr,t ntai disTa i nee sestsN;i+ re=ears sypically mctude the alcleely. {he sick. anO _hNlren Yrnile Me location of all 5ens lLve feceplora carrot hs C8[ermvned. i1OrR indirales [nose buildingS and'aQ4IJLm5 - sr?toals. day=Ee . Hospitals. Medical cant,'rs. and nurwr g harni - vvnare L"y3r%m44a1s wtto aro sensilive rpceplcus are likely to be Imcaled AHA HoSprtai$: Souroa: Arttenimn HoSOG']I Assoc,atwri. Inc Telepncm)e 312-2B0-5991 The riaLana se includes a 11513ng of hOsptLAS t}ase(J on Iho Am�fic m HmspIat A-5soeialm-n s anrxt2l Survey o1 hospitals. Mediml Centers: Provider at Serv)aas Listing Sourt2' r,enies for Medic+ire F Meitic�id Services j eteprme 10-786-30(pO A Iisling mf nospilals with kledrearc provider number. pmouceb by Centers of Medicare 8 Medicaid Serwras. a ferbEral agency within the U S Department of Heallh artid Human Samices Nursing +iames Sauce National 4nrttuleS of HaAll) Telexrime 31}1-5946-I,246 InIDrrn.3I uy on Med�rare and Mlsdicax] CLrtl`et! nur5,nq homes In the United SSates Public Schools Source Nal cna.l Center for Educalion Slauslrn Telephone 2Q2 502-7300 The Nauanai C,enlec lar F-ducahor. Slattsltcs primary tiawhase an elementary and SeC-0ndary puNic educnor. in It,e United Stalos 11 15 a CO-Mp?ehen5Ne. annual. nalionaI sladSUC2U dalatiase al all public elemenaar? and secondary schools and school districts. which zmans Gala Ihet are cOrnparabie across all stateS Private Schools curce Nalional Center f(3r Edur2LOn Slalisbcs TeleOme 202.5v2-7713C- 7ne NAijonal Centerirr Erucalion StadisticF' pnmars, danbase oil pnvale School Iarahonsir%the United ,Slale5 oaycafe Centers: Licensed Facilities Source Deparlment all Sxtal Services Telephone 918-657-40a1 Flood Zone Data: This data, available In select ,ciwrX es across the Muntry, wls ob'.amed 13y EDR in I N9 frog, We Federal Emergency Marlagemwil A.ger.�y fFEMA) Data tlep,-r 10G-year and 5C0-y,sar tlaars zones as defined oy FEMA 4WI: National i4 llands Invemory Tti5 data availaNp in staled counlles aumi3 the country, was obtained by EDR n 21)p2 hmm the U S Fish and WildhIe Service STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION 2006 Tel-3 Atlas Nunn Amend. Inc. A31 ngilts resmed This rnaleri-,il +s prapnel3ry and Ma sublecl nl ropynght protectior .Ind cuter i-ilellectU71 prmpenN rgMs o,uneC by or IiUnsed tv 7ele Ailds NcAn America. me Ttie use of lhis material is suble.l to the terns al @ IiGen5e 3iyeement You vrill be nelo IlWle for any Urnauthori2ed copying or 31s-losure a? Ihis malenal TC 1&4e- a 13 Page GR-2J NEPA CH CKLIST REPORT TRANSITVILLAGE PROPERTY SOUTHEASTOF EAST KINGS CANYON ROAD AND SOUTH ADLER AVENUL FI SNO, CALIFORNIA 11kec1 No, 014-06085 Nl av 22. 2000 1'rearcd for: Mr. Comma Nunez. City of Fresno Planning and Development 2600 Fresno Street, Room 3076 Fresno, California 9372' (559)621-8500 Prepared by: Krazazn &Associates, Cnc. 215 West Dakota Avenue Fresno, California 9301 (559)34s-2200 Krazm-1 �-' ASSOCIATES. INC ME DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER5 _�� wry _Amm & A S S O C i ", f EIS , l 1V c. ���l1rF'.rl�l�rA� �t�G�TvEt_f Ir {� • r t,;.r '�� s� ENGINEEPINC r_UrvStR�)Cr10ri rEjr;;,,.. _. r;,... „r]rq NEPA Checklist Site Marne Transit VillagoPtr� y_y _ Daic: Ma} 22, 2006 Sitc ,address: Southeast of F�isi Cal» �s_. C'an�t��t Road anc! 5 guilt Acker r�vcnuc. E{resno. CaliLonlia I . Is the proposed facility located in an ofiicialiv desismatcd wildcnic:;s orc;i? ?. Is the proposed facility located in an crtlicially willdiife preserve'' Z Will the proposed lacilaN likely affect reported llmt:d thretrtcued or cndan Bred species or desigrsated critical IaAltAs'' 4. Will the proposed facilay likely jeopardi/c the eutltinued e.sltitenc4 of an}` reported proposed cndanyered or threatened spccres? 5. Will the proposed faciln4° likely result in the destructitrn or ad�ersc modification of reported proposed critical habitats (as determined by the l..ndangered Species A -It of 1973)9 6, trill the fmli1v affect districts, sites, buildings, structures or or, ects, si-ntltcarlt in American history, architecture, archeology, c;rtginccring or culture, that arc listed (or eligible for iistingi m the: National Register of Historic Places'' 7. Will the faclliiv affect known ltiativc American relivic�us tiite(s)? 8. Is the facility br:nted in a flcaod plain'' 9. Will consimciion of the proposed facility involve significant change in surface features (c:.i4., wetland fill, (Icfbrestan.on or water diversion)? 22I5 O)y Aventiv • Bakersfield California 43307 • (061) 837-9200 • FAX (661) 837-92111 With Offices Sen,ing the, R'everu United Srate.s Akan 5 #;cgs CI aL%m L6N Project No. 014-060�> NEPA Checklist Rationale Site tame: Transit Villa,(;c. Property � � Datc: Njav 22, 200 Sii.c Address: Southeast ot'E:iA Kjri�Ls C:ativim Rt ja6 and Snutb Adler Avenue, Frt�sno. Calilsirt m I The subject site is located in a residential area of the Catty of l.resno and is not located in an offiulally deswmated � wilderness area. The National Wilderness Preser-vatyoA Slvsti nl map, dated Aueust 200-1, was prepared ha,:L) oil information provided by the U.S. Forest Service' US. Department of Fish & Gamc, U.fi. Burcaii of Land N-larki_0mcm, and the National Park Service. A Nal,ional Wildemcss Preservation System Map. a C,lltflor;ita LDcp:aiment of Fish & Game Wildlife Area -Map dated 2004 and the U.S. Geological 5urvuy (U'S(;S) topoWraphic quadrangle I'Aaiaga, C:alifomia, dated 1964 and phworevised in 1981. were reviewed Lo detcnntrn: if" the subject sne is located in an officially designated wilderness area. -I he suhjcct site was not idewifiicd within the boundaries of an officially designatcd wilderness area. 2 The U S. Department of Fish & 6 amc, DIN ision of Re. -thy, prepared Die National N%-%ldlife Re['ugr ti jstcrn rinyi which Identifies components of the National Wildlife Rcluge System, was viewed ern August 19. 200 Revi-,-.w of ibr National Wiidhic Rcfu4e System map and ljSGS tonokraphic quadrangle Mala_a. California. dated 196-1 ! and photorevised in MI. indicates that the suhfect site Is not identified within the boundaries of an cfiici,dly designated wildlife refuge. i, file subject site is located tit it residential area of the City of Fresno. Elased rin a rtiview of" tlrc California Department of Fish & Game (C I)1 .C(i) Natural Diversity Database map overlay, elated November 2005, no listed. threatened or enclatigered species or designated critical habitats arc rcpotZed wilhin Ifre boundaries of [lie subject site 4. The subicct site is located in a residential area of the City of Fresno. Based on a review of [lie Malaga, California CDF&G Natural Diversity Database ✓nap overlay, dated Noyetnber 29, 2005, no prop,ned tJu atcn: l or ew1,'Angercd spccitis are reported will m the boundaries of the subject site. The suhJeri site is located )n a residential area of the City of Fresno. Based On a revlcw of the Malaga, California CUF&Cr' Natural Diversity Database map overlay. dated November 29, 200, no proposed cntical habitats are reported within the boundanes of the subject site:. 0. According to Nos. Adele llaldwin, Assistant Coordinat(w- with the Southern San Joaquin Vallry Inforniatiot) Center (SSJVIC) in Bakersfield. California, the files at the SSJVIC.' indicates that them are no known cultural resourcr; within the subject site area th�.n arc listed in the National Register of Historic Places. [lie Caliromis Re:jstcr, California Inventory of [!inure Resources, California Points cf I[istcrical ]ntcrest, or the ('alifc)nim State Flistoric Landmarks. According to the Historic Resources I1110miauon System, tilt' subject sue t' Iuit anticipated to impact cultural, historical, or archaeological resources based on the records rcvicwcd Additionally, according to [ire SSJVIC', no cultural reseturcu survey is recommended a[ this tiinr 7. According to correspondence with Mr. Rob Wood. Environmental Specialist III with eltc State of C:aliftomia Native American Ileritaec Commission. "a record search of the sacred lands file has failed to indicate tliu presence of Native American cultural resourcLs in [be immediate pro+jcet arm.— S. Accordiiog to Federal Lmergency iManaryement Agency (FDAA) Panel Map No. 0600C2130F, dated Jul% IQ. 2001. the auLijc[a sir is located in tluod zone X, which is designated as an area (If Minimal flooding. 9. The subject cite is located in a residential area of the City of Fresno. Baud on ilic U.S. Fish & Wildlife. Service, National Weilanck Map. viewed on May 19. 2006, no wetland areas are identified at the location of Ilse %Ubjict si%ccordtnt,, to Ile USGS topographic quadrangle map Malaga, Califomia, dated 1963 and pholoretised nt I9R I, and information collected during Krazan's April 10, 2006 site reconnaissance, ilir location of the subicct site appears to he outside wetland areas. waLei-w-ays, and forested areas; therefore, no signi}Kant changes in surf;ace feature-, will be necessary. KRAZAN & ; LSSO CIATE S, INC. Of ve.s ,Send✓✓; rite 14'estern United Slams I24lF+M? iEPA ti=hccUsi Lwt Project No 014-06085 hhiS Checklist provides publieiy available data that is complied to comply %vith the Natioual Envinonnicrttal Policy Act (NEPA) a; specified in 47 CI 1.1307, Subscctions 1-S. This is not to be considered an exhaustive Sun;ev and is only intended to provide public inforrnatlon from the sources idurrtiliud and to tlic degree expressed. 111c d"Va ohtaincd gym- char and accura,,o: only to tiic deuce imphud by the sources and methods used. Althou-b this preliminary sunrcv was conducted employing a professional standard of care, no warranty is (Tivcn, either cxpresscd ur implied. This report is provided Inr the exclusive use of City of l.rusno Planning rind Uevelopmcru. Uimuthornn:d of', reliance on, or ruicase ofthc information containud in this report without the expressed written consent of ksazan is strictiy prohibitcd and will be without risk or liahillty to Kra/an. KKW/m, ;attachments KespCCtfully SubinitLed, :VFFIS EnviroriAntal ,Assessor KRAZ,XN S, ASSOCIATES. INC. OfTrNc Servin,+ the Ile- torn United Stutcx I-W)MM NEPA ["rgdItrd zinc rrale*A ; _ '' � fix--mil=—.� - .. -- - - . - _ - - .. • .. lr _ .1 a 3: ' . �•___� � �,-- �:. � .....••� I .. _r .' '�� •I .:. I •`�• ~��fl... ri9�/,Q[�� ICI ��� I�9ilk-=' J;. �...-• --_ .i. .. ., i I r.`..-�:�.-k- _.-�•1���'�i �irrr!=� G] III ,;- •li {C:L'11 r r • `� f ' r-F Pa ,. -Huio uliurdl Fie'., ..4is _.�. - .. . ! • r + -$,UTHEPPJ •cr BM 30F pAY'.'fFr : t — 3D5 CArJ• LL ! JS Eake lm;nl�l � `� • ! FI#I La► I OF PALE 'jSkrLian JfN J 5 77 ri .i". J. titnP SOURCL. 7.5 ytINUTE SI--KILS t .4 CI.S TOPOGRAPHIC MAI' M ALAGA, CA DATED 1964 N10-FOREVISE:U 1981 scoh. VICINITY NIAP �-r�ANW �� 11 1:u,E �'ROPEP.Tv by S11111il- St OF EAST KIN(J. CANYON ROADAND 5 A �OUFH ADDER A EN- Uf, Prajrct zo FRE.SNi o. Cr1LtFORNl:1 014-061.1L SCALE N FEET a i I •nLL i.oCAT16'15..,4D DimEM$Irl' AR.f A-NoXIFiATF Da le `� It} iifKrazari �TT4'%¢tl 8�+ _ SITE DFVEL,Orl�%-iF.T ENGINEERS F.9•r4 !lo Officcs Sieving tln` Wesic;rtr Unitcd Stute,w rj Y� � '` i•.� 'F.'6r `��-- I� 'I, ?��rt' f�}•Yx �t .'.V nYr7�^'JS', .� ��IyEj ". +�h'!y� } VA ice} aJ �" _ ����3�.:..� . �' , f' .,£.� �`S' _ �I .fir � � � i � � • � , I Ai Ll III A. T'F fir' li - _ .r I a_.r t 4 • • r} " !;' II I R I 11 'ray It ,lyL- - •�:I• ilk. r' YY'-j `�'k._�: i iv�.y�' 'ram:: •� �;-�� JFy��;or;. ` f f�{'.~ NIA JE ►oncr Kiarrw A NWR �Yre aa Clem& l NWii K�ait� R>•+rer IWe 1.a4 MYR � wm Arcata FVIO Lr",gtonSloneNfF1 ti Ftumbok'.l [Lary hWR WV"w 95* ° Coleman RFH i ' o �R 4 64,q FWO F S1UaIA8a'�G Ouct—cr7to Rrver MVR VA%CPW Cr"k • l;WW" NWR g 0i+rtt8 Sink M7R t)ttwatl NY1R 0 o Surer hYM Sacrlrr*Mo %Wo FUoae Lakes MItR\ Mum lsL&kft /%Stoc►ton FRO \` X.rallon NYfR op -- - 03,11 Jwauln Rom. l,.wo Don Edwards San Framcluo E Elkoct Su N*DVR 4 NVVR 5esl Beach HYiR S,�ryty g� S Inon S4 Campo:p r4TVWL+! hyt Carltita>t4 FWO 5 ° o ctwattr►Ltrs7tJyy�t T�Iaana Sfoua;l um NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUKIE SYSTEM AhL COMPILED BY ` HI: 4UKxazaD US!)1;!':�E2T)g1 Vl C)F fiSli ;�VI) (�A:1iE- NOR If DlVISIUV UI= REALLY P= ENG[NE£RS. CEOIAGISS 1111) EN4fIIIQvuENTAI, SPECI.M1LI:7s AUGiiST 1 ,�, 2005 1 NO "I O SC:AI.I, pfjtces Serutrtg the H'estprn Uriit4_d 51a1r_s 1LIOLUMl!1E.�_ West Hilmar ViA — =. .STA i:w4U ur, t,as�i r Cottonwood ' Creek VIA '�AERCEd ., Kinsman Flat WA MAD5RA San Luis k`�• %..� Reservoir WA •'�'� � _ -' '� ` t endot� yr -r O'Neilt Forebay WA Volta WAF: TULAR. . -_... Los Banos WA—' j 1 Nti North Grasslands YIA-j Little Panoehe `~ , •_``�"._-" _'` , Reservoir WAS KERN_ NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGC SYSTEM COMPILED BY THE U.S. DFPARTMENNT OF FISH AND Ci:\ME DIVISION OF R1':ALTY SE-CLMBER 30, 2000 4UKrazan tit�i�rl� ® ENC[N��RS. CEOtACIST5 AND ENViROKMENTAL SPECIALlS7S NOT TO SCALL Offices Servrng the Western. United States � ••purl �•�'{ Sari Joy E 7 Ildis f rr er Vl- 1; oink"Y", �T ' �4��; sonta G�f�a�1re��a Mq�+7ta�� Sow �'� jn eT� � ?, . Stir NATIONAL WILDERNESS ,f�, PRESERVATION SYSTEM zN(llli1; l H _ 4WKxazan J t 1 LY 2001 ® ENGINEERS, 61MOGIS'I"i AND ENVIRONIJENTA,,L SFECIAI.IS'f5 NOT TO SCALE, Offices Serumy the Wcster?z U'nated States ZONS , r WNW r'11') 01- t REiN(l - = I F, FZON9 A ZL ZONE % I 1 FLNIA FIRM CONIMUNMTY PANEL NUMNER + 06019C2130F DATED: 7-19-01 I �NORTH SITE NAML SCALL 4"Kxazan -fRANIS1T VILLAGE, PROPERTY I" l0ofl fi ENGINEERS, CE4LOGISIS AND ENVIRIGNELGAIr SPECI,111_C5 PROXCr tit 11,I1ILK J OA rL I114-I1(�f1 ti I wf��(� Offzces Seruany the Wostnrn UnLted Stales WO Mimi I-IISTORICPROPERTY SURVEY FOR TICK TRANSIENT VILLWE PROJECT KINGS CANTON AND ADLER AVENUES IN THE CITY OF FRESNO, CALIFORNIA L. Submitted to: Ms. (orris L tiLLgc,, Project L'Ami" gur Housing & Community Dcpamnent Cit.. of F ftcsno 2600 Fresno Strict F' resno, Calif'Orma 93721 Submitted by: J & R Gmvrrormlental SaA ices F79OQ Auberry Road Clovis. CA 11.,6 1 1 .Fungi 2, 2005 0 5 N w w Hisfonc Property Survey for the Transient Village Project, Kings Canyon and Adier Avenues in the City of Fresno. Galitomia EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The project consists of the devek)[micnt of �i v i(c,jnt 5.3 acre parcel (Accessor I'arc.ei Number (AIIN) 472-02 L-01) Into a high-&-iisiry senior and low-inconrc housing complex with an adjacent multi -modal transit huh. The 5.3 acre parcel will be split into two parcels wilh the simller parcel being purchased by Fresno Area Transit (FAX) for its rl`1ult.i-mM1,11 transit hut). The transit huh will provide public bus transportation service with special routes for sr�nior c1trGC CIS, There will be up to 100 rental and fol-s,11c. units for the elderly, disabied, Iow- UICoitie Single- farniliCs, ;end non subsidized housing. The complex will provide approximately 15,000 scluarc' feet of Common Space (libr,.irv, gathering spacc, Small kitchen, �md garnc room) and possibly in open recreational .ircC I. The City of Fresno will use IWMI ; funds frorn the Department of Housing and W-bwt Development to assist in the, development of the proposed 100-unit al)artment complex for senior's and the construction. of 50 Singk'-f;imily houses for incorrre lnd senior's. In the development of the project, there may he I need to relliove .rnd/or' possibly relocate 'a f(-%V of the palm trees that line Kings Canyon load. Removal and/or relocating of the p,ilrn trees will allow for construction Cc.jtriprnCnt and ultinl-,AWly pul)iiC and buS traffic to enter and exit the premises safely. As HOME, funds will be used to frond a portion of this project, it constitutes .r federal undertaking. 'therefore, in compliance %vith the National I Iistoric: Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, ins anicnded, it is the responsibility of the City of Fresno to de'terminC if the proposed undertaking has the potential to rffect historic properties, if present. This rt�port cloctiments the efforts to identify "Ind rvalllatc hisloric resolli—ces to 11 i--staucf'fp rt urve for the Tfansrent V,tta t Project, Km +� Y � Y 9 1 gs (_,wzyort and Adlcr Avenues in the City of Fresno. Cahfam+a support Ii►t' fiucfir,rgs of"No Iiistoric- I'ropc�rtic•s rlIt (-W(I,' pursue►riI to .30 CI'R 800.4 (d) (11, The report also fulfills California 1 nvironmewal Quality Act (CEQA� rcquireinviirs that immo-L71e puh1w ►gencies determine w1wther a 1rroJect will h.wc a significani irnp,wi on m1port"rnl histnric�7l resources. This historic-cra property within the Are�i of Potenti,A1 I.:tf-ects (APF) was identified, recorded arui evrt.lwtted (Appcndix C). It was determined irleligible for inclusion in the National register of, Historic I'lace5; it clues not. rilect Ow SCction Ift defir►ihon (A -a "historic property" (:30 Chh SOO.16(1)); it was also determined not eligible for listing in the CalifOrnia Register of Ihistorical kt-SOurCCs; nor does it meet the c l itcri'i for listing in the Cite of l�'resno Loud Register of 1lisfuricResources. Conscclucwly, the property does not meet tile, CI,"Q)A definition of a "historical resource" I"Title 14 CCR fi I5064.5(a) (Ij-(;3)1. No further ctrltur�d resources investigation is rec-umM(1,udcd for the, undcrtalo'lig unless pl-oject phns ►re -altered to includc aic-<-us not covered by this study I',�c�r Ili Hrslorrc Pi-opeffy Survey fbf rho TiaRseertt Vilfagi! Hrpjecf, Kmy„ Canyon and Allier Avenues m the Cay of Fiesrio. Calr(arnfa TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I INTRODUCTION I PROJECT LOCATION 2 REGULATORY CONTEXT 5 1 NAT10NAI. Hiss-cIr.It' PI1":G,,'d-1-IlI)N ,fit-1` cilr 1W, 116 U-S.0 470 r 4.:4,rj i 3.2 CAL.IY11NIA F,*IVIJ,t+#li4I!-'VTel;. QICAI 3.3 Crrr or Fr4us*-5 E-El fis5Ri(; Pm-:sr:r�VA-ricIN 0I,111Nrs rs:l 7 RESEARCH METHODS 9 BACKGROUND 10 5. 11 11lS'ri)I_'I''A!, C H'r1'-:'I' I () 5,'2 FII..g-1 iii SAKI JIJA�JLiIN VAL,I.I?1' ls? 53 EST AFtI-I`4IMIFNT OF "i jIF CI,ry ciy FRty%lri 1 ] 5.4 TFIc_CC}I-oNY Sti 1I?f1 j, 5.4. I EwMcrbz# Lonfiscx pe 5.4.2 Ect;tc'rbIf f%'Len<J7C,---A Liz+tdscrlfh- 1Cl RESULTS AND FINDINGS 19 6.11 1.31SrC1 If• Rr,l':�f:r II 1 3 i_2 Srri. EVALI-ATI N f),2 j Palm ?'rocs, r'rn�lLttrCT '�..�i�.'�.��.-��� �-�� I o RECOMMENDATIONS I 25 REFERENCES 27 BOOKS, MANU5CRIPTS 2 r MAPS '2'i PERSONAL COMMUNICATION 1() ATP,ENDLx A: PROFFS5U)NAL. QUAIJFICA'riONS 26 APPENDix B. RECORD SEARCH APPE,-49ix C: DPR FbRms 523A & 5238 Fhslunc Property Survey for (he, Tix?seerif Village Prppei7I, Viligs C:,wiy(m and Adler 4venues m thr Crh/ o Frzmc;no. Cali#?rma Fzv(-iRi;R Fic.uRE 1: FIGuwt ; 2: PRD.F6(.-r I OC'ATION PRojEC'r AREA OF POTF:NTiAL EFFECTS FIGURE 3: 1937 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH FIG1'TRE 4: CALIFORNIA WASEIIiGTONIA PALM FIGURE 5: CARNARY ISLAND DATE PALM FIGCTRF: 6: 1950 A>; m. PHOTOGRAPH F iGT) s 7: 1979 A> RIAI- PHOTOGRAPH FiGiixv; 8; 1950 Ai.:xiAE, StiowLNG TRFE-LIKED ROADS 3 4 14 15 16 16 17 20 1> ;ti c } Vfisroric Properh/ Survey for the transient Village Protect, Kin-1 Y Canyon and Adler Avenues, in the Grry of Frosrro. Caldornca 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project consists of Qw developrncrit oki vacant 5.3 zicve parcel (Assessor. P'7irccI Nunibc i (APN) 4 72-02 1 -01) irito i high-do-ntiity senior and low-incorrre housing Complex Willi all adjacent multi -modal transit, hub. The 5.3 acre pmvel will btu split into two I)AFCCts with tyre smaller p�rr(,el being pur(hased by f resno Area Traz7sit (FA -XI ['()I- its multi-i-nodal transit hul). The transit huh will Provide public bus transportation service with spacial routes for senior- CrtrZcrls. "There will be up to 100 rcllull Arid for -sale units for the, c-lderly, disahled, low- iucmilc singles farrrilics, �rnd umi subsicli cd hocrsing, The complex will provide '7pprox1nlatclv 1 �,00O scl rare feat of common space (111miry, gathcririg space, timcxll hitchers, and g'rnle voozrrj and possibly an opc17 recreational area. The City of Frrsno will usc HU1,11? funds from the I.)C[MNTl1C11t of ] loutiin(T :ind (Jrllan Development to assist in the development of the proposed 100-unit �q),artmmw c:.ornplcx for seniors ztzid the construction of 50 single-family houses for. low inronzc snd seniors. In the dcv(.1opli)c111 of tlrr proWct, there imiv bc a nerd to rcmovc �mdjor possihly rcloc�wc ,.l tc-w of the p,.ilm trees that line Kinp Canyon Road. Ren-loval ,Ind/or- rcloc;:Ating of the. lmllil trees will ,Illo%v for Construction equipment and ultimately puhli(. and bus traffic to enter and exit the pr -cruises safe ly. As I10ME,, fl.lnds Will he >.rscd to fui-id a portion Of tlris proImt, it constiltrtcs i fcdcra1 undertaking. Therefore, in compliance Willi t_hc National historic PreseryLtion Act (NHI'A) of 1960, as amended, it is the responsibility of the City of- I" rc'sno to cictcrilline if the proposed undertrtkinf has the potcnlial to alfcc l historic properm--5 if present. For the purposes of the present project, staff of,J ('�, R I?nvironmental Ser�rires perfo;-med the archilcctui-al survev in acrordance with the rcquircrricnls of the N,alional Historic Presr-'T-vation Act of 1OG6, as 1,7111cnded (16 USC 470 et esq.), which sets nritioiial policy for protecting hisloric properties "Ind flit, ("llikl-111a L'rrvir-orimental Qimlily Act of- 1c170 (C;FOA; fTC' �21000, et sect.)_ The survey I! I! Von 2 HStork PrQF.erty Survey (o, mo Fransrenr Vi0age Pro)acr, Kings Canyon ar+d A7 M!r Avenues at lhtr Gily of Frs.,sr!o. La?jfa,r,ra w"c' (-wi il.r(-tr-d I)v Jcrrr I.. !tr;rrlN, W � , F" l;n�. irorlrrr; nt.11 Scrvicc°si who rnc�ets tilt, Sc crc'l.rry of Irricrior's f'I-Ofel,Slon.ii Ou.zlific: itiorr Sl,md.tr ds (or hollr mmi-lacology 'rn]d '1rchllcctur,rl history. 2.0 PROJECT LOCATION: l`lre propo wd projecl al-c'I is corll'irled to the pmp(e.rty iderntiked as Assessor's I'.rrc I Numhe. r (AIIN) 472-021-01. 11owcvcr, thr Arc's of l'olcmIk-iI 1_;Ifccls (A['[,,) for the (•uncm.lrchitcclural surwy irrchld(,ti the srahjec:t property GAIN -172- 021 011, plus Ilia 1r rinr Slat", within thC (.'itv of r"r-esno Fi,1,110 of w,3V th�lt front thr-, trforcnrr miolwd 1rrrvcl (rei-ur to F,ihurr 31. ThC is ILIIh(T dcfincrl ,rs 1wingon the Main rg.t, California, 7.5 N-Iintltc US(7S lopo raphical qu.tdr,mglr- (1c M; Photo Revised 1081) in a poi -lion rrf Scc:lion 7 of Trrw shill 14 Soulh. R ingc 21 , Nlount Diabio Iitrsc slid Mrridiam, X. K r.u, 11n11r1w11CAI 'vn ri r'' ■1 Moslem PAGE 3 Hfl:,torrc Pro,oe�ty Survey for the Transeunf W.Yage P-wo. Kings C.iriy,ln and Adier k: w.ques rp the Cify & Pres.no. Caldoaaa its lldll�% 0 me `0 OR Rest I + , ` • • ■ • VENTURA �' �'��p +A VE _ _: * ""' CANAL +• �� _ . t ' ■-a) NOW= ld 1 Ir`mac_ ..� _._�`-�.r--�I�r—�■ —>. 3 11 CAN �0 NN � i c � _ * �. ROAD ' I : ::� ��' �; I i�, _• "' `a is �' � BurbER A VE■ ~� IN ON ib lowls In ht Icr` ' I' • _. IU,l :.5.1. SlAh,k'. [:Allcx ,. 7 ; M-ui, i I US I I Figirc 1: Project Location (Northeast L" of Section 7, T 14 South, R 21 East) i■ I J,% R km inmim:mjl err%ire. i• w "Istonc PID x.rty Survey foe me 1 rans+errt VfVaga Prolov. il-ffmjs CArlyor? and Adler Avenues In fhe Cery of Fresno_ Cahtomfd Figure 2. Project APE I b .1 i I� F.IR II oil lllU [I t.fi tiff, li C• r r 11 Nrstvr+c Propw.rty Survey for the Trans+eraf Vi0age Rro) ecl, Kings Canynri acid Adler Avem-es on me Cay a1 Fresn6 Ca?*Hvia 3.0 REGULATORY CONTEXT 3A NATIONAL HisTOR.lc PPJ=RVATiort ACT OF 1966 [16 U.S.C. 470 LT zsq] The National historic Prc°servation Acl (NHPA) sets forth natiomil policy fW' protecting historic properties. Under Section 106 fccic�ral regencies arc mandated to kike into account the effects of fed( r,ml on histor-ic- propertics .iffectcd by fcdcr� ll_y funded or federally approved uncicrulkin'Ps. The. NHPA also est�ibhshcd the Natioiml Register of Historic Places and stave historic; pi-cser-V"Ition progi-antis admImstei-rd by a State historic 111-cser-vta110n Officer (S11110). 11 esl,ahlished the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, art independent '3;;cncy th�lt is resporzsihle for implementing Section 100. The Advisory Courrc:il Sccliorl 100 rcgr.tlations arc found rtt 30 C' R 800 - 800.16, National Register Regulations are published in 30 CFP EEO, �3nd Dctermiri ation of l-;ligihilily Rcgulat.ions is published in 36 CFR 03, The National Negistcr criteria f()r cva.lct,t,tirig tine "ignific;-uic:e of properties fcfr the National Register of 1listoric Places were deli-ned to provide a btui l spectrum of opporiuriitics to recognize diverse prlr-ts of our heritage. ]."�Ic:h critcriora is dcvclopc�d to cle�al with rr separate rarc'a of, significalic.c. 1�-our elements offer opportunity for sigriificamce. The crileria for evaluation provided for in Nalioriol Reyisfer Pul'Iel ra 13 ( 1990:2) arc• as follows - They (piality of sugrtific(mcc in Amc n'c (m histor'q, architec lore, arct�r.ac:oloyr�, eng nee Hny, and cr.11turc� is present in districts, sites, budduigs, , tImctures, and objects that possess ircteyritp of location, desigrt, setting, rrtaterials, work-iminship, fcelirui, and association, erne!: I ■ Crile"'wt A - thut are w;,,cociarecl with that have made a sifInI fic aw c owribuffmn to the broud ■ 0111criorr 13 fhur (Irc with thc lir)es of & 14 F nN ,rnurnenI iI '�t•r, icr• P h M Hisforrc Property Sorvey for Me nans,enf tr 1hp PrvQc, Krug; Canyon av d Adar Avenues in the Cary of Fresno, Calrinrni.j Ili oiff lJ(l.tii, of ■ C'riloriori (' thof embocly the clistiru•tilw 0irfr-rwlcristic,.5 of a l pc, pe riod, or incthod o)` c•onstnrctioti, or that aprecwitt the work of a mc1 ;ler, or that Imsses high eirtintic' i ahic q or tltclt r(present n and rlistill (0ish(11A, F'filitfy who.sc ('r;tfil.))tte111s fwgj lack ifidiul(hrcli distinction; or ■ ( 'ritcriori 1) that have rji0ded, or way hc likc=ly to rJic hl, iril'orrrurtion important iriprehlstor,� or history. 3.2 CALiMRNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT The 1�,rlvirorinwntrll Qu,llity Act (U,,OA) requires consider,ttiorn of 17roject inll��io is ttr-1 ,11-c:haeologic,11 or Flistoric.;11 siics dco'meci to he "hisloric;1I FeSOUrc,Cs." A suhst,intial :id ersry c'tunige in the signilicmo (piablics. ril a historicd re,,,,o .t rc e is consicic•rr•d -,a sir,,nificaw intp<u't. Fov the po rpo'sc s of CF',Q/ , .i '111sl ncal mourcin" is .1 It muivt, ]ixtK-►1 ill, gar dc.1cr-111ino'cl icy hr., (.lirtil>lc lol. lisliil:r in, the C,ililorni,i i:cggititcr rfl 111storic"d 1zc sources (Chl ll�). llistoric',il resomic s may include, but is nol li hed 1w I A rcsourcr listed in, or dcle.rrrliriecl to he eligihlr' 11y the Statc f Iisioric,►1 Rcsourc•eti Cr>ntrt1issioil, fctr listing in thr, California ]Zt�l;itiler cif l liSLoric,ll Resowvc.s (Nib, Res. Cock SS5024. 1, "Mile H C'(A%', Scctiori 4850 ct sc.q.); (2'1 A i-csolurcc. included in ,1 loc,ll register of' hislorical resm.11-ces, ,is clr1fiiwd in ,t-.0io>n 5020. 1(k) ol' t_hc l'uhiic Re.sourc es Carle ol- l(lCllllht'fl �ls 51 R1f1C�111L in all hlst_Orlc€a.l-esourc(- sul-vc � 111coling, the rer lu i rt'illent s sec hoii 5021. 1(g) of Lhr, 1'u l)l ic' Rcsou rcr-5 Cock, tituill he 11r'Csur1Wcl to bC his10riC',ll1y or Ctilttlr-�z11�1 sigllific,lrll. l'uhlic: rIgencies 111L1st tivcit 'my such re'source ,is 5ignliic 1111 uilIcss Illc propolider,111c.;c of t'-vicicucc (IC111olltitr"ltc" lh,tt it Is w11 hislorici,llly orr culltir;lllG signihc,1111; 1 \R ru�iimnmC111A`,,%uc• (3) Any object, huildinf;, strucltarr, site, <u�c�a, lll�icc, rc,c'crrcl or mailLIsc:rillt which a laud (lc tcrwincs to l)e h1s1oric,1lly significant in the a vchitectur:_tl, cnginr�ering scic�rrlific, cc,cmorilir�, �igricultur��l, education�cl, so6al, politic•�11, milit'lly, or culturril animals of CalifornM. ..J 14 Calfforni.r Corlc of l:cgutations (ccj' ) 15064.5(a)(I-3)J. T11c cligihility criter;a for tlrr ',,rlif*ol'rlirr Pt,vi,it cr- rrc thr cicfir>itit.r c rite ri,r for assessing the signific.mo. of historic�ll resources for the purposws of CLOrI (()ffice of listoric Preservation n.c1.l. Cirncn111y, -1 resoulve sh�rll he c-onsirlercrl "historically significant if it mints 1_hc critcri�r for listing on the CI 1C R, sis elefine(l in 01c F'ul)li(, hesottrces Cocle (PPC)- (1) Is �lssociatr.d with evcrrts that h�rvr� rrnrlrlC �r sihnilir..itrt contribution to 0w broR(I Yaffe-rns ol, C.11ifcrl-TrI"1's hislor-,- ..urci cultuml hm-it�igc. (2) Is with the liv°(•ti or' 1wi-sons irnt()rt,lut ill wll- tr:rsl. 1 (;3) I";rrrhoclies the clistinr.tiv(. of .r tyl)c, Fx.riocl, region, or rnethocj of. construction, or rc pre.sc-nts the work of .1.11 inipoil_mit creative indtvicluaI, ov possesses high .rrtistic valucs. (4) Has vicicted, or may i-c likOy to v-icl(l, informs fl ioti importrint in prchistor), or history- JPRC 5024.1((-)J. 3.3 City of Fresno Historic Preservation Ordinance 'I'll(- City of Fresno Historic Preservation 0i-dint11ce (h'rCano ML111161MI COCI :, Chaptcr 13, 4) csl�ihhshccj a historic PI-cacr-v;ltion Commission rml r Loc.rl Rcgiswr of I-tistoric Rc5ot1rcc's. Ally building, "I1.11 tur-C, o3>jc�ct, or Sit(' may he dCS gnatcd wi a histor-ic�l resource rrrir_l fisle(I on t1w t,o(-rIl f�cgitilcr if the. I listorir Commission �111c1 thc l"rcsnr-I Cliv Council 1111c; tlh"rt .f \ R fn%ir-,nnirn[.tISk-mi,-c` I':1c:1 4 NlstorrcPioperty Surrey for the irans,er7r Vlifage Profecl, Ktags Car: you and Adler Avenues ,n the City of Fresno. Cahlomla III(- rc sotllvc is morr ih�.ui 50 vct,li-s old: possesscs integrity of,location, design, srilinz;, rtmicr-lals, .vorl majiship, fcclin;;, "Intl associ�ttiori; ,Inca Incets .it Ic�,Isl one of ill(- following criteria: i. Ii Is issociated with events that have made a slgnlflcyillt contrilmlion to the hi-wid patterns ofour history; or ii. It is IA"soclated with thc hve", of persolls sigrlificaril in OUI' p.Ist; or iii. It cnlhodif's the distinclive characteristics of' <t Ivpc, hcriocl or method of construction, or represcrils the work of ,I mx'itcr, or possesses high al-tislic, valrtcs; or iv. 11 hits victd(' l or Ilt,aj he likcl.v to vicld, iltlOrn-I.tliort irltpm,tam in prchistor-v or histol--Y. lFresno Muriicip�tl Codc•, (Miller 13, Article 41 I i&H f I I I r 1111 l I I, II r1 I" 1,,, o, r k PACE 9 r-fisfonr Property Survey for fha Transient Vivage Pmjecr. ftmgs Canyon and Ad4er Avonue rn the C it -� of Fresno. Gafi�omia 4.0 RESEARCH METHODS' The City of Fresno, Depart-ment of' l iousing and Cornrnunity Uevelopr,rcrat retained llic scr-vices of" J tV R I..ri iroiarncntal Scrvic:cs to CMIdUCt Nil alchitc-oural survey of the project area as described above. Arc hivr.al rc.scarch was conducted at the. Califor-nia Roorn, ,Fresno County l'ul�fic I,il.rrar-y, the Fresno County hall of' Records, and at If,c Ilrnry Nl addcri I.ilrr,al:; rat Cadifol-nia Stratc Uirivc r-sily, ,desire>, wal the files a! We Ilislork, Presc•rvrltion Office for the City of 1�,resrio. A r-ccovd search (RS 404-2I7j was (.:onipleted for the proposed project rare'.). 'I'hc record ware h (refer to Appendix 13) %ti-as atrulertaken to do°tcrrninc Ow existence' and c,haraclerristics of all previously recorded cultural resources wilhin thr general vicinity of the project area. Pccovds, maps 'arld files al thi - Southwu San Joaquin Inforimation Center of the California ArchrimVig0d Inventory, California Slate University, Rakersficid were consulted and indicated that there have becri no previous archaeological invesli,;-Ilicans on the• suhjccl property; tiwrc° had been one previous ru-chacolugie_rrl sum, condueled (FRE 257) krinuAbilely of accr,l to the APF- Thcrc lr�i c• he-cri thrut, pvcvious cultuvr it resoulcc survc.ys coriductod Within <a 'i, rrralc r (lius. Them. :ire no r-('corded cUltLrral rCSULIrCCS WithiIl the protect APE, wid It is not known, if resources exist lhert:. There are three recorded cultural resources within a '%.-mile radians of il,e project APE, P- I0-004703, 476S, rand 4767. `i`herc• are rao CLdrural resources within the projcAct AN,, thr,t .arc currently listed on the Natiorrai Register of historic Places, the Calirovnirr Pcgistcr, California Points of Historical Interest, the California Inventory of historic Resources, or any know-n local registry. .f & k F.n%irninurui.il Sin ice, PAW I ; SA HISTORICAL CONTEXT: Hivvic Properfy Su-rvey for Me iranseent VI(age Pro)ecf. Ktrigi Csn�c)n arrdAdrer Averues ire rtre City ofFrc:sno. Gatttomia 5.0 BACKGROUND-. For the present stud-v, only one° prop-rly, ,.I ro%v of palm trees loc.,ve(l within the C:ily of Frc�slio's ri,,hl-of-ws iy and cx1c•rrcling, the icrig1h of' the pr3rcel itlrrllihec.l its APN 472-021-01 was evaluated within the project APF,. The `.Ippmpri;rrc theme within which this property ms evahm"A is N "Rural I [istoric Lamlsc:rpes r Th(' N�itioual Pf—istcr I3 llctirl 15) c10i11cs .> rural historic' lurnclsca_pc as: A gcoymphival arms that Idworiccrllrt Ims beery use d btl [-�coplc, or sh,ape(l or rrtc)cli c-(l 1jy hurrurn actirrity, occ'tgmnc r , or irl_tc n)(-uliorr, find Nun jossesses tt concerrtrulion, Wage, or contirruh!j of curcos of load use, ve-yetatiorr, builelirters arid stnictrrres, rombl and rtrot�rrrrnr.{;, chic] nerlrrral tcalilres (red. l , )). ThC lMllctitl I'urthcT cici'incs the kmdsc�ipc char.tctc vktics ;is iollo% s: Londsccrpc cl!.rtrelcicrZsttcs eirc the tctrrqible c uiderrc c of the mliuities cincl habits o1 the peoples who Occupied, cler.clope d, risccl, and shaped the landscape to serve human nc eds; thcy r O!j a lect thc� bcIicT",, c,ltituelc,s, trudition:s, oriel vahiv:, of these. people, (11(1: 15). 5.2 FIRST EUROPEANS 1N SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY: The firsl Spaariarcls to possibly visit tiro Imt-cr [OoLhill rcgli<rrr of tlrr' Wc'slcITl Sicrrl wc:rc rtn exploring cxpe(htic�n icr1 by .lose jo<Acjuill Mor.rn.r, clough r-lUtr:s that imornga entered `thc rlc}rtheni cmf ()f the v;rlle,v .tnrl traticiccl sot-101 its far its hla(fcr.r C:ourity, forefeet the rivcr u)c1 cast of[(, .1.E R E uvironmrnul'-crkr,rl 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i N,slon.- Property gun rey for rive fransrena VWage Pur�)ed. Kings Canyon .end Adlef.4wenWes in Ih? Cily of Fresno. Calilomia r,arly ninc1ccrllh cenhiry cotltrlcl wlr h %',dley lndKills ca[11(' ,is [i o] punitive '..)ctlons 1)y Spa.nish sokllcrs seeking rurmw,r}` iwoph}`it's (Ims'-;Ion lndions) <ind military deserters. During they MCx1c:an period, sr.v l-"d expedition" inlo Ilse valley resulted in Indians being is tptured anti reiurnCd to the missions, Gr)e expedition led bY Sergeant Jose Pico ill ] �20 either 1-mssed through or near Gashowu territory. Anoi licr expeclition that may have made, contact with the Gashowu was thw of Sebastian Rodriguez in 1928. 13ctwcen 1828 and 1837, M,lriano Guad,, lupe Vallejo would make i number of' punitive expeditions into the valley (Crompton 1932:3). According to one source some of the local Indians were nlissioni7ed, as some 4() Gashowct names appear in the. Ioc,al Book of tiapnsnl ,11 Soledad Mission (179 1 - 1840). The close proximity of' Solcdad Mission which lies approxiruatcly one hundred miles from the project area may sug cst that the (rasho%vu w('I-(, sigrnfficantIv impacted by the Spanish and Mcxic,m cxpcdiliorrs irrto thr V,tllcv. Most certi=linl�� during the 1849s holh Mexicrtns and Angioti would conic into the area in greater nurnhcrs, and as tnorc came into the v,rlley, their visits becanic more permaneril. The discovery of gold in 1848 would ultimatcl} bring lhousarlcls of foi"lunc wt ekrr5 into the lowf r nloi her ]ode ,arcrl �rnd with it grc�aler potenti�d of collf7ict h0wt-crr ]mcli,rms and miners. do much so that 1)v 1851. solcliclrti wcrc sC111 into the trea in response to the iViariposA lndi�ui Wiv. Evcnmu dly, a unties:-Y post wars built oil the south hank of the S,an J );t(juln PIVC1, tllfww lk"o rililcs ,Above H-iuvll and twelve miles soc.rthwest of Auberry. The following vr,,r Barbour w�ls moved and reimiried Fort Miller. Aciu,al]v, there was a settlement of miners ,At this locale which would change its narrue from Roomlle to 1.`ort miller. The major industries of the ,rre a were farntiiig ,ind catl lc. 5.3 ESTABLISHMENT OF THIS CITY OF FRESNO'. As tyre 5tate's po1)ctl,ttloll continued to grow, rlcty counties ware Acing fcrrurcd. I rcSilo County %V;is formed in 1856 and carved from;V poriions of laripos,r, merccd and Tulare Counties. The Cily of' Fresno was C1,kLblishc•d by HIC Centnil farific Railroad in 1872 (E3rtdy 1985:6). lit 1871 1hc: Cite (lit' Frctino h,ad bccc)n)c. t11c county SC�.11 for Fresno Cburlty, Thirict-n Ycars l;rtcr thr r.it)-, incorporated. The city's population in 1885 was 1, 1 12 (C,rrter nd: 5j. I & RE in ii unuwn(A lo., 'i P AQ- 12 Fi,vw7c Property 5ur.,ey kr fire rranseenf wlNa" Profecx fcrngs Canyon aril Adler Averrues in fiie City of Fresno, Cardwrna 5.4 TmE COLONY SYSTEM - !Aside from the railroad, the colony syst.enr, �agriculturc ,Lrld l,:and spccul,ation m,arli1-.-resno Ow focal point in the San Joaeluiia Valley, Tllc• suc_ccss of agriculture slrid the' colony system were directly linked to omf another. Land specul::ltors developed the colornv system to entice people to l-'r-csmo. Thcy purchased large tracts of- land, dividing them into 20-acre lots. As an additional selling point roads were laid out ,and in some cases landscaping %v,as included. Promoters advertised these colomies as self-corrlsained units with nulplc, water to 4row crops and to r,.aise ,a fanaiiv. Thew prorlaotioras weer. vc�r�� 5ut'c.essful ,and contr-ibulcd to the growth of Fresnn Coumty ,and 111tim1-atcly, the city of Fresno. L;md rgcnls portv,ivcd the Fr-csno area in a V(11-v positive li-ht. 'I'llcy Gxcrit -"o f:ar ,is to stress the ,ulvant,ages of living in the colonies as opposcd to ritN- life. l-hcir cfiorts ,err r_apturcd in the following .advcrtisc°m(-nt: Better Than City Properly —A Homeste-,id With ;m Income! Persons of Seden1;ll- v or Confining Situation~ na�-av, Flsl, rOAish ,a llealtlaful and 1>clif;latfUl I.iusincss, ,ancf Acquire ail i;lc�g<�trt gaud iaaf_ Ilorm-stead ill lour or Fivc Year �sj by <'3_ Motic'r,alc Morr1111y I',aVmlent in the. 041iforlui Colony of VT-Csno, amd Need Not Retire from their Present Business until the New Olic• has Become ,a paying lnstitution!-T%venly Acres of' Raisins .-rrc Worth $5000 ,a Year! ` vventy Acres of Prunes Tarr Worlla $ 10,000 a Yenr! A srraall Monthly Payment will secure <a "fwcnty-,acre '[Tact in the Suhurlas of Fresno, a R,ahictly Growing Tower -Only Nifae. Iiour-s from Sian Francisco by ll.afl- The Perfcction of California Chniatc!-No Fever ,ancl Ague! The Natural Home of the Vig, Citron, Raisin, i'runc, Olive, Walnut, Almond, Orange, Lemon! (Winchell 1933:136). Lamiscapirng w:..as Kan important 1),1rt of the devclopnacnt of tilt, c•olonic•s and by the 188W, orre of the more popular trees to he pl,antcd %v is ,s of palm to{es iu i-'rum m awl other colrMrunities within tllC S<an Joaquin V;allev. P,alrn- lielc'cl driVcs COLald he foruad especially in the San J(mluin V,rllcv comtimuing unto the 20111 Centur-v. i',llnis u;crc the preferred tree bcc:�ausc thev pl-ospercd hcrt, ill the• valley. In aai art_ich. published ill the l-cwi/tc i"'m- , I'rcss (,1'4) dated 1-89?. Ohe writer', W. S. I, 011, r.N-h01-Wd tllC l-C Ldc'r5 to :P,ct curl ;111d 1 �1i �:u�unnun'nlyl k-ls�rr, 11 A Nrsfar?c PrGpeh/ .Survey ear the Transrerd Vrlla�e Project. Kings carwori arrd Adier Avenues in the C,4, o/ Fro5no. Galefam+a hc,lutl[ moll tom-m's county ro,ld5 in the Cc Ilil'l v"I lov with ol-narllcntal trces. fhc r11'I1cle Bugg( -steel tlirtl Soulhcnl C aliforrII'l was- the first area to Utilize this tvpc, of [rrndsctping in the 1880s. During the 1880s there• was a land hoom and lrtrge boulevards were decorated with W11-irlr[s types of trees, of which the l»ltrl trcA(- was the incest poplllar (Iladilla l9bl). As evidericed bY soniv of' the older boulevards in Fresno, palm trees were popular ill the colonies as wcll. Planting the trees ma.- have seared one of the following purposes. (1) To bemutifv the colonies; (2) denote propci-ty boulldarl[-'s lO[- otllrrs; (31 alld/m- provide pedc'strkms with shade h-oill the sur1111wr heat commorl to the Fresno area. Trees, especi�llly p�l[m trees, hccalne ,l p,u-t of the cultural I.mdscapc of Fvsilo ,nld Ow surrounding �Irc tls. 5.4.1 EASTRRSY RANCHO - A RURAL LANnscAm Hcvond thv coloriv systclrl scvcrrll 5r.ctions of 1,II1d, a portion of which is located %vitllin ttw project API-,, :vets owned cxc1llsivc•1%- by A. Y. I:astcrbv. As ;i lnemhcl of the so-c'111cd Crewman Syi� Idic:,ltc, Easlerhry had invesic'd in the [Iurclulsc cif 80,000 itc_res prior Io Ili(, corrlin',; of 11w railroad. Aftcr the Cc rm;il PIcihc R'lill-wid purcltrlscd approxim'atcly 1,500 ,roes lr-onl thr Symlic"ltc, the rest of th( land 'X. is divided up mnIonp, the investc)rs. Clew "elan, wr[s ill proportion to thrlt olic's financial invcstrm,nt ill the purchase of tl1e. lance [mire willinill Cltaprnarl. l.;astcrl)v received 5,000 acres of hind e,ist of Fresno (Fatoll 1965. 14; Uclxuw, Cather and Compmny 1,990:8). Fasterby would collahorote with Moses Church and engineer Rohert. Fdiniston ill in effort to firing ca rter to kends owned by Faster -by. A sysicrn of irrigation dit.chcs and cmwls delivered writer from the Kings River to thr- erlst. Fallchcr Creek, a n(ltural drainage xas used as thc prilmmv delivcry sVstcla The developrrlent of the Faswi-hv's 2,560 acre R)arwhcl c:amc shout only through the success of the irrigation system. Within months of the completion of it, thr Hanle-ho lance~ were plarilcd in wheat. The F:rlsterhv lzanc_•ho encompassed Sections 5-8 ofTownship 14 Soulh, Ralf-e, 1 l:",rest (M.1).1:3.&, M) ,111(1 houilcicd by presc iii-C,Iv Helmoilt Avcittrc to the north, Clovis Avc:n-w to the grist., Chestnut Avenue to the west, mid thc Southrrn Pacific trrtchs (known Qwrl as the Stockton t , Tulare l"'ailrn,Idj (m the solith. In 1877, the l'ancho became the plc3pCrty of Willl,iin 07131-lC[1, <1 r 1� -0 & it FAivirnnmcalal Scnwv% 1 - - 14 Ncv�a la hank tycoon ;0 the I,tt.tt upon his de,3tlt, shortly thc:ecnfter, M. "Chao Kcarrnev rrnd N. K. Wisten pIwhased the 2560-acre estate. Hcginning in June 1880, the property W.Is suhdivid(-d into 20, 40, 60- acre Llrllts, hilt II)c most notable buyers indudecl A. B. BLIrICY (420 :rc:rcsj, (worgc H. lrlaltcr (100 rS), the MilugI���i� Vineyard Ccrrnp; k% [.Ifstl awlvs); gild I(. (iram(SO acresj (wincli It It)3a:11S 1T-)). Hfstor7cPropvrty ury-,yfn,ihe franpenl Vdfager='ro�ecr. KGelgs Canypn Lio ,Artier Avejwc6 rn 1he Grey, of Fre.ma. Gehfbmia Fly tine end of 188U,'Kt-41rnry h,Id bought out Mr 11-0011'S 111Wres1 ill ill(' vc;riiurc . Kf,arnvy along, M111 and Jacobi fornwcl Ilse I�)rc"snu Vinewzrii Lomp<a.ny ('lnd ret�airnin- 400 'tcvcs (winchell 1933 1,38), Mclrtl)crs oi, thc ho<i, d irrcludcri L. 1'. I)rcxler, I'residcnt, Jowl)]] 13r�incic nstcin, Vice-1'resiclt�ut, Gcorge. W. Heaver, Lachman <-, Jacobi: `Trustees, ;uId M. "Clzc o, 1%_c,l1,llCY' IvUinger. Some of the investors may 11,1ye been encouraged after rc.r(linh m irtick, in the Fresno Expositor in the fall of 1879 in which Kcarney's verztures in Fresno are rcport.ed. The article read as hallows: 11 is proposed ro calI rhis rrer_) enterprise the VINF,YAND ('01A)rVY, wirl particular e furl tcrilI he mwic to secure us sc Ulers, pc�oplc- t1ur1 arc, cac,rliminted unai grape crtlrttre, with ci view, to mrrk-ing r-!iM, aral rui sin making as the, prorrttrterlt ficalurc offlic crttcrprisc. The riciv sc,herne will he under the control of h-I. Theo Kc al-neI], a gentlemen ruho knows horn to push it. Ife um"; ha, last wec A clrranging the preliminarics for starting up the cntcrpri�,c. From the, ousel, 'Mr. Kc;1r-1rcv was horcl at work nm kim' imprcwcnlcn1�; on the 400 ._1C're propertv (loc;iled iIdi"Iccnt to �ncl ("Ist of tIIc p I o W c I A'FI)_ P iI .1 1 It Fn+uonnrcnlal Nvrz w(, Fj;siorc r,(cpvrfy .;u,-v y fur :fie Tfarrseent k/diage Frorc+c� fxrngs C.ar;yon and AO'er Avenues,n (ha Grfy of Fresno. C3btmia been suggested that under his supClvision, Borne figfaly inell Along with 100 horses were utilized to survey, blow, arld build call;lls alld levees �ls w(T >Is planting trees r1.10ng streets in the area todsty known as "Sunnysl(k", ioc,ated in southeast Fresno (Rehart and Patterson, 1988- I3). The Fresno [ Eepllbh(,eir dated January 22, 1881 noted that the planting of vines ill the recently purchased 400 acres by the Fresno Vineyard Company v,,,ts progressing under the supervision of M. Theo Kearnev. According to Rehm-t -And P,,Oterson (1988: 13), Mr, 1tearney has been credited with having assisted in the pl;m(illg of many of the trees along some of the new streets. These s11-ect5 i11CIL1ded Butler (originally known as Muscatel Street), Kings Canyon (known as /infandel Avenue Ili 1880s), and (formerly known �1-, Nl�tlag;t) Avenues. The trees along Kings Canyon between present-(1ay Willow rind Peach Avenlles included both the C:aliforni�l Wash ingtonia (VV(1 h1nylomU fliferci) and the C.ailary Island Date Palrri (Phoeni_y c,utIcrrren,-;is). On Peach <tnd Butler Avc,nuc°s it Was the mission olive trees. On Mill11CWrl«V<r Avenue lr{ twcen Kings C"inyon Road and Geary Strcet, both the Califormi i Washingtoniri and the mission olive trees «ere planted uruler the supt'rvisioll of M. 'Theo Ke arncv (Karen Musson, Personal Conamuilicatiorl 20051. Thr, Malin trees that presently line Killus C"mIvolt RuacL ])i.l we(.11 willow Avenue ,mcl l'c -lch Avcnue ale more hkcly nssuci;ited with the individual vineval'Cls located on elthcl side of the road. Uor ex"lnlple, they californi.r Washington:.a palms viewed x ..r- in Figure 4 extend the lcrlgth of the: former the Telecluah Vinvy�alds that Ciburrl. Cxlrf ruix44'irhinkl uia}irlmuGtnLubfrrnuet7rlrc�u.�h1'inK'ardt occupied lots 5.1, 54, ancf -- 55 of the Easl.crhy Rancho. It appears that G. 11, Hw-rett c;hosc the CamliA Island Daley Palm (refer to figure 5) to line his property Along the north side of Kings Canyon Ro-ad on hoth the west mid cast sides of Peach Avenue. HIS property included Lot 56 (on the west side of present -dray Peach Avenue) and Lot 57 (on 1 he East side present-day Peach Avenue:) and the northern half of Lot 58 ("Thompson 1891', FID 19371. The date palms in fact coincidc with soutl-wrn property line of'the Barrett property. A 1950 HD aorvil photograph supports this theory (refer to Figure 0), 3I R F,nvlruerhrnial Ser,rce, a U PACIE lip I' I hfovllia .1s111111oIlt<1 appCrlrs to h,lve lined much of the rlorltl sick of ille 1"Fesno Virlcy.u-ds (Oil the south side of frills C tulyon Rowi). As a n-wtter of fe,wi c hetic l)111111 trees w-err• pl.lnled rlfong the 1)1-ojc'c_ t u rtl (Lot 7.51 Fmd �111 �ldj�,Icc llt lot (Lol i o ) to the wcst, all tilt! way to prescllt -dav willow, Avcr1 a e. l'lI(- C,aCI:III fsl,Ind U 11r I" -dill ;md tile- U.,11ik)r[lilt iwerl p1,tllled Alt different 1iInds a, lIoth trces c.111 W;tc11 rl hcirllt of 0,5 1-(..Ct {itil�Ic�llafloll 1985). Al 171-esenl III(' C .Ilifol-lli�l W"..lshllllollia P1.11rils ;lI-e 1thout W to 70 fc'c't u-dl. The C: Imll-v Island 1XIte Palms arc nbou1. 35) to 40 fcc�t tall. I frstonc Proped j &urvey lar the irarrsrent V111age Pro)ect. f(ItIgS Caoyoo and Adler Averues rn Pie Coty of Fresno, Cafrfomra !-igun- S. vit,w hl' vii.i. w-tud n4tr 11AIiw IhAt rhvu4,d I he Lunlr id(;, 11'13.a "-I1. Over the last seventy years the rur,,)t Imidscape of the Easterl)v P UICI10 hits urld(-rl;onC significasit ctlangrs. 5.4.2 EASTBRBTI RANCHO --A CHANGING LANDsCAPE: I'he fOrmer l'lrlds of A- J. 1-,<islerbv h�lvr undergone significant ch.Inlges since tile c"Iriv 19005. Todd-, the ;1rc l orlce domill.lted wNl wineries "Ind vlllryllyds tlave sticculllfxxl io 1)rogress. Holt) col till l rcirll .Ind residt'llti-'ll developments h.}vc "iltrred the historic rural Lllldsc�lpc. 3 K 11 F. li\ n nn inrnl al hw r% It % I P A Ui / Pf--slonc P7oUetly Survr�y jar IN? Transrenf VrQap PP afeff. Kings Cany:m ardAdier Ave rues rr, the Clfe cf Fresno. Cafefornia f�v thr Arid- 1(HOs the ltiu-gr vialcy11-ds established in Section; ; ,,� hsrd Iron further subdivided into srnallcz-2(kwre lots or less. 'Hw Courier liutl(,r- Viney;:irds located in t.hc r-rorthwest one-gllarter of SCCtion 7, were parr of the Sunny, -,id(- Terrace subdivision in 1935, alt.hough this land wcrtdd not he Conrn CI-Cially developed until the 1970s. A portion of the former Tciccluah Vineyards (Lot 53) located on the north side of Kings Canyon Road directly across from the APE was developed as part of the Ventura Tract in 1936 (Progressive Map Company 1937). The Fresno Vineyard property was eventually purch-tsVd fey= Mosesian & Sons, Inc:., also the owner of .r w�)rehouse and cold storag(-. plant on Q Stree'l it) downtown Fl-esno (Bulhulirin 2001:50�. Mr. Mosesian converted the Former winery into a raisin pm,cking Csicility with the vinryards being grafted over to Thompson Seedless for 1a1[c gr"Ipes ws %vell as vaisins (Musson and Willi:mis 1990:41. While no pholos cl:it.inl, than 1936 could be lor-ated, a 1937 Fresno Irrig oWn I Astrid (serial photograph (refer to figurc 3] &-tails the rural landscape of t}rc F,aslr rhy Wincho as well as the palm trees along Kings Cmiy(�n Road bel-wren Willow and Nlinrlc•w�iwi Avcrnucs, Hetwecri 1950 and 100 1, -- - - approxirri'ately onc (;uarter of ;i milt • of balm .i lrScesl wcrc r(-movc'(I I`r[)`[llZl '- — t.1le north 6idc of I.ot`1 W) W. i:111SI CI'lu lClin,rr iJ aml 70 located oil thr south side of kings C'rnvon Rowl on t lic southwest c`ornrr of its intc,rscclion with Minncwawa Avenue, Env = 1079 all of the p.alin trees cast of Hw project A l T, on l he sou l h side of Kings C, I llyon Rorid wer C lyiw- 7. I474111) .ivj.1 fAwt,�gr.,r,h 4 kinp (:n )-n Rood and rnJni rrrr removed- Along ,vilh the -- - ren"wal of the mws, apartment buildings were conslructed on Lot 74 of the fornwcr Faslc•rby R;mcho helwcer► 1979 and 1995; this tot is located adjaccnt to rind cnsl of the pro-jcct APF . 1.3v 2002 rill vestiges of' the former Fresno Vincy,u'd Winery had 1wen replaced with commercial and residenlial d(welopimw with t he exception of n 10-acre parml located on the southwest (x�rt�c�r of llc.mh ".111d kings Call" orr Avenues. 1 ti k r9r01 j,-1Pk;t1 N411 IL W;� PA r .I: 18 H1sforn; Property Surrey Jor 91e rransianf V Oaga Progcf. gangs Canyon andAdlf,­ Avenues in !lie City of Fresno Galrfarnia Srtrn(- o 1 i t),tlrl) I rocs ,al Ilse cnI.r,tricr• to tII(, prOjcct nrc. (A1'N 472 {)2 i f) IJ ,ippc,)r to lmvrc ,also bccr r('nioved Ile-1 wear, lr)[) I aml 1�)79 thus widcnhng the ('111r,lTicr 10 Ippvoxirn,rt(Ily 150 FC(,t (Fcfcr tO 1 igur(, I) LVhilc it is unclear as to w,h:v these p"11111 tre(ts were r'enaoved, it is possihhc th,.ir Ow construction of the 1;1k's. Lodgc in the latter Pi,501') h;t1-c Icd tO the re1110%12i of thelal to Widcll the enu-ance to the E lk's Lodge off E. Kings C,anvon Road. The apparent reinov,al of the trees is rodent when comp,rring the 1937 cant] 1979 Fresno District lrrig,Mon acri,al photogrraphls for this p,lr€icuGlr urea. Upon furlhcr rcvic�~r OI' these same aerial photographs, ipproxim ilch, 70 perccrnt of the Imlill trees oil the south Sid(' of hings C,1lwon Ro;id cast of the pr0ject AP[" itll ihlc. w ].v ro 1*v1miacw,i%va ,Avenue hive peen rcmOved. All lhit r-cm,tins of the histol-ic ru1'21 hIWSUAj)(I kla(AVII -is Ow F;�t.sicr-hN: P alw1m ar(� the trees planted '11mig the roods. Wl)ilc tinrnc of the ro',)ds hkr Mlullt'\V',iwt i Avcnu(r la,tvc h,ad minim.il losws Of frees duc t0 n:atur,ll and n7a[1- imidc evcuts. r( largc percrrnta c of the Ivor-, idom, Kings Canvolt Rorxl lacrt�l�e�tr Willow �rnd NTiniww-.4%m�i A,,,,ei rlcs k ;tvc hcan irmoved for one rc,ison or- artotlacr. [�or cx;iniple, within tltc 1"v'I 20 �,e�ars, W,)l-V` ilrl built ilia(' of thcil slorrs on bind forrncdv part of the Tclequ,th Vineyards (Lot 53j. The cnlr<mce to W,11-Nirtrt is locllvd oil Kingti (,:arivon mood. cvcr,tl of the Califorlli,a W,tshingtOnirl lrtlrtlti were rvillov('d to room 101 the entrance. The only buildings located Nvithin AlIF, on the lmic;cl identified ns, APNI '172 021 01 during the l,lst 50 vcars %%7(r1-c (1('slrov(,(I l)v rr fire rifwr l{}55. !1s pr(tviously noted fhc Elk's Lodge was built bowed] 1057 sand 1901. `I'llr building hurried down between 1095 Land 1909. I \- 11 r.11%III) IIII It' III lI `r[%it 0% I'A(-,F: 1 `) N)stonc Pi-OPerhr &unvey !or tf,e Tears+E-n! VIJrage Pec�20. Kiligs Canyor. and Adler Avenue,z rn flee tarty o! Fresno C2rrtouud 6.0 REsuLTs AND FMDINGS 6.1 HisToiuc RwrAnH The following historic period property vvls idcrrlifWd within 11w project APE: ■ fallen Trees in City of Fresno Righl of Wav fronting 111e p.arrcl idcntilicd us APN 472-02 I -01. 6.2 SITE EVAULATION 6.2. 1 Palm Trees Fronting APN 472-021-01 Thc• lajads within the prrjcct APH. elate back- to the early 187Os vOicri the lanri woos Mvned by A, Y, l astcrby who purchaasc-d 5,000-acres of land front tlac spa c.illcd Gwl-11aaan A portion of they land dcvclopcd and h(.(-.ww krrcrwn its the EaLstc,rbv Rancho. In PMO, M. Theodow Kew-ney wid N K. Maasien bought the 500-Acre prope.rl.y from Williaarn Q'Bria.ta who had purch�rscd the property in 1877. 'I he Elastcrby Rancho was s.plil into lot she's of 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, and 320-.icres. ]however, some ol' the bcsl land located along present-day Kings Canyon Roaad was purchased try notaahlr individuals that included A, H. Butler, who took 420 acres; George H. Mather acquired 100 acres; the Nlarghcritaa Vineyard Company acquired 360 acres; H, Gr�anz bought 80 acres; and Kearricy, Lachman, wid Jacobi formed the l'resno Vineyard Company and established a wincry and vincyards on another 392 acres. While it is generally aacceptcd that one of the goals of Keeney and others was - to piaarat trees along most of the roads within the l�:asterby R"Uwho, 11 is 11ol with cerladnty that one can assume that all of the trees were planted nt the saille time_ Reference is maadc to M. Theo Kearney heing a part of a project that resulted in the phrnting of a w-ariety of trees along scarue of the streets Within E: Isterhv f.aarrcho for Ow purposes of be,autifrcaation, dcnotirag property boundaries for others, rind laroviding pcclestriaans with shaadc front the si►tnr7ar.r he.11 cor7lmon to 11-1c l"resrio area. While mission olive trees were phnted along, fc,wh Avri ate ns well ,as l W1(t r ,Avenue, pahn trees where pl;-anted >along hoth J a S� It F.rr�-irryn+nra��l ��•�, �� I _' 0 Hgslonc Property SJrvey kir me Tratiwool Village Project Kings Canyon and Adler Avei,ues;n rhs C+y of Fresno. Cah,'nmra sides of kings (,'rayon Ro"Id {histoi icalh., known .as %inrniAel rlvenuc� from prescnt-cliry Willow Avenuc to Nlinnew°a%va Avenuc, but it does Trot appear that the trees were .ill planted ',rt lyre same time. If one -aaume5 the trees were planted as pail ot' the designed Lindscapc: along Kings Canyon Rwad between Wilio%v .im[ Nlinnc:w iw a, one plight 11iink that the same type of trees, Cnlifor•ni,,r Washintonia, would he planted. More importantly, trees would be planted nlong both sides of- the kings Canyon Road. This does not appear to he the case Mid most of this information is based on acrial photographs th�o date from 10,37 to L979 (FID). Inure S. 19310 FID Acrial showing trcc lined roads in portions ollastcrby Hanchn. i It appem-s there Were: 11 Ic asl two vRrletics of palm trees p1Rnted along Kings C,,rnvou hold in the Litter 1800s. The trees planted atong the front.age of thc, Telcqur rh Vitrey;,Irds oil the north sine of kings C.rnvola I2o.ad directly across frtlrra the projrct APE' «err (",difornka Washingtoni'l. pillms a.s %wls the south side cif Kin ;s Canyon l�o.rd front Willowllvenuc 1c� the eat enci of thC ;arnjc(,t A111,:. 13�tscd on the 1937 F'R) ,icrl�il photo,,r.rph, the trees, pl.rnwd aloe" the I & It Ell, ironm:w.il '�cnice, Historic Properly survey for the Trdrrsefrt Vilfage Proped. Kings Cdnyaln and Adler Avenues in the Crty of Fresnr7. Cairfumia Teleclu"ili virle.v tmds rind those pkilited on the south time of Kings Canyon l�o�rd Ii'mil preserll-dav Willow Avenue to the• end of the proJcx-i AI'I�; appear to helve been planted at the same° time. The trees appe�ir to helve been pk-lilted to denote property bouud�iries. Oiie might argue the trees, especially those withiri Ili(, project APF, was part of �l dcsir;ned landsc;tpc, but thc research strongty suggests the trees MA-C pl�Mted through the efforts of indi%1ldu<3l property owners rapier than the owner of the 11"nsterby Rancho, M. Theo he�lrncy. It has 1wen suggested that Kew-nc%, Gas hard al work developing all irrigWion system for his FFC--,no Vineyards, along with planting vines r3s well as trees. The trees plantc,d along tll( northern boundary of the 1"re5no Vineyards from the eastern edge of the APE to Mmnewtm-,i riiay limle indeed been pls-Lnted by M. Theo Kearnev, unfortunately, by 1(461 some of, the trees held been removed and by 1979 the rest of Ih{: trees fronting the northern houndai-v of the Fresno Vineyards on the south side of kings C�in,�on Road hid [wen removed. The second VIlWiety of palm licks found can Kings C;inyon Road ii the C,ln"lr-v Isl'_lrld Dim, 11r_dni Whoenzxthese trees appears to have fronted the former lands of G. 11, Harrett; this included hots 54 mid 55 on the wesl side (Af i'e.ach Avenue. Arid Lot 50 on the easi side of the same :avenue. The p�dm,, lining the Barrett prop(°rty nlaY hive I -rail planted biter than the C.ilif01-:1ir, ` 'UShingtoni:a p�airns t.h�ll lined t11e soutlie,rri bouridanT of the Teleclurlh Vineyauls. While both thc. C .,ilitorni<i- WashiriKtoni"i and the U111i11Ar Itil;rnd Date 4'nhrr can re�ic.h heiglits of Est) to 70 beet, the Barrett Palms are )bout 30 percent siilialler than the California Washint;tonia ImIms o1' the former Tciequah Vineyards. There Appear to be two separate plausible arguments as to why the trc,es were ptanted along the roods of the Fasterhy Rancho. While one can argue that some streets lined with trees were indeed intended to he streetsca.pes such as Along Minnewawa south of Kings Can%lon Road; the planting of trees to denote the hound cries of one's property seems more logics.] at least on Kings Canvon Ro<ld. As previously note two tvpes of palms were planted on Kings CMin1,r011 Averme between Willow and reach Avenues. This included the Ca-liforrIM Mishin-t-onia and the CanaiA, I`;l',ind Date Palm. The Canary island late Nlms were planted along the 1,lmds of' G. ii. Barrett-, while it is po<�slble Ilia other' property O w'nevs 'slang Kings C'111yon Ro"O preferred Ill' L 111i�Ul nlil WashirigLollia palms. 1,Si R F.nvirunmratel `er-%ar, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ly,srofic Pia fly 5urvey1w the rratis,enf UJlage Prolecf, Kings Canyo andA�fer.Aver7uesrr1trioCfr}afFrrsm.Cafdomw The 11,11llc most W'Irll r1,-;So it ltvd %vitll Ir('c pi,lrlfillr; Ili Ih[' Rancho rs til. 1`hc°ocic>rc hc,u nr�, . 1 lra��.��,:�cl', �� lj,vit % of 5oth primary and ;c(:(anc3'ary resoltrces failcc! to note ,1rly direct reference to Kearney ns h"lving planted all of the IlVes in the 1%astcrl)v Rancho. Although, the trees pl'arlted along ��lirinc�tiva«�,1 from Kints C,lnvon Road to C1car-,� Street{ppear to flaw been pLilacd by M. "Theo Kc.irm, (Musson and Willimns, 2000). However, the same. cminol he said for lll(, irccs planted ,Hong Kings C�trlyon R0,Ld 1)(1-Ween picucnt-dav Willow Avenue �tnd Peach Avenuc. The influence of individual pl'operty owners 111r1y h<lve kleen t11r overriding influence in this instance. By the 1()30s, H. was clerlr th,11 The r1n<11 landstalpc of' lands formerly thronging to A. Y. 1-;,1uI(!Ifi wcrV cirldecooin<o ch,inge ind this was in direct proportion to ille growth of the c11v of Fresno. I )ur'irlg the (iCCWIc Of' the 1020s the cit}''s population wrni front 24,892 to 47,080 and by the crrd of the 1040 Fresno's populatiorr had jurnllcd to S2,513. The demand for land for commercial and residenti,ll dcvrlopnicr11 �,%:,1s slowly cradicalin- Fresnn's c,lutci-n rur�11 Imidscape. 1=3v illy• 1<11c 1960s, the former kmd,s of the F, istci-hv Rancho wcr( giving ttiri4' to ur11,1n sprawl. L3v illr' rarly 1970s the I1cw IRS building h�1d 1wen complewd c,1sl of Chestnut Avenl.le helwecn Buller ,1nd L�mc Avenues. The lest veSligcs of Ihc historic rur�ll 1.mdscapc known as 111c Fastcrhv Ranch( are the trers planted , long the ('6gc o1, the ro,Ids within the Rar101o. Some of, the slrcrtucapcs retain good inleprily, twildc' others tl,lvc not wc lthc,rcd well over time. Th(t try,��s 1.11X 114cludc clissiun olive Ulce's till t1w west side ()1 Minrlewawa and tlic c.alifonliil washillg1-orli'l mA Ihc'v sl sick of Minncw,lwa Avcnuc fr0111 Kin -.s (:i147-Von 1�o,1d all 'Ih(.. 1(s St)Ilhcrn Pacific 1r,lclCs in the south linve survived the test of lime. 1-lowever, the palm trees 1h<1t line Kings C, ,Avon Road between Willow ;1nd Mirine w�11w,1 Avenues have bean less f0rlun<1te. As pl-CV101.1sly not(-, the p,ilm trees on 1.11c south sick of Kings Canyon Road from the cast end of the Project l TIF. to IMII newIlw<l Avenue werr removed law 1979. 'I'll(, 27 C,diforrlia Washingtonia p,llrn trees located within the Fresno Cite 1igh1 of-w,1y �)nd w-1111in the projr'ct right -of kv�ly wc,rc plrlrlir(1 (`irca 1880. While the. Irecs have inworiry of location orld nlateri;ds, they 11,1w.. poor rnl('grlty related Io selling, design, "lssocl'ltlon, .ind feeling. Wlthlll tllt° coIitcxl Of the Llrgcr historic ruril Landscape, the pafnl trees within the APH' Lick historic irltegritti°. As w,ls prcvIouslv sut gr.st(-d, the palril trccs within Ihc project l PF. are pant of those trees planted bet%vec'n Willow Avenue tt.1 the west, but it is ulx[car as to hint. I'Ar cast tilcv ex1cndcd. Ir is pos'sihic t11,1t the (',Iliforrli,l W,isllin(-,(orbit p,llrns planted on i llc nor -Ill side• of Ihc hIm"S C;iIiV(n Ro,id :l-w> " rcvc;ll 11ow i:1r to 1h(• c,1sl thew [vcrs ('XIcndc(l, T1w 1Oi7 <wrl;d J S It H_n%it uuiriri A \Ci ii y M 11: 23 H.-sronr Properly ,Surveyor the manna , Veffap Projev. K'frags Ganyun and Adder Avenues ro ne Lary of Fresno. Ca+Jumia photor;rriph na�iy suggest t]t<a1 the Crlliforrii.t Washmgtorai,l p.lhns cxicnded from L.ot 74 to Lot 76 (cast to west) mi thc south side of kiligs Canyon kmid. The p.alln/mission olive trees that line mimic%wi%va AyeiiLlC s01111-1 of flings C.lrlyon Rond havc historic.il integrity "and while tlac l'ilidsca.pe has cvolvcd From oIic od �IgFiculturc to oIae of rllr.3l rt'sid(-n:es, (his slrectsc<apc jvtN1Jlti th1 d rural fhlvor, The most prominent strectscape in the Fresno area is Kearne'v Bou[evard. It has %vithslood the test of, linic with only ionic of thr: trees 11"ivilil; to be removed in the name: of' progress Intl this occurrrd along :i section of Chandler Airport. The 27 palin tree~ within Ox project circa appear to h.ivc becil planted to denote properly hound.lr-ies rrlther thall (.feint; a parl of a larger kindsc.ipc" thal 1wirig the 1•msterby Rancho, wilic•h w�ls the oldest developed rancho_ The first shipment of, grain from Fresno came from the t.`<astcrby Rancho. All t1ml remains of the historic rural Ltildsc.ape known as the E. aslcrby Ranched is tdlc tree-liricd roads. Whilc some trees were. planted as p.irt of ra dcsir"liicd landscape such as the one on Nfirinew.aw.a Avr,nuc south of Kings C ..111yon load, the trees plaaatcd within the project APL were planted to denote 011c1 or eziorc property owners. Commercial and residential dcvelopnacrits have .altered the Lasterlay rural laridsc.ipc into an urban Landscape, thus the^ original ezirrilitics of setting, design, feeling, worknimiship, .m(l issoclmlon hove Itch cornpronii, crd. Therefore, the tr(�es, .vithill the project APF, .ilonc cannel he considercd ;-Is .a sigilificalit went at the loc•ril, region.il or imtictri;il lr�vcis. Therefore, ncc farlilli trees.erc neat eligible for the Natioil.al Register of d listoric Plm,c.s u ndcr- Criterion A. The trcc"s .lrc not .assocf.ited v ith an important person. Although M. Theodore Ke .u-ncy has been mcntiorw.d in association with the punting of the trees along the roads within the Fasterbv R.incho, there is no direct evidcnc:c th.il he plmilcd them or designed the roadside l.mdscsapc within the project Af'1".. The fact thort two different types of' palms .arc found :along Kings Crinyoun Po'Id just c.1st of the project APE. strongly sugcst the trCe.s were pl�lntcd by individual prcaper-1v owners such .1s G. W. Mirrett who apparently prcfel-rccl the calialy [sialld Date Palm to the' Ctalifi01.111a Wlshiragtonia, prCVcrrcd by others. Therefore without direct evidence that Kearnc}. 1)1,1111.(.d the tree~ within the project AP and beyond. the trcc.s a.rc not eligible under Criterion H. The trees dare not eligihlc under Criterion C txce,.iuse they do nol clubod-v .l type, period, or method of construction; rind lhev arc not associ.ltcd with .1 C1aaSicr cr.afisnaall. 13 H En+ ii uu u,rntil tier , r, el 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 t i 1 t Vbstore Piopefty Survey tot Me Transient VN ige. Pfvied. 1Cgg5 Canyop and ACer Avenues in tho City of Frevm, CaHforn+a The 27 imim tars v"ithin the p1-(lj(,c1 API,, 1rc no l ciil;ilile for listing in Ill(, N,itionill Re -Isles of l llsloric Piaeccs, nor �lrC they cligihle for the callkwlll�.1 R''C,IIUSI '.r' Of I hStOI-iCFl1 RCsour'cTs. `1'hc 27 polm tiers were also evalu�lt(-d clnd dCtCrnliIICd rlot Ch,"ihle for listing in the City of" Fresno Locrll Register of l fistoric Resourccs, Ag�rin iritcgrity is cstahlished williin the' l<argcr historic rtlral landscape dcfine.d ws the h;aslcrh� Rancho. While the trees have integrity of location and materials, the group of" ire(�s ha c poor 1ritc1,rity as it vcl.ttcs to desigrl, settirig„ arld associ"Ololl. The 11-cis to (to Clot stppCftr to fee assocmled Mill an CvCnl that 111mic <1 slglllhectnt Cotllribulion to ncw llro.td pultrrn of our histol-V; or Or-(" ih(, "Issociatcd with ti-le lives of prrtions significalll in our pWit.WhilC it h,'ls I)CCn su„g(`st(,d !hill M. Theo Kcm-nev nr:ay helve irzstr1.1111crrlrtl in the pl:trlting of hers Along most of the roads within the F,tslcrhy R mcho, no direct irnfo i-m loon w':ts MICOWI-Cd to susl<tilt tiuch �ln al-gurnclit. As �i matter of fllct, the inF(arrnrlti(>n prescrltcd strongly sut;LI('sls thil1 tht. lrccN �;�ililill 111c APE, ,"'TI-C plantcd by rnrl individc1,11 propeury owrrer alone; with that pCI-son'ti nelghhors. The tides do not enihody t.hc distinctive c:havaclt,miiIcs of ,l tvpc, pruiod or method of construction, ()r ceprcicnis the work of �1 mastcl', or possess high al-tistic va1ut­w. "l here.forc, 1 he trees colle.cti`ely within the prraject API-, arc riot cligibIc for they Local Rc-istcr. The uropt�rty -,is tt wholc iti not ,l historic.11 rCsourvcc for the pui- loses of (A-A)A. The p�llm tiv(-s %vould riot. be conlribuml- to thc• Ial-gcl- group of p"ttlll ti-ecs on Kings Cramvon Road it' illo LiFy,cr group �,vrlv to he cv iluawd and found cilgibic to the National of Historic Hacrs, 11w California Register of Ilistor-ic. m- Ow Fl-csim Local Regislel- of' Historic Resources. S R Eu,u.nuurnl_1I-tirr,irr, NO= Property Survey W the Panwent Mage Profeck PUngs Canyon and 4dller Avenues in the Clly of Fresno California 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS: The p'llm be es located kvlthiu Lhe project APE'; were rccorded into they Calilorni,t tlislol-ic:al Resource lnformaliort tivst(,,m (refer to Appendix Ci due to Their agc�, but deI.CF1Y:incd rant tea mecl the Section 106 definition of a historic propcily'; this propertti' 11so (IC LC Fill ined not eligihic for listing in Ole California register elf llislorical Resources or the Cily of Fresno l.oc,al Register cif I listoric Resources. In 1ight of dlcse research results, a finding of "No Historic E're�hr�rties Affected is recomnicndcd for this undertaking pursuant 36 CF R 80W4 (d) (1). No l'urtlaer CUltr:r,11 1-esOL11-ces im"cstig"llion is recommcnded for Ihe undertaking unless projccl plans are .diel-ed to include areas not covcrcd hY this slue.. Fin illy, it It;is IR*n suggestat TWO sonic of, the trees Oc rcilloved ill to sallow both coltstruct iora eduiprtrent rmd later W:sno Ransil buses We access to [he proposed project area. TfW, author' Ob.SCI-VCd that the prrseilt access Of'[' Kings C,inyon road is approximately 150 feet This would appear to t)c mr7re thtln c'niru(Ill re,Olra for hltr:re accrss, l st_rortgls,- urge that tlic p'-dirt t:ccti not I)t` Tcrllovvd. lout ill the cvCnt thw ures must he rcn:ovr.d, I i-rcominc•lld the lar used ,is i:i-fill pThaps Wong Minnmami A%(,.Iru(' South of Kirngs ci.inym) Rm.,Id. j& It Fatiirminicul.11-enk<r, 77 !=YrsR?nc Propeq Survey fui Mu t(4r5,en2 Vdraye Proje:f. Wrnys Cw,yw and .Adfyr Avenues an the C,ry of Fresno. Ca?ilumfa /iPPENDiX A: PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS Jon L. Brady r11ce1s the Srci—r•l.tr,, f1f I,7lerinr's Guil(k lirlcas for l.11-<11 history Ind 1,01-_ Hr.ltly holds :i I;A in holh Politic.11 Scicncf ,in(] Anthropology., sincl can NIA in Iilstory lrorll Stale, University, [uls workcfi as a conslillin<; .1 rc 11:{e(71ur;ist Ind histrrriarl fOr over 25 y'cr3rs, %k7orking with Scction 10fm(I {'I,,OA coml,lirmcc. I lc• fms ,Ilscr scivc(l .Is .1(ljtrn -t faculty rtt Fresno Cite Colle (�. Mcrc(��I Community Coll(-gc, III(' Collcge ol, Scglloli. ,,, E,Vcst I fills t mimiunity Collcoc .nil �k`cst C(risl C hi-i:�;ti.u1 Collc�(c. Courses tmrght include Alwicnt Civiliz.ltiolls, Modern Furopeall Ifisl(rrv, Ilistclr� from 160O to thc° Pr('sent, Culluml A11111rohology, ;)n�1 Politic:}I Scl(11101. a. 11 I C It h;, i4unu,.w.rl ticr%ier, T'r4(T 27 13r.rrly7 J. L. Hesboc Frof;erry Surrey for (he i ran.,wenf VJfage Frafecf. Krug- Carynn ar4AdferA, enues in 0i Cfrj efFresflo. Caldomm REFERENCES 1085 Stctgc,coaclunfj ["it Ow Scut Joaquiu Vullci , C'ahfi)v ricc: 1850-1 Unpuhlished plaster's Thesis, California Stair° Umvf,r5ity, rc'Snc�. 2007 Archaeological Stirucrl for a Multi-fUrnily am.1 Singr (, Vcrrll?'hj NOM('S Pr( jJuct (AYN 4 %2-021-01 ), I rt.st Kincp-; Cu11.1fort Rorrcl (it id Se iIh AdIcr Aueime, Frcwo, t'ccliforniu. PF-cpaued (rrr the Cil%� (f Frr sno Housing and Comrrrunity Developncril Dep.trtr7merir hY ,1 P Ellivironmen I'll Sri -viers, Clovis, Catifol-nil. Hulhuli:in. Herge 2UU 1 The Frcsrio Avrncniuwn : Ilistor-tl ol c1 1)iuu,pom Corrrrlrrrrtirrl. Sr111rcl-- Word Imilf-cr Pvc-'s. (;'.rter, l k('11(h Nl. Nei ai; Ilislw-i' ' . trZee'rttrc 1'kuz. 1'rel;,ir((l fwIII(. Cite ol, I�,resrto, C��liforui��. C1(ugii, C IMI—IeS WU 1008 Xludcru The Rich, C'olorJUl and 1,"Xciting llistoric(il Nvn' Nick° of 1.hW Area Now Knou.,u as 11lwlcrci Counl.q, Califor7ria. l'uhlished by M�rdc i-a County Historical Society. cl-a rpkm, C. (r. 1932 "1 c Ope nitig of Ow iWar-ihosff 1141rr1rrel h'e gioll IN,19-1959. Nlicrohlrll copy of unpLrhIl"lu'd doctoral disseFtalicrrr. The C"ilil'Mr11m sl"Oc Univers1IIv and Collcges rind )- epartnrr.nt of Cicugr.il0 1Y CSU. Fre5no. .I & It F n%ii'nnnitulal `rrti iir. I'A[;, hlrsfcnc Property Survey for the i ransrerrf VWage Profecf, Kfr.gs Carryon and Adler A venues m tax! City of Fresno. Gafrf7mia l)r�Ll�(,%k , ( 'al hrr Ind Collip,m rmd [livid (li rw r7 ,inel Assocmte s t f.1(){) l lip;tonic Ar(j I I'leclUr-O I Suruey Report l:ofIIc 180 Cheslrurr Avenue to Fliglrlwid Aucmw 0(-)-FNF'-1 80 , IcOO. 7.0 06250 :342400. Pvcp,lred for California Ot'TI'�'insportWion, 1)iStrict E�, Fresno, CA11,01-11i't. Rcvised June le)91. t�;,atmi, Edwin W. l�)(r.� L'irrferge' 1"rctirrer, Pictonal Pccollucrious o/"rr West[-.,m C"ty. Frrsiio: [ lLill linhlor7 1'retis. I.,i csnu l�ca�tlhliccrrr t`if�l �clr�erli:,c-rut�rfl. J�nivar4� 22. 1881 e(litiorf. I'vorl, W. �. 18-)2 -Rom sieie Tr-ccs f'or C�Aiforrmi,° P(wi fie Pr(,ss. July Ifs, 1892. The Aruloboo Sociely Nulurc - I)csc•rts. Nc",v° Yeli-k-. r AY(—ei A. Knopf. ha�utition, K. rind S. WithrIIIIs lc)c)c) "Supporting Ncrtie°,lrch, Kearney", in Palmo (S,, Arrrericarm b.'Irrr Tree,,; hiring Maier I41'.,tor-ic kcsource Irf-r untor-y Nomim Lion Vorm, City of Pressrro. Pre p.>red irid sul)Mitle(I to the I)ep�3rlr-1uCnt of li0utiing R'. Neighborlmod R(wit�iliratioln, HiSloric Prc-wr""�11ion C'omnlissii�n, F ivsno, Cal. 1141dill�r, V. lc)(r 1 Switheret Calil'Or'rrto Garclen.� . All II1,ic:ll-we l l lisrorrl. Hcl-.cic.v Uni�rcrtiil�� of C�lliforrii�i ['rrtis. & IN Eiz 'irnnnu'nial �c'n iri' III I! Hmlurc ProjDerfy Survey for the Trans+enf Wifage Pro)ecf. kings Canyon and Adler Avenues rn the Cfry of Fresno Cablom(a Maps: Cr11,11-(1, W U. 11)01) rlihv; ol'Frc l"oo Cowiffj Puhlishcr — W.C. Ciu�ird. Fresno, Californi'l progr(-ssivc M;q) Col-ll )) llv 1�:';:; progfc:;-i?,vo :AI1(!F Of_ Vf(',;r)o ('MifItI/ fro rlI Ofrcicrl uru! Priuutr' O(Ito by tllc' A -hip 5crvice. Fresiio: Progr(,ssivc. Mal) Thonlp"'oll, T1lolrH. 1,89 1 zIllus i hq? of Frc,5rto Cotur_f y, Culifvrriia ij.,a i UhIstrall.orjs. Thom�lti 11. Thol-til)son, Tul;'Irc, Clahforni�l. 1J111t d (1rologic";l Stll,.,(,v. �c�(r4"foCaoJ�r��1�11i�� M.IJi. ��nJ�.t�!.t.a (,)u;�rlrtan<;Ic�, C.11rforrlir:� 7.� 1'llintitc�. Ph(m) 1a:ti I-wd l (W' I . Personal Communications: f"U'arcli Musson, Fresrio, C' 101f()rnirl-2005 .John Whilehousc, Fw,,no. C;Ilifor-ni;i- 2005 S R VITktIou111{plAl wrk t( ,, PACA 311 H,srvw: Prop,- ay ;i itvey 1w fne Fran seeev Vtf.agie Prafecr.. Ifurgs. Carryon acid Adfer Avenues m ilia Cary of Ffesr+:; Gaf,la,.ria APPEDIX B: RECORD SEARCH Jun 27 04 01:30p -CAUFORNkA HISTORICAL RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM f1DELE BRLDUIr1 6F16642415 p_2 FRESNO 56n0ere Sm Joaquin Valley Wow-3n3tion Cemer KERN CafAarnia Stab Uriiegi*y, Bakmllefe KINGS 3M Stndubie 51tg ay MADERA 9akersfidEd. Uifoapia 93311-IU99 TULARE 651AkA-27M FA% 561 /5" 2a t 5 Email, aba{bwieTid�Csub +d.i TO: Rebecca Fraser, Consulting Plannui R- L. Fraser Consulting P-o. Box 2040 Clovis_ CA 93613 DATE: June 26, 2004 (RS # G4 - 217) 'AIORITY RE: EA PW-2Q04-08: Fre.sna Amm ExpresS (FAX): Intermodal Facility Project_ southeast Garner of East Kings Canyon and South Adler Avenues. Fresno, CA (APN 472-021-01) GO: Fresno 0 MAP: Malaga 7 5' CULTURAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH The following are the results of a search of the cultural resources srte record files at the Southc.rri San Joaquin Valley Archaeological Information ('.enter. 4riese Files rnctudc known and recorded archnealogical and historic stiles, inveioory and c xravatian reports riled with this office, and properties listed on the National Pegister of Historic Places, The Historic Property Data File. (4/16/04). the California Register, the California Historical Landmarks, the Cali f omm Imrentory of Historic Resources and the California Points of Historical Ir terest_ The following summarizes the current information available on the subject property based on the records outlined above. PRIOR CVLTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORIES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND A z MILE RADIUS - According to our files there have been no previors cultural resource surveys conducted in this project area. There has been one survey conducted imnu diately adjacent, FR-257, and (3) three previous surveys conducted within a mile radius. Surveys and their designated report numbers are plotted on the project map - KNOWN CULTURAL PC -SOURCES ON THE PROJECT AREA ANO A T MILE RADIUS There are no recorded cultural resources wit hi n the project area, and i I! s no t known if resources exist there - PRIORITY Jun 27 04 04:30p RUELE DAI-BUIN UGIGG42415 0.3 There are (3) three recorded cultural resources within a mile radius of the project area. P-10-004763, 4765, h 4767. Resource locations are plotted on the confidlential project map. There are no cultural resources within the project location that are currently listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register, California Points of Historical Interest, the California Inventory of Historic Resources, or ary known -local registry. COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS According to the information you provided, the Federal Transit Administration will fund the Fresno Area Express in order for them to acquire and construct an Inter -modal Facility on the southeast comes- of E_ Tings Canyon and South Adler Avenues, Fresno, CA. If the subject property is vacant and undeveloped, we recommend that a qualified professional archaeologist conduct a cultural resource study prior to ground disturbance_ SVFO will make the final determirnatian regarding the above recornmendntiorus and notify you accordingly. Please let us knovi if we muv be of further assistance. By 01- Adele Baldwin Assistant Coordinator bate: June 26. 2004 Fee: $180.00/hr_ (Priority smr- ice) C: Lucinda Woodward, Office of l istoric Preservation INVOICE 9 A2676 PRIORITY r.r. Hesfonc Projxvty Survey far the Transrent Virlage Pro)ect, Vi !�s Canyon and dfr. e Avenues m the City of Fresno Calrlom.ia i I i I I I APPENDIX C: FORMS 523 A & B I f i I I I { State of California - The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PRIMARY RECORD rnrnar,a HtR1 A >'ru�omral __ NRHP Status Cade: :�It-er Lishnys fl(""'evv Code Resource Name or #: City of Ffe5no P(operly P1. Other Identifier: Palm TrECS on King Canyon Row! 'P2. Location: 'a. County: r r s,no b- Address: NIA City: Fresno Zip: 93706 'c. t1SGS 7.5' Quad: 'Malaga Date: 1964 (Photo Revised 1961) 'e. Other Locational Data (APN A): 472-021-01 'P3a. Description: RE-iwralii D) Ite Map Reference No.: T: 145 . R: 2 1 E Sec 7 . M.D.B. & M. Located on City property and fronfing Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 472-021-01 is a segnient of a row of California Washinglania (WaShnrgtonia filrfera) -palm trees planted circa 1880 on the South side of Kings Canyon Road fhislorically kn��wvn as Zlflifclndl?I AvPnVC ; Thsre are 25 pain, trees -. ilhin ino protect APE and are .,rithm the r::iiy Of Fiesno's rigni-oi- way The trees are evenly spaced and stand approxilnatelyr 60 to 70 feet tall (refer to Photo No 1 below) These palm trce5 are approxiinately two and ono-haff feet in, diameter at the base and nse to a height of about sixty feet on avei age Each palm tree i:, tall and massive. witli an unnranched trunk and very large fan -shapers leaves Tf)est� palms are furl, of a larger group planted between present-day Willow Avenue and Peach Avenue on Kings Canyon Rcaa Only that section of trees within the project APE was evaluated for This prolerl P3b Resource Attributes: HP29 Landscape Arrhir lure 'P4. Resources Present: ! I. P5. Photoyrapts or Drawing (Photo No. Y - view of ptiims on east side of entrance Io former Elk's Lodge) M. Description of Photo: t:l.;,.. to Photograph,, ',-2 'P6. Date Construr_tedlAge: (Esbnlaled) 'P7. Owner and Address: City of Fresno 2600 Fresno Street Fresno. CA 93121-109e 'P8. Recorded by: Jon L Brady. fv1,ti J R R Environmental 5ervice5 170,90 Auberry load Clovis. CaMornia 93619 'P9. Date Reconk-d: May 28, 2005 'P10. Type of Survey; ■ Init4isive Describe: HPS P11. Report Citation: Historic Propoily Survey for me Traeisiam V10agie Prowv. Kfr7,rs Canyon and Adier Avpnojj 3s in Erie aly of Fre ;rya. Cafilotora 'Attachments: ■ Rluldurg. Structure. end Oblecl Recofd ■ Continuation Page DPR 523.ATest (111941 I State of California r. The Resources Agency Flmnafy �t DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRF a _ PRIMARY RECORD I nnormal NRHP Status Code: Othe' Listings Review Cade^s'11EV1Qf Da1� State of California - The Resources Agency Primmary # DEPARTNIENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRi# BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD Map Reference No.: NVA 'Resource Identifier: City of Fresno Properly 'NRHP Status Code: of B1. Historic Name: Palm Trees or Zinfandel Avenue B2- Common Name: B3- Original Use Roadside landscapte 134. Present Use: Roadside landscape '135. Architectural Style: Palm lined Road '136. Construction History: Archival research suggest the palm gees were planted ci, ca 1880 '137. Moved? MIND ❑ Yes ❑ Unknown Date: WA Original Location: 'Jr�kno::r •Be. Related Features: Detached garage 139a. Architect: Unknown BM. Builder: Unknown '1310. Significance: Theme: Rural Historic Landscape Area: K;iii7r, Canysn Roa Period of Significance: 11360 Property Type: Landscape Architecture Applicable Criteria: NIA The lends within 1he project APE date back to the early lMs when the land was owned by A Y Easlerby when he purchased 5.000,acres of land !turn t1he so-called German Syndioiale A portion of the land was daveloped and became known as the Easterby Rancho In 1880. M Theodore Kearney and N K Masten bought the 2560-acre plopecly from William O'Brian who had purchased the property in 1877 The Easterby Rancho was eventually split into lot sizes of � 20 40, 50. 80. 1�50, and 320-aces However, some n( the b(-, t Land located alnnq present-day Kings Canyoi) Road '?,',is purchased by notable rndividuais that included A B Butler, who tuok 020 acres, George H �1aller acquir6q ttiC� acres, the M:aigherila Vineyard Company acgwreQ 380 acres, H Gfanz bough[ 80 acres. and Kearney. Lachman, and Jacobi formed the Fresno Vineyard Company and established a winery and vineyards on another 392 acres While i1 is generally accepted thal one of the goals of Kearney and others was to plant trees ajong Trio -;I of the roads wit)iin the EasterDy Ram: io it is not with certainty that one can assume that all of the trees were plaritRd at the same tine Reference is made to M Then Kearney being a part of a prr.�lect that resulted in the planting of a variety of trees B11- Additional Resource Attributes: N?.A 13112. References: MacMahon. James A T111.1 Audubon socwfy N:arora Gu,des— Deserts New'r'urk — Alfred A Knopf, 1985 Thompson, T H Alias of Frr ,,wo County. Caftlornra 1691 Guard V. C Alfas pf FrFsm. County C,ikforn,a Publisher VV C Ouafd. 1909 B13. Remarks: B14. Evaluator: Jon L Brady J S R Enuiforinienlal Services 17900 Auberry Road Clovis. CA 93611 t55q) 299-4�95 Date of Evaluation: Nlay 28. 2005 (This space rr�servcd for c+f7icla.1 cornments ) DPR S212 • Test i 1 0 State of California -- The Resources Agency Primary 9 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD along some of the streets within Easterby Rancho for the purposes of beaulifcation, denoting property boundaries for others. and providing pedestrians with shade Iforn the sUnnrner heat common to the Fresno area While mission olive trees vvere {planted along Peach Avenue 3s we.11 as Buller Avenue, palm trees where planted along both sides of Kings Canyon Road (historically known as Zinfandel Avenue) from present-day Willow Avenue to Nlinnetaavra Avenue, but i1 does not appear that the tries were all planted at the same time If one assumes the tree: were planted as pail of the designed landscape along Kings Canyon Road between 'Willow and Minnewawa, one might think that Ilse sarne type of trees, California irVashintonsa, would be planted at the same time More imporlarilly, trees would be planted along both sides of the Kings Canyon Road This does not appear to be the case and most of this information is based on aerial photographs that date from 193T to 1979 (Fla) 11 appears there vvere at least two varieties of palm trees planted along Kings Canyon Road in ttie latter IMOs The trees planted along the frontage of the Telequah Vineyards on the north side of Kinga Canyon Road dirr ctly ac+oss trorn the project APE were planted in California Washingtonia palms as was the south &Ie Kings Canyon Road from Willow Avpnui3 to the east end of the project APE Cased a^ trip 193? FID aerial photograph the trees planted alnng the Telequah Vineyards and those planted on the south si le of Kings Canyon Road from present-day Willow Avenura to tl,e east end of the project APE apprrrr to have been planed at the same Irate The trees appear to have been planted 1rr denote property boundaries rather than being a part of a de-,seigned landscape One might gigue that the planting of these trees was part of a designed landscape. but it would appear to be through the efforts of individual pioperty owners rather than thi?-owtner of the Easterby Rancho, M Theo Kearney fl hd5 been suggested t'nat Kearney was nard at work developing an irrigation system for his Fresno Vineyards. along with planting vwe5 as well as frees. The 1+ei=s planted along the northern boundary of the Fresno Vineyards from the eastern edge of the pi-olecl APE to Mhnnewawa may have indeed been planted by M Theo Kearney, un(O.11 .mate;y, by 1961 some of the trees along the for,ner lands of Fresno Vineyards had been removed and by 19?9 all the bees fio+lLrsg the northern boundary 0 1hrs Fresno Vineyard,, on the south side of Kings Canyor. Roar3 had beer removed trees This informatton rcmes from a careful examination of the FID aerial phral0graph5 for Uie period f 9.37 to 19W9 The second variety of palm trees an Kings Canyon Road is the Canary Island trale Palm (Phoenvr cxnanensjs) that appears to have tronied the former ;ands of G H Barrett, this included Lats 54 and 65 on the west side of Pear,h Avenue and Lot 56 otq the yeast side-nt the lair* avenue The Barred properly located on the north side of Kings Canyon Road had ;tie Canary Island Date f3MM lining the southern boundary of the properiy The_ palms lining the Barrett property may nave been planted lAer lihan the California Washingtonia palirns planted later than those of the Teiequav Vineyards The reasoning being that both the California Washingtonia and the Canary Island Date Palm can reach heights of 60 to 70 feet The Barrett palms are about 30 percent smaller than the California Washingtonia palms that line the Telegquah property and the Fresno Vineyards located on Me south side of Kings Canyon Road west of Peach Avenue Two arguments are made as to why the trees were planted along the roads of the. Easterby Rancho and there still begs the question of who was resporisibie for the planting of the trees One argument for the sfreetsrapes was for beautification and shade, the arugment that emphasis the planting of trees to denote the boundaries, of ones property seems more logical at feast on Kings Canyon Road As previously note h::o lypes of palms Ya ri? planted on Kings Canyon Avenue beta& -en ifl Allow and Peacfit Avenues TKis includes the California Washingtonia and the Canary Island Date Prtlm the Canary Island Date Palm was planted along the land, of G W Barren, whine the other property owners appear It have preferred the California 'Washingtonia The name most often associated with tree planting in the Easterby Rancho is Tll Theodore Kearney the sole propnetor by 1884 However, a review o1 both primary and secondary resources faros to make direct reference. to Kearney as planriny all of the trees in the Easterby Rancho Although, one can conclude that when one compares the mission olive trees and the California Washingtonia patens that line Minnewawa from Kings Canyon Road to Geary Streit anrt those found along Kearney Bouievard the influence of Kearney appears v?viderfl However. the same cannot be said for the trees pla,iled along Kings Canyon Road between present-day WThow Avenue and Peach Avenue Tne influence of individual property owners may have been thp overriding influence in this instance State of California The resources Agency Plirnary 0 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRIN BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD By the 1930s it was clear that the rural landscape of lands formerly belonging to A Y Easterby were undergoing change and this was in direr.l proportion to the grovin of the city of Fresno During the decrrdw of the 1920s the city's population ~went from 24,899 to 45.080 and by the end of the 1940 Fresno's population had lumped to 52,5t3 The demand Tor land for commercial and residential development tiaras slowly eradicating �:resno's eastern rural landscape By the late 1460s, the former lands of the Easterby rancho were giving way to urban sprawl By the early 1970s. the rlew IRS building had been cornpleted east of Che?,lriut Avenue between Butler and Lane Avenues The last vesliges of the Historic rural landscape known as the Easle:rby Rancho are the trees planted along the edge of the roads. within the Ranchr) Some of the stfeetscapes retain good integrity, while others have not weathered well over lime The trees that include mission elrve trees on lh? west side of Minnewawa and the California Washintonia on the east std? of MinnewaNva Avenue from Kings Canyon Road all Me way to Soulhern Paciric tracks Ir5 the south have survived the test of time However. the palm) trees that line K%ngs Canyon .Road between Willow and Mlirinewawa Avenues have been less rortuncate As previously nol,�, the paint trees on Me south side of Kings Canyon Road from ttie east and of The Project APE to Minne,+vawa Avenue were removed by 1979 the -.15 California Washmgtonia palm tries located :,rithin the Fresno City light-ct-way and within the project right-of- way were planted circa 18130. While the trees have integrity of location and materials. they have poor integrity related to Serfmg, d&Sig3l, association, and feeling Wdriin the context of the larger historic rural landscape, the palm trees within the APE tacit historic integrity As was previously suggested, the palm lree5 within the project ARE are part of those trees plat need belwe&ii V'tr Slew Avenue to the west, but if iS unclear as to how far earl they extended It is possoble that the Catifoinsa VVashinqtonias planted un the norlh side of the Kfnq!; Canyon Road may Tevaal how lac ru the east lnesrs trees extended The 1937 aerial phorograph may .uggest that the California Washmgtonia palms extended from Lor 74 to Lot 76 (east to vest) on the souti) side of Kings Canyon Road Tne palMiMISSion olive frees that line Minnewvawa Avenue south of Kings Canyon Read have historical integrity and while ibis landscape has evolved from one of agriculture to one A rural residences, this streetSCape Tetainw that rural flavnr The most prominent strvetscape in the Fresno area is Kearney Boulevard 11 ha5 withstood the test oS timer, with only some of the trees having to be removed in the name of progress and this occurred along a section of Chandler Airport The 2' palrri trees within the protect area appear to have been planted to donate propefty boundaries rathet than bang a part of a larger landscape, that being the Easterby Rzinche, which was the oldest developed cane io The first shipment of gram from Fresno came from the Easterby Rancho All that remains of the historic rural landscape known as the Easterby Rancho is the 17i3e-lined roads Whr1c some trees were planted as part of a de�;ignad landscape saiCri as the one on Miiinewawa AvenuF; south of King; Canyon Road, the trees planted vAlhin the project APE were planted to denote one or more pfop?rty owners Commercial and fr:sidential developments have altered the Rastefby rural landscape into an urban landscape. thus the anginal qualities of setting, design, feeling, waTRmanship, and association have been compromised Therefore, the trees. witluri ttie project APE, alone cannot be considered as a significant event at the focal regional or national levels Therefore, the palm trees are not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places undiyr Criterion A The trees are not ,associated with an important person Although M Theodore Keafncy has bF?en. mentioned In association +frith the planting of the trees along the roads within the Easterby Rancho. thwe is no direct evident,;' that he planted them or designed the roadside landscape within the protect APE The fart that Nvo ditlere:nl types of palfns are found along Kings Canyon Road just easel of tree protect APE strongly suggest the trees were planted by individual properly owners such as G VV Barrett -who apparently preferred the Canary island Date Palm to the California Washingtonia. preferred by others Therefore vrltiout direct evidence that Kearney plaided the trees wslhin the project APE and beyond the trees are not eligibie uncwr Colef inn 6 The trees are not ellgit)le under Criterion C because they do not embocy a type. period Ur method of construclion• and they are not associated 'r-'ith a amaster CTaltsgmn GDf'P 523E Test (1 1194} State of California ---The Resources Agency Primary ►s DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION riRla BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD The 2? patirn trees,rnthin itie ptofecl APE are not £legible for koing m ihr: htaiiorlal Register of 1­11MOHL Places, nor are. they eligible for The Cal0ornia Ragrster of Historical ke50urce& The properly was also evaluated anrl determined r,oi eligible for listing in the City of Fresno Lo:-al R*Igtsier of Hisloru: Resources Again integrity is established within the IargeT Insioric rural landscape defined as the Easterby Ranctro While tree trees nave integrity of location and materials- the group of trees have poor integrity as if relates to design, setting. and association The trees to do q�ci appear to be associaled with an event that made a significant contTibutrori to the broad pattern of our history, or arellhe trees avwl6ated with the lives of persons 5igniricant in our past Mile, it has been suggested that M Theo Kuarne" may hav6 beein instrumental in the planling of trees along moat of the roads wrthFn the Easterby Ranchc. ne d,r4A- FnTormatton was uncovered to sustain such an argument As a mailer of fact, the informalmn presented above strongly suggests that the iree5 within the APE were- planted by an individual property owner along vvith that person's neighbors The trees do not embody the dlshnrtive characteristics of a type. p4Errod of metnod of constiuct:on. or represents the work of a master, or possess nigh �rlif JtQ val�ies Therefote the trees collectively wit"un the pfolert APE are not eligible for the Local Register The property as a whole is not a hrslorical resource for the purposes of CEQA The palm trees vvould not be contributor to the larger group of pairn trees on Kings Canyon Road if the large{ group were to be evaluated and found eligible to the Nalronal Regrslef of Histoiir, Places, the California Register of Historic Resources, or the Fresno Local Register of Historic Resources t t I DPR 523E - Tesl ti 11+941 It W HISTORIC PROPERTY SURNI`A FOR TIIV ,CRANSIT VILLAGE P�2O.IL:C`f KFNGS CALNYON AND :kULE.R ik1;V,Nt!'VS INTHE CITY OF FRESNO, CALIFORNIA �:L�'17Q-a�•fSyi,�E-. f�„��i w, _ ri �: •.�7;7".4 �� _ 4 Submitted to: tils. Corrina L. Nunez Project IManaper i lousing & Community Dcliarhnent City of Fresno 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, California 93721 Submitted bs: 3 & R Environmental Scrvice 17900 Auherry Road Clr>vis. CA 9361 l August 28, 240i HISTORIC PROPERTY SURVEY FOR THE TRANSIT VILLAGE PROJECT KINGS CANYON API) ADLEiz AVF,NUES IN THE CITY OF FRESNO, CALIFORNIA r _ _'J j k a Y 1 - �r : 9 ' - , - Submitted to: Ms. Corrina L. Nunez Project Manager E lousing c& Community Department City of Fresno 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, California 93 72 1 Submitted by: J & R f nvironntental Services 17900 Aubem, Road Clovis, CA 93611 August 28, 200-9 IJ & It i nr rrnnrurnLiL Nyr i(— Nrstonc Property Survey for the Transit Village Project, Kings Canyon and Adler Avenues in the City of Fresno, Califamia This historic-<-"ra property within the Area of Potential Effects (APE) was Identified, recorded and evaluated (Appcndix C). It was determined ineligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places; it does not meet the Section 106 definition of a "historic property" (36 CFR 800. 16(l)); it was also determined not eligible for listing, in the California Register of Historical Resources; nor does it meet the criteria for listing in the City of Fresno Local Register of Historic Resources. Cori secluently, the property does not meet the CEQA definition of a "historical resource" ["Title 14 CCR §15004.5(a) (1)-(3)1. No further cultural resources investigation is recommended for the undertaking unless project plans are altered to include areas not covered by this study. t & h 6 ok,mrwr.A J WMV kWW 1'A(;T W Hrsforx ProperP/ Survey for the Transrf VWag(� Pro Cl Kincrs Canyco and Ad(er Avenues i(r the Cify of Fresno), Catihornia TABLE OF CONTENTS )EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I INTRODUCTION 1 PROJECT LOCATION 2 REGULATORY CONTEXT 5 .1...1 1'4A'1'1C)NAI- 1414STORX PRESERVATTON Ac' OF 1966 [16 U.S.0 470 FT ESW 5 3.2 C.OLIFORNIA EWRONMENTAT, QU-Aun* ACT h 3.3 CITY OF Fl1 E~,QO HTSTORIC; FRCSERVATIO it[)[NANCE. 7 RESEARCH METHODS 9 BACKGROUND 10 5.1 111s-rr,RICrl; cf-)Nl-L.x-r 10 5.2 FIRST iUROP�:ANS IN SAN,30A UIN VAl.1,EY 10 5..3 ESTADLISH,1JENT OF THk: 01-" OF 1'RESNO 1 1 5.4 THE Cr)l..raNY 5Y I'FM 12 ,5.4. 1 Easterbzo Rancho —A Rural L,n dsr°egy i 5 4.'2 Sosti�rbt; Razzcho—A C•haugrn,l Landscape l f> RESULTS AND FINDINGS 19 6.1 H3STORIC RESUsIRC H 19 6.2 :SIT'T: EVALUATIUNS I() b.2. 1 Palm Trees FroFr l r1a1 AlIN 472 021 01 19 RECOMMENDATIONS 25 REFERENCES 26 BOOKS, MANUSCRIPTS 20 MAPS '27 FERSONAL COMMUNICATION 28 APPEriDIX A:_ PROFESSIONAL. QU.ALIFICATIONS 29 APPSND X B: RDC2R�PEAR.q1{ 30 APPENDiN C: DPR FORMS 523A & 523B 33 I & R Fnvironnunl.il Sr, - r. Histn,"c Propeft'y Swvi y for thr iraosre Village Prorpct, Xrugs C<7n}`077 and Adler Avenues in the City of f=p_-sno, californra FIUQREs FI(yURE 1: PROJECT LOCATION 3 FIGURE 2: PROJECT AREA OF POTENTIAL EbJfL.C7.'i 4 FIGURE 3: 1937 AERIAL PrIGTOGRAPH 14 FIGURE 4. CALIFORNIA WASHINGiroNTA PALM 15 FIGURE 5: CARHARY ISLAND DATE PALM 16 FiGu 6: 1950 AERJAL PH01-ocRAPH 16 FIGURE 7- 1979 "RIAL PHOTOGRAPH 17 FIGURE 8: 1950 AERIAL SHOWING Trzu-LINED ROADS 20 t & It in,i—nmrrrl.il \e•rvrr <_, H- stone Properry Survey for the Transit Vdtage Project. Kings Canyon W d Adfer Avenues m fhe City o1 Fresr•.o Catrfomma 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION' The project consists of the development of a vacant 5.3 acre parcel (Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 472-021-01) into a transit village that will includc° a multi-irrodal transit hub, higher density housing and public open space. The housing; portion may include U.S. Department of Housing; and Urban Development (HUD) funded affordable senior housing as well as market rate housing. The City of Fresno will use HUD Home Investment Partnerships (HOME) Program funds to assist in the development of the proposed 100-unit complex for seniors and other affordable housing opportunities. The proposed development also includes approximately 15,000 square feet of common space (library, gathering space, small kitchen, and game room) and possibly an open recreational area. Since the development of the project may result in the need to remove and/or possibly relocate a fewof the palm trees, in the project area, adjacent to Kings Canyon Road. It may be necessary to remove and/or relocate a few of the palm trees to allow for construction equipment and ultirna�ely public and bus traffic to enter and exit the premises safely. HOME Pro -rain funds as well as other federal funding; sources will be used to fund a portion of this project. As these federal funding sources constitute a federal undertaking, it will be necessary to comply with the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as amended. It is the responsibility of the City of Fresno to determine if the proposed undertaking has the potential to affect historic properties, if present. The report also fulfills California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements that mandate public agencies determine whether a project will have a significant impact on important historical resources. For- the purposes of the present project, staff of J & R Environmental Services performed the architectural survey in accordance with the requirements of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 USC 470 et esq,), which sets national policy for protecting historic properties and the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA; PRC §21000, ct seq.). The survey was conducted by Jon L. Brady (J & R Environmental Services) who meets the 8 N EnvirnanunW Srrti'icc% PAC J 2 His(Gnc Properly Survey for the Tram el Vdtage Pa3yW Kinp Canyon and Adter Avenues in (fie Cj!y of Fra.wo. Catilorn,a Secretary of Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for architectural historv. 2.0 PROJECT LOCATION: The proposed project area is confined to the property identified as Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) 472-02 1-01. However, the Area of Poter!: ial Effects (APE-) for the current architectural survey includes the subject properrty (APN 472- 021-01), plus the palm trees within the City of Fresno right.-of-�,vay that front the aforementioned parcel (refer to Figure 3), The project area is further defined as being on the Malaga, California, 7.5-Minute USGS topographical quadrangle (1964; Photo Revised 1981) in a portion of Section 7 of Township 14 South, Range 21 East , Mount Diablo Base and Meridian. J & R F;nvirrinntrnlHl lrrvicr. I,.%f "I 11 Y LIEN TCiRA :I'A VE �� 3 ! f CANYON f I ..Mrrra.wlDrwd A=. r Rod in >!..Id 1 �■ rr��ri ��. lrrr ■rra ■I.aa dill= --- �lp r e 0 &■*c Mar r41a�a�rs, ('all Inmu C�4urIr3nEl�, '..5 M nuA{ I yti I r 1-liSIOM PrOperty Survey for the Transit Vrliaye Protect, Kings Canyorl and Adler Avenues In the Crly of Fresno, California = ■ _ G ■ L r • ■ ■ ■ 1 ■ < ■• 06 ■ � 6Y I i • ' R ■ A MEW J O i I r [4 AVE c ■ pk 4 `*1 i l ■ � I� �r ■ I A Nn[ Tu �Cjlc Figure 1: Project Location (Northeast V. of Section 7, T 14 South, R 21 East) .1 & R 1 nvirn�rrnAnl•1 �rnirer PA f; l } 01'storc Property Survey for the transit ViNage Project, Kings Canyon and Adfer Avenues in the Cify of Fresno, Cadomra ', - M1 fir, i ^��� i � a � s7► � <'S �` �• � `'3 (� r. ITIN _5 I Jl rli I 1 y Figure 2. Project APE J & R Environmental Services PA( I I f-f,sfonc P+aptwTy Survey for 110 rraw-W V,ffagc. Prc�ecf. Kings i, nyon andAdfer A-jex+vesin Me CilyolFresno. Cglrfgmio 3.0 REGULATORY CONTEXT 3.1 NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT OF 1966 [16 U.S.G. 470 ET ESQ] The National Historic Preservation Act (NI -IPA) sets forth national policy for protecting historic. properties. Under Section 106 federal agencies al-(, mandated to take into account the effects of federal undertakings on historic properties affected by federally funded or federally approved undertakings. The NHPA also established the National Register of l-listoric Places and state historic preservation programs administered by a State Historic- Preservation Officer (SHPO). It established the Advisory Council on Historic Presei-vation, Lin independent agency that is responsible for implementing; Section 106. The Advisory Council Section 106 regulations are found at 36 CFR 800 - 800. 16. National Register Regulations are published in 36 CFR 60, and Determination of EiigibillLy Regulations is published in 36 CFR 63, The National Register criteria for evaluating the significance; of properties for the National Register of Historic Places were designed to provide a broad spectrum of opportunities to recognize diverse parts of our heritage. Each criterion is developed to deal with a separate area of significance. Four dements offer opportunity for significance. The criteria for evaluation as provided for in National Register Bulletin 16 (1990:2) are as follows: Tire quality of significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, arid culture is present in districts, sites. buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of'locution, design, selling, materials, workmanship, Peeling, and association, and: �/ l , ■ ,Criterion A - that are hazie made a significant pattern of'ozir history; or associated uAt h. events that contribution to the broad ■ Criterion B - that are associated with the lives of J & R EnvirunmraMt Srnicr% Histor.c Property Survey for the Transd Vdfargg Protecf, Kings Canyc,n and Adh^r Avenues rn the Ctry of Fresno. California persons irjntftcant In ourpast; or ■ Criterzon C - thut embody the distinetiuc characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that posses high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack indiuiduul distinction, or ■ Criterion D - that have yielded, or may be Iikely to yield, information important in prehisiortJ or histo% 3.2 CALIFoRNLA ENvIRONMEHTAL QUALITY ACT The California Environmental Q)ua.lity Act (CEQA) requires consideration of project impacts on archaeological or historical sites deemed to be "historical resources." A substantial adverse change in the significant qualities of a historical resource is considered a significant impact_ For the purposes of CEQA, a "historical resource," is a resource listed in, or determined to be eligible for listing in, the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR). Historical resources may include, but is not limited to: 1) A resource listed in, or determined to be eligible by the State Historical Resources Commission, for listing in the California Register o1' Historical Resources (Pub. Res. Code SS5024, 1, Title 14 CCR, Section 4850 et seq.); (2) A resource included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in section 5020.1(k) of the Public Resources Code or tdcntific�d as significant in an historical resource survey meeting the requirements section 5024.1(g) of the Public Resources Code, shall be presumed to be historically or culturally significant. _JrPublic agencies must treat any such resource as significant unless the preponderance of evidence demonstrates that it is not historically or culturally significant; J & R Ynvironmenral Seniee-, PA( -.I 7 Hisfom FrOpPily Survey for fhe Transrr Vi8age PrQ;Qcf, Kings Canyon ar)d Adler Aveaues rrr the (irry of Fresno, Gariforrrra (3) Any abject, building, structure., site, area, 1) ace, record or manuscript which a lead agency determines- to bc historically sil;nihcant in the architectural, engineering;, scientific economic, agricultural, educational, social, polilic.al, military, or cultural annals of California. . .[14 Califoornia Code of Regulations (CCR) 15064.5(a)(1-3)]. The elilihilit}r criteria for the California Register are the definitive criteria for assessing tlae sigllifacance of historical resources for the purposes of CL0A (Office of Historic Preservation n.d.). Generally, a resource shall be considered "historicalhr significant" if it meets the criteria for listilsg on the C'HCR, ras defined In the Public Resources Code (PRC): (1) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of Californi<a's histcarz and cultural heritage. (2) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past. (3) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high r:artistic values. (4) Has yielded, or may bc; likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. [PRC 5024. I (c)]. 3.3 City of Fresno Historic Preservation Ordinance The City of Fresno Historic Preservation Ordinance (Fresno Municipal Code, Chapter 13, Article 4) established ra Historic Preservation Commission and a Local Register of 1-listoric Resource~. Any building;, structure, object, or site may be designated as a historical resource and listed on (lie Local Register if the Historic Preservation Commission and the Fresno City Council find that .1 & R EMicunnunlal Senirrs Historic Property Survey for the Transit Village Project, Kings Canyon and Adler Avenues in the City of Frosno, Callomia the resource is more than 50 years old; possesses integrity of location, design, setting, materials, Gvorkmanship, feeling, and association; aUld meets at least one of the following criteria: It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or ii. It is associated %vith the lives of persons significant in our Past; or iii. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values; or iv. It has yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history,. [Fresno Municipal Code, Chapter 13, Article 4] .1 & R Fmirill] mnUal5rrvirci 11,Nr 11 `) NrsfUi;L + cipc;rfy Survey for f" Transrf Vi age Frc}ecl, Kmys Canyon a rO Adler Avpriiee.s m Wre OYy N Fresno. Cakfom a 4.0 RESEARCH METHODS: The City• of Fresno, Department of Housing and CommLrnity Developrmm( rclainc,d the services of J Pr, R Environmental Scrvict�ti to conduct "m architectural survey of the project 'area as described ahove. Archival research was conducted at the California Roam, Fresno County Public Library, the. Fresno County Hall of Records, and at the Ilenry Madden Library at California State University, Fresno, �md the files of the I [stork Preservation Office for the City of Fresno. A record search (PS 404-217) was cornpleted for the proposed project are�r. The record search (refer to Appendix B) was undertaker► to cic-Ici— pine the existence and characteristics of all previously recorded cultural resources within the general vicinity of the l�rojcct area. Records m�ips and file~ at the Southern San Joaquin information Center of the Cafifornia Arc hacologicaI Inventory, California State UniversitT, Bakersfield were consulted and indicated that there have been no previous archaeological investigations on the subject property; there: had been one previous archaeological survey condc.rc.ted (FRE-257) irrimcdiately adjacent to the APE. There have bec°ri Ihrec previous cultural resource si-trveys conducted within a '.,l mile radius. There are no recorded cultural resources within the project APE, and it is not known if resources exist there. There are three recorded cultural resources within a V-2-mile radius of the project APE, P-10-004763, 4765, and 4767. There are no cultural resources within the project APE that are currently listed on the National Register of Historic Places, thc: California Register, California Points of Historical Interest, the California Inventon_r of Historic Resources, or any known local registry. .I & 41 Fncironrywmal Scryice. PAt;I 10 Nrslanc Property Surrey for the Transil Wage Project, Kmgs Canvon and Adler Avenues in the City of Fresno Caf fumia 5.0 BACKGROUND: 5.1 HISTORICAL CONTEXT: For the present study, only one property, a row of palm trees located within the City of Fresno's right-of-way and extending t-he length of the parcel identified as APN 472-02 1-01 was evaluated within the project APE. The appropriate theme within which this property was evaluated is a Rural historic Landscapes." The National Regist(,r Bulletin 15 defirres a rural historic landscape as: A geographical area that historically has been used by people, or shaped or modified by human activity, occupancy, or intervention, and that possesses a significant concentration, linkage, or continuity of areas of land use, vegetation, buildings and structures, roads and tvaterruays, and natural features (rid: 15). The bulletin further defines the landscape characteristics as follows: Laridscape characteristics are the tangible evidence of the activities and habits of the people who occupied, developed, used, and shaped the landscape to serve human needs; they may reflect the beliefs, attitudes, traditions, and values of these people (nd:15). 5.2 FIRST E Ropmm IN SAN JoAQum VALLEY: The first Spaniards to possibly visit the lower foothill region of the western Sierra were an exploring expedition led by ._lose ,Joaquin Moraga. Clough (1968:9) notes that Moraga entered "the northern end of the valley and traveled south as far as Madera County, forded the river and traveled east one day.,, .1 & It Envirnnmcia ni SeF-icr5 Hisronc Property Survey for lie rransil w:doq& Fra)oct, K)ngs Canyon and Adler Avenues in Me Cify of Fresno Cakfvrrua Early nineteenth ccntur}? contact with valley Indians came as a result of punitive actions by Spanish soldiers seeking runaway HC0J-) aytCS (mission Indians) and military deserters. During the Mexican period, severer] expeditions into the valley resulted in Indians being; captured and returned to the missions. One expedition led by Sergeant Jose Pico in January 1826 either pissed through or near Gashow-u territory. Another expedition that may have made contact with the GashOWu was that of Sebastian Rodriguez ir► 1828. Between 1828 and 1837, Mariano Guadalupe Vallejo would make a number of punitive expeditions into the valley (Crampton 1932:3). According; to one source some of the local Indians were missionized, as some 49 Gashowu names appear in the local Book of Baptism at Soledad Mission (1701- 1846). The close proximity of Soledad Mission which lids approximately one hundred miles from the project area may suggest that the Gashowu were significantly by the Spanish and Mexican expeditions into the Valley. Most certainly, during the 1840s both Mexicans and Anglos would come into the area in greater numbers, arid as more came into the valley, their visits became more permanent. The discover), of gold in 1848 would ultimately bring thousands of forturic seekers into the lower mother lode area and with it greater potential of conflict between Indians and miners. So much so that by 1851, soldiers were sent into the area in response to the Mariposa Indian War. Eventually, z military . post was built oil the south bank of the San Joaquin River about two mile-, above Friar -it and twelve, miles southwest of Auberr-y. The following year Camp Barbour was moved downstream and renamed Fort Miller, Actually, there was a settlement of miners at this locale which would change its name from Rootville to Fort Miller. The major industries of the area were farming and cattle. 5.3 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE CITY OF F RESNO: As the State's population continued to grow, new counties were being formed. Fresno Counter was formed in 1856 and carved from portions of Mariposa, Merced and Tulare Counties. The City of Fresno was established by the Central Pacific Railroad in 1872 (Brady 1985.6). By 1874 the City of Fresno had become the county seat for Fresno County. Thirteen vears later the city incorporated. The city's population in 1885 was 1,1 12 (Carter- nd. 5). J & R EnvirorimentAl Servicrs HrsJanc Property Scrrvoy for the Transit Village Project, Kings Canyon and AdJer Avenues in the City of Fresno, California 5.4 THE COLONY SYSTEM: Aside from the railroad, the colony system, agriculture and land speculation made. Fresno the focal point in the San Joaquin Valley. The success of agriculture and the colony system were directly linked to one another. Land Speculators developed the colony system to entice people to Fresno. They purchased large tracts of land, dividing them into 20-acre lots. As an additional selling point roads were laid out and in some cases landscaping was included. Promoters advertised these colonies as self-contained units with ample water to grow crops and to raise a family. These promotions were very successful and contributed to the growth of Fresno County and ultimately, the city of Fresno. Land agents portrayed the Fresno area in a very positive light. They went so far as to stress the advantages of living in the colonies as opposed to city life. Their efforts are captured in the following advertisement.: Better Than City Property —A Homestead With an Income! Persons of Sedentary or Confining; Situations may Establish a Healthful and Delightful Business, and Acquire an Elegant and Paying Homestead in Four or Five Year [s] by a Moderate Monthly Payment in the Central California Colony of Fresno, and Need Not Retire from their Present Business until the -New One has Become a paying Institution! -Twenty Acres of Raisins are Worth $5000 a Year! Twenty Acres of Prunes are Worth $10,000 a Year! A small Monthly Payment will secure a Twenty -acre Tract in the Suburbs of Fresno, a Rapidly Growing To,. n-Only Nine Hours from San Francisco by Rail - The Perfection of California Climate! -No Fever and Ague! The Natural Home of the Fig, Citron, Raisin, Prunc, Olive, Walnut, Almond, Orange, Lemon! (Winchell 1933:136), Landscaping was an important part of the development of the colonies and by the 1880s one of the more popular trees to be planted was a variety of palm trees in Fresno and other communities within the San Joaquin Valley. Palm - lined drives could be found especially in the San Joaquin Valley continuing into the early 20th Century. Palms were the preferred tree because they prospered here in the valley. In an article published in the Pacific Rural Press (44) dated 1892, the writer, W. S. Lyon, exhorted the reorders to get out and J & R Fnvirnnmentsl Services Histonc Property Survey for 1he Transit Village Project, Kings Cariyon and Adler Avenues jn the City of Fresno. California huatitifv monotonous coinity roads in the Central V,.►lley with ornamental trees. Th(- article suggested that Southern California was the first area to utilize this type of landscaping in the 1880s. During the 1880s there was a land boom and large houlevards were decorated with various types of trees, of' which the palm tree was the most popular (Padilla 1961). As evidenc(�,d by some of the older boulevards in Fresno, palm trees were popular in the colonies as well. Planting the trees may have served one of the following purposes: (1) To beautify the colonies; (2) denote property boundaries for others; (3) and/or provide pedestrians with shade from the summer heat common to the Fresno area. Trees, especially palm trees, became a part of the cultural landscape of Fresno and the surrounding areas. 5.4.1 EASTER.BY RANCHO - A RURAL LANDSCAPE: Beyond the colony system several sections of land, a portion of which is located within the project APE, was owned exclusively by A. Y. Eastcrby. As a member of Lhe so-called German Syndicate, Easterbyy had invested in the purchase of 80,000 acres prior to the corning of the railroad. After the Central Pacific Railroad purchased approximately 4,500 acres from the syndicate, the rest of the land was divided up among the investors. One's share was in proportion to that one's financial investment in the purchase of the land from William Chapman. Eastcrby received 5,000 acres of land cast of Fresno (Eaton 1965: 14; DcLeuw, Cather and Company 1990:8). Easterbv would collaborate with Moses Church and engineer Robert Edmiston in an effort to bring water to lands owned by Eastcrby. A system of irrigation ditches and canals delivered water from the Kings River to the east. Faucher Creek, a natural drainage was used as the primary delivery system. The development of the Easterby's 2,560-acre Rancho came about only through the success of the irrigation system. Within months of the completion of it, the Rancho lands were planted in wheat. The Eastc-,rby Rancho encompassed Sections 5-8 of Township 14 South, Range 21 Gast (M.D.B.cz M) and was bounded by present-day Belmont Avenue to the north, Clovis Averirte to the cast, Chestnut Avenue to the west, and the Southern Pacific tracks (known then as the Stockton 8& Tulare Railroad) on the south. In 1877, the Rancho became the property of William O'Brien, a J & k E"Oranmcntyl Serviecs PAW- 14 Nevada bank tycoon at the time, but upon his death, shortly thereafter, M. Theo Kearney and N. K. Masten purchased the 2560-acre estate. Beginning in June 1880, the property was subdivided into 20, 40, 60- acre units, but the most notable buyers included A. B_ Butler (420 acres), George H. Malter (160 acres), the Margherita Vineyard Company (360 acres); and H. Granz (80 acres) (Wincheil 1933:138- 139). historic property Survey for the Transit Village Project, Kings Canyon and Adler Avenues in the CNy of Fresno, Calitamia By the end of 1880, Kearney had bought out Masten's interest in the venture, Kearney along with Lachman and Jacobi formed the Fresno Vineyard Company and retaining 400 acres (Winchell 1933: 138). Members of the board included L. P. Drexler, President, .Joseph Brandenstein, Vice -President, George W, Beaver, Lachman & Jacobi: Trustees, and M, Theo Kearney, Manger. Some of the investors may have been encouraged after reading an article in the Fresno Expositor in the fall of 1879 in which Kearney's ventures in Fresno are reported. The article read as follows: It is proposed to calf this new enterprise the VINEYARD COLONY, and particular effort will be Trade to secure as settlers, people that are acquainted with grape culture, with a viers to making wine and raisin making as the prominent feature of the enterprise. The new scheme will be under the control of M. Theo Kearney, a gentlemen who knows how to push it. He was here last week arranging the preliminaries for starting up the enterprise. From the onset, Mr. Kearney was hard at. work making improvements on ti-le 400 acre property (located adjacent to and east of the project APE). it has J & R Enriranmrntrl Srrvim His tOOC Prcperfy Survey fur the T,-2nsrt Village Per e, flings Cirrnyor+ and Adler Avp-num in ME? City of Fresno, Cat+fDmfa been sugg stcd that under his supervision, some eighty men along with 100 horses wore utilized to survey, plow, anti build canals and levees, as well a5 planting; trees along streets in the area today known as "5unnyside", located in southeast Fresno (Rehart and Patterson, 1988: 13). The Fresno Republicaft dated ,Ianuary 22, 1881 noted that the planting of vines in the recently purchased 400 acres by the Fresno Vineyard Company was progressing under the supct-Vision of M. Theo Kearney. According to Rehart Barad Patterson (1988: 13), Mr. Kearney has been credited with having assisted 'in the planting; of many of the trees along some of the ne,�v streets. These streets included Butler (originally known aS Muscatel Street), Kings Canyon (known as Zinfandel Avenue in 1880s), and Minnew awa (forrnerly knowvri as Mal lg;a) Avenues. The trees along; Kings Canyon between present-day Willow and Peach Avenues included both the California Washingtonia (Washirigtnrua filiferu) and the Canary Island Date. Palm (Phoenix conarlensis). On Peach and BuLler Avenues it was the n-iission olive trees. 011 Minnew wa Avenue between Kings Canyon Road and Geary Street, moth the California Washingtonia and the mission olive trees were planted under the supervision of M, Theo Kearney (Karen Musson, Personal Communication 2005). The palm trees that presently line Kings C<anvon Read between Willow Avenue and Peach Avenue a -re more likely associated with the individual vineyards located on either side of the road. For example, the. California Washingtonia palms viewed in Figure 4 extend the length of the former the Telequah Vineyards that occupied Lefts 53, 54, and 55 of thi' Easterby Rancho. It appears that G. H. Barrett chose the Canar Island Date Palm (refer to Figure 5) to line his property along the north Sid Kings Canyon Roacl on birth the west and east sides of Peach Avenue. His property included LA)t 50 (on the west side of present-day Peach Avenue) and Lot 57 (on the east side present-day Peach Avenue) and the northern half of Lot 58 (Thompson 1891; FID 1937). The date palms in fact coincide with southern property line of the Barrett property. A 1p50 FID aerial photograph supports this theory (refer to Figure 6). .1 & R 1{n%irnnmemal 1cr%iccN P,vt-,I if The California Washingtonia appears to have lined much of the north side of the Fresno Vineyards (on the south side of Kings Canyon Road). As a matter of fact these palm trees were planted along the project area (Lot 75) and an adjacent lot (Lot 76) to the west, all the way to present-day Willow Avenue. The Canary Island Date Palm and the California Washingtonia may have been planted at different times as both trees can reach a height of 65 feet (MacMahon 1985). At present the California Washintonia palms are about 60 to 70 feet tall. The Canary Island Date Palms are about 35 to 40 feet tall. i NrslGP.0 Property Survey for the Transit Village Project, Kings Canyon and Adler Avenues in the City of Fresno. Calitomia i&un• S. View oFCaniry blind Darr Palma tiu[ fronwd Ote land, (AG. II - BArrett. Ovcr the last seventy years the rural landscape of the Easterby Rancho has undergone significant changes. 5.4.2 EASTERBY R"cHo—A CHANGING LANDSCAPE; The former lands of A. Y. Easterby have undergone significant changes since the early 1900s. Today, the area once dominated with wineries and vineyards have succumbed to progress. Both commercial and residential developments have altered the historic rural landscape. .I A; R Envirronmcnlal Service% ['A [; F 17 Hislom Prouty Survey for lire Transit Village Prolecf. Y,rrrgs Canyon and Adler Avenues en Me Cary of Fresno, CaWarmi By the mid-1930s the earlier large vineyards established in SCCtiOns 5-8 had been further subdivided into smeller 20-acre lots or less. The former Butler Vineyards located in the northwest one -quarter of Section 7, were part of the Sunnyside Terrace subdivision in 1935, although this land would not be commercially developed until the 1970s. A portion of the former Tclequah Vineyards (Lot 53) located on the north side of Kings Canyon Road directly across from the APE was developed as part of the Ventura Tract in 1936 y (Progressive Map Company 1937), The Fresno Vineyard property was - eventually purchased by Mosesian &, Sons, Inc., also the owner of a warehouse and cold storage plant on Q Street in downtown Fresno (Bulbulian 2001:50). Mr. Mosesian converted the former winery into a raisin pecking facility with the vineyards being grafted over to Thompson Seedless for table grapes as well as raisins (Musson and Williams 1999:4). Whilc no photos dating earlier than 1936 could be located, a 1937 Fresno Irrigation District aerial photograph (refer to Figure 3) details the rural landscape of the Easterby Rancho as well as the palm trees along Kings Canyon Road between Willow and Minricwawa Avenues, Between 1950 and 1951, approximately one - quarter of a mile of palm trees were rernoved from the north side. of Lots 69 and 70 located on the south side of Kings Canyon Road on the southwest corner of its intersection with Minnewawa Avenue. By 1979 all of the palm trees east of the project APE on the south side of Kings Canyon Road were remove . dAlong with the removal of the trees, apartment buildings were constructed on b)t 74 of the former Easterby Rancho between 1979 and 1995; this lot is located adjacent to a.nd east of the project APE. By 2002 all vestiges of the former Fresno Vineyard Winery had been replaced with commercial and residential development with the exception of a 10-acre parcel located on the southwest corner of Peach and Kinks Canyon Avenues. .l & R EnvirmIF"CnINI Services. f A('.I. 18 Restore: Pruperiy Survey (Or t!ie Transit Village Ptofed, iGrgs C,�riyk)n aF) Adfvt Avenues in IN- airy of Fresno, Catrforrim Some of the palm trees at the entrance to the project area (APN 472-021-01) appear to have also been removed bemeen 19(:) l and 1979 thus widening the entrance to approximately 150 feet (refer to Figure 4). While it is unclear as to why these palm trees were removed, it is possible that. the construction of the Elk's Lodge in the latter 1950s r-nay have: led to the removal of them to widen the entrance to the Elk's Lodge off E. Kings Canyon Road. The apparent removal of the trees is evident when comparing the 1937 and 1979 Fresno District Irrigation aerial photographs for this particular area. Upon further review of these same aerial photographs, approximately 70 percent of the palm trees on the south side of Kings Canyon Road east of the project APE all the way tcf Minnewawa Avenue have been removed. All that remains of the historic rural landscape known as the Easterby Rancho are the trees planted along the reads. While some of the roads like Minnewawa Avenue have had minimal losses of trees due to natural and man- made events, a large percentage of the trees along Kings Canyon Road between Willow and �i0innew�3wa Avenues have been removed for one reason or another. For example, within the last 20 years, Wal-Mart built one of their stores on lwid formerly part of the Telequah Vineyards (Lot 53). The entrance to Wal-Mart is located on Kings Canyon Road. Several of the California Washingtonia palms were removed to make room for the entrance. There are no extant buildings on the project APE, .r & R En%iriuinienlvl Scrvice� 1'A(,i l `.) Hfstonc property Survey for fhe Transd ViOacp Prq� 1. Kings Canyon and Adler A venues in 1he City of Fresno Caf,lamta 6.0 RESULTS AND FINDINGS 6.1 HISTORic RESEARCH The following historic period property was identified within the project APE: ■ Palm Trees in City of Fresno Right of Way fronting the p.{rcel identified as APN 472-021-01. 6.2 SITE EVAULATION 6.2.1 Palm Trees Fronting APN 472-021-01 The lands within the project APE date back to the early- 1870s when the land was owned by A. Y. Easterby who purchased 5,000-acres of land from the so- called Gerrnmi Syndicate. A portion of the land was developed and became kno«,z as the Easterby Rancho. In 1880, M. Theodore Kearney anti N. K. Masten bought the 2560-acre property from William ()'Brian who had purchased the property in 1877. The Easterby Rancho was eventually split into lot sizes of 20, 40, 60, 80, 160, and 320-acres. However, some of the best land located along present-day Kings Canyon Road was purchased by notable individuals that included A. B. Butler', who took 420 acres; George H. Malter acquired 160 acres; the Margherita Vineyard Company acquired 360 acres; H. Granz bought 80 acres; and Kearney, Lachman, and Jacobi formed the Fresno Vineyard Company and established a winery and vineyards on another 392 acres. While it is generally accepted that one of the goals of Kearney and others watt to plant trees along most of the roads within the Easterby Rancho, one cannot assume that all of the trees were planted at the same time. Reference is made to M. Theo Kearney being a part of a project that resulted i.n the planting of a variety of trees along some: of the streets within Easterby Rancho for the purposes of beautification, denoting property boundaries for others, and providing pedestrians with shade from the summer heat common to the Fresno area. While mission olive trees were planted along Peach Avenue as well as Butler Avenue, palm trees where planted along both sides of Kings .1 & R hivirunnrrntal 5cr%irr, N(J: 20 Hestonc PropErty Survey for Me Tr,aiml Village Pfofcd, Kings Canyon and Adler Avenues in the City of Frgsno. Cahlc-nja Canyon Read (historically known as Zinfandel Avenue) from present-day Willow Avenue to Minnewawa Avenue, but it does riot appear that the trees were all planted at the same time. If one assumes the trees «rcre planted as part of the designed landscape along Kings Canyon Road between Willow and Minngwawa, one might think that the same type of trees, California Washintonia, would have been planted. More importantly, trees would be planted along both sides of the Kings Canyon Road. This does not appear to be the case; most of this information is based on aerial photographs dating from 1937 to 1979 (FID). It appears there were at least two varieties of palm trees planted along Kings Canyon Road in the latter 1800s. The trees planted along the frontage of the Telequah Vineyards on the north side of Kings Canyon Road directly across from the project APE were California Washingtonia palms as was the south side of Kings Canyon Road from Willow Avenue to the east end of the project APE. Based on the 1937 FID aerial photograph, the trees planted along the J & R Envirnnmcnlxl )rrvices l'A("i. 21 H,sfonc Property Survey lorMe TrdnsN VWage P!Oyecf. Kings Canyon and Adler Avenue& in the Ctfy of Fn-5no. Cahtwma Teiequah Vineyards and those planted on the south side. of Kimgs C'rtnvon Road from present-day Willow Avenuc to the cast end of the project APE appear to have been planted at the same time. The trees appear to have been planted to denote property, boundaries. One might argue that the trees, especially those within the project APT, were part of a designed landscape, but the research strongly suggests the trees were planted through the efforts of individual property owners rather than the owner of the Easterbv Rancho, M. Theo Kearney. It has been suggested that Kearney was hard at work developing an irrigation system for his Fresno Vineyards, along with planting vines as well as trees. The trees planted along the northern boundary of the, Fresno Vineyards from the eastern edge of the project API: to Minruwa%va maV have indeed been planted by M. Theo Kearney, unfortunately, bY 1y(-)1 sorlw of the trees had been removed and by 1979 the rest of the trees fronting the northern boundary of the Fresno Vineyards on the south side of Kings Cl-rayon Road had been removed. The second variety of palm trees found on Kings Canyon Road is the Canary Island Date Palm (Phoetiir canariensis); these trees appears to have fronted thc former lands of G. H. Barrett; this included Lots 54 and 55 on the west side of Peach Avenue and Lot 56 on the east side of the same avenue. The palri-Is lining the Barrett property may have been planted later than the Callf'Ornia Washingtonia palms that lined the southern boundary of the Telequah Vineyards. While both the California Washingtonia and the Canary Island Date Palm can reach heights of 60 to 70 feet, the Barrett palms are about 30 percent smaller than the California Washingtonia palms of the («rrrfcr- Telequah Vineyards. i There appear to be two separate plausible argtrmcnts as to why the trees were � planted along the roads of the Easterby Rancho. While one can argue that sorne streets lined with trees were indeed intended to be streetscapes such as along Minnewaw-a south of Kings Canyon Road; the planting of trees to denote the boundaries of one's property seems more logical at least on Kings Canyon Road. As previously note two types of palms -were planted on Kinks Canyon Avenue between Willow and Peach Avenues. This included the California Washingtonia and the Canary Island Date Palm. The Canary Island Date Palms were planted along the lands of G. H. Barrett, while it is possible the other property owners along Kings Canyon Road preferred the California Washingtonia palms. J & R Envirnnmeneil .Services P A(1I ) 2 1 estonc Property Survey for the Transit Village Protect. Kings Canyon and Adler Avenues in the City of Fresno. California The name most often associated with tree planting in the Easterby Rancho is M . "i huodore Kearney. HO%vever, a review of both primary and secondary resources failed to note any direct reference to Kearney as having planted all of the trees in the Easterby Rancho. Although, the trees planted along Minnewawa from Kings Canyon Road to Geary Street appear to have been planted by M. Theo Kearny (Musson and Williams, 2000). However, the same cannot be said for the trees planted along Kings Canyon Road between present-day Willow Avenue and Peach Avenue. The influence of individual property owners may have been the overriding influence in this instance. By the 1930s, it was clear that the rural landscape of lands formerly belonging to A. Y. Easterby were undergoing change and this was in direct proportion to the growth of the city of Fresno. During the decade of the 1920s the city's Population went from 24,892 to 45,080 and by the end of the 1940 Fresno's population had jumped to 52,513. The demand for land for commercial and residential development was slowly eradicating Fresno's eastern rural landscape, By the late 1960s, the former lands of the Easterby Rancho we're giving way to urban sprawl. By the early 1970s, the new IRS building had been completed east of Chestnut Avenue between Butler and Lane Avenues. The last vestiges of the historic rural landscape known as the Easterby Rancho are the trees planted along the edge of the roads within the Rancho. Some of the strec:tscapes retain good integrity, while others have not weathered well over time. The trees that include mission olive trees on the west side of Minncwawa and the California Washingtonia on the east side of Minnewa�va Avenue from Kings Canyon Road all the way to Southern Pacific tracks in the south have survived the test of time. However, the palm trees that line Kings Canyon Road between Willow and Minncwawa Avenues have been less fortunate. As previously note, the palm trees on the south side of Kings Canyon Road from the east end of the project APE to Minncwawa Avenue were removed by 1979. The 27 California Washingtonia palm trees located within the Fresno City right-of-way and within the project right-of-way were planted circa 1880. While the trees have integrity of location and materials, they have poor integrity related to setting, design, association, and feeling. Within the context of the larger historic rural landscape, the palm trees within the APE lack. historic integrity. As was previously suggested, the palm trees within the project APE are part of those trees planted between Willow Avenue to the west, but it is unclear as to how far east. they extended. It is possible that. the California Washingtonia palms planted on the north side of the Kinks Canyon Road may reveal how far to the east these trees extended. The 1937 aerial .I & R Euvironmenlal Service% f' Ac,I 23 Hrvvic Property Survey for fh9 Trarrsrf WJage Pica ecf, Ken gs Canyon or)d Adler Avenues m free C�fy of FTspo, California photograph may suggest that the California WashmgtL)nla paln75 extended from Lot 74 to Lot 70 (east to west) on the south side of Kings Canyon Road. The palm/mission olive trees that line. Minnewawa Avenue south of Kings Canyon Road have historical intc grity and while the landscape has evolved from one of agriculture to one of rural residences, this strectscape retains that rural flavor. The most prominent strcctscape in the Fresno area is Kearney Boulevard. It has withstood the test of time with only some of the trees having to be removed in the name of progress and this occurred along a section of Chandler Airport. The 27 palm trees within the project area appear to have been planted to denote property boundaries rather than being a part of a larger landscape, that being; the Easterby Rancho, which was the oldest dcvclopcd rancho. The First shipment of grain from Fresno came from the Easterby Rancho. All t remains of the historic rural landscape: known as the Easterby Rancho is tree -lined roads. While some trees were planted as part of a designed landscape such as the one on Minnewaw7 Avenue south of Kings Canyon Road, Lite trees planted within the: project APE were: planted to denote one or more Property owners. Commercial and residential developments have altered the Easterby rural landscape into an urban landscape thus the original dualities of setting, design, ftcling, -vorkmanship, and assuciation have been compromised. Therefore, the trees, within the proji-ct APE, alone cannot I- cornAdered as a siRnif c nt event at LhQ-1,oc_al. rc Tional or national levels, 3 Thewfore, the palm trees are not eligible for the National Register of Histor - Places under Criterion A. 1 11 The trees are not associated with an important person. Although M. Theodora Kearney has been mentioned in association with the planting of. the trees along; the roads within the Easterby Rancho, there is no direct evidence that he planted them or designed the roadside landscape within the project APE. The fact that two different types of palms are found along; Kings Canyon Road just east of the. project APE strongly suggest the trees were planted by individLud property owners such as G_ W_ Barrett who apparently preferred the Canary island Date Palm to the California Wash ingtonia, preferred by others. Therefore without direct evidence that Kearney planted the trees within the project APE and beyond, the trees are not eligible under Criterion B. The trees are not eligible under Criterion C because they do not embody a type, period, or method of construction; and they are not associated w-ith a master craftsman. J :C R EAvirmuncnr31 Servicr, 2/4 Hisrom Property Survey fa, the Transit Village Project, !(ings Carryon and' Adler Avenues m the City of Fresno, California The 27 halm trees within the protect APE are not. eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, nor are they eligible for the Caiifornia Register of' Historical Resources, The 27 palm trees were also evaluated and determined not eligible for listing in the City of Fresno Local Register of Historic Resources. Again integrity is established within the larger historic rural landscape defined as the Easterby Rancho. While the trees have integrity of location and materials, the group of trees have poor integ-T-ity as it relates to design, setting, and association. The trees to do not appear to be associated xith an event that made a significant contribution to the broad pattern of our history; or are the trees associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. While it has been suggested that M. Thco Kcarr►ev may have been instrumental in tale planting of trees along most of the roads within the Easterby Rancho, no direct information was uncovered to sustain such an argument. As a matter of fact, the information presented above strongly suggests that the trees wit -kiln the APE were planted by an individual property owner along «vlth that person's neighbors. The trees do not embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possess high artistic values. Therefore, the trees collectively within the projec APE are not eligible for the Loc. R i. t* r. i'hc roperty as a whole is I a 111a6r1cal resource for the purposes of CEQA. The palm trees would not be contributor to the larger group of palm trees on Kings Canyon Road if the larger group were to be evaluated and found eligible to the National Register- of Historic Places, the California Register of Historic Resources, or the Fresno Local Register of Historic Resources, 3 S It Envirnumrnikl Service, 1W 11 ) ri J-r+;Om Pf&pertl Survey lur the Tfansif ViNage ProtgCt. Kings Canycn and Adler Avenues in the City of Fresno. Callforno 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS: The palm trees located within the project APE were recorded into ti c California Historical Resource Information System (refer to Appendix: Q due to th+~ir age, but were determined not to meet the Section 106 definition of a "historic property"; this property was also determined not eligible for listing in the. California Register of Historical Resources or the City_ of Fresno L.rrcal Register of Historic Resources. In light of these research results. a finding of "No Historic Properties Affected is recommended for this undertaking pursuant 36 CFR 800.4 (d) (1). No further cultural resources investigation is recomnacnded for the tnrcic l-takim, unless project plans are altered to include areas not covered by this studv Finally, it has been suggested that some of the trees be removed in order to allow both construction equipment and later Fresno Transit buses safe access to the: proposed project area- The author observed that the prescnt access off Kings Canyon Road is approximately 150 feet wide. This would appear to be more than enough room for future access. I strongly urge that the Wn-1 trees not, br removed, Blot in [he ev_elitthat.tree-s.mus.t b4 rernoyecl, L reco mmend� ttrees be used as in _-fill perhaps rtIong Minnr,waw,i Avenuc south of KiUg-;8- C n}ron', Road. .�! + s (; 1i' i .1 & .R r'.nrironmrFilial ScrNivrN ["A( -,I 26 1-irstorrc Property Survey fur Me Traosrt Wfage erect. Kings Canyon Arid Adler Avenues (n 1he Uy of Fresno, Cahfureiia REFERENCES Brady, J. L. 1985 Stagecouching in the Sat)_ Joaquin Valley, California: 1850-18 75. Unpublished Master's Thesis, CLlliforma State University, Fresno. 2005 Archaeological Survey for a Multi family and Single Family Homes Project (APN,,172-021-01), East Kings Canyon Road and South Adler Avenue, Fresno, California. Preplared for the City of Fresno Housing and Community Development Department by J ter. R Environmental Services, Clovis, California. Bulbulian, Berge 2001 The Fresno Armenians: History of a Diaspora Community. Sanger: Word Dancer Press. Carter, Brenda 1v1. Nd Historic District Platt - Histon'e Structures Platt. Prepared fir the City of Fresno, California. Clough, Charles W. 1968 Madera —The Rich, Colorful and Exciting Historical Her'tage of that Area Now Known as Madera County, Califor-rua. Published by Madera County' Historical Society. Crampton, C. G. 1932 The Opening of the Mariposa Mining Region I849-1959. Microf►lm copy of unpublished doctoral dissertation. The California State University and Colleges and Department of Geography, CSU, Fresno. DeLucw, Cather and Company and David Chavez and Associates 1990 Historic Architectural Survey Report Route 180 Chestmit Avenue to Highland Averme 06-FRE-I80-, R60.9/R67.6 06250-342400. ,1 & R Fnriranrnrnlal Scrvireti I1:1 i , I 27 f-fisfonc Pmpefty Survey for f1w Transd Village Project, Flings Canyon and Adler Avenues in If-fe City of Fresno. C2lifornia Prepared For: California Department of'I'ransporlation, District 6, Fresno, California. RcviScd June 1991. Eaton, Edwin W. 1965 Vintage Fresno, Pictorial Recollectioris of a Westeni Citrl. Fresno: Huntington Press. Fresno RepubIlCull 1881 Aduertisernerit. Jan«ar,, 22, 1881 eclition. Lyon, W. �. 1892 "Roadside Trees for California," Pacif<c Rurul Press. Jul\: 16, 1891). MacMrahon, dames A. 1985 The Audobort Society Naturc Guides —Deserts. Nu", York: Alfred A. Knopf. Mussorl, K. and S. WillirIiiis 1999 "Supporting Research, Kearney", in Pulrno &- Arnericuno Elm Trees Lining Butler --Historic Resource In.uentony NVorrfirtution Fonn, City of Fresno. Prepared and submittt�d to thc: Department of Housing; 13r, Neighborhood Revitalization, Historic Preservation Commission, Fresno, CA. Padilla, V. 19( 1 Soutlwni California Gurclens; An Illustrated History. Berkeley: University of California Press. Maps: Fresno Irrigation District 1937 Aerial Photo (I3-AB1-68-87) for Section 7, Township 14 South, Range 21 East, M.D,B. & NI. Fresno Irrigation District Off-icc, Fresno, California. .F & R hsvirrinnrcntai S'C"iccg PA(11 28 Histonc Properly Survey for the Transit Village Profecl, Kings Canyon and Adler AvE,nues in the City of Fresno, California 1950 Aerial Photo (AB 1-4G-19) for Section 7, Township 14 Soup h, Range 21 East, M.D.R. & M. Fresno Irrigation District Office, Fresno, California. 1979 Aerial Photo (AB 1-2HFI-187) for Section 7, Township 14 South, Range 21 East, M.D.H. &, M. f�resno Irrigation District Office, Fresno, California. (guard. W. ('. 1909 Atlas of Fresno County, California. Publisher - W,C. Guatd. Fresno, California, Progressive: Map Company 1935 Progressive Atlas of Fresno County front Offciul and Private Data by the Progressive Map Service. Fresno.- Progressive Map Service. Thompson, 'Thomas H. 1891At1as Map of Fresno County, California ivith Illustrations. Thomas 1-1. Thon-ipson, Tulare, California_ United States Geological Survey I964Topographic Map. Malaga Quadrangle, California 7.5 Minute. Photo Revised 198 t. Personal Communications: Karen Musson, Fresno, California-2005 J & R Envirnnmrnlal Srrvirrs 2r} Hrsfonc Property Sur,,cy for the rransrl VWgge Pmjec� rings Canyon and Adler Avenass m fhe Frey of Fresno. Cafefonwa APPENDLX A. Qualifications of Preparer Jon L. Brady meets l_he Secretary of Interior Guidelines for archaeology and architectural history. Mr. Bracly has a B,A. in hoot i Poli[W al Science and AnthropoloU and an M.A. in History with an emphasis on Historical Archaeology from California State University, Fresno. Mr. Brady has worked as a consulting arehacoiogist and historian over the last 25 years working with both Section 106 sand CEQA compliance docurrrcnts. He has also taught at the Community College level in California over the last 16 years as an Acljunet Instructor. Courses tataght include indent Civilizations, Modem European HisLor_y, U.S_ History, I'olitical Science, Cultural Anthropolo*7, ind Field Methods in Archaeolo*!. .I & N Envlra4mr11ral scrwe" !! I P�c,i 3C? Historic Property Survey for the Transi, Village Project, Kings Ca(iyon and Adler Avenues rn the City of Fresno California APPEDIX B: RECORD SEARCH & li hivirom mUl Srrvfcc. ii Jun 27 04 04:30p !C,ALIFORNIA HISTORICAL RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM RDELE BRLDWIn E616642AIS p.2 FRESNO Seetliere 5OR }aagnia Valley WDMaliea CCOUS KERN Ca tensiaSuftVaireniq,Bakeafleld KINGS MR sbdabk H4 way HAVE A Bake isiieid,California93311-Va4 7ULARE 661/%4-ZZ89 FAK WM6a-24 f s Email: abaldwiz* csubedu TO: Rebecca Fraser, Consulting Planner (PS # 04-217) R. L. Fraser Consulting P_O. Box 2040 Clovis, CA 93613 MIORITY DATE: June 26, 2004 RE: EA PW-2004-08: Fresno Area Express (FAXr Intermodol Facility Project- 5out-heast Corner of East Kings Canyon and South Adler Avenues, Fresno, CA (APN 472-021-01) CO: Fresno MAP: Malaga 7.5' ` CULTURAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH The following are the results of a search of the cultural resources site record files at the Southern Sun Joaquin Valley Archaeological Information Center. These files include, known and rezarded archaeological and historic sues, inventory and excavation reports Filed with this offices, and properties listed on the National Register of Ffistoric Places, The Ffistoric Property Data Fife, (4/16/04), the California Register, the California "storinal Landmarks, the California Inventory of Historic Resources and the California Points of lHiistorical Interest_ The following summarizes the current information available on the subject property based on the records outlined above.. PR10Q CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORIES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND A i MILE RADIV5 According to our files there have been no previGLIS cultural resource surveys conducted in this project area. There has been one survey conducted immediately adjacent, FR-257, and (3) three previous surveys conducted within a mile radius. Surveys and their designated report numbers are plotted on the project map. KNOWN CULTURAL RESOURCES ON THE PROJECT AREA ANb A T MILE RADIUS There are no recorded cultural resources within the project arena, and it is not known if resources exist there_ PRIORITY Jun 27 U4 04:3np nDELE BRLDWIM 6616642415 p.3 PRIOR! Ty (RS# 04-217) There are (3) three recorded cultural resources within a 2 mile radius of the project area, P-10-004763, 4765. 3 4767. Resource locations are plot-ted on the confidential project mop_ There are no cultural resources within the project location that are currer►tty listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register, California Points of Historical Interest, the California Inventory of Historic Resources, or any known, local registry. COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS According to the ir;fom tion you provided, the Federal Transit Administmtion will fund the Fresno Area Express in order for them to acquire and cDrstruc an In-termodal Facility on the sou-thenst corner of E.'Kings Carryon and South Adler Avenues, Fresno, CA. If the subject property is vacant and undeveloped, we recommend that a qualified professional archaeologist conduct a cultural resource study prior to ground disturbance_ SHPO will make the final determination regarding the above recommendations and notify you accordingly. Please let us know if we may be of f urt her assistance. Adek Baldwin Assistant Coordinator Date: June 26, 2004 Fee: $180.00/hr. 1?0 Y il►y Service) INVOICE # A2676 C: Lucinda Woodward, Office of F fistoric Preservation PRIORITY j & It Ell v iroomrn Ial St. n,ic State of Califomia The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PRIMARY RECORD Primary HRI # Trinomial ` NRHP Status Code: Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Resource Name or 9: City of Fresno Property P1. Other Identifier: Palm Trees on King Canyon Road `P2. Location: 'a. County: Fresno b. Address: NIA City: Fresno Zip: 93706 'c. USGS 7,5' Quad: Malaga Date: 1964 (Photo Revised 1981) 'e. Other Locational Data (APN #)., 472-021-01 `P3a. Description: Map Reference No.: NIA T: 14S R: 21 E ; Sec 7 , M.D.B. & M, Located on City property and fronting Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 472-021-01 is a segment of a row of California Washingtonia (Washingtonia filifem) palm trees planted circa 1880 on the south side of Kings Canyon Road (hisloficaliy known as Zinfandel Avenue) There are 25 palm trees within the project APE and are within the city of Fresno's right-of-way The trees are evenly spaced and stand approximately 60 to 70 feet tall (refer to Photo No 1 below). These palm trees are approximately two and one-half feet in diameter at the base and rise to a height of about sixty feel on average Each palrm tree is tall and massive, with an unbranched trunk and very large fan -shaped leaves These palms are part of a larger group planted between present-day Willow Avenue and Peach Avenue on Kings Canyon Road Only that section of trees within the protect APE was evaluated for this project. P3b. Resource Attributes: HP29 Landscape Architecture 'P4. Resources Present: ■ Site P5b. Description of Photo: Refer 10 Photographs 1-2 'P6. Dale Constructed/Age: 1880 (Estimated) 'P7. Owner and Address: City of Fresno 2600 Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93721-1094 'P8. Recorded by: Jon L. Brady, MA J & R Environmental Services 17900 Auberry Road Clovis, California 93619 'P9. Date Recorded: May 28. 2005 'P10. Type of Survey: ■ Intensive Describe: HPS P11, Report Citation: Flrstonc Pfuperiy Survey for the Transit Village Project. Kings Canyon and Adler Avenues in the City of Fresno. California 'Attachments: ■ Building. Structure, and Object Record ■ Continuation Page OPR 523A-Test (11/94) 'Required Information State of California — The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PRIMARY RECORD Pnrnary # HRI # Trinomial NRHP Status Code: Other Listings Review Code _ Reviewer Dale Photo No, 2, View cast toward pahn tree on the east side of entrance to former Elk's Lodge, DPR 523A-Test ( 11 r94) 2 'Required Information State of California — The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRl# BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD Map Reference No.: N/A 'Resource Identifier: City of Fresno Property 'NRHP Status Code: 6Z B1, Historic Name: Palm Trees on Zinfandel Avenue B2. Common Name: B3. Original Use Roadside landscape B4. Present Use: Roadside landscape 'Bs. Architectural Style: Palm lined Road 'B6. Construction History: Archival research suggest the palm trees were planted circa 1880 '137. Moved? C7No ❑ Yes ❑ Unknown Date: N/A Original Location: Unknown '138. Related Features: Detached garage B9a. Architect: Unknown B9b. Builder: Unknown '1310. Significance: Theme: Rural Historic Landscape Area: Kings Canyon Road Period of Significance: 1880 Property Type: Landscape Architecture Applicable Criteria: N/A The )ands within the project APE date back to the early 1870s when the land was owned by A. Y. Easterby when he purchased 5,OWacres of land from the so-called German Syndicate A portion of the land was developed and became known as the Easterby Rancho. In 1880, M. Theodore Kearney and N. K. Masten bought the 2560-acre property from William O'Brian who had purchased the property in 1877, The Easterby Rancho was eventually split into lot sizes of 20 40. 60, 80, 160, and 320-acres. However, some of the best land located along present-day Kings Canyon Road was purchased by notable individuals that included A. 8 Butter, who took 420 acres; George H Maller acquired 160 acres, the Margherita Vineyard Company acquired 360 acres, H Granz bought 80 acres: and Keamey, Lachman, and Jacobi formed the Fresno Vineyard Company and established a winery and vineyards on another 392 acres While it is generally accepted that one of the goals of Keamey and others was to plant trees along most of the roads within the Easterby Rancho, it is not with certainty that one can assume that all of the trees were planted at the same time Reference is made to M. Theo Kearney being a part of a project that resulted in the planting of a variety of trees along some of the streets within Easterby Rancho for the purposes of beautification, denoting property boundaries for others and 811. Additional Resource Attributes: NIA B12. References: MacMahon, James A The Audubon society Nalum Guides -- Deserts New York - Alfred A. Knopf, 1985 Thompson, T. H. Atlas of Fresno County, Califomia. 1891. Guard, W. C. Atlas of Fresno County, CallfOmi,I Publisher: W. C. Guard, 1909. 613. Remarks: B14. Evaluator: Jon L. Brady J 8 R Environmental Services 17900 Auberry Road Clovis, CA 93611 (559) 299-4695 Date of Evaluation: May 28, 2005 (This space reserved for official comments.) DPR 523E - Test (I 1 J94) 'Required Information C7� (v m01 C7t7w 67 1 m m S 3m m �u o m cu .7r �c ao c CD o m m o° m �� o m o CY c tD 0 C C Q°, ry o `C rho O= N o C -o ° o a(D CL Q a S b� a�i `� mcn �3 mm a m w �' a��° m� `� ° a=i ro aaroi °� 3 s j w 7 C O 3 7 ? v ID � rDD j� O w O~ ° S O� CL w 5-3-0 ^ N O S i�CL m<-+�`°71 a°'romm�o7,a oov'a� �`�°s�m a'� o��C�a o m S� o v �, � �� c m Aao 3 I m p m i 3 m o o� ns`n a� � ° �`a � w m `� (D �cn � ? 3�.o m Q� m m _ 0 E � � 3�,ro�,ma�wom ��mam'mo� mw�aQds ooa VI �� v�gX��c m i47aSiE3 - maN�o �n oo`Dm°nma�°� Dfl°y�.�w°Dw �C-) ��cmDIDm CU a o�g�Jwa� `"�3mamy�a(v��' •voa�a� °� m° <ErSmn�� �oc'D�-oa�m cu ° m(vm�� ;`'cfoam o ma N m m �o o xiaso m En dam m v° m no iDao rym s �o�ao�m�g �oID ro -ao�,m 3<���roamS way»ova oo�m��g� ,ro o �.aCL mvai mm°o�° V(°u°�? ° 0 °' = m 3 7a `Q "C W° d7 7 pwj 3 3 Q ro ?. ' � 3 `° y O w b n°i tD a p i o w 0� fi m 3 N d U3 fp m w° p to c ID n, 3 �� oMCD _3i mio `�2 -0 m � o w �0 oo f, m�3� �a m m1 �(D j ti c w o o 41 0 o? c: m m m p y s@ 3 3 cn0, o ID c � .m m v o ? m_ � d'o A� m� c a° m � _ m pro° aw(� 0r,D Cc?3�� m��a�ma�n,3Oma4 �30 "3MS :rocNo?'awymo� c do�r��o a�rowv�mo�v_+O�w p 'D -,r-ro 3 m w S S° 3 d d a o a ro m p (� °1 w Z,7 3. m a- W `� m° 3a m 2 a v, a� �. �, ° 3 3-W c a. o m 3 sa= ro m ID ID O ID w. lL O m 7 fD - O ¢� i 0 CD ID ro CL (D C w 7- fG X 91 N" o ° a C) vN Fr- 41 S_0 En. w m ro T_ a j ro ($$OD N `� fOD O i c° �o 3 � � � o �(i cn o a'> j � fD a� ° � o to �cp �m 3 new n 0 a� amg °n�0.mo n32���a� 3�m3mr°vro roL mm'n v°�°�'���m °' 03 o �o ro �D<a am ac.c a@ ro= m o °,Z o m o i �w ro _ O D O 7 w Cn a or M O tD M� ° O � . _. c`�o ti ° Q? 3 p a S° . 0 ro 3 or w n w O ;v� °- w 3m r3o o7°'v�>>°' 3�m�°�o�roCD Ma,� �C7� ��a(°n°°am y m@°'o mho(° c aoegosaw (mnm��mS�ID cIDID 0��� �m�ov w m� m a sw m o- ° cnm 0 o `^ m o 0 303�. C c '� in 6 a v o 7- s- a y m o- ro O= o -. in O 3 3 S ID S D W. f O O w 6a7O1 O a 4Q7� DSay wdoX. uO3 ID ID �ii '0 a romaOSm7DSx TD a3B COL a Oc(D°?moaa�N c mm ° m c -may o n0 m m ID-��' �n v� w m `� °7 i� °' ° m Do 3 mo `� ��tw jO {0� m O iG -0 .0 O_ Q eD 7 S °° N q�y 7� � tCv ry o°- S m Ln I i 0 � w S m° w Z7 D a c o a O 3 m '-^ w G w m _ a j m Cf. m fv '-[ 3 p a j (D M° d O_ S O= c� 7D N GM CD In co .v9 D ; r -o v3; Zzo -G) O n 9j Njnl C �ro --1 a to C m n � ny m '0 y T n A o z� co L 0 n m v State of California -- The Resources Agency Primary q DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRIN j BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD went from 24,892 to 45,080 and by the end of the 1940 Fresno's population had jumped to 52,513. The demand for land for commercial and residential development was slowly eradicating Fresno's eastern rural landscape. By the late 1960s, the former lands of the Easterby Rancho were giving way to urban sprawl By the early 1970s, the new IRS building had been completed east of Chestnut Avenue between Buller and Lane Avenues. The last vestiges of the historic rural landscape known as the Easterby Rancho are the trees planted along the edge of the roads within the Rancho. Some of the streetscapes retain good integrity, while others have not weathered well over time The trees that include mission olive trees on the west side of Minnewawa and the Califomia Washinlonia on the east side of Minnewawa Avenue from Kings Canyon Road all the way to Southern Pacific tracks in the south have survived the test of time. However, the palm trees that line Kings Canyon Road between Willow and Minnewawa Avenues have been less fortunate. As previously note the palm trees on the south side of Kings Canyon Road from the east end of the Project APE to Minnewawa Avenue were removed by 1979 The 27 Calilomia Washinglonia palm trees located within the Fresno City right-of-way and within the project right-of-way were planted circa 1880. While the trees have integrity of location and matenals, they have poor integrity related to setting, design, association, and feeling Within the context of the larger historic rural landscape, the palm trees within the APE lack historic integrity. As was previously suggested, the palm trees within the project APE are part of those trees planted between Willow Avenue to the west, but it is unclear as to how far east they extended. It is possible that the California Washingtonias planted on the north side of the Kings Canyon Road may reveal how far to the east these trees extended The 1937 aenal photograph may suggest that the California Washinglonia palms extended from Lot 74 to Lot 76 (east to west) on the south side of Kings Canyon Road. The palm/mission olive trees that line Minnewawa Avenue south of Kings Canyon Road have historical integrity and while the landscape has evolved from one of agnculture to one of rural residences, this streetscape retains that rural flavor. The most prominent streetscape in the Fresno area is Kearney Boulevard. It has withstood the test of lime with only some of the trees having to be removed in the name of progress and this occurred along a section of Chandler Airport. The 27 palm trees within the project area appear to have been planted to denote property boundaries rather than being a part of a larger landscape, that being the Easterby Rancho, which was the oldest developed rancho. The first shipment of grain from Fresno came from the Easterby Rancho. All that remains of the historic rural landscape known as the Easterby Rancho is the tree -lined roads. While some trees were planted as part of a designed landscape such as the one on Minnewawa Avenue south of Kings Canyon Road, the trees planted within the project APE were planted to denote one or more property owners. Commercial and residential developments have altered the Easterby rural landscape into an urban landscape, thus the original qualities of setting, design, feeling, workmanship. and association have been compromised. Therefore, the trees, within the project APE, alone cannot be considered as a significant event at the local, regional or national levels Therefore, the palm trees are not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion A. The trees are not associated with an important person. Although M. Theodore Kearney has been mentioned in association with the planting of the trees along the roads within the Easterby Rancho, there is no direct evidence that he planted them or designed the roadside landscape within the project APE. The fact that two different types of palms are found along Kings Canyon Road just east of the project APE strongly suggest the trees were planted by individual property owners such as G. W Barrett who apparently preferred the Canary Island Date Palm to the California Washingtonia, preferred by others. Therefore without direct evidence that Keamey planted the trees within the project APE and beyond, the trees are not eligible under Criterion B. The trees are not eligible under Criterion C because they do not embody a type, period, or method of construction; and they are not associated with a master craftsman. The 27 palm trees within the project APE are not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, nor are they eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources. The property was also evaluated and determined not eligible for listing in the City of Fresno Local Register of Historic Resources. Again integrity is established within the larger historic rural landscape defined as the Easterby Rancho. While DPR 523E - Test (1 1/94) 5 'Required Information State of California —The Resources Agency Primary: DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI##- BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD the trees have integrity of location and materials. the group of trees have poor integrity as it relates to design, setting, and association. The trees to do not appear to be associated with an event that made a significant contribution to the broad pattern of our history: or are the trees associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. While it has been suggested that M Theo Kearney may have been insirumentai in the planting of trees alcng most of the roads within the Easterby Rancho, no direct information was uncovered to sustain such an argument As a matter of fact, the information presented above strongly suggests that the trees within the APE were planted by an individual property owner along with that person's neighbors The trees do not embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possess high artistic values Therefore, the trees collectively within the proyect APE are not eligible for the Local Register The property as a whole is not a historical resource for the purposes of CEQA. The palm trees would not be contributor to the farger group of palm trees on Kings Canyon Road if the larger group were to be evaluated and found eligible to the National Register of Historic Places. the California Register of Historic Resources, or the Fresno Local Register of Historic Resources.. DPR 523E - Test (11,94) "Required information C'" G1REPORT TO I HE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION December 12, 2005 FROM: NICK P. YOVINO, Director Planning and Development Department THROUGH: DARRELL UNRUH, Planning Manager Secretary, Historic Preservation Commission BY: KARANA HATTERSLEY-DRAYTON Historic Preservation Project Manager AGENDA ITEM NO, VIB HPC MEETING: 12/12/05 APPROVED BY DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR SUBJECT: REVIEW OF HISTORIC PROPERTY SURVEY FOR THE TRANSIT VILLAGE PROJECT, KINGS CANYON AND ADLER AVENUES, FRESNO. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission review the attached Historic Property Survey Report and letter from the Sunnyside Property Owners Association for the proposed Transit Village Project, Kings Canyon and Adler Avenues, Fresno California and hold a public hearing. Barring new information staff recommends that the Commission adopt a resolution making findings that (1) the 27 Washingtonia palm trees within the proposed project footprint do not appear to be individually eligible to the National Register; but (2) may be a contributor to a larger historic landscape district; and (3) that the trees appear to meet the threshold for treatment as historical resources for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Fresno's Housing Division proposes to construct a transit village that will include a multi - modal transit hub, higher density housing and public open space. The proposed site is a vacant 5.3 acre parcel (APN: 472-021-01) on the south side of Kings Canyon Avenue between Willow and Peach Avenues in southeast Fresno. HUD funds will be used and thus the project constitutes a "federal undertaking" as defined in 36 CFR Part 800.16(y). An archaeological survey report was prepared by J and R Environmental Services in April 2005. The results of this survey were negative. However, due to the inclusion of 27 mature palm trees within the project footprint, a historic property survey to evaluate the trees was required and was completed by the same firm in August, 2005. The consultant concluded that the 27 palms were not individually eligible for the National Register of Historic Places nor contributors to a National Register District; were not eligible resources for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act, and were not eligible to Fresno's Local Register of Historic Resources. In a letter dated September 2, 2005, the Sunnyside Property Owners Association disagreed with the findings. Staff has evaluated both the property survey as well as the information supplied by the Sunnyside community and has looked at additional comparative studies. Staff has concluded that the 125 year old trees appear to be eligible to Fresno's Local Register of Historic Resources and may be a contributor to a future non-contiguous National Register District and are therefore a historic resource for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act. Furthermore, a consultant may not determine the eligibility of a resource for Fresno's Local Register of Historic Resources; only the Historic Preservation Commission may nominate a resource and only the City Council can actually designate resources to the Local Register. REPORT TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Review of Historic Properly Survey for the Transit Village Project December 12. 2005 Page 2 BACKGROUND The proposed 5.3 acre site is located within the center of the former Easterby Rancho, which was developed in 1868 by A.Y. Easterby on 2560 acres. In 1877 the Rancho was sold first to a William O'Brien and shortly thereafter to M. Theodore Kearney and a business partner. By the end of 1880 Kearney had full control of the property. J and R Environmental Services and the Sunnyside Property Owners agree on several historic facts: First, the critical importance of landscaping in the hot Central San Joaquin Valley. Early colony developers, including Kearney, planted a variety of trees along the roads of early agricultural subdivisions and "all that remains of the historic rural landscape known as the Easterby Rancho are the trees" (HPS 2005:18). A fact omitted in the historic survey is that several streetscapes within the former boundaries of the Easterby Rancho are already listed on Fresno County's List of Historic Places, including the trees along Butler Avenue from Clovis to Sunnyside and Butler Avenue from Peach to Clovis and IGlinnewawa Avenue (approximately a half mile away). Both the consultant and the Property Owners also note the importance and involvement of M. Theo Kearney and the fact that these palm trees were planted circa 1880. Thus the trees are 125 years old. The two parties disagree as to whether or not Kearney personally supervised the planting and/or landscape plan, although we know from new research by Marlea Graham (California Garden and Landscape History Society) and Julie Cain (Stanford University) that Kearney played a far more significant role in the later design and layout of Chateau Fresno Boulevard (Kearney Boulevard) than initially understood. In fact it is intriguing to ask whether the lessons learned from the Easterby Rancho weren't perhaps a precursor to a more fully realized landscape design after Kearney met the famous landscape architect Rudolph Ulrich and began to develop Chateau Fresno Avenue. The 27 Washrngfonra palm trees are part of a streetscape of over 45 trees along this side of Kings Canyon Avenue which are nearly matched by a like row along the north side. Numerous trees on the south and north have been removed thus breaking what was presumably a continuous linear feature connecting this streetscape to the trees along Minnewawa (formerly IVlalaga). The question of integrity, both through a loss of trees and to the changing landscape can seem problematic. However, fragments of linear resources are often evaluated as contributors to a larger feature; discontiguous historic districts are also appropriately considered, and the overall connection and importance of these trees to Southeast Fresno cannot be discounted. Regarding the question of the loss of trees and changing context, in a Caltrans study prepared in 1993 Steve Mikesell, current Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer, found that the "Cross of Palms" in Bakersfield was eligible for the National Register although in fact no other historic resources survived from the period of significance and as much as 70-90% of the trees were missing in some segments! Therefore although staff concurs that this particular segment of 27 palms is not individually eligible to the National Register there well may be potential for an Easterby National Register District and/or a thematic nomination regarding the important role that Kearney played in landscape architecture in the Central San Joaquin Valley. Regarding CEQA, as the Sunnyside Property Owners have noted CCR 15065.5(a)(3) defines "historical resources" as any object, building, structure, site, area... which a lead agency determines to be historically significant... provided the lead agency's determination is supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record." The Roosevelt Community Plan Update concluded that the treescapes along Kings Canyon from Willow to Peach (etc.) were potential historic resources. One could argue that this segment of 27 trees is individually eligible to both the Local Register of Historic Resources and the California Register and/or a contributor to a potential historic district, under Criterion I (for their association with the Easterby Rancho), Criterion 3 (for an important type of regional landscape design) REPORT TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Review of Historic Property Survey for the Transit Village Project December 12, 2005 Page 3 and possibly under Criterion 2 (for association with M. Theo Kearney). The period of significance need not slop with circa 1880. The trees have continued to play a changing and vital role in the aesthetic appeal and sense of place for this Southeast Fresno community. Attachments: Exhibit A - "Historic Property Survey for the Transit Village Project." Exhibit B - Letter dated September 2, 2005 to Nick Yovino from the Sunnyside Property Owners Association. City of rnW-3::i4LP Planning and Development Department 2600 Fresno Street • Third Floor Nick P. Yovino Fresno, California 93721-3604 Director (559) 621-8003 FAX (559) 498.1012 December 14, 2005 Re: EA P'W-2004-08 Historic Property Survey Wayne Donaldson FAIA Archaeological Survey State Historic Preservation Officer Transit Village Project Office of Historic Preservation East Kings Canyon and South P.O. Box 942896 Adler Avenues Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 Dear Mr. Donaldson: The City ol' Fresno's Housing Division proposes to construct a transit village that will include a multi-tnodal transit. hub, higher density housing and public open space . The proposed site is a vacant 5,3 acre parcel (APN: 472-021-01) in Southeast Fresno on the souiheast corrier of Kings Canyon Road and Adler Avenues between Peach and Willow Avenues, The City "ill use HUD Home Investment Partnerships Program Funds (HOME) to assist in the purchase and development. Pursuant to the National Historic Preservation Act, the City of Fresno has prepared an Archaeological Survey for the vacant parcel. In addition, a Historic. Property Survey was also prepared, due to the fact that. 27 125-year old palm trees are within the City's right-of- way on E, Kings Canyon Road and may be removed or affected by the proposed project (sec. enclosed). The Archaeological Survey was negative. The 27 Washirngton%a palm trees within the APE (Area of Potential Effects) are part of a longer segment of palnns which are matched on the north side of Kings Canyon Road. The Consultant concluded that the 27 palms were not individually eligible to the National Register of Historic Places, were not eligible for the California Register of Historic Resources and did not meet the criteria for listing on the City of Fresno's Local Register of Historic Resources, The Historic Properly Survey was sent to the Sunnyside Property Owners' Association f'or review as a consulting party. In a 5-page letter dated September 2, 2005. the Association disagreed with the Consult:-unt's findings regarding the historicity of the 27 palm trees. City staff' reviewed both the Historic Property Survey, the letter from the Sunnyside Homeowners and additional comparative studies and presented recommendations to the Historic Preservation Commission at a noticed pul]lic hearing held on December 12, 2005. Abler additional testimony the Commission adopted a resolution supporting the staff reconurnendatlon that the 27 trees did not appear to be individually eligible to the National Register of Historic Places but appeared to nnc.el the threshold for treatment as historical resources for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In addition, it was recommended that staff meet with interested parties to discuss a larger historic landscape district that would encompass and include tree -lined roads that are already on the Fresno County's List of Historic Places. A records search completed at the Southern San Joaquin Valley InformaLion Center on June 26. 2004 indicated that there are no recorded cultural resources within the project area, Due to the ground disturbing aspects of the project, the potential for unearthing cultural remains is considered high. and the project will be monitored for this possibility. Should cultural resources be unearthed during construction a qualified professional archaeologist will be called in i o evaluate the findings and snake the appropriate mitigation recommendations. We request your concurrence that: • the delineation of the APE is adequate 136 CFR 800.4(a)(1), • the level of studies have been satisfactory (36 CFR 800.31 • the undertaking as proposed will have no effect on histo0c properties 136 CFR 800.4(d)(1)1. Please do not hesitate to call nee if you have any questions perL31ning to this study (559) 621-8520. Thank you as always for your assistance. Sincereiv, Karana Hattersley-Drayton Historic Preservation Project Manager City of Fresno Enclosure: "Archaeological Survey for a Multi -Family and Single Family Homes Project (APN 472-021-01)... April 9, 2005 "Historic Property Survey for the Transit Village Project...." August 28, 2005. REGULAR MEETING FRESNO HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Monday, December 12 2005 - 5:30 P.M. City Hall, 2"`' Floor 2600 Fresno Street, Cite Council Chambers Fresno, California 93721 CALL, TO ORDER AIND ROLL CALL The rriecting was called to order at 0:10 p.m. by Chair, Kevin Errns-Rerupel, ALA. Members Present: Kevin Enns-Rempel Chair Cam Maloy Vice Chair Michele Randel, AIA, CSI Commissioner Jeannine Raymond, Ph.D. Cormnissioncr Molly L-M Smith Commissioner Staff Present: Karana Hattersley-Drayton Historic Preservation Project Manager Darrell Unruh Secretary Will Tackett Planner II Cheryl Haroldsen Recording.? Secretary II. APPROVE. -MEET ING NMINETES A. Approve minutes of October 24th, 2005. Kevin Eirrr.c-Rempel noted that on page 2 of the minutes, sixth parabraph, under B.1.: the description of non -conforming -,igns should irtciude an explanation of signs that otherwise would violate the. City's sign code. .Molly Smith moved to approve the inhirrtes, as aineiided, and illichelle Randel secorrdecl. Motimi carried 5-0. III. APPRO.%."E AGENDA Molly Smith moved to approve agenda and Curti 1Jluloy secondod. Motimi carried 5-0. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR (All consent calendar items are considered by the Historic Preservation Commission to be routine and ",ill be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these: items unless requested, in which event the; item will be removed from the consent calendar and considered following approval of the consent calendar.) There were no items on the consent calendar and thus no action taken. V. CONTINUED MATTERS A. Status Report: Fresno's Historic Properties and Minimum Maintenance Standards, Joe Burke, Consultant, described his credentials and reviewed the City's proactive approach to the minimum maintenance standards within the City's codes for historic buildings. of the first ten items provided on the inspection check list, he has completed five reports which will be reviewed by the Contn-lission. 1. Old Fresno Water Tower (HP9001, National Register) .foe Brrrke reported a crack in the concrete floor that is in the same radius as the exterior walls of the building. It is probably due to normal settling when the tower was first built, but he recommends the City keep track of this and possibly have a structural engineer look at it. Behind the ser.,ice counter there is a hole in the brick wall; the exterior finish needs some hatching and paint; protruding bolts on the arbor structure concern him as a potential safety hazard; and, finally, the alcove outside the public restroorns needs to be secured with wrought iron gates that can be locked at night. 2. The Vieux Home (HP4002, National Register) .Ioe Burke believes this house is in incredibly good shape, considerin- how old it is. A few problem areas include a loose post at the underside of the entrance stairwell; also, plaster under the stairwell needs repair; the carriagc house adjacent needs repainting and a new roof; basement level window frames need replacement; the gift shop should he insulated against the weather; several drainage issues surround the hornet and, the wheelchair lift was just repaired, a serious item that might be replaced in January. 3. Fresno Nlemorial Auditorium (HP#052, National Register) Joe Burke noted loose floor tiles on the third floor; a crack in the column on the first floor that extends all three floors and should be watched as a potential structural issue; the stage floor is %vorn and in poor repair; a big issue is the loose ceiling tiles at the front entry from the roof leak above; a large chunk out of the corner of the rear stairs resulting from concrete deterioration; rear doors have an interior -type paneling that has been applied to the exterior and not in keeping with the historic code; and finally, an overhead awning that has been damaged, 4. Fresno Cite Hall Annex (HP#049) Joe Burke refelTcd to this building as a sleeper, noting that one could walk right by without really noticing it; but, it is a noteworthy building because of the interior design. There arc not man}, maintenance issues because of the gn•cat design of the building. There is a roof leak that has b::en an ongoing issue. 5. Fresno County Hall of Records (HP# 17) Joe Burke reported this building to be a very beautiful building with terrazzo flooring and a lot of marble. IMe did find one broken window; vinyl and carpet flooring showing some wear; and, a general maintenance issue of'exterior dirt that a water hose every year could probably solve. In general, Mr. Burke believes the public buildings inspected were in extremely good shape, considering how large: they are and how much work it takes to rnaintain buildings of their size, Jeannine Raymond asked how these differing items might be prioritized. .foe Burke responded the ceiling tiles in \Memorial Auditorium were the biggest issue in all buildings looked at, This is a safety and liability issue that should be addressed with a thorough rooting 'inspection, and possible re -roofing, He will prepare a prioritized list of maintenance issues involved, haraua llattcrsley-Dr(qton addressed the protocol of cstablishing procedures for addressing maintenance issues. She indicates the Commission could accept the findings and request staff to 2 write a letter to the property owners copying these findings, with a copy of the report, and very graciously reminding them of the minimum maintenance standards required. This is the first step as Iaid out in the ordinance. Every property owner should get a copy, of the report and issues can be prioritized within that report. Cam Maloy suogested the City must ensure City -owned properties meet the rninirnum maintenance standards they are required to enforce. Michele Randel pointed out that, rather than the Commission prioritizing, these items, 110r. Burke should come hack to the Commission meetings with these reviews, having initially prioritized the findings. Jeannine Raymond added that liability issues should he stressed. Kevin inns-Rempel opens c116Crrsti1011 to the public. Jeannine Jurkvvich, l 1 )0 W. Roberts, recommended that the reviews and recommendations be according to the Department of Interior standards; such as repairing instead of replacing wlicnever possible, insulating the Camiage house would not fit with these considerations. Integrity can he lost if reconrniendations do not fit those Department of Interior standards. Kevin Errns-Rempel closes public discussion and moves to accept the staters relrnrt and ask staff f to prepare letters to be sent to the owners which indicate the issues found, and especially prioritizing those that cart_, more liability and structm-al darna;e w; :llr. Burke has indicated. ,llotivn carried 5-0. Kevin Enns-Rempel added he agrees with Nls, Jurkovich's sui Lestion of takings the Department of Interior standards into account. Karana Hattevvle,-Drayton states that when staff ~ends letters to property owners, they are reminded of tlic minimum maintenance standards which incorporate the Secretary of Interiors Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. However, we can also foreground the Standards when we send out the letter and report. VI. CONIMISS1ON ITEMS A. Proposed In -till (Second Residence) at the Hopkins Home (HP#231). 1458 E. Divisadero Street, Fresno. Karana Hattel-skv-Drapon reviewed the staff report noting this home is within the area of` potential effects for the Dickey Developmental Center project. The property owners are considering the use of a manufactured home for this infill that will be re -clad with ornamental elements which match as much as possible the horse and its environment. This proposal was also presented to the Fulton LO%VC1I Committee earlier in the day. As a matter of protocol the Commission is authorized to have a final say on any effects to the historic property. Normally staff- would never consider use of a manufitctured home. However, this would be located at the hack of the lot with no visibility From E. Divisadero. The zoning designation is an issue yet to be. resolved. Staff reconiniends Commission approve this infill project subject to conditions set forth in the staff report, i.e., raising the pitch of the roof, adding brackets, changing the porch, etc. Kevin Enns-Renrpel believes the saving grace fir this project is its relative invisihility. Jeanette Jurkovich reiterated the City's preservation ordinance doesn't allow for a decision to be made without an environmental review. Karana Hattersle,-Drayton indicates staff will check with the City Attorney. She clarified that there is a difference between a permit for a historic building and for an in -fill projcct on a historic parcel. She believes the infrll for a future historic district of a utilitarian huilding will 3 have minimal impact. This is an example of an issue where we need to balance protection of a historic resource with the needs of the property owner who loves their historic home but needs to accommodate their aging parent. Cam :Flalov states that an affirmative vote allows the property owner to move for-vvard while working with staff, the RDA and Fulton Lowell, Kevin Enns-Rempel adds that there are obvious issues of'zoning that need to be resolved outside of the Commission and the Commission would like to see the final plans in more detail as they become available. Jeannine Raymond moves to accept staff recommendation to accept the proposed in fill wltilc• staff continues to work with the owner on desi,n and zoninb issues. The motion is seconded by Michele Randel. Alotion carries 5-0. B. Review of Historic Property Survey for the Transit Village Project, Minns Canyon and Adler Avenues, Frestio. Karana Hattersle-Dravtou refers to the surrey provided in the staff report, indicating-, the project is at the former site of the Elks Lodge, on the south side of Kings Canyon Avenue and between Willow and Peach. Federal funding will require both a Section 100 and a C:.EQ,-1 review. There are 27, 125 year -old li'ashingtonian palms within the City's ri(,ht of way, frontim, the property, which may require removal of some. Staffrcport indicates that a consultant concluded the trees are not historically significant at federal, state. or local levels. Sunnvside Property Owners, as concerned parties, responded with a letter disagreeing with the findings. Points of anTrecment include the critical importance of Historical landscapes and treescapcs in Fresno. Theodore Kearney did play a significant role in the planting and designing of Kearney Blvd. but it is ufi.known whether he participated in planting these particular palms at this location. Comparisons of paims of the same species and age as others within the area is noted. Staff concludes this segment is not individually elitgibic to the National Register, but appears eiig�ible to the local register individually and as a conlributor to a larger historic landscape district. The palms should be treated as a historical resource for the purposes of CEQA and the Commission may wish to nominate the south and north sides of the street to the local register in the future. Kevin F.nns-Rentpel asks it we know what possibly removing some might mean: how may are they proposing to remove, Karana llattersleY-Drayton answers that the standard protocol for environmental review is to avoid, minimize, and finally mitigate. Michael Si ala, (lousing and Coll munit}' Development Manager, notes the consultant is ill and states for the record that the City intends to retain as many trees as possible on the right -of= way, in order to minimize impact. There is a potential for removal of some; a teasible site plan is still in the preliminary stages. Sue 11 illiarns, Sunnyside Property Owners Association, believes this part of SE Fresno is very important historically, She distributed a copy of the EIR that was a part of the Roosevelt Community Plan update, showing*, treescapcs in the area as potentials for the local historic register and stetting the colony system of development as an important reason for these trees being where they are, These trees should be on the historie rcgtster and she asks staff to explore an E;IR, for alternatives as these are important trees to preserve. Gary Malaz ian, 2727 l<I' .Bluff, spoke to the substantial urban forest in the City, and those trees are a major contributor and benefit to the City. 4 Jeannine Raymond asked for clarification of the findings of the staff report. Karana HattersleY-Drayton provided that if the Commission wants to consider a mechanism to include some other parts of the historic landscape, it should be done holistically. If the Commission feels they are, important historically, they .should consider heing proactive and brirwit7- ail the trees under the City' s protraction for the future. She encouraged the Commission to consider this for a future nomination Kevin Errns-Rempel indicates this would entails collaboration with the County because many of the County islands run through this colony system area of trees and canals. He states that he IN not convinced by the consultant's reasoning. He believe` a direct connection with Nir. Kearney is not significant or important in this case and the trees have not lost context because some arc: gone. Furthermore, to say these trees to not embody a distinct characteristic of type is questionabie. The planting of trees to mark boundaries is a very distinct characteristic of' landscape architecture in the late nineteenth century. He agrees that these trees, alone, should not be on the rc gister; they are a historic resource and should be a part of a larger landscape district. Molly Smith asks if these 27 trees are not individually eligible for the national register clues it preciudc them from the state or local. Karana hiatie rsley-Drgvton clarifiers that eligibility on the national level requires very high criteria. In order to purchase the land with federal funds, it must go through review and we must answer if these are historic properties as defined by federal law or must answer if they appear eligible for the register and meet the criteria for a historic resource and property for CEQA purposes. Michele Randel moves that the Commission concur with staff, that 27 Waslrinptonian Palms do not appear to be individually eligible to the national register but do appear eligible to the local register as a contributor to a larger historic landscape district; and should be considered as a historic resource for the purposes of CEQ,,-1. 44oll y Srrrith seconds the motion and the motion carries 5-0. Molly Swith recominerids staff prepare a nomination of the 27 trees on both sides of the street; and, to examine whether it would be appropriate to a future nomination as a part of a larger historic landscape district along with the Roosevelt Plan Community, SunnVvide Property owners, the County, and Tree Fresno. Jeannine R(rvnrorrcl seconds and the motion carriv.v 5-1). C. Review of Historic Architecture Survey Report for Environmental Assessment P-05-01 for the Proposed Dickey 'Youth Development Center, Fresno, California. Karana 1lcrtte vlcy-Drayton gave a brief overvie«- of the staff report. The City's Parks and Recreation dehartnzerlt is proposing to construct a new I Ok square foot center on a vacant hail f acre parcel on the cast side of N. Glenn Avenue. Federal and state fundiii, require a Section 106, NEPA, and a CEQA review. A technical study is required to look at possible historic resources based on the normal procedure of evaluation within historic context. She provided an Area of Potential Effects (APE) map for review which includes the first row of buildings adjoining. The current Dickey Playground is one block to the east and was founded in 1910, In 2003, the City proposed a new recreation complex at the current Site. A historic survey for this Conner project was presented to the Commission and the. State, and a consensus on staff findings indicated there were no historic properties under federal law. Two homes were found to he eligible for the local register and are now on that register. Community concerns resulted in dropping the: plans and therefore this new project was developed. The current APE was updated from the previous findings and eleven properties are within the APE and were evaluated fir the national, state, and local registers. One property, the Mary Matson home appears to be individually eligible to the California Register of Historical Resources. Three properties. includin` this home, are already listed on or eligible for listing on the local register• Staff recommends Commission adopt a resolution with findings that there are no historic properties as defined by the NHPA, and there are no anticipated substantial adverse change in the significance of three historic resources for purposes of CEQA. Although the Parks Departments is actively seeking an architectural Finn that will design a context -sensitive building, the Commission may wish to adopt a separate resolution that requires the design be architecturally compatible with this older mixed -use neighborhood. Jeannette Jurkovich, provided a letter written to the Commission and submitted f()r the public administrative record. She reported that this decision was clarified considerably by the court and she expressed her concern that an area of potential effect cannot be determined unless the project plans are known; i.e. traffic and parking requirements and concerns, the building footprint, What the Commission is being asked to do tonight is inappropriate. Section 106 funding should he based on substance and on due diligence. The potential impact must be determined first. Prop 12 monies must comply with CEQA, and there is plenty of time to do this right, including a prudent look at the promleci's master plans; with comments from Parks Dept. She quoted findings froth the previous lawsuit which define the EIR requirements. Kevin Ezzns-Rentiml agrees that the impacts need to be known at the outset but states the Commissions decisions tonight are not giving a green light to doing any sort of project. Clearly this will come back to the Commission with a much more specific proposal for consideration. Karana Hatterslej,-Drajuiz provided that staff has prepared their report under direction of the City Attorney's office. The report prepared for Commission tonight is part of the standard protocol used by the federal government. She notes that this protocol includes drawing a boundary of the area of potential effects as one row beyond the project. One thing the Commissioners should Leel very comfortable about concluding toriisht would be if the Commission concurs that there are or are not properties eligible for the national register. This is the Section 106 process. Cam Mul(q asked why this is even brought to the Commission in 2003, if it was not within the Commission's purview, Kaiwnu Hatterslet­Di•ay&w provided that this is a totally, different protect. If there are no national register properties within the APE; under federal law, there are no adverse impacts to the APE. Jeannette Jurkovich interjeets that we do not know how this project might impact surrounding areas; you cannot know the impact if the project footprint is not known. lighting, security, and noise are all potential issues that cannot be evaluated without knowing the project. The public deserves to see the project plans before a decision is made. Kevin Enns-Rempel stated that there are two things the Commission can do tonight. The Commission can answer if they agree there are no historic properties, as defined by Section 106, within the boundaries of the APE. Ga,y Malazian believes this is a grey area that must be cleared up before the Commission makes a decision. Kevin Enos-Rempel states that he is wiliing to accept staffrecommendations that there are no historic properties, as defined by Section 106, within the immediate boundaries of this APE; but M there are designated local, and possibly state eligible properties within the boundary, Commissioners may wish to direct staff to revisit for review the actual project proposal and addressing potential CEQA issues. Jer►►rmi►re.l aYmo►rd clarifies licr understanding of the imptrct of the proposal currently before. the ComMissinn; noting the decision only allows the property to be acquired and at a later time the Commission can require more information regarding the proposed project. Kara►►a llatterslet-Dra1'ton states that if the Cornmission finds the APE sufficient for the acquisition of the. parcel tonight; that decision cannot be revisited. However, the Commission can require the project desion to come hcforc the: Commission as a part of the motion. Kevin Enns-Reurpel proves to accept staff reco►rr►rrerrdutions that theme are no historic properties, as defined by Section 100 of the ,National Preservation Act, within the immediate boundaries of this APE; but there are designated local, and possibly state eligible properties within the boundary. The Commission also iuclicates tlu�v exl)eet to see the actual project propnsal conic back to the Com►mis,s•io►r at some future point; and at that thne i.s.s•rre.s that relate to CEOA can be addressed. .1lichele Randel seconds the motion. Motion carries i-b. VII. CHAIRPERSON'S REPORT None. VIIl. UNSCHEDULED ITEMS A. INIembers of the Commission None, B. Staff None, C. General Public Jeannette Jurkovich cncoura0es the Commission to revie;v the ordinance and by-laws, alone with the process of deteniur ing historic districts; and reiterating that the Commission must be full; informed upfront when asked to make decisions. Decision-, reLgarding historic districts must have environmental review based on the whole picture. She also requests staff provide lull packets to the public for review prior to Commission meetings. Vlll. NEXT NIEETING The next rcgularly scheduled meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission will be January 23'd, 2006, Conference Room A. IBC. ADJOURNiNIENT The meeting Was adjourned at 8:5-5 P.M. Attest: Attest: Kevin Enns-Renrpel, Chair Darrell Unruh, Secretary City of PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT February 1, 2006 To: Michael Sigala Housing Manager From: Karana Hattersley-Drayton Historic Preservation Project Manager Re: Section 106 Clearance for Transit Village Project On December 14, 2005 1 submitted a letter to the State Historic Preservation Officer regarding the Section 106 evaluation for the Transit Village Project (see attached). As a reminder, the project historic survey was reviewed by staff and presented to the Historic Preservation Commission for comment at a publicly noticed hearing on December 12, 2005. At that hearing the Commission adopted a resolution supporting the staff position that the 27 Washingtonia palm trees within the Area of Potential Effects (APE) did not appear to be individually eligible to [lie National Register but appeared to meet the threshold for treatment as historical resources for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act, As of February 1, 2006 we have not received official comment from the SHPO. Thus pursuant to 36 CFR Part 800.3 (C)(4) we may assume that there are no historic properties for the purposes of Section 106 and thus no historic properties affected by the project. You may request release of federal funds. However, as project plans are developed our department will review and provide a CEQA analysis that adequately accounts for the historic landscape features along E. Kings Canyon Avenue. Please do not hesitate to call me should you have any questions. Copy: Corrina Nunez CALIFOFNIA HISTORICAL RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM FRESNO Southern San Joaquin Valley Archaeological Information Center KERN California state University, Bakersfield KINGS 9001 Stockdafe Highway 31 MW MADERA Bakersfield, California 93311-1022 TULARE (661) 654-2289 FAX (661) 654-2415 E-mail: obaldwin@csub.edu TO: Arthur Farkas, Environmental Division Manager (RS# 06-138) Krazan & Associates, Inc. 215 West Dakota Avenue Clovis, CA 93612 DATE: April 25, 2006 RE: Krazan Project # 014-06085: Transit Village Property Housing Project, Easl hilly-s Carrvoll road arid Socrth Adlcr Avenge, F'resrlo, CA. County. Fresno Map(s): Malaga 7.5' PRIORITY The Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center is under contract to the State Office of Historic Preservation and is responsible for the local management of the California Historical Resources Inventories. The Center is funded by research fees and a grant from the State Office of Historic Presmation. The Information Center does not conduct fieldwork and is not affiliated with any archaeological consultants who conduct fieldwork- A referral list of individuals who meet the Secretary of the Interior's standards for their profession is available upon request.. CULTURAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCH The IC files include. known and recorded archaeological and Historic sites, inventory and excavation reports filed with this office, and properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places, The Historic Property Data Fife, (3/2/06), the California Register., the California Historical Landmarks, the California Inventory of Historic Resources, and the California Points of Historical Interest The following summarizes the knou7] historical resources information currently available for this subject property based in part on the Sources outlined above. PRIOR CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORIES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND A `!2 MILE RADIUS According to the inforrnaLion in our files, the entire project area has been surveyed for cultural resources by archaeologist Jon Brady in April, 2005, our report # FR-2109. PR I ORITY PRIORITYRs # 06-158) KNOWN AND/OR RECORDED CULTURAL RESOURCES ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND WITHIN A '/2 MILE RADIUS No cuittrral resources were discovered within the project site during the field survey. There are no known cultural resources within the project area that are listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the California Register, California inventory of Historic Resources, California Points of Historir�.al Interest or the California State historic Landmarks. COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS No cultural resource survc;y is recommended at this time. If you have any qucslions or need any additional information, please don't hesitate to contact me at (661) 654-2289. By / Adele Baldwin assistant Coordinator Date: April 25, 2006 Fee: $180.00/hr. (Priority ScR1i(c) Invoice # A3862 PRIORITY Art Farkas From: Karana Hattersley-Drayton(Karana.Hattersley-Drayton@remoIov] Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 11:19 AM To: Corrina Nunez; Art Farkas Cc: Russ Weber Subject: RE Transit Village Attachments: Transit'Village Letter to Housing do �11 'ransit Village Leber io Hou5... Art- A mitigated nag don would have to include provisions to avoid removing cr damaging the pdIm gees, The SHFO did not respond ot.ficialty to out December 14th 2005 tnterinackage and encouraged us to invoke Section 900.31vl (4) :failure of SKPO rwponse)' I am attaching the memo Z sent n Hicha=1 Si -gala an Fet:rua f v I t . Let me Wow if you need adds opal information. i?arana Hatteraley-Drayton Historic t:reservarion Frojetit Var:agwr City of Fresno W, D, h U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development o San Francisco Regional Office 450 Golden Gate Avenue fSan Francisco, California 94102-3448 a Environmental Assessment for HUD -funded Proposals Recommended Format per 24 CFR 58.36, revised February 2004 [Previously recommended EA formats are obsolete] Project Identification: Envirorunental Assessment No. H-2005-01 Preparer: Rebecca Fraser, Consulting Planner Responsible Entity: City of Fre..sno, Planning and Development Department 1,Ionth/Year: i`larch 20, 2006 Environmental Assessment Responsible Entity: City of Fresno [24 CFR 58.2(a)(7)] Certifying Officer: Andrew T. Souza, City Manager 124 CFR 58.2(a)(2)1 Project Name: Transit Village (100 multi-family/single-family horses and transportation hub) Project Location: Southeast corner of East Kings Canyon and South Adler Avenues (APN 472-021-01) City of Fresno, Fresno County Estimated total project cost: $20,000,000 (51,000,000 from the City of Fresno) Grant Recipient: City of Fresno Planning and DeveIoprVent [24 CFR 58.2(a)(5)] Recipient Address: _ _ 2600 Fresno Street, Fresno, Room 3[176, CA 93721 Project Representative: Corrina Nunez Telephone Number: (559) 621-806 Conditions for Approval: (List all mitigation measures adopted by the responsible entity to eliminate or minimize adverse environmental impacts. These conditions must be included i.n project contracts and other relevant documents as requirements). [24 CFR 58.40(d), 40 CFR 1505.2(c)j 1. If cultural resources are unearthed during any ground disturbance activities, all work should halt in the area of the find and a qualified professional archaeologist should be called to evaluate the findings and make the appropriate rrnitigation recommendations. 2. Locate trees on southern and western exposures to shade the building; during, hot sununer months. Deciduous trees should be considered since they provide shade in the summer and allow the sun to reach the facility (luring; the winter nnonths. 3. Install sidewalks and bikeways adjacent to the site and connect the sidewalks and bikeways to any nearby existing and planned open space areas, parks, schools, residetltial areas, and commercial areas to encourage walking and bicycling. 4. Include as many energy -conserving features as possible in the design/construchon of the new Youth Center. Examples include "green building" technoloLy; increased wall and ceiling insulation (Ixyond building; code requirements); energy efficient lighting; awning or other outside shading; mechanism for windows; ceiling fens, orient the units to maximize passive -solar cooling and heating„ when practicable; and electrical outlets installed around the exterior of tine building; to encourage use of electric landscape maintenance equipment. 5. Include as many clean alternative energy features as possible to promote energy self-sufficiency. Examples include (but are not limited to): photovoltaic cells, solar thermal electricity systems, small wind turbines, etc. 6. Require construction equipment used at the project site to be equipped with catalysts/particulate traps to reduce particulate and NOx emissions At the time bids are oracle, contractors must demotlstrate the construction equipment used is equipped with particulate filters and/or catalysl_S or prove why it is infeasible to have construction equipment so equipped. Use alternative fuel construction equipment as feasible. Replace fossil -fueled equipment with electrically driven equivalents (provided they are not run via portable generator). 9. Curtail construction during periods of high ambient polhrtant concentrations. This niay include ceasing construction during peak -hour vehicular traffic on adjacent roadways, and "Spare the Air Days" declared by the District. 10. 1Zequire that all diesel engines on the premises be shut off when not in use to reduce emissions from idling. 11. Any new development on the subject property will be subject to Fresno Unified School District Development Fees of $2.24 per square foot for residential. 12. The District will need to review and approve die site's final improvement plans (i.e. grading, street improvements and storm drain) prior to implementation. 13. Construction activity, including grading, clearing, grubbing, filling, excavation and development or redevelopment of land that results in a disturbance of one acre or more of the total land area, must secure a storm water discharge permit in compliance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System regulations. The permit must be secured by filing a Notice of Intent for the State General Permit for Construction Activity with the State Water Resources Control Board. The notice must be filed prior to the start of construction. 14. The developers will install well fit parking lots and landscaping PD. Signs will be posted stating no loitering 16. Securih- fencing and gates will be installed around the proposed project. 17. Install security cameras on the premises FINDING: [58.40(g)] X_ Finding of No Significant Impact (The project will not result in a significant impact on the quality of the human environment) Finding of Significant Impact (The project tnay significantly affect the quality of the human environment) Preparer Signature: _ Date: Name/Title/Agency: Reberca Fraser Cnnsultinr Pianner, R1, Frase-tContiullinp City of Fresno Development Department Date: Name/Title/Agency: Nick Yovino. Director, Planning and Development Department RE Approving; Official Signahtre: _ i Date: Name/Title/ Agency: Andrew T. Souza, City A4and er, City of Fresno Statement of Purpose and Need for the Proposal: 140 CFR 1508.9(b)] The subject property is located in the Roosevelt Community Plan Area which is characterized by a highly diversified residential neighborhood and older strip commercial corridors. The eastern portion of the planning area is dominated by a low density residential development pattern. In the northwestern areas of the community, residential densities are inuch higher. According to the City's Housing Element, there is a need for duality affordable housing mixed with higher market end projects to instill neighborhood harmony and econornic stability. Once constructed, the project will benefit the community and residents. The implementation of this proposed project will return a vacant parcel to a productive viable use, assist in the removal of blight in the community, and provide needed very low and low income housing. Description of the Proposal: Include all contemplates[ actions which logically are either geographically or functionally a composite part of the project, regardless of the source of funding. 124 CFR 58.32, 40 CFR '1508, 25 ] The project consists of the development of a vacant 5.3 acre parcel (APN 472-021-01) into a high -density senior and loin -income housing complex with an adjacent multi -modal transit hub. The 5.3 acre parcel will be split into h%,o parcels with the suialler parcel being purchased by the Fresno Area Transit (FAX) for its multi - modal transit hub. The transit hub will provide public bus transportation service with special routes for senior citizens. There will be up to 100 housing units for rent or sale, available to the elderly, disabled, low-income single - families and non subsidized housing. The complex will provide approximately 15,000 square feet of common space (library, gathering space, small kitchen and game rooni) and possibly an open recreational area. The City of Fresno is proposing; to use V,000,000 of HC) IL Program Funds to construct the mr.ilti-family complex and single-family houses. The multi -family apartment complex and the single-family houses will be constructed during the year 2C06-2007 through the year 2007-2008, Existing Conditions and Trends: Describe the existing conditions of the project area and its surroundings, and trends likely to continue in the absence of the project. 124 CFR 58.40(a)] The subject site is a rectangular shaped parcel located on the si>utheastern corner of South Adler Avenue and East Kings Canyon Road (APiN 472-021-01) the eastern section of the City of Fresno, California. The site is undeveloped and it is accessible from Fast Kings Canyon Road. The site is surrounded by multi -family houses and vacant land on the north (zoned C-2), Gettysburg Elementary School on the south (zoned R-3/BA-15), multi-tamily apartments on the east (zoned R-3/BA- 15) and vacant land and apartments on the west (zoned R-A/BA-15). Statutory Checklist [24CFR §58.51 Record the determinations made regarding each listed statute, executive order or regulation. Provide appropriate source documentation. [Note reviews or consultations completed as wet[ as any applicable permits or approvals obtained or required. Note dates of contact or page references]. Provide compliance or consistency documentation. Attach additional material as appropriate. Note conditions, attenuation or mitigation measures required. I dLLUIb 1JCLC1111111d L1U11 dl1U LUIl1V1L011LC lJULWIMIIldi1U11 Historic Preservation A) Contact: Less Than Significant Impact [36 CPR 8001 Can December 27, 2004, Karana Hattersley-Drayton, Historic Preservation Specialist, Cih, of Fresno, reviewed the project and commented that an Archeological Survey would need to be completed for the proposed project. A search was completed at the California Historical Resoun rs hilurmatiun System on June 26, 2004, There have been no recorded Cultural resources within the project area. However there has been one study immediately adjacent to the site FR-257 and three previous cultural resource~ survPys conducted within a 1/2 mile radius. There are no recorded cultural resource~ in the project area that are currently listed on the National Register of I Iistoric Places, the California Register, California Points of Historical Interest, the California inventory of Historic Resources, or any known local registry. An Archeological Survey was completed for the proposed project on April 9, 2005 by Jon L. Brady. During the survey, the surface was checked for any signs of possible cultural activities. No prehistoric or historic cultural materials were identified during the pedestrian survey, The results of the survey were negative. The proposed project will have "No Effect" on any potentially significant historic properties. A Historic Property Survey was completed for the proposed project by ion L. Brady on June 2, 2005, The Area of Potential Effects (APE) for the current archaeological and architectural survey includes the subject property, adjacent property to the west and tine palm trees in the City of Fresno Right of Way fronting the parcel. The 27 Washingtonia palm trees within the project APE were recorded into the California Historical Resource Information System (see I Iistoric Property Survey) due to the their age, but determined not to meet the Scction 106 definition of a historic propert}°"; this property was also determined not eligible for listing in the California Register of Historic Resources or the City of Fresno Local Register of Historic Resources. In light of these research results, a finding of "No I lisloric Properties Affected is re,commended for this undertaking, pursuant 36 CFR 800.4 (d) (1). No further cultural investigation is recommended for the undertaking unless project plans - are altered to include areas not covered by this study. It has been suggested that spine of the trees be removed to allow butte construction equipment and later Fresno Transit buses to safely access the proposed project area. The author observed that the present access off Kings Canyon Road is approximately 150 feet wide. This would appear to be more than enough room for future access_ fork Brady strongiv urged that the palm trees not be removed. But in the event that trees must be removed, lie recommends the trees be used as in -fill perhaps along Nfinnewa►va Avenue south of Kings Canyon Road. The Historic Study was reviewed by the Sunnyside Property Owners Association and they disagreed with Jon Brady's findings regarding the historicity of the 27 4Vashingtonia palm trees. City staff reviewed both the Historic Property Survey, the letter from the Surmyside Homeowners and addition comparative studies and presented recommendations to the Historic Preservation Commission ata noticed public hearing held on December 12, 2005. After additional testimony the commission adopted a resolution supporting the staff recommendation that the 27 Washuigtonia palm trees did not appear to be individually eligible for the National Register of Historic Places but did appear to meet the threshold for treatment as historical resources for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CF.QA). On December 14, 2005, a letter was sent to the State I li.storic Preservation Officer (SHI'O) requesting concurrence on the adequacy of the APE, that the level of studies were completed satisfactorily and that the undertaking as proposed will have no effect on historic properties As of February 1, 2006, no response %vas received from SI-1110 within the 30-day comment period. It %vas therefore concluded that the State Historic Preservation Office had no comment, The City of Fresno has satisfactorily completed all actions and tesponsibihties under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. No further cultural resources investigation is recommended for undertaking of the proposed project. 1. If buried cultural materials are encountered during, construction, all work in that area should be halted or diverted until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the nature and significance of the finds. Floodplain Management A) Printed: No Impact [24 CFR 55, Executive Order 119881 The proposed project is located within Flood Zonc X (shaded), areas of "100-year Hood with average depths of less than 1 foot, or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; areas protected by levees from 100-year flood, or areas determined to lie outside 500-year floodplain per FFMA ylaps, Community Panel 06019C2130F, effective date July 19, 2001. Wetlands Protection I A) Printed: No Impact [Executive Order 11990] The proposed location is not in the vicinity of any wetland, according to the 2025 General Plan and \faster Environmental Impact Report 410130 (November 2002) and the Roosevelt Community Plan (April 1992). Experience: Where are no naturally occurring bodies of water discovered on or adjacent to the project areas during the field inspection conducted on %March 2, 20 W Coastal Zone A) [Tinted: No Impact Management Act [Sections 307(c),(d)] The 2023 General Plan and Nlaster Environmental Impact Report #t10130 (i`'overnber 2002) indicates that the project area i`5 located in the San Joaquin Valley in Central California and is not located within a coastal zone management area. Sole Source Aquifers A) Printed: No Impact (40 CFR' 1491 HCiD-EPA Region IX, Sole Source Aquifers \4OU of 1990, The project does not need to be referred to the EPA for project evaluation according to the %,IOU of I990 4%,ith HUD-13-PA Region IX, Sole Source Aquifers A) Printed: Less Than Significant Impact Endangered Species Act [50 CFR 4021 There are no endangered species present in the project. area according to the 2025 mineral Plan and iMaster Environmental Impact Report ##10130 (November 2002) and the Roosevelt Community Plan (April 1992). The proposed project site is situated bettiveen LAVo multi -family apartment complexes, an elementary school to the south and state highwaV 180 (Dings Canvon Road) to the north. There will be no adverse impact on rare, threatened, or endangered plant~ or animals in the project area. Wild and Scenic A) Experience: No lmpact Rivers Act [Sections 7 (b), (c)I The project area is not located within a mile of a wild or scenic river according to the 2023 General Plan and Master Environmental Impact Report # 10130 (November ?002) and the Roosevelt Community Plan (April 1992). Air Quality A) Experience: Less'Fhan Significant Impact with ~litigation Aleasures [Clean Air Act, Sections 176 (c) As a result of the San Joaquin Valley's climate and topography, the San Joaquin and (d), and 40 CCR 6, 1, Valley Air Basin (SJVAB) is predisposed to poor air quality. Iiigh mountain 931 ranges surrounding the Valley frequently create air layer inversions that prevent mixing of air masses. The number of sunny clays and high temperalures in the summer favor the formation of ozone_ In the winter, inversions form that often trap particulate matter. The project will contribute to the overall decline in air quality due to increased traffic and ongoing operational emissions. Although the project alone would not generate significant air emissions, the hlcrease in emissions from the project and others like it, cumulatively reduce the air quality in the San Joaquin Valley, The proposed construction of 100 rental and for -sale units for the elderly, disabled, low-income single -families, and non -subsidized housing would be mitigated to a level of less than significant. The federal Clean Air Act, as amended, directed the U.S. EPA to establish air quality standards for several air pollutants. Primary standards relate to the protection of the public's health and safety; secondary standards relate to the protection of the public from non -health effects. The air ollutai*s for which primary standards have been set are: • Carbon monoxide (CO) is an odorless gas that is highly toxic; CO is formed by the incomplete combustion of fuels. • Ozone (03) is formed by a complex series of chemical reactions between reactive organic gases (ROG), oxides of nitrogen (N(7x), and sunlight. • Suspended particulate matter that is less than 10 microns in size given itti small size, can remain airborne for long periods and can he inhaled, pass through the respiratory system, and lodge into the lungs. • Fine particulate matter that is 2.5 microns or less ) is similar to PNIN, but smaller. It generally derives from combustion sources. • Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is a precursor to the formation of ozone. It results from combustion of fos,,il fuels. • Sulfur dioxide (S02) is formed by the combustion of fuels containing sulfur. • Lead (Pb) was a factor when leaded gasoline was available Under the California Air Quality Act, the State also adopted primary and secondary standards for air pollutants. Geographic areas and air basins are classified for each pollutant as either "attainment" or "nonattainrrrent." Areas designated as "nonattainment" are subject to further review and the imposition of pollution control strak-K1es. The nonattainment designation is further subdivided into five cat(*{armor: marginal, moderate, serious, severe, and extreme. Tile degree of an area's nonattainment status is affected by the extent of the pollution and the expected time period n2quired achieving attainment. With respect to the Fresno area, the SJVAB has been classified as nonattain.nrent for ozone and P,NI,o, CO was recently reclassified from nonattainment to attainment by the U.S. EPA. In response to the SJVAI;'s nonattainment status for ozone and I'Mio, the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) adopted air duality attainment plans as required by State and federal regulations. The new attainment plans include more stringent permitting; requirements and a greater level of control on stationary source emissions within the District. Failure to implement the control measures may result in a lass of federal funding for highways and may require sanctions on stationar)l sources. The Valley i<s subject to the most stringent requirements in the California Clean Air Act. These requirements include providing for a 5`-.' per year reduction in nonattainment ernissions, or including "every feasible measure' in the Air Quality Attainment Plan; establishing a permitting program that achieves a no - net -increase in stationary source emissions; developing strategies to reduce vehicle trips and miles traveled; increasing average vehicle rider ship to 1.5 persons during commute hours; reducing population exposure to non - attainment pollutants by 25%; establishing best available retrofit control technology requirements for permitted sources; and developing indirect and area source programs. Is As stated in the current Air Quality Attainment Plan, it is SJVAPCD's strategy to implernerrt multiple tactics or control measures. 'These measures are, in turn, implemented through the extensive collection of District rules, regulations and permitting requirements established by the SJVAPCD. The SJVAPCD reviewed the proposed project and it does not appear that this project alone will result in any significant adverse air duality impacts. Construction of Ole project will contribute to short-term impacts on air quality in the form of increased dust and particulate matter. However, these impacts are local in nature and will cease upon completion of the project. The construction phase of the project will be subject to SJVAPCD Regulation VI1.1, Rule 8020, related to control of dust and M-1111. Continued growtlr in the Fresno metropolitan area and the region will contribute additional air pollutants frorn mobile, stationary, and area sources, thereby making it more difficult for the Air Fusin to meet federal and state air quality standards thereby delaying compliance. The 2025 Fresno General Plan contains objectives and policies to moderate effects on air quality. The General Plan calls for an increase in densities on certain parcels, mixed lapel uses, and a refocus on existing neighborhoods. These policies work to reduce dependence on the private automobile use and to reduce vehicle allies traveled. The proposed project is consistent with these objectives. In addition, the General Plan requires the City to implement all of the Reasonably Available Control ,Measures (RACtii) identified in Exhibit A of Resolution No. 2002-119, adopted by the Fresno City Council on April 9, 2002. Although these measures will result in positive air duality effects, they may not offset effect_~ caused by increased population. The following items are required rules adopted by the SJVAPCD to reduce emissions throughout the San Joaquin Halley arid will apply to the project: 1. Regulate installation of both ►vood burning dcwices and natural gas - fired water heaters to limit the erissions of PMio and oxides of nitrogen (District Rule 4901 and Rule 4902). 2. Reduce Pt1i„ emissions generated by human activity, including construction, road building, bulk materials storage, landfill operations, etc (District Regulation VIII - Fugitive Dust Rules). 3, Regulate source operation that emits or may emit air contaminant~ or other materials (District Rule UO2). 4 Limit volatile organic compounds from architcch.rral coatings (District Rule 4(301), 5. Regulate paving operation by cutback, slow cure and emuLsified asphalt, paving and maintenance operations (District Rule 4641). IVlitibation The SJVAPCD encourages innovation in Measures to reduce air quality impacts. There are a number of measures that could be incorporated into the design/operation of this project to provide additional reductions of the overall level of emissions. Listed below are several measures that should lx� 9 implemented in the construction of the Youth Center. 1. Locate trees on southern and western exposures to shade the building during hot summer months. Deciduous trees should be considered since they provide shade in the summer and allow the sun to reach the facility during the winter months, 2. Install sidewalks and bikeways adjacent to the site and connect the sidewalks and bikeways to any nearby existing, and planned open space areas, parks, schools, residential areas, and commercial areas to encourage walking and bicycling. 3. Include as many energy -conserving features as possible in the design/construction of the new Youth Center. Bamples include "green building" technology; increased wall and ceiling ir7sulatiun (beyond building code requirements), energy efficient lighting; awning or other outside shading mechanism for windows; ceiling fans, orient the units to maximize passive -solar cooling and heating when practicable; and electrical outlets installed around the exterior of the building to encourage use Of electric 1,►ndscape maintenance Cquipment. 4. Include as many clean alternative energy features as possible to promote energy self-sufficiency. Examples include (but are not limited to): photovoltaic cells, solar thermal electricity systerns, small wind turbines, etc. 3. Require construction equipment used at the project site to be equipped with catalysts/particulate traps to reduce particulate and NOx emissions At the time bids are made, contractors must demonstrate the construction equipment used is equipped with particulate filters and/or catalysts or prove why it is infeasible to have clnstTUCtiOn equipment so equipped. 6. Use alternative fuel construction equipment as feasible 7. Replace fossil -fueled equipment with electrically driven equivalenLG (provided they are not run via portable generator). S. Curtail construction during periods of high ambient pollutant concentrations. This may include ceasing construction during peak - hour vehicular traffic on adjacent roadways, and "Spare the Air Days" declared by the District. 9. Require that all diesel engines on the premises be shut off when not in use to reduce emissions from idling. Significance After Mitigation After implementation of the mitigation measures, impacts to air quality as a result of the project will be less than significant. It is expected, however, that regional impacts will remain sigmificant and unavoidable. In this regard, the City of Fresno adopted findings of significant unavoidable impacts and overriding cortsiderations for air quality ►when certifying the Nlaster ElR for the 2025 Fresno General flan. 10 Farmland Protection A) Panted: No Impact Policy Act [7 CFR 658] `I he proposed project is located in the Roosevelt Community Plan Area and is surrounded by apartments and an elementary school. Fhe proposed parcel is not under a Williamson Act Contract and is currently not used for agriculture. The proposed site is planned for residential use. There will be no impact to Farmland. Environmental Justice A) E.xperiencv: No Impact [Executive Order 128981 The proposed site is suitable for the construction of 100 rental and for -sale units for the elderly, disabled, low-income single -families, and non -subsidized housing; will not be adversely impacted by the surrounding residential uses_ The proposed parcel, approximately 5.3 acres, is large enough to construct 100 units and a multi -modal transit liub. LLV L-1 1AII'll L1L11LiC I IIU L ..7+11I IUOI UJ LJCIC1lL1111(i11V11 •1LIU Ll Vl U111C11L,111V11 Noise Abatement and A) Experience, No Impact Control [24 CFR 51 }3] The proposed project is located alone; Kings Canyon Road, along an Arterial street, according to the 2025 General Plan. A Site Evaluation was completed for Kings Canyon Road. A site evaluation +vas completed for the proposed project and the Day -might average sound level (DNL) is considered an acceptable level, (65 DN[. Year 2002), according to the HUD Land Use Compatibility Guidelines for Residential Areas. A Normal acceptable Day -Night Level is below 65 DNL.. Experience: The proposed project, involves development of temporary noise sensitive use,,;. However, after construction of the 100 units and multi -modal transportation hub, temporary noise associated with the construction %%III cease. The temporary noise sensitive uses wi[I 1k limited to day -tune hours. (Monday through Friday 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 .m.). Toxic/Hazardous/Radioa A) Printed: No Impact Clive 11'laterials, Contamination, A Phase I Frivironmental Site Assessment was completed by Rebecca L. Fraser Chemicals or Clasen on April 26, 200I, in conformance with the scope and limitations of A AA1 121 CFR 58.5(i)(2)] Practice E 1527-00 of the project site was performed. The assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the project SITE. The material content of this report is intended to be consistent with a standard of practice as defined by ASTM practice E 1527, Ho% vever, the report format differs in style, arrangement, and presentation of material facts from the format described by Ali' I' 1. Only the current owner of the property was located or contacted for the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. A search was also completed from the Fresno Count}' Health Services, Environmental Health. The project is not in close proximity to clumps, landfills, industrial sites, Leaking underg-rourid storage tanks, and other operaHons with hazardous wastes. The subject property and adjacent properties are free of hazardous materials, contamination, toxic chemicals, gasses and radioactive substances which could affect the health and safet,_of occupants, or conflict with the intended use of the subject property. Siting of HUD -Assisted A) Experience. No Impact Projects near Hazardous Operations [24 CFR 51 Cl The site is not located in proximity to explosive and flammable operations and will not expose people, or buildings, to these: hazards according to the 2025 General Plan and the Roosevelt Community Plan (April 1992). Airport Clear Zones and A) Printed and Contact: No Impact Accident Potential Zones 11-4 CFR 51 D1 The project area is not located in a Runwav Protection Zone, Inner Safety Zone and Sideline Safety Lone, according to the2025 General Plan and ;Master Environmental Impact Report #10130 (November 2002). Environmental Assessment Checklist [I .nvironmental Review Guide HUD CPD 782, 24 C:FR 55.40; Ref. 40 CFR 1508.8 & 1504.271 Evaluate the significance of the effects of the proposal on the character, features and resources of the project area. Enter relevant base data and verifiable source documentation to support the finding. 1 hen enter the appropriate impact code from the following list to make a determination of impact. Impact Codes: (1) - No impact anticipated; (2) - Potentially beneficial; (3) - Potentially adverse; (4) - Requires mitigation; (5) - Requires project modification. Note names, dates of contact, telephone numbers and page references. Attach additional material as appropriate. Note conditions or mitigation measures regenreel. Land Development Code Source or Documentation Conformance with 2 Printed and Experience Comprehensive Plans and Zoning The current zoning of the vacant parcel is R-3 (NMedium Density Multiple Family Residential). 'rhe R-3 District is intended for the development of medium dertisity, multiple -family residential structures for purposes of rental or sale to permanent occupants on lots not less than seven thousand five hundred (7,500) square feet in area. Multiple housing facilities, including rooming and boarding houses, apartment houses and apartment courts, but not to include housing facilities furnished to transient boarders or roomers are a use permitted in the R-3 /one District, according to the City of Fresno Municipal Code. The property is located in the Eoosevelt Community Plan. The 2025 General Plan and Roosevelt Community Plan designate the site as medium density residential. The proposed project is consistent with the City of Fresno Zoning Ordinance and the 2025 General Plan and the Roosevelt Community Plan. Compatibility and 2 Printed and Experience. Urban Impact The subject property is located in the Roosevelt Community Plan Arerl. One goal is establishing and maintaining safe, attractive and stable residential neighborhoods with compatible relationships between housing types and densities. Goals within the 2025 General Plan (Regional Planning) that apply to the proposed project are listed below. 12 1) Coordinate land uses and circulations systems to promote a viable and integrated mu1Li-modal transportation nehvork 2) ['[an for the diversity and quality of residential housing, at locations necessary to provide for adequate and affordable housing opportaaniLies. (lousing patterns should support balanced urban growth, and should make efficient use of resources and public facilities. This project is proposing to create housing opportunities for 100 rental and for- saie units for tlae elderly, disabled, low-income single -families and non Subsidized housing. 'File majority of the area surrounding the proposed project is also planned for residential uses, and as a result, the project is considered to be compatible with surroundin r land uses. Slope 1 Experience. 4larch 2, 2006. The proposed site is flat without significant land forms. Fro5ion I Experience. hylarch'2, 2006 Future construction activities may facilitate wind erosion from exposed soil. ,Fliese impacts will be Lemporary and cease upon completion of the new construction activity. Soil Suitability I Prinked. 2025 Genera[ Plan and \-[aster Environmental Impact Report #10I30 (November 2002) Sail in the vicinity of the project is characterized by well -drained medium - textured grantic alluvium with localized clay strata. Because the topography of the area is generally flat with slope of less than I percent, risk of large-scale erosion from runoff or wind is slight. The potential for wind eriosion is futher reduced by the infrequenCy of high velocit-' winds and because much of the project vicinity is either paved or cultivated. the propsed project would not impact soil suitability in the area according to the 2025 General Plan and Master Environmental Impact Report #10130 (November 2002) and the Roosevelt Community Plan A pril 1992). Hazards and I Printed: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, April 26, 2004 Nuisances including Site Safety Most of the land uses in the project area have not been of the type to generate substantial hazardous waste. klost Land has been utilized for reSideritial purposes since the early 1900's. This project is intended to create opportunities for 100 rental and for -sale units for the elderly, disabled, low-income single - families and non subsidized housing. The project is not in close proximity to dumps, landfills, industrial sites, Leaking underground storage tanks, and other operations with laa7-ardDUS wastes. Energv Consumption I Experience. 2025 General Plan and Master Environmental Impact Report #10130 (November 2002) Construction will require only temporary and minimal consumption of energy. BuildingCode requirements include energy conservation standards which will 13 minimize ever g consumption in the new construction of 100 units. Noise - Contribution 1 Experience. 2025 General Plan and \-taster Environmental Impact Report to Community Noise 010130 (November 2002) Levels The site is currently vacant. This project is proposing to create housins; opportunities for 100 rental and for -sale units for the elderly, disabled, low- income single -families and non subsidized housing. The proposed project will be surrounded by existing multi -family housing and an existing elementary school. The noise is compatible with the surrounding land uses. The noise associated with construction is temporary and will cease upon completion of the project. Air Quality 3 Contact and Experience. 2025 General Plan and \Master Environmental Impact Effects of Ambient Report it10130 (November 2002) and letter dated February 8, 2005 Air Quality on Project and This project is intended to create housing opportunities for 100 rental and for - Contribution to sale units for the elderly, disabled, low-income single -families and non Comnlunin, Pollution subsidized housing. Air Quality Impacts are listed under the :fir Quality Levels Section on pages 7 through 10. Environmental 2 Experience. 2025 General Plan and Master Environmental Impact Report Design #10130 (November 2002) Visual Quality - Coherence, Diversity, The project site currently creates problems of weed -growth and dust control Compatible Use and problems. The implementation of this proposed project will return vacant land Scale to a productive viable use, and provide a resource for the provision of much needed affordable housing for the elderly, disabled and low-income families. The new 100 units will be required to be compatible with existing uses and scale and will com plv with zoning and plan desi mation policies. Socioeconomic Code Source or Documentation Demographic 1 Experience. March 2, 2006 Character Changes The proposed construction of a 100 housing uruts for the elderly, disabled and low-income families will create much needed affordable housing. The proposed project will not have a sigmificant impact on demographics in the area. Displacement 1 Experience. March 2, 2006 There are no existing; residential or commercial structures on the site. Therefore, no displacement will occur as a result of this project. Employment and I Experience and Contact. \larch 2, 2006 Income Patterns No effect, other than the temporary wort: associated with the construction of the proposed project. `The project will have a positive impact by providing housing; for the elderly, disabled and low-i►conie families. Community Facilities and Services Code Source or Documentation Educational Facilities 1 Experience ,and Contact. March 2, 2006 This project is intended to create housing; opportlmihes for 100 rental and for - safe units for the elderly, disabled, low-income sin gle-families and non 14 subsidised housuig. Any new development on the subject property will be subject to Fresno Unified School District Development Fees of $224 per square foot for residential. Commercial Facilities 1 Experience. March 2, 2006 '['here are adequate commercial facilities available in the community to serve residents of the proposed project. Health Care 1 Experience. \-larch 2, 2006 There are adequate health care facilities in the vicinity to serve future residents of the 100 housing units. There is a hospital located in the downtown area, which is approximately 2 miles from the site. '['here will be no impacts to health care tacilities. Social Services 1 Experivnce. ~larch 2, 2006 It is expected that re5identti of this project would come from �%ithin the Fresno 1-10ropolitan area Therefore, thtpre would be no new demand for social sLry ices. Solid VVaste 1 Contact. Fcbruary 4, 2005 Sewer and water requirements sliall be addressed upon submittal of future applications, Doug Hecker, Supervising; Engineering Technician. V11aste VVater 1 Convict. February 4, 2005 Sewer and water requirements shall be addressed upon submittal of future applications, Dou« 1 iecker, Supervising Engineering Technician. Storm VVa ter 1 Contact, February 24, 2005 FNIFCD, Rick Lyons, commented on February 24, 2005, The proposed development will produce storm runoff, which must be properly discharged and mitigated. Such mitigation requires planned local drainage facilities inclusive of pipeline and storage basins. The community has developed and adopted a Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master plan. Each property is required to contribute its pro-rata share to the cost of the public drainage system. It is this form of participation in the cost and/or construction of the drainage system that will mitigate the impact of development, The subject property lies within the Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District's Drainage Area "PP" and shall pay drainage fees pursuant to the Drainage Fee Ordinance prior to issuance of building permit at the rates in effect at the tithe of such approval, The tentative drainage fee for tale property is $70,600. Contact the District for final drainage fee obligation to issuance of the permit. The F14FCD recommends that the City of Fresno require drainage covenant~ of the development to the south of this proposed project to allow surface runoff to reach the existing iv�laster Plan facilities located on L.ast lane Avenue. The existin , laster Plan facilities will provide permanent drainage service to the 15 project. The following rningation are required: 1. The F\MFCD will need to review and approve the site's final improvement plans (i.e. grading, street improvements and storm drain) prier to implementation. 2. Construction activity, including grading, clearing, grubbing, filling, excavation, and development or redevelopment of land that results in a dishrrbance of one acre or more of the total land area, must secure a storm water discharge permit ill compliance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System regulations. The permit must be secured by filing a Notice of Intent for the State General Permit for Construction Activity with the State Water Resources Control Board. The notice must be filed prior to the start of construction. Water Supply 1 Contact. February 4, 2005 Sewer and water requirements shall be addressed upon submittal of future applications, Doug Hecker, Supervising Engineering Technician. Public Safety I Experience and Contact. January 31, 2003 - Police Police are concerned about traffic flow, security, lighting, disturbances, etc. They recommend the following: 1. The developers will install well lit parking lots and landscaping 2. Signs will be posted stating no loitering 3. Security fencing and gates twill be installed around the proposed project. 4. Install security cameras on the premises. - Fire 1 Contact: February 4, 2005 No comment from Fire Department 'The proposed project will not impact the existing fire services. - Emergency \Medical 1 Experience. March 2, 2006 Emergency services will not be impacted. Open Space and 1 Experience. March 2, 2006 Recreation -Open Open space will not be impacted. There are several parks and elementary Space schools located adjacent to and in close proximity to the proposed project. - 1 Experience, \March 2, 2006 Recreation Recreation will not be impacted. - Cultural 1 Experience, March 2, 2006 Facilities Cultural facilities will not be impacted. I () Transportation 1 Contact and Experience. \darch 2, 2006 The proposed project, construction of the 100 housing units and the multi - modal transit huts will not impact the existing roadways, according; to the Draft IMaster Environmental Impact Report for the 2025 Fresno General flan. Currently, Kings Canvon Road behveen Willow and Peach is an Arterial and currently has a Level of Service (LOS) of "C". The current daily volume (Year 2002) is 22,300. The 2025 daily volume fs 29,940. At Year 2025, the LOS will still be a "C" The City of ,Fresno has adopted LOS "D" as an acceptable operation standard for its major street nettivoric, A LOS of "C" is in the range of stable flow, but marls the beginning of the range of the Row in which the operations of Individual vehicles becomes significantly aflected by interactions with other vehicles in the traffic stream The proposed project is located on Stale I Iighway 180. Caltrans will he relinquishing this portion of State Highway 180 to the City of Fresno ui the not - too -distant future (see attached letter dated February 1, The proposed project will not have a significant effect on the transportation and circulation along Kings Canyon Road. The project consists of dousing; for the elderly, disabled and low-income families who will use the multi -modal transit hub located to the adjacent site, along Kings Canvon. Natural Features Source or Documentation Water Resource-, I Contact. Bret Johnson, Fresno Irrigation District, February 20, 2005 Fresno Irrigation District does not mrvn, operate or maintain any facilities located on the applicant's property, f ID expects no adverse impacL,; from the approval the proposed 100 units for elderly, disabled and low income families. Surface LVater 1 Field. -larch 2, 2006 No Impact. There are no surface bodies of water in the project area or on the site itself according; to a field investigation completed on 1•larch 2, 2000 Unique Natural 1 I ield. March 2, 2006 Features and Agricultural I.arids No Impact. The project site is on Flat land, with no unique natural features. The projectsite Ls currently vacant and surrounded by smgT�le-Tamil}, houses and apartment complexes. Vegetation and I Field. 1A irch 2, 2006 Wildlife No Impact. The proposed project site is currently vacant There does not appear to be any natural vegetation other than weeds. 17 Other Factors Source or Documentation Flood Disaster 1 The proposed project is located within Flood Zone X (shaded), areas of 100-year Protection Act flood with average depths of less than 1 foot, or with drainage areas less than 1 [flood Insurance] square mile; areas protected by levees from 100-year flood, or areas determined [§58.6(a)] to be outside 500-year floodplain per FEMA Maps, Conimunitv Panel 06019C21301', effective date July 19, 2001. Coastal Barrier 1 The 2025 General Plan and Master Environmental Impact Report #10130 Resources Act/ (November 2002) indicates that the project area is located in the San Joaquin Coastal Barrier Valley in Central California and is not located within a coastal zone Improvement Act management area. [558.6(c)] Airport Runway 1 The project area is not located in a Runway Protection Zone, Inner Safety: Zone Clear Zone or Clear and Sideline Safety Zone, according to the Fresno Yosemite International Zone Disclosure Airport Area in the 2025 General Plan and Master Env iron men taI Impact §58.6(d)] Report #10130 November 2002 Other Factors Summary of Findings and Conclusions The proposed construction of the 100 housing units for the elderly, disabled and low-income families and the multi -modal transportation hub will improve the neighborhood and provide for a more stable living environment for 100 families. The site is in an area planned for residential development which is ui need of affordable housing for seniors, disabled, and low-income families. Any potential environmental impacts are minimal, and will be reduced to a level of insignificance by a combination of normal construction and zoning requirements, and by the recommended mitigation measures. The new 100 units will be constructed according to the City of Fresno Building Codes. ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION Alternatives and Project Modifications Considered 124 CFR 58.40(e), Ref. 40 CFR 1508.91 (Identify ether reasonable courses of action that were considered and not selected, such as other sites, design modifications, or other uses of the subject site. Describe the Benefits and adverse impacts to the human environment of each alternative and the reasons for rejecting it.) Alternatives to the project were considered including locating the project on another site, and the "No Project" alternative Since the site is available and is the appropriate size and shape for 100 housing units and a Multi - modal transportation hub, and is plaruied for residentiai uses which will permit the proposed density, and is compatible with surrounding uses, it was chosen as the preferred alternative. Alternative sites which are large enough to accommodate 100 housing units would most likely be located in areas of the community farther from the urban center, and in areas where land costs are higher. These factors would result in longer vehicle trips and therefore, more air pollution, and would result in higher costs, making the project less affordable. This project is intended to create opportunities for elderly, disabled and low income families. is No Action Alternative 124 CFI 58.40(e)1 (Discuss the benefits and adverse impacts to the human environment of not implementing the preferred alternative). A "No Fiction" aIterOklive %vouId result in this property remaining; vacant, and no new construction of affordable trousirrg 1 tix the elderly, disabled, and low-ir1corne families. Othersitcs may become available which accomplish t.Prqoal of providing housing for 100 families. However, this site is available, is planned for residential talcs, 0-1 is in area which needs affordable luausing. Mitigation Measure,3!recommended [24 Cl'R 58.40(d), 40 CFR 1508 20] (Rey omrraend feasiblo 4vays in which the proposal or its external factors should be modified in order to minimize adverse emrironmental impact~ and restore or enhance environmental qualihl.) 1. If culluril rc-sdurces area unearthed during any ground disturbance activities, all work should halt in thr area of the find and a qualified professional archaeologist should be called to evaluate the findifig�s and make tine appropriate mitigation recommendations. 2. Locate lzeeti 011 southern and western exposures to shade the building during; hot summer months. Deciduous trees slaoulcl be considered since they provide shade in ll'ie summer and allow !lie sun to reach the facility during; the winter months. 3. Install sidewalks ,and bikeways adjacent to the site and connect the sidewalks and bikeways to any nearby existing, and planned open space areas, parks, schools, residential areas, and commercial areas to encourage walking; and bicycling. 4. Include as many enerp -conserving features as possible in the design/construction of the new Youth Center. 1 xamples iracluile "green building" technology; increased wall and ceiling insulation (beyond building code requirements); energy efficient lighting; awning or other outside shading; mechanism for windows; ceiling fans, orient the units to naaxi.ranize passive -solar cooling and heating when practicable; and electrical outlets installed around the exterior of the building to encourage usO of electric landscape mai-attnarace equipment. 5 Include as many clean alternative energy features as possible to promote energy self-sufficiency. l:xanaples include (but are riot limited to): photovoltaic cells, solar thermal electricity syste nas, small wind turbines, etc. 6 Requ.ire construction equipment used at the project site to be equipped with catalysts/particulate traps to reduce particulate and NOx emissions At the time bids are made, contractors must demonstrate the construction equipment used is equipped with particulate filters and/or catalysts or prove why it is infeasible to have construction equipment so equipped. 7. Use alternative fuel construction equipment as feasible. 8. Replace fossikueled equipment with electrically driven equivalents (provided they are not run via portable generator). 9. Curtail construction during; periods of high anibir�nl pollutant concentrations. This may include ceasing; construction during peak -hour vehicular traffic ora adjacent roaadwa_vs, and "Spare the Air Days" declared by the District. 10. Require that all diesel engines on the premises be shut off when not in use to reduce emissions from idling. 19 11. Anv nesv development on the subject property will be subject to Fresno Unified School District Development Fees of 52.24 per square foot for residential. 12. The District will need to review and approve the site's final improvement plans (i.e, grading, street improvtnient_s and storm drain) prior to implementation. 13. Construction activity, uacludingg grading, clearing, grubbing, filling, excavation, development or redevelopment of land that results in a disturbance of one acre or more of the total land area, must secure a storm water discharge permit in compliance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System regulations, The permit must besecured by filing; a Notice of Intent for the State General Permit for Construction Activity with the State Water Resources Control Hoard, The notice must be filed prior to the start of construction. 14. The developers will install well lit parking lots and landscaping, 15 Signs will be posted stating no loitering; 16. Security fencing and gates will be installed around the proposed project 17 Install security carneras on the premises Additional Studies Performed (Attach studies or sunlmaric's) 1) Archeological Survey, Jon Brady, April 9, 2005 2) Historical Properh' Survey, Jon Brady, June 2, 2005 List of Sources, Agencies and Persons Consulted 140 CFR 1508.9(b)] City of Fresno, Public Works Department, Bob,4ladewelt, Traffic Engineer City of Fresno, Planning and Development Department, Corrina Nunez, Project ;`lanag;er City of Fresno Public Utilities Department, Doug Hecker, Supervising Engineering Technician City of Fresno Fire Department, Fire Chief City of Fresno Police Department, E. RIJ 818, SE Policing District City of Fresno, Karan Hattersley-Drayton, Historic Preservation Project Nlana ger California Historic Resource Information Svstean, Adele Baldwin, assistant Coordinator Fresno alletropolitan Flood Control District, Rick Lyons, Design Technician I San Joaquin Vallev Air Pollution Control District, Flena Nurio, Air Quality Specialist Fresno County, I Iurraan Services System, Kathleen Bover, Environmental Health Specialist III Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Rate Maps Department of Yransportation, Office of Transportation Manning, Moses Stites, Senior Planner 20 Ac rc SUBDIVIDED LAND IN POR, SEC'S. 7 8, T. 14 S. P, 21 E., M, D. B. M. Z 3k —XIN. W, 463 Q: Lu on E YJMGS A.YYQN -- - - - - - - - - - - - - Lit - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - L-- - - - - - - 42. PON- Ui 3 •F. U. S. 0. C- BA -1 5/c 7 P 1-3. 30 H '4 (Lf T /BA -1b 44 C-2 -20117. 78A ar. R 93-ZC F1 91: ZZ9 7! s 93-90 n U 4 H -Y CJF I'LL 214 CJT 7 b. rmc ;ktj�- Ufl I" FRg�NO — cqt- I 91 P-4412-3 C 111- 14-2 r. fj. S. J. EL, 0 21L4r- A :,1A C?) r 3 P 82 AVE. JA P I 1112 F U.,S D. F� - V j 3 (L 01 1-t;4-3 A 01 43114c: 4, 45bp R-P/BA-1 5 F I/BA-15 R-P/BA-15 A-1-B/BA-30 A49 A&4c As LE LIBERTY AVE 4 t. 4 14 0 ZIDI ZU 91 F U.S.D. fR-P/BA -30 7.5 fAr- F CO) T 5 6 7 1 j 11 M ro 61, r Z I LYELL A vE U :cy OF F,9ESNO 1K - -10 ', , o, ", ]j r :c,,r Ft. 4 ngp.y4. YtAc. f. U7 RT/B-A-307 Uil ANHLXATIONt;Z% Bk� EasterbyRancho- Plat3k.2, Pg.6 DErAJL 'A' Parcel Map No. 7226 - 8k. 4 7, Pg. 70 Tract No. 2285 - Plat Bk 25. Pg. 60 JLL NO 75 - AsjamX I &Oe- N(ArOW3 Show SITE LOCATION MAP 5080 EAST KINGS CANYON ROAD (PORTION) SOUTHEAST CORNER OF EAST KINGS CANYON ROAD AND SOUTH ADLER AVENUE FP-ESNO, CALIFORNIA I I" "I &D M KINGS CANYON INTER MODAL/H OUSIN G STYE PROPERTY DIAGRAM M 1/4 cmuom M=nm i Y 14 3, R 71 C 74 41 � 4 � O a T n F- O to EAST KINGS CANYON ROAD EAST LANE AVE. 373.44' Q S Cf 4S' 49' W S 696 29' 37' E 264.69' ® S T 32' 24' w 40.Co' d S 89' 24' 52" 1; 1 94,29' ® S 0' 31' 45" W 50,75, (,p S 89' 28' 15' E 142.15' ® N Cr 45' 49" E 464.20' R R _ Im 7a Lr_! Q 41 4p qU 2 H O N 1 NND SG U G 1q�, Lp LS CAL\ !KCmet sccr*w7 T14SR27 C SCALE 1'=500' PROPERTY DIAGRAM 5080 EAST KINGS CANYON ROAD (PORTION) SOUTHEAST CORNER OF EAST KINGS CANYON ROAD AND SOUTH ADLER AVENUE FRESNO, CALIFORNIA ------------- r dki i f'' ; r I- :i ZZ 71 _~ TOPOGRAPHIC NIAP 5080 EAST KINGS CANYON ROAD (PORTION) SOUTHEAST CORNER OF EAST KINGS CANYON ROAD AND SOUTH ADLER AVENUE FRESNO, CALIFORNIA '.�_�r �,� r'w � � l k"'R•� �,' �_. *�--� � ;fir:- - ';'y=• � � ,R F,��n'`'„-..✓.-�w+.�`,;�.N ' �:�.�,' . M Ys Srr�r.+:'r{1'-_,�' *'+T: �Z+�+•'4Yk�. � . �. ` 4� - �. �'{' IFf y I +•�; f�'`� t*j�l.*'�A"�ir{Y� 3t '�fJ4 a.. %;, .�tr 'rT. - ti :i.,t— fir. #�:. 'S�'•'.� ���^�� J�C .�4i. '.sl r:��. .�� -+' �-T� F-+ � * y r , Ir ,1r { e%r"YI s`� ri-., Y 7' ': y }r*+F �'_ +• ,'�.�.,�.+....++#H�� i ..' � _ �# �� � � � •; .4t _ `�� ._ -- =-r #., i ': It — o,.f•rNrwu..+ mr w r'rl - - I* _ r•IYF ��r Lr...Si 31 . .._ _ ._ '• .1. _ ti{� r�}�,}1 +,i+..f _ ,. ,7 rJ-rk *ip,..- as - ��r rt. iYrir.' ' r _. _ Y 'j J• y }y., 5a:. r +lr�• _ ` . - w. F1^ r 4ofI. � _. .{� i' i ,µ' Syr'. i er`• ,? '+��_ Ip fodp LaJS 441PF .� .�• 1 �.1�.ii1[�a d i 4 ti'l•A _ - ��_!_ - f��S'.'`_�!L'•r 'r 1 { fJi i rJf+i f{.: :},1+3}i, Tr rL -IF 1.7 . • - T • �: qr 'y - 'J.k— ���__� M1 � . ..}.YI.Yw�w�4' � _ '''l+� ?,}3 •?'�p�141� 1!S•`...'t + :t .'� .t�.�+ ��'�'wL ;C`• ',:(,:.*Sr �f�r,f r�,• � r N 'i•� •a>s7• r ��.� _ �! .a��.� �^�-i�'• ,•1 �i►n ,ei = • '' . ',al t:,rr:.ie•-+ 14 VP _— rp'r!!1 i�.. '-•-- `-t..,. ,ry.. ... ..n,1 '#:r1 1.. ^t t of •,�a a• r r 'it,� II"l�!•7 j�1,SI Ci ts, ith l l;'{:.yVl �i'+,•'4•ii 1'ISFri�� r a.e --II Tom- iW_�• T�yY � . r!y ^,_ ' -.Ij ."1,•w� '�-•��.�•f , �1'.:! I :�����"" 7:::•`:�-•L'�• _— dF�. l � +. ,:p' � ::•tl.i ``� •� 1i'.1 a Li,:�Sli:••::=��S.i •:r r - - •,,`'A � ,,w't. _ ..,'.�:` .for la�.[,�1 •:'k� - f �''--� . - - - , _ I lit ((" • >�':,'7:i'� 1;.1 - _: _ = —__ r r .`{•- �!� � y .. � � �.1 �•r �:�r k.•�I , M'��!;k..r, !rl r -t�•~r Ilk • � {.!. t lt.�'^�.� 'Sk i1, •. �� r !` a^ �..•1 �'�.. r'..w-S._ 7R. FmmmIlia It �� '.�'r-t i-j�.9'.-+��:t�.i•.a is .�tl. �•j1rr�Y+.. :-SC.. -'w•�,+•AVyayrr -�: r. l'I�'--� .$<:{ i '� ,E'd 11.4''w i-j i•�'%{.y•ff{i'���,i�l� 11j I qI�}�J 1::'f��F Op ��- - �'-- `-�c�s-+rz-.n�-'..n•,.s.aVMl�+w•r+� _ � '1, r i{J.1ra y"r�•� '�14"Ill ;r I ,.1'SI f I':.� • ., �wN.�-T. 7CYYibY�►�.:57pC-4 ' f 'i - rfw��s 1. 'jri1, ;.9' 'i!�' �!{: t •-S1i'-''! "- 1" .�! � '^, Jeailw. o/'L :� '. •..� '-�, �r:4�1+_ 1:1t1�'j!I I;r '�'�jdi: rl:j.l..i; li:�j�� �� � .7-.•�c� j...! �;•. `i���::.'.., ,w.'..'..,+• i��';}j!'���I' •',}�,;,I';�s�::`.js1li fi::.. r::'E:.�., A rYB_.'.: ,j.= r ;�` ai iiillC r, • 4w•+cv �, ; ,ii. (; 1 y:r• ft t:'I t �-.,__ L-h^^�. -r a rn.t•, ,.Jzarc� v r�_ t � �tii � • 1 .��til 'ii�ih}i:1i �*.� •r' :.�.�::3.�.iri+Cr:otMCCti:.Y �• ���---'h-:r..;p� '�� ` ,� �J '!t�:..4is,l�•.�.�, IC�r?R'"E'''1�3:j,i:' . w+,+r I �arti},l! I �'�•r�l.�{ .-1�3�i{�' i�' �;-"Le ��j,' t•'.r'_^a.-es! +v F1� � '7�! r11e�}'t�j'��+}�! 1}� I3������ J :� "l,• - .r,i��E�_��� r11..,} Yl.a.rFIN:(ri`I s ;ram _ rM. rrarwr�rrr�M_rr ��/'A�/Yltrwl�'��. r+w,a . � r��N�.r+ � � � r r . w wy��ra. w� r+. r • r ��wa . r r •arr� � r � w _ rMr��^ `�+�Mw�yy wrrrw/w �w� -r�rrw�aa�. r. w�.rMir lirr+� ... -� Nr�rr~yrI-ww�a •r�w�r�r��+'-rwr�rr-=�r�w • Mww+�+-�rrwr�_r�ra�r-r��rr. M+ GYM - •. .rrarw.rrrrr+rrr rr�r- rr age • AERIAL NIAP - 1957 5080 EAST KINGS CANYON ROAD (PORTION) SOUTHEAST CORNER OF EAST KINGS CANYON ROAD AND SOUTH ADLER AVENUE MESNO, CALIFORMA .rM AERLAL MAP 1961 5080 EAST KINGS CANYON ROAD (PORTION) SOUTHEAST CORNER OF EAST KINGS CANYON ROAD AND SOUTH A.DLER AVENUE. FRESNO, CALIFORNIA trl - ,.c �-� .. " _ .:� - '. .' �`='mot-•.. � - K �� ,,�(i*y�.tr- a� F •' •fir 9 41 Tj AL zt ol— .?"' : Fri . — .i.� - � ' . . _ r•• IL _ .—'F is F �,y 14 � ................. 77. if —-.—t..� 7{ � �:: — —.. ��_ __ '}� ter• Vil tl! IP -34m: ill rr - vF i+��i�r�c'i� � '� jr V mr—s zrid L8 "M Mi M iw g".12 lei W_ ice' l;,rt,.��;L- I'ViN %. - A mm6w-, fmm-" err �!!v]qA r,�.�r ,w..�o t: ~' +� f'i? r , It 4 V, 2C M; �. ,� a e t `1a • '`.� t FT 6 �rii• ti'7`"�tif-- �•�o�4a�y�riL_I �. �,*MY #sY� - * 1 •.r' ' �,�.�``, �,�ti i � �?�"�''`� �. � x % � . � :��.h, vim•-++ - � 7 1 1 ! y _ elf Lt IL 1 t') `' }}tlr��•�'y'• �' �~ ' k�,� 1+ii •�,� "+i r.. .r,t}��' r��{'.t vr r•� _r'~ :�- sw .;i 7r `.r '.� IM• r•F1S�S r�,�a ��Cyy���•A�1. ���;� � ��•.i�.....+R..�: 1/� I «-�_. ar �� 11: ;re,` 1 1'.!�� 4=I�' •y�r�'f5';; Ta+it frl� �.� — . � {; (a. i ,1 ^•!-'�•�� ,jai:.- � - - - ^�� '�^ � - r e .# s nx.�'• � Yri3 ' jq I _ �rca`` r� I .: �..'..t�. n�w ',�� s� iM1 ICI � 1��•.-: � �� �L�?t� • "'� _ ��Yiia'�r�.�-�ry�,...a--ram.. u.+r'r•.. w.. •. ...' �., +.s" �...:.. � _ ._ r .- ;NJ 4_ti'R 1—. Fr,.: v - _ .l _— '}{_�•7r''- ". ��., - _ TL" 77 =Yr. ,..*Tr�_a^, +�•da.l-..—^ ... ' c 3{^rf•�[�€-. _ J•�+F1`""��'� �t�~ J.�' '��^b,' q:+^�S` -r=r+w�r'a'r:..r I ti <: '.. ill 11 I '+• �3 '� r� +Ff�l r . .� 7 54 } PT _ f 'Lr �.{•} NTH,!!,/ *7_ p ''AL �4 '�' - ._ii • + f{•`9- F'I* _ �.� µ iv [ f ,raj - :xiri"'[",. 1�}?tiYt_ y. � �r{ .. � ? s: ,.k. — {,r'F'r }',r+., • F' + y � , ';'i�. '�:��. i;{.�:ti{•' ..'."M1 .L'?�.L, Y..' k+�111 '� s+y -1F'+ "7 �f `'Y54�lnh ;C_�•l}..j r, Q� .}�_.�, �':.� _.._r,a., k : `{'.: fix`"k .,_.. l..' ,'. _. , f��f�11 II ��}`��f{Cz f'1�r"-"�..`�- N�kF •`1'- i.i� +V}'+' The EDR Radius Map iN ith GeoCheck° Intermodal Site 5080 East Kings Canyon Road Fresno, CA 93727 Inquiry Number: 01255032.1r August 23, 2004 R" Environmental Data Resources Inc The Standard in Environmental Risk Management Information 440 Wheelers Farms Road Milford, Connecticut 06460 Nationwide Customer Service Telephone: 1-800-352-0050 Fax: 1-800-231-6802 Internet: www,edrnet.com I TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Executive Summary_ - - - - - ES1 Overview Map- _ _ _ - 2 DetailMap------------------------------------------------------ --- --- 3 Map Findings Summary- - - - - _ _ .. _ - - - - - - - - - - 4 MapFindings---------------------------------- ---------- --- . ---. 6 Orphan Summary _ - - - _ _ Government Records SearchedlData Currency Tracking_ . - - - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ -. GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary- _ - - _ _ - - - _ _ - _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ A-2 Physical Setting Source Map ---------------------- -. ._______--------- A-8 Physical Setting Source Map Findings- - _ _ - _ _ - _ - . _ - A-9 Physical Setting Source Records Searched ------------------------------------ A-62 01 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 10 with any questions or Comments. N Disclaimer - Copyright and Tfadomark Notice This report contains Infom'ialion obtainod Irom a variety of public and other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL EDR BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAIAAOES. It can not be concluded from this report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sourres. Any analyses, estimates, ratings or risk codes provided in this report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Any liability on the part of EDR is strictly limited to a refund of the amount paid for this report Copyright 2QG4 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, Is prohibitod without prior written pormission. EDR and its logos (including Santiom and Sanborn Map) aro trademarks of Environmental Data Resources. Inc or its affiliates All other lradarnarks used herein are the property of their rospeclive owners TC01255032.lr Page 1 t EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). The report meets the government records search requirements of ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments, E 1527-00. Search distances are per ASTM standard or custorn distances requested by the user. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 5060 EAST KINGS CANYON ROAD FRESNO, CA 93727 ' COORDINATES Latitude (North): 36,735600 - 36' 44' 8.2" Longitude (West): 119.723900 - 119' 43' 26.0" Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 11 UTM X (Meters): 256769.3 UTM Y (Meters): 4068799.5 Elevation; 314 ft. above sea level USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY Target Property: 361 19-F6 MALAGA, CA Source: USGS 7.5 min quad index j TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was identified in the following government records For more information on this property see page 6 of the attached EDR Radius Map report: Site Database(s) EPA ID 1X FRESNO ELKS LODGE HAZNET NIA 5080 F KINGS CANYON RD FRESNO, CA 93727 ■ ■ DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in ED>R's search of available ( "reasonably ascertainable ') government records either on the target property or within the ASTM E 1527-00 search radius around the target property for the following databases: FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD NPL-------------------------- National Priority List Proposed NPL -------------- Proposed National Priority List Sites CERCLIS---- -- ------------- Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CERC-NFRAP------------- CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned TC012550121r EXECUTIVE $WMMAIiY1 1� EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CORRACTS------------------ Corrective Action Report RCRIS-TSD .- .. .--- ---- Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System RCRIS-LOG------------------ Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System ERNS------------------------ Emergency Response Notification System STATE ASTM STANDARD AWP_________________________ Cal -Sites -------------------- Annual Workplan Sites _ Calsites Database CHMIRS___________________-_ California Hazardous Material Incident Report System Notify 65_____________________ Proposition 65 Records Toxic Pits_ ---------- SW FILF_ - _ _ - _ - - - Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites _ _ - _ Solid Waste information System WMUDSISWAT-------------- Waste Management Unit Database CA BOND EXP. PLAN. _-_ _-- Bond Expenditure Plan UST_ ___ ____ __ _ _ _ __ ___ VCP- _ - - _ - _ _ __ List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities . Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties INDIAN UST. -- Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land INDIAN LUST _ Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL CONSENT ------------------- Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees ROD- __---------- ------------- Delisted NPL --------------- Records Of Decision National Priority List Deletions FINDS .------------- I-------- Facility Index SystemXacilityldentificalion Initiative Program Summary Report HMIRS_____-------- _--------- Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System MLTS________________________ MINES_______________ MatenalLicensing Tracking System __ Mines Master Index File NPL Liens------------------- Federal Superfund Liens PADS________ _______________ PCB Activity Database System FUDS________________________ FormertyUsed DefenseSites UMTRA---------------------- Uranium Mill Tailings Sites INDIAN RESERV------------- Indian Reservations ` DOD______________ -------- Department of Defense Sites US BROWNFIELDS_ .. . _ _ . _ _ A Listing of Brownfields Sites RAATS------------------ RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System TRIS_________________________ Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System 4 TSCA....................... Toxic Substances Control Act SSTS...... ................. Section 7 Tracking Systems FTTS iNSP- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FIFRAI TSCA Tracking System - FiFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)[TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) STATE OR LOCAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL AST- - . - Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities CLEANERS------------------ Cleaner Facilities CAWDS_____ ----------- _---- N FE_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ --- - ------- Waste Discharge System Properties Needing Further Evaluation N FIL__________________-______ No Further Action Determination EMI____________________________ Emissions Inventory Data REF_ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Unconfirmed Properties Referred to Another Agency SCH-------------------------- School Property Evaluation Program DEED------------------------ List of Deed Restrictions 0 0 TC0125W32,1f EXECUT14C SVIMIARY 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CA SLiC. . . . .... . . ... . ... Spills, Leaks, Investigation 8 Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing EDR PROPRIETARY HISTORICAL DATABASES Coal Gas_ . _ ------ Former Manufactured Gas (Coat/ Gas) Sites t BROWNFIELDS DATABASES US BROWNFIELDS._. _- A Listing of Brownfields Sites VCP_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ __ _ _. Voiuntary Cleanup Program Properties L. SURROUNDING S{TES; SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. 10 Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis, IfFEDERAL ASTM STANDARD RCRIS: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System. RCRIS includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat andior dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs). generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Small quantity generators (SQGs): generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Large quantity generators (LQGs)7 generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste from the generator off -site to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. A review of the RCRIS-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06l15/2004 has revealed that there is 1 RCRIS-SQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. EquallHlgher Elevation Address Dist i Dir Map ID Page THOMAS BETNEA TRANSPORT 5005 EAST MONO 118 - 114WNW 7 9 M 10 STATE ASTM STANDARD ■ 10 TC41255032 If EXECUTJVE S7 WMARY 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CORTESE: This database identifies public drinking water wells with detectable levels of contamination, hazardous substance sites selected for remedial action, sites with known toxic material identified through the abandoned site assessment program, sites with USTs having a reportable release and all solid waste disposal facilities from which there is known migration. The source is the California Environmental Protection Agency/Office of Emergency Information. A review of the Corlese list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 Cortese site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. EquallHighor Elevation Address Dist I Dir Map ID Page VICTOR MUSSO RESIDENCE 5046 MONO AVE E 1/8 - 114 WNW A5 T LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board Leaking Underground Storage Tank Information System. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/12/2C04 has revealed that there are 2 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. EquallHigher Elevation Address Dist / Dir Map ID Page VECTOR MUSSO RESIDENCE 5046 MONO AVE E 1/9 - 114 WNW A T Lower Elevation Address Dist I Dir Map ID Page ARCO #5803' 4897 E KINGS CANYON 114 - 1/2 W 8 9 CA FID: The Facility inventory Database contains active and inactive underground storage tank locations. The source is the State Water Resource Control Board. A review of the CA FID UST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 CA FID UST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist I Dir Map ID Page PRIVATE RESIDENCE 5046 E MONO 118 - 114 WNW A4 7 HIST UST: Historical UST Registered Database. A review of the HIST UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/1511990 has revealed that there is 1 HIST UST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Dist I Dir Map ID Page HOME 5046 E MONO AVE 1/8 - 114 WNW A6 8 N STATE OR LOCAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL Fresno Co. CUPA:Cerdfied Unified Program Agency. CUPA's are responsible for implementing a unified ■ IN TC01255032.4 EXECUTIVE SUId? ARY 4 M M EXECUTIVE SUMMARY hazardous waste management regulatory program. The agency provides ^� ' oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks. A review of the Fresno Co. CUPA list, as provided by EDR, and daled 0501/2004 has revealed that there are 2 Fresno Co. CUPA sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. EquaUHigher Elevation Address Dist I Dir Map ID Page WAL-MART STORE #2001 5125 E KINGS CANYON 0 - 118 ENE 2 6 VICTOR MUS5O 5046 E MONO 118 - 114 WNW A3 6 MR KA 7u w 00 ■ 0 ■ I 0 TCO',265022.ir EXECuTIVE SUMMARY 5 d a r u r 0 r N I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped: RAINBOW BEND ENTERPEISES SANGER ROCK & SAND CALIFORNIA AQUEDUCT RECYCLING UNLIMITED TSIMRF AND VERMICOMP CENTRAL VALLEY TIRE DISPOSAL CHATEAU FRESNO LANDFILL BALCH CAMP DISPOSAL SITE 7-ELEVEN STORE #2237-19835' BIZZY BEE GAS & FOOD MART CHEVRON #92020' JL GAS & FOOD AMIPM PEP BOYS 4673 SHELL RAPID LUBE USA #96 M.D. WESSON DISPOSAL SITE DOS PALOS CITY DISPOSAL SITE LOWELL HILL RD REFUSE SITE HYDE PARK DISPOSAL SITE SNAKE ROAD DISP SITE BERT BERG S DISPOSAL SITE BALCH CAMP DISPOSAL SITE BIG BLUE HILLS CLASS III SITE CLEANERS Fresno Co. CUPA CHMIRS, Fresno Co. CUPA SWFILF SWFILF SWFILF SWFILF UST UST UST UST UST UST UST FINDS FINDS FINDS FINDS FINDS FINDS FINDS CA WDS a TCX 1.255032.tr EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 %J r F—n r IG?iY MP%F- ' U 1 L.77UJL. l r - MC:UCC:C:d VI pbG. l+lll rJU I►I I1{4 L- IF TLi NE IrrE rti �I ® I IT� 1 I � I _ - k.Kit _ _ �. �.�. ---�-• �.- ... ....... ..... -.. _.... �. ._ Target Property Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property • Sites at elevabons lover than the +argot property A Coal Gasii:cat,on U1ros Malipr.al Pricrily List SiIEtS taAdlIII SltRls t]gpi_ GB1erM 51105 aT.EN A41 0 /N I12 1 WIN. IT,olaf% Raserval<cns BIA Areas o' Concern ' Power transmission Imes oil & Gas pipelines F. t0o•yearflood zone j 500•year flood Lorne --j Federa4 Wetlands TAMIET PROPERTY: Intermodal Site CUSTOt�.#ERI Rebecca Fraser Consulting ADDRESS: 5080 East KNS Canyon Road CONTACT: Rebecca Fraser CITYISTATE'-!'i:1: Fresno CA 93727 INQUIRY a' 01255032.1r LAT/LONG: 36.7356 11 19.7239 DATE: August 23, 2004 1 54 pin C&ayrlpYi•: 2N4 LEA. 1z i �•.�}1 [i��.ln: R41 OT.2011 w4 k �••1 'KpIn M1Ri DETAIL MAP - 01255032.1 r - Rebecca Fraser Consultina i ti I I n a K. E BNO ST Target Property ' Silas at elevatior+s higher than or equal to the target property • Sites at elevations lower than the target property A Coal Gasification Sites it Sen&bve Receptors 01 National Prionty List Silos Landl0l S+tes Dept. Dalense Sites a t:'-.' Slom I r " ;�1Avf D 1114 rA Ili YIM• Indian Reservations BIA Areas of Corcefn Power transmission lines Oil & Gas pipohnes 100•yearflood zone S00•yearflood zone Federal Wetlands I TARGET PROPERTY I t d 1 S' CUSTOr 1Ep b F n — a +te Re ecca raser Consulting ADDRESS: 5080 East Kings Canyon Road CONTACT. Rebecca Fraser CITYISTATEIZIP Fresno CA 93727 INQUIRY i4: 01255032,1 r 1AT/1-ONG: 36.7356 / 119, 7239 DATE; August 23, 2004 I :55 prn Co?M TI •, 2Y,.d E^Fj. fn: 0 ?+: 7J SDI. 1•: P11 Or= .Af �47Ms .tlicerrw] MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Target Distance Total Database Property (Miles) < 116 W8 - V4 114 - 112 1!2 - 1 > 1 Plotted FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 CERCLtS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 CERC-NFRAP 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 RCRIS-TSD 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 RCRIS Lg. Quan. Gen. 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 RCRIS Sm. Quan. Gen 0.250 0 1 NR NR NR 1 ERNS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 STATE ASTM STANDARD AWP 1,000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Cal -Sites 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 CHMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Cortese 0.500 0 1 0 NR NR 1 Notify 65 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Toxic Pits 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 State Landfill 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 WMUDS/SWAT 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 LUST 0.500 0 1 1 NR NR 2 CA Bond Exp. Plan 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 INDIAN UST 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 INDIAN LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 CA F1D UST 0.250 0 1 NR NR NR 1 HIST UST 0.250 0 1 NR NR NR 1 FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 FINDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 HMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 MLTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 MINES 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 NPL Liens TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 PADS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 FUDS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 UMTRA 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 INDIAN RESERV 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 DOD 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 RAATS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TRIS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TC01255032.1r Pap 4 A MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Target Distance Total Database Property (Miles) { 118 218 - 114 114 - 112 112 - 1 > 1 Plotted TSCA TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 SSTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 FITS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 STATE OR LOCAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL AST TP NR CLEANERS 0,250 0 CA WDS TP NR Fresno Co. CUPA 0,250 1 NFE 0.250 0 NFA 0.250 0 EMI TP NR REF 0.250 0 SCH 0 250 0 DEED TP NR CA SLIC 0.500 0 HAZNET X TP NR EDR PROPRIETARY HISTORICAL DATABASES Coal Gas 1.000 0 BROWNFIELDS DATABASES US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 VCP 0.500 0 NOTES: AQUIFLOW - see EDR Physical Setting Source Addendum TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database NR NR NR NR 0 0 NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR 0 1 NR NR NR 2 0 NR NR NR 0 0 NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0 NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 NR NR 0 TC01255032,ir Pago 5 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Datsbase(s) EPA ID Number Coal Gas Site Search: No site was found in a search of Real Property Scan's ENVIROHAZ database. 1 1X FRESNO ELKS LODGE HAZNET 5100850648 Target 5080 E KINGS CANYON RD NIA Property FRESNO, CA 93727 HAZNET: Actual: Gepaid: CACON895368 314 ft. TSD EPA ID: CAL000027741 Gen County: Fresno Tsd County: 5 Tons: 63.2100 Wasle Category: Asbestos -containing waste Disposal Method: Disposal, Land Fill Contad: Not reported Telephone_ (000) 000-OOOD Mailing Address: 5191 N 6TH ST FRESNO, CA 93710 County Fresno 2 WAL-MART STORE 02001 Freano Co. CUPA S106176786 ENE $125 E KINGS CANYON NIA < 118 FRESNO, CA 93727 606 ft, Relative: CUPA: Higher Facility ID: FA0269092 Program Eloment:t-4RGE QUANTITY GENERATOR Actual: 315 ft. Facility ID: FA0269092 Program Element, AUTO REPAIR/MAINTENANCE MODEL PLAN Facility ID: FA0269092 Program Elemenl:CLOSED HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT UNIT Facility ID: FA0269092 Program Elemenl:CLOSED UST FACILITY/DATA VAULT A3 VICTOR 1MUSSO Fresno Co. CUPA S106176769 WNW 50" E MONO NIA 118-1I4 FRESNO, CA 93727 852 ft. Site 1 of 4 In cluster A Relative: Equal CUPA, Facility ID: FA0266630 Actual: Program Element:FORMER CONTAMINATED SITEICLEANUP COMPLETE 314 ft, Facility ID: FA0266630 Program Elemenl:CLOSEO UST FACILITYrDATA VAULT rC01255032,1r Pago 6 Map ID� ^MAP FINDINGS Direcdion - Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA 11) Number A4 PRIVATE RESIDENCE CA FID UST S101581338 WNW 5046 E MONO NIA 118.1/4 FRESNO, CA 93727 852 ft, Site 2 of 4 in cluster A Ralativa: Equal FID: Facility ID- 10000236 Regulate ID: 0004935E Actual: Reg By: Active Undr+rground Storage Tank Location 314 ft. Cortese Code: Not reported SIC Code: Not reported Status: Active Facility Tel (209) 255-6t73 Mail To: Not reported 5-066 != MONO FRESNO, CA 93727 Contact: Not reported Contact Tel Not reported DUNs No: Not reported NPDES No: Not reported Creation 10/22193 Modified: 00100/00 EPA ID: Not reported Comments. Not reported A5 VICTOR MUSSO RESIDENCE LUST S104404085 WNW 5046 MONO AVE E Cortese NIA 1M-114 FRESNO, CA 93727 852 ft. Sito 3 of 4 In clustar A Relative: Equal State LUST. Cross Street WILLOW S Actual: City Leaked Not reported 314 ft, Case Number 5Tt0000268 Reg Board: 0 Chemical: Gasoline Lead Agency Local Agency Local Agency . 10000 Case Type. Undefined Status: Case Closed Review Date. Not reported Confirm Leak: Not reported Workplan: Not reported Prelim Assess: Not reported Pollution Char Not reported Remed Plan: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Close Date: 2000-11-14 00:00:00 Release Date: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id: 14675 Discover Date: Not reported Enforcement Dt : 1965-01-01 00:00:00 Enf Type: None Taken Enter Date: 1990-11-07 00:00'00 Funding Responsible Party Staff Inivals SUS How Discovered: Tank Closure Haw Stopped: Not reported Interim : Not reported Leak Cause: UNK Leak Source- UNK MTBE Date: Not reported Max MTBE GW : Not reported MTBE Tested: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed. Priority: 4 Local Case 4: 0 Beneficial: Not reported TC012550321r Page 7 r r r r r r Map ID Direclicn �' Dissents Distance (h } E!evalian Silo VICTOR MUSSO RESIDENCE (Continued) MAP FINDINGS Staff: DAM GW Qualifier . Not reported Max IviTBE Soil : Not reported Soil Qualifier: Not reported Hydr Basin 9 SAN JOAQUIN (5-22) Operator: Not reported Oversight Prgm: LUST Review Date : 1990-11-07 M.00.00 Stop Date Not reported Work Suspended No Responsible PartyVICTOR MUSSO RP Address. 5046 E- MONO. FRESNO. CA 93727 Global Id: T0601900265 Org Name Not reported Contact Person: Nat reported MTBE Conc: 0 Mibe Fuei- t Water System Name. Not reported Well Name- Not reported Distance To Lust: 1 Waste Discharge Global ID: Not reported Waste D+sch Ass+gned Name. Not reported LUST Region 5 Substance: GASOLINE Case Type: Undefined Program: LUST Staff Initials DAM Status Case C:osed MTBE Code NIA Load Agency Local CORTESE: Region CORTESE Fac Address 2: 5046 MONO AVE E A6 HOME WNW 5046 E MONO AVE V11-1I4 FRESNO, CA 93727 852 ". Site 4 of 4 in cluster A Relative: Equal UST HIST: Facility ID 49358 Actual: Total Tanks: 2 314 ft. Owner Address: 5046 E. MONO FRESNO, CA 93727 Tank Used for PRODUCT Tank Num. 1 Tank Capacity: 00000000 Typo of Fuel: UNLEADED Leak Detection: Stock Inventor Contact Name Not reported Facility Type Not reported Facility ID- 49358 Total Tanks: 2 Owner Address: 5046 E. MONO FRESNO, CA 93727 Tank Used for: PRODUCT EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Case Number: 5T I0000268 S 10"IN1085 HIST UST U001592934 NIA Owner Name: VICTOR & MARY MUSSO Region: STATE Container Num: 1 Year Installed. Nat reported Tank Construction: Not Reported Telephone (209) 255-6173 Other Type: HOME Owner Name: VICTOR & MARY MUSSO Region: STATE TC01255032.1r Page 8 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (It.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number 1]alabase(s) EPA ID Number HOME [Continued] 0001592934 Tank Num 2 Conlainor Num 2 Tank Capacity. X-J01-4G0 Year Installed yet roported Type of Fuel. UNLEAOED Tank Construction: Not Reported Leak Detection Stock Inverilor Contact Name: Not rapoflud Telephone: (209) 255-6173 Facility type, Not reported Other Type: HOME 7 THOMAS $ETHER TRANSPORT RCRIS-SQG 1000455689 WNW 5005 EAST MONO FINDS CAD982494874 1t8-114 FRESNO, CA 93727 1110 ft. Relative: RCRIS. Equal Owner. THOMAS BETHEA (415) 555-1212 Actual: EPA ID CAD982494874 314 ft, Contact. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER (209) 251-8580 ClassificationSmall Quantity Generalor TSDF Activities Not reported Violation Status: No vidaWps found FINDS Other Pertinent Environmental Aclivity Identified at Site - Resource Conservation and Recovery Acl Information system 8 ARCO t15803• LUST S105418571 West 4897 E KINGS CANYON Fresno Co. CUPA NIA 114-1/2 FRESNO, CA 93727 2336 ft, Relative: State LUST Lower Cross Street: WINERY Qty Leaked: Not reported Actual: Case Number 5T10D00790 311 ft. Reg Board: 0 Chemical: Gasoline Lead Agency: Local Agency Local Agency' 10000 Caso Type: Undefined Status: No Action Review Date: Not reported Confirm Leak: Not reported Worliplan: Not reported Prelim Assess, Not reported Pollution Char. Not reported Remad Plan: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported Close Dale: Not reported Release Dale: Not reported Cleanup Fund Id :Not reported Discover Date : Not reported Enforcement Dt : 1965-01-01 00:00:00 Ent Type: None Taken Enter Date . 2002-01-17 00:00:00 Funding: Not reported Staff Initials: JIM How Discovered: Subsurface Monitanng TC01255032.lr Page 9 I ki W r r r r Map ID � MAP FINDINGS Direciuon Distance Distance (N.) EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number ARCO N5803' (Continued) S105418571 How Stopped- Not reported Interim . Not roported Leak Cause UNK Leak Source- UNK MTBE Date. Not roported Max MTBE GW ; Not reported MTBE Tested. MTBE Detected Site tested for MTBE $ MTBE detected Prionty. Medium priority Local Case q 0 Beneficial' Not reported Staff: DAM GW Quatifier Not reported Max MTBE Sad : Not reported Soil Qualifier : Not reported Hydr Basin 9 SAN JOAQUIN (5-221 Operator ARCO PRODUCTS COMPANY Oversight Prgm, LUST Review Date : 2002-01-17 00:00.0-0 Stop Data : Not reported Work Suspended No Responsible PartyARCO PRODUCTS COMPANY RP Address: PO BOX 6036 ARTESIA CA 90702-6038 Global I& T0601992009 Org Name: Not reported Contact Person: Not reportod MTBE Conc: 0 V.1be Fuel: 1 Water System Name. Not roported W0 Name: Not reported Distance To Lust. 1 Waste Discharge Global ID- Not reported Waste Disch Assigned Name: Not reported LUST Region 5: Substance: GASOLINE Case Typo: Undefined Program: LUST Staff Initials DAM Case Number. 5TIOM0790 Status: No Action MTBE Codo: NIA Lead Agency, Local CUPA- Facility 10: FAD267582 Program Element:CONTAMINATED UST SITEJEHS LEAD AGENCY TC01255032.lr Page 10 U 4 U Q a � U w n LL C 4 U- 0 W LL U7 (n Sn r ❑ Z U7 f/J �i1 Vl O Q Li LL w H H r r r r H❑ l4 ❑❑❑❑ LL t Z G Z Z17 LL LL m m LL ❑❑❑❑ Q LL 0 U U LL LL LL LL m U N N f1 N N N N N ti n ti ti ti ti ti ti Qi m Oi m Q1 O7 Q? G� ❑ Q 0 OLLJ � N U U- Q LL W O Q W J IlJ f Q O LL 4 F LL H r w Z n Z W W? Q ❑ LL C O U❑❑ 2 7 Z 0 C) Z W 3 Z o&W Ix d L ol Wwo 0' z 0 z z z z z z z=_ c rc w u a W u z zzo w°o�`9UL) �uu v�wUOz W wcYx ZJ S~ 2 0 4A N U 0 N N w> O m w C 4 4 a wzzzSczzz�� tr Qo�bwwp O n (n (7 Y Y NC u! Y Y Y a N LL WO O LL U P. N N i N YD J. N �!1 r0 Q } d QQJ Z vi w v �i $ o e rwn L W Cr U a b _U M C W 7 ❑ Y C LL W � N N C a && � N J P W W W w Ir) IA �i a fn J �-) �L) w ~ H � ❑ U) U1 W J _1 og"$ WggZ�o00 `a A —� w b n 5 o z u w a w L w o ❑_ Z J y1} �i ❑ n J W Z m❑❑❑ O J_ w O , a• Z w 0 d} S Q j K O C U 0 J Q C w U U < Y LLJ m C r17 m J w� m m W W m 2 2 oV)u ZJ a.wa aozoydaa0 w S W a 4j1 x J w x N O x } z w a 4J C C) 0 r m U -, a v> > J U m 2 m m m lm� o q O 1� cy, 1� yr yrn mp aT0T0 'TTD yN LO 1T� Y7 f�- fCr�'y' N 1f�`71 1`1 IOp m gSR�088800oo z M 0 U 0 0 Q o 0 C 0 0 0 C 0 C C C 0 0 o 0 o o o 0 Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z W w w W W W W W W W W W W W W W W w W W w w C C C C C 'S WC C fL C K w' C C C C C C LL C C LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL W LL LL LL LL LL LL LL V F- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ■ r r M r N GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED I DATA CURRENCY TRACKING To maintain currency of the following federal and slate dauibases, EDR contacts the appropnale governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Elapsed ASTM days: Provides omfinmation that this EDR report rneoLS cr am;eeds the 90-day uFdalmg ruquirurnuni of the ASTM standard FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD RECORDS NPL: National Priority List Source: EPA Telephone: NIA National P6or9tles List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1.200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL silo boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Inlerprotation Carter (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 04127t04 Date Made Active at EDR: 054'21104 Database Release Frequency: Serni-Annually NPL Site Boundaries Sources. EPA's Environmental Photographic Inlerpretafion Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region t Telephone 617-91 B-1143 EPA Region 3 Telephone 215-814-5418 EPA Region 4 Telephone 404-562-8033 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Pnonty List Silos Source: EPA Telephone. NIA Date of Govemment Version: 04/27104 Date Made Active at EDR: OS121104 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Dada Amval at EDR, 05l04104 Elapsed ASTM days: 17 Date of Last EDR Contact: 05r04r04 EPA Region 6 Telephone. 214-655-6 659 EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312 -6774 Date of Data Arrival at EDR', 05/04104 Elapsed ASTM clays: 17 Dale of Last EDR Contact 05104/04 CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System Source: EPA Telephone: 70 3-413-0223 CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, muniapalities. private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensaticn. and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 051171'04 Date Made Active at EDR: 0&10104 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Arrival at EDR: I>6l23l04 Elapsed ASTM days: 48 Dale of Last EDR Contact 06/23/04 CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Source: EPA Telephone: 703-413-0223 As of February 1995, CERCLIS sites designated 'No Further Remedial Action Planned- (NFRAP) have been removed fTom CERCLIS. NFRAP sites may be sites where, following an initial investigation, no contamination was found, contamination was removed quiddy without the need for the rile to be placed on the NPL, or the conlaminatron was not serious enough to require Federat Superfund action or NPL consideration. EPA has removed approximately 25,000 NFRAP sites to lift the unintended barriors to the redevelopment of these properties and has arrhived them as historical records so EPA does not needlessly repeat the investigations in the future This policy change is part of the EPA's Brownfieids Redeveiopment Program to help cities, stales, privale investors and affected citizens to promote economic redevelopment of unproductive urban silos. 11 TC01255032.1r Page GR-1 U ' GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED I DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Dale of Government Version: 05/17104 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: W23104 Date Made Active at EDR: 08110/04 Elapsed ASTM days 48 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 06123104 CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report Source EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 06/15iD4 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 06125I04 Dale Made Alive at EDR: 08110104 Elapsed ASTM days: 46 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 06/07104 RCRIS: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System. RCRIS indudes selective information on sltes which generate. transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs): generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of aculety hazardous waste per month. Small quantity generators (SQGs): generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Large quantity generators (LQGs): generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month, Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator off -site to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, of dispose of the waste- TSDFs treat, store, of dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 06115104 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 06123/04 Date Made Active at EDR: 07/20/04 Etapsad ASTM days: 27 ® Database Release Frequency: Varies Dale of Last EDR Contact: 06/23iO4 ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-260-234 2 Emergency Response Notification System, ERNS records and stores information on reporled releases of oil and hazardous substances Date of Government Version: 12I3t103 Dale of Data Arrival at EDR: 01r76104 Date Made Active at EDR: 03/12/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 46 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 07/26/04 FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS BRS: Biennial Reporting System Source: EPAiNTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups'. Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Dale of Government Version: 12101101 Database Release Frequency: Biennially Dale of Last EDR Contact: 06122/04 Dole of Nerd Scheduled EDR Contact: 0911104 CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Source: EPA Regional Offices 10 Telephone: Varies Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. ■ V r Date of Government Version: NIA Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Last EDR Contact: NIA Dale of Neat Scheduled EDR Contact: NIA TC01255032,lr Page GR-2 ■ i GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ROD: Records Of Decision Source: EPA Telephone: 703416-0223 Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a perrnanenl remedy at an NPL (5uportuWi silo containing lochnical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 04/08104 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 07107l04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10104i44 DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions Source' EPA Telephone: NIA The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollutwxi Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the cnlena that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL In accordance with 40 CFR 390.425.(e), silos may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 04127/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Conrad: 05iO4iO4 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 'J8102104 FINDS: Faclldy Index System/Facility ldenlificalron Initiative Program Summary Report Source: EPA Telephone NIA Facility Index Syslern. FINDS contains bath facility information and 'printers' to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometnc Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track ;nformation on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control). C-DOCKET (Cnrrr-,11 Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for a.l environmentai statutes), FFIS (Federal FadliGes Information System), STATE (Stale Environmental Laws and Stalutes), and PADS (PCI3 Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 04i06104 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Dale of Last EDR Contact: 07I06104 Dale of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 10104iO4 HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-3664 555 Hazardous Matenalk Incident Report System. "MIRS contains hazardous material spiil ink. idents reported to DOT. Dale of Government Version: 02117/04 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 04120;04 Dale of Next Scheduled EDR Conuicl: 07/19104 MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System Sourcw Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301415-7169 MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quertedy basis. Date of Govemment Version: 04119104 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly MINES: Mines Master Index File Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Data of Government Version: 03105M4 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Dale of Last EDR Contact: 071M04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 10/04104 Date of Last EDR Contad: 06;30104 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09127iO4 NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Source: EPA Tetephon e: 202-564 4 267 Federal Superfund Liens, Under the authority granted the USEPA by the Comprehensive Environmental Response. Corrpensaflon and Liability Ad (CERCLA) of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner receives notification of potential liability USEPA compiles a listing of fried notices of Supertund Liens. TC01255032.lr Page GR-3 W- _ -..-_ - -- =-- - --.-- --------- GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED 1 DATA CURRENCY TRACKING W Date of Government Version: Ioil Si91 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Last EDR Contacl: 05124iD4 Data of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 081231&1 PADS: PCB Aclivily Database Syslern Source: EPA Telephone: 202 -564 -3887 PCB Activity Database, PADS identifies generators, transpaners, ccmir.ercial storeys andlor brokors and disposers of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Dale of Government Version: 03130/04 Date of Last EDR Contact. 05112/04 Database Release Frequency: Annually Dale of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/09/04 DOD: Department of Defense Sites Source: USGS Telephone703-692-8801 This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United Stales, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Govemment Version: 10/01/03 Date of Last EDR Contact 051141f>4 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Data of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08109/04 STORMWATER; Storm Water General Permits Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202 S&4-0746 A listing of all facilities with Storm Water General Permits Dale of Government Version: WA Date o1 Last EDR Contact NIA Database Release Frequency: Quarledy Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact N1A INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United Slates that have any area equal to or grealer than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 10/01/03 Date of fast EDR Contact: 05114iO4 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Dale of Next Scheduled EDR Contad: 08l09iN US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-5&&2777 Included in the iisting are brcwnfieids properties addresses by Cooperative Agreement Recipients and brownfields properties addressed by Targeted Brownfields Assessments. Targeted Brownfields Assessments-EPA's Targeted Brownfiotds Assessments (TBA) program Is designed to help states, tribes, and municipali6es—especia4y those without EPA Brawnfieids Assessment Demonstration Piiots—minimize the uncertainties of contamination often associated with brownfields. Under the TBA program, EPA provides funding and/or technical assistance for environmental assessments at brovmfieWs sites throughout the country. Targeted Brownfields Assessments supplement and work with other efforts under EPA's Brownfields Inlbafive to promote cleanup and redevelopment of brownfields. Cooperative Agreement Recipients -States, political subdivisions, territories, and Indian tribes become BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients when they enter into BCRLF cooperative agreements with the U.S. EPA. EPA selects BCRLF Cooperative agreement radpionts based on a proposal and application process, BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients must use EPA funds provided through BCRLF cooperative agreement for specified brownfields-related cleanup activities. Dote of Govemment Version: 04114104 Dale of Last EDR Contact: 06/14/04 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact', 0911104 RMP: Risk Management Plans Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule. which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires coirpanies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard aesessment that details the potential effecls of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst -case and alternative accidental releases: Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance- monlloring, and employee training measures: and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. TC01255032.1r Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED I DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Dale of Govemment Version: WA Database Release Frequency. NIA Date of Last EDR Conrad: NIA Date of Next Scheduled EDR Cnnlact: NiA FURS: Formedy Usud Defense Sites re Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions n w Id M Date of Government Version, 10MI/03 Database Release Frequency: Vanes Date of Last EDR Contact. 07i06104 Dale of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: f 0iO4r04 UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Silos Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-001 1 Uranium ore was mined by private companies for fedoral government use In national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of Ihesand-like material (mill laif it gs) remain after uranium has been extracted from Iho ore. Levels of human expcsure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings wero used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings wore recognized. fn 1978. 24 inaclive uranium mill tailings sites in Oregon. Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, Texas, North Dakota, South Dakota, Pernsytvar4a, and on Navajo and Hopi Inbal #ands. were targeted for cleanup by the Department of Energy Date of Govemment Version: 04122104 Database Release Frequency: Vanes Date of Last EDR Contact': 06i21103 Date of Next Scheduled EDR CmlAcR. G9,20/04 RAATS; RCRA Adminw afivo Action Tracking Syslem Source EPA Telephone: 202-564 -4104 RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was disconfinued. EPA vnll retain a copy of the database for historical records. it was necessary to terminate RAATS bemuse a decease :n agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the inforrnaWn contained in the database. Date of Govemment Version: 04117i95 Date of Last EDR Contact, 06/07/04 Database Release Frequency No Update Plannod Dale of Next Scheduled EDR Contact, G9;06104 TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Source EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the au, water and land In reportable quantities under SARA T Ue III Section 313. Date of Govemment Version: 12131i01 Date of Last EDR Contact: 06122I04 Database Release Frequency Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09120/04 TSCA; Toxic Substances Control Act Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Govemment Version: 12131/02 Dale of Last EDR Contact: W07104 Database Release Frequency: Every 4 Years Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact, 09/06104 FITS INS!": FIFRA! TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenlidde Act)1TSCA (Toxic Substarces Control Act) Source: EPA Telephone: 202- 564-2501 r 0 14 TC01255032 1 r Page GR-5 X GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/13/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 06I21104 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 09120iO4 SSTS: Secticn 7 Tracking Systems Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-5008 Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stal, 829) requites all registered pesticide -producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each astabiishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/01 Database Release Frequency. Annually Date of Last EDR Contact 07/24/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact- 10118iO4 FITS; FIFRAi TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, d Rodenbode Act)1TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-564-2501 FITS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA. TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-lo-Know Act). To maintain currency. EDR contacts Iho Agency on a quarterly basis. Dale of Govemmenl Version: 04113iO4 Date of Last EDR Contact 06/21/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 09120104 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASTM STANDARD RECORDS AWP: Annual Workplan Sites Source: Califomia Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-323-3400 Known Hazardous Waste Sites. California DTSC's Annual Workplan (AWP), formvdy BEP, identifies known hazardous substance sites targeted for cleanup. Date of Government Version: M01104 Date of Data Arrival at EDR- 66f04r04 Date Made Active at EDR: 06l25/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 21 Database Rolease Frequency. Annually Date of Last EDR Contact. 06/04/04 CAL•SrTES: Calsiles Database Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release propertios. In 1996. Califomia EPA reevaiva(ed and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Caisites database Date of Government Version: 06101104 Date of Data Amval at EDR: W041l)4 Date Made Active at EDR: D6125464 Elapsed ASTM days: 21 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Dale of Last EDR Contact: 06104/04 CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System Source: Office of Emergency Services Telephone: 916-845-8400 California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System, CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous malarial incidents (accidental releases or spills). Date of Government Version: 12J31103 Date of Data Arrival at EDR 05118104 Date Made Active at EDR; D6/25/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 38 Database Releaso Frequency: Varies Date of Last EDR Contact: 05113104 CORTESE: 'Cortese' Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information Telephone: 916-323-9100 The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), tho Integrated Waste Board (SWFILS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal -Sites). This iisling is no longer updated by the stale agency. r 9 TC01255032.1r Page GR-6 N �r GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED 1 DATA CURRENCY TRACKING r r r C 4 0 ■ a 4 ■ w Date of Govemment Version: 04i01101 Date of Data Amval at EDR: 05/29i01 Date Made Active at EDR: 07126/01 Elapsed ASTM days: 58 Database Release Frequency No Update Planner) Dale of Last EDR Contact' 04f28104 NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records Source State Water Resources Control Board Telephone 916-445-3846 Proposition 65 Notification Records NOTIFY 65 contaitrs Sacility nctificatiaos about any release which could impact drinking water and thereby expose the public Id a potanlial health nsk Date of Govemment Version: 1001f93 Date Made Active at EDR: 11/19/93 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 11101193 Elapsed ASTM days. 18 Date of Last EDR Contact- 07120/04 TOXIC PITS; Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites Source: Stale Water Roscumos Control Board Telephan e: 916-227-4364 Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites, TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspecicd of containing hazardous Substances where Cleanup has not yet been camploled Date of Government Version: 07101i95 Date Mado Active at EDR: 09126i95 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Data Amval at EDR. 08,;30195 Elapsed ASTM days: 27 Date of Last EDR Contact 05,03l04 SWFILF (SWIS): ScAd Waste Information System Source: Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6320 Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills. SWFILF records typically ccntain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills. Those may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Sect;cn 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Govemment Version: 06114iOd Date Made Active at EDR: 07126PG4 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Amval at EDR: 06116104 Elapsed ASTM days: 40 Date of Last EDR Contact 06116*4 WMUOSISWAT: Waste Management Unit Database Source: Slate Water Resources Control Board Telephone- 916-227-4"8 Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units, WMUDS is carrposed of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Infamialim, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15) Information, Chapter 15 Monl ocng Parametom, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information, and Interested Parties Information. Date of Government Version: 04/01100 Dale Made Active at EDR: 05/10f00 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Dale of Data Arrival at EDR: 04110MO Elapsed ASTM days 30 Date of Last EDR Contact 06107iO4 LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Information System Source- Stale Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5752 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking urderground storage tank incidents Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state. Date of Govemment Version: 07il2104 Date Made Active at EDR: 07/30/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Dale of Data Amval at EDR 071-'12104 Elapsed ASTM days: 18 Date of Last EDR Contact 07112/04 TC01255032.1r Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED 1 DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan Source: Department of Health Services Toiephono: 916-255-2118 Department of Nealth Servieos developed a site -specific exponditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. Dale of Govemment Version. 01/01/89 Dato of Data Arrival at EDR: 07127i94 Date Made Active at FDR. 08;02194 Elapsed ASTM days: 6 Database Release Frequency No Update Planned Date of Last EDR Contact: 05131194 CA UST: UST: Active UST Facilities Source: SWRCB Teiophcne: 916-341-5752 Active UST facilities gathered from the "I regulatory agencies Date of Govemmenl Verslat: 07/12/04 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 07112104 Date Made Active at EDR: 0&16/04 Elapsed ASTM days. 25 Database Release Frequency Semi -Annually Dale of Last EDR Contact 07112/04 VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Contains low threat level properties with erther confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee invesirgation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC's costs. Date of Government Version: 06/01/04 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 06104iO4 Date Made Active at EDR: 06125/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 21 Database Release Frequency Quarterly Dale of Last EDR Contact. 06104/04 INDIAN LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 LUSTS on Indian land in Arizona, California, Now Mexico and Nevada Date of Govemment Version: NIA Date of Data Arrival at EDR: N/A Date Made Active at EDR: N/A Elapsed ASTM days: 0 Database Release Frequency. Varies Date of Last EDR Contact: NIA INDIAN LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 20&553-2857 LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Govemment Version: 06/23/04 Date of Data Arrival at EDIT: 06123104 14 Date Made Active at EDR: 07/26104 Elapsed ASTM days: 33 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Last EDR Contact: 05124/04 INDIAN UST: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Date of Govemment Version: 06/18/04 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 0 121/04 Date Made Active at EDR: 07t2&04 Elapsed ASTM days: 35 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Last FOR Contact 06;07iO4 CA FID UST; Facility Inventory Database Source: Cafifomia Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-445-653 2 IN The Facility Inventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage lank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to localloounty source for current data. 10 w TC01255032. 1r Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED ! DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version; 10131r'964 Date of Data Arrival at FOR 09/05195 Date Made Active at EDR: 09/29195 Elapsed ASTM days 24 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Last EDR Cn,+tail 1212r3 98 HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database: Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5700 The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical IisUng of UST s+tes Refer to k7calJi;Lunly source for current data. Dale of Government Version: 10115M Dale of Data Amvai at EDR 01125!91 Date Made Active al EDR: 0211219t Elapsed ASTM days 18 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Last EDR Contact: 07126+01 STATE OF CAUFORNIA ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS AST: Aboveground Petraleum Storage Tar,k Facilities Source, State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5712 Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks_ Date of Government Version: 12JO1103 Date of Last EDR Ccntacl, 05:03r04 Database Release Frequency-. Quarterly Date of Next Schedulini EGR Conlacl. GBiQ2164 CLEANERS: Cleaner Facilities Source. Department of Toxic Substance Contra Telephone: 916-225-0673 A list of drydeaner related facilities that have EPA 1D numbers. These are facilites with certain SIC codes power kaundrios, lamity and aammefdal, garment pressing and cleaner's agents; kren supply: cam-operalod laur,dnes and cleaning; drydeaning plants, except rugs; carpet and upholster cPeaning. industrial launderers; laundry and garment services Dale of Government Version: 04/21104 Dale of Last FDR Contact. 07i0&04 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Canta^C 10104/04 CA WDS: Waste Dlschargo Syslem Source: State Water Resources Control hoard Telephone: 916-341-5227 Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements. Dale of Government Version: 0611B104 Dale of Last EDR Contact: 0612310-1 Database Release Frequency: Quariedy Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 0912010. DEED: List of Deed Restrictions Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-34 00 The use of recorded land use restrictions is one of the methods the DTSC uses to protect the public from unsafe exposures to hazardous substances and wastes. Date of Government Version: 0710&04 Date of Last EDR Contacl' 07107iO4 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 1 OM4M4 NFA: No Further Action Determination Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 This category contains properties at which DTSC has made a clear delermination that the property does not pose a probiem to the envifonment or to public health. Date of Government Vursion. 06J01104 Dale of Last EDR Conlacy'. 06/04104 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact. 0130/04 ONTC01255032 1r Page GR-9 r r a a IN IN 14 IN 94 IN 14 IN GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED ! DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EMI: Emissions Inventory Data Source: California Air Resources board Telephone: 916-322-2990 Toxics and criteria po0utanl emissions data collected by the ARS and local air pollution agencies, Date of Government Version. 12/31/02 Database Rofease Frequency. Varies Data of Last EDR Contact: 07l22f04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Ccniact: 10110104 REF: Unconfirmed Properties Referred to Another Agency Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone- 916-323-3400 This category contains properties where contamination has not been confirmed and which were determined as not requiring direct DTSC Site Mitigation Program action or oversight. Accordingly. these sites have been referred to another slate or local regulatory agency. Dale of Government Version: 06101/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 0&04104 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08130104 SCH: School Property Evaluation Program Source Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone. 916-323-3400 This category contains proposed and existing sebool sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some Cases. these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose. Date of Government Version: 06M 110.4 Database Release Frequency Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact 06!04104 Dale of Next Srhieduled EDR Contact: 08l30l04 NFE: Properties Needing Furthor Evaluation Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 This category contains properties that are suspected of being contaminated. These are unconfirmed contaminated properties that need to be assessed using the PEA process. PEA in Progress indicates properties where DTSC is currently conducting a PEA. PEA Required indicates properties where DISC has determined a PEA is required, but not currently underway, Date of Government Version: 06/1)1104 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 06l04f04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 0813OiO4 HAINET_ Facility and Manifest Data Source: Califomia Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 9f6-255-1136 FacAly and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DISC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. Dale of Govemment Version: 12131102 Database Release Fro-quency7 Annually LOCAL RECORDS ALAMEDA COUNTY: Local Oversight Program Listing of UGT Cleanup Sites Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Date of Last EDR Contact: 05110104 Dale of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 08109iO4 IN, TC01255032 lr Pago GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED 1 DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Dale of Government Version: 06111/04 Date of Last EDR Contact 0726m04 Database Rolease Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Conlacl 10125'04 Underground Tanks Source: Alameda County Envirocmontal Health Services Telephone- 510-567-6700 Date of Govemment Version: 12;09103 Date of Last EDR Contact 07r26iO4 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Dale of *text Schodu1cd EDR Ccnlact 10Q5104 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: Site List Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department Telephone 925-646-2286 List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste gerorator arA business plarv2185 programs Date of Govemment Version: 06114*4 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Dale of Last EDR Coctac-1 06/14/04 Dale of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 03130,04 FRESNO COUNTY: CUPA Resources List Sourca: Dept. of Community Health Telephone: 559-44 5-3271 Certifiod Unified Program Agency. CUPA's are responsible for implomentrrg a unified hazardous matenais and hazardous waste managemont regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardc:js malerals, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks. Date of Govemment Version: 05111/04 Dale of Last EDR Contact. 05110/04 Database Release Frequency, Semi-Annuaily Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact M09104 KERN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Source: Kem County Environment Health Services Department Telephone: 661-862-8 700 Kam County Sites and Tanks Listing_ Date of Govemment Version: 01127704 Date of Last EDR Contact: 0(i124104 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 09f%04 LOS ANGELES COUNTY: List of Solid Waste Facilities Source: La County Department of Public Works Telephone: 818-458 5185 Date of Govomment Version: 06103103 Date of Last EDR Contact 05l20104 Database Release Frequency: Varies Dale of Next Scheduted EDR Contact: 08/16104 City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank Source: City of El Sogundo Fire Depadment Telephone: 310-524-2236 Iq 14 14, TC01255032 )r Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED 1 DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Data of Govemment Version: 06l02104 Database Rotease Frequency: Semi-Anrualiy Date of Last EDR Contact: D6114j04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08l30f04 City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department ® Telephone: 562-570-2543 Date of Gavernmort Version: 03128/03 Date of Last EDR Contact: 05124l04 Database Roloase Frequency: Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: W23404 City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Source: City of Torrance Fire Department Telephone: 310-618-2973 Dale of Govemment Version: 02117r04 Date of Last EDR Contact: 05/17104 Database Roloase Frequency Semi -Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08116/04 City of Los Angeles Landfills Source: Engineering 3 Construct on Division Telephone: 213-473-7869 Date of Govemment Version. Q310IiO4 Dale of Last EDR Contact: D6114M4 Database Release Frequency: Vanes Dale of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 0903/04 HMS: Street Number List Source: Deparlrnert of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-3517 Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites. Date of Govemment Version: 04/29104 Data of Last EDR Contact 05113104 Database Release Frequency Semi -Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/23/04 Stte Mitigation List Source: Community Health Services Talephon a: 323-090- 7806 Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint Date of Govemment Version: 02126r04 Date of Last EDR Contact: 0511 M4 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Nuxt Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/16104 IN 14 IN imp- 14 14 San Gabriel Valley Areas of Concern Source: EPA Roglon 9 Telephone: 415-972 -3178 San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Govemment Version: 12/31196 Date of Last EDR Contact: 0710&99 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: NIA MARIN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites Source: Public Works Department Waste Management Telephone: 415-4994364 7 Cuff ently permitted USTs in Marin County. Dale of Govemment Version: 06122/04 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Dale of Last EDR Contact: 0&02104 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: I VOVO4 TC01255032.1r Page GR-12 [ GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED DATA CURRENCY TRACKING NAPA COUNTY: Sites With Reported Contaminatlon Source: Napa County Department of Environmental hianagemenl Telephone: 707-2534269 Date of Govemment Version: D6J28/04 Date at Last EDR Contact. 06;28r04 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Dale of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 09/27104 Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-2534 269 Date of Govemment Version: 06128/04 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact- 06128104 Dale of Next Scheduled EDR Contact' 09127;04 ORANGE COUNTY: List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST). Date of Govemment Version: 0&01104 Date of Last EDR Contact 06r08iO4 Database Release Frequency: quarterly Date of Next Sch©duled EDR Contact 09l06iO4 List of Underground Storage Tank Faculties Source. Health Care Agency Telephone: 714d834-344 6 Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilites (UST} Date of Govomment Version: 0&01104 Date of Last EDR Contact 06;08104 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact' 09'%6 A List of Industrial Site Cleanups Source: Health Care Agency Telephone. 714-834-3446 Petroleum and non -petroleum spills. Date of Govemment Version: 061011(54 Dale of Last EDR Contact' 06r08;04 Database Release Frequency: Annually Dale of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09;06;04 PLACER COUNTY: Master List of Facilities Source: Placer County Health and Human Services Telephone: 530-889-7312 List indudes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites. Date of Govemment Version: 07/07104 Date of Last EDR Contact: 06i21104 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annualty Data of Next Scheduled EDR Contact. 09001'04 RIVERSIDE COUNTY: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites 10, Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 909-358-5055 Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). 10 ■ INTC01255032.1r PageGR-13 10 n 0 0 0 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED I DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 06121104 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tank Tank List Source: Health Services Agency Telephone: 909-356-5055 Date of Government Version: W21iO4 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly SACRAMENTO COUNTY: CS -Contaminated Sites Source: Sacramento County EnvironmentallNarlagement Telephone: 916-875-9406 Date of Govemment Version•. 04116iO4 Database Release Frequency Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 07119iO4 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10116104 Date of Last EDR Contaa 07119iO4 Dale of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10118,,04 Date of Last EDR Contact- 05107/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 08/02104 MIL - Regulatory Compliance Master List Source: Sacranienlo County Environmental klanagemenl Telephone: 916-875-8406 Any business that has hazardous matanals on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators. Date of Government Version: 04116/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: Dale of Last EDR Contact: 05i07104 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 0810104 Hazardous Material Permits Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Matenals Division Telephone,'909-387-3041 This listing includes underground storage tanks. modical waste handlersfgeneralors, hazardous malenals handiers, hazardous waste generators, and waste oii gore ratorslhandters. Dale of Government Version: 06/28/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly 04 SAN DIEGO COUNTY: Date of Last EDR Contact: 06l07104 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09106iO4 Solid Waste Facilities Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 619 338-2209 San Diego County Solid Waste Faculties. PqDatabase Date of Government Version: 08/01100 Date of Last EDR Contact 05/25/04 Release Frequency: Varies Cate of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08123/04 Hazardous Materials Management Dlvlaion Databasa P4 Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division Telephone: 619-338-2268 The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment 'H' permit number, typo of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspedion dales, violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/dispoaal of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unaulhorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non -tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination are included.) R 0 TC01255032.lr Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED 1 DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10131103 Date of Last EDR Contact 071'07104 Database Release Frequency' Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/04/04 SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY: Local Oversite Facilities Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Telephone. 415-252-3920 Dale of Government Version: 06107/04 Date of Last EDR Contact: 06/07104 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Conlacl: 09106104 Underground Storage Tank Information Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252 -39 20 Date of Government Version: 06/07/04 Dale of Last EDR Conlacl: 06l07104 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact. D9lC-6!04 . SAN MATEO COUNTY: Fuel Leak List Source: San Mateo County Environmantal Health Services Divisicri Telephone: 650-563-1921 Date of Government Version: 01r29104 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Last EDR Contact- 07109Y04 Date of Next Schedutod EDR Contact 10111/04 Business Inventory Source: San Mateo Counly Environmental Health Services Division Tetep hon e: 650-363-1921 Llst includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators. and underground storage tanks. Dale of Government Version: 04i07104 Date of Last EDR Contact: 07112iO4 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Conlacl 10/11/04 SANTA CL4RA COUNTY: Fuel Leak Site Activity Report Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District Telephone: 408-265-2600 Data of Government Version: 12131103 Date of Last EDR Contact: 06/28104 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Dale of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09127104 Hazardous Material Facilities Source: City of San Jose Fire Department Telephone: 408-2774559 Date of Government Version: 10/01/03 Date of Last EDR Conrad: 0fi107104 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 09106104 SOL4NO COUNTY: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707421-6770 0 0, 0, TC01255032 lr Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED I DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03118104 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 06128104 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09l13104 Underground Storage Tanks Source: Solana County Department of Enwronmenlai Management Telephone: 707-421-6770 Date of Govemment Version: 03/18104 Date of Last EDR Contact: 06128/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09113/04 SONOMA COUNTY: N w M rl L N 14 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 707-565-6565 Date of Government Version: 04126IG4 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly SUTTER COUNTY: Underground Storage Tanks Source: Sutter County Department of Agricuiture Telephone: 530-822-7500 Date of Government Version: 01129104 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually VENTURA COUNTY: Datu of Last EDR Contact: 07126!04 Dale of Next Scheduled EDR Conta:.t: 10125/04 Date of Last EDR Contact: 07106104 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10104XA Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 80 5-6 54 - 2 813 Ventura County Inventory of Cbsed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites Date of Govemment Version: 09/01102 Date of Last EDR Contact 06l25/04 Database Release Frequency Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: OE123104 14 Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654.2813 Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). 14 Date of Government Version: 05104104 Date of Last EDR Contact: 06/17/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Dale of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/13/04 Underground Tank Closed Sites List IN Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)iUnderground Tank Closed Silas List Date of Government Version: 12JO1103 Date of Last EDR Contact: 07113iO4 IN Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next S&eduled EDR Contact: 10!11144 Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operaling Underground Tanks Sauce: Ventura County Environmental Health Division IN Telephone: 605-654-2813 The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (8), Waste Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank M information. 14 A TCO 1255032. Ir Page GR-16 _ -.-_- . - -- - _ -_ - - . IF GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING N Dale of Government Version: 05/04/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact 06117iO4 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contacl: 09/13104 YOLO COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Source. Yolo County Department of Health Telephone: 530-666-8646 Date of Govemmenl Version: 06102J04 Data of Last EDR Contact: 06f01104 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact- 101i8!04 California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) LUST Records LUST REG 1; Active Toxic Site Investigation Source, California Regional Water Quality Control 8oard North Coast (1) Telephone: 707-576-2220 Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Trinity counties. For more current :nfonrat;on, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02r01101 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Last EDR Contact. 06129iO4 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 0812104 LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Say Region (2) Telephone: 510-28&-0457 Date of Govemmenl Versow 03131/04 Dale of Last EDR Ccntacl. 07/16104 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/11iO4 LUST REG 3; Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Source California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-549-3147 Dale of Government Version: 05il9iO3 Date of Last EDR Contact 06129r04 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 08116/04 LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Regien (4) Telephone: 213-576-6600 Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Wafer Resources Control Board's LUST database. Date of Government Version: 0200104 Date of Last EDR Contact_ OW28/04 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09127,04 LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-3291 Date of Government Version: 07101/04 Date of Last EDR Contact 07/19/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10104,04 LUST REG BL: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Source: Califomla Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6) Telephone: 916-542-5424 For more current Information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. ■ INTC01255032 1r Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Govemment Version' 09/09/03 Date of Last EDR Contact: 06129/04 Database Release frequency: No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact- 09IN104 LUST REG 6V: Leaking Undnrgrowid Storage Tank Case Listing Source: California Rogionai Walor Quality Control Board VICtGrvllie Branch Office (6) Telephone 760-346-7491 Date of Government Version: 05i27104 Date of Last EDR Contact: 071'06104 Database Release Frequency Quarterly Dale of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 10/04/04 LUST REG 7: Loaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7) Telephone. 760-34 6-7491 Date of Government Version: 02126/04 r) of I ,aa! EDR Contact: 06129iO4 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Dui., of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 09/27104 tLUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Source- California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ara Region (8) Telephone: 909-782-4498 California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) For more current information, ploaso refer to the Slate Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. Date of Government Version: 04101ID4 Date o1 Last EDR Contact 05112f34 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08;09l04 LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report SoLrca. California Regional Water quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-467-2980 Orange, Riverside. San Diego counties for more current infomatron, please refor to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. Date of Govemment Version: 03101/01 Date o1 Last EDR Contact: 06/29104 Datatase Release Frequency. No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10118l04 California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) SLIC Records SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site investigations i Source' California Regional Water quality Control Board, North Coast Region (1) Telephone: 707-576-2220 Dale of Government Vefsion: 04/03103 Date of Last EDR Contact 06129iO4 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 0812104 SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation S Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Source: Regional Wale( quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-286-0457 Any contaminated site that impacts groundwater or has the potential to impact groundwater Date of Government Version: 07/12/04 Date of Last EDR Contact: 07112104 Database Release Frequency. Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact, 10111iO4 SLIC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Invosligabon & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Source California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone 805-549-3147 Any contaminated site that impacts groundwater or has the potential to impact groundwater. Date of Government Version. 0&26104 Date of Last EDR Contact: 05/17/04 Database Release frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08116/04 10 w 10 TC01255032.lr Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, lovestigalion S Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Source Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone 213-576-6600 Any conLln:inated site that impacts groundwater or has the potential to impact grour3twaler Date of Government Version, 05113/04 Date of Last EDR Contact: 07126104 Database Release Frequency Quarterly Date oT Noxt Schrxluied EDR Contact- IC125104 SLIC REG 5: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cosl Recovery Listing Source Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-855-3075 Unregulated sites that impact groundwaler or have the potential to impact groundwater Date of Government Version: 04XIM4 Date of Last EDR Contact. 0710&;04 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 1C;04iO4 SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sties Source Califomia Regional Water Quality Cnn.trol Board. Lahonlan Region Telephone, 53C-542-5574 Date of Government Versicxv 06107/04 Date of Last EDR Contact': 06107/04 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact Cg106itk+ SLIC REG 8V: Spills, Leaks, Investlgallon & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Source. Regional Water Quality Control Board. Viclorville Branch Tolephano 619-241-6583 Date of Government Version: 04i01iO4 Date of Last EDR Contact: 071M04 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 10104iO4 SLIC REG 7: SLIC List Source. Califomia Regional Quakily Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region Telephone: 760-346-7491 Date of Government Version: 0-61t) O4 Oulu of Last EDR Contact: 06r07104 Database Release Frequency: Vanes Date of Next Scheduled CDR Contact 08123iO4 SLIC REG & Spills, Leaks. Investigation & Cleanup Gust Recovery Listirg Source Califomia Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Aria Region (8) Telephone: 909482-3298 Date of Govemrrient Version: 04MV03 Database Release Frequency: Son•ii-Annually Date of Last EDR Contacl:07109104 Date of Next Scheduled CDR Contact IWO-004 SLIC REG 9: Spills, Leaks, lnvesligaliai & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Source: Califamia Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-467-2980 Date of Govemment Version: 04129104 Date of Last EDR Contact: 06i01104 Database Release Frequency: Annually Dale of Next Scheduled EDR Contact- 08130l04 FOR PROPRIETARY HISTORICAL DATABASES Former Manufactured Gas (Coal Gas) Sites: The existence and location of Coal Gas sites is provided exclusively to EDR by Real Property Scan, Inc. CCopyrfght 1993 Real Property Scan, Inc. For a technical doscriplion of the types of hazards which may be found at such sites, contact your EDR customer service representative. rDisclaimer Provided by Real Property Scan, Inc. The information contained in this report has predominantly been obtained from publicly avallalale sources produced by enblies other wan Real Property Scan. While reasonable steps have been taken to insure the accuracy of this report. Real Properly Scan does not guarantee the accuracy of this report_ Any liability on the part of Real Property Scan is strictly limited to a refund of the arnount paid- No claim is made for the actual oxislence of toxins at any site. This report does not constitute a legal opinion, ITC01255032 1r Page GR-19 ff GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED 1 DATA CURRENCY TRACKING BROWNFIELDS DATABASES VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Source: Department of Toxic Substances Contrcl Telephone: 916-323-3400 Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or ctoanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC's casts. Date of Government Version: 06/01/04 Date of Last EDR Contact: 06104/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Dale of Next Scheduled EDR Contact- 08130/04 US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 tnclWeid in the listing are brownfields properties addresses by Cooperative Agreani RecipierHs and brownfields properties addressed by Targeted Brownfields Assessments. Targeted Brownfields Assessments-EPA's Targeted Brownfields Assessments (TBA) program is designed to help stales, tribes, and municipalities —especially those without EPA Brownfields Assessment Demonstration Pilots --minimize the uncertainties of contamination often associated with brownflelds. Under the TBA program, EPA provides funding anet'or technical assistance for environmental assessments at brownfields sites throughout the country. Targeted Brownfields Assessments supplement and work with other efforts under EPA's Brownfields Initiative to promote cleanup and redevelopment of brownfields. Cooperative Agreemenl Recipients -States, political subdivisions, territories, and Indian tribes become SCRLF cooperative agreement recipients when they enter into SCRLF cooperative agreements with the U S_ EPA EPA selects BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients based on a proposal and application process. SCRLF cooperative agreement recipients must use EPA funds provided through SCRLF cooperative agreement for speafied brownfields-related cleanup aclivitles. Date of Government Version: NIA Date of Last EDR Contact: NIA Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Conrad: NiA OTHER DATABASES] Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that ail wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not nacessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. Oil/Gas Plpslinesr This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs from 1:100,000-State Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category including some ail, but primarily gas pipelines. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: PennWell Corporation Telephone: (800) 823-6277 This map includes information copyrighted by PannWeil Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee Its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell_ Sensltive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmantal discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers. and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are fikety to be located AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, inc. Telephone: 312-280-599 t The database Includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals. Medical Center; Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, of IsTC01 255032. 1 r Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED !DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Nursing Homes Source. National Institutes of Health Telephone, 301-594-6248 Information on MM 'ire and Medicaid cartified nursing fhmos in the United States Public Schools Souica, National Canter for Education Statistics Telephone. 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all stales. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephona: 202-502-73M The National Center for Education Statistics primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities Source: Department of Social Services Telephone: 916-657-4041 Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 1999 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood cones as defined by FEMA NWL Nalioral Wetlands Inventory This data. available in select counties across the country. was obtained by EDR in 2002 from tho U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service w 4 7 4 �7 11 STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION C 2003 Geographic Data Technology inc., Rol. 07f2003 This product contains proprietary and wrfidential property of Geographic Data Technology, Inc. Unauthorized use, including copying for other than testing and standard backup procedures. of this product is expressly prohibited. TCO 1255032. 1 r Page GR-21 0- `I y v 14 ACOUSTICAL ANALYSIS TRANSLT VILLAGE 5080 LAST KINGS CANYON ROAD FRLSNO, CALIFORNIA PREP,LRED FOR CITY OF FRESNO HOUSING AND CON NIUNITY DEV L.OP�-ILNT 2600 FRESNO STREET, ROOM 3076 FRESNO, CALIFORNIA 93721 PREPARED BY BRO'iN'N-BUNTIN ASSOCIATLS, INC. VISALIA, CALIFORNIA September 12, 2006 BBA 311? W SGh ool :.v': - Viialia CA 93291 15591 627-4923 (S-W) 627-6284 FQx r 7"6 C41ifQ?T)I::. - SUjIe A F011 Oaks. CA 95626 f4161 961.-5822 - [9 W 961-6418 INTRODUCTION The project is a proposed high -density senior and low-income housing complex with an adjacent City of Fresno multi -modal transit hub. The project site is located at 5080 East Kings Canyon Road within the City of Fresno, California. The City of Fresno has requested an acoustical analysis to determine if traffic on Kings Canyon Road or activities related to the proposed transit hub will cause noise levels to exceed applicable standards, and to determine the extent of noise mitigation that may be required. This report is based upon the project site plan received from the City of Fresno in July 2006 and transit center operations information provided by the City of Fresno. Revisions to the site plan or operations data may require a reevaluation of the findings andlor recommendations of this report. Appendix A provides definitions of the acoustical terminology used in this report. Unless otherwise stated, all sound levels reported in this analysis are A -weighted sound pressure levels in decibels (dB). A -weighting de-emphasizes the very low and very high frequencies of sound in a manner similar to the human ear. Most community noise standards utilize A -weighted sound levels, as they correlate well with public reaction to noise. CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTABLE NOISE EXPOSURE City of Fresno: The City of Fresno Noise Element of the General Plan and Nfunicipal Code (Noise Ordinance) apply to the project. The Noise Element standards apply to noise frorn traffic on Kings Canyon Road and noise produced by the proposed transit hub. The Noise Ordinance standards apply only to the proposed transit hub. The City of Fresno Noise Element sets compatibility standards for transportation -related noise sources and stationary noise sources. Public roadways, including Kings Canyon Road, are considered transportation noise sources. Noise sources not related to traffic on public roadways, railroads or airports are considered to be stationary noise sources. This would include the proposed transit hub because the facility will be located off a public roadway. For transportation noise sources, the Noise Element establishes land use compatibility criteria in terms of the Day -Night Average Level (DNL). The exterior noise exposure criterion is 60 dB DNL within outdoor activity areas of residential land uses. Outdoor activity arcas generally include backyards of single-family residences, individual patios or decks of multi-farnily developments and common outdoor recreation areas for multi- family developments and transient lodging facilities. The Noise Element also requires that interior noise levels attributable to exterior transportation noise sources not exceed 45 dB DNL. 06-U64 (l:ansIi Village, r=rcsn(1) 8-11.06 For stationary noise sources, the Noisc Element establishes noise compatibility criteria in terms of the hourly equivalent sound level (LL4) and maximum sound level (Lr,,x}. The standards are more restrictive during the nighttime hours, defined as 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. The standards may be adjusted upward (less restrictive) if the existing ambient noise level without the proposed source already exceeds the standards. The Noise Element standards for stationary noise sources are summarized in Table I. TAB LE I CITY OF FRESNO NOISE ELEiN•IEN`I' SI'.kNDA.RDS STATIONARY NOISE SOURCES 1lavtirne I Nighttime _ (7:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m. _ _ _(10:00 .11I.-7:00 a.m.) Hourly Equivalew Sound Lavel (Lty), LL iQ 4i dBA Nlaxianuni Sound LeveG_SL,,,,.), dB, 70 Nate: If the exisaing ambient noise lever equal or exceed the levels in Table 1, rrui igation shall be required to linut noise to the ambient noise level plus five (S) dB. Source. City of Fresno Article 3 of the City of Fresno iVlunicipal Code (Noise Ordinance) prohibits excessive noise from sources that are ,tor pre-enipted from local control. Pre-empted noise sources include vehicles operated on public roadways, railroad operations and aircraft operations. Since the transit hub would result in the operation of transit buses off a public roadway, the Noise Ordinance applies to the project. A potential violation of the Noise Ordinance would exist if the existing ambient noise. IGvel would be exceeded by 5 dBA due to the proposed transit hub. The: existing ambient noise level may be measured, but in no case may it be presumed to be lower than specified by the Code. Table II sumniarizes the noise level standards of the Noise Ordinance as they are applied at residential properties. The Noise Ordinance standards are less restrictive than the .Voisc Element standards in the arse of the proposerl transit huh. TABLE lI CITY Of F'RESNO NOISE ORDINANCE STANDARDS RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES Tine Presumed Lowest Ambient Level, d13A � Allw-vable inlrease,cl4.A 10:00 .m.-7:00 a.m. 50 +5 7:00 . rn.-10:00 . m. 55 +5 7.00 a.m.-7:00 p.rri. 60 +5 Source: City of Fresno Nturtici al Code, article 3 G6.064 (1 Tanya Village- FresMa) 9-31 -00 7 Federal Government: If the project will receive federal funding assistance, it must comply with noise compatibility cri[eria established by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The HUD noise standards are published in Part 51, Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The HUD noise standards address both exterior and interior noise environments, The reference location for detemtination of the exterior noise environment is usually 6.5 feet from residential building facades that face the predominant noise source. A DNL not exceeding 65 dB is considered to be acceptable at this reference location. This is less restrictive than the City of Fresno 60 dB DNL exterior noise level standard. Sound levels greater than 65 but less than 75 dB DNL are considered nor»rally unacceluable in the HUD noise standards and require special approvals. An exterior noise exposure over 75 dB DNL is usually considered unacceptable, Tile noise environment inside a building is considered acceptable if (a) the noise environment external to the building is acceptable and (b) the building is constructed in a manner common to the area. A goal of 45 dB DNL inside buildings has been established in the HUD noise standards. This goal is consistent with the 45 dB DNL interior noise standard applied by (lie City of Fresno. PIZO.IECT SITE NOISE EXPOSURE The predominant existing source of noise within the project site is traffic on East Kings Canyon Road, When the project site is constructed, noise from the proposed City of Fresno transit hub will also he a significant noise source that will affect residential land uses that are proposed for the site and that currently exist adjacent to the project site. Traffic Noise Exposure: Noise levels from traffic on East Kings Canyon Road were calculated for future (2025) conditions, The calculations were based upon noise level data obtained by Brown-Buntin Associates, Inc. (BBA) at the project site, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Highway Traffic Noise Prediction 4fodel (FHWA-RD-77-108), and traffic data obtained from the Fresno County Council of Governments (COG). The FHWA iModel is a standard analytical method used for roadway traffic noise calculations. The model is based upon reference energy emission levels for automobiles, medium trucks (2 axles) and heavy trucks (3 or more axles), with consideration given to vehicle volume, speed, roadway configuration, distance to the receiver, and the acoustical characteristics of the site. The FHWA Model was developed to predict hourly L,y values for free -Bowing traffic conditions, and is generaily considered to be accurate within t1.5 dB. To predict DNL values, it is necessary to deten711ne the hourly distribution of traffic for a typical day and adjust the traffic volume input data to yield an equivalent ]sourly 05-464lrraatiif Village,r=rcino' 8-11-016 3 traffic volume. The Calveno traffic noise emission curves arc used as recommended by Caltrans to more accurately calculate noise levels generated by California traffic. Noise level measurements and a concurrent traffic count were conducted by f3BA within the project site on August 30, 2006. The purpose of the measurements was to evaluate the accuracy of the FHWA Model in describing existing traffic noise exposure within the project site taking into account site -specific conditions. For this project, residential units will be located within multi -story buildings that will be located as close as 200 feet from the center of the roadway. The noise measurement site was located within the project site at approximately 60 feet from the center of- the roadway. The project site plan and noise monitoring site are shown in Figure 1. The project site is flat and at approximately the same grade as the existing roadway pavement. It was not possible to measure noise at the exact location of proposed residential buildings due to security fencing around the project site. Noise monitoring equipment consisted of a Larson Davis Laboratories ;Model 820 sound level meter equipped with a B&K Type 4176 1/2" microphone. This equipment complies with the specifications of' the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) for Type [ (Precision) sound level meters. The meter was calibrated in the field prior to use with a B&K Type 4230 acoustical calibrator certified by its manufacturer to be in compliance with National Bureau of Standards (NBS) reference levels to ensure the accuracy of the measurements. Noise measurements were conducted in ternis of the equivalent energy sound level (1,1 Measured L,y values were compared to L,y values calculated (predicted) by the FHWA Model using as inputs the traffic volumes, truck mix and vehicle speed observed during the noise measurements. The results of this comparison are shown in Table 111. TABLE III COMPARISON OF (MEASURED AND PREDICTED (FHWA MODEL) NOISE LEVELS TRANSIT VILLAGE POJECT-KINGS CANYON ROAD Microphone Height, N. (above the ground) 5 Observed # Autos.41r. 1,016 Observed U 14ledimn Trucks/fir, 32 Obseryed 4 Heavy Trucks/Hr. S Posted Spced (MPH) 45 Distantic, ft. (from center of roadway) L, , dRA (Measured) GO 66.1 L, , dBA (Predicted) 66.4 DiffereLice bt1ween (Measured and Predicted L.., dJ9A 0.3 Now: Ft- WA "soft site" assunied for calculations Source; Brown-Buntia Assoc iaies. Inc. 06-06.1 ( !ramie W119c. Fresno) 8-3 1 -06 4 From Table III it may be detemilned that the predicted noise level Was within 0.3 dB of the rrreasured noise ievel for the traffic conditions observed at the time of the measurement. This is considered to be excellent a-reenient between predicted and measured results, and indicates that the FHWA \-lode] may he used without adjustment to provide a realistic assessment of future: annual average traffic noise exposure within the site. Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) data for East Kings Canyon Road adjacent to the project site were obtained from the Fresno COG. Truck percentages and the day/night distribution of traffic were estimated by BBA based upon studies conducted along similar - roadways, since project -specific data were not available from government sources at the time of the analysis. Table IV summarizes annual average traffic data used to niodel noise exposure from East Kings Canyon Road within the project site. TABLE IV TRAFFIC NOISE MODELING ASSI"MP'TIONS KINGS CANYON ROAD WEST OF PEACH AV`ENIIF FUTURE: (2025) CONDITIONS AtlrJLJAJ 3 t,796 Da !Ni Ili S IJ1 °ill 90'10 Esiin-aiedVittcleS k.cd(in h)- 45 % Medlin Trucks ('"u A -A DT) 3.0 % Heavv Trucks A.4LDT) 2.0 J Sources: Brown-Bunlm Ass(matcs, Inc. Fresno Coca Using data from Table FV and the FHWA Model, annual average traffic noise exposure was calculated for the closest proposed residential building setback along Kings Canyon Road (200 feet frorn the center of the roadway). The calculated traffic noise exposure at this location was 63.0 dB DNL for projected future (2025) conditions. That level exceeds the City of Fresno 60 dB DNL exterior noise level standard for transportation noise sources but does not exceed the HUD 65 dB DNL exterior noise level standard. Transit Hub Noise Exposure: Noise levels produced by the proposed City of Fresno transit hub were estimated based upon operational data obtained from the City of Fresno and the results of noise measurements at an existing transit hub facility at Manchester ('enter its Fresno. According to the City, the Manchester Center facility is similar to the proposed facility although the Manchester Center facility is larger withsnore buses and routes. The Manchester Center currently accommodates eight bus routes, whereas the proposed transit hub would accommodate a maximum of five routes. Hours of operation for both facilities are from approximately 5:30 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. ors weekdays and from approximately 0:30 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekends. U6-064 Jmnsil ViIla�,e, t'resm)5 &-1I 416 Noise measurements were conducted at distances of 50-100 feet from the closest transit hus lane using the above; -described instnimentation on August 30, 2006, Noise levels from individual buses were found to vary depending on equipment and operational conditions. At a distance of 100 feet, noise levels from a combination of idling buses and buses moving through the facility ranged from 58 to 71 dBA. The L,,; for a typical 5- in Mute sample period was 65 dBA at a distance of 100 feet. For noise analysis purposes, it was assumed that the noise levels measured at the Manchester Center transit hub facility provide a worst -case assessment of the proposed facility. The distance from the closest proposed residential buildings to the center of the bus lanc on the south side of the proposed transit hub facility is approximately 40 feet. Noise levels were projected for that distance using the standard assumption that noise produced by a "point" source would diminish (or increase) at the rate of 6 dB for each doubling (or halving) of distance. The calculation resulted in a worst -case maximum noise level of 79 dBA and a L,.;1 of 73 dBA. Such levels exceed the exterior noise. level standards of the City of Fresno Noise Element and Noise: Ordinance as summarized in Tables I and 11. Based upon the above -described hours of operation for the proposed facility, the calculated DNL for transit bus -related activities at the closest proposed residential buildings would be approximately 65 dB. This approaches but does not exceed the HUD 65 dB DNL exterior noise level standard. Noise exposure from transit hub activities was also estimated for the locations of (lie closest existing residential buildings to the cast and west of the project site. Those buildings are apartment units located approximately 50 feet to the west and 350 feet to the cast of the closest lanes of the proposed transit hub facility. The estimated noise exposures at those locations are L,,,;,x and L,y values of 77 and 71 dBA to the west and 60 and 54 dBA to the east of the proposed transit hub, respectively. Such levels exceed the City's standards for stationary noise sources. NOISE (MITIGATION Exterior Noise Exposure: The proposed Transit Village project would result in the exposure of proposed residential buildings to noise from future traffic on Kings Canyon Road that would exceed the City of Fresno 60 dB DNL exterior noise level standard but not the HUD 65 dB DNL standard. However, based upon the site plan analyzed (Figure 1), traffic noise exposure within common outdoor activity areas has been mitigated by locating such areas so that they are acoustically shielded from Kings Canyon Road. If individual patios or decks are to be located on the north side of the proposed residential buildings, individual sound walls should be incorporated into the final project design, As stated above, traffic noise mitigation is not required for compliance with the HUD exterior noise standard. 00-064 (rT(,fllIt Vill;LgC. FIUSVa) 8-'1.06 7 The proposed transit hub would generate noise levels that exceed applicable City noise standards for stationary noise sources at the location of existing and proposed residential uses. Assuming that the transit hub would operate between the hours of 5:30 a.m. and 10M p.ni., mitigation would require that noise levels to the west and south of the proposed transit hub be reduced by up to 28 dB. Compliance with applicable noise level requirements at the location of existing residences to the cast of the site would require that transit hub noise levels be reduced by up to 4 dB. Given the close proximity of the proposed transit hub to the closest proposed and existing residences, it will not be possible to achieve full compliance with the City's noise standards for stationary sources using practical forms of noise mitigation. T}I)ically, sound wells are capable of achieving a maximum noise reduction of 10-15 dB at the first - floor level. Sound walls are not as effective at upper -Moor levels where it is generally more difficult to interrupt line -of -sight between the source and receiver. Individual sound walls around upper -floor decks or balconies t},pically will not provide more than approximately 5 dB of noise reduction. Additionally, it is generally not possible to construct sound walls at existing buildings that are not owned by the project developer. Noise mitigation requirements could be reduced by re -designing the site to place thtr transit hub as far as possible from existing or proposed residences. This, in combination with sound walls, could provide significant noise mitigation compared to the present design. A detailed analysis of the proposed design would be required to detcililinc [lie required height and most effective locations for sound walls. If` transit hub operations were to be iiniit to the Hours of ?:00 a.m. to 10:fl0 p.m., rnitigatidn requirements would be reduced by 5 dB since the City's noise standards are less restrictive during those hours. Interior Noise Exposure: The City of Fresno and HUD interior noise level standard is 45 dB DNL. In order to achieve compliance with an interior noise standard of 45 dB DNL, the proposed construction will need to be capable of providing a minimum outdoor -to -indoor noise level reduction (NLR) of approximately 20 dB (65-45=20). A spceific analysis of interior noise levels was not perfornied. However, it may be assumed that residential construction methods complying with current building code requirements will reduce exterior noise levels by a minirntuli of 25 dB if windows and doors are closed. This will be sufficient for compliance with the City of Fresno and HUD 45 dB DNL interior noise level standard. Requiring that windows and doors remain closed for the required interior noise insulation means that air conditioning or mechanical ventilation will be required, CONCLUSIONS AND RECONINIENDATIONS The proposed Transit Village Project will comply with the exterior and interior noise level standards of the City of Fresno and HUD with regard to traffic noise exposure. The {,{,-064 ( rr;iusti %'Chart. Fresno) n-J ) -06 8 proposed design of the project will not comply '`with the exterior noise level requirements of the City with regard to the proposed transit hub, which is considered a stationary noise source. This is due to the close proximity of the proposed transit hub to existing and proposed residential uses, the fact that the transit hub would need to operate earlier than 7:00 a.m, (when noise standards are more restrictive), and the fact that buses within the current transit fleet produce significant noise levels, Potential noise mitigation measures that could be used to minimize the noise impact of the proposed transit hub include the followinb: Re -design the project to locate the transit hub as far as possible from existing or proposed residential uses, 2. Transition to a quieter transit bus fleet over time, reducing the future noise impacts of the project. 3. Construct sound walls to acoustically shield existing or proposed residential uses from noise generated by the transit hub. The specific height and location of sound walls will depend upon the final site design, and a detailed acoustical analysis will be required to document sound wall performance. It is possible that a re -designed project may not be able to achieve full compliance with the City's noise standards with regard to the transit hub. 4. Provide mechanical ventilation or air conditiorning f'or all residentia[ units `�-itliin the project so that windows and doors may, remain closed for the requirl:d acoustical insulation. 4. E11SUre that exterior doors, excluding glass doors, are solid -core '%,00d or insulated steel with perimeter weather-stripping and threshold seals. The conclusions and recommendations of this acoustical analysis are based Upon the best information known to Brown-Buntin Associates, Inc, (BBA) at the time the analysis was prepared concerning the proposed site plan, project grading, projected future traffic volumes, vehicle speeds, truck mix, roadway configuration, and transit hub location and operations. Any significant changes in these factors may require a reevaluation of the Findings of this report. Additionally, any significant future changes in motor vehicle technology, noise regulations or other factors beyond BBA's control may result in long- temi noise results different frorn those described by this analysis. Respectfully submitted, Robert E. Brown President RhB:reb 06-004 { rransil Vdlagc, Fresno) 8-31 -06 9 APPENDIX A ACOUSTICAL TE N1iNOLOGY AIlIBIENT NOISE; LEVEL: The composite of noise from all sources near rind fttr, ll1 this context, the amblent noise level constitutes the normal or existing level of environmental noise at a given locati(M. CNEL: Community Noise Equivalent level. The average equivalent sound level during a 24-hour day, ohlaincd after addition of approximately live decibels to sound levels in the evening frolll 7:00 p.m, to 10i0l) p.m. and ten decibels to sound levels in the: niglu before 7:00 a.m. and after IW00 p.m. 1)FCIBEL. dB: A unit f'or describing the anlplittldc: of SOnncl, equal to 20 tillie5 the logarithm to the base 10 of the ratio of the prc;surc of the sound measured to the reference pressure, which is 20 micropascals (20 micronewtons per square mcter). DNLILd,,: Day./Night Average Sound Level. The average cqw,, alc m sound level durin« a 24-hour day, obtained after addition of test decibels to sound levels in the night after 10:00 p.m. and bui-Ore 7:00 a.m. Equivalent Sound Level. The sound level containing the sank total energy as a time varying signal over a given sample period. L'y is t}J)ically computed over i, S and 24-hour sample periods. NOTT?: The CNEL and DNL represent daily levels of noise CXPOSUre averaged on an annual basis, while L,,,, represents the average noise exposure for a shorter time period, t},plcally one hour. I'mal: The maximum noise level recorded during a noise event. !K,-!le,4 , t'..i r'.,; Vi Ihrr. rl C i l In i R.t' -1 j:i 'Tile sound level exceeded "[I" pClCent of the 11111C durint, a sample interval (L:;,), Ljo, Llc,, etc.). For example, L,l, equals the Icvcl exceeded 10 percent of the time. B.BA Ali p¢OWN . E4}MtiN A-z ACOUSTICAI. TEWMINOLOGY NOISE EXPOSURE CONTOURS: Lines drawn about a noise source indicating constant levels of noise exposure, CNEL and DNL contours are frequently utilized to describe cormnunity exposure to noise. NOISL: LEVI-A, REDUCTION (NLR): The: noise reduction hetween indoor and outdoor environments of, between two rooms that is the: numerical difference, in dcciheis, of the a%era,,, sound pressure: ievcls in those arcas or rooms. A measurement of "noise level reduction" combines the effect of the transmission loss performance of the stn.tcturc plus the effect of' acoustic ahsorption present in the receiving room. SEL or SF,NIt:I_.: Sound Exposure Level or Single Event Noise exposure Level. The 1eVC1 of noise accumulated during a single noise event, such as an aircraft overflight, with reference to a duration of one second, illore specifically, it is the tinge-IMt n rated A-wcightcd squared sound pressure for a stated lime interval or cvcnt, bused on a reference pressure of' ZO rnicropascals and a reference duration of one second. SOUND LEVEL: The sound pressure level in decibels as measured on a sound level rrlcter using the A -weighting filter network, The A -weighting filter de-emphasizes the very low and. very high frequency components of the sound in a manner similar to the response of' the human ear and gives good correlation %vith subjcctivc reactions to noise. SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS (S"I C): The single -number rating of soured lralISMI5S1011 loss [or a construction clement (window, door, etc.) over a frequency range where speech intelligibility largely occurs. BBA U{I 11G (LT:17731I 4111��t, I fp]IlOi � J l 4G TRANSIT VILLAGE NOISE STUDY RESPONSE in &Violloprnent of the Transit Village Project, the City will incorporate all possible noise mitigation mctisurCS to minimize noise impact resulting ftom the proposed transit hub activity. Every effort will be made to comply with the City's noise standard ordinance or any acceptable variance thereof, As suggested in the Acoustical Analysis for the project; the City willr7ias implement the following: l ) The site plan was redesigned to relocate the transit hub closer to Kings Canyon Road and as far away as possible from the proposed housing units that will be constructed at the south end of the site. 2) The City Department of Transportation FAX is transitioning from diesel to compressed natural Las fueled buses to provide for quieter and cleaner running buses. The Department's long,=er torn outlook calls for transitioning to even quieter fuel efficient hvbrid electric powered buses. Since the current practice is to maintain a bus for a useful life of twelve (12) years, the Department foresees these transitions take place over the next 12 to 15 year period. _i) A soulid wall will be constructed at the northwest comer and along the length of the western portion of•site to reduce noise impact to the existing and rielghboring housing units. Brown- Buntin and Associates is revaluated the noise impact for this western portion of the project using two different sound wall height scenarios. The height that provides for the greatest noise impact will be included in the development of the final site plan and in construction of the project. The City will use the necessary noise attenuation materials and sources in development of the project. 4) A heating, ventilation and air conditioning system will be provided in each housing unit developed as part of the housing portion of the proposed project, 5) Noise attenuation materials will be used to construct the exterior- walls, windows, and doors to reduce interior noise. Michael Sigala, %Imaucr, Housin, and Conununity Development Division and John Downs, Scnior Transit Planner, Transportation/FAX will be responsible for monitorin- and responding to noise mitigated measures. Ir-ansilVIilagcRmT t.Ye10"P 0, li W 4 ►.a i Transportation Consuitants DRAFT A Traffic Impact Analysis for the Transit Village Project Located on the South Side of Kings Canyon Road Between South Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue In the City of Fresno October 27.2006 P L F A S A N 7 0 N S A N T A R 0 S A S A L R A M E N 7 0 F R E S N 0 DRAFT A Traffic impact Analysis for the Transit Village Project Located on the South Side of Kings Canyon Road Between South willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue In the City of Fresno October 27, 2006 This Traffic Impact Analysis Report has been prepared under the direction of a licensed Traffic Engineer. The licensed Traffic Engineer attests to the technical information contained therein and has judged the qualifications of any technical specialists providing engineering data upon which recommendations, conclusions, and decisions are based. % QROFESSl0�fq 1 S BE,yA� ,Prepared B,.,: Liose Luis Benavides, P.E. ,Associate & Fresno Branch Manager No. 2328 � * F,v. rio-7G dl TJKM Transportation Consultants y� p � \� Fresno, CA 93704-2515 ?TEFt Ft�1Fp4i� Tel: 559-325-7530 ' Fax: 559-2121-4940 J:Uur&dL-.u3i,F-.iesr.G''.:;- kVGa AeWP1027i067rans V-Ilage.doc TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..... .... ........................................... ......................... —............. ................................................ | SUMMARY .......... .......... ........... ................... ..... ............. ................................... --................... ................. | ItoknXCori dvmns............ .............. --........................ ........ —_----------________---J LnmvgykuProject Cvndxwnx(Year 2CO3--................ .......................................................... ............. / Near Term /ExisknXPlus Approved and Pipeline Projects Plus Prm^cVConditions (Year 2OU8)............. 2 Cumulative Year 2025 N,PrwecLondkmn/........... .... ......................... .................................................... J Cumuiaiive year2U25 Plus Project Conditions .................................... ........................ ........ ................... j ROADWAYNerwnxx.......................................... ................... —....................................... .................. ............ h LL«-5'uFSEnv4CE kwm-vs�S N1:vWnwxwKXjv................................................ ... ........................................... h [mm�nl^opBow��Amcs-----------------------------------------_'7 TRAPpcVwLuuco.KwTsxSuczw)MAQw-UTK4C3.awuTx/u7F1CCONTROL ........... —..... ................... --...... STUDY }mTExssCrmwSAND Sceyxxmw................. ---............ ......................................... .......... ............ Y Tx�*srr--------------------_------------------------------|0 BoeF»A,s......... ............................................ ............................................... ........... ..................................... || RESULT'S orLEVEL orSsxv[CEAaAL,;o............... .................................... ... ....................................... .... \l 7xapF.-icSxn^LtVARRANTS .................................... ...................................... .......................... ................. |Z D8yACTBAFPROPOSED PROJECT ........................................................................................................... 8 PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................. —............. ................................................. O TnmOENE u^TION ............... ---............................. ....... ...................................................... ............... ...... 4 ?x*DISTxmuno........................................................... ................................................................................ \h BxurmoPLUS PxoJ*cTCONDITION'S ........... ... ......... :.......... ................. ......................... ...................... '\g TRAFFICSIGNAL \YAonmyrs.... ............................. -----................. ........................ ....... ....................... 9 IMPACTS OF APPROVED PROJECTS (NEAR TERM) ............................................................................ Zl DsscnIPTuxN'opAPPROVED AND PUsLINsPROJECTS ............... —.................................................................. 2) Ns^n7snx (GXISTTNC;PLUS APPROVED uvoPfPsuwpPxmJFcTsPLUS PxoxEcT)TRAFFIC CuNoTuNs— ... 22 STxnzFAcIL[msF^mSxA-nEANALYSIS .................... ................. ................................................................. 20 0ooumcANALYSIS- .............. ..... ....................... ........ ................ .......... ............. ........................... —'29 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................ .............................................. }3 ExoTcwoCnmunmmx................................................... —........................ ................... ... ...... ... ............. ]3 EXISTING PLUS 9xuIecTCnwoFrmo(YEAR 2008) .................................................................... —............... I� NmnTERm(ExmINoPLUS APPROVED AND yfPELLNePROJECTS PLUS PRmco)OOND[TIONS(lcv� 2008)34 [uwoLArwE YEAR 202SNo9ncoFcTCopommmm................................. ....... —..... ................ .................. 4 CowoI-A7rVsYEAR 2O25PLUS PxoIFcTCnmnnmwS..................................................................... ............... 35 STUDYPARTICIPANTS ...................... .... ........................... .................................................................... —'36 7]KllPrxruwmEL......... ......... ......................... ............................................................................................. 36 PexSnwsCONSULTED ....... ..................................................................................... —...................... .............. 36 RpF*xsNcs-s.... —............................ ................................................................. —.... ................. .............. 36 LIST OF TABLES APPENDLC A - LEVEL OF SERVICE METHODOLOGY APPEN'DrX B - E)CISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS APPENDa C - LEVEL OF SERVICE WOR-ESHEL-TS: ExiSTING APPENDu D - LEVEL OF SERVICE WORmuEET5: EmSTING + PROJECT (YL:AR ZOOS) APPENDLC E - LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEET'S: NF-xR TERM (E.VSTING + APPROVED AND PIPELINE + PROPOSED PRoiECTS YF-Ut 2008) APPEN'im F - LEVEL OF SERVICE WORJiSHEErs: CUmULmvr- YEAR 2025 NO PROJECT APPENDLX G - LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS: CUM"LkTIVE YEAR 2025 PLUS PROJECT APPENDIX H - COUNCIL OF FRESNO Cot,'NIZ' GOVERN1.fENTS TRAFFIC ,ti90DEL Ru-NTTS APPENDDC I - QUEUING ANALYSIS APPENDIX J - TRAFFIC SIGNAL WAraut NTs LIST OF TABLES TABLE1: COUNT DATES............................................................................................................ TABLE II: F-xISTTNG INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYsis............................................. TABLEIII: EXISTMSEGIMENTLEVEL OFSERVICE ANALYSIS- ............................................... TABLE IV: PROPOSED PROJECT TRIP GENERATION ............................ .... -................................. - TABLE V: EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE TRIP GENERATION . .......................................... TABLE VI: D FFERENCE N TRIP GENERATION............................................................................ TABLEVII: SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION LEVEL OFSERVICLANALYSIS ................................... TABLEVIII: SUMMARY OF SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS ......................................... TABLE IX: APPROVED AND PIPELINE PROJECTS TRIP GENERATION ............................................ TAIBLE X: PROJECT's FAIR SHARE OF THE FUTURE INIPROV Eti1 ENTS............................................ TABLE XI: QUEUINGANALYSIS.................................................................................................. LIST OF FIGURES '1 FIGURE1: VICINITY MAP.......................................................................................................................................4 FIGURE2: SFM PLAN ................... --- .................................. ......................................... ............... ..................... -5 FIGURE 3: ExISTNG INTERSECTION GEONIETRM', VOLUMES AND TRAFFIC CONTROLS (2006) ............................8 FIGURE 4: YEAR 2009 PROJECT ONLY - TRIP ASSIGNMENT............................................................................... 17 FIGURE 5: EXISTING PLUS PROTECT- TRAFT-IC VOLUMES, INTERSECTION GEOMETRICS. AND TRAFFICCONTROLS............................................................................................................................. FIGURE 6: APPROVED AND PIPELINE PROTECTS - LOCATION kqu TRIP ASSIGNMENT.........................................23 FIGURE 7: NEAR TERM (EXISTING + APPROVED AND PIPELINE PROJECTS + PROJECT YEAR 2008) - TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND INTERSECTION GEOMETR[CS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL...............................................24 FIGURE 8: TRAI.T.-IC Vc wm. ES - CIIMULATIVE YE:1R 2025 NO PROJEGTTRAFFIC VOLUMES INTERSLCTION GEO,METRICS AND TRAFFIC CONTROLS...............................................................................................27 FIGURL 9: TRAFFIC VOL.U;1[:S AND INTERSECTION GEOME TRICS - CUMULATNE YEAR 2025 PLUS PROJEC..,.,32 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY Introduction This report describes TJKM's Traffic Impact Analysis MA) for a proposed general play, ;imendmcni for the City of Fresno Transit Village project to be located on the south side of East Kings Canyon (toad botwe; n South Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue in the City of Fresno Figure I shows the location of the proposed project site relative to the surrounding roadway network. The project proposes to change the existing planned land use designation for a 55-acre site at the south side of East Kings Canyon Road between South Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenuc from Public Facdity(Eiementary School to Public Facility/iMedium-High Density Residential. Figure 2 Illustrates the proposed site plan. Due to the requested change in planned land uses, the applicant has filed a "Plan Amendment and Environmental Assessment Application" with the Planning and Deveioprnent Department. The purpose of this focused traffic study is to evaluate the potential traffic impacts, identify short- term and Iona -term roadway and circulation needs, determine potential nutigation measures and identify any critical traffic issues that should be addressed in the on -going planning process. The study primarily focused on evaluating traffic conditions at study intersections, segments, and interchanges that may he impacted by the proposed protect. The scope of work was prepared via consultation with the City of Fresno Traffic Engineering, County of Fresno and Caltrans Traffic Planning staff. Summary The potential impacts of the proposed project were evaluated in accordance with the standards set forth by thc. level of service policy of the City of Fresno. Ccistirr� Conditions Under this scenario, the intersection of South Minnewawa Avenue/East Kings Canyon Road satisfies the rural peal, hour signal warrant during the a.m. peak hour but not during the min. peak hour. It is recommended that the City of Fresno add this intersection to the City's Traffic Signal Mitigation Impact Fee during its next signal fee update. Existing Plus Project Conditions (Year 2008) The proposed project is expected to generate 1.177 daily, 81 a.m., and 84 p,rn_ peak hour trips. Of the 1,177 daily trips 792 or 67 percent are transit trips while 385 are non -transit trips. It is recommended that this project pay the City of Fresno Traffic Signal \Mitigation Impact Fee (TS%MI) of S41.47 per daily non -transit trip to mitigate any impacts to the City's traffic signal network. • Compared to the existin planned land use, the project will slightly increase traffic by 139 more daily, but will reduce. peak hour traffic by 257 less a.m. peak hour and 37 less p.in. peak hour trips. Traffic Impact Analysis for the Transit Village Project Located on the South Side of Page 1 Kings Canyon Poad Between South Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue TJKM Transportation Consultants October 27, 2006 The difference in trips is a 13.4 percent increase in daily trips, a decrease of 76.0 percent of a.m, peal: hour traps and a 30.6 percent decrease in p,m. peak hour tnps. • An evaluation of site access and circulation indicated no deficiencies. In an effort to mininze impacts to East Kings Canyon Road th,_ following is recommended at the proposed Transit Village traffic signal: o Westbound u-turns should be prohibited o The westbound left -turn lane should he adequately signed and marked as an exclusive Bus -Only lane o That the proposed signal be interconnected with the signal at the intersection of Wal- Mart Drive/Kings Canyon Road and that tbeir timing be coordinated o That a channelizing median island (pork chop) be constructed on South Adler Avenue as shown on Figure 2 in an effort to minimize vehicular conflicts. o A raised median island should be constructtd similar to that shown on Figure 2 in order to prevent furor, traffic from the property to north from entering the exclusive "Sus Only" left turn lane. • In addition to the existing north -south crosswalk located at the Wal-Mart Drive/Kings Canyon Road signal an additional crosswalk will he implemented at the proposed transit signal on the east leg of Kings Canyon Road to enable the safe pedestrian crossing between the Transit Village and the Wal-Mart shopping center across the street • Under this scenario, the intersection of South Minnewawa AvenuelEast Kings Canyon Road continues to satisfy rural peak hour signal warrant during the a.m. peak. Near Term (ECisting Plus Approved and Pipeline Projec';s Pius Project) Conditions (Year 20M • Except for the intersection of South Minnewawa and East Kings Canyon Road, all study intersections and segments are expected to operate at or better than the City of Fresno LOS D threshold. • It is recommended that any driveways or local street access to the existing vacant property at the northeast corner of Kings Canyon road and South Adler Avenue be limited to the area between South Adler Avenue and a point 155 feet east of the South Adler Avenue right-of- way and that a pork chop similar to that shown in Figure'2 be constructed. • To improve the LOS at the intersections of South Minnewawa Avenue/East Kings Canyon Road the following is recommended: o The intersection should be signalized while retaining its current intersection geometrics. o Protective left turn phasing should be provided only in the east and west directions are provided. Under this scenario, the intersection of South Minnewawa Avenue[East Kings Canvon Road continues to satisfy rural peak hour signal warrant dunng the a.m. peak hour but not tht p.m. peak hour. Traffic tmpact Analysis for the Transit Village ProleCt Located on the South Side of Page 2 Kings Canyon Road Between South Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue TJKM Transportation Consultants October 27, 2006 Cumulative Year 202' No Project Coirdirions Under this scenario, the intersection of East Kings Canyon Road/South Peach Avenue is projected to operate below the City of Fresno LOS D threshold during the p,m. peak hour. To improve the LOS at this intersection, it is recommended that the following changes he made to exisuno conditions: 1. One additional westbound thru lane _'. Change the existirig casthound thru-right choice lane to a thru lane and construct an additional eastbound thru lane 3. One eastbound right turn lane 4. One additional southbound left -tarn lane with the recommended improvements, the LOS for this intersection will improve to LOS D with 35.8 seconds of delay per vehicle during the a.m. peak hour and LOS D with 45.2 seconds of delay per vehicle during the p.m. peak hour. Under this scenario, the LOS for the segment of East Kings Canyon Road between Wall Mart Drive and South Peach Avenue is projected to operate below the. City of Fresno LOS D threshold. To improve the segment LOS this segment of East [pings Canyon Road should be constricted as a six -lane facility. In order to construct a six lane facility while nunimizin-T the need for right-of-way the following lane and curb to right-of-way pattern should be considered: • That the median island to face of curb dimension be set to 37 feet • That the number orte lane be 12 feet wide • That the number two lane be 1 1 feet wide • That the number three lane be 14 feet wide • That curbside parking he prohibited • That this segment he si-med as a bike route • That the curb to tight -of -way pattern be eight feet wide Cumulative Ytar 2025 Plus Projecr Corulirion.s • The LOS for the intersection of East Kings Canyon Road/South Peach Avenue is projected to operate at LOS D with 45 4 seconds of delay per vehicle during the a.m, peak hour and LOS E with 67.4 seconds of delay per vehicle during the p.m. peal: hour. To improve the LOS at this intersection the same intersection improvements recommended in the previous scenario art: necessary. • with the recommended improvements, the LOS for this intersection will improve to LOS D with 38.2 seconds of delay per vehicle during the a.m. peak hour and LOS D with 45.2 seconds of delay per vehicle during the p.m. peak hour. • Upon build out of the City of Fresno 2025 General Plan circulation element and the recommended irrrprovements in the previous scenarios, all study intersections and segrncrits are projected to operate at an acceptable LOS D or better. • It is recommnended that the, City consider increasing the storage lengths of the left and right turn lanes as indicated in ilic Cumulative 2025 queuing analysis. Traffic lrapact Analysis for the Transit Village Project Located on the South Side of Page 3 Kings Canyon Road Between South Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue TJKM Transportation Consultants Octoner 27, 2006 City of Fresno Nis Traffic Impact Analysis for the Transit Village Project Figure Vicinity Map 1 32.262 - 91IWO& . r5 1 W m N U 2 Y O i 4 r w cn 4 X 3 w ---n t-aos m wZEU q s C'D r s � U LLI Ul 7 7 C2 5 � 3 0 0 Y y L a L r LU Q M a W X X J X x U O IL (D cm C co Q) r O c� Q O U in Cd � F � L-a O .� W ^^,, cc T U l— (� EXISTING CONDITIONS AND STUDY METHODOLOGY Roadway, Network Tht: project site and surrounding study area .ire illustrated in Fig mu 1. Important roadways serving the project site are discussed below: East Kin-s Canyon Road is an existins four -lane divided arterial near the vicinity of the proposed project. East Kings Carryon Road is an east -west major street that extends from downtown Fresno via its westerly extension (Ventura Avenue) and easterly beyond the City of Fresno boundary limits. In the City of Fresno west of South Cedar Avenue, the name of this major street changes to Ventura Avenue. The'_02) Fresno General Plan Circulation Element designates East Kings Canyon Road as a six -lane divided arterial west of South Fowler Avenue and as a four -lane divided arterial east of South Fowler Avenue, South 4Villow Avenue is an existing, two- to three -lane undivided collector near the vicinity of the proposed project and is parallel to Peach Avenue. This section of Willow Avenue is a north -south street that extends from East Lane .Avenue northerly to East Olive Avenue. The 202� Fresno General Plan Circulation Element desigmates this section of South Willow Avenue as a two-lane undivided collector. South Peach Avenue is an existine four -lane divided arterial in the vicinity to the proposed project. Peach Avenue is a major north -south street that extends from East McKinley Avenue southerly beyond the Fresno City limits. The northerly extension of Peach Avenue is Clinton Way. Clinton Way serves as the main access point to the City of Fresno Yosemite International Airport. The 202_� Fresno General Plan Circulation Element designates Peach Avenue as a four-lanedivided arterial north of Jensen Avenue. South ilhnnewawa Avenue is an existing two-lane undivided collector in the vicinity of the proposed project and is parallel to Peach Avenue, Minnewawa Avenue is a north -south street that extends between East Belmont Avenue to the north and East Butler Avenue to the south. The 2025 Fresno General Plan Circulation Element designates Minnewawa Avenue as a two-lane undivided scenic collector between Belmont Avenue and Kings Canyon Road, and as a two-lane undivided scenic drive between Kings Canyon road and the California Avenue alignment, Level of Service Analysis Methodology Level of Service is a qualitative index of the performance of an element of the transportation system. Level of Service (LOS) is a rating scale running from A to F, with A indicating no congestion of any kind, and F indicating unacceptable congestion and delays. LOS in this study describes the operating conditions for signalized and unsignalized intersections. The 2000 Highwav Canaciry ,tdanual is the standard reference published by the Transportation Research Board, and contains the specific criteria and methods to be used in assessing LOS. HCS 2000 and Svnchro software were used to define LOS in this study. Details re"ardint, these calculations are in Appendix A. Traffic Impact Analysis for the Transit Village Project Located on the South Side of Page 6 Kings Canyon Road Between South Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue TJKM Transportation Consultants October 27, 2006 Criteria of Significance The 2425 Fresno City General Plan has established LOS "M as the acceptable level of traffic congestion on maj.or streets, LOS "M is used to evaluate the potential significance of level of service impacts to City of Fresno intersections and segments. Traffic 'Volumes, Intersection Geometries, and Traffic Control The --xisting a.m. and p.m. peak hoar turning movement and 24-hr volume counts were conducted at the study intersections and segments within the past month. Table I below pre}viciLs the count date fnr the respective study intersections and segments while Appendix B contains the traffic counts. The existing tuming movement volumes, lane geometry and intersec-non control are illustrated in Figure 3 TABLE I: CotJv-' DAZ�ti 24-hr Volume Counts A.M. Peak Hour T—P—A',.Peak Hour Study Intersections .� Day Date Day Date Day Date--� S. Willow Avenue at E. Kings Canyon Road n/a nia Tuesday I AuQ= 29. 2C°;,6-uesday ! August 29 2Cl5ti j i Wai-t!art Drive at E. K;ngsGenyoo Road nfa n/a Tuesday August 29, 2CC6 Tuesday August 29, 2C06 S. Peach Avenue at E. Ki-rgs Canycn Road rtla Na Tuesday August 2i, =6 Tuesday i Augus, 29. 2CO6 S. Minneriavia Avenue at E. Kings Canyon n/a nia Tuesday August 29, 2006 Tuesday August Z9, 2006 Road Study Segments E. Kings Canyon Road -Wal-Mart Drive to S. Tuesday August 29, nra nra nra nia Peach Avenue 2006 E. ngs Canyon Road - S. W111ow Avenue to Tuesday August 29, ttia nia nia rua Wal-Mart Drive 2006 Note: w = Nof Appiub.@ Traffic Impact Analysis for the Transit Village Project Located on the South Side of Page 7 Kings Canyon Road Between South 'Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue TJKM Transportation Consultants October 27, 2006 Intersection e1 Intersection f2 Intersection 03 Intersection Id Inlersectian 95 Kings CanyalOWIliaw Kings CanyanlTransil Access flings Canyon/Wal•Mart Kings CanycwPeach Kings CanyunXiinewawa i7 — , CY 0=O 1Za o, 1213(72) W m 6331554) IN A"1* 67(1121 46 f 155) J 324 ) e$ (33} _ 4 �ti � m v 85 (96j mC —" n-r 12 133) r t 14751 CD � N ,� 23 (31) Future {� f�:.91i4fi} 6 — _ m 1FtL4 I1201 R ~ T t (22) 51 28 Intersection 7211<3j �/ I_! I 4t 152i— VI)j 7D 12DfJ1—* j a Rtv 355 f5141 "► — 37£� (6a9)—� s, w 223 d50B) # m � 17 {32} _ %a47i� v, ry iti rT LEGEND • Study Intersection Project Site Study Segment XX AM Peak Hour Volume JKXR 1PM PeA Hour Volume ' 1 Trattic Signal NURTH ., Stop Sign h011G SOW City oT Fresno Traffic Inact Analysis for the Transit Village Project Figure Existing Intersection Geometrics, Volumes and 3 Traffic Controls (2006) iN ' ?-262 - %,%91D6 - * Study Intersections and Scenarios The study focused on evaluating traffic conditions at the existing study intersections and segmonts that may he impacted by the proposed project. The study intersections and segments are shown in Fi,,-ure 3. l.ttter5ee#tins: 1. South Willow Avenue/ East Kings Canyon Road 2. Proposed Transit Village Signal / East Kings Canyon Road 3. Wal-Mart Drive / East Kings Canyon Road 4. South Peach Avenue / East Kings Canyon Road 5. South %,11nncwawa Avenue / East Kings Canyon Road sc�7ments: 1. East Kings Canyon Road, Between South Willow Avenue and 'Alai -Mart Drive 2. East Kings Canyon Road, Between Proposed Transit Village Signal and Wal-Mart Drivc 3. Fast Icings Canyon Read, Between Wal-Mart Drive and South Peach Avenue Project trip distribution to state Facilities: l The intersection of East Kings Canyon Road and South Clovis Avenue 2. The intersection of SR 99 NB Off -ramp and West Jensen Avenue The following scenarios were, addressed in the study: • CxistI g Conditions -This scenario evaluates existing (August 2006) traffic volumes and roadway conditions based on traffic counts and field surveys. • Eristirg Plus Project Conditions (Year 2008) - This scenario evaluates total traffic voluntes and roadway conditions based on Year 2008. Year 2008 pins Project traffic volumes were obtained by adding the project related trips to the previous scenario. • Near Tenn (Existing Plus Approved or Pipeline Projects plus Project) Conditions (Year 2008) -- This scenario evaluates total traffic volumes and roadway conditions based on the ,year 2008. This scenario adds the approved and pipeline proiects to the previous scenario. • Cumulailve Year 2025 Plus Project Conditions - This scenario evaluates total traffic volumes and roadway conditions based on the year 2025 with the proposed project. The Cumulative Year 2025 plus Proiect traffic volumes were obtained from the Council of Fresno County Governments (CFCOG). traffic model runs (Base Year 2006 and the Cumulative Year 2025) and existing traffic counts. In this case, the increment method as recommended by the Modcl Steering Committee was utilized to determine the Cumulative Year 2025 traffic volumes. Cumulative Year 2025 A-o Project Conditions - This scenario evaluates total traffic volumes mid roadway conditions based on the year 2025 and is consistent with the Fresno General Plan. Cumulate ve Year 2025 No Project traffic volumes were obtained from the Council of Fresno County Govemments (CFCOG) traffic model. Similar to the previous scenario, the increment method was utilized to determine the Year 2025 No Project Volumes. Traffic Impact Analysis for the Transit Village Project Located on the South Side of Page 9 Kings Canyon Aoad Between South Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue TJKM Transportation Consultants October 27, 2006 Transit Fresno Area Express (FAX) is the transit operator in the City of Fresno. As the name of this project implies, it is a combination of residential and a transit transfer station. Based on conversations with John Downs of FAX this project will serve as a Transit Transfer station for existing routes 12, 22, 26, 28, and 41. FAX also plans to add and/or extend an additional three routes that will also use the proposed Transit Village transfer station. FAX Route 12 (Southeast Circulator) runs adjacent to the proposed project via East Kings Canyon Road. This route provides a direct connection to the Senior Citizens Village near Chestnut and McClain Avenues, Save Mart shopping center, Wal-Mart, Sunnyside High School, and the Kings Canyon and Clovis Shopping Center. Route 12 operates at one -hour inter.als on weekdays (no weekend service), and its stops nearest to the project site are located on the northeast and southeast corners of East Kings Canyon Road and Wal-Nlart Drive. FAX Route 22 runs near the vicinity of the proposed project vier Kings Canyon Road and South Clovis Avenue. This route provides a direct connection to the. Fig Garden Library, DNIV at McKinley and West, the Tower District, the Downtown Fresno Transit 41all, Central Library, Amtrak Station, Fresno City Hall and southeast Fresno. Route 22 operates at half-hour intervals and its stop nearest to the project site is located is currently located at the northeast corner of Kings Canyon and Clovis Avenue, upon completion of the Transit Village project, this route is planned to extend westerly alone Kings Canyon Road with a stop at the project site. FAX Route 26 runs adjacent to the proposed project via East Kings Canyon Road. This route provides a direct connection to the River Park Shopping Center, Downtown Fresno, the Tower Distnct, Fresno Pacific University, and the Fresno Yosemite International .Airport. Route 26 operates at half-hour intervals, and its stops nearest to the project site are located at the northeast and southeast corners of East Kings Canyon Road and Wai-Mart Drive. FAX Route 28 runs In the vicinity of the proposed project via East Kings Canyon Road, This route provides a direct connection to Fort Miller School, Tioga School, CSU Fresno, Fresno Pacific University, International English Institute, Eastgate Shopping Center, PG&E, Fashion Fair Shopping Center, Manchester Shopping Center, Fulton Mall, Sierra Vista Mall, Sierra Community Hospital., University Medical Center, County of Fresno Social Services Department, and the IRS. Route 28 operates at fifteen -minute to half-hour intervals on weekdays and half-hour intervals on weekends, and its stops nearest to the project site are located at the northeast and southeast corners of East Kings Canyon Road and Wal-Mart Drive. FAX Route 41 runs in the vicinity of the proposed project via South Chestnut Avenue. This route provides a direct connection to Fort Miller Middle School, Scandinavian diddle School, California Christian College, Fresno Pacific university, San Joaquin College of Law, Eastgate Shopping Center, and Manchester Shopping; Center. Route 41 operates at half-hour intervals on weekdays and 50- minute intervals on weekends: currently, its stop nearest to the project site is located at the intersection of'East Kings Canyon and South Chestnut Avenue. Upon completion of the Transit Village project, this route is planned to extend easterly along Icings Canyon Road with a stop at the project site. Implementation of the proposed FAX routes is dependent on ridership dernand and available funding Retention of the existing route and the increase or decrease of route intervals is also dependent on transit ndership and on available Funding. Traffic Impact Analysts for the Transit %linage Project Located on the South Side o1 Page 10 Kings Canvon Road Between South Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue TJKM Transportation Consultants October 27, 2006 Bikeways Currently bike lanes exist near the vicinity of the proposed project site an portions of South Peach Avenue. The 2015 General plan recommends that all new major street improvements accommodate hikv lanes and/or bike routes as an alternative mode of transportation. With the elirtunation of curbside parking, the instaliation of an eastbound bike lane along the project's frontage of East Kings C'anvon Road may he installed adjacent to the project; however, this would not he feasible if the. City pursues to constrict additional capacity along East Kings Canyon Road west of South Peach Avenue. Results of Level of Ser%ice Analvsis Table 11 presents a summary of existing peak hour levels of service at the study intersections while Table III presents a summary of the existing segment levels of' service for the study segments. Level of service worksheets for the existing traffic conditions are. provided in Appondix C. Currently, all of' the study intersectious operate at LOS D or better during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, while the existin- LOS for the snidv segments is LOS A. TABI,E II: Exis'rtNG BTLRSEcrioN, LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS A.M. Peak Hour j P.M. Peak Hour 10 Intersection Scenario Intersection Average Average Description Control Delay LDS Delay LOS (seraveh) �� 19.8 B (seclveh) 21.1 C 1 S. Vhllmv Avenue & E. Kings Oanyon Existing Gondilions Signalized Gna 4 2 Proposed Transll Access Drive & E. Existing Ccndittons n/a nta Na riia rJa Kings Canyon - Road x 3 VIal-Man Drive & E. Kings Canyon EAist g Conditions Signalized 11.1 6 17.3 6 F,�ad _ 4 S. Peach Avenue & E. Kings Canyon Existing Candilian5 Signalized 31.1 G 25.9 C Read S S. peach Avenue & E. Kings Canyon existing Conditions Ttvo way Stop 30.7 26.6 D Road Notes: LOS = Lem or S9rvre w sranal r ,nto s r.en ono lieu r of kcrsa rroxernenf icr slop CO. fdJ d.11L-fS +T5 TABLE III: ExISrtNG SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSES 1D Segment I limits Scenario Number[21-hr LDescription ofLanesounts 1 East Kings Canycn Road S. Willow Ave to Proposed Tiansii Existing Condil;ons 4 17,400 A %fillann Cinnai 2 Fast Kings Canyon Road Proposed Transit Village Signal Intersection to Wal-Mart brive Existiing Condilions 4 17,400 A 3 East Kings Canycn Road :'Jai-41ar1 bhve to S. Peach Ave. Exist�ig Conditions d A� Notes, L 05 = t.svai of Sefwv Tr affi, impact Analysis for the Transit Village Project Located on the South Side of Page 11 Kings Canyon Road Between South Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue TJKM Transportation Consultants October 27, 2006 Traffic Signal Warrants Since the existing speed limit for East Kings Canyon Road is 45 MPH, rural peal: hour traffic signal warrants were prepared for the unsig iahzed study intersection. These warrants are found in Appendix J. Under this scenario, the intersection of South Nfinnewawa Avenuc/East Kings Canyou Road satisfies the rural peril, hour signal warrant during the a.m. peal: hour, but not dunng the p.m. peak hour. It is recommended that the City of Fresno add this intersection to the Citv's Traffic Signal Mitigation Impact Fet during its next signal fe-, update. Traffic Impact Analysis for the Transit Vifrage Project Located on the South Side of Page 12 Kings Canyon Road Betvieen South Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue TJKPI Transportation Consultants October 27, 200e IMPACTS OF PROPOSED PROJECT Proposed Project Description The applicant prcposeF. to construct a Transit Onetated Develonmertt that will include a FAX transfer station, ?_ townhouses and up to 70 senior housing units on a �.�-acre site located on the south side of Fast Kings Canvon Road between South Willow and South Peach Avenues. Figure 1 shows the location of th:.• proposed project site. relative to the surrounding roadway network. The project proposes to change the existing planned land use designation for a 5.5-acre site at [he south side of East Kings Canyon Road between South Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue from Public Fa; ility/Elementary School to Public FactlitylMedium-High Density Residential. Figure 2 illustrates the proposed site plan. Due to the requested change in planned land uses, the applicant has filed a "Plan Amendment and Environmental Assessment Application" with the Planning and Development Department. To facilltate the F,-, X transit transfer station, a signal is proposed at the west end of the prnject sits . The proposed Transit Village siznal would be for the exclusive. use of FAX and therefore the proposed wt� sthound left turn lane will he an exclusive hus lane. In an effort to minimize impacts to the LOS of East Kings Canyon Road, it is recommended that %vestbound u-turns be prohibited and that the westbound left turn lane be adequately signed and marked as an exclusive. Sus -Only lane. Also due to the close proximity of the proposed Transit Village signal it is recommended that it be interconnected with the signal at the intersection of Wal-Mart Dnve]K rigs Canyon Road and that their timing he coordinated. A pedestrian activated crosswalk at the transit signal will be implemented on the east lee of Kings Canvon Road to enable the safe pedestrian crossing between the Transit Village and the Wal-ivlart shopping center across the street. In addition to the proposed crosswalk, an existing north -south crosswalk is also available at the Wal-Mart Drive/Kings Canyon Road signal and this is conveniently located at the northeast corner of the Transit Village project. To be conservative the operational analysis of the proposed transit signal used a 100 percent truck factor for the westbound left turns, eastbound naht turns, northbound left turns and tight turns at the. proposed transit signal. In addition to this FAX staff recommended that a maximum speed of 9 miles per hour h; used in the analysis of these same movements. Currently South Adler Avenue is limited to right -in and right -out access from and to Kings Canyon Road. However the opening of the median island on Kings Canyon Road for the proposed Transit sig7al would enable southbound traffic on South Adler Avenue destined to the east to make a left turn which would conflict with the iwrthbound lefts. To prevent these vehicular conflicts whip retaininL the right -in ri.tht-out access to South Adler Avenue it is recommended that a channelizin, median island (port: chop) he constructed as shown on Figure 2. The construction of the channelir.ing median island would direct southbound traffic to make a right turn a[ Kings Canvon Road. Currently the property located at the northeast corner of the inu; rsec:tion of Kings Canyon RoadiSOntlt Adler Avenue is vacant and is planed for commercial uses and eventually will be developed. Once this vacant site develops it is recommended that access to Kings Canvon Road between South Adler Avenue and the existing Wal-Niart Drive intersection be limited to right -in and ri'ht-out. In addition, it is recommended that a raised median island be constructed between the exclusive "Bus Ordy" left turn lane and the westhound lanes on Kin��s Canvon Road in order to prevent future traffic RA-HC LftywO, Analysis for the Transit Village Project Locared on the South Side of Page 13 .K OO Qarran Aoad Between South Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue 73KM Transp &iian Consultants October 27, 2006 from the property to north from entering the exclusive "Sus Only" left turn lane. Figure 2 illustrates this concept. To improve the efficiency of the proposed transit Signal it is recommended that the minimum width of the transit access street type approach be approximately 40 feet (16 feet entrance, 12 feet left turn lane and I2 feet right turn. Trip Generation The trip rates are obtained from the standard reference Trip Generation. 7" Edition, published by the institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and information provided by the City of Fresno FAX staff'. Tablc i\1 summarizes the trip generation for the proposed general pian amendment; Table V summarizes the trip generation for the existing planned land use designation. Compared to the existing planned [and use, the project will change traffic by 139 more daily trips, but will reduce peak hour traffic by 257 less a,m. peak hour and 37 less p.m. peak hour trips. The differences between the existing planned land use and the requested planned land use are summarized in Table VI below. Thu difference in trips is a 13.4 percent increase in daily trips, a decrease of 76.0 percent a.m. peak hour traps and a 30.6 percent decrease in p.m. peak hour trips. Traffic Impact Analysis for the Transit Village Project Located on the South Side of Pace 14 lungs Canyon Road Between South Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue TJKM Transportation Consultants October 27, 2006 TABLE IV: PROPOSED PR0JL(_'r TRIP GENEPUT10N 1 Gaily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Land Use Unit TriSize ln:0ut � { Trip r In -Out i SITE CODE) Rate Total In Out Total In Out Total Rate 'b j � Rate 40 Senior ll sin - Aµar.hed,1252) 10 d.u. 3.48 I 244 0,08 45:55 3 3I 6 0.11 61:39 5 3 8 �-AX Transit C�o.er' 8 Ratites 99 Y 792 BAO 50:50 32 32^ 64 8.00 50:50 32 I 32 64 flasiduntial Cancommiumr i 24 d,u 5.86 141 0.44 17:83 2 I 9 11 0.52 67:33 B 4 12 Townhouse l230} Total New project Trips 11,TT7 I' 37 44 81 I 45 39 84 pores: n u = rnrwV Trip G bvioglaal based on ff;f0mazo pfowge.¢ by FAX TABLL V- ExISTING GENERAL, I'LAN LAND UsE I mp GENERATION Daily A.M. Peak Hour�� P.M. Peak hour Land Use (IT,E COOE) Size Unit Rate Total Tripin:0ut In put Total I Trip I ln:0ut I in Out Total Rate 0110 i Rate DemenraryScnool (520)'l 805 aludenlsl 1.29 1,038 0.42 I 55:45 186 1152 j 338 ` 0.15 52:48 63 51 121 Total New Project Trips 1 11.0381 I 1 186 I. 152 ( 338 I ti3 58 1 121 flies: ' V&fe CTE does not pfavxid rM QenerAm rares ivr me 4-6 am. pawl hour for ElYrr .Iafy schoais me 4-6 D.M. peak haw i'Jum !rc F'OW i� was U!iWLcTM In NTMnLr1qfeib6PM [yak noa r 1nTls. The Caui7i� at Fresrw Cody of Govamrr�rtls rerornme +�s rhs PrpoeSs. TA1tLEVI: DtSFERENcLtNTRI?GENERATION A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Land Use Daily In Out Total In Out Total I I Freaased Land Use 1,177 37 44 81 45 39 84 Existing General plan Land Use 1.038 186 152 338 63 58 121 Total Trip Change 139 -149 -108 -257 -18 -19 -37 % Change in Trips_ _ _ 13.4 I -76.0 -30.8 Tile City of 1~resno's Traffic Signal Mitigation Impact fee requires that all new drvelopment pay a fey cif $41 47 p:fr daily trip generated by the development however, this fec does not apply to the transit trips included in the project. The proposed project of a FA_i transfer station, 24 townhouses and up to 70seni0rhousing units is estimated to Lyenerate a maximum of 1,177 daily trips of which ordy 385 are non -transit trips. Traffic Impac: Analysis for the Transit Village Project Located cn the South Side of Page 15 Kings Canyon Road Between South Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue TJKN1 Transportation Consultants October 27, 2006 Trip Distribution The trip distribution assumptions were developed based on existing travel patterns, the Council of Fresno County Governments traffic model tun, communication with City of Fresno staff, knowledge of the study area and the 2025 Fresno General Plan Circulation Element. Project trips were assigned to the study intersections based on these assumptions. Figure 4 illustrates the year 200f' project only trip assi"*ntnent to the study intersectioms. Traffic Impact Analysis for the Transit Village Project Located on the South Side of Page 16 Kings Canyon Road Between South Wiflow Avenue and South Peach Avenue TJKM Transportation Consuitants October 27, 2006 Intersection $1 Intersedinn 42 Intersection o3 Inlersectlon dA Intersection 95 Kings CanyonMillow Xings Ganyonffranslt Access Kings Canyon/Wal•Mart Kings Canyon[Peach Kings CanyonlMinnewawa 4F-7 i5) t 2 (f5) 8fS01 �25(25) n LEGEND • Study Intersection Project Site ae� Study Segment XX AM Peak Hour Volume (XX) PM Peak Hour Volume I � it N g*---27 r30) 30 f2gj—► ?2 422) 3 City of Fresno Traffic Impact Analysis for the Transit Village Project Year 2008 Project Only — Trip Assignment 1 N3FT54 Kv rr. Figure IN 4 32•2e2 • iH t -M TABLE U. SUMMARY OF Lti'1' MECi'ION L.CVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS lD Intersection Scenario Description Intersect C Control A.M. Peals Hour AM, Peak Hour average Delay LDS (seelveh) Average Delay (seclveh) LOS ' 1 Existing Corditions Signalized 198 6 21.1 C C S.'Mllow Avenue & Existing Plus Project Signalized ; 22.1 C 26.3 E. Kings Canyon Near Term + Project Signalized 23.3 C 28.1 C Road Cumulative Year 2026 No Project Signalized 32.6 C 43,6 D Cumulative Year 2026 T Project Signalized 29.9 C 44.6 I D Existing Gonditions Does not exist Proposed Transit Existing Plus Protect Signalized Village Signal & - E. Kings Canyon Near Term + Project I Signalized Road Cumulative Year 2025 No Project Na Cumulative Year 2025 + Project Signalized nia nia nla rua 3.3 A 3.5 B y 3.7 A 3.9 A nia I rva v,a rVa 12.4 B 4.6 A 3 Existing Gorditicns Signalized V.'a!-Mart Dare & Existing Mus Project Signalized E. Kings Canyon Near Terre + Project Signalized Road Cumulative Year 2025 No Project Signalized Cumulative Year 2025 + Project Signalized 11.1 B 17.3 I B 15 B 22.3 I C 28.3 C 26.7 C D 48.9 D 35.8 32 C 48.8 D 4 Existing Conditions Existing Plus Prcject S. Peach Avenue & Near Term + Project E. Kings Ganyen Cumulative Year 2025 No Project Road Mitigated Cumulative Year 2025 No Proect Cumulative Year 2025 + Project M%gated Cumulative Year 2025 + Project Signalized 31.1 G I 25.9 I G Signalized 31.8 C ! 25.9 C &gna!ized 33.1 I C 27.6 C Signalized 49.2 35.8 45.4 l 0 68.7 E D 45.2 , 0 D j 67.4 E Signalized Signalized Signalized 3B.2 D i 45.2 0 Exisi ng Conditions Mitigated Existing Conditions Existing Plus Project S. 1Airine;vavra Avenue & %litigated Existing Plus Project 5 E Kings Canyon Road Near Term + Project ftgated Near Term + Protect i Cumulative Year 2025 No Project Cumulative Year 202.5 + Prajef-I Two-way Stop 30.7 D 26.6 0 Signalized 8.8 A 6.6 A i Two-way Stop 32.2 D 27.6 D Signalized 10.1 B , I 6.6 A Two-;vay Stop 46 E j 38.9 E Signalized 10.2 B 9.3 A Signalized 13.6 8 18.6 8 Signalized 12.8 8 19.4 1 B Naas: LGa :: Later or SeMs of &Sna#red xarersa3an and De+ay or wvrz mave+mnt �ar.o p cualra@d nterse0jDns Traffic Impact Analysis for the Transit Village Project Located on the South Side of Page 1 B Kings Canyon Road Between South Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue TJKi'ri Transportation Consultants Cc,ober 27, 2006 TABLE VIII: SUNINU►RY OF SEGNIEYT LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS ID Segment Limits Scenario Number o#Lanes 24-hr Counts LOS I East Kings Canyon Rao S.'flillGw Ave. to Pro aced Transit Village p 9 Signalized Intense.aon Existing Condiiians 4 17,400 A Existing Pius Prolet 4 17,625 A clear Term + Praj..,. ec, 4 20,9C3 B Cumulative Year 2025 No Project 4 28,730 D Cumulative Year 2025 * Project 1 4 26,570 D �I 2 Earl .ri�nCs Canyon Raao ` Proposed Transit Village Signalize,' Intersection to wal-m-an Drive Existina Ccndimns 4 17,40 k A ixisting Plus Project 4 17,560 A Near Term + Prolecl 4 20,930 B Cumulative Year 2025 No Project 4 29,730 D Cumulative Year 2025 r Protect 4 I 29,510 0 3 East tongs Canyon Road 7 Wa:l-li,art Drive to S. Peach Ave. Existing Ccndit:c•ns 4 15,950 A Existing Pius Project 4 16.OB0 A Near Term + Project 4 20,B70 B Cumulative Year 2025 Na Project 4 30,e26 E Cumulative Year 2025 No Project 6 30,326 A Gumuiative Year 2023 + Project 4 29A93 0 Nalev LOS = 69yW of SeR" Existing Plus Project Conditions The Existing Plug Prujcct aiming movement volumes are illustrated in Figure 5. Tltc study intersection levels of s -twice calculation results are contained in Appendix D. Table VII summarizes the levels of service at thc. study intersections, while Table VIII summarizes the levels of service for the study .segments under all study scenarios respectively. Under this scenario all study intersections and segments are expected to operate at or better than the City of Fresno LOS D threshold. Traffic Signal Warrants Since the existing spe::d limit for East Kings Canyon Road is 45 MPH, rural peak hour traffic signal warrants were prepared for the unsigmahzed study intersection. These warrants sue found in Appendix 1. Under this scenario, the intersection of South Mirinewawa Avenuc/F,ast Dings Canyon Road continuous to satisfy rural peak hour signal warrant during the a.m. peak hour but not during the p.m. peal: hour. It is recornniended that the City of Fresno add this intersection to the. Citv's Traffic Signal Mitigation Impact Fee during its next signal fee update. Traffic Impact Anaiysis for the Transit Village Project Located on the South Side of Pape 19 Kings Canyon road Between South Wilfor, Avenue and South Peach Avenue T,IKM Transporatior Consuitants October 27, 2006 Interseclion Al intersection 12 Intersection e3 Intersection 04 Intersection 45 Kings CanyontlNlllaw Kings CanyanlTransll Access Kings CanyonlWal Man Kings CanynnlPsach Kings Calryonlf+linnewawa vs Y O 4 ova n+ 129(72} —fidL} (559) i B07 1796; �{ Ark ) -75 (122) 25 (25) . 46 (155}- � t ( 430 1719) rw _ a �^ mn� �B5i991 yrn� u, 12T:q J _ �-47> 14961 mm 22 (311 v N f-- 721 li3. ) l� Opr `�6{ 75 f 1431— I6E i 120; "„ ^ - -- CFi4 1556$ 2e (n) (2gm 790 37@ � = 167rJ}—► 351S17 a �� rn N l3 v -n nri LEGEND • Study Intersection Project Site Study Segment XX AM Peak Hour Volume (XX) PM Peak Hour Volume 1-0 Traffic Signal N01" Stop Sign ,+f" {' City of Fresno Traffic Impact Analysis for the Transit Village Project Figure Existing Plus Project — Traffic Volumes, Intersection 5 Geometrics, and Traffic Controls 32-252 - 1WT&W - A IMPACTS OF APPROVED PROJECTS (NEAR TERM) Description of Approved and Pipeline Projects ;Approved attd Pipeline Projects consist of developrn::nts that are either under construction, built but not fully occupied, or are not built but have final site development review (SDR) approval, or for which the City has knowledge of'. Table IX h.-low provides the approved projects' trip generation rates for daiiy, a.m. and p.m. peak hours. City of Fresno staff' was consulted in August 2006, regarding approved and/or known of projects that could potentially impact the study intersections and segments. Subsequently, it was agreed by City of Fresno staff that four projects were approved, near approval, or in the pipeline within the proximity of the project site. Figure 6 illustrates the location of the approved, near approval, or Pipaine projects and their combined trip ass ib menl to the study intersections. On September 4, 2006, a reconnaissance of the surroundin-,° area confirmed that the above projects were the only projects that could potentially impact the snfdy intersections and segments analyzed in the Near Term (Existing Plus Approved and Pipeline Projects plus Project) Traffic Conditions. T,%,B1, •; Ll': r#PPA[)VED AND PIPELLNi PROJECTS TR[P GENERATi(-}N Daily 1 A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour M n. ';� Land Use (iTE CODE) Sire Unit a o -J Rate Total Trip knout In out Total Trip fn:0ut oo In Out Total l{ e Rate oa Rate 89 Generat S'r noing Center 46 (1320j 23 740R-1 42.94 1,019 1.03 61:39 15 9 24 3.75 48:52 43 1 Free Standing Discount 79.327 , k.s.' 49.21 3,90a 1.84 51:49 74 72 146 o.B7 49:51 1 0 , 1551 307 A Suoerslore (813)' Fast �:md Restaurant ►fifth Dt:ve--iTuough Window 8 k.s.f, 496 12 3.969 53.11 51:49 217 208 425 34.64 52:48 144 133 2T7 (934} B TT 5220 Single Family 61 d.u. 9.57 584 C.75 25.75 12 34 46 1.01 6.3:37 39 23 62 Suboiwsion (210) C TT 5195 Drigt� Family , �3 d c• 9.57 220 0.75 25:75 4 13 17 1.01 E3:37 14 9 23 Subdivision 1210} D T 7 5262 Single Family 1'3 d.u. 9.57 J 1,081 0.75 25:75 21 64 85 1.01 63.37 72 42 114 Subdivvion (210) Total I . T 111,777 1_Q 343 400 743 462 B72 41-L Notes: Flip Aa at 5 of Ine appmvedAitpgcn are ovum x) Fmffa b or,7,e TfS. As shown in Table IN above the total tnp generation for the Approved and Pipeline Projects is 10,777 daily trips, 74 , a,m. peak hour trips and 872 p.m. peak hour trips. Traffic impact Analysis for the Transit tillage Project Located on the South Side 01 Kings Canyon Road Between South Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue TJKM T ranscor,ation Consultants Page 21 October 2T 2006 Near Term (Existing Plus Approved and Pipeline Projects Plus Project) Traffic Conditions The Near Term (Existing plus Approved and Pipeline Projects Plus Project) Traffic Conditions (Year 2008) taming movement volumes, intersection geometries and traffic controls are illustrated in Figure 7. The study intersection levels of service calculation results are contained in Appendix E. Tahle VIl and Table VQI summarize the levels of service at the study intersections and segments under all study scenarios, respectively. Except for the intersection of South Minnewawa and East Kings Canyon Road, all study intersections and se-ments are expected to operate at or better than the City of Fresn�) LOS D threshold. To improve the LOS at the intersections of South Minnewawa Avenue/East KCngs Canyon Road it is recommended that the intersection be signalized while retaining its current intersection geometries. It is further recommended that protective left -turn phasing only in the east -west direction he provided. With these improvements, the LOS at this intersection is expected to improv., from LOS E to LOS B. Recently the City of Fresno was made aware of plans by Wal-Mart to develop the northeast comer of Kings Canyon Road and South Adler Avenue and a driveway limited to right -in and right -out access from and to Kings Canyon road has been proposed. Based on the proposed exclusive transit only signal it is recommended that any driveways or local street access to the existing vacant property at the northeast corner of Kin17s Canyon road and South Adler Avenue be limited to the area hetween South Adler Avenue and a point 155 feet east of the South Adler Avenue right-of-way and that a pork chop similar to that shown in Figure 2 be constructed to prevent. traffic destined to the east from entering the exclusive bus only westhound left turn lane at the proposed transit signal. Traffic Signal 'Warrants Rural peal: hour traffic signal warrants were prepared for the unsignalized study intersection for the Near Term scenario. These warrants are found in Appendix J. Under this scenario, the intersection of South Minnewawa Avenue/East Kings Canyon Road continues to satisfy rural peak hour signal warrant during the a.m. peal: hour, but not the p.m. peak hour. Trafffic Impact Analysis for the Transit Village Project Located on the South Side of Page 21 Kings Canyon Road Between South Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue TJKM Transportation Consultants October 27, 2006 Intersection #1 Intersection V Intersection 43 Intersection 44 inlerseclion 45 Kings Canyon/Wlliaw I Kings CarryanlTransil Access Kings CanyonlWal-Marl Kings Canyan/Peach Kings CanyonlMinnewawa .�- 12M (147) 129 f 157) I i .. �- rn � iSJ ft53} i a �f� f—B5 f905 J r;4 (711 A 19i121 3a 1+31 ri1101 f 1 f21. r2(10) 121'0 i 14.31 ►1 (IF 615y1-r 791A�i_► Es 7811341 34 t421— * - 6 1121— LEGEND • Study intersection Project Site I +! Study Segment a XX AM Peak Hour Volume I N (XX) PM Peak Hour Volume wC='TH ONear Term Project Location City of Fresno Traffic impact Analysis for the Transit Village Project Figure Approved and Pipeline Projects -- Location and Trip Assignment 6 32.z-52. MUM •,& Intersection 01 Kings Canyon/Willow Intersection #2 Kings Canyon/Transit Access Intersection #3 Kings CanyonlWal-Mart intersection 14 Kings Canyon/Peach Intersection 15 Kings Canyon/Minnewawa In Q T 05K N 0to 142(90y �+= rm ifi5 (SB61 m o �5556 — 231311 � -736(m) f 935 1937) BOfi l6681 m j5n& m 17 1130�, to W - *__759 f637) 11:2J 25 (25) 38 1481 j 30 f33} 55 y ;:76}� Y r ■9S 461`11551-'� 1 2a1 M47i-� X 1G911bG'i� I a2 fb4) ��1 4T2I9941 i �+��* v = 7(7j� c -� -� : ti r. n ° 476(7541-# aary 23 j4d' 69 i 131► 'Ttfl N 32a 1523}}-_} v ti�t9ul ��.. '1 - C] Cy 105 City of Fresno Traffic Impact Analysis for the Transit Village Project Near Term (Existing + Approved and Pipeline Projects + Figure Project Year 2008) —Traffic Volumes and Intersection 7 Geometrics and Traffic Controls iN 3'­262 - TIV06 • A CUNIULATIAFE YEAR 2025 NO PROJECT CONDITIONS The Cumutative Year 2.02-� t\io Project total turning movement volumes are illustrated in Fi«ure S. The study intersection icvels of service calculation results are, contained in .Appendix F. Table V11 sunimartzv� thec levels of service at the study intersections, while Table VHI summarizz:s the levels of service for the study segments under all study scenarios. Under this scenario it is anticipated that all major streets and intersections are built to their ultimate lane geometry and signaiizL:d; ther-fore it is was assumed that the intersection geometry for East Kings Canyon Road and South Peach Avenue w il] be the follrnx ing: • Twa eastbound lefts • Three eastbound thru lanes • One easthound riLTht-turn lame • Two westbound lefts • Two westbound thru lanes • One westbound thru-ri,,ht choices lane • Two northbound lefts • Two northbound thru lanes • One northbound ri(zht-turn lane • Two southbound lefts • One southbound thru lane • One southbound thru-right choice lane Exccpt for the intersection of East Kings Canyon Road/South Peach Avenue and the segment of East Kings Canvon Road between Wal-titan Drive and South Peach Avenue all study intersections and SegrtreIIIS art t�xpectt~d to Operate at or better than the City of Fresno LOS D threshold. The LOS for the intersection of East Kings Canyon RoadlSouth Peach Avenue is projected to operate at LOS 1) with 46.9 seconds of delay per vehicle during, the a.m. peak hour and LOS E with 68.7 seconds of delay per vehicle during the p.m. peak hour. To improve the LOS at this intersection, it is recommended that the following changes be made to existing conditioi1s: • One additional westbound thru lane • Change the existing eastbound thru-right choice lane to a thru lane and construct an additional eastbound thru lane • One easthound right turn lane • One additional southhound icft-turn lane With the recommended improvements, the LOS for this intersection will improve to LOS D with 35.9 seconds of delay per vehicle during the a.m. pwak hour and LOS I:) with 45.2 seconds of delay per vehicle duruiL, the p.m. peak hour. Traffic Impact AmFysts for the Transit Village Project Located on the South Side of Page 25 Kings Canyon Road Between South Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue T.1KUI Transportation Consultants October 27, 2006 To Improve the LOS for the segment of East Kings Canyon Road between 1, all -'Mart Drive and South Peach Avenue it would require that this segment of East Kings Canyon Road be constructed as a six -lane facility. In order to construct a six-iane facility white minimizing the need for right-of-way, the following lane and curb to right-of-way pattern should he considered: • That the median island to face of curb dimension b-- set to 37 feet • That the number one lane be 12 feet wide • That the number two lane be 1 1 feet wide • That the number three lane be 14 feet wide • That curbside parking be prohibited • That this segment be si--rted as a bike route • That the curb to right-of-way pattern be tight feet wide Traffic Impact Analysis for the Transit Village Project Located on the South Side of Page 26 Kings Canyon Road Between South Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue TJKM Transportation Consultants Octooef 27, 2006 Intersection #1 Kings Canyon/Willow Intersection 02 Rings Carryon/iransil Access intersection 43 Kings Canyon/Wal-Mart Intersection #a Kings CanyonlPeaeh interseclion #5 Kings Canyon/Minnewawa n� oN 155{121J I'O1 N�ii��- 11 1�1213 i294j 48J (W 708 i 1,285} LEGEND • Study Intersection Project Site rw Study Segment XX AM Peak Hour Volume {XXi PM Peak Hour Volume 4� Traffic Signal Not a part of this scenario ;;�;Z, N N F 1.327(1.211) 30 (46} J 2t31 (347)-7r % 11,22&1 . nS `ti h JL ! 1113121 +-99N 11.0621 Alf V G&+ IVl �,t! 1141225'i a 145 tsl4j AO "''LI {Qji "t6.r-4t 51 (I 1 la,J-t a i ^^ a - City of Fresno Traffic Impact Analysis for the Transit Village Project Traffic Volumes — Cumulative Year 2025 No Project Traffic Volumes and Intersection Geornetrics and Traffic Controls Figure 8 CUMULATIVE YEAR 2025 PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS The Cumulative Year 2025 Pius Project total tumin; movement volumes are illustrated in Figure. 9. The study intersection levels of service calculation results are contained in Appendix G. Table VII summarizes the levels of service at the study intersections, while Table Vlll summarizes the levels of service for the study segments under all study scenarios Under this scenano, it is assumed the intersecuon geometries and traffic controls arc the same as those descrihed in the previous scenano. Except for the intersection of East Kings Canyon Road/South Peach Avenue all study intersections and segments are expected to operate at or better than the City of Fresno LOS D threshold. The LOS for the intersection of East Kings Canyon Road/South Peacb Avenue is projected to operate at LOS D with 45.4 seconds of delay per vehicle during the a.m. peak hour and LOS E with 67.4 seconds of delay per vehicle during the p.m. peal- hour. To improve the LOS at this intersection the sa= intersection improvements recommended in the previous scenario are necessary. With the recommended improvements, the LOS for this intersection will improve to LOS D with 38.2 seconds of delay per vehicle during the a.m. peak hour and LOS D with 455? seconds of delay per vehicle during the p-m. peak hour. State facilities Fair Share Analysis As requested by Caltrans, the projects fair share percentage impacts to the future improvements w the interchange of SR 99fWest Jensen Avenue and for the intersection of East Kings Canyon Road/South Clovis Avenue are provided in Table X. The proposed project is estimated to generate a maximum of 81 and 84 a,nt. and p.m. peak hour trips respectively. Of the a.m. peak hour trips 64 are Generated by FAX and only 17 are non -transit. Si"larly, of the p.m. peak hour taps, 64 are generated by FAX and only 20 are non -transit. Based on the Council of Fresno County of Governments traffic model none of the non -transit peal: hour project trips are projected to utilize. the intrrseetion of SR 99 1'4B Off-rampfWest Jensen Avenue. The project volumes were obtained from the traffic model prepared by the Council of Fresno Count} of Governments and are found in Appendix H. While the project will undergo a general plan amendment to the City of Fresno General Plan it will reduce peal: hour traffic, pursuant to the interim agreement between the City of Fresno and Caltrans the City Formula is used to calculate the project's fair share contribution towards impacts to state facilities. Currently the intersection of East Kings Canyon Road and South Clovis Avenue is included in the City's Traffic Sigmal Mitigation Impact (TSMI) fee program and therefore payment of the City's TSIMI fee should mitigate this project's fair share impact to this intersection. Traffic impact Analysts for the Transit Village Project Located on the South Side of Page 28 Kings Canyon Road Between South Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue TJKM Transportation Consultants October 27, 2006 TABLE V PRO ECT's FAIR SHARE OF THE F'UYURE L VROVENIEN n' Location Proposed Improvement Project Traffic (Highest Year 2025 Traffic (Corresponding Praj Impct's Fair Share Impact (Pj Estimated Project C _ peak Hour) Peak Hour) Cost (Ct) SR 90 elf? oti-ramp tc jEm Signalizatinr 0 4,79B 0.00 $2a6,900.L'0 3O.G0 East flings Canyon Road' Eg & WB right turn 3 E,751 O.oa°; 53 1,OL`'J.C� S120.00 Souttl UOVIS $120.00 Notes: rau aum imp o-4Piopd Trajf+rl i tCamw2we Year2025 Traf&�. Wfhe+e C = Pro Ws ?ar snare confnbaian C; = CaUVWw =f.Var Queuing Analysis Table XI hclow provides a queue length summary the study intersections for the Existing Plus Project, dear Terrn Plus Project, Cumulative Year 2025 No Project, and the Cumulative Year 2025 Plus Project sccnarios. The queuin17 analyses for the study intersections are contained in Appendix I. Traffic Impact Analysis for the Transit Village Protect Located on the S'oufh Sid,- of Pace 29 Kings Canyon road Between South Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue TJKM Transportation~ Consultants October 27, 2006 TABLE JAI: QC7EUENG ANINLYSU Intersection Existing OLOW Storage length (Ft) Existing + Project Near Term+Project Year 2025No Project Year 2025+ Project A.M. P.M. A.M. PJN. A.M. P.M. A.M. 95 P.M. 335 EB Left 95 150 95 210 95 325 EB Trsu E2,600 135 235 230 290 32.5 1150 310 29D0 E9 Thru•Ri hl 120 2D0 210 2?a 3a5 1075 325 2W0t�WB Left 12-0 150 12!� 150 27C .160 150 35D VJB Thru 1.300 160 1 135 IGO 175 IC31 425 355 395 S Vf Ave' $ E. Fangs Canyon :48 Thru Rigt11 %300 145 165 , -0 190 71C0 4fa7 385 =20 Rcad NB Left 270 65 E5 65 B5 101 95 120 9D NO Thru 2600 115 120 too 130 220 155 105 165 NB Rghl 270 45 65 60 E7 65 110 1 60 ?0 SO Left 165 115 110 145 160 I45 150 145 200 SO Trru 2600 145 90 145 12D 115 135 145 245 SB Thru•Rrght 100 155 115 155 12D 1W 140 160 157 E81t a 670 80 115 155 155 r1a r1a 265 fi70 Proposed Trani I E9 T6ru•Rigt=.1 670 60 B5 105 105 d r?a rJa 165 670 Vdmge Sgral a WB Left 0 106 110 105 110 r!a rua 140 110 E Klrig5 Canyi Fload V4B Th;u 570 55 90 70 1225 rug N4 355 40 NB Lett 0 40 45 50 45 rva Na 60 .1 NB Ri hl 0 55 65 75 65 r.a Na 75 103 EB Left 250 90 185 250 292 Ho 325 325 315 EB Thru 570 70 70 170 195 205 7284 420 570 1Nef'mart Dwo a WB Udum 225 110 90 1 110 200 155 159 165 200 E.Hugs Uan,,,on V1B TNru 1220 275 265 275 410 755 625 640 780 Food WB Thru-R;aNt 1220 250 259 250 425 760 610 62S 7B7 SO heft 590 50 75 1Ea 185 175 253 &DO SO Rtht 590 50 20 95 150 I 120 150 em 1E EB Cual Lefts 165 70 90 135 155 I =.5 250 135 240 EB Thru 1220 145 ISO 19C _1a 215 525 175 460 EBThru•R1ght 1220 165 260 2C5 345 rra r_'a r.a r:a EB Right 0 80 170 125 110 NB Dual Letts 250 120 1G1 155 110 205 300 275 300 NB Thru 2600 220 165 220 180 220 450 310 530 S, Poac-h Ave. A E.:1 r+gz C,anYon N8 Rght 250 50 95 70 IE5 70 3t0 125 290 Raa,j W9 Dual Lefts 760 100 95 115 115 325 325 325 325 WB Thru 25EO 185 260 265 325 1255 1340 690 1105 WB Thru-Right 2550 180 265 265 320 1220 1325 675 1070 SO Loft 205 ISD 145 17D 145 :ra rua Na Na 59 Dual Lefts 0 260 240 25O 230 SO Thru 26CO 265 170 335 ISO 1925 2600 I56D 26C3 SO Thru•Right 2600 260 210 330 190 1EDO 2EC0 1505 NCO ED Left 135 40 59 45 50 100 160 70 17D EBThru 25EO I a D tD 210 1 790 250 EE7 EDThru-Rig_hl 2S50 0 0 20 D 249 825 260 E3D S. tJ.~me s Ca Ave. $ � ISIngsCaalyon R24 WS Left 135 40 35 40 40 125 160 140 145 WB Thou 26CO 15 25 15 2s 393 405 415 395 V45 Thru•R'.ght -m 20 1.0 m 10 355 Ho 42D 345 SO LTA 'Nee $5 t6 qct ED 115 345 175 24D SB LTH ?n00 75 55? PO taa 3fi0 135 37a Nate, ' Tam tart- es not ppeam In De caistuced by Mu, scertam, Traffic impac! Anaiysis for the Transit Village Project Located on the South Side of Page 30 Kings Canyon Aoad Between South Wiflow Avenue and South Peach Avenue TJKM Transporiaticn Consultants October 27, 2006 Queuing analysis was completed using Synchro (signalized) output information. Synchro provides both 50' and 95`" percentile maximum queue lengths in feet. According to the Synchro manual, "the 50111 percentile. maximum queue is the maximum back, of queue on a typical cycle and the 95`' percentile queue is the maximum back of queue with 95"' percentile volumes." The queues shown on Tabie KI are the queue lengths for the respective lane movements. Based on the Synchro Output files it is rccomniended that the storage capacity for the following be considered for the Year 2025 Buildoui of the City's circuiation network: I. The ea -abound left turn lane ;n the intersection Of South Wiliow Avenue[East Kirws Canyon Road h!-! increased to 32` feet of storage The westbound left turn lane at the intersection of South Willow AvenuelEast Kinds Canyon Read be increased to 360 feet of storaue. The southbound left turn lade at the intersection of South Willow Avenue/East Kings Canyon Road be increased to 200 feet of storage. d. The westbound exclusive bus left turn lane at the intersection of Transit Accr<.s.,J ast Kinds Canyon Road be constructed with a mininiurn storage of 160 feet. 5. The eastbound left turn lane at the intersection of Wal-Mart Drive/East Kin-s Canyon Road h:- increased to 325 fe.t of storage or consider the construction of easthound dual left turn lanes with a storage of 200 feet. 6. The eastbound dual left turn lanes at the intersection of South Peach AvcnuelEast KinLTS Canvon Road be increased to 250 feet of storage. 7 Tht eastbound n6t turn lane at the intersection of South Peach Avenue/Eam Kings Canyon Road be constructed with 250 feet of storage. S. The northbound dual left turn lanes at the intersection of South Peach Avcnue/Fast Kings Canvon Road be increased to 300 feet of storaue. 9. The northbound right turn lane at the intersection of South Peach Avenue/East Kinds Canvon Road be increased to 300 feet of storage. 10 The westbound dual left turn lanes at the intersection of South Peach Avenue/East Kings Canvon Road be increased to 325 feet of storage. 1 1. The southbound dual left turn lanes at the intersection of South Peach Avenue. /East Km(T.S Canvon Road be constructed with 260 feet of storage. 12. The easthound ieft turn lane, at the intersection of South Minnewawa avenue t East Kings Canvon Road be increased to 170 feet of storage. 13. The westbound left turn lane at the intersection of South Nlinnewawa avenue / East Kings Canyon Road be increased to 160 feet of storage. Al the remaining approaches to the intersection, left and right rum lanes constructed to the City's standard length of 250 feet will be sufficient to accommodate the maximum queue. Traffic Impact Analysis for the Transit Village Project Located on the South S;de of Page 31 Kings Canyon Road Bet,.veen South Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue TJKM Transportation Consullants October 27, 2006 Intersection N1 Kings Canyon(Wlllow Intarsection 92 Kings CanyonRransit Access Intersection r3 Kings Canyonift-Mart Intarsection 04 Intersection 15 Kings Canyan/Peach Kings Canyon/Minnewawa 7�O � �� m m + 152 11 M o, r rnw� 4-1,160Y" 1, 1271291t t .4-- (1,474' (25i oy v In 165 (19&) n n �- 1.26511. l (48) M M C L 137 (312) �r cn N a ♦- 350 (1.056} cir-N a �2E4 I2281 m 23 fat) t7 u1 N i. ins ♦' 16:) .yam I 70165j _1W j �25 :a,►� `l 12i99}�i/ 4Fi (194} —' 91 (1.538}fit 1 2t)1 (3d7) I �/ ,a91221}� 735[,-047}-; ia(1.2851-►I-� 140(64)�i �V= 7(7)'' °°w �� rc' t 616I1.2171i m + � �. 5ai1191� �wr� N Sol 11,1791+ M O ail m 138193 nub. t LEGEND • Study Intersection Project Site ri Study Segment XX AM Peak Hour Volume (XX) PM Peak Hour Volume Y^,HTH Traffic Signal N ' 1° - City of Fresno Traffic Impact Analysis for the Transit Village Project Figure Traffic Volumes and Intersection Geometrics -- 9 Cumulative Year 2025 Plus Project 72.252-WIWIXIJn CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conclusions and recommendations regarding the proposed Transit Village Project to E Incated on th:! south side of East Kings Canvon Road between South Willow and South Peach Avenues are provided hCIOW Existing Conditions Under this scenario, the intersection of South Minnewawa Avenue/East Kings Canyon Road satisfies the rural peak hour signal warrant during the a.m. peak hour but not during the p.m. peak hour. It is recommended that the City of Fresno add this intersection to the City`s Traffic Sie-nal Mitication Impact Fie durinu its next signal fine update. Existing, Pius Project Conditions (Year 2008) • The proposed pro CCt is expected to venerate 1,177 daily, 81 a.m., and 84 p.m. peak hour trips. Of the 1.177 daily trips 792 or 67 percent are transit trips while 385 are non -transit trips. • It is recommended that this project pay the City of Fresno Traffic Siymal Mitigation Impact Fee (TSMI) of $41.47 per daily non -transit trip to mitigate any impacts to the City's traffic signal network. • Compared to the existing planned land use, the project will slightly increase traffic by 139 more daily, but will reduce peak hour traffic by 257 less a.m. peal: hour and 37 less p.m. peak hour trips. • The difference in trips is a 13.4 percent increase in daily trips, a decrease of 76.0 percent of a.m. peal; hour trips and a 0.0 percent decrease in p.m. peak hour trips. • An evaluation of site access and circulation indicated no deficiencies. • In an effort to minimize impacts to East Kings Canyon Road the following is recommended at (fte proposed Transit Village traffic signal: o Westbound u-turns should be prohibited o That the westbound )eft -turn lane be adequately signed and marked as an exclusive Bus -Only lane o That the proposed signal be interconnected with the traffic signals at the lore section of Wal-X,lart Drive/Kings Canvon Road and that their timing be coordinated o That a channehnng median island (pork chop) be constructed on South Adler Avenue as shown on Figure 2 in an effort to minimize vehicular conflicts. o A raised median island should be constructed similar to that shown on HL=c 2 in order to prevent future traffic from the property to north from entering the exciusivc "Busses Only" left turn lane, • In addition to the existin+iv north -south crosswalk located at the Wal-\Mart Drive/Kings Canyon Road signal an additional crosswalk will be implemented at the proposed transit signal on the east leg. of Kings Canyon Road to enable the safe pedestrian crossing between the Transo V illagc and the Wal-Man shopping center across the street Traffic impact Analysis for the Transit Viffage Project Located on the South Side of Page 33 Kings Canyon Poad Between South Willow- Avenue and South Peach Avenue TJKM Transportation Consultants October 27, 2DO6 Under this scenario, the intersection of South Minnewawa Avenue[East Kings Canyon Road continuous to satisfy rural peak hour signal warrant during the a.m. peak. Near `Term (Emsting Plus Approved and Pipeline Projects Plus Project) Conditions (Year 2008) • Except for the intersection of South Minnewawa and East Kings Canyon Road, all study intersections and segments are expected to operate at or better than the Cite of Fresnn LOS D threshold. • It is recommended that any driveways or local street access to the existing vacant property at the northeast comer of Kings Canyon road and South Adler Avenue be limited to the area between South Adler Avenue and a point 155 feet east of the South Adler Avenue: right-of- wav and that a pork chop similar to that shown in Figure 2 be constructed. • To improvt the LOS at the intersections of South Peach Avenue[East Kings Canyon Road the following is recommended: o That the intersection be signalized while retaining its current intersection georrtetrics o Protective left turn phasing ordy in the east and west directions are provided. • Under this scenario, the intersection of South Minnewawa Avenue/East Kings Canyon Road continues to satisfy rural peak hour signal warrant during the a.m. peak hour but not the p.m. peak hour. Cumulative Year 202-5 No Project Conditions Under this scenario, the intersection of East Kings Canyon RoadlSouth Peach Avenue is projected to operate below the City of Fresno LOS D threshold during the p.m. peak hour. To improve the LOS at this intersection, it is recommended that the following changes he made to existing conditions: l . One additional westbound thru lane 2. Chan-e the existing eastbound thru-TILht choice lane to a thru lane and construct an additional eastbound thru lane 3. One eastbound tight turn lane 4. One additional southbound left -turn lane • With the recommended improvements, the LOS for this intersection will improve to LOS D with 35.8 seconds of delay per vehicle during the a,m. peak hour and LOS D with 45.2 seconds of delay per vehicle during the p.m. peak hour. Under this scenario, the LOS for the segment of East Kings Canyon Road between Wall -Mart Drive and South Peach Avenue: is projected to operate below the Cite of Fresno LOS D threshold. To improve the segment LOS it would require that this segment of East Kings Canyon Road he constructed as a six -lane facility. In order to construct a six lane facility while minimizing the need for right-of-way the following lane and curb to right-of-way pattern should be considered: • That the median island to face of curb dimension be set to 37 feet • That the number one lane b,- 12 feet wide Traffic Impact Analysis for the Transit Village Project Located on the South Sioe of Page 34 Kings Canyon Road SeNveen South Willow Avenue and South Peach Avenue TJKM Transportation Consultants October 27, 2006 • That the number two lane be 1 1 feet wide • That the number three lane be 14 feet wide • That curbside: parking be prohibited • That this se=ent he signed as a bike route • That the curb to right-of-way pattern be eight feet wide Cumulative Year 202,; Plus Project Conditions • The LOS for the intersection of East Kings Canyon Road/South Peach Avenue is projected to operate at LOS D with 45 4 seconds of delay per vehicle during the a.m. peak hour and LOS E with 67.4 seconds of delay per vehicle during the p.m. peak hour. To improve the LOS at this intersection the same intersection improvements recommended in the previous scenario are necessary. • 'Xith the recommended improvements, the LOS for this intersection will improve to LOS D with 38.2 seconds of delay p,:r vehicle during the a.m. peak hour rand LOS D with 45.2 seconds of delay per vehicle during the p.m, peak hour. • Upon build out of the Cite of Fresno 2025 General Plan circulation elemont and the recommended improvements in the previaus scenarios, all study intersections and segments are projected to operate at an acceptable LOS D or better. • It is recommended that the Citv consider incroasino the storage lencths of the. left and right turt7 lanes as indicated in the Cumulative 2025 queuing analysis. Traffic lmoact Analysis for the Transat Village Project Located on the South Side of Page 35 Kings Canyon Road Between South Wiffow Avenue and South Peach Avenue TJkM Transportation Consultants October 27, 2006 STUDY PARTICIPANTS T,JKM Personnel Chris Kinzt.l, P.E. Jose Luis Benavides, P.E. Kai Han Geri Foley Evi Pagh Margie Pfaff Persons Consulted Scott ,Mozier, P.E., Traffic Engineering'vlgr. Bryan Jones, T.E,. Assistant Traffic Engrineering 41gr John Downs. FAX Manager ,Moses Stites, Associate Transportation Planner Kristine Cat, Planning Coordinator II Kathy Chung, Planning Coordinator & Demographer Corrina Nunez, Project Manager References Principal Project'vlana-eriProject Eii-Meer Assistant Transportation Engineer Graphics Designer Word Processing Nord Processing City of Fresno, Traffic Engineering City of Fresno, Traffic Engineering City of Fresno, FAX Caltrans-Office of Traffic Plannirug Council of Fresno County Governments Council of Fresno County Governments City of Fresno, Planning and Dovelopment • Trip Generation, 76i Edition, Washington D.C., Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2003 • City of Fresno, 2025 Fresno General Plata, 2002 Traffic Impact Analysis for the Transit Village Project Located or the South Side of Kings Canyon Road Between South Willow Avenge and South Peach Avenue TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 26 October 27, 2006 APPENDIX A - LEVEL OF SERVICE METHODOLOGY APPENDIX A LEVEL OF SERVICE Pit, description and procedures for calculatin', capacity and level of service are found in Transportation Research Board, Higlnvco; Capacity Manua! 2000. Highway Capacity ,Manual 2000 represents the latest research on capacity and quality of service f'or transportation faciiities. Quality of service requires quantitative measures to characterize operational conditions within a traffic stream. Level of service is a quality measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of'such service measures as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience. Six levels ofsengce are defined for each type of' facility that has analysis procedures available. Letters designate each Icvel. from A to F, with level -of -service ,a represcnting the best operating conditions and level -of -service F the worst. Each level of service represents a range of operating, conditions and the drivers perception of these conditions. Safen is not included in the measures that establish service levels. A general description of service levels for various types of facilities is shown in Table A -I. Table A-1 Level of Service Desert [top Uninterrupted Flow Interrupted Flow FreeNvais Signalized Intersections Facility Type Muld-lane High%vays Unsignalized intersections Two-lane Highways Two-way Stop Control Urban Strcets Ail -way Stop Control LOS A Free -flow Vcn- low delay'. B Stable now. Presence of outer Low delay. users noticeable. C Stable flow. Comfort and Accepmblc delay. convenience starts to decline. D fdioh dertsivv stabie flow. Tolerable delay-. E Unstable flow Limit of acceptable delay. F Forced or breakdown flow Unacct:pwbie delay S�vuix� ifiF�rw�yCo�anty.',{anuua317f;YJ Level of Service Page A-1 TJKM Transportation Consultants Appendix A Urban Streets The term "urban streets" refers to urban arterials and collectors, including those in downtown areas. Arterial streets are roads that primarily serve longer through trips. However, providing access to abuttiag commercial and residential land uses is also an important function of arterials. Collector streets provide both land access and traffic circulation within residential, commercial and industrial areas. Their access function is more important than that of arterials, and unlike arterials their operation is not always dominated by traffic signals. Downtown streets are signalized facilities that often resemble arterials. They not onlv move through traffic but also provide access to local businesses for passenger cars, transit buses, and trucks. Pedestrian conflicts and lane obstructions created by stopping or standing buses, trucks and Parkin,vehicles that cause turbulence in the traffic flow are typical of downtown streets. The speed of vehicles on urban streets is influenced by three main factors, street environment, interaction among vehicles and traffic control. As a result, these factors also affect quality of service. The street environment includes the geometric characteristics of the facility , the character of roadside activity and adjacent land uses. Thus, the environment reflects the number and width of lanes, type of median, driveway density, spacing hetween signalized intersections, existence of parking, level of pedestrian activity and spud limit. The interaction among vehicles is determined by traffic density, the proportion of trucks and buses, and turning movements. This interaction affects the operation of vehicles at intrsections and, to a lesser extent, between signals. Traffic control (including signals and signs) forces a portion of all vehicles to slow or stop. The dolays and speed changes caused by traffic control devices reduce vehicle speeds, however, such controls are needed to establish right-of-way. The average travel speed for through vehicles along an urban street is the determinant of the operating level of service. The travel speed along a segment, section or entire length of an urban street is dependent on the running speed between signalized intersections and the amount of control delay incurred at signalized intersections. Level -of -service A describes primarily free -flow operations. Vehicles are completely unimpeded in their ability to maneuver within the traffic stream. Control delay at signalized intersections is minimal. Level -of -service B describes reasonably Unimpeded operations. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly restricted, and control delays at signalized intersections are not significant. Level -of -service C describes stable operations, however, ability to maneuver and change lanes in midblock location may be more restricted than at level -of -service B. Longer queues, adverse signal coordination, or both may contribute to lower travei speeds. Level -of -service D borders on a range in which in which small increases in flow may cause substantial increases in delay and decreases in travel speed. Level -of -service D may be due to adverse signal progression, inappropriate signal timing, high volumes, or a combination of these factors. Page A-2 Lever of Service Appendix A TJKPri Transportation Consultants Level -of -service E is characterized by significant delays and lower travel speeds. Such operations are caused by a combination of adverse progression, high signal density, high volumes, extensive delays at critical intersections, and inappropriate signal timing. Level -of -service F is characterized by urban street flow at extremely, low speeds. Intersection congestion is likely at critical signalized locations, with high delays, high volumes, and extensive queuing. The methodology to determine level of'service stratift�­s urban str=ts into four classifications. The classifications are complex, and are related to functional and design categories. Once classified, the urhan street is divided into segments fnr analysis. An urban street seLmenl is a one- way section of street encompassing a series of hlocks or links terminating at a signalized intersection. Adjacent segments of urban streets may be combined to form larger street sections. provided that the segments have similar demand flows and characteristics. Levels of service arL related to the average travel speed of veliicies alone the urban street se_>ment or section. Travel times for :;xistin conditions are obtained by field measurements. The maximum -car technique is used. "1-he vehicle is driven at the posted sped limit unless impeded by actual traffic conditions. In the maximum -car technique. a safe level cfvehicular operation is maintained by observing proper foliowing distances and by changing speeds at reasonable rates of acceleration and deceleration. The maximum -car technique provides the best base for measuring traffic performance. An observer records the travel time and locations and duration of delay. The beginning and ending points are the centers of intersections. Delays include times waiting in queues at signalized intersections. The travel speed is determined by dividing the length of the segment by the travel time. Once, the travel speed on the arterial is determined, the level of service is found by comparing the speed to the criteria in Table A-fl. Level -oft s-_rvik:c criteria vary for tite different classifications of urban srrcct, reflecting diff rences in driver expectations. Level of Service Page A-3 TJK.M Transportaiton Consultants Appendix A Table A-11 Urban Street Leveis of Service by Class Urban Street Class I II HI IV Range of Free Flow Speeds 45 to 55 35 to 45 30 to 35 25 to 35 (niph) Typical Frec: Flow Speed (mph) 50 40 33 30 Level of Service Average Travel Speed (mph) j A = 42 >35 >30 B >34 >28 >24 --19 C >27 1> 13 I D > 21 = 17 = 14 -19 E >16 %13 >10 >7 ; F <16 r=t3 Y10 =7 Source: Higirx,grCapaefryMan val2 017 Interrupted Flow{ One of the more important elements limiting, and often interrupting, the flow of traffic on a highway is the intersection. Flow on an interrupted facility is usually dominated by points of fixed operation such as traffic signals, stop and yield signs. These ail operate quite differently and have differing impacts on overall flow. Signalized Intersections The capacity of a highway is reiated primarily to the geometric characteristics of the facility, as well as to the composition of the traffic stream on the facility. Geometries are a fixed, or non -varying, characteristic of a facility. At the signalized intersection, an additional element is introduced into the concept of capacity: time allocation. A traffic signal essentially allocates time among conflicting traffic movements seekinb use of the same physical space. The way in which time is allocated has a significant impact on the operation of the intersection and on the capacity of the intersection and its approaches. Level of service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of control delay, which is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fury consumption, and increased travel time. The delay experienced by a motorist is made up of a number of factors that relate to control, traffic and incidents Total delay is the difference between the travel time actually experienced and the reference travel time that would result during base conditions, i. e., in the absence of traffic control, eeometric delay, any incidents, and any other vehicles. Specifically, level of service criteria for traffic signals are stated in terms of average control delay per vehicle, typically for a 15-minute analysis period. Delay is a complex measure and depends on a number of variables, including the quality of progression, the cycle length, the ratio of t recn time to cycle len- h and the volume to capacity ratio for the lane group. For each intersection analyzed the average control delay per vehicle per approach is determined for the peak hour. A weighted average of control delay per vehicle is then duterinined for the intersection. A level of service designation is given to the control delay to better describe the le%,cl of operation. A Level of Service Page A-4 TJKM Transportation Consultants Appendix A description of levels of service for signalized intersections can be found in Table A-1I1. Table A-ILI Description of Level of Service for Si!!naked Intersections Level of Service Description Vcry low control delay, up to 10 seconds per vehicle. Progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. ,,any vehicles do riot stop at all. Short cycle lengths may tend to contribute to low delay values. B Control delay greater than 10 and up to 20 seconds per vehicle. There is good progression or short cycle lengths or both. More vehicles stop causing higher levels of delay. C Control delay greater than 20 and up to 35 seconds per vehicle. Higher delays are caused by fair progression or longer cycle lengths or botl). Individual cycle failures may begin to appear. Cycle failure occurs when a given green phase doe not serve queued vehicles, and overflow occurs. The; number of vehicles stopping is significant, though many still pass through the intersection without stopping. D Control delay greater than 35 and up to 55 seconds per vehicle. The influence of congestions becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths. or high volumes. Many vehicles stop, the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. E Control delav greater than 55 and up to 80 seconds per ychicl- The limit of acceptable delay. High delays usually indicate poor progression, long cycle lenWnlis, and hirrh volumes. Individual cycle failures art: frequent. F Control delay in excess of 80 seconds per vehicle. Unacceptable to most 1 drivers Oversaturation, arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. klany individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be contributing factors to higher delay. 5ouru : flighwdv C'Qruc{v Alarival 201"0 The use of control delay, which may also be referred to as signal delay, was introduced in the 1997 update to the Highiva}: Capacity Manual, and represents a departure from previous updates. in the third edition, published in 1985 and the 1994 update to the third edition, delay only included stopped delay. Thus, the level of'scrvice criteria listed in Table A-111 differs from earlier criteria. UnsignahzLd Intersections The current procedures on unsi,naliz.ed intersections were first introduced in the 1997 update to the Highway, Caractry Manual and represent a revision of the methodology published in thc: 1994 update to the 1985 High%vcw CapacityManual. The revised procedures use control delay as a measure of effectiveness to determine level of service. Delay is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and increased travel time. The delay experienced by a motorist is made up of a number of factors that relate to control, traffic and incidents. Total delay is the difference between the travel Mile actually experienced and the refcrcncr travel time that would result during base conditions, i. e.. in the abseoce of traffic control, -eometric delay, any incidents, and an}; other vehicles. Control delay is the increased time of travel for a vehicle approaching and passing throu>;h an unsignaiized intersection, :pared with a fr"-Owv%-- vehicle :•r if it we .'lot refs giro . to slowcar stop at the intcrseri!i n_ Page A-5 Level of ServiCe Appendix A TJKM Transportaticn Consultants Two -Way Stop Controlled Intersections Two-way stop controlled intersections in which stop signs are used to assign the right-of-wa-y, are the most prevalent type of intersection in the United States. At two-way stop -controlled intersections the stop -controlled approaches are referred as the minor street approaches and can be either public streets or private driveways. The approaches that are not controlled b%, stop signs are refined to as the major scree; approaches. The capacity of rnovements subject to delay are determined using the "criticai gap" method of capacity analysis. Expected average control delay based on movement volume and movement capacin- is calculated. A level of service designation is given to the expected control delay for each minor movement. Level of service is not defined for the intersection as a whole. Control delay is the increased time of travel for a vehicle approaching and passing through a stop -controlled intersection. compared with a fret. -flaw vehicle if it were not required to slow or stop at the intersection. A desr_ription of levels of service for two-way stop -controlled intersections is found in Table A -IV. Table A-INr Description of Level of Service for Two-Wav Ston Controlled Intersections Level of Service Description A Vera, low control delay less than 10 seconds per vehicle for each movement subject to delay. 8 Low control delay greater than 10 and up to l 5 seconds per vehicle for each movement subject to dclay. C Acceptable control delay greater than 15 and up to 7-5 seconds per vehicle for each movement subject to Mav, I. D Tolerable control dela}• greater than 25 and up to 35 IIseconds per vehicle for each movement subject to delay. E Limit of tolerable control delay greater than 35 and up to 50 seconds per vehicle for each movement subject to delay. F Unacceptable control delay in excess of 50 seconds per vehicle for each movement subject to delay. 5ourcr: H.1ghwpv capacrry .sfanual 2C+M JiUurisdictionlFresnolAPP A LOS•HCM 200.pdf Level of Service Page A-6 TJK1M Transportation Consultants Appendix A APPENDIX B - EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS TMC Summary of South Willow Ave/Kings Can Von Blvd Pro)ecl 9: C6-8I71-col 's V" Eq6lwli� TO-TA� AN, Mr) PM Ell E201 46 5, n rn I APPROACH LAMES Ln Ln < kO 17 add. APPROACH LANES --Jl AM, N10 PM 128 67 TOTAL co* TURNM MOVEMENT CQUMT south -WilloW,Avo- /Xings-CanYvii 51vi 0 morsect, OR Narr.-,,- Cry Date CGLJN7 PETUDDS 7.0Q4M - '3:4)0lA noon )):OOAM I:c�,PM ,oM L-pq!-q 00 PM 67 cy, AW HAi' HOUR 715 AM *0ON KAX HOUR, 0 Ah' FM PEAK HOUR 445 PM TMC Summary of Wal-Mart Dr A veZ2QLngs Canyon Blvd Proiect #: 06-8121-002 I; TOTAL AM ME) P-A, 0;0 270 H7:1 0 200 8 69 355 355 0 514 1—=—=0 - 0 0 APPROACH LANES --- - - - - - - - 01 C, CD LA t" TOTAL z 12 0 33 45 2 w 4(AMMM 760 0 626 1386 0 ME* 0: 38 0 48 86 ti n CD C:) z :v APPROACH LANES cot TURNIl','Ci MOVEMENT CCUir w=A, =N. W.- (jntL-rsaLjiw Name'l "2mfm-v Day Date Froumr Pt-Riom am j ='00 AM 9 00 AM_ noon 11:00 AM 1-.0D 0 pm A: CO Pm a: 110. AM PEAK HOUR 715 AM, W,)Oft PEAK HOUR 0 AM S3M PEAK HOUR 400 pm TMCSummar-y of South Peach Ave/Kings Canyon Blvd Pro,,ect -: 06-9121-003 APPROACH LANES M oc r 1 ���N� -j. n q7's't- a"n V on TDTAL At'. m py A,%, MD W TOTA- 215 72 0 143 ILIM 85 0 r 183 731 223 0 508 MIN* 450 L, 475 I 925 D' 137 90 0 :E7 Arm 166 0 1 120 1_ 288 uti J r"i Ln rN TURNIING MQVE?dEr4T r-'- Cr) I- SoLfth --Pea6,Av0 I Kftscanvor. wive (Inte,secluomi ;Jame} Au Ix Day Date APPROACH LANES COUNT PRODS am F 7:04 AM 9:DD Ahi neon I I-00 Am - I: QG pm 1 A: N Pr-0 6 a �OPIIEJ AM TIEAK 110UP 700 AM nOON 9-EAK KOiJR 0 AM PM PEAK HD-,,.R 4f)() Pm TMCSummary of South Minnewawa Ave/Kings Canyon Blvd Project x: 06-8i21-004 APPROACH LANES p [O tD N $ c0 Q i IT, i a] rn N WW ue TOTAL AM MD PM AM N.0 Pv TOTAL � Q _•.I 93 41 0 52 { t664 to 31 54 : _i� _ u 102S 376 0 649 a545 1209 ,__•6 _i 49 17 0 32 22 50 a a nni — n Ln I TURNING MOVE�KENT COUNT stli= .nneyueevas.Y!!tttSCa�o joy F H- 0(lntersechrn„xrr.l: Day Cate :. APPROACH LANES .p ....' COUNT PERIODS 71Ir1 7-. tD AM • 9:00 AM noon II:OD AM i:W PM LPM 4:DoPM 6'ffCiPM AN PEAK 11GUR 715 AM, P00N PEAK HDUP 0 AM Ph' PEAK HOUR 41.5 PM Volumes fcF'Tuesday, AuquS', 29, 2006 City: Fresno Project u: 06-8122-001 Location: Kings canyon Bivd From South Vlillow Ave to Wal-Mart Ave AM Period NB 58 03 via PM Period N SB Q W6 00:00 11 16 12:00 121 132 00:15 4 11 12:15 154 139 00.30 8 13 12:30 154 'M DD:4s 5 26 14 54 82 12:45 142 574 149 552 1126 D1:o0 7 .; 13:c0 190 121 D115 7 6 13:IS 167 120 01:30 4 10 13:30 US 116 01:45 1 19 ?-a 53 13:45 13S 568 149 5D6 1074 02:CID 6 ? HU 1D2 136 02:15 G 11:15 1B9 137 0{:3D 4 5 14:30 194 141 02.45 4 38 4 24 42 1,111S 142 6132 157 571 1253 03:0 1 3 Moo 136 157 J 03:15 4 3 15:1S 166 159 03:30 4 10 15:30 146 156 WAS 7 16 7 23 39 1S71S 172 62.0 L79 651 1271 040-1 6 7 16:00 180 173 D4:15 5 6 16:15 154 17-0 04-3p 6 7 lb:3o ISD 167 04:45 10 27 12 42 59 L6.45 166 650 175 b64 1339 05:00 17 13 17 :00 U 6 183 05:15 11 30 11:15 16B 213 D5.30 22 42 IT30 185 176 05:45 34 84 44 179 213 17:45 204 744 183 755 1495 05:00 24 33 18:06 16B NO 06:15 25 37 18:15 160 167 06:30 44 5C 18:30 152 156 W415 55 148 74 194 312 1B:45 13S 664 133 E5E 1320 L7.C4 58 85 19:00 150 L59 07:15 H0 Io1 19:15 11r4 133 07:3C 142 254 19:30 144 113 67:45 149 429 174 675 1104 19:45 144 e02 i55 5K 1192 08;00 74 160 20:c0 1S2 137 01,15 78 150 20:15 129 130 MAO 73 115 N.30 122 96 4e i5 53 305 155 560 888 20:45 106 5C-4 115 47$ se32 09:00 65 99 21: C0 L 16 B9 09:L5 58 9e 21:15 62 70 09:30 77 93 21 30 86 62 N 45 74 274 L17 394 6C8 21'4S 80 364 42 2G3 627 10:00 77 111 22:00 62 59 10:15 67 139 22:15 40 213 10:30 70 109 22.20 32 40 ICAS 71 243 116 475 16B 22:45 28 Sb2 32 160 122, 5`:C{1 08 B2 23:00 25 32 11:15 74 536 2 3. 15 36 22 11:30 70 L24 23.30 A 18 L1.4s 107 339 162 551 393 23:45 15 4t3 17 89 507 Total Vol. 1983 3173 51G1 032 59Q 12192 pally Totals Sp E6 I' E Combined 8215 517. 17353 AM PM Split Qlo _ 3e.a°ra� 65.6% 29.7% Peak Hour 11:45 07:15 07:15 Volume 539 750 1195 P.H.F. 1119 D.24 0,75 17:00 17:15 17:00 744 772 1499 C.91 ,.9i 0.97 1laiumes fore Tuesday, August 29, 2006 City: Fresno Pro)ect 1: 06-8122.0C2 Location: Kings canyon Blvd From Vial -Mari Sig to South Peach Ave AM Perlcd NR se 9 WB _ FM Period NB SB ES M 04'.CO 0 11 12:D0 154 130 00:1S 3 8 iz:15 148 135 C0:30 0 6 12:30 135 142 00:45 6 9 11 36 4S 12:45 130 567 15S 562 1129 01:00 0 10 13:00 142 1.12 01:15 9 8 13:is 154 130 01:30 0 6 13:30 142 122 WAS 6 15 1D 34 49 13:4S 165 603 125 519 1122 02:C0 0 5 14:00 16D 112 02:15 3 6 14:Is 186 130 02:30 3 7 14:30 188 135 02:45 9 15 5 23 35 14 45 IS7 691 125 532 1223 03:00 6 5 15:00 165 125 03:1S IS 10 15:15 166 133 03:30 6 6 15:3D 145 130 03:4S 6 33 10 31 64 15:4S 130 b06 141 529 1135 04:00 9 7 16:CO 125 154 04:IS 6 8 16:15 130 145 04:3o 12 11 16:30 is�" Ifd3 04:4S 12 39 20 46 85 16:45 154 567 180 645 IM's 05:0'1 15 25 17:C3 142 168 CS: 1S 45 40 17:IS 133 166 05:30 63 40 173D 125 161 05:45 39 162 33 138 3C0 17:45 105 505 175 670 1175 06:00 72 40 18:00 120 154 OGAS 90 45 In: IS 125 142 06:30 84 60 18:30 1D5 130 GE,AS 87 333 8B 233 S66 18:4S III 463 122 54B 1011 07:00 77 156 19M 130 105 07:15 83 204 19:Is 124 112 07:3C 107 177 19:30 140 12D 07 AS 102 369 160 697 1066 19:45 135 529 105 412 971 08:00 80 155 20! Cc 142 88 Of]:IS 83 148 24:is 100 B6 00:30 68 112 20:30 120 60 CGAS 52 283 125 54C 823 20:15 1IB 480 68 302 782 09:00 90 105 21:DO 105 77 091S 69 110 2 1: 15 68 50 09:30 66 105 21:30 60 54 09 AS 63 283 120 440 728 21 45 55 20 40 221 509 10:00 42 125 22:00 40 33 10:15 81 130 22:1S 35 35 10:30 60 105 22:30 33 20 10:4S 72 2S5 111 471 726 22:4S 36 146 21 169 255 11:00 54 145 23:CO 25 16 11:15 81 130 23:1S 20 15 11:30 75 105 23:30 15 7-0 11:45 &4 294 110 49U 794 23:45 1i : 71 17 70 141 Total Vol. 2G95 3179 5274 5512 5149 10661 Daily Totals rib 58 E8 V'/B Combined 7607 3328 15935 AM PM SRIit 0/0 34.74¢ iiD,3°Jo �3.1flio 51,1°10 48.390 6fa:9a/o P6ak+lour 11:45 07700 07:19 13AS 16:30 16.30. Volume 521 697 1068 699 EEO 1763' PRKF. n,as O Bs 0.93 0.93 0.94 0.95: APPENDIX C - LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS: EmSTING Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing AM Peak 1: Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue 9f7t2CO6 -� 4�' I i Lane Configurations �► '}`�r ]� �'jj. 1' 0.: T96C'. '_r94't7 =tip Lane Width (R) 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 aY,� 12 12 12 12 _ _ Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 "I 0 2 _ 5. r -- LL. 1_in Leading Detector (11) 51D 50{ 9v" 50 _ 50 50 50 so 50 5-7 _ F. Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 15 9 15 9 y�..9 Pod Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1,00 0.98 1.00 1,00 Y =-- .0 �,w�--�c•i z: �. _�,: _n�.. ... r FitiP(Otected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 { [ ,! Fit Permitted[i� 0,950j 0.7�9y50}{y�} 0.950 0.950 +L•."I'�+I,J$. I��.].i�l'l�µ��+L7�11I�3 �'�r1L`:G�����','�.�,`i F"i +lYr�s �.I��R!i �.� _�+-�'-.M1.,�' -�'��� Rignt Turn on Red 're -I Yes Yes Yes .ate ��' Y� aR. �'"�, - - �.a' � - .l":T yr.t - .��:;�;, �I�j;.�lr,:� -.,� r��:; �� - •r�* Y1.00 ='�_;:�. Headway Factor 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.041 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 Link Distance (it) 2648 1384 267'22672 �I ,., Vclurne (vph) 46 324 89} 67 633 128 48 146 24 89 264 60 Peak Hair Factor 0.92r 0.92 0.92 092 0.92 0,92 0.'92 092 O.92 0.92 0.92 092 - 5n Lane Group Flow rvnh? 50 449 0 73 827 0 �2 1 9 26 97 2.52 0 '. _ Prri Inen Print Protected Phases 7 4 3 B 5 2 1 6 Detector Phases 7 4 3 8 6 2 2 1 6 .1?n>xrr'3viEil�.t`sj d;9.+:0 AID -;D. 4:0;] Minimum Split (s) 12.0 23.3 12.0 27.7 12.0 22.6 tL.3 2.0 27.0 3al) 3-3:1j U --1.7;D `"40"0 0-D. 15 -!0 •26.0 .2"-0 1:911 Total Split °/a} 15.0% 3�8.0% 0 0 17 Dlvr 40 0 0.0°9 150% 12 C ^, 2$.0% 19.0% 30.0No 00% Yellow Time (s) 3.2 µ 3 32 4.3'+ 3.2 3.6 36 3.2 3.6 r'�aiE�1r11E.'(5�.- . • -. '`F..G � �.�_� _ - :a`.q '1 :C -1.fl. _0_ '. "..0� '1.0 .-i_1��,.. •. Le,ad)Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Yes ' Yj9 Yis ' .':Yes Yes Yes-_ 'Yes Yes Yam. ,-. - VehiCe Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0 3.0 3.0 Roc ll'.1a1ada None C-Mex None C-Ma`x None None -."Nave. 'None No;ia ` Walk Time (s) 70 7.0 7.0 70 70 _ F1'- t ont'4 :alk' Is't 1=��,.. .17,0 1-5;:�4 . - 1'1 b 11;0 1 Pedestrian Calls i9fnr) 10 10 1D 10 10 Act-Ef"cEG`rcenYf ') 9.9 '5.3_� 9:2 52;8 t3:4 . 1,4,�, f4"5. �M l6`7 A.tuai-dwIc,F.ar'0 0.10 054 O.C9 0.53 O.D$ 014 014 u11 0.17 v,c RRIG ~ 0:30 0.25 0,47 - .0.46 0.3.5. `_0.60 011 0,51 0;60 l_,oniro; ID'�Iay 45.0 148 486 2.8 46.0 424 13.5 45.2 36.1 Baseline Synchro 6 Reccr,. TJKRA Transportatior Consultants Fs.3: 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing AM Peak 1: Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue 4 91712006 ---* --o f- .-- 1- 4\ 1 /� �. ,� ./ Cycle Length 100 Offset: 44 (44%), Referenced to phase 4'EST and MET, Start of Green T_Fie Control Type Actuated -Coordinated Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: ♦1 Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue a2 F a3 k-10 a4 05 Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing AM Peak I Kings Canyon Blvd & 917006 _-.0, �-- Lane Configurations ft A +T+ Vi ? Ii1 ,, F----'. �I L+l7 _. }yJ-. Yl.r�!Jl:/ �. 12. ''1 � .V.- � -,+•"'L Lane Width (ft) 11 12 11 12 12 1212 12 M1 Leading Detector (PL} 50r 50 50 50 50 s0 7uurninlgg Speed (mphl 15 9 A 9 _ _ lrlu 31.af 4 3:ar,r+ .-i'x _15 .' r Pad Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Rlt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 rot _ _ Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 Rignt Turn on Red Yes Yes �00 �1.00 Headway Factor 1.04 1.00 104 1.00 1 00 Link Distance (ft) 1384 1304~ 640 '---- Volume (vph) 70 255 38 760 12 24 45 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0,'942 0.92 0.22 0.92 0.92 0.92 Lane Group plow (vph) 76 386 41 839 0 25 49 Protected Phases� 7 4 3 $ S Cetector Phases 7_ 4 3 a 6 6r4 _ TT hlinmum S.pIrt (s) 12.0 22.9 12.0 22.9 27.0 27.D +20.0% :,..q Total Split (°+6) 22-0°l0 45.0% 43.0% D 0% 35.0% 35.0% _ _ 7Yellow Time (sj s.2 4,3 32 4.3 3.2 3.2 ~Lead �+- LeadiL.ag Lead Lag Lag Lear ;-a' Qpt,mize7 Yps'' `. es Yell .Yas _ Vehicle Extension (e) 3 0 3.0 3.0 , 0.0 3 0 3 Recall- 6#�­.r .. Non'e-G-Max. `Nonni C-l4 xy Max. Max -- Walk Time is) 7.0 7.6 7.0 7.0' Sasti:DD f1#'7kf8Ik (� ~° 1.5_5 14_9 Pedestrian Calls l.,,i,rl 10 10 Act.Ef60t Gr�r 9:8 491D :1 ,1 ' .49:Z' 3110 . =3 a40 Actuated giC Rat,o 0.1 C, 0.49 L_1.12 049 0.31 0.31 vic. Ratio .':' _.0A6 022 0'20 0.49 0"05 .a,TO = Contrail Delay .32'.6 14.2 20.2 - a 24.6 7 5 Queue -Delay'? ; ' 6_0 OX :0-0 0,0 0-0 .0.0 Total Delay 38.6 14.2 20.2 6.5 246 7.8 Baseline 5yrcnro 6 Report TJKV. Transportalion Consultants Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing AM Peak 2: Kings Canyon Blvd & 91712006 Analysis Perod (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2 Kings Canyon Blvd & 04 rB Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing AM Peak 3: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 9/7/2006 4\ Lane Configurations M + ►�►� +� '� ��, Imam Lane Width (ft) 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 10 11 12 12 Storaqe Lanes 2 0 2 0 2 1 1 �m 0 Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 is 9 __r. fu r; :..:s`. _ r; :� . Mi W.R_ _ Ped 8i'Ka Factor 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1 M 1.00 rr +� 4;y _ y�� �.L�� I.x .� .�: .v41:.'4�.,��ALf �'- x_- ,_5. S-.+* ..��^:-". ri:"+� __ + .. ;- �,�'.:"L-i _ tx' Q.� L'.. :#�Y '1�I7, ""J...', Flt pra 0.950 0,950 0.950 0.960 _ Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 ~ on Red Yes Yes Yes �Right �Turn �Yes y71_ Headway Factor 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.09 1.04 1.00 1.00 Link Dastaf ce ((ft) 1304 2640 2688 2656 fvph} 72 223 90 168 450 85 239 534 99 104 611 54 'Volume Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 G.92 0.92 Lane Croup Flow (vnh) 78 340 0 183 `81 0 260 Sao 106 113 723 8 :f?raf _6 Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 Detector Phases 7 4 3 B 5 2 2... 6 . _ -0_ M trn rrii� :r ) ,'b: 4: fit } :a°_� Ito . '+'P 4: 0.. 4,_ r k Minimum Split is} 12.0 30.8 _ 12.0 27,9 12.0 35.5 355 12.0 29.1 T-T'�' y' i ?' _. :0:0 .' 1_�i7' ;85-5 'U.+ 7�7 Oy.. 3-5 -35.5-.17_ i ` -35 Total Sprit (°70) 12 0°l0 33.5°!q 0.0% 14,0°''O 35.5".¢ 0.C'1,. i7.0 5.5°b 3{.5':0 17.tf^ 35 SQ.o 0.3 h4, :9; � 3Q:2 . , 9 2:8 30 6. �30.8' 1�2 ,.5 CL�?' ..., Yeltov� Time (s) 3.2 a.3 3.2 . ., 4 3 3.2 3 9 4.9 ir^ri: (s}'... Et. �I:'0:v 1:U .0 1C.1 1.0 :" _ `i_0 1:0 LeadlLag Lag Lead Lag - ... Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Y. ...:Y:es Yes ,�s Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 _ 3.0 3.0 10 30 1. 3.0 a fire _ None: C-ttlla ' �. None C-Max ''None' -None. .Nano . ,None -N Vdalk Time (,$) 7.0 7.0 i.G 7.0 7.0 1 S_6 _23=v...-- Pedestrian Calls (#Inrj 10 10 10 10 10 Adt -Effdt:Green':{')' - 7.5 ..'35 7 9.5 39:8 12-5 ' ` i 7,7 . 27'71 11..1 ' 2 _ Actuated gJC Raho 008 0.36 C 10 0 40 0.12 0.28 0.28 0 '.1 026 ViE. 5 4io . - 0;-31 0_213 0_58 0.43 0 63' 0.60: 0;�-3. _ Q:50 a_ Control belay 37:t"s 6'.3 50.1 243 47 1 32.8 61 50.5 36:5 Baseline Synchro 6 Reporl TJKM T•-ansoortabon Consultants Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing AM Peak 3: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 9(712006 Tolal Dl ,day 37.9 6.3 50.1 24.3 47J 32.8 6.1 5u.5 36.5 Approach Delay 12.2 30.5 J33.7 38.4 Offset: 0 {G%), Referenced to phm Control Type: Actuated-Coordlnatiod Intersection f 1 •q Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3. Kings Cany 01 a2 m6 n Bivd & Peach Avenue a4 20 1 m7 Basefine Synchro 6 Reoort TJKM Transeortatjon Consultants Page 6 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing AM Peak 4: Kings Canyon Bivd & Minnewawa Ave 917/2006 --► Z f- t I` `' r RMF - �j - 4* — 4, Lane Configurations 1►�r ��TT yt r_ ._1R7��t .a, „ Mr++•il �. -�' . �';_--._�. ....>t.a ,tom. , Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,,9_e2} 092 0.92 0.92 C.92 0.92 0.92 0.'92 iw^f 4+7r,i. :�[ hd'^ST 4 _.]V_ f CLOT - -J } '� f 71 MINIM Y Pedestrians 3 3 3^^?�� 3 j Walking Speed (fits 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,3 Right turn flare (vale) Median storaue veh) 0 0 pX. platoon u vC1, stage 1 canf vol 510 510 798 798 vCu, unblocked vol 750 430 1035 1321 220 1151 1317 279 tC, 2 stage (s) 6.6 5.6 6.6 5.6 p0 guoue free % 96 97 96 68 97 S2 72 68 Volume Left 45 u 0 30 0 Q 6 13 cSb 846 1700 1700 1116 170D 1700� 232 293 Queue Length 95th (if) 4 0 0 2 0 0 46 fit Approach LOS ID 1) rnc,e�se��ro��+�ra�ma � Average De'ay 6.0 — Inters�ctrr Cpacitp;.Liti anon ':4.30` ICIJevelof;Service;' .. Ar4aivsis Period (mini w'._ . 15 -- __ Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKV, fi;ansportatton Consultants Page i Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing PM Peak 1: Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue 9/812006 Lane Configurations ... +I. fit+ �. Lane'Wdlh ift) 11 12 12 11 12. 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 MOMEIMM., maw �. Storage Lanes 1 0 1 01 1 1 0 Leading Detector (Pt) 50 50� 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Pad Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.0I3 0.98 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.950 0,950 u.950 0.956 WE _ Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0_950 0.950 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Heaaway Factor 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1,00 1,00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 Link Distance (it) 2648 1384 2672 267 Volume (vpn) 155 580 33 112 554 72 42 121 64 102 175 65 Peait Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 cm -a.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 6.92 0.92 Lane Group Flow (vj3h) 168 666 0 122 680 0 46 132 70 111 261 0 Protected Phases 7 4 3 a 5 2 1 $ �PJxaeINS: I Detector Phases 7 4 3 a 5 2 2 1 6 -- Aqj: s Itir., - E' . = .c0"T'� _ _ ° 1 �" l .. . 4,"" '19 '' �� ' ,ace r, ,e s`-0._',.. , . Minimum Split (s) 12.0 23.3 12.0 27.7 12.0 22.6 22.6 12.0 27.0 Tax,_:p 3b �C_Q' rKi' rti. 3.1: _':,0: 120 .3.0; 23 tk1]`2 �U:4 Total Split%,�) 22.2% 37.8% 0.0% 18.9% 34.4% 0.0_% 13.3% 25.6p°1,025.6% 17.8% 30.0% 0.0% } Yellow Time (s) 3.2 4.3 3.2 4,3 3.2 3.6 3, 3.2 16 Laadfi.ag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lay Lead Lag L i ry ss �' 77 .-, Vehicle lrxtension (s) 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.6L �� :c"-�- Re atl *tee "'7i(;7ne C=t0� . ."t. �.- one - Walk Time {s} 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0� Pzde,strian Calls (#;;rr) 10 10 10 10 10 A� Effc:'rareeri'{'s); . 16..O 42,8 " Tfl'� . 37.- Actuated gJC Rato 0 18 0 48 0-12 0.41 0.08 0 ",4 0.14 0.11 0.19 vlcRat3o ; . 0.56... 0.40 0.s2 O,47 0.3.3 0,51 0.25 0,56 0 37. E Control Delay 41 8 187 32.5 7 9 43 9 372 I .A d4.3 24 3 Baseiine Synchro 6 Report TJKNI, Transportation CCr'SU112..-tS Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing PM Peak 1: Kings Canyon Bivd & Willow Avenue 918006 g Lau Total Delay 41.8 18.7 _ 32.5 7.9 43.9 37.2 9.4 44.3 24.3 Approach Delay _ 23.3 y 11.7 30.6 3a.3 Cy6e Lengtin: 913 Offset: 40 (44° ), Referenced to Dhase 4:EB7 and B:WBT, Start of Green Control Type Actuated -Coordinated Intersection Signal Delay 21.1 Intersection LOS C •wRRtf�lflOYls�J M. Analysis Period (.min) 15 _- Solits and Phases: 1 Kinas Canvon Blvd & Willow Avenue ti 11� e2 I i 03 1'--11� Baseline Synchro 6 Reporl TJKM Transportation Consullams Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing PM Peak 2: Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive 9I8rz006 s r *-- k' b 41 Lane Configurations Lane Width (ft) -11 12 11 12 12 12 12 t Leaning Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 Tuming Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 9 - y.� /yam -F- Ped Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0..96 r Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 U.950 RYA - _ Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Headway Factor t.04 1.00 1,04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link Distance (ft) 1394 1304 640 Volume (Vph�y) 2130 514 45 626 33 72 159 `.'_ •1ti h Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 P, '�M Lane Croup Flow (vph) 217 559 52 716 0 78 173 Protected phases 7 4 3 6 $ Detector Phases 7 4 3 8 6 6 _ 71 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 22.9 12.0 22.9 27.0 27.0 i ..- i,,as_ _ '1so 1:0' oa Total Split (%) 30.0%F 50.0% 16.7% 36.7% 0.0% 33.3% 33.3% Ma3rii+_CiPei (s3 _ '_2'-`Q8' _T.?.`.TIMM_. Yel,low Time (s) 3.2 4.3 3.2 4.3 3 2 3.2 LeadiLag Lean Lead Lag Lag �,,.,,��z'k�`:p�9llll�t'_,• ...'..'�'��e�8 ., T>:�$.S' `{F•5 , -,s: � .1�� _' Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,13 3.6 F ecall:�t+�{ode' -Noh6-C=Mii-x ; N_ an6 C-Max; ldlax. Max - - Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 (anti Do t`3rValkr(s�, .:3,:7- '97 ..... :1'5:8' L- Peci strian Calls (#ihr) 10 10 16 10 Aidt'�t��'xr�ieri'�s;� .18;'y._..4�;iJ� '9�D �359:.. -.26nt�"_.26J�._ _ .-•-..--�-- ;- �..-#..--- . --- Actuated g/C Rati_a 0.15 0.52 010 0.40 0.29 0`29 _-.., - , .�� - _. vfc:ftatio '072 0 Control Delay 26.2 7.2 39.7 22.8 24.9 56 QLjeaO6.Delay. .. b ., 0.0 0.0 'o o . :.,0:0' '0 D - Total Delay 26.8 7.2 39.7 22 8 249 56 Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKM Transportation Cons::ltants Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing PM Peak 2: Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive 918)2006 � -� t; ~ � \*. .0/ Approach Delay 12.7 24.0 11..8 Lenqth: go Offset 88 (98%), Referenced to phase 4-.EST and MET. Start or Green Canirol Type: Actuated-G ordinated Intersection Signal Delay: 17.3 Intersection LOS: B Analysis Person (min) 15 Splits ant Phases 2: Kings Canyon Blvd & INal-Mart Drive Baseline 5ynchro 6 Report TJKivi Tra^sportation Consultants PaQe 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing PM Peak 3: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 9/812006 Lane Configurations -0 N Lane Width (ft) 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 10 11 12 12 GOR yY Storage Lanes 2 0 2 0 2 1 1 0 Detector (11) so 50 50 50 50 $o so so Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 9 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 9 _-Z .'"M M_�BVW=TlltaW" L. �_g 1111 11�� H Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Rignt Turn on Red Yes ye,5 Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.09 1_04 1.00 1.00 NMI IM 7 I .20M to I Link Distance (ft) 1304 2640 2fi88 2656 �Ellll Volume (vph) 143 500 47 120 475 98 123 356 254 108 277 185 cod Peak Hour Fartor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Alm 0 91- OR �1 711--F F 97 rT,07 -7 9 P, I-Eine Group Flow fvDh) 155 603 0 130 623 C 134 3137 276 117 502 - ._.; , , Prbi '': . -, . . - , - �P.r,i: :.. . _._ - Prot. -. I . - . - .. ---' pi �7, :.(3(,l Protected Phases 4 8 1 6 0 , irpb. . ­.. . Detector Phaser. 7 4 3 6 5 2 2 1 6 Minimum Split {s) 12.0 30.8 12,0 270.9 12.00 35.5 35.5 12.0 219.1 -0 71 To ,5 '0 '-' _g �O Total Sipilft (%) 13.7% 33.2% 0.0% 12. 6`,; 1 0 'D% _2'. 6' 1'1�' 37.411/0 3 7 41'?b 16.811V'O 41.61A O.Q0% M b -i5ce � ": ' " 7 _8' 7: B '30�6 - 0- 8 J5. 1-1-6- . '. Yellow Time is) 3,2 4.3 32 4.3 3,2 . f 39 I 3.9 , . 3.2 19 Al� Iz-5 Laad,'Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Yes 'Y Vehicle E)ctension ts) 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 30 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 one C;M i . ..-.- T4one Non rvoh$NMe 'N Walk Time ? s) TO 7,0. 7.0 7.0 7.6 FJ5'F..0 64t Walk . ..... :-''- 156 . 23-16 23.6 Pedestrian -:. Calls ( #.'h r)' 10 in 10 10 -"4_8 Q, 1 Z 41.1.. 1. 13.4 18,5 '! 6.5-: -tO-.:T'77_ Actuated giC Rat-.o 0.09 044 0.198 0.43 0.14 0.19 0.1.9 0. 11 0.17 vjC RSiio 0-51 -0.39 0.48 0:42 0.29 0.:57 0,55 0162 - .6-71 Contra[ Delay 46.9 20.4 47 5 209 37.3 344 5.5 49.9 _72.7 Baseline Synchro 6 Repor, TJKPV1 Transportation Consultants Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing PM Pear I Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 902006 _.* __O. --* f 4__ T d Total Delay 46:9 20.4 47 5 20.9 -371. - :_-4 4 �.5 4'-.� 22_.7 C. Approach Delay 25.8 25.5 24.8 27.6 Off 5at 0 W/3), Referenced to Ohase 4:EBT gnd .MT, Start of ra&n, bhaster Interaedion Control Type: Actuated-CoardisWed intersection S+anal Delay: 25.9 SRtersecti❑n LOS: C I'nt~se��irr a{} Iy[y, •t'.t�l¢ai�i�n.�.5 Analysis Period (min)1S Splits and Phases: 3 Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 01 Rl Baseline Syrcnrc 6 Report TJKM Transportation Consultant: Page 6 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing PM Peak 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave 9/7/2006 Lane Configurations � ��► � '��, .fir _ 4 �► Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.22 0.92 0.92 — Pedestrians) 3 3 3 3 Speed (fVs) 4-0 4,0 4.0 {Walking ,v�ra4.0 •„ Y�.�.. .1_..S�itY. 3... iiP_c_.r4'fi�T7i� �rs��''��L-r':7:-.!!: r.... Right turn (Ian? (veh) _ Median storage veh) 0 0 p.X, platoon unblocked .� X. l: LSi. aL A.!. s- — VC1, stage 1 conf vol 839 839 660 660 17-7 vCu, unblocked vol 629 743 1 216 1515 376 1152 1518 31.9 _ tC,[`2� stage (sj 6.6 5.6 — 6,6 5.6 tF; p0 queue free % 94 97 92 $9 98 94 87 97 ckUl_capaaitY::hj.r?_, Y.k9e7}t� Volume Left 57 0 0 24 C V inia'I i ht ' :-0. =35 p 0 cSH 940 1700 1700 851 1700 _ f lume-to Capaci#Y.u.-, _ '+3:�ifi. ,T28 "'0. -'1 U_03 6:23 Oueue Length 951h (ft) 5 0 0 2 0 Lane LOS A A ;�roa6h,Up y (s) G• 6 0.3 Approach LOS 0 13 12 7 7CO 211 236 _ 0 19 21 C o 24.6 . D C rseEFt - — — ---- - Average Delay 2 1 inters6rtic `Capacity,Utilizatiorr 36. T % . ICU'Level of Service A Analysis Period tmin) 15 Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing Mitigated AM Peals 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave 9!1112006 1 --* j-'*-- 4_4� t r' `► 41 Lane Configurations +T+ T+ 9 Lane Width (ft) 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 �.-.a.. $i.::Tti'�h'-�' +,-� _ .� .ti. �I'' • �s7'ry1I�y7.5.'' ���it �i�! .__il. . �1w.:lJf^* Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 _ _ Detector (R) 50 5050 50 50y 50 50 5,/0y"-- ,�Lee�a��ding p ' TWENMR !iv+'�v''r�..`i�_--TL°3�.':� �._ti ��: �'l7� Turning500 �S 15 7 � 9 15 9 5 � 9 gy�y4rSpe�yw�ry�_y{m,phh)) I.i� 4i�W+LV Ji+ice...-irr:L��4�-,+4+� ;��(157 _ {1n]5 rt';.•-I3 �. Ped Bike Factor 1,00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 _0.99 _ Fff Fit Protectee 0.950 0.-50 G.9ga 0.995 Fit 0.950 0.950 0.978 0.975 _ }{P!.�ermiilllelfciyp +4iF 4YY li Y_' f y .y :11 W. � Right Turn am Red -r Yes Yes Yes Yes 1+4i�+ a TPF� .I Ai °r Headway Factor 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 LA Distance (ft) 2640 2664 2€88 2656 Tr u`e�_Tirrl$ s' � ; _ �_ ±e .r �sr�, l B:� r'� " ' ih vx� �17 Valuma (vph) 41 376 28 664 23 7 54 25 12 49 68 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.82 0.'92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92� 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 '19 �- ;'tom 3. ^�- 27 3"41' '_4 F ' Lane Group Flow (vphlo 45 427 .. .k_'': 0 30 T47 0 0 Y 94 0- ..0 1.40 0 arm.�:= : Perm . Prateecctte�d�Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6 Deleclar Pha,es 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 _ _ _ - �20.0 Minimum Split is) 12.0 20.0 12.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 _r pi__ Total Split 0-1 23.1% 38 5% tag �. 0.0% 23.1 % 38.5% 0.0°0 38.5,t' 38.S% 0.0% 38.5% 36.59% 0.0% Ivia rriuriC;reen,(s.j 7:.'3.71�4;7.. 7.8 :14:�.; T5.1 "15.1 15.1 `15-1. 7�� Yellm-` Time is; 3 2 4.3 3.2 4.3 3:9 39 3.9 3.9 Afl? �edTirne (s) 1.,l " 1:0 11'0 .1.0 1.0 1.0 T.0 LeadlLag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lean=Lag Dptimi7e2: Yes Yes' Yes Yes Von icie Lxteislon 451 3 ': 30 3.0 q.0 3 0 3.0 3 C, 3.0 R>sce[II.ode - . None C-Min' None C=Miri None'- None None LUa1ic Time ts) 7.0 7.0 ; .0 7.0 7.0 7.0 F.'i 4ralk _(s.. :'.._. �.D I. Q 1.0 1:Q- 1:0 Pedesirian Cans (XI 10 10 10 10 10 1D Act,ilct Green (s) 6.9 ' 35.8 6:3 33.,3 86 Actuates a+C Ratio C. 13 0.89 0 12 0.64 0 17 C117 v/c-Ratio • . 0.20 0:1.8 0-15 - 0.33 ' , : 0.3�- : .: ` _ 0.42' Control Delay 21.0 5 C, 2' .0 8.2 14 6 i 1.2 B;35eline 5ynchro 6 Report TJKM TransporXalior-i Consultants Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing Mitigated AM Peak 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave 911112006 Total delay 21,0 5.6 21.0 8.2 14.6 11.2 Approach Delay 7.1 6.7 14.6 11.2 a Analysis Period fmin! 15 Splits and Phases: 4: K}ngs Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave Baseline Syncnro o Report TJKNI Transportation Consultants page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing Mitigated PM Peak 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave 911112005 Lane Configurations '* 4+ l o P l) ; + 9 f].... 1 C� 1' 00 k'90G. • OD : I'9[�L3 `1 : 1'9 OF.. '9 fii- �'9 Q..- :_ �:TIP nr Lane Widlh ffti 11 12 ,;rt 11 y 12 12 _(3f0 12 12 12 12 12_ 12 -- -12 _ Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0~ 0 0 _ _ x 30 Leading Defector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 K 5C 50 Turning Speed (mph) 15 T9 15 9 15 9 15 g _ -:0-ow- 1�'�1'-F1t7' Ped Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.99 0.99 _ 1^fir '-_T Tlwt+y ry---- ...-a'- _ .JrT,•-+--ems-�y�r Pit Protected 0.950 0,950 0.985 0.959 _ _ rD Y0.934 Flt Permitted 0..9so 0.95pa0 0.950 1 Right Turn on Re-d Yes yes Yes Yes Headway i=actor 1.04 1.00 1 00 1.04 1 00 1 00 1.00 1 GO 1.00 1.6b .C.0 1.00 Link Distance fk) 2640 2664 26158 4656 7ri1ifrie�5) 4G+Yij., Vclurne fvph) 52 649 32 22 545 31 ;2 6 i 13 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 092 0.92 C.92 0.'92 0 �� 0,92 C 32 i;.92 6.a2 9z 0.92 Ai to v M1 ). �. '7.D5 �35 .... 1 `522, �34 -3 �2 .2' Lane Group Flow (vph) 57 740 u 24 62�D 0 0 44 0 u 53 0 Ti�a:lyp . _.. P.tbf P:v ,:,} Perm Protected Phases i 3 8 2 3 .. ---4 -- aeieciar Phases 3 8. 2 w6i'm.i� fiI ti, -�' '. _. 0_ 4:1 -4+0, . 4A -j, - C3 4 0r. . ,` Mirr, Split tsl 12.0 20.0 120' ?0.0 20.0 20 0 200 20.0 T-4 I:Spli# s]-..... -'72. 1 .'ZI-0 0:0 1'2:0 23_D. 0.0 20',b 2D'D. '-fM5 --2M' 20:_D_ 0-'D Total Split 21 8% 41.8% G 0%. 21.3�0 41. 0 0°' 36.4% 36 4°4 (}.00,::. 3&4''c 35.4-p'o ' O'D M6lXimurF.Green'(s) '.S _'1777. 1 T7 1.5.1 - ::�5:1' 15:1 1-5.1 Yel'6w Time (s) 3.2 4'.3 3.2 4.3 3 9 3.9 3.9 3 9 A11":`RedTiin? is) -�:0 -.. '1 0_0. 1;0 1.0 '1.0, 1:0 1.0 Leadlt_ag Lead Lead Lag Lag Ld-1 ag 01;ntirnize? YeY s es Yes 'des,: Venicie Extension is'. 3.0 3 03 0 30 3 G 3.0 30 30 R'eaa- H- ode Nana Chin None C-Min . None None None None: Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 0 7 0 1 0 7 0 Fla shlDont calk;{s? :.= 1-0 1 _ .. 1.0 1.0 1:0 1:D .=. Pedestr+an Calls Whr) 1C. 10 10 10 10 10 ActEflctCr ri=,�9�. .._',. 7'S A5:8 _ 6.3 39':� Actuated grC Ratio 0.14 4.83 0 11 0-73 0.14 C. 14 vk .Ratio .. _. ta_25 - 0-26 0,-t� 0 25 ^��•�::._ 0.19. :� ..'4ti�; 0.22_�rs�' Control. Delay 22.6 4.0 224 6 3 161 15.3 Baseline 5ynchro 6 Report TJK11 Transportation Consallanis Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing Mitigated PM Peak 4� Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave 9111i2006 4_- '� t �' 1 Tow( Delay 22A 4.0 22,E 8.3 --- U.1 15.3 Approach Delay 5.3 6.9 16.1 16.3 Cycle Length: 55 >� Offset: 32 (561/6), Referenced Fw--MW:s: , Control Type; Actuated-Coord Intersection S@hialDelay; 6-3: Ilrerse J20 Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 4: Kings inated 4,EBT and &WET, Stan of Green btersection�LOS �r Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave I 51AN" Syncnro 6 Recort TJW. Tran atr*r, Consui?ants page 2 L APPENDIx D - LEVEL OF SERNqCE WORKSHEETS: EXISTING + PROJECT (YEAR 2008) Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing+Project AM Peak 1: Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue 9/8/2006 --�I, --► ­,* 'r *-- 4\ 1 /* `► 1 4" Lane Width (ft) 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Lanes 1 0 1 0'� 1JT1ti i CI ��{S*torage _I IxI .7 (.'..:_�"^"Jl�ivi;.'�T',�v.^'; '?+ �.i:'.r_..T iVII+"'3! : L12 Leading (Detector (ft) 50�y 50 50 50 56 50 50 505 50 _ � y -...`� Y _ Turning Speed (inph) 15 9 9 15 99f7� 15 9 /is y it#. 1M�p��K•'%Li ,ia J _L r' w- l a .h! T jy_ L. Lr -ft RI .Gif: 4i�t.r ]��y Y� _ 5�+ N Pad Bike Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 I'DO 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 .�_.y . Y� I i§ r, ...."M1<*} ,. w.iY �" :1-ice•m" : . . . " r -TC Y Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.95u 0.W) _ ,Flt Permitted 0,950 0.950 0.950 0.950 PL.rm1 .._- 1"6 j... 3C1 Q . €� ." . ,, ;- M1 Pight Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Sate -jn +� : if ,' :... 4 vi•, f - ,� 3 .. Headvray Factor 1.04 1.Orj ; AO 1.04 1�.00 1.00 1.00 1.01) 1.00 1.00 1 [ 3 0. Tip Link Distance (ft) 2846 746 2672 2672 ., Volume (vph) 46 328 89 75 640 129 48 1ar3 29 90 264 C,0 Confl.:P,s:li#Ihr)} "; . :.3 . . -.'3, -: -' 3 --. __ -..... 3 - - 3 Peak Hour Factor 649 0.92 G 92 92 0.92 092 0.92 0.92 C-.52 C 92 0.92 092 Adji.' f I " ' -(-dO` 50 '357 . .. ' 9 . 82 . '696-.: " 1:40 .. "57: �159 - 32 98 _ 2E7.: .,° '65 Lane Grouo Flow 'vpni 50 454 0 82 836 0 51_' 1.59 3? 98 352 0 Turn Type " Prot Prot Prot Perm Prot _ Protected Pnases 7 4 3 6 5 2 1 6 Detet,tor Phases 7 4 3 0 S 2 2 1 6 xorn lnitiai (s) 4.0 :4.0 A10 �.4:0 ; 4`53: 4.0 4W,4.. 4'.rJ AP: Mimmum Split (s`� 12.0 23.3 12.7 27.7 12.0 22.6 226 12.0 27.0 _ = _ "', 14:'D. ':2-_77.0 -0.0 To13r Spli", ('rl I S 0"0 35.0°a Q.C°� 1$.3c`o 36 3°o O.L'^,a 15 L'.fo~ _-10' 31.3°a 31 3'¢ 17 5°e 3 .8`,� 0 C. 1Vlaxirnum'Teen (s) 7;8 "2i:7 13:8- -` 23.7 , 7.$ 20:4 _ -20' g 8 : ' 2-2. Yellow Time{s) 3.2 4 3 3.2 4.3 3.2 3.6 36 2.2 36 All d me (s) 1 .0 AO 11:0 :y ;0 F:0' 1:0 0, `--I D .I 0 LaadlLag Lac Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Laic Leau, Loa Lead=.'a ptimize-r Yes. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes` "Yes : �'e5 Yes ' Vehicie Exiension is) 3.0 3.0 3.0 30 30 3.0. 30 30 3.0 Re^I i';taae ' None C-Max None C-Max Nonµ Non' Done 'None None." Walk Time: (s) - 07 0 7 0 7 0 7.0 Flash E)66S,7441 t (h)' . 11.0 T5.4 11.0 ' 11.0 15.4 Pedestrian Calls (#1hr) 10 10 1 D 10 10 Ac: Effct.Green (s) 7.2 37.0 8.6 40.5 7.2 13 5 13.5 8.9 17-2 Acicarea g`G P3G0 0019 046 C 11 13 51 0.09 0 17 0 17 0 11 C 22 vlc.Ratio 0.33 0.29 0.45 0.48 0,33. 0,51 0.1.1 0.51 6.47 Control Ovay 386 16.8 394 17 2 385 31 1 97 399 25.1 BaselinE- 5ynchro o Rui3wl TJKi11 Transoortation Ccnsuitants Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing+Project AM Peak 1: Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue 9/812006 Approach Delay 18:0 19.1 29,6 28,3 Offset: 52 (65%), Referenced to phase 4:1=13T and a:VVBT, Start of Green Canlroll Type: Actuated -Coordinated k Intersection Siginal Delay: 22.1 lnler�ection LOS G 1cif i i ap I ;Elfilizatio S2:13° ,1C1:J Level';r,"Se ice Anaiysis Perad (min) 1 Splits and Phases. 1 Kings Canyon Bivd & Willow Avenue a�1 11" 02 03 Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing+PrDject AM Peak Z Kings Canyon Blvd & Transit Access 1012012006 --- 0. "It fl, 4­ 4\ 1A11 Lane Configurations tt I r I aw f E-Q9 .1f,90 Lane Iffidth (0) 12 12 11 12 12 12 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 1 74 Leading Detector (ft) 50 60 50 50 50 Turning Speed (mph} 9 9 99 Ped Bike Factor 1 0.98 FIt (Protected} 0.950 0.950 M 9 MNIAXE. I Flt Permitted 0.950 .0.950 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link Oistance (h) 746 638 147 Volume (vph) 430 7 25 807 6 28 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Fiaw (vph) A67 a 27 877 7 2B Ciin�e TYm Type Prot a Perm Permitted Phases 2 MFKFi =_hsgjs 71 ,, M n 7im'u-m- In it -al (s) 4.0 4 4�0 4.0 4.0 4.01 K�q .1 ": '20.0 �2_ Trial Spilt (s) 0,.o 46 7 3 33.3 33.3 :IL :55.4io M 80 4U,1W-4 -' X, q2 A _I Maximum Green (s) 21.4 15.8 41 4 29.1 29.� . . ..� .. . _ 28.4 Tr,- ... - _.. - " J&.2'. - rJ - '�.9 ' - __ � - ' __ - .. - All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 0 1.0 7 Lead -tag O.Dtirnize? Yes Yes 7 ji) -..- A17. 3_ - - r -J-.O:: ­.. 0 Reoad Moce _ -Max Ncne C-Max None None Ped 771 Flash Do_ni Walk(si 3 15.'4 Act EWi Green is) 4 0. 1.04 487 21i, 22.3 . AE ...... 0-13 . . -0.61 - �29 . 0"2g -7- v/c Ratio q.27 0, 0 1 0 03 0.11 Baseline Syncnro 6 Report TJKM Transcor'tabon Consultants Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing+Project AM Peak 2: Kings Canyon Blvd & Transit Access 10/2012006 LOS A 0 A C A Approach LOS A A B Arre+a Type: 7 Other 92 _ 11 ytii� Actuated Cycle I_enpth: 80� Natural Cycle: 65LI�y �'/VI■F�IU+-'aJii�4iOi 1: �+42TY�.l�IGiL �li}�0. *.u��,ys�M� Maximum We Ratio: 0.41 __....73 . e i pr` r e i Intersection Capacity Utilization 35,1% ICU Level of Service A �-Is7�er'i°� tritr� Splits and Phases: 2: Kings Canyon Blvd & Transit Access o2 I:4 If" Baseline Sync'nro o Report TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing+Project AM Peak 3: Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive 9IBr2OC6 Lane Configurations P 4 .i. �60A. ::�..- �;�o�'=`r-sao= 7:��0 :� �•sao:.: :. ..-����4t�:�►e���� Lane Width jf��tyy}_ 11 12 11 ..�a ..:'-�so;!a 12 12 " 2 ~12 - .. - ._ .: ,--: Y.��.:;��- �,� Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 _ _50 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 4 1u 9 _ L ._ . _ Mw7vi E.-1 nU i ..�D Pad Bike FadCif 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected .0.950 0.950 0.950 - Flit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 :- - Sit rm�•�.:�t" , 90f 7? = ,; g • -. - v - Right Turn on Red Yes Yes_ 72- _ _ _ Headway Factor 1.04 µ 1.00 1 04 1 00 1.00f 1.00 1.00 17 .a:: x . _; Link Distance (ft) 638 1304 640 *787 Volume {vph) 78 385 38 12 24 45 Ccnfi:Pr�t4st#;hrj-...--_ ,�1d' ;.� _ �. :r- . . =�- �,�a'':�.�_.....�: ._.._-;. .. .- '.._.... �v• - Peak 'dour Factor 0.92 0.92 0 92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 -49 Lane GroupF',c,:,v(vphj 85 418 41 $68 0 26 49 T'�`T)'P -;Prot Prot Perm Protected P-saws 7 4 3 8 6 PeFr1iIL, te'tr;FhasB-s Oesectu-r Phases 7 4' S $ 6 C tS1! rlimumtis$I..(sj --4;0 -- :i 4 0 :q. . --: . 4:.0" :A'. Minimum Split (s} 12.0 22.9 12.0 22.9 27.0 27.0 TG'alaS :: _ 1-�:. J't:a. Totai Split (a) 18.6% 44.3r,.{ 17.11t 42.9% 0.0% 38.6% 38.6% Ma' xir5Uti h-Green:(s) 'g:.. 5:7 T_'B .24-T , _ .-A 'T2- � B Yellow Time (s 3.2 4 3 3.2 4 3 3.2 32 A11'�Fed.Time (s) tl' . ,; :0 �.0 1-0 1.0 '1,0 Lead.11-ag Lag: '_aC Lead Lead Laai=.L :O 3iirrue"7�" =Ys ,Ys'Yes_ Vehicle Extension is) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 30 F e all Mike.,NoneC-Max ..None C-Max -'PJ1aX tv18x Walk Time is 70 7.0 7 D 7.0 Flai th Dont tiA7alk (s) . ! 9:7. 9.7 15,8 15.8 Pedesirmn Calis Whr) iC 10 10 1.0 Acf,Eff6t.GTOerl.ts) ; .1:8.3 31.9 '7.0 28.6. 23:0 23.0 Actuatt�d WC Ratio 0.12 0.46 0 10 041 0 33 0.33 vIC:Rati-a -OA2 -0.26 0.24 0.�9 0.05. 0.09 Contra; Delay 21.5 38 31 4 19.5 16.4 6.0 4uetie.Uelay '° 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Deiay 21 5 3.8 31.4 199, 16.4 60 Baseline Syncnro 6 report TJKM Transporation Consultants Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing+Project AM Peak 3: Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive 918006 Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 8 (11 referenced to phase 4.EET and SAST, Start of Greens Contfol Type: Actuated -Coordinated _ Intersaetia Signal Delay: 15.0 Irnersection LOS- B Grit s c i city lib' adia�; ;5°ig_ 1i� U: — (min)w Spfits and Phases: 3 Kings Canyon Blvd 8 Wal-Mart Drive G;1 �ma 07 Baseline Syriznro 6 Report TJKt� Transportation Consultants Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing+Project AM Peak 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 9/8/2000 Lane Configurations t} r }, Y R12 Lane Width (ft) 11 12 1 11 121_1�x 12 10 12 12 ��t'.-!Ch.i,.'...., y? 1 .yy1 �1G St6raye Lanes 2 0 2 0 2 1 1 0 4,0 Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 4 _ Tuming Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 r� � 9?'^0:995 Ei'9.;: .1 _ _ .' _ .0` _ _ _ ,�t -t Ped Bitce Factor r0 1.00 1.00 - . 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 - 0,95 1.a0 1 00 _ _ Fit Protected 0.950 0.�.�9}}50 Cr.95G 0.950 _ Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0,950 0._9550 _ �- * �_•` < _ Righl. Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes 5a d, f 14w-- RaTOR'j. k� .0. ._ Headway Factor . _ 1.04 1.uC► 1.00 �._ 1.0�4 .-2i 1.00 �.00ti "i.04 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 _1.05 Lmk Distance (f;) 1304 2640 2636 2656 7'r:T`irni.t) : ti:9i9:0;0}k _ _ . 6 _ • _ " Volume (vph) -: ,...-- 75 245 95 168 471 85 243 --34 , y_. 534 99 104 .'-' 611 56 Cotifl:F7 T'1r}.'.. �-.�-- Peak dour Factor 0,92 r1.92 0.92 D.92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 092 0.92 092 Aaj: REW �vphj... _ '" s.:' ' : 28T-` .103 23 ,5'" 2 _ ;92..: 2"64'. 590 ` . t'0A 113, 64 _61 Lane Group Flow (vph) 82 369 0 183 604 D 264 580 108 1 .3 725 0 'Curn�yj e• __. ., :. Prot`,; :` Fiat _ :Per,i. Prai _.F`41}rc:t. Protected Phases 7 4 3 a 5 2 1 6 P2rm14tec����?h�ses - .., - '-� ' � _r• , ,. ... . _ ,� .._ _ - .. Detector Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 2 �6 fVlirtiiaT�urr1_In]t+t�l.is) .. ' ..0.. 4 1;0 ;4,.0 410 4-0 �4.'O. ._:4.0. _ .. . Minimum Split is) 12.0 30.8 12.0 27.9 12.0 35.5 35.5 12.0 29 1 TGl2t S �'t.4si :. ti" ;0 1,;5 ...0,0 13:: 32:5: 0-0 1.7-0 :-25,6 ; 35� - ,'3- -5 0.10 Total Spit' ;;° a'i 12.6% 33.2° c C 01/6 13 7% 34_ •20A 13.0% 1_7 9% 37 4% 37.4°I 15.9% 3.5.3% 0.0%• {Iitaxtrnur,� Green' (sj -i8 -± '26; 8,8 7 2 _ ... v. �.. 2 , . '30::6 . `30:0, _ I G:a 28:6 Yellow Time I s) 3.2 43 3.2 _ 4.3 3.2 39 39 3.2 3.9 AICJR� d,Time'(s) 1:0 1.0 1-6.-- `1 0 1.0 �_0' '", 0.. 1.0 1_U LeadJLag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Le' di 9. Optimize, Yes. Y'6s !Yes . 'Yes Yes. :. , Yes.: _Yes �n� :Yes Vehicle Extension (s} 3.0 30 3.0 3 0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Reda);rl de r None C=ti1ax None:C-Max None None 'None 'None Nonery . Walk �T ime {s'I 70 70 7.0 1.0 70 F)ash Ddnt Walk (s) 18,a`. 15.6 23,6 23,6 17 -2 Pedestrian Calis (91hr) 10 10 10 10 10 Act. Effct Green*' 7s. - 32.3 9.3 35:5 122 27.4 274 10.0 2513 Actuated c_.+C Rwtic 0.08 C 34 0 10 0 38 0 13 029 0.29 C. 111 C 27 vlci;atio 0.31 0,31 0,57 0:46 0'63 .0,57 0.22. 0,53 0,78 Control belay 44.0 21 4 47.9 24.9 44 4 29 9 5.6 52.7 348 Cas81one Synchro 6 Report TJKV Trarsporatior Consultants Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing+Proj'ect AM Peak 4i Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 9/8l2006 ---* --0- --,* f- *-- I,- 4,\ Total Delay 44.0 v 21.4 47.9 24.9 44.4 29.9 5.6 52,7 34.0 �!M!�Ff�11]Qjljj 1,0 '1�22 Approach Delay 25.5 31.1 37.2 �-M IMA Noun= Cycle Length: 95 015ot- 0 (0'16), -Referenced to ' phase 4-E - BT and S-WST, Start of Gfw, Master lntermecbon Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Intersection Signal Delay-. 31.8 Intersection LOS, C .4-444 S-q'aj Am3lySiS Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases. 4. Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 21 1 1' e2 !R.IiAhne Synchro 6 Report TkN Tranwor-,ation CorFu,,ants Page 6 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing+Project AM Peak 5: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave 9/8/2006 Grade 0° 8 0% 0% f �*Gyyi �0.92 Peak Hour Factor 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.32 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 LF1i Pedestrians 3 3 3 3 A - V4' �lkirng speed (ft+s1 4.0 4.0 ....M 4.� , 4.0 _ Per6er�i Bi'�cae :.. .:'p�, T:nlr:r;�,- Right turn flare (veh) *=aramtyp _. _.- : :_ * �.. • .� Median storage veil} 0 0 Pik- � �.L * _ ,.S li SJ,ya`A\r� +��..�T+L~ _ tY.-21 _-f ., +'�-::�: Q pk, platoon ur,'alocked VC1 • stage t c©nf Vol 534 534 820rt 620 vCu, unblocwed vol 771 454 1070 1366 232 1185 1363 390 tC, 2 stage (sj 5' 6.6 5.6 6.6 5_6 'MOM_ p0 queue free % 95 97 95 66 96 92 71 .88 Volume Left 45 0 0 30 0 0 8 13 1roJiirne; igrt �` + ;G: 1,84 `0 r��7 �C .7T , FA 's ''"MM .. c5H 631 1700 1700 _ . 1093 1700 1700 224 284 aiurne` -- . q-4 ' _ _ ? .,: ., r ; Queue Lenath 95th (ft) u 0 2_ 0 0 48 64 C n#rol beta fsl 0:6..' t .D 0.0. 0.4 .'0'.0';' : 0.0. '2'�-4 Lane LOS A A 1�' D saac . _ _ :2 ... 29 Approach LCS D. p UN - Average Delay 5.1 � _ _ Mnfre�tlrn Capeorili* T_�atior: --3:,i�r '_ V15 rfSe_ _ Analysis Period (min) _IC"Cl�ruizre -�'IL Baseline Synchro 6 Repot `JKM T;ansporation Consul;anls Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing+Project PM Peak 1: Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue 9/11/2006 Lane Width (11) 11 12 12 11 12_ 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 _ V 41RI i,`� Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 Leading Detector ft 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Turning Speed (mph) is 15 9 15 9 15 9 _ Pad Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.�8 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 _0.950 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0,950 _0.950 _ Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Headway factor 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.100 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ar Link Distance (ft) 2648 746 2672 2872 _ Volume (vph) 155 508 33 122 559 72 42 121 70 103 17-5 ss (�`aF3lso Peak Hour Factor 0.92 U.9 0:92' 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 C.G2 A Lane Group flog (YI 168 .675 0 133 886 0 46 132 76 112 261 0 'CU �7 Protected Phases 4 3 9 5 2 1 6 Detector 7 4 3 8 5 2 2 1 S gPhass+es _ St�rIZsF`�[!d� Minimum Split (s) 12-0 23.3 12.0 27.7 12.0 22.6 22.6 12.0 27.0 Total Split (%) 22.2% 37.8% 0.0% 16,9% 34.4% 0.0% 13.39% 25.51,66 25.6% 17.8% 30.11% 0.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.2 4.3 3.2 4.3 3.2 3.6 3.6 3.2 3.6 Lead/Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag t,g Vehicle Extensio_n!s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3-0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 11) _ Ft T 1 Nart {�. hJiax_ _ Norm:, �. �Norie ' d1Vo �e. 7 one _ .._ - ... _ V+lalk Time (s) 7.0 .,� 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 MO 11.E 15.4 Pedestrian Galls (#r ir) 10 10 14 10 10 ActiEffetGr:e6-(:s;,.' 135 40,1 13.0. 396 7.2, 12-5 12"5 .10.5 17.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0 15 045 0.14 044 008 0 14 C 14 0.12 0.20 v/c Rfio-- 0,66 0.43 0.54 C.45 0.33'. 0.5.2 0.27,' 0.55 :0,37 Control Delay 42.9 20.2 44 9 21.3 43.9 37.3 9.2 436 24.1 Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing+Project PM Peak 1; Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue 9111126G6 Z 4 Total Delay 42.9 20.2 44 , 21.3 43 9 37.3 9.2 43.6 24.1 Approach Delay 24.7 25.1 7 1 29.9 r.acf%L .�., -,,:: Gyole Length: 90 Cffsel: S W'3), Referenced to brae 4-EET and UV6T, Start of Green e: Actuated -Coo intersection Signal Delay, 26.3 Intersection LCS- C in rs agu' a~ iac ail a i�ri 9 63>Q- .'-a ...'* �CiJ'; sie1,af~ vi�e:A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: Kings Canvon Blvd & Willow Avenue a2 1 r Zi 1'--4* aA 1 f' a3 on I -A a? I*' eB Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJM Transportation Consultants Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing+Project PM Peak 2: Kings Canyon Blvd & Transit Access 10/202006 Lane Configurations tT* f t r R. Lane Width (ft) 12 12 1/112 12 12 �T.ail�'��" Storage LanesME 11 1 Detector11) 50 50 50 50 50 Leading 7.9!Tr-W711MS?F Mt Turning Spead (mph) 9 9 g 9 Lar1"iTf 'i_W L2 - - - Ped Bike Lactor 1.00 U Flt Protected 0.950 b.960 Fit Permitted 13.950 0.950 Right Turns on Red _Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link Distance (ft) 746 638 147 -(vph, Volume 719 7 25 790 6 26 t;.on�1EsT�Z ' 'l.. Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 '7T7�; ,. -_ -._ v_. Adj. Flow (vph) 782 B 27 859 1 28 L�I�Y4'.' i;` 859 _7 -...-7S.D Tum Typey� . �'� Prot ^ Perrn 1� li4 �„��z,�G�-�L�, �.-.a�wsYcrF+« ':^.•- r Permitted Pttiases T:L#.CL'� 2 V�,J L�i LA - M Ir. Y-� ,].i ,..J]?•"... .Yi h4. Minimum Initial (s) 4.a 4.0 4 0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ' Y- •. -.20.0 27,_' ' " ",F ,;t �:. 1, . Total Splil (s) 32.7 0.0 17.0 49.7 . . 30.3 30.3 30.3 ^-' A , -'_,. - - � 0 � 0 D 8� P Cf' � r IFS lot I, P ,.: , :�k= 9, a:.t,: ,0 +!0 27:3 Ja' 62.1, :37.- �a-. 7w9 %'; .:' % ; . . Maximum Green ($) 27.4 12.8 44.4 26.1 2.&1 25.4 3.2 43 ,3.2 .. _ 3 2 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes _ Recall Mode C-Max None �C-Upx None None Pad Flash Dorn Walk (s) 9.3 15.4 Pesriar falls,{#1#tr):. r1.,.1:.' ' x: -, 10 4 Act Effct Green (sl 42.7 B.4 487 23.3 23.3 _ A teat d JG:Ratia _ _.� 53' 0,'10 0.81 '.0:29 ' 0.29- vfc Ratio 0.43 0.29 040 0.03 0.11 Baseline Synchro 6 Repart TJKh1 Transportation Consultants Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing+Project PM Peak 2: Kings Canyon Blvd & Transit Access 1012012OC6 IC Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 rJ. O Q.G LOS A p_ A C A ^+�J��s�T��r4��1"a` �-rT.r-r.�'!-L-- �y �}- - ��y ���'�r--:. --° r-' - 4T-•. {}�i, -- Approach LCS A A B - - - - _ --_- - - - Area Type:_ Other Actuated Cycle Length-. 60 �c ~ - Natural Gycle: BS J° FOR u RS!'.iZemri i�ra .� Maximum vtc Ratio: 0.43 Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.7% ICU Level of Service A Solits and Phases: 2: Kincis Canvon Blvd & Transit Access 1'*\,, m2 1 *' 83 1 0 mQ 1 .4 85 l� eB aase6ne Synchro 6 Repon TJKM Transcortat.on Consultanis Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing+Project PM Peak 3: Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive 9l1 V2006 � --0 r � 4-, \0- 4/ Lane Co"nWfiig uratt{ions`1�W�{y�y � V �. �1y rJ�7,�1�' ' 17IIMMO .F -ffl-_! . �+YhYf+ +,I�.l V�llI! 0 r.� � F! f:Y, KTl ... 5.. ...r Lane Width (ft} 11 12 11 12 12 12 1. L.-_ �.12 Leading LOetector ({t)} 50 50 50 50 50 50 T.. W.iceUrl - Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 9 ltb��`f�r�����-7�:�y=rt:;t�fl. •' _ �`�'�5.. i�',��=`�"'`T:�kD,., v:��, Pejd Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 , --T� r-1..�...ls.'_ h sae jj1.00 %-•417�!'�_.lii,�aa- af::x�- Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0,950 - _ Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 10,950 _ Right Turn on Fled Yes des Headway Favtory 1.04. 1.00 1 04 1.00 1. 06 1. GO 1,00 � Link Distance (ft) 638 1304 640 Volume (vph) 204 543 48 656 33 72 9 59 37 PeakHourFactor_ 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.92 Adj��Flor"Ptti'. _ . ,Z r; x;40 :52 ,713 3678' 'f,79.. � 4 i�.� ' Lana_ Group Flow (vph) 222 590 52 749 0 78 173 Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 6 Detector Phasea 7 4 3 8 trRw.-'dryy41.'+ .^ -4. i� AL Minimum Split [s) 12.0 22.9 2,0 - 22.9 _ 27.0 27.0 3it _ Total Split (°a) 30.0% 52.2°10 15.6'.'_ 37.3i; 0.0% 32.2% 32.2`:,, f41 tll i en ..T i`7-..'9.8' -25� 4. .2 -Bw. y Yelllo�w��Time (s) 3.2 4.3 3.2 4.3 3.2 3.2 ..ti .. _. _ _ .. .1} 1, �1' TJ -- • f ._ , s ._t`. --. rf--^;+Y,.` - Lead�Lag t-ag Lag Lead Lead _ Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3 0 3.0 3.0 � F : one C-MiDK "None . Max. ' A-Aax "Max rz' C. Walk Time (5) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Fnl# of-Welk4SUM'- Pedestrian Galls Whir) 10 10j 10 10 '_8' 0 30'0 . 25;G�" __.. . Actuated g/C Ratio 026 0.54 0.09 0.33 0.2a 0,25 0.a5 0.64 x Control Delay 33.7 1.�' 41.7 28 3 25.7 5.8 COueue Quay -0.0 -0.0 0:0 0.0 : 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.7 129 41.7 28.3 25.7 5.8 Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing+Protect PM Peak I Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive 9111l2CC6 —0. 4--- 4-, 1,0. wl Approach Delay 16.6 29.2 12.0 Cycle Length; 90 Offset. 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and MST, Start of Green Control Type: Aaivated-Coordinated intersection SIignal Delay. 22.3 lntersuction LOS C Analysis Per.od (mini, 15 Splits and Phases: I K Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 6 Lanes. Volumes, Timings Existing+ Project PM Peak 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 9/1112006 Lane Configurations J ;IT M!- Lx, - - - - -jar- Lane Width (tt) 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 10 11 12 12 Storage Lanes 2 0 2 0 2 1 Leading Detector Jft)' 50 so 50 50 50 so 50 50 60 Speed ( Fed Bike Factor i'm 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 0,99 1.00 0.99 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0. 915D 0.950 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 &9 0 0.9801 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.04 1.00 1. DO 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1A 1.09 1 1.00 1-00 Link Distances(ft) 1304 2640 2688 2656 TIT -Irl- T��-AIEMMIMM A� I Volume (vph) 143 530 51 120 496 95 127 356 254 108 277 188 Peak Hour Factor 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 092 0.92 0.92 'A M.0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 155 631 0 130 646 0 138 387 276 117 505 0 -;4�-17P r4-- PO n -'P Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 P� Detector Phases 7 4 3 a 5 2 2 6 w-7 4-0-',. Minimum Split (s) 12.0 30.8 12.0 27.9 12.0 35.5 35.5 12.6 29,1 -7, L Total Spirt 13.7% 33.2% 0.0% 12.6% 32.1% 0.0% 12,6% 37 4% 37.4% 18.8uVo' 4 1 . 6% 0.0% . , *Fi;, YOow Time fs) 3.2 4.3 3.2 4.3 3.2 3.9 39 3.2 3.9 Leadll-ag LagLead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead y6G YQsies -mYes Yes VVehicle Extension �s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 � 3.0 3.0 3O 0 Wb i.VMgx Nane `Non-6� ''No .c" .:N noi N Walk Tirne 7.0 7.0 70 7,0 7.0 1 6. 51 23,6 23-6 -1 7--Z Pedestrian Calls (9ihr) 1D 10 10 10 110 Alf' 6?e ri (- d) ' , " " -8.!B. -421. 7.8 41.1 13.4 18.5 18.5 10:7. 151-1''.' RWo 0.09 G 44 0.08 0.43 014 0.19 019 011 0.17 .'0.48 0,43 0:30 0:57 O-r,55� 0,62 0,72 - - Control De;ay 46.9 2D.6 47.5 21.2 37,3 344 5.5 49.9 -22.4 Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKIVI Tra-, sportation Consuilants Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing+Project PM Peak 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 911112005 Total Delay 46.9 24.6 47.5 21.2 37.3 34 4 5.5 49.9 22.4 Approach Delay 251 25.6 24.9 27,5Md Cycle Length: 95 Offset- D (Mlj. Referenced to prase 4:EBT and $ W13T, SWIL Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated _ Int4rsection Signal Delay'. 25.9 intersection LOS- C mw Analysis Perigd (min) 15 Y Splits and Phases: n Blvd & Peach Avenue Baseline SyncnrD 6 RePort fi,l+W 7ransgo tabor consultants Page B HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing+ Project PM Peak 5: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave 91812006 ---I. --* or- 4-- *-- 4\ t W—MMITE E-N� Lane Configurations : 7' Grade 0% XMW :7. Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 Pedestrians 3 3 3 3 Walking Speed (tv's) 4 - %ri 4.0 4Z 4.0 '�e'10111 111 M I R1 1gL1i turn flare (ven) Median storagaveh) 0 tyff� pX, platoon unblockecl VC 1 I conf vol 862 862 683 663 -'Stage 711 7T 79 9W. C Z L ff*yj r7 _- vCu, unblc.-ked vol 652 766 1250 1561 388 1186 1562 330 tC. 2 stage (s) 6.6 5.6 6.6 5.5 PO queue free % 94 97 92 89 98 93 87 97 *Y4. Vol,u-rneleft, 5-7 0 0 24 921 1700 1700 835 `c�Sti -7 i Queue Lengiri 95th (ft) 5 0 D 2 0.-0 Lane LbS' A A Appioabh,.Dday (sy 0.6 0.3 Approach LOS 0 0 13 12 .0 1700 1'e00 204 2228 2-'A- 4 9, WtS 0 0 20 21 D D D ftjt� $ !fit,rt—rne742--j� , -.- 7F —7- ,17-77,777-:- I.I Average Delay 1. Ic A n 'Capacity -Utilization 3713% ICU Level of -Service - grT . Analysis PM­ric-d (min) 15 Baseline Synlarro 6 Report TJKrV, Transportation Cons-,:!r-cmts Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timinas Exist] ng+Project Mitigated AM Peak 5: Kings Canyon Blvd & Mirtnewawa Ave 91112006 Lane Configurations ldnaFfl sro otpy is ;{ C7� 't.901D 1'_ lG "!goo.�'�__ r� `;�r. Lane I�dth (tt) 11 12 12 11 12" 12 12 12 1 12 12 fit , , Storage Lanes 1 0 Thal „ Leading Detector �1t} 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 I- aFT79 � :. 11 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 "25_ 5�y�p15 9 15 9 1.5 _ r� �w Ped Bike Fact& 0.99 1.(]0 0.99 1.00 01.99 0.99 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.996 0.995 gap Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.978PJA ,976 _ Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes h1.00 Headway Factor 1.04 1.00 00 1-04 i-00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ^ Link Distanre sit) 2640 2664 2688 26.98 Tim ITirnetsj5 -Y �.�,-- __4Q4 �''" _ . _T4`0' " . „ -- .-:4 8 +' • Volume Ivion) 41 398 17 28J 684 23 7 54 25LL 12 49 68 73 __ Peak "our=actor C.92 0.92 C.92 -0.92 09�92 C 92 0 92 0.92 092 092 0.92 0.:i2 Adj. oh�; 45 : 4 3 18 30 743' 25 8 59 -27 . 13 .53 - 74 Lane Group Fiow tvphl 45 451 0 30 768 0 0 94 0 0 4" trot :. : Prot' - . Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 a 2 0 f?er;�ltlwd�?hes�s- ' ,,. -, .�,s. -.-:-- _ .'8 - • � . Detector Phases 7 . -.. 4 __ - 3 . _ _2 � e 2 2 6 6 f41t�rsril,.lnitial'5) +41J rvi; imurn Salct (S) 12.0 20.G 12.0 20.0 200 20.0 20.0 20.0 nfaf Sprit ids} __ 0.'0;..,L :O `:5 K.-0 :.0:.0 Total Split (m) 24.0% 44 0% 0.CY':�. 2e 00i0 44.00ii, 0.0% 32.09•o 32.D°lo 0.;,. � 3� O% 14 0�7 O.Q?4 t171aximiam Green (sj - 1 .13 38:7 9._'8 5:7: ?= ' T2 :1. 2 :1 .'27.1 ^ -.27.1. -= i Yellow Tirne (s) 3.2 4 3 n' 3 2 4 3 3.9 3.9 °,.9 39 Aft", d_ irne �s) 1.0 '1;0 1.0 ' ; 0 LeadlL�g Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead L:ag..Opt,rnize? `.. .Yes. .. Yes ;des:. ,Yes' Vehtc-.e Extension >s! 30 30 3 0 3.6 30 30 3.0 3.0 R&A,�1ode . ,gone CA1in None C-fain NcnL- None None. _ Ne6e- IiValk Time (s) 7.0 70 7 0 '. i ,.C• 7.0 Fltast.':Dont W ilk:(s) 1:0 1:D 1 0 1.0 110.. Pedestrian Calls (#';-+6 10 10 10 10 10 10 Act_E_6ct Green-(s) .8.9 757• ' : '7 3 711 11.2 11.2 . Actuated g/C ratio 0 09 0.73 C 07 0 72 +" 0 11 vrc Ratio - 0.30 0.17 0.24 0-31 0.45 0 Control Delay 33.6 14 43 8 68 324 261 Baseline Syncbro o Reporn T.1KM Transoor;ai-.on Consultants Pace 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing+Project Mitigated AM Peak 5: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave 9/1112006 TIPP Total Decay 33.8 14 _ 43.8 S.@ 32A 26.1 Approach Delay 4.3 8.2 32.4 26A ru Offset: 76 11 Referenced to pro 4:E87 and 8` T, St Control Type: Actuated-Gaordhated Intersection Signal Delay' 10.1 Interse6w LOS: 8 tTBC iO3t :3 fl lc.: ?' Analysts Period (iz in) 1a Splits and Phases: 5: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minne.vawa Ave 1 'T a2 1 4' 03 I-1 r.A I ~ J Cv C!0 �? Baseline Synchro 6 Reaort T!KM Transcortatian Consultants 112 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing+Project Mitigated PM Peak 5: Kings Canyon Blvd_& Minnewawa Ave 9/1 112CO6 4*-- Lane Configuralicris 4 Lane Width (ft) 11 12 r 12 T 11 12 12 12 12 -C. 112 12 12 12 St -;rage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 '9. LeWading Detector17{ft) so so 5.01 50 so 50 50 so z 46 pff - . .. I I ffl-��R Turning Speed imph) 15 9 is 9 15 9 15 9 Pod Bike Factor 1.G0 1.00 II.C.0 1.00 0.99 0.99 F11 pfote-cted 0.950 0.950 0.985 0.989 '� -7 Tt Permitted 0.950 0 9EO, 0.934 0.250 _Mpg OLTtr r Rigtil Turn cn Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Fr Headway Factor 104 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 LAM ff� Link Distance (1) 2640 2664 2688 2656 v -Fn Volume (vph) 52 670 3.2 22 566 31 12 16 13 11 19 18 31 �7- Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0-92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 '57, FiTff Lane Group Flow (vph) 57 763 0 24 649 0 0 a4 C 0 53 0 7 ra:Perm Penn Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 '2 ..01 Detector Phases 7 4 3 6 2 2 6 A F Mini _C). n: 0 A. 4 2� M Minimum Split (s) 12.0 20.0 12.0 20,0 20.0 20 0 2o.0 ?n n ftrn rF 7; r�: - -'0 - 1: __.o 0 -0%' t3iG.- - 't&% , '-�& '--j) '-.6' ' NWL - , 10 Total Split 21i�. -41'ii-� 0. 2'l-,-B%'' 41 8% 0 0% 384% 36.4% 0 0% 36 41�-',- x MiIiT=iq9W . 7 . -17 7 --- . Yellow Time(s) 3.2 4.3 3.2 4.3 3.9 3.9 3.9 39 AN tn 9 1..0 1 . Leadil-ag Lead Lag Lead Lag ze Lead L d 7�aj.-Qofimi'- '�. p.-. ',- - yeg Win""„ - Vehicle Extension!s) 3.43 3.0 '].C, 3 f, 3 0 1-10 -'0 3 0 -C-ViTi None. C-Ury Nbn'e.­.-Ndrie ' No'Ce''n'E';' -"N6 Walk Tinge is) _-Norte 7.0 7.0 7.0 7 C 7:1 - 7,0 rl6iP,.'D7Qri6V.Va k b 1:0 1.0 1.0 1,: 0 1 L 10 10 10 10 10 10 AcIffict'Greah (5) 7 5 45.'8 6.3 39-9 7.5 '75 Act, 3t-ed g/C Rvio 0 '11-14 0 83 0111 0.73 014 C. 14 VICRatio, '0.25 0-26 0.12' 0.25 0.19 0.22 Coni:'-31 Delay 22.8 4 0 22.4 6.4 161 15.3 Baseline Synchro 6 Repoil TJKM Trarsocrtation Consultants Pace ' Lanes, Volumes, Timings Existing+Project Mitigated PM Peak 5: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave 9/11/2006 6.4 16.1 15,3 6.9 16,1 15.3 Offset: 32 (5a%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and B'WBT, Start of Green Control TVDe: Actuated -Coordinated Intersection Signal Delay: 6 6 _ Intersection LOS: A _ic Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases Basgine Synchro 6 Report TJKM `CTansportation Consultants Paoe 2 APPENDIX E - LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS: NEAR TERM (EXISTING + APPROVED AND PIPELINE + PROPOSED PROJECTS YEAR 2008) Lanes, Volumes, Timings Near Term AM Peak 1: Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue 91112006 Lane Configurations 0 tl� t P Vi 0 ry �12 Lr -- Lane Nldth (ft) 11 12 12 11 -12 12 -12 12 12 12 12 27 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 I r Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 _I.Eal 50 �50 50 50 50 50 50 Turning;Spe?ed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 FIMM_ Pad Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 0.98 .00 1.tlo 1.00 ^ � + !n m Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0..950 0.950 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Headway Factor I.D4 1.00 1.00 1 04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 Lit �g1,00 a,Li F!7 Link DisWiioe (ft) 2648 746 2572 2672 T.. :'`,F�i, r;a. Volume (vph) 46 412 89 96 7_36 14,2 y8 14-6 52 112_ 2fi4 CC Hfi'�'�?easr PrYr _ -7T 7 _.: L f ` •' fC. _ _6C J Peak Hour Factor 0,92 0.92 t_ _ . 092 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 092 Ad ' Floxv { pFrl _ .: '�-ra Y C 97 : ':0 8.�10 154 - 52. -1-59 ' -. � � 2_. ''. ' .65 ... Lane GroUD Ftow {vphl 50 545 .' .'57 0 -104 954 0 52 159 57 _:28'- 122 352 0 TO P#TyPey 1 - Prat : tProt :tadIM Prot Protected Phases -Prot 7 4 y 3 8 5 2 0 - ,. ' Detector Phases r 4f 8 5 2 2 .1 ❑ 1i1iIn1rnurn Spilt (s) 120 12.0 27_7 12.0 22.5 22.6 12.D 27.0 T�1@',R..ft `17'Ll2 0 27,13 ?_'i_0 --114A '29.:0 0 0 1 '0' ` n':1) 771 Z`..C� ',�27.0 _ 4 Total Split (°' } 15.0% 33 S°', 0 l'. 17 6% 36.30'-.3 0 0c° 15. D 2B.8'a 28.8% 20.0% 33.P l8 0.0% Mairam green (s): Yellow Time f s} 3.2 4.3 3.2 4 3 -3 3.6 3's 3.2 3.0 A1�i'iriesj ' 70 1-'7 .,t. 0. �_. = }."f;L _ LeadlLat3 v_]:, Lead Lie/adn . _ Lag Lead '_e_-diLead .s� Lao Lag r3y �L/ag 1'e , ' FRS' .. - �-J 1 6J _ Ir�rl _ .Yes -.es ry Vehicle Extension (s) 30 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 �'..0 3.0 30 3.0 l ode:..... Non.e.C-M'. Norte'C-M x None None' None None lrlon� Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 ; r 7.0 7.0 15.4 11.0 11-0 15.4 Pedesinan Calls (#lhr) 10 10 10 '10 10 Act'Effe# Gsee:� {s) 7:4 -' 35.5 .9.2 39.3 7:2 ' 13;0 13..0 -10.3 .18.1 Actuated o!C Ratr3 ().09 0 44 0 12 0.49 0.09 ti 16 C 16 C; 13 0 23 V' -0.3,6 0.33 3,3 019 644 : fl.'Ewe Control De!ay 38.0 180 41.4 19.9 385 32.2 8.7 37.7 24.3 BaseJne Synchro 6 Repol TJKM Transpolation Consultants Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Near Term AM Peak 1: Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue 9/11,2006 Total Cycle Lengths: 80 8.7 37.7 24.3 Offset: 48160%), Referenced to pbwe 4:EdT and 8;i MT, Start cd Graen Iq r"ei �l 0 x.�:.,. , Conkrol Type: Actuated -Coordinated [ Intersection Signal elay;:.2..3 Intersection`.L•CS' C' Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue o2 1 1* e1 ---► 04 If- m3 06 1— a7 Baseline Synchrc 6 Reporl TJKM Transportation Corsultants Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Near Term AM Peak 2: Kings Canyon Blvd & Transit Access 10[2012006 Lane Configurations OR 11.11 Lane Width (It) 12 12 11 12 12 12 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 1 _ _ Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 'ray Uff I :...M w. ;#tt Turning Speed (mphi) 9 9 9 9 Fled Bike Factor 1,00 0.98 if IIIIIIIIIIIIIIEMMAIr-W Flt Protected 0.950 0.980 l=11 Permitted p_95Q 0:950 Fight Turn on Ra-d Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 IM 1,04 1,40 1,D0 1.00 0 `. Link Distance (ft) 746x 638 147 VaILMe (vph) 559 7 25 $35 6 26 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 °7 ' A.dj. Flow(vph) 608 a 27 1016 is Turn Type Ptol Perm _ Permitted Phases 2 Minimum Initial (5) 4Z 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 - Total Split (s) 28.7 0.0 190 d7.7 32 3 32.3 32.3 w ��55 //�� !/ +�77 �j pp`L�f r // II11 _ �.�yfyy _ f}v -0.69Z. L.3.8% 55.5% -4VWZ, '�T]!- h 404'4.' '►�:•:+`_-- :Y� .. Maximum Green (a) 23.4 14.8 d2.4 28 1 28.1 274 All -Red Tme {8) 1.0 110 1 7 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Ve;Fiiensaon1¢s0_;0'~; �t) : _3:a0 :30 :3:0 _ -,.;.-_�,,--.,� .:L T`ir:•. Recall Mode C-Max done C-Max None None Ped Plash Dont Walk (s) 9.3 15.4 P.estr, nCa7rs.{#Inr}.'': Rr_„"._0 ACt DO Green is) 42.7 8.4 48.7 23.3 23:3 Actutsd`glD Ratia = 0, -_ rv`�;--_ r9' °A:29: _ _ v!c Ratio _ 0.33 0.29 0.48 J 0.03 0.11 Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKi41 Tramr)ortation Consultants Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Near Term AM Peak 2: Kings Canyon Blvd & Transit Access 1012012006 � r '— � � LOS A D A C A K ac Approach LOS A A a Area Type: Other C icwL. n=t, Actuated Cycle Length: SO _ Nalural Cycle: 65 ice" {gal :��t+ale' �''_`. � t�kS --.-""""— ii Maximum Vc RaVo: 0.48 1 RiqME1inn' r alb y : ['ritar a rfl �' _ Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.7% ICU Level of Service A *tat srs��a Y lits and Phases: 2: Kinas Canvon Blvd & Transit Access of 14" A c§ I+— 29 Baseline Syncnro o Report TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Near Term AM Peak 3: Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive 9111r2CO6 LaneConfiguralions A t14 . �" 'I_9 [J;:,�7 G " "I- OQ.D 1" 13Q �12T Lane IjVidth (ft) 11 12 11 12 12 12 _ Leading Detector {it) 50 50 50 50 50 50 Turning Speed (mph, r 15 9 9 15 9 Pad Bike Factor 1.00 1.00: 1.00 1.00 0.99 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 IL =fAOR Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 _ APO..'/995T0_ �j Im Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Factor 1 f04 1,00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1 03 1.00 1H,IIeadwryay �63B LinK Distance (fill 1304 640 J391 Vo(ume �vph) 201 3B 606 ',65 165 154 Peak Hour Factor 092 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 B76 1-we Group Flow (vph) 218 425 Al 1'55 Q 17C� 167 :Prot _ Protected Phases `r 4 3 8 5 Detector Phases 7 4 3 8 5 6 ,' 1 4.0' A'13 4-_E1 Minimum Spit (s) -12.0 22.9 12.0 32.9 7-7.0 27.0 _ 15:'J: • �,1;�7 =°�1�_0 �t�' E��7• '.�•`�.?-0 � ��"--t = Total Splii (o5) ?1 4 ; 44.0% 17 19% 40.0❑14 . ❑ °1 0.0 l0 38.6 ru ,� .T= ..-_ °' 3'B.E ,o _ _ Yellow Time (s) V 3.2 4.3 ; 2 4.3 3.2 3.2 it '"70 -1.0 -CO _ Leadog Lag Lao Lead Lead lLa C tirr'Irze.'.- Yes - .Ye - Yez Yes fl VeWicle Extension 's) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 30 R 1l!Aode - hlnne .C-Max. None-C-Mai- . -Max mak a ^TW;;,����.�':: ' Walk Time (s) 7.0 70 7.G 7.Q iah_ CcTit klalt (s) .:. 97, _ 97. - 15:8 , 15'. 8' Pedestrian Calls t4!nri 10 10 1G 0 Aci.i fCt`Gr'e=ii rsy- 71.0. '.3'1.'9 -7 0 24.0 210 23.0 Actuateo grC Ratio 0.1d 046 0 10 �).34 0.1-3 0.33 vljz-Ratto : '0.62 027 0.24 0:89 0:31. 0.27 Contral De:ay 554 18.3 31 4 31 9 194 4.5 QueugD:Biay D.0 0:0 0.0 ' --0.0 0:0 0'.0 _... , Total Delay 55.4 18.3 31 4 31.9 19.4 4 5 Baseline Synchm 6 Report TJKM Transporation Consultants Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Near Term AM Peak 3: Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive 9/1 V2006 .,-* --. I; *-- t `0. �.V/ Approach Delay 30.9 31.9 12.2 Cvcle Le Offset: 3z (49aln}, Ref renced to phase 4:96T and 6 Control Type' Actuated -Coordinated Intersection Signal Delay: 28.3 Analysis Period (min) 15 Soffits and Phases: 3 Kings Cany UBT, Start of Creeri Intersection 1_08- ` Blvd & 11,44Aart Dave F Aa i— ► " 09 Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKM Transportation Consultants Pace 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Near Term AM Peak 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 9/11i2C06 }-a. �.w .: -S. tiz.a.. •_ Y1LL� nI W.I/�.� �.L •ry L�lJ� ..,1�4I - " L'' .l ii%:l� 4J *, �'J Lane Width K) 11 12 12 11 Y12 12 11 12 10 11 12 12 tMi�#:;}�'` sr" U� Storage Lanes 2 0. 2 0 2 1 1 0 _ _[� y rofiia ' d F' ,�T. Y.!iF.il+►j;'G 3?- _ _ Leading 003ctor (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Turning Sr ed (mph) 15 9 15 3 9 15 9 15 9 Ped Bii�e Factoryy 1,00 1.00 1.00 1�..0_0 1.00 0.99_ 1.00 1.00 f y _•S. ._� _._`ti_s}�__.4'1-.rr Fit Protected 0.950 --.-- 0.950 0.950 0.950 _ Fit Permitted 0.950 -0.950 0.950 0.9_50 _ _ Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes - ' _ Z.Headway Factor 1. t'�4 1.00 1" 1.04 ' .00 1.00 1 04 1.00 1.09 1.04 1.00. 1 u0 L�n�i�.'.L81�S1�r7c��'�?�• V� _�� ._. Y _ �.��"_' r'' _ _ - _{ - - i _ Link DiMance (ft} 1304 2640 2689 2656 .40 C' 4 ^i98 Volume (vp171" 109 324 29 1?1 Stio 92 290 551 114 104 618 Peak Hour 1=actor 0.92 0.52 0.92 0 '�? 0 9? C 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 92 092 0.92 i j i+ '; ` 1:1 ,. '..140 1'fiu " .3104. .-:'IXI 15 599 4 1.73' _ r 2. _10.7 Lana Group Flow (vDh) 1-18 492 _ 0 1 B-5 7()4 0 315 599 124 113 779 0 T6 r ff. T. + - " PrC.t..I Prpt Prot -Perm 'Prot �` f .. Protected Phases 4 _ 3 8 5 2 1 fi �7 -..-. �xi .;:,�_,.. ." . �2 Detector Phases 4 3 B 5 2 1 6 :a ."�:a:,;-_�. �:-'L;a`-?a _'.._-=_ Minimum Split fs) 12.0 3p0-B 12 0 27.9 12.0 35.5 35.5 12.0 29.1 ToJss:r�s'"'.: Toi8� Splii ? fi 12.6% 33.2% 0.0"4o 13.7% 34.2% 0 0"b 17.9% 37 40i_ 37 4 ;0 15_.B`'" 35.3% U11% axim Mum: Gre�en (s) .. : 426`2 8.:8 . , 7.� - . ''12:8 ' 30;a 30.6. . 1.0:8 Y3.9 YellowTime ..ti 3.2 4.3 3.2 4"3 32 3.9 3.9 3.2 A91O 1.0 1_0 4TM1:L�: _1;G. 10. 1:0 LeadlLag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag _ lak�ag0lp1in,iyeiYaes_.:.4s.. Yes,:... ; ,(ems _Y85 Yet Vehicle Extension [s} 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3 u 3.0 3.0 R e A 4 la" ry N -i:'C=?u1Ta}� - None C-Max ' None None 'Nand 'None None -' WaXTime is70 7.0 70 7.0 7C Flash ,Doi t wdik ,(s) ; J 8'S ; 15:6 23.6 . 23.6 17.2 ' _ i'edestnan Calls (#1'nr% 10 10 10 10 10 Act-: f€6f Greesi.r ; :9. 310.. 9.3 " 32'.r4 1.2.5. 283 28.7 10-0 26.3 Actuated g C .Ratio 008 0.33 0 10 034 0.13 10.30 0.30 0 1' 0.2B 0:44 0;58 0:60 oJ3 q_§7 " 'o:24 &.63 Oi"81,: ," _ ; Cantro; Deiay 460 24.2 48.1 28.7 48.6 29.3 5.4 52.7 35.2 Baseline Synchro 6 Reporl TJKM Trz�nsper,ation Consultants Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Near Term AM Peak 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 9111/2006 a Total Delay 46.0 24.2 48.1 21B.7 i 48.6 29.3 5.4 52,7 35.2 Approach Delay 28.4 32,8 32.3 37,4 Off set: ,}}0 {D°/o), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8:VMT, Start of Gmeri. ftsster Intersection Control Type; Actuated -Coordinated Intersection Signal Delay:-33.1 Inaersectian1_0S:-C -- o nE+ 58 °I,GiI.,rcel a. �s�tw:iryeY:C�. Analysis Pericd (min) 15 Baseline Synchro 6 Repad TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 8 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Near Term AM Peak 5: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave 9111i2006 Lane Configurations I +4 4+ +$, Src=i S{ M } • _"_r ' yi.-: 1 Grade 0%0 , . �.- 0% 0% _YLi11Y.�'. 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Pedestrians 3 3. 34 Y- i}—'.. - IT i ..fir ��.�4�i• ��:r:`�r.:.. Walking Speed (ftls) 4.0 4.0 40 4.0 Right turn fiafe (veft) 1ldet4i2e =_,. Median star -age vet't) 0 0 PX, platoon unblocked i U. -W mail vC ; , stLaga 1 c ni vol 624 624 905. 9W Aw vCu, unblocked vol 852 545 1206 1541 277 4324 15541 4?0 1G, 2 stage {s) 6:8 5.6 6.6 5.6 p0 queue free 94 97 86 .61 95 V 67 B7 1 Volurne Le# 46 0 0 33 0 0 21 13 _ 1loiiamilr�Ri}li: �`�' ' .'�{?� ;, T TM�• , cSH 774 1700 1700 1010 1700 1700 199 253 Queue Length 95th (it_) 5 0 0 2 0 0 78 Lane LOS A A E D0 A`pxo"eli ;"sl :.: f.'lL;�r ..: :.3F�, Approach LOS E E Average Delay 6.5 apcity'UI`i['iz>ic�n..,',' Irsters_actia'n-; °l� ICL1�evel=of;Service A . Anaiyai.s Penoa (.mini 15 Baseline Svricnrc 6 Report TJKM Transportation Cors121ants Page I Lanes, Volumes, Timings Near Term PM Peak 1: Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue 9/11/2006 Lane Configurations ►j, Lane ridth (h) 11 � � 1- 4-- 1- 12 12 11 12 12 t /* l OEM M. 'P 12 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 W Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 60 50 50 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 9 15EVA- _ Ped Bike Factor 1 00 1.00 00 1.00 1.00 0 98 1.00 1.00 F11 Pratected 0.950 0.950 0 950 0.950 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950- 0,950 0.950 Red ig]Fht Turn oned Yes Yes F,� Yes Yes ��� i �SI}T4�V EME-1 K% '�• �r.NNnY SiYI'. �i Headway Factor 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 �w5... 1. GO 1.00 1.00 Link Distance (ft) 2648 746 1 2672 M. 2672 Volume (vph) 155 694 33 142 677 90 42 121 104 1201, 175 65 Peak Hour Factor OM 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 . Lane Group Flow (vph) 168 790, 0 154 634 0 46 132 113 130 261 0 Proiected Phases 7 4 3 8 a 2 1 6 pi rat Detector Phases 7 4 3 B 6 2 2 1 6 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 23.3 12.0 27.7 12.0 22.6 22.6 12.0 27.0 Total Split (Go) 20.0% 37.8% 0.0% 18.90/. M.N. 0.0t/. 13.3% 28.9% 28.9% 14 4% 30.0% 0.09/u _ fUlaKi,urr+teen_i.7`_; 9r8: Ye(ilow Time (s) 3.2 4.3 3.2 4.3 3.2 3.6 3.6 3.2 3.6 Lead}Lag Leadf± Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag �a�7 ,���'Q�!TT31�E'?.. ,.,.r-Y�S . .Y�S~ ..yr - , �S'n- _ * - `�'�'�5. "_•�.e5 -3.0 ..._ �s'�S� .Pam-_,- c• Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3,0 3.6 3.0 3.0 10 3.0 3.0 __C=M'e _ _N4ne'C-t�i ri` 'Nonp. Nan-6- Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.G 7.G Fl�r ka l xr t alk:(sj ;'`{. 71`:t3 15.�4 11-0 11;.0 Pedestrian Calls (#!hr) 10 10 10 10 10 3&6 13_:0, ",-36.5 ?.2 .12!A 124 12-0 21.2 '.._ -- Actuated ^?C Ratio 0.15 0.41 014 041 0.0a u 14 = '4 013 0.24 Vic,, _J=68 d:.56 0.63 0.59 0.33 . 0.52 0.36 0:56 0:3'I Y ,'Ratio Control C-vay 46.6 23 4 48 5 24 5 43.9 36.7 79 45.4 22.8 Baseline Syncnro 6 Report TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Near Term PM Peak 1' Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue 9/1iiHC6 --* --p. -,,* f- 4" 1 f' `- 1 d 9i U tu�. - ]Elr `.' y � yyyy� 52�t Total Delay 46.6 23A 4a.8 24.5 . � 43.9 36.1 r .5 45,4 22.8 `•':". - iauw.L/�'� Approach Delay �.lr_i—. i_"-..-.. .2� 27.5 2.8..3; ' 6.6 30.3 _ _ _ F _M ti7,— :7 Cy. -le Length: 90- adeT;�ng1UM Offset: 14 (11%), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and &WBT, Start of Green +T —� :. - - — a. Control Type. Actuated -Coordinated Intersection Signal belay::28.1Intersection LOS: Q. intee#Tarr;Ci{�acit'#ta1int:4°�o .. Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1. Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue e4 1 # 0 i \ 5 1 � '6 1-# o7 �_ 0e 1 Baseline Syncnro 6 Report TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Near Term PM Peak 2: Kings Canyon Blvd & Transit Access 1012/2006 --0. --v f- 4--- '*� /4' Lane Configurations +T+ 9 � � Lane Width (ft) 12 12 11 12 12 12 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 1 �� : max.::. •�..''��'�' Leading Detector (ft) 50 so 50 50 50 Tuming Speed (mph) 9 9 9 9 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 6,98 Rt Protected 0.950 0 950 Fit Pemirttoa 0.950 0.950 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Headway Pector 1.60 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. M?3� .; Link Distance (ft) 746 638 147 J t �� IR1�K3_ . Volume (vph) 878 7 25a 937 6 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 952 8 27 1018 7 28 _ _ LIq- Turn Type Prot Perm $Fttass.£ ;" _4 _ �?'z-f _ Pfr�t' Z ..- Permitted Phases 2Y -IriiIIial '4_0 Minimum (aj 4.0 4..0 4.0 4.0 4.0' _ foTf011!J.5 _ -`' -' _ � . - 24 "4 ; i i7 `, a. i i R l _ M Total Split (s) 36.7 4.0 15.0 513 28.3 26.3 28.3 Maximum Green (sj 31.4 10.8 46.4 24.1 24.1 23.4 _ 1 . 1.0 1.0 ".0 1.0 1.0 1.0 fA-ll-Raea�dd'T'iime(t�(s) - Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode C-Max None C-Max None None Ped _ Flash Dont Walk: (s) 9.3 5 4 Act Effc# Green (s) 42.8 8 4 48.7 23.3 23.3 Actuated alCRatio 0.-54'' 0.10 0.61 - 0.29 0,219 Vic Ratio 0.52 0.30 0.48 003 0. Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKM Transportation Consultants Rage 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Near Term PM Peak 2: Kings Canyon Blvd & Transit Access 10/20/2006 Queue Cie'av OA 0.0 0.0 D.D 00 s L05 A D_ A A _ VAN - Approach LOS A A B - - Area Type: Other {{..� [[ El m Actuated Cycle Length: 80 eco h.EHT a91V?BT• `'a '.= N ,.. Natural Cyde: 65 _ Max,mum v1c Ratio' 0.52 lnt��s'�ct c �Stgr"��]�ay�` �..*�'�� �� •�r � . toe . - „ Y.- lntersection IJtillzalion 38.711/6 ICU I_eva! of Service A _Capacity Splits and Phases: 2: Kings Canyon Blvd & 7ranslt Access -4Y- ¢2 • m3 04 Baseline Synchrc o Report TJK%', Transoortat:on Consultants Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Near Term PM Peak 3: Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive 9J11;2006 Lane Configurations �} ►j x Lane Ndth (ft) 11 12 11 12 - 12 -12 12 Leading Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 YT ;ing Speed (mph) '15 95 �, �.1.. r 4i:. -- j'.9.-r9 n15y_ r �"'ti'iLi: �•$�7''' U-�.J' . _� I:UG _ r1 ,} 'TI.`J.yYL"1* " Ped Bike Factor 1.00 1.0_0{ 0.99 1.03 0.98 ae FIt Protected 0.95C• 0.9s[3 0.950 FIt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 Fight Turn on Red Yes Yes �Y L Headway1.04 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _Factor Link Distance (ft) 638 1304 640 Volume (vph) 347 557 48 668 186 247 294 r P&ik Hour Factor a.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 �} y4 .74 Ad� � 'i 1ii..'ld+�� C ram./y11 j=S.'i111.�. .-2Co -i _. .+�"�i K- �+`/4. [ Y�rrr,(ry��`+I by 13 �y{ 3.- - iT� - . K. -11-77,7�+ti rah.' .;. Ljianntle.�Group Flow (vph) 377 ." 605 52 926 0 266.. . 320 Protected Phases 7 4 3 a 6 778 Detector Phases 7 4 3 8 .6 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 22,9 12.0 22.9 27.0 27.0 _ _ taI 7cSplii(°!a) 32.2% 56.7% 13.3°I9 37.8% 0.0% 30.G% 39.0% rAp- gn Yellow Tima,s') 3.2 4.3 3 4.3 3.2 32 �'-IT-" �1',.0k LeadfLag Lag Lag Lead Lead Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 30 l 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 F3� f�14dr:*.,'No'- C-Max `tdone C-W _ Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 F�asfio4h1alk.i.. yCalls _ .9.7:' 9 _ �" -. _''1`S 8"15i _ - - " ." :;' .i1t..:,,i. Pedestran Mnrl 1C' 1.10 10 : "2-5:0 #;s _2 30-13 ' 29:o' 'ate Actuated gJC Ratio 0.28 0.58 0.08 0.33 0.26 0.26 0;80 C� 30. 0.38 .0:81 0:60 0.1 1• - Control Delay 44.9 11.2 45.5 326 359 6.4 _ T Queue Delay` ^O.0 -.C.O .0..0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 44.9 11.2 45.5 32.6 35.9 64 Baseline Syn hro 6 Report TJKIV. Transportation Consultants Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Near Term PM Peak 3: Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive 911112006 "# � r � k- 114, 41 Approach Delay 24.1 33.3 19.9 2 (Z°%), Referenced to phase 4:E]3T and UMT, Start of Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Intersection Signal Deiay:,26.7 Intersection.-WS G Analysis Period (man) 16 Splits and Phases: 3: Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive C; r3 o4 Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKM Tranmoriation Consultants page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Near Term PM Peak 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 911 U2006 Lam! Width (R) 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 10 11 12 12 Storage Lanes 2 0 2 0 2 1 1 D FIE Lea7MWding Detector (ft) 50 SO 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 jF lr� Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 9 Fed Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 0-99-1 06- 0.96 Fit Protected 0,950 0.950 0.950 FI(Permitted 0.950 0.950 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes yes yes, Headway Factor 1.04 1.00 1.00 1,04 1.00 1.00 1.04 IM 1.09 .1,04 1.00 1.00 Link Distance (ft) 1304 26410 2688 26% Volume (vph) 186 623 93 130 586 105 167 376 265 112 313 22 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 WhS2 �4 9, Lane Group Flow (vpn) 202 778 0 141 751 0 182 409 288 122 562. 0 `�I� � 7q; NE_7 I. "Pdrrn P-0 Protected Phases 7 4 3 S 5 2 1 MEW 4 5 2 2 1 6 Minimum Split (3) 12.0 3G.8 12.0 27.9 12.0 35.5 35.5 12.0 29.1 '-0 Z. W Total Split (11%) 12,6% 34.2% 0.0% 12.6% 34.20,14 0.0",0 14.7% 37.4% 37.4% 15.8% 38.4% 0.0% r Yellow Time (s) 3.2 4.3 3.2 .4.3 3.2 3.9 3,9 3.2 3.9 ".-t-0 A-11 I I 1:0, . . -.. .. 5 0-: iRPv.ZU -- k Lead)Lag . ' Lead . Lag .. _ Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag 6Mize7. �y Yes -Yes yhi . . - - , � '. :Yet"' ". - 7 -T, '.7 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 3.0 0 3.0 3.0 3 0 3.0 3.0 F�FMW MTd i N6-1 C_Ma X. e '.NorTe-t-Mfa'X :,Nonee ' Nods_-N6n7_1,Kd�-e-_�N. k Time ts) 7.0 7.0 70 7 0 7.0 �ZgLW_pry Walk.(s)' 18%5 15 "!6. Pedestrian Calls ("M t 10 10 10 10 10 Ad' Oct breen (s 104 4TT0 8,8 .39,5 9;4 1S.:9 18.9 10'.2 19.7 Actuated g/C'Ratio 1 0.43 0 09 042 0 10 0.2O 0.20 0.11 0.21' 1,1.56 0.52 0,46- 13.52_-0:58 0.59 0.-56. 0-67 0.,ff Controi Delay 47 1 22 7 45.7 46.5 34.1 6.2 55.3 ZZA Baseline Synchro 6 Reporl TJKIV, Trap soorlaliop Consultants Page 7 Lanes, Volumes Timings Near Term PM Peak 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 9111t2006 Tokal Detiay 47.1 22.7 45 7 .5' 46.5 34 3 6.2 55.3 22.4 Approach Delay 27,727_.0 27.6 28.1 Cycle Length- 95 Offset 0 { °a;, Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 131`48T, Start of Green, Master inter ctivn Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Intersection Signal Delay: 27-6 Intef56�ction LOS C e-e'B ." Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKIU Transportwon Consultants Page 8 HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Near Term PM Peak 5: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave 9,11i2oc6 ---* f- 4- 4\ T I L.01 Lane Configurations ►j tit -.•.ram,-= ��,'•-,--�-.�r .,�:- •--:,�•-- i _ Grade 0% _ 0% 0% �01�18 WT Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Pedestrians 3 3 3 3 WVa—Mng Speed (ftls) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Right turn flare veh) �.=xkkz.�,.. Median storage veh) 0 Q pX, platoon unblocked vC I. stage 1 conf vol _ 964 964 782 782 •vCu, unblocked . vol �E�h_u 729 870 y � 1415 1763 440 1345 1770 ry�36,9ry L ` F�Ib7WIR7- f r'#k~'Mill`. IC, 2 stage (s) 6.6 56 6,6 5.6 p0 queue free % 93 95 77 87 96 92 B4 97 Wiar�mi`546 ` 3.'. Volume Let 59 0, 0 s5 0 0 30 12 `t] CSH SZ2 1730 1'uv 762 1700 1700 176 197 T. 79 12.05 0.27 Queue Length 951h (#7 5 0 C. 4 0 0 F 27 9.5 O-0, C_0 10;0 a Lane LOSLL A A D Apy:(s), . 0.6 0.5 30r0 ' Approach LOS i= D HerS��r��lnli7i - ,{.,-,�_r+�js' -�'.,F�_'"T"`R 4' «fig•..-- �t.� ,�'�' max. Average Delay 2.9 irif fs' `t 'paci ; ltiliiafiori :d3,1° iCU Leivet-of:Servii;a Analysis period (min) 15 - - ,.w..5� v ."'!Tf 3�r.V i+yw; .r^n� •• -� -,�•^ -- _ ti ; 7, rr•T'r _ -. _ :�}fic��La.ic�..}-�_+r.r2' r�rri�'Vf�`� ''�.x�.:'��_ .. __ .. _ • ,.F. �.J�i:2�:,_t [r y. Baseline S+fnctirc o Report TJKILi Transportalion Consultants Page Lanes, V6umes, Timings Near Term Mitigated AM Peak 5: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave 911112006 Lane Configurations +10 4 T204 1:, j �9Ob �._.'19[ia Lane VU�ic11h fft) 11 12 12 11 1� 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Starape Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Leading Detector (fi) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Turning Speed (ruph) 15 9 15� 15 9 15 9 r: Lam` 1 antpr.. T' � _ ' , AS r„� 5 . _9 _ _ '7 �;` Q.J w ;7rB1�" 1?0{•; D7 0 A Ped_Hik_e Factor - 0.99 1,00 0.99 1.00 0,99 ~ - 0.99 _ _ _ _ 4 yy.. _ ,W I I �7�Js •i"i=!-F :' '}, fyL�C+'�'+!�•'+��Qy^••'. 9_', F � ..T+.'+ +: TT•� �r��y��t5•�-w-�• I~r4. +f.,,k •` ._N. . _ > _. - .I t.1^'.. - �'.J:.D.7V?_.xi. =T.:: �i�',ti.a ;fir ��•Rt•. xl._. Fit Protectea_ 0.950 0.950 0.991 0.1995 Fit P'ermitted__' Ci,940 0,974 �}[0,950 _0.950 $��EFY.'J�f111r,+-••}z�.l'._�1G�+'�0`r�'��� !��' 1�,i._,- '5��� '�J �_��� •++,-��:+n_�I Y4'•� Rig'-it Turn on Reo Yes _ _��_ Yes _.:� .. Yes Yes S4fd "Fi'a}:i Heaaway Factcr 1.04 1.00 1.00 1 R4 0 1. M 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.G0 1.00 Qhi-°So;_e,�ed 'ti��ph�}:...r , _ a _.,__ � -� ,. '.5v 4 s�-, .� - - ,s_ _� ._.. � .. w Link Qastance (it) 2640 2664 2688 2.656 Ttairl Tiri :�±' ' �r.� _ .4.5^8, .. r., ~. _ �. n5:3 Volume Jvph) 42 476 23 30 75-B 23 19 54 34 2 49 69 jf Peak Hflur Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 C.92 &92 0 92 0.92 0.92 Lane Group Flow (vph) 46 542 0 33 849 0 0 117 0 347 0 urrn Protected phased 7 4 3 6 2 6 Pe�rrut�tetf ll�s- - - ' - . - - _ 1 Detector Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 g 8 Mtnamnrn tra;fial is� ,';: . 4.0.L� 4.0 Min+mum Spli! ;aj 12.0 20.0 12.0 20.0 200 20.0 20.0 20.0 TI} 4 � +$�r17� ' 0:0 ?.0 ''46:0 :C_0' ­ 3�1.0 31 0 r_ VI Total Split (%) 23.0°l07 46.09'. 0,0',0 23 0""1 ��i3O'%' O.O%' 31.0"'c 31.0'�u 0.0'/-� 3?.C% 31 C-% 0_.0°41 Maxfmijtn!( r6en -(') - 18:6 IIY.i. '. 1.8:8 0 : ' - . _ 26.'.1 26.1 Yeliow Time (s) 3.2 4.3 3.2 4.3 3.9 39 3.9 0.9 iirns} le .(. .1. 1:0 rj ;0 1.9 1.0 _ `1.0 1.0. :_ ': LeadJLag Lag Lag Lead Lead �e cJ= �g:Optirmze 'Yeas- Y-es. Yes Yes `. Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3 C 3 0 30 3.0 3.0 Fecal Uo.Cie None G-tJliri None:C-Min None NoI Nane None . `. Walk Time ;;) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7,0 7.0 7.0 F$6h..Do'~i1 Wb)k to 1.0 9;D .. ,0 1,0 Pedestrian Ca is (#lhr)_ 10 10 10 10 10 ',0 Act�frct:Greeh.(.s _ 1?.?;. 7 ,$ .- 7.: 7:i'6 1116. 1T:6 Actuates g!C Rate. 009 0.73 1 C:8 0.72 C 12 0 ;2 v!c Rafio' ,.::.,.. 0.31� � 021 0.26 0:34 - . .. _ p,5 - , 0.9 Control Delay 25.0 1 5 43.7 71 33.9 25 1 Baseline Synchro 6 Report TXM Transcoraticn Consultants Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Near Term Mitigated AM Peak 5: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave 9111r2GC6 -.1 --0- f- .4- 4\ .1 Cycle Length: 100 Offset: �72 (72%), Referenced to phase 4:E9T and B:WBT, Start of Green oxill ,Control Typee. LA'ctuated-Coordinated ,yIp3�M {,F'. a:Q . -T . F''�5 ,r _ _ - •_in 3;y.. y� -At-. �t �= _"s.r1Vi1� ..-.ti.. .t x�eZY'siis�'bL1M1'77+71� �1+�-..r.'rF..... ij Intersection Signal Delay: 10.2 Interseciion LOS: 8 14 I'rtea?�G w7f .1;� Analysis Feiicd (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 5: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave z,; Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKN', Transportation Consultants page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Near Term Mitigated PM Peak 5: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave 9111J2C06 � � � "r � �- � f 1* '* 1 d Lane Configurations ►j Lane Width 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 MIT Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 a 9 _ TgEe1 CKS� ',.'wtY f �'? '7iF {r - f *.I �:�L: �'�j r {�F M �' 5. Tg_ nil, Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50� 50 5f0�. 50 50 TRUFF�I'..: Y.aiV4i [�. . `y _ y�rt Turning Speed.(rnph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 '5 .9 �ri ^W dr. • �"1. tp `�Urr0S�N'i' _ O:mS ^_° Ped Bike Factor 0..99 ~ 100 µ 099 1.00 0.99 0,99 _ Fit Protected 0.950 C.050 0.979 0.585 R. R � ,2 , Fit Permitted +0.95_0 0.95�0 0.B-B6 0.950 8Qrx3 :6k•`1; .;f.2W_ 001-,_ _rr�. ,1�iS:..A74 tip. .--_. "I' :��.._ .....�:Y ' Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Headway Pactor 1.04 1.00 -.-v 0. 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 v. 7 NOW Link Distance f.ft) 264C- 2664 2688 2656 eTr •_ '0 45.8 _.. 'k_4_'.;..=� Volume (vp�'? 54 754 44 32 637 31 28 16 22 11 19 20 Car.fl. P>rd. (#;= , rrr � '3 ".3; �.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 092 C 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 092 0.92 0.92 "x..q �- r;._�', ,4.g. :.,.Fagg. 34' �, 1 _ ... '2 , 21 .,.., Lane Group t^'aw fvph) 59 868 0 .35 7-6 0 0 71 0 0 55 C l�rot.. -. ;Perm, _ Perm. Protected Phases 7 4 3 6 2 6 _ Detector Phases 7 a 3 8 2 2 6 6 Mani rir ii l�" 4.0"4.'0 - 40 -0. 4.0. .A,6. . . 0 . -4.-0 . Minimum Split (S) 12.0 20.0 12.C. 20 D 20 0 20 0 ..' 20.0 20.0 p'it'fs t} � '0 0 ? > 47.r 0:0 :3i]LO 3 :0 ''` .:0. ',3o.�) 0 =lV Total Spl,t ffl.Q) 23.00% 48.O0o 0.0_% 22.0% 47.0% 0.0% 31D 0% 30.0;¢ 7� 0.0% 30.0V- 30.0°!0 00% f4S r tn; reen.18.8:.:'�4 7' �._ 17:3 4'1�7 x- YellcNv Time (s) 3 2 4.3 - 3.2 4 3 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 RII:R6d Tiri-ie:(s) i.0 -1 ' 1.:0 1 r0 1.0 -. 1:01:0 LeadlLag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lea4='C*a Qptimize? Yes ° Yes Yes Yes VRhicla Extension f s.) 30 3.0 3 {t 30 3.0 3. 3.0 30 Re al) 7UM1 de :. None C46 None C-Min None None- - .' None . Norio,., 'Valk Time }51 7.0 7.0 7.0 7 0 7.0 ;.0 Fi�Iii Z6nf-walk,(s) . - ' '1:D 10 1,0 1.0 _ Pedestrian Cal.s (#Ihr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 Aot: i:#. Gre en (s) 1,9.2 . 77.9 7.16 64.2 9. d _ Actuated g1C Rano 019 0.7o 0.08 0.64 0.09 0.09 vlc tio:.-018 0:32 0,27 0.33 0.43 _ Control Delay f 19.5 24 43 6 11.5 30.5 28.5 Baselire Spnc'nro 6 Report TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Near Term Mitigated PM Peak 5: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave 9/1112006 � --► � 4,- 4� T /'.� 1 � Total Decay 19.5 2.4 43.8 11111..5 3t],6 28.5 Approach Deia+� 3-6 _ 13.0_ 30.6 28.5 7 i 4 any 7 ��r'.. Offset: 16 (15, %-), Referenced to phase 4:F_BT amd B:VVBT, Sian of Gmen IN Control_Type Actuated-Coordinated Marti Wig" lnter5ectron Signal Decay: 9.3 Intersection LOS: A #rv.icatA Analysis Period (rn,n) 15 Splits and Phases Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKM Trarspo:rtatiora Consultants Page 2 APPENDIh F - LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS: CUN4LTLMXT- YEAR 2025 No PROJECT Lanes, Volumes Timings Cumulative Year 2025 No Project AM Peak 1: Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue 9115f2CC6 Lane Configurations fli, Caio�F9 TI Lane Width M) 11 12 12 11 12 12_ 12 12 12 12 12 12 _ _ l Storage Lanes y 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 - Lea,,diing Detector (") 50 b0 50 50 50 50 50 50 IT+F1i111l1j _50 y�•2. �''l_ 41i J Turning Speed (r ph} 15 9 15 9 15 @ 15 9 _ Ped Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.M 1,110 1.00 Flt Protecled 0.950 0:950 0.950 0.950 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Right Turn an Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Al Headway Factor 1.04 1.00 - 00 1 04 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link [)!stance (ft) 2648 2672 2672 r133,84 1`F Z!T17_ti`.?'� :i=ors: tel:} ''��..' , sax'i= -._ 1 ._ . _T { T *268 Volume (vph) 48 706 14.8 129 1183 155 83 166 55 125 60 -0.92 - Peak Haul Factor 0,92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 C1�92 0.92u.9 4Z 0.92 .. _ ?` 07 r x 'vph'j=; . "1]51�`-`. - `:5,gI' '*1' 8; ,. 50 - 6'. "_ 2 - • ^' ETa . Lane GrbUD Flow ivph) 52 928 0 140 1454 _; 0 90 160 �0 136 356 0 7n e' :: ;.; Fro* Prof Prc- rerrnP _ Protected Prnases 7 4 5 2 1 u �11tL - -. --. - - - -, - ..--� • n -., _ _ -- - Detecw Phases 7 4 3 $ 2 2 ~! b i1�lln i rrl 4.0 .' 4'0 _._ _ _.: -_-4= .b` - 4 Ca :.. Y 4. inimum MSplit (s) 12.0� 23.3 12.0 27.7 12.0 22.6 22,6 12.0 27.0 Tfdt J= p`Iikf(if 777-'rrt2.'0 ^:' c=0 0:0 : ' 12`6 -'19Z -0 w 5t1 'ti_� _' - a Tb;a! 5olit f°�) 15 0°l0 0.0°; 15.0% 3$.3°l0 0 0°l° 15D°4 20.C% 33.8% D.0°/4 - 78 .2'3.7 Yellow Time (s) 3.2 43 2.2 4.3 3.2 3.6 `3.6 3.2 36 AII=Red''T'i'rri'e " } . O 1._ 0 1.: 0 1.! C' ° "'; d "' 0 1-C i' LeadlLag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lea Lag Lag Lead Lag Y.2s Yes :yes _ Y-es :Yes 'Yes Y.- T_ . Vehicle Extension {s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.D , 3 u 3.0 3.0 3.0 ID f'2ecOfWde 1VoR ':C tut T-"' ''`None C-iUl ' .No'ne None fVane gone None 1Nalk Time ($) 7._0 7.0 7.0 _ �laf�oe# '4�lalk '_�1 - 5.4' Pedeslrian Calls (#)hr} 10 10 10 10 1fl_ A&EfEf c3 e3n (sy Actuated g/C Raga 0.09 0 40 &"0 0.46 0 10 C 17 u 17 0 13 0.23 vIc FMi6 ' , ' -. - 0 9 ..> i'.. .G�3 0:92 0.Z5 fl:58 . 0.19 Cartiroi Delay 382 23.0 73.7 35.7 45 3 32.7 5 39.7 24.6 Baseline Synchro 6 Reaort TJKM Transimrtaticn Consultants Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025 No Project AM Peak 1: Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue 911512006 -,* --* ---* i- *-- 4\ T �' 1 d Total 8.4 39.7 24.6 Approach Delay 24.4 38.1 31.7 28,8 Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenmd to phase 4:EST and SM13T, Start of Control Intersection Signal delay: 32.6 Intersection LOS: C lre # d -c+elfreR� " Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue al I ;r a2 m4 a3 05 I ♦ ro I- e7 Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025 No Project AM Peak I Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive 9115/2006 Lane Configurations 41 f .:� Lane Width (ft) 11 12 11 12 12 12 12 _r{. Storage Lames 1 1 0 1 1 3� Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 S0 so �1Fy r�!!� Turning Speed (mpn) 15 9 9 15 9 Fed Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Fit Protecte❑ 0.960 0.950 0.950 Flt Purmilted M50 0.950 0.950 urnon Red Rkghl Turn-on. Yes Yes j _ +� yyy, .r il3S�rw Headway Factor 1.04 1. ii0 1 04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.Od Link Distance (ft) 1384 604 640 'I Y Vo�ll�u++I�m_e (vph) 201 656 38 1327 165 165 164 ofp �� Ci il�l.:1yaC?$,�Trf tt°:,.':-'"3f ! f U, 1-'1.a� - TI9,..7-K Peak Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 yHour Lane Group Flow ±-vph', 218 713 41 1621 D 179 167 Ti�`n:-.T�P�'�;.._ . - . P.rot�' _ � Prot �1 �';,•:.. '_�...-,, -s;�,�, Protected Phases 7- 4. 3 8 6 trxytt�t1 Pies. . _. - 7. Detector P,h,., s- 7 4�j 3 8 .6 13 t � Minimum -Split (s) 12.0 ;2.9 1-2.0 22.9 270 27.0 T4tai .Split °10) 17.8% 543.7% 13.3% 52.2% 0,0% 30.0% 30,0% N� t�ua Yeet� 5y.r,.:= �_,f7.tT;B " .-41.7 - f.$ .-- z2, Y�-Ilow Tlrne (s) 3.2 4.3 3.2 4 3 12 3.2 in�'s. i,C . fi.D 0. : 1:0 Lead/L.ag Lag Lag Lead Lead L atl q.:D }fisrtiz 7. 'Yes:, Yes . yes, �yi - VeNcie Extension ts) 1.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.-0 ReGa'Accte . _; hloae_'C-K+1aX ttane .C=Max .. fiAar: _ Walk Time tsj 7.0 . 7.0 70 7.0 �Ia1Dot3t:i+(alkl.- Pedestrian Calls_ 1#.:niO 1u 10 10 10_ Act-Effet Creep {s}...- .-.. 1z A ' 5.1:8 . 4 43:0 - 2� 0 23.0 Actuated g/C Ratio r. 13 0.58 0.98 048 0.26 0.26 Control Delay 92.8 11.7 43.5 42.1 310 6.4 Baseline 5ynchro 6 Report TJKM Transporation Consultants Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025 No Project AM Peak I Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive 9/1512006 Approacn ❑,+erla�y 30_7 42.1 19.1 Offset: 8 (9%), Referenced to ease 4:E9T and MST, Start of Green - Controi Type: Actuated.Coordinated Interseclion Signal Delay: 35.8 Intersection LOS: a tO P7717 ._� Analysis Penod (min) 15 Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKNI T-answrtat+on Consultants Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025 No Project AM Peak 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 9/1512006 Lane Configurations ��i ��� � ��i �� ►j� �� � ��j �j+ _ '7ypg.a0 :; $ G' Lane Width iftj 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 10 11 12 12 a7i�Oraa •� r . tii+ILL1' ia7 .n } Storage Lanes 2� 1 0 29�{J -=-J 2 1 2 O Mal I5 Leading Detector (tt)µ 50 50 50 50 50 50 50� 50 50 50 yy Turning Speed frnph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 _ L Irv= .: ;, �0_,--;_G'�, 9u ,�", OW Pad Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 _ _{fi,., _. _ 1.00 ' .00 1.00 0.98 1.00 - - 1.00 Fit Protected 0.950 M0 0.950 _0.956 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 _0.950 Rog"... _ s28 r�J3 :,T=32t.$'_ . 43t'' :,_ D. •. 8' '.., G' -. k1 - A Right Turn op. Red Yes Yes Yes Yes �c, `' d`3J.R :�1' +•�•�..t� -� ,.-.v __.�.".r`�, 'i.04 1.00 'I.00-.. ,..:,r..L��k6��.'-ttS'�t__.._. _1.'04 1.00 1.00 _.._.. _��s{c,.s-...:.. .:#--.i.:ihl. 1 f„4 1.0�001.09� 1.04 1.00 1.00 jHleadwayFactor I�ALF��r��..W '.sr? rr._... S_r_ " T ." '+1T•T4iM1 ,1y- !1'.. si Yi: Link Distance (fl) 700 ��-+v. 1260 s.s�tGatllyrLl.� 26,88 2655 + Volurne (Vphi 114 688 145 284 996 137 406 658 208 201 723 126 . ^0.92 Peak Hour Factor 0.9.2 0.92 0.92�0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Lane Group Flag {vph) 124 630 158 309 1232 0 441 7115 226 218 923 �'�� 'p"�F'i;•'�?PeT�ri'-`"F�_'ts _0 � ,.._�; o ; ,!_ .,'?,P.4'�',r'• � , Protected Ptaases 74� 3 8 5 2 1 4 Peqced:bS Detecior Phases 7 4 4 3 8 5 2 2 '1 6 h Olmum�lsii - ,0 '4 4:0 -4.+0. ..�: -- Minimum pIA (s:r 12.0 30.8 34.8 12 0' ?7.9 12.0 35.5_ 35.5� 12.0 29 1 _ Total Split (°01 11.41% 33.3% 33 311,lo 14.0 c 41 0% O.O fn 17.1 % 35.2°ra Z5,2% 12.41,o 30.5% 0.t} A h faen (sl . }_t3:� 7'ri,29: , 3.5:8 . 37,;'7 , 13:t3 ,1 . _3 _1'{ 8-B. y ' , Yellow Time :s',i 3.2 4 3 4.3 .. 3.2 4.3 3.2 3.9 3.9 3.2 3.9 0. Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Leac Y6 y. e -YeS Yes , YB6' yes. Y$5 Y:e;S .:Y6s Vehicle Extens,on (s)' 3.0 3.0 30 3.6 3.0 .Y1ES 3.0 "0 3.0 3'C 3 G Ul de 1o;re C-tulax G=N1a None C=Max _ -Norie:,:NcKL_6. 1Vone . -None Non _ e _ Walk Time (5) 7.0 7.C� 7 0 _. i 0 7.0 7.0 CO)'.95.6 _ _ : Pedestnar Calls (W(hO 10 10 10 10 1C 1D ACt Efft` Gr6n".,.5'- ' 8:0 . 32 7 -327 14 ?: 39_0. m - 14.0 33.0 310 40 `r281] Actuated u?C Ratio 0.08 �C 2.1 0.31 0 :4 0.37 0.13 0.31 C 31 0.G9 G.2v v1SZFaiio Ou50_ . 0.41 1i.27 0,c5 0.96 1.0 t.65 0.37 D7.�' t.00 y. _. Contro, Deia-; 53.8 29.5 5.8 46.7 494 90.5 34.3 5.5 65.1 67.E 8aseiine Syncnro 5 Report TJKM Transpor,ation Consultants Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025 No Project AM Peak 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 911512006 Total Iu Offset: 0 (OW, Referenced to pha x.le:. Control Type. Actuated-Gaordlnat Intersection Signal Delay: 49.2 ffiRE-M 2- Analysis Period (rnin) 15 Splits and Phases: 4: Kings Ca el I t+ e2 e6 08 5.5 66.1 67.6 67.3 and 8.WBT, Start of Green, Master In#er5e0k )n intersection LOS: D n Bivd & Peach Avenue ' - Z? i-7-11' @A ■7 BazfWe Syrchro 6 Report TJK'W Transportation Consultants Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025 No Project AM Peak 6: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave 9/1512006 Lane Donfiguratians Lane Width 1fb 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 42 12 12 12 '''III Storage Lanes_ 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 �50 Leading Detector {ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 - Tuming Speed (mph)' 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 .,.-�- 11 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 a-' Fit Pratecteb 0.950 0.950 0.992 0.9f9J�y6"7[ _ }_ Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.938 0.974 M NO Ri ht Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1"fl0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Link Distance (ft) 1380 2664 26M 2656 Volume (vph} 44 772 53 70 1366 23 20 54 51 12 65 73 � Peak Hour Factor 0.92pry 0.92y 0.92 0, 9_220.92 0.9;}2j 0, 92 0.92 0.92 0.92� 0..9j(2 _ }10..929'Q2�'L � { y l:u 1; Lane Group Plow (vph) 48 897 0 76 1510 0+ 0 13.6 .I-�A. 0 0 163 Ti ' IPsot , Y - -5 __. l tot ' , '!` ' ="' ertn ., '3 _0 T,~ P ziia^f•'. ; ..= - Protected Phases + 4 a 2 6 .•� 3 - - •.J^ - ,-vim,- - .- r - w _. vz�..��-+:•�f F rt,�z..�--fir- Fju: tix�L a. J Detector Phases 7; 4 3 $ 2 2 6 6 �.( '1 .. �... 1 ,' S - ,L7. ':U ' �12.0 4'D-- ---- - L` 14. t . �'', Minimum Split {s} 12.0 20.0 20.0.- 20.0 20.0 2.0.0 20.0 7 ^ PO.-O. 0,0 Tolai Split ('o) 18.5°l0 50.8O/D 0.0 0i8 la-5-15 1.8 to 0 +'0 30.8°0 30.t1 o G.G'4c 30 $°fon 30.8% 0.0% Maxr� rn-(s) Yellow Time 3...24..`i_",,_ ; s} 3 3.2 4._3 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 � ASl ��'�fnlE".5) 1�6f� �.� 1_:0 ,. �.Q '1.� -.. .-. .i"�'.'�.•:#,��� L.eeadlLagY LeadLag Lead Lag_ - „ - cr '-4F.. �L+r�Y.>•-.1 S f4'�]'u1�r'�_- -��� _.. f '�' �-_k��' �- -. .- - --}w.r'= .A .- `�' Vehi&e Exlensaon ts) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 110 3.0F 30 *' G4r `' �` 'riNnne'.� i4lrri- fiio�+ C,li-Q f�ori� hlcne _ _ Kane Pdaa%e Walk Time is.) 7.0 7.0 7 0 -.0 7.+0 - 0 F�ash�Jan� kOfalk (j `; - ;. ; :�.y;'T. 1, 1 1:0 1J_i '_ Pedesman Galls (#/hrl 10 10 10 10 10 10 Act•E:fa.-'Green_(s'� .7 41:.8 .,719;"--W7-" y0 10.1 _ Actuated gtC Ratio 0.11 0.64 012 65 0 16 0.16 +�)c'atio .- . ,0:2 -16.6 Cantr❑I Deiai' 2E.2 9.5 29.B 14"0 17.6 Baseline Syncnro 6 Report TJK{U Transoortati-y, Consultants Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025 No Project AM Peak 6: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave 9115MG6 --* --,, --* f- `�, t ,,- �- 1 41 Total Delay 28,2 9.5 29.6 14.0 17-6 16.6 Approach Delay 14,4 14.8 17,6 16.6 Cycle Length: SS Offset: 32 f49%), Referenced to phase 4:i~l17 ski M87, Stan of Green Control Type: Actuated-Goordinatad k§ i fl v- Intersection Signal Delay: 13.6 Intersection LOS: 6 In#ersP, ks n C 92c11 SMYLaok{> MI t e�e'I f � Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and PI n Blvd & Minnewawa Ave &5etine Synchro 6 Report TJKM T,-j:--,t3or2ation Consultants Page 8 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025 No Project PM Peak 1: Kings Carryon Blvd & VVillow Avenue 9/15/2006 ��� r� 4\ 1 1* `9- Lana Confgurstions I tT* ►j � ►j , is 91 00,2M - 1� 00...7J F:a _� J 1���0 0 _ 1_' 9. - sA Lane Width Oft) 11 12 12�� 11 12 12 12 12 12 1.2 12 12 _ Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 Leading Detector (it) �50 50 50 50 5+0 50 50 50 50 :r� a t ;=:.�_' �.'w4s�' `yam' �16 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 _9 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.90 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 x Fit 0.950 0.950 0.95D +P.Jroott�/e�c•�tej�rd _ i Fit Permitted 0.950 0.1J50 0.950 - 0.950 ..�"'.x... C�+��_18*' Right Turn on Red Yes Yes _, Yes_ ..H9.- -r „-_ Yes ,,--++'1'1'�TT��lIrr.�py Yy !!T'�r•�YSj _ �. �-� He,jad+rray�yFactor 104 1.00 1.00 1.04 100 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 . 1.00 1.00 1.00 LSti.9Cx _�3 rn'�'S1�SCI T ..-' j.. -5i- Cs'. 'l'=T f�.L�.�-s ..ki�u� .� }�.�..s��'b` Link Distance (fi) 2648 1384 2672 2672 + T VoiuymF (vph) 194 1285 643 294 906 121 42 121w 101 121 175 65 [ Unll'�lfilr Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 092 0.92 0.92 0.9.2 0.92 0.92 0.92 _0.92 _ Lane Group Flow (vph) 211 1467 0 320 1204 0 46, 132 110 132 261 D TF?eym ;.�pt" Protected Phases 7 4 3 B 5 2 1 6 Detector Phases 7 4 3 6 5 2 2 1 6 +216 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 23.3 12.0 27.7 12.0 22.6 12.0 27.0 -�sCi 55-, fl _ 1 :t) 0 :23_C ... .0 .�.w Total Split (%'... 19.2% 45.8% 0 0`/a 21.7 lia 48.3% 0.0% 10 0ao 19,2°4. 19.2% 13.3°+c 22.5% 0.0% i�31a c�_ ]fn; re2�t (s) 18'S ,:�#9.3 ; ,' - 2.9:8 ,152:7_ -#. 7.'$. i8.4% 18:�1 Yellow Time is) 3.2 4.3 . 3.2 4.3 3.2 36 3.6 3.2 3.6 '0- I.O. .��1 D '-;,' ,l y�f' � Lead?Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lack Lead Lag _Yes Vehicle Extension .+s1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0- 30 10 30 3.01 �+lcn-f�rlax : - - Tune _C t49ax Y. .None Ior�'e _'None ;Bane txlone_� ~ Walk Time is-) 7.0 7.G ,. 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flaplai[+bntJ3 Pedes3rian Calls tWhr) 10 10 10 10 '`.0_ _ .2.. 1 :2.: ; 1 .�.::. 'U" :- Actuated Q'C Ratio 0. i6 0.47 0.1 B 0.5t 0.03 012 0 12 1 0.10 0." `.o:SO -0,90 . ..103 0.7-C : 0.43 . 0.61,E 0�39 . .0.79' - A.A4 - Control Delay 654 3B.5 107.0 27 1 64.1 54.5 11 1 79.1 39.5 Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKV1 Transportatior Consultants Pare 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025 No Project PM Peak 1: Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue 911512046 -,,* --0- --* r 1 .01 ,,. Total (Delay 65,4 38.5 f 107.0 271 64.1 64.5 11.1 79.1 39.5 Approach Delay 41.9 43,9 WS 52.8 iaaa Offset: 1 04 (87%). Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8: $T, Start of Green Control Type: Act Intersection Signai Delay: 43.5 Intersection LDS: D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1 Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue 11 + 26 1'-�* o7 �— oB Baseline Slnchro 6 report TJKh1i Transportation Consultants Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025 No Project PM Peak I Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive 9115/2006 � � 1; -*-- 4� I* Lane Configurations a + , 9.00. gCCU ...1- .01 ._ Lane Width (Ft} 11 12 11 12 12 12 12 _ _ Storage Lanes Leading Detector tff? 50 50 50 50 s0 Turning Speed !rnohh 15 9 9 15 9 1� �t11 ctar _ _ 1. A':95` 1J70 _ flr9 v. '1, .;;_ F Pad_ $ike Factor ?.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 Fit Farmitied 0.950 0.950 0.950 '34�22 -' -0 1746.. 1544' Right Turn on Red Yes Yes }gypp •�-'-'- - .r iLWTFCLY14' •f - '' f-t --r _ +r 23 _ r-L"`_-T-.-T= c}t '1�� eadway Factor 1.04 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 1" tH Link Distance (ft) 1384 664 640 rd=jls------- ---- Volume (vph) 347 1226 48 1211 166 247 294 Peak Hour Factor 092 0.92 092 0 92 u".92 {1.92 0.92 Adj,_Floarr:.: pl .. '3r. .1 3 ' , . 52 12112 _ ^: �a2`: pO r�r��r7J/i• T • _ �i„'� � {, Lane Group Flow ivphF 377 1333 52 15-18 0 268 -.20 _ �-",.� .. ...�. . ruinTe : 'Prat .7 Prot w_. __... _ Pere;- r Protected P ,a es 4 3 3 6 Detector Phrases 7 4 ? B 6 6 Ir9atiiCfitSr '. x ` •,,4::L1 ... 4; 0 ..0 -4Q ,4 0 0 ; Mrrnfrnum Split (s) 1?.0 22.9 12 0 22.9 27.C' 270 To .S alit',ts} ' 20 51:ID 1Y'-0 41'tb r_ 0,O "2-7.0 •2 -0. _ Total 5plil !°,S} 24 4^:. e ; 3.3°,, 45.6% 0.0% 30 0% 30 0% �A u icrxi'green'(s) A .8- ...45-7: _ T_B: -, 35.7.. Yellu�v Time {s) 3.2 4 ' 3 2 4 3 3.2 32 1-C .-0 1;0 _ LeadlLao Lag Lag Lead Lead L >iaa qp2iirrizv7.. ::_Yes X` s :;_�•, i ' �; - Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 10 3.0 3.0 3.0 Re_;None.C=Max 'None C-fUfarx"' Waik Time (s) 7.0 7.rl -.0 ' 0 Iasf7 9-.7 Pedestrian Galls (Whr) 10 Act: EtFci roan . ,r , :.1 �:"0 : 51 Z ' , i .2 37_ .0 2?:0 _ � $` Jam' Actuaieo g.'C Rp,.io 0.20 0 58 0 -OB 041 0.26 026 v1+ Rafia ...: 1;11 d.�6 0.138 1,07 0_60 0.�i - Conlroi Dalay 1,184 '16.2 455 71.7 35.9 6 4 Baseline Synchro 6 Reaort TJKV, Transportation Consultants Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025 No Project PM Peak 3; Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive 9/15r4006 _'# ___' q .4— 4 Total De -;ay 118.4 16.2 45.5 717 35.9 6.4 Approaah Delay 38.7 70.8� 19.9 Cycle Length. 00 Onset: 0 (0",'.), Referenced to phase 4.EST and 9:M7, Staft of Green �a Control Type: Aclualed-Coordifiated . v lntersecl�on Signal [delay; 48,9 Intemectian LOS: d Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases I Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive � m3 m4 06 n7 Baseline Syrcnre 6 }deport TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025 No Project PM Peak 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 9/1520M Lane Configurations t?T I' TT M t+ r 11 +1+ Lane Width fi#) _11II y�11 12 12_ {j11 12 12 11 12 10 11 12 12 Storao'e Lanes 2 1 2 0 2 1 2 0 Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 5t 50 50 50 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 �... - Fad Bi4 a Factor 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 MIM VOW Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Sat sfapfirr�xi�3`?`tiP5::3L$3 '. £*52��!' ``'iQ ° WR�' T y Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes _ Headway Fazrtar 1.04 1.00 1.00 1904 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.011 1,09 1.04 1.(30 1.00 Link Distance (ft) 640 1200 2688 2656 MM -00 Volume (vph) 225 1185 94 228 10 312 327 759 308 200 793 251 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0,92 0.92 09290 92 0,92 0.92 0..92 0.92 0.92 0.92 �0..92 , T ... �-�.4x Lane Group Plow (vp; 2fi5 1288 �102 248 1493 0 355 :8t5 �2i 422. 217 1135 D Protected Phases 7 4 3 B 5 2 1 6 y-� r; ;y�...s-�•. =..y r. :,--ram.-�.-'gym R Od! ' s-tt-.hf 7 1:'c�tirr ^+��T- T'r�.. �yi:� . _.l�'.+:;�.�c--U- Deiectar Phases 3 6 7 4 4(% � 22 ? rrt"o- 1 _ } j5j r�8 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 30.8 30.8 120 27.9 120 35 5 3 5 12.Ct 29.1 Tat_i 4:8:k�; 1? 0_ 10.0°la 3_7_'�. -°,0 ' 4y.:o: m,. Total Split (°!o) 10.8% 40,0% 40.0%J13.3% 42.5" 13,w r7 34.2°'4 34 2%L 12.5°l0 33.3% 0.0% ' Yellow Time (s) 3.2 4.3+ 4.3 3.2 4.3 32 - 9 29AII ? 2 3 9 Lead,`l_ag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lao Lead Lead L N@T rfi ylz � ZMKKTF ;. '' es 1Yes Fees _ _,.�. ` s _ es� _ Yes" e �3.0 . _ Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 � 3.0y 3.10 3.0 30 3.0 3 C _ 3.0 _ T'-Norse C- x Nane Nflrie' Nonc None None +l�yappll� Time (9) 7.0 7.0 7_.0 7.0 7 0 7.0 111II// .23 6 Pedestrian Calls r#"h•) 10 1'3 10 10 1 C 10 {,._.. Ac't.1 f C ers;(:s) :. :0 44.E +#4 1�1.8 47 0 1, .-0 ' 37,E - ,37. L 1;�; 8 - Actuaiee giC Rali© 0_ 08 0.37 '0.37 0 10 0.39 0.10 0.31 0.31 0.09 030 v�r cat�o ` :1 00 . 0.69 0.16 . 077. 111, 1.08 0.76 L} +0 A ?4 _ 1.��k�,3�'a_ II Deiay 1120 34.6 5 5 59.0 90.1 122.9 42.8 23 :; w, .4 96.8 Baseiine 5yncnro 6 Reoort TAM Transportation Consultants Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025 No Project PM Peak 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 911512006 Approach Delay 44.4 85.7 55.4 911 Cycle Length: 120 7 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 41-EBT and 8:WBT, Start of Green, Master Intersection Type: Actuatad-Co6rdinwed Intersection Signal Delay- 68.7 Intersection LOS: E I e[-kL M,�t�it T], aMt4i'`kiant 8w Analysis Period .(mini 15 Splits and Phases 4- Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 39 #7 Baseline Synchrc 6 Report TJK14i Transportation Consultants Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025 No Project PM Peak 6: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave 9/15/2006 Lane Configurations ME tl tT 4� 4 - Lane ffidth (ft) 11 12 12 11 12_ 12 12 12 12 12 12 fit J Stwage Lanes 1 D 1 D D 0 0 0 Leading Detector (ft) 50 J50 50 50 54 so to 50 Z IpFI+I+� �1FSV�++Y_t4:1: Jam. _4. •FL l'v .... .�.Y__',•,47_>7...`4 Turning. Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.99 0.99 Fit Protected 0L}.9T50 00.950 0 983 ayy _ Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.719 f�.909 _ y7 �F-;iitt " on Red Yea Yes Yes Yes fyRigg}ht'pTT,urn _ 1.04 1,00 1.W 1.04 1.000J�}.1.1 OQyy�� 1.00 1.00,.4-� 1AD 1.00 1,00 1,00 IH`eadway�jl..Fyactar Link Gis-tance (ft) 1380 2664 -268B 2656 J Volume (vph) 89 1470 118 65 1Dd6 42 57 53� 56 33 96 60 Peak Hour Factor : • " 0.92 0.92 u.92 0.92 0 42 0.92 0.92 71 0.92 0.92 0.92 092 y i5� _ 20: _ �0.992{* : t fix•., �r _ _ _-�- }? 74 : 7. •rya Lane Group Flow (uptt) 97 17'26 01 -± 71 1 Z25 0 - 0 151 _30W 0 205 0 i'eriii .sF3 - = Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6 I�F•:I"+iW�ta�r5 ': I��F�1.� _ .. hi.1-�' � - .3r�= .•'-NS.LL�Tic�la' Detector Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 20.0 12.+0 2Q.0 2D.0 20.0 20 0-_ 20.0 Total Split (%) 14.2% 64.2'46 f;.0'',`U 10.V"O' 60 $"-'- 0.001d 25.0% 25.0% 0.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0.0% IUiaurnrrt.�lj8j. ,:,L.;1`2 8 ";'7:7' ?`5 67.7 =?:� ,'',-rq.5 1' , 25'it°^:�rs`� Yellow Time (s) 3.2. 4.3 3.2 .3 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 A fftw Time-tsl. ry- �i 1.0 0 ..�v LeadlLag Lead Lead Lao Lag �p Vehicle_ Extension is) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 "M1lone .C=Min -r t+ artiu= 1+Jcr+e�_l=`fJai" Walk time is) 70 7 0 7 0 + 0 7 0 7.0 Flash Doi it Vdalft+(5i."- - _ Peaestrran Calls (#!hr) 10 10 1010 10 10 Act Etfct Green s) _..11, `_ ..81 B 4 . 76.0 Actuated a1C Ratio 0.10 0.68 0.07 0.63 0117 ().17 ufC.:ftB'ic J:BO . 0.:56 Controi Delay 80.8 8.6 71 0 14.7 51.9 48.4 Baseline Synchro 6 Report 7JKM 7ransaortahon Consultants Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2425 No Project PM Peak 6i Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave s��57oos Approach Delay 12.4 17.8 • 51.9 48.4 Cycle Offset. 42 �35%), Control , Skan of Green Intersection Signal Delay: 18.6 Intersection LOS: 8 Analysis Period (min) 15 its and Phases: 6: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave a4 e6 I' 07 1 Z6 a3 Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 8 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025 No Project Mitigated AM Peak 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 9/14t2OO6 � --* ---* (, *- 'I- *\ t /* '* 1 4/ Lane Configurations M +ff r �) +tIIIII ++ r 1) fl� I 4M.11-CE, dft-0-1- -1-1 - L�:� NIM 1� I LAM- j qn�,:f-114VIM �t ; Z&- -0-9 M Om P-� Lane ftdthi (11) 111 12 12 11 12 12 ill 12 10 11 12 12 Storage Lanes 2 1 0 2 1 2 Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 so 50 so 50 50 50 50 50 419 Turning Speed frnph) 15 9 is 9 15 9 15 . w-� MY P-11 71--i Ped Bike Factor 1-00 0.9131 I.DO 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.950 0,950 0.95() 0.950 -9 IX Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0,950 0.95 awl 2 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes .7:. Headway Factor 1.04 I.DO 1.00 11.104 1.00 1 00 1.04 1,00 1.09 1.04 1.00 1.00 03 Link Distance (ft) 700 1260 2688 2656 T T. Volume (vch) 114 588 145 -284 996 137 406 658 208 201 723 126 ARFII.P K-P Peak HOU Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 10-192 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Lane Group Flow (vph) 124 639 15B 309 1232 0' 441 715 226 215 923 Pmtecied Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 15atef-tses 7 4 4 3 5 2 2 1 6 r Ndi'mmurn Split (s) 12.0 30.8 30.8 12.0 27.9 12­6 -5.5 -5 5 12.0 29.1 Total Split 12 C rt -32.0% 32.0% 35,0% 6.0916 19.0% 38.00/a 38.01/c -15.0% 34.0% 0.0% Mdiiii�.r� Geen -(9) .-...B 11Z 7 �' Yellow Tune (s) 3. 2 4.3 4.3 3.2 A. 3 3.2 2.9 3.9 3 2.9 77f ---G D -�-ead - J 4 . . Lead;Lag"' Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag' Lag Lead -Lag Y "Yes LIS Yes yer, Yi6i 9, yo" S . YE�6 'Ye b Verlicle Extension 0 3.0 30 3.0 3.0 3.0 3-0 3.0 3.(. .'Nold -None C-Max".," -N ofi e Nine.. None None Noiaj+ __;am Walk Time fs) TO 7 . 0 7.01 70 7.0 7.0 Pedestrian Calls 10 1 C. 1 Q 9'E-ffql Gir' in (�)'. 2-B;'6-1 ­U'98 1 111 1. '31-4. 16-0 33 - .. .. .- --ge . Actuated g,C Ratio 1108 ..­ . .. 0.29 0.29 - 0.11 I- 0.32 0.15 G 34 G. 34 0.10 0.29 vic F�atic­�"­ 0,49 DA4- :0.26 - 0.84 .. 0.77. -.0-89 Q;80 .35 Contro: Delay 42.2 27.9 8.7 5T8 26.5 64.0 30.0 4.9 504 450 Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025 No Project Mitigated AM Peak 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 911412oe6 1--1. --t' f- 4-- 4\ 31,,- 1,0- 1.01 Approach rielay 25.5 32.E 36.7 45,6 a � . Cycle Length.- 100 Onset; 0 (0%), Referenced to phasa 4:1 9T and &VAT. Start of Green, Master Intersection Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Intersection Signal oeiay: 35.9 Intersection LOS: Q Analysis Period (min) 15y Solit on Blvd & Peach Avenue Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKM Transpor,ation Consul;ants page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Project Mitigated PM Peak 4: Kings_Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 91140006 Lane Configurations Lane Width (ft) 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 � 12 10 11 12 12 2 Stamp Lanes 2 1 2 0 2 1 2 0 Leadin Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 - WP_ff' - - � _x'_ -i : -��c.�ti _ . ..:`i`�- _ F . t: .w3 T _ �, mm., f` r Tuming Speed �rnph;+ 15 9 15 9 15 9 15� 9 „�.'l:�.r'-S•'=i.L a+��4•s1.Y�-1-'l+eQ'{w�'; �_��'_"..n�'".r_�_5i rcl r-��i.�'LLB.v:..u��"r?u.s:��'.�f,��-5.��.�'"{:,-isf^t'UY IIJ Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 i .00 i 1.v0 0.99 1 00. 1.00 .00 Flt Protected 0.950 0.91,RM5�0y'_r1y 0.950 il.95u F+ltt Permitted 0m9�50 0,950 0.950 0.950 �+ y] Righl Tura on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.09 1.04 1.00 1.00 Link Distannce (ft) 64.0 1260 26BB 2�6�r6,�u,,_ Volume (vph) 224 1178 93 228 1056 312 316 759 388 200 793 239 10.92T 1 �0.92 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 6.92 0.92 0.92 C.92 Lane Group =low (vph) 243 1280 101 248 1487 0 343 225 422 217 1122 0 ._ - :Pprrii 1-1 F3i*1.1 -. Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 „rot 5 2 1 8 Detector Phases 7 4 4 3 5 2 2~ �" .6 40 _8 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 30.8 30.8 12.0 27,9 12.0 35.5 35.5 12.0 29.1 - i�',k�+f3`2 32: ' 130 'i]=0 -'aa.o - ; 7 4 if;12 4`= - -` a:C _ Total 5pllt (°) 12.f3% 33.5°Ia�3.3'.0 2.7% Z4.9% 0 OV6 14.7% M._1 'h�'13..ari.���F 39 8% 39.8% 12.6% 37 7u.¢ 0.0 fa _ ._... Yellow Time (s) 3.2 4.3 4.3 3.2 4.3 3.2 3.9 3.9 32 3.9 A�'eii1''aets. _ .. LeadlLag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag_ Lag Lag Lead Lead _ Lf~�{J d Y1 kfT111rE $ Yes l e5 DES ` E'S: Yes r ?�('es .''f �fi _ _ c5 of as .. Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 30 3.0 3.0 3 0 3.0 Dec AM ' " "� ` None.C=M M-C-Max None-C-Ma" - gone None None `None Nang :' n Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash l (�t k+alfc i e ; - 18: 5" -1 Sr .t 5 23, 6 .23.6- , r .. `' •.+--- Pedesir,,an Calls r# 17rj 10 10 _ 10 10 - 10 ActJ^ fdgreW(aj B__,Q 2 fv_2 9.17. 29,E - 10.0 .ao -3"a 8. Actuaiea g,C {patio 0,08 0.30 030 0.09 0.31 0.11 0.36 G.: 6 0013 0.33 vii, -Rd I iq 0.d.8 0 &6 0"14 n6 0:99 `0_66 _ Comm, Delay 745 384 6.2 620 46.8 904 28.9 13,8 63.2 508 Baseline Syn:.hro 6 Report TJKM Transpartation Consultants; Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Project Mitigated PM Peak 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 9/14/2006 Total Delay 74.5 38A 6.2 62.0 46.8 90.4 28,9 13.8 63.2 50.8 Approach Delay 41.8 49.0 38.2 52,8 r Cvcle Lenmth: 95 Offset: 0 (OW, Referenced to phase 4.ESTand 8;W8T. Start of Green, Master Intersection Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Intersection Signal Delay: 45.2 Intersection LOS: 0 Inters Analysis Period (rein) 15 Splits and Phases: 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue a1 4-- ad 07 Baseline Syncnro 6 Reoorl TJKM Transporatior, Consultants Page 2 APPENDIx G - LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS: CUN ULATIVE YEAR 2025 PLUS PROJECT Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Project AM Peak 1: Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue 9/1412006 Lana Width (ft) 11 12 12 11 12 12 112 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 Lea'ing Detac Or 50 uju su 50 so 50 so so 50 _ wzm- -7-2-77 5, W-I 17; -Z Turning Speed (mpri) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 �^-I�TW Pad Bike Factor 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 FTr F.T . Pit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 S256111115151 - - SUW r 1117-3m:7.1 -752 T M7 3 2T. 90-77 N1.1 T T !FFT.-TF .__VZM7V7 .__MZM77 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Headway Factor 1 . 04 1.00 '1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0-0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 --12 T...-K ) � IT, :.' Link Distance (ft) 21348 746 2672 2672 Volume (vph% 48 694 143 127 1166 152 83 166 55 116 268 60 # - -- 77 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 092 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 FT2,71 .9 Z - , 6 A-" Lane Group FIcw (vph) 52 915 0 138 1426 Rfol;..P I ---l- 0 90 180 60 126 356 0 .-Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 -Le 5 2 1 6 6a 7 oetel-.Zof Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 1 6 7 Minimum Split (5) 12.0 23 3 12 � 27.7 12.0 22.6 22.6 12.0 27.0 I:VlB -37:C. 0- :1 L;,n --ilq 0 12AO'7.�Iff Total Split (9A) 13.33 % 4 1. 1 `i-- 3.031 ',5.6"o 43 34iV 0. 0 13. 26.9% 26,9% 30,0% 0-0°-m4i Yallaw Time (S) 12 43 3.2 4.3 3.2 3 v 3.6 21, 2 3.6 Leadll-aq Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag ' -S Y85 "ye s Y'a y1as yes VeNda &'tersion,,s:-- 3.0 3.0 30 30 30 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 F 6' None:C-Mii ­ "None C-Max:- None Nor'ie,.* :,.No.- None N6ji4--:.' Walk Time (.S,� 7.0 7.-0 70 7.0 70 v. Ped&wran Calls (Whr) 10 10 10 10 10 Af EN � -a-rQS --t" -7-6 14,2, 4.")7 -fl.5 2D-2 Ar,ivaied o/C Ratio 0.0 13 1 0 5 .42 0 U - C.I. 6 0.16 013 0,22 VIC 7 013 ­483 0-61) 0,32 0:20 -0 0'-45 Co nirol Delay 45.3 23.0 62.7 27.8 551 7 3 44 46.1 238 Base{ine Synchro 6 Report TJKM Trarsroriation Consultants Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Project AM Peak 1: Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue 911412006 Total Delay 45.3 23.4 62.7 27.8 55.1 37.3 9.4 46.1 22.8 Approach belay 24.2 30.9 37.1 33.3 Offset: 47 (47%), Referenced to phase 4-EST and BMST, Start of Greer, Control Type. Actuatad-Coordinatad Analysis Period (min) 15 Blvd & Willow Avenue Baseline Synchm 5 Repor' TJK,M T ansportation Consultants Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Project AM Peak 2: Kings Canyon Blvd & Transit Access 1012012006 Lane Confiilurati-ons Lane Width (ft) 12 12 11 12 12 12 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 11.' pp _ Leading Detector (It) 50 50 50 50 50 Turning Speed (Mob) 9 9 9 9 EM _ Pad Bike Factor 1.00 0,98 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 + .� MEMO i!' Fit Permitter 0.950 0,950 Flight Turn on Fled Yes Yes �* ~ J1.0O Headway Fadix 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 Link Distance (fk) 746 .�'10._ 638 147 ' r��iHne . Volume {Vpo) 791 7 25 1394 6 26 MG-:l�i• • r T••- ' Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vpn) 65G B 27 1515 7 28 _ Turn Type Prat Perm Permitted Phases J Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ,.'��,`{ J„2 aI( ":iE 'MEE� - +t- xlil-j41YJ�.V tJt a..- -Y YY{iy.LtM` . . . _ Total Split (s) 42.7 0.0 17..0 59.7 •MJaY. 30.3 30.3 .. y -. 30.3 rwfi�:�� ,^,o-, Maximurn Green is) 37.4n� .�3��a•:��� 12.8 544 26.1 2F 1 .�67r'i�s,"-~ --- �-- -- - - _. 25.4 _ L All -Red Time �s) 10 1.0 1_. C 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lead -Lag oplim'12:0 'des Yes :C. " '3:0 .3.0 -.3_0- 3.0 Recall Mode C-h,1ax None C-Max Norge None Ped I/UaTime:`s :7:0 :7:0 - R•;4 - Flash Dont VValk (s) 9.3 15.4 Pe�esfri�nr�lls�#7hr). ..�� - - - - .----- • . : ;��� u� `� Act Effct Green ;1) 52.1 - 6.3 58.7 23.3 23.3 Actuafad.glGfiatio :'fj 6 0 2 v1c Ratio 0~43 0 33 G.o6 O.G3 O.i2 Baseline Syncnro 6 Report TJKrvl T anscofiation Consultants Gage 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Project AM Peak 2: Kings Canyon Blvd & Transit Access 10120/2006 --I- --v f- r— 4\ t* Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.4 LOS B D B C S Approach LOS B B B IN Area Type. Other Actuated Cycle Length: 90 ,; g 'S !NLT C: { .. F�- is i'�t61r. 4tau�ti i t�esn: , r, Natural Cycle: 65 Maximum v!c Ratio: 0.66 �tT'_... it dersection Capacit}r Utilization 51.4'do ICU Level of Saroce A Splits and Phases: 2 Kings Canyon Blvd &. Transit Access a4 08 $aseline Sync'nro 6 Depart TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Project AM Peak 3: Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive 911412006 Lane Configurations '� �►+� Lane Width (ft) 11 1? 11 112 12 12 _12 Leading Detector (ft) 50 SO 50 50 u'0 50 - Turning Speed (rrmph) 1,5-: 99 9 15 9 ry Ped Bike Factor 1.00 1.00R 1.00 1.00 0.98 �0.950 Flt Protected 0,950 0,950 _ _ Flt Permitted 0.950 0.954 0.950 _ Right Sum on Red Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.04 1.D0 1.04 �1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Link Distance (ft) 638 131a4 640 Mimi L Volume (vph' 201 616 38 1285 1a5 185 154 Peak Hour Factor 0,92 0.92 0,92 U2 0,92 0.92 0.92 Lane Group Flow (vph) 218 670 41 7554 0 179 167 _ ;Prat~""_` .� Protected Phases 7 4 3 $ $ Detector Phases 7 4 3 a $ E A11irirQerrrt kn;l ;s] 4.D 4 Minimum Sp it (s) 12.0 22.9 12.0 22.9 27.0 27.0 Total Split '17.81.0 56.7% 13 3% 52.2% 0.0°,'oY 30.0% 30.D% t►il ici teen Is j 7 t_.8 . 'j Yellow Time (s) 3.2 4.3 3.2 4 3 3.2 3.2 AI1,fte€i'i� . 1;0 1 1 D .. 1.0 :0 1,0 _r_-q+- f-s-_ LeadiLag Lag -13: Lag Lead Lead Le tIM'Ize? Ye5 Y.6e . Y.es Ya.s Vehicle Extension {s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ,. Jo "a G=il ast '14�n C �16.�;� ~ : i41a •° . �, :. ,�-, � -: . xf: VValk Time (s} 7.0 7.0 70 7.0 1 OL+P+4l t�]Il . ... .. ._._ .7 !. - -. __ _ ..__ -+�_'- - �IJ' _ - YTi .. ; Y Pedestrian Calls (#I`hri t0 10 10 `10 ns x ree ' :. - 7.2-C�' 7.; _ 63 = _ . 2350 Z3'P _ Ar,luated g:C Raab 0.13 0.58 u.Q8 048 0.26 0.26 vil. F666 o:96 -0,U 0-30 _ a,sa 0..40. "� `o.a2 Coniroi Delay 92.8 11.5 43.5 34.9 31.0 64 Queua.f3r31aY:'; ; A.0 :0 0: ' 0,0 : '0'0 - d.0 .0.0- .... Total Delay 92.6 11 5 43.5 ?4.9 31.0 6.4 Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKM Transporation Consultants Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Project AM Peak 3: Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive 9114t2006 --*. f-- 4-, 1* Approach Delay 31.4 35.1 19.1 Cycle Length: 90 1%), Referenced to phase 4:E-B r and &WBT, Start of Grew Control Intersection Signa Analysis Period (n,u)) 1 Splits and Phases' 3 Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive (; ®3 oe e7 Baseline Synchro 6 Report TjKtv1 Transportation Consultants Page 6 Lanes.. Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Project AM Peak 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 9114/2006 Lane Conrigurations +T* tT+ '_15Cti.0 .._ 1:3D" Lane Width (ft) 11 12 # 7 11 1' 1 11 12 10 11 12 12 + Storage Lan as 2 1 0 2 1 0 Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50-= 50 50 50 50 50 _ Turning Speer! jrnp�j 15 9 15 9 15 a 15 9 Ped'6ike Fa ;tor 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 _ }0.950 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 E. u Fit Peannittea 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Righ,' Turn pn Red Yes yes Y#s Yes _ Headway Factor 1 C4 03 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.69 1.04 1.00 1.0 , Lin'K Distance (R) 1304 2840 2,y656 I*'{ 15 "�. 5Li7�4`-+ w� :_, +a�[rY 1r•i- _2688 � y F-- v`'. pry.', I yy w. -• -0C ry� �~ V01urne (wph) 109 138 2®4 990 137 400 65a 208 201 723 9 8 �mzmffw�5�61 f �0.92 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92T�0.92 0.92 0.92 C 9�' 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Lane Group Flow (vph) 118 610 150 309 1225 0 4-v5 ,.5 226 218 893 8 ' --P'errri. � ,..-�_ :- -P kP, Protected Phases 7 4 3 9 .R�ok 5 2 1 6 ilCf+ vSlir�"i-�tsti -`' Detector Phases 7 4 4 3 8 5 2 2 1 6 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 30.8 30 8 12.0 27.9 12.0 35.5 35.5 12.0 29.1 :33 5 19:0 ,:40°5 -:0:0 '17--0 Total Split 12.0% 33.55'% 33.5'�- 19 0% 40 5% 0.0% 17.0' 3 35.5°ro 35 5`"7 12 0% 30.S% 0 ON l t i tCreart s) 7y 28-2 28:2-­-"14-,18 35.2 12_�S 30;6 :30J6 . ` 'IL8 Y el l aw Time (s) 4.34.3 32� 4.3 3.2 , 3.9 3 2 3. J _ S1��Atl3F�2J, � 7.i0 %rlPt'il-�:_- �;� r9� 1Xp Lead11_ag Lead Lag Lag .�.SJ Lead Lag Lead Lai L.ear.1 Lag yes. 'r'es 1`Rs . Yes . des' y es ''a�, " __ Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3 0� 3.0 3.0 3.0 30 3 0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3 ii ',None No None C,-Max N-one None ,None 'None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7 0 70 7 n 7.0 7 CIlaii-4 2W:6 23,E _ 17_2 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 1G !..7-:' 30A 30-8 '1 .7 36.8 "13.b 31w5 31.5 R.0 20.5 _ Actuated gIC Ratio U 0.31 0 31 0.14 0.37 0.13 0 32 ir..;2 D,08 = ti5 vlo i t��' `,:_: _�:-�� .� q:d6 ; ,d 9 . '0 8'.'_ ,D=69 0.96 1:02 M5 0.37 Control Delay 49.8 28.5 5.7 42.4 42.1 92.5 32.8 54 ,'1 4 59.8 Baseline Synohro 6 Report TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumuiative Year 2025+Project AM Peak 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 911412006 Total M Aoor 5.7 42.4 411 5.4 71.4 59.8 62.1 Offset: G (1w%), Re%renced to phase CEBT and 8:MT, Start of Green, Master Intersection inated Intersection Signal Qela A 4 Intersection LCMAM Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peaeh Avenue 05 r� Baseline Synchrc 6 Report TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 8 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Project AM Peak 5: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave 911412006 Lane Configurations I TI +T 4. .' - � -11C 11 D ;1"5ac,' " _�1 lCfQ' ttb :�9o:Q, 1: 6o' u �Gt -"12 _Tg �I�" C10 Lane Width (ft) 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 IIETZ _ Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 s0 50 s0 50 Turning Speed Impn) 15 91 15- 9 15 9 15 9 Ped Bike Faclor --1.00 1.0{3 0.99 _ 1.00 0.99 0.99 -0.950 Fit Protected 0.950 0.992 0,996 Fkcit Permitted 0.950 0.947 0,974 y_0y.95_0.'�1� o U Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 l.Ofl 1.p0 1.00 11.04 1.001.0 1"00 1.00 Link Distance (ft) 2640 2664 2688 2656 �54 Volume ('dph) 42 735 50 70 1364i 23 19 60 12 65 73 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 C.92 0.92 -0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 iq j�'F am+r'(tipf�}:.,, ' ! . '}: 6, -_, � g . 5d . -1'4.8.1 25 Lane Group Fiow i.vph) 46 853 0 76 ; S08 0 0 134 0 0 160 0 Perm ,ae : _ Protected Phases 7 4 8 2 fi i L �6 Detector Phases. 7 4 3 B 2 2 6 120.0 Minimum' split (s) 12.0 2a.0 12.0 20.0 20.0 200 20.0 irlit_+f?ir5"'~'' 'c$5:i. 71/3.��y4 CcF:8:i6.. (3fD Total Spilt 5.�4? 1fi.0°o J$. ��4 J.Opi, 7�11;:fl.1(�};D !n=5':0_ 1Ll.O9J OO.O�O V.'�p �:D 24.0"I� 24'i fn5 U.0 fU f-2-_:0. Lti.la"2.Q�/0 L.V4a v � 13.8 .54•;; . ;. Yellow Time (s) 12 4.3 3.2 4.3 IS 3.9 3.9 3.9 w Lead)Lag !-=ad Lag Lead Lag Lea+ ag+Dptitnii�`r.. ffes. ;".,fl!0• �-''YR , Vehicle Extension lsl 30 3.0 3.0 3.0 3 0 3.0 3.0 30 Recall !lliade _.ihlarae' C�A m ;." `None:.>C=t it , . None : j1+Ean ..None Non ' '^' Walk Time ( s; 7.0 7 .JO 1.0 7.0 _ F.las�'-�slk _7.0 Pedesinan Calls (4 hr) 10 10 10 10 ;G 10 _ _ _ At t.�tfcE G teen .(s :: �_ 65:7. - 9.9 0 3 13..E t14 : 7. Actua±e'd ;',v Fzatio 0.08 0.67 0 t0 0.?0 0 13 0.+3 vlc RBtib" : " 0 ti2', _037 0 45 0.t31 _- ; '0:54 0:n3 :.. Control Delay 58.0 30 4E 3 11.3 33.3 33.1 Baseiire Synchro 6 Report TJKt41 7ransportation Consultants Page 9 Lanes, Voiumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Protect AM Peak 5: Kings Carryon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave * 9/ 1412GG5 Total Delc Approach Ada Offset- 36 (36%), Referenced to pho Contro{ Type: Actuated -Coordinated Intersection Signal Delay,`, I Analysis Period (m;n) 15 Splits and Phases: 5: K Start of Green Canyon Bivd & Minnewawa Ave --*" e4 Baseline Synchro o Report TJV.1 Transportation Consultants Page 10 Lanes, Volumes. Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Project PM Peak 1: Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue 911412006 -,* --► -"' 'r 4\ t /,0. `- 1 _ 4 .1Y ..._ .. Lane Configurations fT+ + + lid ANW;:. Y Lane ffidth (ft) 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 27.0 J. 1 .�; k�f0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 Leading Datector (ft.) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 LTf�:t r 1.1.Dw',,a..1;5 l'_.`�15:'1.O;T _ _'1_R .'0_t,_ 5;5 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 1.90 1.00 1.00 0.98_ 1,00 1,00 MT �711 MT Flt Protected 0._95_0 0.950 0.950 0.950 _ s _ Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0,950 _ .rr" 1��'1 ' ;4 , 77 _ wf. Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes op - Headway Factor 1.04 00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.0c) -- 1.00 1.00 1�17,(46 Link Disran_ce (yft) 2648 2r6i 2 2672 Txtirrrte 1 r�icw Valurne (vph) 191 t2S5 64 291 976 120 42 121 104 120 175 65 ,0.92 Peak Hour Factor �l,9252 0.9'2 C�.42 0.92 l 92 D.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1qc9. ' . 70 516 -." M' 113'I ::4'6- .132 .1 13-. AaO 1 )a 71 Lane Group Ploy (voh) 2' 1 14�- 9 315 1191. 0 46 132 1 i 3 13C 261 0 %u' .: '.. Prot r; Prot Pror, -Perm :Prot Protected Phases 7 4 v $ 5 2 1 Perrr�tt t~P.liaSes ~B Detector Phases 7 4 3 5 2 2 1 6 MirV-f:RU s inifia ' A.-O :. _ .. :'�� � 4. 0. .. 4..0 -40 '4-D Minimum Split (s) 12.0 23.3 12.0 277 12.0 22.6 226 12.0 27.0 Tv�l - -M1 ,23`0 "5510 "'O`D ._�zs t5;8.0 .0.0 '�-1'2_0 23.0: _2.3,D 1�.:D.... . ^0.9 Total Split { �) 19 2° 0 45.8% 21 7% 48.3% 0 i 0.r ;•1 19.2° � 9 2fi � 13. 3% 22.5¢,Q :.0" Ma arnum Green (s) 18:8 49:7, 21 8 .21':. .8 . 1'8:4 18.E '--:11.:8 "'? A; _.'. Yellow Time (s) 3.2 4.3 3.2 4.3 32 3.6 3.6 3,2 3.6 Ai',�Rdd-U.ne,(s) 1.0 3.?0=, 4.0 ?.0 _{r. .1-0 �.6• Leadl'Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag..- Lag Lead=Lag _Otirrlixe7 ' _'Yes tiS es ' _Lead Yes' 'Y:eb Vehicle E;:iension ts) 3.0 30 3.0 3.6 3 0 30 3.0 3.0 3.0 ReGa1(: `otle_Y : None:C=A+1aX 'None C-Max None. `None `,Non4''.None _ Norte Walk Time (s) 70 70 7 0 7 0 7.0 F1ash;:poritltlalk(s!, " ,_ 11i0 .15A 11.0 11.0 Pedestr.an Calls (9r11r.i 10 11C 10 10 10 Act E:fet Green (s. . _Z 19.0, 55:0 22.0 58.0 7A 14.2 14.2 " 12.8 21, 6 Actuated g1C Ratio 0.16 C 46 C 18 0 48 0.136 0.12 012 Oil 0 1.8 0:79 0:92 1:02 0.71 0.43 0.61 0:4.0 Ma :0.41 ' Control Delay 698 41 7 104 C 28.0 64 1 54.5 '1 1 687 38.5 Baset,ne Synchro 6 Raport TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 1 Lanes, Volumes. Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Project PM Peak 1: Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue 9114R006 Total Delay 69.8 41.7 104.0 28.0 64.1 54.5 111 68.7 3a.5 k -' icy :s: �'1 `. - Appmaach Del a� 45.2 43.9 39.2 48.5 Offset. 50 (42%)• Referenced to phase 4:EBT and BVJBT, Start of Green MEW-Y% -a Control Type: A.ctuated-Coordinated lid&}4�r1�1j�J#�irl�i3.�i�C1:,1,T:, r. •. _ .., . ,-:�a--•n;,,.� Interseciion Signal Delay-. 44_6 Intersection t_OS D Inters r r�:Capa sGy #fli a l r� 80r9°� IC.JQ Le Lei ^:`S8rvfce"l3 Analysis Pericd (min) 15 Splits and Phases- 1: Kings Canycn Blvd & Willow Avenue L I"f:: v�.L _ if I�•V'�'Y�_ I� l�I��c'l� � � �•a� �� FS` • Baseline Syncnro 6 Repor: TJKM Transportation 0v-s-.;'tants Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Project PM Peak 2; Kings Canyon Blvd & Transit Access 10/2012006 ___* "�t j `- "*\ /r Lafte Width (ft) 12 12 11 12 12 12 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 1 '��a' ,aTL� stTii�ae:is.'t ._._ 4. 4, v -50 �" , � ;� •t��- - '' Detectorl-1,{7}f��� 50 5La 50 50 'µL�eG�d�+1IF�{iiniig� Turning Speed (,mph) 9 9 9 9 . P_ d Bike Factor 1.00 0.97W� V Fit Protected 0.950 095D Fit Permittedry 0.9_50 ��'�0.9y50 ROM Turn on Red rYes ���•.t4 -_ _P F. Yes .. 1.7vf, r� N W"K Headway Facto�[rl� 11.01) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 �+y1.04 L��E_tIMa =�- er2ti�,`�_7-' N �,,.•rr-' . ,F -.L'.-M� _fir' ':.Ire "+�-t. :7%�:..14.:i.:i _ Unk Distance ittj .,'�[.�_. i S�'�'�.:1,....-��y 748 638 �:wL'J_i_� 147 ��'i� ` _ 1lolume fvph) 1538 25 1474 6 26 �s7c _ 7SSyl i+'y�l}Ly '�ir'i=KJI.t,i y:' kl•�.,`S�i571.�4'1.[til.?_ +�fbf. 363Y �Y'G:..rrl Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 092 0.92 0.92_ M2 �78a1L`ds:{o�.^; Adj. Flaw �vph) 1672 8 27 ' 602 7 28 Lu _;. . Turn Type Prot Perm '2: Perm�lted Phases �2 DW ot,Ph25e7s - - _ Minimum Initla{ fs) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 kll im_ pllti j .:7 _ x 20.O .275. ., . .. �'^ _ Total Split (s) ; i .7 0.0 i 5.0 92.7 27.3 27.3 27.3 Tot4;5pllt (6/0) :B4 $% D�C'to 12 °l ,77 3°/a"22'.8%.22 8%" - 3°% Nlaxwr,um Green isa 72.4 10.8 B7.4 2-3.1 23.1 22.4 _ s� All -Red Time cs'� 1.0 1 0 1 Q 1.0 1 0 r� 1 0 Le'Cag' L'ag ..:...Lead Lead -Lag Optimize'? Yes Yes Vi3tlie,�i'terisiail:(s) . - ' •..... h RecO Mode C-Max None C-Max .. None None Pad Walk 7srne (si T. G.. - :0 Flas'n Pont Walk s; y.3 154 Pedestrian Gailsv(#1hr) _ _�,O , :_. r . [ _ 10 , + ;r -- n'- Act Effct Green i,$) 80.0 8.9 88.7 23.3 23.3 Acfuaied IGRatio - :0 87 „' _ Vic Ratio 0.72 0.42 0 62 0.04 0 16 Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKfh Transnor tabor Corsultants Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Project PM Peak 2: Kings Canyon Blvd & Transit Access 1012012006 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 4.4 0.0 0,0 i LOS A E A D B 7777 Approach LOS y A A C us � Area Type: Other Ej Actuated Cycle Length: 120 _ 9-k-9-LT—Mon Natural Cycle: 90 Maximum vIC Ratio: 0.72 1c-- intersection Capacity Utilization 55.6% � _ ICU Level of S_er0ce 6 Baseloe Syncnro 6 Repert TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Project PM Peak 3: Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive 9/1412OC6 -.,# -0. 4--- *-, v. -*/ Lane Configurations Lane Width (ft) 11 12 11 12 12 Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 IN I �'; _-_.._. x�..- 39 Turning Spead i.mphj 15 9 15 9 _ Pei HikeF Or 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 _ FIt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 } Flt Permitted 0,950 0.950 0.950 _ _ Right Torn cnyRed Yes Yes _ i Headway ractor 1.04 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Link Distance (ft) 638 1304 $4p 511,11 IN Volume (vph) 347 1217 48 1206 186 247 294 GMNIP �a Peak Flour Factor 092 0.92 0.92 0.92 OM 0.92 0.92 Lane Group ;:iow (vph) 377 1323 52 1512 0 26B 320 TvrrA'w AMI.�'ra 1.4, 'Perin Protected Pluses 7 ��a 4 3 8 i3 ' Detector Phases y 4 3 8 6 6 Minimum Split {sj 12.0 22.9 12.0 22.9 27.0 27.0 Total Split .11;1) 24 4% 56.7% 13.3% 45.6°l,j 0.0% 30.00,� 30..0% M ki�irFmu men 4's) 1 �- Yellow T-irne (s! 3.2 4.3 3.2 4 3 3.2 3.2 AID Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead ARM _ Vehicre Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 ta174o'de tJone'C=IUIax...None.C=Meic N]ex..::=°lVai: T. R ..* W a I k Time is j 70 7.0 7 0 7 0 lali;dal (.sj 97 97. 15:8 15.8 ' 'k ... Pedeslnan Calls r#..'hrj ... 10 10 10 1 D 51_d3 . ..37,:. _ 23;.0 Actuated a/C Ratio C'.20 0,56 0.08 041 0.26 0.26 vi#2iia: ;�;11 0_£6' ' 0:38 i:{i6 01) 051 ,-: Control De,av 1184 16.1 45.5 70.2 35.9 64 Que ie [�.elay 0.0 0; 0. 0.0 1.2 `0-0 0.0 Total Deiay 118.4 161 45.5 71.4 35 9 64 3aseline Synchro 6 Roport TJKff Transpor,ation Consultants Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Project PM Peak 3: Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive 91142006 _'# —0. 1;; *--- 4-, 1* w.'-a10."'`';A.-yy Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 44 (49%), Referenced to phase 4: EBT and MST. Start of Green ..mot Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated liiimr'c�araY Intersection Signal belay: 48',8 Intersection LOS: Q Analysis Period (min) 15 Solits and Phases n Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive Baseline Synchro 6 Report T,10,1 T.-ar_.sporaticn Consul ants Rzgp 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Project PM Peak 4: Kings Canyon Blvd &I Peach Avenue 9114/2006 Lane Gonftgurations jJle3' +6�,-r'0�lT � � Lane Width (ft) 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 10 11 12 12 _11 L�Yr� }� jar"- - -.. +`�.i"!:.'7- ,:I�J,+.',0yi'j;i]iG1ti! 'xac'�..� Storage Lanes 2 1 t 0 2 � 0 _ _ _ _ _ !1- '41kii-T'�t�l/`r.4''�i2,'�j-p{yr-/--y'S T7�_1 _ i��r'#":'FrLl Leading Detector (tt) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 �50 50 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 _ Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,98 1 00 1.00 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0,950 Fit Permitted '0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 ;5at"�1_`--" ,- � r+c���_3]3 ''�"'��7:3�,_ it �k�3 ._• Right Turn en Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Sat -k _--'1,01 >r '' Headway Facto 1.04 1.00 1.00 ", .04 1,00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.09 1 XA 1.00 1.00 ----= � Link Distance (T) 1304 264D 26088 2656 _ Volume (vph) 224 1178 93 228� 1056 312 3160 759 368 200 793 239 P&zi'. Hour Factor 0,92 D.92f 0.92 0.92 0.392 0.92 0_ .92 0.92 0.92 6.92 Adj _ ,�0..92 _ , �0.992 Lane G; _:t:u Fl::,,N 243 1280 101 248 1437 0 343 1 "5 422 217 1122 0 ;Parm :P�rdt d Perm... r s+ Pprotected Ph2ses - ...-.. 7 4 3 .8 5 1 fi f �i�•n�tt��FP�k�"��.,`tiiS4=•Sw.`���4�ti, �'i�� ; L-4 �F �+'r �i�l Cetec',L'j Phases 7 4 4 8y 5, 2 2 1 6 M11�J177E7F1: y,-i� � Minimum+ Split (s) 12.0 30.8 30.8 12..0�y 27..9} 12.0 35.5 35.5 12.0 29.1 91 hT+1Rti.liV.ywV• Total Split (10)w 10.0% 39.2% 30.2% 15.8% 45.fl°r8 0.13% 12.5% 33.310 _ _ �y_- 33.3% 11.7% 32.5% O.Vlq tlhazaiil rra r en (s} : =� + = 714: 4 Yellow Time {s) 3.2 4.3 4 3 TM 3.2 43 3-2 3.' 3.9 3.2 3.9 irt_1t0 LeadlLag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Leaf Lag Lag Lead Lag Li"1-gktsr47za? --Y's''�s1'fes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) , - - 30 3.0' 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 30 3.L, 3.0 3.0 "jo' ;- ` .Nori 7G-Mai=N1axV:-.None C=Va'i� �- - :None 'None None -No Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 PJa_ _C�ntikL6fafk s} _}�" E .18� 15:6 23'5 2.36 1 PPdestnars Calls (#jhr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 Act.I�F .' G, "nY{s.3 ' ' 8'0 ' 44 5' 44.5 13':5 50.0 11"0 36.0 .36.0 10.0 .35.0 Actuated gl- Rat,- 0 I37 0.37 0.37 0 111 0-42 0 09 C 30 0.2-'� G.08 0.29 vic---R o i.11' '' .89 0.13 O.S7 1'.t74. 1.14 D-78 ' d.74 0.79 1;.12 Control Delay 1442 34.4 5.s 52.9 66.9 143 5 44.7 28.6 74.9 104.2 Baseline Synch.o o Repart TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Project PM Peak 4; Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 9/14/2006 Total Delay 144.2 34.4 5.6 52,9 66.9 143.5 44.7 28.6 74,9 104,2 Approach Del$ 49.1 84.9 6119 99.5 Offset: 0 IN), Referenced to phase 4:t=BT and &-WBT, Start of Genera, Master Interaedon �afri"r�� Gi?c1e. Control Type- Actuated -Coordinated Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue y oil I 1' 02 1 'r .0 Y �d Baseline Synzhro 6 Reporl TJKM Transoorlation Consultants Page 8 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Project PM Peak 5: Kings Canyon Blvd & iMinnewawa Ave 9114/2006 s � � i- t � T Caniguratio ns t'1 Tj{► , ► (Lana _ ry� _ /�{y r{' +' iK09- 4�ff - - = I' +? '.f}si 75 y+y_�y�j _ _ {T 1{y�_ y Lane VVidth (ii) V, 1212 1.2 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Storage Lann!e',�s 1 0 0 0 fl 0 J0 Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 y411 fi .' -^m.�� •_ ''r ..- Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 Y- ''�- 4'a-• ,:.., Wit_ s.._r`Li- 15 9 15 9 15 i�. 9 a ':` �- �==- Ped Bike Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 - `4x}'-.7-ELI Ftt Protected 0.950 D. 0.963 0.991 _ _ _ 'T1S!.`'��rJ'• -J,Y 'r �3'3 ` u '- •� iim, .51 kp �...vlz,. ;' Flt permitted 0.950 i2'�'�TS.�.' ...r� 0.950 _'.' 0.716 Y"-_ 0.908 _ _ IiT Right Turn en Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.04 1.00 1.00 1 04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 77-+ +,r r'r,*,- _ Link Distla''7�}'nce (ft) 2640 266'4 2688 2656 '.F''_ {Tj-J-`�*'�f,=:, 'LF 1 �YFT:f..*AS+.�v-PT ,, f' i .I E{.4:__a.. "; +i.*a:':_'-._1 sax...- Volume (vph) 89 1467 118 65 1084 42 58 53 57 33 96 Be Peak Hour Factor 0.52 0.92 0.92 0.92 0._92 0_.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0,92 092 0.92 _ : �.: e I_ 1-1.78.: 0 ' 63 56 �62 , � £ 1.64 -'.55 �''128 . Lane Group Flout {upn) 97 1723 0 r 1 1224 0 0 1E3 0 0 205 0 fol. - � Prat .-.Perm' ,.<„ - _ - P'erm Protected Pnases 7 4 . �- 3 8 2 6 Detewlar Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 v 6 7. Minimum Split (s) 12.0 20.0 12.17 20.'3 20.0 MAD 2M 20.0� TOM Split °o) 14.2% 64.2% 0.0"6 10.894 25.0% 25 0% 0.+J"o 25.0% 25.00,10 C.0% 14ta9rarnun3; r�ert (s? r-7'L_^r _ - 0.6 6 = _ 5: t - 25.1 YrtiTime (s.I 4 3.2 3 eau 3.2 4.3 3.9 39 3.9 2.9 1.0 , "1. 0 .. 1 1-0 LeadlLag Lead �_ead Lag Lag _ • Via._• �itir_��...dtt+. Vahirie Extension fsl 3.0 30 3 0 30 3.0 .:1...r.�-.. 3.0 ,. 3 0 3.0 jj hlone t.-10jr, None `C-Min 'None: None NonR -gone. ;' , Walk. Time :sl 7-0 7.0 i 0 70 ' 01 7.0 4desirian Calls (Mhri iQ 10 10 10 10 10 Act.E ct ree.v ,,$) `.:..-- 1 i.:A , 'BG.�3 9.0 75:'9 20.7 20,7 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.10 0.67 008 0.63 17 fii 17{ OcMili ^"�:6{� 0_ � .6b 6:56' O. t 0 D71 Control Delay 76.8 10.5 678 14.7 521 48.2 Basel}ne Synchrc 6 Report TJKM Transportation Consul ants Page 9 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Project PM Peak 5: Kin2s Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave 911 4r2OO6 --* --* 'r 4 4_ 4\ 41 Total Delay 76.8 10.5 67.8 14.7 52.1 48.2 Approach Delay 14.0 1 7.fj 52.1 462 Intersection Signal Oelaj..t9fq1-` Jntersection-LOS4 I G U1. —PL -9199 =7 Analysis Period (min) 15 tits and Phases: 5: icings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave @2 41� Baseline Sync7ro 6 Re ' porl TJKM Transportation Consultants Page 10 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Project AM Peak Mitigated 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 911412006 Lane Configurations Lane'Width (R) 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 12 10 11 12 12 _ 91o;a-e_��rtdtl�`(U, l A'T_T �r{ 29oT xo.-... � Storage Lanes 2 1 2 . 0 2 __. _.: 1 2 0 _ Leading Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 W50 L'9 Turning Speed ph'y 15 15l 9 15 9 15 {{y{{yryry(rrm_ lVl W•i�Y'� 7 }}�� _/ %9y �l� 1.:aC - - _ _ _ __ �7 �+��.__kw. C Pad Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 1.00 1. CO " 00 o.39 1.60 1.+30 u182 FJt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0,950 �rC.t�.,, •.,��_>a 'iz��6-. "��8�__:d9�� . G� -3�86,,' 35�5� `�_.=���� Flt Permitted Q.950 0.950 0,950 0.950 B31;``350S.. 14 3 : Rignt Turn cn Red Yes '(es Yes Yes $atd_Af=lo'XRTR) _ .,7_-22_ _ Headway Factor 1.04 1 00 1.00 1 04 1. CO 1 00 1 04 1 00 102, 1.04 1.00 1.ElD L.c_rZk . 'se3•h . _ _ .•45 Link distance (`t) 700 1260 2688 2656 Tr'av irsie :ti ). .` . . '. � _ '1 9.:1 --' A _5_. _" :, t T.�- _ 44 5 Volume (v'ph) 109 561 138 284 990 137 400 658 208 201 723 98 Gb'nlpeds',1r'rFr+'L�.'y�J? ;:1 �.4 .3 ' F31_3_' Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 092 0.92 0.92 t:+lpti...._ 1-p "'a0 :809`-.' �k�,7_E .14g, -435. Lane Groua Flow ivp lj 118 61C 150 309 1225 C 435 715 226 218 893 0 Tarr, Ts? . ` ;'Prct Perm Prot Prof `_ . Aerm Prot _ Proiecte'd Proses 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 P6rM, ttted, Phases 33 = Detector Phases 7 4 e, 3 8 S 2 2 1 6 I�Urifrium-Irriaiel..(S} 4-0, _,•4,0. :4_0- : 40 `4:0 4:0 410 -kO 4.0 4-3.` Minimum Split (s) 12.0 30.8 30.8 12.0 27.9 12.0 35.5 35.5 120 291 0 13210 14:0 .34:0 .0.0 1'8.0 37.0 37-0 '12.0 31�0 0:0 Total SR (`%) • a p 12.6% 33.70!0 33.7% 14-7% 35.8% 0.0% 189% 38.9% 38.9% 12 e..'I.• 32,6`:� Ob% Mia iF&.n'.Green (s) _ .8:. ` _28.7. 267' 9.8 28. 13:8 32.1 . 32':1 7.8 2.&', Yellow Time (s 1 32 4.3 4.3 32 43 32 3.9 3.9 3.2 39 A51=Re;iTime (s) - 0 .0 1:-0 1_..0 ;1,.0-: ; �w�J �:�. -'1 D . "1q' Leadi'-aa Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag' 0 pt irxiize„ 1.Yes . _Yes;.: Yes .: Yes: --'Yas, _. Yes -_'{es' YBa: '.Y�s•.- Yes ',��, Vehicle Extension (s� 30 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.0 3.t} 3 0 3.0 3.0 ReCnK-lAode 'None C-Mex C-Max None CGPAax None None' None'_ None %Balk Time (s) 7 0 7.0 7 0 7.0 7 0 70 Hash wont Walk (s) 18.5. 18.5 1.5,6 23.6 23.6 17;2' Pedestrian Calis s9/hr) '.0 10 10 10 10 10 Act Effct,G.reen (.$) _ -7.7. . 28.0 28:0 1D:3 30J& 14.0 32-. 7 -32.7 .. 8;0 26;7 Actuated g1C Ratio 0.08 0 2S 0.29 C 11 0.32 0.15 0.34 0.34 0.06 C.2d vlc.Ratio. ,. 0.44 .. 0.41 t7:27 '0'87 0.76 0.90 0.59 0.35 Oi f 9, 0-1 . • .. Control Delay 46 5 27.9 57 66.7 32.1 63.1 28.0 4.8 636 463 aaseline 5yncnrc, 6 Reoorl I-JKV, Transportation Consultants Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Project AM Peak Mitigated 4: Kings Canon Blvd & Peach Avenue 9/1412006 s � f Total Delay 46.5 27.9 5.7 66.7 32.1 63.1 29.0 4,d 63.6 46.3 Approach Dewy 26.6 _ 39.1 _35.3 4$.7 Cycle Lenatn: 95 Offset: 0 (°S�, Referenced to phase 4;F_BT and 9WEIT, Surf of Green, UlasWrintersect'tcin Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated - tntersec:tian Signal belay 30.2 intersectron LOS- D _ Intel e>rtiah' 2. �cul Lwev rw `' ,S _pae:iy.'Jtafizatiar�,7.7�� D.:_r !'�- ".���'su. �' f�.�x ids. Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue `► of i T- m2 1 I fl3 f—'* 04 1 C- ! ♦ 46 I* 0 �_ o8 Baseline Synchro 6 Report TYM, Transportation Consultants Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Project PM Peak Mitigated 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 9114/2005 Lane �rCy�on_frg_ uyrations1j�i'y�Lyttt r "'i) ttl* y}�ry� '��T� �rS�GI tt F _��j tl* j900 ��_9,L' 0 -Ir9pb {4 Lane Width (R) 11 12 12 11 12 +2 11 12 10 ':1 12 12 Stto(y$r{aggeeLµ�aIar, 1 2 0�^ 11 2 0 {y2 Ilk { •i. SJ V..'.4-:- j2 -�_--�'y '_-`I 6. F'f�J' {.}f•ri'L�VrJ '� � Leading Detector (ft) 50 5D - 517 vO 50 5_0 50_ 50 50 so 77 _ Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 '5 9 15 9 -:0S";7'...:: Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 1.00 1t_ 00 1.0 0,89 1.00 1,00 �L•�5+ Ti.. _. __.._ i4__' _44.i' . FIit Protected �'. s .. 0..9550- .= 0.9a5�0+ 0.950 0.950 1} # rye{_ �PGIi{+yb_ yJL OIJ.' .1 _ y_ _ Fit Permitted 0.950-- 0.950 0.950 0.950� �t m, . -_ _ 1`4383"'4? : rr -.i] ,3 35Ef5 -� , ,�- _. ,.. : ._.- Right Turn on Red YPs Yes Yes Yes k: Headway Factor 1.04 1.00 1.00 1,04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.09 1.44 1.00 1.00 Link Distance fft'I 640 1280 2688 2656 T[av61 YI[Tle";$) �wv . r � . I 45 _ �r� •+ Volume Z24 1178 93 228 :0.^e 312 759 38�8 200 793 239 [jivrcni�yy .� _y3'6 Peak Hoer Factor 0.� Q) 0.32 1).92 0.92 0,92 u 52 J 92 0.92 0.92 0.920.92C.92 Adj4F.liT h �-48 ."120 1+3' 2148 339.7' S*_ ' �L� '' '•}LL+ ' �if.l '[+Gi1 wS�'�CxSS1 Lane Group F1'�5r� t;.ohl 24 123C 10: 248 147 0 343 825 42z 217 1122 lk n ,ype ._ ::._Q70t" . +. ::.Perm. Prot . _+ Frdt Parm hrot ' Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 P&dr E5 emlses. ­7 - ...' Detector Phases 7 4 4 3 8 5 2 2 1 6 r� lq pa (t) 0 p 4.3 .. 'd.,D 4:t7 :0 �:.0 4 0 -4.C. �.0 Minimum Split (s) 120 30.8 ',u 8 12 0 27.9 ,2.0 35.5 35.5 ;?." 29.1 Tiatal'Split (s1 ,12_6. 32:2 .3" 2 .1" j3 ^' 3 ' ' 'O D- .... - -Z _ 3 ' =�".8' �12. i 35� O TaRaI Splil (;a) 12.6% 33.91r'; .33.c"4 13.7a,� 3Y.9 ro C'_0°f, 14 39.8 0 3 +"s"ro 12.6° 3i.7°% 0.0% {UFO txliirr,'Greeri<(s) - 7.,u Y . E:9 Z8_� �.8:8; i 7.9 `':8 , _32:9..,Y3 Yellow Time (s) 32 4.3 43 12 43 3.2 39 3.9 3.2 3.9 AY'R�t:1-Time (s) ':,'; - 0 1:0 1-:0 ;.7.1'.;0 IM 1..0 1;G. 1-0 .iSW0: ,.'. +Lead Le,ad;Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Leah Liao -Lai Cptimize'7.,. ' Yes . Yes Yes. Yes .Yes Yes Yes% Yes' 'Yes' Y€s Vehicle Extension �s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 30 3.{l Reca11 t£+f )d& None C f x C-A71ax -"None C-Max None None ' None done None.: 01alk Time r,1 7.0 7.0 TO 7.0 7.0 7 0 15.6 22-3-6 23,E 17.2 Pedestrian halts (91.hf). 10 10 10 10 10 10 Acf-EffctGreen (s) 8.0 28.2- 282 `9:D '292 1C.0 31b 23.8 -:8.0 3;:8 Ac'cated g;C Ratio 0.08 0.30 0.30 009 0.31 iv ' i 0.36 0.36 0.013 Lj v3 v.'c �atia '0.88 0.86 0.19 0.80 D.96 0.99 0.66 0`62.. = 0,;.13, . 0.97 Control Delay 74.5 3$.4 6.2 62.0 46.8 904 28.9 1 i8' 63.2 50.6 Baseline Syncnro 6 Reocr. TJKMI Transpor:atlon Consui:al,ts Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings Cumulative Year 2025+Project PM Peals Mitigated 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 911412006 -"" --t f- 4-- 1,- `\ t 1,0. 1- S Total Approach Delay 41.8 49.0 38.2 521 Cycle Length: 95 (09A), Referenced to phase 4:EBT and 8-.WBT, Sta- Gf Greer. Master Intersection CoMpol Tyne: Actuated-Caordinated Intersection Signal Delay: 45.2 Intersection LOS: D Analysis Period (min) 15 y Splits and Phases: 4 Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue 01 •2 1 � wa "ROPIr qm�-1121— Baseline Synchro 6 Report TJKi41 Transportation Consultants Page 2 APPENDIX H - COUNCIL OF FRESNO COUNTY GOVERN4fENTS TRAFFIC MODEL RUNS 1 via alll as�ba r+ S I 27992 +: $443 23294 22725 22462 I 22492 1 22993 Klq s LoiS 34.1 fp5p 1051 1D%91 571 4 Yfln Kings Cafi r, —._-- — — _iSlitgs Lenlp�— iSingS�e7B 874 521 {`ad ,On K. - -- -- .i KagLtn 7'13 � m.�c+s -- � ;{ Ingi< Lanpon --- x]s CJTs Cartytxl - - --� -- - 12a0 56 I 555 555 KnM2 2799992 1152 I 11,29 23294 y 221za 22462 22462 22993 b w ul k. o c F i k ` 0 0 I. 61734 � 814 1160� � %2 06 127 210 37B -- L air— -- �— �2766 641 lanY Lane 534 Lane -- -- -- Lane26 -- - 9e6 216 I� 554 555 { her 127p6 GiS 3kLL�p03�1�r�pO 'r,rva' 6u.r.f *ti it [•: il3 1 N ...-.. r - W Law Li = � W 4y i 1.3219 rill 77I +.1 222 -Base Year 2GQ5 — -- ---- am, Pm. end daily hper Software by CrWabs Licensed !o TJKM T ansveriaticn Consuitants y. f■ a tp rq • a n �n O w d �Y aba R aio R im w�;oy I 2934J 1140 #222 on 1Sn ga 4-Z�nyoR �w _ . --------�--- kings Canyal -- I 7�2 1362 292 Q I _ A o r, 1f o °s 0 1 L w G I m n 4 4 a a w--Tip 27244 1057 3fi.99 S 1139 M33 1Sinp Canyon 1346 - - - 4{in4s- - Ka+gs Canyon 674 1291 Gas 272,34 taz� 26395 { -- - - -- - - _ Base Year 2DCFi am, pm. and dimly Vipef Software by Citilabs Licensed to TJKVi Transportation Consultants lue�as 7AIti bfl9� TLLv* Tui�■ 1 ]18 OC, {48E5 I 7 $ I r I 1222 523 TLWA TIr■ 770 97] p 516 Ala in R54 --T"t _—_----__ • iyy ze2 51�, eaa I I 1� r ' �t I I . I SQpyl did li7r TWRc 2 +4 6E0 sons liai1 1E111 r' ]�9ie 1551E 7E257 3N571 �7277 is:7i *04M I. ISs7 T7r I 771e 1756 Ills ^,7�5 �85B 1773 177E 175E t 7'�5! 154h 'fits I 152G %Q%l IVA lee? Gn or. II (;JpnyDn J-- i Kota C—r" — --'-- rl�n [xApn 1`• 'a4 f My li r" IIfA r 7'd' R-9p Can,N K" Ei rw fn�kw6nYp` W'n4a E;k! n KdVi :anym IES1 } t951 1 ' 945 M 947 sf0 1 0 1161 1IOT 105.9 7971E SGili I 1965 ICES 1965 { v 225J 21e9 4-- 221i o .0 a ,3'I$fi1 ]]5fi4 756#5 1026k 365T7+ m r• u �] O i�a21 i 5 a2a a0a6a a � a i •I 1 11 ggf4 ¢ v504 i e w ry 661; 5075 50 a 151 270 943 fine ]E1 -- Lz 366 iG51 —— Lwv -- --__— . -_— LJF. Lh4 ib3 ro42 iEq - - -• u a rt • ' ' .. n n i iF -n- Ilew Rom• T 06 , YE25a.eai5 �'w' 991s, 9e0c' 929x 1W ;�7 449 +21 55• 112 I ira I 524 'Alai&.r1w 1i5 BLOW I+13 6M 275 {2 •2 ' 715 aJb • ssl 553 5E7 LkRw u'd15 12E25 G965 9&M 1 � 1 a ;7 C4jn7l jive Year 2025 NC arD�eif - - am. prn and daily If per Software by Cililabs Livensec to TJK,,li Transoortatior Consultants 62 7 I C 0 10 a 1 T'ulaie Twart TL4LA" 13 Tvlalr Tusue 6 d 0 75 1 1 I ' o I 2�7,��m$ o� L �7 I a r 1132 97 157a 1j5 162) Mil 2MD 2151 1224 77 t I t 7]S 142 I 151 151 11 1 97 Kings Canyan �.lny3n 114 135 1 6] 153 L11 KQ19i anypn — -- .— — - KmyS Kinp Cdnypli— 5(jhjm Canyon 7A 14rgs Cmrfrn Kings Canyon ^.KWW22 Caft" -•- - __-_� IUn9s canyon 92 1�3 143 12B + 14l 151 1.6 I 79 1-01 1698 145 176 175 164 aA 'moo -err■ I 13a9 *.11s 2457 MD -c 1233 " O { '.. I M--a, (R � I -Ir 13 Lana 0 IfI 4 1; - --�------- Line � us 0 13 ti 1ae ZIP �s �r m W - -- — -- Y — -�rdpc5ed Super %W-Mart xpanslan 5alert a M.. p M.. ana dalhy Viper Software ny Gitilabs Licensed to TJK141 Transponatien Consultants 9 - Tu;�ie � 3' jl 5 3S 5224 87 BS Kmp k.A m — 7B 84 D 1233 a I I I s I I /iper Software by Citilaos I N9 , 77 !O53 74 Kays f irWn ' 7 1 Kings Kings Car"— -- -- --- Canyon -- 65 K �iS Gam 7 65 1;AN 73 I iDS7 1 a a ter, r. �lyry a¢ I � 1 I P i'oposed Sum Wa:-Val Expansion SC1eci �Ohe- a m., P m.. aYi(� daily Llcensec to TJKivi Transporiatlon Consultants _ T u" D I lu4err p Twrq ------ TuIMe_ — p 0 � 4 I 0 I 79 3 5 _- — _longs CanYan _ wings arr�m ti ![9 D a Tulare rL a_ SS6 a � 94 77 J 72 64 sa e —'- Canyon 5 H Ca�Y.on 4 a 2 a 2 3 r _ Kind Cdnynn _�4i ---K�4i _ �----�."-- I1i�3 Ca Y4^ Kir-js Canyun 3 C3nyq� 4 I Kin g9 La ngan ---- - Kinpa C anyors } I 51 1 2 7. T6 it9 61 p 'COO 4 Y 4G'I�� a I t U a s 4 4 - -' --, - - Lane --_ Lane D _ �— o 7 D q Cl o C L r 4 � r }} I I I D D I 1-a 13WLef-- --__ Y._-- dutleF �3ulcr u --__-T Bulger ._ � — —'----. 9wDCr - t a a I - I — - — -- '- - ! -Propi:4ardy Selecl Zane " a.m., p.m.. an0 wady Viper Software by Citilabs Licensed to FJK,,r Transportatton Consu{t,ants --�------ Turerc ------ -- -- --�- ---- -- ;Mere '— — -- -�--- 6 p t} � 2 + {It m J� Ri I L i G- a i9 4.4 41 4D rI 3 < 2 I vM'ly4n Klrgs C.In-ym . -- —'-- -� Vor-j5 G_dn"n —' .— Kirmjm �,&Mirw :anyca Kingswary,on KwgsGan,.on Mu, _—. _--- — 2 i Qs ca nxan si 42 �y Mon L I � m F i r y u u R. 4 0-4- q■ a 4 ado ' i aao��aoo mor3 �I� pail+ ' i -- BullerulPJW l -- -- -- I ¢ - Buller duller ..-_ kI' gu06'r 4 I 6 I Project only SeIecl Zane - - -- - a m., p m , af%c gaily Vtper Software by Citiiabs Llcansed to TJKM Transpartalmr) Consultants . , .L0 0 o ,� , , 0 0 2,5 , 0 \ u a r __ � _ aj_ �. \n , _ Jansen� �Jenjern � [_�\.------------- jenLen _ .---"=-�. '■ »gin _ ° » \ ��- 2 2 D © o . ,°�� 3,- , $ \ , .3 0 /�� , 0 ,ram \% � \ . Viper Software h Dmabs « C, e \ c` IV Proj GNS , ;-- ar. r. and daily D:en s c 2 TUKu T eapon±EnConsuRa 5 I ' a � U p $:O ao -4 9 6 0 a' Cl p p a 0 a a _ f I,larr _ Tu ere p Q r o rl:are------- Takl Tulare �u13i9 ruA ° aTUOrr ;SUIC 5rhM4 a p l 6 6 D two a I i p fl a o O b g; p 6,0 p C CI P? a�oolra aa0 � 0 c, c cdnf c," w w ' •-oa � } opr. OOO rn va �o p d I 1e 2 Z i I 1 1 K� 9s Cant 1 II IC�ISIi Can'a+elr _ _� - � -King GdB IYYGI y Krols Cdr1'e4n I i Cdnyor K{ rI s -znyro. �Cnq� C ar knn _ ... _ {(rltigs Gsn n 1 ryon K rrgs G anym I K-ogs Canyon S 4CIng� j ny811 Cm I 3 r �n i�aom w, i . I n 9' S i.746 � r Yi00❑ OrOO� �a'j•41 Cl uj U 1 I 4 u p p i 0 p a p p Bulxr 9UIItlI DLrutI Bow p Uuller I fi p u p Q I 5 I I nin m40f ;YC oo N Y I -- — -- — - Prowl only Select �Gne - - i3 in.- p M.. and daily 'Iper Software by Citilabs Licensed to TJKr,! !.UInsoortatICr Consultants 39a16 1122 M SD3 337#] j54+& 3$S70 1s3a 17.2J 1m 1717 171E -- KinpsC.ny.n 1Sao 1$65 S55tl IM Kmv Cen}ron -- _Kjn51a CAr+7on_ _ 4142 rgs11934 rti Car n K-F 1 f°n KL19s Can 3DW6 l34 935 945 953 yt503 Met 19rA 1912 35e4a 551n mac. —I r,6k I � k.a [s is p tr j _i36 2 E58 t`'1�r 15a 1A70 Loris 271 Lpne 395 Line 29R �035 a7m `64' 15161 i �IL � 17548 561 966 Lane 275 1053 175<E M5WA 1705 15a-5 Kegs Canyon ".; Ganyw 9s1 1976 3653Z rI mry� �Y�m - - - -- - - Cumulalr u Year 2025'Fatal Tratfic VOlulr.er, - ---- — -- a m p.m,• and daiky Viper Sofmare by Cdclabs LlcenseC tc TJKr4 Trarscortat,cn Consultants Aux 4136 I7o 1853 1595 1935 Kavgs Cgnygn � ISm s Genp'�I Kxgq Canyon _ K4ngs Can},m 951 ':1o9 1376 x251 36542 o 431U r7'11 P O 41349 1767 1a5G ---' �- KvQ!6 Ganyan KirdgB C 3ny'on 10E5 2185 41349 uasz I yaaa 42A 447 47s 5�O -- C_uu_av --- surw 6uh;1 - CulnwlaMre Year 2",125 Total TTOITC Valurrml; afn . p In.. ar}(5 daily 4639T 1'j3 Ima iSlPep k^,Yn}pn W20 2215 4np ES I Y I I ry� lY 4 h 4 ry =1� SI� 9321 414 446 /iper Software ny Citiians Ucer.sed to TJKM Transportation Consultants ti rr eft S 'd _ i Wi 3 � T 126 L S6� 0��4 $ 2743 2559 G46 JonStl'. Je1161 I � 8� J 0 5> M 2S44 1 .20 y cf.---------`-�-- en"n m - —s — J9G97� J ' J,an69h - ---'— Jensen - - - ail $ � '. ItIn n S'.Q ? ago �en5WI ns Jeie li n mm 97g a a2 4 1970 2a51 y �Asl D 74 r drrm, w d `4 I 265 Z04 -ws A04 195 216 Q ti r�' ',7 •_ I — — ---- — Cunnalanve Year 2025 - a.m.. and p m Viper So twate by Citila'os Liceris8d to TJKM Transportation Consultants 5iA 628 I+757 HaM 1733 18& Canyon K,ngs Canyon Kings Canyon --_� t05s 102a 221 S I 17 414 A aag ,—Jer Bu6nr r-- ilia _ 205 51i /goer Sots vare Uy C1111abs - aa`'jlr�-a W v 546 w n @ Ise 375 _-- Tulare - Twlere ',Tulaie- T%.,ata _ _ %wore Tulare 175 64 147 7i0 I 5s0 K's ^ u 0 t7V 1673 ian 17 G l4age CnhyOn _cgs Cw'owi 1 1073 M } g s—� ?134 I 321 �gi 1b, 3.5t Twle�a Yvov, _ twine it rn N 'O La I x 4n�' Cf y^ I $ m 'x4 1Y13 1755 17n L.�-,-rq! K CanyOl _ -._— IF y°n }{5n s Canr- 517 1069 j 953 7131 214❑ f n :.n i���' a��l ..s � I1f I L ; r I 1 419 451, 594 :5 { a ull4r III 4+0 i 392 — BulteBe 114r Bullor B� ' 2Z9 B xler But,e 9 9 SY, 27d a21 i33 5�2 �n n :�laaa CvmurarreYear2M — - - --- am anti p.rn Licensed to TJKM Transportation CGrit ult43ntS APPENDIX Z - QUEUING ANALYSIS Queuing and Blocking Report Existing AM Peak Baseline 9/1412006 Intersection: 1 Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue (Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L T TR Average Queue (R) 51 83 62 70 44 56 so 111 14 65 93 t;3 Link Distance (it) 2601 2601 1304 1304 2627 2526 2626 Queuing Penalty �vah) u Storage B1k Time 0.0:0 0,01 0,01 Intersection: I Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive pirecliorns Served L T T U T TR L R 06ICIFu`r; A}ferapeQueLie (tk) 46 84 69 25 78 65 'la 24 Link Distance (fi) 1304 1304 1219 1219 689. 589 Queuing Penalty (vats) Stara Bay 5,,{} " _ .. ... Storage Blk Time°r6) Que''uiiig Pini,! .'�va��1, -94�,-­ Sim Traffic Reoo`t Page 1 TJKMI Transoortatxon Consultants Queuing and Blocking Report Existing AM Peak Baseline 9/14/2006 Intersection- I Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue NOW I Directions Served L L T TR L L T TR L L T T Average Queue (ft) 24 38 41 45 62 73 119 109 71 85 135 122 Link Distance (ft) 1219 1215 2551 2551 2637 2637 Gli e Storage Blk Time (%� O,go 0.00 0.00 Intersection: 3: Kings Canyon Bivd & Peach Avenue Directions Served R L T TR :v Average queue (ft) 32 111 229 216 Y, r - Link Distance (ft) y 2605 2605 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Blk Time 1%) 0.09 Qut1,_Pnity 11,WIt Intersection: 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave —� Directions Served L TR L TR LTR LTR Average Queue (R) 20 ~ 1 14 1 42 64 Link Distance (ft) 2551 2636 2637 2645 _ lipFi�:81lc:Tirrrei("x} Queuing Penalty aveh) StvraBay D.'is't ft -- 135. _7 Storage Blk Time 135 - �� =4t� ; i� t.e?,- -r. fi��i •5 ±,r.�iti 'gin is.:c. r Cueu�n-g'erialty;++eh} ... -- _ - .. T -� . --•• : ,� ���� _ Nework Summary Networkwide :Queu'ing'Penalty: 13 SimTrafflc Report Page 2 TJKM T ransportal;on Consultants Queuing and Blocking Report Existing PM Peak Baseline 9/1412006 Intersection: 1: Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue Map—" Directions Served L T_ TR L T TR L T R L T TR f17i;,a�,�G�'xl�u�) �t _ �` ;�'•„.i9� ,v�+�5``�1��'-'(;�`�: :._"7�'�6` '��`� .. Average Queue (ft) 112 150 121 77 54 71 43 74 J 31 81* 66 70 Link Distance (#t) 2601 2601 1304 1304 2627 2626 2626 Queuing Penalty (veh) 5#t rsW . r. 70 Storage Bik Time (°got 0.00 1.! :,0 N rsrdly'i(ane Intersection: 2: Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive Dlrectloos Served L T T U T TR Ly R NE li a .62 f49 Average Queue (ft) 13?,.� 38 154 156 42 50 Link Distance (it) 1304 1304 1219 1219 589 589 Up&811'71- WAN Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Blk Time (°/fl) 0.03 0.01 7�.' Srn'rafftc Report Page 1 TJlt,,t Transportation Consultants Queuing and Blocking Report Existing PM Peak Baseline 9/1412006 Intersection: 3: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue .1 MINE Directions Served. L L T TR L L T TR L L T T Average Queue (ft) 59 75 131 130 38 45 122 110 40 50 106 B7 Link Distance (ft) 1219 1219 2551 2551 2637 2637 IAKPI� Queuing Penalty (veh) $LQ 4 t_-- 14 Storage Blk Time Intersection: 3: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue Directions Served R L T TR L*-- ,i Average Queue (ft) 67 88 110 113 Link Distance (ft) 2605 2_605 Queuing Penalty (ven) Storage Bik Time (° j QuY wing �? naltyit' Intersection•. 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave R Directions Served L T TR L T l_TR LTR Maxtrnsmt ' ueY' `� _:. a3 `5 `3V-- - w:55 , .. 317 70 .55. Average Queue (ft) 16 4 3 $ 1 27 29 -.45 2 , . _..17 LAB fLL _ . _ � q _ Link Distance (ft) 2551 2551 2636 2637 2605 Llpstri Blk T.Ime Queuing Penalty (ven) 4; rag ,Ba_ Diit ({t - 135 m 135 Storage Blk Time {%} Queusng Penalty (ueh) r.�l„ ,ram _, - — . . -ems _•.. - Nework Summary Network wide'.Queuing Penalty: 17.�- SimTraffic Report Page 2 TJKM Trar,sp"alion Consultants Queuing and Blocking Report Existing+Project AM Peak Baseline 911412006 Intersection. 1: Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue l „ �. L 1 Directions Served L T TR L _ TR T R L T TR AJ--^ 1:58- _ -- 1 '4.. _ 192 - .. 14-9 _ .. .54 Average Queue (ft) 36- 62 57 60 82 80 32 76 _ 14 68 91 95 Link D7 stance (ft) 2601 7601 6438 668 2627 2626 2625 K $ T Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Blk Time (ova) 0.00 yrA�;��1�tlt;k'�i""f r�--�r:��,�i-`�i�-i- r_r.�ti ...=r�---=... .-.-...._-•- - Intersection. 2 Kings Canyon Blvd & Transit Access 'Directions Served T TR L T T L R I++tax3irium qr}' . _1 7, ' 13 47: 84 ' ' 49 , Average Queue (ft) 32 19 37 10 23 _ 17 -s4 ..- ,39 .6 Link Distance (F'; 668 E68 568 568 100 1DO queuing Pen�}aHy (veh) Storage BN Time O.CO Qirtun.. ailsfty.1�`�' _ Intersection: 3: Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive Directions Served L T T U T TR L R lItiu6 fft - {--J.':.4' 39 _ _-r:.6 - — — • .- _ —..ti Average Queue (ft) 47 34 19 34 134 124 1 v 2.5 08' '_27.2�_ ;-.49 �t:7:. �3... Link Dista�ncre.'(ft)ry�p_{f�Q`j 568 568 1219 1219 589 589 'Ir4F}f�lr�'��IIIV�.5.RT 1'7 Queuing Penalty (veh) -225 - - . ;.. Storage 6 1 k Tirne (°a) 0.02 OimTraffic ReDort Page TJKivi T ransPortafian Consultants Queuing and Blocking Report Existing+Project AM Peak Baseline 9/1412006 Intersection- 4- Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue Directions Served L L T TR L L T 7R L L T T - Average Queue ft) 29 38 65 94 55 63 114 110 68 81 . 144 131 Link distance ffk) 1219 1219 2.551 2551 2937 2637 L�j;aniBi ar.�o Queuing Peralty (veh) k�M�t Storage K Time (1/6) 0,DO OZO Qinetutlg. Intersection: 4. Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue Directions Served R L T T'Ft Average Queue (ft) 32 85 189 179 0#54�@ ieti _ Link Distance {ft) 2605 2805 1J.p Queuing Penalty (vein) Storage Blk Time f.%) O.Q4 uipg Peral�y:f?r��------- - .i 5. Intersection: 5: Kings Canyon Blvd Ave {&Minnewawa Directions Served L T L T TR LTR 1_TR Average Queue (ft) 14 1 11 2 4 46 49 Link Distance (n) 2551 2638 2636 2637 2605 tJp"sf ilk ,fin e fj[]Ij-� Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage ;Bay Disi+:lift! ';:. _ -35 Storage Blk Time (%) Nework Summary Network wide 'Qsaeuing Penalty: 7 SlmTfaffic Re Dort Page 2 TJKiV1 Transportation Consultants Queuing and Blocking Report Existing +Project PM Peak Baseline 911412005 Intersection:1, Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue Directions ',Eervea L T TR 1- 7' TR L T R L T TR PZA4 -_ ` - 7 IP� �4 Average Queue (ft) 102 14a 120 -1 71 65 30 64 57 64 Unk Distance fft) 2601 2601 66.7 2627 2626 2626 IM M - Queuing Penalty (Veh) 9_q�15 009 �,-- L 2 7 §�oragallk Time O.OD intersection-, 2-, Kings Canyon Blvd & Transit Access Directions Served T TR L T T L R R 715f -W-T -.- ?6ri-177- Average Queue (ft) 58 31 44 34 33 11 25 Unk Distance {ft? 66B 66B 5B8 568 100 1D4 Queuing Penalty -, -'—--(v,-ehti - '7 T Storage H-.k Time (lic.) Mo Intersection: 3: Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive Directions Served L T T U T TR L R -1­6i :�4 .� ; Average CiLeue (ft) 33 20 J4 166 144 377 _�jjjjf� :"7 WIN Link Distance (ft) 568 568 -12,19 12,19 589 589 Queuing Penally (ven) 'a Zay- - fst',(ft 2*5 Storage 131k Time 0.00 0.02 SimTraflic- Report Pace 1 TJK,%, Transocrtation Consullanis Queuing and Blocking Report Existing+Project PM Peak Baseline 911412006 Intersection: 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue Directions Served L L T TR L L T TR L L T T Average Queue (ft) 47 74 139 144 44 63 153 144 44 53 96 92 Link Distance (ft) 1219 1219 2551 2551 2637 2637 Queuing Penalty (veh) /yyj Storage Btk Time j 0.05 0.00 Intersection: 4. Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue Directions Served R L T TR llri .;Cf7_'Now Average Queue (it) 69 82 101 122 9s5ttti;1�2�8k� Link Distance (ft) 2505 2605 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Slk Time (%_o) Intersection: 5: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave _' TE, A. R ` Directions Served L L T TR LTR LTR N1§�NRSIM-256 Average Queue (ft) 22 9 4 1 27 25 -.: _ Link Distance (ft) 2636 2636 2637 2605 Queuing Penalty (veh) _ Storage Blk Time QUeii'itiig Nework Summary Neturork wide'Queuing,Penaity:.1.6 . � 3:f' SlmTraffic ReDcrt Page 2 TJK{b1 T-answrtaiion Consultants Queuing and Blocking Report Near Term AM Peak Baseline 9/14/2006 Intersection: 1-. Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue 7Awry'pq ,ryn _ _ '��1�}YNiG7�k Directions LL T_ TR L T TR L T R L T TR _ y�Served {{{{_ 72 Average Queue (fl) 45 ' 33 11)d S5 74 88 40 99 28 80 91 92 Link Distance (ft) 2601 26D1 668 668 2627 2626 2626 _ QueuingPenalty {veh) _WI RKE Storage Blk Time (%j 0.00 0.00 _ Intersection.- 2: Kings Canyon Blvd & Transit Access Directions Served 7 TR L L R T T ,y Average Queue (ft) 63 38J 40 1732 1C. 27 Link Distance (ft) 668 668 568 568 100 100 Queuing Penalty tveh) Storage 8 Pr, Time (%) Intersection: I Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive --„� - - Directions Served L T T U T TR L R A�a�aa�artY4uet7 }" ._. `194 11, _ S0 24'1 -20O 2_" Average Queue (ft) 139 28 22 28 89 106 99 53 9a;teue. v _Y,• �4J', "a t}5 v8' :11�$' r- Link Distance (N) 568 568 1219 1219 589 589 _ �?. {� Queuing Penalty (veh) fora a `��jr Dai]t (fEj 25 -_ :.225 Storage 81k Time (%) 0.02 0.00 QueLatngenalty.(yafij 4:,#,i'..,f0. SlmT.-aff c Repor, l'aae " TJKM Trarsnortation Consultants Queuing and Blocking Report Near Term AM Peak Baseline 9/14MG6 Intersection: 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue — Directions Served L L�T TR L L T TR L L T T _ Average Queue { t} 3860 114 124 53 66 171 167 92 97 134 129 Link Distance (ft) 1219 1219 2551 2551 2637 2637 la's" .ea Queuing Penafh{ {Yeh) Storage Blk Time (%j 0.03 0.00 Intersection: 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue Directions Served R L T TR �7Paxa,i#,Q�` Average Queue (tt) 36� 85 235 230 L .._ Link Distance ffty 2605 2%5 Queuing Penalty (veh) S�t3ag??yi-ER '_2�4' Storage BI'K Time (°I°} 0.14 Intersection: 5: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave Directions Served L TR L T TR L T R LTR _ Average Queue eft) 16 2 10 1 1 50 90 Link Distance (ft) 25�1 2636 2636 2637 2605 Queuing Penalty (veh'a Or'a - Storage Blk Time (°,:�) QueuirsgPenalty,;(suef�}.. Nework Summary Network wide Queuing. Penalty: 24 SirnTraf*,'ic Report Page 2 TJKPh Transportation Consuftants Queuing and Blocking Report Near Term PM Peak Baseline 9/142006 Intersection: 1: Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue D:rections Served L T TR ! T TR L T R L T TR V'P 9 EdEi-I �4 i i R F,:77-•" 1 ~15 R ? 55-' - --1� .20, �5 17. 1 $ T-97 7 r' Average Queue (ft) 119 191 148 87 93 106 29 72 43 54 63 68 _ Lank Distance (h) 2601 2601 668 1-3U 2627 2626 2626 Queuing Penalty (veh) _ _ Storage Bik T!me { o) ir.00 0.00 01 Intersection: 2. Kings Canyon Blvd & Transit Access IMUM_ _ _ _ loll _ _ _ M , _ Directions Served T TR L T T L R NEW Average Queue (ft) 88 4s2i_iy��y3�p6y� l y}5�1 64 ~ a 25 �R4'1—t'tli.l i�l• 5�... Link Distance (ft) w 668 568 568 100 100 Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Blk Time (o) 0,00 Intersection: 1 Kings Canyon Blvd & Wai-Mart Drive Directions Served L T T U T TR L R Average Queue (t#j 190 SO 17 65 240 261 122 77 Link Distance (ft) 568 565 1219 1219 589 589 .0 r-9s WR Queuing Penalty (veh) y. Storage Blk Time (le'.) 0.02 0.12 S+mTraffic Reaort Page 1 TJKM Transpor;aticn Ccnsultants Queuing and Blocking Report Near Term PM Peak Baseline 9/1412006 intersection: 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue Directions Sefred L L T TR L L T TR L L T T Average Queue (tt) E56 93 190 199 42 66 198 195 54 6a 104 91 Law.,QQZ OP Link Distance (Q) 1.219 1219 2551 2551 2637 2637 Queuing Penalty tjeh) Storage Blk Time (9'aj 0.12 U2 Intersection: 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue Directions Served R L T TR Average Queue (R) 61 77 111 125 Link Distance (ft) 2605 2605 U,P%M;-cam Queuing Penalty fveh) Storage 81k Time Intersection: 5: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnevrawa Ave D{�i++rryeyycti.tiy.onn.sServed L L T TR L.{T7>''}� L`CR rrr({{{T'} 1Yi4T�wrn','''Lr.��4. --�� I�i�:'•1 �+ S>- .r .'�'�_ > .-r �.�+.t�{..'���LII uJ'_r.wi �.� 4�•f <i,tiA'�.N Average Queue fo) 20� 1 13 2 1 40 33 Link Distance (R) 2551 2636 26362637 26 Queuing Penally (veh) Storacle 81k Time Nework Summary fVeLv'vcork :vide-C�ueii'irig.;PenaltY .40 ' ::';� =:.% SimTrafi c Report Page 2 TJKM Transportation Consultants Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative Year 2025 No Project AM Peak Baseline 9/1512006 Intersection, I.- Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue NW-M . . . . . . . . . . Directions Served L T TR L T TR T R L T TR -2B! Average Queue (ft) 39 196 173 99 55� 569 9-5 -.28 23 78 90 95 96 Link Distance (ft) 2601 itial 1304 2627 2626 262-6 Queuing Penalty iveh'i S 16 Storage 61k Time (%) 0.02 0,00 0.2B 9.D1 O-W Intersection: I Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive Directions Served L 7 T U T TR T T L R 68 -I;E "Le F W: — Average Queue (R) 161 88 93 49 543 548 254 251 97 69 I- in is rce (ft) 1304 304 542 542 621 621 594 5 94 4 jf[—z Wfn,"3 I W) ' 7 if 74 T W-- GMT Queuing Peralty (Veh" 219 271 9 C. ' .- -, -- .- - .- - - — ... -- -- - - - — ,T -- -C Storage 81,e Tirne,',Iv.) 0.011 0.42 ,SimTraffic Repon Page 1 TJKRA Transpodaiion Consultants Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative Year 2025 No Project AM Peak Baseline 911512006 Intersection: 4; Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue Directions Served L L T T T R L L T TR T T Average Queue (1t) 47 62 133 118 59 46 107 238 846 823 8 2 MOM Link Distance (ft) 621 621 621 1171 1171 1324 1324 Queuing Penalty {_vshj 19 18 Storage 81k Time (%) 0,05 0.45 Intersection: 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue - - —..... Directions Served L L T T R L L T TR fflts�rdga��w�± Average Queue (ft) 185 202 189 113$ 49 129 115 1171 1110 Link Distance (ft) 2613 2613 2605 2605 Queuing Penalty {vah) Storage Hlk Tirrre °rG) 0.00 001 0,01 0,01 0.00 0.05 0.63 Intersection- B: Kings Canyon Blvd&�.yMinnnne�wawspaA�vc-e�p}7 ��y� - �, ,:aYN.G"m_ �a s 5' ____-_ _ •' ia,-�I Directions Served t T TR L T TR LT.R LTR 1 a!��37:1' �1'60.. ' ' 47:�1 „ 363 1.99 Average Queue (ft) 47 102 131 62 227 203 65 70 95 ) _= 8.. Z-(% =2 b 123 �.� " 159 `351 �, I $ ;<= .114 Link Distance (ft) 1324 1324 2636 26A3 2642 2611 ..ram-r,�--•a*ra-r•'^. Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Blk Time (%) 0.04 01 CC�iautngenalty'{venj` _ 2 12- Nework Summary Nesrviife Qaeuing:Penalty: 946 SimTraffic ?deport Page 2 TJKM Transportatbn Consultants Queuing and Blocking Reoorf Cumulative Year 2025 No Project PM Peak Baseline 9/15006 Intersection: 1: Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue mo ,: Dire�ctionsServed L TR L T -TR L T R _ L T TR jT4� A �l�J T 6 _.'�7 '.trJ '�1 '� ...:Lt�I_ Average Queue (ft) 230 791 r'c79 263 Z69 433 ,4FMi`�*:I_� yS 799+ _2"06 _ _ +--4J`1 �95��,6y4y . I �7 ; aT P+CYJ, +799 � +� �� I.]wr f rI iAU Link Distance (ft) 2601 2601 1304 .'304 2-627 260-3 2S26 (queuing Penalty (veh) + _ St'orage+Blk Time (%) &00 0.40 0.08 0.01 O.C2 0.01 Intersection: I Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive Directions Served L T T U T TR T L R lvfaxiix�iyrt7"t�efj�` 'k Civ^ u.1'� r, , _ ems- �:: Average Queue (ftl 270 645 765 48 434 430 2 156 91 . Unk Distance (ft) 1304 'I 304 602 602 561 595 595 :..tiesSf`,Yitpf9 Queuing Penalty (vah) u 4 _ i.ti_.. .. jam. � � , .. ..._ �. .._ti r3""t r," ,� ..�.•. Storaae_B lk Time i%) 0.57 0.06 — 0.33-- •_ _..- i .-- t' -- —�� .� : C�teuin�ry,'T'�nafty�(vehj,�`��`82��`��.�,,-�`�'.�" SimiTaff iz Recor Page 1 TXrO Transportation Consul'.ar's Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative Year 2025 No Project PM Peak Baseline 9/1512006 lntersection: 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue Directions Served L L T T T R L L T TR T T _ T Average Queue (ft) 137 166 388 a6,, 23 1 66 76 187 1033 1016 47 43 Link Distance (ft) 561 5e1 561 1171 1171 1324 1324 I}61f5trl �T1rxl=��R) Q0 " Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 84 77 Storage Blk Time0.19 0.28 0.33 0,63 intersection: 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue •�W."AWWA!-dye fi _ _ 1 "�i. '.�liC_ ; .*r. Y+. i�-k L7 Directions Served L L T �T R L L T TR :-�a.. 9��,�,: 1g. r t - .?5 Average Queue (ft) 2-14 237 290 279 163 129 142 1915 1890 9,5tT�}� ue�� - J�:..-�'03_. ��3� '�3� ,.��,•� Link Distance (f) _:295,�=3.30�:,�•" 2613 2613 2605 2605 lrriB ,°a - Queuing Penalty (veh'} 0 0 Stcrsage Bay Sisfi ft'1..25.0. ' 5toraga, Blk Time ('a) -:'25-0:.. '11 0.08 C-.08 0.02 0,05 0,60 _ Queuing�_;eCty',(,veh.) _0.01 _ _D. ;6. �`?'cs3_ _ Intersection. 6: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave I�fa�re `—-.1✓gY'a"�1;- B ILTrR Directions Served L T TR�L T TR LTR fV12XimlUi d C ubue:{ftj 16 968 -160.: 419 ._39.8 4'1.4 380., _ ' Average Queue (fz 92 ..9:�65 - 448 475 74 225 199 201 198 156 _ . 7;8a .,�22 .�'i59..''�4m . _ 8 .- 342 . _ ;, r'_T .€�' , Link Distance (ft) 1324 1324� 2636 2636 2642 2611 U sts am' Bsk Tlme {°�o) 5" . -': o ' `. .. ,_ .. �_'-' �' . yt`+ ' Queuing Penalty (veh) Stor696�- 'qy Dist (ft) 135 - .135 Storage Slk Time 008 0.34 0.01 0 15 Queu rig'.Peralty (veh) 63 3.3 6 . ,. .11 Nework Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: '1536 SimTraffic Report Page 2 TJKNI, Transoortation Consultants Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative Year 2025+Project AM Peak Baseline 91142006 Z: Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue jIntersection- Directions Served L T TR L T TR L T R L T TR Average Qtut:ue (ft) 48 202 195 82 177 1-89 - i0 115 B3 94 97 _ IA M . HMO- 9��� T' T. ". � 4 }- 4�- .'h'. .FpS-. a �2601 .Llf33 �b Link Distance (ft) 2601 665 2627 2626 2626 _ �668_ `'�7- Queuing Penalty (veh) RV LIT i — Storage Blk Time (1'.) 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.130 15UP - _:� .1` 7 - „is - ,._ ..M.7 #_ - �� '...fir.. i ., j-Y- a..-. mO ,11-0q Intersection: 2: Kings Canyon Blvd & Transit Access Directions Served T TR L T T L R T. Average Queue (H; 92 7 51 178 183 16 27' Link Distance(Ft) 668 66A, 568 568 100 100 U. Queuing Penalty (veh) DIK Time /Storage 2. Intersection: 3: Kings Canyon Bivd & Wal-Mart Drive W Directions Served L T T U T TR T T R Ma irTwm=ti7uaue . _ -614 614 ' 232' ;35 :24—D . 1.2, Average Queue (ft) 194+ 157 150 44 439 440 27 23 1 55 9i5t3 C ; e`Aftl 22 ,. w ''i '163 .:163$ ' '6 rx. -" 3� 18.1 Ifs Link Distance (ft) 568 568 542 542 621 621 594 -: 4 L1'rS esrti'81k Ime 0:00 C.00 0.0s 6.05 Queuing Penalty (vent 1 1 37 38 Dis( .(ft} 2'S0. 225 Storage Blk Time 0.14 0.00 0.32 .1 Sim,Tratftic Report Pape 1 T JOA Transaoralion QonSuMants Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative Year 2025+Project AM Peak Baseline 9/1412006 Intersection: 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue Directions Served L L T T T R L L _ T TR L L , 7 9. _ Average Queue (ft) 45 54 1'22 111 K, 56 97 21$ 495 y 493, 170 11313 Link Distances ffl1 621 621 621 1171 11-71 .. ...,,�. _y, 'w'�� _�:'.�;;r�•',;u�r�;s:.,14'�+.i�'rtt?4i��P�i�r 'a� �i Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage B1k Time (°I°j 0.01 0.30 O.b2 0.02 Intersection: 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue Directions Served T T R L L T TR Average Queue ift) 200 195 44 134 150 1148 1104 Lints Distance (ft) 2613 2613 25a5 2605 Queuing Penalty (veh) .tcri`$�y.C+rSx's's;t?=. '50 2i75 . 205 Storage 81k Time f%) 0.02 0.02 0.C1 0.63 _ C uOg_leiaalfy & �f ' ' ' = _., _ . V ._ -1 4 . ...-r• �.: ..v.:.r ;, � ` * � Intersection: 6: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave Directions Served L T TR L T TR LTR LTR Average Queue f1t) 35� 141 154 _ 72 240 206 66 _ 89 Link Distance (it) '1324 1324 2636 2636 2642 2611 x'y!i!Y NJ- i _ _ 'I'kis V,_... tri .. :�-y.y�{+ +LFi�w-} V i1 J 'I. G 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) • 555 Sta�3 e-a hiss# ' :1 i5 t5 Storage Blk Time t%1 01.,8 0.01 0.14 Queusn :Penait va .ram 4 7 11 Nework Summary Netvrork wide Queuing Penalty: 429,- S;mTraffic Repml Pace 2 TJKNI Transoortation Consultants Queuing and Blocking Reporl; Cumulative Year 2025+Project PM Peak Baseline 9/14f2006 Intersection: 1 : Kings Canyon Blvd & Willow Avenue Directions Served L T TR i- T TR L T R I- T TR Average Queue (ft) 159 1632 1509 205 4 249 270 39 88 51 122 1,10 75 §V-9fim'—w- WWIt �—-O Link Distance (ft.) 2601 2601 868 3 66a 2627 2626 21326 't7,7 a sy m R, Qup,uing Penalty (veh) 0 D y gel, -4 ist, �7- i! 7 - FF 'ITMO Storage 8Jk Time f%) 0.00 0.45 0.01 0.02 0.05 0.00 a5 Qj intersection: 2'. Kings Canyon Blvd & Transit Access Directions Served T TR L T T L R Ma�ci (16 - - -�Wft) I - --- Average Queue (ft,, 516 494 45 186 183 18 30 Z— Link Distance (ft) 668 668 568 568 100 100 qtrT Queuing Penalty (ven) 27 24 0 Storage BA Time M7— Intersection- I Kings Canyon Blvd & Wal-Mart Drive Directions Served L T T U T TR T T L R FA9'x7n� VM- !Oa—ueft-) �77407'91TY64t -4- 7;` 724's .8n 261 78 Average Queue (fti 248 47 331 67 569 569 71 63 139 99 95ift a 315'-- 7.37 787 772 2- 7. ".219 "l'j3 C, Link Dist�?ice (ft) 568 568 602 602 561 ;61 595 595 0. —t IT, 0 6. Quewnq Pen'alty (veh) 75 5 136 f 6 race'! gg Y.-bi W t �j 7 225-' Storage Elik Time 0.34 0.05 0.46 O'LI=L:ino Pe661ty (V4h)'-- 5 1 r nT raff ic Ra part Page " TJKM Transportation C011SI-Illants Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative Year 2025+Project PM Peak Baseline 911412ac6 Intersection: 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue Directions Served _ L L T T T TR� L L T TR L I 20177 266.1e. :� 1I rt 5 Average Queue (ft) 100 144 315 289 162 47 77 182 HS 859 1765 194 Lints Distance (ft) 561 561 561 1171 1171 _ 7- Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bilk Time 0,16) 0.08 0.11 0.28 _ 0.01; 0.48 0.04 0.02 intersection: 4: Kings Canyon Blvd & Peach Avenue Directions Served T T R L L T TR Average Queue (ft) 303 293 136 147 140 1855 1802 Link Distance (ft) 2613 2613 _ 2605 2605 Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 �Dag:6aYD't_4 ti!c`jF •.2b_;.�i;ti2 '205 -- - -%r Storage Blk Time (°!a) 0.12 0.09 0.00 0.06 0.01 0.59 _ Bgr Intersection: 6: Kings Canyon Blvd & Minnewawa Ave Directions Served L T TR L T TR LTR i_TR Average Queue (ft) 94 446 458 75 22.7 190 199 153 Link Distance (ft) _ 1324 1324 2636 2636 2842 2611 LI o—A-VBlk. . (� '; f :4 1Q r , _.. . ''.:5 -_ Queuing Penalty (vein) 0 Sta. r +$ Ay O;a— .--.,:: .1;35 Storage Blk Time 0.09 0.32 0.06 0.16 Nework Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 145 BimTcaf iic Reporl Page 2 TJKM Transportation Consultants APPENDIX) - TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS Peak Hour Warrant (Rural Areas) (Community less than 10,000 population or above 70 km/h (40 mph) on Major Street) intersection: Kings Canyon/Vtinnewawa Sct,nariw Existing AM Peak Flgwe 4C-4. Warrens 3, Peak Hour (70'/ Factor) (COMMUNM LESS THAN 10,0011 POPULATION CR ABOVE 7D kinlh (40 mph) ON MAJOR STREET) > i 400 �I = w a: 300 a a. Q i� y c �w �y z 200 r ~ S t O 1GD c� 2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES I � I i 2 OR MORE LANES S 1 LANE t LANE & 1(LANE I 300 duo 500 4t -100 W) 7W am 900 1DDO 1100 1200 1300 MAJOR STREET —TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES — VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note: 100 uph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with two or more lades and 75 vph appUes as the icmer threshold volume for a minor street approach with one lane. E. Kinas Canyon Blvd. Volume = 1,144 ['PH ,4 signal is warranted Source: 310TCD 2003. Hr,lrwriv Truffic Serrals. PART4 (Page 4C-7) a !�, �j Peak Hour Warrant (Rural Areas) (Corninunity less than 10,000 population or above 71) km/h (40 mph) on ivlajor Street) Intersection,- Kings Canyon/vlianewawa Scenario: Existing PNI Peak Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3 Peak Haar (717 Factor) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,0010 POPULATION OR ABOVE 70 km/h 140. mph) ON MAJOR STREET) a04] i 2 DR MORE LANES & 2 0R MORE LANES � i r�a d 2 OR N1DRE LANES & 1 ► sts � � � i i _AN 3W I i 1 LANE & 11LANE d C) zL 2 s I z� `� ° 100 -100 �75 aao 400 Soo No 70D am 90D 1000 000 120C 1300 MAJOR STREET TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES — VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note; 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with hvfl ar more lanes arrd T vp�-► appiles as the lo%,%-Gr threshold volume for a minor -street approach wi{h one lane. E. Kenos Canyon .Blur!. Volume = 1,331 VPH A signal is not warranted Source: Al UTCU 2003. Nighwal. Tretf is S'ignnfs, PSI RT d WaVc dC-- 7 ) Peak Hour Warrant (Rural Areas) (Community less than 10,000 population or above 70 km/h (40 mph) on Major Street) Intersection: Kings CanyonAl innewa%va Scenario: Existing -Project AM P:-ak Figure 4C4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour (7i3:a Factor) (COMMUNITY NITY LESS THAN 10,008 POPULATION OR ABOVE TO km/h (40 mph) ON MAJTIR Sl'FIM) ' 400 Q 1 U O � Er: 300 C e o C: 700 ti o 1000 ' 2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR PAOSE LANES 2 OR MORE LANES $ 1 LANE 1 LANE $ 1 LANE I i 4 1 `1Go `75 300 400 500 600 700 BDO 900 1ODD 5106 1200 130C MAJOR STREET TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES — VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note: 10E vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with: two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as tho lower threshold voiume for a minor -street approach with one lane. E. Kin' s Can von Blvd. Volume = 1,191 VPH A signal is warranter! Source 3117CD 200,, Hrtilywar TrarTcSignak, P.4ur4 (Page.4('-7) Peak Hour Warrant (Rural Areas) (Community less than 10,000 population or above 70 krn/h (40 mph) on Major Street) Intersection: Kings Canyon/Minnewawa Scenario: Existinp,--Pro'ect PM Pca- k Figure 4C4. Warrant 3, Peak Maur (Taro Factor) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,090 POPULATION OR AHQ-VE 70 km/h 140 mph) ON MAJOR STREET) CL 7 = 4W } U ru7. 4 � a 300 3 li U) LW 200 �O�JI y 4 d 100 = C7 2 l i 2 OR MONE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE 1 LANE a 1 �fLANE t $ i I '75 300 40Q s00 600 700 8W 900 1000 110D 1200 1300 MAJOR STREET —TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES — VEHICLES PER HOAR (VPH) 'Note; 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach w th two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as 1he lower threshold volume For a minor-strael approach with one lane, E. Kings Canyon Blvd. Volume = 1,373 VPH ,4 signal is not warranted Suurce; AfVTCD 3003. Highway TraflcSi;nals, PART 4 (Page 4C-7) Peak Hour Warrant (Rural Areas) (Community less than 10,000 population or above 70 km/h (40 mph) on Major Street) Intersection: Kings Canvon/Minnewawa Scenario: Near Terns Ali Peak Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour (70% Factor) ('COl49ahEUNT Y LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION DR ARUVE 70 km/h (4D mph) ON MAJOR STREET) ' 4p00 LLI !' d �w V ti -00 I� z L� r � �� L ✓5 100 _ C) M z OR MORE k LANES & z OR MORE LANE � 2 OR MORE LANES,3 t LANE 4 l 1 LANE & 7 LANE 1 i � TI- k -7f 300 400 500 600 700 am 900 100D 1100 120D 1300 MAJOR STREET —TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES — VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note: 1 do vph appiies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with two or mare lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume ,oT a rninor street alppraach with one lane- E. Icings Canyon Blvd. Volume = 1.352 VPH A signal is warranter! Source: AWTCD 200-3. Hig,hwn,e• TrrrrJic Sid rrah, PART 4 (Page 4C-7) Peak Hour Warrant (Rural Areas) (Community less than 10,000 population or above 70 km/h (40 mph) on Major Street) Intersection: Kinds Canyoni'Minnewawa Scenario: Near Term PM Peak Figure 4C 4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour (70% Factor) l(COMMUNiTY LESS THAN 10,090 POPULATION OR ABOVE 7D km/h (40 mph) ON MAJOR STREET) f I i f I MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANE=S 4. I 2 OR MORE LANES & t LAME � ir 300 � r 1 LANE & Z LANE 0 W > 104 � ; a I 300 400 500 600 700 ROD 900 1ODD 1100 1200 1300 MAJOR STREET --TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES — VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with Ewa or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower IE1:reshold volume for a minor -street approach with one lane, E. Kings Canyon Blvrl. Volume = 1,553 VPH A signal is not warranted Sourrt,; M1.'TCD 2003. H;h«•av, Traffic Signals, P11RT 4 (Page 4C- 7 s Fresno City Hall559-621.88GO 2600 Fresno Street, Rrr. 4064 Fresno, CA 93721-3623 tre4nv Kok November 15, 2006 TJKM Jose Luis Benavides, P.E. 516 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 200 Fresno, CA 93704-2515 Uly of Public Works Department Jon Ru+z, Duecicr SUBJECT: Review of TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY (TIS) for Transit Village Project located on the south side of Kings Canyon Road between Willow Avenue and Peach Avenue TIS06-074 dated October 27, 2006 APPROVED for Planning Commission We reviewed the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) for the proposed subject project which consists of 70 Senior Adult Housing Units, 24 Residential Townhomes/Condominiums and a FAX Transit Center with 8 bus routes The previous 2025 General Plan land use designation was for an Elementary School. The site is approximately 5.5 acres. The following comments are from Traffic Engineering staff s review of the study. General Comments The trip generation for the proposed land use based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual is acceptable. However. the project will have to develop as senior housing to utilize the reduced trip generations and a covenant with the buildings shall be put in place to require Senior Housing. In addition, since the townhomes/condominium land use trip generation was used the site must be developed with townhomeslcondominiums rather than apartments. The proposed project is projected to generate approximately 1,177 average daily trips, 81 trips during the AM peak hour and 84 trips during the PM peak hour. 792 of the daily trips are transit FAX bus trips. Compared to the existing planned land use, the project will increase traffic by 139 daily trips, but reduce AM peak hour traffic by 257 trips and 37 PM peak hour trips. However, 5.5 acres is a pretty small Elementary School site for Fresno, so it is questionable whether the assumption of 805 students on this campus would be feasible as most Elementary School sites are 10 acres. This project shall pay its Traffic Signal Mitigation Impact (TSMI) Fee of $41.47 per Average Daily Trip (ADT) at the time of building permit. Based on 385 non -transit ADT and the current (TSMI) rate the project shall pay $15,965.95. This project proposes to break the continuous median on Kings Canyon Road and install a westbound Bus Oniy Left -turn Lane Traffic Signal. • This signal shall restrict westbound U-turns (prohibit). The westbound left -turn lane shall be adequately signed and marked as an exclusive Bus - Only lane. The proposed signalized intersection shall be interconnected, coordinated, and synchronized with the Kings Canyon RoadPIViliow Avenue and Kings Canyon RoadlfNalmart Drive intersections to reduce delays to through vehicles on Kings Canyon Road with the new ITS Phase 3 Signal Coordination and Synchronization project. This new intersection was not anticipated with the Phase 3 protect and will be the responsibility of the Transit Village pro iect. • It may be beneficial for the project to install an ITS camera pole near the Transit area similar to the Manchester Transit Center. This would enable FAX employees to nbserve the Transit Center via the Traffic Operations Center. • To restrict southbound left -turn and through movements from Adler Avenue thal are not currently allowed because of the median on Kings Canyon Road, the Transit Village shall install a channelized median island (pork chop) on Adler Adler. • To prevent future vehicle traffic from the undeveloped Walmart property on the north side of Kings Canyon Road from entering the Bus Only left -turn lane, the proposed Transit Village shall construct a raised median island delineating the left -turn pocket. The driveway from the undeveloped Walmart property near the left -turn pocket shall be limited to right -in and out turns and have a raised median island (pork chop) delineating this movement and restricting access to the left-tum pocket. This driveway shall be located west of the opening for the left -turn pocket. • The cost of engineering design and construction of this signal is not reimbursable and can not be credited against the TSMI fee as this signal is for the sole purpose of access to this project • The project proposes and shall install a pedestrian crosswalk with the signal installation on the east leg of the Transit Bus Signal intersection to facilitate pedestrians crossing Kings Canyon Road. 4. The proposed project shall make necessary improvements and right-of-way dedications along adjacent public streets as per City of Fresno standards and requirements. If you have any further questions regarding this matte., please contact me at (559) 621-8792 or b[yan.iones@fresno.gov . Sincerely, Bryan D. Jones, T.E. Traffic Engineering Manager Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering C: Traffic Engineering Reading File Copy filed with Traffic Impact Study Mike Sanchez, Planning 3 Deve'opment Dept, Mark Johnson ar,d Leslie Parker. Traffic Operations Louise Gilic. -Traffic Planning Superfisor f ;— 7 RA Nor r T,1 +4 Q HQU S1 +r A^ F. %'r•i' ARi+01-t cNW�1€ I G — — - R�s�11r4 �F,, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1352 WEST OLIVE AVENUE P_ 0 BOX 12616 FRESNO, CA 93775-2616 PHONE (s 9)445-6666 FAY 1559) 466-4066 TTY (559) 438406u April 19, 2006 i%1r Arthur Farkas Environmental I.?ivision Manager Krazan & Associates 215 W Dakota Avenue Clovis, CA 93775 Dear tVir. Farkas: FICA Yoe,r pp wee` 3 e em Cl'D- L%xlew j 2131-IGIVCEQA 6-FRE-180-62.1 KRr\Z.AN PROJECT NO. 014-06035 TRANSIT VILLAGE PROPERTY Caltrans has reviewed the environmental assessment for the "Transr' Vdia­c Pronernv" located on the south side of East Kings Canyon (State Route 180) and South Adler Avenue. We have the follo%ving. continents: There is insufficient information to fully evaluate this project's impacts to the State Highway System. Caltrans will have further comments when the additional details of the pro)cct come forward. The project description indicates that the property will he developed with up to 100 units of mixed single-family or multi -family housing. Depending on the mix of uses and the number of units, the project may exceed the 100 peak -hour trip generation the City of Fresno uses as a threshold to require a traffic study. Should it be necessary for this project to conduct a traffic study, please reference the Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, dated December 2002, and send the scope of the TIS to Caltrans before the traffic study is conducted. Caltrans Guide, while advisorv, contains Best Practices and gives insight into Caltrans' expectations when reviewinry a traffic study. Ii the traffic consultant has any issues or concerns regarding the use of the Guide or its interpretation. please contact us so resolution can be reached. We cannot, based on the information supplied, determine if this project will impact the intersection of State Route (SR) 180 and Clovis Avenue. Caltrans has collected funds from several developments to mitigate for impacts to this intersection. These funds were used to construct lcft-turn lanes on west and eastbound East Kings Canyon. We will continue to r,,quest mitigation for this intersection, using future funds to construct right -turn lanes from SR ISO to Clovis Avenue. We recommend that the City begin to collect fair shares ior- this intersection in order to add left-tum lanes to north and southbound Clovis Avenue. This would improve the operation of the intersection. Caltrans will be relinquishing this portion of State Highway ISO to the City in the not -too - distant future. Should the City request a dedication of right-of-way from this project, Caltrans will accept the amount of right-of-way to accommodate the City's ultimate configuration COT - East ItiinLs Canvon Road. ( ahrrros wiprom rrrobdav across Cahforlrr Mr. Arthur Farkas April 19, 2006 Page 2 Should the applicant develop the project prior to the relinquishment of SR 180 to the City, an encroachment permit from Caltrans will be required if activities are proposed within, under or over thc. State highway rights -of way Actin ity and work planned in the State rr{�ht-of way shall be peric>rmed to State standards and specifications, at no cost to the State. Engineering plans, calculations, specifications, and reports (documents) shall be stamped and signed by a licensed Engineer or Architect. Engineering documents for encroachment permit activity and worm in the. State right-ot-way may be submitted using English units. The Permit Department and the Environmental Planning Bran& will review and approve the activity and work in the State right-of-way before an encroachment pei-mit is issued. Encroachment permits will be issued in accordance with Streets and Highway Codes, Section 671.5, "Time Limitations." Encroachment permits do not run with the land. A change of ownership requires a new permit application. Also, if the project is developed prior to the reiinquishment, the following will apply: 1, It is the Department's policy to minimize new access points to State Hightivays C:altrans will need to evaluate the prolect's planned connection to the State Highway. 2 Any existing or proposed driveways accessing State right-of-way must meet current State standards. 3. Caltrans recommends that the applicant construct a sidewalk along the property's frontage with SR 180. The sidewalk should be at least 5 feet wide, 4 Existing curb, gutter and sidewalk, and curb ramps may need to be reconstructed to meet current ADA standards or other applicable State or Federal accessibility and safety requirements. 5 All existing concrete curb, flutter and sidewalk that is damaged, broken and/or cracked shall b, removed and replaced in -kind. 6. Any and all damaged concrete surfaces within the right-of-way which pose a safety hazard due to potential tripping hazards shall be replaced or repaired in accordance with ADA and/or applicably State or Federal requirements, 7. No water from the site shall be allowed onto the State right-of-way without the Department's approval. 8. The owner needs to submit the pedestrian improvements proposed in the State right-of-way to the Department of State Architect (DSA) for certification. The encroachment permit authorizing the work will not be issued until the pedestrian improvements in the State right-of-way are certified by the DSA. The owrner needs to contact Saher Yassa at (916) 323-2643 for the submittal requirements 9, No advertising signs are allowed in or over the State right-of-way. A sign permit may be required for advertising signs adjacent to and visible from the State Highway rights -of -way. The protect proponent must construct and maintain the advertising sicris without access to the State Routes. Contact Susan Swenssen at (209) 948-7869 or (209) 94S-7641 for additional information or to Obtain a sign permit application. Additional information on Caltrans Outdoor Advertising Permit requirements may also be found on the Internet at ,%-"-,Ar.dot.ca.gov/hq/�oda. 10 Landscape and irrigation should be kept outside of the State right-of-way. If not, a landscape and irrigation maintenance agreement is required between the Department and the local jurisdiction before an encroachment permit is issued for the work in the State right-of-way. Calrrans improves nrohibi'l across Cai(jvrnxn' Nlr. Arthur Farkas April 19, 2006 PaL,,e S Earle plarinim-, could make transit a viable altumativc for residents of this project (Caltrans recommends that the project be routed to Fresno Area Express (FAX) staff for their revit!w aru comment. Plcase see Attachment Number l for other recommended transportation altematives There is no explanation in the project description of the project's title "Transit Village Property." ttid`, are unclear whether this is property once owned by the transit agency, now being considered for housing or whether the drsi�m includes aspects of "Transit Oriented Development" or " TOD." If this n intended as a TOD.. Caltrans would like to review the specifics of the design. If the development is truly transit -oriented, the project -related impacts to the State Highway System ma}: be reduced. Caltrans Office of Mass Transportation has prcpared an evaluation of TOIL projects. The document is available a-: httparwl,�rw.dot.ca,gov/h4JtilassTransrdoc_pdfiTOD2ITOD_Compendium.pdf. Pleas.- see Attachment Number One for other recommendations for transportation alternativ(2s. Please be advised that any future development adjacent to a State Route, whether the enuticment is deemed by the lead agency to be discretionan., or ministerial should be sent to Caltrans for review If you have an), questions, please call me at (559) 445-6666. Sincerely, MOSES STITES Office of Transportation Plannin, District 6 Enclosure C; Mr. Scott Mozicr, Cite of Fresno Public Works Mr. Bryan tones, C ity of Fresno Public Works Ms. Barbara Goodwin, Council of Fresno County Governments '(:;jl:r t7+i c 1mprnt CS mnip i tff - ncrOrs CoI!ioi1G ATTACHMENT NUi 4BER 1 CALTRANS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES: Ongoing development throughout the City of Fresno, including this project, will make traffic operations significantly worse by adding considerably to delay and congestion. Transit alternatives can help reduce, congestion and delay and reduce overall degradation of air quality and c1ndlocked intersections. The City of Fresno should focus on ways to eliminate trips in addition to enhancing capacity, Transportation alternatives the City should consider include standard highway solutions along with the following: 1. Park and ride facilities on site or within the proximity of this project. ?. A study of the general accommodation and provision of mass transit in this area to provide insight on ways of increasing transit usage. 3. Exploring the potential of commuter shuttles. The shuttie could be financed through an assessment district and provide a way for individuals to utilize a park -and -ride facility or commercial area parking lot and be shuttled to various commercial/office centers within the area. Commuters who need to go further could use City of Fresno transit if the City planned for convenient connections. This may help to reduce the Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) demand seeking to use the State Highway System. 4. Providing, for continuity of non -motorized transportation. S. Exploring the potential for employer -sponsored carpoois/vanpools or monthly transit passes for employees as well as including as a condition of project approval a covered transit stop as mitigation for project -related impacts to the transport ationicircuiation system. 6. Exploring the potential for linking the purchase of a monthly transit pass with new residential development as partial mitigation for congestion and air qualwy impacts, and to ensure the long term viability of public transportation. STATE OF iIF{}R�1+ B�JSRJESS TRr1*i Q�jRT iln� AND H6115 'G iGCNC Y _ - -- — _ ARNQLn MJWA 7rN?KfiIU rnY..,,rr DEPARTMENT OF MkNSPORTATION 13S2 WEST OLIV£ AVENUE P O BOX 12616 FRESNO. CA 93.7 8-2616 PHONE (559) 445-6666 FAX (359) 4ss-408R TTY (559) 4Bo-40rt: Jule 27, 2006 Mr. JOW Bcnavides, P.E. TJKM Tvinzportatlon Consultants 516 VY'. Shaw Avenue, Suite 200 Fresno, CA 93704-251 Dear Mr. Bcnavides: rla}vurpowerr bi' vi erv/ ef?-juerpt f 213 1-IGP,/CEQA 6-FPE- l 80-62).1 KR,kZA1N PROJECT NO. 014-060S5 TRANSIT VILLAGE TIS SCOPE Caltrans has reviewed the scope of the traffic impact study for the "Transit Village Property - located on the south side of East Kings Canyon (State Route 180) and South Adler Avenue. We have. the following comments. Caltrans has identified a need for an additional turn lane at the State Route (SR) 99 northbound off -ramp to Jensen Avenue. The study should deiermine the development's traffic impacts to this location and calculate a fair share to mitigate for the impact. Caltrans has also identified a need to improve capacity at the East Kings Canyon Road (State Route. 180) and Clovis Avenue intersection. Westbound and eastbound right -turn lanes on East Kings Canyon Road are needed. We understand that the City has included these improvements in their impact fee program. We will accept the amount the City determines should be directed toward this intersection as mitigation for this project's impacts to this portion of the State H11-hw4-y System. Vlrhile the improvements mentioned above will improve operations at the intersection, dual left-tum lanes on the northbound leg of Clovis Avenue at East kings Canyon Road are needed to optimize traffic flour. We have recommended to the City that they be{Tin to collect fair shares from development to implement this improvement. There is no explanation in the project description of the pro'ect's title "Transit Village Property." Wt ar- unclear whether this is property once owned by the transit agency, now being considered for housin, or whether the design includes aspects of "Transit Oriented Development" or "TOD." If this is intended as a TOD, Caltrans would like to rL-vicv,, the cif cs of the design. If the development is truly transit -oriented, the project -related impacts 1-0 the State Hi�zhway System may be reduced. Caltrans Office of iMass Transportation has prepared an evaluation of TOD projects that will provide some guidance. The document is available a': htipdot. ca. gov;hglAlassTransidoc-PdfM3D2.'TOD C0mpendium.pdf. 'Cff�J rRRS 1 rnpror?S J7ro h ry ccross Gateform i(;" Mr. Jose Benavides July 27, 2006 Page 2 If you have any questions, please call me at (559) 445-6666. Sincerely, MOSES STITES Office of Transportation Planninc, District b C: Mr. Scott Mozier, City of Fresno Pubiic Works VL. Bryan Jones, City of Fresno Public Works Mr. Arthur Farkas, Krazan & Associatus Ms. Barbara Goodwin, Council of Fresno County Governments C.qfjraDs �mprovcs mobdim across C4NIOfornm Art Farkas From: Coruna Nunez [Cornna.Nunez@fresno govj Seat: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 2'.55 PM To: Jeffrey Heeren; Michael Sigaka, Art Farkas Subject: 1'fknsit Village traffic study 'The County of F�-asno respr~nded with "nff cc.,-meni:" and vaitraris might tie taring tc Iwo -weeks tc respond. lCorrina L, Nunez, Peo]ect Manager Housing and Communii:y GeveLopment bivLs.�on Plann;.ng and Development Department City cf Fresno 26OD Fresno Street, Room 3075 Fresno, CA 9372:-3605 Phone: 559.621.0506 Far.: 559. 457. 132 5 1 Figure 2-1.1 ROOSEVELT COMMUNITY PLAN UPDATE CIRCULATION PLAN 1 1 1 MC KINLEY City of Fresno Deveiopmem Department OLIVE FWT 180 1 RELMONT 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 TULARE KINGS CAHTOAJ�, 0_!' r �i ' 1 � ` O00000100000000l 2 00 1 �\ is 1 1 1 1 Id 1 CNURCI4 \ r JENSEN 1 \ 1 1 ■ 1 � S C C ANNAOALE — 7 — --+i ��"— G T # a i NORTH \ I _ iIj LEGEND 1 1 YUSCAT �i. FREEWAY CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY \ 1 SUPER ARTERIAL MALASA 1 •� 1 1 �4 \� 1 !++! ARTERIAL AMERICAN ! � ! +amimm COLLECTOR r � d 000000 SCENIC ROUTE . u o u s u # a a 1 GEARY AVENUE 2 HAMILTON AVENUE -60- S(-_>» .Ica quill `'->,li(-,`. "Nir Fkfflutir>» C;(wit-ol Distrwi April 18, 200E Krazan & Asscciates, Inc Attn. Arthur C Farkas 215 W. Dakota Ave Clovis. CA 93612 Reference No C20060834 Subject: Environmental Assessment Review Proposed Transit Village Property, Fresno California {APN 472-021-01) Dear Mr Farkas. The San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (District) has previously commented or this orelecl The District offers the following comments in addition to previous comments Previous comments To Becky Fraser for City of Fresno Housing Department EA H-2005-01. Sent February 8, 2005. Reference No. C20050078 District rules and regulations are periodically updated. Based on the information provided, the preoosed project will also be subject to the following District rules. The following items are ruies that have been adopted by the District to reduce emissions throughout the San Joaquin Valley, and are required This project may be suJi to additional District Rules not enumerated below To identify additional rules or regulations that apply to this project, or for further information, the applicant is strongly encouraged to contact the District's Small Busiriess Assistance Office at (559) 230-5888 Current District rules can be found at http llwww.valieyair orglrulesllruleslist htm. Regulation VIII (Fugitive PM10 Prohibitions) Rules 8011-8081 are designed to reduce PM10 emissions (predominantly dusUdirt) generated by human activity, including construction and demolition activities, road construction, bulk materials storage, paved and unpaved roads, carryout and trackout. landfill ooeraiions. etc. If a residential site is 1.0 to less than 10 0 acres, an owner/operator must provide written notification to the District at ieast 48 hours prior to his/her intent to begin any earthmoving activities as specified in Section 64 1 cf Rule 8021 A template of the District's Construction Notification Form is available al http llwww.valleyair.orglbusindlcomply1PM10/forms!Notification°/a2OForm`/`20Final%2012 01.2005 do,;. The District's compliance assistance bulletin for construction sites can be found at http:llwvAv valleyair org/busindicomply/PM10/Req%20VIII%20CAB,pdf Rule 4002 (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants) In the event that any portion of an existing building will be renovated, partially demolished or removed, the project will be subject to District Rule 4002. Prior to any demolition activity, an asbestos survey of existing structures on the Dro)ect site may be required to identify the presence of any asbestos containing building material (ACRM) Any ,deniitied ACBM having the potential for disturbance must be removed by a certified asbestos contractor in accordance with CAL -OSHA requirements. If you have any questions concerning asbestos related requirements., pease contact Mr Brian Dodds of this office at (559) 230-5962. Ms Jan Suaomie- at (209) 557-15422, Wk Sherman Yount at (661) 326-6933 or contact CAL -OSHA at {559) 454-1295 The District's Asb"Wfi Rk%urrdrrnenls Bulletin can be found at http llvalleya+r orblbus,ndlcomplylasbe5tosbulln him Mr. Farkas Proposed Transit 'tillage Property. Fresno April f 8, 2006 Page 2 Rule 4103 (Open Burning) This rule regulates the use of open burning and specifies the types of materials that may be open burned. Agricultural material snall not be burned when the land use is converting from agriculture to non-agricultural purposes (e.g., commercial, industrial, institutional, or residential uses) Section 5.1 of this rule prohibits the burning of trees and other vegetative (non-agricultural) material whenever the land is tieing developed for non-agricultural purposes In the event that the project applicant burned or burns agricultural material, it would be in violation of Rule 4103 and be subject to District enforcement action Rule 9510 (Indirect Source Review) This rule requires the applicants of certain development projects to submit an application to the District when applying for the development's last discretionary approval. The rule requires developers to mitigate emissions at the project site, to the extent feasible, and to pay a mitigation fee to the District for a percentage of the remaining emissions The ISR rule becomes effective March 1. 2006 Projects that have not received a final discretionary approval by March 1, 2006 must submit an ISR application by March 31, 2006 The District encourages innovation in measures to reduce air quality impacts. There are a number of fealures that could be incorporated into the design/operation of this project to provide additional reductions of the overall level of emissions. (Note Some of the measures may already exist as City development standards. Any measure selected should be implemented to the fullest extent possible,) The updated suggestions listed below should not be considered all-inclusive and remain options that the agency with the land -use authority should consider for incorporation into the project. Construction activity mitigation measures include: Limit area subject to excavation, grading, and other construction activity at any one time Limit the hours of operation of heavy duty equipment andlor the amount of equipment in use Replace fossil-tueled equipment with electrically driven equivalents (provided they are not run via a portable generator set) Apply idling time limits or require that all diesel engines be shut off when not in use on the premises to reduce emissions from idling. Curtaii construction during periods of high ambient pollutant concentrations, this may include ceasing of construction activity during the peak -hour of vehicular traffic on adjacent roadways, and 'Spare the Air Days" declared by the District. Implement activity management (e.g. rescheduling activities to reduce short-term impacts) During the smog season (May through October), lengthen the construction period to minimize the number of vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. Off road trucks should be equipped with on -road engines when possible. Minimize obstruction of traffic on adjacent roadways. Construction equipment may be powered by diesel engines fueled by alternative diesel fuel blends or Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel (ULSD). The California Air Resources Board (CARE) has verified specific alternative diesel fuel blends for NOx and PM emission reduction. Only fuels that have been certified by CARB should be used, Information on biodiesel can be found on CARB's website at htip-l/www.arb.ca.govlfuels/diesel/alldiesellaitdiesel.htm and the EPA s website at htlp:llwww eoa.aovloms/modelslbiodsl htm. The applicant should also use CARB certified alternative fueled engines in construction equipment where practicable. Alternative fueled equipment may be powered by Compressed Natural Gas (CNG), Liquid Propane Gas (LPG), electric motors, or other CARB certified off - road technologies To find engines certified by the CARB, see their certification website http llwww arb.ca aovlmsprogloffroadicerticert.php For more information on any of the technologies listed above, please contact Mr Chris Acree, Senior Air Quality Specialist, at (559) 230-5829 Mr. Farkas Proposed Trans! Village Praperly, Fresno Apnl 18, 2006 Page 3 Construction equiament may be used that meets the Curren` off -read engine Qm-zsion standard (as certified by the CARB;, or be re -cowered with Aft enarne that meets this stanclarc Tear I, Tier II and Tier III engines have significantly less NOx and PM emissions compared to uncontrolled en -YAM To find engines certified by the CARB see http Jiwwvw arb ca govlmsorogloffroad/certicert phi This site lists engines by type, then manufacturer. The "Executive Order" shows what Tier the engine is CadiWC as Rule 9510 requires construction exhaust emissions to be reduced by 20 percent for NOx and 45 percent for PM10 when compared to the statewide fleet average or to pay an in lieu mitigation fee For more information on heavy- duty engines, please contact Mr Thomas Astone, Air Quality Specialist, at (1559) 230-5BQ0 District staff is available to meet with you and/or the applicant to further discuss the regulatory requsrements that are associated with this project. If you have any questions cr require further information, please call me at (559) 230-5800 or Mr Dave Mitchell, Plannino Manaqer, at (559) 230-5807 and provide the reference number at the top of this lette° Sincerely. D bbie Johnson Air Quality Specialist Central Region DJ.cxl E nclosure& c FikE San Joaquin vahce 7 :fir Polluriol-I Control District COMPLIANCE ASSISTANCE BULLETIN October 2004 Fugitive Dust Control at Construction Sites: New Requirements Regulation Vlll, Fugitive PM10 Prohibitions, of the District's Rules and Regulations apply to activities that generate fugitive dust. Fugitive dust is emitted into the air by activities that disturb the soft, such as from earthmoving activities and vehiculariequipment traffic on unpaved surfaces. Windblown dust is also of concern at construction sites The District adopted Regulation VIII in 1993 and its most recent amendments became effective on October 1, 2004. This is a basic summary of the regulation's requirements as they apply to construction sites Visible Dust Emissions (VDE) may not exceed 201Ye opacity during periods wher soil is being disturbed by equipment or by wind at any time. Visible Dust Emissions opacity of 20% means dust that would obstruct an observer's view of an object by 20% District inspectors are state certified to evaluate visible emissions. Dust control may be achieved by applying water beforeiduring earthwork and onto unpaved traffic areas phasing work to limit dust, and setting up wind fences to limit wind blown dust. Soil Stabilization is required at regulated construction sites after normal working hours and on weekends and holidays. This requirement also applies to inactive construction areas such as phased projects where disturbed land is left unattended. Applying water to form a visible crust on the soil and restricting vehicle access are often effective for short-term stabilization of disturbed surface areas. Long-term methods including applying dust suppressants and establishing vegetative cover. Carryout and Trackout occur when materials from emptied or loaded vehicles falls onto a paved surface or shoulder of a public road or when materials adhere to vehicle tires and are deposited onto a paved surface or shoulder of a public road. Should either occur, the material must be cleaned up at least daily, and immediately if it extends more than 50 feet from the exit point onto a paved road. The appropriate clean-up methods require the complete removal and cleanup of mud and dirt from the paved surface and shoulder. Using a blower device or dry sweeping with any mechanical device other than a PM10-efficient street sweeper is a violation. Larger construction sites muss prevent carryout and trackout from occurring by installing gravel pads, grizzlies, wheel washers, paved interior roads, or a combination thereof at each exit point from the site. Access and Haul Roads that are unpaved, as well as unpaved vehicle and equipment traffic areas at construction sites must have dust control. Speed limit signs limiting vehicle speed to 15 mph or less at construction sites must be posted every 500 feel. Storage Piles and Bulk Materials have handling, storage, and transportation requirements that include applying water when handling materials, wetting or covering stored materials, and installing wind Carriers to limit VDE. Also, limiting vehicle speeds, loading haul trucks with a freeboard of six inches or greater along Nurlhern Reg.un Office [.enlydi rC�giun Qf1ir_e Soulhern Repun CAii_e 4230 Kiernan AveeruN:, SmIL 130 1990 East Cerrysbur� Aw.-nur. 270' '' 5t:eet, Suite 275 W.riemo. Cam. 95356-9321 Fresno. CA 93726-7244 Bakersfield+, CA 93NI-2373 (209} 557-6400 • FAX U091 557:,4?5 r55`3) 23043004 s fAX 1`5591 :]0];063 (661} 32"900 • FAX t6611 326-6983 WF, p1 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINERING SERVICES DIVISION . 559-621-8650 2600 FRESNO STREET R 4016 • FAX 559-488-1045 FRESNO CA 93721.3616 WW%A' CI FRESNO.CA.US David Healey, Director April 17. 2006 KRAZAN AND ASSOCIATES ATTN: ARTHUR FARKAS 215 WEST DAKOTA AVE. CLOVIS CA 93612 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS FOR PROPOSED TRANSIT VILLAGE PROPERTY Dear Mr. Farkas I have received your letter dated April 6, 2006 which provided an overview of the proposed project located in Fresno, Your letter requested that we provide comments related to conditions of approval for the projects. We are unable to provide specific conditions of approval without a formal application being submitted for our consideration. These applications may include, but are not limited to, conditional use permits (CUPs), rezoning applications, site plan review and building permits. Please be advised that the proposed project will need to comply with City Codes, ordinances and conditions of approval that may be established at the time formal applications are submitted. Typical Public Works conditions of approval include, but are not limited to: dedicating road right of way for street purposes; offering landscape and pedestrian easements; construction of roads, utilities (water, sewer, electrical, cable TV, flood control, etc.); undergrounding of existing overhead utilities; payment of all fees including impact fees adopted by the Council; installation of landscaping; annexation to a community facilities district for maintenance of certain infrastructures; and construction of traffic signals, median islands, sidewalks, and street lighting. Once your client submits formal applications to the Planning and Development Department they will be routed to us for our review and comment. We will, at that time establish our conditions of approval If you have any questions please feel free to call me at 621-B650. Sincerely, Michael Kirn Assistant Director CC Mike Siciala Louise Monroe Art Farkas From: Nathan Sanchez [Nathan.Sanchez@fresno.gov) Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 10:13 AM To: ArtFarkas@krazan,com Subject: Transit Village Property Subject property is located south of Kings Canyon Rd. and west of Peach Ave. The 5.3-acre property which is identified as APN 472-021-01, the Property is proposed to he the Transit Village, a construction of up to 100 housing units of multi -family apartments and single-family dwelling, The site is 13,000 feet (approximately) south of runway 11R-29L of the Fresno Yosemite International Airport. Depart-ment of Airports Review At a 100:1 slope from the end of the runway, FAA would require a Form 7460 to be filed for each objects near or above 130' in height. We anticipate no adverse impacts on the Fresno Yosemite International Airport or Fresno Chandler Executive Airport. L. Nathan Sanchez Engineering Tech Voice: 559-621-4527 Fax:559-498-55,19 E-Mail: Nathan.Sanchez@o.fresno.ca.us Fresno Yosemite International Airport - Projects 4:..2 0/06 C O 1856 fiR1E� April 19, 2006 Krazan and Associates Arthur C. Farkas 215 W. Dakota, Ave, Clovis, CA 93612 Dear Mr. Farkas: PROJECT NUMBER: 014-06085 County of Fresno Denarimvnt of Community Ncalth Edward L. Moreno, NIR, �M.P.H, Director -Health Officer 999999999 LUD011 M PF_ 26112 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION: The City of Fresno proposes to construct a 100-unit multi -family complex for seniors and 50 single-family houses for low income seniors. The proposed project is located on the southeast corner of East Kings Canyon and South Adler Avenues. APN: 472-021-01 t Recommended Conditions of Aaoroval: Construction permits for the 50-lot residential subdivision should be subject to assurance of sewer capacity of the Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility. Concurrence should be obtained from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). For more information, contact staff at (559) 445-5116, Construction permits for the 50-lot residential subdivision should be subject to assurance that the City of Fresno community water system has the capacity and quality to serve this project. Concurrence should be obtained from the State Department of Health Services, Division of Drinking Water and Environmental Management (DDWEM), For more information call (559) 447-3300. • Due to the proximity of the proposed residential uses to an existing thoroughfare, consideration should be aiven to conformance with the Noise Element of the City of Fresno General Plan. A noise study should be conducted in order to identify the potential noise impacts and offer mitigation alternatives. The Fresno County Department of Community Health is concerned that abandoned water wells are not being properly destroyed, particularly with respect to new development projects, As city boundaries expand, community services are provided to areas originally served only by individual domestic and agricultural wells. Improper abandonment of such wells presents a significant risk of contaminating the Z.', Calker Ma!! P.0 Sox 1 1 S6 7 1 Fresno, Califomia 9377-S ; (559) 447-M? FAX (5 `.1 445-3174 Equal Enpiayn ml QppOttuniIY IIirm Live Adwm 1)%pbled EmpiUper Arthur Farkas 014-06085 April 19, 2006 Page 2 of 2 city's community water supply, For this reason, when development occurs, it is extremely important to ensure the safe and proper destruction of all abandoned water wells. Prior to destruction of any existing agricultural well(s), a sample of the upper most fluid in the well column should be sampled for lubricating oil. The presence of oil staining around the well may indicate the use of lubricating oil to maintain the well pump. Should lubricating oil be found in the well, the oil should be removed from the well prior to placement of fill material for destruction. The "oily water" removed from the well must be handled in accordance with federal, state and local government requirements. Transportation of these materials on public roadways may require special permits and licensure. The Department of Community Health is available to provide consultation in cooperation with your city in order to encourage the proper destruction of wells and safeguard our water quality. City staff may contact Ed Yamamoto, Environmental Health Specialist, Water Surveillance Program, at (559) 445-3357 for more information. • Appropriate measures should be incorporated into the project to minimize potentially significant short-term localized noise impacts to noise sensitive receivers caused by the operation of construction equipment. Construction specifications for the project should require that all construction equipment be maintained according to the manufacturers' specifications, and that noise generating construction equipment be equipped with mufflers. In addition, consideration should be given to limiting noise - generating construction activities to daytime hours as specified in your municipal code. REVIEWED BY: Kathleen Boyer, Environmental Health Specialist III (559) 445-3357 kb cc: Ed Yamamoto, Environmental Health System Krazan D14.0fi085 Sransil Village :.r __. FRESNO METROPOLITAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT File 5 �0.10 "PP" 10. "llp„ April 18, 2006 Krazan & Associates, Inc, Vlr. Arthur C. Farkas Enviornmental Division Manager 115 West Dakota Ave. Clovis, CA 9361E Dear i\Mr. Farkas, Environmental Assessment Review EA H-2005-01, for the Proposed Construction of 100 Units for Seniors at the Southeast Corner of East Kings Canyon and South Adler Avenues Drainage Area "PP" The Fresno ivletropolitan Flood Control District bears responsibility for storm water management within the Fresno -Clovis metropolitan area, including the area of the subject site, Within the mctropolitan area, storm runoff produced b}' land development is to be controlled through a systern of pipelines and storm draina-ae retention basins The proposed development will produce storm runoff, which must be properiy discharged and mitigated. Such mitigation requires certain planned local drainage facilities inclusive of pipeline and stora✓e basins. The California Environmental Quality Act and the National Environmental Policy Act requires the mitigation of adverse environmental impacts associated with land development projects. It is the position of the District that incr.ased stortn runotl associated with land development is a significant adverse impact requiring mitigation at the time of, or prior to development. The community has developed and adopted a Storm Drainage and Flood Control Master flan. Each property is required to contribute its pro-rata share to the cost of the public drainage system. It is this form of participation in the cost andior construction of the draind2e Svstcm thc.tt will mitigate the impact o[ development. The subject property lies within the Fresno I Metropolitan Flood Control District's Drainage Area "PP" and shall pay drainage Bees pursuant to the Drainace Fee Ordinance prior to issuance of a building permit at the rates in effrrct at the time of Such approval. K:+eeis+iT nmrnW a5sc<smcnl rcvim lctrcrs`ca 2WIy-01 sc doe 5469 E. OLIVT • FRESNO, CA 93727 • (5591 45C-3292 • KkX (559l 456-'," 94 Mr. Farkas April 18, 2006 Page 2 The District recommends that the City of Fresno require drainage covenants of the development to the south of this proposed project to allow surface runoff to reach the existing Master Plan facilities located on East Lane Avenue. The existing Master Plan facilities will provide permanent drainage service to the project. The District will need to review, and approve the site's final improvement plans. (i.e. gradln,�, street improvement and storm drain) prior to implementation. The proposed development appears to be located within a 500-rear flood prone area as designated on the latest Flood Insurance Rate Maps available to the District. necessitating appropriate flood plain management action. Construction activity, including grading, clearing, grubbing, filling, excavation, development or redevelopment of land that results in a disturbance of one (I) acre or more of the total land area, must secure a storm water discharge permit in compliance with the U,S. Environmental Protection Agency's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System regulations (CFR Parts 122-124, Nov. 1990). The permit must be secured by filing allotice of Intent for the State General Permit for Construction Activity with the State Water Resources Control Board, The notice must be filed prior to the start of construction. Copies of the State General Permit and Notice of Intent are available at the Fresno \Metropolitan Flood Control District, If you have any further questions, please contact the District at (559) 456-3292. Very truly yours, i 41;- Rick Lvons Design Technician I RLJIrl >; ie ok- lrueir'•ca 2U5-05 stz kingscanyon-adler{pp}lv,doc EXHIBIT "B" �-- NORTH 114 CORNER OF SECTION 7 W21 , NORTHEAST CORNER -AST KINGS CANYON ROAD OF S_cY;ON 7 i4121 F SS` 2647.57 --- I ___-----N80-27-S4'w'-621-50--------- - NW CORNER OF LOT 79 � '��` r� � o g ^] p r nti 20.00 U .47 Ln w r�1 C� h '�— i > I�, ,O' v z, IL3 z �C' �•r W LU Q �31 i�� !.S C� ~' o } Ito Q;O , low LLJ 2 Ll fo LL �0 � � 1 7 0 Q O ILL jA LU k1I� cS 4 I I { 1 r-- - - SST- AN E-A'JE. �— - . __ _ - - •----'--- - LINE TAB! F B �R7ti� LE-NGTH 4? 5 M22<' w 40,09 - 51723r5, )42.11 �j lN0,: A 7S PAR- 70 c_ w' Wri---0 ; = i'Y 0= FALM �?54:-,7--= rip M Lw��oau�ca�.c LF�� LU Ins CL ca a c,. r rooAC,-- — — f w er: 01TY OF FRESNO 21104-1 3- :,f PL'6L'�WOA1S PLA` iVQ. 27E3 PARANTED TO THE CITY OF rrt;SNO : FZMOD4L / HOUSING SITE "c -'o2— 1 5-A-7721 en sc'f-` Luanne Walker -Grant G"bal Chairperson Rob Castro tr,bal Vice -Chairperson Craig Martinez 5ecretaryl-Treasurer Ray Barnes Member at Largc Aaron fortes Member at Large 23736 Sky Harbour Road Post Office Box 410 Friant Cahforn�a 93626 (559) 622-2587 Fax TABLE MOUNTAIN RANCHERIA TRIBAL GOVERNMENT OFFICE April 19, 2006 Arthur C. Farkas, Environmental Division Manager 215 W Dakota Ave., Clovis, Ca. 93612 RE: Krazan Project No. 014-06095, Proposed Transit Village Property Dear Arthur C. Farkas This is in response to your letter dated April 6, 2006, regarding Krazan Project No 014-06085, Proposed transit Village Property, Fresno, Ca. Thank: you for notifying us of the potential development and the request for consultation We have no concerns regarding this property and decline participation at this time. We would appreciate being, notified in the unlikely event that cultural resources are identified during any future development. Sincerely, r _.- Bob Pennell Tribal Cultural Resources Director 559.325.0351 (559) 822-2693 NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION ris CWYnOL MALL, ROOM 261 6LCRANFRM, CA ew1oi (fled)85.7-4Qtti Fax MG) 2V.g= VMOD "8 WW".rWre.oLrN April 21, 20136 Arthur C. Parkas Krazen & Associates, Inc 215 West Dakota Avenue Clovis, CA 93612 Sent by Fax. 559-348-2201 Number of Pages; 2 RE: Proposed Transit Village property, Fresno County Dear Mr, Farkas: . WI A record search of the sacred land the has tailed to indicate the presence of Native American cultural resources In the immediate project area. The absence of specifier site information in the sacred lands file does not indicate Me absence of cultural resources in any project arsa. Other souroes of cultural resources should also be contacted for Information regarding known and recorded sites. Enclosed is a list of Native Americans indlviduaislorgan4atlons who may have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area, The Commission makes no recommendation or preference of a single individual, or group over another This list should provide a starting place in locating areas of potential adverse impact within the proposed project area. I suggest you contact all of those indicated, it they cannot supply information, they might recommend others with specific knowledge. By contacting all those listed, your organixatlon will De better able to respond to claims of (allure to consult with the appropriate tribe or group. It a response has not been received within two weeks of notification, the Commission requests that you tallow -up with a telephone call to ensure that the project information has been received. II you receive notification of &ange of addresses and phone numbers from any of these individuals or groups, please notify me. With your assistanoe we are able to assure that our lists contain current information. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (918) 653-4040, Sincer ly, l.V_ ab Wood re (Z Environmental Specialist III Fresno County April 21, 2006 Chaushiha Tribe Jury Brown 10553 N. Rice Road Fresno I CA 93720 559-434-3160 Santa Rosa Rancheria Table Mountain Rancheria Bob Pennell, Cultural Resources Director North Valley Yokuts P.O. Box 410 Yokuts Friant , GA 93M-0,n (559) 822-2587 (559) 822.2693 FAX Clarence Atwell, Chairperson P.O. Box 8 Tache Lernoore CA 93245 Tachi (559) 92-4-1278 Yokut (559) 924-3583 Fax Table Mountain Rancheria Lee Ann Walker Grant, Chairperson P.O. Box 410 Yokilts Friant , CA 93626-oi T7 (559) 82-2-2587 (559) 822-2693 FAX Table Mountain Rancheria Michael Russell, Tribal Administrator P.O. Box 410 YDkuts Friant , CA m2"i rn (559) 822-2587 (559) 822-2693 FAX rule UZI Is, current only me of the data of this doounrcnt. Table Mountain Rancheria John Goodfellow, Environmental Coordinator P.O. Box 410 Yokuts Friant , CA 9362 -a1 rn (559) 822-2587 (559) 822-2693 FAX btatrlbu ton of this flat does not refieve ■ray person of satu" responsibility as dunned In Section 7t7505 of the Hefilth and 600y Code, Section 5097.94 of the PubaD Resources Code land Section 5097.95 of tine Public PAnouroes Gods lhlp ko Is only oppllable lo► oontscUnp local Native Arnert,rffine with reed to etaiharel reeoarroes for taro pruQosed Transit tHuepe proMly, Freeno Courtly. AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF REAL PROPERTY AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS East Kings Canyon Intermodal/Housing Site FRESNO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, hereinafter called "FUSD" without regard to number or gender, hereby offers to sell to the CITY OF FRESNO, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called the "City," the hereinafter described real property on the following terms and conditions: 1. The real property which is the subject of this Agreement, and which is hereinafter for convenience referred to as the "subject property," is situated in the County of Fresno, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Exhibits A and B, attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein. 2. The purchase price for the subject property shall be the sum of TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($275,000.00) as just compensation therefor. The District and City agree that the appraised market value of the subject property is $650,000.00 and that this value is subject to the terms of a Redevelopment Cooperation Agreement entered into by the District and the City on July 11, 1990. Said Agreement addresses the exchange of properties between the two parties, which resulted in a $375,000.00 credit to the City. Said credit is a result of the difference in the appraised values of the two properties exchanged under that 1990 Agreement between FUSD and the City and thq, 'Kith the execution of this current Agreement the credit no longer exists in favor of the City. 3. It is agreed and confirmed by the City and FUSD that notwithstanding other provisions in this Agreement, the right of possession and use of the subject property by the City, including the right to remove and dispose of improvements within the subject property, shall commence on the close of escrow controlling this transaction, and the amount shown in paragraph 2 herein includes, but is not limited to, full payment for such possession and use, including damages, if any, from date of said closure. 4. FUSD represents and warrants that it has the authority to make the offer herein made, and that it holds fee title to said real property and can convey the subject property free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, and restrictions of record except for the title exceptions noted in 5.b below. 5. The sale shall be completed through an escrow to be opened at Chicago Title Company, 7330 N. Palm Ave., Suite 101, Fresno, CA 93711 ("escrow holder"). Said escrow shall be EXHIBIT B opened upon the following terms and conditions, and FUSD and City, by their signatures to this Agreement, make this paragraph their escrow instructions: a. The City shall deposit the sums specified in Paragraph 2 of this Agreement and the closing costs in escrow upon receipt of a demand and statement from said title company therefor. b. Payment of said sums, less FUSD's cost to clear title, if any, may be made to FUSD only when escrow holder possesses and is in a position to deliver to the City a fully executed and acknowledged and recorded grant deed to the subject property and when said escrow holder stands ready to issue to the City a standard title insurance policy guaranteeing a title to said property in the City free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, and restrictions of record, except for: Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11 and 12 of Preliminary Title Report No. 5647294-JT, dated July 29, 2004. C. Property taxes for the current fiscal year, if any, as they apply to the subject property, shall be prorated to close of escrow. It is understood that FUSD shall be responsible for the payment of all unpaid taxes, penalties, redemptions, and costs allocable to the subject property for all periods prior to close of escrow. Refund shall be made to FUSD out of escrow, for taxes previously paid by FUSD which are allocable to the part of the current fiscal year subsequent to the close of escrow. d. The escrow fee, cost of policy of title insurance, recording fees (if any), and all other closing costs shall be paid by the City. e. Disbursements of the purchase price to be in the amounts, at the times, and in all respects in accordance with the terms and conditions and subject to the limitations of this Agreement. f. It is agreed that FUSD may, on or before the date possession of said real property is delivered to the City, remove from said property and retain as FUSD's property the following described improvements: None. 6. Miscellaneous Provisions: a. Waiver. The waiver by either party of a breach by the other of any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach of either the same or a different provision of this Agreement. No provision of this Agreement may be waived unless in writing and signed by all parties to this Agreement. Waiver of 2 of 7 any one provision herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other provision herein. b. Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of California. Venue for purposes of the filing of any action regarding the enforcement or interpretation of this Agreement any rights and duties hereunder shall be in Fresno, California. C. Headings. The section headings in this Agreement are for convenience and reference only and shall not be construed or held in any way to explain, modify or add to the interpretation or meaning of the provisions of this Agreement. d. Severability. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. The invalidity, or unforceability or any one provision in this Agreement shall not affect the other provisions. e. Interpretation. The parties acknowledge that this Agreement in its final form is the result of the combined efforts of the parties and that, should any provision of this Agreement be found to be ambiguous in any way, such ambiguity shall not be resolved by construing this Agreement in favor of or against any party, but rather by construing the terms in accordance with their generally accepted meaning. f. Attorney's Fees. If either party is required to commence any proceeding or legal action to enforce or interpret any term, covenant or condition of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such proceeding or action shall be entitled to recover from the other party its reasonable attorney's fees and legal expenses. g. Precedence of Documents. In the event of any conflict between the body of this Agreement and any Exhibit or Attachment hereto, the terms and conditions of the body of this Agreement shall control and take precedence over the terms and conditions expressed within the Exhibit or Attachment. h. Cumulative Remedies. No remedy or election hereunder shall be deemed exclusive but shall, wherever possible, be cumulative with all other remedies at law or in equity. i. Exhibits and Attachments. Each Exhibit and Attachment referenced herein is by such reference incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement for all purposes. j. Extent of Agreement. Each party acknowledges that they have read and fully understand the contents of this Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and 3 of 7 supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral. This Agreement may be modified only by written instrument duly authorized and executed by both the City and the Seller. 7. The parties hereto acknowledge that FUSD, as a school district, must comply with the provisions of California Education Code Section 17464 in connection with the sale of its real property. The parties agree that this Agreement is conditioned upon FUSD's compliance with Section 17464, and is further contingent upon no party notified pursuant to Section 17474 (other than the City of Fresno) offering to purchase the subject property under terms more favorable to FUSD than the terms set forth herein. 8. Time is of the essence of each and every term, condition, and covenant hereof. 9. It is understood and agreed that as a condition precedent hereto, this Agreement shall have no force and effect until approved by the Council for the City of Fresno. This Agreement is to remain open for one hundred twenty (120) days from the date hereof, and that upon the Council's approval and its duly authorized execution within said time by the City, this Agreement shall become 4 of 7 a contract for the purchase and sale of the subject property binding upon FUSD and City, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors in interest, and assigns. APPROVED AS TO FORM: HILDA CANTO MONTOY City Attorney p Deputy Date: I RECOMMENDED FOR PROVAL Bye Neil Hansen Senior Real Estate Agent SELLER: FRESNO UNIF D HOOL DISTRICT By: �.1/ Mich el E. Hanson Superintendent Date // 0 Address: 4600 N. Brawley Ave. Fresno, CA 93722 APED ASM—Orl,—C—r This Agreement is executed by the City of Fresno by and through the Director of Planning and Development of said City pursuant to authority granted by the Council of the City of Fresno on ATTEST: REBECCA E. KLISCH City Clerk Deputy IntermodaJ Agme CITY OF FRESNO 0 Nick P. Yovino Director of Planning & Development Date: Address of City: 2600 Fresno St., Room 4019 Fresno, CA 93721 5 of 7 EXHIBIT "A" APN: 472-021-01 T (portion) That portion of Lot 75 of Easterby Rancho, in the City of Fresno, County of Fresno, State of California, according to the map thereof recorded in Book 2, at Page 6 of Plats, Fresno County Records, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the northwest corner of Lot 76 of said Easterby Rancho; thence S 89''27'54" E, along the north line of said Lots 75 and 76, a distance of 647.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence S 0°45'49" W, parallel with the west line of said Lot 76, a distance of 373.44 feet; thence S 89°29'37" E, a distance of 284.69 feet; thence S 0°32'24° W, a distance of 40.00 feet; thence S 89°24'52" E, a distance of 194.29 feet; thence S 0°31'45" W, a distance of 50.75 feet; thence S 89'28'15" E, a distance of 142.15- thence N 0°45'49" E, parallei with the west line of said Lot 76, a distance of 464.20 feet to a point on the north line of said Lot 75, said point being 1268.50 feet east of the northwest corner of said Lot 76, as measured along the north line of said Lots 75 and 76; thence N 89°27'54" W, along the north line of said Lot 75, a distance of 621.50 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the north 29.00 feet. Contains an area of 5.389 Acres, more or less. For the purposes of this description the northwest corner of said Lot 76 is taken to be 30.00 feet south of the north line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 14 South, Range 21 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, and 20.00 feet east of the west line of said Northeast Quarter of Section 7. v D S J s LS 5096 Co 2004-151 15-A-7721 0:%DATA'\WP\Kings Canyon Intermodel housing Site.wpd 6 of 7 EXHIBIT "B" NORTH I CORNER EAST KINGS CANYON ROAD OF SECTION CORNER 114l� /— OF SECTION 7 14121 / S 89°27'54' E ! 1 —L-------- }------------ N8r27'54',Al-621.50'----7-- — — a 647.CC r NW CORNER Q OF LOT 76 —20.09 N P `l� W > o Q �I Q N5 0 t'u, o v' �. J O a F — M u! O Oz cn � w l LLI O w �. 7_ NO SCALE LI ~ L3 1S a �b`�qC`'� '` o r` w > ' u' Iio LL ¢ � I� u 0 ! w ,z --E-AST-IANE-AVE. - - - - ' - LJNE TABLE BEARING LENGTH Ll S 8r24'37- E 284.64 1-2 S 0�32'24' W 40.G0 L3 S 89'23'52' E 194.29' L4 5�15- 50.75 LS S! 42.) 5' ® INICICA TES PARCEL TO BE GRr'vtiTE0 TO THE C(TY CF FRESr`JO 5. 389 Acres± R&`& 2/ CITY OF FRESNO 2004-151 E) P,4RTifE%rr OF FUt]L'C'ffCTICS PLAT NO, 2763 PARCEL TO BE GRANTED TO THE CITY OF FRESNO FOR INTERMODAL 1 HOUSING SITE _ ____15V -. _ 1 C3�°'�'� o0UGL4S �lj Q- NO u COI D:'�+lAar.474cC rra+rb,N.. c.xxarr tiQG HC �3,�C� ca ar '1 Cw BY nhC :A-,E sc-: E sl-�. OF sr_rrs 15-A-7721 n LJ 9 4 1